Slashdot Mirror


Georgia College's New Policy — Reporting All P2P Users To the Police

An anonymous reader excerpts from an article at TorrentFreak: "Georgia's Valdosta State University has updated its network with software that can pinpoint students who use P2P software. The university is committed to stop file-sharing on its network even if that results in prison sentences for students. Offenders will be disciplined by the school and then handed over to the police, the university has announced." School policy is one thing ("don't use file-sharing software on our resource-constrained network, or we may kick you off"), but I suspect the police wouldn't appreciate the task of sorting out legal from illegal use of widespread, essentially neutral software tools. Update: 11/15 18:27 GMT by T : Reader (and VSU alumnus) Matt Baker contacted the school; he reports that the school's IT director Joe Newton in response flatly denied the claims in the TorrentFreak article, and says the school hasn't installed such P2P tracking software, and doesn't hand students over the police, and says instead "I cannot foresee that we would ever do so." Thanks, Matt.

56 of 421 comments (clear)

  1. Any forms of file-sharing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is this related to any forms? What about downloading cc music or shows and isos of linux?

    1. Re:Any forms of file-sharing? by seeker_1us · · Score: 3, Interesting
      According to TFA,, it is ALL file sharing

      The new system is undoubtedly going to cause collateral damage, since an effective P2P detection tool will be unable to make a distinction between legitimate and illegitimate use of P2P software. This means that booting up your BitTorrent client to download free films such as Snowblind will result in a referral to the police station.

      This is abolutely ridiculous. Furthermore, copyright infringement (even if it was real) is a civil matter. Referral to the police station is of very quesitonable legality.

    2. Re:Any forms of file-sharing? by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Referral to the police station is of very quesitonable legality.

      Uhh, referral to the police is foolish and a waste of time but it's not of "questionable legality". I can refer anything I want to the police. Doesn't mean they will investigate it or do anything but it's not a crime to tell the police about a civil affair.....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:Any forms of file-sharing? by mr_mischief · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, copyright infringement can be a criminal matter. It's just that you need to make money from it for it for it to be criminal.

      What is criminal is using the university's network against their authorization. They don't authorize anyone to access their network using P2P file transfer software. That's probably going to be a tricky legal situation, but they do have the right to set the terms of use for their own network.

      What's really funny, though, is that P2P swarm-style file sharing software isn't the only software that connects peer computers. To really ban peer-to-peer communications would block some games, communications software like VoIP and IM, IRC's DCC sessions (which can be used to transfer a file or just to chat), Windows workgroup networking, and probably a dozen other things not coming to mind at the moment. They need to be really clear in what peer-to-peer computer communications they allow and don't in their wording, and make sure they detection software enforces exactly what they say it does in their policy.

    4. Re:Any forms of file-sharing? by stinerman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Copyright infringement can be a criminal matter. However, it is a *federal* criminal matter, not state.

      The local cops would have to call up the FBI. Unless Georgia has separate copyright laws on the books, the state police have nothing to charge the students with.

    5. Re:Any forms of file-sharing? by burris · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't have to make money. The No Electronic Theft Act of 1998 changed the definition of "financial gain." 17 USC 101 now reads:

      The term "financial gain" includes receipt, or expectation of receipt, of anything of value, including the receipt of other copyrighted works.

      In other words, now they can go after people trading. I don't doubt that a prosecutor could convince a jury that the ratio system on a Torrent site, for instance, shows that the defendant expected to receive other copyrighted works in exchange for continuing to seed whatever it is they downloaded.

    6. Re:Any forms of file-sharing? by Teancum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More properly, if you want to ban peer to peer software, you need to ban the use of TCP/IP on the network. There are networking protocols that won't permit peer to peer connections at all. Perhaps this college needs to consider some other network architecture for their internal network instead.

      Of course doing so would have some far reaching consequences including leaving their students unprepared for life outside of the university, but such things don't matter in higher education circles, do they?

    7. Re:Any forms of file-sharing? by Wovel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or patching WoW... It is fun when the clueless come out of the closet..

    8. Re:Any forms of file-sharing? by Ihmhi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That might be a good "I am Spartacus" situation.

      If college students are good at any one thing (besides getting wasted and pulling all-nighters) is raising hell for a good cause. Why not teach a few hundred students how to use Bittorrent and have them download Linux ISOs and other legitimate, legal stuff nonstop to, in effect, flood the system and make something like that completely ineffective. Or better yet, maybe a student could create a DDOS software variant where a bunch of computers would connect peer-to-peer on the college's network and trade junk data between each other via Bittorrent, Gnutella, and other similar filesharing protocols.

  2. Isn't this going to get expensive? by RogueyWon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, I'm no expert on the US legal situation, but what's to prevent a situation like this from happening:

    1) Student installs 100% legal copy of World of Warcraft, Starcraft 2 or any other game which uses a P2P updater system on their PC in their dorm room.

    2) Game does its P2P stuff to get its patches.

    3) College spots P2P activity and calls police.

    4) Police charge college administrators with wasting police time.

    5) Student sues college.

    Like it or not, P2P isn't just about illegal filesharing. Yes, I'd fully accept that most P2P traffic is illegal, but a blanket policy like this just seems doomed to (probably expensive) failure.

    1. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by Stargoat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One would hope so. Recall that ATT did this during the Bush Administration with its warrantless wiretaps. The only difference is that ATT allowed access to everything, rather than a specific subset of everything.

      This is a clear breach of 4th Amendment rights. I wonder when the police will be sued.

      I would suggest the ACLU take this case, but with their late track record of kowtowing to the government (full body scanners anyone?), I wouldn't look for help from them.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    2. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by RogueyWon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't see the police department as being in the wrong here; at least not yet. The college has announced an intention to report all uses of P2P software to the police. I don't see that the police have yet given any indication of how they will respond, not least when presented with a case relating to legal P2P traffic. If the police take no further action with the information provided to them, then they are surely in the clear.

      What does occur to me - and this is where I'd welcome input from somebody who does know the legal situation in the US better - is that here in the UK, and in many countries whose legal systems have historic links to ours, there is an offence of wasting police time. If there is any equivalent law in the jurisdiction that covers this college, then I suspect they'd find themselves in breach of it, which could open their administrators to criminal prosecution.

    3. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Insightful

      End result: College bans games. Games aid terrorism by masking real illegal activity in a shroud of legitimate traffic; they are therefore illegitimate by proxy.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    4. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A problem, though - copyright infringement with p2p *is* a criminal offence in the US, has been since the NET act. The police can't be seen to simply ignore a reported crime - they have to do something, even if it's just a stern warning. But if they do that, then the copyright holders will have to get involved, in order to prevent copyright infringement from becoming something the police demonstrate as beneath their notice, like littering. If the police do severely punish infringers, they have to face a public backlash... it doesn't matter what the police do, they are in for a hard time either way. So is the college, and so are the students.

    5. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by RogueyWon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Agreed, but a blanket policy of reporting all attempts at P2P filesharing (which may not be a crime) to the police as copyright infringement is going to result in a large number of false accusations. As I said in my OP, a large number of legal pieces of software, not least games, use P2P methods for their update systems. If I were running a police department, with limited resources, and suddenly began receiving a large number of false accusations from the local college, at the very least I would want to get the college's administration in for a polite but firm chat about the appropriate use of police resources.

    6. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's no 4th amendment problem here. You're a guest on a private network and the network administrator believes that you are committing a crime, so they report you to the police. There's no problem with that.

      The problem is that Valdosta is taking the proper steps to verify that the behavior is actually illegal and they are going to end up wasting police time as a result.

      But, if you're on a private network, you shouldn't have any real expectation of privacy, besides what state law may give you.

    7. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by bemenaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a state funded "public" university. The lines on that get a little muddy. The phones in the dorm rooms have the same legal protection that your phone in your house does.

    8. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by houghi · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Belgium all the police would do is send it to the court. They will then need to investigate if they have some time left. As it stands now as long as there is no financial gain, they will ignore it.

      However if there is financial gain, then they will investigate.

      Now try to file cases in large numbers and many where there isn't even anything illegal going on, will upset the court and those are not people you want to piss off.

      The police will act only on command of the court and I am sure the court will say: "Your network, your problem.". Now if they would kick people because of use of p2p and these people will want to sue their provider, they will have much more chance of being heard and even winning their case.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    9. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 4, Informative

      I dunno, there are a LOT of WoW and CoD players out there. Especially on a college network. With Cataclysm set to release in a month, and CoD just released (Hence needing to be patched most likely, games being what they are) it seems to me that there's probably a lot of legitimate P2P traffic on a university network right now. Gigs and gigs worth per client in WoW's case. I think my computer has downloaded something like 5 or 6 gigabytes worth of patches and preloads (They're making Cataclysm available for direct download rather than making you go to the store and buy a copy) in the last month or two with another 3-4 gigs expected before Dec 7. Then probably another 500MB to a gig in patches to fix the stuff that didn't scale like they thought it would.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    10. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by LambdaWolf · · Score: 4, Informative

      You beat me to the punch on this reply, but since I had already typed up some back-of-the-envelope calculations, here they are.

      World of Warcraft has around 12 million subscribers according to Wikipedia. The past couple of months it's been pushing out updates in anticipation of the Cataclysm expansion. Let's round the size of those updates to 5GB (although they may well be closer to 6GB by now). Perhaps not every subscriber is actively playing and has downloaded those updates, but they'll be outweighed by the active players with two copies of the client software (desktop and laptop, or work and home), so let's underestimate the number of updated client programs as 12 million.

      You can divide World of Warcraft players roughly into two categories: the majority who let the game client automatically update itself using the BitTorrent protocol; and the minority who prefer to manage their patch downloads manually using BitTorrent. The set of players who pay enough attention to download their patches manually but choose FTP over the more convenient BitTorrent is minuscule. So we can safely estimate the portion of patch downloads that use a P2P protocol as 100%.

      12 million subscribers times 5GB per subscriber is 60 million gigabytes of legitimate P2P throughput. And that's just getting ready for Cataclysm this autumn. There must have been several hundred million gigabytes more with the last two expansions and over the life of the game, to say nothing of Starcraft II (huge pre-loads of the entire client!) or other game companies than Blizzard (gasp!).

      So, indeed, 60 million gigabytes != all but "almost every single byte of it". Even if piracy does account for a lot, even a majority, of P2P traffic, it does have a nontrivial legitimate usage that Internet users have a right to.

      --
      "This algorithm runs in constant time. Come on, 2,147,483,648 is a constant..."
    11. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not a private network. This is a state school. It's the government reporting these kids to another government entity, a clear. I smell a civil rights lawsuit just waiting to happen here (especially if the police start acting on these reports).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by icebraining · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, they're not guests, they're paying users of that network - that's part of what tuition pays for. Are you a "guest" of your ISP's network? Do they have the right to go through your data? Then why is it any different in this case?

    13. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow, I got modded "flamebait". Amazing.

      To answer the replies I've gotten so far:

      -Yes, it's a private network. My lab on campus is funded by the NSF and the state, but that doesn't mean that you have any right to come in off the street and use my desk. Similarly, most public libraries require you to register (ie, get a library card) before you can use their networks and even then they tend to block a lot of services (including p2p).

      -The fourth amendment has typically only been applied to your own personal property (ie, your house, your car). I'm unaware of any 4th amendment legal precedent that the government is not allowed to monitor the traffic on its own network. Again, the 4th amendment works on the idea of the expectation of privacy and I don't think you can have that when you're using a state-funded Internet connection on a state-funded campus.

    14. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm unaware of any 4th amendment legal precedent that the government is not allowed to monitor the traffic on its own network.

      I'm going to refer to your post the next time somebody suggests that we need a municipal owned last mile to "fix" our broken broadband market.....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    15. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by yiantsbro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thinking this through this is actually an excellent way to get the IP holders off the backs of University IT Departments. All Universities develop a blanket policy that each identified use is reported to the local police. The local police ignore the flood of accusations and write them off for lack of evidence. The University has take the most drastic step it can so what are the IP holders left to complain about. They can try to go against the local police forces but good luck with that.

    16. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by ATMosby · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, every time I shop at Target, I'm a guest there.

    17. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, it's a private network. My lab on campus...

      But we're not just talking about labs, we're talking about dorms -- i.e., the students' homes. There's a difference between a lab (i.e., work) Internet connection and a dorm Internet connection!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    18. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by KingMotley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, your tuition isn't for the network. The network is a benefit of being a student (in most cases). And yes, actually your ISP does have the right to go through your data if you broadcast it on their network. Perhaps you need to read your ISP agreement sometime.

    19. Re:Isn't this going to get expensive? by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Too bad there's not a "-1, ignorant" mod, or you would have been spared the "troll". BitTorrent is P2P, and most of its traffic is legal; Linux distros and the like. Plus, there is ten times as much indie music as RIAA music on P2P, it's just that the indies, not having radio, rely on P2P, MySpace and Facebook, which is why the RIAA is against P2P; it isn't about piracy, it's about stifling the competetion.

  3. I bought some lighter fluid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can you point me to the appropriate police department to turn myself in as a possible arsonist?

    1. Re:I bought some lighter fluid... by captainpanic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I passed a free newspaper to someone else on the bus this morning. The police showed no interest when I told them.

  4. So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're young, living on your own for the first time, and the place that's supposed to be teaching you stuff announces that at the first sign of a misstep they'll "discipline" you and then hand you over to the police for a second helping of same, with a permanent record attached to boot.

    What a wonderful way to grow up.

    1. Re:So by Atrox666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey a university is no place for the free exchange of information young man.

      You should be spending your time doting on dusty old profs and their stale ideas.

  5. this new file sharing app Ares?? by kamakazi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Did I miss something? Have the people coding Ares implemented a new protocol, or is this college 5 years behind? Of course, having actually been involved in writing software to track computers on a college campus I am also curious how the college is fingerprinting machines to detect MAC address spoofing, but since this is a press release I wouldn't expect any technically informative information.

    --
    "Proximity to wonder has blunted our perception and appreciation of it" --Tim Hartnell in 'Exploring ARTIFICIAL INTELLI
    1. Re:this new file sharing app Ares?? by kamakazi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Managed switches don't help prevent MAC address spoofing unless you actually allow a MAC to only connect through the port it first connected on, which kinda gets in the way of people roaming on wifi. Yes there are actually wireless solutions that will approximate physical location by access point triangulation, but good luck in a busy spot. Actually identifying a specific computer on an untrusted network (which they all are these days) is extremely difficult. Knowing what port a particular machine is plugged into is easy, but knowing what machine it is is not. Some wireless solutions now also backhaul all traffic to a wireless controller, so when you roam your connection point to the network doesn't change, but like I said, specifically locating a wireless machine is also next to impossible in a busy public spot.

      The problem with MAC spoofing is the incredibly difficult time the person who gets spoofed will have proving their innocence. And of course the legal types on the plaintiffs side will attempt to tell a jury that a MAC address uniquely identifies a machine, and if the poor innocent spoofee gets a normal non tech-savvy lawyer they will probably succeed.

      --
      "Proximity to wonder has blunted our perception and appreciation of it" --Tim Hartnell in 'Exploring ARTIFICIAL INTELLI
    2. Re:this new file sharing app Ares?? by kamakazi · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Most college networks require a login to use- even from your personal computer(s)."

      Actually, not a login, for the simple reason that that breaks all non-browser devices. They require registration of your device, but if they required a login then no Playstations, Xboxes, or iPhones would work, because you can't login with an email client or a video game. Once a machine is registered (Identified by the closest thing there is to unique, the MAC)then all the bad guy needs to do is check to make sure the target machine is not on at the moment, and spoof the MAC address. The traffic will be logged as belong to the poor innocent spoofee. And yeah, it may be less than 1% that know how to do it, but a single innocent person be persecuted or prosecuted is too many.

      --
      "Proximity to wonder has blunted our perception and appreciation of it" --Tim Hartnell in 'Exploring ARTIFICIAL INTELLI
    3. Re:this new file sharing app Ares?? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      since MAC addresses usually are bound to the network card (pcmcia, usb, pci, even onboard) it might be 'fun' to have a nic-trading situations where people have a POOL of usb wifi dongles and they simply do what they want on the net, drop their usb dongle into the barrel and pick another. could EASILY be done on campus.

      keep switching the mac's around to make the whole process useless. ie, make one of their 'tools' worthless.

      next up, have linux os's on thumbdrives that can be recycled in a similar fashion (with some changes; full restores to known configs with some 'salt' to keep each system unique enough). but rotate them and the uniqueness is invalid.

      come on college kids: they're upping the ante. fight back in the creative ways you guys are known for.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  6. Re:not necessarily a bad policy by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the student wins: the police will mostly ignore the pirating

    Until it turns out to be a student who runs a blog that criticizes the police department, or some politician wants to run on a "tough on crime" platform, or some police officer whose cousin works for the RIAA. Relying on the police to not prosecute people who are reported to them for breaking the law is not something I would do.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  7. Mass-downloading of legal software by captainpanic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Students should just start downloading legal p2p software... at a massive scale.

    Make sure that the university and the police department are getting overworked from false claims of illegal downloading.

    It's a peaceful, harmless and non-violent way of teaching stupid people that p2p is not always illegal.

    1. Re:Mass-downloading of legal software by Albanach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the schools internet policy bans p2p software, they're still going to discipline and possibly expel the student.

      Sure there may be little or no legal consequences, but screwing up your degree because you breach a contract you freely entered into might not be the smartest move.

    2. Re:Mass-downloading of legal software by kyrio · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you already entered a contract and the other party decides to add a couple of new lines to the contract without your initials to approve the additions then the contract becomes void. At this point you sue the other party for damages.

    3. Re:Mass-downloading of legal software by DurendalMac · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unless there was already a clause that policies may be subject to change with proper notification, in which case it is not void. The university would be retarded not to have that in the contract already.

    4. Re:Mass-downloading of legal software by tompaulco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You would be stupid to sign such a contract, however.
      Stupid or desperate, I agree. However, in almost every case where someone is signing such a contract, there is literally no alternative. Would you just not go to college, because all of the colleges have this phrasing in their IT contracts? Would you not buy a cell phone because all of the cell phone companies have this phrasing in their contracts? Would you not receive power from the electric company, not receive gas from the gas company, not work for almost any employer?
      At some point, the courts need to step up and realize that these contracts can not be binding when the agreeing party has no recourse other than to do without said service. In the case of IT at a university, they almost certainly REQUIRE you to have internet access, and if you are in the dorms, it MUST be provided by them, so it ought to be ILLEGAL to make you sign a ToS that they can change at any time.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  8. Re:Why should the police care? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why should they go to all that hassle for something that'll have no negative effect on their district and only serve to push up the crime statistics and take officers off the streets?

    For the same reason that the police go after people who possess drugs: it keeps them employed.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  9. Valdosta State's rep in Jeopardy by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Valdosta State was right up there with Harvard and Yale at the top of my applications list but seriously, who would even THINK of going there NOW? ;)

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  10. Re:not necessarily a bad policy by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    of course the police can abuse you. of course anyone can abuse you. but you need to learn that, just as crippling in this world as an overabundance of trust to people who don't deserve your trust, is the existence of people like you: those with such a crippling poverty of distrust that you won't even expect a simple human baseline of behavior in civil society

    the abuses you imagine above are rare. of course you might someday suffer from these kinds of abuses. and of course the ceiling can crash on your head right now. you can't live in a shell, expecting the worst all the time. you need to place some trust in your fellow human beings if only because you suffer the most when you assume the worst possible scenario all the time. most people are good and decent. really

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  11. As A Georgia Resident... by somaTh · · Score: 3, Informative

    I found the headline misleading. Georgia College is not doing this. North Georgia College isn't doing this. South Georgia College isn't doing this. East Georgia College isn't doing this. Not even Middle Georgia College is doing this. I'm just saying, if you're going to capitalize Georgia College, make sure that's actually in the name.

    --
    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    1. Re:As A Georgia Resident... by skywire · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Despite the fact that the first sentence of the very short story clearly names Valdosta State University, and the fact that everyone learns as a child that significant words in headlines are capitalized, you still managed to confuse yourself into believing that the school in question is Georgia College? I don't buy it. You are feigning confusion as an excuse for posting. Behave yourself.

      --
      Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
  12. Re:Parents will appreciate this by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because parents tend to believe their kids are perfect little angels who would never do anything illegal.

  13. Higher education, by morons... by Chas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yep. Can see that all the dollars from tuition that haven't gone into their "resource constrained" network have gone into getting quality staff there! They've all had the highest quality lobotomies that money can buy!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  14. Criminal vs. Civil by watermark · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought your run-o-the-mill copyright violation was a civil matter. Shouldn't they be reporting the students to the copyright holders?

  15. Re:GNU/Linux, *BSD, etc. by amoe · · Score: 2

    Citation needed

    --
    You look beautiful! Incidentally, my favourite artist is Picasso.
  16. Re:Parents will appreciate this by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the 'you must go to college' meme is slowly dying.

    actually, it should. not everyone should be in college. furthermore, the 'thinking arts' that america uses to be known for is fading (overseas). the notion of going to school, doing your time in studies and having it pay back is a BROKEN SOCIAL CONTRACT and those of us already at-age know this ;(

    if I had kids, I would not send them to college. I'd send them to a trade school where they work with their hands in some form (mechanic, plumber, electrician, capenter, etc). these are the outsource-immune jobs. they're less 'sexy' than IT work but IT work simply won't exist in this country when elementary school kids reach the workforce age. like I said, the social agreement of 'study hard and you will get a good job' is busted now and will be even more as time goes on. american 'thinkers' are something companies are now considering to be *too expensive*.

    universities are VERY expensive and often don't pay for themselves (again, lack of jobs can make school a pure expensive and not ever by worth what you paid for).

    and now you have universities being openly hostile to their students.

    I would simply drop out (in fact, I did, back in my day) and get my own education. work experience matters more than a paper degree for most jobs in IT once you get beyond entry level.

    the day where you assumed 'grow up and go to college' was for everyone just does not apply anymore. in fact, sending 'everyone' to college was a failure waiting to happen.

    if I was trained in construction or plumbing or auto repair, I'd still have a job. but being in software development means my country has sold me out to india/china/etc. I really wish I was in another field and I hope some of you software-thinking kids will reconsider this already saturated field and find something PHYSICAL that you can do for work. those things tend not to be outsourced.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  17. lol by Charliemopps · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone that's gone to college knows that the university does it's very best to suspend every constitutional right they can while you're there. I've been to court over legal issues twice in my life and both times they were within a year of each other and while I was in college. In both cases I represented myself, challenged the counties evidence on constitutional grounds and won. Those weren't my only run-ins with the police either, just the ones that went to court. In one instance they searched my room while I was on Christmas break and charged me for having an empty wine bottle in my room. Unfortunately for them I was 23 at the time. In another instance a police officer asked if she could come into my dorm room. I refused, at which point she said if I didn't have anything to hide I'd let her in. I explained that rights were like muscles, they get weak if you don't use them. She came in anyway and despite a thorough sacking of my room found nothing.

    The universities play these games because the students let them. I eventually just moved off campus. My rent was 1/3rd what the dorms were and I didn't have any more trouble with the university police. I recomend the same for everyone living on campus at this university as well.

  18. I refused to do this when I worked in Uni IT by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to work for a university's network dept. at a fairly high level and it fell on my shoulders to handle the RIAA complaints, I pretty much refused because it was ridiculous. When I would be forced to turn info over, I would just give them IP's which were basically useless but they would never get back to me for more info. When the pressure really got strong, I decided the only way I would comply would be to install a device that did actual audio fingerprinting. This way it wasn't just a witch hunt or false positives based on someone simply using P2P or a filename but verified inspection and reporting. Even then, it had it's own way of handling it internally, after each offense it encountered it would email the user with the info and a warning, after 3 infractions it basically cut the port speed to 56k for that user so they could still do school work but little else, any additional infractions resulted in reporting.

    It put the onus on the student and was as reasonable as could be for the screwed up system in place. In the end the RIAA should never have as much power as it does and the fines should be at most $5-20 per song which is between a 500% and 2000% penalty which is quite enough without being so insane as the current system is. No matter how you slice it, it is B.S.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  19. Re:Legal torrents are easily distinghuised by xnpu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not disputing that torrents are useful. But do you need to get your WoW updates at school?