Slashdot Mirror
Grigory Perelman Turns Down $1M Millennium Prize
Kleiba writes "After turning down the prestigious Field Medal in 2006 for his contributions to mathematics, the reclusive Russian mathematician Grigory Perelman announced yesterday that he is rejecting a $1 million Millennium Prize from the Clay Mathematics Institute for solving the Poincare conjecture."
Yeah, and do you know why? Because this guy believes that most advancements in science are cooperative efforts, and that recognizing individuals for merely putting the last piece in the jigsaw puzzle is intellectually dishonest: It devalues the work of everyone else who contributed.
#fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
There aren't too many of 'em left out there. I wouldn't be surprised if he had requested his name to be withheld from being publicly acknowledged.
Living With a Nerd
Didn't he reject the award repeatedly, over the past few years, every time he was asked? Why are people still annoying the poor guy?
he thinks he doesn't deserve the lion's share of the prize because there were others who contributed to his (their) achievement
the man has principles, that's for sure
all of our work, whatever we do, whether science, math, movies, music... we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, or on the shoulders of those working right next to us. often recognition for making a contribution is just a matter of luck, of being the one who accumulates the most media coverage for being at the tipping point when there was a tipping point to be had (as if anyone knows where or when the tipping points lie)
not that i'm denigrating grigory's contributions. HE is denigrating his own contributions. a genuinely humble man, even in the face of a cool million. he's more of an ascetic than i could ever be. he's married to his intellectual pursuits, he's foregone earthly indulgences because they will just get in the way of all he cares about doing. he knows that the money will ruin his mental discipline. locking himself in a room with his mind out of genuine intellectual passion
i admire him, i could never do that. i like the earthly indulgences too much
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
Oh, you don't have the kdawson->English plugin installed, do you?
Haida Manga
I was under the impression that he publicly stated why he wouldnt accept the money, and it was basically:
"If I had that money then I would feel compelled to use it to do good charitable things, but what I really want to with my life is more math and as such, that money would be a burden"
"His name was James Damore."
Millennium. Two Ns. From Latin "mille", thousand, and "annus", year. A thousand years.
If you write it with only one N, it would be derived from mille and anus, which would be "a thousand assholes".
First off, charities can get quite political.
This guy doesn't see of it as his money to determine where it ends up. He is just doing his part. He does not require a monetary award for his actions, he believes the benefit will come from him doing his work.
He's not a mathmetician for his own benefit, so he's basically trying to say that by saying "Take the money out of the equation".
Haha, see what I did there?
is pretty damn proud of him, for doing the math, AND rejecting the prize
his value system came from somewhere
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
And the only reason they took him seriously was from past work. So in other words; if someone cracks an astounding math problem and they don't know you; they will ignore you because you did not "follow their procedures"; even though your work might be the basis for faster than light travel or some current science fiction technology. What a bunch of self absorbed petty cry babies. They remind me of the scientists in HHGTTG for hanging the guy that created the infinite improbability drive; simply because they didn't like a smart-ass.
My karma is not a Chameleon.
Taxes would be a bitch. It's better to not exchange money in the first place.
How about they put the prize money into a scholarship fund. Surely he couldn't object to this. He could outline the type of benefactor he'd like to receive a stipend from time to time and leave the actual selection to a committee formed by associates of the Millennium Prize board.
rejecting the money is selfish, accepting the money is selfish, giving it to his mom is selfish, keeping it from his mom is selfish, etc. it all depends upon the motivation
all that i am saying is that the apple doesn't fall far from the tree, so therefore whatever his motivation for rejecting the money, his mother probably shares the same motivations in her personality. therefore it is likely that she would be happiest with him rejecting the money. giving the money to his mother may very well be the absolute worst thing in the world he could ever do to his mother
so don't assume that your perspective is the only perspective that matters in situations like this, especially since you are not even in the situation. people are different, potentially very different from your own personality
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
"If you're so smart, why ain't you rich?"
.
Prisencolinensinainciusol. Ol Rait!
it's Field*s* Medal. Named after the Canadian mathematician, John Charles Fields.
Not Field Medal.
Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
It's an amazing demonstration of intellectual honesty. I'm in no way denigrating his contribution but the essential breakthrough was made by Hamilton's use of the Ricci Flow. However he's no doubt brilliant and the beauty of his solution seems to be enough for him.
Shut up, twat.
Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
Forget charity - if he doesn't want the award, he could give it to his mother. Perelman isn't just great at math, he's also a weird guy and a hermit. In his case, he's living with his elderly mother whose main source of income is her pension, which is not a lot in Russia. He's being offered more than enough money to cover his mother's living and medicine costs, it would be a very prudent thing to do.
Narrator: Meanwhile, at the International Conference of Mathematics...
(In a oak-walled conference room, about two dozen bearded and bespeckled men gathered around a long table, cluttered with papers, a large blackboard on the wall full of figures, cross-outs and erase marks. The man at the center of the table stands from his chair and wearily proclaims:)
Conference Leader: Well, gentlemen, I fear a solution to the Riemann hypothesis eludes us once again...
(Suddenly, a masked man bursts through the conference room doors.)
All: It's the Lone Mathematician!
LM: Gentlemen, I believe this is what you're looking for! (Slaps a paper on the desk. They all look down at it, then look up astonished)
All: A solution to the Riemann hypothesis! BUT HOW!?
CL (holding up the paper): So elegant and precise, and yet so simple! You're a man of true genius!
LM: I'm merely standing on the shoulders of giants, gentlemen.
(The Lone Mathematician gracefully leaps onto a nearby windowsill and steps out. They all run to the window and look down, seeing that he has jumped onto the back of a horse in the courtyard.)
LM (riding off): Hi Ho Sliderule, Away!!
CL: Who was that masked man? I wanted to thank him...
.
Prisencolinensinainciusol. Ol Rait!
Perelman's character and sense of personal integrity is as good as his mathematics, if not better!
Its a bit of a shame he chooses to be so reclusive as so many of us could learn from this man.
Yeah we should give him a prize or sth. Oh, wait...
Has anyone tried presenting him with a simple bouquet of flowers?
Loose lips lose spit.