Slashdot Mirror


Amateur Radio In the Backcountry?

bartle writes "I spend a lot of time hiking in the Colorado Rockies. Cell phone reception is very unreliable and I'm curious if carrying a small amateur radio would make any sense at all. I don't want to add too much weight to my pack; from what I gather, a radio weighing a pound would give me at most 5 to 10 watts of transmitting power. I have no idea if this is enough to be effective in a mountainous region, and I'm hoping some experienced Slashdot hams could give me a clue. I'm only interested in acquiring a radio and license if it is a lot more effective and reliable than the cell phone I already carry. Otherwise I'll just wait for Globalstar to bring back their duplex service and buy a next-generation SPOT messaging device. (I know some Slashdotters will want to suggest a modern SPOT or Personal Locator Beacon; these are suitable for the worst kinds of emergencies, but I'll point out that reliable communication can help prevent small crises from becoming big ones.) Are small amateur radios effective in the field, or are vehicle rigs really the only way to go? Or am I better off just waiting for satellite?"

376 comments

  1. depends on where the repeater is by cgrant · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most frequently you're going to be talking to a repeater, so it depends somewhat on where you are in relation to the repeater. Having said that 5-10 watts is a lot of power compared to a cell phone.

    KA0ZRW - now in WA

    1. Re:depends on where the repeater is by sentientbeing · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes. Most frequently you're going to be talking to a repeater, so it depends somewhat on where you are in relation to the repeater.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    2. Re:depends on where the repeater is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What? Is this someone's bot gone wild?

    3. Re:depends on where the repeater is by rwade · · Score: 1

      It took me entirely too long to get this joke. Wow -- I'm aging, eh?

    4. Re:depends on where the repeater is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow -- I'm aging, eh?

      Well, you sound like you're Canadian... So you can be forgiven...

    5. Re:depends on where the repeater is by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Funny

      whoosh!

      --
      No sig today...
    6. Re:depends on where the repeater is by atomicthumbs · · Score: 1

      He could use a satellite repeater, couldn't he?

      --
      http://pinopsida.com
    7. Re:depends on where the repeater is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Most frequently you're going to be talking to a repeater.

    8. Re:depends on where the repeater is by mysidia · · Score: 1

      This is most effective if you install and maintain the repeater, then you could make design decisions that will effect what area should be covered by your repeater :)

    9. Re:depends on where the repeater is by JustOK · · Score: 0, Redundant

      whoosch!

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    10. Re:depends on where the repeater is by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

      **chk BEEP**

      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    11. Re:depends on where the repeater is by rhook · · Score: 1

      He can also program the rangers frequencies into the radio for use during an emergency.

    12. Re:depends on where the repeater is by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Entirely too long? I had to read your post before I realized that someone attempted a joke. But then it hit me and made it more funny then it otherwise should have been. If you're aging, I'm probably ready to retire.

    13. Re:depends on where the repeater is by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes. Most frequently you're going to be talking to a repeater, so it depends somewhat on where you are in relation to the repeater.

      Make sure you program the repeaters into the radio before you head out. These are available at many area ham radio websites. In addition...it would be worth the time/money to buy an extra battery...along with a battery adapter which uses AA batteries.

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    14. Re:depends on where the repeater is by benfell · · Score: 1

      Finally, the beginnings of a correct approach to this question.

      First, we can't really answer because we don't know specifically where you would be backpacking. The comments about line of sight are, of course, correct, but repeaters may indeed exist where cell sites do not. The American Radio Relay League (ARRL) publishes guides to repeaters and a Windows program (which I haven't recently tried under Wine) that can somewhat automate the process.

      N4RKY

    15. Re:depends on where the repeater is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      NVIS antennas on HF (High Frequency) bands tend to be the best communications setup for mountainous terrain. This style of antenna moves the takeoff angle of your antenna from being near the horizon (good for long distance) to straight up. This is less efficient because at this steep of an angle most of the signal passes through the ionosphere rather than bounce off of it. However, if you're only trying to communicate with someone within 10-100 miles of your location the amount of signal reflected will be enough to communicate. Your best bet is to use 80m at night and 40m during the day.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_Vertical_Incidence_Skywave

      Then you get into the problem of having an antenna that is not only portable but can be tuned for multiple bands. You can bring a couple of lightweight low power dipoles cut for each band. If that's too much of a hassle to erect while in the field you can go with something like a buddipole.

    16. Re:depends on where the repeater is by True+Vox · · Score: 1

      That was no 'bot, that was a sentient being!

      --
      "Gratuitous complexity is akin to chaos" - True Vox
    17. Re:depends on where the repeater is by u38cg · · Score: 1

      whoosh!

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    18. Re:depends on where the repeater is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have either yet to get the joke or not found it very funny. I suspect the former. Have mercy, would someone please explain?

    19. Re:depends on where the repeater is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree that 5 watts is a lot more than the 1/2 watt you will get from a cell... a cell is very restricted. You have to be in range of the cell tower to get anything useful. With a Ham radio you can use a simplex frequency and talk direct with out the use of a repeater.

      Also one thing to think about is a directional antenna. There are many models out there, one of which is www.arrowantennas.com they offer a back pack portable yagi which can be used to communicate for 100 miles or more in a line of sight.

      in my opinion, cells have their place, but I have a ham license as well, and use it as much or more than my cell. No I am not one of the old guys that have been at it for years...

      AE7JM

      Jim Morrison

    20. Re:depends on where the repeater is by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Informative

      A little more technical detail:

      Most small/compact (handheld) amateur radios are UHF/VHF units. (Usually called HTs, for Handheld Transceivers) The two most popular ham bands are the 2 meter (144-148 MHz) and 70 cm (approx. 440 MHz, I'm a bit rusty and haven't touched my radio in a few years.)

      VHF/UHF communications is line of sight based, so unless you're within LOS of a repeater, you probably won't be able to do much, unless you have friends nearby with similar units. You can operate VHF/UHF HTs in a unit-to-unit (Simplex) mode, but most people use them to talk via repeaters. Repeaters listen on one frequency and transmit on another, usually with an offset of 600 kHz in the 2 meter band. Even if you are in coverage of a repeater, it's not always guaranteed someone will be listening.

      APRS (Automatic Packet Reporting System) can report your position with periodic position broadcasts. This could let friends track your movements whenever you're in coverage of an APRS gateway or digipeater, for example at http://aprs.fi/

      There are also portable solutions for HF (global) communications (frequency 30 MHz), but the most portable solutions (suitable for a backpacker) will only do Morse code and not voice.

      Getting a license is pretty easy and cheap (no Morse code required for the Technician license that allows VHF/UHF operation, and the FCC may even be allowing operation on the HF bands without a Morse test now - I'm not sure if they've updated their rules based on the ITU rule changes a few years ago), so I would recommend starting the process of studying and finding an exam session now.

      Andy Dodd
      N2YPH

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    21. Re:depends on where the repeater is by Nate+B. · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but not wise, IMHO. Some years ago there was a case in California where a hiker got into hot water for transmitting on the local sheriff's frequency to report a legitimate emergency. The FCC did nothing to defend the radio amateur for using any means at his disposal during an emergency. Since then my advice is that radio amateurs do not have carte blanche access to the frequencies of other radio services even during a legitimate emergency.

      In short, transmitting outside the amateur radio bands opens one up to any legal actions from all entities up to and including the FCC.

      --

      "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
    22. Re:depends on where the repeater is by rhook · · Score: 1

      If it's not a matter of life or death you can get in trouble, what was the emergency?

  2. VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by v1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    and don't work well in the mountains unless you and the other guy are both within line of sight of each other. Repeaters can help work around the LoS problem but there probably aren't many in the area you are considering.

    jacking up your power can only help so much. it's not like the higher power blasts through the mountains. Higher antennas can help, but if you're already in mountains, you are probably outgunned in the height department.

    Some form of satellite is probably going to be your best bet. Or some lower frequency (LF/HF) that will cover variable ground terrain better.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by mmontour · · Score: 1

      Or some lower frequency (LF/HF) that will cover variable ground terrain better.

      One radio to look at is the Yaesu FT-817ND. It's a relatively compact battery-powered unit that covers HF as well as VHF and UHF bands. However this unit is still much heavier and bulkier than a modern 144 MHz handheld.

      Question for the original poster - who do you want to talk to? Is this mainly for communication within a group of hikers? Is it to reach someone at a nearby city, and if so will that person also have a radio? Do you need to make a telephone call from your radio?

    2. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by speleo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree. I've used cell phones, VHF/UHF HTs, and satellite phones in the backcountry and if reliable emergency communication is your primary concern a satellite phone like Iridium is your best bet.

      You can get portable high frequency ham radios that can talk over the horizon, but they start go get a bit bulky and require an more complex antenna setup for best results.

      With an Iridium phone you can get it out, lock onto a satellite and be talking to someone in minutes. You do need to see a sizable portion of the sky, though -- they don't work very well in dense forest. And keep in mind 911 doesn't work on Iridium so have some numbers programmed in. The cell phone revolution seems to have rendered actually remembering someone's phone number a lost art.

    3. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hi the "Line of sigh Myth" is still being told I see dont blame anyone as many "Noted books" still use this old myth.

      VHF 144 - 148 MHz two meter Amateur radio hand held radios running 5 watts (standard high power on most) work great in mountainous terrain as long as the are established amateur radio repeaters in the area.

      Most areas in the pacific Northwest were I live have good VHF coverage into the back country many with open auto patches.

      Satellite phones are ok unless you going into valleys or deep forest were either you cant not "see" the birds or via "vegetation attenuation" of the signal to unusable levels.

      Cheer's

    4. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by jfandre · · Score: 0

      Ok, if you're real lucky, you may be able to connect with a repeater that has autopatch capability. Then you might be able to make phone calls, but that depends on how the repeater owner has the autopatch set up. You may be only able to make local calls, or if you make arrangements with the owner ahead of time, you may be able to make long distance calls. Just do a google for say, colorado repeaters and you should find a listing. Then you can contact the repeater owners.. You could also look at http://www.colcon.org/ . This is a network of linked repeaters. May be a way to get a message to the outside world if that's all you're looking for.

    5. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 5, Informative

      Amateur radio is dieing. There isnt a need for it anymore and the "hams" are getting old. 144mhz is the new CB where anything goes. I suggest getting satellite devices or something along those lines. Dont waste your time or money on amateur radio.

      You know, you shouldn't demonstrate your ignorance in public like that. There were a record number of new amateur radio licenses issued in 2009 and the number of new licensees in 2010 is already ahead of that pace.

      Not only is amateur radio not dying (note the correct spelling of that, BTW), it's thriving.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    6. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Where are your NetCraft numbers to back that up?

    7. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Nethead · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just make sure you bring your home-made J-pole twinlead antenna and a sling shot. Get that baby up in a tree and you'll hit something (Lyman, Pilchuck, Gold Mountain, Tiger, Cougar, Mission Ridge.. something.)

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    8. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this marked informative? They're making unsupported claims, and frankly, with the crap spelling, I wouldn't trust anything unsupported that this person says. ESL isn't the problem, since they live in the "pacific Northwest." Unless there's something to back this up, I'd ignore it.

    9. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amateur radio is dieing. There isnt a need for it anymore and the "hams" are getting old. 144mhz is the new CB where anything goes. I suggest getting satellite devices or something along those lines. Dont waste your time or money on amateur radio.

      You know, you shouldn't demonstrate your ignorance in public like that. There were a record number of new amateur radio licenses issued in 2009 and the number of new licensees in 2010 is already ahead of that pace.

      Not only is amateur radio not dying (note the correct spelling of that, BTW), it's thriving.

      Exactly correct. And further, all ham bands are monitored, so don't think you'll be getting away with that 11 meter cr@p on the amateur bands. 73

    10. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      The "open autopatches" thing makes me wonder a bit, too. I can't remember there ever being very many of those and, in my area at least, there's only one operating autopatch left out of a dozen or so. Cell phones pretty much killed them off.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    11. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by atomicthumbs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm a ham and I'm eighteen years old. I got my license in 2006. I don't think amateur radio's gonna die anytime soon.

      --
      http://pinopsida.com
    12. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by pspahn · · Score: 1

      ESL isn't the problem, since they live in the "pacific Northwest."

      Doesn't Vancouver, BC have the largest Chinatown in the world (outside of China, of course)?

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    13. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Manfre · · Score: 1

      Removing the Morse Code requirement definitely did lower the bar so more people could hop over.

    14. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "With an Iridium phone you can get it out, lock onto a satellite and be talking to someone in minutes." ...and you can rent one for 40$ a week.

    15. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Around the Vail valley ski resorts there are open repeaters on many peaks... not sure about the back country. You should be able to do some internet research to turn up a list of open repeaters in the area you are interested in. My experience using handheld amateur radio (in quiet, back-country type locations) as a cell replacer is: with a repeater: good for "local" use within the range of the repeater network, without a repeater: you can often achieve the same thing by shouting loudly.

    16. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amateur radio is dying on its feet. The average age of participants across the world is increasing year on year.

      If there are more licences it is because the licence system has been dumbed down and these days any Tom, Dick and Harry can get a basic licence with a couple of weeks reading. No need for morse any more.

      There was a time when being able to communicate with someone across the other side of the world was a unique and amazing experience and young people were drawn to it. These days all you need is a satellite phone or in most cases, an ordinary mobile phone.

      I belong to an amateur radio club. I would be surprised if the average age is less than fifty. That fits with my experience visiting other clubs in the region (UK)

      That isn't to say it can't adapt and attract a new audience (the world of independent networks and exemption from the arbitrary off switch controlled by the state appeals to me.

      But be honest, most amateur radio bods tend to be older.

    17. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Except on 75m SSB.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    18. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Rachel+Lucid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm one of the new 2009 licenses.

      Internet repeaters help.

    19. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for stepping on that lid. Just upgraded my license to general. Will be going up to extra. Am working on getting others interested. Here in Hurrican Alley it is the only thing which works after a good storm blows through. KB5VYA

    20. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Working on my Extra now, hope to have it in a couple of months. A lot of math involved, something I'm not very good at.

      Drop me an e-mail at [mycallsign] @ cox.net if you'd like to set up a QSO some time. I work 20m (days) and 40m (evenings) PSK31 a lot.

      73 de KJ6BSO

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    21. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

      I've carried a VHF/UHF HT on a couple backpacking trips in the Smokies. Even having every repeater in the area programmed in (including all the non-ham ones I could find), I was usually out of coverage of everything. I could sometimes "kerchunk" one on a ridge, but any emergency use would probably require a lot of hiking and trial and error. (Now that's with a decent "rubber duck" antenna. A good directional antenna could help with that to some extent, especially if you know the bearing to the repeater, but can't cut through a mountain.)

      I would seriously consider just renting a decent PLB and learning how to best prevent small emergencies from becoming large ones.

    22. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by mlievore · · Score: 1

      Also, it is up 60% from 1984 to 2009... Next time check your numbers before shouting your mouth off!

    23. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by rhook · · Score: 1

      Amateur radio is dying on its feet. The average age of participants across the world is increasing year on year.

      Of course the average age is increasing, they're getting older every year, same as everyone else on the planet.

    24. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by rhook · · Score: 1

      Plus airtime.

    25. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can also find the phones on ebay and get a prepaid card.

    26. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the "Line of sigh Myth" is still being told "
      "work great in mountainous terrain as long as the are established amateur radio repeaters in the area"

      So, uh, why do you think they need repeaters if "line of sight" is a myth? Could you be remarkably retarded? Splendidly stupid?

    27. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the actual Chinatown in Vancouver, BC, is pretty small. However, the Chinese population in Richmond, BC, that's huge.

    28. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by headonfire · · Score: 2

      "Line of sight" is not a myth. It is fact. You're talking about using a repeater. If there is a repeater, you need line of sight to hear and speak with it. That's how life above 30 MHz is. Period.

      (Barring the exception of ~50Mhz when solar and ionospheric conditions are good, both of which are quite variable, and currently both pretty bad. Not reliable for emergency communications, but good enough for a hobbyist to play with.)

      VHF/UHF do *not* work well in mountainous, densely forested regions, anyplace there are things between stations. That's physics, son.
      Even inside large skyscraper buildings, there can even be problems with law enforcement handheld radios on different floors and outside on the ground, not to mention between units outside with all those tall stone and metal structures around them. There are things in place to fix that, but the problem had to be taken into account.

      So, essentially what you've suggested is that he rely on the potential existence of somebody else's hardware somewhere in the mountains with known bad terrain using a possibly inappropriate technology.

      Nice one.

      Otherwise, I say the OP should check this comment out: http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1731206&cid=33015672 [slashdot.org] . Consider carrying a current repeater map/directory of the area and a quad-band handheld, recognize that he may have to climb to a high point to use it, hope that somebody is listening, and realise that if he breaks a leg at the bottom of a valley he'd better have that SPOT locator handy because that radio probably isn't getting out anywhere. And don't chuck out that cell phone, either - amateur radio is no replacement for it.

      And yeah, I'm a licensed operator. I enjoy my hobby and encourage others to join in, but it does require a learning curve that's a bit more than buying a shiny thing from a guy in a turtleneck. Learning to implement the right technology for the right situation is part of that, I think.

    29. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If the average age is increasing, it means that fewer young people join those clubs.

    30. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      In the UK, there is a very simple Morse test (send and receive a short phrase, with reference to a code chart, as quickly or as slowly as you need to). You do this for *any* licence, whereas before the CW test was only required for the HF bands.

      Now, what's interesting about that is, very nearly everyone that has sat their Foundation licence test at our club in the past year has gone on to learn more about Morse. Maybe they haven't built up any great proficiency (ha! I should talk!) but they're interested, and keen to improve their Morse skills. I think it's a reaction to the easy, "throw power and computers at it" attitude of modern digital voice and data modes.

    31. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by jfroot · · Score: 2, Informative

      And keep in mind 911 doesn't work on Iridium so have some numbers programmed in. The cell phone revolution seems to have rendered actually remembering someone's phone number a lost art.

      This is untrue. 911 does work on Iridium and is handled by an outsourced company called Intrado. Additionally, you do not need an active account or SIM for 911 to work. Which makes an Iridium Sat phone a great emergency back-country tool.

    32. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by silverdr · · Score: 1

      Sorry - I am a ham myself (for many years now) - but he's got a point. The number of licences and the relative ease of acquiring one these days, makes it exactly feel like the next CB, where "everything goes". Again - I am sorry but that is how an older ham sees (or rather: hears) it.

      --
      Now, mod me down freely. My karma can't get any worse...
    33. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      My 2-meter radio works quite well when hiking in the mountains of Northern Arizona, where I live. From most locations I can usually access several different repeaters. It helps that I use a much larger telescoping 5/8 wave antenna, than the small rubber ducky antenna which came with the radio. On maximum power the radio puts out 5-Watts power.

      Several of the repeaters that I can usually reach are on various mountain tops about 50 miles away. At that distance, using my old hand held Kenwood TH-22 2-meter radio and a telescoping 5/8 wave antenna, I can usually be heard quite clearly. In many cases, I have been able to access the repeaters clearly, even when smaller hills blocked my view of those mountains. Of course if I were down in a deeper canyon, I probably would not have been able to reach any repeater.

      I have also talked directly to another ham when using my 2-meter radio directly without going through a repeater. I have sometimes been able to talk quite quite clearly, from about 10 or 20 miles away, line of sight, even when the radio was on its lowest power setting. In one experiment under those circumstances, I tried switching antennas and power levels and found that the 5/8 wave antenna using the 0.05 Watt power setting, performed about as well as the small rubber ducky antenna when using the maximum 5 Watts setting.

      Each mountain top repeater, is located in different direction. So depending on which repeater I choose, I can talk to hams in a different city or town. Each repeater is on a different frequency.

      About 5 or 10 years ago, a brief thunderstorm came up while I was hiking. After getting back to the main road at a view point, I spotted a very small fire off in the distance, in the forest. The fire was a barely visible spec of smoke off in the distance. Two people with cell phones tried to call 911, but could not get a signal. So using the 2-meter radio in my truck, I easily accessed the first repeater that I tried, to ask someone to report the fire for me. Another ham immediately, replied, saying that he could call it in for me.

      A couple of minutes later, the other ham told me that someone in a lookout tower, could see it too. A few minutes later a smaller, off road type firefighting truck rolled up and 3 firemen got out with binoculars, a radio, a map, a some kind of device for pinpointing the exact location of the fire in the distance. As they talked into their radio, I could her them say that it looked like just one burning snag and that they could cancel the air tanker. It was good that they were able to quickly put out the fire while it was just one burning snag.

      I am not very active in ham radio. But when hiking or backpacking I usually take along either an extra battery pack or an extra battery case, that holds 4 AA batteries. I also bring my cell phone too. My 2-meter radio frequently works in places where my cell phone does not get a signal. Living in Arizona, I would not want to run out of water after being stranded for a few days after breaking a leg while hiking or after my 4 wheel drive truck broke down.

    34. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by otterpop81 · · Score: 1

      and don't work well in the mountains unless you and the other guy are both within line of sight of each other. Repeaters can help work around the LoS problem but there probably aren't many in the area you are considering.

      It's true that you only get line of sight (ish) to a repeater, but in mountainous areas, repeaters are often located on the tops of the mountains. In my experience, some of the farthest distances I've ever worked on VHF have been in the mountains (which is mostly in the Appalachians). I'm sure someone will say, "Rockies are different, etc." Fine. Like another poster said, "it depends."

      Keep in mind too, that even though people use the term line-of-sight, you can clearly talk to people you can't physically see. (Not sure how much you know about radio, etc, and the term is a bit misleading.)

      My experience is that being on the side of a mountain works great for simplex. In between two mountains, of course, less so.

      Check an online repeater directory either here:
              http://www.artscipub.com/repeaters/states/Colorado.asp
      or here:
              http://www.usrepeaters.com/
      to see if there's one near the top of a mountain you're interested in backpacking on.

      As another poster said, find a local radio club and ask them. Local hams will know best where the coverage is in your area.

    35. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      I neglected to mention that there is also a much closer repeater in or near each of the small mountain ranges where I usually hike. So frequently the nearest repeater is only about 10 or 20 miles away, on a mountain top. So with the help of the telescoping 5/8 wave antenna on my hand held 2-meter radio, I can usually access that or some other repeater. It also helps that there are usually repeaters off in several directions, since the hilltops are usually lower in at least one direction.

      If it is just one small nearby hill, more often than not, the 2-meter radio signals seem to be able to bounce or bend themselves around that one small obstacle. But, I have occasionally been in places, such as deep canyons, where I could not access any repeater.

      The mountains in this part of Arizona are not as rugged as in many parts of Colorado, so I am not sure just exactly how it would compare. But, about 12 years ago I had similar good results when accessing a couple of repeaters when hiking in southern Utah.

      The 2-meter radio in my pickup truck is even more powerful, with 50 Watts maximum power and a 5/8 wave antenna on the roof.

    36. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by tresho · · Score: 1

      "open autopatches" Last week I heard one being used on a 2M repeater near Great Smoky Mountains National Park in an area with no cell phone coverage. Some young people camping in the park were checking in with Dad at home. YMMV.

    37. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time check your numbers before shouting your mouth off!

      The phrase is "shooting your mouth off".

    38. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      It's the "open" part I was wondering about. All of the autopatches I was ever aware of required entering a DTMF code and getting the code (understandably) required membership in the organization that maintained the repeater. The only one left here in San Diego County is that way.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    39. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by tresho · · Score: 1

      The kids who were camping apologized at the end of their patch, saying the repeater was the only way they could contact Dad from where they were. That makes me thing the repeater was an open one. However, I didn't note any of the repeater's details.

    40. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Builder · · Score: 1

      The reason that ham in the UK is dying is because of the foundation licence. I'd just started studying for my licence when they brought that poxy thing in, and as a result I dropped out.

      I am not able to schlepp about to a club. Most of my free time is between 1 and 4am and I wanted to study in my own time. I didn't want to sit in a club with a bunch of bores learning at other people's pace. I didn't want to have to spend 2 hours commuting to my nearest place.

    41. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      There are exceptions to the line of sight rule for VHF/UHF, such as knife edge diffraction, reflections (e.g. your signal might bounce off of a valley wall and reach a repeater just out of LOS) and tropospheric ducting (likely not to see that in mountains, it's more of an over-water thing usually.)

      However you can't rely on these to get you more than a little bit of extra distance unless you get lucky.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    42. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by headonfire · · Score: 1

      Those phenomenon are far from the norm, though, and, in context, hardly worth mentioning to the OP. They're essentially technicalities that won't serve him practically, which is what it sounds like he's looking for.

      Ducting is the only "real" exception to line of sight and is highly dependent on solar and geomagnetic conditions and is not at all reliable or regular communications. I've witnessed some incredible 2 meter ducting, though. A couple hundred miles on 5 watts out, though for a brief period of time during the summer in the midwest across the plains.

      Otherwise, knife's edge is just an angular bending of the signal and reflection is like a mirror - both sides still have to be able to see the "mirror" to communicate, and the "mirror" in this case is entirely dependent on random circumstance of location.

      These aren't really viable or applicable to this guy's needs. If he wanted to play with radio as a hobby and not as a tool then he could have a lot of fun experimenting, but that (sadly, in my opinion, but i'm a little biased, it being a hobby of mine!) isn't the case here.

    43. Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but amateurs have over 20 satellites in orbit right now that can be used for low power communication: http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/satellites/status.php

  3. Handheld + crossband repeater at the vehicle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As noted it does depend on where the repeaters are/what local frequencies are in use.... that much said - some car units are designed as cross-band repeaters and could take the 1-5 watts of a handheld and retransmit on another frequency with a bit more output power....

    1. Re:Handheld + crossband repeater at the vehicle... by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Right, because if your car battery dies, you want it to take down your communications and your means of egress.

      If you're going to do this, get a second battery for the radio, so you can still start your engine.

    2. Re:Handheld + crossband repeater at the vehicle... by rhook · · Score: 1

      It would also be a good idea to have a solar charger on your roof so you can keep the radio on the air. The solar panel will also make it easier for your vehicle to be spotted from the air.

  4. It isn't like telephone service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Communicating in the mountains is tricky. The low conductivity of rock means ground wave (low frequencies) isn't very good. The mountains themselves block line of sight making high frequencies problematic. Amateur satellite communication is low bandwidth. Shortwave skip works but is unpredictable. Your best bet is to put a repeater on top of a mountain (expensive and difficult).

    Amateur radio probably won't replace your cell phone. Talk to the local hams and find out what they're doing. Maybe they already have a repeater for instance. You should get to know them in any event because you may find that your life depends on them.

    1. Re:It isn't like telephone service by LandGator · · Score: 1

      So? You've forgotten NVIS

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_Vertical_Incidence_Skywave

      qsl.net/wb5ude/nvis

      developed by the Fritz in the Big One

      tactical-link.com/WWII_NVIS.htm

      which allows our ARES unit to cover from Victoria to Sacramento and inland to Boise from Portland on five watts; no repeater required.

      NVIS has many advantages over traditional HF antennas, not the least of which is the ability to get out from canyons as well as flatlands and mountains. The antenna is light, matching the weight of the rigs recommended below. NVIS also reaches out locally, not skipping hundreds to thousands of miles away, so you will end up talking to a ham who likely knows where you are and which PSAP (Public Safety Answering Point, AKA 911 Call Center) to call to get you help quickest.

        'QRP' radios are designed for low power operation on SSB voice and CW as well as FM. You can buy a factory made FT-817ND

      if you don't feel the joy of DIY

      qrpp.org/#qrp_kits

        - but, I tell you what, the kits

      elecraft.com/K1/K1.htm

      are much lighter, as light as 9 oz.

      elecraft.com/KX1/KX1.htm

      eham.net/reviews/detail/101

      g4ilo.com/mfjcub.html

      CW is a paper tiger; you can learn it well in a month, and there's a surfeit of training aids now to help you learn.

      dxzone.com/cgi-bin/dir/jump2.cgi?ID=3045

      youtube.com/watch?v=6-3pYkvKRe8&feature=related

      --
      There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  5. Try the local ham radio club by cgrant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You might try to find a local ham radio club and ask what their experiences in the area are, and specifically where you're going to be hiking.

    1. Re:Try the local ham radio club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they should also be able to help you study for your license. Remember, that in order to operate any of this equipment
      being discussed here, you need an amateur radio license, and the only way to get one is to pass the licensing exam. By
      doing so, you will become familiar with the rules and regulations and also understand how things are set up and why.

      An earlier post mumbled something about the purported power limits for handhelds - that may apply to other radio services
      (e.g., MURS, FRS, CB, etc.), but isn't pertinent to the amateur radio service, where the permitted power limits are much higher
      and are well beyond what a typical handheld radio can provide.

  6. talk to your outfitter? by xSauronx · · Score: 1

    I would expect that outfitters in that area who providing hiking supplies and such may have some idea as to what your best options are. Surely you know a place or two local to your area with experienced hikers that you can consult? Just an idea, maybe you've tried that already.

    --
    By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
  7. Satellite phone by hansbrix · · Score: 3, Informative

    Inmarsat. It works in the mountains of Afganistan.

  8. Don't do it! by Suzuran · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ham radio is a HOBBY for people interested in communicating by radio, and the technical development of same.

    It is not a replacement for your cell phone. It is not a replacement for ship-to-shore-email services. It is not a replacement for wi-fi.
    We are not the Police/Fire Reserve. We are not the DHS Auxiliary. We are not the NOAA Field Agents. We are not an emergency communications service.
    (We -can- do this stuff as a matter of Last Resort, "When All Else Fails", but that is not our primary purpose! Many people forget this!)

    If you are not interested in communication by radio or the technical development involved in doing so, DO NOT waste your time with ham radio.
    You will only disappoint yourself.

    1. Re:Don't do it! by N2UX · · Score: 1

      Actually, per the FCC regulations, the primary purpose of HAM radio *is* as a replacement for all other radio communications in an emergency. The "hobby" and "promotion of the radio arts" parts are secondary.

    2. Re:Don't do it! by jridley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uh, actually, one of the primary reasons that the FCC originally and still allows amateur radio the really impressive set of bands and technologies that they are allowed is that they ARE there for emergency communications.

      What do you think Field Day is all about?

    3. Re:Don't do it! by Suzuran · · Score: 2, Informative

      97.1 Basis and purpose.-
      The rules and regulations in this Part are designed to provide an amateur radio service having a fundamental purpose as expressed in the following principles:
      (a) Recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service to the public as a voluntary noncommercial communication service, particularly with respect to providing emergency communications.
      (b) Continuation and extension of the amateur's proven ability to contribute to the advancement of the radio art.
      (c) Encouragement and improvement of the amateur service through rules which provide for advancing skills in both the communications and technical phases of the art.
      (d) Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of trained operators, technicians, and electronics experts.
      (e) Continuation and extension of the amateur's unique ability to enhance international goodwill.

      Nowhere does it say the primary or majority function of the ARS is emergency communications.
      Only one of these principles mentions the word "emergency" and it is not the "primary".

    4. Re:Don't do it! by N2UX · · Score: 1, Informative

      Look at the very last part of paragraph A. "Particularly with respect to providing emergency communications"

    5. Re:Don't do it! by Suzuran · · Score: 2, Informative

      Field Day is about operating under minimal conditions. This can be useful in an emergency but that is not its SOLE or MAIN focus. It is not a training exercise for any branch of the military or law enforcement.

    6. Re:Don't do it! by Suzuran · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a comma there, not a period. They are clarifying the "voluntary noncommercial" part of item A.
      Item A is not any more or less important than any of the other items.

      If the ARS is redefined such that emergency communications becomes our primary or main focus, then the other items can AND WILL be eliminated as extraneous.
      We must not fall into this trap!

    7. Re:Don't do it! by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Shhh! How do you think I get the local emergency management to pay for my toys!

      tribalhams.net

      73 de w7com

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    8. Re:Don't do it! by N2UX · · Score: 1

      The "comma" provides the reason for all of the other things, which is for Emergency Communications. To argue otherwise is inane.

      If Emergency Communications is not the prime reason, then we *will* lose our bandwidth to entities willing to pay a lot more than we can.

    9. Re:Don't do it! by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      If Emergency Communications is the prime reason, then we *will* lose our bandwidth to those same entities whenever there isn't an emergency, for the same reasons.

      Consider APRS messages.
      "Hey FCC, AT&T/Verizon here, why are these hams competing with me by sending text messages on emergency frequencies? They are an emergency service, and there's not an emergency, so why are they allowed to do this?"

      That's why we have to have five reasons, so as to not have all our eggs in one basket.

    10. Re:Don't do it! by stevew · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You really need to get off your high horse.

      The guy has a license - so that means he passed the same test as you did. He thinks it might be a reasonable safety option - and he's trying to verify that opinion. If he winds up using it for an emergency, then he well within the basis and purpose of the service. If he doesn't use to do anything else but talk to some buddies while he's hiking - he STILL is within reasonable and normal usage.

      So PLEASE drop out of lecture mode.

      --
      Have you compiled your kernel today??
    11. Re:Don't do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone! What's the point here exactly? If you hear an emergency broadcast you seriously will intentionally ignore it? Because you're just there to further the art of radio?

    12. Re:Don't do it! by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      No, of course not. That would be stupid. But that doesn't mean I should have to misrepresent everything I do as being under the auspices of emergency preparation.

    13. Re:Don't do it! by Suzuran · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, he didn't pass the same test I did. They discontinued the test I passed because it was "too hard" and "no longer relevant".

      That aside, nowhere does it say that he has a license. He doesn't want to use it just for an emergency either, he wants to use it as a more reliable cellphone in non-emergency situations.
      That's why he's asking about duplex sat service.

    14. Re:Don't do it! by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Field Day is about operating under minimal conditions. This can be useful in an emergency but that is not its SOLE or MAIN focus. It is not a training exercise for any branch of the military or law enforcement.

      It's also about getting amateur radio out there in front of the public in order to attract people to the hobby. There's a low-level disagreement in my ARC about whether we should continue to have our Field Day activities in the same remote mountain campground we've been using for the last few years or move them to somewhere more accessible to the general public just for that reason.

      73 de KJ6BSO

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    15. Re:Don't do it! by Suzuran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can agree with that. We had a lot of visitors at our Field Day site. I was lucky enough to have an opening to Europe on PSK31 when a bunch of cub scouts came through. It took them awhile to wrap their heads around the idea of there being no internet or phone service involved. The number of people who understand the tech behind the devices they use daily is dangerously small.

      I hope you get out of the hills and get good results; If you aren't showing your work, you're not working!

    16. Re:Don't do it! by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      I can agree with that. We had a lot of visitors at our Field Day site. I was lucky enough to have an opening to Europe on PSK31 when a bunch of cub scouts came through. It took them awhile to wrap their heads around the idea of there being no internet or phone service involved. The number of people who understand the tech behind the devices they use daily is dangerously small.

      I hope you get out of the hills and get good results; If you aren't showing your work, you're not working!

      I've pretty much stayed neutral on the topic (spending a weekend in the mountains is kind of nice, after all) but am beginning to lean in the direction of doing things more publicly. I think it's better for the hobby as a whole.

      Changing the subject, the recent increase in sunspot activity is great, isn't it? Last night I worked a station in Buenos Aires on 40m PSK31. 40 watts, 6000 miles--that's the kind of thing that makes ham radio a kick in the ass.

      Drop me a line, maybe we can set up a digital QSO. E-mail address is [mycallsign](at)cox.net

      73 de KJ6BSO

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    17. Re:Don't do it! by N2UX · · Score: 1

      I don't think any amateur radio op has misrepresented that the *only* purpose of the service is for emergency communications.

      The fact is, the legislative history shows that the government interest in Amateur Radio is for emergency communications. The promotion of the radio arts, the maintaining of a pool of people trained in those arts and the experimentation in those arts are all intended to provide people and technologies that can be used in an emergency.

    18. Re:Don't do it! by stevew · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How do you know he didn't - Cause if you knew my call - you wouldn't make that same assumption about me.

      Happens that I had to pay to take the test(s) at the FCC in person (including code at 20wpm). So I DID likely take the same tests as you. Get over yourself.

      Further - I've held certain positions within the amateur community that causes me to have practical experience with getting FCC to do something about violations of 97.113 (and have had those people sited.) He is WELL within the basis and purpose as currently stated.

      Let the guy enjoy his hobby - as I would suggest you do too. (and try to not be such a license bigot) After all - the thing that binds all of us together within the hobby is the love of the radio art.

      --
      Have you compiled your kernel today??
    19. Re:Don't do it! by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      I understand that the government only cares about cheap emergency backups, but I disagree with that line of thinking.

      There's a thin distinction between "primary purpose" and "sole purpose", and I don't think we should get there. We just make it easier for us to get screwed later when the need for the "primary purpose" can be discounted.
      Besides, if the rules were structured the way you say they are, with our primary purpose being emergency communications, then the paragraph would have been structured with items b through e on a sublevel beneath item a.
      However, in the rules as they stand, those items are on the same level as item a, which to me says they are on equal footing.

      In any event, the idea I originally wanted to express is that ham radio is not a direct replacement for any one other service, and getting a ham radio license only as a replacement for some other service without being interested in the hobby at all is just going to lead to frustration.

    20. Re:Don't do it! by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      Let's slow down here. I think you misunderstand what I am saying.

      My picture of the situation is that the OP is NOT a licensed ham and is asking if he should get a license purely to use a ham radio as a more different cellphone.
      He is not interested in ham radio at all, he merely wants to replace his existing insufficient cellphone service.

      My point is supposed to be that ham radio is a diverse hobby and not a direct replacement for any one other service, and expecting it to work that way is going to lead to frustration.
      I am not trying to play the code-speed-license-date-penis-size game.

    21. Re:Don't do it! by mysidia · · Score: 1

      No, but it says that it is ONE of the functions, "voluntary noncommercial communication service, particularly with respect to providing emergency communications." and that is enough.

      Note that is the basis and purpose of the regulations, not a declaration of the basis and purpose of the Amateur radio services

    22. Re:Don't do it! by N2UX · · Score: 1

      I would agree whole heartedly with that. I do a *lot* of backcountry hiking, and even though I have an Extra class license, I have never taken even so much as an HT with me. I do take a cell phone and check in with my wife when I have signal, updating her on my current position and my planned route. That way, If I don't check in she can contact the authorities with my last known position and where I would likely have gone.

    23. Re:Don't do it! by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      This is like saying that a bowl of fruit containing an apple is an apple because it has an apple in it.

      Please read post #33016314 and its parents so we can avoid duplicating misunderstanding.

    24. Re:Don't do it! by N2UX · · Score: 1

      In my opinion, the word "particularly" distinguishes the emergency purposes as being more important than all of the others, otherwise they would not have put it in there.

    25. Re:Don't do it! by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      ... and in my opinion, it applies to the preceding public-service aspect only, otherwise they would have put it above the others in hierarchy.

      We are going to run in a loop if this keeps up. I will probably stop here before this gets too much more convoluted.
      Take that however you will.

    26. Re:Don't do it! by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Funny, our local sherrif's department sponsors field day here...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    27. Re:Don't do it! by mysidia · · Score: 1

      And the GP post is like saying: a bowl of fruit doesn't have apples in it, bowls of fruit can only have pineapples.

      Nowhere has the FCC said the amateur service is just a hobby.

      Of course YMMV trying to use amateur frequencies to seek help in an emegrency; it's not as if any other amateur is paid to listen, and if there's no local disaster or communications emergency in the area, it's not like a lot of people will necessarily even be thinking of listening on common frequencies.

      You might be better off with an emergency radio, to be used only when human life is threatened and you need assistance.

    28. Re:Don't do it! by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      Yeah except when things go to shit in a hurry and the cell networks fail due to power loss, they call out the hams.

      Let me offer some practical advice to the original poster. Yes 5 to 10 watts will get you quite a distance. You see, if there's one things we hams all recognize right away it is height above average terrain or AHAT. E.g. if one could potentially see their house from there, it's a pretty sure bet you can hit a repeater somewhere.

      Here's the U.S. National Repeater Database.

    29. Re:Don't do it! by tftp · · Score: 1

      How do you know he didn't [?]

      If I'm correctly deciphering the thread, you here talk about the original poster (bartle.) If so, then his own words are quite clear:

      I'm only interested in acquiring a radio and license if it is a lot more effective and reliable

      So he has no license at the moment. If so, I agree that prodding him toward ham radio just so he has a better cell phone would be a distraction, if not worse. I, for one, can't recommend ham radio to him over the satellite beacon, because if he breaks a leg he won't be able to throw an HF antenna into a tree. Satellite beacons are better suited for emergency use.

      There was also a separate discussion between Suzuran and N2UX, but it's on a different level. I don't think you are talking about that - at least because N2UX clearly has a license :-)

    30. Re:Don't do it! by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly confident that EVERY FCC licence has an emergency use clause in it.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    31. Re:Don't do it! by rhook · · Score: 1

      We are not an emergency communications service.

      Actually, that's exactly what HAM radio exists for.

    32. Re:Don't do it! by rhook · · Score: 1

      Frequencies on the ARS only become emergency frequencies during an emergency, and when announced as such. Perhaps you should go read through your study guides again?

    33. Re:Don't do it! by rhook · · Score: 1

      That's probably the reason a field day was held at a local high school recently.

    34. Re:Don't do it! by rhook · · Score: 1

      Makes sense since SAR communications are often handled by HAM radio operators.

    35. Re:Don't do it! by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      Please read starting at post #33015698 - you're late to the party and there's no need to rehash what was already posted.

    36. Re:Don't do it! by russotto · · Score: 1

      The real reason the FCC still allows amateur radio is Verizon hasn't decided they want that spectrum yet.

    37. Re:Don't do it! by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      I know that. I'm the one arguing that the ARS is not _primarily_ an emergency service.

    38. Re:Don't do it! by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

      Other people have commented at length about the role and importance of emergency communications in amateur radio, so I won't go into that. I also agree with several people that your tone here is much too negative.

      I will say that you have made an important point that a lot of people have skipped over: an amateur radio rig is not a replacement for a cell phone. A cell phone, as long as you can reliably get a signal, is engineered to give you a reliable link to any phone user in the world, just as long as you enter the phone number; in addition, there are no restrictions on what you can use a cell phone form. Amateur radio, on the other hand, is very often about talking with people you randomly come across in the bands, and getting reliable communications between predetermined persons may require considerable communications skills and effort. Also, there are restrictions on what you can use amateur radio for.

      So really, the asker needs to be more specific about what they're expecting to do with the radio and check carefully whether (a) they're allowed to, (b) whether the radio will meet their needs.

    39. Re:Don't do it! by eos3fan · · Score: 1

      So if I'm interested in moving from just SWLing into more ham radio, what's a good way to start - looking for local clubs?

  9. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what he needs is a 27MHz Citizen's Band radio? Besides rednecks and freaks, who still uses CB?

  10. HF/low power by freebase · · Score: 2, Informative

    Short answer is that it depends.

    Are you going to learn morse code? It's not required for a license anymore, but a QRP (low power) rig on 40 meters can work hundreds or thousands of miles with a decent antenna if the atmosphere is right. QRP rigs can be extremely small and light, too.

    Yaseu has the FT-817 all-mode all-band radio that comes in at about 1.2kg (just more than 2.5lbs) including the antenna and battery. It's about 5"x6"x2" as I recall, with about 5W max output. It definitely gives you options.

    --
    Sig??? I don't need no stinkin Sig!
    1. Re:HF/low power by steveha · · Score: 3, Interesting

      a QRP (low power) rig on 40 meters can work hundreds or thousands of miles

      When I got my ham radio license, the instructor told the class a funny story.

      There was this old guy out hiking, and the old guy carried a 40 meter Morse code radio. The guy hurt his leg and could not continue. Some hikers came along and offered help; the old guy told them "pitch my tent, help me inside, and throw this antenna wire up into the trees." That's all he wanted, and after they did that, they walked away (they never followed up with anyone).

      So the old guy started tapping out his emergency report. One old ham operator, hundreds of miles away, was monitoring the 40 meter band and got the report. And in fact you had to be hundreds of miles away to get it; the report wasn't possible to pick up close by. So the ham operator in another state got on the phone to the Snohomish County Search and Rescue, to tell them what was going on.

      Our instructor works for the Search and Rescue department, and he disbelieved the initial report. "Did you say the 40 meter band?!?" When S&R got to the park, they couldn't pick up the signal; they had to use cell phones to talk to the guy in another state to communicate with the guy who needed help.

      So, the moral of the story is: if you want to whistle up help, maybe a 40 meter rig isn't the best way to go.

      Personally, I'd carry a 406 MHz personal locator beacon.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    2. Re:HF/low power by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

      A 5-watt HF rig just doesn't cut it for reliable SSB (voice) communications, especially with portable / compromise antennas. There are some good semi-portable 100-watt rigs, but they're not anything I would want to take backpacking. The best solution seems to be some smaller 20-watt or so commercial HF radios like the Vertex VX-1210 that could work, but they're not cheap. You could combine a 5-watt radio like the FT-817 with the HFPacker amp to get 35 or 100 watts, but the combined package isn't terribly rugged. The ideal place to research a lot of portable HF options is the "HF Pack" website / email list (hfpack.com).

      Even if you did get a decent HF setup that you're comfortable carrying, there's a learning curve to operating. You'd want to understand what bands work best at different times of the day, what nets are available when, and how to work a net. That's assuming that there's a net in that area like Southcars that could serve as a good point of contact if you had an emergency. Calling CQ or breaking in on random hams could get you help in an emergency, but having dozens to hundreds of scattered receivers and ears listening at once gives you a lot better chance of making contact.

      Of course all of this is assuming that any emergency would still leave you capable of operating the radio. Dialing a sat phone or setting off an EPIRB / PLB is a lot easier than setting up a portable HF station and making a contact even if you have two arms and all your brainpower intact. Imagine doing it with a broken arm or leg, concussion, hyper/hypothermia, etc.

    3. Re:HF/low power by steveha · · Score: 1

      Eh, I'm not sure you actually had to be hundreds of miles away to pick up the signal. But I do remember very clearly that they couldn't get the signal from close up (like, at the park).

      Basically there aren't any 40 meter repeaters set up, so you either need to get a direct line-of-sight or an atmosphere bounce. So the practical effect was that they had to talk to the guy in another state and have him relay messages back and forth.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    4. Re:HF/low power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was this old guy out hiking, and the old guy carried a 40 meter Morse code radio. The guy hurt his leg and could not continue. Some hikers came along and offered help; the old guy told them "pitch my tent, help me inside, and throw this antenna wire up into the trees." That's all he wanted, and after they did that, they walked away (they never followed up with anyone).

      So, wait, let me understand this...

        - He hiked out solo without a routine checkin plan with someone and was unfortunate enough to hurt himself.
        - He was then lucky enough to encounter some hikers who were right there and willing to help him get out.
        - Instead, he decided to piss that opportunity for certain rescue away, and take a risk that he would use a single-point-of-failure bit of electronics to hopefully reach someone who would be able to arrange to have an S&R team hike out to rescue him at taxpayer expense?

      What?

      No, seriously. What?

      I'd say his selection of band was far from the worst of his decisions.

      The hikers who encountered him should have followed up, true. That was irresponsible of them.

      But, man, this reminds me of people who hike up in the mountains in a t-shirt and shorts equipped with a cheap GPS and cell phone in a zip-loc and call S&R when they get lost because they didn't bring a map and compass, and they're thirsty because they didn't bring any water, and they're cold because it's getting dark and a damp cotton t-shirt and shorts are worse than being naked when the temperature starts dipping. But at least the ones I've encountered by chance know enough to take the water I give them, throw on the blanket I hand them, and hike back down with me immediately.

      So, the moral of the story is: if you want to whistle up help, maybe a 40 meter rig isn't the best way to go.

      The real moral of the story is: Plan ahead and have a checkin plan if you're going to hike solo. If that plan fails and you find yourself in a situation where you need help, and help becomes available, don't send it away and wait for the next opportunity to get help.

      Ever.

  11. Going into nature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I go into nature to get away from technology. This is the one place where I carry, at most, a flint and knife.

    I understand why you'd like to be able to communicate but there's much more to listen to than to be said when out in the wild.

    1. Re:Going into nature? by twidarkling · · Score: 1

      I think you've a fundamental misunderstanding of the point, here. It's to communicate in case of an emergency, not to be reminded to pick up the milk on the way home.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
  12. Oblig simpsons by Jorkapp · · Score: 1

    > ...experienced Slashdot hams

    Homer: Mmm... experienced Slashdot hams.

    --
    Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
  13. In a word... by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...no.

    There's no amateur radio transceiver that weighs in at less than a pound that would give you the kind of power or reliability you're looking for. Also, unless you're willing to put in the effort to obtain at least a general class amateur radio license, you'd pretty much be limited to the VHF/UHF segments of the amateur bands, which are not good in mountainous terrain unless you are certain you'd be in range of one or more repeaters during your trips. If you were willing to learn Morse code, you would have access to a small portion of the 40 meter band with an entry-level (technician) ticket but then you'd have to carry some sort of long wire antenna and be able to get it up into a couple of trees if you want a realistic hope of making any sort contact.

    I'd say that either use a vehicle mounted amateur radio rig that can put out 100W or so--there are several neat little units available, but they don't come cheap, around $1000--or just enjoy the outdoors without worrying about communication. Hell, I packed into the Sierra Nevada for years without a cell phone (they hadn't even been invented at the time) or any other sort of link to the outside world. I liked it that way.

    73,

    de KJ6BSO sk

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
    1. Re:In a word... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      which are not good in mountainous terrain unless you are certain you'd be in range of one or more repeaters during your trips

      i don't think he said anything about cost being a factor.

      He could build an unmanned amateur repeater station somewhere up in the mountains himself and deploy it before going out. It would be a bit more expensive than carrying a cell phone, though...... depending on whether the cell phone is under contract with one of those plans with exorbitant roaming fees though :)

    2. Re:In a word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you want a realistic hope of making any sort contact.

      I say take some ear plugs (for your own protection) and duct tape two (maybe three) megaphones together Simpsons style.

    3. Re:In a word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said! I can't remember my password here, so I am an Anonymous Coward -

      I was an active Ham for over thirty years and when the cell phones came into vogue I packed in the ham gear and went cellular. Amateur radio was one of the most expensive and time consuming things I ever get involved in. I did a lot of vhf and uhf work along the Colorado front Range. Good coverage eastward, none once you got into the mountains a dozen miles, or so.

      Just use the mountains for what they were intended, risky business and the mark of a true pioneer.

    4. Re:In a word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there is this thing: http://argentdata.com/products/repeater.html That Plus a radio, plus an antenna will still run you less than an iPhone 4. Plus, unlike the iPhone 4, the antenna will work.

    5. Re:In a word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...no.

      Also, unless you're willing to put in the effort to obtain at least a general class amateur radio license, you'd pretty much be limited to the VHF/UHF segments of the amateur bands,

      Unless in case of emergency.

        97.403 Safety of life and protection of property.
      No provision of these rules prevents the use by an amateur station of any means of radiocommunication at its disposal to provide essential communication needs in connection with the immediate safety of human life and immediate protection of property when normal communication systems are not available.

      Somebody mentioned the Yaesu FT-817ND which is small, light, and all mode. Quite handy.
      73 K3IC

    6. Re:In a word... by kcbnac · · Score: 1

      Park high on a hill near where you'll be hiking, hook that thing up, throw an antenna on the roof, solar to keep it charged, and have THAT be your repeater. With the voicemail feature you can even leave messages as to your current location, and then just have any rescue crews start there.

    7. Re:In a word... by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      True enough, but he's going to have a hard time learning how to use an FT-817 in an emergency if he can only use it as a technician most of the time. He'd be limited to CW on small portions of of 15, 40 and 80m, and 200KHz of phone privileges on 10m. Plus, the FT-817 only puts out five watts and weighs 2.5 pounds, which is twice what he said was his maximum weight.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    8. Re:In a word... by tcgroat · · Score: 1

      On mountain peaks and ridges you do have a good chance of accessing a repeater. Check the Colorado Connection system of linked repeaters, it covers much of the state. But if you are down in a canyon or valley, repeater coverage is much less reliable in the back country.

      If you are competent in Morse, there are several sub-pound transceiver options (this is a manufacturer's marketing page, read it as such). Morse gains about 7dB improvement over SSB radiotelephony from reduced noise bandwidth (typically 500Hz vs. 2500Hz) and about 6dB more because the peak-to-average power ratio is 1:1 instead of 4:1 or worse. Net improvement: 13dB, making 5W of Morse about equally effective as 100W of SSB (a result which my experience and that of other QRP fanatics confirm).

      But no matter what radio you carry, including satellite phones, don't assume you'll be able to reach it and use it if you have a serious fall or accident. You may lose it down a slope, hit it on a rock and break it, or be incapacitated and unable to communicate with anything. The best advice is to not go it alone: hike with a companion. If you do go solo, stay on well-traveled main trails where help is likely find you. Technology does not ensure safety in the back country.

    9. Re:In a word... by oldave · · Score: 1

      If you were willing to learn Morse code, you would have access to a small portion of the 40 meter band with an entry-level (technician) ticket

      Since February 23, 2007, Morse code is not required. Technicians have CW privileges on 80, 40, 15 and 10 meters, and phone (SSB only) privileges on 10 meters.

      73 de KN4DS

    10. Re:In a word... by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Uh, that's what I was getting at.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    11. Re:In a word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post is incorrect: You do *NOT* need to learn Morse code to get *ANY* amateur radio license. All currently issued license classes (Technician, General, Extra) only require a written test.

      *THERE IS NO MORSE CODE REQUIRMENT ANYMORE*

      73 de N2KMF

    12. Re:In a word... by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      I did not say code is a licensing requirement. What I said was that a person holding a technician class license is limited to the CW segment of the 40m band.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
  14. Re:Nope by hedwards · · Score: 1

    Those big backpack radios they used in Vietnam were usually leftovers from WWII. They weren't big because they needed to be, they were big because the government wasn't funding new ones. And break downs were a serious problem. The ones my dad used were capable of sending a signal clear around the world, which could cause problems if he wasn't mindful of it.

    Back in the late 90s, I was working in the back country, the radio we used was about the size of a late 80s cell phone and it had plenty of power to get in touch, even in the middle of a valley. No need to get anything more than that. Unfortunately, I can't recall the specifics, but they are the ones that were used by the forest service and various state agencies in the back country.

  15. Why wait for a satellite telephone? by RKBA · · Score: 4, Informative

    They're here now, although they are a little expensive.

    1. Re:Why wait for a satellite telephone? by $pace6host · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Inmarsat iSatPhone PRO isn't too bad (hey, at ~$600, it's in line with the original list price of the first iPhone!), and you can rent it from those guys (outfitterconnect.com) if you're just going on a trip off the net for a while. Advantages over amateur radio are simplicity, GPS location services built in, no need for an exam / license, direct connectivity to the world wide phone network, and it's 24/7 always available. Oh, and I almost forgot, it has BlueTooth! Seriously, if the idea is just to have it for emergencies, there's even an EMS plan for ~$16/mo that has no minutes built in, w/ ~$1.50/min rate for calls. If you don't ever plan on calling anyone because you enjoy being out in the wilderness all alone, but want to have that safety backstop of being able to reach someone in an emergency (and give them lat/long of where you are), that sounds ideal. Just don't drop it in a river or land on it when you fall off the rock face.

  16. Hams in the backcountry sometimes squeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring an appropriate filter.

  17. Yes, I always carry an HT by mpoulton · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm involved in wilderness search and rescue in remote areas of Arizona. We have no cell coverage in most of the areas we work in, and only have sheriff's radio repeater coverage in about 50%. Amateur radio repeaters cover most of the rest. My commercial VHF radio is programmed with all the regional ham repeaters in addition to the sheriff's frequencies and every other wilderness public safety frequency used in the region. If I'm going into certain areas with especially bad coverage, I'll also carry a quad-band handheld (VX-7R) and an external 25W VHF amplifier. No matter what gear you have, location matters most. It is often necessary to climb the nearest ridge to make contact with a repeater, since valleys are usually completely dead spots. The only effective way to communicate from a deep, narrow valley is with HF, or at least 6M with over 100W of power. We use low-band VHF at 120W between vehicles and do fine in very rough terrain. So yes, carry radio gear. Know your area's repeaters well, though, and be prepared to seek higher ground in order to communicate. A SPOT locator is a very good idea in addition, though, and serves a completely different purpose from other communications gear.

    --
    I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
    1. Re:Yes, I always carry an HT by molo · · Score: 1

      Hi, could you expand on your use of a 25W VHF amplifier? Is this a commercially available unit? And with what antenna do you use it?

      Thanks.
      -molo

      --
      Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    2. Re:Yes, I always carry an HT by mpoulton · · Score: 1

      I built mine from an amplifier module ("brick"), but there are commercial units available like the Mirage B-34 that do the same thing. Mine has only a very small heatsink and runs on a 3-cell lithium ion pack. It's not intended for frequent use, only for emergencies when it's needed.

      --
      I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
  18. Some hams like to hike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out the ATS-4. QRP rig in an Altoids tin.

    http://kd1jv.qrpradio.com/

    &

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AT_Sprint

  19. Re:Nope by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 4, Funny

    So what he needs is a 27MHz Citizen's Band radio? Besides rednecks and freaks, who still uses CB?

    Truck drivers. Oh, wait...

    (Disclaimer: I am a truck driver, so I'm allowed to make that joke without being modded troll/flamebait.)

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
  20. VHF HT and portable Yagi by Achra · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, a ham radio can get you much better range and ability to contact the nearest town without much weight. Much better than a cellphone. Cellphones are line of sight around the 2ghz range, they stink without a repeater nearby. Don't bother with a handheld HF rig, unless you know morse code you're not going to get any skywave propogation via phone at 5w. Pick up a 2m monoband handheld transceiver and a portable 2m yagi to go with it. You'll be able to reach an easy 50 miles with FM voice modes and hit the repeater in the nearest big town. This assumes that there is not a mountain in the way, of course.. You're not going to be able to get radio THROUGH a mountain. Ideally you're up on the side of a mountain. I understand that you'll be worried about weight, but it seems to me that being able to contact civilization is pretty important if you run into real trouble. I can recommend this portable 2m yagi: http://www.arrowantennas.com/arrowii/146-3ii.html and really any 2m monoband HT will do you well, don't pay for the bells and whistles. The old HTX-202's work great (if you don't mind paying a pound or 2 for your radio). With regard to getting a technician class amateur radio license, the code requirement is long gone and it should be pretty trivial for most slashdotters to obtain a ham radio license nowadays. One last thought: AO-51. There are low-earth orbit amateur radio satellites that can be worked with handheld transceivers and a good dual-band yagi. The passes are short (15 minutes) and the process takes some practice, but you could definitely get out a distress call that way, no matter what the terrain is.

    --
    Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    1. Re:VHF HT and portable Yagi by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Icom V8 and a j-pole made out of twin lead.

      http://www.qsl.net/wb3gck/jpole.htm

      http://www.icomamerica.com/en/products/v8/

      Bring fishing line and a slingshot, get the antenna up in a tree.

      Under $200USD and easy to pack.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    2. Re:VHF HT and portable Yagi by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      ***Cellphones are line of sight around the 2ghz range, they stink without a repeater nearby.***

      In theory, you're right. However, in practice, I've found cell phones to be better than I expected. A number of times, I've been able to get a bar or two in places where I had expected that cell phone reception would be hopeless (e.g. Marjum Pass in Utah's House Mountains). Often it requires walking around a bit and holding the phone in various positions in order to find enough signal to check in and tell the folks at home that everything is fine. Cell phones usually don't work from the bottom of steep walled canyons of course, but I have my doubts that anything without some power and a real antenna will work reliably in those.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  21. Selection also depends on the intended use. by UncleBex · · Score: 1

    Although I subscribe to the "you are in the wilderness for a reason" school of thought, it would help to know why you are looking for some sort of radio link to the outside world. Do you need it for emergencies or checking the latest Slashdot articles? Understanding your intended use will help narrow the suggestions thrown at you.

    If you only want it for emergencies, then nothing beats having the skills to do what you are doing and the buddy system. Enjoy the outdoors, not carrying an extra 3 pounds of gear. YMMV.

    --
    "If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe." - Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Selection also depends on the intended use. by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      > nothing beats having the skills to do what you are doing
      Except perhaps doing new things, learning new skills, and taking whatever measures one deems prudent for comfort and safety while adventuring.

    2. Re:Selection also depends on the intended use. by UncleBex · · Score: 1

      Except perhaps doing new things, learning new skills, and taking whatever measures one deems prudent for comfort and safety while adventuring.

      True, but all too often I see people who use technology as a crutch, especially out in wilderness areas. Instead of taking the time to learn a new skill, all too often people simply jump right in before realizing what they are getting into. I am all for people doing new things, especially when they involve experiencing the outdoors, but being informed is critical. Thus, it would seem important to know what the anticipated need of radio communications is. It would probably also be helpful to know what he/she is doing in the mountains. I would not necessarily recommend a huge heavy radio to someone who is trying to hike the Great Divide Trail at a world record pace. But, if he/she is out for a morning of bird watching, then what gear is appropriate for the trip changes substantially.

      --
      "If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe." - Carl Sagan
  22. Probably not for short range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are looking for short range communication then you are probably SOL as they will behave very similar to your cell phone (putting aside repeaters [think cell tower] and the proximity of other people listening close range). You will have more transmission power with an amateur radio but as others have mentioned short range communication frequencies will be impacted by physical obstructions. Long range communication frequencies on the other hand "bounce" off the ionosphere and can travel much farther. I've been able to achieve 1400+ miles w/ 100 watts of power and a crappy dipole antenna inside a ground floor apartment.

    However you're probably looking at ~10 pounds at least for a "portable" solution that could put out 100 watts (your in-vehicle setup essentially) and even then you are talking to people hundreds, if not thousands, of miles away.

  23. Iridium by Anynomous+Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't know your budget, but renting or buying an Iridium 9555 phone with a prepaid plan may be an option. The handset is quite small and works everywhere.

    --
    I'm not a coward by any name.
  24. honestly by waambulance · · Score: 1

    if lack of cell phone reception causes you to worry about your safety, you have no business hiking *anywhere* your cell phone reception is anything less than 4 bars...

    stay in the city.

    or bring a hiking buddy and register with the local Park Ranger.

    1. Re:honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking jackass.

    2. Re:honestly by twidarkling · · Score: 1

      That's a bit harsh. I'd say he's being responsible, wanting to ensure communications in case of an emergency. Better than sliding down a hill due to some loose rocks, spraining your ankle, and then discovering that "oh fuck, I can't talk to anyone."

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
  25. X-Band Repeat by dracocat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you move forward with this, one option is to setup your car as a repeater. You can park your car at the trailhead and turn on the repeater in your car. Then the idea is to hopefully hit your car from your handheld, then your car can hit a repeater. In addition to the additional radio in the car that supports Cross-Band repeating, you will need to add a battery or two to your car, and a fresh one in the trunk.

    Like others have all pointed out, the handheld frequencies are all generally line of site. This could mean that in a real emergency, you may need to climb to the top of the nearest peak to actually have line of site to anyone. Then once on the top of the peak you may find that your cell phone works as well!

    Amateur radios work great in the backcountry in communicating with your own party in a different campsite or at a base camp while you continue on up to a summit.

    The SPOTs as you have already researched works pretty well. I especially like the non-911 "Help" button, which just sends a predefined message to someone. I think this is a great feature, as you may need someone you know to start hiking up to you to help you out, but may not need a full Search and Rescue.

    1. Re:X-Band Repeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SPOTs are dubious because of the funding model.

      The real emergency personal locator beacons all operate on the basis of providing only emergency location information, and using government search & rescue resources. Most of the world's governments (and certainly all the ones likely to have the resources to actually rescue you) are part of the international agreement to monitor these satellite signals and if necessary rescue people. Nobody cares which vendor sold you the beacon, or even if you made it yourself (kids, do not try this at home, building a working satellite beacon is hard, and you want it to be reliable) because of this.

      But SPOT needs customer revenue to provide the forwarding service. They need people to buy the SPOT branded device, or else they have no money. If while you're hiking the SPOT service goes bankrupt, by the time you try to send an emergency message there may be no-one listening.

      If I thought the worst case was that I'd be unnecessarily damp and cold for a few hours, I'd be happy to rely on SPOT. But if you're doing anything where a genuine rescue might be needed, it leaves me a bit queasy.

  26. Look to space by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    You can rent satellite phones.

    1. Re:Look to space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up. This is the only reply so far that has given a practical solution.

  27. you need to talk to these people by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    QRP is the art of using small, low-power equipment to talk to the world. But do it for the love of the game, It might get you out of trouble, but there are no guarantees.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  28. re portable radio by freddieb · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you get your ham license, a 2 meter handheld might fit the bill. Look at the ARRL (arrl.org) repeater handbook and see if there are 2 meter repeaters in the vicinity of where you hike. Hams like to place repeaters on the highest mountops when they can so you may find there are signals available. Amateur hand helds are very small and light. A technician class amateur license is easy to obain. There are also personal emergency locater beacons (PLB's) similar to the EPIRBS carried by ships and aircraft that are available for hikers. You can't communicate on these devices however, if you get lost or stranded you can activate it the satellite receivers relay the coordinates of your location to air force search and rescue teams.

  29. Probably not what you need, but welcome, anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A prior posting had a rather unfriendly tone to it and that is not properly representative of Ham Radio. While you would be welcome to study up and take the test and join us, I doubt that light-weight Ham band handi-talkies would serve your need any better than a cell phone. VHF radio transmission on the ham bands is pretty much like the cell phones...line of sight. Deep in canyons or behind ridges, you probably wouldn't reach another Ham and you can only communicate with or through other Hams or their repeaters. On the other hand, my 2 meter rig saved my bacon years ago when the rudder failed on my sailboat in rough water off California's Point Conception. I owe my longevity to Ham Radio and the dedicated Hams on the Santa Barbara emergency nets.Regards from WH7QQ

  30. It definitely depends on the situation... by the_rajah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Modern VHF/UHF handi-talkies are, well, handy if you've got repeaters that you can reach. The other alternative is HF low power rigs that can also be quite small and portable. If you don't mind learning the code, it can be extremely effective. Here's a mountain rescue story that involves just that.. If you take this approach, you can arrange scheduled times and frequencies when someone will listen for you. The great thing about this is that the person can be half way across the country.

    I'll second the opinion about the Yaesu FT-817 as a great portable "DC to Daylight" rig that can run SSB and FM voice modes as well as CW (code) on most of the commonly used bands from HF to UHF. It's a little larger, but is extremely capable. The Icom IC703 is another portable rig. See one in use hiking in Colorado here .

    I've been a ham for 53 years now and have run the kilowatt rigs with big beam antennas over 100 feet in the air, but I have the most challenging fun with a 4 watt CW rig and a wire or mobile antenna.

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:It definitely depends on the situation... by pyser · · Score: 1

      Long time ham here too and I love low power (QRP) operation but it isn't for wimps or beginners. Still, I definitely recommend it once you acquire some operating skills. I have a FT-817 and love it - I use it mobile, portable, while camping, and even at home and have worked an amazing array of countries including New Zealand with its 5 watts and a 12 foot whip fastened to a hotel balcony. Small and capable as it is, it's still heavy if you are watching every ounce as you would on a long trek.

      The lightweight champ I recommend is the Elecraft KX-1. It's a kit, so electronics assembly skills are required, but the manuals are very clear (think Heathkit) that anyone who knows how to solder to a circuit board can build it. Smaller than a paperback book, it measures 3x5 inches x 1 inch thick, weighs less than a pound (plus 6xAA batteries), will work on 20, 30 40 or 80 meters and has its own built-in antenna tuner and battery pack, so all you need is a key, your iPod earphones and a roll of wire to throw up into a tree for an antenna, and you are on the air. It is a Morse Code-only rig, though, so you'll have to know the code, but if you are serious about it, it isn't difficult. I take mine on campouts as well, and it's nice to kick back in the sleeping bag and have a few contacts before dozing off.

      A couple years ago a ham hiked the Pacific Crest Trail and his communications was a KX-1. He kept a schedule with another ham and would check in regularly. His story was featured in one of the ham magazines. If you want to keep in touch with non-ham family members or associates, you could do the same. You'll meet plenty of hams through your local radio club, and it's likely someone would be willing to set up a sked with you. In that case, he is not only a hiker but was a ham already - he didn't get into ham radio solely as a means of communication while hiking. If you do, you might end up enjoying it - it adds another facet to being outdoors, off the grid but still in touch with just what you carry in your pack.

    2. Re:It definitely depends on the situation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad someone else watches the g0at - one of my favorite youtube ham guys along with k7age. 73's!

  31. It Depends.... by RedLeg · · Score: 1

    Like a couple of other folks have said, it depends on several factors.

    If you're thinking of a handheld with a rubber duck antenna, their wattage is typically 5 or below, and range on the rubber ducks suck. You can carry an additional compact antenna, but it only helps so much.

    Line of sight to the other station (or repeater) is more or less required, and antenna height really helps on 2m for that reason. If you're in good shape and can get to a summit with LOS, great. If you're crippled up and can't "see" the other station (or repeater), you're screwed.

    So, for 2m, you MUST contact the local Hams and get some understanding of the footprints of the repeaters (if any) in the areas you plan to traverse.

    HF is a little different. The Yaesu Ft-817ND that someone else mentioned is an all mode, VHF/UHF/HF man portable rig. It has two antenna connectors, one for UHF/VHF just like a handheld, and outputs 5W at best. HF will require you to hump sort of HF antenna and you're still limited to 5w at best.

    The other BIG "it depends" is your license status and level. A Technician license is relatively easy to come by and will allow you to operate an HT (or the 817) on the 2m (and a few other freqs). To get significant use privs on HF, you will need to stand the General exam (having passed the Tech first).

    You will probably be best served by contacting local hams and asking these questions. Having the proper license, buying the radio, humping it in and calling for assistance in an emergency does you no good if there's no coverage in your area, or if no one is listening. These same guys can also help you with obtaining your license.

    Hope this helps

    Red
    (Amateur Extra)

    1. Re:It Depends.... by thestuckmud · · Score: 1
      Repeater access depends on location. There are no ham repeaters within range of the best backcountry skiing in CO (nor at my ski resort of choice, for that matter). Still, I use a 2m HT (Handy Talkie, a.k.a. walkie talkie) with a high degree of success to communicate with friends when skiing in the backcountry. Reaching a base camp after crossing a couple of ridges is not something I have tested. If you want to get an idea of effectiveness, grab a pair of cheap FRS radios and try them next time you are out. If they give decent performance, get you ham license and you can get better, more powerful equipment, and can also modify it to transmit on local sheriff/SAR frequencies in case of emergency.

      I also hold an Extra class license, but only for bragging rights.

  32. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are wrong about the radios in Vietnam.

    Radio Set AN/PRC-25 was the state-of the-art FM tactical radio for the Vietnam War. The mostly solid-state design brought weight down to less than 20 pounds with battery vs. 26 pounds for the AN/PRC-10.

    The PRC-10 Story Ends in Vietnam

    In July 1965, responding to General Westmoreland's complaints about the AN/PRC-10, the new, transistorized FM radios of the AN/VRC-12 and AN/PRC-25 families were shipped to Vietnam. Those radios, intended for deployment in Europe, soon became the mainstay of tactical communications in Southeast Asia. In three and a half years, 20,000 VRC-12 and 33,000 PRC-25 radios were delivered to Southeast Asia. The PRC-25, which fully replaced the PRC-10, was, according to General Creighton Abrams, "the single most important tactical item in Vietnam."

  33. sat phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your best bet would be a Satellite Phone for the trip. Since they just have to have LoS with the sky.

  34. Re:Nope by Nethead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When building our local EmComm van I specked in a CB. The rest of the hams thought I was crazy. I said, "Who do you think will be delivering supplies, maybe a trucker?" They then thought it was a wonderful idea.

    The goal isn't to insure that all communications are by ham radio, the goal is to communicate.

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  35. sat phones and self reliance by panZ · · Score: 4, Informative
    As someone who has climbed the world round, it is important to find out what means of communication the area you are in use first. If you don't want to research much, sat phones and SPOT are awesome. For instance, in many parts of the Alaska Range, rangers monitor family radio transmissions and broadcast weather updates on their channel. Those little radios have gotten pretty good range over the years and are used to coordinate rescues all over Denali, Mt. Forker and Huntington. There is also line of sight CDMA phone access in many parts of the states where GSM fails leaving the european climbers begging to use your phone from time to time. SPOT beacons are great though. There are 3 levels of message you can broadcast as you probably know. The mid-one is akin to saying "I'm in trouble, here's where I am but don't alert the authorities". If you're absolutely concerned with being able to consult a doctor or ranger at any time, get a sat phone. You don't have to depend on Globalstar either. Iridium is still functional and outside of North America, Thuraya is fantastic. I've used BGAN for data access in the deepest, darkest parts of the world but at $6/mb, you'll want to keep it to emails. I've also rented Iridium phones for use in Nepal. They are light, cheap-ish, rugged and still completely functional despite ownership changes. You can rent or own cheap handsets and buy minutes when you need them. If you have global rescue insurance through a club like the American Alpine Club (AAC), you can initiate an insured rescue call from a sat phone anywhere in the world or just call friends and family when you are lonely.

    Most importantly though, don't rely on technology to get you out of a jam. Avy beacons fail, GPSs die, radios don't reach people on the other end. They are all wonderful, life saving tools but odds are you won't need any of that stuff. Read the Wilderness First Responder medical book, read Freedom of the Hills, etc. Go prepared. A vast majority of the time, you'll be able to get yourself and other people help without 'calling' anyone.

    --
    --Let's hack root on 127.0.0.1 --panZ
    1. Re:sat phones and self reliance by paulgrant · · Score: 1

      Can you give a list of books since you have them handy and read them? I'm always interested in a knowledgeable persons reading recommendations.

    2. Re:sat phones and self reliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh Those are wise words. You must be a fellow scout. Be prepared, and for gosh sakes, bring a knife. Baden Powell

  36. No, ham radio won't work for you by tftp · · Score: 4, Informative

    As I understand, you need the radio for a purely utilitarian purpose - to talk to specific people. You are not a ham yourself (not yet, at least) and likely the people you want to talk to are not hams either (otherwise you'd ask them, not Slashdot.) This means none of you can legally (or effectively) use ham radio. This can be corrected; ham license exams are not complicated, I took three on the same day, from no license to extra, but I have radio background and I'm not new to ham radio (I was first licensed around 1980, I think.) A man from the street will have lots of problems with higher level exams unless he understands things like the theory of linear circuits, complex impedance, and such.

    You certainly can go ahead and get a ham radio license for yourself, if that is interesting to you in any way (there is more than one way to enjoy ham radio.) But you probably can't tell your friends, parents, or whoever is on the other end, to go and get a license - that's probably beyond most people's abilities, just like it is for me to learn classical dance :-) People are all different.

    However if you only want communication then getting a ham radio and license doesn't make much sense. If I want to fly from SF to Paris I don't want to study for a pilot license; I buy a ticket, and a professional pilot will do all the flying for me. It is cheaper, simpler, safer, and lets me do things that I want to do - not what I have to do.

    Technically, ham radio in emergency is the absolute best way to make a contact with another ham. Even satellites are not as reliable. Ham radio depends primarily on equipment that you (and the other guy) have. No need for expensive satellites that may or may not be in the sky or otherwise operational. There are many ham bands, and you can always find a band that works at the time of need. HF bands will work for short range communication pretty much at any time (using the ground wave.) In mountains NVIS makes sense. V/UHF is not likely to work there because distances are large, terrain - rough, and repeaters would be scarce. To be well prepared for an emergency you need to have an HF rig, and if you can do CW (at any speed) it's even better.

    An experienced ham would probably take a small transceiver with him into mountains; either HF or HF+VHF. He wouldn't need much of an antenna - any long wire would do fine at his elevation. In good conditions he'd be able to communicate with the whole USA with mere 5W; in bad conditions he'd be able to contact a local ham to report an emergency (and he'd have his GPS coordinates.)

    A new ham most likely won't be able to fully utilize the spectrum that he has access to (depends on his license.) He'd bring a UHF HT with him, and he wouldn't be able to hear anything. Also repeaters are tricky sometimes, they require PL tones and you need to know them in advance to elicit a response from a silent repeater. So you must come prepared.

    In your situation it would be safer for you if you rely upon commercial methods of communication. They are better supported and they require hardly any experience. If you need the radio only to report an emergency then you can get a beacon for that. If you want to talk to your friends from the top of a mountain then you need a satellite phone (and lots of money to pay for it.)

    1. Re:No, ham radio won't work for you by bkeahl · · Score: 1

      I agree that in theory Joe-Sixpack would be overwhelmed understanding the technical details required to get an General or Extra class license.

      However, many seem to get the license anyway by understanding how to memorize answers to question pools.

      I had an entertaining discussion with a new "Extra" (I was still a Technician) where he was concerned because when he dead-keyed his mic on SSB he wasn't reading any power output ... yeah, he really understood the technology! :)

    2. Re:No, ham radio won't work for you by tftp · · Score: 1

      However, many seem to get the license anyway by understanding how to memorize answers to question pools.

      QRO to them, as long as they retain that knowledge. And they will remember what is important. Most of the Technician level questions are regulatory, and most of that is not applicable to everyday operations. For example, it's great that a ham knows how to take his HT to Canada, but there will be no major calamity if before going on vacation he has to check the book about that. It's not something that you need to remember while talking on a repeater during your morning commute.

      As the ham progresses to General and Extra, the questions become more and more technically complex, requiring candidates to do calculations. Again, not everyone is born with detailed knowledge of the Smith chart. If, say, someone is more inclined toward DX work, as opposed to hand-building his antennas, that works too. Modern antenna tuners are amazingly simple to use (press a button and it's done.) So if the guy buys an FT-950, for example, the internal tuner will match the output connector to whatever the shack end of the cable looks like. Not optimal, sure, but it's usable.

      when he dead-keyed his mic on SSB he wasn't reading any power output

      Was he, by any chance, a CB'er in his previous life? I had a brief encounter with AM many years ago. Never liked it. My first rig was CW only, though SSB was theoretically supported too.

    3. Re:No, ham radio won't work for you by Rachel+Lucid · · Score: 1

      Best thing about Ham Radio Tests -- If you can take them all on the same day, you still only pay the fee for one test (Basically, a "Keep Passing until you fail" kind of mindset.)

    4. Re:No, ham radio won't work for you by bkeahl · · Score: 1

      Who cares if he came from the CB world? I don't really know and it seems unimportant in discussing the theoretical capabilities of someone who passed the Amateur Extra test.

      My point is that anyone who actually has the knowledge the Extra test supposedly requires would know unmodulated SSB would result in no power output. Proof that memorizing the answers does not equate to proficiency or capability. Another Technician class operator explained the theory behind SSB to the new Extra class amateur. I wanted to let him fret another day or two. This is a clear example that memorizing the answers to a test does not equate to retained knowledge.

      Your remark regarding calculations required to pass the General or Extra test completely misses the point. The above referenced individual, and most people who take the test, couldn't even identify the formula from a line-up because They're memorizing the questions and answers from the pool.

    5. Re:No, ham radio won't work for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry about the tests! They are administered by volunteers these days, and a few bucks towards a bribe gets you an extra license!

  37. You are asking the wrong question by Osama+Binlog · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Assume you will *not* have any communication.

    They fail because of the lack of coverage, the charge in the battery or the fact that no one else will be able to figure it out (if you are the one hurt).

    Some simple precautions go a long way: the buddy system, first aid kit, topo map and compass, planning your route, extra food and water, notify friends of your departure and return. These do not cost as much and will do a lot more.

    I used to carry a 2 meter rig when I went backpacking with the scouts. I found there was no coverage - except near cities.

    The back country is a great place. But, it is terribly unforgiving for any lack of preparedness.

    1. Re:You are asking the wrong question by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More to the point, if you are generally unprepared for whatever you're doing, and call for a rescue, your rescuers will hate you. My sister worked for several years as an EMT in an area that's popular with outdoor adventurers of all stripes, and they never begrudged someone who was well-prepared but ended up with a broken leg due to bad luck, but absolutely loathed people who had no clue what they were doing and ended up causing a risky search-and-rescue because of their own stupidity.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:You are asking the wrong question by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      "Assume you will *not* have any communication."

      And isn't that the point of a back country trip? To disconnect from the incessant buzz of modern life and all the electronics?

      The simple precautions in the parent post are all you really need, plus common sense and some experience. Once you know what you are doing you can even do a singleton. A week in the back country with no other contact with another human is very relaxing. (Yes, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory said I am an introvert.)

    3. Re:You are asking the wrong question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking a remote antenna and throwing it over a tree will increase that range.

      The whip or rubber duck antenna on small hand held transceivers won't get much range.

  38. Colorado Repeater Map by rwade · · Score: 2, Informative

    Original poster indicated that his primary area of focus is coverage in the Colorado mountains. I do not have specific first-hand knowledge of the coverage area for amateur VHF/UHF in Colorado, but this repeater map could be a good reference, though it is dated 2006. It's authors indicate that a 2009 version is for sale in print.

    A preliminary skimming indicates coverage in several mountain cities. I'm no radio engineer, but I would imagine that the Estes Park repeater would probably do him pretty good in Rocky Mountain National Park -- at least in the highlands...

    1. Re:Colorado Repeater Map by bvargo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Original poster indicated that his primary area of focus is coverage in the Colorado mountains. I do not have specific first-hand knowledge of the coverage area for amateur VHF/UHF in Colorado, but this repeater map could be a good reference, though it is dated 2006. It's authors indicate that a 2009 version is for sale in print.

      A preliminary skimming indicates coverage in several mountain cities. I'm no radio engineer, but I would imagine that the Estes Park repeater would probably do him pretty good in Rocky Mountain National Park -- at least in the highlands...

      In addition to the above, there's a decent coverage map for Colorado Connection here, but some of the repeaters (especially Durango) are missing from the map. Colorado Connection is one of the larger repeater systems in the state, consisting of almost twenty linked repeaters.

      I'd still recommend a SPOT or similar system though; you never know where trouble might strike.

    2. Re:Colorado Repeater Map by rwade · · Score: 1

      In addition to the above, there's a decent coverage map for Colorado Connection [colcon.org] here [colcon.org], but some of the repeaters (especially Durango) are missing from the map. Colorado Connection is one of the larger repeater systems in the state, consisting of almost twenty linked repeaters.

      Googling around, I did note that ColCon map, but immediately disregarded it. In addition to leaving out Durango, the Estes Park repeater is clearly missing. Just doesn't seem like that great of a coverage map.

    3. Re:Colorado Repeater Map by ptbarnett · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In addition to the above, there's a decent coverage map for Colorado Connection [colcon.org] here [colcon.org], but some of the repeaters (especially Durango) are missing from the map.

      It's been a long time since I was there, but at the time, the Durango area (and northeast to the Vallecito Reservoir) had solid coverage in the 144 MHz (2 meter) band. There was a solar-powered repeater operated by a local club on top of a mountain, broadcasting at 100 watts.

      I had an interesting discussion with one of the club members about the perils of maintenance -- the road to the site was only open in the summer. The repeater went down for some reason (lightning strike?) before the road opened one spring, and they had to hire a helicopter to fly someone to the site to repair it.

      I'd still recommend a SPOT or similar system though; you never know where trouble might strike.

      I'll second this. SPOT transmitter/locators are really inexpensive, and will provide a much more precise location if you need help. You can also use it to send a simple "I'm OK" status message periodically, and later use it to plot your locations from which you sent the message.

    4. Re:Colorado Repeater Map by ptbarnett · · Score: 2, Informative

      the Durango area (and northeast to the Vallecito Reservoir) had solid coverage in the 144 MHz (2 meter) band. There was a solar-powered repeater operated by a local club on top of a mountain, broadcasting at 100 watts.

      Yes, it's bad form -- but I didn't look this up before I hit submit.

      I believe this is the repeater that I remembered: DURANGO, Eagle Pass - K0EP

    5. Re:Colorado Repeater Map by Dr.+Zim · · Score: 1

      There was a solar-powered repeater operated by a local club on top of a mountain, broadcasting at 100 watts.

      You mean transmitting at 100 watts. It is illegal to broadcast on amateur frequencies except under very limited conditions.

      --
      (name withheld by request)
    6. Re:Colorado Repeater Map by d-ude · · Score: 1

      There was a solar-powered repeater operated by a local club on top of a mountain, broadcasting at 100 watts.

      You mean transmitting at 100 watts. It is illegal to broadcast on amateur frequencies except under very limited conditions.

      Semantics. To the muggles it means the same thing.

    7. Re:Colorado Repeater Map by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Semantics. To the muggles it means the same thing.

      No kidding. I was having it out with some nutcases in another slashdot thread that thought any radio transmission was a 'broadcast' and that they should be able to receive it legally. I tried to explain the difference, but it didn't work. To them broadcast was defined by the medium and not the intent. Sad, actually.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    8. Re:Colorado Repeater Map by WNight · · Score: 1

      To them broadcast was defined by the medium and not the intent.

      Well yeah, if your medium goes through me, it's a broadcast even if that term has a more specific legal meaning as well.

      And that's enough to justify the legality of receiving it - I can. You sent it to me.

      You should point out the pedantic terminology where it matters, but you shouldn't think the terminology is the argument.

  39. I Disagree. by rwade · · Score: 1

    Ham radio is a HOBBY for people interested in communicating by radio, and the technical development of same.

    Actually, the amateur bands are set aside for almost non-commercial, non-music, non-broadcast use whatsoever -- that's kind of the beauty of it...

  40. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well man, go ahead and get a cell phone. You see, amateur radios can only contact other amateur radios. That means you can't (easily) use one to call up your buddy in Boston, unless he's a ham too and the bands are in your favor, or you use Echolink (the internet) or whatever.

    5 watts is more than enough power to go around the world on HF, I know a lot of people that operate with less than 1 watt and talk to Europe daily (nightly?). The bands open up later in the day, but during the day depending on how you set up your antenna you can get a minimum of 200 miles up to 400 miles range.

    It's all in the antenna. At the house I run 5 watts in to my 6dB gain base antenna and can talk as far as the curve of the earth will let me, on VHF. My VHF/UHF mobile radio will let me get ahold of someone in every single place my cell phone doesn't work. My handheld probably will too, but to be honest I haven't tried. I don't head off to WV very often, which is the only place I'm at where coverage is questionable. I'm certain that if I had a good antenna for my cell that I'd be able to get it going in places it wouldn't otherwise. A little gain will go a very long way, every 3dB of gain that you have equates to twice as much radiated power.

    If you are wanting to use amateur radio to talk to friends, give it up unless they are hams themselves. If you are wanting to use amateur radio for emergency situations only, feel free to. Hams love helping out in an emergency. A license is not required to use a radio in an emergency, but getting your license will make sure you at least know how to not fry your rig and be able to get some signal out in the first place and will allow you to legally test your setup (otherwise nobody will come back to you to let you know).

    Now, HF is a huge pain in the ass. VHF/UHF on the other hand is very simple. 100 mile contacts are trivial to do, but that kind of stuff is line of sight only. If you can't see the antenna you want to transmit to, you just might not make it in. 5 watts in to a proper half-wave antenna can accomplish that with a bit of luck, but something more typical is 20 to 30 miles out of your stock rubber ducky. Don't spend more than you have to unless you gots it to burn, but you will need an appropriate handheld, a better antenna, and a spare battery. Those 'batteries' that hold 6 AA's (or what-have-you) are good for emergencies too and are worth getting. Expect to dump $250 for a very very good setup that will do what you need. Here in Kentucky, all of our state parks have excellent repeater coverage so using a simple handheld is a very good option. In fact I just use the stock antenna on my handheld. Where you live, that might not be the case. You should go check out http://k5ehx.net/repeaters/ to see what repeaters are around the area, and if it's covered at all. As others have suggested and will suggest, I'll suggest again: GO TO YOUR LOCAL HAM CLUB AND TALK WITH THEM. They will know more about operating in your area than the internet will. Besides you'll eventually have to deal with them to get your license.

    In short, you probably don't want to become a ham. You probably want a cell phone that has an antenna connector and a really nice antenna to plug in to it. As us hams say, spend at least as much on the antenna as you do the rig, preferably more.

    73 de KB3TXC

  41. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    THAT'S THE JOKE

  42. HF QRP by JumpingBull · · Score: 1

    QRP classics published by the ARRL is probably the reference work.

    The book "the electronics of radio" by Rutledge; Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-64645-6 makes understanding and building such a HF radio easy(r).

    Other useful works would be the ARRL antenna handbook, and the ARRL radio amateur handbook. Of course packing a mirror, whistle and survival kit are also recommended. Hope this helps

    --
    This is progress?
  43. HF / CW by N7DR · · Score: 3, Interesting

    FWIW I live in Colorado.

    Most responders seem to assume some sort of VHF but, as a few people point out, that's not really a great idea because there are big gaps in repeater coverage in the mountains.

    However, 5W (or less) on HF CW would be ample for emergency communications, and you wouldn't have to worry about whether there's a repeater nearby. There are lots of designs for lightweight QRP (i.e., low power) single-frequency (or limited-frequency) rigs that would be suitable. I'd probably go for one that transmitted on 40m, just because there's more CW activity there, so you're more likely to be heard quickly than on, say, 80m.

    I don't hike in the mountains, but if I did I would definitely carry such a rig with me. It only needs to save your life once.

    1. Re:HF / CW by michael_cain · · Score: 1

      I also live in Colorado.

      It may (or may not) be worth noting that after spending some millions of federal dollars to expand coverage for emergency providers (law enforcement, fire, etc) in the last few years, there are still significant amounts of the mountain terrain that do not have coverage on those frequencies. There are likely to always be places that you can hike to where there's no coverage of any sort, including satellite except for brief periods.

      OTOH, in an emergency situation, local repeaters may not be necessary. This story describes a case where the emergency broadcast was received by a ham more than 100 miles away, apparently without benefit of a repeater.

    2. Re:HF / CW by Third+Normal+Form · · Score: 1

      I spend a good bit of time in Colorado hiking and biking in places where there is no hope of cell coverage. If I'm going somewhere off the beaten path, I toss my HT into my pack- the extra weight isn't noticeable, and while I have no illusions about being able to hit repeaters from a remote valley somewhere, it sure doesn't hurt to bring it.

      http://www.arrl.org/news/injured-colorado-skier-uses-amateur-radio-to-summon-help

    3. Re:HF / CW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is good advice, although I would favor 80m because:

      a) it's below the NVIS critical frequency most of the time during periods of low sunspot activity such as we're now in (40m is not), so you'll cover the local region; and

      b)that's where most of the cw traffic nets meet several times a day, so you're more likely to reach competent message-traffic handlers.

      A roll-up 80m dipole deployed even a few feet off the ground will send a signal almost straight up, which is what you want in rough terrain. The ionosphere will refract it such that you can communicate for several hundred miles.

  44. Can't hurt? by autocracy · · Score: 1

    Do it. I can hit a repeater that's 40 miles away using a 5 watt handheld in my house. Mountain to mountain, I've done 150 miles (Cadillac to Washington). It's not fool-proof, and you'll have to know a lot more than you would with a cell phone. Map the local repeaters, know the tones...

    That said, for the cost, a spectacular tool. I've used mine to start a search & rescue for friends of mine who were lost in a place with no phone service. I bring my VX-8r whenever I go backpacking.

    KB1PNB

    --
    SIG: HUP
    1. Re:Can't hurt? by whoppo · · Score: 1

      Hey man... fancy meeting you here :)

          -- WA1RB

      --
      chown -R us /base
    2. Re:Can't hurt? by ResQuad · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree with this. The cost to take the ham test is $15, and the basic exam is not rocket science (Do you understand what electricity is? Congrats, you're halfway there). You can get el cheapo chinese knock off raidos (not that I recommend it, but you could) for less than $100 that'll run 5W on a single band. I've got a Yaesu VX-8R also and while it costs $400, it is very rugged (water resistant) and runs on 4 bands. I've used it up in Tahoe (North lake) to hit repeaters in South Lake, 30+ miles away, while in a building. No problem at all. Of course the repeater 1 mile away I can barely hit because I'm in the shadow of the Mountain... but thems the breaks.

      If you get the license, get a used radio that'll do 5W on the at least single band (which ever there are repeaters for in your area)... it wont cost you much. You program it, pack it with some long lasting batteries, toss it in your bag, and forget about it. It's there if you need it. Plus, who knows, you might even try taking it out and testing it on a trip when there isn't an emergency. Worse comes to worse you find it doesn't work what so ever, and you re-sell the used radio. Net loss? Maybe $20-30?

      KJ6FNQ

  45. Grave Danger by b4upoo · · Score: 0, Troll

    There have been incidents of murder, rape and robberies due to triangulation of hikers from radio signals. I can see carrying a SW radio for emergency use and that is as far as you should go. Any use of such a device in a remote area can easily cost you your life. Believe it or not our nation has enough sick people running loose that some see stalking as a sport, a way to find a rape victim or a way to supplement income.

    1. Re: Grave Danger by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [citation needed]

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    2. Re: Grave Danger by tftp · · Score: 2, Informative

      [citation needed]

      No citation needed because what the GP claims (HF DF done by criminals) is impossible and unbelievable. HF DF requires huge installations ("elephant cages") and this technology is not available to many nations, let alone vagrants. VHF DF is theoretically doable with a man-portable equipment, but in practical terms it isn't. Besides, any DF in mountains will result in tons of multipath, so you need to be in an airplane if you want to perform DF with any hope for accuracy.

      It is true that there may be danger present when you are out there. There may be danger from weather, from [lack of] luck, from poisonous plants, from dangerous animals ... and from people. People would be the last on your list, unless you hike in Central Park of NYC. Criminals are not entirely stupid, they don't wait for people in the middle of nowhere; and hikers aren't likely to have their diamond rings and thick wallets with them. Some hikers may be armed. The most dangerous place for a hiker is probably the sidewalk in front of his home.

    3. Re: Grave Danger by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      While I agree with you about the danger from humans being the least of someone's worries while out in the back country, you are incorrect about VHF direction finding. In fact, "fox hunting" is a popular activity among amateur radio operators.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    4. Re: Grave Danger by tftp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In fact, "fox hunting" is a popular activity among amateur radio operators.

      Not in the mountains :-) You need to listen on repeater's input, and the terrain most likely doesn't give you the line of sight. On top of that, the criminal doesn't know the frequency, and doesn't know timing of transmissions (those are given to fox hunters.)

      Basically geolocation with a single, not moving station is not possible; you only get a bearing to the strongest direction of arrival. To triangulate without moving you need to have many stations (more than three, probably.) To triangulate with a single site you have to move yourself - and you have to move fast because you need to change your position so much that the LOB changes, and you have to move faster than your transmitter moves. Ideally you spiral around the transmitter. This requires a vehicle, most likely a flying vehicle (that solves the LOS problem also.) Such a setup is completely out of a common trail stalker's league. Perhaps a rescue team would be sufficiently equipped and trained to do DF, since they often use helicopters. The professional equipment with Watson-Watt antennas will cost you just under $100K, ham level equipment with Doppler antennas will be much cheaper, but it will distort the audio with the switching tone.

      If we set the reference risk of a hiker meeting a criminal at 100%, 99.(9)% of it will come from the criminal just lying in wait near the trail. No radio needed, and he instantly knows who is coming, how many people, are they armed or not, etc. - facts that can't be determined from a brief radio communication. Criminals are usually not very smart, and their methods are amazingly simple; that's why they so often work.

  46. It can and has been done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there is amateur radio repeater coverage in the area you intend to visit, a handheld may be all you need. You can boost the performance of your radio significantly by using an external antenna and placing it up a tree.

    If there is no repeater coverage you will have to look into HF frequencies. I recommend you investigate the Yaesu FT-817. It is designed for the kind of service you are interested in and will run on 8 AA batteries. If you are willing to learn morse code you will be set right there. If not, you can get a netbook or OLPC computer and attach it to the radio and operate digital HF. (Whatever you type will show up on other people's computers using the same frequency). Or you can go one step further and send and receive email via the winlink2000 system. This sort of setup has been used by mountain climbers with great success.

    Unfortunately, you will not be able to get all this functionality for less than 4-5 pounds but life is all about tradeoffs.

    You may find the following page useful: http://members.shaw.ca/ve6bko/overview.html

    - VE6BKO

  47. Re:Nice idea, but you're wasting your time by Suzuran · · Score: 1

    Please kindly troll elsewhere.

  48. Re:Nope by Paco103 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So glad to see some people thinking about that. I hate how often the ham community shuns CB and the mere mention of it. Yes, it certainly has it's own problems, but nearly EVERY truck and a good amount of touring motorcycles are equipped with CB. Considering how many charity bike rides that ARS covers that make use of motorcycles, this also seems overlooked. I've never thought of it from the delivery, but I'll certainly keep that in mind in the future.

  49. Amateur Radio may do what you need. . . by djspinrite · · Score: 1

    Amateur radio has the most available options and are only limited by your willingness to carry the gear. You can certainly make contacts with people at great distances only using a little power. Line of sight is not a very big issue(hike the Arizona back country regularly with just a HT in tow). Antennas, amps and careful band choice will make all of the difference in the world. There are satellites to contact through, repeaters to hit and people who scan for distress calls all the time. Look only to some of the amateur radio rescue stories to see that quite possibly amateur radio is the way to go. Once licensed the only ongoing fees for amateur radio are the ones you choose to pay(memberships and new gear). Consider that plenty of folks travel the Appalachian trail with only a small QRP rig in tow and manage to make plenty of contacts you may be barking up the right alley. Check out ARRL.org or 14er.org for more information on that subject.

  50. Hack a cell phone to have more power by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

    Might work, but as other posters mentioned things like the mountains may be the reason for the signal loss rather than the amount of power.

    1. Re:Hack a cell phone to have more power by N2UX · · Score: 1

      The only problem with that is the possibility of FCC fines (generally running US $10,000 a pop) for modifying the equipment if caught or captured. YMMV.

  51. Pussy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have them drop me off at the park BUCK NAKED. I make my own survival tech when I'm out there.

  52. Hear, hear by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    I go away for a couple of weeks every year where there is no cell coverage, and I just get an Iridium "pay as you go" card. Coverage anywhere you can see the sky, including low earth orbit.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  53. Re:Nope by Peach+Rings · · Score: 1

    The batteries were unnecessarily gigantic though; we have much better Li batteries today.

  54. Ham radio won't replace your cell phone. by laslo2 · · Score: 1

    Ham radio will not be more reliable than your cell phone, unless you are exceptionally lucky.

    A 5W dualband (2m/70cm) handheld will possibly get you to a local repeater, if you are high enough up out of the trees and you don't have a mountain blocking your signal from reaching the repeater. Unfortunately, the only way to really test this is to be out in the boonies with your radio-- but often the groups that maintain repeaters will post coverage maps on their websites that will give you some idea.

    The real problem is who will answer your call. I live in a medium sized city with 15 repeaters; unless there's a scheduled net going on, those repeaters are usually very quiet. I imagine that in the backcountry where there are fewer people, it follows that there would be fewer hams listening. If you're really going to consider ham radio as a backup plan, try to get in touch with local hams ahead of time and see who monitors what. It won't help you to be able to reach a repeater if no one's going to answer and be able to help you.

    A portable HF radio might be a better option because you'll be able to reach more stations, but it will take more than a pound of space in your pack. You will also probably reach people who are far away from you are, and won't know local conditions (terrain, roads, landmarks, agencies), so it will be difficult for them to send the right help to the right place.

    That being said, check out HFPack at http://www.hfpack.com; those guys play outside and take radios along. Also, the Burning Hams Mailing list at https://lists.burningman.com/mailman/listinfo/burningham-list is interesting to monitor, especially in the months leading up to Burning Man each year.

    --
    Karma only matters to me now and zen.
  55. Re:Nope by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    Those big backpack radios they used in Vietnam were usually leftovers from WWII.

    bzzzt. Thank you for playing.

    http://www.tourofdutyinfo.com/ToDAdvisorwebpages/fieldradio2.html

  56. Do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not get your license and test it out for yourself? You may just find a new hobby that you enjoy, and if not it's not a big loss.

  57. Learn to take good advice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fine, call me a troll, but when you see the truth of the matter, don't say I didn't warn you.

  58. Re:Nice idea, but you're wasting your time by atomicthumbs · · Score: 1

    I am eighteen and know how to use an SWR meter and tuner to tune an antenna, and what the advantages and disadvantages of various HF antenna designs are. Your argument is invalid.

    --
    http://pinopsida.com
  59. Re:Nice idea, but you're wasting your time by Suzuran · · Score: 1

    You aren't alone. There's a few kids here who are on the right track too. This guy is just trolling. Don't give him any attention.

  60. Use a satphone or HF ham gear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Hi, dawson,

    I'm a ham, and I'll say that the answer depends. Sorry. If you carry a small handheld transceiver with 5 watts and a rubber duck antenna, it's mostly line of sight. So if you're in sight of a repeater (not literally in sight - it could be many miles away from your mountain perch), you'll be able to hit it and probably find someone listening (but not necessarily). Handhelds work in VHF/UHF frequencies which are short range to begin with, your radio will not have a lot of power, and that rubber duck antenna is notoriously deficient.

    I have two suggestions: a Yaesu FT-817, which is an HF 5-watt radio, and a good external antenna which will get you out on HF bands which are world-wide. See http://blog.makezine.com/archive/author/diana_eng/ for videos and instructions from a ham who does backcountry radio work with antennas and such.

    Or second, a satellite phone. The last time I checked into satphones, Globalstar satellites were being wrecked by radiation, and their service was not useable. If I understood correctly, they needed to replace their entire galaxy of satellites, but they were moving the working ones around trying to maintain coverage. Be sure to check into that before you get a satphone. I've rented satphones for a week when I've camped in Death Valley, and that was a cheap and effective way to get local weather information on what roads were closed by snow before I headed out to a dead end. I've also arranged for tows for other campers.

    If you want communications for an emergency, I'd go with satphones. I've taken my hundred watt TS-480 to Death Valley, but I'm car camping. I have to say that you get lots of answers when you call "CQ AF6WI portable from Death Valley" :->

  61. Re:Nope by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    How was it unnecessary? Should they have just waited around for 40 years for new battery technology?

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  62. Amateur satellites by rwade · · Score: 1

    That is a good point, but the antenna tends to be fairly cumbersome. The process and results of working amateur satellites would make it a somewhat dangerous communication method on which to rely with in trouble in the wilderness...

    1. Re:Amateur satellites by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The antenna issue can be dealt with but how would he know how to find the satellite out in the backcountry? He'd have to lug a laptop with sat tracking software installed along with him. Besides, working satellites can be pretty tricky. Not only do you have to track the moving bird with your antenna, you have to continually adjust your frequencies to compensate for the Doppler Effect. The OP doesn't even have his ticket yet; it might be a little much to expect an inexperienced operator to make a satellite contact.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    2. Re:Amateur satellites by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he could use an Android phone with a ham sat tracking app.

      I see there's one called HamSatDroid but I haven't tried it myself.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    3. Re:Amateur satellites by tagno25 · · Score: 1

      The antenna issue can be dealt with but how would he know how to find the satellite out in the backcountry? He'd have to lug a laptop with sat tracking software installed along with him.

      There is sat tracking software for both Android and the iPhone.

    4. Re:Amateur satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You don't need a laptop for sat tracking. Print out a week of sat passes on a piece of paper and take it with you. Or, use one of the iPhone sat tracking apps. I'm sure android has them too.

      Sat tracking is trivial with a handheld Yagi and you don't need to worry so much about the Doppler shift on FM. I made a contact the first time I tried to contact a sat. It's easy.

      N8YY

    5. Re:Amateur satellites by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he could use an Android phone with a ham sat tracking app.

      I see there's one called HamSatDroid but I haven't tried it myself.

      I believe that app requires a working Internet connection. If he's got a phone with a working Internet connection, he doesn't need ham radio.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    6. Re:Amateur satellites by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      There is sat tracking software for both Android and the iPhone.

      Yes, but they require a working Internet connection

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    7. Re:Amateur satellites by tagno25 · · Score: 2, Informative

      HamSatDroid (for Android) only needs a internet connection to update the keps (keplerian elements) file and that is not done automatically.

    8. Re:Amateur satellites by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I thought comm satellites were geostationary. All he would need is a compass and a chart.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    9. Re:Amateur satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense! With the proper app, an Iphone will suffice for utilizing the satellites in question just fine! Wait, what? You require an AT&T connection? -- nevermind

    10. Re:Amateur satellites by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought comm satellites were geostationary.

      Not amateur radio satellites. It costs a lot of money to up a satellite in geosynchronous orbit, far more than even a bunch of hams could come up with. As a result, amateur radio satellites are usually piggybacked on commercial launches with a bit of spare capacity and end up in a much lower orbit.

      You can go to the Amsat Web site for more details.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    11. Re:Amateur satellites by Hooya · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the app gets the position from the internet or if it's using the connection to download the telemetry data and doing the calculations itself. If it's the latter, a sync before going on the trip would be fine. AFAIK, the decay is not too bad for the calculated position for at least a couple of days. I don't even remember how frequently NORAD provides updates for the telemetry data.

      if it's the former (just uses the internet connection to talk to a NASA/NORAD web server to get the position) then you're hosed. Unless you implement the algorithms in the Spacetrack report and create the app yourself.

      It's not all that difficult. I did it for a class about 6-8 years ago and used it to track a weather satellite. Actually downloaded the TIFF weather map. Was a fun class.

    12. Re:Amateur satellites by Hooya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seems like the amateur radio folks need to get together with the amateur rocketry folks and cook some shit up and put a sucker in a geo-stationary orbit.

      now that would be brain science ;)

    13. Re:Amateur satellites by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's the latter. I did a little research and it turns out I was mistaken about requiring an Internet connection.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    14. Re:Amateur satellites by camperdave · · Score: 1

      As a result, amateur radio satellites are usually piggybacked on commercial launches with a bit of spare capacity and end up in a much lower orbit.

      Still, you could put together a circular slide rule to compute the satellite's position. No need for an internet hookup.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    15. Re:Amateur satellites by Achra · · Score: 1

      PocketSat+ http://www.bigfattail.com/software/pocketsatplus/ is a free satellite tracking software for PalmOS that I find extremely sufficient, so no need for a laptop. I agree with working satellites being pretty tricky, though.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    16. Re:Amateur satellites by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Still, you could put together a circular slide rule to compute the satellite's position. No need for an internet hookup.

      Um, I think that trying to calculate Keplerian elements while in distress might be a tad impractical even with a circular slide rule. Turns out, though, that I was incorrect about the iPhone and Android apps requiring an Internet connection. They only need to be updated periodically.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    17. Re:Amateur satellites by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Especially if you're in distress of some sort. Plus, you generally only have a few minutes of air time available to you on each pass.

      RR on the tracking software, turns out I was incorrect about the software for iOS and Android needing an Internet connection.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    18. Re:Amateur satellites by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Not only do you have to track the moving bird with your antenna, you have to continually adjust your frequencies to compensate for the Doppler Effect.

      That's really easy to do. The satellites move very slowly across the sky - about the same speed as someone walking past 500m away. On the VHF/UHF FM modes (which are really the only practical crossband handheld modes) you only need to tune the UHF downlink - the Doppler shift for a whole pass on VHF is about +/-1kHz.

    19. Re:Amateur satellites by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      There is a web page explaining how to calculate AO-51 passes "by hand" based on the passes all being about an hour and a half apart. You can estimate when and where the satellite will appear in the sky and track by hand.

      For the ISS, it's easy - on dawn and twilight passes you can actually see the thing. Aim at the bright dot moving from west to east.

    20. Re:Amateur satellites by f3rret · · Score: 1

      Not really, I have a sat tracking app on my iPhone, it just downloads a list of satellites and their orbital characteristics. So he would just need an internet connection before setting off so he can get the latest TLE files.

      Now I don't know if whatever satellites are used for amateur radio are in there.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    21. Re:Amateur satellites by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Um, I think that trying to calculate Keplerian elements while in distress might be a tad impractical even with a circular slide rule.

      Sorry, I meant more of an astrolabe variant than a circular slide rule, per se.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    22. Re:Amateur satellites by LandGator · · Score: 1

      Not really. Amateur rocketry folks are not allowed access to LEO much less Clarke orbits.

      --
      There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
    23. Re:Amateur satellites by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      No, that would be an epic win of epic proportions. (:

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    24. Re:Amateur satellites by ptx0 · · Score: 1

      What would stop the launching of the satellite from a country that does not enforce such restrictions?

    25. Re:Amateur satellites by LandGator · · Score: 1

      1. Money. Are you Delos D. Harriman? (look it up)
      2. Every nation on the planet regulates amateur radio.

      --
      There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
    26. Re:Amateur satellites by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      That's OK, there's always satellite internet to provide the internet conn...oh, wait

  63. Re:Nice idea, but you're wasting your time by N2UX · · Score: 1

    Yeah.... That's why I'm still using an HF tranciever with vacuum tube finals and pre-amp, and a tube based linear amplifier .... Because I Don't know how to use anything but an icebox radio. Yes, my license is current, and has been maintened current for the past 24 years.

    By the way, a pretty obvious roll attempt. You need to work harder.

  64. Re:Nope by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

    Because obviously the existence of good and affordable Li battery tech today implies the existence of good and affordable Li battery tech 40 years ago.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  65. Sat phone is way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iridium sat phone, expensive, but works anywhere

    1. Re:Sat phone is way to go by hey! · · Score: 1

      Wonderful. Just the thing for my next cave diving expedition.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Sat phone is way to go by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Don't forget signal fires. Just about as effective, but makes effective use of that most plentiful of resources when down deep - oxygen!

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  66. There are so many options,,,,, by klausner · · Score: 1

    There are so many ways that a ham can make contact from anywhere on the planet that it's staggering.

    While VHF/UHF repeater coverage in Colorado is excellent because most of the repeaters are on top of mountains, you can also find a lot of places in the back-country where you can't hit a repeater because some @#$%^ mountain is in the way ;)

    You could also communicate via satellite. There are ~20 amateur radio satellites currently operating.

    Then there are the "traditional" methods using HF frequencies.

    The Amateur Radio Relay League (the national ham group) runs an exercise annually that focuses on various modes of operating in the field. Hence the name, Field Day. Unfortunately, it was last month.

    But the ARRL or a local ham club will be a better resource than random ramblings here. Check them out (or find a local club) at arrl.org.

  67. Re:Nice idea, but you're wasting your time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hipster. "It used to be really cool, now its lame", i hear that about everything, its all BS.

  68. Not /. by pspahn · · Score: 1

    Ask the forest service what they use.

    Of course, it will likely depend on what you consider backcountry. If you're just up on Berthoud/Loveland Pass, I'm sure nothing too fancy is needed.

    Personally, I'm still waiting for my phone/gps/internet/avy beacon device to show up. Now I have the Evo, I'm wondering if there is a way to make this thing function as an EFFECTIVE avy beacon. Bluetooth or wifi connection with others in my group maybe?

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  69. Pikes Peak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Luckily, the 146.97 out of Colorado Springs seems to cover a very LARGE geographical area. Having monitored it for the last several years, I'm always impressed with it's range.

  70. Get a Sat Phone by 32771 · · Score: 1

    I spend my last vacation in Western Australia and had similar worries. I was on my own and had a rental car. Annoyingly enough I couldn't rent a sat phone, buy an EPIRB/PLB, or buy a shortwave radio. I cut all my trips into the outback short and didn't do anything crazy, it worked out ok.

    I remember getting about 10km with my CB radio at 4W. This is not enough for Australia. Somebody here was talking about the 100W range for what you want to do, this sounds much better. Don't forget though that you have to carry batteries and a short wave radio with antenna. I also remember some HAM radio friends talking about their pricey equipment so I would say that even with a ~AU$3000 sat phone contract you may be better off than with 10kg of HAM gear at similar or at least half the price. If you can rent the thing you will also not have to deal with a 24 month contract.

    With a car and a HAM license short wave radio may make sense, but I would probably still try to get one of the following:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distress_radiobeacon .

    --
    Je me souviens.
    1. Re:Get a Sat Phone by AJ+Mexico · · Score: 2, Informative

      (1) It is possible to rent a satellite phone, a lot of places. Why is the OP "waiting" for a satellite phone? They are not any more expensive than a lot of ham radios. The airtime charges are expensive, but presumably limited to important or emergency situations.
      (2) Remember that some personal locator beacons can be used to send a simple non-emergency message to a pre-defined email address. Usually "OK" and your lat/long coordinates. Would this solve your problem? Personal locator beacons are the greatest backcountry safety device to come along in years. Get one, and then do everything you can to make sure you never need to use it.
      (3) For hiker-to-hiker communications in the US, why not FRS/GMRS radios? These are cheaper than ham radios, and about as likely to give line-of-sight communications in the mountains. Licensing requirements are none (FRS) or trivial (GMRS).

      --
      Computers obey me.
    2. Re:Get a Sat Phone by Locklin · · Score: 1

      Just an aside, you cannot legally cross the US/Canadian border with your GMRS radios or travel to a lot of countries. GMRS here in Canada is limited to 2 watts and integrated crappy antenna. My 5watt ham HT can go to most countries and, with a roll-up j-pole strung up in a tree, can probably transmit 100x as far as my GMRS radio.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
  71. Re:Nope by Peach+Rings · · Score: 1

    Try looking at the context. Read GGP and GGGP

  72. spotty coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am WA0SUD an Extra Class in Colorado since 1967. Localized coverage is VHF mostly and is very spotty in remote and rural areas. Repeaters are needed for handhelds beyond "line of sight" and they are not as prevelant as they once were. I would sadly not recommend this for back-country use except for recreation.

  73. Re:Nope by LoneHighway · · Score: 1

    So what he needs is a 27MHz Citizen's Band radio? Besides rednecks and freaks, who still uses CB?

    Truck drivers. Oh, wait...

    (Disclaimer: I am a truck driver, so I'm allowed to make that joke without being modded troll/flamebait.)

    Hey! I resemble that remark! (2 million miles and counting.)

  74. If you're willing to learn morse code... by Question+Mark · · Score: 1

    ... there are several ultra-portable rigs that can broadcast huge distances (thanks to atmospheric effects) with just a loop of wire thrown over a tree.

    The KX1 comes to mind: http://www.elecraft.com/KX1/KX1.htm

  75. Don't miss Wes Hayward's pages on hiking... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

    See www.w7zoi.net -- in addition to being one of the all-time great technical writers in the ham radio area, Wes is also a hardcore hiking enthusiast who's actually designed a lot of homebrew portable gear for that purpose.

    His interests are oriented more towards HF rather than VHF but that just makes the problem more interesting. If you have an emergency in the woods, even somebody in Australia can get help to you...

  76. training and experience by htdrifter · · Score: 1

    If you need a cell phone you should stick to developed and marked trails.
    That's a good way to get experience and test your equipment and methods.
    Blistered feet can disable you for days.
    Keep the weight down. Don't carry anything you don't need.

    For wilderness areas you need survival training and experience. It's best to use the buddy system.
    Check in with the ranger station where you will get any necessary permits and information on local conditions.
    Tell them where you are going and when you'll return. It's like filing a flight plan.

    The Rockies are great!
    Good luck!

       

  77. Road noise by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Forgive him... he thought the "whoosh" was the truck going by...

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  78. Amen to that!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People today are not used to being away from their umbilical cord. They feel that they need a cell phone to be in touch with people 24/7. Part of the attraction of being in the wilderness is to get away from that stuff. Also, whatever happened to developing some outdoors skills.

    1. Re:Amen to that!!! by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree with you on that.

      Funny thing, however: I lived for over fifty years without a cell phone and never worried about being out of touch. Now that I've had one for while, though, I feel naked if forget it when I leave the house.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
  79. Re:X-Band Repeat - don't do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are not right at the car to turn the radio off, then this would probably be a violation of the rules!

  80. Look at the FT-817 or an ELT by bkeahl · · Score: 1

    Look at the FT-817. It isn't a hand-held, but it is designed for backpacking. The advantage is it covers HF (long distance) and VHF (line of sight), so you can hit a local repeater if one is around OR you can go to the "HF" bands and yell for help there - of course, you may be speaking to someone 600 miles away!

    The downside is it's not a hand-held ("HT"). Also, you'll need to string up an antenna for HF communications and if you're hurt that'll be tough - heck, it's a pain to put one up in ideal circumstances!

    If you're primarily concerned about calling for help in an emergency then you could consider a personal Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT). You can't communicate with anyone other than letting the world know you need rescuing though.

  81. Iridium phones by Animats · · Score: 1

    They are not cheap, but Iridium phones work anywhere you can see the sky. A basic "Emergency" plan costs $40/month, plus $1.39 per minute of airtime. An Iridium 9555 phone costs $1295. Weighs 266 grams, about twice the weight of an iPhone. There's a foldable, flexible solar charger available.

  82. Re:Nope by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

    My wife gets upset when I make disparaging cracks about truck drivers, doesn't seem to get that it's an inside joke.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
  83. I'm with you by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've got a ham station, and it includes an AM/LSB/USB base CB radio (top center in that image) and associated dedicated antenna. If the goal is being able to communicate in an emergency (and that is one of my goals as a ham), ignoring one of the most widespread tools out there is not the best idea.

    It's also not fair to just say "rednecks and freaks"; there are a lot of folks in this area, ranchers and so forth, not "rednecks" by any definition other than perhaps suntan, who use CB as a practical (and free) means to keep in touch. I know some that are a good deal more sophisticated in both outlook and education than some of the characters I've run into here on slashdot.

    For that matter, ham radio is no exclusive preserve of reason, manners, and intelligence, either. So let's keep the "redneck" comments down to a dull roar, shall we?

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:I'm with you by couchslug · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "It's also not fair to just say "rednecks and freaks".

      It's past unfair and well into "stupid". Those of us who drive long distance often use CB to keep track of road conditions. Just lurking is usually enough. The CB craze is mostly over, (praise be to Allah!) so there are fewer dumbfucks polluting the airwaves.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  84. Re:Nice idea, but you're wasting your time by eclectro · · Score: 1

    The hobby is gone forever.

    It'll be like disco. It will make a huge comeback. Just like abba

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  85. Do you really need a radio? by tombeard · · Score: 1

    I have spent hundreds of hours alone in the deep woods. Yes, there is a minute chance that such a device would save you, but it would totally destroy the wonderful sense of self confidence you get when you get yourself out of a tight spot. I don't mean that you will use the radio to get out of the tight spot, but that you will always know that you could have. You were never really alone, relying on no one but yourself. Take a mirror, signal flare, and a whistle to direct a search party if you must. Remember, you are responsible for yourself in the woods, be carefull and thoughtfull. The satisfaction you will get bringing yourself home will more then reward the risk. And if you can't get yourself back, why should anyone go in and get you? Leave an itenerrary with a friend so they can come looking for you if you don't return; don't involve strangers.

    --
    The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
  86. Weenies. by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have them chop off three of my limbs, have a Bothrops asper bite me on the remaining one a couple of times, encase me in several feet of ice, and drop me in a deep, 33f mountain lake attached to a 40-ton anchor on a short chain.

    You kids just don't know the meaning of challenge anymore. You probably still wear shoes in your own house. Weenies.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Weenies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you regrow them limbs? Or are you typing via brainwaves? (Not trolling, just curious).

    2. Re:Weenies. by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      I bite the tails off lizards, jam them on the stumps, and force them into human limb form by sheer force of will. The lizards just grow new tails. It's a totally renewable and environmentally friendly procedure. You have to respect the environment.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  87. Ham is PERFECT for Back Country Communications by lyle101 · · Score: 1

    I have been a ham for 15 years (since I was 17) and my primary application of the hobby has been back country communications in Arizona. I am active with a local 4x4 Ham radio club and the ham radio is our primary form of communications. When hiking / camping / and kayaking, I always bring my waterproof Yaesu VX-7R with me and can usually communicate with a local mountain top repeater if I have a clear view. It sometimes requires hiking to a higher elevation, but typically works. Sometimes, especially when I am on the Mogollon Rim, I even have access to a telephone autopatch and can telephone my wife from my handheld ham radio to check in with her.


    My mobile radio is capable of functioning as a make-shift repeater (crossband repeat) and on most excursions, I am rarely more than 5 miles from my truck. As such, I can actually use my truck to significantly extend the range of my HT (handie-talkie). However, I typically only do this in more remote areas where I know that I will have a difficult time communicating with a repeater.


    Additionally, I use APRS in my 4x4 to beacon my GPS position. Some handheld and mobile radios have this feature built in. The end result is that friends, family, and other hams can see my exact position on a Google map overlay.


    Finally, one of the most important reasons for bring my radio on every trip is that I also know that should I ever overstay a planned trip in the back country, my wife would inform the local search and rescue teams that I am a Ham and that I would be trying to communicate on 146.520 at the top of every hour. This would significantly increase the probably of a successful rescue, should I become lost or injured.

  88. some links by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

    IANAHRO, but the topic is interesting. I was snooping around and I found this link which discusses equipment and antennas and has some relevant videos. This site has some info on the various ham bands that might be relevant. It mentions that the sun spot cycle is a problem right now for long distance communications that bounce of the ionosphere. From that site it looks to me like the 20 meter (14mhz) and 40 meter (7 mhz) bands are your best bet. I wouldn't want to have to rely on repeaters on mountain tops. I'd get myself a Yaesu FT-817 and plan to rely on the busy 20 meter band to bounce the call for help off the ionosphere. I'd also look into using an amateur radio satellite. Even though you only get one 15 minute window every 24 hours it's better than nothing. It seems most of those satelites work in the 2 meter band. So an FT-817 would also cover it. But it seems that a small dish antenna might be your best bet to transmit to the satellite. A yagi would probably be easier to pack though. You might also look into a helium balloon or kite aerial antenna. A very cool/geeky way to maybe get above the mountains. I wouldn't want to rely on having to summit a mountain when you have an emergency. I would assume we are talking about something like a broken leg or worse. Despite all these budget communication options if you really value your life and have some money I would go with renting a satphone.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  89. Car GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last time I went backpacking in Yellowstone I threw my car GPS in my bag in case I got lost. I turned it on a few times and was always able to connect to the GPS satellite. It won't let you call for help if you break your leg (then again, neither would a radio that needs LoS or an antenna in a tree), but a GPS and a paper topographic map should make it impossible to get stranded at least. Something to think about anyway, might or might not be relevant to the subby.

  90. Front Range? by steve.clason · · Score: 1

    "I'm curious if carrying a small amateur radio would make any sense at all." Yes. http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_14440362 The person rescued is a friend. He had been carrying a small, 5 watt handheld 2-meter radio for 20 years whenever he went skiing or hiking. This time it saved his bacon, but he was experienced, well prepared and had done some research and some tests. The radio without the preparation would just have been weight. He was lucky, too. The repeaters serving Colorado's Front Range (I live in Boulder) are on pretty high peaks and reach into the mountain areas some, but as has already been said you will probably have to be on a ridge to communicate with anybody. There are fewer repeaters in less populated areas but more than you might imagine. A more-or-less accurate list is here: http://wiki.radioreference.com/index.php/Amateur_Radio_Repeaters_in_Colorado.

    --
    Steve Clason Boulder, Colorado USA
    1. Re:Front Range? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      Funny, I was about to post a link to that Daily Camera article as well (I also live in Boulder). I had commented on that article also, noting that he was able to establish a non-line of sight connection to the repeater that was 80 miles away in Woodland Park. I'm still surprised that was possible! Do you know if his radio hit other repeaters along the way to get his signal to Woodland Park? In any case, it was a great thing that he had a radio with him and had prepared for using it.

    2. Re:Front Range? by Nethead · · Score: 1
      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    3. Re:Front Range? by steve.clason · · Score: 1

      He couldn't remember what frequency he got the response on, so he may have hit the Colorado Connection linked system (http://www.colcon.org/repeaters.html), but he only got the one response so that seems unlikely. Then again, an 80 mile shot with 5 watts in that terrain seems pretty unlikely, too, so I suppose we'll just have to wonder about it.

      --
      Steve Clason Boulder, Colorado USA
  91. Disaster defense in depth... by whoppo · · Score: 1

    1) Talk to someone in a local ham club. They will let you know what kind of VHF/UHF repeater coverage there is in the areas you're interested in hiking. They can also help you with test study material and direct you towards the Volunteer Examiners near you. Go ahead and get at least a Technician class license. The test is relatively easy and the exam is less that 20 bucks.

    2) Get yourself a basic hand-held VHF/UHF radio. You can find them used for cheap money or you can spend the bucks on a new one. There's a Chinese dual-bander that very popular, FCC approved for commercial use (if that's of any use to you) and can be had for under $125.00 delivered to your door with battery, desk charger, antenna, etc. The quality is actually pretty good.. in fact I own more two of them (in addition to several other brands)

    3) Go ahead and get yourself a SPOT satellite locator and pack that along as well

    Now... if you find yourself in trouble and you're within range of an amateur radio repeater, then you can call for help that way.
    If you're not able to reach a repeater, then send for help using your SPOT device with a pre-programmed message that includes a simplex (non-repeater) frequency on which you will be listening. Now when the SAR teams, which quite often include hams, get near you (or fly over you) you can communicate directly with the folks that are coming to help.

    If nothing else, getting a ham radio license will introduce you to a wonderful hobby that can involve anything from casual conversations with other hams in your area (or around the world) to participation in emergency communications with a local ARES team. There are on-air contests if you're interested in things like that, or you can just use it when you're hiking. What you do with it is up to you.

    I've been a ham for 30 years, I'm the Emergency Coordinator for my counties ARES / RACES / CERT team working directly with county & state EMA, I'm a volunteer examiner and have had the pleasure of helping hundreds of new hams get started. I've spoken with hams in more than 150 countries from my SUV just while commuting to and from the office. I've met some of my dearest friends through ham radio and I wouldn't trade it for anything.... so don't pay any attention to those who would tell you it's a waste of time, because they apparently just don't get it.

    Cheers and best of luck to you.

    --
    chown -R us /base
  92. Ugh, God, there's one in every ARC by StarKruzr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Don't do it." FUCK you, chief. Who are you to discourage a potential future Ham based on what YOU say the Amateur service is "for?" People become Hams for all sorts of reasons. The FCC specifies what we may NOT do on amateur bands, and gives reasons for establishing them in the first place, but EVERY use permissible is entirely valid and should be encouraged to further the hobby.

    So this guy starts out with a backpack HF rig to make sure he has a way to get messages out of the wild, and then what? You should know how this goes if you've been in the hobby as long as you say you have. You start out with a specific purpose, and then one thing or another starts interesting you, and before you know it you're watching the waterfall for PSK31 on HF and trying to DX with Zimbabwe a couple months later.

    I became a Ham BECAUSE of the service's emergency provisions. I watched a plane fly into the North Tower of the WTC and kill my cousin and her coworkers in Cantor-Fitzgerald, and then heard about ARES and RACES volunteers stitching Manhattan's emergency services together so they could communicate in the wake of having their repeaters turned to ash. I heard those stories and said "I want to be on that team. THAT'S how I'm going to contribute." So I got a license, and got elmered by some of the guys who volunteered on Wall Street, and eventually started learning about how huge the hobby is and how much you can do with it. I found out about MARS and Skywarn and EchoLink and IRLP, and all the incredible things you can do with just a little dual-band HT, and I was hooked. Now my friends and I talk on a number of the local repeaters in town (I've since moved) on a regular basis.

    But according to you, I never should have started, because emergency services are not the "primary purpose" of the Amateur Service. Kill yourself. I can't stand curmudgeonly old fucks like you who think if you didn't start on CW on 10m you're somehow illegitimate. Get over yourself.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Ugh, God, there's one in every ARC by Suzuran · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I didn't say anything like that, and you're just projecting your hate for someone else on me. Did someone burn you at some point? Anyway, let me try to break it down for you.

      This guy is not interested in "becoming a ham." You saw 9/11 happen and felt a need to contribute to the situation. You saw the other hams doing their thing and wanted to join them. So you did. However, this guy is different. He does not want to contribute like you did. This guy DOES NOT CARE about ham radio. All he wants is to replace his cellphone with something that "works better". Did you not read his post?

      Anyway, so pretend he decides to go along with it. He gets a license and spends a few thousand getting a mobile rig, starts trying to make "phone calls" and all of a sudden he's got people listening to his "phone calls" and maybe some talk over the top of him and oh my gods what kind of stupidity is this? So he yells at these other people to go away, since this is his private conversation and they shouldn't be listening, which is of course missing the point to you or I who expects a radio to be a radio, but to him it's a big expensive cellphone that doesn't work the way he expects. So after a few months of this he gives up and sells the equipment and tells all of his friends (and their friends and so on...) that ham radio is an expensive waste of time full of jerks who listen to your phone calls. This is of course false and seems comically implausible to your or I, but he doesn't understand that!

      This sort of scenario is not at all uncommon, and every time it happens it is the fault of the hams who refused to step in and provide guidance or worse, hams who misrepresented what the service really is - under the misguided idea that we are somehow obligated to grow our ranks at any cost. Not everyone is a "potential new ham". You have to evaluate THEIR wants and needs and expectations and give them enough information to properly decide for themselves whether or not they should continue.

      All I am trying to say is that if you are expecting ham radio to directly replace some other service, and nothing more, you are going to waste everyone's time and a lot of your money. Ham radio is a hobby and not an appliance. I would rather you not have a license than have an expired license and a misguided hate of ham radio. I fail to understand how that makes me an "old curmudgeon" who should commit suicide. It does not help anyone for someone to have a license and no understanding of what that license means.

    2. Re:Ugh, God, there's one in every ARC by n2nov · · Score: 1

      As the lead in the amateur radio response on 9/11 in NYC, all I can say is that those who were ready to serve were greatly appreciated. We had many who wanted to serve but were untrained. However, we found other things for them to do that helped out the Red Cross. After the emergency was over, those that still wanted to learn were invited to join us for training. We still maintain that comradery through training and public service events via our group - the New York City Amateur Radio Emergency Communications Service (http://www.nyc-arecs.org). To "StarKruzr" and others who obtained or wish to obtain their amateur radio license because of 9/11 or any other disaster, don't let that enthusiasm die off and continue to be active and keep learning. Also, teaching others helps you to keep it fresh in your own mind. Comments and questions are welcome at n2nov@nyc-arecs.org

    3. Re:Ugh, God, there's one in every ARC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calm down children. The dude wants to know "if it is a lot more effective and reliable than the cell phone I already carry". The answer, from a hiking colorado ham, is:

      YES, it is a LOT more effective AND reliable than a cell phone IN THE MOUNTAINS. Cell phones basically are dead weight as soon as you get somewhere fun, and even if you can get service there, your battery will die VERY quickly. The number of locations from which you can reach a ham repeater are much greater than the number of places from which you can reach a cell tower. So it's obviously more effective.

      Since you're playing in the mountains, usually the goal is to get to the top of something. When you get there, you can usually talk to something. It's only logical. The only kicker is you need to be aware of what repeaters will be in the area you are going to, before you go. Either carry a repeater book or pre-program your radio. Be sure to get an antenna that is dedicated for use in the band you are planning to use (2m band is probably fine, there are more repeaters at 2m).

      You could also use it to call for help for somebody you meet on the trail. You could also use it to talk directly to search and rescue trying to find you, even if you weren't able to call for help.

      But it's not a cell phone, you're not going to order pizza or chat with an old friend on it, unless you make ham radio a hobby and really get into it, in which case even those are possible. You don't have to make it a hobby to save your life or the life of somebody else.

    4. Re:Ugh, God, there's one in every ARC by mangu · · Score: 1

      your battery will die VERY quickly

      For a 2m rig it will die even quicker. For true reliability in the mountains he should go QRP, but then he would need much more knowledge than he seems to be willing to get.

    5. Re:Ugh, God, there's one in every ARC by nschubach · · Score: 1

      But think about it this way... there's no way he's going to be able to sell his radio at full price, so... cheaper gear! (smile)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    6. Re:Ugh, God, there's one in every ARC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it possible that a person look at ham radio for one misguided reason and learn new things? In the process of learning new things, it it possible for them to grow into the "proper" ham you think they should be? Sure it is. Much more likely than you becoming an effective elmer.

    7. Re:Ugh, God, there's one in every ARC by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      Thanks much from my family and everyone else touched by your help on those days.

      I did get licensed and briefly met with a Staten Island ARC before moving out to the Midwest, which is fun whenever I call CQ and somebody goes "KC two?! Huh?" :)

      --

      +++ATH0
    8. Re:Ugh, God, there's one in every ARC by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      Depends, are they interested in trying to learn new things? Did you bother to ask?

      If they aren't, then ham radio is not for them.
      If they are, then by all means, encourage them to the best of your ability.

    9. Re:Ugh, God, there's one in every ARC by GeneralJon · · Score: 1

      Hey, I got my license originally so I would have emergency coverage in the back country. Now I've got an Extra license, and having lots of fun. Doesn't matter how people get into ham radio - that just opens the door to lots of wonders.

    10. Re:Ugh, God, there's one in every ARC by Locklin · · Score: 1

      To anyone reading the above: yes ham has it's version of a "troll." They are these guys who think they work for the FCC and know what amateur radio is "for." Fortunately, the folks on the airwaves are generally the nicest and most helpful people you will ever talk to. These guys, like most other trolls, are more common on Internet forums and are full of it. Amateur radio has been so successful at spurring innovation because it is simply defined by what it is not (commercial radio), and not for some preordained purpose.

      <sarcasm>I guess I should get on the repeater tomorrow at 8am when those old timers are "ragchewing" again. That repeater is for "contributing" (whatever that means), not replacing IRC chat </sarcasm>

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    11. Re:Ugh, God, there's one in every ARC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, kick those stupid ragchewers off! We need more traffic nets that never have any traffic to pass because nobody has sent a radiogram since the late 50s.

  93. NVIS, HF, repeaters, etc. by drwho · · Score: 2, Informative

    I find it distressing that so many posters here have talked about VHF/UHF only, and in relation to repeaters. There's more to ham radio than that, there's more to portable ham radio than that. The satellite option was at least interesting. The antennas don't have to be large (look up arrow antenna), the problem is calculating where the satellite will be and when, and then getting through the massive amounts of traffic on said satellite.

    Repeaters are great, but they only work when you're in range. If you're going to be in the rockies, there will be a lot of times when mountains will block reception. When on hilltops, you may get TOO MUCH reception, from far away, that makes it difficult to use the one repeater you're trying to.

    If you buy a more expensive HF rig, you can get communication even from down in a ditch. Usually, HF communication uses large antennas and the curvature of the earth makes the signal bounce off a layer of the ionosphere far away, and because of the angle, land even farther than that, sometimes bouncing off the earth back to the atmosphere, etc. But the problem with this is it tends to be unpredictable. There are predictions that can be made, but they're only general. A bigger problem, for the backpacker, is that these signals are almost always far away. the NVIS method, "Near Vertical Incidence Skyway", involved signals that go nearly straight up to the ionosphere, and then almost straight back down again. The result is hopping over mountains and fairly predictable communication with low interference. An advantage is that the antenna doesn't have to be high off the ground, in fact it's REQUIRED to be close to the ground...but stretch out horizontablly, not vertical like a walkie-talkie antenna. As the antennas tend to be larger for the HF band, you'd have to make camp and set up your hunk of wire a few feet above the ground before getting on the air. There are other issues with NVIS, the only one of importance being that the frequency which you tune to, in order to facilitate communications, varies throughout that day. But it does so in a predicatable manner.

    If you get the Yaesu FT-817, you get a small radio that's just a little bigger than a walkie-talkie, that covers both HF bands, VHF, and UHF...so you can use repeaters or NVIS as available. The battery and charger than come with the FT-817 are crappy, go for the aftermarket W4RT produced models. There's an aftermarket antenna called "Miracle Whip", that is much better than the antenna included with the unit, is small and easy to use. You might also want to buy a portable solar panel. The ones made by Brunton are nice. Get the 12 Watt version, the six watt one isn't enough to charge your radio quickly.

    Last piece of advice: don't just wait until you're out in the field to get familiar with the equipment. Get practice using it, with all its accessories in various configurations, BEFORE you go camping. It will be well worth the practice.

    FT-817, W4RT battery, charger, Miracle Whip, solar panel -- package can be acquired for under $1000 (much less, in my case).

    1. Re:NVIS, HF, repeaters, etc. by whoppo · · Score: 1

      For the OP's intended use, HF just isn't as practical as a combination as a VHF/UHF HT and a SPOT type device.

      First there's the weight / bulk issue... even an 817 with battery, antenna, microphone. etc , as small as it may be, is a few pounds (about as heavy as 5 or 6 HT's).. that's a considerable amount of weight for most hikers .. and a fair amount of space in a daypack.

      Then there's frequency.. where in the vast HF spectrum would he call where someone who can actually help *might* be listening to hear him? During the day 20 meters is generally open and with a modest antenna and a few watts it's easy to make a contact hundreds or thousands of miles away. In the early morning or late evening 75/80 meters might open up, but a small antenna and a few watts won't do much there.

      And what if he needs help on a Saturday afternoon when there's half a dozen QSO Parties going on and the bands are full of over-processed kilowatts shouting "Contest Contest" and "You're 59.. gimme your call again... again? again?"

      Don't get me wrong... I'm a big fan of mobile / portable HF and I play with both regularly, but it really doesn't sound like the right choice for a mountain hiker's first application of ham radio. Perhaps once he gets "the fever" he might choose to spend the extra money and carry the extra hardware for those mountain-top DXpeditions :)

      --
      chown -R us /base
    2. Re:NVIS, HF, repeaters, etc. by drwho · · Score: 1

      After I had posted, it occured to me that the cost and complexity of what I had opposed makes it inappropriate for a non radiophile. So, you're right, a SPOT device and perhaps a cheap, lightweight HT would be more appropriate. I think that perhaps why I posted all of this is because I have recently bought the FT-817, and am urgently awaiting its delivery in the middle of next week, with an eye towards hitting the trail and doing some portable hamming as I make occasional stops along the way (Do I measure the number of miles I spend on the rail as 'hamming distance'?)

    3. Re:NVIS, HF, repeaters, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do I measure the number of miles I spend on the rail as 'hamming distance'?

      That is the worst pun I've read in quite a while.

      Thank you!

  94. use utp or fiber channel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well if you dont want to loose connection you might use an utp cabel, you probaply hang allready in cables, so its just an extra line.
    then you can put a small netbook with you, and have internet access, to call for help.

  95. The China made Wouxun KG-UVD1P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out the Wouxun KG-UVD1P.

    Got mine on ebay and it covers both FRS/GMRS UHF frequencies but also 144MHz and works well for HAM use also. Got mine for a little over $100.

    Pretty tough little radio. Has already survived two drops on hard floor from belt height.

  96. Mobile crossband repeater by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Speaking of repeaters, a really good option is to have a good mobile dual band rig in your car, capable of what's called crossband repeating. Basically the idea is you transmit from your HT (handheld) on one band (like 70cm), which is received by the rig in your car and retransmitted on another band (like 2m) preset to the input frequency of a local repeater. If the local repeater has autopatch (most do) then you can make phone calls, or in an emergency just call for help to any of the people listening to that repeater. Also many repeaters are networked, so you can communicate across many hundreds or thousands of miles if you wanted to get in touch with a specific person (like a buddy that listens in for you while you're on hikes).

    Both the wattage and antenna gain of a mobile (car-mounted) rig are orders of magnitude better than any HT rig (due to FCC regulation of wattage allowed for handheld transcievers, antenna size, and even vehicle groundplane), so you could reliably work repeaters dozens of miles away in that scenario.

    Oh, on another note, many HTs are now multiple band (my Yaesu handheld transmits on 4 bands!), and thus the OEM will include an antenna that is only mediocre across all the bands the HT supports. For best performance you should use an antenna specifically tuned for the band you are going to use. I used 70cm for your HT in my example above, because antennas for that band are nice and short which is good for portability. Then you can have a high gain 2m on your car that can really reach out and touch repeaters far away.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Mobile crossband repeater by dziban303 · · Score: 1

      I used a setup like this when I would go hiking in northern Nevada. You have a Yaesu VX-8R? Getting kind of long in the tooth these days, but I still love my Kenwood TH-F6 tribander HT.

    2. Re:Mobile crossband repeater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would crossband work in a situation like this? Wouldn't you have to leave the radio in the car running, and wouldn't that kill your battery over the course of a few days?

    3. Re:Mobile crossband repeater by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      "due to FCC regulation of wattage allowed for handheld transcievers, antenna size, and even vehicle groundplane"

      There is no such thing for amateur radio transcievers.

      However, there's a practical limit of around 5 watts for handhelds dictated primarily by thermal management and battery power available in that form factor. Mobile rigs have a nice big car battery backed by an alternator to run off of. (Running directly off of a car battery for extended periods is not advised - starter batteries do not like being deep cycled.)

      A useful thing when traveling is to build a J-pole antenna from twinlead. J-poles have pretty good gain, and are normally NOT a compact antenna, however if constructed from twinlead, you can roll it up and just hang the end off of something when you want to use it. Plenty of variants on this available from Google, including http://www.qsl.net/wb3gck/jpole.htm and http://larc.hamgate.net/pocketJpole.htm

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  97. w7zoi.com for backpack radios. by swschrad · · Score: 1

    Wes is a boonies hiker on the west coast, and an RF design engineer for the better part of 40 years. and a frequent contributor to QST. check some of his backpack designs out.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  98. I live in CO and carry a handheld VHF radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    They work in some areas and not in others. If you're on a mountain top, you'll probably be able to hit a repeater. You can use the repeater on the space station with 5W and a handheld YAGI.

    Check out these links:
    Colorado repeater association: http://www.w0cra.org/
    Colorado connection repeaters: http://www.colcon.org/

    Here's a coverage map. http://www.colcon.org/fig/colcon_coverage.gif

    With an FT-817 and an HF dipole thrown into a tree you can talk all over the country depending on conditions.

    So the answer is that coverage depends mostly on where you are for VHF (hills are good, valleys are bad). I carry my HT when I backpack and try to get a repeater contact every once in a while. I've built up a mental map of what areas that I hike in have good repeater coverage and what areas don't. Nothing is going to be a 100% solution. Sometimes I backpack with the FT-817 and I can usually get somebody with a little luck and patience. Sometimes, when conditions are good you can make amazing contacts.

    Get a Technician license and an 2m HT and give it a try. Carrying some thin coax, a roll-up J-pole antenna, and something to get it into a tree will help tremendously. There are also folks that make very lightweight backpacking Yagi antennas. Antenna gain is amazing.

    N8YY

  99. what about CB radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what about CB radio?

  100. CW (Morse Code) Is the Best Option by Hoskald · · Score: 1

    For a small radio, something like the Small Wonders Labs SW-40 is perfect. You can talk on 1 to 2 watts 1,000 miles plus with a modest dipole antenna. The downside is you need to learn Morse code (CW) but that is not too difficult. With the Koch method you can be at 10 wpm in a month. Just takes practice.
    The weight is such a rig will be under 1 pound total and will give you many hours of communication.
    73,
    KD5TGN

    --
    For the sake of Peace, the Sword.
    1. Re:CW (Morse Code) Is the Best Option by Hoskald · · Score: 1

      Forgot to add, the cost of such a rig should be less than $100.00

      --
      For the sake of Peace, the Sword.
  101. Iridium by ouachiski · · Score: 1

    An iridium Phone weighs about a pound and would be much more reliable, but the service would be more expensive.

    --
    sorry for my comments, I'm drunk
  102. Here's your solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A hydrogen balloon and enough rope to let it get as high as you need.

  103. Search & Rescue by stableos · · Score: 1

    Take a repeater guide and a small dual band HT. Roll up J-poles are cheap to buy or make. We use amateur radio frequently with search and rescue in Colorado. Elevation will help you get to the many repeaters around the state and give you a way to talk to Search & Rescue, Civil Air Patrol, ARES, and National Guard helos if necessary. A SPOT beacon is also an excellent device for the terrain here as it gives us your coordinates. I volunteer in Teller County with SAR and our hams use amateur radio as much as our dedicated frequencies due to better coverage. Cheap insurance. IMHO. I don't go backcountry without an HT.

    Good luck,

    N3TCQ

     

  104. recommend the SPOT by josephSevern · · Score: 1

    I am a long-time search and rescue technician in Colorado. I got my ham license expressly for SAR work. The short answer is that amateur radio works great in some locations; not at all in others. We use a combination of emergency services radios, amateur radio, and cell phones. We have satellite phones available but I don't recall ever using them.

    Personally, I would recommend a SPOT beacon. The newer ones allow you to signal a 911-level emergency, a non-emergent help signal, or an OK signal, along with GPS coordinates. They are lighter than ham HTs and will work in more locations.

  105. Re:X-Band Repeat - don't do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets not start this debate on slashdot.

  106. no special FCC limit for handheld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "FCC regulation of wattage allowed for handheld transcievers, antenna size, and even vehicle groundplane),"

    Uhh. if you could build a 1 kW handheld, you're free to use it. Not that it would be smart, but the beauty of Amateur Radio is that there are very, very few FCC rules on hardware.

    1. Re:no special FCC limit for handheld by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      If you could build a 1 kW handheld, you're free to use it.

      Maybe. In 1996 Amateurs came under the jurisdiction of RF exposure limits, so a 1kW handheld, depending on frequency, would likely put you over the limit. I don't know for sure that the exposure laws pertain to yourself or just others, come to think of it.

      There are a pair of exceptions to requiring an evaluation:

      "However, the FCC presumes that certain stations are safe without an evaluation. Those are:

              * Amateur stations using a transmitter power of less than 50 W PEP at the transmitter output terminal.
              * Mobile or portable stations using a transmitter with push-to-talk control."

      So if your 1kW handheld uses a PTT, you'd be exempt from a mandatory evaluation, but would still be required to be in compliance.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  107. Part 90 vs Part 97 by Wapiti-eater · · Score: 1

    Amateur Radio is a Communications "Hobby". An Avocation. Not a service you can subscribe to.

    You have to learn how things work, set up your rig(s), antennas and accessories, learn their strengths and weaknesses, learn what modes and bands do what and why, develop your own skills and equipment, practice then - learn more, explore and understand what and how to accomplish your goals and then, "When all else fails", you can be a real asset to user agencies and even yourself. An trained, experienced RF communicator.

    But, to just go get a license and expect to be able to meet emergency needs - and worse, set yourself up as such - that's a huge stretch. Yes, there are anecdotes where a few 'n00bs' have helped - but those are the exceptions and even then, they'd have been able to offer more if their foundation was deeper and broader.

    That's possibly an insight into why some (of us) hams are so "anti-emergency" appearing in their perspective. If you want an "emergency" radio - go buy one. If you want to equip your emergency service with a 'back up' system. Don't use Amateur Radio - get a backup system.

    It's because hams have learned the radio art, when an emergency presents, they can meet the needs "when all else fails". But you can't be proficient in the art just because you have a license. That's just the beginning. But what a journey it is!!

    --
    Senior NCO in the fight against entropy. I've seen things, man. Things no one should have to see.....
  108. Contact local clubs by Ximok · · Score: 1

    My recommendation would be to contact the local Ham clubs in the areas you plan to frequent. You may find that there are a number of repeaters in the area you are going to be in.
    http://www.arrl.org/find-a-club

    I would encourage you to become a Ham, I have enjoyed the hobby for the last 8 years. Most Hams worth their radios would gladly sit down and have a conversation with you about whether or not becoming a Ham and getting a radio up in those mountains is worth your time.

    You can still do a lot with 5 Watts of power on VHF.

    KD7PUA

  109. Sure this has been said, but... by frozentier · · Score: 1

    I'm sure someone basically mentioned this, but under normal circumstances, legally hams only talk to other hams on the radio. If you are wanting it to REPLACE a cell phone, don't do it. If you want it for emergency communication in the event you get hurt, or you want it to just spend time BS'ing to someone else, then it would be perfect.

  110. Worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been licensed for roughly 18 years now and I fell out of the hobby about 10 years ago... but I bought a 2m HT about 2 years ago when I started hiking again. I bought an extended life battery and a 5/8 wave antenna that collapses to a 1/4 wave for some added flexibility. I can't say that I carry it with me everywhere I hike, as most places are well travelled paths and most are within cell coverage areas. But when I go to remote places like in Montana or west Texas, I take my radio. I print out a list of repeater frequencies for the area and long/lat cords for each on a piece of paper, then coat it with map seal to waterproof it. This way if I am in trouble, I'm not hunting down repeaters in the area.

    I think it's a good investment for my purposes... I don't mind a few extra pounds if I'm heading off into the middle of nowhere.

    1. Re:Worth it by Ximok · · Score: 1

      On a similar note, you can purchase the ARRL Repeater directory for about $10, I keep a copy in my truck, but it fits real good in a backpack pocket too. It has almost all the repeaters in the US and Canada.
      http://www.arrl.org/shop/The-ARRL-Repeater-Directory-2010-2011-Pocket-sized/

  111. Gah! by tqk · · Score: 0

    I tried to wade through a lot of the comments to this, but gave up half way. Sorry if this's been asked.

    YOU'RE CAMPING! WTF do you want to be connected for?!? Camping is supposed to be synonymous with "getting away from it all." You're doing it wrong! I don't care if it's the 21st Century; that's no excuse.

    As for the other three thousand of of you helping him to make this happen, fsck! Geeky's one thing. Pathological behaviour in any realm is inherently dangerous. You need help!

    --
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Gah! by tqk · · Score: 0

      Replying to my own post, yeah, I take my telescope camping, and if I saw a killer asteroid coming, it'd be neat to beam the news in, but really! Remaining connected while camping? Get a Winnibago and a trailer park plugin. They may even have a pool and playground for the kids.

      Sheesh.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  112. HF (was Re:VHF/UHF are mainly line of sight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to score the parent article up as being sensible.

    HF is a good bet for longer range communication, but it takes some skill to do it effectively. The 817 is a lovely little radio but to get anywhere on HF you need an antenna. You can make an antenna by throwing a bit of wire into a tree (any trees out there?) or use other means. Really the antenna is the big decider.

    If you're going to be making antennas ad-hoc you'll need an antenna matching unit to make up for your innacurate calculations, or will have to have a way of making a matched antenna. Maybe pre-cutting your wire will help or used a ready made one.

    There are portable HF antennas. I've not tried them - finding that experimenting with wire is more fun. I imagine that as you get smaller and lighter you will lose efficiency simply because of the large wavelengths at HF and antennas having to be large to resonate. There's a group online called HFPACK (hfpack.com) that's worth looking at. The photo on their page will give you an idea about the antenna situation.

    Satellite is going to be easier to use. If you're not interested in radio for radio's sake it's probably the better bet. Radio is a good hobby, but I don't think it's worth learning just for this side use.

  113. Why not Texting on 40 meters? by kobol · · Score: 1

    Why don't "they" develop a texting system for long-range use? I know the mobile companies would hate it, but a protocol using CW-digital burst on HF channels allocated for this purpose would allow sending a text message along with sender-id, receiver-id, error-correcting, and authentication. The receiver would monitor a set of these channels and filter out the desired messages. One could construct a transceiver that stored received messages with a built-in WLAN and webserver so that a PDA could serve as the GUI so the whole FAMILY could send and receive messages during the whole trip!

  114. Can't stop the Signal! by ZebadiahC · · Score: 1

    Its interesting when you hear about countries and their uprisings the news talks about how they Twitter to get the word out and lately countries like Iran try to seize their internet so as not to allow these protesters to get the word out. With countries trying to control what is getting out to the real world the fall back position just might be old school Ham Radio.

    "You can't stop the signal"

  115. Re:X-Band Repeat - don't do it. by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

    Okay, let's start the one about the mobile unit set to cross-band repeat being in violation of FCC regs for not IDing itself every 10 minutes instead.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
  116. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are right in considering ham radio.

    There are a wide variety of handhelds which can contribute to your enjoyment, safety, and act as a critical link for immediate help if you are lost, hurt, or need additional assistance.

    While a ham radio installed in a car will be convenient and more powerful, a handheld seems called for by your comments.

    If I were in your spot, I would strongly consider a radio with an included GPS function along with APRS which is a free service which will allow your friends and family (and you) to follow your progress on an accurate topo map.

    That's what I would recommend. I'd also consider adding a backup set of batteries or a small solar panel that can fit in a backpack, and of course some detailed maps.

    It is possible to make direct person to person contacts with other hikers or drivers, as well as repeater-augmented contacts. A repeater is an automated radio receiver/re-transmitter that is usually owned by a local private club or group, and provided as a courtesy for those passing thru.

    The repeater's re-transmitter is usually quite sstrong, 50 or 100 watts, while the typical handheld is 2-5 watts, so having a repeater on your side is almost like having a powerful satellite overhead. Repeaters are most often located on ridge or mountain peaks, and often add a tall antenna mast to increase coverage.

    It is possible to talk into your handheld, have it rebroadcast by a repeater, and then get phone-patched to a landline or cell phone. Your contact may also traverse the internet.

    The GPS/APRS feature causes a stream of radio packets to indicate and move to track your position on a map, and is the fastest way of being found. The 2 meter ham band is one of the better band for your challenge; it's frequencies range from approx 144Mhz to 148mhz.

    Another radio option open to you is the Family Radio service, where radios have 1-3watts of power; useful in coordinating the activities of a small group.

    Don't forget CB radios still exist and offer decent coverage in some areas. They are typically mounted in vehicles or at home stations.

    Finally, there are GPS devices designed to help you from getting lost, and sounding an alarm. One such appears in the latest issue of Wired magazine.

    For all around functionality, I'd go with a strong ham radio handheld with a GPS feature, and ask about upgrading to APRS. Buy an extra set of batteries or two, and depending on how you will recharge them, you may consider a car recharger, or a solar backpack recharger.

    You'll find that ham's are naturally handy and helpful, and enjoy "rag chewing" just yakking about any topic, so you won't feel so isolated and alone if you have coverage; it may require you occasionally trek up to a hill top for best coverage, but it is a skill which could easily save or augment someone else's life, and works in a private plane, on a boat, on a horse, on a river, and nearly everywhere on earth.

    It's a skill worth having. Then after your trip, you may decide to get an inexpensive home unit, and expand the borders of your life a bit, while learning a useful skill which comes in handy any time there is a flood or storm or someone else is in need.

    Have fun!

  117. Assess your needs first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be honest who do you want to talk to? Emergency personnel? get a SPOT or PLB to call for help. They really don't want to have a "conversation" with you. They want to know your exact location so they can get there ASAP. If you fall or are injured setting up and operating a ham radio may not be possible. You need something push button simple.

    OTOH, if it is for blabbing to your friends, having the wife or work call you, updating facebook, etc then DON'T go hiking! IMHO the real beauty of hiking in the back country is enjoying the natural beauty, solitude or company of a good friend. Schlepping every bit of technology with you really detracts from that.

  118. amateur radio rescue call. by nblender · · Score: 2, Funny
    I have my amateur radio license in Canada and use my transceivers fairly regularly out in the back woods... I have a mobile unit (Yaesu FT8900r) and a handheld (Yaesu VX-3R)... With the correct antenna on the handheld, at 2M and 1.5W, I was able to hit a repeater 75km away, line of sight. In the backwoods, not so wonderful. We usually set a truck to cross-band repeat for long distance simplex communication. There is a repeater in the area as well but it is not frequented by other hams since it is a private repeater which backhauls APRS to town. We use it also to talk to one another for an annual offroading event that we put on. In the past we have used it to relay medical status update information from town back to a group still out in the woods. One of our members lives within line of site of the repeater and can hit it from the truck in his driveway.
    My only reason for having a ham license is to communicate with my club members as outlined above. I don't involve myself with the greater 'ham' community other than to pay my membership dues in the local repeater society to help support the ongoing maintenance of the repeater network. In listening to some of these guys talk while on my way to work, I envision a rescue call going something like so:

    - K2BRK Mayday Mayday Mayday. Anyone listening
    + K2BRK K2HLP what is the nature of your emergency
    - I've injured my back and I'm trapped under a log in the Shwitzer valley. I need help.
    + Wow. The Shwitzer valley is a long way away. What rig are you using?
    - A yaesu vx-3r and a yoyodyne G8 SMC antenna. Please send help.
    + Oh, I have one of those antennas. It's a good unit. I paid $38 from YingCo on eBay. Thank you for the contact K2BRK. K2HLP clear.

    Just kidding. I suspect most basement Ham radio geeks are literally waiting for the day where they can assist in some sort of emergency situation.

    1. Re:amateur radio rescue call. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Just kidding. I suspect most basement Ham radio geeks are literally waiting for the day where they can assist in some sort of emergency situation.

      Did Canada ever "do" Tony H-H-H-Hancock ?

      (A radio and later TV series from before I was born consisting of sketches from the rather shambolic life of the rather shambolic Mr Hancock. In one episode, he does exactly this. Disaster, predictably, ensues. Must have put a whole generation off the idea of ham radio.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  119. Amplifier for cell phone? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    http://boatantenna.com/cellular/cellphone_signal_boosters.htm

    I'm unsure if it's legal or if it even works.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  120. I used to work for St. John's School of Alberta, and their sister school in Manitoba. We did major trips in the lake country and in the mountains. (3 week canoe trips, 10 day hikes)

    Before sat comm, we used SBX 11 radios. They weighed about 12 lbs, and used 9 D cells. The antenna was another 3-4 lbs. Both were bulky enough that the radio + antenna was one person's total share of the group gear. At that point the phone company had mobile operators. The Alberta school had it's own base station and frequency.

    My recollection is that the two frequencies we used most were 7 and 5 MHz -- made for long antennas. Getting them high enough was a chore, as well as finding a clear patch.

    Typically we would try to communicate each evening, on the hour starting from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. If we didn't get through we'd try one more time before breaking camp.

    It was a crap shoot. We'd get through every 3-4 days and let people know we were all right.

    Once satellite communication became available, we dropped the SSB radios. A sat phone rented for about $300 per month -- cheap when you are taking other people's kids into the bush. Probably cheaper now.

    For individuals, I'd recommend the SPOT system. Your local mountain equipment stores may rent them.

    If you are clever you can communicate a lot more than "I'm ok" "I need help" by using the intervals between communications to send info.

    --
    Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
  121. An opinion from a Search & Rescue person by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Portable Ham radios often don't have enough power to get outside of valleys and low-lying areas in otherwise mountainous country. Even with access to repeaters, you still need good line-of-sight to get to them. Our Quad Unit, Dog Teams, and Backcountry ground-pounders all carry 5-watt hand held radios and we usually have to set up a 4x4 unit with a hard mount radio as a relay although more of the Quad guys are getting 50-watt hard mounts for their vehicles. In some areas of the county where we have lousy radio reception even with repeaters, we have a portable repeater made from two 50-watt hard mount radios and that gets taken out in the field to provide signal to the really remote areas. In addition to hard mount and handheld radios, I personally have a cellphone booster. This gadget works pretty darn well but you need to be able to plug it into 12 volts. SPOT beacons are excellent. We've had several rescues in the county with subjects that had these. Basically, the signal gets picked up by the nearest military base who then contacts the county Sheriff's office with the coordinates. And satellite phones solve lots of problems other than cost. Be damn sure you have a GPS and lots of batteries. And be REALLY DAMN sure that you tell people where you are going and when you expect to return. If there is a backcountry log at the trailhead, fill it out. And finally, BE VERY VERY VERY suspicious of magazine articles that tell you to get off the trail. That's total bullshit and incredibly irresponsible on the part of the magazine.

  122. Re:HF / CW QRP by TVmisGuided · · Score: 1

    If someone's looking for a small, low-power CW-only unit, I humbly suggest the Elecraft KX1. Pluses: about the size of a paperback, runs on 6 AA batteries, claimed battery life at 1-2W is 20 to 30 hours of "casual operation", base model operates 20M and 40M, has an optional internal antenna tuner so a random-wire antenna will provide good results, and by all reports is a very reliable unit. Minuses: it's a kit, so if you're not comfortable with a soldering iron it's probably not for you, and doesn't have its own key unless you buy the optional plug-in paddles.

    Were it me, I'd plop down the bucks on the kit, add the tuner option and maybe the 30M and 80M modules as well, spend a few evenings putting it together, and stash it and a couple of fifty-foot rolls of hookup wire in my pack, along with some extra batteries "just in case". I may not need it, but added to whatever other personal-safety equipment I have along, it's one more possible avenue of communication.

    DISCLAIMER: I am in no way affiliated with Elecraft.

    --
    All the world's an analog stage, and digital circuits play only bit parts.
  123. Back Country Ham by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Much of this post has to do with making the connection under *any* conditions. If you can reach the top of one of our 14ers, make a simple J-pole antenna using it instead of the built in rubber duck, and ground a 5W HT with a screwdriver jammed in the ground, you can hit pretty much anything you want. Your mileage will of course vary, and I pack 2 different rigs depending on what I am doing.

    The issue isn't reception, it's transmission. You will need more than a 5W HT to reliably hit anything from anywhere unless you do your homework and keep to the range of your radio... but if you had to do that, you'd probably stick to a cell phone, right? ...Which brings me to the second point. Ham radio isn't like what folks see in the movies. We can't make a radio out of coconut hulls and a hairpin and reach a voice 200 miles away, but you already knew that. you have to select a band in which to operate, know what resources are available in that band and area, and pack something in with enough punch to hit it.

    First of all, band. Low frequency is better in our mountains. I work 2M (144MHz, VHF), but 6M (50MHz) would be better, 70cm (440MHz, UHF) is worse. A rule of thumb here is that sound is a lower frequency than light, right? While light is line of sight, sound can get around corners. Oversimplified, but the principle remains the same. The reason that lower frequencies are better in our mountains, is that line of sight is often very limited by the landscape. Running WiFi out here can be a real nightmare.

    Next up is resources. Unfortunately, there are more user friendly resources available for UHF than at 2M, and 6M operators are pretty much on their own. That isn't as bad as it sounds though. 6M can really reach out and touch someone, especially if the atmospheric conditions are right for a skip. 2M may not have that many repeaters (particularly here in Southern Colorado) but it has descent range. UHF has all the toys it seems, but outside the metro area and in the mountains, it is of limited use. If you are down in a canyon with a good bit of iron and can't climb, you won't reach emergency services 15 miles away with 35W on UHF, but 2M will.

    Power. Yeah, it is all about that. If I am running by myself, I carry a cheap 5W 2M HT. I have a home made J-pole antenna built into my pack and it works just fine. I have modified my radio with a jack connected to the chassis (RF ground). I simply connect a wire from this jack to a screwdriver jammed in the dirt. My record is 47miles with good line of sight, altitude and grounding. If I am doing SAR, I can't rely on the fact that I can make the conditions ideal. My rig for this is a Yaesu FT-897 radio with an LDG AT-897 autotuner. The Buddipole antenna does everything I need and at 20W on multiple bands I can hit what I need on VHF. Better still, I can rig a bypass on the limiter (which limits you to 20 watts while running on batteries) and transmit at 100W briefly if conditions are really in the toilet. Unfortunately, this rig is both heavy and expensive. The whole shebang ran me about a grand and tips the scales at 20 pounds.

    If you can work CW (morse code) rather than voice, you can work the planet on bands as low as 160M with only a few watts and an improvised antenna. Radios for these bands weigh ounces and fit in altoids tins. The antennas are the real weight there, as they tend to either be huge or have a lot of tuning components to really work well.

    Hope this post clarified more than it confused. If you happen down this way for a hike, look me up!

    Best regards and 73,

    KD0CXH

  124. 146.25MHz = 2m National Calling Frequency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm supprised that no one has mentioned it, but there is a national calling frequency (146.25MHz FM, Simplex) which can be used in the absence of local repeaters etc.

    Not only could this be a life saver for you and your party, by monitoring this whilst in the wild you may be able to help others in difficulty.

    Under limited battery/power situation, the recommendation is to TX/Monitor 'on the hour'.

    1. Re:146.25MHz = 2m National Calling Frequency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean 146.52MHz

  125. I actually just got a new portable setup by bbowers · · Score: 1

    I just got a new Icom 703+ and purchased a 18aH 12V SLA battery for it. I use a Par EndFedz 10/20/40m dipole thrown up into a tree and can talk to anyone worldwide. Now, this doesn't cover local 2m/70cm frequencies, but it's a great setup to take backpacking which doesn't weigh too much. I use the bigger battery because I want as much operating power at that 10W I can get. You can downsize to a smaller 7-10aH battery to cut weight. But keep in mind you may also cut your transmit power too. The Yaesu FT-817 is also a fine choice and in my opinion smaller and lighter than the 703, but you can only do around 5w out max. It comes with a battery back built in though.

    --
    Even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day.
  126. What works best in a forest? by Whatsmynickname · · Score: 1

    I had the same question, but sometimes I'm in a forest canopy area. Therefore, I would assume higher frequency ranges, especially in the Ghz range, would not work there. So in a forest setting, what comms would work best? 40m? 60m? Would PLBs work in a forest?

  127. Short wave is not line of sight. by niftymitch · · Score: 1
    Short wave at five watts commonly spans the globe and at the same time may not find the next town.

    N.B. short wave is not a phone service. It is illegal to use it as such with some interesting exceptions.

    Amateur radio is alive and well and a one watt 40meter CW transceiver in a tin of mints with a spool of antenna wire is very packable.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  128. cheap satellite email with an APRS handheld by wigger · · Score: 1, Informative

    send email using APRS to one of many available satellites, although you may only get a few good passes each day-
    http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/information/faqs/aprs.php

    including the international space station-
    http://www.ariss.net/

    many APRS handheld radios are available-
    yaesu vx-8r:
    http://www.yaesu.com/indexVS.cfm?cmd=DisplayProducts&ProdCatID=111&encProdID=64C913CDBC183621AAA39980149EA8C6

    kenwood th-d72:
    http://www.universal-radio.com/catalog/ht/3072.html

  129. NVIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only saw one poster mention NVIS...

    NVIS is a form of propagation where the RF is sent vertical, and reflects off the ionosphere. The result of this is that your coverage ranges about 200 miles from your location. You will need to use 80m day or night, or 40m during the day. 5 to 10w should work if you're using CW. Since you are sending the RF vertical, being in a valley won't be an issue. Since NVIS works best with antennas low to the ground, your antenna setup is simplified even though you'll need a bigger antenna.

    I have used NVIS to check into qrp nets so I know it can work, though I'd expect the SPOT solution to be more size efficient and more reliable.

    Check out Elecraft K1 or KX-1if you are interested in some decent kit-built backpacking radios.

  130. Yep by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    I have a CB in the jeep too, right next to the 2M/HF rigs. Very handy knowing what the road conditions are, especially in winter, here in Montana -- mother nature can be quite the temperamental lady. And while there may not always be a ham on the road, there are always truckers.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  131. Satellite phone ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rent one when you're going out. Return it to the vendor when you get back.
    Weight is appropriate (I met an RAF mountain rescue team trialling an early one about 15 years ago ; eminently packable, though hardly light weight) ; dimensions are appropriate ;reception is appropriate ; available for rental without too much difficulty.
    Cost is the biggest reason for not owning one. Which is why there is a reasonable market for them for rent. Do roadworks in the middle of nowhere (cellphone-reception-wise, that can be almost anywhere) and it very quickly gets to be a justifiable business expense.

    But frankly, I'd look at the human factors first. If you're on your own, what are you doing that you can't face the thought of crawling on a broken knee for a few days to get back to "civilisation" ? ; if you're in a group, why don't you have confidence in the ability of your group to get assistance and get you off? ; if you're leading a party, why don't you have confidence in yourself to get your party to safety while managing casualties. If you've not addressed those human factors, then you can be guaranteed that your technological fix will short a circuit (or have a flat battery) at precisely the wrong moment.

    Murphy's Law : if it can go wrong, it will.
    Extended Murphy's Law : if it can go wrong, it will go wrong, in the most inconvenient possible way, at the most inconvenient possible time.

    Murphy was an optimist.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  132. Epiphyte by khakipuce · · Score: 1

    Just make yourself one of these

    www.norcalqrp.org/files/Epiphyte3Mnl.pdf

    --
    Art is the mathematics of emotion
  133. Fm limited, need small hf and it is antenna as key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like iPhone, the antenna is the key. Antennas that come on must fm hand-helds are not very good, you can however improve this but fm 2m transmission is going to get you 20 mile radius at best without ancillary gear. Now if that gets you to a repeater...like a cel tower...you mare good to go. Other radios, which require a higher class of licence, with a decent antenna, can just be a properly cut length of wire, will give you cross country and better performance but most small unit are low in wattage again raising challenges. Best option on that front is to go with digital mode like psk31 combined with small radio like icon ic-706 with nue-psk and a small keyboard....quite a bit more than carrying cell phone

  134. Chiming in late, however... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Summary answer - it depends. There will be situations where a ham rig is the only thing that works, and situations where nothing works. Regardless, the up-thread comments about being prepared for a back country trek apply first, last, and always. A few suggestions re: radios for back country:

    All: Especially at VHF & UHF frequencies, altitude is your friend. Several thousand feet of elevation and a clear shot at the horizon can compensate for limited power & antenna.
    All: Look for something that will do more than one thing for you - a radio that receives NOAA Weather Radio frequencies, AM & FM broadcast, and can monitor local ranger & S&R channels (assuming you have that info) may be more useful than a radio that is FRS-only or 2 meter amateur only.
    All: With antennas, bigger is usually better.
    All: battery life vs weight - lithium rechargeable provide the most oomph but you need to recharge eventually. AA batteries are ubiquitous (at least at stores near trail heads) but have a weight penalty.

    By service:
    - FRS: +higher user density, cheap, no license. - limited power, limited antenna = limited coverage.
    - 2M amateur: + reasonable probability of local assistance **if** a repeater is in range. Strong benefit from altitude. Reasonable weight for a 5W radio. Some have GPS & APRS built-in.
    - limited range, battery/power consumption, the stock "rubber duck" antennas usually suck.
    - HF amateur: + reasonable chance someone someplace will hear you, followed by lengthy set of phone calls while they locate the appropriate authorities and convince them they are not a nut (followed by high probability you'll get written up in a future issue of QST). There are a huge number of trail-friendly radios/kits available; almost all are CW (Morse code) only. Several radios are about size of an Altoids tin, antenna can be 2 pieces of wire about 33-66 ft in length (7MHz band).
    - limited performance if voice (SSB) is required, antennas can become bulky/tedious to deploy.

    If I were doing it: I'd look at 3 radios, depending upon my specific needs & interests:

    - VHF/UHF + all-band reception: Yaesu VX8 (I have one) with built-in or add-on (2 models) GPS and 2 aftermarket antennas - a long flexi whip, and a roll-up jpole with feedline (can make or buy). Will give you good performance, Weather band, broadcast band, and public service reception, GPS location/elevation, limited APRS. Weather-resistant packaging. If I wanted smaller/no GPS, I'd look at the other Yaesu radios with weather-resistant enclosures. Limitation - no or very degraded operation with AA batteries; either carry spare pack or make up an external battery pack that uses AAs.

    - HF "all mode". Only 1 choice - Yaesu FT817. Get 2M & 70cm as a bonus, but no public service or weather radio reception (I think - mine is a much older model). long whip and roll-up jpole for VHF, wire for HF. Wire antenna will have to be cut to operating frequency or you need an external tuner as the radio lacks one. Can use internal AA batteries or 3rd party NiMH or lithium packs, or external power. Downsides are size, weight, and power consumption - better than many factory radios, but not up to trail-friendly standards.

    - HF CW. One of the Altoids-size single band CW rigs. I'd opt for 40M if I could have only one band. For factory/better-kit built, look at the (Chinese) HB1 (I think that's the model), TenTec sells same as a 2-band radio, the Elecraft KX1, or the PFR or ATS series. HB1, TenTec, and KX1 are multi band, reasonably wide frequency coverage, designed for low power consumption, have built-in tuner. The company that sells the HB1 (check ebay) has recently a

  135. Go do it! by Suzuran · · Score: 1

    That'd be a good place to start. If you can't find one, www.arrl.org and www.qrz.com are other good places to start.

    1. Re:Go do it! by eos3fan · · Score: 1

      Thank you

  136. A bit of reality by rhalstead · · Score: 1

    Yes, Amateur Radio is often more reliable than cell phones. No, it is not just a hobby, it is listed as a service which is growing in numbers with a high percentage of newcomers being young people. It served as one of the primary means of communication after Hurricane Katrina and the earthquake in Haiti. Field day is listed as training exercise for operating under emergency conditions. Also each year exercises (simulated emergencies) are run working with local, state, and national agencies. BUT to the original question: In the rugged back country it is quite easy to reach a point where no radio communications is possible, be it satellite, SPOT, or Ham Radio, particularly if you have fallen. Probably SPOT would be the most reliable, but he indicated he wants more than that. At least messaging capability and not complete isolation from civilization. There are many areas in the Rockies and particularly in and near the National Park where 2-meter repeaters work well, but they do not give complete coverage, or didn't when I was there. BTW for 2-meter coverage 5 watts is plenty for all but very rare instances. A repeater directory will give all the frequencies including tone access. Any HTs should be programmed well ahead of any trip, but carrying a directory which is about the same size as a king size pack of cigarettes is good insurance. Wandering the back country alone is a peaceful and enjoyable experience, but none of us are immortal and accidents do happen. Hence the buddy system and a planned area left with those you know back in civilization. So it gets down to how much risk is a person willing to take and just how far will he be getting "off the beaten path". IMO Ham Radio does offer some more reliability, but so does each additional piece of equipment over the basic SPOT. OTOH it takes time and money to earn the license. A good multi-band HT is relatively inexpensive at $300 to $400. Were it me (and it's not) and my only use for Ham Radio would be to carry it into the wilderness, I'd probably pass. As I'm already licensed, I'd certainly carry at least a 5W HT such as the VX7R (I have 2 of them) along with a couple of extra batteries in *addition* to SPOT. As peaceful as it can be, I'd not walk far in the back country without company and preferably another knowledgeable hiker. Knowledge of the area would certainly be a plus.

  137. I've done it by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

    You're quite right. I've got an FT-817, and I take it camping. I've got a slingshot and some twine, plus 120 feet of thin wire hooked up to make an inverted-L antenna. A year or so ago I was camping up moderate-high in the Sierra Nevada, in a valley where cell-phone or 2m/440 reception would be out of the question. I used my slingshot to hoist the high end of the antenna up about 35 feet and made contact with a guy in Texas on my 2.5 watts, no problem. I was working him CW, but I'm sure he would have heard me on SSB, too.

    You can also buy a little solar panel for the FT-817, amusingly enough. But it's probably a better idea just to pack along some extra AAs.

    For my money if you really want to guarantee emergency communication, I would get one of those tiny QRP rigs that Elecraft sells, with built-in paddles, then pack along a slingshot, twine, and a few hundred feet of wire to make a 40m inverted-L. That gives you solid regional day and night coverage at a cost of less than a pound or so. Of course, in this case you do need to learn code, but it's not like that's actually hard.

  138. My opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I routinely carry a Yaesu FT-817 and a full load-out of accessories, including solar panel to keep the batteries charged, when I go camping / backpacking. With all the stuff necessary to operate it over the HF / VHF / UHF bands it comes to around 8 - 10 pounds in the volume of a standard camera bag. I carry it for ham radio's sake, not as an emergency tool, though I do not discount the possible utility. Most of the points I would make are already stated above. If all you want is emergency rescue, get the SPOT beacon. If ham radio still sounds interesting, try arrl.org to find a club in your area and licensing info. Ham radio has a long tradition of helping out newcomers.

  139. Kinda sorta by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

    I think it's worth noting that this is kind of exactly the reason there was a surge of folks, as I recall, getting their ticket in the mid-80s, when 2m repeaters really took off. Quite a lot of guys used the thing as more or less a cell phone, or really car phone, since HTs were still pretty bulky. Not only to set up meetings and stuff with other hams, but also to put a call through the patch to say he'd be home late or what else was he supposed to get at the store?

    I think there's room for people who at least start off thinking they'd like a "cell phone" that works even when the power and phones lines are all out from a hurricane. After all, they're doing no harm, they're paying their dues to keep the bands ours, and -- who knows? -- it's entirely possible at some point they might drift into something more technical. This is to even leave out the possibility they might get involved in some RACES or ARES work and put their skills to use for the community.

    I don't think the guy should be discouraged for social reasons. Sure, he should know about the technical limitations, but otherwise, go for it and welcome.

  140. ham radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a member of a search and rescue team in Colorado. We use amateur radio (2 meter) for backup. So when our team VHF, county 800, and cellphones don't work, ham does. Realize that you'll need some elevation in most backcountry locations to hit a repeater or someone on simplex. Consider getting a second antenna, like a telescoping whip or at least a quarter wave wire. Of course, satellite is getting relatively inexpensive and should be considered.

    But the reality is that I carry 4 radios/devices to ensure I can talk to someone. I wouldn't recommend that to anyone.

    If you go the PLB route, please register the device. It would be nice to just be able to call the owner once for a false alarm instead of trying to track one down. SPOT is a nice idea but we had trouble accessing their dispatch center on the one SPOT search that I've done.

  141. Digital comms from the field? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel your pain. I have forwarded the question to a friend of mine who backpacks in the PNW frequently. He will tell you that the way to go is to learn Morse code and travel with a lightweight low-power QRP rig and use a wire antenna in the trees.

    You can make long-distance contacts with VHF SSB, from high points with decent antennas, but only if someone is listening, i.e. during a contest. You can't count on it at any old time, and you may not be high enough with a clear view in the right direction.

    Personally, having frequently failed to get out with low power FM and SSB VHF HTs from the boonies (including APRS), I am looking at a digital (PSK) solution. That will depend on a netbook/laptop with a very good battery and something like a Flex 1500 or Softrock Ensemble transceiver. Or a Signallink USB with an SSB HT. And a good antenna like a Buddipole. Wire is fine if the trees are in the right places.

    I carry a Spot as well these days. There is a new version with a Magellan GPS that does two-way comms now. Not cheap though.

    Good luck and 73

    Barry, VE7VIE/WV2J