Slashdot Mirror


Rogue Satellite Shuts Down US Weather Services

radioweather writes "On Sunday, the drifting rogue 'zombie' Galaxy 15 satellite with a stuck transmitter interfered with the satellite data distribution system used by NOAA's National Weather Service (NWS), effectively shutting down data sharing between NWS offices nationwide, as well as weather support groups for the US Air force. This left many forecasters without data, imagery, and maps. Interference from Galaxy 15 affected transmissions of the SES-1 Satellite, which not only serves NOAA with data relay services, but also is used to feed TV programming into virtually every cable network in the US. NOAA's Network Control Facility reports that the computer system affected was NOAA's Advanced Weather Interactive Processing System (AWIPS) used to issue forecasts and weather bulletins which uses the weather data feed. They also state the problem is likely to recur again this month before the satellite drifts out of range and eventually dies due to battery depletion."

202 comments

  1. A red satellite?!? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Goddamn Commies finally attacked! To your bunkers, citizens!

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:A red satellite?!? by SputnikPanic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, stop talking about me!

    2. Re:A red satellite?!? by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 1

      After reading the "rouge" in the headline, I couldn't even make it to the summary, let alone TFA!

    3. Re:A red satellite?!? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sarah Palin has SATELLITES!??!?

      I thought that she was in orbit herself - around planet Murdoch.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:A red satellite?!? by nyctopterus · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, satellites shut down weather service!

      (Sorry)

    5. Re:A red satellite?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Rouges are red, violets are blue, and rogue is spelled with e after u!

    6. Re:A red satellite?!? by Physicser · · Score: 1

      Rouges are red, violets are blue, and rogue is spelled with g before u!

      There. Fixed that for you.

    7. Re:A red satellite?!? by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      I think we're just trying to pass a hint to China that they really want to bring it down for their next intercept test. ;-)

    8. Re:A red satellite?!? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, the summary spelled "rogue" correctly.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    9. Re:A red satellite?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CmdrTaco can't even handle a simple copy/paste job.

    10. Re:A red satellite?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia Earth rotates around satellites.

    11. Re:A red satellite?!? by Stregano · · Score: 1

      Rouge zombie satellites. I promise you, I am already in my bunker typing this and connecting to the net through morse code

      --
      The world is how you make it
    12. Re:A red satellite?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Friend Computer, this one ^ says he's a commie!

    13. Re:A red satellite?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Does this have anything to do with the Tiananmen Square Mascara?

    14. Re:A red satellite?!? by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 1

      "Rouge"

      Maybe it just likes to wear makeup :-)

    15. Re:A red satellite?!? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Wait, a second satellite, this time without makeup, has disrupted weather sats again? What the hell's going on up there?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    16. Re:A red satellite?!? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Of course, we have shot down satellites, too.

      Speaking of China, can you imagine the moaning and conspiracy theories if it were a Chinese satellite that "went rogue" and did this? Cable TV would be full of talking heads calling it an act of war and calling for retaliation, and slashdotters would be offering the counter-theory that, no, this just shows how inept they are. But in fact this rogue satellite is Made in the USA. Stuff happens.

    17. Re:A red satellite?!? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, as the Chinese demonstrated with their last one, "intercepts" don't bring anything down. They just create a cloud of shrapnel.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    18. Re:A red satellite?!? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Goddamn Commies finally attacked! To your bunkers, citizens!

      I know that it's against the Rules of Slashdot, but if you'd RTFA, you'd see "When it first failed, Intelsat and the satellite's builder, Orbital Sciences Corp. of Dulles, Va."

      While it's still possible that the satellite's builders are "Reds" in some form, but with an address like that "Red neck" is more likely than "Red Star".

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    19. Re:A red satellite?!? by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      Wolverines!

      --
      -
  2. Rouge eh? by richy+freeway · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're putting makeup on satellites now?

    1. Re:Rouge eh? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no, no, you've got it all wrong!

      The satellite is the makeup!

      A bit of rouge satellite goes extremely well with some eyeliner asteroid, and you'll want to round them out with a nice, light, gamma burst lipstick to bring it all together.

      Doesn't the solar system look so pretty now?

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    2. Re:Rouge eh? by angiasaa · · Score: 1

      Nah, the satellite _is_ the makeup! :P

      --
      Geekism is your _only_ God!
    3. Re:Rouge eh? by Annirak · · Score: 2

      No no, it's a reference to Diablo, where the rogues wore red clothing, so everyone called them rouge!

    4. Re:Rouge eh? by theantipop · · Score: 5, Funny

      Everyone who plays WoW knows rouges are overpowdered.

    5. Re:Rouge eh? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      All kidding aside it's easy to get them confused (imo).

      Rouge is spelled as one pronounces Rogue, rohg. Rou (roh) ge (g).

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    6. Re:Rouge eh? by s4ndm4n · · Score: 1

      Everyone who plays WoW knows rouges are overpowdered.

      OMFG! If I was drinking something I would have had liquid coming out my nose! And I might add playED wow, in my case.

    7. Re:Rouge eh? by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Actually, that would be r-ow-g. ou, as in shout

    8. Re:Rouge eh? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Do you pronounce genius as "ghenius"?

    9. Re:Rouge eh? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      No?

      The IPA for Rogue is ro<small upsilon>g r-o<small upsilon>-g The o<small upsilon> is pronrounced like owe, road, below. Given this, if you heard Rogue, you'd think Rouge.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    10. Re:Rouge eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he probably writes it as "genious".

    11. Re:Rouge eh? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Does this have anything to do with Sarah Palin and her book "Going Rouge"?

    12. Re:Rouge eh? by Binestar · · Score: 1

      ghoti! (fish)

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    13. Re:Rouge eh? by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Given this, if you heard Rogue, you'd think Rouge.

      Actually: no, no I wouldn't. But thanks for playing.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    14. Re:Rouge eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is? Not in North America, pal!

      Rouge = rooje

      Rogue = Row-Guh

    15. Re:Rouge eh? by MonChrMe · · Score: 1

      Rogue -> Ro(w) + Gue(ss).

      Rouge -> Rou(lette) + (ca)ge

      I never seem to have any problems with them... but that could be a Brit thing. Divided by a common language and all that. :)

    16. Re:Rouge eh? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Actually: no, no I wouldn't. But thanks for playing

      One person is not a valid sample size. Insert coin to continue.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    17. Re:Rouge eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Everyone who plays WoW knows rouges are overpowdered." - only a maroon would say that.

    18. Re:Rouge eh? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      It basically comes down to the Rou, If you'd pronounce that as Row, then you'd likely go for Rouge, if you'd pronounce that as rue, then you'd likely get the correct spelling of rogue.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    19. Re:Rouge eh? by bareman · · Score: 1

      That, was Brilliant!

      The other WoW geeks (former player myself) are still laughing since I read it aloud to them.

    20. Re:Rouge eh? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Let's make it two, then. "Rou" does not sound like "Row". Sorry.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    21. Re:Rouge eh? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 2

      You've red too much into their comments.

    22. Re:Rouge eh? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      In what universe does rou sound like roh? If anything you should naturally think the ou sounds like ow.

      A g proceeded by an e rarely sounds like anything other than a j, so you should assume r-ow-j, which gets the particulars.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    23. Re:Rouge eh? by treeves · · Score: 1

      Actually, rouge is pronounced with a zh, not a j sound, since it comes from French.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    24. Re:Rouge eh? by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      One person is not a valid sample size.

      From zero to hypocrite in less than ten words! You've got a future in politics, my boy!

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    25. Re:Rouge eh? by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Funny

      A bit of rouge satellite goes extremely well with some eyeliner asteroid, and you'll want to round them out with a nice, light, gamma burst lipstick to bring it all together.

      Doesn't the solar system look so pretty now?

      Ummm ... I think that might be the first make-up tips I've ever seen on Slashdot.

      Now, stop it! ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    26. Re:Rouge eh? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      He was talking about the spelling of Rouge. If you know your grammar and were to sound it out without ever hearing it first, you would think "R-ow-j". The default sound for "ou" is "ow", the default for "ge" is "j". "R-ow-j" is what you would naturally assume the correct pronunciation is for rouge.

      Rogue, were you to attempt to spell it without having seen the word before, would probably end up as "rowg" or "rohg", because that is how it sounds: "r-oh-g".

      In other words, your enunciation is shit.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    27. Re:Rouge eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the satellite that broadcasts Palins "Going Rouge" at us...

    28. Re:Rouge eh? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Rou often sounds like "roo" in fact, since many words with the combination are from the French.

      The assumed sound, however, is the same as that in out. It's such a standard sound that the dictionary often gives it in its pronunciation guide (TFOD's pronucniation for "Route" is simply rout or root).

      GP is just trying to save face, even though he is demonstrably wrong.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    29. Re:Rouge eh? by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      I don't fallow.

    30. Re:Rouge eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol wut?

      Rouge is pronounced "rew-je", with the "je" sounding a bit like the "che" in "douche".

      Rogue is pronounced "row-ghe".

    31. Re:Rouge eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ghoti! (fish)

      My Engrish teacher used to use that all the time...ghoti... too funny! Thanks for the flashback (I think?)

    32. Re:Rouge eh? by iceaxe · · Score: 1

      Everyone who plays WoW knows rouges are overpowdered.

      Ding ding, we have a winner. May your karma increase.

      --
      WALSTIB!
    33. Re:Rouge eh? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Do you pronounce genius as "ghenius"?

      Absolutely. And you should hear how I say "whipped".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    34. Re:Rouge eh? by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      My dog used to pronounce it "ROOOG" usually when somebody was outside the door.

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    35. Re:Rouge eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no, you've got it all wrong!

      The satellite is the makeup!

      A bit of rouge satellite goes extremely well with some eyeliner asteroid, and you'll want to round them out with a nice, light, gamma burst lipstick to bring it all together.

      Doesn't the solar system look so pretty now?

      Yeah, maybe you should stop worrying so much about makeup and go work off some of those big fat gas giants. It might clear up your great red spot too.

    36. Re:Rouge eh? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Eh, it's a good joke but it's been around for years.

    37. Re:Rouge eh? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      In what universe does rou sound like roh?

      this one.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    38. Re:Rouge eh? by kumanopuusan · · Score: 1

      Using a gamma burst for lipstick is like using buckshot for mouthwash. One estimate for the energy released in a gamma burst is 10^44 Joules, which is about 1000 times greater than the gravitational binding energy of the Sun.

      Doesn't the solar system look so pretty now?

      It might win a Kurt Cobain lookalike contest, but I don't think it's going to be winning any beauty pageants.

      --
      Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
    39. Re:Rouge eh? by suomynonAyletamitlU · · Score: 3, Funny

      It only seems that way at first blush.

    40. Re:Rouge eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that the Blush Administration again?

    41. Re:Rouge eh? by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Rogue follows the basic structure of vowel consonant vowel, which tends to be a long sound for the initial vowel, and -ogu- has no other words that make an "ow" sound, so "rohg" or "roh-gue" are really the only things you should end up with in American English if you just follow the basics you learned in elementary.

    42. Re:Rouge eh? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Jesus, lets hope this never happens on /. with something like "ough"...

    43. Re:Rouge eh? by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, the Earth is definitely gonna get some action!

  3. Rouge satellite by ZaphDingbat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bet their faces are red about this one.

    1. Re:Rouge satellite by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Looks like we caught CmdrTaco Red Handed not proof reading his postings.

    2. Re:Rouge satellite by vxice · · Score: 2

      Just leave him alone, he never gets any breaks. Whenever he posts a mistake everyone justs jumps all over it. Haven't you ever made a misprint, why can't we just leave him alone. /end Brittany Spears defender screaming.

      --
      every anarchist is a baffled dictator. Benito_Mussolini
    3. Re:Rouge satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, he was red handed because he chose masturbation over his editorial duties.

    4. Re:Rouge satellite by jovius · · Score: 1

      Without mistakes there isn't perfection.

    5. Re:Rouge satellite by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Ah, the old "flip side of the coin". It's actually sillly logic. You can have perfection without mistakes. That would in fact be the definition of perfection. Saying "You can't have one without its opposite" is possibly the worst argument you can stand your basis on.

      It's about as silly as saying "There has to be aliens on the moon because you can't have not aliens without aliens".

      I know you're probably trying to sound a bit philosophical - how could we possibly know what perfection is without a reference to imperfection - from a practical standpoint, we've seen more than enough and perfection should now be much easier to achieve. We have our reference points set. Perfection should be the goal.

    6. Re:Rouge satellite by Chapter80 · · Score: 1

      Without mistakes there isn't perfection.

      Concise in it's message, thought provoking, and their's no way to dispute it, to.

    7. Re:Rouge satellite by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Without mistakes there isn't perfection.

      Counterpoint: Without mistakes there is perfection.

      Yet both statements are perfectly true. Thanks for gracing us with this little logic bomb... I shall now explode in a poof of logical inconsistency.

    8. Re:Rouge satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well maybe he's making "mistakes" on purpose to get more hits, posts etc.

    9. Re:Rouge satellite by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Hy, "rouge" is a perfectly cromulent word!

    10. Re:Rouge satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We would not value perfection without knowledge of the effects of imperfection. Doesn't mean we should give ourselves a pass for failing to strive for excellence, though.

    11. Re:Rouge satellite by dwarfsoft · · Score: 1

      Their isn't?

      --
      Cheers, Chris
    12. Re:Rouge satellite by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      Stop being such a bool!

    13. Re:Rouge satellite by Chapter80 · · Score: 1

      Their isn't?

      Look again, for 2 more!

    14. Re:Rouge satellite by dwarfsoft · · Score: 1

      Ahh. Well played, sir. I shall "whoosh" myself ;)

      --
      Cheers, Chris
  4. The Reds launched a satellite? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 0

    [Soviet Russia joke goes here.]

  5. That's a joke right? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    That's an intentional misspelling of the word for humourous effect, right? Right? Unbelievable!

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
    1. Re:That's a joke right? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      They could at least have made the headline "Rediculous Rouge Satellite Shuts Down US Weather Service Boxen".

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:That's a joke right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no! "Rediculous Rouge Satellite should of shut down us weather service boxen with virii"

    3. Re:That's a joke right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that there were three comments on the firehose submission taking the piss out of the spelling, it probably was a joke.

    4. Re:That's a joke right? by deniable · · Score: 1

      It's way over my head.

  6. Luke SkyPrancer - Leader of Rouge Squadron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    lol, worse every day.

    1. Re:Luke SkyPrancer - Leader of Rouge Squadron by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Are we going sailing?

      Or are we going Saaaaaaiiilliiiiiing!?

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  7. Nice by multipartmixed · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just wait until next week when a mascara satellite knocks out the GPS network!

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:Nice by Massacrifice · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just wait until next week when a mascara satellite lashes out at the GPS network!

      FTFY

      --
      -- Home is where you eat your heart out.
    2. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just ask the chinese to shoot it down?

    3. Re:Nice by magarity · · Score: 1

      Why ask the Chinese? The USAF has missiles to knock out satellites. They tested one by blowing up a perfectly good solar research satellite a few years ago.

    4. Re:Nice by need4mospd · · Score: 1

      Things will really get hot once the hair dryer satellites get into action.

    5. Re:Nice by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the Russians are working on a make-up remover anti-satellite?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    6. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those missiles were for Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites. Getting something out to geosynchronous orbit, even a small missile warhead takes a lot more fuel that those can carry.

    7. Re:Nice by hey! · · Score: 1

      Because half an hour later they'd have to shoot it down again.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  8. Spelling by Norin+Radd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rogue, not rouge. It's not wearing makeup.

    1. Re:Spelling by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Rogue, not rouge."

      The two aren't mutually exclusive, thweetie!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  9. Hasn't anyone called? by jbeaupre · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hasn't anyone called Technora yet? Space Debris Section should have been tasked to retrieve Galaxy 15 long ago.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    1. Re:Hasn't anyone called? by David_W · · Score: 1

      Space Debris Section should have been tasked to retrieve Galaxy 15 long ago.

      Sorry, it'll be another 60 years or so before Half Section is operational.

    2. Re:Hasn't anyone called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're just a bunch of diaper men.

  10. By the same author by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who ghost wrote Sarah Palin's book "Going Rouge"

  11. Rogue satellite by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    Doesn't anybody want to comment about the rogue satellite?

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:Rogue satellite by ZaphDingbat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, yeah. Sorry about that. I red the summary this time.

    2. Re:Rogue satellite by LordEd · · Score: 1

      I could comment about it until I'm red in the face, but I'm not sure if anybody will listen until the spelling is corrected.

    3. Re:Rogue satellite by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Which rogue satellite?

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    4. Re:Rogue satellite by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      The rouge one, of course.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    5. Re:Rogue satellite by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, nobody cares.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    6. Re:Rogue satellite by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I thought that's why we had military operatives to fire off the diverting thrusters and avert the crisis!

      Did the recruitment commercial lie to me?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  12. Let the record show... by gman003 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let the record show that the first eight comments were entirely devoted to pointing out a common typo in the headline, and that every response to those comments so far has been directly related to said typo. Let it not be said that Slashdot cares not for the Queen's English.

    1. Re:Let the record show... by deapbluesea · · Score: 1

      What, you expected this crowd to debate a topic on its merits? For shame! Most of us don't even read the article!

      --
      Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.
    2. Re:Let the record show... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2

      Let it not be said that Slashdot cares not for the Queen's English.

      Double-negatives, though... now that's another matter entirely.

    3. Re:Let the record show... by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Let the record show that yours is the ninth in a series of comments entirely devoted to pointing out a common typo in the headline.

      This one makes it ten.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    4. Re:Let the record show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CooooooooomBOOOOOOOOOOOOO BREAaak kkk ERRR!!!!!!

    5. Re:Let the record show... by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Is it common? I've never made that mistake. Anyone else want to cop to it?

    6. Re:Let the record show... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      This one goes to 11.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Let the record show... by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Double negatives in English are only a problem when they are used to convey a negative sense, but here they are properly used to convey a positive sense. Well, that's how I learned it anyway. In this case, it doesn't lead to confusion -- for me, at least.

    8. Re:Let the record show... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      Let it not be said that Slashdot cares not for the Queen's English.

      Really, do you have to call him a queen just because he wears makeup? You really don't know anything about his sexual orientation just from what he's wearing...

      --
      That is all.
    9. Re:Let the record show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common typo? Speak for yourself. My native language is not English and I would _never_ do that mistake, since those are two distinct words with distinct meanings and they're not even homophone (unlike, for instance, "your"/"you're" or "which"/"witch"). Meaning... for someone to do that typo, I'm quite sure that person doesn't know what "rouge" means nor how to read that word.

    10. Re:Let the record show... by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just make ten louder and make ten be the top number and make that a little louder?

    11. Re:Let the record show... by gman003 · · Score: 1

      There's actually a perfectly good reason. 10, by convention, is the most amplification possible on a device without causing distortion. 11 is louder, but the sound will be at least somewhat distorted. While some musicians (metal, for instance) actually prefer the distortion of the sound, many musicians do not. Hence, 10 is a logical extreme for the device, but inclusion of 11 (or higher) is an option appreciated by some.

    12. Re:Let the record show... by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      Or in the words of one of the undisputed masters of rock:

      Nigel Tufnel: The numbers all go to eleven. Look, right across the board, eleven, eleven, eleven and...

      Marty DiBergi: Oh, I see. And most amps go up to ten?

      Nigel Tufnel: Exactly.

      Marty DiBergi: Does that mean it's louder? Is it any louder?

      Nigel Tufnel: Well, it's one louder, isn't it? It's not ten. You see, most blokes, you know, will be playing at ten. You're on ten here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up, you're on ten on your guitar. Where can you go from there? Where?
      Marty DiBergi: I don't know.

      Nigel Tufnel: Nowhere. Exactly. What we do is, if we need that extra push over the cliff, you know what we do?

      Marty DiBergi: Put it up to eleven.

      Nigel Tufnel: Eleven. Exactly. One louder.

      Marty DiBergi: Why don't you just make ten louder and make ten be the top number and make that a little louder?

      Nigel Tufnel: [pause] These go to eleven.

    13. Re:Let the record show... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Dear sir or madam,

      Please stop ruining my faux-witticisms with facts.

      With kindest regards,

      Me.

  13. There's only one solution by russotto · · Score: 1

    Space Sharks! With fricking Space Lasers!

    1. Re:There's only one solution by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Space Sharks! With fricking Space Lasers!

      I was sort of thinking the same thing... kind of... If, apparently, blasting the satellite into 10K pieces is a bad idea, what about just melting it a little bit with a powerful laser -- to destroy its electronics and transmitter? Why hasn't this been done already, if not by military, then by some intrepid DIY slashdotter? (Sharks are cool too, but that means big salt-water aquariums, and sure they can be beautiful and very rewarding, but if you don't live near the ocean it can be expensive and a real chore to keep it up.)

      The weather is totally underrated, and I don't want mine interrupted.

    2. Re:There's only one solution by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Lasers? Lasers are expensive. Why not send a micro-satellite with some drills and a taser on it. It docks with the satellite (with magnets or maybe glue pads of some kind, since I guess the zombie satellite isn't meant to be docked with), stabs the fuck out of it, and then sends a shock through its drill bits for good measure. Maybe it could spew some acid into the satellite too if it can be kept from freezing before it does the job. A 2ftx6ft tube-shaped satellite could pack the stuff needed to do this with room to spare. Hey, why not add some extra fuel so it can push the satellite towards the atmosphere when it's done?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  14. stay on target, stay on target by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    Rouge Two: [the Y-wings are running the gauntlet toward the Death Star reactor-port] The guns - they've stopped!
    Rouge Five: [realizes why] Stabilize your rear deflectors... Watch for enemy fighters.
    Rouge Leader: They're coming in! Three marks at 2-10!
    [Rouge Two is slain by Darth Vader and his wingmen; Rouge Leader starts to panic]
    Rouge Leader: It's no good, I can't maneuver!
    Rouge Five: Stay on target.
    Rouge Leader: *We're too close!*
    Rouge Five: Stay on target!
    Rouge Leader: [shouts] Loosen up!
    [he too is picked off by Vader and Company; Rouge Five tries to escape but is fatally winged]
    Rouge Five: Rouge Five to Red leader, lost Tiree, lost Dutch.
    Red Leader: I copy, Rouge Leader.
    Rouge Five: It came from... behind!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:stay on target, stay on target by rgviza · · Score: 1

      Estee Lauder: My rouge is the best! Try autumn orange!

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
  15. 49ers Packers game affected by astern · · Score: 2

    Knowing the machinations behind the NFL on FOX broadcasts (double redundancy -everywhere-) I was surprised when the game dropped out and returned in 4:3 SD on Sunday, now I know they must've lost their uplink.

    --
    If the world isn't beating a path to your door you're doing something wrong.
  16. Orbiting space trash is here to stay by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1, Troll

    Orbiting space trash is here to stay.

    There will no money in collecting 10,000 MPH space trash until someone it sued because they didn't clean it up. Humans (or Ferengi) do nothing unless there is profit.

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    1. Re:Orbiting space trash is here to stay by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Clean it up? How the fuck do you clean it up?

    2. Re:Orbiting space trash is here to stay by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Clean it up? How the fuck do you clean it up?

      Well, I suppose we could start with a sense of humor. Or at the very least, Star Trek trivia. Come on guys, it's TUESDAY for Christ's sake. The hangover should be gone by now.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Orbiting space trash is here to stay by pclminion · · Score: 1

      I'm already working on Wednesday's hangover, so maybe that's it. Still struggling to get the specific reference...

    4. Re:Orbiting space trash is here to stay by EMeta · · Score: 1

      Katamari. Lots of Katamari.

  17. Weather forecasting by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    No more satellite images? No more data and imagery??

    Back to tea leaves then.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Weather forecasting by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      Or radar.

  18. What's with the "editing" today? by texwtf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Rouge satellites?

    Are the slashdot editors drunk? This is only the latest of several simple grammatical and spelling errors in the summaries today.

    1. Re:What's with the "editing" today? by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. I've heard Taco actually asks other editors to not fix errors in his posts. He likes them that way.

  19. No TV? revolution in America! by fantomas · · Score: 1

    I am sure the US public will get by without weather reports but affecting tv programming? does this mean NO TV?! I predict a riot. Maybe even a revolution. This could bring down the USA!

  20. I hate those damn red satellites. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Filter error: You can type more than that for your comment.

  21. In Soviet russia... by ijakings · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, Weather interferes with you!

  22. But where's the conspiracy? by HungryMonkey · · Score: 1

    Rogue, or a test of satellite jamming capabilities? No amount of software/hardware security will help if you just have to float a satellite with a 'stuck transmitter' on over.

    1. Re:But where's the conspiracy? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Here's an easy hardware fix: switch frequencies.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:But where's the conspiracy? by sjames · · Score: 1

      According to TFA, they have done that now and things are more or less back to normal.

  23. Let's Get This Straight. by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 1

    This is a "runaway" wearing rouge? A zombie runaway too? So a zombified runaway is going down the orbital highway wearing too much makeup, or is the headline incorrect?

    I am so confused!

    Kids these days!!

  24. zomg Zombie satellites??? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2

    Are they slowly lumbering into different orbits and gnawing on the CPUs of any live satellites they can find?

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:zomg Zombie satellites??? by Philomage · · Score: 1

      Basically, yes.

  25. so the zombie apocalypse starts in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    didn't see that one coming.

  26. Poor satellites... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    I see my grandma made it to them too, with the pinching of the cheeks and all...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  27. OMG Zombie?!? Nuke it! by cstacy · · Score: 1

    Nuke it out of orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

  28. Not exactly what happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The possible Galaxy 15 interference isn't expected until 12/12 to 12/18. In anticipation of the interference, the contractor that maintains the SES-1 satellite for the National Weather Service adjusted the signal's power levels early Friday, resulting in data slow downs and sporadic missed messages. After resolving the power level problems Saturday, signal problems reappeared on Sunday. It was determined that interference from another instrument on the same satellite was causing the signal degradation. The signal was switched to an alternate frequency (which is when the author stopped receiving data). The source of the interference was found and fixed by mid-day Monday. Current National Weather Service admin messages can be found here: http://weather.noaa.gov/tgstatus/

  29. When will we have weather again? by erroneus · · Score: 2

    I was beginning to wonder why it hasn't snowed here yet despite that there seems to be ample moisture and below freezing temperatures. I guess this explains it.

  30. Why not use the X-37B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the USAF should use their spiffy new drone shuttle to capture/destroy/repair this poor little misguided satellite . Seems like a good demonstration case to me.

    1. Re:Why not use the X-37B by onkelonkel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The X-37B operates in low earth orbit about 200 miles up. The satellite is in Geosynchronous orbit at about 22,000 miles up. How do you get the X-37B to where the satellite is?

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    2. Re:Why not use the X-37B by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      There's a significant difference between LEO (where the shuttle, ISS, X-37, and the majority of manned spaceflight has taken place) and Geosynchronous orbit. About 35,500km difference actually.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    3. Re:Why not use the X-37B by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      The X-37B operates in low earth orbit about 200 miles up. The satellite is in Geosynchronous orbit at about 22,000 miles up. How do you get the X-37B to where the satellite is?

      Rockets. Lots and lots of rockets.

      Seriously, it's not rocket science to come up with THAT answer.

    4. Re:Why not use the X-37B by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      The problem will be getting it back down...

    5. Re:Why not use the X-37B by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      No, that's easy. It's when you add "intact" that it becomes a difficult problem.

    6. Re:Why not use the X-37B by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Of course it will. Just add more rockets. Again, not rocket science.

      You add delta V to get into a higher orbit, and you fire retro thrusters (subtract delta V) to go into a lower orbit.

      Figuring out how many rockets are in "lots and lots of rockets", how large they are and how to get the X-37B back onto the ground safely - that is rocket science.

  31. Rouge? What is this reddit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I'm late to this slashdot article and all the good jokes about the misspelling in the article's title have already been done.

    ---------
    T.Dzubin

  32. The real reason it still has power.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those Energizers keep going, and going, and going, and going, and going....

  33. DirecTV affected? by rthille · · Score: 1

    Interesting. The data download on my ancient DirecTivo stopped yesterday or Sunday. It reports one receiver getting 89% and the other 0%. I figured it was the Tivo going bad (it's been rebooting itself a lot lately), but maybe it's the satellite.

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    1. Re:DirecTV affected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong orbital slot, wrong band. But close; AMC-1 is @ 103W, DirecTV is 101W however DirecTV is Ku, not C band.

  34. why can't cable use fiber to feed the headends? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    why can't cable use fiber to feed the head ends?

  35. Layman's explaination by sjames · · Score: 3, Funny

    We start with the uplink properly paying attention to it's mate in orbit and all is well. Then this painted strumpet comes sauntering by and the uplink's attention wanders. This is naturally followed by the slap to the cheek. It takes a few minutes to re-align after that.

    Intelsat is powerless to do anything about this cosmic red light district.

  36. Humm by n_djinn · · Score: 1

    That is a heck of a weak link in the chain. No redundancy? I had better go RTFA soI know if the weather channel will survive this datapocolipse.

    --
    I do not play in the middle of the road
  37. it's ROGUE by rgviza · · Score: 3, Funny

    it's ROGUE dammit! Rouge is makeup

    --
    Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    1. Re:it's ROGUE by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Rouge is Fe2O3. The satellite was rusty.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    2. Re:it's ROGUE by Drishmung · · Score: 1

      it's ROGUE dammit! Rouge is makeup

      Or polishing compound.

      So, it's a subtle reference. Obviously it's better to burn out than to rust, both for rock stars and satellites.

      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
  38. Oh for god's sake. Iliterate headlines now????? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

    If people want to casually post loose, rouge, etc. I'm willing to let it slide.

    But having it in a headline just makes slashdot look pathetic.

    Are there no editors, are they illiterate, or do they just not care?

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  39. Perhaps, for redundancy... by slk · · Score: 1

    They could use this wonderful network of tubes that we can shove bits through called the Internet. There's plenty of bandwidth to stream high-def TV, weather images, etc; in fact, it's done every day. The satellite network no doubt serves as an important link, but you would think that fiber optics work in a pinch. (note that this is not a weather data gathering satellite, just a weather relay)

    --
    ERROR: Null .sig, core dumped.
    1. Re:Perhaps, for redundancy... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      That's probably good in a number of locations, most likely including pretty much everywhere that would be affected by the rogue satellite. However, at risk of being pedantic, the ISP and telco that I work for delivers Internet via satellite links because there are no roads and no land-lines from our upstream to the area we serve. Satellite is the *only* way to get there for at least another couple of years.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  40. "rouge"? by rbrome · · Score: 1

    Why do I care about the color of the satell... oh, you meant "rogue". Kinda hilarious typo.

  41. Just shoot it down already ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to have the US Air Force shoot this bastard down... They have the weapon for this (ASAT missile, fired from an F-15). How much more trouble will they allow this bastard to cause ?

    1. Re:Just shoot it down already ! by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Right. Just as soon as they develop the magical F15 that works at 22,000 miles in the air.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  42. So *that's* what that was... by ryanvm · · Score: 2

    This is personally amusing to me because I spent half of Sunday trying to track down reports of my Android Live Wallpaper app not working properly. I guess in hindsight, it's pretty cool. I mean, it's not often that you get to lament that a rogue satellite ruined your afternoon.

    Oh, and in case you were wondering why I didn't take the opportunity to shamlessly plug my app.

    http://www.appidio.com/apps/radar-wallpaper/

    It's a live wallpaper for Android phones that shows the nearest NWS radar imagery.

    1. Re:So *that's* what that was... by cvnautilus · · Score: 1

      You know you're a nerd when you spend half of an entire day trying to get a fancy wallpaper to work.

  43. Article is completely incorrect by vortexf5 · · Score: 2

    The outage over the weekend was NOT caused by Galaxy 15. Galaxy 15 is expected to pass by SES-1 on December 15.

    --
    I'm angry, and I Meta Moderate!
    1. Re:Article is completely incorrect by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      You realize it doesn't have to be directly in front of it to interfere with the signal, right?

      Neither the summary nor the article ever said G-15 passed by SES-1.

      What they said was Galaxy 15's transmissions interfered with NOAA's AWIPS, which is absolutely correct. They fixed the problem by changing frequencies on the operational satellites, and everything is hunky dory.

      After Galaxy 15 passes SES-1 in a few days things should be able to go back to normal.

      Is it really that hard to actually read? Jesus.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    2. Re:Article is completely incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it is the ARTICLE that is incorrect huh? So the title was like warming up?

  44. Why not start deorbiting this junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the orbiting debris's owners are known. Couldn't we start de-orbiting this junk and charge the owners for the service? A reasonable Earth based solution would be to use lasers to push a satellite up, just a bit at apogee, without adding angular velocity. This should bring the perigee down closer to Earth. In time object would drag on the atmosphere and burn out.

  45. Unaffected by WizADSL · · Score: 1

    Not having data feeds from millions of dollars of satellite equipment available, weather forecasters have instead been using a bag of d20s to make their predictions and oddly, forecast reliability has improved 12%!

  46. Re:Oh for god's sake. Iliterate headlines now????? by treeves · · Score: 1

    Pathetic? Better be careful. Next thing you know, you'll say it's stagnated and start getting modded troll!

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  47. I experienced this first hand by Myopic · · Score: 2

    I work at a weather company and this problem turned into some hurried phone calls to staff over the weekend. I'm on the data team, but I was only peripherally involved. This outage was expected, but not expected for another six days, so we were prepared with code changes for when the problem arose, but we hadn't turned on those changes yet because we thought it would be another week almost.

    And I'm going to wrap up my post now, because I don't actually have anything interesting to say about it.

  48. Given by pilgrim23 · · Score: 2

    that the problem is the erratic orbital nature of Galaxy 15, and the fact that this orbit intersects weather Satellites. Would it be proper to refer to this relationship as.... NOAA's....Arc? Two by two.

    --
    - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  49. epic spelling mistake! by wozzinator · · Score: 0

    a rouge satellite? really?

    --
    BSD is for people who love Unix, Linux is for people who hate Microsoft.
  50. There's only one hope... by kaizendojo · · Score: 1

    Quick - someone call Max Factor!!

  51. I shall sneak up on this satellite by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I shall sneak up on this satellite with my trusty level 85 worgen rouge and kill it with my blad of deth.

    It shall be an ex-satellite.

    It shall be a pine tree in the Fords.

    It shall have gone to join the Queue Indivisible.

    And all that this rouge satellite shall have to say will be one thing:

    "I'm feeling better. It's just a Fleischer wound!"

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  52. stay on topic, stay on topic by vjoel · · Score: 1

    It's no good, I can't moderate!

    --
    What part of `yes no` don't you understand?
  53. Re:Oh for god's sake. Iliterate headlines now????? by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 1

    Are there no editors, are they illiterate, or do they just not care?

    yes

  54. "Rogue" sat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does this have to do with Sarah Palin?

  55. Re:Oh for god's sake. Iliterate headlines now????? by Timex · · Score: 1

    Next thing you know, you'll say it's stagnated

    Nah. It's gone WAY past that. I think /. jumped the shark when they started posting article stuffs on Facebook... Why bother with the site itself anymore?

    --
    When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
  56. Interesting. by Timex · · Score: 1

    Someone edited the title to correct it and neglected to make a note of the correction with the article. Nice.

    --
    When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
    1. Re:Interesting. by socsoc · · Score: 1

      Basically making most of the comments not funny...

    2. Re:Interesting. by Timex · · Score: 1

      Basically making most of the comments not funny...

      I'm thinking that it reeks of "revisionist history" because it makes no record of the mistake ever have been there, and most of the posters are looking like dyslexic goofs. :\

      --
      When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
  57. easily fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kill -9 galaxy15

  58. Re:Oh for god's sake. Iliterate headlines now????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either your title was a joke or you're a fucking moron. I'm gonna go with the latter.

  59. Re:Oh for god's sake. Iliterate headlines now????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, if they didn't make an innocent misteak like this every now and then,
    we wouldn't have anything to complain/post about.

    And, yes, I'll take my misteak medium-rare with Bearnaise Sauce, thank you, Gordon.
    Just don't forget the risotto appetizer first, OK?

  60. Sadly, seems everyone missed the obvious... by werewolf1031 · · Score: 1

    It should be:
    from the ambush-eviscerate-vanish dept.

    "Nerds" my ass. :P

  61. Degrees and knowledge by NateTech · · Score: 1

    Those TV stations used to hire these people called "meteorologists" who could get a local forecast right greater than 80% of the time by looking outside the window and knowing what time of the year it was. Now they hire hookers and tell them to read NOAA text.

    --
    +++OK ATH
  62. Rogue Sat - Shoot the fucker down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Naaa Naaa,

    Industrial Military War Complex my ass - shoot the fucking thing down ya bunch of pussies!
    What ya going to do when another asshole group of hackers takes over a "Satellite"!

    US Cyber security my ass!