Slashdot Mirror


Polar Flares To Be Visible Tonight

ideaMUX writes "NASA's solar dynamics observatory recently detected an M-class flare hurling a coronal mass ejection (CME) into space. The CME is not fully directed toward Earth, but some of the plasma cloud may be visible in the magnetosphere tonight, causing a geomagnetic disturbance and possible aurora. NASA said M-class flares are medium-sized, and can cause brief radio blackouts that affect Earth's Polar regions. Minor radiation storms sometimes follow M-class flares."

88 comments

  1. "Polar Flares"? by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's an original, I think.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:"Polar Flares"? by Megor1 · · Score: 1

      I'm not to sure about this website it says: "The cloud may also *casue* geomagnetic disturbances." and the title of the website has the word Tsunami in it?

      --
      Everyone that disagrees with me is a paid shill
    2. Re:"Polar Flares"? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...M-class flare hurling...

      Chili contests? Night of drinking?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:"Polar Flares"? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Funny

      M-class? So is it some kind of Mercedes SUV thing?

    4. Re:"Polar Flares"? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It's easier to spell than Aurora Borealis. Kinda catchy, too.

  2. From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circle by ThunderThor53 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thank you Slashdot.

    Sincerely,

    All your readers outside of polar areas that won't be able to see anything anyway.

  3. Skinner! by swanzilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aurora Borealis?

    At this time of year?

    A this time of day?

    In this part of the country?

    Localized entirely within your kitchen?

    1. Re:Skinner! by Gerocrack · · Score: 1

      I'm going to make a batch of steamed hams, and watch the show!

    2. Re:Skinner! by luddite47 · · Score: 1

      Aurora Borealis?

      At this time of year?

      A this time of day?

      In this part of the country?

      Localized entirely within your kitchen?

      May I see it?

    3. Re:Skinner! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I see it?

  4. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's not quite right for this event.

    Here's a forecast for tonight's event, it's possible that anyone north of about 55 degrees in North America will get a glimmer.

    True, that leaves most of us SOL. But that's why CME events are special -- people who can't normally see the aurora borealis get a chance to view it.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  5. Science Pron by cosm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Polar Bares Coronal Mass Erection III
    Guaranteed Plasma Cloud Shot

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:Science Pron by ebingo · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would explain the M rating

  6. M-class...flare? by by+(1706743) · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...detected an M-class flare...

    So...can you live on it?

  7. OMGZ - I can see them from here?! by eagee · · Score: 3, Funny

    That only happens like... never!

    Sincerely,

    Someone from Cleveland (you insensitive clods!)

    1. Re:OMGZ - I can see them from here?! by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      You better hope we never have a solar flare such that the resulting aurora is visble from Cleveland.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:OMGZ - I can see them from here?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You better hope we never have a solar flare such that the resulting aurora is visble from Cleveland.

      You're not actually serious, are you? Auroras are visible* from Cleveland about once a year, on average--more during solar max, less during solar min, like now.

      *Not factoring in light pollution

    3. Re:OMGZ - I can see them from here?! by JumpDrive · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I have actually seen recordings of them as far south as Ft. Davis Texas.

    4. Re:OMGZ - I can see them from here?! by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > I have actually seen recordings of them as far south as Ft. Davis Texas.

      It's not the latitude. There they don't have to be so bright as to visible through the skies of Cleveland. As in most large cities, the residents think there are only five stars in the sky, all only visible when a power failure coincides with an unusually clear night.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  8. 2 questions... by cez · · Score: 1
    I wonder where the best place to view this from would be? The Aurora Borealis are best viewed in Alaska, but during the winter. My girlfriend just got to Alaska recently and I'm on the North East coast, we'll have to compare notes!

    Speaking of Alaska, I wonder what time dude's plane crashed?

    The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said a minor radio blackout event occurred at 2 pm EDT on Monday when an M1 flare erupted on the Sun. Solar flares are classified as C (low intensity), M (moderate intensity), and X (high intensity).

    --
    Walk with Music;
    1. Re:2 questions... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Loss of radio could be a problem, more for navigational aids than communications. GPS is not very accurate for aircraft, especially when changing altitude, and even when it works. They had fog and cloud and tried to get over a mountain.

    2. Re:2 questions... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Not from Anchorage, it's cloudy here today. If it was clear, I'd go to Eagle River Nature Center or Earthquake Park here in Anchorage.

    3. Re:2 questions... by cez · · Score: 1
      That's what she said!

      Oh... wait a minute, that loses funniness when it's the truth... and not sexual at all.

      --
      Walk with Music;
    4. Re:2 questions... by plopez · · Score: 1

      we were out doing field work today in the lower 48. Our radios kept having problems tx and rx. We couldn't figure it out. At the end of the day we compared notes and others experienced the same problems. I think the flares are to blame, since everything works well under other circumstances.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  9. Time to Hide! by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    I am going to pack all of my electronic equipment into the newly built Faraday cage I built in my garage.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    1. Re:Time to Hide! by turkeydance · · Score: 1

      Die Earthlings!

    2. Re:Time to Hide! by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      You better start hiding the electrical grid you attach that equipment to as well.
      (Go Solar!)

    3. Re:Time to Hide! by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      What, you don't have your own nuclear reactor on-site?

      Philistine!

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  10. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by Kvasio · · Score: 1

    unless this is DARPA playing with HAARP again.

  11. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

    That's not quite right for this event. Here's a forecast for tonight's event, it's possible that anyone north of about 55 degrees in North America will get a glimmer. True, that leaves most of us SOL. But that's why CME events are special -- people who can't normally see the aurora borealis get a chance to view it.

    The only people in the US that will be able to see it live in Alaska - likely an extremely insignificant portion of the /. crowd.

  12. Earth has two poles by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In Australia, seriously. Aurora Australis is just as beautiful.

    Earth has two poles.

    1. Re:Earth has two poles by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 3, Informative

      The article's title and description refers to polar, so no where is it north-centric.

      Even the UAF site has a map for the Southern Hemisphere.

    2. Re:Earth has two poles by cez · · Score: 1

      my bad mate! Was a typo... I meant the best time to see them in Alaska was the winter... when its not all night bright and shite. Cheers!

      --
      Walk with Music;
    3. Re:Earth has two poles by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but one of them is upside-down!

    4. Re:Earth has two poles by aqk · · Score: 0

      Good point! (I'm in Canada)
      But every time I see one of these idiot TV thingees about masses of electrons flying out from the Sun, they always seem to show them being attracted to the Northern Hemisphere. Why is this?
      Do you really get to see the Southern Lights like we do?

      Does maybe the South Pole just get a shitload of positrons instead? (that might make it even more dramatic!)
      All kidding aside, just why is this?

    5. Re:Earth has two poles by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Not really. There aren't any settlements on southern hemisphere that are anywhere as near to the pole as there are in the north, and that quite obviously limits the show a lot.

      Southern tip of Tasmania is 44 degrees south. Most of Europe and almost entire Canada is closer to the north pole than that is to south! We have _cities_ 70 degrees north, you'd have to live on Antarctica to match that on the south pole.

  13. Um... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nicolas Cage just drove by my house really fast shouting into a cell phone. Should I be concerned?

  14. Seymour! The house is on fire! by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Seymour! The house is on fire!

  15. Weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its raining heavily here, so I doubt they will be visible (even though I am at 46 degrees north)

  16. But... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    But why would I want to see polar flares? I mean, it's cool and all, whatever floats your boat... but I'm just not "like that".

    --
    C|N>K
  17. Took down Ted Stevens plane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fried all the electronics.

  18. Hooray for dyslexia by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I the only one who read that as "Polar Bears To Be Visible Tonight" and thought, "Holy crap, they're usually invisible?!?"

    1. Re:Hooray for dyslexia by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Every see a polar bear in a snow storm?

      Here is a pic:

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Hooray for dyslexia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joke's on you! Slashdot blocks image postings for a reason!

      You'll have to post a URL.

    3. Re:Hooray for dyslexia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    4. Re:Hooray for dyslexia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *woosh*

    5. Re:Hooray for dyslexia by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      AC makes a good point. Here's an ASCII drawing I whipped up instead:

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    6. Re:Hooray for dyslexia by MokuMokuRyoushi · · Score: 0

      Reverse *whoosh*. Fail.

      --
      Humans are terrible replicators of Godly things.
  19. Obligatory by nomorecwrd · · Score: 1

    Menchara-class flares over a Menchara-class planet?

    Been there, done that ;-)

  20. Re:That's nothing! by geekoid · · Score: 1

    YOu can see your own hemorrhoids? dear god man, see a Doctor.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  21. Re:yuo F"ail It by Gohtar · · Score: 1

    What?

  22. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    an extremely insignificant portion of the /. crowd.

    Yeah, and there's not many of those people either.

  23. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by abigor · · Score: 2, Informative

    The OP mentioned "North America". Incredible as it seems, there's this country in North America to the north of the US with 35 million people in it that might want to see this event. Remarkably, this story is relevant for them.

  24. Re:That's nothing! by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    It's ok, he's a professional...

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  25. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The OP mentioned "North America". Incredible as it seems, there's this country in North America to the north of the US with 35 million people in it that might want to see this event. Remarkably, this story is relevant for them.

    Not really. Most of us are too engrossed in drinking beer and beating each other with hockey sticks to look at the sky. ;-)

  26. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by goofyspouse · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your point is valid, but the vast majority of Canadians live south of 55 degrees north. Calgary is 51 degrees, and even Edmonton is only just over 53 degrees...

  27. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

    I seriously doubt most Canadians even live near the lower portions of Alaska, as far as longitude goes. Of course, there aren't many Alaskans, hehe.

    A lot of Canadians, if they live towards the southern part of their US-bordering province, could potentially be further south from the pole than north-eastern US states like Maine.

  28. Nope... often visible in the continental US by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Informative

    The only people in the US that will be able to see it live in Alaska

    Nope. I generally do pretty well here in NE Montana.

    This shot, and this one, are aurora photos from the CME event last week.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Nope... often visible in the continental US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus God be careful out there!!

      Don't you know that stuff steals your soul?

    2. Re:Nope... often visible in the continental US by ramana8 · · Score: 1

      Sarah Palin !

  29. Son of Balmer by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had a bipolar flare-up and tossed a chair.

  30. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by socsoc · · Score: 1

    Ted Stevens will see it.

  31. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by winomonkey · · Score: 1

    The only people in the US that will be able to see it live in Alaska - likely an extremely insignificant portion of the /. crowd.

    On behalf of the Alaskans who are a part of the /. crowd, I would like to convivially wave an insignificant digit in your general direction. Sadly, you will not be able to see my digit-waving-display, just as you won't be able to see the aurora display tonight.

    If it makes you feel any better, our weather here in Anchorage will not likely permit viewing, either ... damn clouds.

  32. Nope, still not visible to most by sjbe · · Score: 1

    The OP mentioned "North America". Incredible as it seems, there's this country in North America to the north of the US with 35 million people in it that might want to see this event. Remarkably, this story is relevant for them.

    Seeing as how I live in the lower 48 states and am further north than a huge percentage of the Canadian population I have to say you might want to consult a map. Most of the major cities in Canada are barely north of the border. Hell I could be in one of them within 40 minutes if the border crossing wasn't crowded.

    1. Re:Nope, still not visible to most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not his fault, Europeans are some of the most geographically ignorant people on the planet.

  33. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0, Troll

    Thank you Slashdot.

    Sincerely,

    All your readers outside of polar areas that won't be able to see anything anyway.

    I really don't understand why this is insightful. Linux stories aren't helpful to the majority, either.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  34. i was going to pull a grammar nazi by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    and say "really fast shouting" should read "shouting really fast" but then i saw you are referring to nicholas cage, so yeah, you are grammatically correct after all

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i was going to pull a grammar nazi by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Good lord, I had to stare at it to even see it. I swap words like that sometimes and I don't why know. Yoda genes in me I have.

  35. i do not believe in you upside down people by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    summer in winter? winter in summer? stop it now

    antipodeans are a fictional kind of leprechaun invented to scare young children. there is no such thing as another hemisphere. you would fall off!

    you are a poor troll trying to pull a fast one

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  36. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by aqk · · Score: 0

    Incredible as it may seem to people of the US, North America also includes Mexico.
    (Welcome to Geography, American know-nothing)
    I'm sure millions of Mexicans will certainly be up late tonight to see this magnificent polar event!

    - Speaking as a Canadian, and no, I do not live in an igloo.

  37. Re:yuo F"ail It by zeropointburn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sometimes I think that troll is a weird form of eliza trainer, trying to produce comprehensible posts based on slashdot post histories. Clearly a non-starter unless you've been drinking sterno. Alternatively, it could be some form of encoded data, posted in a public forum and cleverly disguised as an asshat. /tinfoilhat

    As to the light show, wish I could see it.

    --
    -1 raving lunatic; +6 subGenius... Things even out...
  38. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by aqk · · Score: 0

    Incredible as it may seem to people of the US, North America also includes Mexico.
    (Welcome to Geography 101, American know-nothing)
    I'm sure millions of Mexicans will certainly be up late tonight to see this magnificent polar event

    - Speaking as a Canadian, and no, I do not live in an igloo.

  39. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by IceFoot · · Score: 1

    Actually, what is the population of Earth north of 55 degrees (north latitude)? Is there any way to find that statistic?

  40. Re:Um... Cagey warning by aqk · · Score: 0

    Nicolas Cage just drove by my house really fast shouting into a cell phone. Should I be concerned?

    Well, don't let him in, unless he's brought his brother Faraday along.

  41. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by bar-agent · · Score: 1

    Actually, what is the population of Earth north of 55 degrees (north latitude)? Is there any way to find that statistic?

    Sure. Take a population density map and consider only the part of it that is north of 55 degrees. Depending on the legend, you may need to determine the land area north of 55 degrees or the total population of the world as well.

    --
    i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  42. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by Sulphur · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our Inspector General non loo inhabitant overlords.

  43. Re:yuo F"ail It by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Alternatively, it could be some form of encoded data, posted in a public forum and cleverly disguised as an asshat. /tinfoilhat

    "Good morning, I see the swallows have left early for Godwanaland this year."
    "Indeed, and the meerkat breeding grounds are teeming with voles."

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  44. Re: Seymour! The house is on fire! by a.deity · · Score: 1

    It's just the Northern Lights, mother.

    --
    Option-Shift-K.
  45. Re:yuo F"ail It by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    It looked more to me like someone in Russia is trying to learn English while drunk.

  46. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, wise teacher could you tell us which part of Mexico is north of 55N?

  47. Re:From all residents outside the [ant]arctic circ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you Slashdot.

    Sincerely,

    All your readers outside of polar areas that won't be able to see anything anyway.

    I really don't understand why this is insightful. Linux stories aren't helpful to the majority, either.

    He said all your [Slashdot's] readers. A large number of those use Linux or are interested in it for some reason or another, like its competitive pressure on Microsoft in some areas like servers. As Slashdot is a primarily American site that still includes members from around the world, and most people don't live 55 or more degrees north, a tiny number of those are going to see this aurora. So you see there is no comparison between Slashdot readers who might read a Linux story versus Slashdot readers who are going to personally witness this event. Nice try but it is you who lacks basic insight in this case.