Slashdot Mirror


China Demands Real Names From Mobile Phone Users

itwbennett writes "Starting this month, mobile carriers in China are requiring people who set up new mobile phone accounts to register with their real names as part of a new government measure to reduce anonymity among the country's 800 million mobile users. And within 3 years, the carriers must also register the real identities of all existing users, said China Telecom spokesman Xu Fei. The new policy comes as China has been pushing users to register with their real names online. In August, online gamers had to begin real-name registration under regulations that are meant to protect minors from Internet addiction and 'unhealthy' content."

187 comments

  1. I predict by dangitman · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The most common name of Chinese children will become Fuk Yu.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:I predict by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Informative

      The most common name of Chinese children will become Fuk Yu.

      Richard Gazinya, here. "Dick" to my friends.

      As a high-school freshman, I went by "Ivan Yaganoff". I dated a girl who went by "Phyllis Glass".

      We actually did once get a cafeteria monitor to say "Who's Dick Hertz?" At the time, I thought it was the funniest goddamn thing ever in the Universe. Today, of course, I am much more sophisticated, but at the time we cracked up through the rest of the day's classes and straight through to fourth period the next day. "Who's Dick Hertz," indeed.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:I predict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the Chinese govt needs to learn that the most unhealthy content on the Web, encountered by Chinese citizens, is Chinese govt propaganda.

    3. Re:I predict by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      We actually did once get a cafeteria monitor to say "Who's Dick Hertz?" At the time, I thought it was the funniest goddamn thing ever in the Universe. Today, of course, I am much more sophisticated

      I'm sorry, that shit's funny no matter how old you are. And yeah, I'm over 30. Besides, the pranks only get more involved as you get older.

      Sophisticated's overrated.

    4. Re:I predict by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Today, of course, I am much more sophisticated,

      You could have fooled me.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    5. Re:I predict by blai · · Score: 1

      hahaha u sed period LoL!

      --
      In soviet Russia, God creates you!
    6. Re:I predict by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You could have fooled me.

      I have fooled everybody.

      Actually "more sophisticated" just means more farting and burping and funny faces are involved.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  2. Nothing new... by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

    India has been doing this for years. It's not possible to get a sim card without a valid 'proof' of your identity. It's another matter that if the terrorists really want to get a sim card, this requirement wont stop them - as it's very easy to get forged documents.

    1. Re:Nothing new... by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

      India has been doing this for years. It's not possible to get a sim card without a valid 'proof' of your identity. It's another matter that if the terrorists really want to get a sim card, this requirement wont stop them - as it's very easy to get forged documents.

      If all terrorism disappeared tomorrow never to reappear in any form whatsoever, governments everywhere would mourn its passing.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:Nothing new... by omglolbah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Requiring it has been required in Norway for a while.

      This is the direct result of people abusing the system by getting pre-paid phones and being cockbags with them. Now you cant get anonymous phones.

      Personally I do not have an issue with this. While I love privacy I also think that at some point you need to have a certain amount of accountability. Being called up at 4 in the morning by some assbag pretending to be a customer at work.... not amusing.... not at all....

      Then again, almost nobody opt out of the cellular phone registry here, so if I have a phone number or a name I can find the other. Their street address is also in this system.
      Anyone can query it at sites like Gulesider.no ("yellowpages").

      If you dont want people to know who you are, then dont call them :p

    3. Re:Nothing new... by cgenman · · Score: 1

      "But my name really is Dogg6969! My parents loved animals... a lot."

    4. Re:Nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the direct result of people abusing the system by getting pre-paid phones and being cockbags with them. Now you cant get anonymous phones.

      what good is a freedom if you can't use it for anything.. "you can be anonymous as long as you comply with X" is not a freedom.

    5. Re:Nothing new... by Psaakyrn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      False, they'll just define something else as terrorism.

    6. Re:Nothing new... by causality · · Score: 1, Interesting

      False, they'll just define something else as terrorism.

      No offense, but "definition of 'any form' fail". Not that I don't appreciate your general point. Just that I carefully worded my post to account for it. You're absolutely right thought that this is the mentality with which you are dealing.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    7. Re:Nothing new... by suomynonAyletamitlU · · Score: 1

      If all terrorism disappeared tomorrow never to reappear in any form whatsoever, governments everywhere would mourn its passing.

      If a government is mourning its passing, not all terrorism has disappeared.

    8. Re:Nothing new... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you want to protect the theory of nice things, don't be a shithead or they'll be taken away in practice.

      "B b but they said 'unlimited internet', how can they complain about me download TB of stuff I'll never watch just because I can!"
      "But FedEx said the boxes were free, what do you mean they somewhat expect me to ship stuff via FedEx with them and not take dozens to build cardboard furniture?"

      In other news, can we please just shoot the goddamned assholes instead for a change?

    9. Re:Nothing new... by maugle · · Score: 1

      "*sigh* ... Well, at least we still have pedophiles and crack addicts."

    10. Re:Nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'nice things' are only nice if you can actually use them. if you can't, they're not really that nice after all. conditional anonymity is worthless.

      well then they shouldn't have said 'unlimited internet'.. no one's fault but theirs.

      they did say the boxes were free.. maybe beyond a limit, they ask for proof that your'e actually shipping stuff?

      I agree. we should shoot the assholes, however I don't think your list and mine line up.

    11. Re:Nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This logic of not passing laws because they can easily be broken is idiotic.

    12. Re:Nothing new... by Psaakyrn · · Score: 1

      No one said that their new definition of "terrorism" has to any way resemble "terrorism". Nor do they have to use the actual words, only the intent. Before terrorism, we had "Protect the children" (and after that we'd still have that unless something solves that). And before that, we had "Stop the Commies". With the rise of China, we may well see this coming into play again.

      It's a never-ending cycle, they just need an excuse, any excuse will do.

    13. Re:Nothing new... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      as it's very easy to get forged documents.

      Aww.... /me acts disappointed you didn't mention the ease of secretly cloning the SIM card of someone walking by 15 feet away, using cellphone scanners.

    14. Re:Nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Thailand defines terrorism as their opposition ...

    15. Re:Nothing new... by the_womble · · Score: 1

      Terrorism is already sufficiently vaguely defined to allow them to go after a lot of people other than those the public thinks of as terrorists:

      Anyway, to (roughly) quote Yes Minister, terrorism is an irregular noun:

      I am a freedom fighter, you are a guerilla, he is a terrorist.

      Mrs Thatcher call Nelson Mandela a terrorist. Given current legal definitions many much admired historical figures could be classified as terrorists.

    16. Re:Nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note also that previously we had the "drug wars", now drugs fund terrorism. And if the **AA agencies get their way, piracy will be the new defacto terrorism (they're already telling us it funds terrorism on their DVD intros).

    17. Re:Nothing new... by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      South Africa passed a law along the same lines last year - requiring all cellphone users to present not only proof of identity but proof of residential address (it's known as the RICA law) a similiar law (FICA) has been in place for bank accounts for several years.

      Both laws are in theory supposed to help combat crime (make it harder for criminals to get false bank accounts to store their profits and such) - and because of the size of our crime laws South Africans frankly don't seem to CARE about privacy. The few of us who do just don't matter as the majority of the population actively supports anything that might reduce the likelihood of a carjacking (including having Johannesburg almost as camera-covered as London).
      The sad thing is - none of these laws have made us any safer - it's just made us a lot less free... but then those of us who have read a little wider (for example the works of Benjamin Franklin) knew that before it was done...

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    18. Re:Nothing new... by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you're just a moron that doesn't understand words such as what unlimited means. When you put restrictions on amounts then it's no longer unlimited. If you can't understand this basic fact and why people get angry at false advertisement then please don't comment in the future.

    19. Re:Nothing new... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mrs Thatcher call Nelson Mandela a terrorist. Given current legal definitions many much admired historical figures could be classified as terrorists.

      Nah, terrorists try and fail. Those who succeed become heroes.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    20. Re:Nothing new... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Passing laws that can be easily broken and will be regularly broken, and only bothering to enforce them when it suits the government's whims is corruption.

    21. Re:Nothing new... by nobodie · · Score: 1

      When I got my phone here (Suzhou, Jiangsu, PR China) they asked for my passport but unfortunately I didn't have it. So the girl behind the counter used her name and ID card for the phone. Too bad for her I hate that particular branch store They signed me up for the super-premium plan and then made it hateful to go back to the super cheapie plan.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    22. Re:Nothing new... by warrior_s · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, in some Indian states (such as Jammu and Kashmir), you have to fill out a form with your name, photograph, and proof of address to get a pre-paid/post-paid connection.... All in the name of terrorism. So, what happens now..... Pakistan is setting up towers along the International border, and the terrorists are getting sim-cards from pakistan and making calls using pakistani towers, whereas local indian population has to go through so many hassles to get a single sim-card.

    23. Re:Nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Spain they require it too. You can't have any kind of phone if you don't identify yourself.

      It was after the Al Qaeda attacks on Madrid, which were based on mobile phones (by the way, they caught all the terrorist in a few days, no trouble, no war needed), so maybe it was related.

    24. Re:Nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they also have laws requiring people to identify themselves before they yell in the street or bang on your door ?

      It seems a classic "modus operandi" to impede on others' freedoms is to have a small group abuse them and then get laws passed to prevent that and all other anonymous use. It's called throwing the children with the bathwater.

    25. Re:Nothing new... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      Rationalize all you want. Rant about "but they said unlimited" as much as you please. If it will help with your sandy vagina, yes technically you can download crap you'll never watch 24/7 just because.

      That does not mean you should because ISPs are tired of a tiny minority of users using half their bandwidth and incurring half the maintainence costs, and if this continues they will institute caps on everyone and people won't be free to use a lot of bandwidth now and then anymore, all because a handful of people can't understand "don't be an asshole and ruin it for everyone."

      The idea of things not being explicitly limited is applicable to domains with a noted absence of shitheads who abuse the absence of limits. One might draw analogy to cooperative multitasking, with yourself arguing that just because it's possible for one process to use 100% of CPU it should be a right to use 100% of CPU, when in fact this is manifestly false because it breaks the underlying system.

    26. Re:Nothing new... by LingNoi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      So let me get this right...

      Instead of agreeing with me, coming to the conclusion that ISPs should simply stop using the 'unlimited' slogan you go on a long winded rant about how I should stop being so rational and accept the fact that ISPs should be able to lie as much as they want in their marketing campaigns.

      If ISPs are tired of users using their bandwidth then simply restrict it and offer different pricing schemes.

      and if this continues they will institute caps on everyone and people won't be free to use a lot of bandwidth now

      Good that's exactly what needs to happen because right now people aren't getting what they pay for. A lot less in fact.

  3. Isn't this the same in the US? by MrEricSir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I seem to recall AT&T demanding my social security number when I signed up.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by fugu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure if this is still the case, but you used to be able to buy a prepaid phone with cash.

    2. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by jpapon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I seem to recall AT&T demanding my social security number when I signed up

      That's probably because they run a credit check on you since you're entering into a contract with them and they typically subsidize your phone price.

      I'm not sure, but I believe you can get a prepaid phone without a social or anything like that. And since most phones in China run on the pre-paid model, there's no need to keep track of who people actually are.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    3. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's so they can run a credit check on you. They don't really care if you are who you claim, what they care is whether you can pay your bill.

      Ah, America.

    4. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I seem to recall AT&T demanding my social security number when I signed up.

      Credit check. Pay-as-you-go or prepaid don't need anything, even your name.

    5. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by Surt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And you just gave it to them? No, they do not have the right to demand your SSN, and you are under no obligation to provide it to acquire a cellphone. Laws in some states even make this practice illegal, assuming that they would not back down on the demand (if they back down, no problem, they can ask, they are just required to bow to your refusal).

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    6. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What states would those be?

    7. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by Surt · · Score: 1

      CA and NY at least both have SSN disclosure laws that would prevent this (with some specific exemptions that don't include cell carriers).

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    8. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the SSN just be part of the information they get back when running a credit check on you?

    9. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Thats funny, its illegal to use a social security number for any purpose other than taxes or social security benefits.

    10. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by Fred+IV · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, this is still the case. You can buy prepaid phones and replenishment cards with cash at a convenience store and then activate or add minutes online without having to provide proof of identity. Paranoid types will do this at an open wi-fi access point to avoid leaving an IP trail. I know TracFone operates this way, but the other carriers may have a similar policy.

    11. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by dissy · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the SSN just be part of the information they get back when running a credit check on you?

      They can make that assumption if they wish.

      Of course, if you have a common name and someone else with said name has poor credit, they can also assume you as the same person and deny you services.

      However in reality cellular carriers only even try asking for your SSN if they will be extending some form of credit to you, usually in the form of loaning you a phone for no money up front in exchange for charging you for that phone (and then some) over the course of your contract.

      If you pay for your phone out right, and then pay for service on a month to month basis however, there is no credit involved and so no SSN assumptions need to be made.

    12. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely false. In fact, federal law requires that it must be provided to obtain a license of any kind. Including a fishing license. You can thank Bill Clinton and the Republican held Congress circa 1996 for that. It is used to track down "deadbeat dads".

    13. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      you can call in (from any phone) and register a cash-bought 'burner' (lol).

      they will ask you for your name. I said 'sorry, I don't want to give that'. and he said (tracphone, btw) 'well, I need SOMETHING to call you by. make up a name'.

      I laughed.

      (no, I didn't start up with 'you can call me ray, or you can call me jay ...'. the guy in india might actually BE 'jay' and not quite get the joke.)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    14. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cite please. The only California laws I've read limit the disclosure of SSNs, not the collection.
      http://www.privacy.ca.gov/res/docs/pdf/ssnrecommendations.pdf Have a look for yourself and tell me I'm wrong

    15. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's illegal for THE GOVERNMENT to use it for any other purpose. Commercial entities and private persons can use it for (almost) whatever they want.

    16. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by scream+at+the+sky · · Score: 1

      I was in Seattle recently, and walked into an ATT store to pick up a prepaid sim for my phone to avoid roaming charges with my Canadian carrier.

      less than 5 minutes later, I walked out of the store with an assigned mobile number, $10 worth of minutes on the phone, and $10 lighter in the wallet. the dude didn't even ask me for my name of identification. when I quizzed him on that, he told me my name was homer simpson, and I was born 01/01/1980

      --
      I wish I was a neutron bomb, for once I could go off...
    17. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      If you take legal action against them for asking for your SSN, you can be rest assured, your identity will be known, which is what you were maybe trying to avoid, or was it?

    18. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you just gave it to them? No, they do not have the right to demand your SSN, and you are under no obligation to provide it to acquire a cellphone.

      Firstly, they don't need a "right" to do something. They can pretty much ask for anything, so long as it's not explicitly forbidden - free country, remember? Secondly, you're right that you are under no obligation to give them this data. Similarly they're under no obligation to sell you a phone. You could say, "fair enough I'll take my business elsewhere", but very good luck finding a phone company that will give you a contract phone without wanting to check your credit history.

    19. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by Zarhan · · Score: 1

      How do you add minutes online anonymously - insert cash into the CD drive? At some point you are asked for a credit card number, right?

    20. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by Fred+IV · · Score: 1

      You can buy a replenishment card with cash at a convenience store. The card has a code on it which can either be entered into your phone directly or associated with your account online to add minutes to your balance.

    21. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      You can buy cards with voucher codes at convenience stores for cash, then put the voucher codes in online.

    22. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Conversely, they are under no obligation to sell you a cellphone.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    23. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? by CeruleanDragon · · Score: 1

      I'd've just said, "You can call me Al. But only if I can call you Betty."

      --
      ad astra per alia porci
  4. spain is doing the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spain is doing the same - so why not china?

    1. Re:spain is doing the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      worst reasoning ever.

    2. Re:spain is doing the same by Inconexo · · Score: 1

      Sure.

      But I wonder, why are we surprised seing a dictatorship who jails disidents act this way, but a western democracy does the same and we barely notice?

    3. Re:spain is doing the same by delinear · · Score: 1

      Exactly my thoughts - it's been the same in the UK for a while now. I think they now ask for these details when you buy a SIM/PAYG phone, but even if they don't or you get around it by buying online, you have to register the phone with the phone company in order to add credit, which requires giving them your details.

    4. Re:spain is doing the same by mikechant · · Score: 1

      Exactly my thoughts - it's been the same in the UK for a while now. I think they now ask for these details when you buy a SIM/PAYG phone, but even if they don't...
      They don't (it's not a legal requirement)

      or you get around it by buying online, you have to register the phone with the phone company in order to add credit, which requires giving them your details.

      You can top up an anonymous phone bought with cash using e.g. scratch-card type vouchers bought with cash etc.

    5. Re:spain is doing the same by Inconexo · · Score: 1

      That's not Spain's case.

      You must provide your data if you want to use a SIM card. When this law was approved all anonymous clients were required to register. The unidentified SIMs were disabled.

      The reason? Madrid 3/11 bombings were made with unidentified SIMs (which ironically were tracked to the massacre authors).

  5. Foolproof Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. Register for a cell phone with the real name of someone you hate.
    2. Commit a crime with the cell phone.
    3. ???????????
    4. PROFIT!!!!

    1. Re:Foolproof Plan by allusionist · · Score: 1

      Turns out this already exists in many forms...it's called fraud. This doesn't change that except maybe making it marginally harder.

  6. I'm being serious here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...why does this matter and what would it solve? i'm not trolling, but the hong kong office of my company as 80 people in it' IT department. no lie, 50+ of them have the same name. that's just the IT group; add another 450+ for the other employees. we append port number to their names (informally) so we can have some idea of who it we are talking to. there are only so many names to go around for 5 billion people. i have to imagine that there must be some value in tracking this as any identifying marker is better than none. but still, it seems kind of useless. apologies if anyone takes this as a troll as that's not my intent. at what point does a common value loss it' "value"? 1 billion? 5 billion? what's the formula that makes this worthwhile?

    1. Re:I'm being serious here... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      the hong kong office of my company as 80 people in it' IT department. no lie, 50+ of them have the same name.

      I think Chinese names are a little bit more diverse than that.

    2. Re:I'm being serious here... by koxkoxkox · · Score: 1

      In China, some surnames are very common, but the possibilities for first name are virtually endless. There is not a finite list that most people choose from like in the West (at least the part of 'West' I know). A lot of people share the same surname, but to share the same name completely is very rare. Because of that, it is much more frequent to use the complete name of someone.

      Additionally, the system will of course use Chinese characters, not the simplified romanisation used in English press articles and maybe in your company that very often group together twenty or more different characters, so multiply greatly the risk of collisions between two names.

    3. Re:I'm being serious here... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      but the hong kong office of my company as 80 people in it' IT department. no lie, 50+ of them have the same name.

      Yes, but I doubt that all of the 50 people live at the same address, have the same bank account and were born on the same day. I would assume that the registration would involve these additional pieces of information.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:I'm being serious here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /--/ i'm not trolling, but the hong kong office of my company as 80 people in it' IT department. no lie, 50+ of them have the same name. that's just the IT group; add another 450+ for the other employees. /---/

      Us Northern Europeans have the same problem, we all have the same name: Jansson, Janson, Jannesson, Jansen, Jonsen, Joneson, Jonesen Jonsson, Jonzon (a novelty spelling), Jensen, Jonasson, Jonsson, Jonson, Johansson, Johanson, Jönsson, Jönson, Jonsen, Jösson et.c.

      We all magically become Jonson in USA, or sometimes (randomly) Johnson.

    5. Re:I'm being serious here... by misosoup7 · · Score: 1

      It's probably true that Chinese names are slightly more diverse in Chinese, but the moment you use PinYin or Giles-Wades to romanize it, they have have the same spelling. And also, Chinese people also tends to pick very common English names if they have them (yeah I have one of them too); compounded with the fact that there aren't that many Chinese last names (especially within one geographic location*), everyone has the same name in English. Now for my Chinese name in Chinese, I'm fairly certain that no one else in the world has it, and I have very good confidence in it. But using PinYin shares my first name with a Taiwanese actress/singer. * In rural China, there are entire villages where everyone has the same last name. It's kinda hill billy out there.

  7. Plenty of places do this by mirix · · Score: 1

    Seem to recall having an issue getting a SIM in England, but it's been a while...

    What surprises me is that China wasn't /already/ doing this.

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
    1. Re:Plenty of places do this by xnpu · · Score: 1

      Nope, they didn't The issue that I have with this is that points of sale will drastically decrease. Currently you can get simcards literally everywhere. (Every news stand, soda salesguy or cigarette shop will sell you one.) Already word on the street is that this is 'mafan' (hassle) if nothing else and people will stop selling.

    2. Re:Plenty of places do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto, my wife had to submit a xerox copy of her passport in Germany for a prepaid card and this was less than a month ago. We have to provide identity and address proof here in India to avail of a mobile connection (prepaid or postpaid). The main reason cited is security, but the real reason is almost always tracking down people when they refuse to pay bills.

    3. Re:Plenty of places do this by the_womble · · Score: 1

      Exactly: Chine is now as oppressive as:

      Australia, France, Germany, Japan, Norway and Switzerland

    4. Re:Plenty of places do this by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      i was about to hit the same topic. the same fact surprised me as well when i was visiting japan.

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    5. Re:Plenty of places do this by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      It's been proposed in the US legislature, too. It just hasn't been passed and signed into law yet.

  8. Public phones by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Governments will start to clamp down on anonymous use of public phones, by requiring credit cards or pre paid cards with ID.

    1. Re:Public phones by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Doubtful, but economic pressures will cause such phones to stop taking cash, eventually, so less service is required. When you swipe your CC to use the pay phone, you will be identified

      And public phones are rapidly disappearing, at most places, other than hotels/airports, where surveillance is already quite robust.

    2. Re:Public phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " by requiring credit cards or pre paid cards with ID."

      They are already doing so in Sweden (pay phones, and pre-paid). If you buy pre-paid since several years back you need to provide ID and register yourself. At first when they deviced this, you were only encouraged to do so, else you'd lose rebates and whatnot. After a while it became mandatory. Pay-phones had some phone-cards, and now they have credit cards instead.

      And in arab states (like Egypt, UAE, ...) you can't since way back by pre-paid or anything else without providing ID and register so that you can be identified by your phone number. I guess no prank calling in those countries. And the most interesting thing, nobody finds this interesting unless china starts doing it.

    3. Re:Public phones by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Governments will start to clamp down on anonymous use of public phones, by requiring credit cards or pre paid cards with ID.

      I think they will just let public pay phones fade away, they can hardly get much use nowadays when everyone has a mobile anyway, it will be easy enough to say they are uneconomic.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  9. How can this be enforced? by fnj · · Score: 1

    So Obi-Wan has a private transaction and sells his phone to Skywalker. Skywalker then calls the service provider and tells him "his" address (i.e. Obi-Wan's for all the provider knows) has changed from 4523782378 First Street to 4361278 7th Avenue (where Skywalker in fact lives). How does the Gesta^H^H^H government know the phone has moved to Skywalker's hands now?

    Anyway, bless the internet and chat. Fat chance trying to enforce traceability with that. Since any fool can set up OpenFire on his own cheap VPS server and run it with SSL to boot.

    1. Re:How can this be enforced? by rm999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      What you are proposing would be breaking the law. Like any law, people will follow it if they think they may be punished for breaking it. It would be up to China to enforce this if they think it is important.

      In the case of India, when someone registers a SIM card he can expect a government official to visit his home and verify his identity shortly after the purchase (India is super paranoid after the Mumbai terrorists used cell phones to coordinate their attacks). I believe officials can visit your registered address anytime after that to make sure you haven't sold the card. If India can enforce a law like this, I'm sure China can.

    2. Re:How can this be enforced? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Are cell phones so unpopular in india, so few people have them that it's actually economically feasible for the government to do that?

      Or there are a heck of a lot of cheaply paid government officials, or India is extremely extremely wealthy...

    3. Re:How can this be enforced? by zill · · Score: 1

      I believe officials can visit your registered address anytime after that to make sure you haven't sold the card. If India can enforce a law like this, I'm sure China can.

      Obi-Wan: "The phone is still in my possession. I am not the one you are looking for."

    4. Re:How can this be enforced? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Obi-Wan: "The phone is still in my possession. I am not the one you are looking for."

      These are not the Droids you are seeking. Nothing to see here. Move along.

    5. Re:How can this be enforced? by Rexdude · · Score: 1

      They used satellite phones, not cellphones. But yes, terrorism is cited as the main reason for SIM card registration. While registering you're required to show proof of identity- a passport/driving license and proof of residence.

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
  10. About time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you to the Chinese goverment waking up to this. The spamming levels should drop at least until the spammers find another method of delivery....

  11. Unusual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We have had to show photo id for as long as I can remember in Austraila when getting a new phone or sim card.

    There really isn't that much seperating "us" and the "bad" guys these days except we are "us".

    1. Re:Unusual? by jpapon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well it seems like Australia actually has some of the most draconian laws in the "western" world concerning things like the internet, anonymity, porn, censorship and so on. And yes, I know Australia isn't in the west.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    2. Re:Unusual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You know there is a solution.

      But it requires thinking and being free. Things that scare people.

      Maybe we are better off with "the government" (who exactly is that, if it is not us?) taking care of us.

    3. Re:Unusual? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well it seems like Australia actually has some of the most draconian laws in the "western" world concerning things like the internet, anonymity, porn, censorship and so on. And yes, I know Australia isn't in the west.

      We have our moments

    4. Re:Unusual? by dohzer · · Score: 1

      Real names are required to register mobile phones in Australia, right? Or is it different for pre-paid phones?

    5. Re:Unusual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i only had to hand over a wad of $50s to get my prepaid phone. they also don't require any proof of ID when you register it. When you go on a plan however obviously you have to hand over some sort of information.

    6. Re:Unusual? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      You want anything sim related, have to prove who you are.
      ~ photo id, bank card, medicare card, bank statement
      It started with banking and other databases for pensions ect.
      Australia embraced public, 24/7 database searches to combat fraud in the mid 1980's.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Transaction_Reports_and_Analysis_Centre
      There was chatter from the feds about doing the same for ISP contracts too.
      Long term the idea is instant ip seen on net to real name for any cleared Australian police/fed in near realtime, no courts, waiting, no paper work.
      So yes banking is tight, phones too, ID for ISP's are been looked at with interest.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:Unusual? by SQL+Error · · Score: 1

      Doesn't have to be photo id; if you pay for it by credit card that's good enough.

      But I agree that the law is oppressive and needs to be repealed.

    8. Re:Unusual? by reason · · Score: 1

      I've had to show 3 forms of ID to get a prepaid SIM both times I've done so in Australia.

    9. Re:Unusual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet we are out of the global financial crisis, unemployment is low, we have a universal health care system that generally works, we are fairly safe on our streets and don't need to cower inside out houses with guns... in fear of guns.

      We can also use metal knives and forks on domestic planes.

      The internet issue... dead, no way it will be passed with about 60% of politicians against it.

    10. Re:Unusual? by pmontra · · Score: 2, Informative

      We have had to show photo id for as long as I can remember in Austraila when getting a new phone or sim card.

      A photo-id is required for buying SIM cards in Italy but not for phones unless they contain a SIM card, which is not always the case here.

    11. Re:Unusual? by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      No way. They may be more 'draconian' (by your definition) than in the US, but they are generally less so than most of the EU. Australia in almost every way (cultural, government, etc.) really is a middle ground between Europe and the US in my experience.

      For instance:

      - Requiring ID to get a prepaid SIM card is standard in Australia, but also in most of Europe. I don't see this as particularly 'scary'. You are signing up for a company's services. They need to know who you are (even prepaid users have an 'account' and can request mailed statements etc.). And if you really wanted, you could just give fake details.

      - The 'internet laws' you are thinking of (the filter, I assume?) never actually got passed and looks like they never will thanks to the outcome of last week's election. They don't exist. Slashdot just likes to hype every proposal up as if it were a done deal, but then fail to report when things actually ~don't~ end up happening.

      - The proposal to record users' web histories is similarly doomed. But I should point out that it was essentially a proposal to introduce what is already the STANDARD EU directive on recording web history, here in Australia. That is, ~much of Europe already does this~, but we don't.

      - Games censorship: again this has been somewhat misrepresented on Slashdot. The problem here is not a law AGAINST certain content, it is the lack of a classification FOR it. Basically we have a classification system like most countries. But due to an oversight (and the age of the laws in question), there's no R18 rating for games (although there is for movies, literature and any other content). So there's no classification that can be given to games that surpass the limits of what can fit under the MA15+ category. And if something isn't classified, it can't be sold commercially. Let me reiterate - there is absolutely no law against OWNING such content. You just cannot ~sell~ it within Australia. The wheels are in motion to get these laws updated though, and in the meantime we can do what we've always done: buy it off Ebay/foreign website.

      - Porn: not sure what you mean by this. Again any restriction on this relates to ~selling~ it (and even there, it varies from state to state). Nothing wrong with owning it. Yes customs technically has the legal power to search for it being brought into the country (as certain types, i.e. child porn, ARE obviously illegal). But I've never seen this actually occur in practice (and I travel internationally a lot). And for that matter, customs/immigration have the right to search for ANYTHING they want anyway - this is true in all countries. If you want scary immigration officers, I can assure you the US TSA are a lot worse than anything Australia has to offer ;)

      So overall, we certainly do have somewhat tougher laws than the US when it comes to communications/censorship etc. But generally speaking we have less of these laws than Europe. We are nowhere near the most draconian (to use your definition) in the western world therefore.

      Theres a flipside too - we have substantially better consumer protection, privacy etc. laws than the US. Companies get away with so much in the US that would result on them getting stomped on here (or in the EU). So I guess we basically are a more regulated society in general, and that has both good and bad aspects.

    12. Re:Unusual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had to show 3 forms of ID to get a prepaid SIM both times I've done so in Australia.

      Where the FUCK are you going for that, mate -- the local prison?

      Last 2 times I've been back to Oz, I've stopped in to get a SIM at the first Telstra phone shop that I happened to spot on the highway, and both times the only bit of paper I've had to show the proprietor to get it all sorted was a 50-dollar note.

  12. Wow.. these kids are pretty trusting... by jpapon · · Score: 1

    Cell phone users simply should register with their real identification, said Li Mi, a coffee shop worker. "This is good, it will be secure," she said. "I know some people will be afraid about revealing their personal information, but I don't think that will happen. The (companies) won't give that out."

    Seriously Li Mi? You don't think the companies will sell your information to the highest bidder?

    "I think it will be more secure and the carriers will be able to track and store my information", said Li Junru

    Jeez. These kids are pretty brainwashed.

    They're getting rid of one of the last anonymous communication tools in a country that heavily polices any speech which criticizes the government. And all these kids can think of is that it will allow them to restore their contact list from the company's server if they lose their phone.

    --
    -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    1. Re:Wow.. these kids are pretty trusting... by russotto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Jeez. These kids are pretty brainwashed.

      Or, they know better than to object publicly. Or the news agency made sure to print only comments favorable to the policy -- a practice not, alas, restricted to China.

    2. Re:Wow.. these kids are pretty trusting... by jpapon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Or they've been indoctrinated through years of Chinese public education.

      In reality they probably don't even exist. Why go out on the street to get comments on something, especially if you know everyone is too scared to give you anything but the party line anyways?

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    3. Re:Wow.. these kids are pretty trusting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In reality, I think you are simplifying the entire scenario. I'm sure that there are a large amount of kids who are silently rejecting authority. Not because its the right thing to do... Not because it's the cool thing to do... but because, given a group of X people, N/X people will just naturally resist authority. Such is human nature.

    4. Re:Wow.. these kids are pretty trusting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or maybe

      http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/3/19/

      post AC just for extra irony :)

    5. Re:Wow.. these kids are pretty trusting... by causality · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or they've been indoctrinated through years of Chinese public education.

      If so, then they learned it from the USA which learned it from Prussia which learned it from India's training for the underclasses of the Hindu caste system. The original founders of the USA system used to be quite open about this soon after the Industrial Revolution. Their biggest fears were that overproduction caused by too many independent American entrepreneurers might make them take heavy losses on their massive investments in industrial equipment and centralized production and that the poor might become dangerously discontent.

      The solution they embraced was a system of schooling designed to teach the masses just enough to be useful workers but not so much that they can think critically and understand things like Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis or bread-and-circus. Other nations saw how useful this was for the ruling class (who, by the way, overwhelmingly go to elite private schools where they are taught to be leaders) and adopted similar policies.

      The fact that people in Western nations tend to recognize China's use of public schooling for these purposes (because China is teh evil!) but fail to recognize the less-extreme version employed by their own countries (because we are patriotic!) is a masterful triumph of this system.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    6. Re:Wow.. these kids are pretty trusting... by PPH · · Score: 1

      "I think it will be more secure and the carriers will be able to track and store my information", said Li Junru, speaking slowly and clearly into the nearby potted plant.

      There. Fixd it for you.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    7. Re:Wow.. these kids are pretty trusting... by grcumb · · Score: 1

      "I think it will be more secure and the carriers will be able to track and store my information", said Li Junru, speaking slowly and clearly into the nearby potted plant.

      There. Fixd it for you.

      Physician, heal thyself. 8^)

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    8. Re:Wow.. these kids are pretty trusting... by jpapon · · Score: 1

      The fact that people in Western nations tend to recognize China's use of public schooling for these purposes (because China is teh evil!) but fail to recognize the less-extreme version employed by their own countries (because we are patriotic!) is a masterful triumph of this system.

      I'd venture to say that it would be impossible to teach certain subjects, particularly history, without injecting some sort of bias. Of course, the US education system is far more biased than it needs to be, and is frequently allowed to be corrupted by politics (for example, how the Texas Textbook curriculum planners decided to leave Jefferson out of their texts).

      On the other hand, I would say that higher education in the Western world is fairly unbiased.

      Keep in mind the key difference between the U.S. and China - in the U.S. you can always go to the library or online and verify what your teachers are telling you. Good luck trying to get the real story on Mao, Tibet, or Tienanmen square inside of China. Or at least good luck trying to do it without getting yourself put on some watchlist

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    9. Re:Wow.. these kids are pretty trusting... by Rexdude · · Score: 1

      If so, then they learned it from the USA which learned it from Prussia which learned it from India's training for the underclasses of the Hindu caste system

      Citation needed. I'm sick of people going on and on about the caste system without understanding anything about it. Castes initially began with the division of labor, broadly into the priests, warriors, artisans and untouchables. Within each category there are thousands of subcategories. It is very important to note that no Hindu scripture endorses or enforces the concept, thus you can still call yourself a Hindu if you don't want to follow the system. The trouble with caste started by people being locked into it by birth. The son of a blacksmith could not aspire to any other profession, for example. The untouchable castes were ostracized by the upper castes. There was no 'training' as such for anybody, and lower classes stayed illiterate. If anything, the rote learning that is so common today in Indian education can be traced to Lord Macaulay, who famously dismissed all Indian/Arabic literature as not worth even a shelf in a Western library. (note 10) He started the education system in India, which was aimed at producing clerks for the East India Company and later the British administration. These people would understand enough English to get work done but not form any kind of critical thinking that might lead to unrest and rebellion.

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
    10. Re:Wow.. these kids are pretty trusting... by causality · · Score: 1

      If a simple rephrasing such as "the caste system associated with the Hindus" is enough to destroy your objection, and it is, then you're making a big deal out of nothing, and you are. Good day.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    11. Re:Wow.. these kids are pretty trusting... by Rexdude · · Score: 1

      I was pointing out that there's no connection between the Prussian military inspired school system and the caste system in India, where there wasn't any special training as such. Members of each caste passed on knowledge of their profession from father to son. If anything, ancient India followed the Gurukul system, where students lived with their teachers away from family while they learned, and also performed daily chores for the teacher-a far cry from the military inspired setup of the Prussians that came about much later.

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
  13. No problem by oldhack · · Score: 1

    I've got nothing to hide.

    Singned,

    Sum Yung Gai

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  14. India already does that and more by Tester · · Score: 1

    Last year, when I visited India, the world's largest democracy, I tried to buy a pre-paid SIM card. They asked me for a photo, proof of address (like my hotel's address) and a photocopy of my passport. It seems it's standard in India since the Mumbai attack.

    "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin

    1. Re:India already does that and more by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Man, that shit was pain in the ass, and then the card gave up only after a week. Piece a - how do you say shit in Hindi?

      Damn cheap, though, with good coverage.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    2. Re:India already does that and more by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      In Europe(at least Germany) you are also required to show ID in order to buy a sim. I guess as a result of the Madrid attacks, not sure. But anyway, if you REALLY wanted a SIM that wasn't in your name all you would have to do is hang around at night near where drunk people gather. You can be guaranteed that at least one person will drop their phone.

    3. Re:India already does that and more by bsDaemon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I like how people always feel like they have to cite that India is the world's largest democracy, as if that amounts to a hill of beans. Does doing terribly stupid, ineffective, and seemingly oppressive things magically become OK just because some plurality of the people managed to strategically vote their party into a leading position? I think not. At least the Communist Party in China doesn't have to go through the indignity of lying about their intentions and motivations.

    4. Re:India already does that and more by debiansid · · Score: 1

      Last year, when I visited India, the world's largest democracy, I tried to buy a pre-paid SIM card. They asked me for a photo, proof of address (like my hotel's address) and a photocopy of my passport. It seems it's standard in India since the Mumbai attack.

      Nonsense FUD. This has nothing to do with the Mumbai terror attacks. We have always had to submit ID and address proof for any kind of telecom connection (telephone, mobile or internet). It has more to do with non-payment of bills than with terrorism.

      "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin

      There are communities in this world that do not consider "proving who they are" as an oppressive thing. Get out of your hole and you will notice that liberty is all about perception.

    5. Re:India already does that and more by ornavv · · Score: 1

      Sweden has the same policy as germany. And every communication that happens to travel outside of swedish borders is being intercepted and plenty of local communication can travel outside of swedish borders because of routing, i.e. phone calls, internet and so on, whatever is the cheapest/shortest/fastest/the government decided it wanted intercepted and paid some techie to do it

    6. Re:India already does that and more by delinear · · Score: 1

      Of course you can't be guaranteed that they won't notice shortly after and get it cancelled, or that someone won't see you picking it up and alert the authorities. If a terrorist plot centred around obtaining cell phones from drunken revellers, I think we could pretty safely ignore them as a credible threat.

    7. Re:India already does that and more by delinear · · Score: 1

      GP is talking about prepaid (or "pay as you go") phones - how does submitting your info have anything to do with paying your bills for a device you can only use up to a prepaid credit limit?

    8. Re:India already does that and more by debiansid · · Score: 1

      GP is talking about prepaid (or "pay as you go") phones - how does submitting your info have anything to do with paying your bills for a device you can only use up to a prepaid credit limit?

      Ouch, I missed the 'prepaid' aspect. But even for prepaid cards, the requirement of an ID and address proof has always been there; nothing to do with the terrorist attacks. What has changed due to the terrorist attacks is that a lot of the vendors have become obsessive about this, mainly due to the fact that practically everyone knew someone who died in one of the 2 major terrorist attacks in Mumbai. Earlier the same people had a cavalier attitude towards this and would simply ship in fake documents for every sale. In fact, you can still get sim cards, internet connections, etc. without any documents in smaller cities where people have not encountered terrorism first hand.

  15. blame cell phone bombs on needing real names to ge by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    blame cell phone bombs on needing real names to get a phone.

  16. works fine in Germany by yyxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You have a government issued ID with a government-issued ID number. Phone companies are required to collect this information and verify it with the government. They also generally require banking information for billing purposes, and make sure that that's consistent with the registered user of the phone as well. Yes, you can try to privately sell a SIM card registered under your name to someone else and manage to get by with prepaid cards. But that's a risky thing to do, because if the phone is used for some illicit purpose, the police will come to you. Even if you can prove you didn't do the crime, intending to get around registration requirements itself may cause trouble. There are some ways around this (e.g. roaming SIM cards), but most people are fully registered and tracked.

    As for the Internet, Internet connections are also registered with the government under your name, and your provider is required to keep a record of all your connections, and it's illegal to set up open access points. Of course, it's easier to communicate clandestinely with Internet protocols, including going through foreign proxies, but if you try, that itself is often detectable and suspicious.

    Where Germany wins over a place like Saudi Arabia is that they generally use all this tracking and surveillance only against actual crimes, although it's probably only a matter of time until those protections erode and governments will start using it for political purposes. Some of the people responsible for the laws and technology had plenty of experience from fascist and communist regimes.

    1. Re:works fine in Germany by Local+ID10T · · Score: 1

      You have a government issued ID with a government-issued ID number. Phone companies are required to collect this information and verify it with the government. They also generally require banking information for billing purposes, and make sure that that's consistent with the registered user of the phone as well. Yes, you can try to privately sell a SIM card registered under your name to someone else and manage to get by with prepaid cards. But that's a risky thing to do, because if the phone is used for some illicit purpose, the police will come to you. Even if you can prove you didn't do the crime, intending to get around registration requirements itself may cause trouble. There are some ways around this (e.g. roaming SIM cards), but most people are fully registered and tracked.

      As for the Internet, Internet connections are also registered with the government under your name, and your provider is required to keep a record of all your connections, and it's illegal to set up open access points. Of course, it's easier to communicate clandestinely with Internet protocols, including going through foreign proxies, but if you try, that itself is often detectable and suspicious.

      Where Germany wins over a place like Saudi Arabia is that they generally use all this tracking and surveillance only against actual crimes, although it's probably only a matter of time until those protections erode and governments will start using it for political purposes. Some of the people responsible for the laws and technology had plenty of experience from fascist and communist regimes.

      Wow. That is just difficult to imagine, especially for Germany. I'm trying really hard not to Godwin this discussion, but... Doesn't that all sound a bit fascist? The population is numbered, registered, monitored, and tracked?

      --
      "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
    2. Re:works fine in Germany by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

      Where Germany wins over a place like Saudi Arabia

      wait, did you just say that? "hey, at least we're not as bad as the saudis".

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:works fine in Germany by yyxx · · Score: 1

      Well, it's more like "at least they are not as bad as the Saudis".

    4. Re:works fine in Germany by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Do you think that it's that different here in the States? For most wired broadband Internet connections, you're going to need to give them a real service address (they need to know where to string the wires, right?), and a real billing address (these are the same for most people, of course, but they need to know who/where to send the bill). They're expecting a real name, but I imagine you could give them an alias, as none of my wired ISPs have ever asked for ID. Not sure how much good that would do, however, as they know where you live.

    5. Re:works fine in Germany by xnpu · · Score: 1

      Back in the Netherlands this was easily fixed. One guy bought 30.000+ simcards and sold them. That may be a crime in itself for which he could be (but wasn't) charged. More importantly, the huge amount of cards made it plausible that he indeed sold some/most/all cards that ended up being involved in a crime.

    6. Re:works fine in Germany by molecular · · Score: 1

      Wow. That is just difficult to imagine, especially for Germany. I'm trying really hard not to Godwin this discussion, but... Doesn't that all sound a bit fascist? The population is numbered, registered, monitored, and tracked?

      yes, it's fucking sad, and at the same time the government is trying to attack fb, google et al for privacy invasion, somehow making the population feel cared about.

      Well, cared-about we are!

      Think electronic id-cards and passports (rfid with picture and fingerprints etc) that you are supposed to also use for banking and other online activities, like buying stuff and logging into forums.

      Think all number-plates on highways being scanned (system developed initially to toll heavy vehicles) and info on all car movements being stored.

      Think secret hidden internet blacklist, allegedly to "fight child porn" (oh the poor poor children!), but of course the real reasons are quite different.

      Think open access points being illegal (and breaking into secured ones is, too).

      Other than that: yes, we're pretty much under surveillance and close control here.

      For now, this doesn't bring people to the barricades just yet (freenetproject, tor, wikileaks and other tech vents some anger), but as soon as "sending encrypted data" becomes suspicious or even outlawed (!!), streets and cars will burn.

    7. Re:works fine in Germany by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Do you think that it's that different here in the States?

      Whats that thing called an SSN meant to do in America?
      Act as a State Security Number?
      Is it your passport number for getting access to government services?
      Or is it some other form of Unique Personal Identifier?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    8. Re:works fine in Germany by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Crime is a funny concept. When you attack an innocent person and injure them, that's a crime. When you steal from someone who has worked hard for their possessions and it's not saving you from absolute starvation, that's a crime. However, if your government is committing crimes against you is it really criminal to protect yourself?

    9. Re:works fine in Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. That is just difficult to imagine, especially for Germany. I'm trying really hard not to Godwin this discussion, but... Doesn't that all sound a bit fascist? The population is numbered, registered, monitored, and tracked?

      Some of those things is actually demanded of all countries that is part of EU. Most Western European governments make similar demands. You have to remember that business is more regulated in Europe and consumers have more protection, this information is mainly used to protect consumers from getting scammed.

      As for being fascist. Germany and most other countries in Northern Europe has a much more transparent government then you guys living in USA. Because the citizens still has the upper hand informationwise, knowing more about the government (and how their private information is used), then their government is allowed to know about them, it would be much harder for the government to abuse this kind of information then it would be in USA. As for southern Europe and GB (really shady governments, there is even some states in USA that is ruled more transparently then those countries): I would say, yes, it is fascist.

    10. Re:works fine in Germany by yyxx · · Score: 1

      Do you think that it's that different here in the States?

      Yes, it really is. In Germany, every resident must register his physical home addresses with the government, and service providers need to verify accurate personal information. They also need to store connection information. In the US, there is no requirement to register your home address with the government, and ISPs don't communicate with the government about your identity or location.

      That means that in the US, you can walk into a store, buy a mobile device, prepay with cash, and start using it (provided a company offers you that service). And even for wired connections, the US government doesn't automatically get your information and there isn't even a requirement to get the wire under your name, meaning that it doesn't enter databases that way.

      Of course, police in the US can find out a lot about you, but they need to take active steps and often need to get a court order. And since the information isn't collected consistently and automatically, data mining becomes much harder.

    11. Re:works fine in Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Where Germany wins over a place like Saudi Arabia is that they generally use all this tracking and surveillance only against actual crimes, although it's probably only a matter of time until those protections erode and governments will start using it for political purposes.

      "crime" is government speak for "anything we don't like". They find it funny they weren't called on it yet.

    12. Re:works fine in Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europe has had major civil wars, religious conflicts, communist regimes, and military dictatorships in the last 20 years, both north and south. Much of Europe lacks separation of church and state and lacks adequate free speech protection.

      But, hey, just like for the past 200 years, Europeans still like to think of themselves as superior to everybody else.

      Have a good, hard look at your history and your laws, and then get your house in order.

  17. In reaction to SCAMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Speaking as an expat who has been living in China for almost 5 years, this is being SOLD as a reaction to phone scams. It is a general rule that when you deal with real estate agents, art agents and others, do not give them your phone number or you will be bombarded with spam text messages at least 10-15 times a day. On top of this, there is an almost daily report of some crime ring scamming people for money by sending them text messages, or calling them while impersonating someone/some agency they know and trust.

    That's how it is sold to the public, who otherwise would make a stink about this kind of thing. Even in this political environment, you have to suger coat the pills a little.

  18. Good! by Local+ID10T · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now when they try to push the same legislation thru here in the USA all it will take is a quick comparison to COMMUNIST CHINA to get the politicians to vehemently oppose it....

    --
    "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
    1. Re:Good! by MadMaverick9 · · Score: 1

      Why is the parent modded "insightful"?

      In the USA you already have this legislation for the longest time.

      You have to show some form of id when you buy a cell phone/sim card in the USA; be it credit card, driver's license, etc.

      I know this from my own experience: when I bought a cell phone ten years ago at an AT&T store, they asked me for my driver's license.

      So ... the USA is no different than Europe, Australia, ... or China.

    2. Re:Good! by causality · · Score: 1

      Now when they try to push the same legislation thru here in the USA all it will take is a quick comparison to COMMUNIST CHINA to get the politicians to vehemently oppose it....

      Until it's attached as a rider to some bill that otherwise has overwhelming support. Hey, it worked for the Internet Kill Switch and so many other pieces of bad legislation...

      It's not like the elected politicians actually read the bills they vote on anyway. They're far too important for such trivial and mundane tasks. They have people for that!

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    3. Re:Good! by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      You're too late.

      All US cell companies require ID for a "credit check" that also verifies the ID of whomever is going to pay the bill. They've got your name, SSN, and home address.

      Sure, there's prepaid that can be bought with cash, and I know the research into this was done by Ryan Seacrest, Guilana Ransic and the rest of the E! News team, but it doesn't make it any less true. Buy too many minutes with cash only and don't pay with a credit or debit card at all, and they'll raise prices and tap the phone.

    4. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that you're wrong, good point. I can walk into any store and buy a pre-paid phone, complete with the sim-card and pay with cash. No ID, name or signature required.

      I know because I bought my grandmother an AT&T pay as you go phone about 3 months ago.

    5. Re:Good! by ornavv · · Score: 1

      Not really, all they need to do is to point to european nations, as they already do. European nations point to U.S. when implementing draconian crap, so why would U.S. not point to european nations when implementing the same crap?

  19. Has been the case in Europe ever since by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't really see the story here.
    I guess whatever China does is news?
    This has been in effect pretty much all over the world as far as I know.

  20. Bzzzzt. Wrong answer. by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Informative

    Under federal law (or more specifically, the law is tacit on the subject that) ANYONE may ask that you provide a social security number - and use it as an identification number for you - except the government. Now, that comes with some caveats. You are not required to give them your SSN, but in that case they are allowed to deny you their services based on your refusal.

    Your state laws may have other provisions, but normally the alternative is that you must give them enough personal identification to uniquely identify you and your entire financial history...which is really the only reason not to give out your SSN. With the information they have, just about anyone can get your SSN for $10.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Bzzzzt. Wrong answer. by Americium · · Score: 1

      ...AT&T...

      Ummm, prepaid cell phones are available almost anywhere in the U.S. , and you can purchase them with cash. We aren't talking about you willingly giving up your information to a company known for spying on US citizens just to get some iCrap.

  21. Just in Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In most of Africa, you can still buy (and activate and permanently use) a SIM card without showing any ID. Then again, many Africans (especially from former conflict zones) don't have great ID. But I know of few other places where this is possible.

  22. So in the country of 1.3 billion people.... by BLToday · · Score: 1

    there's built-in anonymity with millions of people with the same name.

    1. Re:So in the country of 1.3 billion people.... by zill · · Score: 1

      They also keep track of your DOB, and your national ID number (SSN equivalent).

  23. Good... by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    Now if only registrars did the same when selling domain names...

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  24. Because after all... by tombeard · · Score: 1

    There is no way a black market in prepaid sims could develop. Follow the money.

    --
    The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
  25. here's mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok, Commie Pinko China-- you want my real name? Here you go: BITE ME

  26. As seen on (Mexican) tv! by Superdarion · · Score: 4, Informative

    A couple of months ago they tried this in Mexico. At first everyone was scared because they said they'd disconnect any line that wasn't registered.

    At the end they didn't because too many people didn't register (in the order of millions) and about a month after the deadline the government simply desisted on the whole idea, calling it a "bad idea" and claiming that it was badly implemented.

    Too bad the Chinese can't count on that happening, though.

    1. Re:As seen on (Mexican) tv! by carp3_noct3m · · Score: 1

      Some of the German carriers do this as well, while I was visiting I made an account, and gave them my true identity...James Bond. ;-)

      --
      "It's ok, I'm completely secure as long as my iron is off"
  27. Kentucky Fried Movie by Eevee · · Score: 1

    Guard number one is a senior on Klahn's mountain, and aspires to be a research chemist. Welcome, please, Hung Well! Guard number two is a real skating buff. A warm welcome for Long Wang! Traveling comes naturally to guard number three, as he's a licensed airplane pilot. Welcome, please, Enormous Genitals!

  28. unhealthy? by VirtualJWN · · Score: 1

    Bullets are definitely unhealthy.

    --
    "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke
  29. A totalitarian Govt cannot survive anonymity by BeadyEl · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...and the one thing the Chinese government values above all else is its own power. More than economic prosperity, more than public health, more than national prestige - the Chinese government treasures its own continuous reign.

  30. Canada too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Canada, you need a name even to buy a prepaid cellphone. It's probably easy to lie however.

    1. Re:Canada too by zill · · Score: 1

      Why would you need to lie?

      In common law countries (i.e. Canada and most of US) a person can have however many names they wish, as long as the names are not used for fraudulent purposes.

    2. Re:Canada too by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      In Canada, you need a name even to buy a prepaid cellphone. It's probably easy to lie however.

      So you just call yourself "Mike Ockissore" living at "666 Fucktard Avenue, Twatsville, Ontario" and they let you have the phone?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  31. Big Turn by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    Never saw this coming.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  32. Be glad it's just your name by Clovert+Agent · · Score: 1

    In South Africa there's RICA - the Regulation of Interception of Communications Act - that requires cellphone users to register every SIM card with all their details, including proof of ID and residence, before the end of the year (IIRC) or be cut off.

    The likelihood of reducing crime versus feeding a booming black market for SIMs is left as an exercise for the reader.

    1. Re:Be glad it's just your name by mdm42 · · Score: 1
      ...And uptake so far - after something like 18 months of trying to get people to comply - is somewhere in the region of 12% of all cellphone users.

      Watching to see what's going to happen on 1 Jan when the phone co's get told to cut off 85% of their revenue stream...

      --
      New mod option wanted: -1 DrunkenRambling
    2. Re:Be glad it's just your name by ornavv · · Score: 1

      Im sure they will be happy, everyone will be buying new sim cards, and everyone will be pissed off with whatever teleco they were with changing to a new one.

  33. Re:Isn't this the same in the US? and AUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telstra like asking for all sorts of personal questions when you connect a land line.

    Why do they need my date of birth? *sigh*

    So, when I connect a land line (yes, with Telstra, it's a long story, go read whirlpool.net.au for details) I say "I don't have a licence" and "I am not allowed to disclose work information" and "I am not allowed to disclose my date of birth".

    Say the work one first, they then assume you work for defence or similar, and stop asking stupid questions .. like what is your driver's licence number (I still don't know why they would *need* this to connect a home phone line).

    Also, I fail to see why I should disclose to telstra if I am planning on connecting a DSL service on the land line being requested. What business is it of theirs? Meh.

  34. Change for the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was able to get 500MB per month mobile internet plan (using GSM EDGE) in China without ever showing a piece of ID or so much as a credit card.. try doing that in most countries.

    Too bad it's going to change, China in some ways seemed really libertarian to me but they are coming up with more regulations all the time

  35. So in the next Jason Bourne movie by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 1

    how will he get by this?

    1. Re:So in the next Jason Bourne movie by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      He'll steal a phone from someone and kill them to prevent them reporting the theft.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    2. Re:So in the next Jason Bourne movie by delinear · · Score: 1

      Haha - that's exactly what came to mind when I saw that scene in the movie. I can't remember if he was in Paris or London at the time but I just thought, how the hell did he buy a phone and start using it without having to register his payment method and add some credit. As far as I know you've not been able to do that in the UK (and I think most of Europe) for at least most of the last decade. I think in the US there's no restriction, though, so I guess it was the Hollywood reality distortion affect?

    3. Re:So in the next Jason Bourne movie by mikechant · · Score: 1

      how the hell did he buy a phone and start using it without having to register his payment method and add some credit. As far as I know you've not been able to do that in the UK (and I think most of Europe) for at least most of the last decade.

      As far as the UK is concerned, you're wrong. There's no legal barrier to buying and topping up a pre-paid phone or sim anonymously with cash, and no current proposals to change this.

      There was some talk of this under the previous UK government, e.g.
      http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article4969312.ece

      but it never got anywhere.

      Also, the proposed id cards and national identity register backing them have been abandoned before any significant rollout occurred.

  36. France does this too by leighklotz · · Score: 1

    I bought a SIM card in France and it came with an envelope into which I was to deposit a copy of my identity papers. The instructions claimed that the card would stop working 14 days after activation unless the papers were received.

    1. Re:France does this too by clive_p · · Score: 1
      The serious side-effect is that it makes it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for visitors buy a local SIM card for their mobile phone in order to avoid the rip-off charges that nearly all mobile phone companies charge for roaming. I guess governments are in league with the mobile phone companies in this respect.

      When I visited Australia and bought a local SIM card it took me ages on the phone to register, since I didn't have whatever the Australian equivalent was of an SSN number, and the whole process cost me a lot of time and money, making the SIM-card purchase only marginally worth-while.

      Fortunately the UK doesn't (at present) require SIM card registration, so visitors to here shouldn't have that particular problem.

    2. Re:France does this too by pmontra · · Score: 2, Informative

      I spent the last month on vacation in Australia. I got a SIM card mailed to me in Italy on June when I registered on the Internet with http://www.vipbackpackers.com/ (they have a discount card for hostels, tours, bus, etc). I gave them my address and credit card. The SIM card worked well.

  37. In democratic Bulgaria... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In democratic Bulgaria such a measure was introdiced months ago. To prevent crime.

    1. Re:In democratic Bulgaria... by mr_mischief · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's too bad all the innocent people have to be punished without a trial for something to prevent crime. That's especially true since it won't prevent crime, and only may make it easier to prosecute criminals after the crime is committed. In fact, it will likely cause more crime, like armed robbery of people with cell phones so the crooks have phones that aren't tracked to them.

  38. Real names? by louic · · Score: 1

    That does not sound like a big problem, considering how easy it probably is to get a fake ID in China.

    1. Re:Real names? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Why not? It's easy enough to get a fake copy of anything else from China.

  39. Re:Isn't this ILEGAL in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that only employers and certain government agencies were allowed to ask for/use social security numbers?

  40. I can see the situation now... by Mattskimo · · Score: 1

    Officer: "What's your name, citizen?" Citizen: "Superman." Officer: "Very funny, what is your real name?" Citizen: "Superman." Officer: "I'm going to ask one more time, what is your real name?" Citizen: "Okay okay fine. It's Clark Kent."

  41. Same here in Turkey by Xas · · Score: 1

    It has been this way in Turkey for almost 5 years. You have to legally apply with ID and a signed paper every time you want a new mobile number.

  42. I want someone else to try it first by quatin · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'm on the fence about this one. As a frequent visitor of many hobby forums, I've noticed the amount of trolling has increased exponentially over the years. It has progressed very badly for some online communities. If all you visit is Slashdot, be thankful of the civility that occurs here.

    I don't buy into the doom and gloom of government oppression that goes along with real name registration, nor do I buy into "the net needs anonymity". Seriously, look at 4chan, our glaring symbol of internet anonymity and see what happens when the masses come together under the cloak of anonymity.

    However, I do see potential of abuse with using your real name everyone on the net. Therefore, I would like someone else to try it first (on a mass scale) and see if it's an utter failure, before trying to implement it ourselves.

  43. number plea-uz by slick7 · · Score: 1

    Is this what happens when you "wing" the "wong" number?

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  44. what next? by xmvince · · Score: 1

    what are they going to demand next? Probably a DNA database followed by a genital recognition database (they may need a microscope for that one)

  45. About real names.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What ? Xu Fei is requesting real names ??? He should be requesting a real name from his parents....

  46. From an Anonymous China Mobile subscriber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm truly going to have to wonder how this will be enforced. I started my China Mobile account for $10 USD and pay little top-ups of like 20-100RMB when I need to. I was shocked when my account was set up by just browsing a list of phone numbers - in a shop that was set up in something resembling a self-storage stall or shipping container. Per Chinese custom, I picked one of the few numbers that did not have a 4 in it. (This is unlucky in many Asian countries.) 55RMB got me a phone line and 5RMB of credit. You do pay more for a non-4 number.

    I'm pleased with the service whenever I visit China. It beats the crappy service I get from AT&T, and of course I presume it is bugged. I pay 10RMB/mo for the line and a up to 0.59rmb/min for the calls. (6.8RMB is approx 1USD).

    So my question is - next time I buy a top-up (at the trillion or so China Mobile shops ranging from tiny shack to huge mall botique) am I going to get the 5th degree about it? I can also buy a card from a vending machine and enter the scratch-off code into the phone after dialing the service number 13800138000. I'm guessing that's over.