Slashdot Mirror


Egyptians Turn To Tor To Organize Dissent Online

An anonymous reader writes "Even as President Obama prepares to follow Mubarak with his own 'internet kill switch', Egyptians were turning to the Tor anonymiser to organise their protests online. The number of Egyptians connecting to the internet over Tor rose more than five-fold after protests broke out last week before crashing when the Government severed links to the global internet. Information security researcher, Tor coder and writer of the bridge that allowed Egypt's citizens to short-circuit government filters, Jacob Appelbaum, told SC Magazine Egyptians were 'concerned and some understand the risk of network traffic analysis.' Appelbaum has himself been the subject of attention from US security services who routinely snatch his electronics and search his belongings when he re-enters the country and who subpoenaed his private Twitter account last December." Which helps explain why Appelbaum is helping to organize a small fundraiser to get more communications gear into Egypt.

152 comments

  1. I'm Confused by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a little confused. How does Tor work when they shut down the Internet?

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Even as President Obama prepares to follow Mubarak with his own 'internet kill switch..." I'm confused they let these political nuts submit articles.

    2. Re:I'm Confused by Narkov · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't let facts get in the way of a good story.

    3. Re:I'm Confused by lazy_nihilist · · Score: 5, Funny

      Simple. The Internet treats censorship as damage and routes around it.

    4. Re:I'm Confused by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm a little confused. How does Tor work when they shut down the Internet?

      RFC 1149.

    5. Re:I'm Confused by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't let research get in the way of a smart-ass comment.

      --
      "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
    6. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget RFC 2549.

    7. Re:I'm Confused by thetartanavenger · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm a little confused. How does Tor work when they shut down the Internet?

      From the summary:

      Egyptians were turning to the Tor anonymiser to organise their protests online.

      I presume they meant prior to their loss of connection. Of course a headline of "Egyptians Were Using Tor to Organise Dissent Online" would be much less dramatic.

      --
      Who need's speling and grammar?
    8. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The number of Egyptians connecting to the internet over Tor rose more than five-fold after protests broke out last week before crashing when the Government severed links to the global internet.

    9. Re:I'm Confused by ocdscouter · · Score: 2

      I really hope that pigeon's only dropping packets on my desk!

    10. Re:I'm Confused by MachDelta · · Score: 2

      Homing pigeons and vans filled with hard drives.

      Except, on the tor network the van is swapped for a bus at its first node, a truck at the second, a fleet of yugo's at the third, etc, etc..
      Similarly the homing pigeon is switched with a homing goat, homing otter, homing walking stick, etc.
      It's really quite a fascinating process.

    11. Re:I'm Confused by markdueck · · Score: 2

      RTA. Heading and summary are off. Egyptians were using TOR before internet was cut off completely. I knew I had read that internet was completely off, not just being censored.

    12. Re:I'm Confused by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes ...

          How far does the information have to travel, to get to the nearest border? About 250 miles. Less, if there's a point to point wireless relay. Sure, the "Internet" may be disabled. So all the fiber coming in country may be disabled. So all the ISP's may have downed their uplink interfaces. That doesn't mean an uplink isn't a tower climb away.

          Then again, I wouldn't want to be the guy climbing a tower to set up an uplink directly against the government's will, in the middle of a freakin' revolution. It's either a way to find out what the real effective of a MPK (or M16, or M4, or M40A3, or M21, or M1A2, or T55E, or... or .... or... damn, they have a huge variety of weapons). Shot off a tower, or a tower shot out from under you. Neither sounds like a very good option. Twitter wouldn't seem to be the highest priority during combat.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    13. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      Here

      Your donation will go to providing satellite internet devices, other related equipment, to help with network access costs,and general support for Egyptians and people working with Egypt during this crisis and beyond.

      Not very hard to find an answer.
      Instead of an invoice for my 3 minutes of searching, may I kindly ask you to go to the posted link, fill in the form and hit the "Donate" button.
      Thank you.

    14. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you shoot them?

      Just wait for them to climb down.

    15. Re:I'm Confused by scotty.m · · Score: 0

      ... said John Gilmore
      But that doesn't answer the question. Without Internet, Internet censorship is irrelevant. Also, TOR has nothing to do with censorship.
      You must've been rolling that quote around for a while, looking for the right moment to throw it in the mix. This wasn't it.

      --
      Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
      [ST8Z6FR57ABE6A8RE9UF]
    16. Re:I'm Confused by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      You seem to be new here.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    17. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they were just so anonymous, even the internet connection didn't realize where the packets were from and went right through the down internet tubes.

    18. Re:I'm Confused by smart_ass · · Score: 2

      Are you talking about me?

      (Seriously ... see username)

      --
      Ouch ... did I just say that.
    19. Re:I'm Confused by pinkushun · · Score: 2

      The govt initially just blocked Twitter and Facebook, that's when Tor usage spiked (in addition to the traffic from journalists). The net was cut by the time the streets was filled with people.

      "About a half-hour past midnight on Friday in Egypt, the internet went dead."

      You win a years supply of yesterday's newspaper for the 'Reading News Fail' award.

    20. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes ...

      I thought it was a truck and a series of tubes?

    21. Re:I'm Confused by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You're not the only smart ass in the world, I'm not the only opportunist in the world. Get used to it, our names are being abused constantly.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:I'm Confused by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What you consider droppings IS the packets.

      You haven't been on the internet for long, have you? Else you'd know that this is what 99% of the packets you get is.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:I'm Confused by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I dunno if I understand that government. Instead of handing the people their soma so they don't protest, they intentionally take it away, leaving them with nothing to do but to protest?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    24. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes ...

      Too much lag, I can't use my favorite FPS under such conditions.

    25. Re:I'm Confused by metacell · · Score: 1

      From the summary:

      The number of Egyptians connecting to the internet over Tor rose more than five-fold after protests broke out last week before crashing when the Government severed links to the global internet.

      I.e, the Egyptians used Tor a lot right before they shut down the Internet.

    26. Re:I'm Confused by metacell · · Score: 1

      The summary actually says that:

      The number of Egyptians connecting to the internet over Tor rose more than five-fold after protests broke out last week before crashing when the Government severed links to the global internet.

    27. Re:I'm Confused by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      International links are shut down, but that says nothing about internal connectivity. In this context, Tor can be very useful.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    28. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In what way is that nutty?

    29. Re:I'm Confused by Seth+Kriticos · · Score: 2

      Well, if I'd plan a revolution, I'd set up a few mobile satellite up-links and an ad-hock WiFi network through the major cities, establishing communication and organization cells with instructions how to operate them (protocol).

      But then again, a revolution is mostly a pretty messy, so they were probably preoccupied with other things, like wild rage and stuff.

    30. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes ...

      Or the latency of it. A station wagon full of tapes is great if you want to transfer vast amounts of data over a comparatively long time, and compares favorably to network connections.

      But if you want to do, y'know, *browse*, or Twitter, or upload pictures to Flickr, or use Facebook... come *on*, it's entirely useless, and you know it.

    31. Re:I'm Confused by eltaco · · Score: 1

      may I kindly ask you to go to the posted link, fill in the form and hit the "Donate" button. Thank you.

      no, no you certainly may not. seeing as the next regime will be worse than this one, probably with very strong islamic influences (sharia law) and even more persecution of coptic christians.
      I for one welcome the old overlords of egypt.

      --
      It's not about fate, it's about character.
      there be no shelter here, the frontline is everywhere!
    32. Re:I'm Confused by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Oh, he's more than new here.

      Don't care who proposes it, "internet kill switch" is bad legislation.

    33. Re:I'm Confused by sorak · · Score: 1

      Simple. The Internet treats censorship as damage and routes around it.

      The more time I spend online, the more I am beginning to believe that statement needs an addendum:

      The internet sees stupidity as content and makes backup copies

    34. Re:I'm Confused by Hydian · · Score: 1

      Must be strong homing pigeons.

    35. Re:I'm Confused by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      It can even route to your house if you don't have an ISP. All you have to do is BELIEVE!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    36. Re:I'm Confused by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      Homing pigeons and vans filled with hard drives.

      Except, on the tor network the van is swapped for a bus at its first node, a truck at the second, a fleet of yugo's at the third, etc, etc.. Similarly the homing pigeon is switched with a homing goat, homing otter, homing walking stick, etc. It's really quite a fascinating process.

      Awww come on I thought it was tubes. Now it's trucks, vans and yugos? This is tricky.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    37. Re:I'm Confused by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Nah, he tried an experiment with a bunch of guys and a plane. That had a catastrophic flaw, The transit method crashed. That's one of the best things that could have ever happened to the Internet.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    38. Re:I'm Confused by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          That's been replaced by LARP Unfortunately, they're using real bullets, and respawning has been disabled.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    39. Re:I'm Confused by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Or the latency of it. A station wagon full of tapes is great if you want to transfer vast amounts of data over a comparatively long time, and compares favorably to network connections.

          Well, compared to no connectivity, the "station wagon" is much better.

          We were discussing an exercise on how the fastest way to move a terabyte of data would be. It could be sent over a T1 (the connectivity at the site). The better solution was FedEx. Copy it from the server to an external drive. FedEx it to the destination. Copy it from the external drive to the destination server.

          If the T1 was gone (like in Egypt now), the "better" solution would now be the only viable solution.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    40. Re:I'm Confused by markdueck · · Score: 1

      yes, after reading it again later, I realized that the summary does say it. The wording is a little hard to follow though.

    41. Re:I'm Confused by ocdscouter · · Score: 1

      I always figured that there was more porn than shit on the internet. And any intersection of the two is beyond my desired operating parameters. But since we're here:

      2Pigeons1Packet

    42. Re:I'm Confused by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Doesn't toe a party lie of an American political organization is now considered "nutty"?

      What drugs have you been mainlining?

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    43. Re:I'm Confused by metacell · · Score: 1

      True.

    44. Re:I'm Confused by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I was going to moderate this story but already posted in it.

      It's ok because I couldn't find the Motha fsck'n funny mod anyways and wanted you to know that deserved way more then just funny.

      Of course there is be some out there wondering what is so funny about 2Pigeons1Packet. I suppose they should keep wondering.

    45. Re:I'm Confused by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The also had a lot less ways to coordinate the protests or hide from repercussions of doing so in the process.

      It's a communications, command and control situation. Extra unorganized protesters are a lot less of a threat then a few well organized and motivated ones.

      In the states, we use similar tactics. Except we don't deny access. Instead we infiltrate and provoke then take out the leadership to drop the organization and coordination.

    46. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't tell me about it!

    47. Re:I'm Confused by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Urk... Ok, I brought this onto myself, but still... thanks for ruining my lunch.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. This reminds me by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 2

    This reminds me a lot of that Corey Docterow novel about the kid who was blamed for being a terrorist in San Francisco.
    Used TOR and xboxs to make an ad-hoc network. Was actually a bit of an interesting read, although a bit worded for younger people.

    1. Re:This reminds me by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Little Brother?

      It was a cheap fantasy. You could tell throughout that the author desperately wanted to be that cool, anti-authoritarian kid, and set up a world specifically for him to do cool, anti-authoritarian stiff.

      I'm against creeping government powers and the slow transformation into a police state as as the next guy (probably quite a lot more so), but "Little Brother" read like the author was whacking off all the way through.

    2. Re:This reminds me by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Was that the one where he spent a page making it brutally clear to the reader that he didn't have a clue about how networks work, by spouting things like 'DHCP' in completely inappropriate contexts. Even that wouldn't have been so bad, except that the entire discussion added absolutely nothing to the story - it was just a 'look reader, I know about tech!' aside that completely failed.

      I've never noticed an author in more desperate need of a decent editor than Doctrow.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  3. "US security services who routinely snatch his .." by unity100 · · Score: 1

    He should just move out of the United States of Fascistica already then.

    no freedom is left there.

  4. Net kill switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I see people always going on about that. I can't see how this would help in the US. If people were protesting or there was unrest in the US, hitting the net kill switch would be economic suicide. In Egypt and Tunisia, the net was used more for socializing than business. In the US, the bulk of net use (in pure data) is business related. Our entire economy runs off of the net now. Turning it off would shut down or severely hobble a large number of fortune 500 companies, not to mention thousands of small and medium sized businesses. Also, like in Egypt and Tunisia, it would just give people more reason to go out on the streets. Without the net to bitch about the state of the country/world on, they would turn to going outside and raising hell instead. So sure, the govt can build their kill switch, but only if they plan to jettison our economy with the push oa button.

    1. Re:Net kill switch by Narkov · · Score: 1

      "In the US, the bulk of net use (in pure data) is business related"

      Got any stats to back this up? I would have guessed that YouTube/NetFlix/piracy/porn..etc would be orders of magnitude greater than pure business traffic. Unless you mean YouTube is a business and therefore business related?

    2. Re:Net kill switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      YouTube, Netflix, porn... all businesses.

    3. Re:Net kill switch by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Informative

      I can't see how this would help in the US

      You're misunderstanding what the "kill switch" legislation is. It's not technical. It's a legal mechanism by which the administration can tell services (including operations like Twitter or Google, or just Google's Gmail service, or an entire ISP, or just one blog site), software vendors, or individual engineers that they must take a specific action as required during an emergency. It's no different that the government's already existing ability to commandeer ham radio equipment, or cruise ships, or food distribution companies. If they think that a dozen people are waiting for instructions via Twitter to time their dropping off of backpack bombs on subway trains all around the country, then the "kill switch" is invoked: federal power to tell Twitter to shut down or otherwise do what they say has to be done. The legislation lays out penalties for failure to comply with such orders.

      This doesn't give the president a button to push. It gives him lawyers to push, in real time, on short notice.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:Net kill switch by SirAstral · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It wouldn't help a thing. This is politician solution to a problem that's not even a problem. If I were a foreign country I would be cheering the kill switch on, and when it passes, I would try every living thing I could in CyberAssualt to make them throw the kill switch. We will cause far more damage to ourselves than any cyber attack if we turn ourselves off.

      but we just keep voting these ass clowns into power. the problem is not our elected corrupt officials, its the people stuck in some ridiculous idea of a party system that George Washington our 1st president warned would destroy us!

      Did you vote Democrat? Then you are part of the problem!
      Did you vote Republican? Then you are part of the problem!

    5. Re:Net kill switch by orphiuchus · · Score: 1

      Did you vote Democrat? Then you are part of the problem!
      Did you vote Republican? Then you are part of the problem!

      Did you vote 3rd party? Then you are some sort of weirdo or mutant!

    6. Re:Net kill switch by DigiShaman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You looking at it all wrong. First and foremost, it's about politics. Pure and simple. By nature, politics is social construct based on an illogical foundation of power and control. So it should not surprise you that when human lives are deemed expendable for a "greater cause", the entire economy of a nation even more so. History is rife with examples the world over.

      In short, don't try and make sense of the Net Kill Switch. All you need to understand is that it's about politics. Knowing that should at least save your sanity.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:Net kill switch by SirAstral · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the misunderstanding, just shutting down some sites like that can have the implications of getting several workers laid off because the company cannot generate revenue. Why didn't they just kill switch GM when they went toast, or the Investment Bankers, and all the rest of the diseased scumbags that help ruin the economy? Just kill switching a few website could result in the termination of a thousand jobs easily! If you piss of businesses enough don't forget that they can easily ruin an economy in retribution! Once it happens a couple of times to a big enough (and they are only getting bigger) online entity people will see what a bad idea this is!

      Think of it like this. Cloud computing is getting popular yet no one see's the potential downside to having so much infrastructure centralized. In computing systems there is always 1 person at the top with the Keys to the Kingdom! And what happens if he goes crazy and ransoms the entire data center or just flat out steals the data for a cash cow on the black market? I can't wait till it happens because apparently knocking out the google cloud for a couple of days for 1/2 of their customers is not enough to get people to think!

    8. Re:Net kill switch by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      We need more people to think like you: Logically!

      It will not help against a cyber attack, really. That is just an excuse for the Govt to lobby this 'kill switch' into action.

      To me, logically, it seems more like a 'censorship kill switch', I may be wrong, but think about it for a minute:

      The Govt sees now what can happen if people coordinate via the net.

      Suddenly, what they feared could happen to them, is happening in Egypt.

      _Note I talk about the Govt, not the U.S., who are the people_

    9. Re:Net kill switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The idea is to threaten the kill switch, not to actually use it.

      Say the U.S. degrades to the point Egypt's at, riots and protest rallies everywhere. The FBI goes to Google and ask for the IP address for everyone who searched for "DC protest rally". The coin toss comes up heads so Google decides to enforce their don't be evil policy and asks for a warrant. The president then calls Google and points out they have a rather nice website, and it would be a shame if something were to happen to it.....

    10. Re:Net kill switch by camperdave · · Score: 1

      The reasonable man adapts himself to the world – the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. Vote 3rd party if you really want things to change.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    11. Re:Net kill switch by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Not only that, but realize that globalisation works for internet companies more than for anyone else. You shut me down here? I open up in Australia. Or Hungary. Or India. Or Abu Dhabi, even Russia or Malaysia for all I'm concerned. For an internet business, it does not matter at all where they screw the racks into the walls.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:Net kill switch by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Voting doesn't change a thing. Else it would have been outlawed long, long ago.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:Net kill switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So it would be more adequate to call it "state censor switch"

    14. Re:Net kill switch by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Did you vote 3rd party? Then you are some sort of weirdo or mutant!

      Mutation is what provides change for evolution. ;)

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    15. Re:Net kill switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you piss of businesses enough don't forget that they can easily ruin an economy in retribution!

      What are you? 12?

    16. Re:Net kill switch by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/01/egypt-isp-shutdown/
      Gov calls, sends, codes all the 'big' isp's a message. Smaller isp's, private groups get a DHS visit.
      You wake up, turn on your adsl modem, cable, optical device ect no lights for you today.
      Ring the telco, at best a recored message, or nothing.
      Dust off your sat phone or phone an isp outside the USA with your CC.
      Can that US sat phone running in the US on a US CC be turned off or tracked http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3078689 as in Iraq?. Can international calls be blocked?
      Whats left? Ham radio is registered, ie the gov would have a "list" of users and detection would not be hard...
      http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2009/04/fleetcom Brazilian Sat-Hack like or risk a data hand over to a fleeing tourist/diplomat/press?
      NO CARRIER

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    17. Re:Net kill switch by Alarash · · Score: 1

      Big companies (read: banks and similar) don't use internet, they use MPLS-VPN over private, carrier networks. I don't think they'd turn those off, at least not at the same time as Internet. But even if they did that, people in the US have access to much higher technologies than in Egypt, so people would start hacking satellite data links within hours. Or use long-range radio, etc.. It would be a bigger problem for e-commerces of course, such as Amazon, Dell or E-Bay.

    18. Re:Net kill switch by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > This doesn't give the president a button to push. It gives him lawyers to push, in real time, on short notice.

      wow, those are nicely smith'd words. I may use that phrase if you don't mind; it really captures the essence of what our Fearless Leader(tm) has up his sleeves.

      (I don't doubt the next FL will up the antie, too; they always do)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    19. Re:Net kill switch by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      agreed. D's are part of the problem. R's are part of the problem. the party system gives false dichotomy and solves NOTHING but gives us a fake kang/kodos that we can rally around one while hating the other.

      nice circus for us to 'participate' in.

      we need a reboot. a 2.0 level system that was rebuilt and kept no sacred cows. all should be revisited.

      will it happen? not peacefully. that means it will happen elsewhere since I'm 100% confident that americans are too fat and lazy and mostly happy with their situation to 'rise up'. won't happen in my lifetime.

      who will be the next america 2.0? sadly, not us. we will drive our stupid 2 party system into the ground and america along with it. extrapolate - do you LIKE where things are headed here?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    20. Re:Net kill switch by Sparrow1492 · · Score: 1

      There's a third party?

    21. Re:Net kill switch by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      ham radio WOULD work. there's no license requirement to turn the switch on and start modulating.

      in time of crisis, who the hell would care if I made up my ham callsign or not!

      they can find you as you transmit but if enough people did it, there's not enough cops in the world to stop half or quater of the population using radios.

      problem is - ham radio is mostly dead (I used to be involved in 70's, fwiw) and its hard as hell to find LOCAL shops that carry the gear. its not hard to operate but you do need to BUY the gear and getting it if you don't already have it won't work in an emergency.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    22. Re:Net kill switch by vgerclover · · Score: 2

      The legislation lays out penalties for failure to comply with such orders.

      Does it lay out penalties for misuse of such powers?

    23. Re:Net kill switch by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      Does it lay out penalties for misuse of such powers?

      It's the same as mis-using the long-standing executive powers to stockpile bauxite in the strategic reserve, or mis-using powers to take over city bus fleets in an emergency, or mis-using powers to do anything else. It's called not getting re-elected, usually. And if it's criminal (we have tens of thousands of laws already spelling that out), then it's called getting impeached.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    24. Re:Net kill switch by Thangodin · · Score: 1

      Wow, talk about being part of the problem. Many of the responses to this article, above and below, are the problem.

      The internet kill switch is not there to prevent political dissent, it's a reaction to terrorist attack at that hotel in Mumbai a couple years ago, where the terrorists used cel phones and text messaging to coordinate the attacks. Pretty much every government in the world is looking into something like this. The kill switch won't work (because no one will know how they're coordinating until it's too late), but it's there for the same reason you have to take your shoes off in airports (only in America, by the way)--it gives people the illusion of safety, and that gets votes. Israeli airport security experts have already broadly mocked American security measures, but any government that dismantles them will get slaughtered at the polls, and you know it. Your problem is not the government. Your problem is that you have a democracy where people are inclined to vote for a lot of stupid things. They're afraid, because the media has discovered that you can sell a lot of shit by scaring people.

      So if you want the people of America to rise up, who are they rising up against? A democratic government, duly and legally elected. So the problem is the people, or the fact that the people have the vote, which is what you will have to change in whatever utopia you have planned. Who's the fascist now? Oh, and by the way, one of the stupid things that people will vote for in times of higher crime and civil unrest is tighter control: more police, more prisons, more draconian laws. That's how the Nazis won. So, either you become the fascists, or the government that people vote for to stop you becomes fascist.

      Most revolutions make things worse--the only reason that the American Revolution went so well is that it wasn't a revolution but a war of independence against a foreign power (as was the breakup of the East Bloc in 1990). The people who ran America afterward and established the rules of government were pretty much the same people who ran it before. What happened in France, Russia, China, Cambodia, and Iran are a lot more typical. Revolutions are wars between elites using the people as pawns, and the elite in opposition usually have some idiotically simple ideology, some ism, that they claim will fix everything. It never does, because the world is unbelievably complex, and pretty soon they have to look around for someone to blame for their failures; the infidels, the counter-revolutionaries, the capitalists or communists, or maybe just the Jews. Come meet the new boss, same as the old boss--or worse. We'll see how long the Egyptian democracy survives the influence of the Islamic Brotherhood. Hopefully, they're smarter than the revolutionaries of Iran, but like the Iranians, they're pretty young and naive. If you think Americans are stupid, people who've never had the opportunity to participate in politics and see how it works are completely clueless.

      One of the worst things about good times is that people forget about the bad old days start to think they're living in them. They get bored and think anything new would be better, more interesting. Well, yes, war is interesting. Death is interesting. War and revolution are the very last option, and I doubt many people on Slashdot have actually tried, or even studied, many other options. Blowing shit up is easy; building it is hard. So the question for any would-be revolutionary is: are you really a brave visionary, or just fucking lazy?

    25. Re:Net kill switch by mu22le · · Score: 1

      paraniod_mode
      In case you havn't noticed Mubarak didn't need any special law or a big red button to shut off internat access state-wide, just a few well placed phone calls to the the major ISPs.

      I wonder if that could ever happen here in the 'civilized' west (in London they chirurgically shut off mobile comunication during the student riots, remember?) and what counter measures would we have.

      Could we use the good old phone network to cohordinate? How many of you still remember their home phone number? you mother's? your friends'? How many public phones are there in your city?

      So I started investigating the current status of mesh wireless network. There is a significant number of people walking around with a wifi enabled linux phone nowdays, are they enough to build an on-the-fly mesh network? We already have some of the software stack available (http://www.olsr.org/?q=node/30), what seems to be missing is a simple user interface and a messaging system.

      And then then what about pratical issues: battery life, interferencies... We should really be experimenting with this stuff now. It may prove to be quite a useful resource in other emergencies too.
      end: paranoid_mode

  5. Tor's new slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Tor, it's not just for child pornographers and anti-Communist dissidents any more!"

  6. they've learned nothing by SchroedingersCat · · Score: 1

    They've learned nothing from the history of the internet. There is no need for "kill switch". FUD, few trolls and a bunch of idiots gotta be enough to ruin any sensible group.

  7. Appelbaum needs to get a change of pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every photo of this guy, he seems to be wearing the same pair of pants. He's either very poor, or lacks personal hygine.

    1. Re:Appelbaum needs to get a change of pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like most slashdorks.

  8. Is Tor another name by zlel · · Score: 0

    for Toth?

  9. Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    $15,207 raised so far. Help us get to $100,000

    Confirmation number: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
    An email with your donation details has been sent to xxxxxxxx and you can print your donation receipt.
    DONATIONS COORDINATOR CONTACT INFORMATION
    Avaaz Foundation
    iain@avaaz.org
    9173883988

    Go to PayPal Account Overview

    1. Re:Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      Here

      $15,242 raised so far. Help us get to $100,000
      Your donation will go to providing satellite internet devices, other related equipment, to help with network access costs, and general support for Egyptians and people working with Egypt during this crisis and beyond.

  10. Egypt suffers for abondoning the Old Gods. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By turning away from Ra to Allah, now Egypt burns for this treachery. They will lose their Stargate for this insolence.

  11. It's further proof. by pizzach · · Score: 3, Informative

    Proof that anyone using a Tor is a criminal with something to hide. They just happen to be breaking Egyption laws instead of US ones. The scumbags. [/end sarcasm]

    --
    Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
  12. More of the same, move along... by SirAstral · · Score: 1

    Nothing is going to happen. The punks in power will make just enough changes to make the protesters happy. Then the protesters go home thinking they did something special and nothing really gets changed. Governments are professionals at theater like this. Obama just needs to STFU. He has the audacity to comment on what they need to do for democracy when he is trying to remove it over here. As TFA states Obama wants a kill switch for our USA Net. And with the TSA going "total sack adjustment' on everyone in blatant violation of 4th amendment rights with all the coward Americans just sheeping through the lines with little protest.

    Let us know when the citizens start shooting Egyptian officials in the face, then we can know they mean business. We will see who has the brass to say "Give me Liberty or Give me Death!"

    1. Re:More of the same, move along... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      As TFA states Obama wants a kill switch for our USA Net.

      The persistence of FUD over this is amazing. The proposal in question would limit a power that the President has had since 1934. The "OMG Obama wants an internet kill switch!" meme is a lie.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:More of the same, move along... by SirAstral · · Score: 1

      FUD exists everywhere. Kill switch just happens to be its common name, so get over it already. The simple fact is this! Someone is seeking a way to get more power than what they already have over the internet. And just because there will be some limits in place does not mean anything. The real end is increasing power or relocating it for a political gain. You need to remember that while yes a lot of FUD rolls with a lot of things the basic principles usually remain the same. Why would they need this bill? To increase power somewhere! If they are decreasing power, then why are they not focusing on bigger issues? Don't get me wrong, I can certainly go for gubmint relinquishing power, but that just does not happen without a steaming mass of citizens hulking out on capital hill!

    3. Re:More of the same, move along... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Nothing is going to happen.

      I'm taking a long position on natural resources. It might be a mistake but I'm willing to risk it.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:More of the same, move along... by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Typical fucking American, freedom isn't being administered unless someone is being "shot in the face".
      br. America - Fuck yeah!

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
  13. Is it just me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or should america set up an internet or pure twitter satellite ( or satellite network, like iridium ) and hand out a few transceiver dishes ( or units if dish isn't strictly necessary in the case of an iridium type setup ) and then hand out access to key journalists in countries under similar turmoil. Keep the flow of information unchecked?

  14. Obama is now a Republican? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um...how does Senator Susan Collins, Republican from Main, putting forward a beyond-all-reason-lame bill, somehow equal Obama following Mubarak? Yes, the bill is to give the president the time power to kill the Internet in various poorly defined ways, but that's one amazingly long politically reaching spin if I ever heard one.

    1. Re:Obama is now a Republican? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is how they operate... accuse the other side of their own agenda. And if the other side actually comes up with an honest to goodness good idea, throw a wrench in it because the idea wasn't their own. While one side tries to do the right thing, the other side is trying to win at all costs. This is what we should by now expect from a country where pro-football is the largest organized religion, matched in ferver only by the largest unorganized religion, gun collecting.

  15. That's true in America... by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Interesting

    but the rest of the world riots for real. China keeps their populace in line with shear brutality, but Egypt is connected to other countries enough that isn't an option (they're also not powerful enough to resist being "liberated").

    Basically, it's only dumb, Fox news lovin' Americans that can be fooled so easily. Mostly because Americans have had 60+ years of indoctrination that's crushed any sense of entitlement and turned us into a nation of abused housewives that always blame ourselves ("The reason I lost my job, car, home, everything was I just didn't work hard enough, it's got nothing to do with H1-B visas, whatever those are!"). Even when Americans accept entitlements they don't feel it's right, and they've got to be tricked into it. Ayn Rand had to be talked into it at the end of her life (medicare/Social Security) so she wasn't homeless, and there's legions of dummy's marching in anti-socialized medicine parades on their Medicare provided scooters. They've got no idea.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:That's true in America... by SirAstral · · Score: 0

      It's not just Fox, it's all of them. The news is just sensationalistic about everything to attract eyeballs, and the majority of Americans buy it hook, line, and sinker.

      You can't fault anyone for taking a government handout because that money came from the citizens anyways. The government does not give you money, they legally steal it from citizens then take a lot for themselves to give their cronies and then gives some of that to their constituents/citizens. I do not agree with SS, or Socialized anything because Liberty must come first. The government should never be in the business of a citizens personal life at any level, unless they are committing treason or other high crimes.

      The government should only collect enough taxes to Protect the Nation, Enforce the Constitution instead of ignoring it, and create and pass laws within the confines of the Constitution that best benefits the Country as a whole! If a state wants to enact Socialism at multiple levels then it is within their power to do so as long as they do not run afoul of the Constitution, but the Central Government never has any business doing it!

      You should go and read George Washington's farewell address. He warned us all about the problems we now have! An no one cares!

    2. Re:That's true in America... by pacinpm · · Score: 1

      ...nation of abused housewives that always blame ourselves ("The reason I lost my job, car, home, everything was I just didn't work hard enough, it's got nothing to do with H1-B visas, whatever those are!").

      Actually they are right. People with H1-B visas agree to work harder for less money than Americans. You can only blame yourself for no job offers.

      Should you mention outsourceing to oversea country you would have a point.

    3. Re:That's true in America... by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      How are they any different? In both cases people who don't have the resources to compete on a global scale are being made to do so, and being destroyed in the process. It be one thing if we had socialist nations that uplifted everyone, but you've got dog eat dog capitalism without anything even close to a level playing field between the rich and the poor

      The real problem here is we're fanatically adhering to a system (capitalism) that doesn't work in a global economy with fast shipping, fast transportation and fast data. We forget that Adam Smith's core premise included an upper class that lived close enough to the poor (and with few enough guns, bombs & tanks) to wallow in their misery too. Nowadays they just live far, far away. Like they did during the black plague, only now with modern communications they can oversee their little empires and keep them under control.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    4. Re:That's true in America... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      China keeps their populace in line with shear brutality,

      What? If you disagree with the government, they shave your head?

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  16. Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF??! by catmistake · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Even as President Obama prepares to follow Mubarak with his own 'internet kill switch',

    WTF??? I'm really getting sick and tired of this partisan garbage on slashdot. It's bad enough that it's in posters' comments, do we really have to have it force fed to us in the summaries? Hey lefties... fuck you... but you righties, a special "go fuck yourself" from me, mkay? Arrogant lying assholes... say anything to make the competition look bad, anything at all to win. Stupid, women-hating, fascist money lovers. Bite me.

  17. Revolution Radio by unlocked · · Score: 4, Informative

    Get some 100 watt FM transmitters make a afsk broadcast(Setting up Soundmodem on Linux). Next plug headphone jack from fm radio into laptop use multimon or windows equivalent. Just have to coordinate freq maybe could try encrypting it with open-ssh and sharing certs

    1. Re:Revolution Radio by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Do you know if this has actually be tried? I just happened to have spent the evening reading up on packet radio and routing topologies; making a list of things to try out. I've been focusing on 2-way comms, but your idea has some interesting 'last-mile' benefits.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  18. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I sense tension. Are you hiding your true feelings?

  19. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by SirAstral · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wait isn't your side the one's saying love the muslims who don't mind killing their women and daughters? Seems you have some hypocrisy to work out before you start assisting others with theirs!

    The people usually talking about partisan problems are the most partisan of all! And by the way. Partisan is GOOD! The more time they spend fighting on capital hill they less time they spend taking freedom away.

  20. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he has a point... we visit here because we are nerds and enlightened, beyond good and evil. Besides, it's not the liberals calling for a kill switch, and certainly not the President. It's the nanny-state conservatives, the ones who (believe they have the right to) decide what YOU are allowed to do in your bedroom, that decide what YOU are allowed to put in YOUR body. The first sentence of the summary isn't merely inaccurate. It's a lie, and a dirty trick.

  21. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by catmistake · · Score: 1

    OK, I lashed out... wish I didn't but I did. My bad. I'll try to keep that reigned in a little.

  22. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by catmistake · · Score: 1

    thanks for seeing through my idiotic rage. I'm feeling much better now.

  23. Have you been watching the live feed? by pinkushun · · Score: 2

    2 *million* people are marching for their freedom. In passerby interviews they keep repeating that they want a peaceful protest, as they want the rest of the world to stand behind them and see they really want this change.

    Despite that, people got killed from police gunfire, live rounds and rubber bullets included.

    Sure there are a few looters, some suspected of being undercover police to instill FUD in the crowds, a tactic not beyond the past 30 years of tyranny.

    The army publicly announced they will _not_ fire on the people as long as the protest stays peaceful.

    Google's official blog explains a new technology developed by a group of tech geeks who wanted to contribute positively to the current situation in Egypt.

    This is not just middle east anymore, this is humanity coming together.

    Check it out :-) http://english.aljazeera.net/watch_now/

    And http://stop404.org/682 :-)

  24. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I missing something or why is it a bad thing to say Obama is planning to have Internet kill switch? I mean, if you search with the terms "obama internet kill switch" you get plenty of articles about this.

  25. a seriously unanswered question by ILuvRamen · · Score: 0

    If all internet was turned off and all forms of communication were supposedly disabled, how are the government and police communicating? Either they shot themselves in the foot or they themselves have something set up to use. Why isn't anyone talking about that? Anyone have any information on what the "other side" is doing for internet and other communication?

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  26. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by kenshin33 · · Score: 1
    hey your as gullible as anyone. you say :

    The news is just sensationalistic about everything to attract eyeballs, and the majority of Americans buy it hook, line, and sinker.

    an yet ...
    you might want to look for the difference between causality and correlation ... that could be a start.

  27. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, I have to agree with Catmistake. This is deliberately misleading demagoguery. Save it for Glen Beck. No one else cares.

  28. Re:"US security services who routinely snatch his by silentcoder · · Score: 1

    He did.
    He's been living in London for years.

    Come to think of it though, that may have been a step backwards...

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  29. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by metacell · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For a European like me, the difference between Democratic and Republican presidents seems minimal with regards to electronic surveillance and censorship.

    In my own country, Sweden, the parties conveniently switch to criticising surveillance and censorship when they're out of power, only to conveniently switch back when they're in power again.

  30. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You lost me at "sick".

  31. tor when shutdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It works best during shutdown, absolutely no traffic and zero routing problems ;)

  32. Please get your wordings straight by McTickles · · Score: 0

    You can't "shut down the internet", THE internet? seriously? Egypt can shutdown all the subnetworks that constitute the internet all over the world?

    When I read "THE internet" in that context, it makes me think of dumb yank going "oh look honey they shutdown THE internet; they cut THE electricity; they cut THE water..."

    Yeah because your internet is THE internet...

  33. I guess egyptians can't visit sites by McTickles · · Score: 0

    With this monstruosity called BlockScript installed.

    Seriously BlockScript (and others alike) are a thorn in the side of the free internet.

    I had trouble with company VPN access because of them, and whats worse they completely ignore you even if you explain to them that you are the one in charge
    of the machine connected to the IP they consider a proxy and so on and what you use it for and so on.

    IRC servers are another problem, i understand the security concerns, but more and more people ARE GOING TO USE PROXIES AND VPNs AND OTHER SHARED IPs (especially with IPv4 running out too) ...

  34. Egyptians cannot visit sites by McTickles · · Score: 0

    With this monstruosity called BlockScript installed.

    Seriously BlockScript (and others alike) are a thorn in the side of the free internet.

    I had trouble with company VPN access because of them, and whats worse they completely ignore you even if you explain to them that you are the one in charge
    of the machine connected to the IP they consider a proxy and so on and what you use it for and so on.

    Same goes for IRC servers, I understand the security issues, but more and more people are going to use proxies, VPNs and carrier NAT'd IPv4 in the future

  35. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Even as President Obama prepares to follow Mubarak with his own 'internet kill switch',

    WTF??? I'm really getting sick and tired of this partisan garbage on slashdot. It's bad enough that it's in posters' comments, do we really have to have it force fed to us in the summaries? Hey lefties... fuck you... but you righties, a special "go fuck yourself" from me, mkay? Arrogant lying assholes... say anything to make the competition look bad, anything at all to win. Stupid, women-hating, fascist money lovers. Bite me.

    u mad bro?

  36. Delay Tolerant Networking RFC 4838 and RFC 5050 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delay-tolerant_networking

    Build the Bundle protocol into the mobile phones, they support bluetooth and wifi these days. At least then you get email and some store and forward application/protocol like usenet would also work.

    Then all you need are some edges which connect with the Internet.
     

  37. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u mad?

    u jared lee loughner?

    i post a link to your slashdot journal to the feds...

  38. WTF this is an obvious troll by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 4, Informative

    When has president Obama suggested an Internet kill switch? This is the idea of a Republican senator and has not been endorsed or supported by Obama, afaik. This should have never made it to the front page, it is an obvious troll.

    1. Re:WTF this is an obvious troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the idea of a Republican senator

      And Lieberman (D,Connecticut) and Carper (D,Delaware).
      But they must just be puppets in some vast Republican conspiracy instigated by Collins, right?

      Or maybe neither (D) nor (R) care about the plebs any more, and we should stop buying into the rhetoric.
      Sure the summary is trollish, but Obama hasn't exactly been going out of his way to fight for our rights (See: TSA, FISA, GITMO, etc).

  39. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i wish i had some mod points i'd mod you up. back in the 90's slashdot was must read stuff for technical information and dialog. now its just another blog site full of agenda driven rabid dogs all seeking to foist their lame pitiful political and moral views. sure trolling is fun but, this crap isn't even entertaining. i browse this site maybe once every 2 weeks now and its mostly rehashed day late and a dollar short drivel. i guess that is what you get when you monetize any kind of conversation. so yeah pretty much fuck all the fucktards with nothing to say about technology and everything to say about their philosophy, morality, and politics on all sides. this is certainly next to the last place on the net i would go for that. the last place being wefartinourcheriosthruastrawandeattheneatthem.com they seem to be a little sharper on the technical side though so i follow them now about as much as i follow slash's content

  40. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people usually talking about partisan problems are the most partisan of all! And by the way. Partisan is GOOD! The more time they spend fighting on capital hill they less time they spend taking freedom away.

    You silly fool. It's a way of stripping our freedoms! They can make you want any piece of legislation as long as the other guys really really don't want it. Throw in a few emotionally charged words and everybody's upper reasoning atrophies for the rest of the argument. If these assholes would STOP the partisan shit and start being motherfucking statesmen we'd all be in a hell of a lot better place. Oh wait I'm blaming the wrong people. It is people like you, good sir, that allow this type of shit to continue. Name me one single session of congress that didn't strip your rights away. Name one presidential administration that didn't strip your rights away. You'd probably have to go back to the 19th century to find one. Partisan bullshit isn't doing a thing to stop your rights from being systemically removed. It's a way of keeping you misinformed and distracted.

  41. Fuck partisanship. by just+fiddling+around · · Score: 1

    Fuck partisanship. This is objective evil, free of dem/gop bias. Yes, the "internet kill switch" is designed to do what Mubarak did. In fact, this is it's ONLY use.

    It does not have any parallel in any other communication medium: not TV, not the telephone networks, etc. Why? Because our forebears would have sniffed the fascist, totalitarian bent of it and would have shouted "NAZI, STALIN!". Now most of the US is constituted of pussies: "oooh, please save me from the teeeeeeerrorists! please! put everybody in a cage if it would save me from the teeeeeerorrists!"

    --
    You're not old until regret takes the place of your dreams.
    1. Re:Fuck partisanship. by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Summary poster attempted to pin it on Obama, saying he was considering it. Nonsense. That was what I meant by partisan BS. Summary Poster is obviously a Republican birther, or some such nonsense. The game is "hate the other side no matter what," and it's garbage. I honestly doubt even McCain, a Republican, would seriously consider it. It's teabaggers. They want to control aspects of our lives, under the banner of "superior morality," that no one has the right to control. And if events in Egypt shows us anything, it's that control is an illusion.

    2. Re:Fuck partisanship. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      That was what I meant by partisan BS. Summary Poster is obviously a Republican birther, or some such nonsense. The game is "hate the other side no matter what," and it's garbage.

      You're playing the same game here. Anyone who calls Obama out over his obvious hard-on for authoritarianism is a teabagger? That's partisan bullshit.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Fuck partisanship. by catmistake · · Score: 1

      You're playing the same game here. Anyone who calls Obama out over his obvious hard-on for authoritarianism is a teabagger? That's partisan bullshit.

      I don't see how falsly attributing something to Obama is "calling him out over his obvious hard-on for authoritarianism," nor how correcting this, for accuracy, is partisan. Maybe Obama is authoritarian, but lying about him isn't evidence of it. This has old-school conservative tactics written all over it... these days, that's the Tea Party's modus operandi.

      Find anything anywhere that says Obama, or any liberal, thinks an internet kill switch is a good idea. You will fail. The proposal came from a Republican senator, and this is the second time a Republican has suggested such nonsense. The nanny-staters are in the ranks of the Republican Party and the Tea Party. It's not partisan to point out that someone is attempting to attribute a bad idea to the wrong person.

    4. Re:Fuck partisanship. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I already quoted you a bit in another post. The official stance of the Obama administration, given as testimony to Congress by DHS Undersecretary Philip Reitinger is that the authority to implement a kill switch already exists. Since Obama has done nothing to change that, he must believe that it is a good thing.

      Also, I said it before, and I'll say it again. Obama is no liberal. There are no liberals in the US government. Both Democrats and Republicans are rank authoritarians.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Fuck partisanship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until you cite a source, other than your own spurious posts, we'll all assume you're lying. Frankly it's easy, because anyone with even a modicum of knowledge about the Internet knows that it's practically impossible. Egypt had maybe dozens of connects, simple to cut off... the US? Probably thousands if not tens of thousands. It'd be more correct to say a US killswitch would kill the rest of the world's internet, while the US would hummalong fine without them.

      "Official," my ass. And your logic is hardly compelling. Looks like you studied logic under Glenn Beck, ROFL. I can do that too... you never said you don't stick a hot poker up your ass every night, therefore you MUST be sticking a hot poker up your ass every night! Hatta, you're a sick, twisted individual, always sticking hot pokers up your ass! Get a clue.

  42. Holy alliteration Batman by trollertron3000 · · Score: 1

    Holy alliteration Batman! What a headline. Did Susy sell sea shells by the seashore also? The rule is do not follow with the same starting consonant more than twice. I'm a troll and even I stick to that rule.

    --
    Tiger Blooded Bi-Winning Machine
  43. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by Hatta · · Score: 0

    Partisanship? Which side do you think Obama is on when he proposes this kill switch? Which side do you think /. is taking?

    Hint: It's not left vs right. It's subjugation vs freedom. That's the kind of partisanship we need more of.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  44. Mod Parent BIGOTED TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "muzzies"!? what an asshole

  45. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by sorak · · Score: 2

    We do the same. During the Bush years, the GOP meme was "trust the government. It's unpatriotic to stand in the president's way". After Obama's election, but before he took office, that meme changed to "The president is out to push a socialist agenda and I hope the president fails", and these same people who were decrying dissent took a tactic of filibustering and obstructing every attempt at legislation, because they didn't want to give the other guy any victories.

  46. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by Hatta · · Score: 1

    The first sentence of the summary isn't merely inaccurate. It's a lie, and a dirty trick.

    Explain this to me. Not only is the first sentence of this summary accurate, it's the only way a reasonable person could construe the situation. How can you look at the "kill switch" proposal and think that it's for anything other than what Mubarak has just done? What other possible use is there?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  47. I Want To Believe (in Tor) by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1

    I really want to support online freedom of expression, but I struggle to justify the operation of a Tor exit node or of similar open proxy services given all the potential abuses. I don't want to unwittingly further crime or terrorism. I also don't to waste my scarce computational resources on someone else's anonymous access to entertainment. I cannot ignore the fact that by allowing other people's traffic to transit my personal network connection, I am liable (or culpable) for their activities to a certain degree. For example, if someone threatens the president from my exit node, the Secret Service will turn my life upside down (and rightly so). Does anyone else share similar reservations about Tor or Freenet? I could restrict the sites accessible from my server (e.g., set up DNS so that only Google, Facebook, and Twitter resolve), but then the question becomes, how would I know which sites the activists need to access? Any suggestions?

    --
    I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
  48. Well, I have been routing since 28/01 by quarkie68 · · Score: 1
  49. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by catmistake · · Score: 1

    I'm just going to quote the comment above my OP to show you what a silly person you are.

    Um...how does Senator Susan Collins, Republican from Main, putting forward a beyond-all-reason-lame bill, somehow equal Obama following Mubarak?

    Let me help you understand this a bit... liberals would never propose a kill switch. Obama is a liberal. The idea comes, for a second time, from the ranks of the REPUBLICAN party. FYI Obama is a DEMOCRAT.

  50. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by Hatta · · Score: 1

    The bill is also sponsored by Sen Lieberman (I formerly D), and Sen Carper (D). A similar bill in the past was sponsored by Sens. Rockefellar (D) and Snow (R). This bill was unanimously passed by the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, a body with the same number of Democrats as Republican. (more D if you count Lieberman). This bill is as bipartisan as it gets.

    I agree, that liberals would never pass such a bill. However, there are no liberals in the US government. Obama is a center-right statist. He has continued the practice of warrentless wiretapping. He has prosecuted no one for commiting acts of torture. He has done nothing, at any juncture, that decreases the power of the state. He has given no indication that he would veto this mainstream, bipartisan bill if it comes to his desk. Given all that, it is in no way misleading to put Obama's name on it. If he doesn't want the power to shut down the internet, all he has to say is "I'll veto that".

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  51. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by Hatta · · Score: 1

    Also, notice this article.

    That provision has attracted widespread criticism from privacy advocates, who claim it amounts to giving the president a "kill switch" over the Internet. Collins has said the president already has that authority under Section 706 of the Communications Act. Testimony by DHS under secretary Philip Reitinger earlier this month indicates the administration shares that view.

    So you see, Obama's position is even worse than that put forth in the bill. This bill would explicitly authorize an internet kill switch. Obama thinks he already has that power, without any further congressional oversight.

    That is straight up hard core statism. If you care about freedom at all, oppose Obama.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  52. It has wide-ranging support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    According to this article, it's Senator Joe Lieberman's idea and "other sponsors of the bill are Senators Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, and Tom Carper, a Delaware Democrat."

    Personally, I don't care whose idea it is, I think it's a bad idea period.

  53. Those thieves! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who routinely snatch his electronics

    Just think about how many pairs of sensor equipped Nikes he must have lost during jogging already..

  54. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a European like me, the difference between Democratic and Republican presidents seems minimal with regards to electronic surveillance and censorship.

    In my own country, Sweden, the parties conveniently switch to criticising surveillance and censorship when they're out of power, only to conveniently switch back when they're in power again.

    Never imagined it could ever get this way, though many were nibbling at the edges. After 9-11, all the creeps in the world rolled out with a plan. Unfortunately they were successful. Fear it will be a long time before we take this country back.......

  55. Re:Net kill switch doesnt kill your community wWAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OC no Net kill switch cant ever kill your community wireless WAN be it a short range community project or a a lot of bonded inter connected long range directional point to point http://www.zeroshell.net/eng/ live cd , No ISP required so no problems for a so called "kill switch" and if you use low power ARM boards to make these you can run them off grid for many hours too in case of power loss.

  56. Re:Partisan bullshit overtaking slashdot??? WTFF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By not denying you like to stick hot pokers up your ass, you must love it. You are a sick fuck, Hatta. Just keep your ass and your bloodied anal pokers away from us, Hatta, or should I call you Glenn Limbaugh or Rush Beck?? Hock your sadist partisan bullshit somewhere else. This site is for nerds, you lying douche-pimple.

  57. Solutions, Ideas. by boynas · · Score: 1

    I think it would be a good idea to brainstorm utilizing the power of Slashdot readers. One of those: "What would you do?" How can we support a civilian network with no ISP backbone. WDS? Mesh networks? Analog modems? Rsyncing important websites the wikileaks way? Using BBS or text oriented technologies to preserve civilian bandwidth? GSM cellphones ala Burning man? Seriously... With no Internet we are completely segregated and powerless. At least the US, we are not even withing walking distances from downtowns. Can Slashdot help organizing this info? It would be awesome testing some of these technologies!