Slashdot Mirror


Experts Explain iPhone 4 Antenna Problem

CWmike writes "Reports of call and data signal strength problems in the new iPhone 4 have a basis in fact, a hardware expert said Thursday. Later in the day, Apple acknowledged that holding the iPhone 4 may result in a diminished signal that could make it difficult to make and maintain calls or retain a data connection. 'Gripping any phone will result in some attenuation of its antenna performance with certain places being worse than others depending on the placement of the antennas. This is a fact of life for every wireless phone,' Apple said in a statement issued to several media outlets, including PC Magazine, which had run tests earlier Thursday. 'If you ever experience this on your iPhone 4, avoid gripping it in the lower left corner in a way that covers both sides of the black strip in the metal band, or simply use one of many available cases.' Scores of new iPhone owners confirmed the reception problem in a string of more than 360 messages posted to a thread on Apple's iPhone 4 support forum." A blog post from an antenna design company explains that the reception problems are probably the direct result of phone design adapting to FCC requirements.

101 of 427 comments (clear)

  1. Cue the fanbois by plover · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next thing you know, holding a cell phone with the thumb and forefinger by the top right corner will become the fashionable way for any of the cognoscenti to hold their phones. Those of us who cradle them in the old fashioned way will be "not of the Body of Jobs", and mocked and ostracized.

    --
    John
    1. Re:Cue the fanbois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sorry, but there is only one correct way to hold a phone

    2. Re:Cue the fanbois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    3. Re:Cue the fanbois by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Next thing you know, holding a cell phone with the thumb and forefinger by the top right corner will become the fashionable way for any of the cognoscenti to hold their phones.

      So how come this problem was not identified during the system test of the device? Were all the testers instructed to hold it that way? Or maybe they identified it, but did not have the courage to report it?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Cue the fanbois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Next thing you know, holding a cell phone with the thumb and forefinger by the top right corner will become the fashionable

      The japanese demonstrating proper handphone technique:
      http://photos-451.friendster.com/e1/photos/15/48/18428451/1_246234319l.jpg

    5. Re:Cue the fanbois by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In a sane world there's no way that my theory can be right, but here it is:
       
      The lab tests were done at Apple HQ, where AT&T has a tower in order to keep Steve Jobs happy -- plenty of signal even with the defect. The field tests were done with the rubber disguises on, so it didn't affect them.

    6. Re:Cue the fanbois by Hope+Thelps · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It Just Works. As long as you hold it the way Steve Jobs instructs you to. Coming from the supposed experts on user interface this is a major let down. Users holding the phone the way that comes most naturally to them are not wrong - the product is wrong.

      --
      To summarise the summary of the summary: people are a problem. ~ h2g2
    7. Re:Cue the fanbois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So how come this problem was not identified during the system test of the device?

      Because - you'll really love this - they put it in an iphone 3 case when they were supposed to be testing it so as to keep the super shiny design secret. Really. The product they were testing wasn't the product they were planning to launch. Bunch. Of. Cowboys.

    8. Re:Cue the fanbois by Idbar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apple will also be releasing this new accessory.

    9. Re:Cue the fanbois by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Grounding, or effectively grounding (by say, shorting two ends of a dipole) an antenna will *always* result in loss of signal, even when starting values are ideal. But regardless of how it was missed, the fact that it was missed at all means one thing: inadequate testing.

    10. Re:Cue the fanbois by Pojut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Grounding, or effectively grounding (by say, shorting two ends of a dipole) an antenna will *always* result in loss of signal, even when starting values are ideal.

      I think the bigger problem is that with all of Apple's "expertise with hardware", they would design something with this kind of flaw.

    11. Re:Cue the fanbois by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Funny

      THEY FIRST told me I HAD to use iTunes, and AT&T,
      and I didn't speak up because I wanted to be Cool.

      THEN THEY told me I couldn't change the battery,
      and I didn't speak up because I buy a new one every year.

      THEN THEY told me I had to hold the phone with my pinkie extended,
      and I didn't speak up because I don't mind looking gay.

      THEN THEY CAME for more of my money
      and by that time there was none left to buy more crap.

      Apologies to Niemöller.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    12. Re:Cue the fanbois by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Luckily the human body is a pretty poor conductor, as long as you are not standing in the shower (which I believe would be a bad place to talk on the phone anyway).

      I can say from first hand testing that the initial quality of the signal has a lot to do with the attenuation caused by this issue - if you already have a good signal it doesn't seem to cause any problems.

      Anyway, as you said, the fact that this was missed is pretty amazingly bad testing, especially considering how Jobs actually described in the keynote that the reason the metal on the outer rim had a visible break was because it acted as an antenna. Wouldn't you think the *first* question one would ask as a tester (or an engineer!) is "hmm, these are not connected for a reason - I wonder what happens when I connect them with various common household objects, like, say - my HAND?"

    13. Re:Cue the fanbois by link5280 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I like my cell phone held this way

    14. Re:Cue the fanbois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't forget Apple's motto: form before function.

    15. Re:Cue the fanbois by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have the insatiable urge to punch that person. The douchebag just oozes off of him/her (honestly I can't really tell).

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    16. Re:Cue the fanbois by Gazoogleheimer · · Score: 2, Informative

      At the RF frequencies involved, you're a lot more conductive than at, say, low-voltage DC.

    17. Re:Cue the fanbois by PPalmgren · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm curious who they are employing to design this stuff. I learned about this crap in EE 102, my first year of college. Also, if they had anyone with long-term experience in the company, they'd remember what happened with early 90's cell phones with the retractable antenna.

      I honestly think that there's a case here of someone without knowledge in middle management overriding engineer's recommendations.

    18. Re:Cue the fanbois by isilrion · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, that's L from the movie.

    19. Re:Cue the fanbois by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's not phone. Thats P H O N E, as in Please Hold On Narrow End.

      --
      blah blah blah
    20. Re:Cue the fanbois by Guillermito · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry, guys. This is the right way

    21. Re:Cue the fanbois by ZosX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fake!

    22. Re:Cue the fanbois by FreonTrip · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why would you quibble about such a beautiful thing?

    23. Re:Cue the fanbois by IICV · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's okay, he's just cosplaying a douchebag.

    24. Re:Cue the fanbois by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Next thing you know, holding a cell phone with the thumb and forefinger by the top right corner will become the fashionable way for any of the cognoscenti to hold their phones.

      So how come this problem was not identified during the system test of the device? Were all the testers instructed to hold it that way? Or maybe they identified it, but did not have the courage to report it?

      Or maybe it doesn't happen on all iPhones. http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/some-iphone-4-models-see-signals-drop-to-0-when-held-left-handed/

      One iPhone 4 demonstrated the issue everytime it was held in our left hand (...) Our second UK-purchased iPhone 4 was fine, showing none of these handling symptoms. (...) P.P.S. Since some of you are asking, our review unit showed none of these issues.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    25. Re:Cue the fanbois by xtal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      DC resistance of your skin is not the only effect here.

      The admittance change from your finger adding capacitance and changing the inductive value of the antenna changes the antenna's tuning and ability to effectively radiate. This adds up to the antenna being much less effective.

      --
      ..don't panic
  2. Cases by Peach+Rings · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How will wrapping the phone in a case and then holding it the same way as before fix the problem?

    1. Re:Cases by dingen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because the case is made out of rubber and runs around the phone, effectively isolating you from the antennas, avoiding the antennas to connect to each other through you.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    2. Re:Cases by Loomismeister · · Score: 4, Informative

      The skin connects the front and back antennas through electrical conductivity. If there is a case blocking the connection the problem doesn't happen.

    3. Re:Cases by antibryce · · Score: 3, Informative

      the problem comes about when your hand shorts the two metal bits together. Put a case on them and you won't short them.

    4. Re:Cases by wramsdel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It'll insulate the metallic ring that's "part of the antenna system", which might mean "the antenna" or might mean "some other element that helps the antenna do its work" (i.e. a resonant grounding piece). Antennas are tuned, resonant, structures...think of a tuning fork that needs to oscillate at a certain frequency. Bridging the gap between the two exposed elements changes the electrical characteristics of it such that the antenna becomes detuned and reception is impaired. By applying a case, your hand can no longer come in contact with the ring, so the antenna isn't as severely detuned and the cell phone signal isn't as attenuated. I say "as severely" because there will always be some impact when your hand is in reasonable proximity to the device, but it won't be of the magnitude that direct contact would be.

    5. Re:Cases by PPalmgren · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Form over function has been Apple's M.O. when it comes to certain design choices with their devices, something like this shouldn't be surprising. Its also the reason a lot of people buy their devices.

      Apple sells Shiny, and this is a result.

    6. Re:Cases by icebike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Exactly.

      Its not that the antenna is at the bottom, its because it is external, and metal, and skin is conductive.

      This is a fundamental design flaw that I can't believe they let slip. Now they will probably have to offer discounts on "bumpers" to bring the phone back up to published specifications.

      Using external antennas that can be shorted by normal hand moisture! I'm not aware of any other phone that does this. Why was it necessary with a glass backed case? The antenna could have been at the bottom like prior iphones.

      There is SO Much about this iPhone release (hardware and software) that has been problematic that I am starting to believe Apple's claims that the leak of the "lost" phone was indeed damaging to Apple. I think it forced their hand, and cornered them into releasing a phone that was not yet ready with software that still had a lot of problems.
      The fanboys will be here momentarily to mod this down. Sigh.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:Cases by dangitman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And the real question is why they made the bottom strip out of metal since it's not an antenna.

      Perhaps because it *is* an antenna? It doesn't have just one antenna, but multiple antennae circling the phone, for Wi-Fi, GSM and Bluetooth.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    8. Re:Cases by yakumo.unr · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, what they're saying is, all phones suffer from this, apart from any phone that has the aerial behind an insulating layer, such as a plastic case.

      Off topic, we're the only phone with the external metalwork acting as the aerial, isn't that awesome.

      Don't forget all phones suffer this defect, so it's not a design defect, no really.

    9. Re:Cases by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I was initially skeptical that this might be software related, but recent rumors have a plausible software theory. The new iOS 4 has a new algorithm for picking the tower and channel that the phone uses, when it can see more than one. It appears that this mechanism may have a defect which is triggered by attenuating the signal (such as by bridging the two antennae with salty skin). This appears to cause the phone to decide to attempt switching channels. The speculation is that the timing is off, and the phone sometimes reports "no signal" rather than deciding to switch or stay put.

      Death Grip hysteria may end Monday with iOS 4.01

      The issue described is plausible, and fits some of the observations.
      • Some folk can reproduce this problem, basically at will (one of the magazine review sites).
      • Other folk are unable to reproduce this problem, at all (another reviewer at the NYT).
      • At least some folk who can reproduce this issue are doing so in areas where reception was previously known to be marginal (including one of my developers at his house).
      • The problem may have been harder to diagnose during Apple's testing, due to pre-release testing taking place inside insulated cases, thus the problem would be triggered less often, and not in associate with anything special that the user would notice (holding the phone in a certain way). The frequency of dropped calls might have been within the "normal" range for the AT&T network, given the small sample size of a few hundred test users. (Apple's off site testing includes hundreds of people, but that's actually a pretty small sample size, compared to the 600,000 people using the phone today.)

      It will be interesting to see if a software patch emerges within a few days or even weeks, and cures this issue. If it does, I'll think back to several cell phones I had previously, which had problems that I could and did reproduce, and reported clearly to the vendors (both network and cell maker) and for which no patches were forthcoming, ever, during the life of the phone. Regular software updates for iPhone are a damn sight better than the old way, where the answer to any problem was "buy the new version of the phone you just bought a month ago".

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    10. Re:Cases by icebike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For this theory to be believable, the phone would have to be failing one other key feature of cell tower hopping, namely keeping track of the relative signal strength of multiple towers at all times.

      Attenuation would affect all towers in the same band roughly evenly. It might not affect different bands the same, and the phone might be dropping to EDGE of something like that.

      But I still don't see how this gets out of the lab and thru field testing.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    11. Re:Cases by cybereal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The effect of attentuation drops off exponentially as you remove the attenuating obstruction from the antenna. However, there is reason to believe that there is a different problem besides attenuation affecting a very small number of handsets. Personally I suspect some kind of ground fault in the casing leading to a magnetic field interfering with the radio itself. This wouldn't demonstrate itself as the loss of a couple bars, it would be complete or nearly complete loss of signal.

      That said, I have an iPhone 4 and cannot reproduce any of the reported problems at all no matter what I do. I have to put my phone in what almost amounts to a faraday cage (a steel lock box) just to see any signal degradation. But a friend of mine has seen the problem occur with nothing but the tip of his finger placed over the antenna on the left side, specifically when touching the metal. The metal plates are not the antenna, the black lines are, so what this tells me is that there is some issue with grounding of the body in that phone. But until I can have him try his "magic finger" on my own iPhone, I wouldn't jump to any real conclusions. None of the reports so far have been remotely scientific. There are numerous variables and without any cross checking it's all guesses for now. Attenuation will definitely occur but it's usually not so dramatic as to go from five bars to "Searching..." like this friend of mine is seeing.

      --
      I read the script, and I think it would help my character's motivation if he was on fire. -Bender
    12. Re:Cases by slimjim8094 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you fucking serious?? I hope you don't seriously believe that touching an antenna on a device with few-watt or less output power is dangerous.

      First of all, internal antennas are the new part. For the longest time, every cellphone had a telescoping, exposed antenna. You can even still get them, if you want.

      Second of all, the phone transmits at an outside maximum of 2W - usually much less. You can literally suck on an antenna broadcasting at 2W and not feel a thing (I've done it)

      Third of all, tons of other things that you use all the time transmit over exposed antennas: Old cordless phones, many walkie-talkies, baby monitors... etc. The reason you cover up an antenna has to do with protecting the antenna and, as it happens, protecting it from detuning.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  3. in addition by nimbius · · Score: 2, Funny

    for those slashdot customers experiencing loss of signal and poor quality, we recommend exiting the basement and removing your storm trooper helmet to place calls.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:in addition by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Geeks generally don’t buy Apple products. They buy a Linux phone from an obscure company that is also barely usable as a phone, but at least completely hackable.
      Hipsters and valley girls buy Apple products. Oh, and those people that drive Priuses. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  4. Another person by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    who would rather be part of a group then have a properly working device.

    Sad really.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Another person by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can hold my Android phone any way I want to and I don't see any loss of signal strength, so apparently it *is* possible to design a working phone within current SAR limits...

      I wasn't aware that government regulation forced BP to cut corners and undertake a risky well closure strategy, ignoring evidence that the BOP was damaged. Which regulation was that?

    2. Re:Another person by Edzilla2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's funny how every single other phone is not affected by this very dangerous government regulatior...

  5. Re:Antenna placement by copponex · · Score: 3, Funny

    I suspect they figured no one would bother to use to try and make a phone call.

  6. Simply ... by randyzoch · · Score: 5, Funny

    1) Stand on one leg, preferably facing the cell tower. 2) Use your other leg to form a crude counterpoise for the iPhone4's various antennas. Also, experiments in dry/low-humidity regions which lead to dry/chapped hands may also contribute to your success making and holding a call. What other company could get away with producing a product like this and succeed?

    1. Re:Simply ... by daath93 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All you have to do is mention Microsoft in a negative fashion and the apple monkeys clap and giggle like mentally challenged school girls. Substance and fact are not required.

    2. Re:Simply ... by bythescruff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What other company could get away with producing a product like this and succeed?

      Way to ignore the enormous elephant in the room.

      --
      Chuck Norris: Socialism == a thousand years of darkness.
  7. Uh... Huh... by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny

    "For best results, levitate one inch from your ears."

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Uh... Huh... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're just jealous that your reality distortion field is so weak it can't even levitate a cellphone a mere inch away from you! ~

  8. Is there no other design solution? by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The iPhone 4 has two symmetrical slots in the stainless frame. If you short these slots, or cover them with your hand, the antenna performance will suffer (see this video I found on YouTube). There is no way around this, it's a design compromise that is forced by the requirements of the FCC, AT&T, Apple's marketing department and Apple's industrial designers, to name a few.

    Possible solutions include:
    • having another small slot so the two antennae aren't right next to each other and you'd have to short both slots.
    • Cover with a non-conductive coating
    • Put the antennae actually inside the phone.

    I guess there are some extremely complex technical or aesthetic or regulatory reasons why each of these isn't going to work but I'd like to know what they are.

  9. Re:The cure is in the case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You forgot to mention it's a $29 rubber band.

  10. QA by LeftFootRequired · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thats what you get for making you engineers hide the product in public by dressing it in an iphone 3 case during QA. Oops!

  11. So its really the iPod4? by phonewebcam · · Score: 4, Funny

    Worse reception than the iPhone3 - check.
    Still tied to the worst US carrier - check.

    But hey, facetime is so awesome it overcomes all this...

    Realtime video calls which exceed the definition of the human retina? - cheC&&^& >>>>>CARRIER LOST

  12. form over function by nobodyman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course, apple could have easily designed the phone with with a some plastic along the side, but this would go against their aesthetic "vision". Anyone who has used an Apple mouse (*any* Apple mouse) knows that ergonomics takes a back-seat to physical appearance. Always.

    1. Re:form over function by dingen · · Score: 4, Informative

      The reason the case is part of the antenna system is actually to improve reception, because it makes the surface operating as an antenna larger.

      When isolated it works pretty well I suppose. But it fails when a user touches all antennas at once, effectively short circuiting the entire system.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    2. Re:form over function by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually this was touted on iphone4 introduction speech as a "major new feature" by Jobs. It was kind of obvious for anyone who actually ever worked with antennas that it was trouble. But apparently it sounded fashionable to countless ears of apple clients.

      It's a feature among others, aimed to increase hype value of the device. It's pretty obvious why no one else did it, and hence probably seemed like a good marketing idea to apple. All it had to do was what it always did, present it as an awesome revolutionary new feature.

    3. Re:form over function by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe their validation staff have small fingers. More likely testing was done with the device flat on a bench with people checking boxes to verify correct display on the screen.

      I see this all the time in my work. Our system just isn't used in the same way it is tested.

    4. Re:form over function by nobodyman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another believable theory I've heard is that the "fake 3gs" cases that they used to disguise the prototype units meant that this problem wasn't caught during field testing.

    5. Re:form over function by wfolta · · Score: 3, Funny

      Never used a Magic Mouse, I see. They're incredible.

    6. Re:form over function by uncqual · · Score: 2

      Prior to the Apple mouse, mice had two circular rollers instead of a a spherical ball.

      Hmm... Actually, Apple was about ten years late to the game. They must have noticed the Xerox Alto I mouse while they were stealing everything else. (I'm pretty sure the two small steel balls at the bottom were just for "sliding" purposes - although I must admit I've not used the depicted mouse for almost 30 years).

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
  13. Apple Fanboys In The Media In Panic Mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They all want to flood the Net with their obligatory iPhone 'reviews' and 'reactions' claiming:

    "It's amazing!"

    "A must upgrade for all existing iPhone owning Hipster Douchebags!"

    "Magical!"

    "Teh best thing evah!!!"

    while the actual piece of crap iPhone 4 is:

    Ugly
    Defectively designed
    Runs an outdated OS

    No wonder Google kicked Apple and the iPhone into 3rd place in sales and Android is now selling at roughly 50-60 million phones a year.

  14. "Just avoid holding it that way" by Chad+Birch · · Score: 5, Informative

    Saw a great post on reddit earlier today where a user goes through a bunch of Apple's own advertising to see how they've shown the phone being held.

    --
    Sturgeon was an optimist.
    1. Re:"Just avoid holding it that way" by asdf7890 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Another reddit poster showed the true way to hold an iPhone: http://i.imgur.com/h9UDd.png

  15. Danish professor predicted this by Namarrgon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This guy is an expert in antenna design from Aalborg University, and predicted this two weeks ago.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  16. Coating is best idea by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They already had the phone inside the case in previous generations, the external antenna does improve the signal. No need to throw the baby out with the bathwater. A light non-conductive coating would work perfectly well.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Coating is best idea by m2shariy · · Score: 2, Informative

      A light non-conductive coating would work perfectly well.

      May I suggest duct tape? There is nothing duct tape cannot fix!

  17. FCC? by guspasho · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A blog post from an antenna design company explains that the reception problems are probably the direct result of phone design adapting to FCC requirements.

    Because it has nothing to do with their decision to place the antennae on the exterior of the device.

    1. Re:FCC? by daveime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well it seems to work for just about every other phone made in the last 15 years.

  18. It may have been by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And it may have been dismissed. Apple is very much about form over all else. The most important thing to them is how something looks. Features and function get subverted to that end. They've had other devices with problems due to their designs. Time Capsules are an example. They have a bad habit of failing after a year and a half or so, way more than you'd expect. Reason is the internal power adapter. It puts too much heat in the small case and causes failures. The smart thing would have been to have it external, but that would ruin the look.

    So Apple may have known this was a problem and said "Fuck it, people can just hold it as not to touch the antennas. We don't want to hurt the looks."

    1. Re:It may have been by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "
      And they would have been correct - they will sell more from looks and the Apple fans will not only hold it different or purchase the rubber pads but will sing the praises of having to do so.
      "

      I use a Macbook Pro as my development machine. I love that computer. It runs like a champ, is fast, battery life is great, and the trackpad is just about my favorite piece of computer hardware ever. It's great...except for the PERFECT right angle along the perimeter of the thing. A perfect right angle + solid aluminum construction = sore wrists for me.

      I googled it to find out if I am alone in disliking the sharp edge along the perimeter of the thing. There were not just a few people touting this as A Good Thing, because after all everyone uses a computer in the same way and you are NOT supposed to rest your wrists on the mighty macbook after all, so Apple was just helping me to learn how to properly use a computer. An obvious design flaw justified away by so many people. I like my iPhone, I like my macbook, so I guess that makes me an Apple fan. But to justify design flaws, as though Apple were incapable of such a thing is inexcusable.

      --
      blah blah blah
    2. Re:It may have been by PapayaSF · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had the same issue with my MacBook, but the plastic case meant it was easy to get some fine sandpaper and take the edges down a bit.

      Yes, Jobs does stumble sometimes with his design sense. The notorious round mouse of 1998-2000 is another prime example.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    3. Re:It may have been by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I feel like you're only half right.

      Apple's belief has always been that function FOLLOWS form. The user interface guidelines that they publish dictate form because it results in better function from a user perspective.

      This still holds true for the iPhone 4; getting Facetime to work is function, getting it to work without a bunch of tedious setup is form. Because they required it to work without a bunch of tedious setup, we're only now seeing it in generation 4 of the phone; before pure function is allowed out the door, the form must be acceptable.

      Apple's very good at marketing, and we all remember CmdrTaco's famous comments on the original iPod, another device that seemingly put form first. But that form dictated the function, and it brought MP3 players into the mainstream. This is why Apple's products STILL make them so much money.

      In this case, it would have been better for them to do a bit more form->function->form revision, I guess, but sometimes things work just good enough to get out the door, no matter what company you're talking about. And this is a limited problem (not everyone can reproduce it) with a few easy fixes. In the video games industry this would be classified as a 'KS' bug: 'Known Shippable'. And they did. :)

  19. If it affects "every wireless phone"... by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...then why is it that this is the first time so many people are experiencing this problem?

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
    1. Re:If it affects "every wireless phone"... by dingen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because it's bullshit. No other phone has a conductive casing with the antennas attached to it. Now we know why.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    2. Re:If it affects "every wireless phone"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...then why is it that this is the first time so many people are experiencing this problem?

      Because they weren't looking for it. The trouble is the location of the antenna was pointed out to everyone. Try the same thing on a Nexus One, a 3GS or pretty much everyone phone out there: you'll notice the same thing, unless they've tweaked the bar representation to take account of it (yes everyone cheats).

      It's like pointing out the suspension wires in an old Trinitron CRT: people have no idea they're there and enjoy watching the TV, until somebody points them out.

    3. Re:If it affects "every wireless phone"... by alvinrod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny thing is that it's not the first time. Some reproduced the issue with an old Nokia candy-bar style phone and put a video of it up on youtube. I don't have the link handy, but some site pointed out a Nexus One discussion thread from several months ago that discussed a the same issue. Just for fun I just took my own phone out of my pocket and observed the different in signal strength when it's just sitting on my desk and when I hold it. It loses a bar, but I've never noticed before because I've never thought to look at it, most likely due to the fact that I generally good good reception on Verizon and wouldn't think to look at it that closely. The only reason so many people are experiencing it for the first time are because the people who buy Apple products have a greater tendency to obsess over shit like this and post about it on the internet. Then the internet denizens, who collectively get hardons over all things Apple, endless talk about it. If it weren't for Apple, this would almost be a non-event that ends of being drowned out by all the other noise.

  20. You are supposed to hold it with your pinky out! by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's just like drinking a latte.

  21. Not a problem for Apple fans by HexKrak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The first and 2nd gen iPhones had the highest dropped call rates in recent history but it didn't stop people from using them. If apple announced their next phone would be constructed purely from dog poo, for environmental reasons of course, people would still line up around the block to be the first to own one.

  22. Re:No case? by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Something that affects 50% of customers is a non-issue? Despite your claim, you are, in fact, a "fanboi."

  23. Re:No case? by C++0x · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm no fanboi, but seriously, how many people don't use a case for their iPhone? Probably 50% of my friends own one, and I can't think of a single one who goes "naked". This is a non-issue.

    Your "non-issue" decree is thoughtless. I use a leather sleeve case like this one http://store.apple.com/uk/product/TT756ZM/A and so for me this iPhone 4 design defect is a very real problem. Apple should do the decent thing, admit their stupid mistake and provide a real solution - such as giving customers Apple iPhone 4 bumper cases, which they already recommend as a workaround, free of charge (instead of charging $30 a piece).

  24. Re:Nothing to see here by bbahner · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the phone has signal issues in real world use your point is valid. I haven't seen real world issues with mine yet - but we shall see. I suspect if this is really a problem Apple will do something about it - they're certainly profitable enough to do a replacement program. It would certainly be less expensive than the fallout of a yearlong debacle with their primary product. It is telling that in this thread someone marked my prior comment as a troll (really??) Seems to me there is plenty in this stream that is quite a bit more inflammatory than that. Slashdot certainly has a 'point of view' ..

  25. Geeks and Apple by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh, I guess that's funny in a Slashdot sorta way, but I'm not the first person to notice that conventions of programmers, like Java One, or BSDCon or various hacker and security geek conferences are seas of glowing Apple logos, the past few years. I know that among the programmers I know, it's actually the best programmers (the ones that I would recruit for any project on any platform with any language) who are nearly all on Mac OS X. Maintenance programmers tend to stick with the platform they work on during the day (usually Windows), but even some of those have switched to the Mac at home.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  26. Presperation triggered by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the reason they may not have found this in testing, is because it seems that you have to have slightly sweaty hands to trigger the problem. Just after running through an airport I was able to replicate the speed drop, but sitting on the plane a little later I could not see a network speed drop no matter how tightly I gripped the edges.

    The tested mostly in winter, now it's summer - leading more people to have this problem.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Presperation triggered by xs650 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is a disgrace that it even got to testing, anyone with a clue about RF design would have predicted the dismal performance.

  27. One Antenna? by PPH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been working with s device that has four antenna patches, a system to monitor the received signal strength from each, the transmitted SWR, and based upon these inputs, select the best antenna to use. Its not a cell phone, per se, but it operates on GSM systems and cannot be installed in a controlled environment (much like not being able to predict how a user will grab a phone).

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  28. Re:The cure is in the case by cynyr · · Score: 4, Funny

    1) buy some broccolii from the store
    2) remove and dry off the rubber band
    3) place rubberband on iPhone
    4) ???
    5) PROFIT!(and save like $27, and get some iron)

    --
    All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
  29. or perhaps like multitasking, phone reception by ClosedSource · · Score: 3, Funny

    is an advanced capability they need time to figure out how to implement well. iPhone 5 will fix it.

  30. Love Glove it by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Slip a condom on that iPhone before you use it; honestly people - safe sex begins with safe phone calls to arrange the booty call.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  31. Re:The media need to call Apple out. by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I enjoy many apple products. However, they do not shit rainbows and butterflies. I am aware that they, like every other company on the face of the planet, from time to time, produce an inferior product. Your welcome to your personal shit-fest about apple, but really, if your that butt hurt about the existence of the company, then go cry in a corner you emo prick.

    I want you to consider how shitty the home computing world would be if Microsoft never had ANY market competition. Imagine for a second how shit-tacular whatever OS we would be using would be if there were no competition between Apple and Microsoft. They are polar opposites in many ways, and wether they admit it or not, they strive to out do one another in the OS department. Without competition, the OS world would be a disgusting wasteland.

    Apple is damn sure not a golden god on a unicorn with butterfly wings like some idiots make them out to be, but your fanatical 'anti apple' stance is just as moronic. /rant goodbye karma....

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  32. Re:The only 'fanbois' I see are mindless droids... by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please tell me where I can touch my Nexus One (with a single finger, mind you) that will cause it to drop a call. Calling this a nonissue is moronic.

  33. Re:Missed? Seriously? by symbolic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think this was missed at all. It's like any of the other "defects" that have showed up in Apple products. I'm tempted to believe that Apple knew quite well about this, but decided to go with it anyway because a) fixing it would involve removing some of the "sleek" factor and b) they knew that there would be such mass hysteria over acquiring the new product that it wouldn't matter - at first. It's all about taking calculated risks.

    That having been said, it's precisely this attitude that destroyed my fan loyalty several years ago- I simply got tired of being bent over by Apple's marketing prowess. I still buy an Apple product every now and then, but the days of drooling all over myself at the mere mention of a new Apple product are LONG gone.

  34. Re:No, even then by thegarbz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not required. Proximity would have enough of an effect on the system. Remember we have a device here which passes power despite having two completely open ends. Putting a resistor across the terminals (your hand) would have an effect even if it wasn't directly touching the device.

    To that effect, a case that that provides a 1-5mm buffer between the antenna and your hand will have a much larger effect than a semi-conductive coating (because at 2.4GHz frankly a lot of things are semiconductors) 1micron thick applied by wiping on the inner thigh of a Swedish virgin*. *I think only Steve's iPhone is constructed this way. The rest of the world gets some Chinese hag with syphilis.

  35. Re:The only 'fanbois' I see are mindless droids... by catmistake · · Score: 4, Informative

    Please tell me where I can touch my Nexus One (with a single finger, mind you) that will cause it to drop a call. Calling this a nonissue is moronic.

    shows you in the manual

    see page 6, moron

  36. Re:Missed? Seriously? by sqrt(2) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm pretty sure that's why they designed the bumper accessories to be the way they are. They turned a product defect into a way to sell an overpriced accessory to fix their devices shortcomings - and it's working! The Jobsian management style never ceases to amaze me with its outcomes.

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
  37. Re:The only 'fanbois' I see are mindless droids... by CrazyChinaman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Putting your finger there may attenuate the signal. But it won't short the antenna. My antenna is internal. I can't even take the backplate off and short it. Once I get home, I'll do some speed tests for ya if you like, but right now, I'm in a huge concrete box. BTW, that's an Incredible...he did ask for an N1 death-point ;)

  38. Re:This is 100% Apples fault by dzfoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'll going out on a limb here and guess that this issue is akin to the "exploding iPhone" problem that was all over the news a couple of years ago. It's perhaps a manufacturing defect or even a design flaw that requires very specific and non-typical circumstances, which is affecting a very small number of people.

    And just like that previous issue, that very small group of affected people happen to blog all over the Internet, which then echos their complaints and amplifies them very efficiently, giving the illusion of a massively reported problem--at least to those who read that sort of stuff (which apparently is every other person in the Internet)--and re-enforcing their own biases that Apple is evil. There will be claims of deceit, and threats of legal action, and the echo chamber will cry that Apple has "lost their cool" (again) and have "made a mockery of themselves and everyone" (again), and of course, that this will probably--and most likely--be their downfall (again).

    Then, as with the "exploding iPhone" hoopla, those really affected by this problem will get rectification or compensation from Apple, while the rest will get told off and ignored for being alarmist and reactionary bloggers; and it'll all die down eventually, quietly, and nobody else will care.

    The sun will rise in the east, then set in the west, and consumers will continue purchasing the thing because it works for the vast majority of them. Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

              -dZ.

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
  39. Re:The only 'fanbois' I see are mindless droids... by catmistake · · Score: 2, Informative

    but right now, I'm in a huge concrete box

    You mean there are places where you don't get ideal reception? Huh. Sucks for you I guess. And everyone with a cell phone. Yes, newsflash, in poor cell areas you. may loose calls. Try finding that death touch when you're sitting under a tower. This is such utter garbage it's ridiculous... in the face of SCIENCE telling you there is nothing wrong... the multitudes that still believe ... incredible

  40. About that iPhone 4 Reception Problem by catmistake · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By now you’ve all heard reports that the iPhone 4 has a “terrible design flaw” that makes it useless for calls once you pick it up. Well, ok, I’m exaggerating a bit but you’d be forgiven for thinking that with the way this story has spread like wild fire. Now, I don’t doubt that some people are having an issue with this, but I’m amazed at the way this story was reported and the way it was picked up by the mainstream news media. First of all, Gizmodo were pushing this big time on Thursday, along with any other story they could find to paint the iPhone in a bad light (including, surprise surprise, you drop it and it breaks). Big surprise. From there other blogs started picking up on it and then it reached the mainstream media. What amazes me about this is that, first of all, most of the people reviewing the phone never noticed an issue with it and that most reviewers had noticed improved reception.

    Secondly, as has already been pointed out, the same thing happens to existing phones. When Apple said this in their email they were set upon by bloggers for being dismissive of the “fatal design flaw” but they’re telling the truth. I tried it with my iPhone 3G and it does the exact same thing. Hold it in the bottom left corner and the signal drops. I’ve had my phone for over 2 years and I never noticed this issue until someone pointed it out and I tried to replicate it. But what I find really telling about the reporting on this is that virtually none of the mainstream media reports into this did any research or looked even remotely into the issue. They just reported on the Gizmodo story coupled with a few anecdotes from viewers or readers who were having reception issues. I’m not trying to down play the problems of those who are having problems, what I’m annoyed about is the complete and utter lack of perspective. For a start, a little bit of research would have found out that the Nexus one had the exact same issue when it was launched. But where was the outrage there? Where was the massive controversy about the Nexus being “flawed”? Why wasn’t this pushed as the main story by Gizmodo for several days? It certainly never reached the mainstream media, and yet according to the people experiencing the issue, it’s pretty much the same.

    The problem is now that regardless of the extent of the reception issue, it will forever be seen as the “design flaw” of the iPhone. Anyone who tries to point out that other phones do in fact experience this are immediately branded as fanboys. It’s amazing how people are so eager to buy any controversy that involves Apple that they loose all sense of reason or balance. It’s gotten so bad lately that I’ve almost given up blogging about Apple and the mac, two subjects close to my heart. It seems that people are only interested in expressing phoney outrage at some inconsequential thing Apple does and creating giant controversies out of insignificant issues (I’m not talking about the iPhone 4 reception issue here before people start giving out about that I’m saying it’s an insignificant issue – although for many people apparently it is). It’s amazing to me how there has developed this complete disconnect between the impression you get about Apple from reading technology sites and publications, and the reality on the ground. The tech press (particularly tech blogs*) has lately been overwhelmingly negative about the Cupertino company, and yet contrast that with hundreds of thousands of people queuing for an iPhone 4. We’re given the impression that the iPhone is a terrible platform for developers and that its atrocious policies mean developers are abandoning it in droves for Android, and yet contrast that with WWDC selling out in 8 days.

    I think the root of the problem, or at least part of it is the way a story spreads. It often starts on a blog when someone publishes their opinion on something

  41. Re:This is 100% Apples fault by Loomismeister · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, this design flaw affects 100% of the phones. If you have an iPhone and hold it in your left hand, bridging the millimeter gap in the metal band that goes around the perimeter of the phone, then it will lose it's connection. 100% of the time this will happen.

  42. Re:This is 100% Apples fault by IrrepressibleMonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, this design flaw affects 100% of the phones. If you have an iPhone and hold it in your left hand, bridging the millimeter gap in the metal band that goes around the perimeter of the phone, then it will lose it's connection. 100% of the time this will happen.

    That's not being universally reported. Did you read all of the articles? Read through the PCMag (second link) - that's not what is being reported there. Yes, the problem could be affecting all iPhone 4 handsets, but it's certainly not affecting all iPhone 4 users. Theories are flying around about hand sweat, local signal strength and even GSM bandwidth as contributing to the size of the problem.

    All of the YouTube fault demonstrations I have seen have shown users holding the phone unusually firmly, with the ball of the hand coming right around to the front of the phone (even to the point of partially obstructing the screen). This isn't how most people hold their phone - although I accept that some might. Ars Technica http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2010/06/new-iphone-4-antenna-causing-potential-reception-issues.ars posted some preliminary investigation claiming no issues when holding the phone "normally", but proving the issue when dampening their hand and adopting the "death grip".

    So yes, there is an issue, but your mileage may vary. It may not require the level of hysteria that has been reached in certain media outlets.

    Interestingly, this may actually be a combination of issues as the same symptoms have been demonstrated on the 3G and 3GS in the "death grip" and neither has an external antenna. Similar issues have been reported on the Nexus 1 and Palm Pre - you can find some links off this article: http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2010/06/jobs-on-iphone-4-antenna-avoid-holding-it-in-this-way.ars

    I don't want to dismiss anyone's fears. I'm still uncertain as to whether I'll purchase an iPhone 4 myself, but I doubt the scenario that you describe is being experienced by the majority of IPhone 4 users.