Slashdot Mirror


The Gulf's Great Turtle Relocation Project

An anonymous reader writes "All along the Gulf Coast's beaches it's turtle-hatching season. Conservationists knew the poor hatchlings wouldn't have a chance if they swam out into the oily waters of the Gulf, so they came up with an incredibly ambitious plan: they would dig up 70,000 turtle eggs, carefully raise them in a climate-controlled hanger at the Kennedy Space Center, and release the hatchlings into the clean Atlantic waters off Florida's east coast. Now that project is well underway, and Discover Magazine has pictures of the first batch of hatchlings crawling toward the welcoming waves. But there's a chance all this do-gooding won't do any good. New Scientist found experts who argue that releasing them into the Atlantic rather than into the Gulf will screw up the turtles' navigation systems, which will prevent them from following their normal migratory routes."

104 comments

  1. It's spelled with an 'a', dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    carefully raise them in a climate-controlled hanger at the Kennedy Space Center

    That's hangar, not hanger. Like with separate, it's annoying how few people manage to get it right...

    1. Re:It's spelled with an 'a', dammit by Flyerman · · Score: 1

      I would say this is a bad comparison. Unless you have a very specific set of hangar-based forums, you'd rarely see people use "hangar" anywhere near as much as "separate".

      Maybe a car analogy? People who have to swerve across 2 lanes of traffic to reach the jughandle/exit? Might be less effective in Jersey...

  2. Which beach? by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So will the return to the beach they were released from? Or back to the ones in the gulf? I suspect this will make for some very interesting research in the future.

    1. Re:Which beach? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      They will dutifully crawl out of the ocean and back into the KSC hangar in which they were raised. We'll subsequently hear about some rocket failing to achieve orbit when a clutch of turtle eggs mysteriously causes some malfunction.

  3. Look at the bright side by meerling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe they'll end up establishing new populations in different locations.
    It's certainly better to give them the chance rather than simply let them be exterminated.

    I know, it's a complex situation with many variables that can't even be fully defined, much less accounted for. That's true, but we can only try to mitigate this disaster as best we can, or sit back and complain about those who are trying to fix it. Your choice.

    1. Re:Look at the bright side by Huntr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sometimes doing SOMETHING is worse than not doing anything. Don't be pissed at ecologists who have legit concerns about the turtles. Save that for BP and the gov't response.

    2. Re:Look at the bright side by copponex · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's true, but we can only try to mitigate this disaster as best we can, or sit back and complain about those who are trying to fix it. Your choice.

      This is slashdot. Brace yourself.

    3. Re:Look at the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't be pissed at ecologists...

      (Assumed GP was male) I don't think he was; his reply was very moderate in fact.

      That said, how could leaving the turtles to be wiped out be better than rescuing them and giving them a chance at an unpredictable future? I suppose if they go on to wipe out 2 species because of the change in habitat or something.

    4. Re:Look at the bright side by Dalambertian · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I meant to mod this funny. accidentally hit overrated. wish there were an undo button..

    5. Re:Look at the bright side by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Maybe they'll end up establishing new populations in different locations.
      It's certainly better to give them the chance rather than simply let them be exterminated.

      I think it's important to note that while 70,000 eggs seems like a lot, it comes from only 800 nests in two states. Turtles lay a lot of eggs, because most of them are not going to survive in any case.

      The point here is that they're hardly moving all the turtle hatchlings to the east coast, so if moving them is futile or even detrimental compared to leaving them in the Gulf, that'll be apparent in the outcome of the sea turtles that will hatch in the sands of the Gulf coast. On the other hand, if they have even a chance to survive in the Atlantic while the Gulf ends up being certain death for the turtles left there, then that's a huge win. The species occurs naturally on the Atlantic coast, so it's not like we're introducing a new species with potentially detrimental consequences.

      There's very little downside here, and the potential for a huge upside. The experts may be right that it is futile, but it is absolutely worth trying and I commend these folks for it.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:Look at the bright side by Asic+Eng · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sometimes doing something can be worse than not doing anything - that can be true sometimes, but nobody has suggested it's the case here. However the question has been asked "Why not place them into an area that is thought to be part of their normal migratory route?" Which is an interesting point.

      Of course it's not like the US Fish and Wildlife Service hasn't considered that. [...] releasing the turtles on sand allows scientists to assess how they are coping with the move. The process also mimics turtles' natural behaviour.

      I don't know which side has it right, all involved appear to have arrived at their conclusions by thoroughly considering the alternatives. I don't think it's very useful to delude ourselves that we can determine the correct approach just from a quick glance at a headline. There are lots of complex issues around - that's just the way the world works.

    7. Re:Look at the bright side by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Well, you could post a comment, thus negating your mods to this thread. Why don't you do that?

      Yes, I know, whooosh, and all that. I'm on the east coast and could use a little circulation.

    8. Re:Look at the bright side by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is slashdot. Brace yourself.

      Bracing yourself is futile, and only idiots would try it.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    9. Re:Look at the bright side by rwa2 · · Score: 0

      Meh, it's not like they're moving all the turtles. They're just spreading them around a bit. Most baby turtles get eaten anyway (survival rate from hatching is something like 1/100?), so at worst they're expanding the culinary variety of wildlife out on the panhandle. So we're really talking about ~700 turtles that might reach adulthood, which isn't really all that terribly many in the scheme of things.

      Yeah, doing nothing means no one can hold you accountable for anything. There people who are perfectly happy to live their lives that way. But all the same, I'm glad there are some people who take the initiative and then stand behind their actions, for better or for worse; you could spin it either way.

    10. Re:Look at the bright side by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Consider it risk mitigation. There's some risk relocating them and there's more certain risk NOT relocating them. They're quite unlikely to relocate all of them. This maximizes the odds of some surviving.

    11. Re:Look at the bright side by rollingcalf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Their survival rate is likely to be much higher than usual, because the eggs that are relocated in this project won't be dug up and eaten by animals, and the hatchlings also won't be killed by predators when making their way to the sea.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    12. Re:Look at the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The panhandle is on the gulf side.

    13. Re:Look at the bright side by whoda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Putting non-native species into alternate natural environments has never led to any problems...

    14. Re:Look at the bright side by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is slashdot. Brace yourself.

      You're imagining a Beowulf cluster of turtle hatchlings, aren't you.

    15. Re:Look at the bright side by TheLink · · Score: 1

      FWIW, there's the bit about: "carefully raise them in a climate-controlled hanger" that reminds me of what some bright sparks did in my country (when trying to be helpful):

      They collected lots of turtle eggs and incubated them to try to increase survival rates. However ALL the hatchlings turned out to be females.

      Turtle gender is determined by the temperature of the eggs:

      http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V5X-4002DP2-4&_user=10&_coverDate=12%2F31%2F1995&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1403037906&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=8218153421fb6ec52b5f99062d99f544

      If there aren't that many eggs from that species, screwing up the gender ratio might be worse than just leaving them in "mama turtle" selected spots (and depths).

      In this case I'm guessing that the climate controlled hanger will generate a more natural gender ratio (which probably includes at least one male per generation ;) ).

      --
    16. Re:Look at the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebodies got to save the wee turtles!

      ACH! Save me from the wee turtles!

    17. Re:Look at the bright side by jafiwam · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      No. Complaining about a solution that may not work over one that definitely won't because the one that is a "maybe" is unknown is stupid egghead bullshit.

      There's a reason you fucking nerds never get laid. Sometimes you just gotta cut your losses and deal with the fat chick.

      The criticism of "what will it do to migratory patterns" is hopelessly detail oriented in a big picture that should be very obvious.

      Out of 70k turtle babies, only a handful of them will survive in non-oil soaked condition in the first place.

      The ecologists do not have legit concerns. They are simply doing what dumb narrow minded over specialized dorks do and should in this case, be ignored.

    18. Re:Look at the bright side by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot. Brace yourself.

      You're imagining a Beowulf cluster of turtle hatchlings, aren't you.

      No, he's imagining turtle hatchlings naked in hot grits.

  4. Sad by ceraphis · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is really sad, I always liked turtles. And frogs.

    We may soon see a rash of BP stations being razed with the only clue being some discarded pizza boxes.

    1. Re:Sad by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, there wouldn't be any Mutant Ninja Turtles in the first place were it not for chemicals in the water!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who do all the profits get siphoned off to? You are BP saying "no, no, don't hurt us, because actually you'll be hurting, 'some one else'."

  5. Sure, I can see the disadvantage... by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That the 'experts' are worrying about, but really... what are the other options?

    What are the potential outcomes of letting the hatchlings make their way into the polluted water?
        Turtles die of exposure to oil
        Turtles survive because all the predators have already died from the oil
        Most turtles die, except for a few that have a natural ability to survive on oil
        Surviving turtles attack remaining oil reservoirs and consume them

    Seriously, I think that the people who have committed themselves to preventing a straight up die off of an entire generation of gulf-coast turtles should be commended as heros.

    fwiw, I hope that the 70K extra turtle on the Atlantic coast overwhelm the natural predators and allow more hatchlings to reach adulthood. Is there a chance that the introduced population could displace the natives? Possibly.

    What have been the results of other navigating species (salmon, birds, monarch butterflies...) who are relocated?

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
    1. Re:Sure, I can see the disadvantage... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      What are the potential outcomes of letting the hatchlings make their way into the polluted water?

      Turtles die of exposure to oil

      Turtles survive because all the predators have already died from the oil

      Most turtles die, except for a few that have a natural ability to survive on oil

      Surviving turtles attack remaining oil reservoirs and consume them

      Note, for reference, that on average, 1 sea turtle in 1000 lives to adulthood. So we'd normally expect 70 of them to survive.

      I expect that we'll never be able to tell whether this has done any good at all...

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Sure, I can see the disadvantage... by DougWebb · · Score: 1

      Maybe all of the (surviving) predators that normally kill most of the baby turtles will still be looking for them in the Gulf, and next year there is going to be a turtle plague in Eastern Florida.

    3. Re:Sure, I can see the disadvantage... by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they could sample the genetics of hatchlings and see if there are descendants of gulf turtles emerging from atlantic beaches in the next several years?

      Hell, if people are willing to move 70k eaggs, then why wouldn't they be willing to swab a few thousands turtles, "for the sake of science"

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    4. Re:Sure, I can see the disadvantage... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Birds and butterflies can actually adjust their migration patterns if you offset their starting points. Don't ask me how they do it, I don't think anybody has figured that out yet.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    5. Re:Sure, I can see the disadvantage... by Undead+Waffle · · Score: 1

      Or there will be a plague in eastern Florida of sharks or elephants or whatever it is that eats turtles.

    6. Re:Sure, I can see the disadvantage... by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Funny

      You missed one outcome:
      - Turtles grow to their teenage years, mutate and then move into the city sewers placing a strain on pizza joints who are unable to figure out where to deliver the pizza.

    7. Re:Sure, I can see the disadvantage... by sjames · · Score: 1

      On the bright side only the slowest teens will fall to the invading horde.

    8. Re:Sure, I can see the disadvantage... by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      Or there will be a plague in eastern Florida of sharks or elephants or whatever it is that eats turtles.

      [[Sea turtle#Importance to humans]]

      A plague of humans in eastern Florida? I'm afraid it is a bit late to worry about that!

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    9. Re:Sure, I can see the disadvantage... by camperdave · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Hey, where're ya goin'?"
      "Winter feeding grounds... I think"
      "You're going the wrong way"
      "Damn humans. Mind if I follow you?"
      "Be my guest."

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    10. Re:Sure, I can see the disadvantage... by fermion · · Score: 1

      Another advantage of the east coast is that Louisiana is evidently not enforcing turtle exclusion devices for the fishing boats. Even most of the gulf coast seems to be more concerned with maximizing fish productivity at any cost. It may that the some turtles might survive the oil. It could be that some turtles might not be caught in fishing nets. It may not be that they survive both. Therefore moving east is a good thing.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    11. Re:Sure, I can see the disadvantage... by mqduck · · Score: 1

      That the 'experts' are worrying about

      What's with the scare quotes? Are you implying that you're the *real* expert here?

      --
      Property is theft.
    12. Re:Sure, I can see the disadvantage... by daveime · · Score: 1

      Most turtles die, except for a few that have a natural ability to survive on oil

      And then BP can train them up to plug the holes in all their other leaking wells.

    13. Re:Sure, I can see the disadvantage... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I expect that we'll never be able to tell whether this has done any good at all...

      Actually, if any turtle populations are established on the east coast, we'll know if it's done any good at all. Especially if populations decline in the gulf, which they are almost guaranteed to do.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Sure, I can see the disadvantage... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      I expect that we'll never be able to tell whether this has done any good at all...

      Actually, if any turtle populations are established on the east coast, we'll know if it's done any good at all. Especially if populations decline in the gulf, which they are almost guaranteed to do.

      Since there are already turtle populations on the east coast, we won't notice the addition of about 70 adult turtles in a few years.

      And even the Kemp Ridley sea turtles can be found in the Atlantic from time to time, so finding a few more of them doesn't really tell us much.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  6. always nay-sayers by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You are always going to have people complain, even if you came up with a 100% clean, 100% efficient new energy source there would be some people who complain the miss the taste of pollution or something. Will the turtles die?

    His view is backed up by evidence that suggests turtles are programmed from birth to follow a specific migratory path once in water. Indeed, turtles from different nesting sites seem to inherit different sets of navigational instructions.

    Basically, in the past they have exposed turtles (in tanks?) to magnetic fields and found that they follow the magnetic fields as if they were navigating through the ocean. It kind of surprises me that no one has ever taken a turtle from Texas and put it in the ocean in Florida just to see what would happen. Here is their chance: hope they pay attention to what the turtles do.

    --
    Qxe4
    1. Re:always nay-sayers by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Funny

      It kind of surprises me that no one has ever taken a turtle from Texas and put it in the ocean in Florida just to see what would happen.

      Well, that's my vacation plans settled.

      Airline Check-in in Texas: "Two for Florida? Um, where's the other passenger?"

      Me: "It's this here turtle."

      On the airplane . . .

      Me: "Stewardess, another Martini for me and another squid for the turtle."

      Stewardess: "I think you've had enough, sir."

      Me: "Don't worry, the turtle is driving."

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:always nay-sayers by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      It kind of surprises me that no one has ever taken a turtle from Texas and put it in the ocean in Florida just to see what would happen.

      Well, that's my vacation plans settled.

      Airline Check-in in Texas: "Two for Florida? Um, where's the other passenger?"

      Me: "It's this here turtle."

      On the airplane . . .

      Me: "Stewardess, another Martini for me and another squid for the turtle."

      Stewardess: "I think you've had enough, sir."

      Me: "Don't worry, the turtle is driving."

      Just don't fly AirTran.

    3. Re:always nay-sayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For years they brought sea turtle eggs from Mexico to repopulate Texas beaches.

    4. Re:always nay-sayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me more about the turtles in tanks. I feel they are the only thing stopping the sharks with lasers from taking over the oceans.

  7. best thing is to try both ideas by cats-paw · · Score: 3, Funny

    release 1/2 from the sand
    release 1/2 out to sea

    Then we'll know, right ?

    --
    Absolute statements are never true
    1. Re:best thing is to try both ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you meant, leave 1/2 in place, and move and release the other 1/2 in Florida,
      then I agree completely!

      But maybe the biologists know more about what will work already, from having studied it? Maybe someone somewhere did research on what would happen... wish we'd see a link to something.

  8. more cancelled vacations by get_your_guns · · Score: 1

    So the west coast of Florida is having vacations cancelled because of the oil and now with the release of 50-60,000 confused turtles attracting sharks in a feeding frenzy now the east coast of Florida will suffer as the vacation are cancelled there also.

    1. Re:more cancelled vacations by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Perhaps all those places need to send BP the bill.

  9. Lost at sea beats drowned in BP's gulf . . . by wrencherd · · Score: 1

    . . . but not by much.

    It's a chance, though as one of the experts in TFA said, "Why not place them into an area that is thought to be part of their normal migratory route?"

    I thought that there are loggerheads on the Atlantic/eastern seaboard beaches? Are the gulf turtles so different that they could not survive the change?

  10. Kowabungu dudes by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    Just build a sewer elsewhere and order in some pizza, the turtles will soon move.

  11. Re:A Waste Of Time by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This study shows how the east coast turtles make their way to the gulf stream using; visual cues, wave direction and (finally) magnetic direction:
    http://www.unc.edu/depts/oceanweb/turtles/offshr.html

    They do not show any info on how they make their way back.
    What information are you using to determine that they will just wander back to the gulf?

    At the very least this will give a great study on the 'homing' tendencies of turtles. Do they reurn to where they were hatched (learned behavior) or do they return to where their genetic forebearers lived (genetic imprinting)?

    What advantage do you see to allowing them to die? Is it simply less work for humans? And if those people were not already actively invovled in fixing the well or cleaning up sludge, what negative effect could it have on those efforts?

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
  12. Not Clear We'll Know the Outcome by dangle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nowhere have I seen any information about tagging the turtles to monitor their progress. It might be impossible given their small size at birth in comparison to their adult size, and the fact that this population takes about 18 years to reach sexual maturity. The LAT has a few more details: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-oil-spill-turtles-20100715,0,2244379.story

  13. Relocated to stainless steel tubs .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    then placed over a flame and lightly seasoned. Mmmm turtle soup.

  14. Re:What Food? by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have to wonder - if all the baby turtles natural predators are already dead, and we go release ~70'000 healthy hand nurtured healthy turtles in an ecosystem whose balance has been totally screwed up, perhaps for many decades to come... whether we are just going to be heaping more shit on top of what we have already dumped on the system. The ecosystem does not care that turtles have big teary looking eyes - those little beak's still have to eat something...

  15. Duh? by b4upoo · · Score: 3, Informative

    The same species that nest in the Gulf also nest on the East Coast of Florida which is oil free. The real issue is whether the built in homing instinct for nesting will be to the original nest or to the transplant nest from which they emerge. I have no knowledge of whether the issue has ever been studied. Either way it is still a big problem as the East Coast breeding grounds may not support additional nests as over population and erosion take their toll on natural conditions.

  16. Re:What Food? by Gavin+Scott · · Score: 5, Funny

    Indeed, and when those poor turtles have been exposed to all the toxic mutagens in the oil and the weird chemical dispersants that have been employed, we could all be in serious trouble once they become teenagers...

    G.

  17. Since no one else said it by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    No one else seems to have said it, so I guess it's up to me.

    The Turtle Moves!

  18. Re:What Food? by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Indeed, and when those poor turtles have been exposed to all the toxic mutagens in the oil and the weird chemical dispersants that have been employed, we could all be in serious trouble once they become teenagers...

    G.

    True, but thy still have to find a rat to train them...

  19. I thought the same thing! Bergoo Soup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think aborted baby turtles in the Bergoo Soup taste better, because when you rip the ovarian cyst-like eggs out of the mother turtles back after ripping her shell off, the eggshells are underdeveloped to give a cool refreshing taste when the calcium hits stomach acid. Tastes even better when they're harvested from living gravid females. There is even a wonderful French cuisine that can be cooked from their brains, but I don't trust that because there's a number of pathogens that can be imposed onto whomever eats. I'll stick with buttery turtle babies out of sterile ovarian tissue, thankyouverymuch.

  20. Re:What Food? by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

    I hear people taste good basted in cocoa butter, aloe, or other flavors of SPF. The oceans around Florida are full of enticing human sized morsels.

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  21. How far? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do they just need to rescue the turtles on the surface, or is it turles all the way down?

  22. Turtle relocation is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    RIGHT 90
    RIGHT 90
    FORWARD 100

    1. Re:Turtle relocation is easy by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  23. You have two chances: by seeker_1us · · Score: 1

    slim and none. Take your pick.

    1. Re:You have two chances: by dangitman · · Score: 1

      slim and none. Take your pick.

      Can I buy a vowel?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  24. Re:A Waste Of Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    It's waste of money. What's the benefit of saving the damn turtles?

    In my home country people have been trying to save the damn sea turtle for a damn long time. Look it up: the Sea Turtle Project in Brazil. They look for the nest in beaches and project their surroundings to (greatly) increase survival chances.

    You know what that's useless? Because if you stop to do it, the Sea Turtle population will starting becoming smaller again. It was going to vanish anyway. But people feel good protecting it. The environment changes. Species die. That's it. It seems cruel but it just how it works.

    People seem to think man-made environmental change is different than nature-made. Wake up. Men is part of nature. The Gulf oil spill is no different than a beaver damn collapsing - besides the scale.

    And if you someday drop by a Northeastern Brazil beach, rent a car, go a small coastal town and try a Sea Turtle soup dish - it's kinda of rare, due to protection laws and you may have to look for a while. Ask also for cachaça, the local alcoholic beverage. And chili. It's amazingly good.

  25. oil burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how many barrels of oil was used to power the machines that brought the volunteers to the beaches, dig up the nests, move the eggs, plant the neats, etc...

    1. Re:oil burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Far fewer than were used to build and ship your computer so you could post your wondering on /.

  26. crossovers by hyperion2010 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone else feeling a TMNT / Captain Planet crossover right about now?

  27. Re:What Food? by nschubach · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's the alcohol talking, but ROFL...

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  28. Re:What Food? by Smauler · · Score: 1

    Just about all turtles are endangered - there are a hell of a lot less of them now than there were a few hundred years ago. We've already fucked up the ecosystem by killing most of the turtles.... What most turtles eat (jellyfish) don't seem to be endangered at all - the lack of turtles and other predators seems to be increasing jellyfish numbers. Too many turtles is not going to wreck the ocean biosphere any time soon.

  29. Svetz - Fetch me a Turtle... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 0, Troll

    All this reminds me of those old Larry Niven stories, where some time-traveling nave in the future goes back in time to get whatever animal is requested by the dim-witted ruler. Extinct, mythical, doesn't matter, in the future, they are all things that don't exist, and all the same.

    Turtles? Never seen one. Exist, doesn't exist... all the same to me.

    If they can't survive, they should have evolved better. Oil is a natural product. Do you want them to survive lava flows too?

    Something else will succeed Homo Sapiens as the "dominant" species on this planet someday, and they probably won't worry about our demise. And so it goes.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Svetz - Fetch me a Turtle... by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      You've never seen a turtle?!? Where do you live??

      I guess I'm on the opposite end of the scale from you, I've CRASHED A CAR because of a fucking snapping turtle!

    2. Re:Svetz - Fetch me a Turtle... by atomicthumbs · · Score: 1

      Yes, oil is natural; it's naturally underground. Perhaps you also subscribe to Rush Limbaugh's theory that since it's natural, it'll go away without us doing anything.

      --
      http://pinopsida.com
    3. Re:Svetz - Fetch me a Turtle... by MoeDumb · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link to the article which I read. Learned it is not Limbaugh's but Roy Spencer, PhD's, theory. http://www.drroyspencer.com/about/

      --
      Mod Me Up. You'll make a grown man cry.
    4. Re:Svetz - Fetch me a Turtle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you're disassociated. How emo of you.

      Oil is a natural product. Oil slicks this size are not. Equating any animal dying due to the toxins in oil to evolution is about the most ignorant thing I've ever seen someone write.

      Can we dunk you in crude and see how you handle it?

      Of course we wouldn't expect a turtle to survive in a lava flow, stop being a moron.

      It's very much like people living at the bottom of a volcano. If it erupts, you die or get away. If you survive, you move away from the volcano.* We're moving turtles because we would rather save them the time of dying by the thousand before they figured it out. I'm sure they would figure it out eventually, but why bother letting them die due to our mistake? This situation is all about correcting horrendous mistakes. We're lessening the impact of our screw ups. That's part of responsibility.

      *- Obviously people move back, there is no accounting for these types of people.

    5. Re:Svetz - Fetch me a Turtle... by jprupp · · Score: 1

      The turtles have probably evolved very well. I mean, their cuteness makes us humans feel sorry for them and help them survive. Appealing to another species that can benefit their long term survival is a relative advantages. I'm sure not many people would care if a disgusting creature like the cockroach goes extinct, unless that would become a problem for a more liked creature.

      I think turtles are going to do just fine, if only because some of us help them out when they are having a hard time. It's fortunate that humans can act on behalf of other creatures, new generations tend have a soft spot for biodiversity.

      I for one would like to see that my grandchildren will have the opportunity to see such a wonderful creature. Even if they might not care, I don't see why we should leave them to face extinction. Biodiversity can benefit us in ways that go beyond simple exotic amusement.

      Now I think this is not a task that should be covered by the government with taxpayer funds, but rather by private foundations.

    6. Re:Svetz - Fetch me a Turtle... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

      OK, I have seen a turtle.

      In the zoo. On TV/Movies. Maybe once, long ago, running over them on a turnpike somewhere, back east.

      No. Turtles do not come up in everyday life in the arid southwest. I see mostly people, way too many people. Then ants, birds (the hawks are cool), and the occasional coyote. Oh, and once in a while a rattlesnake - oh and lots of rabbits, and rats, which I don't really think of as useful to me in any way.

      But no. No turtles in any way more meaningful to me than Saber tooth Tigers or Woolly Mammoths.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  30. Re:I thought the same thing! Bergoo Soup! by Racing_Turtles · · Score: 0

    I hate you. Just sayin'

  31. Needs a different title by dbIII · · Score: 1

    The Turtle Moves!

  32. Re:I thought the same thing! Bergoo Soup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just think, if this doesn't work we'll be 70,000 turtles closer to people like you never being able to post about this stuff again. Once they're gone, they're gone, and you'll have to go back to eating boring old veal when you want to piss the weaker-stomached folk off.

  33. This will become the norm by Eclipse-now · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell, there are 6 main ways we are systematically destroying ecosystems. (Not including global warming!) Through what I call the 6 p’s of ecosystem destruction we are systematically taking nature and paving it over, ploughing it up, polluting it, preying on predators, spreading pests, and over-populating the entire planet!

    So as well as the normal conservation programs, I'm guessing we are going to see more of these radical interventions to try and same some of the biodiversity on this planet.

  34. Re:A Waste Of Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have tea partiers in brazil?!?!

  35. Hi by lorenzadutt16 · · Score: 0

    Great information thanks for getting this out there for people like me to read.Thanks for sharing, really cool site... http://www.online-insurance-quotes.org/

    1. Re:Hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! I wonder what this here linky-doohickey does!

  36. Re:What Food? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever tasted raw aloe? I have. It's extremely bitter and unpleasant. Lasts a while too. Stick with the cocoa butter and some dill

  37. Re:A Waste Of Time by atomicthumbs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So it's bad to try to fix something we screwed up?

    --
    http://pinopsida.com
  38. Re:I thought the same thing! Bergoo Soup! by atomicthumbs · · Score: 1

    Serious comment: fortunately, the French eat land turtles, not sea turtles. Most land turtles aren't quite as endangered.

    --
    http://pinopsida.com
  39. Re:A Waste Of Time by daveime · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And while we're at it, let's blame that bitch Mother Nature for wiping out all the Raptors ?

    Just when you think you've heard the dumbest thing possible, someone comes along and breaks the record. Congratulations parent for making my day.

  40. Re:I thought the same thing! Bergoo Soup! by daveime · · Score: 1

    Most land turtles aren't quite as endangered.

    So couldn't we teach them to swim and solve the problem that way ?

  41. Ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What. The. Fuck. We're doomed, right?

  42. Re:What Food? by helix2301 · · Score: 1

    They also need to find a news reporter named April and a guy with a hockey mask named Casey.

  43. A+ for effort though by JasoninKS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even if the turtle's navigation is goofed because of the relocation, at least the people from this project are trying something. I can certainly applaud that. Better to give these turtles a fighting chance than sending them to definite doom.

  44. Go turtles! by koan · · Score: 1

    This way they have a chance, and I think most people underestimate the adaptability of animals, they may be fine navigation wise, but what will they come back to?

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  45. Re:What Food? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    "...and we go release ~70'000 healthy hand nurtured healthy turtles..."

    I wondered the same thing, so I went to TFA to look for photos of 70,000 turtles since I figured that'd be pretty cool to see. Most turtles I saw was a dozen, no photos of large hangars full of turtles or hundreds of containers full of eggs or anything, so I'm wondering where the other 69,988 turtles are, or if "70,000" was just the number of turtle eggs usually laid each year and they used that number but have no intention of actually saving 70,000 turtle eggs.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  46. Well just by jprupp · · Score: 1

    Upgrade their navigation systems.

  47. print(subject) by QuaveringGrape · · Score: 1

    Dear humans,

    Please stop screwing with survival of the fittest. It doesn't work. Ever.

    Sincerely, kingdom Animalia.

  48. The Gulf? by gfreeman · · Score: 1

    Surely I am not the only one to have not immediately thought of the Gulf of Mexico?

    My first thought was of the Persian Gulf, and a Google search for "The Gulf" brings that up first too.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un sig.