Slashdot Mirror


Hidden Backdoor Discovered On HP MSA2000 Arrays

wiredmikey writes "A hardcoded password-related security vulnerability has been discovered which apparently affects every HP MSA2000 G3, a modular large scale storage array. According to the alert, a hidden user exists that doesn't show up in the user manager, and the password cannot be changed, creating a perfect 'backdoor' opportunity for an attacker to gain access to potentially sensitive information stored on the device, as well as systems it is connected to."

197 comments

  1. Wow... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Funny

    The hard coded user and password in the HP MSA2000 is set to: username: admin

    password: !admin

    WaHAHAHAHAH! Not even "n9xe2uPAthe9" or even "Mr.Snuffles". And it is exactly the same as the very generic username, except for one extra character. It's almost as bad(or perhaps even worse) then using "123456" or even "password."

    This further proves that "faith based security" - relying on vendors to provide systems with built-in robust security- is not a good practice.

    Well...nah, I won't even go there. Too easy. I'm trying to be a good boy. Would somebody like to post a sysadmin's prayer for us?

    1. Re:Wow... by chemicaldave · · Score: 1

      Who would ever guess that the password for admin is "!admin" or "not admin?" Secure beyond belief!

    2. Re:Wow... by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes but you've now seen the ! so it's NOT admin, we'll have to keep looking.

      Those HP guys are clever.

    3. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      !I

    4. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anyone started testing other HP equipment for the same issue?

      Not familiar with the product in question, but it's possible a superuser account could have been embedded like this so they could reset data on RMA'd units without having to pull the chips... or for remote troubleshooting. That doesn't make it any less stupid, but if it's here there's no reason it couldn't exist in other similar products... or even not so similar ones.

      Probably worth checking if you have any HP gear in house, better safe than sorry.

    5. Re:Wow... by zill · · Score: 1

      "Mr.Snuffles"

      How did you find my password?

    6. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me the serenity to accept my users ineptitudes, my CFO's shortsitedness and help me curb my frustrations.
      Also, please help prevent anyone from finding the bodies.

    7. Re:Wow... by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      Its because whoever would use that login is obviously not the admin.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    8. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not my password.

      I use 5...4...3...2...1...

    9. Re:Wow... by beanpoppa · · Score: 5, Funny

      Steve-"Hey, Frank! What should I make the password for our backdoor admin account?" Frank-"Definitely NOT admin!" Steve-"Ok."

    10. Re:Wow... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On a serious note, with a user name of 'admin', would that prevent an actual user account being created with 'admin' as the name?

      Wonder if that might be a new check to run on vendor systems to weed out the truly stupid 'features' like this one. Run a script to create frequently used admin accounts and see if any fail due to them already existing.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    11. Re:Wow... by ocdscouter · · Score: 1

      I guess he's not Brian, either.

    12. Re:Wow... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, that 80s group... "Admin (Not Admin)". I loved that song.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    13. Re:Wow... by f3rret · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't !admin mean subfactorial[admin]?

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    14. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Would somebody like to post a sysadmin's prayer for us?

      Our Router, which art in IOS
      hallowed be thy interface
      thy packets come
      thy routing be done
      on the LAN as it is on the Web.
      Give us this day our daily Clues
      And forgive us our LARTings
      As we LART those who make stupid service requests
      And lead us not into Windows support
      but deliver us from lusers
      For thine is the Network
      The Bandwidth and the Packet
      For the duration of the DHCP lease.
      Amen

    15. Re:Wow... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      To be fair, to use that login you have to go through a few steps:

      1. You have to be shrunk down and enter you own brain.
      2. Remove your common sense.
      3. Show the back door your admin and not admin.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    16. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would laugh except I've run across an agency where the management decreed that all the admin level accounts would be renamed with a "!" in front of them, for unspecified security reasons. (It's probably just to make going through audit logs easier.) So, now any noob that gets a hold of a user list will know exactly which accounts to brute force. !johndoe for the win!

    17. Re:Wow... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Only in math, not in programming.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    18. Re:Wow... by sheetsda · · Score: 2

      He is, however, a very naughty boy.

    19. Re:Wow... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      But is he the Messiah?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    20. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it HP or the Chinese manufacturer that built the components that put the backdoor in?

    21. Re:Wow... by sjs132 · · Score: 1

      A login/password worthy of the emperor would be: biggus dickus

      --
      --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
    22. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shake for me... I want to be your backdoor man - Led Zeppelin

    23. Re:Wow... by s0litaire · · Score: 1

      more likely is a bored HP Designer wanted an easy password to remember...

      *put-on-tin-hat*
      OR
      The NSA/CIA/IRS or Homeland (in)Security asked for a backdoor and HP decided to give them one their IQ could remember....
      *keep-tinfoil-hat-on* (hey!! they could be listening to my thoughts...)

      --
      Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
    24. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is everyone laughing? That was exactly how it went.

      Now if you'll excuse me, I have a meeting of fellow Asperger-sufferers.

    25. Re:Wow... by dave562 · · Score: 1

      The only way they could have made it more secure would have been to use fnordadmin. Then it would have been REALLY obscured.

    26. Re:Wow... by ocdscouter · · Score: 1

      What's so funny about Biggus Dickus?

    27. Re:Wow... by afidel · · Score: 2

      Except for the fact that this is called out in the admin guide and it's recommended that you change it. Of course I'm sure lots of people set them up without reading the guide (it's pretty thick) so they should probably have a wizard to change the default at first login like Brocade does.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    28. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! What is the rule that says you'll never have mod points when you need them?

  2. No one ever got fired for buying HP . . . by drsmack1 · · Score: 2

    Oh wait...

  3. And the password is..... by drsmack1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    cntraltdelete

    If that is too long to type, you can use the shortcut keys on your keyboard. This HP thing goes deep. . . .

  4. Hello Joshua ... by tgd · · Score: 3, Funny

    How about a nice game of chess?

    1. Re:Hello Joshua ... by Nikola+Tesla+and+You · · Score: 1

      It would have been really funny and clever if they had used that as the password...

  5. Ok so two things by Aerorae · · Score: 1

    1) Why the hell would any manufacturer hard code ANY passwords or users and
    2) Just how many of these systems are out there, in which areas of the private & public sectors?

    1. Re:Ok so two things by Saishuuheiki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One would assume that you would hardcode it so if the user loses his password, he can call the company. And trust me, they WILL lose their password.

      One would hope that the password is put somewhere that a firmware flash can change it however.

    2. Re:Ok so two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1. Backdoor for "Administrator forgot password" (not that it really justifies it, but either it is that or government conspiracy which seems less likely)
      2. Lots, and many sectors including sensitive areas like data archives for healthcare services. This just created an IT security nightmare for some very large companies (think fortune 250) and likely government too (though the U.S. government tends to prefer Dell over HP most of the time).

    3. Re:Ok so two things by TopSpin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just how many of these systems are out there, in which areas of the private & public sectors?

      Lots and most of them. MSA2000 are common. HP been selling them for years. Although it has been superseded by newer models the channel still has a large supply. Pretty good hardware for the money.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    4. Re:Ok so two things by sqlrob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That doesn't need a single hardcoded password. Generate one based on the serial number of the device. Recoverable, and a heck of a lot more secure than a single password for everybody.

    5. Re:Ok so two things by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Okay I understand that but this is dumb. Maybe require a physical button or key to be turned on the server to allow that password to be used! Or maybe an USB device with crypto on it plugged in to activate it?
      I mean really people HP must have people that are at least as smart as I am.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Ok so two things by zero_out · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They probably put a hardcoded u/n & p/w into the system early in development to ensure that their login security system worked, then implemented configurable logins, forgetting to remove the hardcoded one.

      When I code something that is meant to be configurable, I first hardcode some values to ensure that the code works, then I code a configurable text-file based system, like ini or properties files. Finally, I move on to implementing the desired configuration method, such as LDAP, SQL, or HTTP GET. Anything sensitive is encrypted, of course. I have always remembered to remove the hardcoded values, but I've seen colleagues forget to do the same.

    7. Re:Ok so two things by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      One would assume that you would hardcode it so if the user loses his password, he can call the company. And trust me, they WILL lose their password.

      They should have done something that at least has a chance of verifying physical access to the machine - like making the password a derivative of the serial number.
      As in luser admin calls HP says he's locked out, HP asks for serial number, runs it through some algorithm only known to HP that outputs the password for that system.
      That's not perfect either, but it would be a big improvement over harcoding the same damn password for all units.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    8. Re:Ok so two things by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      You can give them a document, and tell them that it will cost $10,000 to recover the keys on it if they lose it, and spend 3 hours explaining how important this is, and they will be unable to locate it 3 days later. Don't underestimate the ability of an employee to forget where they left their lunch, much less an important password.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    9. Re:Ok so two things by biskit · · Score: 2

      One would assume that you would hardcode it so if the user loses his password, he can call the company. And trust me, they WILL lose their password.

      One would hope that the password is put somewhere that a firmware flash can change it however.

      Or it might even be resold to someone else who doesn't know the password - used equipment exists - and they don't engrave the password on the outside. But sometimes for this 'hidden' password to work, there must be another condition on the equipment to be present - like loopback plugs in place.

      --
      what? me worry?
    10. Re:Ok so two things by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Which is why the password could be generated from known facts but not ones an outsider would be likely to get right. So combine serial number, date of purchase, company name, contact phone number and whatever else you want, then hash all that to get the password that cannot be lost but is hard to guess.

    11. Re:Ok so two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Based on the serial number? That's security through obscurity of the worst kind. The question an attacker has to guess is "Which algorithm did they use to generate the password?" There are only 20 or so good algorithms. Less than 5 bits of entropy. The only way to make such a scheme work would be to salt the hash, and store the salt on HP's campus. That is a big logistical problem, considering how manufacturers operate their manufacturing lines.

      No, that is not good enough. It is much better to use a single, enormous private key with suitable access controls (like SELinux). How many guesses will it take to compute the public key for an unknown 2048 bit private key? A lot more than can be done before the Sun swallows up the Earth.

    12. Re:Ok so two things by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Even better than a secret algorithm, which are generally bad juju, you might as well just use well-known and well tested cryptographic techniques: Each unit's service backdoor would be its MAC address, signed with an HP private key(stored with the same care reserved for SSL root certs and the like). The unit would just have to know its own MAC address and HP's public key to be able to verify the validity of the signature...

    13. Re:Ok so two things by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      A more likely scenario:

      1. company A is sold to company B
      2. admin jumps ship for a less crappy job
      3. company C disassembles company B in a hostile takeover, and sells off the bloody parts
      4. admin quits
      5. hardware sits in a rack somewhere, forgotten
      6. admin quits
      7. clueless newb hired as servermonkey
      8. servermonkey makes a hash of things
      9. server monkey promoted to management
      10. company sold to GM
      11. company sold off from GM
      12. new owners can't track down password for server, cross their fingers and hope the problem disappears
      13. sever needs critical security patch and the company support
      14. their own phone rings,
      THE CALL IS COMING FROM INSIDE THE HOUSE!!!!

      true story.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    14. Re:Ok so two things by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      Not quite security by obscurity, if the number isn't presented in the UI anywhere (it becomes "something you have").

      Where are you getting 5 bits of entropy? Hell, the serial number on my HP laptop is 10 alphanumeric.

    15. Re:Ok so two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until someone works out the algorithm, then pre generates all the possible passwords. Then you just have to worry about every single device out there.

      I mean, not like that has happened before, perhaps even more than once.

      Granted though, better than the current setup of same default password everywhere, but still, not that much better. You might as well pregen a random password and stick it on the device. At least then you need to physically be there to find out what it is.

    16. Re:Ok so two things by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      They should have done something that at least has a chance of verifying physical access to the machine - like making the password a derivative of the serial number.

      Hell, just making the account name or password the serial number would work wonders. I mean, in general, physical access trumps all anyway.

      Actually, is there any reason to seperate username and password for a backdoor superuser account. I mean, the username could be secret and the password null or the username could be well known and the password hidden, and it would be just as secure. The reason to separate the two is because other people need to manipulate the user but not know the password. If it's a backdoor account, than the only person that can modify the account is the superuser, so the two types of information don't exist.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    17. Re:Ok so two things by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume they generate a pass using a simple hash? The phrase "based on the serial number" doesn't say anything about the transform used.

      For all we know "based on the serial number" means they're using public key cryptography on an extremely secure system...

    18. Re:Ok so two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Cisco routers you just hold the button down while powering on the device. I can't really understand why more security than this is necessary. The disks in an MSA aren't encrypted (though they do have a proprietary raid format, that could be easily reverse engineered), so if you wanted to get the data, you could just pull the disks and walk off with them.

      Too much security can be an unacceptable inconvenience. Say some authorised person sets the password incorrectly on one of my routers, and can't remember what he set it to (this happens), I'd much rather just reset the password using the cisco password recovery procedure, than have to engage a support call with the device manufacturer to recover a password (which could easily be done by an adversary using social engineering). Also in the common situation where you are not the original customer for the equipment, second hand, or contracted asset transfer, and you are no longer under support contract, you are not going to be able to utilise the remote password recovery mechanism. I'd much prefer to have a documented standalone procedure for device recovery that requires physical access to the device only.

    19. Re:Ok so two things by mr_walrus · · Score: 1

      serial number is probably on invoicing and shipping paperwork.
      probably in an easily accessed "customer warranty" database too.

      needs to be a unique identifier from the physical machine
      NOT used for anything else whatsoever at minimum.

    20. Re:Ok so two things by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Pretty good hardware for the money.

      Did you get a different MSA2000 than I did? About 2-3 years ago, the group I was in needed to quickly deploy the modern equivalent of an MSA1000 or MSA1500 (which were incredibly reliable), and since we were a mostly-HP shop, the MSA2000 seemed like the logical option. I never stopped regretting that purchase.

      First of all, the rack hardware was insultingly poorly designed. It was essentially impossible for someone to rackmount on their own. This was when I began to suspect that HP had just rebadged someone else's hardware, because HP's own rack kits (well, the ones whose designs they inherited from Compaq) are usually great.

      Second, as soon as I'd had it up and running for a week or so, every night I'd get email alerts marked "Informational" that indicated there was a parity check problem and I needed to contact support as quickly as possible. When I did, HP support said it was not a problem and I should ignore them, because it was a bug in the firmware.

      After a particular firmware update, those same messages kept coming, but were then marked "Critical Error", or something along those lines. I re-opened the ticket, and was told something to the effect of "oh, yeah, you are going to need to move all the data off of the array, delete everything, and rebuild it from scratch". This was for a number of parity check failures that I could count on one hand. There were literally something like four bad blocks on a 7TB array, and the only "fix" was to delete and rebuild the array.

      Oh, and I forgot to mention, we had two of these devices, and they both did the same thing, but with a different ~5 blocks on each one. I asked HP Support how they expected me to believe that rebuilding the array would prevent the same problem from recurring given that it had happened on two different devices within a few weeks of each other, and never got a satisfactory response. They also weren't willing to e.g. ship us another pair of devices so I could copy the data to them, cut over, and ship them back the bad ones, despite my employer buying hundreds of HP servers every year. The hardware was at a remote location, so the idea that we would be forced to buy *another* 14TB storage system to use temporarily while the real one was rebuilt was pretty insulting.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    21. Re:Ok so two things by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Right up until the algorithm for generating the password leaks and a method to extract the serial number over the network is found.

      These may seem unlikely, but with access to the machine someone can dump the software for someone else to reverse engineer. Its harder but not that hard for someone who REALLY wants to get in.

      The reality of it is however, these things aren't sitting on a network that people who aren't allowed to talk to it ANYWAY are roaming around.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    22. Re:Ok so two things by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the kind words on the MSA1000 and MSA1500. I worked on the MSA1000 and was principle designer for the 1500. These were the first 2Gb Fibre Channel products and the MSA1500 was the first SATA/SAS tiered storage device.

      --

      To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

    23. Re:Ok so two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have always remembered to remove the hardcoded values, but I've seen colleagues forget to do the same.

      How do you know you have always remembered? If you forgot, then by definition you don't know.

  6. Almost Kernel.org by allquixotic · · Score: 0

    Just a while back, kernel.org got some infrastructure upgrades, including two HP MSA70s. Hopefully this invisible user account doesn't affect their boxen, seeing how they're a different (but similar) model number.

    1. Re:Almost Kernel.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The MSA70 is just a disk-shelf, and is connected to the host via. SAS: there is no way to connect an MSA70/50/30 to an IP network.

      While we're at it, you'd really have to go out of your way to expose something like an MSA2000 to the wider internet, as you'd have to be stupid enough to be running your storage network on a routable range with external routing from your edge. Basically, you'd have to a giant fuckwit.

    2. Re:Almost Kernel.org by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Serial port to ethernet, you access it with telnet. They're ubiquitous.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    3. Re:Almost Kernel.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, you'd have to a giant fuckwit.

      I accidentally the giant fuckwit, myself.

  7. leaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP to blame for WikiLeaks?

  8. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Uhhh....your Ameriphobia is showing. When all you do all day is think about how America is bad, then it's not surprising when you invent scenarios in which you are correct. I am reminded of the Baptist preacher who thinks that every time someone gets an STD, it must be the work of Satan.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  9. That's funny, because by seebs · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whenever you type '!admin' all I see is '******'. Whereas, if I type 'hunter2', all you see is '*******'.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    1. Re:That's funny, because by Stregano · · Score: 1

      pl3as3d0ntst3almyp4ssw0rd

      lets try this out

      --
      The world is how you make it
    2. Re:That's funny, because by Stregano · · Score: 1

      Wait a second...

      --
      The world is how you make it
    3. Re:That's funny, because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BASH.org has clearly kept you entertained.

    4. Re:That's funny, because by Deflatamouse · · Score: 0
    5. Re:That's funny, because by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      You should never fall for one of these scams, else your ******** might get exposed by a key logger. I'm careful that I only enter my ******** when I am sure that no keylogger is attached to my keyboard. If you are careful, noone will ever guess your ******** even without these extra processes used to hide them.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    6. Re:That's funny, because by formfeed · · Score: 1

      xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

      lets try this out

      Wow, your password would take forever to crack.

    7. Re:That's funny, because by Stregano · · Score: 1

      on a real note, i always type in sentences for my passwords. single words and letters won't do it for me. even random letters, if the password is small enough, can be brute forced eventually. type in a sentence, and while you can crack it, it is much, much tougher. that is why every website i personally build has around a 50-100 character limit on passwords if not allowing for much longer ones

      --
      The world is how you make it
    8. Re:That's funny, because by satuon · · Score: 1

      Ha, I thought I was the only one who did that. My passwords are phrases actually, but still make 10-15 characters.

    9. Re:That's funny, because by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

      Me too, song lyrics. No I'm not telling you the name of my favourite band.

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  10. Password regs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    aren't all passwords supposed to be "encrypted" ?

  11. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

    Don't we hear every so often about how the US government wants backdoors into otherwise secure systems and crypto algorithms for "national security" or "law enforcement" purposes? I suspect that the MSA2000 was required to have a backdoor to appease Uncle Sam, and somebody at HP decided that if Uncle Sam wanted a backdoor, Uncle Sam could damn well have a goate.cx-esque backdoor.

    In this case, it's hoped that competitors to Uncle Sam's campaign contributors buy this storage array for cheap and easy industrial espionage. It's not about national security or law enforcement, it's ensuring US companies can exercise their right to make a profit. If it involves hacking into a competitor's system and downloading all their data, even better. No one would suspect their disk array!

  12. Some other examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Your point about relying on vendors is a superb one. Here's another data point to be concerned with.

    A lot of startups, and not-so-small companies, source their boxes from Asian manufacturers. This is generally known, and not a surprise. What may be a surprise is that not even the vendor who turns it into an server type of product is authorized to open the box. If they do, the warranty is voided. The top end boxes will go for +$15K a pop, so you can darn well be certain that the vendor doesn't open the system.

    This is a superb opportunity for Chinese manufacturers to put in a back door to an embedded server product. I can think of a half dozen vendors, who's names everyone recognizes, which do this.

    Good luck on securing that.

    1. Re:Some other examples by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      We have servers that cost a lot more than that, we open them all the time.

    2. Re:Some other examples by icebike · · Score: 1

      What does opening the box have to do with backdoor passwords?

      I looked inside the case of my NAS recently, and didn't see any passwords. Does that mean I am safe?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:Some other examples by skarphace · · Score: 1

      I looked inside the case of my NAS recently, and didn't see any passwords. Does that mean I am safe?

      You obviously aren't looking hard enough.

      --
      Bullish Machine Tzar
    4. Re:Some other examples by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Right. You have to turn the cover over and look at the underside.

      "Do not remove eraser."

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    5. Re:Some other examples by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      I can think of a half dozen vendors, who's names everyone recognizes,

            And who you utterly fail to mention - why? Are you afraid of being sued? It's not libel if it's true. Either that or you're full of shit.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:Some other examples by Cylix · · Score: 1

      I actually purchased an embedded video encoder device that was password protected recently. The only published way to recover the unit was to call support and get the backdoor information. For an out of warranty device this would equate to around $150 for just a simple password fix.

      I did try to brute force the password at first, but because the usernames can be manipulated this was rather useless. Just before I was about to call support I decided to see if there were any weaknesses in the underlying OS.

      Sure enough there were some fairly nasty ones published and not that long ago. I was able to rip through the entire memory of the device and find ALL of the username/passwords in clear text. This list of credentials also included more then one unlisted backdoor account that could be used to enter the device. Even worse is this is a remote exploit that can be used against any device.

      This is actually a lot worse then an MSA2000 which you may not find online. Even when my group had racks of these units we didn't actually use the out of band access because they could be managed via their SAN path. The failover controller option was so poorly implemented that we actually unseated the second module. If a unit had more then a disk failure issue the controller or other offender parts would get swapped out until it was all green lights.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    7. Re:Some other examples by onepoint · · Score: 1

      off-topic but related: many years ago, published in Analog, Corporate warfare was discussed. So I would not be surprised that in the next 20 years we see 'root' access to system if certain parts are put together.

      If I was China, I would be doing this together, just some basic stuff ( hard drive xyz + vidoe card abc = root ) over time and multiple attack vectors, there would be a significant chance that some of these 'roots' would have an advantage that you needed

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
  13. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't we hear every so often about how the US government wants backdoors into otherwise secure systems and crypto algorithms for "national security" or "law enforcement" purposes? I suspect that the MSA2000 was required to have a backdoor to appease Uncle Sam, and somebody at HP decided that if Uncle Sam wanted a backdoor, Uncle Sam could damn well have a goate.cx-esque backdoor.

    Exactly! What happened was that they used this type of storage array to hold data on the 9/11 cover-up, and also to edit the footage of the "moon landing". Also the specs for their black surveillance whisper copters.

    Or someone at HP is a moron.

    --

    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

  14. Not working here by jonathanhowell · · Score: 5, Informative

    A quick login test on my MSA 2012i G3 doesn't work.

    "Access denied"

    more testing later.
    J

    1. Re:Not working here by kordaff · · Score: 2

      Yeah I figured you wanted me to change that for ya, so i went ahead and did so.
      --

    2. Re:Not working here by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Send me your IP, I'll take a look.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    3. Re:Not working here by operagost · · Score: 1

      That's funny, but like the article says the password can't be changed. This will have to be fixed with a firmware update.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Not working here by jgtg32a · · Score: 5, Informative

      On the article some guy said it is only accessible through the serial port.

    5. Re:Not working here by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the article some guy said it is only accessible through the serial port.

      Which kind of changes the whole tone in my opinion. I'm of the persuasion that if a black hat has physical access to your hardware, you've already lost. It's still shockingly bad practice from a vendor, but if this is true it goes from a serious issue to a moderate one.

    6. Re:Not working here by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Then this is much less of an issue.

      If the attacker can get to the serial port they can just trash the thing if they want too.

    7. Re:Not working here by idontgno · · Score: 2

      Unless someone put a dial-in modem or telnet-to-serial converter on the maintenance port. You know, for ease of oh-dark-thirty troubleshooting? I mean, rapid response to late-night network trouble calls.

      I've been a sysadmin at a largish installation. Maintenance modems aren't rare. You might hope the out-of-band command channels would be at least as secure as the in-band ones.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    8. Re:Not working here by yakatz · · Score: 1

      According to a comment on the original article:
      Try 'manage' as the username.

    9. Re:Not working here by Necron69 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The array they mean is really the MSA P2000 G3, which is a new 8Gb/s fibre channel array. Note that the array is OEM'd from Dot Hill.

      I tried the 'exploit' on my array. Yes, I can log in with admin/!admin, and no, the admin account does not show up in the GUI listing. BTW, the "admin/!admin" combo was the default login on previous versions of this array, but for this version, the default account was changed to "manage". I'd guess this is a coding error, not some deliberate backdoor.

      The article is wrong that the password cannot be changed. You can change it just fine from the CLI:

      HP StorageWorks MSA Storage P2000 G3 FC
      System Name: MSA_P2000_1
      System Location:XXXXXXXXX
      Version:L100R013

      # set password admin
      Enter new password: ****
      Re-enter new password: ****
      Success: Command completed successfully. (admin) - The password was changed.

      Verified that login is no longer possible via web GUI or SSH. Problem solved.

      - Necron69

    10. Re:Not working here by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Out of band is almost always worse. Which is why you should have the maintenance modem itself require strong passwords.

    11. Re:Not working here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope it works via the web/telnet and ssh interface

    12. Re:Not working here by wiredmikey · · Score: 1

      Someone else had commented that it did work via web interface as well and didn't require a serial interface. Statement from HP should be coming soon.

    13. Re:Not working here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So have I. We used terminal access concentrators on our modems and GSM gateways, you would have to login to the TAC before you could open the serial console of any of the attached devices. It also saves on the number of phone lines you need. The MSA also has dual controllers, I really can't imagine leasing two phone lines for every MSA in your data center. It's not surprising that there is a backdoor on the console, practically every piece of hardware has some way to reset it to factory config, the better ones don't allow you to dump the existing config from the device, and require a physical button to be held down during boot to activate, but I don't see this as a security hole. The console of most unix boxes allows you to break into the rom debugger and do everything, so you should secure access to them further down the datapath.

    14. Re:Not working here by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      if you have MSA2000 G3 and not a G2 use the login manage

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    15. Re:Not working here by martbhell · · Score: 1

      MSA2012i is a G1 MSA. On G1 and G2 you do not need to login while logging on through the serial port. I would expect HP to get a firmware out that rectifies this on the G3.

    16. Re:Not working here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange, all I see is

      # set password admin
      Enter new password: hunter2
      Re-enter new password: hunter2

  15. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1, Troll

    Zip up. Your flag-waving nationalism is showing.

  16. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by ppanon · · Score: 1

    I think Uncle Sam would have been a little more creative in choosing the backdoor password since it would have, in large part been USA companies rendered vulnerable. This indicates, I think, either a disgruntled worker who didn't care about picking a hard to find backdoor, or an agent for the foreign government of a country that does a lot of outsourcing who wanted anybody discovering the backdoor to think it was a disgruntled worker. Sometimes it's all about plausible deniability.

    --
    Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  17. Why are we complaining? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a vulnerability it's a feature.

  18. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by Nimey · · Score: 2

    How d'you know it wasn't some Chinese firmware programmer?

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  19. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by OzPeter · · Score: 1, Informative

    Uhhh....your Ameriphobia is showing. When all you do all day is think about how America is bad, then it's not surprising when you invent scenarios in which you are correct

    U.S. Tries to Make It Easier to Wiretap the Internet

    FBI drive for encryption backdoors is déjà vu for security experts

    Yeah .. you're right .. its Ameriphobia when US companies are complying the gubmint

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  20. ObWarGames by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mr. Potato Head! Mr Potato Head! Back doors are not secrets!

  21. Not uncommon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dell Tape storage systems have the same thing. Running a tcpdump while the support rep is logging in should get it for you :-)

    1. Re:Not uncommon! by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

      NO SSH?!?! That's even funnier! Does the tcpdump give you any info on when the motherboard for the tape drive controller and back-plane are going to melt down in a heap of bubbling goo?

      This is probably a mistake. A real backdoor would have a snazzier passwd as well as its code buried where someone would not easily spot it. Or a special customer service generated one, like every other company worth their salt.

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
  22. Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It amazes me how many Slashdot has, how quickly people here will believe some amazingly complex and willy explanation over a simple and obvious one. So what is the obvious one here? Simple: HP support. They want to be able to get in to the units to help their customers, and do shit like recover passwords (which customers will lose). So they add their special hardcoded maintenance account.

    Seriously, going from this to "OMG government conspiracy," based on NO additional evidence means you are presupposing. You've decided on a conclusion (that the government requires everything to have a backdoor, which is 100% false) and are then making a massive illogical leap with no supporting evidence to that.

    1. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 0

      You've decided on a conclusion (that the government requires everything to have a backdoor, which is 100% false) and are then making a massive illogical leap with no supporting evidence to that.

      I do that all the time when I'm bored. Then again, I think that Jacqueline Kennedy paid Lee Harvey Oswald to whack her husband because she was tired of his philandering.

    2. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It amazes me how many Slashdot has, how quickly people here will believe some amazingly complex and willy explanation over a simple and obvious one. So what is the obvious one here?

      That the Government wants access to our back door to, I guess, stick more in there?

    3. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seriously, going from this to "OMG government conspiracy," based on NO additional evidence means you are presupposing.

      And you have totally fallen for it. The gubmint is one step ahead of you already by using psychology to defeat your common sense. They selected the account/passsword to masquerade as an HP support account, knowing that if it was found out that people like you (or should I say gubmint shills????????) would try and convince the rest of us that it was all an innocent mistake!

      Try and refute *that* Mr G-Man!

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    4. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It amazes me how many Slashdot has, how quickly people here will believe some amazingly complex and willy explanation over a simple and obvious one. So what is the obvious one here? Simple: HP support. They want to be able to get in to the units to help their customers, and do shit like recover passwords (which customers will lose). So they add their special hardcoded maintenance account.

      This is plausible. Too bad they didn't do it right, like by adding a user with a private 2048 bit DSA key, and using SELinux to make sure nobody can see the key except for the SSH process. Even this might not be paranoid enough, depending on the numbers of deployed machines, SELinux vulnerabilities, and numbers of SSH vulnerabilities that make it possible to read memory illegitimately.

    5. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 2

      Try and refute *that* Mr G-Man!

      Time, Mr. Ozpeter...
      Is it ... really that time ag...ain? It seems asifyou only ... just arrived.

      You've done a great - deal in a ... small time span. You've doneso well, in fact, that I'vereceived some ... interesting offers for your services.

    6. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK but an MSA2000 is NOT a toy. It might not be the first class SAN solution for large caps but they certainly power lots of medium business with billion dollar a year bottom revenue lines. Those companies are big enough to care about security and big enough to employ at least one competent systems administrator even if they will then force him to use some second rate monkeys for help. That person one should NOT be forgetting the password, what if something happens to him? Well they way I did it is I wrote that stuff down. The sensitive passwords were kept in a safe deposit box on CD-ROM inside an AES encrypted zip file at the bank the CEO had the other key and knew the password to the zip as well. $25 dollars a year is a small investment to ensure that one of us will be able to obtain that information if needed. Anyone buying an MSA2000 can afford that and come up with a similar suitable arrangement.

      If HP *needs* a backdoor for serving the units its 2010 they really should have some alternate log in method, perhaps a serial header on the controller system board or something so that you would have to give them physical access or an attacker would have to gain physical access and the credentials should be a certificate file so their will be no guessing the 4Kb password.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    7. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      While there is a logical place for support accounts, particularly with fancy enterprise junk where phoning home to the mothership when things go sour is considered a feature; but hardcoded passwords are an amazingly stupid way of setting them up.

      Even a superb hardcoded password is going to sneak out eventually, even if only after the units start to be scrapped(but before all of them leave production). At a bare minimum, the hardcoded password would have to be unique per unit. Even better, use something like a cryptographic challenge/response system, so even an attacker with silicon level access can only learn HP's public key, which is useless, and HP can still do their thing.

      Because of the needs of humans, passwords have their place; but for anything automated/serious, cryptographic techniques are the only way to go. Anything else is pitifully amateurish.

    8. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by LordLucless · · Score: 2

      Really? I see nobody here mentioning conspiracy theories (certainly nobody modded up) except you. The thing is, we don't care why HP did it. What we care is that they did. And regardless of what they were going to use it for, what it can be used for is compromising the security of a user's system. It may not have been malevolent, but it was certainly condescending (users are to stupid to manage their own system) and it definitely compromises security.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    9. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by random_ID · · Score: 2

      I find it baffling, myself. Anyone smart enough to create this backdoor (for whatever reason) should be smart enough to pick a better username/password.

    10. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Here's the thing though: this is an incredibly bad way to support hardware.

      #1: Your customers actually don't trust you when they find out that there's a hardcoded user in the hardware. Why? Because businesses with a proper understanding of security know that this is a massive security hole, and will refuse to buy that hardware.
      #2: There's already a way to get admin-level access to hardware: ask the client for it. If they don't want you to connect to their internals with their own password, there are things like VPNs and temporary admin password - again stuff that is basic IT methodology. Yeah, it's a bit harder than just handing things over to the vendor and say "Fix it", but it's vastly better.
      #3 If user recovery is the issue, the solution is wrong. The proper solution is a hardware reset button that has no user-level API. Yes, all the settings are borked. Export them, reset, import them back in. Yes, it's harder, but it's the right thing to do.

      Yes, you are correct: this is all for the purpose of easy support. However, it's braindead, and any company with an IT department worth its name will refuse to run hardware with this "feature", and should look closely into vendors with a better understanding of security.

      And that's coming from someone who used to work for HP.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    11. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      in fact, that I'vereceived some ... interesting offers for your services.

      $120 per hour for labour, $60 per hour for travel time > 1 hour from home base. All expenses at cost, and own use car mileage paid at full government rebate amounts. All time (labour and travel) over 40 hours per week to be booked at time and a half. Over 60 hours a week at double time. All flights over 3 hours to be booked at business class or better, and where available gate lounge fees to be paid.

      So can we do business?

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    12. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Weird. I always thought that the woman in the limo was Lee Harvey Oswald in drag, and Jacquie was the one with the rifle in the repository.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    13. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Nimey · · Score: 1

      No, no. That was Vladimir Putin in drag, and the rifleman was Sarah Palin.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    14. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by f3rret · · Score: 1

      See it's in cases like this I just point to my sig.

      It pretty much explains my position on these kinds of things.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    15. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by f3rret · · Score: 1

      They might have been smart, but apparently also lazy.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    16. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by NovaHorizon · · Score: 1

      ack!! You're one of them! one of those government spies! You're only here to tell us our paranoia is unfounded as it lacks proof.. just as the government would say if they didn't want us to look deeper...

      ah ha! You're insinuation that our paranoia is unfounded is the exact proof needed to say our paranoia is fully justified!

    17. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, the username/password only works through the serial port, which means physical access most of the time...

    18. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm....the MSA2000 is an entry level SAN solution. And you do need physical access, or at least console access.

    19. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      However, it's braindead

            Especially considering that this sort of hardware isn't exactly targeted for the "grandma's computer so she can skype the kids" category. Presumably the HP support staff can rely on having someone with at least half a brain on the other end to work with.

            But then again, if they're dumb enough to buy HP...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    20. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Come on, be realistic. Palin wasn't born until 1964 so

      OH SHIT SHE HAS A TIME MACHINE

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    21. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by blair1q · · Score: 1

      HP tech: Welp, your new machine is ready to fly.
      Customer BOFH: Bitchin!
      HP tech: One thing, though.
      Customer BOFH: Yuh?
      HP tech: I need you to create me a root-access account so I can log in on service calls.
      Customer BOFH: Oh, no sweat. What username?
      HP tech: 'admin'. All lowercase.
      Customer BOFH: Makes perfect sense. (Types.) Wow this thing's fast. Here, enter your password.
      HP tech: (Types '!admin' twice) Done.

      Repeat for every customer...

    22. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo.

      You heard about that gizmodo password compromise story, right? Now, everyone knows you're not supposed to store plaintext passwords. Store a salted hash, and if the hashed value of whatever the user enters happens to match that hash, then they must have entered the right password. It's been best practice for a long, long, long time.

      We know.

      We don't do it. We store plaintext passwords for thousands of users.

      Why? Because someone demands that we be able to email users the current value of their password. It's all for service. So we deliberately do the wrong thing, not because we're stupid, or because there's a government requirement, but because someone insists that customer service work a certain way.

      This shit happens and there's nothing you can do about it. If some HP grunt was told, "You have to add a backdoor so that when they call us, we'll be able to do something," then he had to do it.

    23. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by hey! · · Score: 1

      It amazes me how many Slashdot has, how quickly people here will believe some amazingly complex and willy explanation over a simple and obvious one. So what is the obvious one here? Simple: HP support.

      Well, I think the reluctance to accept this simple explanation might have something to do with the fact that a syphilitic monkey could eat a bowl of molex connectors and shit a more sensible support password recovery scheme than that.

      Of course, the idea that the gummint is behind this isn't sensible. It's irrational. On the other hand, there's no sensible, rational explanation for something so idiotic. The closest thing I can come up with to a reasonable explanation is that the backdoor got put into the software during testing but was never taken out. That's pure speculation, but it certainly makes more sense than a support option that will give every customer who forgets his password the password to every other customer's array.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    24. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 2

      Rather than, offer you the illusion of free choice, I will takethe liberty of ....chooosing for you if, and, when, your time comes round again.

      I do apologize for what mustseem to you an arbitrary imposition, OzPeter. I trust it willall make sense to you in the course of... well...

      I'm really not at liberty to say.

      In the meeaantime... this is where I get off.

    25. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lol'd

    26. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by ps2os2 · · Score: 0

      OH SHIT SHE HAS A TIME MACHINE

      Even if she had one she couldn't see it because it was too obvious.

    27. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Vreejack · · Score: 1

      Yes, physical access is required. I used to have a cheap pocket lcd terminal could have plugged in to access the machine, but it's likely that if I have access to the room I already have admin access to the hardware anyway.

      You aren't going to see email spammers pulling this, but state actors who can afford to train people in real cloak-and-dagger operations might find this back door useful, in that it allows quick--virtually instant-- rootkit installation if you have the right piece of hardware ready to plug in the jack. If this hardware is not actively protected then someone walking by might quickly be having it phone home.

         

      --
      "Will future ages believe that such stupid bigotry ever existed!" -- Ivanhoe
    28. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that the following story got posted a short while ago, your post doesn't seem all that insightful anymore. I'm not accusing the gov'tal overlords in the HP case but the powers that lie, cheat and steal are not above pulling a lot of surreptitious shit.

      FBI Alleged To Have Backdoored OpenBSD's IPSEC Stack
      http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=129236621626462&w=2

    29. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the heck did you fit the safe deposit box into a zip file?

    30. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You say this like it's all supposed to make some kind of difference. It's not like Siemens would put a hardcoded password on industrial SCADA gear now would they? Or any of the many other SCADA providers now right? RIGHT? .... Oh.

      I agree with what you said, but it's far more common than people think.

    31. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The default administrator user is there for installation purposes only (eg. to see if everything works after connecting all the cables, etc), is clearly documented in the MSA2000 G2/P2000 G3 user manuals (yet it is...). And the password can be changed using the CLI.

      What else do you want? Such a fuzz over nothing really...

      And if you check out ALL the equipment out there, you'll find that every vendor has some sort of default user built-in for the very same reason.

    32. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by kitgerrits · · Score: 2

      You mean to say this admin !admin account doe not work on the Telnet/HTTP/FTP network services that are enabled by default on a MSA2000?

      The admin/!admin account are the documented defaults in the manual, just like monitor/!monitor.

      I don't know about the G3 but, on my MSA2000 G1's, I have been able to disable the "admin" account privilege (admin/monitor/disabled) and added my own admin account with a secure password.

      (Technically the G3's are a new OEM (LeftHand ), so it is possible this is locked, but I don't think so)

      --
      "I was in love with a beautiful blonde once, dear. She drove me to drink. It's the one thing I am indebted to her for."
    33. Re:Sigh. Consparicy theorists by Celestialwolf · · Score: 1

      Seriously, going from this to "OMG government conspiracy," based on NO additional evidence means you are presupposing. You've decided on a conclusion (that the government requires everything to have a backdoor, which is 100% false)...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_Law_Enforcement_Act

      "CALEA's purpose is to enhance the ability of law enforcement and intelligence agencies to conduct electronic surveillance by requiring that telecommunications carriers and manufacturers of telecommunications equipment modify and design their equipment, facilities, and services to ensure that they have built-in surveillance capabilities, allowing federal agencies to monitor all telephone, broadband internet, and VoIP traffic in real-time."

      That might change your mind.

      If telecommunications and internet connections are essentially required to have government back doors, is it really that far off to assume the same for popular operating systems?

  23. epic win for use case to outsource? by TravisHein · · Score: 1

    I can't believe this would have been done by anyone inside HP?

  24. The Cisco teleconference backdoor could be deadly by Invisible+Now · · Score: 2

    Read the Cisco vulnerability report: root control of the device...

    Think where this teleconferencing suites are used: The Whitehouse, Pentagon, Central Command and every three star command...

    Who might want to lurk on some reality TV?

    --

    "Knowing everything doesn't help..."

  25. Oblig Wargames Reference by steve6534 · · Score: 1

    Mr. Potato Head, Mr. Potato Head ! Backdoors are NOT secrets !

  26. Who OEMs these? DotHill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The back sure looks extremely DotHill-ish, and not LSI or some other storage vendor's hardware.

    Someone needs to start checking other DotHill arrays....

  27. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the Chinese would be smarter and subtler than that - unless they thought I'd think that about them, which proves it!

  28. Of course, this won't affect most people ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Naturally, this isn't a huge concern, because all companies using disk arrays of this type have admin access via a secure subnet that only IT staff have access to, via dedicated network ports and dedicated PCs, with no way for traffic to reach the arrays from the outside world.

    Right?

    Right?

    Uh ... guys?

  29. This is so 80's security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I first remember seeing this type of security described in the 80's movie, 'Wargames'.

  30. Wikileaks - how they do it by igadget78 · · Score: 1

    Username: Julian
    Password: Assange

    1. Re:Wikileaks - how they do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Username: Julian
      Password: !Assange

      FTFY

  31. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by Jeng · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Perhaps I didn't read close enough, but I didn't see anyone complying.

    The FBI and NSA can ask for the moon, doesn't mean they are going to get it.

    From reading your link perhaps you should have a case of Indiaphobia or United Arab Eremitesphobia.

    There are other countries in this world with the pull to have back doors included, its not a u.s.a. specific issue.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  32. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its probably nothing like that. Some idiot on the service side of the house probably convinced some VP that a backdoor was needed so the support people could deal with customers who had lost the passwords or when they had to refurbish and RMA and wanted to be lazy and not have to replace any chips or flash the thing or whatever. That VP then made the software team add the backdoor. I think on the MSA15000 there is a check the make sure the password does not match the user name, which I might have run across when familiarizing myself with it with it prior to deployment. They developers probably wanted to make the password match the user name (its hidden after all) but also did not want to run into that test code somewhere even with the hard coded value.

    That being said, admin was an aggressively stupid choice and hard coded back doors at least rank as very stupid to begin with.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  33. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

    Zip up. Your flag-waving nationalism is showing.

    I love my country, salute my flag, and honor the soldiers who have fought to keep us safe. From foreigners. With uninteresting opinions. Who should butt out!

    THAT is flag-waving nationalism. As it is generic, you may easily reuse it for your own nationalistic purposes, which I will, of course, ignore, because you are probably a foreigner. So butt out. :-)

  34. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I didn't read close enough, but I didn't see anyone complying.

    The FBI and NSA can ask for the moon, doesn't mean they are going to get it.

    From reading your link perhaps you should have a case of Indiaphobia or United Arab Eremitesphobia.

    There are other countries in this world with the pull to have back doors included, its not a u.s.a. specific issue.

    Oh I agree this is not an American phenomenom, and it was really funny when people were getting all up in arms over the phone equipment supplied to Iran. And the case in Greece with the phone system was also a very very sophsicated backdoor hack that probably was (some) government related. But as to companies complying. Do you really think that part of a companies advertising campaign is "We support all government requested back doors!"

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  35. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'm an alien, an exile from Planet Transsexual.

  36. FEAR by mysidia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If someone disables the building's primary security system, defeats the lock on your front door, breaks in, when nobody's there, figures out where your MSA is, defeats your server room's dedicated primary alarm system, breaks through the steel fire door into your server room, defeating the ANSI GRADE 1 industrial access control locks, figures out the precise cage where your MSA2000 is located, defeats the cage locks, figures out the combination to open your cabinet, and somehow removes the faceplate without triggering the intrusion alarm, or motion detectors, noise sensors, and surveillance cameras attached to the server room's secondary security/environment monitoring system.

    Then yes... there is a small chance someone might be able to insert a serial connector into your MSA to login as this GUI-unavailable backdoor user without the perp getting caught pretty quickly.

    By the way, the 'password security' on many routers can be defeated by sending a BREAK via serial console during reboot, or by pushing a recessed RESET button. Where is the outrage?

    1. Re:FEAR by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Um.. You mean all they have to do is put on a set of blue coveralls, carry a small tool box with some sticker from one of the Ma Bells or even a printer manufacturer on the side, and claim he is there is complete some order started a month ago and we are all doomed?

      That's not very comforting.

    2. Re:FEAR by josteos · · Score: 1

      This is why ALMA is my security system.

      --
      Save the Music; Save the World at http://www.TuneTriever.com (Our latest Android game)
    3. Re:FEAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, Here's your citation, one among many:

      Password recovery cisco 3750 series switches: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps628/products_password_recovery09186a0080094184.shtml

      Your employees are dangerous. That has always been the case. Blowing holes in the network security can happen if someone actually does RTFM.

      If the running-config is similar enough to the actual config, would you IT guys even notice without a help desk ticket about something that was "broken"?? Most places, my guess is not for a very long time, if ever.

    4. Re:FEAR by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Um.. You mean all they have to do is put on a set of blue coveralls, carry a small tool box with some sticker from one of the Ma Bells or even a printer manufacturer on the side, and claim he is there is complete some order started a month ago and we are all doomed?

      While that trick might work against some server rooms; the ones most likely to have high end gear such as SANs are large enterprises, with their server parked in the major datacenters.

      Without an escort that had their body parts scanned and was added to the "authorized list" well in advance, and the bell tech themselves added 24 hours in advance with full background check, no bell tech or maintenance worker is getting in.

      Keep in mind... banks and other institutions with extremely valuable data can have equipment residing in the same facility as company Xyz with their MSA, and many of the front line security measures are shared by multiple tenants.

      The secretary isn't physically able to open the door with his/her hand scan and PIN number to the FIRST stage security screening area, let alone reach the server room door to "accidentally" let a poser in. Because no one security guard has the power to allow someone in from the outside.

      And of course there are other security measures at major enterprises' datacenters. Probably secret ones.

      If your "maintenance guy in blue" did get through the front gate... security would immediately notice them approaching and not authenticating themself to open the door to the company's cage they were doing maintenance on.

      Hell, it can take the legitimate engineers who were already pre-authorized through biometrics 20 minutes to get through the front door in such facilities.

      I wouldn't be surprised if they add full body scanners like at airports.

    5. Re:FEAR by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was attempting to make a joke like in the movies where all you needed to defeat a million dollar security system was pretend to be the guy repairing it.

    6. Re:FEAR by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Now that you've pointed out how easy it is on routers to the ignorant public, expect someone to pick this up and publish it as the next big 'OMG INTRAWEB IN DAGNER!$' entry that like the regular 'OMG no IPv4 left' we've been seeing for the last 10 years.

      You, I, and every other person who's done any significant amount of sys or net admin work knows there are reasons why weak/well known accounts in these cases aren't 'OMG SCARY', but those details are left out by the douche bag blogger who thinks what he does makes him/her a journalist.

      As you clearly pointed out the fact that the entire world now knows about this changes absolutely nothing is irrelevant. Its all about the ZOMG factor, PageRank and ad impressions my friend.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    7. Re:FEAR by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Interesting... well... one way to defeat it would be to actually be the guy whose job is to repair it.. :)

      Insider attacks are tough to defend against, assuming compromise of the correct individual

    8. Re:FEAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah or i could just write an lua script for nmap that randomly scans, detects and auto-roots that shit, which might save the aforementioned crap.

    9. Re:FEAR by sjames · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, yes. In other cases, it's more like if they pop out the ceiling tile in front of the door and short the latch, then reach through the cage with a serial connection on a stick, they're golden.

      The real reason data break-ins don't happen all the time? For the most part, nobody gives a crap about your sooper sekrit corporate power point presentations, especially the people who have to attend the meetings.

      The routers are moderately more secure since you can't hit break during a reboot or press reset without taking it rather obviously offline.

      All in all though, it's not a horrible situation, but needs to be well documented so that people can design appropriately.

    10. Re:FEAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a small bluetooth Serial device that can easily hide behind that faceplate while plugged in and it powers from the serial port. now access is granted from outside the server room. one high gain yagi and I can nail it there in the basement from Marketing on the 6th floor.

      So all I have to do is bribe one of your underpaid people to go and install this stuff. your IT staff dont make 90,000 a year so a bribe of $5000 will get their attention or someone in your place that has access to install it for me. Plus your info will net me 1.2million on the open market so I can grease it even harder...

      Stuff if Security theater man. Your only defense against me is paying your IT staff enough that a large bribe can be easily ignored.

  37. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

    Heh... No such thing as too much Tim Curry. Carry on.

  38. Help me out here by mikein08 · · Score: 1

    These super secret access points are there so the maintenance guys can get access when they need it? Not in my shop. If vendor's maintenance people need access, I'll be the one to give it to them and I'll be the one to deny it if necessary. It's my equipment, my data, my computing facility and no one outside my organization is going to get into it without my permission. If I owned equipment which has undisclosed (to me) access points, I'm suing the manufacturer for as much money as I can possibly can get. Such actions by vendors/manufacturers are unconscionable.

    1. Re:Help me out here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slow down there clueless powerboy. LOTS of equipment has admin and console admin passwords and maintenance modes that you may or may not know about. In fact, most enterprise level SANs (which the MSA is not), tape libraries, UPSs, PDUs, and fiber switches have them, at least more do than don't. I'd also be willing to bet that most enterprise level things things with any type of maintenance contract have them as well. If you did not know that or just now hearing about that concept, you are WAY behind and very naive.
      Anyway... your company hired you and by default, put you in a position that you happen to be one of the current overseers of the equipment. Get over yourself, you are one small cog in a group of cogs that keep everything running and secure. Everyone knows a cog can be swapped out and the system will continue to run just as it did or maybe even better with the old cog.

  39. Livingston Routers (Yes, I'm old) by Joe+U · · Score: 2

    Livingston (now Lucent) routers had a recovery mode where you physically had to flip a DIP switch and read a key to them.

    If I remember correctly, this would get you one factory default wipe, so you could get back in and then restore the settings.

    IMHO, this is the only type of solution that works, you need physical access, AND have to be willing to restore from backup.

    1. Re:Livingston Routers (Yes, I'm old) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually no, it would allow you to login in root/superuser mode. And they were so retarded they'd even show you the _old_ password when you set a new[er] one, so you could just change it to foobar, glance and the old password and change it right back. Of course, as you say, this needed physical access, which generally means game over anyway.

    2. Re:Livingston Routers (Yes, I'm old) by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      I thought it wiped out the data, I must be thinking of another brand.

      Either way, it involved flipping switches and calling a third party, which isn't horrible as far as password recovery goes.

      It's not perfect, but like you said, if you're standing in back of the router flipping switches, you can do all sorts of things anyway.

    3. Re:Livingston Routers (Yes, I'm old) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You only called the 3rd party if you hadn't reversed the challenge/response algorithm ;-)

      The issue with showing the old password was worse if you had co-located equipment that could suffer a blip and used the same password for all your gear :-)))

    4. Re:Livingston Routers (Yes, I'm old) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You only called the 3rd party if you hadn't reversed the challenge/response algorithm ;-)

      Seriously? That would take years.

      The issue with showing the old password was worse if you had co-located equipment that could suffer a blip and used the same password for all your gear :-)))

      And that's another reason why you don't do that.

    5. Re:Livingston Routers (Yes, I'm old) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years ? Funny, it only took me an afternoon (ok, maybe a couple of weeks of on and off unrelated work that prep'ed the way).

      Regarding the "you don't do that", sure - if you're savvy enough to be aware of it, account for it and support the operational burden.

  40. Ummm, the person I was replying to? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    If you don't see it adjust your threshold. I was replaying to a conspiracy theorist.

  41. Re:The Cisco teleconference backdoor could be dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CISCO15

    no joke.

    or u + u

    these problems are all over the place.

  42. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The NSA and GCHQ started this. They then talked to Nordic, German and French telco names to keep encryption low/weak tempest shielding or provide a back door.
    Now all the units are from Asia and they have learned/designed/offered the same style of devices.
    As OzPeter said, Costas Tsalikidis, the Greek telco whistleblower was found hanged.
    Adamo Bove head of security at Telecom Italia who exposed the CIA renditions via cell phones ‘fell’ to his death.
    Exposing the backdoors and longterm tracking can come at a price.
    Thats why many regimes around the world will want to build their own Linux based telco systems. They know whats built in when a low import price is quoted.
    Clandestine services the world over leak to the press/make statements - dont buy/roll out trust any new hardware until tested.
    I hope now admin and telco people slowly wake up.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  43. User: Carli by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

    Password:spyspyspyspy

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  44. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by vadim_t · · Score: 1

    That's silly.

    My country deserves no unconditional love just because I happened to be born in it, the flag is just a picture, and the soldiers sometimes fight for a just cause, and sometimes for a completely senseless one. My country is not special. If it goes wrong, I try to set it right, and do the exact same thing with any other country I happen to be living in at the moment, if I have the ability.

    Nothing deserves unconditional respect. Respect is earned through good deeds.

  45. Re:HP & brocade switches by turtleshadow · · Score: 1

    HP many years ago integraded with brocade switches. There was always an admin password to most HP device at the enterprise level: the cited storage array + fibre switch or tape library robot. However most only worked with physical access to either operator panel or serial port.

    Now that IP has been for a few years the new serial port I predict many more devices in the future will have their firmware/management ports compromised. I think its SOP in large vendor enterprise to build such into your systems.

    At some point you have to trust the guy inside the datacenter. What scares me is many Datacenter grade IP/KVMs, and other embedded devices are in now SMB and moving into the house.

    To be honest its saved my bacon when the OP before me took the secret sauce passwords to Davy Jones locker.

  46. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    It's interesting. HP is a US company with offices all over the world that outsources most of it's production to foreign labor.

    Why you are limiting this to the US government is sort of interesting in that it could have been slipped in by about any worker in almost any country working for almost any outside interest. And because HP doesn't individually develop and install custom firmware for each and every product it produces, it's only obvious that once it gets in, it would be in all of them that have the same firmware/operating system. But here you are already speaking about how your hoping some conspiracy to steal secrets from political contributor's competitors as if there isn't any other motivation.

    If you ask me, I would say it's simply a debug account that was supposed to be removed before final production and someone dropped the ball.

  47. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by Gunnut1124 · · Score: 1

    Damn, all I use mine for is backups...

    --
    America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed. -Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936
  48. I don't think the gov't requires a backdoor by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    I don't think "the government requires everything to have a backdoor." I just think that if the FBI, or the NSA, or the CIA, or the U.S. Marshals, or the Department of Defense, or the Department of the Interior, or Homeland Security, or any one of any number of Byzantine U.S. government organizations approaches a large company like HP and says "Hey, we buy a bunch of stuff from you, do you mind if we have a backdoor?" I think in 90 percent of cases the answer will be "Sure, no problem." You don't need a conspiracy when the people will just grin and go along with whatever the government says.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  49. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by mr_walrus · · Score: 1

    why wouldn't a 'debug account' show up in a user display?

  50. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disconnect the serial port, and then solder alternating pins to 120VAC and ground. Problem solved.

    Assuming of course, you don't intend to use the serial port for anything legitimate.

  51. Umm, not just HP, not a back-door by Nalez · · Score: 1

    Well, most appliance type devices (and in this day in age, enterprise class and mid-tier storage arrays are appliances) contain some kind of technician login, or tech support login for vendor support. When HP shows up onsite, and needs to apply a firmware update with full customer knowledge; this is the account they use.

    Generally the account IS hidden, and the password is hard to guess.

    USING THIS ACCOUNT DOES NOT GIVE ACCESS TO YOUR DATA. That would require physical access, or access to a storage network to make fiber channel or SAS connections, that is assuming that the controller is not one of the controllers that supports iscsi. If someone you do not trust has physical access to your disk array; and that access is not monitored (camera) then you have bigger issues to worry about.

    If you are going to comment on field service accounts on storage arrays, please have some experience supporting storage arrays first so you know what the hell you are talking about.

  52. Umm, yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EMC does the same thing. Pretty sure IBM does too.

    Guess I should be more of a publicity whore and write articles about stuff that isn't news and is common knowledge in the IT sector once you get out of the "I went to ITT for my A+" crowd.

    1. Re:Umm, yeah. by suso · · Score: 1

      I can confirm that EMC has the same vulnerability. I nearly shit my pants when I saw a semi-sales type come in to show us some management tool and he connected to our million dollar SAN with his program without us giving him any credentials. When I noticed that he didn't have to use a password, he said it wasn't a big deal because nobody has access to that program. Typical moron. Shame on EMC. Shame on IBM. Shame on HP. You all suck and have monkeys working for you.

      SANs are a huge waste of money IMHO.

  53. Re:Looks like a big "fuck you" to Uncle Sam. by Magada · · Score: 1

    But as to companies complying. Do you really think that part of a companies advertising campaign is "We support all government requested back doors!"

    Umm... yes, actually.

    --
    Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  54. Dammit by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    And having the servers in the break room looked so cool!

  55. hardcoded hidden user by doperative · · Score: 1

    > "A hardcoded .. hidden user exists that doesn't show up in the user manager, and the password cannot be changed..

    Any idea how it got there?

  56. Mr.Snuffles is my password! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great now I'm going to have to change it. Our admin said that the password column was a "unique key" or something so I have to guess a lot of things before one sticks.