Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft IE Browser Share Dips Below 50%

alphadogg writes "Microsoft's Internet Explorer, which has dominated the Web browser market since blowing by Netscape in the late 1990s, last month fell below the 50% market share level for the first time in years. IE's share of the worldwide market fell to 49.87% in September, down from 51.3% in August and 58.4% a year ago. It is followed by Firefox, which increased its share slightly from 30.09% to 31.5% and Google Chrome, which grabbed 11.54% share, more than triple its September 2009 share, according to market watcher StatCounter."

15 of 297 comments (clear)

  1. good riddance by poetmatt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    while they're doing interesting things in IE9, I'd love to see MS acknowledge that a majority of the people who use IE are either forced or don't even know there are alternatives.

    1. Re:good riddance by click2005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MS will never acknowledge anything except that IE9 is better/faster/safer/blingier than the other browsers.

      The point is that with IE9, all of the major browsers aren't that bad really.
      Thats the way it should be. Your choice in browser shouldn't matter.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    2. Re:good riddance by hedwards · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed, but until IE 6, 7 and 8 are out of the way, it's likely still going to matter. It really should be a matter of personal preference, at least that's what I thought standards compliance was for.

    3. Re:good riddance by js3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How and why should they? Funny story my moms IE had a huge toolbar filled with crap so I tried to remove it but she complained! she whined that she likes the huge toolbar because it had useful stuff on it like auto form filling or some nonsense. different people different things.

      --
      did you forget to take your meds?
    4. Re:good riddance by A12m0v · · Score: 4, Informative

      I should have posted a link with the stats, sorry. http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    5. Re:good riddance by Millennium · · Score: 4, Informative

      This. IE6 won't die until XP dies; even though IE7 and IE8 run on XP as well, there will always be people who Just Won't Upgrade.

      Even if IE6 eventually does die before XP, IE8 certainly won't, since IE9 can't run on XP. This is why Microsoft really should have added XP support to IE9.

    6. Re:good riddance by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IE9 is still a problem tho...
      When IE6 came out it wasn't all that bad compared to its peers, just like IE9 today. However, if everyone moves over to IE9 and other browsers die out then you can kiss goodbye to any updates, IE9 will stagnate and become the new IE6.
      Market share of any browsers other than IE should be as high as possible, otherwise MS will just screw the web like they have done before.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    7. Re:good riddance by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Informative

      The CEO of Google said "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to be afraid of".

      No he didn't. He said "If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place." That seems more like a warning to me: if you do something stupid and it gets on the internet, you've already lost. You can't complain about people reposting it, or indexing it, or emailing it; the genie is out of the bottle and it is impossible to delete something from the internet (at least if the collective internet finds it entertaining in some way).

  2. Hmm..interesting by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find it rather interesting that the source for this figure is the same StatCounter that the same people cheering this figure about IE will claim is wildly inaccurate due to the fact that it shows Linux with like a 1 or 2% market share. But since in this case it shows something negative about Microsoft (IE market share, Windows XP vs Vista & 7 market share) it is taken as holy gospel truth. Hypocrisy. Isn't it grand?

    1. Re:Hmm..interesting by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree counting of this nature is somewhat dubious since it's hard to sample the web uniformly. That said, the milestone matters less than the trend, which is most likely reflected accurately so long as they don't change how they count. In other words, it doesn't really matter whether the absolute percentage is now 50%, 60%, or 40%; what's certain is the web monoculture Microsoft wanted so badly and nearly achieved at the height of their power has failed. And that's a good thing.

  3. No real increase for firefox... by daid303 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Firefox has been around 30% for the last year, while IE dropped 10% in the same time, and Chrome gained 10%.

    If this trend continues then it might balance out at 30/30/30/10 for IE/Firefox/Chrome/Other. Which should be good for everyone I think. There is no holy browser (except lynx), so a good balance of users should make sites more standard compliant in the end.

    1. Re:No real increase for firefox... by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

      There is no holy browser (except lynx)

      Surely thou meanest blessed telnet to port 80? We have learned to respect the ways of wget and curl, but the heretical lynx shall be spoken of with curses forever!

  4. Depends on whom you ask by asdfington · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Measuring browser market share is kind of a tricky task since any one site can only tell you who visits *their* site, or the sites whose stats they aggregate.
    Check out the stats here:
    https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers#Summary_table and you'll see that depending on whom you ask, IE has anywhere between 48 and 63% of the market share. Stats from sites that cater to developers (notably w3schools are skewed heavily* towards Firefox and Chrome, mainstream sites towards IE. Then there's the factors that lead to over-estimation, under-estimation... it's a sticky wicket for sure.

    I say look at the aggregate results. Then I mention I have no idea how those aggregates are tabulated and weighted (Do W3Schools' stats have the same weight as WeTrack10mSites.com?). The only thing you can know for sure (more or less), is the traffic statistics on *your* site, which, to the developer, should be pretty much the only ones that matter. Pro tip: explain that last sentence to your clients.

    *I don't really know if something can be "skewed heavily," but what the heck, you only live once, right?

  5. Re:Google Chrome Frame by pahles · · Score: 5, Informative

    The fraction is quite large unfortunately. Lots of companies still enforce the use of IE6! All because they heavily rely on 3rd party software (like SAP), which will not be updated.

    --
    Sig?
  6. All this dispite IE always being pre-installed by linebackn · · Score: 5, Informative

    What I find most interesting about the drop in IE usage is that this is happening in spite of IE still pre-installed on every single Windows computer and not being truly uninstallable (Even if the icon and tiny iexplore.exe are removed, which is all the Win7 add/remove feature does, 99% of it is sill there and can be fully embedded by applications)

    This means a huge number of people are going to the trouble of obtaining and installing a third party browser, and ignoring that a browser is already installed. It would be interesting to see some statistics on where and how people are getting them.

    I also have a feeling that for at least the short term, IE 9's inability to run on Windows XP might bite into IEs usage share. Firefox 4 will still run under 2000 and XP (and unofficially apparently even Windows 98 using a special piece of kernel extending software)