Slashdot Mirror


DDoS Attack On Wikileaks Increasing

tetrahedrassface writes "According to the Twitter feed for Wikileaks, the attack on the controversial site is increasing and is now at 10 Gigabits per second. In light of the recent release of highly sensitive documents and calls by many lawmakers around the world to swiftly find, extradite, and try suspected rapist Julius Assange for breaches of national security, one nation, Ecuador, has offered asylum."

16 of 919 comments (clear)

  1. Ut Oh! by PORNorART · · Score: 5, Funny

    /. is in trouble now for leaking the US's inability to conduct a succesful DDoS campaign.

  2. Re:At least someone has balls (and common sense) by spazmonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wikileaks doesn't out anything anymore, unless its US intelligence. Haven't you noticed they pulled all private corporate leaks and European and other countries leaks? It's not a generic leaks site anymore or I would still support it. They are solely an anti-US espionage org now. They lost any credibility, and any respect, at that point. I say hang him.

  3. I confirm the asylum offer. by Ecuador · · Score: 5, Funny

    He will be quite comfortable and safe in my mother's basement.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  4. Personal Attacks & Defamation by MBHkewl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "suspected rapist Julius Assange"

    Their attempt at discrediting the accuracy of the info by repeating the word "suspected rapist" is a bit of an old cliche, don't you think?

    Also, does this still work, even with so much data available?

    --
    Mod points are a dangerous tool. Abuse them wisely.
    1. Re:Personal Attacks & Defamation by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think possible dog molester MBHkewl is right. Much as I disagree with MBHkewl's alleged disgusting lifestyle, I think it's possible, just possible, that we're seeing an obvious case of character assassination here. And I urge readers to overlook the fact that MBHkewl purportedly rapes innocent puppies long enough to consider that he may have a point.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  5. Re:If you didn't do anything wrong, by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least isn't that what the government tells us?

    The government also tells you to hide under your desk in the event of a nuclear attack.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  6. Re:Gov't Sponsored DDoS by copponex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The US government has overthrown democratic governments, it's FBI has assassinated American civilians, the CIA is currently torturing someone to death in a secret prison somewhere in the world, and right now it has the right to extra-judiciously assassinate any person, even US citizens, that it believes to be involved in terrorism.

    With these facts, I hardly think an orchestrated DDoS attack seems unlikely.

  7. He is rocking the boat that people are sitting in by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Interesting

    People don't like people who rock the boat they are sitting in, especially if its edge is already close to the waterline. They tend to kick people overboard, even if they are the person trying to signal a rescuer.

    Wikileaks is exposing not just the obvious criminal corruption, the stuff you claim on others, but the widespread moral apathy that is the US of A. You can see it from the murder video. 12 civilians clearly unarmed shot with the murderers expressing clear joy at their slaughter. The US reaction? Absolutely nothing. If any of these soldiers were ever to be brought before a war crimes tribunal, the US of A has invasion plans for The Netherlands to stop any international justice by whatever force required.

    This is America, and it doesn't sit well to have this truth shoved in their face. They want to believe the US of A is the land of the free, defender of democracy, hero of the oppressed.

    You have to remember that most countries have the same thing. The Netherlands and its war crimes in Indonesia. Recently the state refused to meet a survivor of a masacre the germans would have been proud off, because it was going to upset the murderers. Don't ask the british about their colonial behavior or say the treatment of Jews after WW2.

    Wikileaks is kicking up the dirt in peoples eyes and the people don't like it one bit.

    Easier to kill the messenger then deal with the message. Always has been true, always will be. Cue this message running a high change of instantly disappearing because a teabagger is upset and mods it down to never be seen again.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  8. Re:Wikileaks isn't a leaks aleaks site anymore by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Are you serious?

    ...

    The US is the "juiciest target" in the entire world?

    Or are you one of those people who erroneously believes that the free and democratic nations of the world are actually the world's most egregious oppressors and abusers, and the US sits at the pinnacle of the abusers?

    If you think the US is the "juiciest target", I wonder what you'd think if we saw the same level of leaks of communications from, say, Chinese corporations, the Chinese government, and Chinese "diplomatic" efforts...

    At its launch, WikiLeaks said it was "founded by Chinese dissidents, journalists, mathematicians and start-up company technologists, from the US, Taiwan, Europe, Australia and South Africa", and that its "primary interest is in exposing oppressive regimes in Asia, the former Soviet bloc, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East". Instead, WikiLeaks publishes mostly classified information from democracies.

    So now, nations like China and Russia have an advantage over the US in the conduct of their international affairs, intelligence, and defense. I can only imagine China's delight with each new release from WikiLeaks.

    Steven Aftergood, a veteran crusader against excessive government secrecy and director of the Federation of American Scientists' Project on Government Secrecy, notes, "WikiLeaks must be counted among the enemies of open society because it does not respect the rule of law nor does it honor the rights of individuals." WikiLeaks doesn't care whether information it obtains is legitimately classified, nor whether it may cause grave harm if released. Indeed, the only thing exempt from this reckless behavior is WikiLeaks itself.

    What is interesting to me is that many observers of this phenomenon in free and democratic societies seem to believe it is their own governments that are hiding the most egregious information, which deserves to be exposed via channels like WikiLeaks.

    I would submit that individuals who live in the US and other Western nations who believe their governments are "oppressing" them have no idea what "oppression" is.

  9. It's not a claim anymore it's a fact. by elucido · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just read this:

    http://cablegate.wikileaks.org/cable/2009/03/09BAKU179.html

    Intelligence sources are being put at risk by these leaks. Julian Assange claims to care about civilians but he leaks documents that can get people killed? Why? To solve what?

    The world is not made safer. Nothing in these cables are worth the loss of civilian life. These cables don't prevent a war with Iran or North Korea, they make war much more likely.

  10. Forget Assange by Raven_Stark · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If any heads should roll over the leaks, it should be those of the guy who stole the data and whatever dunce(s) allowed peons access to the data. Although, overall so far, I'm generally pleased with the leaks because they show that most of the world's leaders are fallible but basically rational human beings. For instance, it is good to see that most of the middle eastern leaders understand that Iranian leaders are nutjobs who cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons. Same goes for China's recognition that Kim Jong Ill is off his rocker. I feel much better about the world in general now because so far the leaked info confirms my suspicion that the world's messes aren't as insurmountable as it sometimes seems.

    That said, I am deeply embarrassed that the Pentagon is incompetent enough to have allowed the leak of things said in confidence. They are idiots who shouldn't be trusted with so much power.

    Even more, I am embarrassed over the USA's strong-arming of Germany over the arrest of one of its citizens. World ***please*** don't take that kind of shit from us (the USA).

    I really think it is high time for the USA to turn over the job of policing the world to a democratically elected world government. It is unfair for the US taxpayers to pay so much for world security and to get all of the blame when our leaders fuck up and holy fuck do they ever fuck up. More importantly, it is unfair to the world for the US to have so much say in how the world is run.

    --
    http://www.marxist.com/
  11. Re:Slashdotting by barcarolle · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think you mean, "[your interest is] piqued."

  12. Re:Nobel Prize by CraftyJack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yep, nothing spreads peace like discrediting diplomacy.

  13. Re:Gov't Sponsored DDoS by copponex · · Score: 5, Informative

    FBI assassinating American citizens
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO

    Deaths due to torture
    http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/06/30/accountability

    Extra-judicial assassinations (not including daily drone bombings)
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/world/middleeast/07yemen.html

    Of course, no one really knows what The Agency is doing right now. What is known is that the secret prisons still exist, and that the legal process of "extraordinary rendition", known to the rest of the world as kidnapping, still occurs. Our terrorism suspects are regularly flown to dictatorships like Egypt and tortured with our approval.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_rendition_by_the_United_States

  14. Re:If you didn't do anything wrong, by nomadic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone speaking to a diplomat and expecting confidence was naive from day one.

    You're completely missing the point. When one diplomat tells another something, the expectation all around is that it will get written down and passed to the recipient's superiors. It is NOT expected that it will fall into the hands of someone like Assange who will release it to the world.

  15. Re:The true reason for this release by Brannoncyll · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just Assange using wikileaks to attack a country he hates.

    Clearly this is why the headline story on BBC news today is about China's thinking on North Korea, and the headline story in The Independent is about missiles in Iran, both of which are sourced from the Wikileaks cables and neither of which is remotely 'anti-US'. I'm sure there are numerous other examples. It seems that you are being deceived by the US government propaganda machine, which attempts to bias (US) public opinion against things it doesn't like by claiming that they are attacking the democratic beacon of justice and humanity, the great and powerful USA, land of the free etc etc.