Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Complaints Help Russian Gov't Pursue Political Opposition Groups
asaz989 writes "The New York Times reports that Russia selectively pursues software piracy complaints from Microsoft in order to suppress the opposition — confiscating computers for evidence, searching offices, and the like. Microsoft lawyers usually back the authorities in such cases, even when cases such as that of the environmentalist group Baikal Waves, which went out of its way to buy licenses to prevent police harassment and nevertheless had its offices raided, and its computers confiscated. Microsoft participated in this legal process. Published alongside this story, under the same byline, is a related piece on the collusion of Microsoft lawyers with corrupt Russian police in extorting money from the targets of software piracy investigations. In a responding press release, the company states, 'Microsoft antipiracy efforts are designed to honor both [antipiracy concerns and human rights], but we are open to feedback on what we can do to improve in that regard.'"
to open source, this is a prime example. Sheesh!
Bring back Clippy! You'll notice a sharp drop in piracy immediately.
There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
Yes, but Microsoft is apparently in collusion to help the police in these cases. That's disgusting. Absolutely disgusting and it would be so no matter if it was Apple, Google, or some other software vendor.
"There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
You know, while I know it's popular opinion to hate on Microsoft on slashdot, doesn't it seem to me that it's the Russian government abusing their own laws in order to screw the opposition, rather than Microsoft sitting there plotting how to hurt people? If it wasn't this, it would be something else.
Just sayin'..
Well, modern Russia is known for extreme corruption, literally from the level of local police up to the top. They will use any method possible, regardless as to Microsoft's involvement.
I was watching Fareed Zakaria GPS about 2 weeks ago, and he had a guy on whose business was literally stolen by local police. They raided the offices, took a set of papers required to own the business as part of the raid, transferred it to an inmate's name, who was serving a long sentence, then had a shell corporation sue the business. The judge entered a billion-dollar judgment within a day. Then, the lawyer who discovered all of this testified against the cops. He got thrown in jail for 6 months, where his water purifier was stolen while he was moved around a whole bunch of times in the prison, and eventually died there.
William Browder was the man running Hermitage in Russia before this whole thing happened.
There isn't one reason for NGOs continue to use microsoft software, in fact there are lots of reasons to not use it!
"but we are open to feedback on what we can do to improve in that regard.'"
Of course, such feedback might make you a target but hey...
Microsoft is inherently evil. Like kicking puppies.
On one hand, Microsoft has a right to complain about copyright infringement. Even I will not deny them that. On the other, Microsoft is probably aware of the selective nature of how Russian officials investigate and act on those claims. Should Microsoft, imagining for a moment that they have any sort of conscience, contribute to the oppression of human rights by issuing complaints?
As another pointed out, running Linux and free software on every machine will not quite end the problem. After all, Microsoft has long since campaigned against "naked PCs" and that they are likely to be software pirates unless they were sold with OEM Windows and OEM Office. Their complaints may well be in the form of "they are running PCs but we show no indication that they have licensed any software from us!" That would be reason enough, I suspect, to raid a location or two.
So, I have decided that Microsoft is a willing and complicit tool in this case. They can't not be aware of how their complaints are being used given their selective enforcement nature. And as far as Russian government officials are concerned, we are generally aware of the levels of government corruption within ex-Soviet countries. (I'll grant that the impression of government corruption in Russia is rather "cartoonish" in our understanding which is essentially belief without first-hand knowledge or evidence.) Microsoft should be more careful about issuing complaints. They aren't making examples of software pirates, in these cases, they are just being used as a weapon to "legitimately" attack political opponents.
Only because Apple and Google don't have a history of being corrupt as a whole.
"There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
In as much as Microsoft isn't stepping up to clear the names of groups (like Baikal Wave) that have legitimate copies of their software, but are apparently helping the police bully groups that don't, I think you're missing the point. Microsoft isn't just a pawn in this, they're actively helping the state and not helping innocent victims. They're making definite choices who to assist and it's not a purely business decision. (Clearing the your customers of stealing from you is good business.)
> My money's on the $5 wrench. [xkcd.com]
Refusal (and therefore, I suppose, inability) to surrender your encryption keys in the UK is a crime. I suppose trying to use some system with deniability might be of use, but given the spirit of that law, I don't see it as an impossibility that the court would merely presume (based on other "evidence") that you have used the deniability features of whatever encryption system is installed, and jail you for not surrendering the (presumed) keys (even if you haven't used those features).
I know..... but that's why i think people should stop and think about what they are doing once in a while, instead of using Windows because everyone uses Windows even though it is crap.
People rag on about how weird Richard Stallman is, but he has been correct about pretty much everything.
This shows us exactly why we should NEVER be using software that locks us in and can be used to harm us.
soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
Russia by definition can't be a third world country as they define the second world
Soviet Union defined the "second world". That country is no more.
how the fuck can you put Russia in the same category as Nigeria?
As of 2008:
Population
Russia: 142 021 thousand
Nigeria: 140 003 thousand
Gini coefficient
Russia: 40.5
Nigeria: 43.7
Corruption index
Russia: 143rd place
Nigeria: 147th place
Average male life expectance
Russia: 58 years
Nigeria: 52 years
Mortality rate
Russia: 16,04 deaths per 1000 people
Nigeria: 16,68 deaths per 1000 people
Property right protection index
Russia: 63rd out of 70
Nigeria: 64th out of 70
Number of citizens in favor of democracy
Russia: 47.8%
Nigeria: 44.2%
Number of citizens claiming that stability is more important than freedom of speech
Russia: 47%
Nigeria: 43%
Press freedom index ("Reporters without borders")
Russia: 144th out of 169
Nigeria: 131st out of 169
Ease of doing business index (World Bank)
Russia: 106th out of 178
Nigeria: 108th out of 178
Economic freedom index (WSJ / Heritage Foundation)
Russia: 120th out of 171
Nigeria: 131st out of 171
Global peace index (IEP)
Russia: 118th out of 121
Nigeria: 117th out of 121
The economies of both countries rely mostly on export of natural resources, primarily oil and gas.
If you thought that Brin was joking when he said that "Russia is Nigeria with snow", then you were wrong. He actually meant precisely what he said, and numbers back it up.
Oh, and in case someone might want to attack me as an "ignorant American clueless of other countries", I'm Russian.