Slashdot Mirror


Google Testing High-Speed Fiber Network At Stanford Res Halls

GovTechGuy writes with this news from "Google has reached an agreement to build its first ultra-high speed broadband network near Stanford University, the search giant announced on Thursday. The agreement with Stanford means the university's residential subdivision will be the first place to test Internet speeds up to one gigabit per second, more than 100 times faster than the typical broadband connection in the US. The plan is to break ground early next year." That might just be worth $50,576 per year to have.

107 comments

  1. Fiber by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ~10 years ago, Palo Alto installed a fiber network at a great expense.

    I wonder if they're leveraging this existing network, or laying new fiber?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Fiber by Demoknight · · Score: 3, Funny

      The first post is never informative. I feel like you're doing it wrong.

      Whereas the second post should probably at least entertaining so a pre-touche on that one.

    2. Re:Fiber by socceroos · · Score: 1

      I imagine they're laying new fiber since the summary says they're going to "break ground early next year".

    3. Re:Fiber by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you're attempting to get meaningful information from Slashdot comments, you're the one doing it wrong.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  2. First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First?

    1. Re:First? by by+(1706743) · · Score: 1

      Looks like Demoknight had it backwards.

  3. Imagine the piracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ohhh, the uses are endless!

  4. That might be worth ... by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Funny

    To some students, it might be. Sadly enough I know someone who chose their undergraduate institution based on the ping times they got to their favorite gaming servers; he actually carried a notebook with him to each school he considered, and wrote down the ping times from each school to his favorite servers.

    I'm sure you'll be shocked to know he graduated with less-than-stellar grades, and then took a rather mediocre job afterwards.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:That might be worth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm sure you'll be shocked to know he graduated with less-than-stellar grades, and then took a rather mediocre job afterwards.

      ...so, like, what? A slashdot editor?

    2. Re:That might be worth ... by monkyyy · · Score: 1

      lol i srsly googled their name to see if i can get in since this is my last year in highschool

      --
      warning pointless sig
    3. Re:That might be worth ... by Captain+Segfault · · Score: 1

      To some students, it might be. Sadly enough I know someone who chose their undergraduate institution based on the ping times they got to their favorite gaming servers; he actually carried a notebook with him to each school he considered, and wrote down the ping times from each school to his favorite servers.

      It's absurd to use it as the only criterion, but quality of internet connection is a perfectly reasonable thing to consider if you're going to be locked in to campus housing.

    4. Re:That might be worth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's worse? Their editors, or their coders?

    5. Re:That might be worth ... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      lol i srsly googled their name to see if i can get in since this is my last year in highschool

      If you haven't heard of them before now, then you probably aren't Stanford material. And I'm quite sure if you wrote your application essay (especially this late) like that, you would be laughed out of the admissions process.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  5. How convenient... by Luke+has+no+name · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After all the hubbub, they put their fiber network in their own back yard. Real surprising, guys.

    1. Re:How convenient... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      I can understand Google keeping it close and in an academic research environment. In a few years they might start investigating more mainstream uses, and in 5 to 10 years some of this may trickle out to the average Joe. I expect in that time frame other commercial interests will do the same.

    2. Re:How convenient... by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well look at it from a testing point of view. No community can saturate an internet line quite as quickly or effectively as a bunch of horned up, tech-savvy college kids spending hours a day torrenting, playing facebook games, and streaming music, video, and porn 24/7.

    3. Re:How convenient... by Stregano · · Score: 1

      Who said you need to be in college to continue doing this?

      --
      The world is how you make it
    4. Re:How convenient... by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 2, Funny

      Colleges just exist as a nice aggregator of folks who do this, thus leading to a higher concentration of porn streaming per capita.

    5. Re:How convenient... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this is Slashdot, but seriously. RTFA.

    6. Re:How convenient... by Hooya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      PornPerCapita (PPC) might just be the new meme to replace LoC...

    7. Re:How convenient... by Caspin · · Score: 4, Informative

      umm... RTFA?

      There are only 850 homes that are being serviced at Stanford, mostly faculty (no dorms). Google has plans to scale they're broadband experiment up to 50,000-500,000 homes before their done.

      Stanford was selected to be the first because it was small and close to Google's campus. It is essentially the trial run before the really big deployments.

      The rest of the communities will be selected before the end of the year.

    8. Re:How convenient... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what article you read (or didn't, most likely) . As the article says, "Product manager James Kelly said Google will learn from the small deployment how to scale the Google Fiber program effectively for larger communities. The goal is to provide fiber connections to between 50,000 and a half-million people. Communities will be selected before the end of the year."

      So, Google is doing a very limited test site at Stanford before they try to deploy to tens to hundreds of thousands of homes. Sounds one heck of a lot like common sense if you ask me. Run a very limited test close to where the tech is being developed so you can find all the problems and fix them faster. Nowhere in the article did it say that this would be the only installation, or anything like that.

    9. Re:How convenient... by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

      >>>Colleges just exist as a nice aggregator of folks who do this, thus leading to a higher concentration of porn streaming per capita.

      But college boys have college girls to play with.
      What do they need porn for?
      ;-)
      I can see how this situation might not be realistic though, considering colleges ban torrenting. Just imagine: A 1 million K line and you can't use it for its main purpose. Disappointing.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    10. Re:How convenient... by timeOday · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can see how this situation might not be realistic though, considering colleges ban torrenting. Just imagine: A 1 million K line and you can't use it for its main purpose. Disappointing.

      Actually the main purpose for bittorrent vanishes with 1gbit symmetric Internet. Why bother pooling upstream when it isn't scarce any more? You'd still want lots of peer-to-peer servers (so 10,000 clients weren't all hitting the same server), but there would be no reason for a single client to connect to more than 1 server, which would eliminate most of the complexity of bittorrent. Just find any server with the file you want that isn't too heavily loaded, and download it from them.

    11. Re:How convenient... by L7_ · · Score: 1, Insightful

      are you purposefully being obtuse to the there/their/they're usage?

    12. Re:How convenient... by frozentier · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Keep it up and you're posts are going to get modded down.

    13. Re:How convenient... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why no-one really bothered with bittorrent for sharing mp3s. It really came into it's own with the rise of movie and TV piracy.

    14. Re:How convenient... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eh? Out of 2 uses of there/their/they're in his whole post, he screwed up one of them - and that was enough to warrant a snarky comment like that?

    15. Re:How convenient... by L7_ · · Score: 1

      Actually, I thought it deserved a comment because he reversed the usage on both:

      Google has plans to scale they're broadband experiment up to 50,000-500,000 homes before their done.

      Should be "Google has plans to scale thier..." and "...homes before they're done."

      Such improper usage leads me to believe that the original poster just does not understand proper grammar.

    16. Re:How convenient... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      But college boys have college girls to play with.
      What do they need porn for? ;-)

      They can't all get laid, as can be seen in this soul-crushingly depressing Win7 ad:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upXD78-owwQ :(

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    17. Re:How convenient... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody, look, grammar Nazi has failed to proofread his own post

  6. What other bottlenecks? by mewsenews · · Score: 1

    They'll have gigabit to their curb but I can't imagine they'll be piped directly into a backbone or anything..

    or will they? Does Stanford have a beefy link to the internet?

    1. Re:What other bottlenecks? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 4, Funny

      This isn't a Stanford network; it's a Google network so it will probably connect to the GoogleBone. If you thought Google was fast now, just imagine - with this network you probably get search results before you type the query.

    2. Re:What other bottlenecks? by rpmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      but what bone is the Google Bone connected to?

    3. Re:What other bottlenecks? by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

      Fone Bone

      Or possibly Thorn if you need a female connection.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    4. Re:What other bottlenecks? by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Between google search, google news, gmail, googletv, and youtube, some people might be fairly happy with fast access to nothing but google. Throw in facebook and you'd have a reasonable Cliff Notes version of the Internet. And I'm only being about 2/3 facetious.

    5. Re:What other bottlenecks? by Late+Adopter · · Score: 1

      CASH BONE!

    6. Re:What other bottlenecks? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      You mean, the Feds will.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    7. Re:What other bottlenecks? by dragin33 · · Score: 1

      I already do get results before I'm done typing the search query.

  7. awww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucky bastards..

  8. One gigabit per second by holywarrior21c · · Score: 3, Funny

    My university has 4GB/day cap on the internet. hypothetically speaking, if we had this 1gigabits connection, it can become useless in 32 seconds.

    1. Re:One gigabit per second by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      My uni a couple of years ago had a whopping 300mb/month cap. 2.3 seconds.

    2. Re:One gigabit per second by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I think a certain university network I know has (had?) 10 GB/day. However, that did not apply to intra-campus bandwidth so it only encouraged people to access the ridiculous amounts available locally.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:One gigabit per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8GB/month download cap

      yes, per month

      you can imagine the amount of account sharing that happens with people not living on the campus and people living in the dorms.

    4. Re:One gigabit per second by Facegarden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think a certain university network I know has (had?) 10 GB/day. However, that did not apply to intra-campus bandwidth so it only encouraged people to access the ridiculous amounts available locally.

      Aww man, that just reminded me of the private P2P network my buddies setup in college a few years ago. It was totally local and private, and it was invite only, so there was basically no risk of getting caught. Very much content was shared over that link.

      Ahh, the good ol days.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    5. Re:One gigabit per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your university is terrible. Haven't you guys ever heard of Internet2? We've got multiple links to multiple carriers (research and common) adding up to over 40GB/sec. And this is just in Eugene!

    6. Re:One gigabit per second by afidel · · Score: 1

      LOL, we had an OC3 connection just for the dorms in 1997. Unfortunately since then they've only upgraded to a 400Mbps connection on the resnet side since so it's way less impressive now relative to home connections =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:One gigabit per second by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Penn State upgraded about a year ago from 4GB/week to 10GB/week. Man, that was rough. Have to set up downloading linux ISOs on Sunday night - if they were DVD images, one download could eat your entire cap. That or use the wifi - but there's no wifi in the dorms, so you'd have to go elsewhere for that. I used to leave my laptop running in it's bag so it could hop between wifi nodes and download while I walked from class to class.

  9. This is not for students by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 4, Informative

    This network is for houses on Stanford's campus where faculty and staff live. The students will have to be content with only 100 Mbps in the dorms.

    1. Re:This is not for students by toastar · · Score: 1

      only 100mbps.... I only have like 10 o.o

    2. Re:This is not for students by yincrash · · Score: 1

      i assume there is still a sizable population of students who live off campus...

    3. Re:This is not for students by froggymana · · Score: 1

      yeah, well I'm stuck with a nice and crappy plan from Verizon, but now its switched over to "Frontier" and things have only gotten worse. I have a 1Mbit connection :/

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
    4. Re:This is not for students by dorv_05 · · Score: 1

      Your assumption is for the most part incorrect. 95% of Stanford undergraduates live on campus, as well as 56% of graduate students. Housing in the area is extremely expensive, and many faculty members live in university subsidized housing, which is necessary for the university to maintain a competitive compensation package for their professors.

    5. Re:This is not for students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. The residential subdivision of Stanford that has the name Stanford, CA is not student housing. It is for faculty and staff is and is very exclusive. I visited someone at one of these homes once. He had a live in butler, the house was massive (probably about 5-7k square feet) and he told us the story about how he didn't like where it was when he first bought it so he moved the whole house to the other side of the lot. I don't think anybody in this neighborhood is really hurting for more amenities. This is just icing on an already very fancy cake.

    6. Re:This is not for students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On campus, I get roughly 80 Mbps up and down through speed test sites

    7. Re:This is not for students by godunc · · Score: 1

      ...because google doesn't want to stress their experiment that hard. Imagine how many torrents those kiddies would have going with a 1gbps connection. At least fu@!book doesn't require a fast connection...yet.

    8. Re:This is not for students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, 99% of undergrads live on-campus. It's part of the culture.

  10. Not res halls (dorms) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The recipients are faculty and staff who live in houses owned by Stanford.

  11. Yeah what is this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Stanford?! I thought the point was to service areas that didn't already have good broadband. Really, this is some bullshit.

    1. Re:Yeah what is this crap by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      Where would you like to start up an ISP from scratch:
      A university where you can find patient and probably gifted and future employees.

      Or just jump to a city or an urban environment, where the phones could be slammed because "the internet is down" while they test and deploy.

    2. Re:Yeah what is this crap by bv728 · · Score: 5, Informative

      In fact, if you RTFA, you'll notice the phrases such as 'Test' and 'learn from the small deployment how to scale the Google Fiber program effectively for larger communities.'. This is intended as a close to home, easy deployment.

    3. Re:Yeah what is this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stanford?! I thought the point was to service areas that didn't already have good broadband. Really, this is some bullshit.

      Why? You can compress the traffic to those areas quite effectively, since it's mostly the same "OMG A NIGGER IS PREZIDENT!" emails anyways.

    4. Re:Yeah what is this crap by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      This is not the same as Google's community fiber program.

  12. so when will we be getting this? by TideX · · Score: 1

    So when is google going to roll out their ISP service? I want 1GBps, screw comcast.

    1. Re:so when will we be getting this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a place you can move right now, and you can even call Comcast up and say SCREW YOU!

      http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/09/13/2040211/Gigabit-Speeds-At-Home-In-the-US?from=rss

    2. Re:so when will we be getting this? by choongiri · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you sure that's what you want? At least streetview stops outside your house. Sometimes.

      With a Google ISP, you know they'd be cataloging every non-ssl page you visit, inferring things about ssl encrypted sites you visit (as your ISP they would know the IP address of the server you connected to, remember), and using every last bit of your data to target advertising and profit from you in any way possible.

    3. Re:so when will we be getting this? by elewton · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they will.
      Would that bother you?

    4. Re:so when will we be getting this? by TideX · · Score: 1

      You make the assumption that Google cares about my data. Google has catalogued and indexed the internet itself I don't think they give a shit about what one person does on their computer. I trust Google and they have yet to disappoint me. I'd trust them with my information more than Comcast. Besides I already use SSL and TOR whenever possible. Before you start attacking Google consider what OS and programs you're using to type replies. Stop being so paranoid.

    5. Re:so when will we be getting this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this different from other ISPs?

    6. Re:so when will we be getting this? by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      Hyperbole. What they're trying to leverage is the self-reliance on distribution channels, not leeching everyone's data.

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
  13. Yes, Return Some Of That Tax-Dodge Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to the former U.S.A. and

    do NO evil.

    Thanks in advance.

    Yours In Vladivostok,
    K. Trout

  14. More importantly... by lullabud · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's his PVP ranking?

  15. $50k? Uh, it's already available elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In Japan they get gigabit for $90/mo and it has been available for 5 years or so. $50k seems kind of steep.

    We here in the US seem to have a warped view of things due to our crapper Internet infrastructure.

  16. What about Peter Lothberg's Mom ? by mbone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...the first place to test Internet speeds up to one gigabit per second

    I think not. Peter Lothberg's Mom has had 40 Gbps for over 3 years now.

    1. Re:What about Peter Lothberg's Mom ? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      More correctly, her basement did. In which her lowly geek spawn resides.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:What about Peter Lothberg's Mom ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and in several other Swedish cities, you can get 1Gb/s Internet connections (without the nepotism;) for between 40 and 120 USD per month. See the Prisjakt overview.

  17. Drexel University has had this for years! by GerbilSoft · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm currently a student at Drexel University, and they've had gigabit Internet links for several years. It was initially implemented in the main buildings, but then extended to dorms around two years ago. I regularly download files from public Internet servers at over 20 MB/s, and the connection's mostly limited by my laptop's hard drive.

    1. Re:Drexel University has had this for years! by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      Over here at UPenn, they've rolled out 802.11n campus-wide, and I've hit the max at 300Mbps or so. They'll be rolling out gigabit in the next year or two...

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    2. Re:Drexel University has had this for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a grad student at UPenn. I was living in a dorm last year and the connection was terrible. Video chat on Skype with parents would often not work. Now I have Verizon and it works flawlessly. I also have great wireless connectivity in my office... I essentially need to walk with my laptop to the hallway every time I want to transfer a file to our department's linux server, because I only get a few KB/s in my office. The wireless sucks.

  18. 1000Mb connections are not unheard of by ndege · · Score: 1

    Just over a month ago, Slashdot reported 1000Mb connections (up and down) to the home for $349.99 per month covering all of Chattanooga, TN.

    I can order it where I live...and, no contract for this fiber to the home connection either. If you want to hear it from the horses mouth, read it here.

    Also, I discovered that by adding a home phone (delivered via the same fiber) to that quote, the total price actually drops to $317.03 per month.

    I have no personal affiliation with EPB, but I do think it is uber-cool that I could upgrade to 1Gb by making a phone call and paying [a lot] more each month. Their 30Mb up/down for $57.99 is enough for me. :)

    --
    Sig Return: 204 No Content
    1. Re:1000Mb connections are not unheard of by GezusK · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I'm thinking...if you're going to post this news...at least don't forget about a fairly recent post that refutes it's "first" status.

      I think its too bad that they picked an area that has the financial means to do this themselves, instead of helping an area that doesn't.

  19. Re:$50k? Uh, it's already available elsewhere by Jason+Kimball · · Score: 1

    But $50k would be expected if the bandwidth was provided by a cell phone network....

  20. Re:$50k? Uh, it's already available elsewhere by JonySuede · · Score: 1

    did you click the link you bloody moron ?
    56k is the tuition cost

    --
    Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
  21. Re:$50k? Uh, it's already available elsewhere by mmaniaci · · Score: 3, Informative

    The $50k is housing and tuition costs for Stanford students, not the price of the service. I'd link you to the source, but, yeah, you won't click it.

  22. Re:$50k? Uh, it's already available elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One whoosh for the dumbass

  23. I think I speak for all of us when I say by Matt+Perry · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please seed!

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:I think I speak for all of us when I say by timeOday · · Score: 1

      If we all had gigabit network, there might not be any real need to "download" anything to local storage in the first place - or even to own a PC (or game console). Just move all apps to the cloud and display them on your internet-connected TV or monitor. Even 3d games could be run that way with a gigabit to play with.

    2. Re:I think I speak for all of us when I say by afidel · · Score: 1

      Nah, 1080p30 takes a bit over 3Gbps and I know most gamers whine about 30fps.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:I think I speak for all of us when I say by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      You can't reliably encode, compress and stream realtime while maintaining perfect HD clarity. All of those little ms add up.

    4. Re:I think I speak for all of us when I say by oranGoo · · Score: 0

      Well, if Blue-ray can do 1080p24 in H.264 at around 25-35 Mbps then not sure where you pulled out 3Gbps out from (I only get a similar number if I multiply 1080 x 1920 x 50 frames x 32 luma/chroma = 3.31 Gbps).

      And OK, maybe today we can not use commodity hardware to do real-time (as in interactive) encoding and decoding of 1080p60, but I have always liked the idea of thin clients and central resources.

  24. Australia's already got Gb to the home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    As an election stunt last month or so, the Australian Government got the knob turned on the new National Broadband Network, being rolled out right now, setting it to 1Gbps instead of 100Mbps. So I think Australia beats Google.

  25. So what? Hmmm by Mysteray · · Score: 0

    Google pulls fiber to some "faculty- and staff-owned homes" at the school which incubated their search engine company?

    They have fiber optics running at "up to one gigabit per second" even. For a distance of two whole miles. Wow. Good to know that in the year 2010 there's still cutting edge research going on in the Valley. Usually a Google project is a little more innovative and ambitious than that.

    But wait: "The location just a few miles away from Google will also make it easier for engineers to monitor progress." Could it be that Google just might be interested in some other benefits of "easy monitoring"?

    You don't suppose they could be .... nahh .. they would never be so evil as to test their personal data collection and targeted marketing algorithms on their old college professors.

    Would they?

  26. Shaw is doing this in Canada by RajivSLK · · Score: 1

    Shaw is already offering gigabit FTTH Internet in Calgary and Vancouver (http://www.shaw.ca/en-ca/ProductsServices/Internet/The+Fasternet/).

    They call it the Fasternet and it's free for 6 months. I already have 100mbps from shaw in Victoria and can't wait for gigabit. Google doesn't seem very cutting edge to me.

    1. Re:Shaw is doing this in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of caps do you have on that? Here Videotron offers some reasonable speeds... but caps it at 120GBs... which if you have a 50Mbps connection, just shows how much they like to screw their customers over.

    2. Re:Shaw is doing this in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about goddamn time. Coming from Seoul to Vancouver was like moving to a third world country for internet.

  27. What are they "testing" here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly are they "testing"? Aren't there enough trials of Gigabit around the world (in Tasmania, AU- http://www.nbntasmania.com.au -for example) that they could simply use the existing findings? Or is their something magical about fiber from Google?

  28. Gigabit since 2004 in dorms at U of Minnesota by Paktu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was a freshman there, they installed gigabit ethernet in all of the dorms. This was way back in 2004. I can't find anything that old, but here's a source from 2006 to confirm it: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2075070,00.asp

    1. Re:Gigabit since 2004 in dorms at U of Minnesota by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's not the same thing.

    2. Re:Gigabit since 2004 in dorms at U of Minnesota by blakelarson · · Score: 1

      The gigabit ethernet is nice, but that's just the internal network. The connection to the Internet is what Google is working on.

  29. Wrong Summary by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    The summary is wrong. Stanford provides discounted faculty housing. The article doesn't talk about their dorms.

  30. Had it in 2003 by icthus13 · · Score: 1

    I had a GigE connection in my dorm at the University of Florida in 2003. Granted, all we did with it was stream music over iTunes and LAN Starcraft, but it was great for geek cred.

  31. fiber'round d'world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Useful background information:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiber_to_the_premises_by_country

    I have this option available in my area (Helsinki), €99.81/month:

    http://www.sonera.fi/laajakaista/laajakaista+kotiin/1000+megaa

    Basically, it's 1000/100 but since I am more than happy with the 210/10 that I have currently I don't think I will be bothered to upgrade the monthly fee at this time (the 210/10 is €45/month). The speed is pretty much maxed out any time of the day or month, no limits, so it's all pretty kick ass. I don't really CARE; I been happy with my internet connection since I got ADSL 1024/512 back in 2000. THAT was awesome, upgrade from 56K dialup to 1024/512 felt like the speed was unlimited. =)

    The difference from 10 MB/s to 100MB/s is irrelevant for me, I don't transfer that much stuff. My biggest transfers are Steam games now and then, 4-8 GB will be done in less than 10 minutes, that's better than good enough for me. But nice to see things going forward, not complaining!

  32. Case Western Gigabit in dorms since 2001 by brian0918 · · Score: 1

    They installed gigabit fiber in the dorms my freshman year. I guess we were spoiled.

  33. Shot across the bow Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please challenge Comcast Google.

  34. When will it be available to us by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I sometimes hate hearing about what's coming because it gets my hopes up NOW, instead of later, I know it is a catch 22, as we need more interest for things to advance, and you can't have interest by the masses without informing them in advance of what is coming, but MY GOD, how long before we get the cheap solar panels everyone keeps taking about.

    Will this be another one of those stories that only 15 years later will we see our ISPs upgrade to this type of fiber???