Slashdot Mirror


(Don't) Make Your Own Fire Tornado

Flash Modin writes "In the last two weeks, both water and fire tornadoes have been widely covered by the media. As any physicists would have, we immediately thought 'I want to do that!' SO... You should absolutely, under no circumstances, not attempt to recreate the following fire tornado; but if you did, here's exactly what you would need, how you would do it, and what it would look like."

86 comments

  1. There's an easier way... by johnhp · · Score: 5, Informative

    The version in the story is too complicated, but there's an easier way. The catch is that it has to be really cold outside... I'd say at or below freezing.

    All you have to do is acquire a bottle of lighter fluid and a lighter. A zippo lighter works best. Spray a puddle of lighter fluid on cold pavement. Light the fluid (may take a while, it's difficult to ignite when cold). Once it's burning, stand back and spray a steady stream of lighter fluid into the flames. After a spray or two, a fire tornado will develop. I've made fire tornadoes that were an inch or two thick and at least ten feet tall.

    1. Re:There's an easier way... by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      +5 Interesting but Insane

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:There's an easier way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just don't forget the blowback arrestor.

    3. Re:There's an easier way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've made fire tornadoes that were an inch or two thick and at least ten feet tall.

      That is not enough. It needs to be bigger. Much, much bigger!

      I propose an oil drum with vanes cut from the top part, bent to make a fan. Put it on a stable, rotating stand that you can calibrate to less than a millimeter off the center of gravity. Fill it with gasoline, spin it with the power of a drill.

      Set it on fire and stand far, far back when you plug in the drill. Most likely when the flames are the highest the barrel will destablilize and turn the entire area into a gigantic fireball.

      I have an irresistable urge to build this device. :3

    4. Re:There's an easier way... by Gibbs-Duhem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah yes... I seem to remember this particular method resulting in second degree burns on two of my friends when the fire flashed back to the bottle of lighter fluid and exploded.

      Not recommended. Steady streams of flammable liquid connecting flame to a fuel bottle is a stupid idea.

    5. Re:There's an easier way... by 6Yankee · · Score: 4, Funny

      I worked at a small airport, and trained as crash crew.

      Part of the training involved a six-foot-square metal pan full of oil, which the instructor lit.

      It was while standing there with the hose, hand on the lever but thinking that the foot-thick tornado of fire towering over me was way too beautiful to put out, that I realised I maybe wasn't the best person for the job...

    6. Re:There's an easier way... by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      That is not enough. It needs to be bigger. Much, much bigger!

      seems like parent AC needs a concrete mixer truck

    7. Re:There's an easier way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notes:

      1. Careful not to set friends, animals, houses or lawns ablaze accidentally. All it takes is one misplaced squeeze of the lighter fluid bottle and someone or something is unintentionally on fire.

      2. This will reduce the life of your pavement. Disregard this if it is your parent's pavement you are ruining. They should have paid more attention to you, anyway!

    8. Re:There's an easier way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 Interesting but Insane

      Yeah, no crap. My parents are ER physicians, and I can't tell you how many serious burns are caused by people squirting fluid into an open flame. The flame catches the stream, and burns back into the vessel. You can imagine the rest.

    9. Re:There's an easier way... by nloop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, you are making that up. Lighter fluid isn't very explosive. The little plastic bottle doesn't contain enough oxygen to cause an explosion. Good luck getting the flame through the tiny spray nozzle while spraying fluid out of it. Physics are against your story. While calling shenanigans on this I figured I'd consult youtube. If this were possible, there would definitely be videos. The only videos are the tins of lighter fluid literally doused and burned from the outside in. Totally different, that features boiling fluid exploding a tin.

    10. Re:There's an easier way... by Blackhalo · · Score: 1

      It's only when some jack-ass refills the bottle with gasoline, that you run into trouble...

      --
      "There is nothing to do it. But to do it." -Floyd Pepper
    11. Re:There's an easier way... by Shatrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can imagine the rest.

      No I can't. There's no oxygen in the bottle. I can see people being burned by spraying too much out and creating a fireball, but I'm having trouble envisioning a scenario in which the bottle explodes without already having been on fire long enough to melt through the plastic.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    12. Re:There's an easier way... by Desert+Raven · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not uncommon for pyromaniacs to become firefighters.

      In rural areas, a number of arson cases end up being traced back to volunteer firefighters. Most commonly involving abandoned structures or barns.

    13. Re:There's an easier way... by GiveBenADollar · · Score: 2, Informative

      If this were true then welding torches couldn't exist. The nozzle itself prevents the flame from traveling to the reservoir. Doesn't matter that it's plastic, what matters is that it has no oxygen flowing through it, and it also absorbs any heat before it can flash back. Steady streams of flammable liquids are relatively safe as long as you don't light yourself on fire.

    14. Re:There's an easier way... by Jurily · · Score: 1

      It was while standing there with the hose, hand on the lever but thinking that the foot-thick tornado of fire towering over me was way too beautiful to put out, that I realised I maybe wasn't the best person for the job...

      I'm not quite sure you'd have the same reaction if said flames also constituted an immediate threat to your and others' life.

    15. Re:There's an easier way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes definitely made up. So many people tell that same story or "know" someone it has happened to. Hairspray torch works the same way, flamethrowers, etc... The flash back thing mostly happens when some jackass is pouring gas onto open flames out of a container. For some real dangerous flaming fun try the super soaker flame thrower http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc3vcXp_7O8 That lazy susan tornado is completely lame.

    16. Re:There's an easier way... by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      The things the Mythbusters guys like to blow up?

    17. Re:There's an easier way... by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      Actually in the case of a bottle of lighter fluid there can be oxygen in there that was just sucked into the bottle from repeated squirtings.

    18. Re:There's an easier way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One person from my family suffered terrible burns (85% 3) from an accident (work related). He was treated in a special hospital. There the doctors said that the most common cause of fire accidents were people trying to lit their barbecue from bottles.

    19. Re:There's an easier way... by fluffy99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can imagine the rest.

      No I can't. There's no oxygen in the bottle. I can see people being burned by spraying too much out and creating a fireball, but I'm having trouble envisioning a scenario in which the bottle explodes without already having been on fire long enough to melt through the plastic.

      Just because you can't envision how it happens doesn't mean it can't happen. It's not that the flame burns up the stream while your squeezing. Its when you stop squeezing the can and it sucks air and burning fluid up into the can. I have a co-worker whose kid did this and the can exploded and gave him 2nd degree burns plus a few cuts on his hands from the metal.

    20. Re:There's an easier way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A flashback arrestor or flame arrestor is a device most commonly used in oxy-fuel welding and cutting to stop the flame from burning back up into the equipment and causing damage or explosions. " -- Wikipedia

      No, that's what allows welding torches to work safely.

    21. Re:There's an easier way... by ormondotvos · · Score: 1

      Uh, you never ran an acetylene torch, ever, did you?

    22. Re:There's an easier way... by GiveBenADollar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You had an acetylene bottle explode and are here to talk about it! My hat is off to you friend.

    23. Re:There's an easier way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It would be much cooler with a abstract mixer truck.

    24. Re:There's an easier way... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      How would it have exploded? It seems you'd lack the necessary oxygen inside the lighter fluid bottle.

    25. Re:There's an easier way... by snspdaarf · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not the nozzle on a welding torch. Flashbacks into the mixing body of the torch are fairly common. Usually, there is a "pop", followed by a whistling, and the torch gets real hot real fast. However, if properly set up, there is a flashback preventer where the hoses attach to the torch that contains a brass screen. It's the screen that blocks the flame.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    26. Re:There's an easier way... by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > In rural areas, a number of arson cases end up being traced back to volunteer firefighters. Most commonly involving abandoned structures or barns.

      Clearly, this can not happen in areas that are not rural.

    27. Re:There's an easier way... by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > Steady streams of flammable liquid connecting flame to a fuel bottle is a stupid idea.

      Steady streams of stuff are not the problem. Lots of technical applications and my burning of liters upon liters of stuff depend on this.

      Once you stop pressing a bottle and you suck air and a bit of lighter fluid back into the bottle the problems can start. If the stuff is still burning once it's back in the bottle, you have a problem.

    28. Re:There's an easier way... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      The key is in how you work. If you have a decent squirting bottle (thin stream) and squirt with high pressure it can be done quite safely. You must also be careful when you stop: you should stop fast. Do not let the stream falter when you stop. You must try to prevent the air from drawing back into the bottle by keeping the bottle in shape.

      The problem is: most people are not able to do this properly (and/or are drunk) when they try. They let air into the bottle and squirt air out again. The fluid makes a nice spray of droplets which ignites very fast. The shock of that causes the user to loosen the pressure on the bottle and suck in the flaming droplets. The pressure builds in the bottle and within a couple of seconds the bottle can explode.

      So: If you know enough about physics and use that knowledge you can be safe. You just can't play with fire, be drunk and be safe.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  2. Make sure the screen is really secure... by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 4, Funny

    We're using Play-Do!

    --
    Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
  3. Not just water and fire by melikamp · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would watch those videos if they weren't wrapped into a shit tornado also known as Adobe Flash.

    1. Re:Not just water and fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoulda bought an andrioid :-P

    2. Re:Not just water and fire by ischorr · · Score: 1

      Sorry troll, iPhone plays it just fine.

      And sorry parent troll, but that video also plays just fine as Webm. Or flash.

    3. Re:Not just water and fire by melikamp · · Score: 1

      Oh, I can play it without using flash? How?

    4. Re:Not just water and fire by BehrA · · Score: 1

      There's an app for that.

    5. Re:Not just water and fire by melikamp · · Score: 1

      What's the app called?

    6. Re:Not just water and fire by Drakino · · Score: 1

      Any number of ways, depends on how you want to do it.

      iPhone - Just works, all YouTube videos show up as playable due to the device pulling the H.264 version inside an MPEG container.

      Android 2.1 and below (aka, ~70% of the Android platform) - Pretty much the same as the iPhone

      Android 2.2 (a tad below 30%) - install Flash, or keep using the old method

      Firefox - The popular way seems to be with Greasemonkey and scripts to pull down the same H.264 file. Google search Firefox youtube no flash

      Chrome, Safari - Just enable the HTML 5 version. http://www.youtube.com/html5

      Opera and Firefox 4 will get WebM versions via HTML5, but not many of the videos are transcoded yet.

    7. Re:Not just water and fire by ooshna · · Score: 1

      Android.

  4. Awwww by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 1

    C'mon. This is the internet. Blowtorch. Blower fan. Bottle of oxygen.

    GO!

  5. THE CITADEL IS GONNA BLOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell are you still doing in city 17?!

  6. You call that a flame tornado? by NetDrain · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a real flame tornado: Nate Smith, a gent I know personally, doin' his thing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qulN52bR9vk

    1. Re:You call that a flame tornado? by durrr · · Score: 1

      I want to see a flame hurricane, can you forward the suggestion for me?

    2. Re:You call that a flame tornado? by cryoman23 · · Score: 0

      now That is sweet XD and much bigger then the one posted here...

      --
      epic sig..... ya i got nothing
    3. Re:You call that a flame tornado? by NetDrain · · Score: 4, Funny

      Get on /b/ and post a video of yourself punching a kitten.

    4. Re:You call that a flame tornado? by caladine · · Score: 1

      Where's my (+1, awesome) mod?

    5. Re:You call that a flame tornado? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Happy to oblige - http://www.srl.org/machines/flamehurricane/. All you need are several pulse jets with 150lbs of thrust each!

    6. Re:You call that a flame tornado? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank's for showing me the video I thought I'd see, FTA (if you can call it that...) was lllaaammmeee.

    7. Re:You call that a flame tornado? by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "I want to see a flame hurricane, can you forward the suggestion for me?"

      You came too late. You should have been at Dresden by mid forties!

    8. Re:You call that a flame tornado? by black3d · · Score: 1

      That. is. awesome.

      --
      "The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
    9. Re:You call that a flame tornado? by a_hanso · · Score: 1

      would you settle for a flame tsunami?

    10. Re:You call that a flame tornado? by conureman · · Score: 1

      The safe and sane method I learned in Hollywood is to use compressed air to spray Lycopodium pollen into the air, and we used rubber cement for ignition. The rubber cement didn't blow out from the wind, and it was utterly controllable with a flick of the air valve. We made some little bitty 30-foot fireballs &c., but really the sky's the limit on this. A neighbor told me about working on a movie called "The Thorn Birds" where some rookie director insisted on setting a real fire for authenticity in his big climax. Not only were the flames less impressive, but a lot of people were nearly killed by the firestorm which ensued.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  7. Mentos by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    When started to appear the mentos on coke videos in internet, suddently a lot wanted to try that, but the consequences of doing it wrong or unsafe werent so bad, even funny sometimes. But if this goes viral, well, the darwin awards will have to open a special chapter.

    1. Re:Mentos by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this whole thing is a perfect example of how intelligence doesn't necessarily correlate with wisdom.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Mentos by CyberDragon777 · · Score: 1

      Oooh... The mentos thing with a flammable liquid instead of coke and dissolved oxygen instead of CO2.....

      --
      We both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
  8. Bigger, stronger, with more destructive capability by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 1

    Back before I knew such things existed in nature, I had the idea of hopefully causing a fuel/air explosion with a regular tornado.

    The idea was to pump a bunch of fuel into a regular tornado and ignite it, theoretically causing the tornado to dissipate.

    Unfortunately a lack of funds and people brave enough to man the trebuchets kept me from my plan.

    But it just seems more _eventful_ than a lazy susan and lighter fluid.

    Yes, my house insurance has extra coverage.

  9. More power by bugs2squash · · Score: 3, Funny

    Have some friends help you flip the family car on its side. Securely fix the lower driven wheel to a stake driven into the ground next to it, or through its spokes to prevent it turning. Put a board to act as a turntable on the upper driven wheel and repeat this experiment with much more lighter fluid while someone revs the car in drive to make the plate spin at tremendous speed. This combines a reduction in reasonableness with more danger.

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:More power by theReal-Hp_Sauce · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't forget to use a car with an oil pan/lubrication system that is designed to work at all angles.

      Otherwise you will be purchasing an engine rebuild from your local mechanic before you get bored of the fire tornado.

      -hps

  10. Re:Bigger, stronger, with more destructive capabil by wolf12886 · · Score: 1

    You mean like this?: http://www.xkcd.com/748/

  11. Not bad by JackSpratts · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:Not bad by Flash+Modin · · Score: 1

      I don't think the wet sponge and lighter fluid technique would work for that.

    2. Re:Not bad by Freddybear · · Score: 1

      That looks like it could be this sort of structure: http://www.mrsciguy.com/box.html

    3. Re:Not bad by Flash+Modin · · Score: 1

      I was wondering how best to add a cow into the fire tornado.

    4. Re:Not bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks very familiar -- Rotherham, UK: http://www.visitmagna.co.uk/content/58/fire-pavilion

  12. Oh crap....... by spazekaat · · Score: 0

    Awwww..my weekend is now fsk'd up.....I thought it would be fun to have a mini tornado to play with!

  13. Fun With Cremora by tpstigers · · Score: 1

    As many of you probably know, Cremora is highly flammable. A friend of mine once filled a coffee can with Cremora and placed a common butane torch beside it (with the flame burning over the can). Then he fed an airhose into the Cremora, the other end of which attached to a compressor. With everyone well away from the coffee can, he turned on the compressor. The resultant fireball was about 20'-25' in diameter.

    1. Re:Fun With Cremora by GiveBenADollar · · Score: 1

      Shhh!!! Don't tell people about that! There are already people on slashdot who think lighter fluid is extremely dangerous! I hope nobody mentions hand sanitizer napalm, then we would be in trouble!

    2. Re:Fun With Cremora by Flash+Modin · · Score: 1

      Actually hand sanitizer doesn't work, the flame is too hard to see.

    3. Re:Fun With Cremora by CyberDragon777 · · Score: 1

      The Mythbusters did that too:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRw4ZRqmxOc

      (Obviously they scaled it up a bit :))

      --
      We both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
  14. The mythbusters have to try this! by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    The mythbusters have to try this!

    1. Re:The mythbusters have to try this! by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      What myth will they be busting?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:The mythbusters have to try this! by CyberDragon777 · · Score: 1

      Well... the myth of... umm...

      Ah! The myth of securing wire mesh with Play-Doh of course!

      The 10 meters high tornado of fiery death will be a logical follow op for them :)

      --
      We both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
  15. Cool Clothes bro! by damianesteves · · Score: 1

    Why's this guy dressed like Billy Mays / Blockbuster employee?

  16. Is this at the country club? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty sure this is against Country Club rules.

  17. Ok. I was hoping for more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was hoping for a lot more than this. I mean come on. I've seen super kewel vortecies created by taking 2 2litre plastic coke bottles (or any 2 litre bottle), filling 1 about half full of water, and connecting the two together with a "tornado tube connector"(tm) and swirl the water in the bottom bottle around. Then turn the bottles upside down so that the full bottle is on top (actually you don't really have to start the water swirling, it will start on its own). Presto-Chango and voilà! Instant tornado! (Note to all Road Runners and Coyotes: No "Acme Instant Tornado Seeds"(tm) required.

  18. RE: (Don't) Make Your Own Fire Tornado by insnprsn · · Score: 1

    Well, that was impressively unimpressive.

  19. Whoosh!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That “whooshing” sound you just heard were flames drafting over your head.

  20. Reminds me of toothpick plasma by gringer · · Score: 1

    This fire tornado thing reminds me of toothpick plasma. Not the same thing, but seems to be about as neat.

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
  21. Yet another classic with LOX by plopez · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjPxDOEdsX8

    ANd of course there is one you really should *never* do unless you are Hunter Thompson: bottles of propane, a large caliber rifle, and a packet of nitroglycerin.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  22. easier than you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Almost any liquid fuel will make a nice fire vortex. And liquid powered fire vortexes run really well, because they create a mist of fuel droplets that gets carried up into the vortex, where they provide a lot of updraft.

    People actually do this for a living: http://www.reelefx.com made the fire vortex for David Copperfield, for instance.

    There was also an article in Amateur Scientist decades ago about it.

  23. Company made GIANT versions of this by wisebabo · · Score: 1

    Back in the days when I used to design theme parks (fun profession!) I used to work with a company (Spectra F/X) that made these.

    Most spectacularly GIANT versions of these flame tornados were used in Universal Studio's attraction "Backdraft" based on the movie of the same name. At least that what I think it was named; the title was about the hazard a firemen faced when entering a burning building that suddenly gets an influx of more oxygen. Anyway, the attraction is pretty impressive lots of real, hot fire and exploding oil drums (relatively) near you. If you're in Los Angeles you might want to go see it. Even though you definitely feel the heat from the flames and explosions, I think the safety record is quite good (haven't heard of any accidents).

    The company designed and built this and a lot of other flame effects. I got to see one of their flame tornados being built and tested out in the cavernous workshop; i wished i had taken a closer look at this engineered device, it looked like a turbine and was roughly the size of a large trash can. (Believe me, it was engineered, this company built a lot of safety critical stuff in its day). A long time ago it won the Oscar for special effects for the movie "Ben Hur". Unfortunately it went under about 10 tears ago.

    If any of the Spectra F/X guys are reading this, I'd like to say hi! (TK in CGI).

  24. LAME-O by Phoghat · · Score: 1

    Sounds looks like a mind freak. Big build up, no pay off

    --
    Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  25. Nice and all by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

    But I think for sheer apocalyptitude it doesn't beat the fire and lightning volcanic ash cloud

  26. That's not a tornado. THIS is a tornado! by PeterPiper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It was a few decades ago, but in my teens I had occasion to spend a weekend at a fireman's weekend where a great many and varied workshops were being given on any number of esoteric aspects of firefighting, and some of the more mundane. I took some of the mundane workshops on forest fire fighting and such. But I made my weekend more of a relaxed affair so I would have time to wander and see what everyone else was up to.

    One group was busy creating fire tornadoes, and putting them out. But what I am referring to here, is nothing at all like what is featured in this video, or anything at all like Hollywood has ever dared venture.

    The group was training in how to assault oil fires and extinguish them with a water hose, which is no mean trick. To make matters more complicated for them, dead center of the oil fire was a husk of tanker truck tank. This sat in the middle of a concrete pool ~10 meters square (30' x 30'). The pool was filled with six inches of water. The instructors would dump a full oil drum of oil into the pool, creating an oil slick that covered the entire surface. The training crew ready, they would toss in a match.

    Now THAT is a fire tornado!

    The result was a literal tornado of fire, a veritable solid pillar of flame that would do Moses proud! Thirty feet in diameter, this vortex roared so loud you could barely hear the shouted commands of the fireman as they assaulted the monster. It ripped and twisted, the spiraling cylinder reaching easily a hundred feet or more, straight up. The flame was dense red, and so intense there was nothing opaque about it. Pure fire, at it most intense.

    I sat there for hours watching as they put it out, and lit up another, over and over.

    --
    Peter
  27. They did it wrong by conureman · · Score: 1

    Sorry I didn't read to here before I posted above. If they had shot the air across the TOP of the powder, then the venturi -like effect would have atomized the particles properly, the igntion would have been nearly instantaneous, and they wouldn't have wasted hundreds of pounds of powder creating a smoldering mess around their device. This has been done for years, and the flame can be turned on and off at will. I suppose Cremora is cheaper than Lycopodium powder. It looks like maybe I should set up a proper demonstration for the YouTubes. I might try something with Aluminium dust, but I don't want to get Homeland Security all excited.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  28. jet propelled bottle by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    get a can of alcahol-butane mix, e.g. Lynx deoderat.

    get a plastic bottle, not to big.

    spray a moderate amount (not too much) deoderant into the bottle. (hot days are best).

    wait.. a tiny while.

    place bottle on ground

    ignite opening

    jet propelled bottle!

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.