Slashdot Mirror


DDoS From 4chan Hits MPAA and Anti-Piracy Website

ACKyushu writes "Say what you like about 4chan; when they want something done, it gets done. Following a call to arms yesterday, the masses inhabiting the anonymous 4chan boards have carried out a huge assault on a pair of anti-piracy enemies. The website of Aiplex Software, the anti-piracy outfit which has been DDoSing torrent sites recently, fell victim to a DDoS itself. They were joined in the Internet wasteland by the MPAA's website, which also fell to a huge and sustained attack."

318 comments

  1. And now... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let the slashdotting commence!

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    1. Re:And now... by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Seeing as the Slashdot editor/submitter were too lame to include links themselves, I'll give you all a hand at, um, investigating these fine websites.

      Aiplex
      MPAA

      I actually didn't think the Aiplex site was correct at first, just because of how awful it is. Maybe they got into the "anti-piracy" business because they failed so amazingly hard at website design.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    2. Re:And now... by glavenoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh the irony.

      Wait, this is irony, isn't it?

      --
      I, for one, am looking forward to the inevitable /. beta rollout fallout.
    3. Re:And now... by bcmm · · Score: 1

      MPAA.org and aiplex.com both seem to be working at the moment.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    4. Re:And now... by catmistake · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...because they failed so amazingly hard at website design.

      Great websites aren't designed. They are incepted.
      truly nice post, btw

    5. Re:And now... by matazar · · Score: 3, Informative

      MPAA is down for me and aiplex is still trying to load.
      I'm in Canada though.

    6. Re:And now... by Jester998 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, that's rather interesting... when I went to the mpaa.org site, it immediately got stopped by NoScript; it was trying to redirect me to a URL in the form www.mpaa.org/my.ip.add.ress

      Put on your tinfoil hats, everyone.

    7. Re:And now... by HawaiianToast · · Score: 5, Funny

      FYI, Your links don't work. I've tried several times now...

    8. Re:And now... by haderytn · · Score: 0, Redundant

      That is the point.

    9. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, half a dozen virgins click some links to sites no one actually bothers with?! Wow, scary!

    10. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Same here. And a lookup on my.ip.add.ress didn't give anything useful.

      I think it is a highly suspectable event.

    11. Re:And now... by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your IP address is exposed with every tcp connection you make and (by default in most web servers) logged with every http request you make.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    12. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Of course, but why would they bake it in the url?

    13. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whooosh!

    14. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mpaa.org is back now

    15. Re:And now... by Jurily · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's the only way they know to log it.

    16. Re:And now... by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>>mpaa.org site immediately got stopped by NoScript

      Really? Noscript didn't flat anything. Of course I have it set for "temporarily allow top-level domains by default" and "allow 2nd level domains". Hmmmm..... I like where it provides a link to get TV shows/movies online legally including sites like Hulu and TheWB.com - worth bookmarking.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    17. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, if you're behind a proxy server for whatever reason, this would expose the client IP and not the proxy address.

    18. Re:And now... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1, Informative

      Fail at web server administration.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    19. Re:And now... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      aiplex will only load the title and it just kind of sits there. Haven't tried the MPAA. While I legal torrent I don't like hackish (and amateurish) attempts at using more than web server logs to record my IP address.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    20. Re:And now... by ratboy666 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Me too:

      mpaa.org went to mpaa.org/my.ip.add.ress

      and that, resolved to a page that set a cookie. Once I allowed the cookie, it redirected my to a page that said:

      "The page you are looking for is cannot be found.
      Please try again later. "
      (sic)

      So, it's probably an attempt to deal with the DDoS. Either that, or my IP was geolocated, and there is no appropriate content...

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    21. Re:And now... by blind+biker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The MPAA site works for me, rather well, and it seems like a high-bandwidth site, too. I'm in Finland, if that's of interest.

      So, it seems MPAA recovered and/or the DDoS is over already.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    22. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ... interesting...
      can anyone else confirm that going to:

      www.mpaa.org/127.0.0.1

      seems to result in an infinite redirect for them?

    23. Re:And now... by martinux · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've tried several times now...

      Forty-seven million times?

    24. Re:And now... by matthewv789 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I notice that the MPAA site has a "Report Piracy" form at http://www.mpaa.org/contentprotection/report-piracy.

      As a member of the society that has granted copyright holders their limited, temporarily monopolistic usage rights, I am at this moment reporting the misappropriation of the terms "theft", "ownership" and "property" with respect to these rights and the content they cover. (They are violations because copyright is a social contract between creators of intellectual property and society, and any contract has two sides. The MPAA et al are violating their side of the contract.) I discovered these violations on their very website! Anyone else want to complain?

    25. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      FYI, Your links don't work. I've tried several times now...

      Keep trying!

    26. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      @AnonymousCoward just tested w #tor. it uses the tor ip address, not my real ip address

    27. Re:And now... by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      I actually didn't think the Aiplex site was correct at first, just because of how awful it is. Maybe they got into the "anti-piracy" business because they failed so amazingly hard at website design.

      Wow, I see what you mean.
      It looks a lot like a domain squatter/parking page.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    28. Re:And now... by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Forget the web design, the copy is the real problem. Have you actually read it? It's like Dilbert's pointy haired boss on coke. This is dreadful pre-computer, let alone post internet. I refuse to believe it's actually a real site, more like a front set up by a 4chan member to drive traffic at an advert based IP for a few hours. Simples.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    29. Re:And now... by Goaway · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's so cute when people think Slashdot could still actually Slashdot anything.

    30. Re:And now... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      it did for me, at about 9:20 EST

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    31. Re:And now... by russotto · · Score: 4, Funny

      Technical people seem to think that their beliefs are correct and everyone else is wrong far more often than other professional classes.

      Why would one hold a belief that one did not believe was correct?

      Anonymous is just an expression of that. They believe they are right and are justified in attacking others based on their belief.

      Right. When Aiplex and the MPAA attack sites and people, that's OK. If some group attacks them in return, it's akin to terrorism.

    32. Re:And now... by shikaisi · · Score: 1

      The Aiplex site has an Enquiry form as well where you can leave a phone number and email address and your message. Nice of them to give me a place to ask all the questions about their business that I would like answered.

      --
      No left turn unstoned.
    33. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because they more often think they're right doesn't mean they're wrong about being right more often.

    34. Re:And now... by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      Too bad the linked sites are full of numb nuts who only allow access inside the USA. That's too bad else they might have actually recaptured some customers. Oh well.

      Yes I am aware one could setup a VPN and gain access.

    35. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here's the Occam's Razor explanation: technical people do it...(get ready)...because they are technical and know how to do technical things.

    36. Re:And now... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 4, Informative

      Seeing as the Slashdot editor/submitter were too lame to include links themselves, I'll give you all a hand at, um, investigating these fine websites.

      Aiplex MPAA

      I actually didn't think the Aiplex site was correct at first, just because of how awful it is. Maybe they got into the "anti-piracy" business because they failed so amazingly hard at website design.

      Let's skip the web site design and just look at the content -- is this for real?

      Aiplex has a blend of technology savvy & process driven dedicated team bringing about a paradigm shift in rendering customized solutions to its clients. We have steadily grown in reach and service offerings with a favorable cost-benefit ratio & keeping pace with the emerging business needs of our customers.

      First - you're using "&" in the description of your business? Second, those sentences don't actually make sense...

      Now let's look at the <title> element of the web page:

      Medical transcription , Search engine optimization , AiPlex Software Pvt. Ltd. , MT & seo , Seo & mt , transcription services , medical transcription , medical transcription services , medical transcription work , medical transcription job , medical transcription company , medical transcription medical transcription karnataka , medical transcription india , medical transcription news , medical transcription offers , medical transcription company in bangalore , medical transcription company in india , medical , information , medical records , medical dictation , medical transcription night shift work , mt night shift job , mt work , mt jobs , mt careers , mt business , mt training , mt desk , mt daily , mt bangalore , mt india , mt 24*7 , mt company in banglaore , mt company in india , mt outsourcing , mt careers in bangalore , mt jobs in bangalore , mt hipaa regulations , mt hipaa compliance , out source medical transcription , aiplex , aiplex mt , aiplex mt bangalore , aiplex medical transcription , voice files , dictation , medical dictation , mt dictation , doctor voice files , patient record , patient charts , health care india , security in healthcare , security in medical dictation , Processing million lines a month , office based mt opportunities , home based mt work , home transcription , HT bangalore , aiplex home based benefits , mt career opportunities , aiplex guarantees 98.5 % accuracy , aiplex quality management system ensures customer expectations , toll free dictation , disaster recovery plan , attractive prize of 8cents per line of transcription , 360 degree machanism to deliver flawless transcripts , robust infrastructure for data back, data security & confidentiality , 12hrs turn around time ( TAT) , mt resume online , direct submission previlage at higher rates for HTs , enhanced benefits for enhanced targets , medical transcriptionist , proof reader , Quality analyst , Best MT company in bangalore.

      Alas, though they boast "SEO" in their title among other things... a search for "medical transcription" on google doesn't turn them up (at least in the first page). The I'm not usually a fan of this kind of "justice", but in this case the web was a slightly better place for the duration of this site's outage.

      On the other hand, if this is who the Bollywood (not the MPAA as TFS implies) employs to do their dirty work, then the only real concern is that torrenters will fall off of their chairs laughing. In the process they might collectively hit their heads on their power strips and take their dirty file-sharing systems offline.

      On the third hand, looking back through the press coverage of Aiplex, I notice that the *only* person who claims that Aiplex is working with Bollywood is the owner of Aiplex. This hints to me that their rather successful attempt to bltiz the media with their name has backfired in the most extravagantly perfect way possible.

    37. Re:And now... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      I reject your assertion that Engineers are more likely to be like this. I've found it true of most professional classes.

      I've yet to meet a doctor who doesn't seem to fancy them self a professional economist. It goes along with years of education and training. Once you've studied very hard at one small specialty there is a temptation to think that your above average education has granted you the magical powers to know everything else about everything else along with it.

      There are lots of arrogant dullards but for those with a well respected highly technical intellectual background it's easy to feel as if your arrogance is justified and warranted since often it is. On the flip side you get the stupid Slashdot questions like "yeah but how do the researchers know that..." when the researchers of course addressed those very questions.

    38. Re:And now... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Surely EU citizens have some other places equivalent to Hulu.com or NBC.com where they can see TV shows/movies online?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    39. Re:And now... by Voyager529 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fail at web server administration.

      At least their success rate is consistent.

    40. Re:And now... by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      It's more likely a quick and dirty IP filter hack. Maybe they can't get the server admin on the phone, and the app guys are trying to do what they can until the server admin wakes up. Or figures out how to run a server, either way it's all they can do.

    41. Re:And now... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know proxies work differently, but I just pictured the MPAA server admins reading the logs and going "OMFG the attacks are all coming from 10.10.0.0/16 and 192.168.1.0/24. We are being attacked from within!!!!"

    42. Re:And now... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Not really, no. Few countries have, afaik, something close to Netflix subscription streaming...but as I recall there was something subpar about it; and in some way it works around the "common market" stuff.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    43. Re:And now... by sznupi · · Score: 2, Funny

      PS. Well, naturally there is also tpb & eztv...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    44. Re:And now... by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think you need to read the referenced article. I'm not asserting that engineers are more likely to be terrorists, it's a proven fact.

    45. Re:And now... by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      Yes, but only technical people are attacking the MPAA and it's cronies. You don't see anyone sending pipe bombs to them, or going out and cutting their power and/or data lines? Those are things non-technical people would do, but they don't.

      The only people that are attacking them are technical people.

    46. Re:And now... by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      At least their formatting tags seem to be in order... :P

      Also, I wanted to laugh at their 'live support' staff. But it is just a redirect to an ad filled search engine. Wow...

    47. Re:And now... by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      Why would one hold a belief that one did not believe was correct?

      I have many beliefs, that doesn't mean tha I am correct, or that anyone elses beliefs are wrong. A belief is different from proven fact. Certainly, technical people have no monopoly on this, as evidenced by Tea Partiers, Religious nut jobs, etc.. but as a profession, they seem more prone to it.

      Right. When Aiplex and the MPAA attack sites and people, that's OK. If some group attacks them in return, it's akin to terrorism

      I didn't say it was ok. But neither is it ok to respond in kind, especially when the group itself (nor it's members) were specifically the target (the same is true of Scientology, Anonymous certainly is not CoS target audience).

      It's not supposition that Terrorists are more frequently engineers. It's fact. And it's the same mentality that lets one be a terrorist as what Anonymous is doing.

      Did it ever occur to anyone that maybe, just maybe, such DDoS attacks might also be hurting others? People on the same subnet? People at the same ISP? Such flagrant disregard for collateral damage is another similarity to terrorism.

      I'm not pro MPAA, or CoS or anything, but I think this behavior is stupid, and not only does it help the cause, it hurts it.

    48. Re:And now... by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      A more fun option to hit is this:
      http://www.easycounter.com/user/?comm=remind_password
      With the user name: muhammedanseer
      They don't even seem to have a spam limit.

      But that would be mean right?

    49. Re:And now... by HundyCougar · · Score: 0

      I think you have too many hands

    50. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I notice that the MPAA site has a "Report Piracy" form

      I've reported Somalia to them severall times but ships still have problems going by there.

    51. Re:And now... by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      I'm just gonna call it an ironcidence

    52. Re:And now... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Yay! I'm cute! :p

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    53. Re:And now... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Too true. Win at consistency? But I smell fail in the win(d). Ah well.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    54. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Done! I applaud anybody else stands up to these bastards.

    55. Re:And now... by Decker-Mage · · Score: 1

      Naw, must be like me. I'm a squid (ex-US Navy) and an economist (econometrician primarily), so I'm really dangerous! Five "on the other hands" to go through.

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
    56. Re:And now... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Actually you are wrong. Technical people make bombs. Instead of killing you with a bomb though, they may shoot you in the eyes with a laser. Your generalizations are just wrong. No one is sending mail bombs to Aiplex because it would be what you call overreacting. They are DOSing, so we of the internet DDOS them back, but they haven't killed anyone. All they have done is slow down some famous torrent sites and make it a little bit more difficult for us to get free stuff. I have had to resort to magnet links on TPB recently and that didn't always work for me, but I was still able to get every torrent I wanted. They annoyed us. So we annoy them a little. Turnabout is fair play. Killing them would *not* be fair play and since there is money to be made some other Indian will just take his place. It would accomplish nothing. OTOH mail bombs and anthrax in every MPAA executive's mailbox might make a difference. It takes technical people to make those things though.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    57. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    58. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's so cute when people think Slashdot could still actually Slashdot anything.

      Going by the counter on the aiplex front page they're taking five hits a minute.

    59. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Aiplex has a blend of technology savvy & process driven dedicated team bringing about a paradigm shift in rendering customized solutions to its clients. We have steadily grown in reach and service offerings with a favorable cost-benefit ratio & keeping pace with the emerging business needs of our customers."

      BINGO!!!

      http://www.bullshitbingo.net/cards/bullshit/

    60. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hmm, probably they try to get the real IPs of proxy users ...

    61. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      One of my friends told me I just don't understand irony. Which was ironic, because we were at a bus stop at the time.

    62. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [quote] [...] If some group attacks them in return, it's akin to terrorism. [/quote]
      Perhaps so. But I choose to compare it with punching back.

    63. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it ever occur to anyone that maybe, just maybe, such DDoS attacks might also be hurting others? People on the same subnet? People at the same ISP? Such flagrant disregard for collateral damage is another similarity to terrorism.

      No, no, see, that's the whole beauty of it! Same with subnet spam blacklists! We terrorize the innocent victims into rising up against the evil people who...

      Oooooooooooooohhhhhhhhh.......

    64. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You use Facebook quite a bit, don't you?

      Thank God /. has proper threading!

    65. Re:And now... by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      I was a security consultant for various governments around the world. One CEO or high-flying officer once talked to our CTO, saying "I want an army of one-armed consultants!"

      Not understanding, the CTO asked him why, to which the guy replied, "Because I'm so frigging tired of hearing 'On the other hand, ...'!"

    66. Re:And now... by initialE · · Score: 1

      they want you to know they are able to track your activities? even if they aren't?

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    67. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both sites are back up again on Sunday morning (EST). I guess the hurricane has passed (or they're in the eye).

    68. Re:And now... by SevTheMighty · · Score: 1

      So, essentially they are just throwing technical jargon into a page and hoping that it increases their hits so they can continue their "Net Vigilance" while seeming like a respectable company who does more then just try to play "big brother". At least that's what I took away from it.

    69. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They moved MPAA.org on to Dosarrest after the attack started
      They site work fine for me

    70. Re:And now... by hat_eater · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had my ports scanned several minutes after I visited MPAA site (and told NoScript to allow the script to run). It's not something that happens to me everyday, in fact, I recall only a few other detected port scans this year. And a few minutes after that, I logged another port scan. The IP addresses were 221.195.73.68 and 216.34.181.51 but I don't think they are real somehow.

    71. Re:And now... by daveime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd like you to grow up and stop endorsing shitty behaviour like the MPAA outsourcing their scumbaggery to the 3rd world.

      The way to prevent copyright is through the legal system, NOT by employing fucking Indians to DDOS torrent servers.

    72. Re:And now... by daveime · · Score: 1

      Oops, I meant to say "The way to prevent copyright infringement" ... but either works for me to be honest.

    73. Re:And now... by flyneye · · Score: 3, Funny

      Television and movies worth bookmarking.
      Kleenex worth saving.
      Flies worth counting.
      Yugos worth restoring.
      Feces worth polishing.

                I suppose you can see where I'm going with this...

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    74. Re:And now... by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Damn so is that rash! *anxious personal scratching*

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    75. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As per the **AA philosophy:

      "Great websites aren't designed. They are intercepted."

      There, fixed that for ya.

    76. Re:And now... by cekander · · Score: 1

      Insightful, not funny. And now, interesting it was modded as such. Are we in deniable about the bogusness of the mainstream political use of the word "terrorism"? Or maybe, is it funny in a sad-but-true sorta way?

    77. Re:And now... by russotto · · Score: 1

      I have many beliefs, that doesn't mean tha I am correct

      Of course not. But why would you hold a belief that you did not believe was correct?

      I didn't say it was ok. But neither is it ok to respond in kind, especially when the group itself (nor it's members) were specifically the target

      I imagine that "Anonymous" includes a rather large proportion of those who were users of torrents, in fact. Impossible to know, because they are anonymous. But if it isn't OK to respond in kind, how IS it OK to respond? Crying to authority is worse than useless; authority is on their side. Is your advice just to take whatever they dish out, without response?

      It's not supposition that Terrorists are more frequently engineers. It's fact. And it's the same mentality that lets one be a terrorist as what Anonymous is doing.

      Repetition of a statement does not increase its truth value.

      Did it ever occur to anyone that maybe, just maybe, such DDoS attacks might also be hurting others? People on the same subnet? People at the same ISP? Such flagrant disregard for collateral damage is another similarity to terrorism.

      No, it's not. For terrorists, the injuries, damage, and death to those who are not combatants are the whole point. And unfortunately, being unwilling to risk collateral damage allows your enemies to surround themselves with noncombatants as effective protection.

    78. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when I went to the mpaa.org site[...] it was trying to redirect me to a URL in the form www.mpaa.org/my.ip.add.ress

      ... thus amplifying the /. effect. Well played, 4chan, well played.

    79. Re:And now... by morie · · Score: 1

      Strangely, when I tried to see the awfullness myself, the server wouldn't respond. Hope nothing bad happened.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    80. Re:And now... by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Of course they win at consistency. They couldn't fail on everything if they didn't win something.

    81. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you even mean by "technical people?" Your labeling of "terrorist" is also very broad and it makes it sound like you just have a grudge against science and technology oriented professionals.

      Assuming that by "technical people" you mean anyone who has picked up some arbitrarily "large" amount of computer literacy, well it's obvious that it takes a some technical competency of the right kind to mount a technological attack. Also, these same people with the appropriate skills will naturally be the first to understand the nature of the MPAA's technical subterfuge and thus understand their foul play.

    82. Re:And now... by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      What, half a dozen virgins click some links to sites no one actually bothers with?! Wow, scary!

      Clicking is for sissies. What you do is wget a page on the site, redirecting it to /dev/null. You put that in an infinite loop and go to sleep. Do it all through tor, so your IP changes often.

      Of course, there are Firefox extensions that can automatically refresh pages, so you can fire up Torpark, install such an extension, open several dozen tabs with the annoying website and have it refresh every 15 seconds.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    83. Re:And now... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      true, true

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    84. Re:And now... by h00manist · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they tried a trick to turn some of the ddos traffic back onto itself?

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    85. Re:And now... by jgoemat · · Score: 1
      LOLZ

      Aiplex has a blend of technology savvy & process driven dedicated team bringing about a paradigm shift in rendering customized solutions to its clients. We have steadily grown in reach and service offerings with a favorable cost-benefit ratio & keeping pace with the emerging business needs of our customers.

      Are those even proper sentences?

    86. Re:And now... by TheBallWatcher · · Score: 1

      12hrs turn around time ( TAT)

      TIT for TAT i'd say.

    87. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time you click 'Preview' when posting on /., /. decide to port scan before you post. Perhaps that is why it takes so long to post for the first time every session.

    88. Re:And now... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Except that the DDoS was in response to a DDoS of tracker sites on the web. If Anonymous is guilty of a crime, then so are these Orgs for doing the same thing.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    89. Re:And now... by Dalzhim · · Score: 1

      And have a bot keep doing it for you! ;)

    90. Re:And now... by mldi · · Score: 1

      Great websites aren't designed. They are incepted.

      The problem is you gotta go 3 levels deep!

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    91. Re:And now... by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 1

      No, don't send them anthrax, that wouldn't be just naughty, but flat-out wrong.
      I think they just need a cookie.
      However: cookies don't fit in envelopes, so just send them some flour/sugar in the envelopes, perhaps a note saying 'would you have preferred anthrax?' and they can figure the rest out themselves.

      ...That might be interesting...


      (Yeah, this is a joke, I'm pretty sure even doing that would be illegal, so please don't mod me Insightful or Informative. Funny is OK; so is Troll)

      --
      "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
    92. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah aiplex.com is down and MPAA are a little slow.

  2. Is it just me? by Panspechi · · Score: 1

    Or I'm getting aroused thinking of this.

    1. Re:Is it just me? by anomic_event · · Score: 0

      Awesome.

    2. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got wood...

    3. Re:Is it just me? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      I got wood...

      Like this?

  3. Does anyone care? by Zironic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh noes their website went down for a few hours, that's sure to stop all of their operations! Or not...

    1. Re:Does anyone care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I care. Perhaps you're just not a very caring person?

    2. Re:Does anyone care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. The storm passes eventually. But I wonder if they'll realize it's the same situation for the pirates when the MPAA or their proxies attempt to DDOS the "pirate" web sites? It's just as futile.

    3. Re:Does anyone care? by MokuMokuRyoushi · · Score: 1

      In any case, they're *still* down for me XD. This is the kind of thing that makes me smile.

      --
      Humans are terrible replicators of Godly things.
    4. Re:Does anyone care? by swabeui · · Score: 1

      I would tend to agree. If you're going to do something like this it needs to be a) sustained and b) something that interfere's with the business. MX records come to mind.

  4. counterproductive by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think neither the MPAA nor Aiplex really care about about their websites getting knocked down; if anything, it gives them more publicity and lets them generate additional FUD about the dreaded "pirates". If anonymous members can't target more essential parts of their business with their attacks, they shouldn't bother.

    1. Re:counterproductive by rotide · · Score: 5, Informative

      Your mistake is in thinking that anonymous does anything for rational reasons or for anyones benefit. It's merely mob mentality and they do it for kicks.

    2. Re:counterproductive by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think neither the MPAA nor Aiplex really care about about their websites getting knocked down; if anything, it gives them more publicity and lets them generate additional FUD about the dreaded "pirates". If anonymous members can't target more essential parts of their business with their attacks, they shouldn't bother.

      I doubt that is the kind of publicity the MAFIAA seeks.
      4CHAN isn't just attacking their websites - they are mimicing the MAFIAA.
      If DOS'ing a website is wrong then why is Aiplex Software, a proxy of the MAFIAA, doing it too?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:counterproductive by kimvette · · Score: 4, Insightful

      . . . because he who has the deepest pockets and slimiest lawyers win!

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    4. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think neither the MPAA nor Aiplex really care about about their websites getting knocked down; if anything, it gives them more publicity and lets them generate additional FUD about the dreaded "pirates". If anonymous members can't target more essential parts of their business with their attacks, they shouldn't bother.

      If 4chan manages to DDOS the official sites of the upcoming and just-out movies produced by MPAA members, they'll be hurt pretty badly. All of their ads, TV, web, printed, and so on, point to these sites.

      So DDOS van be a viable weapon, if that's how MPAA wants business done.

    5. Re:counterproductive by DurendalMac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um...no. Most people don't give a crap about the website. They see the preview, the poster, and buy a ticket. On top of that, it's not like they can't get the trailer via Youtube if the site is down, assuming they would even go to that site for those few hours.

      DDoSing a movie site would do diddly squat to the bottom line.

    6. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it hilarious that this was moderated as troll, considering how >90% of the people involved in any of these attacks usually just to it "for the lulz".

      There are very few people on the boards, particularly /b/, who give a damn about morals or any of that other "pretentious bullshit".
      All they want is a good laugh, even if it is quite literally just pointing and clicking a DDoSer script / program.
      Honestly, i'm surprised nobody has went to the effort of making a simple game based around it like one of those simple resource based games, but instead of resources, it is pings to websites.

    7. Re:counterproductive by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      . . . because he who has the deepest pockets and slimiest lawyers win!

      No, technically it's who has the fattest pipes.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    8. Re:counterproductive by gman003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would still be more effective than DDoSing the MPAA site.

    9. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The MPAA (only them, in this case, not the RIAA) will point to these attacks regardless and spin them as something that they will say they don't condone, and paint the attackers as the scum they are wanting to eliminate. To that end, they may even deny connections to AiPlex Software's vigilantism, painting themselves as above the use of DoS at the same time, and start criminal procedures against 4chan's owner (moot) for allowing this odious crime to happen, despite him having no control over the posts of 4chan's members, or things like that. Never underestimate the what an irrational organisation may do, be it 4chan or the MPAA.

    10. Re:counterproductive by bertoelcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If anonymous members can't target more essential parts of their business with their attacks, they shouldn't bother.

      So should they do black faxes then?

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    11. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The greatest power is in convincing others they don't have any.

      You have already lost.

    12. Re:counterproductive by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Troll

      But not as effective as starting a rumor that they drew a picture of Mohammed. (Not the terrorist that flew a plane into the WTC, the pedophile that he's named after.)

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    13. Re:counterproductive by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Or the most pipes...
      Hence, the D in DDOS. ..oh...wait....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    14. Re:counterproductive by funkatron · · Score: 1

      You make that sound bad. Kicks are fun.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    15. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Game.

    16. Re:counterproductive by EdIII · · Score: 1

      If anonymous members can't target more essential parts of their business with their attacks, they shouldn't bother.

      Ssssshhhhh!

      The first wave of attacks was merely a distraction. General Pedobear is leading an attack through the backdoor to crush them once and for all.

    17. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DDoSing a movie site would do diddly squat to the bottom line.

      If anything it'd go up, free publicity.

    18. Re:counterproductive by hedwards · · Score: 1

      So, tracking down cat abusers is not for anybody's benefit?

    19. Re:counterproductive by hedwards · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's African American faxes, you insensitive clod.

    20. Re:counterproductive by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, you're right. I was actually reading TFA and scrolling down through these comments, with a half-formed idea in my mind. "It would be great if these guys took these sites down, and kept them down." Alas - we are talking about immature, wannabe IT geeks and their followers. Their attention spans are as short as certain parts of their anatomies. By Monday, RIAA and the MPAA will be doing business as usual. But, I can't complain. If the power of 4chan were actually harnessed, and put to some sustained use, they could do almost ANYTHING. And, that anything would just as likely be detrimental to the web, and normal people.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    21. Re:counterproductive by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      *cough* Backdoor? *cough* Well, I guess RIAA and MPAA deserve to be backdoor'd. Go for it, General. Especially if it will distract you from some little kids for awhile.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    22. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make that sound bad. Kicks are fun.

      Kicks just keep gettin' harder to find
      And all your kicks ain't bringin' you peace of mind

    23. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly rabbit.

    24. Re:counterproductive by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      The first wave of attacks was merely a distraction. General Pedobear is leading an attack through the backdoor to crush them once and for all.

      The general is talking about surprise buttsex, right? General Pedobear should be one of the most experienced in that field.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    25. Re:counterproductive by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Correct, until the real pirates get a call to arms and go destroy the building and run the staff off the plank, this is nothing more then a cool stunt.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    26. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was Faxes of Color...

    27. Re:counterproductive by shikaisi · · Score: 1

      The old get older but the young get stronger

      May take a week and it may take longer

      They got the guns but we got the numbers

      Gonna win, yes we're taking over

      Jim Morrison

      --
      No left turn unstoned.
    28. Re:counterproductive by Hardtrance · · Score: 1

      Silly Rabi. Kicks are for trids!

      --
      This post is LAW where prohibited by VOID. Prosecutors will be violated.
    29. Re:counterproductive by Music2Eat · · Score: 0

      If DOS'ing a website is wrong then why is Aiplex Software, a proxy of the MAFIAA, doing it too?

      Because the RIAA and MPAA are respectable businesses that are only trying to protect their legitimate property, and 4CHAN are a bunch of scary anarchists that want to destroy everything you hold dear. or at least that's how they'll sell it to the media.

    30. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . . . because he who has the deepest pockets and slimiest lawyers win!

      Until the lawyers' Internet connections are hosed from Eastern Europe where they have no reach. And then the lawyers can't surf or get any mail and their interaction with the outside world grinds to a halt. Odds are they're using Exchange, which can often be brought to its knees in many SMB environments (i.e., how powerful is the actual server and storage I/O back-end?).

      Said lawyers could also find themselves subscribed to various "inappropriate" magazines and catalogues at their home addresses. There's also auto-dialers at 2 AM (and 3, and 4, and 5).

      I'm not condoning this, nor necessarily think it's productive or even a good idea, but the fees that a lawyer gets may not be worth the grief they'd receive if they piss off the wrong person/people/group. When you think you are Anonymous, and don't care about the consequences of your actions (or don't think there are/will be any), then there's often no reason to moderate your actions.

    31. Re:counterproductive by robot256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dare you to send a color fax.

    32. Re:counterproductive by oiron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You had me laughing at "respectable"

    33. Re:counterproductive by SheeEttin · · Score: 5, Informative

      they do it for kicks

      You misspelled "the lulz".

    34. Re:counterproductive by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      May take a week and it may take longer

      If it takes longer, doesn't that amount to growing older?

      Oh, wait. It wasn't Jim Morrison who sang 'I hope I die before I get old.'

      He just up and did it.

      It's nice when you can die when you're young and fresh and everybody can then admire you forever after. I guess.

    35. Re:counterproductive by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Except it wasn't an example of actual cat abuse - but they were still doing it for the lulz. Silly to think otherwise.

    36. Re:counterproductive by jprupp · · Score: 1

      As you well put it, they're a mafia, a mafia that controls government and that make the law as they see fit. These are not reasonable people, but unscrupulous and greedy weasels. Let this DDoS stack their moral. Let them experience the power of those they oppress.

    37. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they do it for kicks

      You misspelled "the lulz".

      You misspelled "Teh"

    38. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    39. Re:counterproductive by tokul · · Score: 1

      If DOS'ing a website is wrong then why is Aiplex Software, a proxy of the MAFIAA, doing it too?

      Mafiaa is "fighting the pirates". Attacks on their sites is vigilante counter attacks. In reality both are wrong, but mafiaa can find good sounding name for their own actions.

    40. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled the "teh".

    41. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree, yes there is a strong mob mentality - but Anonymous is one of the few ligaments 'the people' have left to protest with anymore.

      They serve an important function, and I expect they will mature (in both senses) in years to come. They have an enormous capacity for justice and equality already, that will likely only improve. Some of our generations greatest examples of publically accepted irrational thought are the things Anonymous has protested, like Scientology and the MPAA/RIAA propaganda, yes - they began as /b/tards, but they are also 'the people' - they are becoming more the latter than the former they began as.

    42. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are laughing, but what about technically illiterate 6pm news watching people? I.E. the majority of people out there?

    43. Re:counterproductive by notaspy · · Score: 1

      links anyone?

      "If anonymous members can't target more essential parts of their business with their attacks, they shouldn't bother."

      --
      hi!
    44. Re:counterproductive by M8e · · Score: 1

      U misspelled teh "teh".

      TFTFY

    45. Re:counterproductive by Music2Eat · · Score: 1

      I guess you missed my "or at least that's how they'll sell it to the media."

      They don't care what /. thinks. /. and 4chan are lost causes to them. They know that. My parents on the other hand, no matter how many times I try and explain to them the benefits of limited copyright terms, can't get past the idea of why people should get another persons hard work for free. In their mind Walt Disney created Mickey Mouse and as such the Walt Disney Corporation should have the rights to it's image forever. Anyone that doesn't think so is just trying to get something for nothing.

      If you don't think the RIAA and MPAA will spin this in the exact way I described, you've got your head in the sand. If you think they'll view these DOS attacks as anything but a victory, you've got your head up your own ass.

    46. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Episode # 5787748-01 of "Internet Tough Guy"

    47. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's African American faxes, you insensitive clod.

      I'm African, so it is just faxes, you insensitive clod.

    48. Re:counterproductive by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Until the lawyers' Internet connections are hosed from Eastern Europe where they have no reach

      No. Instead the US sends intelligence agents to foreign nations and suggest that bogus charges be levied against people who conduct business which is legal in their own nations but illegal in the USA. Where was there a story about that? Oh, yeah, right here on slashdot.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    49. Re:counterproductive by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      I think neither the MPAA nor Aiplex really care about about their websites getting knocked down; if anything, it gives them more publicity and lets them generate additional FUD about the dreaded "pirates".

      Exactly. Congrats to all of the idiots out there that just gave the MPAA a very public example of "computer terrorists". Nice going.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    50. Re:counterproductive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my, would AfroFax be a good company name or what?

  5. Great job 4Chan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You just told the powers in the world to stop fucking around on the Internet and to start fucking around with jackbooted thugs knocking down doors.

    I feel so much safer now.

    1. Re:Great job 4Chan... by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      This is so true. I can sympathize with some of the ideas of Anonymous, but the problem is that they are feeding the very people they hate with idiocy like this. Now they have more ammo to sling right back, not only at the public, but at congress as well. "Look at what these little miscreants did! This is what pirates are like! Extend our already overextended power!"

      The DDoS will be beneficial to the **AAs in the long run and the shortsighted idiots on 4chan are handing it to them on a silver platter.

    2. Re:Great job 4Chan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can hardly say "look, look at the terrible things they're doing!" when it's exactly what they are paying people to do.

      Well wait, no, the MPAA is excellent at doublethink like that.

    3. Re:Great job 4Chan... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Next up, MPAA execs arrive at work to find 10,000 flaming bags of dog crap on their "porch"

    4. Re:Great job 4Chan... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "You just told the powers in the world to stop fucking around on the Internet and to start fucking around with jackbooted thugs knocking down doors."

      That was inevitable. One must eventually decide what to do about the thugs.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:Great job 4Chan... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1
      Adding on to that, a few words past from Jocktroll, the ultimate professional troll of Slashdot:

      First Link: No piece of technology will ever come into general use that can defeat the Media Mob. They have enough money and power to nullify any countermeasure.

      The battle for internet freedom must be fought in meatspace. Lawyers working for the media mob must be targeted, their offices firebombed, their families harrassed. They must be made an example of, abducted and executed, their bodies dismembered and put on display.

      Anyone working on internet repression is a legitimate target for violence. Nothing short of bullets and fire will ever stop them. All their money cannot save them once they're trapped in their offices on fire, or stabbed to death in an alley, or poisoned at lunchtime.

      Second Link: Why wait for "one day" and such extreme measures? We know where those clowns are. Get their CEO, two shots to the chest and one to the head, problem solved. Lock their offices closed with all the workers inside, set them on fire. Anyone who dares to follow in their footsteps ends up killed. His family is slaughtered as well. No need to go nuclear. And no need to wait for some unlikely saviour.

    6. Re:Great job 4Chan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese needle snakes?

    7. Re:Great job 4Chan... by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      Troll? Other than the prison terms and maybe needle ride, I agree with the guy you are calling a troll.

    8. Re:Great job 4Chan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome.

      I can shoot jackbooted thugs knocking my door down. It's kind of hard to shoot them on the internet.

    9. Re:Great job 4Chan... by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's a bit extreme, can we try the dog poop first?

    10. Re:Great job 4Chan... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Do you really thing that the targets would NOTICE dog shit stuck to their shoes, or tracked into their offices and homes? Think about who you are talking about here. Extreme? How many successful revolutions have there been that were NOT extreme? People who hold power almost never voluntarily relinquish that power, nor do they negotiate away portions of that power.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    11. Re:Great job 4Chan... by Professr3 · · Score: 1

      We keep trying, but all it seems to do is knock their websites offline.

    12. Re:Great job 4Chan... by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      Yes they are. It doesn't matter how hypocritical and slimy those guys are. What matters is what they are capable of doing, and they're banking on most people (congress included) being ignorant.

    13. Re:Great job 4Chan... by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      I agreed right up until everything that came after "meatspace". Fighting this online will do NOTHING. Most people don't give a crap about the internet and know squat about technology.

      However, the measures are, as his name states, very trollish.

    14. Re:Great job 4Chan... by sjames · · Score: 1

      I think they are exactly the sort of people who believe only they should be allowed to throw shit around.One incident wouldn't do more than annoy them, but if they get home and find more of the same, they might well turn out to be exactly the sort of deeply paranoid (in the colloquial sense) people who would be horrified to know that the unwashed masses know where they live and have a personal grudge.

    15. Re:Great job 4Chan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As things are, there is little that the average(?) netizen can do to fight these jerks at the **AA's. Doing this may feed them, but doing nothing also feeds them, and gives the appearance of silent approval of their behavior. As ineffective as this is, at least it makes the statement "hey, we do NOT approve". Meaningless gesture? perhaps, but some countries MP's ARE actually concerned about a little thing called public image. If it costs them at voting time (either in lost votes or just plain bad press), they WILL notice and at least consider the issues before blindly signing that next blank check for the extortion ....er, "royalties" to the **AA's lawyers.

      The result is the same, except they will NOT enjoy it as much. This is about as much as we can expect right now.

    16. Re:Great job 4Chan... by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      And the execs keep wiping their asses with C-notes. They laugh at the bozos in Anonymous and make more filthy lucre. This does nothing. Seriously, it does nothing but pull a few sites offline for a few hours. It's not even a moral victory.

    17. Re:Great job 4Chan... by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      I think they are exactly the sort of people who believe only they should be allowed to throw shit around.One incident wouldn't do more than annoy them, but if they get home and find more of the same, they might well turn out to be exactly the sort of deeply paranoid (in the colloquial sense) people who would be horrified to know that the unwashed masses know where they live and have a personal grudge.

      Which reminds me, of course, of Fight Club. (Of which we do not speak, of course.)
      Petty grievances should make their rich lives hell: piss in their soup, dog shit in their food, V1agra ads in their e-mail, viruses on their computers, constant tracking followed up by reporting any petty traffic violation to the police... so many things could be done, and most of them legal, as Scientologists know full well.

      The Anonymous could do that, if they had an attention span better than that of a senile goldfish.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    18. Re:Great job 4Chan... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You just told the powers in the world to stop fucking around on the Internet and to start fucking around with jackbooted thugs knocking down doors.

      We're talking about copyright holders enforcing copyright via civil action, not the fucking Night of the Long Knives. Get some perspective.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  6. bring it on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    nice work.

  7. Well by iONiUM · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At the very least, this should show the MPAA that no matter what kind of resources they have, 4Chan can muster the same or more. I mean, obviously this didn't have any short or long term effect other than someone probably saying "oh, our websites are down." But ya, if they are capable of this (with sheer numbers), they could be capable of more.

    Basically I'm for anything that scares the MPAA somewhat, or at least is a force fighting them, even if the "fighting" (in this case) is rather pointless and somewhat childish.

    1. Re:Well by DurendalMac · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Are you really this STUPID? Can 4chan muster hordes of lawyers and effectively lobby congress? Anonymous is far too shortsighted to have any kind of lasting impact here. You're apparently one of them. A DDoS that brings their site down is nothing. It gives them more ammo to use against piracy when they lobby congress. 4chan isn't capable of more. They're rarely capable of anything in the real world, and that's where the RIAA and MPAA are hurting people.

      This is nothing. This is a "moral" victory for idiots who need to feel important online because they don't know how to do that in the real world.

    2. Re:Well by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      How is it giving them ammo? Neither website was an important part of their respective business. They didn't lose any money over it. It's more symbolic than anything else. What we really need to do is figure out the IP addresses of the machines doing the DOSing of TPB and send them a few trillion nastygrams. DDOSes need to be responded to in kind. If it brings down half the internet (as in the Make Love Not Spam debacle), well good! That is the fucking point. This kind of behavior should not be tolerated.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    3. Re:Well by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      What we really need is a screensaver application to DDOS these bastards. Maybe Lycos could help code it. I agree that we have to keep our attacks up for at least as long as Aiplex does. Aiplex is an international Cyber-terrorist. Where are all of our so called cyber-warriors when we need them? If only the CIA were one of the good guys, the president of Aiplex would find himself facing multiple kiddie rape charges. Then the charges would be dropped and then reinstated again just to add to the publicity. Child rape is illegal in India, right?

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    4. Re:Well by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      Yes, because the MPAA/RIAA have never pulled costs out of their ass. "Look at what these miscreants did! They took down our site and it cost us (insert Pinocchio numbers here)! The government needs to crack down on this kind of hooliganism! Here, let us stuff your pockets, Senator Bedfellow..."

    5. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of an Anonymous capable of mustering lawyers or lobbying congress chills me to the core.

      "Therefore, your honor, I contend that child porn should be not only legal, but mandatory!"

    6. Re:Well by westlake · · Score: 1

      But ya, if they are capable of this (with sheer numbers), they could be capable of more.
      Basically I'm for anything that scares the MPAA somewhat even if the "fighting" (in this case) is rather childish.

      Whatever else may be on the Tea Party agenda, two things are not:

      The free movie fix for the geek.
      Letting a mob from 4Chan hijack the web and blackout any site they don't like.

      It would be easy - easy - for the anti-intellectual, anti-elitist, sentiment in American political life to find a new target in the geek's adolescent sense of entitlement.

    7. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... figure out the home and personal IP addresses of all the employees that work for these people...

      Attack them directly. The little people that make the big bad company work.

    8. Re:Well by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      "because they don't know how to do that in the real world."

      Problem is, it seems that no one knows how to do that. That's why nothing is ever done...

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    9. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most they're capable of in the real world are harassing phone calls and falsely ordered pizza. I have a feeling neither of those are going to bother the MPAA that much.

    10. Re:Well by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      And they'll say that a DDoS is wrong? That would be quite a nice response from them, but will raise the question of why are they doing the same thing...

    11. Re:Well by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      And you honestly think that they can't spin it in their favor? They have professional spinmeisters, as opposed to Anonymous, which has misogynistic husks.

    12. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could definitely be capable of more. Sure DDoSing the website is annoying, but image using a warbot to spam random email address @mpaa.org. Sure, spam filters will catch some, but will they update fast enough to catch every one? Particularly if the bot could recognize valid "no such address" responses versus an absence of response (or "out of office" responses). If only a few hundred get through to each employee, it seems it would hamper real-world business efficiency. Enough could even impact email server performance. How many organizations can operate efficiently without email?

    13. Re:Well by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      The most they're capable of in the real world are harassing phone calls and falsely ordered pizza. I have a feeling neither of those are going to bother the MPAA that much.

      Can you imagine the amounts of food that could be ordered for each and every of MAFIAA lawyers?

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
  8. Matthew 26:52 by Gonoff · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.

    In schoolboy terms "they started it!"

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    1. Re:Matthew 26:52 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.

      In 4chan terms "they started it!"

      ftfy

  9. Link Please by Starvingboy · · Score: 1

    Anyone have a link to the affected sites... :

    1. Re:Link Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  10. Awesome.. by Oasiz · · Score: 1

    Like 4channers ddosing wasn't already enough. Now the sites will suffer from the slashdot effect as well. Not that all this matters to me. I feel bad for the admins as they will get all the trouble and chaos. Ddosers likely think that they are attacking the big corporate giants but instead it's just the network admins who get all the shit and still desperately try to keep the sites up.

    1. Re:Awesome.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like 4channers ddosing wasn't already enough.
      Now the sites will suffer from the slashdot effect as well.
      Not that all this matters to me.

      I feel bad for the admins as they will get all the trouble and chaos. Ddosers likely think that they are attacking the big corporate giants but instead it's just the network admins who get all the shit and still desperately try to keep the sites up.

      Baww!!!

      Nevermind the fact that those network admins are playing their rolls to a problem in a larger picture.
      A message is being sent, and it's being heard, regardless of the casualties. Good work, Anon, you make me proud!

    2. Re:Awesome.. by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's the beauty of corporations. You can never trouble them with protests. You merely trouble their employees. Likewise, you cannot imprison them, for they do not actually exist.

    3. Re:Awesome.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone willing to work for *IAA deserves it! Hit their admins hard until no one wants to be an admin for them!

    4. Re:Awesome.. by couchslug · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Ddosers likely think that they are attacking the big corporate giants but instead it's just the network admins who get all the shit and still desperately try to keep the sites up."

      The servant of an enemy is still an enemy.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:Awesome.. by zblack_eagle · · Score: 1

      But you can imprison senior management. You know, those who control the company

    6. Re:Awesome.. by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 1

      Someone doesn't live in Amercia.

    7. Re:Awesome.. by hedwards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't that a compelling reason why they shouldn't have any rights under the constitution?

    8. Re:Awesome.. by Khyber · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Firebombs make great imprisonment devices. Just make sure all exits are covered.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    9. Re:Awesome.. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, and when you vote with your wallet and refuse to buy the products of some corporation which you don't like - guess what, the people who get all the trouble (of a lower figure on their paychecks, or possibly even being laid off) are its employees! O horror!

      I honestly don't understand where this line is coming from. I work for a large and rather unpopular (around here, anyway) corporation. As such, I fully expect the flak it may receive from disgruntled customers - should there be enough of it - to be reflected on my paycheck, bonuses etc. After all, impressive profits that it makes every quarter are most certainly reflected that way, so that would only be fair. A share is fair when it's of everything that goes in, whether gold or shit.

      Same for MPAA admins. I've no idea if it's a high-paying job or not, but either way, the money they get doesn't materialize out of thin air - it is a result of MPAA business, and, more specifically, the business decisions that it makes. If one feels comfortable using such a pay source as a means of supporting themselves, they should also accept the strings attached to that paycheck.

    10. Re:Awesome.. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Firebombs make great imprisonment devices. Just make sure all exits are covered.

      if you really believe that the issue of fucking copyright law is worth murdering people for, I wold suggest seeking psychiatric help, but you're probably too far removed from reality to understand your problem.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    11. Re:Awesome.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. But be sure to remove those rights also from any other legal entity that isn't a person (I am talking unions, clubs, societies, etc. here).

    12. Re:Awesome.. by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 1

      I heard of some folks that thought that some Tea was worth the deaths of over 500,000 people...

      Not trying to troll with my oversimplification, just pointing out that some people feel their beliefs are worth fighting for.
      On this issue, I'm not informed enough to have a strong enough opinion to take any sort of drastic action, but there are many who do, and while many disagree, it's not uncomon or even unusual for people to take action for their beliefs of their rights that others consider 'heavy handed'.

      --
      "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
    13. Re:Awesome.. by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 1

      To further this: These employees can always go work somewhere else. And should this not be encouraged?
      Just imagine if everyone working for the MAFIAA decided to work somewhere else, and noone wanted to take their places due to these kinds of troubles. That would be a rather large 'win' don't you think?
      Sure it's highly unlikely, but as an extension of the cause and effect I think it merely justifies the actions.

      --
      "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
    14. Re:Awesome.. by zblack_eagle · · Score: 1

      Firebombs make great imprisonment devices. Just make sure all exits are covered.

      +2 flamebait indeed.

  11. wrong target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    wouldn't it be more efficient to target Aiplex's and MPAA's gateway so that workers would have difficulty to "work"? If they don't use their own websites, they might have not noticed at all.

    1. Re:wrong target by Khyber · · Score: 1

      No, they directly targeted the load balancers, which is much more effective.

      Wider area of splash damage.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:wrong target by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to imagine just what is the average's MPAA employee's "work".

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  12. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Dislike Internet Vigilantism
    >Become an Internet Vigilante
    Oh /b/ you so crazy.

    1. Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO! U!

  13. Knock It Off by Effugas · · Score: 1

    The problem is collateral damage. Legitimate actors can't get into the DDoS game, because if they legitimize DDoS, the network will *fry*.

    The "good guys" cannot flood nearly as significantly as the bad guys. Worse, the good guys are significantly more exposed -- they have corpnets, they have partner nets, etc. Today it's the website, tomorrow it's Hulu.

    There are paths on which the anti-piracy people have the high ground (not moral high ground, tactical high ground). DDoS, in no uncertain terms, is not one of them.

    1. Re:Knock It Off by sjames · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, the MPAA has been paying Airplex to DDOS torrent sites for some time now. In this case, Han really didn't shoot first. In effect, they DID legitimize the DDOS and so this is Anonymous saying "Oh, OK then".

    2. Re:Knock It Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In many/most countries DDOS is flat out illegal. Make it intentional and paid - well that's a bigger crime. Offshore, disguising money trail - bad indeed.

      If evidence can be found to prove that statement, and the money connection proved, why have
      they not been investigated and people put in jail.

      Some lawyer should take out a permanent injunction stopping or knowingly taking part in illegal actions and laundering money to overseas parties, hostile to the USA. Better yet prevent movie houses and studio's sending money to criminal organizations that sanction this intolerable assault on the laws of the USA.

      Subpoena's will discover who is paying the piper. As for the other side, it looks like self defence, although those affected could always bring a class action for their outage - reason enough that a contingency lawyer may find good money to be made in this 'arms' war.

    3. Re:Knock It Off by sjames · · Score: 1

      Wealthy companies with political connections rarely get investigated and neither do their executives.

      As for bringing suit against them, to what end. They have bazillions to spend on lawyers (and have proven willing to spend outrageous sums even against individuals on public assistance). The best they might get would be nearly worthless coupons.

      When law enforcement and the courts fail, other actions take their place. Fortunately this one is non-violent.

  14. Anon delivers... by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    ...gigabytes of packets to you. lulz

  15. DDoS Software by Mojo66 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know a good DDoS software that runs on Linux? The mono port of LOIC is awful.

    1. Re:DDoS Software by selven · · Score: 3, Informative

      COUNTER=0
      while [ $COUNTER -lt 1 ]; do
        ping www.mpaa.org
      done

      Anything wrong with this?

    2. Re:DDoS Software by selven · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is something wrong with this: pings are being blocked. Substituting it with wget seems to be working just fine though.

    3. Re:DDoS Software by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Bash + curl.

    4. Re:DDoS Software by selven · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry about the chain of replies to myself, but mpaa.org seems to be blocking my IP after 440 successive wgets :)

    5. Re:DDoS Software by psergiu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you sure you're not blocked after 420 wgets ? :)

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    6. Re:DDoS Software by RichM · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know a good DDoS software that runs on Linux? The mono port of LOIC is awful.

      Bash fork()ing might work with "wget target.com".

    7. Re:DDoS Software by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Funny

      440 or 420? Hmmm. This is a very important question. One which I MUST research. Maybe we can get everyone on slashdot to test this?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    8. Re:DDoS Software by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      Maybe we need to test the parameters of the limit first. Two is a painfully small sample size. Maybe we could up the sample size to say.....10 000.

    9. Re:DDoS Software by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      Like this?

      :(){ wget target.com;:|:& };:

    10. Re:DDoS Software by Bungie · · Score: 1

      Try ping -f from a root prompt on Linux and you'll find it much more interesting.

      --
      The clash of honour calls, to stand when others fall.
    11. Re:DDoS Software by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

      420 Error
      File Not Found, dude

      --
      *DrugCheese rants*
    12. Re:DDoS Software by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It consumes very little bandwidth. When attacking webservers, the two most effective approaches are pingflooding and octopus. Which one depends on the server config. Sometimes the synflood - basically a much improved variation of the octopus - can be extremally effective. Most modern firewalls will filter it out though, so you have to fall back to the octupus ancestor. There are two programs for octopus attacks: Anoctopus and Slowloris. They are just different implimentations of exactly the same thing. There is also bwraep, but that isn't applicable in this case. It works only on hosted servers with a monthly transfer quota.

    13. Re:DDoS Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For Apache, and some others, slowloris is the ticket.

      For IIS (which the sites in question run), and some others, slowloris doesn't work, so just use hping3 to send them a happy synflood. Script here.

      Of course, this is brutal to your uplink, so don't forget to find an unencrypted or WEP (wesside-ng -- so easy a caveman could do it) network whose owner you don't like, and burn away.

    14. Re:DDoS Software by GameboyRMH · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      THAT'S OVER 9000!!!!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    15. Re:DDoS Software by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with simply leeching images off of their website and posting them onto one of the social networking sites? This way anyone on your buddy list gets an update and a picture that saps bandwidth from their site. This is an untested idea of course and is only meant as a thought game, do not try this at home blah blah blah...

    16. Re:DDoS Software by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Sorry about the chain of replies to myself, but mpaa.org seems to be blocking my IP after 440 successive wgets :)

      Pass it through tor.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    17. Re:DDoS Software by gilgongo · · Score: 1

      slowloris.pl is a better way - I'm told.

      --
      "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    18. Re:DDoS Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely a better method would be:

      while [[ 1 ]]; do
      telnet -E -8 www.mpaa.org 80 < /dev/urandom
      done

  16. "Anti-piracy?" by seeker_1us · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wouldn't call the MPAA "Anti-Piracy."

    THEY would call themselves "anti-piracy" but they actually lobby for legislation that gives them control over content beyond what copyright law allows, in order to reap greater profits. They also try to lock down and control content delivery mechanisms and channels in order to maintain a monopoly.

    Not really an "anti-piracy" group.

    1. Re:"Anti-piracy?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you not see the shorts before movies where the poor set builder says he won't get paid if you keep pirating movies?

    2. Re:"Anti-piracy?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like an "anti-free-culture" group. Where are those damned hippies when you need them?

    3. Re:"Anti-piracy?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they sue people? That's as anti-piracy as they come.

    4. Re:"Anti-piracy?" by rusl · · Score: 1

      They are pirates who steal culture by fencing it off instead of just using it, sharing, evolving. Unlike upright citizens who share. Pirates in the Caribbean were also mostly working for American or European navies but doing so under a different flag for strategic reasons.

      --
      Stupidity is its own reward.
    5. Re:"Anti-piracy?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you not see the shorts before movies where the poor set builder says he won't get paid if you keep pirating movies?

      That's why I slipped that guy an extra $100 to give me a copy of the DVD two weeks before it hits theaters.

    6. Re:"Anti-piracy?" by Zorque · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've always loved those commercials; that guy and everyone else on the regular staff got a paycheck for their work long before the movie came out. If they actually made a percentage of the film's profits, which I guarantee none of them do, then they'd have a right to complain. I guess the point I'm trying to make is moot since that guy wasn't really a carpenter anyway, but an actor.

    7. Re:"Anti-piracy?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, the wealth is obviously in the consumers' hands.

      But then again, don't let me convince you that this product is something you really need.

    8. Re:"Anti-piracy?" by Ltap · · Score: 1

      Yes. In fact, you could say that he will only get paid if you keep on pirating movies ...

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
  17. As the call to attack said... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Payback's a bitch.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:As the call to attack said... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Guess we showed them, huh?

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:As the call to attack said... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Have you paid attention? The next target is finding individual **AA members personal internet connections and then attacking those after we're done with the RIAA.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  18. On a Saturday? by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    What the hell is the point of DDOSing a company on a weekend? All the people who deserve it are out at their summer houses throwing their last party of the season. The only person who'll actually care is the poor networking flunky who has to come in on his day off or risk being fired.

    1. Re:On a Saturday? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Kids are in school during the week.

    2. Re:On a Saturday? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      What's the point of DDOSing the MPAA anyway? I can't imagine they get much traffic and nobody's going to miss much if it goes down.

      Neither will the "anti-piracy website".

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:On a Saturday? by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      They probably pay for their bandwidth, you know. At the very least it might cost them some pennies.

  19. Arms race, anyone? by istartedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only winners in an arms race are the arms dealers. In this case, that'd be bandwidth providers, security specialists, anybody who "helps" you in your attempt to win the fight.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Arms race, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case, that'd be bandwidth providers, security specialists, anybody who "helps" you in your attempt to win the fight.

      Lawyers, definitely lawyers.

    2. Re:Arms race, anyone? by StoatBringer · · Score: 1

      "intents and purposes", for fuck's sake.

      --
      Cress, cress, lovely lovely cress
    3. Re:Arms race, anyone? by the_saint1138 · · Score: 1

      Woosh...

    4. Re:Arms race, anyone? by rusl · · Score: 1

      I thought it was intense.

      --
      Stupidity is its own reward.
    5. Re:Arms race, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only winners in an arms race are the arms dealers.
      In this case, that'd be bandwidth providers, security
      specialists, anybody who "helps" you in your attempt
      to win the fight.

      So that means MPAA and Aiplex is losers? Interesting :)

    6. Re:Arms race, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Ghandi-esque notions are as antiquated as industrial economic theory applied to information age realities.
      In the information age, he who controls the information, wins. If one is denied access to that information, that information cannot be used. While passive resistance works fine at a physical level, it takes more effort in a networked environment.

    7. Re:Arms race, anyone? by istartedi · · Score: 1

      At no point did I advise either side to employ Ghandi-style passive resistance.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    8. Re:Arms race, anyone? by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      I could care less.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
  20. RIAA being attacked next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    A casual trip through 4chan's boards found an interesting tidbit. They are planning another assault, on the RIAA now. It is planned for Sunday. Finding the details on 4chans boards should be trivial for any slashdotter. Just trying to be informative.

    1. Re:RIAA being attacked next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:RIAA being attacked next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is unfortunate. I think DDOSing should only be done against someone who started it. The MPAA and their Indian cohorts started this fight. I don't see the point in going after the RIAA right now.

  21. Another important link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Interesting seems like 200+ people are in a chatroom coordinating this right now.

    http://pastehtml.com/view/1b3tqp1.html

    1. Re:Another important link by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One of the first things I saw was this: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-69-172-200-0-1 Network NetRange 69.172.200.0 - 69.172.201.255 CIDR 69.172.200.0/23 Name PEER1-DOSARREST-01 Handle NET-69-172-200-0-1 Parent PEER1-BLK-14 (NET-69-172-192-0-1) Net Type Reassigned Origin AS AS13768 Nameservers Customer DosArrest (C02492651) Registration Date 2010-05-12 Last Updated 2010-05-12 Comments DDoS Protection services RESTful Link http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-69-172-200-0-1 (I know, I'll lose the formatting - just go to the link, alright?)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  22. what kind of english is this? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    quoted from 'aiplex':

    Solution

    To eradicate piracy at its best possible, we strategically follow some of the best practices outlined below;

    Finding the links of the unauthorized content using appropriate software which co-relates the copyright / licensed material in any given format.

    Our 24/7 net vigilance agents & customer support team will have a rigorous check on video sharing communities and perform regular scrutiny for copyright deviation.

    A list of leading 159 video sharing communities where videos in any forms are uploaded will be on a rigorous check for any new uploads.

    We shall approach the service provider with the authenticated links of the pirated products being uploaded & appeal them to remove the content/file by issuing legal notice / request letter for violation of copyrights.

    Our 24/7 support team would also prevent the damage by issuing instant legal notices to the service provider & block the account for deviating copy right laws.

    wtf?? I mean, they seem like kids or something. not very good english for an 'official' net-sheriff (oops, that was another clown on teh intertubes, pardon me).

    I'm not impressed. sorry.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:what kind of english is this? by symbolic · · Score: 1

      I think it's because Aiplex is located in Bangalore.

    2. Re:what kind of english is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly, there are 159 leading video sharing communities??

    3. Re:what kind of english is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every day I am thankful for Bangalore. When they aren't producing crap like this for me to laugh at, they're producing shitty software that I later get paid big bucks to fix up.

    4. Re:what kind of english is this? by oiron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Buzzword compliance... Look at the rest of their site for some Dilbert-esque lulz

      People :

      Aiplex is staffed by a strong, coherent, and well-trained team of 100 plus people who have witnessed a sense of growth that is unparalleled in the industry. We have nurtured an atmosphere of teamwork, commitment, and accountability enabling the team to meet business demands consistently.

      You've just "witnessed" a "sense" of growth? In other words, you didn't actually grow, you just "witnessed" something that feels like growth... After truthiness, growthiness?

      They also seem to be into SEO; sounds like quite a sleazy company...

    5. Re:what kind of english is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, their claims are doubtful. Lots of the best video torrent sites are invite only, check their membership rigorously and don't allow magnet links- and the ones that aren't have been notoriously hard to shut down being outside the US and all.

      And while I tend to ignore spelling nazis, I did lol at the end of their , where 3 entries before "proofreader" it says "privelage".

  23. Get out and vote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish I could mobilize 4chan dwellers and /b/tards in particular to go out and vote for their national Pirate Party come election time, but it appears the vast majority haven't reached the age of maturity yet...

    1. Re:Get out and vote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I could mobilize 4chan dwellers and /b/tards in particular to go out and vote for their national Pirate Party come election time, but it appears the vast majority haven't reached the age of maturity yet...

      They may eventually reach the age of majority, but I doubt many will ever reach the age of "maturity". :P

    2. Re:Get out and vote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I am wrong, but I believe that if 85% of all Americans voted for Oprah, she still wouldn't be President unless she was affiliated with either the Democratic or Republican party.

    3. Re:Get out and vote... by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Sorry, They all voted Ron Paul.

    4. Re:Get out and vote... by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mobilize 4chan dwellers and /b/tards in particular to go out and vote for their national Pirate Party come election time, but it appears the vast majority haven't reached the age of maturity yet...

      So as a group they are indistinguishable from the Tea Party and several other voting blocks?

      Oh, wait... you prolly meant "age of majority"...

      --
      Will
  24. Unless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless 4chan is trying to track down a cat abuser or troll children, slashdot users flocking to the links will probably do more damage than 4chan could.

  25. 4chan, DDoS, and the needful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess someone asked 4chan to "please do the needful" to Aiplex and the MAFIAA...

  26. up now by rusl · · Score: 1

    http://www.aiplex.com/registration.html
    http://www.mpaa.org/search/policy

    are up now. and fast for me in BC. cloud scaling? It may be that they are paying to keep the sites up with extra bandwidth. This actually would impact their bottom line instead of just being a nuisance the way normal DDOS (take down) would be.

    --
    Stupidity is its own reward.
    1. Re:up now by mykos · · Score: 1

      MPAA's IP changed.

  27. You are a sad, funny man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's truly bizarre in my mind"

    But not at all bizarre outside your mind. Which means your mind is probably bizarre.

    Nontheless, I'll grant you that there are aspects of your mind that are not bizarre (you seem to be able to form complete sentences), but the rest is fairly broken, and not producing much that is either sensible or credible. Either that or you are simply trolling. But the way you do it is so strange, twisted, and just ....odd... that its hard to determine if there is an element of some physical injury to the reasoning center in your mind? That seems so terrible for you to know that your bizarre thoughts are caused by a physical injury and that you fully understand the implications of what its doing to your bizarre mind.

  28. short and sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while [[ 1 ]]; do curl http://www.mpaa.org/ >/dev/null; done

  29. What's with Aiplex? by Squeeself · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who doesn't see how Medical Transcription intersects in any way with SEO and Anti-piracy?

    Also, I'm saving this blurb from their front page as one of the best, most generic examples of corporate-speak ever:

    <Insert Company Name Here> has a blend of technology savvy & process driven dedicated team bringing about a paradigm shift in rendering customized solutions to its clients. We have steadily grown in reach and service offerings with a favorable cost-benefit ratio & keeping pace with the emerging business needs of our customers.

    1. Re:What's with Aiplex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see.. Dissecting marketingspeak:

      has a blend of technology savvy & process driven dedicated team (We use computers...) bringing about a paradigm shift in rendering customized solutions to its clients (...to revolutionize the way we do things for our clients...). We have steadily grown in reach and service offerings (... We're gaining in power and what-all we can do...) with a favorable cost-benefit ratio (...That's not too outrageously expensive, but still inflated enough to keep ourselves in business... ) & keeping pace with the emerging business needs of our customers. (... And we adapt... or fail.)

      (And, we're awesome at pulling marketing buzzwords out of our ASSets.)

    2. Re:What's with Aiplex? by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually their involvement in medical transcription rather bothers me. Much of medical transcription in the USA is now outsourced to India. If companies like this one exhibit ethically questionable behavior in regards to one aspect of communications, can they be trusted to properly handle the sensitive identity and health care information that is at the core of medical transcription? There is no assurance that these greaseballs who admit to deliberately corrupting portions of the Internet are not doing things like compiling lists of patients with terminal diagnoses to sell to funeral homes so the undertakers can use targeted marketing techniques more effectively....

      I'd like to see some USA Federal or State Attorney General do some investigation about whether there may be criminal activity, or the potential for that, here.

      --
      Will
    3. Re:What's with Aiplex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see some USA Federal or State Attorney General do some investigation about whether there may be criminal activity, or the potential for that, here.

      Hehehehe. ...

      Wait, you are serious?!

      MWAHAHAHAHAHA!

      Welcome to modern day world democracy - one $localcurrency, one vote.

      Bonus points for CAPTCHA phrase: Hoodwink.

    4. Re:What's with Aiplex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather see a benevolent sailor starting a DOS attack from the MPAA website to the AIPLEX IP blocks or vice-versa :)). That would be more interesting :)).

  30. Doesn't seem like /b/'s doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't believe that this was 4chan. I lurk 4chan pretty regularly and haven't seen anything about this - not calls to raid or anything. There isn't anything on the insurgency wiki and I can't find anything on ED. Also 4chan's DDOS's aren't generally sustained, usually they only last a couple of hours before people get bored. I suspect that something else is at play here.

    Posting anonymously because I don't want people to be able to know that I lurk 4chan.

    1. Re:Doesn't seem like /b/'s doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe that this was 4chan. I lurk 4chan pretty regularly and haven't seen anything about this - not calls to raid or anything. There isn't anything on the insurgency wiki and I can't find anything on ED. Also 4chan's DDOS's aren't generally sustained, usually they only last a couple of hours before people get bored. I suspect that something else is at play here.

      Posting anonymously because I don't want people to be able to know that I lurk 4chan.

      http://pastehtml.com/view/1b3tqp1.html
      yes it is.. you are obviously lurking in craptastic fashion

  31. Re:Harness by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Dammit, I wan'na see a Starship powered by a 4Chan engine!!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  32. DDOS plan by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

    What Anonymous didn't mention was that their entire plan was nothing more than to create a press release in order to unleash the largest botnet on earth: Slashdot.

    1. Re:DDOS plan by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      lol (:

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  33. Say what I want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, if you want me to. They're scum of the earth. The kind of people able to do mass murder if they ever find themselves in a war.
    That's what I think of 4chan. They're demented.

    I may be an anonymous coward, but so are they for the most part.

  34. Talk like a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was all done in celebration of the International Talk Like A Pirate Day

  35. There's not much point to addressing Anonymous by ConaxConax · · Score: 0

    The people who use 4chan don't all do this type of thing. It seems more like someone would suggest something and various people there would anonymously opt in, others would complain about the merits of such a thing, others would ignore or report it etc, and to claim it is supported by 4chan isn't right - the users comments are their own, not those of 4chan owners.

    1. Re:There's not much point to addressing Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      holy fuck.. do you not click the link the the chat room where it's all being planned?

      http://pastehtml.com/view/1b3tqp1.html

      and here's a link to the timer RIGHT HERE!!!
      this is very much an anon/4chan operation called operation payback due to airplex's DDOS on the pirate bay

      and point to note they are still trying to take down airplex again

      >>>> FOCUS ON 122.181.180.181 (AIPLEX) (TCP port 80, 3-4 threads - No 'Wait for Reply') (TCP MESSAGE "payback is a bitch")

      >>>> CURRENT STATUS [UP!] http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/aiplex.com >>> USE LOIC [SAFE] http://http//sourceforge.net/projects/loic/ >>> Linuxers use SLOWLORIS, it's super effective! In fact its more effective then javaloic. >>> MACS USE JAVALOIC >>> Timer see http://www.tinyurl.com/riaatimer >>> AIPLEX WILL GO UP AND DOWN, IT AUTO REBOOTS >>> NEWFAGS PLEASE SEE RULES AT http://pastebin.ca/1943830

  36. Dilbert said it... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Two wrongs, in special cases, can make a right (if they cancel each other properly).
    http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/1999-02-07/

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Dilbert said it... by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      And a double positive makes a negative? Yeah, right.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    2. Re:Dilbert said it... by WeatherGod · · Score: 1

      Dude, have you ever had double-decadent chocolate cake? It's so good, but so wrong...

    3. Re:Dilbert said it... by h00manist · · Score: 1

      I'm happy to see organized people working together against Big Money. Although I'm not sure i know the answer for how to best reply to a ddos from them, I tend lo think "call the hitmen, I mean, the lawyers." I guess I'll go chat a bit with 'em. Any IRC directions?

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
  37. Power of companies vs The people by unity100 · · Score: 1

    guess who wins.

  38. So are Army soldiers, Bird pluckers, & Mike Ro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to use dementia to fight the demented some times: no different than funneling a caustic explosion own a tube.

    Welcome to the Inter-Blagosphere-Tubenets: put your soap on a rope so you don't drop it on the floor.

  39. 4Chan is being Scapegoated: All news blames them!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't 4Chan doing this. There has been a large vocal journalism crowd in bed with FCC &US Government to shut-down Poole's innocen BBS. Even all the illegal and "CP" content on the boards is by government employees trolling everyone. Much of the most incideous content is only available to the prsecuting attornes that have such in their evidence repositories. No different than COPS walking home leaving the drugbox with something to throw onto the Homeless and Jobless people he's been wanting to get off the streets. 4Chan is just that: a unch of free/homeless/jobless whose website isn't controlled by anyone that favors government.

  40. Try this! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Mine's more betterer!

    #! /bin/sh

    COUNTER=1
    while [ $COUNTER -gt 0 ]; do
        echo "\n=====Attempt $COUNTER=====\n"
        wget -t 5 -w 0 --no-cookies -O /dev/null "$1"
        COUNTER=$(($COUNTER+1))
    done

    Save, make executable, and it attacks whatever site you pass it until you stop it, for instance "./dosattack www.mpaa.org"

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  41. Who's really at fault? by jwkckid1 · · Score: 0

    Seems that the 'Pirates' web sites that were earlier DDos attacked by MPAA members web sites were in turn counter attacked. Shades of "sew the wind, reap the whirlwind"? From my perspective this battle is heating up in exactly the wrong direction and may spread beyond what both factions may have expected of desire. The whole tit-for-tat attitude is not going to solve the precieved problems of either... It also seems relatively evident that if the MPAA and it's members websites had taken proper and available security precautions to protect their Intellectual property in the first place the "Pirates" would have been thwarted long ago now...

    --
    Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
  42. "Hope I die before I get old." by mattt79 · · Score: 1

    Pete Townsend wrote it, Roger Daltry sang it, and both of those geezers are still around!

  43. "assault on a pair of anti-piracy[?] enemies..." by mbeckman · · Score: 1

    Um, shouldn't that be "assault on a pair of _piracy_ enemies? I'm just saying.

  44. mpaa.org worked for me by h00manist · · Score: 1

    I acessed them from sao paulo brazil. Seemed slow but quite OK.

    --
    Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    1. Re:mpaa.org worked for me by h00manist · · Score: 1

      Another type of ddos would be to report the entire world for piracy. All planenary citizens should be reported for piracy. They viewed movies and kept them in their memory

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
  45. fuck 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are the most pathetic losers there are on the web.

    They all think they are badass.

    Nothing but a bunch of packet kiddies and noobs.

    Bring your worst... Im not scared...

    LOSERS!

  46. Virtual vs Physical by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 1

    In the virtual world? Yes
    Now, imagine if they had posted the street and postal addresses of the organisations...

    eg: http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/Spam_King_Inundated_By_Junk_Mail_Fails_To_See_The_Irony/

    --
    You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.