Slashdot Mirror


The Search For the Mount Everest of Caves

NoMeansYes writes "An interview with James Tabor, author of the new best-selling book Blind Descent, introduces a pair of accomplished scientists — American Bill Stone and Ukranian geologist Alexander Klimchouk — who are the two most prominent figures in extreme caving. Both have figured prominently in the ongoing quest to discover the deepest cave on earth. Tabor describes what conditions are like inside supercaves like Cheve (-4,869 feet) and Krubera (-7,188 feet), before discussing Stone and his far-reaching technological innovations. These include the Posideon Discovery Rebreather and NASA's ENDURANCE. Extreme caving probably won't remain underground (so to speak) much longer, however. The article notes that James Cameron is planning to release a 3D film next year about extreme cave divers."

233 comments

  1. 3D by Cameron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh not again!!

    1. Re:3D by Cameron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That guy is like Crytek. He makes movies that look good but have a crappy story. Though, at least Far Cry was pretty innovative with the gameplay.

    2. Re:3D by Cameron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pre-Titanic, he used to get the story part right, too.

    3. Re:3D by Cameron? by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      Oh great.

      A movie about spelunkery. What could possibly go wrong?

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    4. Re:3D by Cameron? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      If they can dive 7000 feet, then they could reach the BP wellhead.

    5. Re:3D by Cameron? by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      Just be thankful it's not Michael "Baysplosion" Bay doing it!

    6. Re:3D by Cameron? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Funny

      When my wife and daughter were out of town I watched Transformers 3 (or was it 2?) using the video projector she uses for her lectures and 5.1 system cobbled together from my stereo and the speakers and subwoofer from my home recording studio.. There were so many loud explosions it made by puppy pee on the carpet, which it hasn't done for six months.

      I may have spotted a little bit too, but that was because of Megan Fox's impressive mating display.

      The acting by the stars was brilliant, but the humans weren't nearly as good. Although Megan's heiny was acting up a storm. As a tuchus, it has remarkable expressive range.

      If any of you mention to my wife that I watched a Transformers, I'll have to kick your ass. Her opinion of my intellect is already low enough, thank you very much.

      I also watched The Sacrifice by Andrei Tarkovsky, and all things being equal, I liked the Transformers better, despite The Sacrifice's Palme d'Or at Cannes. What, you got a fuckin' problem with that? I don't care what you say, Tarkovsky should have used more explosions.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:3D by Cameron? by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm the only one who loved Avatar:-/ Or one of the few that admits it in the geek circles.

      I do recognize the downfallings like somewhat 2d characters (though as an epic much better than Emmerich's total cookie cutter films whose formula seems to be rinse and repeat).

    8. Re:3D by Cameron? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Tarkovsky should have used more explosions.

      http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/07/he-hates-your-favourite-movie/

    9. Re:3D by Cameron? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Informative

      If they can dive 7000 feet, then they could reach the BP wellhead.

      Read this. The depth is measured relative to the cave mouth and the deepest cave involved a 46m dive at the bottom. You cannot dive 2000+m all the way in water because the pressure will be ~200 times atmosphere and you will be crushed. Since air is ~1,000 less dense a 2,000m heigh drop in air is about the same as being under 2m of water which is why cavers and potholers can make it to such depths but deep sea divers cannot.

    10. Re:3D by Cameron? by cynyr · · Score: 1

      I thought the special effects were very good, WETA has come along way. As for the story it was very very very flat.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    11. Re:3D by Cameron? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      If they just cut out the character development and anvilicious Pocahontas-meets-Fern-Gully storyline, and instead added a voiceover by Richard Attenborough, it'd be an absolute smash hit.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    12. Re:3D by Cameron? by rhathar · · Score: 1

      That's a fantastic idea, then they might have actually made some money with the movie, as opposed to the measly 2.7 billion they made instead.

      --
      http://www.chaotickingdoms.com
    13. Re:3D by Cameron? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      I didn't say "absolute smash hit unlike the flop that it was". I'm well aware that the movie is very successful. I was just saying that an Attenborough-style documentary about the human tech and the ecosystem of Pandora would be more interesting (to me, at least) than the movie was. I'd submit that it's the vividly imagined world and the possibilities that consciousness uploading affords that form the basis for the movie's success.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    14. Re:3D by Cameron? by pipingguy · · Score: 1, Troll

      At those pressures your lungs are working very hard. Real deep divers breathe a combination of O2 and He. You are aspiring about 21% oxygen and 72% nitrogen at this moment. Unless you are in Mom's basement. CO2 is denser than air, so it collects in basements and other low-lying regions. CO2 constitutes 0.0390% of earth's atmosphere, so it is obviously a gas that threatens humanity.

    15. Re:3D by Cameron? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Titanic's story and writing wasn't bad. It was a cheesy love story, told in a somewhat non-linear format, with a pretty painfully obvious MacGuffin. It was a pre/teen love story. But in the pantheon of Twilight and Ever After, Titanic was actually at the upper-end for writing in the genre.

      And after Titanic was Dark Angel. Some of the writing of Dark Angel wasn't terrible, though Jessica Alba struggled with the role a bit.

      Really, the only truly terrible writing that Cameron is responsible for is Avatar, (and some cringe-worthy lines in True Lies).

    16. Re:3D by Cameron? by Jaknet · · Score: 4, Informative

      You cannot dive 2000+m all the way in water because the pressure will be ~200 times atmosphere and you will be crushed.

      You don't get crushed by the pressure as your body is mainly water/fluids and the air spaces you have are equalised whilst you are breathing.,

      The reason for not being able (yet) to dive to these depths is the fact that even with extreme technical diving gas mixes the air becomes toxic well before these depths. The O2 in normal air "approx 21%" starts to become dangerous at depths below 60m with a rapidly increasing risk of central nervous system toxicity leading to convulsions, blackouts and drowning. This is why technical divers have to change gas mixes as they go deeper with each mix having a much lower % of O2. That's without even taking into account the problems of removing the massive amounts of Nitrogen absorbed by the body and the problems that the Helium added to replace the O2 gives to the body as well.

      The current depth record of open circuit diving is around 300m and even that still included over 9 hours of stops on the ascent to off-gas safely.

    17. Re:3D by Cameron? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't forget partial pressures of gases. In effect, putting the oxygen under to much pressure can result in a "dieseling" effect. When using exotic atmospheric gas mixtures, the goal is not only to remove potentially harmful gases, but also to control the partial pressure of oxygen itself.

      Definition:

      The pressure a gas would have if it alone occupied the space in which it is being measured.

      For example: Air is 21% oxygen and therefore the partial pressure of oxygen in air at the surface is 0.21, meaning that it would occupy 0.21 of the space on the surface. As depth increases, pressure increases so that at 10 meters (33 feet) of sea water surface pressure is doubled and air pressure is also doubled. This means that while air still occupies 21% of the volume it is now twice as dense and it's partial pressure is now 0.42. The partial pressure of oxygen reaches 1.0 at approximately 37.6 meters (123 feet) and at this depth breathing air is the equivalent of breathing pure oxygen on the surface.

      http://scuba.about.com/od/scubaterminology/g/partialpressure.htm

      There are probably better links out there, feel free to use Google to satisfy your curiosity. ;^)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    18. Re:3D by Cameron? by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1

      It'd be DAVID Attenborough for the voice-over, as in "Life On Earth", not his brother Dickie, I think.

      .

      --
      They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
    19. Re:3D by Cameron? by data2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You would not be crushed. Your body largely consists of fluids, which are hardly compressible. All your gas-filled orifices and holes are connected to your breathing tract, so that, using some form of compressed air, you can counter balance the pressure.
      What is more of a problem is the narcosis all gases cause. With normal compressed air, the effects start at about 30m of water column. At about 65m, you get to a depth where compressed air contains so much oxygen that it gets lethal.
      So deep divers use different mixes for going down, when they are at depth and for decompression. Very deep dives have only limited amounts of oxygen, which would kill one at normal pressure due to hypoxy. There were experiments in pressure chambers, where all nitrogen was replaced by hydrogen, and one "diver" managed to go to 700m (>2000ft), but because of the decompression phase, the whole dive took >45 days to complete. This depth is also assumed the theoretical limit for current gases, although the deepest water dive was (only) to about 500m.

    20. Re:3D by Cameron? by data2 · · Score: 1

      I have to correct you on this. A team of research divers managed to go to about 500m. 300m is the record for private divers, who fund the efforts themselves or through sponsors.

    21. Re:3D by Cameron? by captainpanic · · Score: 1

      If they can dive 7000 feet, then they could reach the BP wellhead.

      They don't dive. They climb most of the way (through air). The story says that:

      Then in October 2004, Ukranian Alexander Klimchouk, who holds a doctorate in hydrogeology, reached the dry bottom of the world (6,825 feet) inside Krubera (KRU-bera), which is found within the Arabika Massif in the western Caucasus Mountains, in a region of Abkhazia in southeastern Republic of Georgia. (In August 2006, Ukranian cave diver Gennadiy Samokhin reached Krubera’s ultimate depth of 7,188 feet.)

      ... which means that the actual dive was 111 meters (363 ft) in depth. Nothing special in means of depth (only special because it was in a bloody deep cave in the dark with pointy rocks, dust and creepy monsters that nibble on your toes)

      To reach the BP well, they could of course remove all the ocean to make it similarly easy.

    22. Re:3D by Cameron? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      according to the head company they actually only made 5 million rubles. something about selling all the rights to a seperate corporation to hold the assests.

      If harry Potter movies have made less than $100 million combined than Avatar is no where close to $2.7 billion.

      don't you love hollywood accounting? They make Golden Sachs and Enron look legit.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    23. Re:3D by Cameron? by f3rret · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well someone could call 'spelunking' 'spelunkery'.

      Oh an according to that James Tabor dude, serious cavers hate the term 'spelunking'; personally I love it but ten again I rarely go diving into moist caves.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    24. Re:3D by Cameron? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...to much pressure can result in a "dieseling" effect.

      Not to be confused with the Vin Dieseling effect, characterized as a downward pressure on movie quality due to actor selection -- "Pitch Black" not withstanding. :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    25. Re:3D by Cameron? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Thank you sir.

      Not a cave, but Lake Peigneur http://home.versatel.nl/the_sims/rig/lakepeigneur.htm

    26. Re:3D by Cameron? by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 0

      If wearing golden socks is wrong, I don't wanna be right.

    27. Re:3D by Cameron? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I still say Titanic should have kept the working title, Lesbians on a Boat.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    28. Re:3D by Cameron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought I was watching Ferngully on the floor of my 1st grade classroom again. As visually spectacular as it was, the story was entirely too rehashed and boring.

    29. Re:3D by Cameron? by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

      You don't get crushed by the pressure as your body is mainly water/fluids and the air spaces you have are equalised whilst you are breathing.

      Actually, Your body can not maintain pressure and you would in fact be crushed. Deep dive suits maintain pressure and if at any time your suit become compromised you instantly become mush.

      Source.

    30. Re:3D by Cameron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid I have even more bad news to add.

      Once the pressure gets high enough, even INERT gases become toxic. (Just google nitrogen narcosis.)

    31. Re:3D by Cameron? by Dishevel · · Score: 0, Troll
      You are a NAZI!

      Er, I mean "Climate Change DENIER!"

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    32. Re:3D by Cameron? by stevediver · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Deep diving is extremely dangerous and requires exotic blends of gases that vary with depth range. The deepest ocean dive that has ever been recorded was in 1988 to a depth of 534 meters. It was done in the Mediterranean by a team of divers from COMEX using a mixture of Hydrogen, Helium, and Oxygen. The gas mixture must balance the physiological effects of each gas component in terms of narcosis and metabolic needs. All gases, even "inert" ones have effects on the nervous system. The physical nature of these effects is largely unknown, but they likely stem from the differing solubility of each component in various parts of the body. There is some literature that makes the case that the narcotic effect of a gas depends on its lipid solubility with the suspected mechanism being that the dissolved gas molecules lodge in cell membranes and change their physical properties affecting neuro-transmission. The deepest "chamber dive" was to 701 meters which took 43 days to perform the decompression. You get more into at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturation_diving and http://www.techdiver.ws/exotic_gases.shtml It is possible (likely?) that these records have been surpassed by the military, but as far as we know it is physically impossible for a diver to survive at the depth of Deepwater Horizon rig, let alone do useful work.

    33. Re:3D by Cameron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misunderstand what is happening. They vented off the air pressure in a "cut hose" simulation and reduced the interior of the suit to atmospheric in that video.

    34. Re:3D by Cameron? by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Yes, because of the "air space" that is the helmet, the pressure in it became lower compared to the pressure of the water. Had there been no air space, there'd have been no squishing because pressure would be the same all over and there'd have been no place to squish you into.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
  2. I wonder if they'll find... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    any underground cities ruled by a matriarchal society of scantily clad spider-worshipers?

    1. Re:I wonder if they'll find... by JDeane · · Score: 1

      Lolth will not be pleased that you have exposed her plans!!!

    2. Re:I wonder if they'll find... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'd think someone with a name like Lolth would have a sense of humor about it.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    3. Re:I wonder if they'll find... by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      Mod Parent +1 Funny. /never have Karma when i truly want to give it

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  3. Cameron's Extreme Cave Divers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Features blue characters much like his last film Avatar, however in this case it's due to a lack of oxygen.

    1. Re:Cameron's Extreme Cave Divers by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Funny

      Features blue characters much like his last film Avatar, however in this case it's due to a lack of oxygen

      Which they overcome by embracing the wisdom of the natives. In the end, the protagonist (a white man) will become better at caving than even the natives, thus showing us again that Cameron thinks white men are the best at everything they do.

    2. Re:Cameron's Extreme Cave Divers by BigDXLT · · Score: 0

      Well, prove him otherwise. Make a movie where the non-white guy/gal/it proves he's better than the white guys at something. Go ahead, do it, make a bazillion dollars at the same time.

    3. Re:Cameron's Extreme Cave Divers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean eighty or ninety percent of sports movies?

    4. Re:Cameron's Extreme Cave Divers by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Funny

      Features blue characters much like his last film Avatar, however in this case it's due to a lack of oxygen.

      It might also be due to methemoglobinemia.

      I saw the Blue Man Group recently, and I wondered if they each applied their own makeup or if they blue each other.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Cameron's Extreme Cave Divers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one else blue Tobias Fünke on Arrested Development, so he must be quite talented.

    6. Re:Cameron's Extreme Cave Divers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or The Brave Little Toaster.

    7. Re:Cameron's Extreme Cave Divers by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do sports count as "doing something"? I would say no, but I've already been accused of being an opinionated old bastard.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    8. Re:Cameron's Extreme Cave Divers by silentcoder · · Score: 2, Funny

      Four words:
      White men can't jump.

      (Unless you count contractions as double-words because then it's five words).

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    9. Re:Cameron's Extreme Cave Divers by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      LOL. Where are my mod points when I need them?

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    10. Re:Cameron's Extreme Cave Divers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cameron thinks white men are the best at everything they do

      I guess he hasn't seen a welfare line lately.

    11. Re:Cameron's Extreme Cave Divers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since 'can't' can be expanded into 'cannot' as well as 'can not' four words are fine either way.

    12. Re:Cameron's Extreme Cave Divers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so glad someone made a movie about blue people in the jungle. That hasn't been done since the Smurfs, and it was high time.

      I can't wait for the next vampire movie. I hear it's written about school children, by school children. It's about a bully vampire and a hero vampire that vanquishes the bully vampire in a final vampire showdown near the swings. It's supposed to be eff'in bad-ass. The teachers are all vampires too, except the principal who's a lawyer. But they can only go on the playground at night, to hump stray dogs, except the principal who fancies Swissies -- he's called the day-humper. But then one of the teachers, who's actually a gay, midget vampire, falls in love with one the dogs, but the dog won't reciprocate, and the gay midget cannot restrain his unyielding love. In the end they all die then get married to appease the stupid, deluded chicks in audience, who post-poned their shopping trip to see the movie.

      I can't wait to see Avatar part 2, where the blue people open a casino and George Clooney and a gang of vampire yoga instructors who just graduated from the police academy, rob them.

  4. There's a reason they call it extreme by DJRumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Something as simple as stirring up some dust can mean death to a cave diver. It takes a special kind of person (nut) to do this. I watched a few specials on this and how easy it is to die. All I've got to say is that it must take a pair the size of the the former twin towers. I'm not fearful of enclosed spaces in the slightest, but this is just insane. On top of that, if you manage to get that deep, you have to account for the trip back, meaning if you exceed your air supply by getting lost in dirty water, or any other number of potential gotchas, you could easily end up overstaying your welcome and just not have enough time to get back out again.

    I could actually see myself paying for a feature film about this. Not out of an interest in doing it myself, but seeing the extreme conditions man will venture into to quench an unstoppable curiosity.

    1. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      And whatever you do, never ever call them "spelunkers".

      They hate that.

    2. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      And whatever you do, never ever call them "spelunkers".

      They hate that.

      Seriously, everybody is just way to sensitive these days.

    3. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, everybody is just way to sensitive these days.

      Hey! I'm in that group, and I sure don't appreciate you saying that. Take it back, hater, or I'll banish you to the lost world, 20 000 leagues under the sea, at the center of the Earth.

    4. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by moderatorrater · · Score: 5, Insightful

      seeing the extreme conditions man will venture into to quench an unstoppable curiosity.

      Or to get chicks. Some people will do anything to impress chicks.

    5. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by OttoErotic · · Score: 3, Funny

      On top of that, if you manage to get that deep, you have to account for the trip back, meaning if you exceed your air supply by getting lost in dirty water, or any other number of potential gotchas, you could easily end up overstaying your welcome and just not have enough time to get back out again.

      That's what she said.

      --
      "Once in Hawaii I had sex with a 102 year old male turtle. It is difficult to argue that it was consensual." - Steve Ma
    6. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by mad.frog · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's true (at least in the USA)... for whatever reason, avid cavers call themselves "cavers", and use "spelunkers" to refer to people who enter caves without the proper equipment or training. Thus, at caving conventions you see bumper stickers that read "Cavers Rescue Spelunkers"...

    7. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by swb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It'd be nuts to "free" dive in caves, without a rope or some other guide back. For these extreme dives you'd think they'd also work their way down with spare air tanks so they never had to worry about going all the way back up to the top, just back to the last air tank drop.

      I also wonder if they couldn't engineer some kind of capsule that could be inflated in a larger chamber to serve as a base on longer dives, possibly with an air line from the surface, sort of a base camp.

      Regardless, you gotta really not have even a hint of claustrophobia. I usually enjoy cave tours, mine tours and that sort of underground thing but the idea of diving in a cave makes me sick to my stomach nervous.

    8. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by zippthorne · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've done it.

      Dust can mean death, but the real enemy is complacency. If you get a few dives in you and you start to skip steps, that's where the dust (silt/clay, actually. Sandy bottoms aren't as big of a danger) cloud (blowout) can cause problems. or if you start doing it without the proper training (i.e. learning from everyone else's mistakes instead of repeating them. It's critical to learn from others' mistakes when a small mistake can be fatal.) you can achieve similar results.

      Just stirring up silt shouldn't do anything worse than just end your dive (or in a popular cave, piss off other divers who will also have to end their dives early....) - you follow the line you'd been laying back out of the cave. A lot of the training is training yourself to be comfortable in disorienting black-out conditions, so you make the right choices.

      The problem is that familiarity breeds contempt. It starts out with you not drilling out-of-air emergencies on the surface before every dive, and before you know it you're tying your cave line further and further in instead of starting it in open water every time. You're swimming across gaps without laying line because you didn't bring enough gap reels and you think you're familiar with this part of the cave.

      Then you start using gear that has no business being in a cave: scooters and rebreathers. Both of which can get you further into the cave than have any business being, when complacency causes you to fail to lay the groundwork for your escape in the event of an equipment failure.

      Anyway, my point is that you don't have to be that crazy to dive caves, especially if you don't go that far in, and stick to well-explored areas. but you do have to be vigilant about maintaining both your gear and proficiency. And the reward? You'll have to try it and find out.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    9. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by grantek · · Score: 4, Funny

      They should just admit that the more popular term is "spelunking" (because it sounds cool to say), and go with that. They probably just don't want to cave in to that kind of influence...

    10. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by jd · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would say yes, you could make an inflatable base that could be installed in a cave. You'd need to have some fairly ingenious materials tech to prevent such a capsule from shredding itself on any sharp rocks or being at-risk in general from any uneven surfaces. You'd also need a fair amount of extra air in order for any kind of airlock system to not flood the capsule. Overcoming the pressure sufficiently to expand and then reducing pressure to equalize would also pose technical challenges. However, I see nothing that is actually impossible in any of this. Difficult, yes. Possibly impractical. But not impossible.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    11. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Some people? You mean all of them who penises but aren't attracted to them.

      Men do everything they do in order to get laid.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    12. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, people do this. It doesn't take "balls the size of the former twin towers". It's just training and desire.

      These dive teams leave nothing to chance. Your sixth sentence indicates an ignorance of how these things are really done.

    13. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by Big+Bob+the+Finder · · Score: 4, Informative

      Being a rescue trog myself, the running joke is that "spelunk" is the noise you make hitting the ground when you rappel off the end of your rope.

    14. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by Totally_Tux · · Score: 1

      For these extreme dives you'd think they'd also work their way down with spare air tanks so they never had to worry about going all the way back up to the top, just back to the last air tank drop.

      They already do. Part of the pre-dive plan is to work out how much gas (plus reserve) is required for the dive. If needed additional tanks can be staged further into the cave. Stage tanks are used to provide gas to allow for exit out of a cave.

      I also wonder if they couldn't engineer some kind of capsule that could be inflated in a larger chamber to serve as a base on longer dives, possibly with an air line from the surface, sort of a base camp.

      Yep look at commercial divers doing saturation diving

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturation_diving.

      For cave divers doing long decompression stops, an underwater habitat can be used. This provides some relief from cold water and allow the diver to eat and drink (keep up their energy and metabolism).

      The habitats can be constructed out of a very large metal or sturdy plastic tub, secured to the cave ceiling. The diver removes equipment and once in the habitat can decompress out of the water at the same ambient pressure as the water depth.

      Note that you would only think about doing this if you are spending several hours of decompression in hostile water environment.

      For long linear cave penetration base camp can be set up on dry land (out of the water) in between cave sumps.

    15. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh don't start... You'll dig yourself a hole, and find yourself in deeper than you wished.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    16. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't think turning up at a girl's front door in a re-breather and stating "I'm a real fan of caving" will sound anywhere near as funny to her as it does to him.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    17. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Even those who use 'to' where they ought to be using 'too'?

    18. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by digitig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Men do everything they do in order to get laid.

      Posting to /. just isn't working like we'd all hoped, is it?

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    19. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by data2 · · Score: 1

      And in DIR terminology (DIR= Doing it right = a very strict diving system), "noobs" are refered to as strokes.

    20. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by tokul · · Score: 1

      Or to get chicks. Some people will do anything to impress chicks.

      Stupid chicks might be impressed. If one has some brains, she will understand that she can't have future with such person. He will be MIA one day and she will be left alone with kids, debts and lots of useless stuff that killed her second half.

    21. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Chicks dig deep divers ?

      ...sorry. BTW, in the mountainous city where I used to live (Grenoble, France) a lot of the speleologists I saw were female.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    22. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Dust per se does not exist as everything is wet by definition.

      Still, a proper silt-out can last for up to 24 hours. I played with silt in open water and it's possible to create a cloud so dark you literally can not see your hand before your mask. And that's normal, outside silt. Not the insanely fine-grained silt in totally still water that has been sitting there for a few hundred or thousands of years.

      Google for side-mount and no mount if you want some good shivers. Those guys are crazy even by cave diving standards ;)

    23. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > It'd be nuts to "free" dive in caves, without a rope or some other guide back.

      Correct. There was one free dive in the Blue Hole in Dahab, but that was guarded heavily and not a proper cave, if in an overhead environment.

      > For these extreme dives you'd think they'd also work their way down with spare air tanks so they never had to worry about going all the way back up to the top, just back to the last air tank drop.

      While you usually tend to come back the same way, people like to carry all their gas with them. Same for scooters etc.

      > I also wonder if they couldn't engineer some kind of capsule that could be inflated in a larger chamber to serve as a base on longer dives, possibly with an air line from the surface, sort of a base camp.

      They are doing this in various long-term mapping projects. To see an example, go to:
      http://www.ekpp.org/

    24. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by RichiH · · Score: 1

      1) They use steel capsules. Inflatables would be a joke.

      2) You have extra air on your back, on your scooter and in your dry habitat, if any. On the most modest of trips, you will have 3/2 times as much air as you need for the entire dive, though the trend is to take double the amount.

      3) You don't need an airlock. Just flood the thing with a gas mix suitable for the depth it's in and maintain oxygen level.

      4) Every SCUBA, be it open, semi-closed or closed-circuit has to maintain ambient pressure anyway. You don't have muscles to breathe. You simply release your muscles and your lung expands. Same thing works under water.

      5) To fill a habitat, you don't even need pressure equalisation. Simply open a tank and let it flood the habitat. Physics will take care of the rest.

    25. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > Then you start using gear that has no business being in a cave: scooters and rebreathers. Both of which can get you further into the cave than have any business being, when complacency causes you to fail to lay the groundwork for your escape in the event of an equipment failure.

      I call bullshit. Of course, you need at least one spare scooter and rebreather, but there is no reason not to use them _if done right_. The active scooter has a rebreather built into it. Spare rebreather on your back, spare scooter[s] dangling from your back crotch ring.

    26. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by misfit815 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Used to be quite into caving before that whole "family" thing got in the way. In the periodical I received, there'd be an annual accident report summary. Twisted ankles, broken arms, etc. Then you got to the cave diving section. Fatality. Fatality. Fatality. When cave diving goes wrong, it goes horribly wrong.

      On a lighter note, it was quite a unique activity. When you kill the lights, it is *dark*. That sounds obvious, but it's something you just have to experience. Plus, all of the movements needed to traverse caves in my region mean that it's quite a workout. Your whole body gets used.

      And if you are 3 hours from the entrance, then you are a minimum of 6 hours from help should something actually go wrong. That thought always gave me an appreciation for it.

      --
      Jesus told him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me. - John 14:6 NLT
    27. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      ...for whatever reason, avid cavers call themselves "cavers", and use "spelunkers" to refer to people who enter caves without the proper equipment or training.

      That's because "spelunker" sounds like someone who likes a dirty, dirty sex act...
      Wait... Never mind.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    28. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by dnaumov · · Score: 1

      Something as simple as stirring up some dust can mean death to a cave diver.

      OK, stupid question: how/why does stirring up some dust cause death?

    29. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by Totally_Tux · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because stirring up silt can completely block your vision and can be very disorientating (and may lead to a snowball effect with regards to line entanglement and panic). If you're unable to find your way of the cave by other means (guideline, blind navigation), then you'll die as you'll run out of time and consume all of your gas.

      Fundamentally, we're not designed to survive for very long in such an environment. You only have a finite amount of gas to get your butt back to the surface.

    30. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by bjourne · · Score: 1

      Or, if you can't get any, to at least get to visit some holes in your life. :)

    31. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There are plenty of tear proof materials, kevlar et al.

      And I imagine this would look a lot like a diving bell, which is technically pretty simple, and handles all air lock and pressure issues. Much simpler to do than a re- breather! So I imagine they already do something like this, and just did not mention it, or there are other issues holding them back more than this.

      I think it is unlikely that we in the 30 seconds we have been thinking about it have hit on a cool invention that will solve the problems that guys who have been doing this all their lives did not think of.

    32. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      seeing the extreme conditions man will venture into to quench an unstoppable curiosity.

      Or to get chicks. Some people will do anything to impress chicks.

      Hey now, Caving and extreme caving is NOT just for men. There are a lot of women cavers out there... www.flickr.com/undergroundearth

    33. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by radtea · · Score: 1

      When cave diving goes wrong, it goes horribly wrong.

      And despite the optimistic claims of many people posting here, it can go wrong even if you do everything right. This is quite different from ordinary diving, where fatalities are almost always a result of someone doing something stupid in a situation than a more experienced person would survive.

      Cave diving fatalities are if anything more prevalent in experienced divers, and all the smug folks here talking about how you just have to Do It My Way--which for some reason is never justified via actual statistical analysis or good empiricism, just lots of anecdotes and manly blustering--are just fatalities waiting to happen.

      In over thirty years of participation in a variety of activities I've experienced relatively serious equipment malfunctions or other problems while scuba diving, sky-diving and climbing (including free climbing places I really shouldn't have) and I've survived all of them by responding appropriately. In a cave dive, especially a deep one, there are any number of relatively minor things that can go wrong that you don't have any way of responding to.

      That's not adventure: it's stupidity. You may as well play Russian Roulette and then brag about the thrill and belittle the sane people who think you're an idiot.

      You can drill all you want and test your gear all you want, but the reality remains that gear does fail, and in extreme cave diving there are any number of relatively minor failures that you have no way of responding to except death. That is why people die in caves, and not in open water, and all the manly bluster in the world won't save you when it happens.

      People who dive in caves are engaging in the same kind of technological and personal over-confidence that let BP drill a mile underwater without ever seriously and realistically considering what could go wrong, or recognizing that they had no useful response available when it inevitably did.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    34. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the people of slashdot should just let the media call script kiddies 'hackers' because it is just cool to say and more popular than the words 'script kiddie'. I don't care if what they do is different, 'hacker' is just a cooler word.

    35. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by dpilot · · Score: 1

      > People who dive in caves are engaging in the same kind of technological and personal over-confidence
      > that let BP drill a mile underwater without ever seriously and realistically considering what could
      > go wrong, or recognizing that they had no useful response available when it inevitably did.

      One key difference... BP hasn't died, at least not yet. In such circumstance, death is usually "externalized."

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    36. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by Tmack · · Score: 1

      It'd be nuts to "free" dive in caves, without a rope or some other guide back.

      Agreed, though people do it. To me (a caver) cave diving itself is done by Nuts.

      For these extreme dives you'd think they'd also work their way down with spare air tanks so they never had to worry about going all the way back up to the top, just back to the last air tank drop.

      They have dive plans, know how far they can go for what they have in the tank, and have emergency tanks stashed along the way. Since this expedition used rebreathers, any extra tank on a dive would be only for emergency use. SCUBA rules themselves still apply, so without special gas mixtures you cant go too deep, and without extra long decompression staging you cant stay below 33' for too long of a time.

      I also wonder if they couldn't engineer some kind of capsule that could be inflated in a larger chamber to serve as a base on longer dives, possibly with an air line from the surface, sort of a base camp.

      Good luck finding room for that anywhere in a cave. Knowing a guy that was on the J2 expedition as a packmule to haul the rebreather equipment down to the sumps, its hard enough getting just the essentials down to the dive site, even disassembled as much as possible. Even if you did get it down there, where would you set it up? For it to be any use it would need its own air supply (more tanks), power source, a dry floor and room to remove dive gear, lay down and rest.

      Regardless, you gotta really not have even a hint of claustrophobia. I usually enjoy cave tours, mine tours and that sort of underground thing but the idea of diving in a cave makes me sick to my stomach nervous.

      In caving, the claustrophobia usually only kicks in if you are doing really tight pushes into unknown body-sized passages. Caves made mostly of those kinds of passage are generally reserved for the sadistic cavers that like that kind of torture. Most caves contain a good bit of walking or crawling passage with decent sided rooms at places, with enough room to easily turn around or pass someone else.

      Tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    37. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The preferred nomenclature is spee-lunkers, please

    38. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by phoenixwade · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And in DIR terminology (DIR= Doing it right = a very strict diving system), "noobs" are refered to as strokes.

      I'm pretty sure that DIR and GUE analists would refer to much of slashdot the same way - I have zero use for those arrogant assholes. Although some of the philosophy, rational, and developed techniques and equipment placement and choices are quite good, the prevailing attitude of the DIR diver at goes with it puts people off to the point that they are irrelevant and ignored. I do subscribe to the idea that there are people with cave cards that have no business with them (just like US drivers licenses), I just think that some of those with that "i'm better than everyone else, and you're a stroke" attitude should be barred too. The focus should be on saving lives, not on pissing off people in the same hole you're in.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    39. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      seeing the extreme conditions man will venture into to quench an unstoppable curiosity.

      Or to get chicks. Some people will do anything to impress chicks.

      Hey now, Caving and extreme caving is NOT just for men. There are a lot of women cavers out there... www.flickr.com/undergroundearth

      Yeah, that's probably why the OP said "people".

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    40. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      I feel that diving a rebreather is safer than open circuit for the same dive and gas profiles. Yes, a rebreather can encourage a diver to reach beyond their limits. Yes, they are more technically complex than open circuit. Even with those caveats it is very comforting to have hours of air to sort out a problem, instead of minutes.

      (I dive wrecks, my caves are made of steel.)(Don't listen to me, I'm crazy. I dive homebuilt kit.)

    41. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      The same thing can be said for manned space exploration - However people are still willing to take the risks. If we stop doing anything that is considered hazardous, we stop an awful lot of progress (I'm not up for arguing whether caving is progress, I don't dive :P ).

      Identify the risks, mitigate what you can, accept that despite your best efforts you *still* might not come back.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    42. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by jd · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's often precisely what happens with inventions. However, only one in a billion of those ideas are ever worth anything. That's where the problem lies.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    43. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by jd · · Score: 1

      The problem with deep caving is that you'll often want to go where steel/rigid capsules could never be transported. And if you actually DID find the Everest of caves, you're looking at needing 5+ of these, which you somehow have to convey through the previous ones.

      Inflatable capsules would not be a joke - indeed even NASA has seriously considered whether inflatable modules might be better than rigid structures for some parts of space stations. They would, however, be extremely difficult to get right.

      I am talking about a non-flooded capsule - basically something that would be comparable to a pressure chamber - in which SCUBA (do people really consider this an acronym any more?) gear is not required. Why? Because one of the big dangers in any form of deep diving is that the only people who have either the skill or the nerve to go that deep are also friggin' insane and often push themselves way too far. Although not cave diving, I seem to recall the curator for the Andrea Dores wreck museum died on a dive to the ship from the bends. He was no fool and certainly no amateur, and we'll never know for sure what went wrong. However, it is an absolute certainty that he made some sort of mistake and that this snowballed to the point of catastrophe.

      The kind of shallow caves that tourists go visit don't pose those kinds of threats. The kind of deep sea caves these explorers are wanting to find - well, there are plenty of surface caves that go down thousands of feet. That's four times deeper than any wreck diver has ever gone and that's before you even factor in the starting depth for such an undersea cave. You will NOT find instructions on how to accomplish such a feat on page 47 of your fireside girl's handbook. You have to invent a way.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    44. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      All I've got to say is that it must take a pair the size of the the former twin towers.

      I'll tell the lady cave divers I know. If you're unlucky, you'll continue to live.

      I'm not fearful of enclosed spaces in the slightest,

      Not relevant.

      but this is just insane.

      The cave divers I've known, male and female, are some of the sanest people I've met. They may have differing ideas to you about what's important in life - but that doesn't make them insane. More specifically, it doesn't make them suicidally insane - which is what most outsiders think. Yes, the sport is dangerous. So you manage the risks to an acceptable level, or you "turn your back and fin away/ and live to dive another day" (to quote an old joke).

      On top of that, if you manage to get that deep, you have to account for the trip back, meaning if you exceed your air supply by getting lost in dirty water, or any other number of potential gotchas, you could easily end up overstaying your welcome and just not have enough time to get back out again.

      Well, isn't that obvious? Well done, you've passed Cave Diving 1.0.1. This is why the CDG chose, when it was re-founded in late 1940s BTW, time isn't important - gas volumes are important. You only have to control the amount of gas that you waste by getting emotional about things, and then you've only got the utterly inflexible laws of physics and physiology to determine if you're going to live or die. But you knew that when you were planning the dive, and now you've either got to dive the plan, or abort while you're still in your safe space of stress/ gas volumes/ consumption. ("Plan the dive, then dive the plan" is another old diver's aphorism that is important.)
      I'll give you a hint for Cave Diving 1.0.2 : the duration during which you are "welcome" in The Darkness is generally less than 5 seconds. For any more extended stays, the most popular way of thinking is to assume that the whole cave is conspiring with the rest of the universe to kill you, and to plan your dive on that basis. It's a way of thinking that achieves the "most popular" status because people who don't think like that tend to die. Or leave the sport in some other way.

      Excuse me - the wife has just powered up her new Windows 7 laptop, which means we've got a nightmare of obscurity and terror to negotiate worse than any cave dive I've ever done.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    45. Re:There's a reason they call it extreme by fractoid · · Score: 1

      That is the single best refutation to that link that I've ever seen. Well done, sir!

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  5. leaving mom's basement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is that involved for extreme caving ?

    1. Re:leaving mom's basement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I'm guilty of it myself from time to time, Slashdot badly needs a "-1, Cliché" mod.

    2. Re:leaving mom's basement by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Not if the extreme cave... is in your Mom!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:leaving mom's basement by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I just left your mom's basement, and while it was definitely deep, I don't think it was a record since I could still reach the bottom with my standard spelunking package.

  6. Freud? by Oyjord · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder what Freud would say about such "extreme caving"?

    1. Re:Freud? by westlake · · Score: 1

      I wonder what Freud would say about such "extreme caving"?

      "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar." A good smoke.

    2. Re:Freud? by phantomcircuit · · Score: 3, Funny

      He'd do another line and tell you to get out of his bathroom.

    3. Re:Freud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Und godDAMNIT, mine name ees not Ziggy!

    4. Re:Freud? by Maudib · · Score: 1

      I wonder what Freud would say about such "extreme caving"?
      "This is no cave."

    5. Re:Freud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what Freud would say about such "extreme caving"?

      "Help help let me out of this box!"

  7. interesting technology by blackest_k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The articles quite interesting, new antibiotics , a rebreather letting someone say underwater for 10 -12 hours at a time and then theres the nasa mission to europa...

    making a movie is the least interesting thing mentioned.
     

    1. Re:interesting technology by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Europa?! Have NASA learned nothing?!

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  8. Finally a Cameron movie with depth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looks like Hollywood acknowledges that their movies are too superficial.

  9. Jon Stewart interviewed the author a month back by vk2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Jon Stewart interviewed the author a month back - http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-june-15-2010/james-tabor

    --
    No Sig for you.!
    1. Re:Jon Stewart interviewed the author a month back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my country we get a delay of 15 days in the show, so I downloaded the torrent.
      I saw the show and because of that I bought the book online.

  10. cameron has been obsessed with diving for awhile by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Informative

    and you could really see it in avatar: all that beautiful day glo flora was obviously inspired by your average earth coral reef

    and cameron has said avatar ii is going to be an aquatic adventure on pandora:

    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/herocomplex/2010/04/james-cameron-talks-the-enironment-the-avatar-sequel-and-more.html

    We created a broad canvas for the environment of film. That's not just on Pandora, but throughout the Alpha Centauri AB system. And we expand out across that system and incorporate more into the story - not necessarily in the second film, but more toward a third film. I've already announced this, so I might as well say it: Part of my focus in the second film is in creating a different environment - a different setting within Pandora. And I'm going to be focusing on the ocean on Pandora, which will be equally rich and diverse and crazy and imaginative, but it just won't be a rain forest. I'm not saying we won't see what we've already seen; we'll see more of that as well.

    considering how cameron's diving hobbies inspire his creative works (look at titanic and the abyss), i welcome whatever comes out of the creative ferment of his mind from his interest in deep caves. perhaps the abyss ii? some sort of horror movie? avatar iii will be in a galactic cave? who knows...

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  11. Imperial Strikes Again by labnet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most of the world uses metric, and it now it is just plain distracting to articles in feet, miles etc.
    Here's is a suggestion for Google: Have a translation option that converts these pages into metric on the fly!

    --
    46137
    1. Re:Imperial Strikes Again by brxndxn · · Score: 1

      It's already been patented about 30 different ways by 10 different companies in the middle of 40 legal battles and will never be useful in any way to the public.

      --
      --- We need more Ron Paul!
    2. Re:Imperial Strikes Again by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Imperial is not quite the same as Standard. One difference, for instance, is that the gallons are bigger...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:Imperial Strikes Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you realise that all the cars in america could get 20% more gas mileage by just switching to the imperial gallon, instead of Queen Ann's Gallon.

    4. Re:Imperial Strikes Again by Asahi+Super+Dry · · Score: 1

      Adoption of the metric system is the first step on the slippery slope to communism. I will grant the difficulty of converting back for those nations that have already made this mistake, and so I move that we rechristen the "kilometer" the "freedom mile."

    5. Re:Imperial Strikes Again by hcdejong · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a Greasemonkey script that will show the conversion in a tooltip:
      script

  12. Wasn't this a Goon Show episode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it sure sounds like it....

  13. More People Getting Stuck In Caves by Chris+Rhodes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will slashdot's far reach cause more people to get stuck in caves? People are always diving in caves. People seeking new passages through small holes get stuck all the time.

    Will the movie result in an uptick in caving deaths? 60 percent of cave deaths in Florida are related to cave diving. I've always wanted to go caving, except that everything I read about it, is about someone dying.
    Push-Pull.

    1. Re:More People Getting Stuck In Caves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "60 percent of cave deaths in Florida are related to cave diving."
      What are the other 40% related to? Cave skating, cave jumping, cave carpooling and cave sleepwalking?

    2. Re:More People Getting Stuck In Caves by OttoErotic · · Score: 1

      People seeking new passages through small holes get stuck all the time.

      See comment 32870540. This is just too easy in articles about caving. Where's the challenge?

      --
      "Once in Hawaii I had sex with a 102 year old male turtle. It is difficult to argue that it was consensual." - Steve Ma
    3. Re:More People Getting Stuck In Caves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not.

      The other 40% are "Cave Sun Tanning"

    4. Re:More People Getting Stuck In Caves by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      "60 percent of cave deaths in Florida are related to cave diving."

      What are the other 40% related to? Cave skating, cave jumping, cave carpooling and cave sleepwalking?

      No, just caving.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  14. Deepest? by Drishmung · · Score: 4, Informative

    They've gone down 2km. That's still about half the depth of the 3.9km TauTona mine, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TauTona and far short of the 11km of the Challenger http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Challenger_Deep. Now if there were some caves below the oceanic trenches...

    --
    Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    1. Re:Deepest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They've gone down 2km. That's still about half the depth of the 3.9km TauTona mine, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TauTona and far short of the 11km of the Challenger http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Challenger_Deep.

      Now if there were some caves below the oceanic trenches...

      Natural caves not mine shafts.

    2. Re:Deepest? by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Now if there were some caves below the oceanic trenches...

      Perhaps Cameron could make a movie about what they find deep down in the oceanic trenches...

    3. Re:Deepest? by pipingguy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Didn't this used to be called Mariana's Trench? I used to know a girl named Mariana, she wasn't too trenchant. Maybe the name went wherever the pronunciation of Uranus went. Probably up Urectum.

  15. Not until Scotty can beam me up by rbrander · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I second the statement, "I'm not claustrophobic, but this is insane". It's the sheer un-rescue-ability of it all, if you simply get wedged, that gets to me.

    A young man died cave diving in the Rockies not far from Calgary a few years back. The awful bit was that he got delayed coming back, wasn't sure how far it was, went to the limit of his air, turned the little knob that gives you the last five minutes, and used that time scratching out a goodbye to his family on the air tank.

    Right around one more corner from where he would have seen the flashlights of his friends waiting for him.

    Lessons I took from it:

    1) Cave diving is insane.

    2) If you're ever certain you're at that last moment of your life, nevertheless spend it trying to survive. Your family actually knew you loved them already.

    1. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      As a longtime caver, parent is correct: cave diving IS insane. (I'm glad some insane folk exist, as the knowledge they glean from this is valuable. Nevertheless, the risk is huge, and makes BASE jumping look safe by comparison...)

    2. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by Like2Byte · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cave diving is insane.

      Indeed it is! I'm a caver. I do not cave dive for several reasons:
      1) I'm not a diver.
          Cavers who wish to cave dive must spend years honing their diving skills and working as a team. They are also, usually, fairly acclimated cavers.

      2) Cave divers have a near 100% fatality rate where "accidents" have occurred. Don't believe me? See the National Speleological Society's Caving Accidents report.

          Here's their website.

      3) Of particular interest is year 1994. Scroll to the bottom to see the cave diving "accidents" report. Check out year 2000, also.

      4) See my original discussion on this topic on slashdot. Clickey

    3. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by metlin · · Score: 1

      I don't cave dive, but I do pursue high-adrenaline sports, including climbing and base jumping.

      In my mind, the sheer "un-rescue-ability" of the whole thing is what makes it interesting and worth pursuing.

      When people explored the world in the days of yon, they did not do it expecting a rescue. Nor did people those who attempted first ascents.

      Not that I disagree with the rest of your piece on doing everything you can to survive...

    4. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by Raenex · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why do you put "accidents" in quotes? You make it sound like foul play is going on.

    5. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      2000 was a weird year:

      injury - struck by thrown cyalume stick
      fatality - jumped onto rocks outside entrance
      aid, no injury - rescued stranded calf from cave
      no consequence - snowmobile fell into cave

      no consequence?

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    6. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When people explored the world in the days of yon

      What?

    7. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by dogzdik · · Score: 0

      At least you already have lots of dirt on top when you do die......

      --

      .

      Voting up, Voting down - If I really gave a fuck about your approval or not, I'd come and ask you.

    8. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What they mean is, he was a dick and his death is of no consequence :)

      Apart from the lost snowmobile of course!

      (Hint: they mean they lost the snowmobile, no one was hurt)

    9. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > A young man died cave diving in the Rockies not far from Calgary a few years back. The awful bit was that he got delayed coming back, wasn't sure how far it was, went to the limit of his air, turned the little knob that gives you the last five minutes, and used that time scratching out a goodbye to his family on the air tank.

      That places him in the 70ies, roughly speaking. Technology and procedures have advanced a _lot_ since then.

      Look at the statistics: The people who die in caves are untrained, under-/overequipped or old-timers trying to break a record or two.

    10. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      HA HA HA! Good one. :P

      Seriously though, if a cave diver has a problem with his or her equipment he/she usually only has 2 minutes to live. That's why I put quotation marks there.

      Thanks for the chuckle.

    11. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the Caving Accidents Reports provides for some 'interesting' reading.

      Here's the kicker - those are the ones you hear about.

    12. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by CaseM · · Score: 1

      Why do you put "interesting" in quotes? You make it sound like it's going to be boring.

    13. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Does intentionally placing ones life in danger and having the odds beat you count as an accident

    14. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by tehcyder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Cave diving deaths are all preventable by the simple method of not going cave-diving because it is a fucking insane hobby, so you could argue they're more akin to suicide than accidental death.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by stevediver · · Score: 1

      > The awful bit was that he got delayed coming back, wasn't sure how far it was, went to the limit of his air, turned the little knob that gives you the last five minutes, and used that time scratching out a goodbye to his family on the air tank. I find the scenario as you describe really hard to believe. What you describe is called "J Valve" tank, which had a spring valve that would artificially stop the air flow at around 500psi. The idea was that you would use the tank until it got hard to breathe, then pull a lever that would let you use the last 500psi. It was a great idea in the early days before people started using pressure gauges. J-Valve tanks have been obsolete for years! I agree that cave diving is extremely dangerous, but no one in his right mind would do it with vintage gear. Unless, by a "few years" you mean 30 or so.

    16. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      Cave diving deaths are all preventable by the simple method of not going cave-diving because it is a fucking insane hobby, so you could argue they're more akin to suicide than accidental death.

      You'll get no argument from me, brother! You're preaching to the choir!

    17. Re:Not until Scotty can beam me up by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing the point. These people are genuine explorers and, yes, there are risks. Big ones. But extreme cavers, the ones who don't follow well-travelled paths, in the purest sense truly do boldly go where no man has gone before.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  16. Insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am with Linus on this one.
    I totally agree with him on this.

  17. Yes by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Funny

    The article notes that James Cameron is planning to release a 3D film next year about extreme cave divers.

    And the year after that will see "Cavatar"

    A man falls in love with a female from a tribe of green, subterranean lizard people, and helps her fight off the evil white American oppressors who want to drill her (wink wink) home for sub-crustal oil.

    1. Re:Yes by Chagatai · · Score: 1

      Somebody just watched an episode of Dr. Who from the sounds of it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hungry_Earth

      --
      --Chag
  18. Re:cameron has been obsessed with diving for awhil by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Funny

    considering how cameron's diving hobbies inspire his creative works (look at titanic and the abyss), i welcome whatever comes out of the creative ferment of his mind from his interest in deep caves. perhaps the abyss ii? some sort of horror movie?

    Maybe he can go spelunking in a library, and learn how to make an original plot and put that "3D" concept to work with his character construction.

    galactic cave?

    o_O

  19. i've always found criticism by circletimessquare · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    by random overly negative internet trolls of extremely successful obviously talented people to be funny. thanks for the laugh

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  20. ENDURANCE and Europa, a few technical challenges by Tisha_AH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The endurance device looks really cool as an autonomous submersible that can find it's way back to the transducer dropped through the opening in the ice. Here are a few problems;

    Getting to Europa the package needs to set down in an area where there is a "lead" in the ice where it is thinner. Trying to drill or melt your way through a kilometer of ice would be a serious challenge that we would even have a problem with today (an opening the size of Endurance).

    To make a hole would either require an automated drilling system or a nuclear power source to melt it's way down to below the ice. Since RTG (radioisotope thermal generators) require a significant amount of plutonium or radioactive thorium to generate even a small amount of thermal energy it would require a "real" reactor to create enough heat to melt a hole. As the reactor and ENDURANCE melts their way down they would deploy a tether back up to the surface. As they melt downwards the water will freeze above them, leaving the tether encased in ice.Once they break free of the ice layer and make it into the depths of Europa's ocean the reactor can be powered back and act as a docking station, recharging station and communications hub for the ENDURANCE explorer. Data would be relayed back up the tether to a satellite relay station to send data back up to an orbiter.

    With a "down hole" power source the ENDURANCE probe could carry out extended exploration missions down to the crush depth of the submursiable and missions could last for months (aka the Mars rovers).

    --
    Tisha Hayes
  21. As a longtime Caver and Geek... by mad.frog · · Score: 1

    I read Blind Descent and had mixed feelings. While I have the utmost respect for the folks who enter caves of this nature (aka "supercaves", a term not used in the caving community), the author plays it for maximum drama.

    The truth is that there is a long continuum of people who explore caves, and this book is just profiling the people at the highest of the high end, but at the end of the day, they want the same thing as most other techno-geeks: to be the first to find something really cool. (They just happen to have the physical, mental, and financial chops to actually have a shot at it. Not to mention luck, in large quantities.)

    1. Re:As a longtime Caver and Geek... by mad.frog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The other thing that bothered me about this book was the author's persistent implication that it's *possible* to find "the deepest cave".

      Until we come up with a universal earth-scanning technology that can reveal all subterranean openings (that are passable to humans), this title can't be granted with any certainty.

      Krubera has the current title, but then, many other caves have held the title in the past. It's not like a mountain, where height is (reasonably) verifiable with current technology -- finding the deepest human-reachable location requires lots of effort and luck.

    2. Re:As a longtime Caver and Geek... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Until we come up with a universal earth-scanning technology that can reveal all subterranean openings (that are passable to humans), this title can't be granted with any certainty.

      Wouldn't Reflection Seismology be a method to do this?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  22. Re:The deepest cave on Earth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plumb it's depths with your tongues, you fucking propeller-heads. Plumb it and fucking like it!

  23. I've always found by Gizzmonic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Enjoy that McDonald's burger, and wash it down with a Bud Light! Popular=best!

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    1. Re:I've always found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you just gave me the munchies!

    2. Re:I've always found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preach it, bro! Any self-respecting Slashdotter knows that popularity is in fact negatively correlated with quality: the more popular something is, the worse it must be. Now let's all feel smug and superior because we're above all the unwashed masses who like movies like Avatar!

  24. playing nethack by xmorg · · Score: 1

    So they are playing nethack... and getting paid for it!

  25. Oh Gods! not another Cameron 3D movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's next...

    Cameron Presents "Colonoscopy" In 3d IMAX, Coming to a theater near you 2013...

  26. Centere of the Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the 2 most prominent in extreme caving were Arne Saknussum and Professor Lidenbruch

  27. This article about Dave Shaw... by pongo000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...describes how something can go horribly wrong in a cave dive (in this case, Bushman's Hole, one of the deepest freshwater caves in the world) even with the best planning efforts of experts in the field. It's a long, but incredibly sad, read. If you want to read something really haunting, Dave Shaw's website is still online. The video is out there too (aired on ABC in 2005). I leave the video links as an exercise to the reader. It's not something I really want to dig up again.

    1. Re:This article about Dave Shaw... by PPH · · Score: 1

      I'm not a diver, but one thing strikes me as odd about this dive: What happened to the "buddy system"? In spite of all that planning, one person goes down alone. Something goes wrong. And there's nobody there to check each other.

      If the dive is so extreme that a second person can't be found (or money for a second set of equipment) to make the dive, it can't be made at all.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:This article about Dave Shaw... by miketheanimal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, cave divers don't work with buddies, because it doesn't work. Zero visibility, passage too small for two people side by side, etc., etc. Cave divers may be insane but they are not mad!

    3. Re:This article about Dave Shaw... by ledow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's wrapped in extreme amounts of emotive narrative, but that story just describes how something can go horribly wrong if you do extremely dangerous things without planning them properly, and don't follow established rules. A diver's (Deon) dead body, that's been there for years, found in a deep cave, is recovered for no particular reason than to be heroic. The equipment they use is new, improperly tested and mostly "home-brew" for the situation they want to use it in. Some of it breaks.

      The body-recovery is then portrayed as something brave and necessary, instead of just plain silly to go EXACTLY where a previous expert, experienced diver has died and whose body is STILL stuck, and as a single diver (with only backup crews who won't dive that far down) try, on your own, to recover the body. Something killed the original diver, and you're going to have to stand there and deal with whatever that was in order to free the body.

      To quote, when they reviewed the footage of that *solo* diver who died going in to recover a body that was already *trapped* in place, the video (recovered only by sheer chance, and recorded on bog-standard video camera in a home-brew housing) showed the body floated. "This was totally unexpected. Deon, as it turned out, was not completely skeletal, and he was no longer stuck in the silt. Instead of decomposing, his corpse had mummified into a soaplike composition that gave it mass and neutral buoyancy. And for some reason--no one has an explanation--the body had become unstuck from the mud as soon as Shaw started working on it. "The fact that the body was now loose, and not pinned to the ground, was not one of the scenarios that we had thought about," Shirley sighs. "The body was not meant to be floating." It's a lot easier to slip a bag over an immobile body than a body floating and rolling in front of you at 886 feet."

      Amazing that a body comes loose when you're disturbing it in order to loosen it. And amazing that a body isn't completely skeletal given that recovery of bodies in every extreme has shown some to be remarkably well-preserved.

      After the video shows the recovery diver's breathing rate increasing (and he's very experienced in dealing with that and the intoxication of breathing diving gases): "Watching the video with a clear head, it is hard not to wonder why Shaw didn't just turn around right then and abandon the dive." The "attempted recovery dive" that he was stating when he was on the surface. And he's quoted earlier as saying "Better one dead than two".

      But he pushes on: "He keeps working to control the body, letting go of his cave light so he can use both hands... Shaw has been at it for two minutes, and the cave line is seemingly everywhere. It snags on his cave light, and Shaw pauses to clear it. At this, Shirley and Herbst bridled. A cave diver should never let gear float loose. "It's a recipe for disaster," says Shirley, who will always regret not being present when Shaw told Hiles (ON THE SURFACE!) he would put the light to the side at times. "Do not do that," he would have warned him."

      Then the video shows more of the hazard that the diver was in: "Suddenly he loses his footing on the sloping bottom. He scrambles back to the body in a cloud of silt." (the bottom where the body was already trapped and claimed its first victim).

      Afterwards, doubt is cast on his abilities by companions - extremely experienced, cave-divers - but the author conveniently tucks it away: "But he also wonders whether Shaw should have done more buildup dives to increase his tolerance for narcosis--much the way a climber will try to acclimatize to altitude--and his ability to recognize when it reaches dangerous levels. "When he started putting the body in the bag and it didn't work, he should have immediately turned around and left," Gomes (the only person to have successfully dived that cave that far) says. "I didn't think it was worth the risk of a diver losing his life to recover the remains of Deon Dreyer," he says flatly."

      Arrogance,

    4. Re:This article about Dave Shaw... by radtea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's wrapped in extreme amounts of emotive narrative, but that story just describes how something can go horribly wrong if you do extremely dangerous things without planning them properly, and don't follow established rules.

      None of which changes the fact that cave diving is extremely dangerous with a very high fatality rate even when you plan them properly and do follow established rules.

      Cave divers sometimes emphasize the errors people made in a few cases and seem to want to imply that that means everyone who dies while cave diving has made a mistake. But other than entering the cave in the first place that is known to be false: it is possible to die while cave diving even though you do everything right. That's why cave diving has such a high rate of deaths amongst experienced divers, unlike ordinary diving, where experienced divers virtually never die even though novices do with depressing regularity.

      That is, simply because A => B, doesn't mean that B doesn't happen when !A. And we know from raw empirical fact that experienced cave divers who are doing everything right still die. We even know why that is the case: there are any number of relatively minor malfunctions that do not have any response except death.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    5. Re:This article about Dave Shaw... by mr.bri · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There's also Jim Bowden. Held the record for deepest open-system dive for awhile (does it still stand???). Lost his buddy on the dive as well. Took 12+ hours!

      He's an avid cave diver, spends his time exploring caves around Mexico, and works to preserve them.

      He's also a NAUI instructor, which is how I know him. Got to spend a week learning from the best diver in the world (at the time), and he also is a really nice guy. He gets really serious when it comes to diving, though. I think you have to be a little crazy to do the things he's tried, but that doesn't mean you're stupid. He is well aware that every time he goes down, even with years of training, that he may not come back up.

      A really remarkable guy, and it was an honor to learn from him.

      http://www.mexicoprofundo.org/teammembers-jimbowden.html

    6. Re:This article about Dave Shaw... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone else snicker at the thought of "diving in Bushman's Hole"?

      Nope. Just you. Sorry.

    7. Re:This article about Dave Shaw... by PPH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      passage too small for two people side by side, etc., etc.

      So you go single file, with a safety line between divers. And you can check on each other (even in zero visibility) by tugging on the line periodically. Or other means of communication.

      The whole lone diver/mountain climber/whatever is just a form of macho posing. Particularly when the mission was to recover a body. There was no new frontier being opened up.

      I just hope people like this don't leave any famlies with children behind. Besides the obvious grief for a lost father, it defeats Darwinism.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re:This article about Dave Shaw... by Fumus · · Score: 2, Informative

      And in "Future Plans" there is the whole plan of his last dive. Quite sad nobody has access to his site to add a little "Dave is no longer with us" memo on the front page.

  28. yes, absolutely by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

    its a democratic ideal: in a meritocracy of cultural output, whatever rises to the top as most popular is automatically the best. its the only objective measurement possible

    to say there is some other measurement of quality is to say that random rules according to some clique of self-appointed arbiters of quality is something to be respected. on what basis? show me the objective scientific determination of quality. there is none, just whim and fancy and fashionable trendiness. whatever appeals the most to the masses, is automatically the most superior of cultural output. that is the an ironclad truth because its the only objective truth. everything other measurement of quality is subjective and therefore flawed

    of course, various subcultures have their own lists of what is superior in quality. but the likes and dislikes of various subcultures are not superior to the masses, despite the arrogance and assumed sense of superiority of those various subcultures

    populism rules. everything else is cliquishness, classism, arrogance, and bullshit

    so continue shitting all over one of the most successful directors in all of cinema. its really impressive, and utterly meaningless. you're such a respectable authority, oh random ultranegative internet troll

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:yes, absolutely by clong83 · · Score: 1

      Your argument just doesn't make any sense. There's a difference between cost effectiveness and quality. I'm guilty of having eaten a McDonald's hamburger, and I probably will in the future, too. But I don't think it's the best burger out there. Perhaps on a long road haul or a busy day, given my available time, money, and availability of other options, I will eat there. So do a number of other people who may be economically forced to feed themselves and offspring with cheap food. Lack of better options doesn't make the outcome the "best", or most desirable by any stretch.

      I bet if you went into a McDonald's and interviewed everybody in the store over the age of 18, and asked them if McDonald's made the "best" hamburger, most of them would say "no".

      To keep this on topic, I have largely no opinion on the film avatar or Peter Jackson in general. Oh wait, the topic is caving. Yeah, cavers are weird.

    2. Re:yes, absolutely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I disagree. Apples and oranges.

      Quality and popular have never had much of a relationship as demonstrated by Wal Mart.

      Cheap, low quality products are popular, but their consumers wouldn't normally consider them quality.

      Similarly: Toyota vs. Ferrari

      One is much more popular. One is much higher quality.

    3. Re:yes, absolutely by lgw · · Score: 1

      Never argue with a man who cannot understand the complexities of the "Shift" key.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:yes, absolutely by fractoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where are my mod points when I need 'em? It doesn't matter whether some welfare- or parent-supported douche thinks they're the foremost authority on something. Ultimately, how successful and effective something is is the ultimate measure of quality. Just like the way low-budget arthouse films are generally absolutely crap (or if they're not, they rapidly become huge hits, reinforcing the "if it's popular then it's good, and if it's good it will be popular" theme).

      It's the same reason that no matter how much your hacker's aesthetics cringe at using Microsoft Office, it's still used by so many businesses. It gets the job done with less fuss than anything else, and results in a better rate of return on investment, therefore however much you, personally, dislike it - it IS better.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    5. Re:yes, absolutely by cgenman · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between being an event worth going to and being a well-written movie. Avatar is the highest grossing movie of all time. That makes it the highest grossing movie of all time, no more no less.

      It's also widely derided for its lackluster characterizations and terrible writing. If you put it to a vote, you'd probably get far greater votes of "poor writing" than lots of other movies that released in 2009. Or to simplify things down, if you had a poll "Which had better writing, Toy Story 3 or Avatar?" I seriously doubt Avatar would gain more than 20% of the votes. Yet it made far more money. Does that mean one is better than the other? No. But the popular opinion that Avatar was a rehashed Dances With Wolves (or Ferngully) was pretty common.

      Which is not to say that the movie was terrible. But that other parts of the movie were more important to the moviegoing public than the writing.

      Alos, don't throw assessment to a misguided reliance upon unrelated facts. Think for yourself. Subjective assessments are fuzzy and unclean.

    6. Re:yes, absolutely by rtfa-troll · · Score: 2, Funny

      No no; you don't get it. More small letters are used every day than big letters. They must be better. His post just sticks to the best all the time and ignores inferior "capital" letters. You and I are just misguided throwbacks.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    7. Re:yes, absolutely by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Calling an Italian car, and a Ferrari at that, high quality is stretching things _a lot_.

    8. Re:yes, absolutely by SoupIsGood+Food · · Score: 1

      There are two mistakes people make when judging something -

      1) "Massively Unpopular" is not the same thing as "Underground" or "Indie."

      2) "Massively Popular" is not the same thing as successful or good.

      Boney M was massively popular. Iggy Pop wasn't. One of these '70s solo acts is still selling out venues and making gold records and influencing generations of rockers.

      Word 5.1 on the Mac was excellent, top-of-its-game software. Everything since has been an overbloated nuisance. On the Mac, no-one really uses it to write anymore - everyone uses Text Edit, as it is light and stable and free, and then copies their text into Pages (or Word) for final formatting without worrying that Microsoft's crapware will eat your work.

      On the PC, yeah, you're boned - you have either Word, or your choice of OSS Word-wannabes who are no less bloated or kludgy.

    9. Re:yes, absolutely by locallyunscene · · Score: 1

      What does welfare or living if your parents have to do with having an opinion? The fact you put so much stock in an ad-hominem attack makes me glad you don't have mod points.

      FTFR, I am afflicted with neither of those problems.

      If most popular is best then you sure must not think very highly of humans; we're not even the most numerous mammal.

      Most popular means most tolerable to the largest proportion of people, not best fit for your given situation.

    10. Re:yes, absolutely by zicAU · · Score: 1

      This "democratic ideal" might be true in a world without marketing and advertising. Marketing and advertising have no place in a true meritocracy.

    11. Re:yes, absolutely by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I would frankly argue that Toyota is high quality. The just seem to have way less problems then any other brand out there. Over 7 years owning Toyota cars, I have never had one break down. Just a thought.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    12. Re:yes, absolutely by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      its a democratic ideal: in a meritocracy of cultural output, whatever rises to the top as most popular is automatically the best. its the only objective measurement possible

      What has this to do with democracy or meritocracy? It's pure fucking mercantilism: Hollywood distributes a movie with a heavy ad campaign, and it people go to see it due to the sheer fact of its ubiliquity.

      populism rules. everything else is cliquishness, classism, arrogance, and bullshit

      Really? That's why we're so engrossed with number one hitmaker Pat Boone, while no one remembers Chuck Berry. Why everyone reads Zane Grey and no one gives a shit about that hack Scott Fitzgerald.

      Honestly, you have to take a longer view of things, my friend.

      so continue shitting all over one of the most successful directors in all of cinema. its really impressive, and utterly meaningless. you're such a respectable authority, oh random ultranegative internet troll

      I may not know art, but I know what I like. You're apparently too stupid to determine your own tastes, so you just go along with whatever anyone else says, so you won't have to think. How utterly insipid and cowardly! Let me guess, you've never eaten anything but hamburgers and pizza your entire life!

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    13. Re:yes, absolutely by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, how successful and effective something is is the ultimate measure of quality. Just like the way low-budget arthouse films are generally absolutely crap (or if they're not, they rapidly become huge hits, reinforcing the "if it's popular then it's good, and if it's good it will be popular" theme).

      Really, then how do you explain the Blair Witch Project? It was utter shit and became a huge hit!

      There's certainly relationship between the fickle public's ever-changing taste and quality, but I wouldn't want to confuse the two. Of course, you are probably still wearing your Members' Only jacket and Zoobas, so maybe I shouldn't bring up these complicated arguments, they might make your head hurt.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    14. Re:yes, absolutely by fractoid · · Score: 1

      We agree on the first point - that's what I was trying to convey with the "or if they're not, they rapidly become huge hits" part. As for the second - I contend that 'massively popular' will ultimately entail commercial success, which is the most basic, all-encompassing measure of overall quality. Not specifically technical excellence, but overall fitness. A shitty piece of code which nonetheless more adequately fulfills a business requirement than any other piece of code is, by this holistic definition, 'better'.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    15. Re:yes, absolutely by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      How do you figure that popularity is an objective measurement of quality? You have no idea how it came to be popular. It could have been chosen to be consumed by the population on purely subjective grounds and so then it would not be objective at all.

      When there is something wrong with your knee, do you hold some sort of poll and get the majority's opinion of what should be done, or do you go to an expert, i.e., a medical doctor? The medical profession is definitely cliquish and classist, but not very arrogant nor bullshitting you. It's not necessarily arrogant to claim to know more than someone else.

    16. Re:yes, absolutely by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      I just have to add. Your standard is poor in a more serious way than I alluded to in my previous post. We are talking about the value of the artifact (movies in this case) itself, not the value of impact of the movie or something else. But on your system, what you consider the value of the movie changes based on things external to the movie, so it just fails to be a standard of the value of the movie itself at all. It's only if a great number of people watch some movie wherefore you consider that movie to be good. Conversely, if a movie is unpopular, then it is not good, according to you. But a movie is no different whether it is popular or unpopular. A movie could be made and absolutely no one could watch it in its final cut: It could be sealed in a vault. But the movie would be no different if the vault was opened and subsequently watched by all. In the vault case, the movie is no good according to you, but, taken out of the vault and watched as such, it is good. But it's the same movie in both cases, so clearly your standard of taste fails to take in account the movie itself by itself.

  29. Re:ENDURANCE and Europa, a few technical challenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The AUV that will be used to explore Europa will need to be much smaller than the ENDUANCE AUV, the large vehicle size is mostly for prototyping software and hardware. Also it allows room for an accurate inertial measurement system and relatively large science payload. The ice penetrating robot concept is currently being prototyped using power over fiber. The eventual Europa vehicle will, most likely, require an RTG to melt through the ice and power the AUV for months / years.

    If funded this project will be able to answer one of the most important scientific questions of our lifetime: if there is life present outside places other than Earth and if life evolved in parallel on Europa and Earth (e.g. DNA / RNA strands are significantly different from each other or some other encoding method is used).

  30. Spelunk by camperdave · · Score: 2, Informative

    They call them spelunkers because that's the sound that you make when you fall into a chasm filled with water.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  31. The last adventure left to mankind by deboli · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Exploring caves is the last adventure left to the proverbial "common man". Everything is mapped and surveyed except caves. Even if you climb a mountain as a first ascent, someone has photographed it and its height is known. There is no technology that allows to survey caves without going there and that is the excitement and fun of it. You can do it big as Bill Stone of you can find a few meters in a local cave and you can do it according your technical and physical ability. Just join the local Grotto and you have that chance! Nothing beats entering a passage where no other human being has walked before and where your light illuminates formations that nobody has seen before. You can do this only in space and on the bottom of the ocean but the costs and technology needed for that is beyond the reach of hobbyists.

    There will never be the ultimate deepest cave as we know the highest mountain as there are no means of knowing this until all caves are explored. Estimates place the ratio of explored caves at some 5% of total caves. Some have not even an entrance... Of course, we know the theoretical limit which is the height difference of the limestone bedding that houses the cave but there might always be a higher entrance or a sump or something else

    The reason why caving is not as popular with viewers is that it really is not a spectator sport. All you see is some cavers departing into a deep hole. Comparing this to seeing mountaineers where you can see the mountain, the cliff and where you can admire the challenge you have no such chance with a cave. And if you're not a caver you can not imagine the challenge, the joy, the cold and the misery and the excitement.

    1. Re:The last adventure left to mankind by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Estimates place the ratio of explored caves at some 5% of total caves.

      I recently moved to a place renowned for its caving (the Vercors, which held the deepest known cave for many years, the Gouffre Berger). On the cliff along the Furon road, in some places there's indeed about a cave entrance every 10 meters !

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  32. Movie - North Face (2008) aka Nordwand (German) by JakFrost · · Score: 1

    I'm reading this article and this sounds a lot like the mountain climbing movie the North Face (2008) aka Nordwand (German) that I would highly recommend watching because the real-life story of the climbers parallels the events in this article.

    This whole extreme climbing thing is very dangerous whether it is going up mountains or going down caves because any little incident and not even an accident usually turns out fatal later on, even when it is something out of your control such as unexpected critical equipment failure.

  33. Ukrainian, not Ukranian by tnmc · · Score: 1

    Spelling, eh?

  34. Re:Do you know what's interesting about caves? by miketheanimal · · Score: 1

    Boring git. Go crawl back into the hole you came from!

  35. Other 40%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  36. Bad car analogy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you saying? That nobody likes Ferraris?

  37. Who modded parent informative? CORRECTION! by RichiH · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scuba_diving#Effects_of_breathing_high_pressure_gas

    Every SCUBA diver who is not enclosed in armour (some are) breathe gas at ambient pressure. As you can see in the link above, there are various risks associated with deep diving, but the truly limiting factor are the effects of the various gases at depth. Helium and hydrogen are used to replace oxygen and nitrogen to some extent, but they come with their own set of problems. All other gases are too heavy and/or toxic and will kill you in the short or long run. Argon is the only one light enough to be breathed, but it's a _massive_ hallucinogenic.

    Too much oxygen: Cramps, reduced field of vision up to and including temporal blindness. Damage to cell tissue if exposed for prolonged time (starting at 8-24 hours, depending on who you ask)

    Too much nitrogen: You become stupid. The effect is gone the second you go above your personal depth limit (of the day). Also, your metabolic rate goes through the roof. You feel your entire body panicking and need to fight to stay calm. Those effects become less if you dive deep on air regularly.

    Too much helium: HPNS. Your nervous system goes into overdrive; often accompied by shivering.

    Too much hydrogen: I think it was narcotic, if less so than nitrogen. As it's not really used in non-professional diving I don't know too much about it. Although it's cheaper than helium, it likes to go boom. Pair that with high-pressure oxygen and the tiniest fleck of grease or oil anywhere will make everything explode all by itself.

    Various side effects like helium being able to get out of solution easier, forcing you to ascend even more slowly etc pp also come into play.

    Also, as any caver will tell you, unless you _know_ a cave has constant supply of fresh air, you better bring your own gas. Your body detects higher-than-normal levels of CO_2, not the absence of O_2. Under the right conditions, a lung-full of zero (or less than 12%) oxygen gas will ensure that you are unconscious before you hit the ground. After that, you suffocate and die, but at least you won't know it.

    1. Re:Who modded parent informative? CORRECTION! by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Every SCUBA diver who is not enclosed in armour (some are) breathe gas at ambient pressure.

      Nitpick: SCUBA stands for Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus, and by definition gives the breathing gas at ambient pressure. So if you have a normal pressure diving suit (more like a miniature submarine), you're not scuba diving.

    2. Re:Who modded parent informative? CORRECTION! by wanax · · Score: 1

      Under the right conditions, a lung-full of zero (or less than 12%) oxygen gas will ensure that you are unconscious before you hit the ground.

      I've heard quotes like this quite often, but don't understand the mechanism. I can hold my breath in excess of a minute. Residual blood oxygen supplies can keep the brain alive for about 15 minutes with CPR. How is it that breathing in a breath of 'bad air' that has low oxygen content causes loss consciousness so quickly?

    3. Re:Who modded parent informative? CORRECTION! by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Counter nitpick: There are armored diving suits which are actually self-contained. Though I agree that most depend on surface support.

    4. Re:Who modded parent informative? CORRECTION! by phoenixwade · · Score: 1
      No, He's right, if you are SCUBA diving, then you are diving ambient pressure ( the suit being Wet, armored, dry, semi-dry or Chartreuse is irrelevant), and have to concern yourself with gas loading, oxygen toxicity and all those various issues that divers breathing high pressure gas have to concern themselves with.

      You also could be diving a rebreather, which come with the same set of pressure considerations that SCUBA does, but uses a different set of equipment. I've heard instructors differentiate rebreathers from "SCUBA" but historically speaking both can be referred to as SCUBA.

      On the other hand, If you are diving an atmospheric suit, like a Newt Suit, or a GEM, then you are not diving SCUBA. SCUBA refers to a level of apparatus that falls far short of an atmospheric suit (and Far, Far Cheaper)

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  38. Yah, right.. by RichiH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whoever modded you insightful has never seen a proper SCUBA diver. It's the least sexy sport, bar none.

    Unless you build a pee valve into your dry suit, the only way to take a leak in a dry-suit are diapers. Yes, diapers.

    Add the fact that you need to stay hydrated very well and that cold water will make your body pull blood into the torso. This, in turn, makes your bladder work overtime. Being perfectly still most of the time during ascent and the nice bubbly noises all around you adds extra fun!

  39. Posideon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "These include the Posideon Discovery Rebreather and NASA's ENDURANCE." POSEIDON.

  40. Not American-Friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the leading diving instructor/regulator/certification organization in the US and several other countries, I was surprised to not see PADI as one of the organizations which can certify you for the rebreather. Way to go, guys.

  41. Cool, but no 3d please! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 2, Insightful

    3d for this, 3d for that, really , we need 3d like we need a third nipple...useless, especially for something like a documentary....
    I tend to think hollywood just makes all these movies on purpose to waste money when we have a real problem with
    our planet (oil spill) that could use all the help we can give....seems pointless to go to the movies when our planet is dying, and we are doing almost nothing for it...

  42. What's the matter with you people? by wandazulu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    159 comments, as of this writing, and not a *single* Colossal Cave reference? Narry an XYZZY to be found anywhere here? And you call yourselves geeks and nerds. Why, back in my day....now get off my lawn!

    That said, I did a little bit, a very little bit, of cave diving in Hawaii, and while you have to trust your equipment completely when underwater, there was always (to me) the comfort that "escape" is just going straight up. In a cave, you don't even have that. It was quite unnerving and, while I'll always say I had a good time, I was glad when I was back on the surface, climbing into the boat.

  43. "That makes it the highest grossing movie by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    of all time, no more no less."

    its status as highest grossing movie of all time also means it is automatically the highest quality movie of all time

    simply because every other measure of quality you can present to me is subjective. using economic response as a measure of quality is the only objective measure we have

    "Think for yourself. Subjective assessments are fuzzy and unclean."

    you are bouncing my words to you back at me. that's what i'm saying to you: subjectivity is useless. objectivity is the only valid tool to measure quality. and therefore, objectively, economic response is the only valid tool we have to measure quality

    "It's also widely derided for its lackluster characterizations and terrible writing"

    you just broke your own rules about subjectivity

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:"That makes it the highest grossing movie by cgenman · · Score: 1

      I'm just saying that "quality" is an inherently subjective metric. If you prefer an objective metric like "highest grossing," that's fine. But pretty much by definition you can't mix your metrics, or else you are mislabeling your variables.

      "Best" is another big one. You can have a "fastest 0-60 in dry weather on asphalt" "least damage after a 2-story fall into sand" or "best selling" car. But you can't have an objectively "best" car without adding a modifier. That's an inherently subjective judgement, and pushing an objective measurement into it just mislabels your data.

  44. i agree with everything you wrote, but by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i just wish that next time you evangelize about caving/ spelunking, that you put a huge asterisk at the bottom of your sales pitch and explore some of the many easy ways you can wind up very dead in a cave (lost, drowned, asphyxiated, stuck, buried, frozen, steamed, etc.)

    enthusiasm is good, but enthusiasm and caution is what is required for caving/ spelunking. otherwise, if there is a rash of deaths in caves from clueless passionate noobs, authorities may outlaw the practice to amateurs, and that defeats the enthusiasm in your words above

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i agree with everything you wrote, but by deboli · · Score: 1

      I fully agree with that, that's why I suggested to join the local grotto / cave club before going off exploring in the original post. I probably could have emphasised this a bit more.

  45. in true ad&d/ mmorpg fashion, real life caves also involve hordes of subterranean creatures

    did you ever wonder where all these cave dwellers come from? in an interesting symbiosis, those who most often play ad&d/ mmorpgs are already living subterraneously in their mom's basement. and after years they grow pale from lack of sun, derive an ability to subsist on day glo orange subterranean food sources like nachos/ fungus, lose the ability to communicate with surface dwellers- beginning to asocially and atavistically attack them mercilessly without provocation (usually as mindlessly negative trolls on internet forums), and after a few more years of evolution, they turn into the very same cave fodder they dispatched in their ad&d/ mmorpg campaigns

    so don't get them to leave their mom's basements. we need something to slay to make real life caving as exciting as the virtual versions

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  46. it is pretty freudian isn't it? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    going into mother earth's forbidden secret hidden dangerous cave

    so what you are saying is that going caving may later lead to an opportunity to go... caving

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  47. Good question -- here's the answer :) by RichiH · · Score: 1

    Disclaimer: The mechanism is the same, but the numbers are prolly off. Also, red blood cells are good at keeping oxygen; my calculation assumes dilution in liquids, not proper blood.
    Again: The figures are off, but this is the correct mechanism.

    Let's assume you are breathing normal air at 1 bar.

    1 bar * 21% oxygen = 0.21 bar oxygen

    As you know, you exhale about 17% oxygen; let's assume your oxygen level in returning blood is about 13% (I am not sure, sorry. Yet that fits the 12% figure from earlier). As your body needs about a minute to pump all 5 liters of blood through your body when at rest, you arrive at the usual maximum of one minute. Though again, the rising panic you feel when you hold your breath is rising level of CO_2, not dimishing O_2.

    Now, take a lung-full of 0% oxygen. Your blood arrives with 13% oxygen in it and leaves with 6.5%. As your blood takes the fast (and thick) lane to your brain, the effect happens fast.

    To all doctors etc: If you have better figures, _please_ correct me.

    To anyone speaking German: http://www.gtuem.org/984/Tauchmedizin/O2-Mangel.html
    Babelfish: http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translate_url?doit=done&tt=url&intl=1&fr=bf-home&trurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gtuem.org%2F984%2FTauchmedizin%2FO2-Mangel.html&lp=de_en&btnTrUrl=Translate

    1. Re:Good question -- here's the answer :) by wanax · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the explanation. I'm fairly sure your detailed numbers are wrong, but the crux of the point is clear: blood comes back to the heart relatively deoxygenated. If there less oxygen than is normal (or predicted?) enters the blood at that point, then deoxygenated blood goes immediately to the brain, which is under the level needed to support a conscious state and leads to rapid blackout within seconds.

    2. Re:Good question -- here's the answer :) by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Point is, the blood is deoxygenated even _more_, depending on circumstances.

  48. Depends on Technique by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    My assumption in saying you will be crushed is because I assumed you would be using a pressurized suit because this will get you deeper than pressurized gases. Only an idiot would try to use SCUBA to dive to those depths because of the toxic effects of the gases under pressure.

    1. Re:Depends on Technique by RichiH · · Score: 1

      If you are using a pressurized suit you would not dive deeper than its max depth so you would not be crushed.

      Of course there are no suits that go to this depth.

    2. Re:Depends on Technique by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      The situation is hypothetical: if you attempted to dive to 2km using the current best-depth diving equipment you would be crushed, not poisoned.

    3. Re:Depends on Technique by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you really wanted to get down to 2km you would use a surface-supported vessel and it would work ;)

    4. Re:Depends on Technique by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      In a cave? ;-)

  49. Depends of Diving Technique by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    I assumed a rigid suit which gets you deeper than gases - so you have a choice of being crushed later or poisoned sooner.

  50. Yes you would be crushed by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    You would not be crushed. Your body largely consists of fluids, which are hardly compressible.

    However, as you point out gases become toxic at high pressure and so the technique used for deep dives is a rigid suit to maintain a lower pressure environment around the diver. No such suit can survive to such depths hence you would be crushed by the suit collapsing around you and compressing your chest cavity.

  51. Oh, underwater! by grrrl · · Score: 1

    For some reason I assumed "extreme cave diving" was like base jumping, free falling down into the depths of a huge chasm. Took me quite a few comments to realise it meant diving as in scuba diving...

  52. Re:Do you know what's interesting about caves? by epp_b · · Score: 1

    It was a Big Bang Theory reference made in jest. How did Slashdot not get this?