Slashdot Mirror


India Now Wants Access To Google and Skype

crabel writes "A couple of weeks ago India went after RIM and its mail service; it has extended its hunger for data now to all telecommunications. All telecom companies have to give them access to all voice over IP services that go in/out or happen within the country. Heck, they are even going after VPNs used by corporate employees working remotely."

60 of 366 comments (clear)

  1. Well... by panda · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fuck doing business with India or Indian corporation/nationals.

    --
    Just be sure to wear the gold uniform when you beam down -- you know what happens when you wear the red one.
    1. Re:Well... by jgagnon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Considering how many businesses still flock to China with relatively little protection for their IP, I doubt this will affect business relations much as long as it is more profitable to do business there than elsewhere.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    2. Re:Well... by HungryHobo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm not sure I'd even trust certs issued by any companies based in india at this point.

      Anyone have any suggestions which cert authorities I should be excluding?

    3. Re:Well... by moogied · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Flamebait?! This is a VERY valid statement. If have sensitive documents and do a lot of work in India because you own a call center there or something, you would most certainty need to look at this.

      --
      So basically, -1 troll/offtopic is really slashdots way of saying "I hate that you thought of something before me."
    4. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm posting anonymously as my new employer has not found the time to purchase my company laptop and I'm "borrowing" a co-workers machine.

      So, post explanation, let me say I have many friends, a few family members, and a few acquaintances who are from India. Even knowing how nice these people are and such, I agree with Panda - fuck doing business with India. The reasons I say this are manifold, but include the fact that if American companies quit outsourcing to India (and other countries) exactly how many jobs would be created in the American economy? How much money would be pumped back into the economy that is teetering between recovery and disaster #2? Are companies so stupid that they have lost sight of the fact that if America's economy fails and we cannot get jobs that pay a living (or BETTER) wage then WE can't buy those nice shiny objects they're selling?

      Borrowing heavily and massive credit card debt are slowly being eliminated from the many friends and family I've talked to - and news I keep hearing as well. Everyone is a little paranoid and they are paying off debt as fast as they can; well, most everyone is. We have plenty of people who want to work in the United States they just don't want to work for $5 or $6 an hour AFTER taxes. Unless you're living in a highly affordable area (which eliminates most cities), then you can't survive on that wage without help of some kind.

      Bah, I've digressed a bit but the point remains - do business in America you American companies. Stop outsourcing everything, including the natural talent that America (used to?) has. If we keep brain-draining our research and other knowledge to foreign countries what the hell are we going to have left? We've shipped everything else off - manufacturing, electronics, call centers, etc, etc.

    5. Re:Well... by tophermeyer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll second that because I see you got modded flamebait as well. It's nothing against Indians or companies that operate in India, but data disclosure is something you need to be aware of. If a company is going to be distributing your information you need to know who it goes to and why they want it. The fact that this would apply to every company that operates in India seems very relevant.

      Maybe you decide it's ok that the Indian government gets ahold of your data. Maybe your data is sensitive and you don't want any government obtaining it. It's worth paying attention to at the very least.

    6. Re:Well... by Peeteriz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Encrypt your data. Public VoIP gets the exact same treatment as the telephone network when you're calling your branch office in Mumbai - if the government asks, the call is intercepted, and any third parties will give out your data - your phone, mobile, mail and DHL/Fedex packages are all subject to this.
      If you want privacy, don't trust third-party public networks and do encrypted message exchanges that you and only you control.

    7. Re:Well... by delinear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunately, for anyone who cares about how their data is used, it's the companies who will make the decision. I might switch my bank to one I consider more secure only to find in two months time that they intend to outsource key parts of the business. I wonder if we'll eventually see a niche market in organisations which guarantee to keep your data within the boundaries of your own country (then you only have to worry about your own government getting their hands on it).

    8. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who do they think they are, the US?

    9. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The Indian side of me understands completely where they are coming from. Shit, America is doing the same thing, just undercover. India is a large target for terrorist attacks and this is one way they can monitor the Indian public and anyone who communicates with the Indian public for any terrorist activities.

      I'm not saying its right, based on American laws...but what native Indian is going to fight this? They all want to be safe. They don't want to worry about another Mumbai attack.

      The American side of me understands where most of the posts here are coming from. Invasion of privacy, corrupt governments using information against its own people, and the thought of someone having all information about you at their fingertips. Again, this all happens in America, but there are atleast some laws that protect us just a little.

      To the Indian government: I hope you can come up with another way to protect our people. Demanding things from businesses such as this is a truly poor choice for international business and, eventually, the trust of your people in you. Get that census thing done right, give every Indian an ID number, map out all of the towns in the country...pretty much turn India into today's US. Train a good military force, and protect the borders. It's time to play some good defense, and when called for, put that offense into effect.

    10. Re:Well... by HisMother · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why should pulling out cost anything at all? Crappy coders and incomprehensible phone monkeys abound all over the world -- India has no monopoly. Buy your commodity services elsewhere.

      --
      Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    11. Re:Well... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm fairly sure most of the issue with RIM and the others is their encrypted communications.

    12. Re:Well... by shoehornjob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bah, I've digressed a bit but the point remains - do business in America you American companies. Stop outsourcing everything, including the natural talent that America (used to?) have.

      American Corporations are suffering from a ravenous bout of greed and short term profit taking. Until they change their act or the government cracks down on outsourcing (neither of which is likely to happen any time soon) we're in for a long ride. I hoped that the government would attach conditions to all that bailout money we paid out but they failed us again. It seems like we will have to right up to the brink of complete failure before we get their act together.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    13. Re:Well... by jgagnon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There really isn't much of a difference. Either way your business has the potential to lose assets simply because you're doing business in that environment. It's all about risk versus reward and so long as the reward for doing business in India outweighs the risks, businesses will continue their efforts there.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    14. Re:Well... by tophermeyer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually your example is perfect, that is one of the reasons I prefer to use a local Credit Union rather than a national bank. I have no real guarantee that they won't outsource a call center, but based on the model and scope of their business I can feel reasonably comfortable that they won't.

    15. Re:Well... by webminer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow! This comment got modded 'insightful'? Really? Indian govt trying to do what US govt already does invites such hateful comments. Why am I not surprised. As usual Americans dont want to acknowledge the reality. Their govt already intercepts every possible communication. But when a foreign govt does it, suddenly there is a backlash. Atleast India is going public. BTW, China already does this. So, fuck US and China as well.

    16. Re:Well... by interval1066 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What he's saying is regardless of the encrypted status of the carrier/protocol that you are using; encrypt your data on your own; in other words, say you want to send an email or an IM, before sending the message, encrypt it, and make sure your recipient has the same encryption tools.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    17. Re:Well... by jgagnon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And that patent in China means far less than it does in the US. In China, companies copy products and ideas from other companies all the time, with little risk of losing more than they stand to gain by doing so.

      Now in India you may lose trade secrets (schematics, blue prints, secret recipes, etc.) simply because your email is intercepted by a corrupt government official that hands it off to your competitor for a kickback.

      Either way your company loses something that you can't easily get back. These situations are not all that different.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    18. Re:Well... by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have an example for you. A company I used to work for in Vancouver, Washington outsourced entry level data entry to a couple of different companies in India. The cost was about 80% of what it cost us to have it down by employees here in the US. Except the quality was so variable (occasionally very good, but usually a high percentage of errors, varying from 20% to 100% (you wouldn't believe the sort of errors I found sometimes) and we demanded an error rate of less than 1% from our own employees (and could consistently get that from most), that we spent far more than that 20% discount in increased quality assurance costs. They finally stopped using them more than 2 years after this was pointed out to them. Sometimes businesses are glacially slow at reacting to problems, even really small ones (and this was a very small family owned company).

    19. Re:Well... by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you want to be secure from government intrusion, all of them. Don't be naive and think that US based CAs are any better. They'll roll over for an NSL in a second. If you want to be secure from the government manually create, exchange, and verify your own certificates.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    20. Re:Well... by webminer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And India doesnt not have massive population that these companies wont see as a market? Either you live in a cave or you are amish to now know how big google and skype's markets are in India.

    21. Re:Well... by DrgnDancer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Businesses bend over to comply with China because of it's massive population that they can exploit. Either to harness them as cheap manufacturing or to get their Internet dollars. India can't compete on either count.

      Bwa-huhn? China's population is greater than India's, true, but only by 150 million people or so. According to Wikipedia, China has 1.34 billion people vs. India's 1.19 billion. Granted 150 million people is a pretty big number (it's slightly under half the total population of the US), but as a percentage China's population isn't that much bigger than India's. Certainly they're close enough that the effort expended to separate people from their Rupees should be roughly equal to the effort expended to separate people form their Yen.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    22. Re:Well... by Shotgun · · Score: 3, Informative

      Case in point. In the '93 time frame, I worked in a AT&T factory (before they split off Lucent). One of the devices we manufactured was a small device that you connected to your telephone headset to encrypt your conversation (the other end would have to have a similar device).

      The US government caught wind of it, came in and bought all the stock, and paid AT&T to not produce any more.

      All the digital switches we produced were required by law to have a backdoor that the government could use at will to monitor calls.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    23. Re:Well... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If RIM, a pretty big company with lots of corporate clients, has problems keeping their encrypted communications from the government, the government is going to give anyone using their own encryption even more of a problem.

    24. Re:Well... by bhagwad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but what native Indian is going to fight this? They all want to be safe.

      You'll be surprised. And not all of us prefer to cower in safety while everything we say and do is monitored.

    25. Re:Well... by kumanopuusan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interestingly enough, yen and yuan are merely different simplifications of the same traditional character, which simply means round. The English transliterations may be different, but arguably it is a single written word.

      --
      Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
  2. Is India trying to *stab* its economy? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Demanding access to all the corporate VPNs is a great way to make companies more skittish about outsourcing there!

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:Is India trying to *stab* its economy? by CaptBubba · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is especially true considering just how notoriously corrupt a lot of the Indian government is. It has been featured on NPR and other news outlets as being a large impediment to business.

      Then you will have someone in a position where they have access to all of your company's secure communications? For the price of a bribe anyone could find out proprietary information that could sink your company or they could gain access to listen in on calls and glean account information for identity theft or just to solicit customers.

    2. Re:Is India trying to *stab* its economy? by pavera · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This really wouldn't be too uncommon. IBM has to have very detailed technical conversations/emails/etc with outsourced people in India, it would not take much to determine their future plans, product launches, progress, feature sets, etc. If you're competing with IBM and have access to all this information, you can easily beat them in the game. Same goes for any company with outsourced workers in India. It's not necessarily that it would "quickly sink" IBM, but it could easily quickly sink a new product launch, or a new division... And if you're a startup, and IBM, HP, or MSFT has access to this information that you've passed off to your outsourced labor, it could very quickly sink your company. IBM releases your product 2 months before you do you're done.

      You mentioned "thinking about your internal security" the problem isn't internal security, it is that your perceived internal security now has an open spigot to the government of India... you have no internal security by default. Employees have to be able to discuss project progress, plans, etc. You have to have product meetings, there has to be communication about these things or nothing will ever get done. And the nature of these discussions if revealed to a third party can easily spell doom to a product, business division, or startup.

      Further, it would be a huge temptation to use this information to trade stocks... Think you overhear an HP conversation where its revealed that they just lost a major customer to IBM, or they are months behind schedule on a new product... You've finally found step 2
      1) Use gov't access to private communication to glean insider information
      2) Short/Buy stock as appropriate
      3) Wait for information to become public/earnings release
      4) Profit

    3. Re:Is India trying to *stab* its economy? by NetNed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Should be a lesson to all businesses that outsourcing has even more draw backs then originally thought.

      Have worked for companies over the years that outsourced design work there and it was a lesson in "you get what you pay for". S.O.P. not followed, formats disregarded, no concept of how to use software correctly, and not using any kind of standard in the dimensional drawings.

      If you have ever dissected a product and wondered why on earth it was designed in such a stupid way it is because of design taking a back seat to getting a product to market, outsourcing to countries with ill trained people that are akin to slave labor and pushed to get things out as fast as possible, and stupid design decisions based on saving $.01 even if it hurts the integrity of the product.

      Somewhere along the way corporations convinced themselves that people do not want quality products and instead would like to pay full price for something that will definitely break prematurely.

    4. Re:Is India trying to *stab* its economy? by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with all your points, and the consequences are obvious:

      If a company wants to avoid this, they have to stop transferring sensitive work to India. First and second level support can stay there, because they deal with
      -already released products
      -and semi-public information (common support cases that are too frequent to keep the topic secret).
      What has to stay outside of India is most of development, and maybe third level support where more sensitive stuff is handled.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    5. Re:Is India trying to *stab* its economy? by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is there any large company (ie. more then one building) which doesn't need secure communications?

      Today it's the VOIP and VPNs, next week it will be the encrypted email or whatever else is preventing them from snooping. If you're doing any kind of corporate business in India you should be planning to leave before your competitors figure out who to bribe.

      --
      No sig today...
  3. well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe this is a good thing, in a way. maybe if India requires access to corporate vpn, it will dissuade security-conscious companies, such as a large, multinational, 3-lettered one, from outsourcing to india

  4. vpns? maybe outsourcing will slow down, then. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    trying to look at the bright side (sort of). selfishly, I realize that-

    but if there is fear in US companies that they can no longer trust people in india (eg, tech workers) because the risk of losing their competitive edge either to the government or other companies might be too much.

    if I had signature authority on outsourcing for a company, I'd strongly reconsider pulling back any 'sensitive' work that is being done there. as of now, its no longer 'secure' (not sure it ever really was but now its totally worthless as a trustable domain).

    this could actually help tech workers in the US. in a left-handed kind of way, that is.

    suddenly, I'm all for india filtering and spying on its citizens!

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  5. If only ... by m0s3m8n · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If only all google, skype, and others would just stop service for 1 day, maybe the Indian Government would reconsider. But that would probably be called collusion or something and branded illegal. Were is the State Department? Are they trying to defuse the situation? I ask because I don't know if they have any involvement.

    --
    Conservative, mod down for violating /. political norms.
    1. Re:If only ... by jgagnon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Any action by the US government on this issue would not go over well diplomatically.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
  6. Re:Sevens Sins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given that the "Seven Deadly Sins" are a Christian construct and only 2.3% of India's population is Christian, I don't think a nation state with polytheistic Hindu as it's official religion will care much about your datum.

  7. Not A Surprise by anonymousNR · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was doing my masters(in India) , my friend through his relative was able to get a project with DRDO(One of India's Defence Research Department).
    His project was to develop a GUI in QT in linux for the Data Packet Sniffer program they already had in place, yes it reads all the incoming and outgoing emails of all the employees
    , and everybody knows about this and nobody cares about it.
    India has bigger problems called Corruption,Terrorism,Communal Conflicts to deal with that everyone is treated Guilty until proven Innocent.

    --
    -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
    1. Re:Not A Surprise by jgagnon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This level of monitoring without transparency will just make corruption easier.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    2. Re:Not A Surprise by celtic_hackr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sniffing of all incoming and outgoing email in a Department of Defense is usually a good thing. Sniffing all incoming and outgoing email in the country is usuially NOT a good thing. Big difference here. You want your military secrets protected from being emailed by employees and contractors.

  8. S/MIME by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is a solution: Use S/MIME. This is the email encryption standard supported by all major mail clients without need for plugins. It can even work with web-based gmail using a firefox addon: http://richard.jones.name/google-hacks/gmail-smime/gmail-smime.html

    You can create your own certificates or get free certificates from places like Comodo.

    One quirk of S/MIME is that the subject line is not encrypted. This is a good place to add the text "India can suck my beef jerky" to every encrypted message.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:S/MIME by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, they make a lot of sense. If you rely on blackberry encryption, you have no idea when your privacy is being invaded by the Indian government. With S/MIME, they can't even attempt to spy on you without you being aware. They won't go fishing through your correspondence. They won't data-mine you. They would need to be specifically targeting you and admitting to you that you're under investigation to even have a chance of seeing your mail.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  9. That's Nice by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They could potentially do some real damage to their economy while still not being able to monitor all electronic communications in their country. Hopefully they're not putting all their security eggs in the "monitoring" basket, because people will find a way to communicate under the radar. Any terrorists that monitoring catches are probably not the ones you have to worry about.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  10. Re:ok... by Predius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Only way the government is getting access to my VPNs in the US is with a court order and warrants, and even then they're only getting exactly what is spelled out to the letter in the warrant and nothing more. Any vague sweeping requests will be punted back up stream.

  11. The Great Wall of India by rantomaniac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems like the Indian government has found a more effective way of building a great wall around its borders - let the people outside build it.

  12. vrtual privacy networks? by nedlohs · · Score: 2, Informative

    virtual private network, surely.

    Or did some group decide to replace a perfectly good name with a crappy one?

  13. how is this NOT an outlawing of encryption? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    so let me get this straight. the indian government thinks it has a RIGHT to intercept all communication that it wants to (sans warrant, mind you).

    does that essentially make personal end-to-end encryption illegal? it has to! the concept of you being able to conceal your comms is in the process of being ILLEGAL there.

    people are commenting on 'well, just use SSH or SSL or ...'.

    but you are missing the point. if they insist on getting access to all comms, you think they'll tolerate people doing an end-run around this?

    the VERY next step is to identify users who side-step this with their own encryption layer and persecute them, one way or another. it has to follow. first you require all data to be sniffable and then you go after those that won't agree.

    I remember about 20 yrs or so ago, it was illegal for french citizens to use encryption (details are fuzzy; I may not have this exactly accurate). but france was some kind of exception and vendors had to do all kinds of backflips to sell to french companies. are we going back to shit like this, again??

    I think we are. its absolutely coming that encryption will be deemed 'munitions' again. or, encryption that WORKS; the bullshit encryption you think you can trust but is breakable will be 'allowed' to you to keep you feeling like you have some control.

    I guess its now: any encryption that is legal is encryption you cannot trust.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:how is this NOT an outlawing of encryption? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      people are commenting on 'well, just use SSH or SSL or ...'. but you are missing the point. if they insist on getting access to all comms, you think they'll tolerate people doing an end-run around this?

      I think the legislators miss the point about "encrypted VPN" being such a trivial technology. They probably think there must be around 100 big companies doing that in India right now and they will soon discover that their law is inadapted. Back to the drawing board.

      I remember about 20 yrs or so ago, it was illegal for french citizens to use encryption (details are fuzzy; I may not have this exactly accurate). but france was some kind of exception and vendors had to do all kinds of backflips to sell to french companies. are we going back to shit like this, again??

      There was a limitation to the key length. More than a certain length was considered "military material" and required some authorization. Mind you we were happily generating 1024 bits keys (the limitation was something ridiculous. IIRC but it was something like 56 bits), using them routinely. I doubt anyone has ever been prosecuted for this. It bothered vendors though. We do that a lot in France : vote bad laws, do not apply them, use them as a precedent to vote even worse laws, rinse, repeat.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  14. Too bad for Democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    India Now Wants Access To Google and Skype

    Google and Skype should just say no. In fact, if everybody said "NO!" then India would condemn itself to being a third world country. It would also give BlackBerry an incentive to say "NO!" too, because if your competition isn't making money off of evil, then BlackBerry isn't losing any business from competition. Of course India (et al) could always just continue to steal technology, but at least that would give trading partners an incentive to retaliate.

    When the democracies start spying on there own citizens then being in a "democracy" is quite useless. Warrants, oversight and checks and balances are what made America (on paper at least) a great nation. Too bad everybody is falling for the lowest common denominator repression that used to be the primary domain of dictatorships.

  15. Re:Goodbye India by Predius · · Score: 5, Funny

    You wanted to be the greatest source of ICT Professionals in the world.

    You started low - call centres - but hoped high.

    Now you just shot yourself in the foot with a rocket launcher.

    As long as they got a good bounce they'll reach the Quad Damage and be rocking despite the minor health loss up front.

  16. Re:India = not all that democratic by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    our CFO's will outsource the 'mundane' coding, sure. but sensitive stuff? any smart CFO will rethink this.

    finally, a competitive advantage. at least RIGHT NOW, the US won't demand that all US based VPN's be sniffable at any time and without a warrant.

    we finally have a good reason to NOT offshore; that CFO's can understand.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  17. Just give them access to chatroulette by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 2, Funny

    They'll never want to eavesdrop on private communication data again!

  18. Re:India = not all that democratic by BangaIorean · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What nonsense. The only reason India was closely allied with the Soviets was because Pakistan used to suck up to the USA, and used to receive all kinds of assistance from the US. India wasn't as powerful then as it is now, so there weren't really too many options with us. That does not make India any less democratic, so STFU - or is critical reasoning a bit too tough for you? Going by that logic, since the USA and Pakistan have had. and continue to have, this long love affair, one could say that the US is a terrororist-sponsor nation, just like Pakistan!

  19. Just because you want.... by Lokinator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Shouldn't mean you will necessarily get. Certainly if I were subject to EU or even the lower US privacy standards, I'd have grave concerns about out-sourcing *anything* to a locale that so cavalierly violated the most rudimentary notions of privacy and security. More pro-actively, to the extent a mere slashdot-peon can, I'd encourage RIM to go back to their pre-agreement stance and begin negotiations with other telecommunications providers and ex-pat companies with an India presence to present a united front at both the political and technical levels - implementing further and hardened security and privacy measures rather than undermining the often-minimal security in place today.

    Governments are like puppies. They keep crapping in the middle of the floor until you rub their nose in it a few times.

    --
    "It is morally wrong to initiate the aggressive use of force.." Of course, defensive force is fair game...
  20. Re:India = not all that democratic by Herkum01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    our CFO's will outsource the 'mundane' coding, sure. but sensitive stuff? any smart CFO will rethink this.

    Yeah right, the executives that work their way up to CxO are the guys who would save a nickel today to get their bonuses and take a golden parachute out tomorrow when the company tanks.

  21. Re:ok... by bickerdyke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or a "National Security Letter" where you can't neither talk nor complain about?

    --
    bickerdyke
  22. Re:Going too far, BUT... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And Indian civil society is not going to take it

    Sure they will.

    Over the past ten years the government of the USA has eroded the civil rights in your nation, and the citizens by and large have said "meh" and gone back to watching Kate Gosselin on "Dancing with the Stars." Why should India be any different?

  23. Re:India = not all that democratic by schmidt349 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Lean toward?" India took billions of rubles in Soviet military equipment and actively participated in Soviet intelligence activities. Yeah, that's just "leaning toward."

  24. Appeasement... by divisionbyzero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    never works. It only emboldens that aggressor.

  25. Re:vpns? maybe outsourcing will slow down, then. by kungfugleek · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The flaw in your logic is that you're thinking about the long term. In my experience, senior executives are brought in to a company with the understanding that they will do whatever it takes to jack the stock price up a certain percentage, then get the hell out. Outsourcing is perfect for them because it lowers the bottom line short-term, they post record profits, and then get out before it all comes tumbling down.

    Ok, I admit, I'm only thinking of one or two executives in particular right now, but it can't be too uncommon.