Slashdot Mirror


The Placebo Effect Not Just On Drugs

dvdme writes "It seems the placebo effect isn't just valid on drugs. It's also a fact on elevators, offices and traffic lights. An article by Greg Ross says: 'In most elevators installed since the early 1990s, the 'close door' button has no effect. Otis Elevator engineers confirmed the fact to the Wall Street Journal in 2003. Similarly, many office thermostats are dummies, designed to give workers the illusion of control. "You just get tired of dealing with them and you screw in a cheap thermostat," said Illinois HVAC specialist Richard Dawson. "Guess what? They quit calling you." In 2004 the New York Times reported that more than 2,500 of the 3,250 "walk" buttons in New York intersections do nothing. "The city deactivated most of the pedestrian buttons long ago with the emergence of computer-controlled traffic signals, even as an unwitting public continued to push on."'"

31 of 824 comments (clear)

  1. This explains the political process by Cornwallis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I keep voting and nothing new happens.

    1. Re:This explains the political process by alen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      what do you expect to happen? i've lived in the US almost 30 years and everyone wants a government check and free health care but they don't want to pay for it.

      after 30 years i like the US, A LOT

    2. Re:This explains the political process by ChefInnocent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh for a mod point. I've come to look at the election process as voting for Coke or Pepsi when all I want is a glass of water. Transparent and no artificial additives.

    3. Re:This explains the political process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I keep voting and nothing new happens.

      Funny coincidence... my father calls the "walk" buttons at traffic lights, "politician buttons". I never understood the answer, and thus the joke, as a child... went something like this:

      Dad: "why do you always press the politician button?"
      Me: "why do you always call it a politician button?"
      Dad: "because it does nothing."

    4. Re:This explains the political process by H0p313ss · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I keep voting and nothing new happens.

      You joke, but during the Suharto regime in Indonesia (1967 - 1998) they held elections and a large part of the population thought they lived in a democracy as a result. They had a very large, and politically diverse, number of parties and they allowed them all to have rallies etc.

      Come election day, nothing ever changed and the people were more content than they would have been without the illusion of political contention, it was very educational to watch.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    5. Re:This explains the political process by Smidge204 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More specifically, people want free health care but don't want "them" to have it, because "they" are moochers or lazy and are just taking advantage of the system. "If I get free handouts from the government, that's okay because I'm just getting my tax money back. God forbid someone else gets assistance, because that's my money, dammit!"

      I know several people who have stated this point of view explicitly. The cognitive dissonance is tear-my-hair-out infuriating.
      =Smidge=

    6. Re:This explains the political process by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 4, Funny

      Water isn't even on the ballot. There is, however, Mellow Yellow...yeah, no thanks.

    7. Re:This explains the political process by Schadrach · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've known someone who was ranting about those "damn liberals and their socialist programs, trying to push socialist health care on us now" *while* filling out forms to apply for Medicare.

    8. Re:This explains the political process by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 4, Informative

      We want free healthcare.

      It's the insurance companies that pays for astroturfing that gives the appearance that we really don't want universal healthcare. What was really amazing was the number of medicare recipients protesting against universal healthcare.

      The other amazing thing is how people believe that if we give tax cuts to the wealthy then jobs will magically appear. Never mind that we are talking about making Bush-era tax cuts permanent and not introducing new tax cuts. If the tax cuts were a panacea then why haven't they created new jobs in the past 3 years?

      Mainstream media creates perceptions. Perceptions don't always reflect reality.

      Also the US government always seem to do what is good for corporations and hardly anything good for consumers. They try to make it appear it was good for consumers. Take the current "Health Care Reforms" that the Democrats passed last year. It doesn't come close to making health care free, in fact it forces us to purchase health insurance. So on the surface it looks like the consumers are finally getting affordable healthcare, in reality the insurance corporations are getting customers who are forced to purchase insurance.

      Next thing you'll see is the government promising more jobs from exports by initiating free trade with a country whose growing economy is based on jobs being outsourced from the US. Oh wait it looks like Obama wants to announce something....

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    9. Re:This explains the political process by bberens · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'll add another to your list. I'm a very small government conservative (against Department of Education, against even a large standing army, etc.). But I support socialized healthcare. Why? Because it's the only feasible pathway away from employer controlled healthcare. We've already killed the biggest noose employers put around their employees (pensions), the last big thing is health care. Once you strip that away from the employer you will see TONS of people starting up that small business they've always wanted to. Nothing will be better for capitalism in America than socializing healthcare. Mark my words. It's coming, and it'll be great when it happens.

      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
    10. Re:This explains the political process by Chapter80 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll add another to your list. I'm a very small government conservative (against Department of Education, against even a large standing army, etc.). But I support socialized healthcare. Why? Because it's the only feasible pathway away from employer controlled healthcare. We've already killed the biggest noose employers put around their employees (pensions), the last big thing is health care. Once you strip that away from the employer you will see TONS of people starting up that small business they've always wanted to. Nothing will be better for capitalism in America than socializing healthcare. Mark my words. It's coming, and it'll be great when it happens.

      You state a problem ("employer controlled healthcare is a noose around employees") and jump to a solution ("make it free for everyone").

      Why not come up with a solution that is better aimed at the problem? Like: Pass a law that says, "you want to be in the Health Insurance Game (i.e. Wellpoint, Cigna, Humana, Aetna, United Health, etc), you are REQUIRED to accept pre-existing conditions, and offer insurance to individuals."

      In fact, the government could require standardization of plan offerings across the industry (much like the government dictates what "grade A Extra Large Eggs" are). The industry group - representatives from Wellpoint, Cigna, etc. (not the government "death panels") could define what a Plan A "The Insurance Company takes all the risk" through Plan Z "Insured is willing to take more risk". If we were all looking at the same "industry norms" menu, we could make logical decisions for ourselves.

      Since I'm really only concerned about catastrophic, I would like to buy a plan Z, and I'll deal with my own minor issues.

      Imagine this: right now I have a prescription for a daily medication that the insurance company is only willing to pay for one every four days. So somehow, when faced with the "buy it for $117 or pass on it", I get by without it. I am making economic decisions. We all should be making economic decisions. Now, this isn't a life-or-death decision for me, it's addressing a minor inconvenience. But I'm good with that.

      I fail to see how paying for any idiot to walk into an emergency room because they have a headache is going to spur entrepreneurship!

    11. Re:This explains the political process by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was actually wondering last night why governments in places like myanmar bother with voter intimidation when they only need to do a bit of number magic for vote counting (which happens away from the eye of [most] members of the public).

      Iran tried that recently and it ended up being the closest they've come to losing control in the last 30 years. You might argue they just weren't slick enough, but that's a risk in and of itself too.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    12. Re:This explains the political process by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The government can give $10 to educational charities or $100 to prisons. I want the smallest government possible, so I'm for Head Start. That program causes a reduction in other services that, overall, saves me money.

      But then, there are those that would rather spend $1000 on prisons than give one "needy" person $1 because they are anti-charity, not for an effective expenditure of money.

  2. How is this news? by Eudial · · Score: 5, Funny

    My computer isn't responding when I click an icon. I click again. Nothing. So I click it really hard 30 times in a row. Now the computer decides to respond. Clearly, the computer can read my frustration, and therefore hurries to open the 32 firefox windows I requested.

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  3. close button in elevators... by codegen · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well yes and no. It is true that most of them have no effect in normal operation, but when the elevator is in service mode (i.e. apartment move mode), then doors stay open until you press the close button.

    In my sister's apartment, the close button has a effect. The normal door open time is about 40 seconds, and it will close the instant you press the close button (i.e. after 5 seconds). In the office building that I'm in (mid 60s construction), the close button has no effect unless the elevator is in service mode).

    --
    Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
  4. Re:Intentional? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If no one ever tells the masses that the elevator or crosswalk buttons don't do anything then of course they're going to keep pressing them. They may not help but the person doesn't know that it doesn't make a difference. At least when you hit something with a hammer you know something happened.

  5. not placebo by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ok, so I arrive in a town at an intersection with a button.
    I am going to press it because how the heck do I know whether its connected or not?

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:not placebo by Tsiangkun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm the jogger. If you would have looked, made eye contact, and given me the right away to cross, I would not have to hit that button. I KNOW it causes you a longer wait. As soon as you learn that it is faster to yield to the pedestrian than to wait for a whole light cycle, the situation will change. As it is, you show no sign of yielding, so I hit the button.

    2. Re:not placebo by dzfoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      You have arrived at an intersection in town. There is a button.


      > Press button

      You press the button and... Nothing happens.


      > Press button

      You press the button again and still nothing happens.


      > Smash button a few more times!

      I do not understand "Smash".


      > Press button

      You press the button and this time something happens.

      You have been eaten by a grue.

      [r]etry / [q]uit?

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
  6. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or how little respect people actually deserve.

  7. Other non-placebo treatments by jomegat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I read an article in the Washington Post ~20 years ago about people waiting in lines. A hotel was constantly receiving complaints about the speed of their elevators. They kept tweaking the elevators, but the complaints continued to roll in (despite the quantifiable improvements). Rather than continuing to pursue the problem with technology, they turned to psychology and installed mirrors in the elevator lobby. Seems that if people have something interesting to look at (to them at least), the time passes more quickly and they do not notice that the elevators are slow. After they made this final change, the complaints stopped. I think about this every time I see a mirror in an elevator lobby.

    --

    In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they're not.

  8. Re:It is slashdot too. by wisty · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or their ADD forbids them from waiting for a whole damn minu

  9. Not sure "placebo effect" is accurate by gosand · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Placebo effect" implies a perceived improvement. I think it's obvious by the number of times people push elevator close door or street "walk" buttons, or fiddle with office thermostats, there is no perceived improvement.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  10. Not sure author understands meaning of "placebo" by ugen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Placebo" refers to situation where a patient does not know that the medication is inactive.

    I am not sure about everyone, but I happen to know that most "close" buttons on elevators and most street crossing buttons to activate a pedestrian traffic lights do not work (the former by design, they are there for fire control mode, the latter mainly because they are broken :) ).
    However, I still continue to use them and the reason is very simple:
    1. They still work occasionally (as was the case just last week in a hotel elevator, where doors would close immediately by using close button, and stay open for extended periods of time without it, tested many times). It's a "nice surprise" when it works - and nothing is lost when it does not work.

    2. They may be required occasionally. I know of a quite a few intersections where pedestrian traffic light won't turn green without the use of a button. It's not worth wasting a few traffic light cycles to find out whether the button is or is not needed. It's easier to just press it - if it works, great, if not - again nothing lost.

    So, to conclude, this situation is nothing like placebo.

    Well, perhaps except for thermostats, but I haven't worked in the office in years - and when I did, never bothered with these things.

  11. Re:Wow. by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Informative

    I dunno about NY, but it varies here in Ohio.

    1) Some lights change at the same rate, regardless of pressing the button.
    2) Lights with chirpers/beepers/buzzers will only make noises if the button is pushed. I think all of these change at the same interval regardless of pressing the button, the button merely tells the light to activate the speaker when it switches.
    3) In the suburb where I live, the walk lights won't show unless you hit the button. The timing of the traffic lights doesn't change, you just get a nice walk light. This is rather obnoxious because you get yelled at if you cross when a walk light would have been active if you had hit the button...
    4) Some lights won't change unless you hit the button - about the same as described by the poster from Austin.
    5) The one light I know for absolute sure doesn't do anything if you hit the button, is near where I work. Hit the button, don't hit the button, do either all day, it doesn't matter, the sign will never switch to "walk"...

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  12. Close door buttons do work.. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They are a good aid in me repeatedly hitting it both before and after someone boards the elevator, and a visual aid to my sighing in exasperation when they make it on the elevator. They convey exactly the message I intended.

  13. bullshit by eyenot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "most elevators installed since the early 1990's, the close door button has no effect"

    and yet i frequently use the close door button to real effect in nearly every elevator i have been in in the last fifteen years including ones installed since 2000.

    meanwhile, some news claims aren't factual but people believe they are because they are made by news agencies.

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  14. purely anecdotal but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the close door buttons DO work in our building (FWIW we have Otis) but there's a trick which I've experimentally confirmed: something has to trip the sensor between the inner & outer doors to make it think someone has gotten on or off. I can consistently (100x out of 100 tries) replicate the following behavior: if elevator stops on floor w/nobody waiting I simply waive my hand in the gap, press the close button & the doors immediately close/elevator continues - press the button w/o something having tripped the sensor & it just sits there till its normal timeout period.

    individual results may vary but I've successfully been doing this for 10+ yrs at my current employer...

  15. I created a WOW priest named "Placebo" by aapold · · Score: 5, Funny

    After reaching the level cap, I'd join pug groups and in the role of "healer". I had gear with special effects that did nothing and created all manner of macros to create these effects while at the same time emoting that I was healing my target.

    After the wipe, when they'd call me on it (I have yet to find an addon that will monkey with other people's trackers) I'd try to explain that I was doing this strictly for research and they were in the placebo group.

    Somehow, this did not seem to appease them.

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  16. Otis elevators. by nblender · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was a young-hacker, I worked as a bellman.. It was slack work except when tour busses came in and then it was a scramble to get luggage up to the rooms. It meant multiple trips with a full cart and no passengers... What I couldn't handle was the long rides down to the lobby stopping at 10+ floors to pickup additional passengers... I soon discovered that if I held the 'door close' button while the elevator was descending, it would stop at the floors where people had pushed the 'down' button but the door wouldn't open. The elevator would stop. Hesitate for about 1.5 seconds, and then start moving again. The unfortunate drawback was that outside of the car, the 'down' light would go out and the waiting passengers would have to press it again to call for another elevator. I then learned that I didn't have to hold the door-close button. If I felt the car slow down and managed to press the button before the car came to a full stop, I could trigger the override.

    Eventually, I got a copy of a master key (which I still have) that allowed me to just put the elevator in service mode and didn't have to override anything.

  17. Re:i'm sick of this kind of whining by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With a straight face, yes Al Gore would have gone to war with Iraq in his first term.

    The Clinton/Gore administration were hawkish on Iraq from 1993 on. The escalation of bombing radar, C2 and C3 nodes in the Northern and Southern No-fly zones were all Clinton policies. Desert Fox was a Clinton administration operation, and the Democrats were fired up in 1999 to start a war with Serbia and invaded Haiti in 1995.

    Al Gore ran in 2000 as being more interventionist abroad than George W. Bush did

    http://www.ontheissues.org/al_gore.htm
    http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Al_Gore_Foreign_Policy.htm#Internationalism

    Following the loss in 2000, Gore went to an oppose Bush policy mode from the spring of 2002 which continues.