Slashdot Mirror


LHC To Idle All Accelerators In 2012

sciencehabit writes "Particle physicists and science fans everywhere knew that the European particle physics laboratory, CERN, near Geneva, Switzerland, would shut down the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the world's largest atom smasher, for all of 2012 for repairs. Many expected that the shutdown would stretch to more than a year, which CERN officials confirmed today. But most probably did not expect CERN to idle all its other accelerators at the same time, shutting down a variety of smaller projects and forcing hundreds of scientists not working on the LHC to take an unanticipated break in data taking. The longer shutdown could be a chance for US scientists working on the Tevatron at Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois, if researchers there can persuade lab management to keep the machine going instead of shutting it down in 2011 as currently planned." Reader suraj.sun notes other CERN news making the rounds right now about plans for the International Linear Collider, a 31-kilometer-long collider designed to complement the LHC. Construction on the ILC could begin as soon as 2012.

117 comments

  1. Relief... by mconeone · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess we won't have to worry about 12-21-2012 after all.

    1. Re:Relief... by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      They're trying to change the profecy but it will fail, somehow some bored lab tech will manage to start the accelerator and cause the end of the universe anyway.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    2. Re:Relief... by starglider29a · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a self-UN-fulfilling prophecy... just like when computer makers began rounding up to 667MHz processors. Apparently, 66Mhz, 266MHz, 466MHz needed to be rounded down, but they had to round up 666.

    3. Re:Relief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's going to buy Satan's processor?

    4. Re:Relief... by localman57 · · Score: 4, Funny

      In the 80's we bought a PCjr. Does that count?

    5. Re:Relief... by topham · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering if they decided the terrorist threats would be insurmountable in 2012 so they thought they'd take the opportunity to do needed repairs instead.

      Does seem weird.

    6. Re:Relief... by jgagnon · · Score: 1

      Also consider all the people who bought Windows ME...

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    7. Re:Relief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why can't you spell prophecy?

    8. Re:Relief... by Torodung · · Score: 3, Funny

      No! That's exactly what the Mayans would have us believe, from their time traveling relative dimension pocket near the Andromeda galaxy. The only way to prevent the catastrophic end of the B'ak'tun is to RUN the Large Hadron Collider and create a Higgs Boson that will counteract all the neutrino emissions from the sun.

      For the love of god, we must run the LHC or we may yet pass through the CGI event horizon, our imaginations running wild, causing the ruination of all the good creatures and the ultimate victory of the Woodland Critters!

      (Oof. Perhaps I shouldn't have watched the John Cusack 2012 movie and South Park back to back on Netflix last night?)

      --
      Toro

    9. Re:Relief... by f3rret · · Score: 1

      How do you know that shutting the LHC down isn't going to be what causes the apocalypse? Maybe the events that will eventually cause the end of life as we know it have already been set in motion and are only kept in check by the fact the LHC is running.

      Just sayin' man.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    10. Re:Relief... by mikael_j · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Because everyone makes mistakes from time to time, especially those of us who are multilingual. What I'd like to know is why you can't capitalize the first word in sentences.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    11. Re:Relief... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, should they fire it up in 2012 because they completed the necessary maintenance earlier than expected, that's when we know the world's going to end.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    12. Re:Relief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the internet is an informal medium and thus capitalization is not required in such a strict sense.

    13. Re:Relief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also consider all the people who bought Windows...

      Fixed it for you ;)

    14. Re:Relief... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Yes, they did the same shit for DDR SDRAM (667). That's because of stupid christians that still believe in the interstellar zombie jew.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    15. Re:Relief... by el3mentary · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      By extension of that, neither is correct spelling.
      Mr Pot may I introduce you to my good friend Mr. Kettle.

      --
      I reject your reality and substitute my own.
    16. Re:Relief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 internets to you sir.

    17. Re:Relief... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I guess we won't have to worry about 12-21-2012 after all.

      Errr, since my level of worry about 2012-12-21 (ISO format date) was precisely zero above (or below) my worry about any randomly selected day of the week, does your reassurance mean that I can now be (guardedly) optimistic about that date?

      What the hell is so special about that date anyway? It's not palindromic, unless you're in a locale that uses MM-YYYY-DD ; oh no, it's not even palindromic then. Does it spell something rude when typed into a base-13 calculator and turned upside down, or something?
      Oh, hang on - this is SlashDot, and that's a date of cosmic importance and significance? So it's the date on which SlashDotters will get laid? I'll tell the wife to put it in her diary.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    18. Re:Relief... by KraftDinner · · Score: 1

      I couldn't believe my ears this past weekend when I heard people discussing how scary 21-12-2012 is going to be because they read all the "facts" about it. Needless to say, I lost a lot of faith in humanity that day.

    19. Re:Relief... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      Don't hold back... tell us how your really feel!

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    20. Re:Relief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      american date fail!

      2012-12-21

      you can abuse the '/' all you want but dashes are for yyyy-mm-dd

  2. This is how it'll happen by easterberry · · Score: 5, Funny

    "we're supposed to shut it down for maintenance"
    "No! This is our only chance to beat CERN! While they're still doing repairs!
    "You have to stop, the numbers! They're not stable!"
    "Almost there... almost there..."
    "GORDON! GET OUT OF THERE!"
    *green electrical storm*
    "My god... I never thought I'd see a resonance cascade, let alone create one!"

    and that's it people. We sent the crowbar to CERN. We're doomed.

    1. Re:This is how it'll happen by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      sigh...I'll go gas up the airboat.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:This is how it'll happen by Luckyo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sell the idea to Valve. I mean it.

    3. Re:This is how it'll happen by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Now these points of data make a beautiful line!

      (Oops, different game.)

    4. Re:This is how it'll happen by Psaakyrn · · Score: 1

      It's relevant. Black Mesa (CERN) is in competition with Apeture (Fermilab). Next, we'll see Fermilab cause a laboratory to disappear into nowhere.

  3. DAMNIT!!! by SpongeBob+Hitler · · Score: 2, Funny

    And here I was hoping they would end the world!

    --
    Wollt ihr den totalen Krieg?
  4. Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by jaymz2k4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It might be essential but it saddens me a bit how much of a let down the LHC has been. Fermliab however has been a real story of inspiration. I hope we see results from Geneva in the future but so far it's not exactly been inspiring stuff and this decision to shut down everything sounds a bit OTT.

    --
    jaymz
    1. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by localman57 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah. The news is all like: "Hey, did you hear about the new collider? It's like the largest ever and stuff." "Really? Does it work?" "No, but if it did, I bet it'd be really cool."

    2. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by bucky0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You're comparing apples and oranges. All of these big experiments have things they need to get to get worked out before they're running at their design strength. That's the problem with building machines that are their own prototypes.

      I can't speak for all of them, but the detector I work on has been performing excellently (all its detector subsystems, etc..). There was a flaw in some of the accelerator magnets of the main LHC ring, and it needs to be fixed, which involves warming up and cooling down the magnets (which takes 3 months each eway)

      Fermilab, by comparison has been running for something like 20 years, they did their shakedown phase a long time ago, and now they're tuned to run optimally. It's the lifecycle of these things.

      --

      -Bucky
    3. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by Facegarden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're comparing apples and oranges. All of these big experiments have things they need to get to get worked out before they're running at their design strength. That's the problem with building machines that are their own prototypes.

      I can't speak for all of them, but the detector I work on has been performing excellently (all its detector subsystems, etc..). There was a flaw in some of the accelerator magnets of the main LHC ring, and it needs to be fixed, which involves warming up and cooling down the magnets (which takes 3 months each eway)

      Fermilab, by comparison has been running for something like 20 years, they did their shakedown phase a long time ago, and now they're tuned to run optimally. It's the lifecycle of these things.

      You're totally right, but I wish the planners took that kind of thinking into account. They all said this would be up and running 5 years ago, for much less cost than it has accrued.

      http://public.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases1996/PR09.96ECouncil96.html

      That was from 1996, so I understand this stuff changes, but it *always* goes over time and over budget. Can't the planners be a bit more realistic? Right now you're saying "look, these things happen," but before they said "these things won't happen." At least, i feel like thats how it goes. I haven't been too involved so someone let me know if I'm wrong.

      I guess the politicians are weary enough and these things are hard to get funding for, so people want to over promise a bit, but it just leaves a bad taste in people's mouths.

      Personally i think this stuff is worth way more money than wars and bailouts and whatnot, so I'm not complaining about the funding, i just think that these things constantly going over budget is the whole reason politicians are reluctant to buy in in the first place!
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    4. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      You at CMS or ATLAS?

    5. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by localman57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That was from 1996, so I understand this stuff changes, but it *always* goes over time and over budget. Can't the planners be a bit more realistic?

      The planners who give realistic budgets never get their project built. The money ends up going to the guy who gave an unrealistic budget, an the illusion of a much better value.

    6. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

      It might be essential but it saddens me a bit how much of a let down the LHC has been. Fermliab however has been a real story of inspiration. I hope we see results from Geneva in the future but so far it's not exactly been inspiring stuff and this decision to shut down everything sounds a bit OTT.

      The LHC has beaten the Tevatron for the record of highest energy collision which was around 1 TeV, and they've since completed collisions at 3.5 TeV. True, that's half the planned capability of 7 TeV and they're way behind the original timeline, but the LHC has already broken new ground. Before they shut down they hope to have a decent amount of 3.5 TeV data, then fix shit and still hit their target. I wish all my failures were that good, particularly if I was doing bleeding-edge science no one has done before. I did remember a story about one of the scientists working on that Mars probe that crashed due to the feet/meter thing, she'd been working on it for 7 years which went up in a ball of fire. Now that's failure.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. The summary sucks. It basically says "it's shutting down and now they want to build another monster machine before this one even works?" As usual, BS Internet summary.

      TFA actually describes what the shutdown is for - to fix the problems that initially caused the explosion few years ago. Until it is fixed, LHC is running at 50% peak power, but they are running it so they can get data that can be analyzed during the shutdown. People are not going to be out of stuff to do, there will be plenty. Smaller projects have a year to get their data together so they can analyze it or get more data from other sources.

      LHC is not a magic machine that turns out gummy bears. It is a precision measurement instrument and sometimes you need to adjust it. The measurement data may take a few days or weeks to capture, but may end up taking *YEARS* for analysis.

    8. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      I was in the tunnels at Fermilab a few years ago - friend of a friend tour. They were shut down for months doing maintenance and upgrades. It's not like they've been running non-stop or unchanged since they first started up. By contrast, LHC has yet to get to the "first light" phase; as others have said, kind of disappointing.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    9. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      You at CMS or ATLAS?

      I don't like to get into it too much online but, as a hint, I can see the tevatron ring from my office.

      --

      -Bucky
    10. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Understandable. I too am not a fan of my online and IRL personas being connected. Best of luck!

      /Couldn't see the tevatron from the cube farm in Feynman
      //Cafeteria food was decent though

    11. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      That was from 1996, so I understand this stuff changes, but it *always* goes over time and over budget. Can't the planners be a bit more realistic?

      The planners who give realistic budgets never get their project built. The money ends up going to the guy who gave an unrealistic budget, an the illusion of a much better value.

      Yeah. I guess even if the politicians *know* it will go over budget, if the public doesn't realize it, they'll still look good.

      Still frustrating, but its how people work i guess.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    12. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. If you're an evil proposal writer, your goal is to come in as the lowest bidder, even if you know you can't complete the project on that budget. But you also have to come in high enough that the customer has invested sufficient resources that when you have to ask for more money, they're already too committed just to scrap the project. It's like playing poker...

    13. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GBTW or no Pub stop at the train station

    14. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by f3rret · · Score: 1

      That was from 1996, so I understand this stuff changes, but it *always* goes over time and over budget. Can't the planners be a bit more realistic?
      -Taylor

      Well that cannot really budget for accidents really. I mean you build the thing as close to the limits of your budget, then something breaks and you have no choice to go over budget.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    15. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      and this is why letting your boss know your handles online is a bad thing

      (actually was my boss)

      --

      -Bucky
    16. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      That was from 1996, so I understand this stuff changes, but it *always* goes over time and over budget. Can't the planners be a bit more realistic?
      -Taylor

      Well that cannot really budget for accidents really. I mean you build the thing as close to the limits of your budget, then something breaks and you have no choice to go over budget.

      I've never been part of a large, long budget project, but I get the idea that since accidents are unavoidable, people *have* to budget for accidents and unforeseen circumstances, or every budget ever would be over time.

      Obviously many people fail to do this, but you'd expect people throwing around tens of billions of dollars to have enough experience to allow time for unforeseen circumstances, if they're being honest.

      I mean, if they have to bring the thing up to ambient temp, they're down a *minimum* of 6 months (3 months to warm, 3 months to cool again). If that happens a few times, they're a year or two over time. You'd think they would have expected that might have happened and allowed for it.

      I think instead they were afraid to be honest about how long it would take because they were trying not to lose support.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    17. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by jo42 · · Score: 1

      I propose we give Mythbusters a truck-load of rare earth magnets, a container-load of copper wire, a trailer-load of liquid nitrogen and a skid-load of duct tape - they'll find what we're looking for no problem. Even if they do have to blow everything up at the end...

    18. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by ozbird · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're off by a factor of 2. The individual beams are currently running at 3.5 TeV; the collisions are at 7 TeV. The goal is to ramp up to 7 TeV beams for 14 TeV collisions.

    19. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by PGOER · · Score: 0

      They'll declare the myth busted, but not before they fake their way close to making the system work, and then pile explosives on the entire project to detonate it in an abanodoned rock quary, to ensure that no one reproduces their experiment.

      --
      I am not a nerd, I just play one in real life. My avatar thinks I'm a total loser.
    20. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      If you ask them to approve 100 dollars and 20 years for your project, they'll say no. So you go for 50 bucks, and say you can have it ready in 2 months.

      2 Months later, you say you need "some more time" because something "unexpected" happened, and you'll need another 20 bucks. Or they can just shut down and loose 50 bucks and 2 months of work. So they say yes, and go ahead.

      It is the *ONLY* way to do certain things. Because people with power is stupid.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    21. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      I did remember a story about one of the scientists working on that Mars probe that crashed due to the feet/meter thing, she'd been working on it for 7 years which went up in a ball of fire. Now that's failure.

      Minor nitpick, the units issue was an issue of newtons of force v. pounds of force. Probe in question was the Mars Climate Orbiter.

    22. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by cowscows · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I've spent years working on designs for some pretty standard buildings (condos/apartments/etc) that end up not getting built for whatever reason, and it sucks. When things do get built, there's always changes on the fly during construction, and usually some going back after it's "finished" to fix things or tie up loose ends. And while buildings are fairly complicated, they're rather crude and basic compared to particle accelerators and those awesome looking detectors.

      Getting the LHC built and running at all was an amazing accomplishment. The fact that it's still got a ways to go to reach its maximum potential is just a small problem compared to the many they've already worked through.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    23. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are running *today* at 3.5x the max energy Fermilab ever achieved. The shutdown is after they collect lots of data at 3.5TeV (takes long time to analyze it) so they can do a proper fix to achieve 7x Fermilab energy.

      Funny how you write 3.5x best ever energy and new physics being done to "yet to get to the first light phase".

    24. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by evilviper · · Score: 1

      "Supercollider!? I just met 'er!"

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    25. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      You are expecting things to happen right away. It's only natural. Instant gratification is what we crave today. But these things take a long time to develop fully. It's been under development for a long time already, and a couple of more years to work out the kinks is basically what one might expect. I don't think there's something wrong with the LHC as such, or that it's taking longer than it should. It's that we are expecting things to happen with the snap of a finger, and that's just not how it works.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    26. Re:Not sure what to make of the LHC so far by Demonantis · · Score: 1

      Never thought of it that way. It is like Hollywood accounting of the science world.

  5. Refractory Period by boneclinkz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Even the largest hadrons can't stay active forever.

    1. Re:Refractory Period by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      I thought they were extinct a long time ago? Squished by a comet into oil, which is now causing fishing boats in the Gulf to be idle. I didn't know they used shrimpers to catch subatomic particles, but since they are used to catching tiny things already, I guess it makes sense.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    2. Re:Refractory Period by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Call The Doctor for a hadron lasting four hours or more.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:Refractory Period by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Forever?

      Those commercials say that if your large hadron lasts 4 hours, you should call your doctor.

      Personally, if my large hadron lasts 4 hours, I'm calling everybody!

    4. Re:Refractory Period by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call The Doctor for a hadron lasting four hours or more.

      Why do you think a Time Lord would be interested in knowing that?

    5. Re:Refractory Period by tacarat · · Score: 1

      NSFW and only slightly off topic :P
      http://sexylosers.com/202.html

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    6. Re:Refractory Period by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who?

    7. Re:Refractory Period by nametaken · · Score: 1

      They call that Prionpism?

    8. Re:Refractory Period by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Fuck me.

      Preonpism. Humor fail.

  6. Getting tired.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    of reading about LHC repairs. Just create the damn black hole

    1. Re:Getting tired.. by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      They've had to delay that disaster, with all the other ones they have created. They had to delay that one until they had milked all the current ones for all they could.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  7. Bad headline by jfoobaz · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's wrong, and it's even contradicted by the summary below. The LHC isn't idling all accelerators, CERN is idling all of the accelerators they operate.

    I know it's Slashdot, but is it too much to ask that the editors try to pay enough attention to ensure that the headline is accurate with respect to the summary?

    1. Re:Bad headline by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I know it's Slashdot, but is it too much to ask that the editors try to pay enough attention to ensure that the headline is accurate with respect to the summary?

      Was that a rhetorical question?
      If not, the answer is "yes".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  8. 2012 by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    But how will we shrink the Earth to an object the size of a pea on December 21, 2012?

    1. Re:2012 by localman57 · · Score: 4, Funny
      I think so Brain,

      But how will we shrink the Earth to an object the size of a pea on December 21, 2012?

      Narf!

      FTFY.

  9. Re:newclear power available now, no gadgets requir by dyingtolive · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why are the copypasta trolls always so attracted to 2012/LHC stories?

    --
    Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
  10. Too Late for Tevatron by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Informative

    The longer shutdown could be a chance for US scientists working on the Tevatron at Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois.

    There are not many channels in which the Tevatron will be competitive with the LHC after the first data run assuming that we get the expected amount of data. The only advantages which the Tevatron has are a far better understood detectors and a larger luminosity sample but the first is lost with time (as ATLAS/CMS analyse and understand their detector data better) and the second is hard to significantly improve on given their already large data sample. The far higher energy of the LHC means that once the first data run is collected it will be very hard for the Tevatron to continue to compete with new physics. To give you an idea of the advantage a higher energy gives simply increasing the Tevatron energy from 1.8 TeV to 1.96 TeV (i.e. 10%) increased the number of top quark pairs produced by ~40%. The LHC energy is 350% that of the Tevatron so it is hard to see how they will be competitive with typical new, high energy phenomena after the first LHC run.

    1. Re:Too Late for Tevatron by bucky0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      To add to the parent, there's so many top quarks (something that's pretty rare, even on the tevatron), that we're planning on subtracting it out as a background for other events (tops share some decay channels with other, more interesting particles)

      --

      -Bucky
  11. No they won't stay idle for long by TheHawke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They'll delve into the masses of data accumulated over the years, peering at impact traces, peeling back gig after gig of data in search for that miracle that would flip the universe as we know it upside down...

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  12. Particle accelerators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The day physicists charmed politicians with a lot of math to convince them that infinite wealth was just beyond reach because surely if we can manage fission then certainly fusion should be no problem (remove all references to recreating gravity/temperature/pressure conditions inside the sun here).

    PS: Physics doesn't work that way. When someone says "Fission = energy; fusion = MORE energy" you need to medicate that person. Reality = "fission = energy, fusion = REQUIRES energy". Oh dear, stars are an exception.

    1. Re:Particle accelerators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words idiot.

      Hydrogen Bombs.

      Or if you prefer, thermonuclear weapons.

  13. doomsday by yoldapirate · · Score: 0

    I guess CERN is too afraid to be responsible for doomsday in 2012 after all...

  14. Tin foil hat time by Whatsmynickname · · Score: 1

    Maybe they are shutting it down until after December 21, 2012 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_phenomenon)

    1. Re:Tin foil hat time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they aren't shutting it down until after December 21, 2012

      There, fixed that for you.

      Posting AC because I normally hate the FTFY meme.

  15. Re:kraft dinner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's hard to believe that you're posting at -1 with such a valuable outlook. Thanks for your contribution!

  16. ILC by PiMuNu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really hope the ILC gets the go ahead But you would not build it until you know the Higgs mass (if the Higgs exists) because you want to work with e+e- collisions on the centre of mass. Until you can prove the Higgs mass is in the design range of the machine, you simply wouldn't built. So I think that story is yarbles.

  17. Re:Way to go, CERN by twidarkling · · Score: 1

    I'll do it. I need 3 million sticks of TNT, 12 million cars, 2 million doses of LCD, access to a major religion's power centre, and a set of keys.

    Oh, also 10 feet of rope and 4 disco balls.

    --
    Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
  18. so it looks like 2012 will not be the cubs year. by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    so it looks like 2012 will not be the cubs year.

  19. related to the mayan end of the world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it humorous that the LHC is shutting down for the entire period encompassed for the supposed mayan "end of the world"

  20. Re:kraft dinner by mea37 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    wonder how many boxes of Kraft dinner i could buy with the money they spend on any TWO of the various r&d efforts over the centuries that led to a world in which it's possible for me to cheaply buy a box of Kraft dinner

  21. Re:kraft dinner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I work on the LHC, and if its pinnacle of achievement, its major contribution to the progress of humanity, turns out to be cheaper Kraft dinners, I think I'm going to go lie under a bus.

  22. not unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's not a big secret that we will be having some high solar/magnetic activity now, & for some time to come. it wouldn't be thoughtless to turn off your billion watt radio/atom smasher before the biggest anticipated 'lightning' strike ever.

  23. It's all falling into place by Torodung · · Score: 2, Funny

    OMG. Here is confirmable data, streaming in newsfeeds from all over the world, that the LHC is actually involved in a time travel paradox with a Higgs boson it can never create. Eventually the entire site will be nuked from orbit by the Higgs boson, because it's the only way to be sure.

    --
    Toro

  24. Re:Way to go, CERN by blair1q · · Score: 1

    Fear and Loathing in Saint-Genis-Pouilly...

  25. Re:kraft dinner by f3rret · · Score: 1

    wonder how many boxes of Kraft dinner i could buy with the money they spend on the TWO colliders

    Well I don't know what the other of the TWO colliders are, anyhow.

    A Kraft dinner costs a $1.16 according to some lazy, half-assed googling, and according to wikipedia the LHC has a budget of 9 billion dollars.

    So you could buy about 7.75 billion Kraft dinners. Tasty.

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  26. Re:Way to go, CERN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Troll. Everyone knows it takes an odd number of disco balls to end the world.

  27. GOOD! We Dont Want Germans to be Starting No WWIII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AGAIN!!! What is it with thise Germans and weapons and world conquestation? They done lost two wars already and here they are messing around, wanting to start a third, and final. Leave the universe to God, I say, and we'll leave Germans to find something else to do with those OFFLINE collisors. God still hate the Germans!!!

  28. Oh well by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    Scientists generally ask for money and deliver slowly. Unfortunately, we really won't know if it's a waste of money until more money is poured into it. They should nickname it "Government."

  29. Re:kraft dinner by easterberry · · Score: 1

    Are you implying that Kraft Dinner is not the greatest food in the world? As a Canadian I am deeply offended!

  30. Re:kraft dinner by el3mentary · · Score: 1

    7.75Bn?

    Brings a whole new perspective on the term "Feed the world"...

    --
    I reject your reality and substitute my own.
  31. Damned "Idle" stories! by Tetsujin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I turned off idle stories, so why am I still seeing them??!?

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  32. Re:kraft dinner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like my hadrons in a creamy cheese sauce.

  33. Blackhole anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they found something. Something at higher energies. Something that scared them.....

  34. Couldn't FTFY... by vlueboy · · Score: 1

    Even the largest hadrons can't stay active forever.

    I was gonna Fix That For You ... but I'm now scared of the prospect of "large hardon colliders" and just ran away :(

  35. Power Up by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    That is the date for them to power things back up. Gotta prepare for that big bang ya know, have everything in perfect condition to create the end of the world.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  36. Apparently, they have laid off- by aqk · · Score: 0

    They have laid off (actually given a 1 year sabbatical) to a couple of Ecuadorean, or Peruvian physicists for 2012.

    " OK you Mayans- go have fun - report back here in 2013.""

  37. Re:kraft dinner by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

    Those hydrons are supposed to be served Ice Cold (TM), mister.

    --
    Here be signatures
  38. Re:kraft dinner by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

    Yeah... Feed the world exactly _ONE_ dinner. How's that supposed to help? "Oh yeah we made sure those poor africans died half a day later than expected" '>_>

    --
    Here be signatures
  39. 20 years to build by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly I doubt this is ever going to truly happen. It took them 20 years to build this thing and some of the parts they are using are 20 years old. They have to replace whats old with the new now.

  40. Re:so it looks like 2012 will not be the cubs year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody knows the Cubs will win in 2015, unless Doc Brown or Marty screw up the timeline again...

  41. Re:kraft dinner by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    WTF is a kraft dinner? aren't they the people who make spreadable cheese?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  42. "a chance"? .. stupid by EriktheGreen · · Score: 1

    "The longer shutdown could be a chance for US scientists working on the Tevatron at Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois, if researchers there can persuade lab management to keep the machine going instead of shutting it down in 2011 as currently planned."

    Try to wrap your head around this: this is not an "us vs. them" situation. It's not a competition. If you're cheering for one "team" or the other you're performing a psychological trick to fool yourself into feeling good.

    If either group of scientists successfully discovers new knowledge that improves our understanding of the world, everyone gains. Sure, any scientist wants to be the first to discover something important, but most scientists know that if they've made a contribution to the whole effort, they're as responsible for progress as the man who has the "eureka!" moment.

    If you're hoping the American site does it before CERN because you're American, and then you get to feel good for your team "winning", why are you doing that? Why don't you try feeling good or bad about your own life, instead of identifying yourself with national or international physics projects so you can cheer them on like they were a sports team or political party?

  43. Aah, memories.... by John+Guilt · · Score: 1

    Nothing like working night shifts in the middle of the (to my coastal eyes) incredibly violent Illinois lightning storms...sitting next to a giant container of liquid hydrogen. Science!
    (The Pirelli calendar someone had left in the control room wasn't much consolation---I like my women like I like my coffee: hot, without fake tyre tracks on their bodies, and COVERED IN BEES.)

  44. Re:kraft dinner by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    Are you sure the Kraft dinner wouldn't kill them _sooner_?

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  45. Re:Way to go, CERN by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    ...2 million doses of LCD...

    Are those 22 inch 'doses', or 25 inch?

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  46. Re:Way to go, CERN by twidarkling · · Score: 1

    ... Fuck.

    Secret's out. I'm a nerd, not a druggie.

    --
    Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
  47. Re:Way to go, CERN by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    What amazes me is that I, also a non-druggie, was the first slashdotter to catch it.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  48. Re:kraft dinner by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1

    It is what Kraft Macaroni and Cheese is called in Canada.

    --
    TODO: Insert witty sig