Slashdot Mirror


Things You Drink Can Be Used To Track You

sciencehabit writes with an intriguing story about the potential of figuring out where people have been by examining their hair: "That's because water molecules differ slightly in their isotope ratios depending on the minerals at their source. Researchers found that water samples from 33 cities across the United State could be reliably traced back to their origin based on their isotope ratios. And because the human body breaks down water's constituent atoms of hydrogen and oxygen to construct the proteins that make hair cells, those cells can preserve the record of a person's travels. Such information could help prosecutors place a suspect at the scene of a crime, or prove the innocence of the accused." Or frame someone by slipping them water from every country on the terrorist watchlist.

202 comments

  1. subject goes here... by Keebler71 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Or frame someone by slipping them water from every country on the terrorist watchlist.

    That's tough to swallow...

    --
    "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    1. Re:subject goes here... by smi.james.th · · Score: 1

      That's tough to swallow...

      Agreed. One would wonder just how much water one would need to drink for it to reflect in one's hair, if this is true.

      --
      One thing I know, and that is that I am ignorant...
    2. Re:subject goes here... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      This "water" stuff you're talking about.

      I've heard it can be used at a mixer of sorts for a proper drink...but haven't tried it that often.

      Hmm....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:subject goes here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of times I buy bottled spring water to brew my beer with. I guess by I would appear to spend a lot of time in other places. In fact, I also drink a lot of craft beers from places I've never even visited, both inside and outside the US. Guess I'll have to check and see if I'm on the no fly list yet.

    4. Re:subject goes here... by Hylandr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bottled Water anyone?

      How much water is used to make soda ? beer ? Juice ?

      Will water move through beef or other imported vegetables and be tested in our urine?

      There are too many disparate sources for water or "Second Hand Water" for this to ever hold up in court. I hope.

      One sec... knock on the door...

      - Dan.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    5. Re:subject goes here... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      You clever use of pun makes me wet with envy.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    6. Re:subject goes here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... beef or other imported vegetables...

      wait, beef is a vegetable? and an imported one at that?

    7. Re:subject goes here... by damnfuct · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget that the foods you eat were likely grown in some other region and shipped to your supermarket. Maybe they'll think you're a Colombian druglord because of your morning coffee.

    8. Re:subject goes here... by decoy256 · · Score: 1

      If you're a female... eewww.

      If you're a male... double eewww.

    9. Re:subject goes here... by swalker42 · · Score: 1

      all the best vegetables are made of beef

      --
      You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means
    10. Re:subject goes here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that needs to go on a shirt - seriously.

      all vegetables should start their life with a moo.

    11. Re:subject goes here... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. There are far too many variables here for it to ever be very reliable.

      And as someone else mentioned, it is far easier to give someone water -- or plant DNA evidence, for example -- than to plant, say, fingerprints.

    12. Re:subject goes here... by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Some of the best quotes probably started life as a typo. ;)

      - Dan.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    13. Re:subject goes here... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Uh, they do. It's called "fertilizer".

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    14. Re:subject goes here... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1
      Yes, with all the imported produce such as Mexican tomatoes, Brazilian orange juice, and Greek olives, I'd say there are a lot of foreign isotopes floating around.

      CSI Miami: "Hey, either the murderer lives in Colombia or he just ate some Campbell Soup from New Jersey. Let's indict the coke-using bastard anyway!"

      Detective: "I'd say ... puts on sunglasses ... how do you like THEM tomatoes!"

    15. Re:subject goes here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And because the human body breaks down water's constituent atoms of hydrogen and oxygen to construct the proteins that make hair cells

      Wait, so you're you're telling me I have the power to separate water into H and O? Man, I am so fucking cool.

    16. Re:subject goes here... by infidel13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I don't understand is why any self-respecting scientist or engineer would work on something so blatantly geared toward the eventual and haphazard restriction of human liberty. Look around you, folks -- you're creating the police state.

      --
      quia potentia mens mentis
    17. Re:subject goes here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This Shirt gives me a lot of compliments from strangers. Oddly enough, I get the most compliments from vegetarians.

    18. Re:subject goes here... by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      I *am* a Colombian druglord, you insensitive clod.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    19. Re:subject goes here... by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Who drinks tap water when traveling anyway?

      I have never found tap water in other places to taste "right". The mix of minerals and various contamination is always slightly different and just tastes wrong. Of course, when away from home, I do spend a lot of time in central NY, and the area my family is in has a slight bit of sulfer in the water, which even makes it smell different (and quite unpleasant, though, they don't even notice)

      Not to mention that a significant portion of the population drinks bottled drinks in general. Even if they drink coffee made from local water, thats local water coffee, mixed with local water from however many bottling plants of whatever other beverages he drinks.

      my guess is, this would be useful for some people, but overall, isn't going to be that useful. Then again, prosecutors will probably try to use it, its like that one researcher who put out a paper on how you have to be careful when using FMRI machines by showing how easy it was to design a test that showed a dead fishes brain responding to visual stimulus.

      Once you want to find evidence of something, it just gets easier and easier to find it. The law of fives is never wrong.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    20. Re:subject goes here... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      There are far too many variables here for it to ever be very reliable.

      That may or ma not be true with respect to modern people, but essentially identical techniques have been used for a good while in archaeological investigation with high reliability. Of course, more than a century ago (when the police start to say "this is an archaeological investigation, not a criminal matter), people had a far more locally-sourced diet, as you correctly point out.
      Evidence like this could be put before a court, but any competent defence lawyer should be able to (honestly) place sufficient doubt in sufficient juror's minds that it's unlikely to be a severe threat. Assuming that you've got a competent defence lawyer.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    21. Re:subject goes here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if my bottled water comes from someplace where a crime was committed, and I have never been there myself?

    22. Re:subject goes here... by smi.james.th · · Score: 1

      Well, I drink tap water from wherever unless I've been specifically warned not to.

      I doubt that if I travel somewhere for a week that it will have chance to leave mineral deposits in my hair though... surely?

      --
      One thing I know, and that is that I am ignorant...
    23. Re:subject goes here... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Evidence like this could be put before a court, but any competent defence lawyer should be able to (honestly) place sufficient doubt in sufficient juror's minds that it's unlikely to be a severe threat. Assuming that you've got a competent defence lawyer."

      Yes, that was the point I was trying to make. Not that it should never be used as evidence, but that the validity of that evidence, in the vast majority of cases today, would be extremely questionable.

    24. Re:subject goes here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't measured it, but I'd estimate my hair grows at a rate of about an inch a month, so if your somewhere for a week, that would be a 1/4 inch growth, easily enough to detect. If it was just a day trip, maybe not, but it depends how sensitive their tests are, it is feasible, but you might not drink much water from the place you visit in that short time.

    25. Re:subject goes here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/your/you're/

    26. Re:subject goes here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's tough to swallow...

      That's what she said.

    27. Re:subject goes here... by bandmassa · · Score: 1

      Bottled water? And what about the secret sleeper cell in the Evian plant?

      --
      "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1
  2. Wait, what? by DIplomatic · · Score: 1

    Such information could help prosecutors place a suspect at the scene of a crime, or prove the innocence of the accused.

    How could you possibly prove someone's innocence this way? You could only be sure that the person in question had not drank any tap water from that city.

    1. Re:Wait, what? by pspahn · · Score: 5, Funny

      If your accuser says you were in Philly, and your hair says you were in Detroit, then you might be innocent of the crime in Philly, but you're still stuck in Detroit.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    2. Re:Wait, what? by Michael+Kristopeit · · Score: 0

      "help" them prove... pile on the circumstantial facts and hope the jury buys it.

    3. Re:Wait, what? by d0nster · · Score: 1

      How could you prove their guilt? If I bottle tap water from Las Vegas and sell it to someone in New York, you can't prove whether the New Yorker was in Vegas or just drank my crappy bottled water.

    4. Re:Wait, what? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      As with any other types of evidence, a single piece of evidence is seldom enough to convict. You have to have other pieces of evidence that you would use together to corroborate the story.

      The crime was committed in Vegas, the criminal claims to have been in New York, but the hair/water evidence shows he was either in Vegas or drank your crappy bottled water and there were also plant fibers on his clothing from plants common to the desert southwest. Neither piece of evidence by itself proves that the New Yorker was in Vegas, but taken together it seems much more likely.

    5. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a timestamp attached to those water molecules?

    6. Re:Wait, what? by mea37 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Is there a timestamp attached to those water molecules?"

      Well, there sort of is. Hair grows at the root only, so if I watch how the patterns change moving from the root of a hair to the tip, I can get a fuzzy sort of timeline of your waters' origin. Circumstances where that's precise enough to be useful, though, seem narrow.

    7. Re:Wait, what? by mea37 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A major component of most things you drink is water.

      Most things you drink aren't bottled in your home town. (Including bottled water, if you're into that sort of thing.)

      If somehow this technique were to be come a common defense tool, then someone planning a crime could shrewdly stockpile tap water from a city with a distinct signature that isn't where the crime will take place.

      It might be marginally useful as a tool in a civil case if you want to convince the jury where someone was (but probably not if you want to convince them where he/she wasn't); I would hope it would be considered too inconclusive to be used in a criminal trial.

    8. Re:Wait, what? by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      Uh... the USG claims you went to Afghanistan to train with terrorists for a month, you just went to London like your last ticket purchased in the US says... then you use the hair.

      If the hair says London, the government knows you either had a massive water truck with you or that you are telling the truth. OTHO, if the hair says Afghanistan then they have circumstantial evidence and might have caught you in a lie. In the end, it's better screening out than in or catching people in lies.

    9. Re:Wait, what? by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you also have to think about how much of your water comes from drinking water and how much comes from food. Most food is local (especially things like bread), but even produce is often not from that far off (bananas excluded, obviously).

    10. Re:Wait, what? by jgagnon · · Score: 1

      Or you just brought bottled water from wherever it is you want them to believe you were while you were away. Obviously, this water stuff can't be used conclusively on its own.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    11. Re:Wait, what? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Not true everywhere.

      I'm in Alaska.

      My Coca-cola is bottled in Anchorage or Juneau.
      My beer is generally bottled in Juneau - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaskan_Brewing_Company or sometimes Bend Oregon - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deschutes_Brewery
      My water comes from the tap so it's local

      Those things are pretty much all I drink

    12. Re:Wait, what? by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Your defense strategy if caught training with terrorists would be to lie about what country yuo were in?

      Good luck with that.

    13. Re:Wait, what? by Eravau · · Score: 1

      ...then someone planning a crime could shrewdly stockpile tap water from a city with a distinct signature that isn't where the crime will take place...

      Or he could shave his head.

    14. Re:Wait, what? by Net_fiend · · Score: 1

      I'd hope it wouldn't be useful at all. This is plain cockamamie crap. I don't care if my food tells you I was in Bangladesh. It isn't foolproof enough to use in any court of law. This is paramount to saying "We should have Thought Police like in Minority Report." Total BS. Technology should only be used in court battles to a point otherwise we're going to start putting more innocent people in jail than there already are and I'm sure that number is too high as it is even if we can't properly calculate; everyone in jail is innocent. / sarcasm I love IT/science, but using it unabashedly without 2nd guessing its uses or even the outcome is foolish. This issue is just like with the science freaks that think some day some special break through is going to happen that explains the entire universe. Not only is that foolish thinking its ridiculous thinking. Everyone knows the answer already. 42.

      --
      "When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty."
    15. Re:Wait, what? by damnfuct · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that there is water in foods (produce especially).

    16. Re:Wait, what? by Burning1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If somehow this technique were to be come a common defense tool, then someone planning a crime could shrewdly stockpile tap water from a city with a distinct signature that isn't where the crime will take place.

      I'd be impressed if you could stockpile significant amounts of water without leaving evidence in the form of empty containers, palates of water, shipping receipts, purchase receipts, and loyalty card information.

      It's not that hard to destroy evidence. The hard part is destroying evidence without creating even more evidence.

    17. Re:Wait, what? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      Most food is not local, not even close. Take a look at the small print when you're at the supermarket; around here (central NY state) most of it, especially during the winter and spring, comes from places like California, Florida, Mexico, Argentina, even China. Bread is one of the few exceptions (and the wheat isn't grown locally, either).

    18. Re:Wait, what? by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      I think it would be more, which terrorists were in which countries when. But also useful for someone reentering the US with an unknown travel history.

    19. Re:Wait, what? by stewbacca · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or he could shave his head.

      Leave Brittney alone!

    20. Re:Wait, what? by nephilimsd · · Score: 1

      According to a recent documentary I watched (I wish I could remember the name now), Coca-Cola is almost always bottled locally or near-locally, because it's much cheaper to transport the concentrated syrup and add the water later than to have a larger plant add the water then transport nationally.

    21. Re:Wait, what? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Yea, thats my understanding too. I grew up in South Dakota and there were bottling plants in Rapid City, Aberdeen and Sioux Falls, so no where more than 150 miles away.

      Pepsi only had two at that time.

    22. Re:Wait, what? by cusco · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's called Stroh's Beer.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    23. Re:Wait, what? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Depending on your situation, it may not be that hard. For example, the city of Minneapolis, MN gets its water supply for the Mississippi River. A few miles away, most of the southern suburbs get their water from the Jordan and Prairie Du Chien-Jordan aquifers. On one hand, that may make it easier to pinpoint where someone is from, but on the other hand it also means I would not have to travel far to get water from a very different source.

    24. Re:Wait, what? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      If your accuser says you were in Philly, and your hair says you were in Detroit, then you might be innocent of the crime in Philly, but you're still stuck in Detroit.

      If your accuser says you're from Detroit but your hair says your from Three Mile Island...

      Actually, you'd be screwed.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  3. especially if you drink by nopainogain · · Score: 1

    coffee and other bean-based-products in the office.

  4. When I travel, I bring back bottled water. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a big collection of bottled water from a lot of different countries because I like the labels on them. I see a potential use for them now.

    1. Re:When I travel, I bring back bottled water. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've got a big collection of bottled water from a lot of different countries because I like the labels on them. I see a potential use for them now.

      Dude, don't drink them! They're valuable! Do you know how hard it is to get illicit liquids like water into the US these days?

      I had bottled water in my checked luggage seized last time I flew back from South America... maybe they thought I might have dissolved drugs in them or something. I figured it was better to let them keep them than ask for the water back, since all I wanted to do was catch my connecting flight (ATL airport, btw).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:When I travel, I bring back bottled water. by shentino · · Score: 1

      That is exactly why they take it, because they know you're in a hurry and can't put up a fight.

  5. Never mind the tracking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the human body breaks down water's constituent atoms of hydrogen and oxygen to construct the proteins that make hair cells

    You're saying that walking out in the rain makes my hair grow??? WOW

  6. Or... by aonic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's hope there aren't any murders near the Coca-cola bottling plant!

    1. Re:Or... by masterwit · · Score: 1

      You should move to Deer Park... none of that worry and fuss here!

      --
      We should start a new Slashdot and return control to the geeks. It actually wouldn't be that hard to get some users to
  7. Oh boy I can hear it now... by McNihil · · Score: 3, Funny

    My toilet telling asking me... "How was your trip to Tokyo?"

    or the next version that checks the stool... "Rosanna the cow hopes that she was a tasty treat!"

    1. Re:Oh boy I can hear it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or frame someone by slipping them water from every country on the terrorist watchlist.

      Dude. If someone did this to me, I'd be pissed.

    2. Re:Oh boy I can hear it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the shiteater troll when you need it...

  8. Seems silly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what's to stop you from carrying around water from New York to thwart anyone from trying to identify you via this method. Or drinking bottled water for that matter.

    1. Re:Seems silly. by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      Most people get most of their water from food and food is often approximately local, especially things like the water in soup and bread.

  9. nice to know we've solved all the world's problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    so we now have the time to concentrate on tracking people by the water they drink.

    This is so super awesome, I'm going to move to a 3rd word slave state to ensure I get the most oppressive experience possible.

  10. Wouldn't it be ironic by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

    If this method could tell us if it rained on your wedding day?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Wouldn't it be ironic by swanzilla · · Score: 2, Funny

      If this method could tell us if it rained on your wedding day?

      Nope...that would be a coincidence. Still. Fifteen years later.

    2. Re:Wouldn't it be ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would not even be a coincidence. A coincidence requires two same-time events. If it rained on your wedding day it would be a coincidence, but if this method told you that, it's merely correct.

    3. Re:Wouldn't it be ironic by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      Unless this method turns out to be totally bogus, in which case the result *would* be a coincidence.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    4. Re:Wouldn't it be ironic by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      If this method could tell us if it rained on your wedding day?

      Nope...that would be a coincidence. Still. Fifteen years later.

      Isn't it ironic that a song about irony misses the point completely? ;)

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  11. Liquid Tin Foil by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's why I only drink liquid tin foil.

    Who's laughing now?

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Liquid Tin Foil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's why I only drink liquid tin foil.

      Who's laughing now?

      Magneto.

    2. Re:Liquid Tin Foil by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      That's preposterous, he said tin foil. Magneto can't do squat with tin.

      Aluminum foil, on the other hand...

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:Liquid Tin Foil by electron+sponge · · Score: 0

      Aluminum isn't magnetic.

    4. Re:Liquid Tin Foil by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then how did Doofenshmirtz attract a giant ball of aluminum foil with a giant magnet, then? Huh?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:Liquid Tin Foil by Net_fiend · · Score: 1

      That was iron buddy.

      --
      "When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty."
    6. Re:Liquid Tin Foil by mea37 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another fun but pointless fact: tin foil isn't made of aluminum.

    7. Re:Liquid Tin Foil by MobyDisk · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's because you are using substandard tin foil. The best tin foils are made of mahogany.

    8. Re:Liquid Tin Foil by Vixe · · Score: 1

      Fuckin' magnets, how do they work?

    9. Re:Liquid Tin Foil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever someone says tin foil though, they almost always mean aluminum foil... Since the end of World War II anyway. If your point was that the guy way up there said Tin and you're going to hold him to it (magnetically), then fair enough.

    10. Re:Liquid Tin Foil by jd · · Score: 1

      Depends on whether you are talking about ferro-magnetic permanent magnets, rare-earth permanent magnets, regular electromagnets, superconducting electromagnets, regular superconductors or magnetars.

      (A regular superconductor is anti-magnetic - it will repel ALL magnetic fields.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    11. Re:Liquid Tin Foil by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      What about aluminium? Those crazy brits always trying to confuse things.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    12. Re:Liquid Tin Foil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Magneto. How does he work?

    13. Re:Liquid Tin Foil by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

      Another fun but pointless fact: tin foil isn't made of aluminum.

      Curses! Foiled again!







      For the pendants...
      Boris Badenov: Phooey! Foiled again!
      Natasha Fatale: Don't you mean, "Curses! Foiled again!"?
      Boris Badenov: Please, Natasha. This is kiddie show.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    14. Re:Liquid Tin Foil by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      Only on Slashdot can someone make a reasonable funny X-Men joke and then be ridiculed for not being nerdy enough understand that the scenario is impossible.

      Its MAGNETO. If people's hangup is that "there is no way Magneto could attract aluminum, that would be ridiculous!" then I think we should all take a field trip out of the basement and into some sunlight.

    15. Re:Liquid Tin Foil by jd · · Score: 1

      This being Slashdot, the first priority is to determine the physics needed to gain the superpowers. Why make jokes when you can make it real? P.s. I hates Bagginses! Hates them forever!

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  12. Similar use recently by Deag · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/england/bristol/10332975.stm

    Basically some bones from a German cathedral could be places as having lived in England due to isotopes in the teeth.

    This helped confirm the bones were of a 10th century English princess.

    1. Re:Similar use recently by paiute · · Score: 2, Funny

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/england/bristol/10332975.stm

      Basically some bones from a German cathedral could be places as having lived in England due to isotopes in the teeth.

      This helped confirm the bones were of a 10th century English princess.

      It was that, and the label on the box which read "10th Century English Princess".

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    2. Re:Similar use recently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was that, and the label on the box which read "10th Century English Princess".

      That was the expiration date.

    3. Re:Similar use recently by Deag · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough they were actually labeled (with her name though). It was to confirm. Can't be trusting labels.

  13. Not enough degrees of freedom by goodmanj · · Score: 3, Informative

    This may be forensically useful, but don't think of it like a fingerprint or a DNA match. There's only one degree of freedom here -- whether the water is isotopically "heavy" or "light". All of a person's water co9nsumption history is mixed up into one number.

    So you won't be able to tell the difference between, say, a person who lived all year in Illinois (with a moderate isotope ratio) and a person who flies back and forth between Montana and Florida (who'd have a mix of "heavy" and "light" water in their system.)

    1. Re:Not enough degrees of freedom by Nutria · · Score: 1

      So you won't be able to tell the difference between, say, a person who lived all year in Illinois (with a moderate isotope ratio) and a person who flies back and forth between Montana and Florida (who'd have a mix of "heavy" and "light" water in their system.)

      Unless the technicians are clever enough to check multiple sections of the person's hair.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:Not enough degrees of freedom by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So you won't be able to tell the difference between, say, a person who lived all year in Illinois (with a moderate isotope ratio) and a person who flies back and forth between Montana and Florida (who'd have a mix of "heavy" and "light" water in their system.)

      Not true. The fact that the oxygen isotopes are bound into hair means that we have some kind of a time reference.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:Not enough degrees of freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that's true. As far as I can tell, the idea is that the hair is generated using the water isotope mix that has been recently ingested. You could roughly trace back the locations visited by an individual as far as his hair length allows, by analyzing different sections of it. Of course, it can't distinguish if you rapidly flip between water supplies (e.g. in the course of a day), but it's not one big average number either.

    4. Re:Not enough degrees of freedom by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      Good point re the use of hair to provide a timeline, but if you figure the average human consumes about 1.5 kg of water a day, and contains about 60 kg of water, that means the water has a residence time of about a month and a half. It'll take that long to "flush out" your system.

      And the "one degree of freedom" problem still limits the location accuracy of this. Check the map in the original article. The isotopic ratio of water is the same in Florida as in Texas; the same in Boston as in San Francisco. This data can narrow down a person's location, but it'll never provide a unique unambiguous location.

    5. Re:Not enough degrees of freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two degrees of freedom, actually -- one for hydrogen and one for oxygen.

    6. Re:Not enough degrees of freedom by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      Actually no! Check Figure 2 in the original article. Hydrogen and oxygen isotopes are linearly related to each other in natural waters, following the "Global Meteoric Water Line". If you measure delta-2H, you know delta-18O or vice versa.

  14. Polonium 210 by rilister · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This has been done before: in the investigation of the poisoning of Alexander Livinenko, the traces of Polonium 210 left wherever the poisoner(s) went gave the UK authorities a very detailed trail to work with - one that not only showed the exact teapot used for the poisoning, but also provides a fingerprint of where the Po-210 was produced and at what date.

    It's quite a fascinating story:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Litvinenko_poisoning#Polonium_trails

    Simply substitute Po-210 for something not deadly and you have a wonderful tracking mechanism.

    --
    'This writing business. Pencils and what-not. Over-rated if you ask me. Silly stuff. Nothing in it' - Eeyore
    1. Re:Polonium 210 by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Simply substitute Po-210 for something not deadly and you have a wonderful tracking mechanism.
      Ummm, No see Po-210 is rare as opposed to say water which covers most of the earth's surface.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    2. Re:Polonium 210 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply substitute Po-210 for something not deadly and you have a wonderful tracking mechanism. Ummm, No see Po-210 is rare as opposed to say water which covers most of the earth's surface.

      You're not tracking the water, dude. You're tracking the minerals in the water, which vary depending on where on earth's surface you are at.

  15. and so with a single by nimbius · · Score: 1

    bottle of spiked evian, 4chan's /b anons go from sending justin bieber to North Korea, to sending justin bieber to Cuba.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  16. Forensics by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see this science being abused. Whether your body contains a certain chemical signature or not is still circumstantial evidence, but increasingly our justice system (like many countries) are using it to give carte blanche access to a person's private information and life. Worse, if the request is later determined to have been falsified or exaggerated, the evidence gathered as a result of that request is still considered valid for the persecution of not just the original crime, but anything else uncovered as a result.

    Thanks to shows like CSI and confidence in science, we want DNA samples, hair, urine, and a billion other things -- and believe that their presence somehow proves or disproves guilt. This is despite the fact that such evidence can be manufactured with ease -- the prime example being Photoshop for photographs, but virtually every technology you have around you can be used against you in some fashion or manipulated to imply or explicitly state something that is not true. Yet the courts rarely ask that samples be tested for contamination, or refuse to re-hear cases where the lab clearly and undeniably compromised the results.

    It used to be that testimony was the primary vehicle in obtaining a conviction. Now we're increasingly using evidence that neither the judge, jury, defense, or even prosecution fully understands to take away other people's freedoms, sometimes under false pretext. While this particular technology is neither good nor bad, the system that will incorporate its use may be fundamentally flawed.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Forensics by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it doesn't seem that useful.

      I drink a lot of water at work. But I have a gallon of water that rode with me on the 1000 mile trip to where I live now. It sits in my closet, on the off chance that my water goes off. I drink that, and I have a beautiful stripe of isotopes which indicate I spent a few days 1000 miles away.

      Combine that with all the bottled water people drink, and all the pre-packaged drinks, and it's useless for much of anything. If I'm a mixture of water isotopes from Atlanta and Upstate NY, what does that tell you? I live in NY and travel to Georgia? I live in NY and drink a lot of Coke? I live in Idaho and subside on Coke and Saratoga Spring Water?

      This seems like it would be pretty much as good as a polygraph.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    2. Re:Forensics by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have heard that prosecutors hate CSI type shows because jurors want some technician to come in and say, "the pesticide oh his wheels indicate that he was at the farm at the time of the crime." Luck breaks like that only happen on... well, CSI.

    3. Re:Forensics by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

      Worse yet, since CSI came out forensic investigators have noticed a marked rise in the number of cases where Gloves and or Bleach were used at the scene of the crime. The Bleach is supposed to damage the DNA evidence they might leave behind.

      Anyways if you want to game this system, do you drink water only where you live, and bring bottles filled at home with you, or just always buy bottled water and never drink tap?

      As others have mentioned they'd probably get a lot of false positives from the local bottling company.

      I also wonder what if any significance this would have for Historians with ancient jugs of wine, and other spirits? No there aren't human hairs involved, but the isotope chemistry should still hold up.

    4. Re:Forensics by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wish people would watch Law & Order more. Yeah, I'll sometimes sit through an episode of CSI but at the end of it, they always catch the murder and the murder always confesses at the end, saying they just had to kill or some other bullshit.

      OTOH, L&O follows detectives around as they talk to one person who leads them to another and then they go back and, you know, acts like a detective. That and not every episode ends with "Yeah! we got that son of a bitch!" Some have been real downers which does more to stir emotions rather than feeding viewers the same tripe every time.

      Grr.. don't even get me started about those science montages.

      "Hey, writer dudes say they ran out of dialogue. Can we squeeze in 10 minutes of quick cuts of people looking at vials and microscopes set to music in an incredibly dark room with stylized colored lighting that makes no fucking sense at all?"

      "Yeah, no problem."

    5. Re:Forensics by damnfuct · · Score: 1

      And this sort of testing does little to improve security. If we place increased faith in systems that are (possibly wrongfully) assumed to be infallible, it gives the criminal who bypasses the system that much more credibility in his story. On the flip side, the general population loses freedom. It is truly a lose-lose situation.

    6. Re:Forensics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see this science being abused.

      Yes. All scientific advancements have a potential for abuse.

    7. Re:Forensics by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      Thanks to shows like CSI and confidence in science, we want DNA samples, hair, urine, and a billion other things -- and believe that their presence somehow proves or disproves guilt.

      For what it's worth, prosecutors are complaining that due to shows like CSI, juries are more reluctant to accept conventional circumstantial evidence, so it might not be quite that simple.

      Of course, having seen lots of stupid jury decisions going both ways, I'm not sure that I'd actually want a jury trial if I was ever accused of a serious crime.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    8. Re:Forensics by Kenoli · · Score: 1
      I think it has potential uses, but its usefulness is wildly exaggerated in the article:

      Such information could help prosecutors place a suspect at the scene of a crime, or prove the innocence of the accused.

      Evidence that places someone in the general area of a city/region does not place them at the scene of a crime. Also, given the ease at which it can be manipulated, it certainly doesn't prove anything either.

    9. Re:Forensics by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      So basically, you're saying that people should get their comprehension of the legal system not from this fictional show that alters reality for dramatic effect, but instead from this other fictional show that alters reality for dramatic effect. That sounds like a great idea.~

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    10. Re:Forensics by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'd prefer people go with the one that is more grounded in reality than the one that isn't since people seem to take that happens on TV to be reality.

      Teaching people that science isn't fast, clean, or clear would go along way. DNA tests take a long time. No, computers can't magically clear up pictures or zoom on anything that looks shiny to get a clear image of the killer.

      CSI is like junkfood. L&O is like pub food (not to be confused with bar food). Closer to a real meal but still not the best in terms of necessary nutrition or quantity.

    11. Re:Forensics by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer that people not use either show as a basis for their understanding of reality. It's not as if CSI and Law & Order are the only available options for learning about criminal justice.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  17. This by Haffner · · Score: 1

    will never hold up in court.

    --
    "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
  18. Since when are oxygen and hydrogen ... by Nutria · · Score: 1

    considered minerals?

    That's because water molecules differ slightly in their isotope ratios depending on the minerals at their source.

    the human body breaks down water's constituent atoms of hydrogen and oxygen to construct the proteins

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:Since when are oxygen and hydrogen ... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      The two statements are not directly related to each other except that they relate to the water.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:Since when are oxygen and hydrogen ... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Source, when it comes to natural water, refers to the headwaters. Thus, this sentence says that the isotope ratios of water vary depending on the minerals present in the ground where the water fell out of the air originally. The second sentence is poorly worded and should have said that the human body breaks down water into its constituent atoms of hydrogen and oxygen to construct the proteins. As a result, you can tell from the isotope ratio in the water where it fell originally.

      HTH.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:Since when are oxygen and hydrogen ... by selven · · Score: 1, Informative

      1) Water at spring A has more calcium (a mineral) than water at spring B

      2) Because of this, and some chemical processes, the water at spring A has a higher percentage of heavy water (deuterium oxide) than the water at spring B (this has a 50%+ chance of being incorrect, but let's stick with it for the example's sake)

      3) Person X consumes water from spring A and person Y consumes water from spring B.

      4) The metabolisms of the two persons break down the water and put it into the proteins in their respective cells.

      5) Person X has more deuterium in his cells than person Y.

      Hope that helps clear things up.

    4. Re:Since when are oxygen and hydrogen ... by blueg3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nope. Different isotopes of the same element have the same chemistry, so chemical processes won't alter isotope ratios. This is an important feature of using isotopes as tracers, since generally the tracer elements will be subject to a lot of chemical processes -- like being absorbed into the body and incorporated in to hair.

      It turns out that TFA (which is just a bad summary of an actual paper) appears to have introduced the "minerals" bit. Minerals aren't involved; different water sources just have different hydrogen and oxygen isotope ratios.

    5. Re:Since when are oxygen and hydrogen ... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      since they are neither animal or vegetable?

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  19. Ever seen a Commie drink a glass of water? by PatPending · · Score: 3, Funny

    General Jack D. Ripper: Mandrake, have you ever seen a Commie drink a glass of water?

    Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Well, no, I can't say I have.

    --
    What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    1. Re:Ever seen a Commie drink a glass of water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I scrolled and scrolled to find the Dr. Strangelove comments.
      Are slashdotters not concerned about their bodily fluids?

    2. Re:Ever seen a Commie drink a glass of water? by balbus000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I only drink the blood of my enemies.

      And occasionally a strawberry Yoo-hoo.

  20. old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Abby already used it to locate Agent Lee's 'daughter' - old news..

  21. You've got to be kidding me. by VorpalRodent · · Score: 1

    And what if the minerals at the source of the water are appreciably the same? Reliably being tracked back to a handful of collection sites across the US doesn't exactly equate to "placing someone at the scene of a crime".

    If you look at the heat map included with the article, the entirety of Florida is indicated as having the same expected water composition. Similarly for most of Texas, and wide swaths of the Midwest / Central US.

    So if someone commits a crime in Tallahassee, and I buy bottled water at Disney World, I must have done it. The same goes for proving of innocence. If I drink only bottled water that comes from a neighboring state, because it tastes better, is that sufficient evidence that I didn't murder the guy, because I was obviously in Minnesota at the time?

    I'd be interested in knowing the rate at which the water is added to the hair, and how finely it can be read. Can we tell if someone drinks water with different compositions each day for a month? Can we tell what water he drank last week?

    I'm just going to put on my tinfoil hat and start shaving my head...then no one will be able to tell what kind of water I drink.

    --
    Take it to the limit, everybody to the limit, come on, everybody fhqwhgads.
    1. Re:You've got to be kidding me. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The whole "This could solve crimes" thing is really overblown here. I mean technically it could conceivably be used as evidence, but I could imagine it being a little more useful for forensic identification. If you have no idea who someone is, knowing that they probably lived in Denver until 3 weeks ago before moving to New York is going to narrow down your possibilities considerably. NO good on its own still, but it's another tool to use.

    2. Re:You've got to be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh crap. And I thought she was shaving her pubes for ME....

  22. Prove you were in Atlanta by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    "There a murder in Atlanta, and I can prove from your hair sample and this expensive test that you were in Atlanta at some point!"

    "Or you proved that I drank a bunch of Coke bottled in Atlanta, and that you like to waste tax payer dollars on silly tests which prove nothing."

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Prove you were in Atlanta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There a murder in Atlanta, and I can prove from your hair sample and this expensive test that you were in Atlanta at some point!"

      "Or you proved that I drank a bunch of Coke bottled in Atlanta, and that you like to waste tax payer dollars on silly tests which prove nothing."

      The only way you'd get Coke bottled in Atlanta is if you were in Atlanta. They mix and bottle soda all over the world, with plants in every city.

  23. ... can preserve the record of a person's travels. by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    And because the human body breaks down water's constituent atoms of hydrogen and oxygen to construct the proteins that make hair cells, those cells can preserve the record of a person's the travels of things people drink.

    Fixed that for you. This would work if we didn't ship products throughout the country. Get pulled over for a DUI, "Couldn't have been me, check my hair! I've been in Fort Collins!"

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  24. it only shows where the water is from by onionlee · · Score: 1

    considering that many people dont drink tap water, one can easily have been "in florida" by drinking a bottle of zephyrhills water...
    i wonder how drinking soda would affect this

  25. amazingly enough by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    researchers have used this technique to uncover the shocking truth that a small hamlet in southern maine is actually the residence of tens of millions of people

    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=poland%20spring

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:amazingly enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That made me laugh out loud.. Why wasnt this modded up as funny..

    2. Re:amazingly enough by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      Totally unrelated comment, but I grew up around there. Poland Spring (the town) barely even qualifies as a hamlet. The plant is the only thing of note.

      My house as a kid was upstream on that aquifer. We used to get it right out of our tap, and now I pay for it to be delivered. It kills me.

    3. Re:amazingly enough by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Same here... worked at Chipman's Farm in the summers when I was a teen.

      Personally I don't pay for bottled water though. Instead I pay for a softener and and reverse osmosis filter in my house. I wish I had the same water I had in Poland Spring.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  26. Can't catch me by flaming+error · · Score: 2, Funny

    Baldness FTW

    1. Re:Can't catch me by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0

      There are other types of hair that could be used other than on top of your head.

      "Sir, please remove your pants and underwear. We need to get a hair sample from you."

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re:Can't catch me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an avid cyclist it's lucky for me, then, that I wax my "taint".

    3. Re:Can't catch me by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Ok, not sure if this is a joke... but ouch. There has to be some kind of hair remover that's not going to stretch your sack when you use it.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:Can't catch me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baldness FTW

      Unless you're also lacking any kind of pubic hair, body hair, eyebrows, eyelashes, nose hair or ear hair, don't count on not being traceable.

  27. an opportunity for profit... by macbeth66 · · Score: 1

    ... a water bottling plant that bottles water from every major municipalty and mixes them together.

  28. Some BIG assumptions there.... like bottled water. by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I mean, sure, the bottled water will have the same signatures, but what is to say you didn't drink your own bottled water wherever you went? Or things like bottle sodas, and drinks. The best you might be able to do is say that they had drink which used water from XYZ location. It is a far stretch to say that they were in XYZ when they drank it. Heck, there are stores around me which sell bottled water from around the world, and I know I have even tried a few, but I never left my home town, yet it according to this "evidence" I have been to Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Ukraine, Ireland, and Poland...

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  29. Bottled water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some bottled water is tap water, I wonder if that could confuse the method.

  30. Re:nice to know we've solved all the world's probl by ultranova · · Score: 1

    This is so super awesome, I'm going to move to a 3rd word slave state to ensure I get the most oppressive experience possible.

    That is quite unnecessary; the officials in all Western states are working hard to bring the 3rd world here. All we have to do is lose a few more jobs and repeal minimum wage laws and I think we're all set.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  31. Hair grows by mangu · · Score: 1

    you won't be able to tell the difference between, say, a person who lived all year in Illinois (with a moderate isotope ratio) and a person who flies back and forth between Montana and Florida

    Hair grows at a rate of about a couple millimeters per week. Your frequent flier would have striped hair.

    I don't know what's the minimum amount of hair needed for this test, but it's certainly possible to cut hair samples smaller than what it grows during an airplane trip from Montana to Florida.

    1. Re:Hair grows by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how consistently that works. The minerals in your body may not be absorbed at a rate that gives you high enough amounts of precision, and you may be acquiring said minerals from another source, which might also be imported. Also, drug testing results are only good for 90 days (with 30 days being what's admissible in court), and I would think those tests are much simpler, since it's present or not present, not fingerprinting an exact isotope ratio. There are so many potential problems with this that i can't see it being a viable method.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  32. Crap Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a bunch of crap science, how many people in the real world drink enough "water" (pop, juice, etc) from a specific source to leave a protein imprint large enough to be reliable. Throw in bottled water, bottled/canned pop, canned soups/foods (mostly water), varying metabolisms, etc and this "technology" quickly loses all credibility in my opinion. Looks like just another faulty "anti criminal/terrorist" technology meant to make its creators a hefty crate of cash at taxpayer expense.

  33. destroying evidence by uremog · · Score: 1

    so getting a haircut before a trial is now considered destroying evidence

  34. Airport variaty by Zumbs · · Score: 3, Funny

    The airport variaty: Has someone else given you water to drink?

    --
    The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
  35. So...according to this... by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    I spend quite a bit of time in Jalisco, Mexico.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  36. Maximum by Shugart · · Score: 1

    We are approaching maximum bogosity.

    --
    History is so yesterday!
  37. So now I'm from Ireland by Chaymus · · Score: 1

    Thank you precious years of whiskey & Guiness. I can write this trip off my bucket list and they'll have a hard time disproving it.

  38. Fiji water... by oldfogie · · Score: 1

    So, if I drink Fiji Water consistently, they will never be able to prove that I was anywhere near the crime scene?

    COOL!

    1. Re:Fiji water... by Grantbridge · · Score: 1

      So, if I drink Fiji Water consistently, they will never be able to prove that I was anywhere near the crime scene?

      Until the local police in Fiji decide to pin all their unsolved murders on you!

  39. Terrorist water! by md65536 · · Score: 1

    Yet one more thing to fear.

    At least now it makes sense why we're not allowed to bring liquids on planes.

    Report your neighbor to the local homeland security office if you suspect he may be drinking unpatriotic isotopes.

  40. Thats why by jason777 · · Score: 1

    I only drink bottled water. Ha ha ha!

    1. Re:Thats why by OnePumpChump · · Score: 1

      Most of which is just municipal water from a source near you. The only way around this is to drink amazingly environmentally unsound imported water.

    2. Re:Thats why by jason777 · · Score: 1

      What about spring water?

    3. Re:Thats why by OnePumpChump · · Score: 1

      A lot of that is regional, too. (And a lot of what you think is spring water isn't.) You need some worldwide brand that comes from a single source.

  41. Re:Some BIG assumptions there.... like bottled wat by Tekfactory · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've never left the US, Canada and Mexico, but my hair would say I spend a little time each year in Speyside, Scotland drinking water that is anywhere from 12-18 years old, usually Macallan.

  42. Re:Some BIG assumptions there.... like bottled wat by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    To be fair, they do attempt to address that, though they do so only in the average case. Actually a big part of the paper is exactly that: an attempt "to assess the links between purchase location and the isotopic composition of beverages" and given that purchase location may not be the same as bottling location, whether or not "these beverages could have a confounding impact on the overall isotopic composition of a consumer’s fluid intake".

  43. Screening by God_TM · · Score: 1

    They can install sensors that can collect samples from the bathrooms at airports (or onboard airplanes themselves) as everyone needs to go. They can gather the location data and attach it to video showing who went into the bathroom during that time possibly detecting hostiles... If they really wanted to track specific regions, I wonder if they could they add something to the local water supply to give it a very specific isotope ratio?

    1. Re:Screening by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      They can install sensors that can collect samples from the bathrooms at airports (or onboard airplanes themselves) as everyone needs to go.

      And this high tech, extremely expensive system can be overcome by...holding it. You should work for the TSA.

    2. Re:Screening by raovq · · Score: 1

      Thats not correct. My university does a fair amount of isotope data, and there are no sensors. It requires GC-MS instruments (many thousands of dollars) teamed up with liquid nitrogen, combustion chambers, very large cylinders of gas and certified standards. There is no small amount of work in accumulating isotope data for complex (and not so complex) molecules. The data you get is very crude to say the least. Sure, you can tell if someone consumed (not all water is drunk) isotopically heavy or light substances, but that is about the sum of it. Isotopes are processed very differently by different systems in the body (as a rule, heavier isotopes react much slower in biological systems) which confuses the process to the nth degree (these processes are still debated in the simplest of lifeforms, let alone humans). As a scientist, while the technology is real (and has been for a couple of decades), their assertion that the numbers would be in any way meaningful is just fantasy. Put the tin foil hats away.

  44. Murder is easy.... by WonkoS · · Score: 1

    OK, so all you need is an identical twin gullible enough to drink water given to him by you during a trip you bought for him in NYC.... then you go and assassinate the president after having given your twin Washington DC water to drink while you guzzle NYC water at the scene of the crime. Do a quick getaway and finger your twin. The jury will convict in a new york minute.

  45. Stupid by blair1q · · Score: 1

    0.05% of the atoms in my body are replaced by water I drank at the scene of a crime, and the CSIs think they're going to ignore the other 99.95%?

    There is such a thing as contempt of court, you know.

  46. Whisky drinkers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your honor, this person's isotope levels prove conclusively that he has actually lived in Scotland for the past 5 years....

  47. What about bottled drinks? by gknoy · · Score: 1

    If you only drink mainstream bottled beverages, wouldn't that rule out any local factor in what you are drinking? "Well, he looks like he was drinking some beer brewed in Ireland..." Similarly, Dasani/Sparkletts/Arrowhead all have relatively large sales areas, don't they?

  48. Tracking the birds by hipp5 · · Score: 1

    This is already done with birds. I worked at a bird observatory for a little while. We could catch birds in nets, clip a small feather from their wing, and send the samples off to be analyzed. We were able to tell a lot about the travels of our birds based on isotope ratios in their feathers.

  49. Typo - that's "beer is a vegetable" by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Imported, domestic, bottled somewhere across the continent, Rocky Mountain Spring Water, whatever.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  50. Re:Some BIG assumptions there.... like bottled wat by blueg3 · · Score: 1

    Congratulations for coming up with the same obvious problem everyone else did. Did you, by any chance, read the part of the paper where they discuss this problem and its ramifications and then test how well the isotope ratios in tap water function as a proxy for the isotope ratios in purchased bottled beverages?

  51. Is shaving your head destroying evidence? by billstewart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd say the "identifying where a bottle of water is from" part may have some scientific validity. Assuming that the isotope ratios in the oxygen molecules in your blood match the water you're drinking is more dubious - you're also breathing air, which may have different ratios, plus your body would also be exchanging liquids between cells and bloodstream, so there's a long slow storage period. How that relates by the time the stuff gets out to your hair is even more speculative. The real question is how much was speculation by the scientists, and how much by the reporter.

    But yeah, terrorists are going to start drinking bottled water, and the real trick is that you'll be able to identify terrorists by all the water bottles in the trash. Or, wait, was that terrorists or tourists? Hard to tell the difference sometimes...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  52. So will my fondness for Guinness... by rwyoder · · Score: 1

    ...provide evidence that I've been living in Ireland all these years?

    1. Re:So will my fondness for Guinness... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      ...provide evidence that I've been living in Ireland all these years?

      Brewed under license... New South Wales.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  53. allergy to water by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    Well, one of Polish kings, Leszek Bialy, sent the pope an opinion of his medics that claimed that he suffers from an allergy to water, and, because during a campaign in Palestine an uninterrupted supply of beer or wine would be hard to assure, he can't go to the crusade there.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    1. Re:allergy to water by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Back in those days, beer and wine was safer to drink than water because the alcohol would kill all the organisms that made you sick.

  54. I'm untrackable, then, because... by macraig · · Score: 1

    ... I only drink distilled water.

    (Yes, I really do. I don't like the taste of mineralized "drinking" or tap water, and contrary to marketing the mineralization has no health benefits.)

    1. Re:I'm untrackable, then, because... by Americano · · Score: 1

      So distilled water has no isotopes of Hydrogen and Oxygen in it at all? Man, you must get thirsty drinking that.

    2. Re:I'm untrackable, then, because... by macraig · · Score: 1

      So what if it does? I know, you think you're being funny, but really. They won't be isotopes indicative of where I am or live, will they? They'd be indicative of whatever water source the distiller (Niagara, DS Waters) is using. So DHS would wind up sending the troops to some place on the other side of the country.

    3. Re:I'm untrackable, then, because... by Americano · · Score: 1

      Yeah it was a joke, intended to point out that "isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen" are not removed by distilling the water, because the water is made up of those "isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen."

      Most bottled water you buy is bottled very near to the point of purchase, so it would still probably give a decent location as long as the signature was good enough to not provide 500 possible matches.

      As has already been discussed ad nauseam here, the technique as described wouldn't allow them to track your location by the minute, but the isotope "signature" would be just as present in your hair as it would be in the hair of anybody else who drinks bottled water or anything else - distillation would do nothing more to affect the outcome than drinking anything else that's not tap water water directly from your sink.

  55. The perfect crime... by kiehlster · · Score: 1

    As long as I order Saratoga water when I'm out of town, I would appear to forensics as having never left home. And I'll shave my head for good measure.

  56. Someone needs a chemistry refresher by therealkevinkretz · · Score: 1

    The human body does *not* "[break] down water's constituent atoms of hydrogen and oxygen to construct the proteins ..." Not, that is, unless I misunderstood the definition of "nuclear biology".

  57. Quit Calling it That! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    Or frame someone by slipping them water from every country on the terrorist watchlist.

    Small detail, but it still peeves me:

    Countries aren't on the terrorist watch list, people are.

    Countries are on the State Sponsors of Terror list.

  58. Re:... can preserve the record of a person's trave by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

    ...those cells can preserve the record of a person's the travels of things people drink.

    Fixed that for you.

    You not only fixed it, you also exploded the heads of at least a dozen grammar nazis.

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  59. Bald will be the new radical by harl · · Score: 1

    For obvious reasons bald is the next rebellious hair style.

    --
    I find being offended by me offensive.
  60. You hate America if you.. by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    Drink only bottled water, what are you hiding?

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  61. I was warned of this 33 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was on a ship in the USMC back in '77, an officer told me that the Pepsi cans I was throwing overboard could float indefinitely, allowing the Russkies to track us via radar. I was shown how to rip the can in the middle to guarantee it sank.

  62. Re:... can preserve the record of a person's trave by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    Yea, it was supposed to have strikethrough, but I stubmitted before preview.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  63. Precious bodily fluids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mandrake. Mandrake, have you never wondered why I drink only distilled water, or rain water, and only pure-grain alcohol?

  64. Need to disguise your travels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neutron Water! For that fresh-from-the-powerplant glow!

  65. "Deep protected wells in Southern California" by Katchu · · Score: 1

    huh. I gotta stop drinking this bottled water. I reside in Colorado but could get tied to activities "deep" in Southern California.

    --
    Keep Doing Good.
  66. Re:Some BIG assumptions there.... like bottled wat by Sulphur · · Score: 1

    He leadeth me past the distilled waters.

    --

    Doctor to patient with carboy on lap: When I said I wanted a sample of your water, I did not mean tap water.

  67. Drink your own urine or someone else's by Ranger · · Score: 1

    and no one will want to follow you.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  68. This is old stuff by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

    Isotope-tracing methods have been existing for a long time. My thesis work (1987) concerned the development of an isotope-sensitive analytical method. We used it for analyzing fly ashes dispersed in the atmosphere by power plants. I remember that by looking at the isotope fingerprints of the dust found in a few cubic meters of air we could pinpoint which plant in Europe was emitting it.

  69. could you confirm the rumor? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    that poland spring is on top of a dump?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poland_spring#Controversies

    In June 2003, Poland Spring was sued for false advertising in a class action lawsuit charging that their water that supposedly comes from springs, is in fact heavily treated common ground water.[8] The suit also states, hydro-geologists hired by Nestlé found that another current source for Poland Spring water near the original site stands over a former trash and refuse dump, and below an illegal disposal site where human sewage was sprayed as fertilizer for many years.[8] The suit was settled in September 2003, with the company not admitting to the allegations, but agreeing to pay $10 million in charity donations and discounts over the next 5 years.[9] Nestlé continues to sell the same Maine water under the Poland Springs name.

    that's one of those factoids that is either a 100% true hilarious joke on us all or a massively bold faced smear, i can't decide which

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  70. Don't count on it... by Temkin · · Score: 1

    Having actually worked in next door to a oxygen isotope lab, and having seen just how painstakingly difficult it is to do Oxygen mass spectrometry correctly...

    I'm not worried about this getting abused any time soon.

  71. This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you're drinking from a well this can't place you at an exact location. And it certainly won't place you there at a precise time.

  72. must stay one month to be detectable by Herve5 · · Score: 1

    The original paper hardly discusses the hair-tracking aspect (concentrates on describing how different cities are indeed "separable"), but it refers to an earlier paper, http://www.pnas.org/content/105/8/2788.full , where actually there is a time diagram extracted from one single hair.

    The diagram shows the isotopic signature along the hair, checked at 4-weeks intervals, for a guy which went from China to the US: there is a clear break in the curve at the time of the moving.

    But the timescale is also clearly at least one month (below, you just stay within the noise).

    So, if you cross the States one single day to kill him, and have a drink at the airport before flying back, this will definitely not be detected ;-)
    OTOH this may help you proof you definitely came to visit me a full month last year...

    --
    Herve S.