Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

NASA Delays Discovery's Final Launch To February

Posted by Soulskill on from the hope-you-brought-a-blanket,-keith dept.

Velcroman1 writes "NASA has postponed the launch of space shuttle Discovery's final mission to no earlier than early February — the latest in a long string of delays that have kept the spacecraft grounded for more than a month. Discovery is now slated to launch no earlier than Feb. 3, with the delay allowing NASA engineers more time to analyze why small cracks developed in the shuttle's huge external fuel tank. The cracks have since been repaired, but NASA wants to make sure similar issues don't pose a future concern."

8 of 62 comments (clear)

  1. Future Concern? What Future? by jdastrup · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it's fixed, launch it. Why worry about future concerns? There won't be anymore Space Shuttle.

    1. Re:Future Concern? What Future? by dbialac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right, that way they can add an additional delay. The goal is to string along the salaries of the 800 people who lose their jobs as soon as the shuttle hits orbit as long as possible. And as somebody who works near Cape Canaveral, I fully support not having 800 more unemployed people here.

  2. Patience and Safety by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hope their final voyage is a safe one, and one day we will have a manned mission back to the Moon and maybe to Mars.

    Here is a cool infographic I found on the Space Shuttle

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  3. Shuttle vs. Everyone by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Meanwhile, various other launch systems, that aren't pork-bloated, politically-designed flying bricks, just keep chugging along with their launches and schedules successfully. I suppose this is what happens when politicians and business majors decide they can be engineers. Go figure

    --
    Motorcycles, Robots, Space Gossip and More!
  4. I heard the real reason was.... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I heard the real reason was that the crew refused to let the TSA agents do the new pat down procedure.

  5. Dec 17 launch was stupid anyways by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know who or why they would push the launch to Dec 17. First of all, the Shuttle is not tested across a year boundary, and the last flight is not the time to be testing to see if this works. (Dates are complex enough, and handling all possible date transitions is even harder. Thus it's easier to not fly the Shuttle across a New Year transition rather than have to test everything to ensure it can handle it).

    I believe it was supposed to be a 10 day mission, so if it launches Dec 17, it means it returns Dec 27. Which gives you 4 days before you're in test-pilot mode (the missions may get extended unexpectedly due to launch delays or weather on return). While I doubt the shuttle would just explode when the clock ticks over, 4 days doesn't seem like a lot of leeway.

    All they had to do was push it another couple of weeks and they'd have a whole year to schedule and launch. At least it seems saner heads have prevailed.

    1. Re:Dec 17 launch was stupid anyways by SmilingBoy · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, it is true - they normally don't fly over new year's eve. In a press conference they mentioned that they could reconfigure the computer systems on a quiet day in orbit to deal with it but that it still entails some risk.

  6. Re:I should work for Nasa by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, the correct methodology is to make the contractor pay for the inspections and any repairs, plus a fee for any delays to launches.