Slashdot Mirror


Japan's Elderly Nix Robot Helpers

SteeldrivingJon writes with this quote from a story at the BBC: "In Japan, robots are friendly helpers, not Terminators. So when they join the workforce, as they do often in factories, they are sometimes welcomed on their first day with Shinto religious ceremonies. But whether the sick and elderly will be as welcoming to robot-like tech in their homes is a question that now vexes a Japanese care industry that is struggling with a massive manpower shortage. Automated help in the home and hospitals, believe some, could be the answer. A rapidly aging first world is also paying close attention to Japan's dalliance with automated care. ... The country's biggest robot maker, Tmsuk, created a life-like one-meter tall robot six years ago, but has struggled to find interested clients. Costing a cool $100,000 a piece, a rental program was scrapped recently because of 'failing to meet demands of consumers' and putting off patients at hospitals. 'We want humans caring for us, not machines,' was one response."

200 comments

  1. Tut Tut... by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    Machineists. Believers in Carbon Superiority.

    1. Re:Tut Tut... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      What could go wrong? go wrong?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Tut Tut... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      What could go wrong? go wrong?

      Rôjin Z?

      "No one messes with the Ministry of Public Welfare!"

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:Tut Tut... by camperslo · · Score: 1

      It's not surprising that the elderly want (human) companionship as much as a helper. Vendors would have more luck targeting sports fans and others that don't want to leave the sofa and t.v. long enough to get food or beer.

      I guess the next generation would address yet another "need". Will children have nightmares of being chased around by a robo-toilet with arms?

      Prepare for a future teabagger revolt over tax dollars funding robo-toilet-slaves for obese sports fans. Maybe if the robot is also a home security system and has weapons?? The NRA would back that.

    4. Re:Tut Tut... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Probably less than with humans. I heard that as malfunctioning as they may be, no robots has ever reacted to an incentive to break its orders.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    5. Re:Tut Tut... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is in Japan, you ignorant leftist douchenozzle. They might subsidize schoolgirl-bots with tentacles there.

  2. Old joke by Yetihehe · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Japan robots use old people.

    --
    Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
  3. Damn straight! by nebaz · · Score: 1

    We want humans, not machines to care for us. Might make the pill a little easier to swallow if the machines were hot though.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:Damn straight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but it's not like we can all download copies of Lucy Liu. ...yet.

    2. Re:Damn straight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the machine itself (preferably hot one) would always swallow.

    3. Re:Damn straight! by couchslug · · Score: 1

      After experiencing a variety of paid "caregivers" for my aging parents, I'd prefer good robots for myself!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  4. Xenophobia... by babymac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, if you want humans to care for you, Japan, you just might have to accept people who don't speak or look Japanese. Get over your completely homogeneous society already!

    --
    "War makes me sad." - Me
    1. Re:Xenophobia... by TheLink · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah that's not the problem.

      They just need to consume more fries and cola (and keep away from that grilled fish and green tea). Then they'd have fewer elderly :).

      Surprisingly they smoke quite a lot and they're still not dropping dead quite fast enough for their economy.

      --
    2. Re:Xenophobia... by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      They might have to accept people that don't look Japanese, but speak? Seriously? I don't think it's too much to ask for the people caring for your elderly to be able to communicate with them without calling in the floor translator. I can't imagine how frustrating it would be to have to pantomime out what you need from the people who are being paid to care for you.

    3. Re:Xenophobia... by z3pp3h · · Score: 0

      If they want to be xenophobic, let them. Have you been personally slighted by this? And knowing someone who has been "wronged" doesn't count.

    4. Re:Xenophobia... by God'sDuck · · Score: 1

      They might have to accept people that don't look Japanese, but speak? Seriously? I don't think it's too much to ask for the people caring for your elderly to be able to communicate with them without calling in the floor translator. I can't imagine how frustrating it would be to have to pantomime out what you need from the people who are being paid to care for you.

      Yeah, you'd want to speak the language before being promoted to direct patient care. But you can work to learn the language while doing the other 90% of the work -- cleaning toilets, doing laundry, delivering laundry, cooking, doing dishes, being the second set of hands for any patient care, changing light bulbs, driving the delivery vehicles, building the next nursing home...

    5. Re:Xenophobia... by DrgnDancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Their problem is quickly becoming one of choosing a poison. The elderly vs middle aged vs young adults vs children gap in Japan is approaching critical. Most of the industrialized world is experiencing problems with an aging populace: the problem is less pronounced but existent in the US, noticeable in a lot of Europe, getting serious in other parts of Europe, and nearing critical in Japan. If the Japanese elderly don't want to cared for by robots, and they don't want to be cared for by non-Japanese (or non-Japanese speakers, let's face it Japanese is neither a commonly learned nor easy to learn second language) their remaining choices are getting thin.

      It's simple math. If there aren't enough young people to care for the old people you either need to import more young people or find another solution. What that solution is I don't know, but robots were at least a legit attempt.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    6. Re:Xenophobia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Japan, if you look foreign then you speak English. "Because that's what gaijin do!" Even if you speak fluent Japanese.

      Of course we're talking about the management and the gate keepers. The people ACTUALLY interacting with them wouldn't care but to the ones that hold the power there's always some sort of short-fall or inadequacy if your hair is blonde or your skin is brown or black.

    7. Re:Xenophobia... by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's important for workers to speak the local language not just to make things easier for their employers, but also so that they are aware of their rights.

      When I moved to Finland a few years back, I initially despaired that even lowly jobs required a decent knowledge of Finnish, but when I reached relative proficiency in the language and started working in blue-collar part-time work to put myself through grad school, I was happy that I could understand the rights gained for me and my colleagues in collective bargaining between the union and my employer (every worker has these rights, even if they aren't a union member).

      But an immigrant who doesn't speak the local language can be exploited mercilessly by his employers.

    8. Re:Xenophobia... by Nadaka · · Score: 2

      <humor>Exactly, the solution to this problem is not robots, its Mexicans. </humor>

    9. Re:Xenophobia... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      There is xenophobia and chauvinism in Japan, yes, but considering their density, I think they're right to be skeptical of immigration as a response to this need. Japan is a very crowded country.

      There is, despite the "graying of Japan", an ongoing recession and widespread youth unemployment. What is needed is the creation of frameworks to produce jobs caring for the elderly. That's not an easy problem to solve.

    10. Re:Xenophobia... by blind+monkey+3 · · Score: 2

      It's simple math. If there aren't enough young people to care for the old people you either need to import more young people or find another solution. What that solution is I don't know, but robots were at least a legit attempt.

      Soylent Green.

      --
      BM3
    11. Re:Xenophobia... by EdIII · · Score: 1

      It's not about a homogeneous society. They can only choose from people already on the island, and can't import more. Japan's population density is amongst the highest in the world.

      A robot is a slight improvement only because it would require less space than a normal person. Meaning, you could put it in a closet when not using it. Of course, even closets in Japan are at premium in some places.

    12. Re:Xenophobia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just send the old people to hawaii or something.

    13. Re:Xenophobia... by camperslo · · Score: 1

      NHK has been running a series on the shifting demographics of Japan. The percentage of the population that is retired compared to that of working age has been rising. It leads to a shortage of workers (at least with the right skills), and fewer resources to help those that are retired. The problem is one that other countries including the U.S. need to look at also.

      Using robots is very clever, but besides them not being a good substitute for human companionship, they're still way too expensive for consumer uses.

    14. Re:Xenophobia... by 517714 · · Score: 1

      </humor>Exactly, the solution to this problem is not robots, its Mexicans. <humor>

      Fixed that for you!

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    15. Re:Xenophobia... by maugle · · Score: 2

      Their problem is quickly becoming one of choosing a poison.
      ...
      If there aren't enough young people to care for the old people you either need to import more young people or find another solution. What that solution is I don't know...

      Y'know, I think you may have stumbled upon the solution already...

    16. Re:Xenophobia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that niggers should take this advice.

    17. Re:Xenophobia... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Don't they have certain honorable traditions, too?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    18. Re:Xenophobia... by couchslug · · Score: 0

      If xenophobia drives good tech, fine with me!

      The more jobs we automate, the fewer incentives for the backward to invade our countries seeking work.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    19. Re:Xenophobia... by John+Saffran · · Score: 1

      All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing - attributed to Edmund Burke

      Standing by and doing nothing about 'evil acts' is a choice in itself .. a choice of tacit support for those perpetrating such acts.

    20. Re:Xenophobia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell people the elderly are being sent to Hawai and put them on Yoshinoya rice instead.
      AKA The Soylent Green Solution

    21. Re:Xenophobia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used my mod account to mod you up; everyone else should too!

    22. Re:Xenophobia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny because it's true.

    23. Re:Xenophobia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need to either import foreign aged care workers or have enough children in their youth to care for them. They missed the second option.

    24. Re:Xenophobia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on out to the country. Plenty of room, tons of apartments (and houses!) sitting around cheap and at under half-capacity. It's also where a lot of the old people are.

      Of course, there's not much to do out here, aside from taking the lovely public transportation into the cities, but broadband penetration is good enough that it doesn't have to be like living in small-town USA.

    25. Re:Xenophobia... by RewriteQuran · · Score: 0

      A state cannot productively govern more than 2 million citizens.
      Time to decentralize World into Cantons as in Switzerland.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantons_of_Switzerland

      --
      Govt must constitute a panel to rewrite US Constitution and Quran
    26. Re:Xenophobia... by matfud · · Score: 1

      The up front cost is high but paying a person is far higher. So they wont be consumer devices any time soon. Dogs have been found to be good at finding that human relationship. It is not humans it is just being alive and unpredictable.

    27. Re:Xenophobia... by matfud · · Score: 1

      Perhaps having fur and spreading saliva all over youre face helps?

    28. Re:Xenophobia... by matfud · · Score: 1

      In France, Germany, Italy that is true too. Rusty language skills cause the assumption that you speak english. Which in my case is true but always floors me as I would like a refresh on the language.

    29. Re:Xenophobia... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      This problem can be solved by youth in Asia, I'm sure.

    30. Re:Xenophobia... by ewok85 · · Score: 1

      Broadband penetration in the country is terrible in Japan :\ Its already been pointed out by Softbank that KDDI and NTT's handling of fibre optic rollout has been patchy, inefficient and exceedingly expensive - the monthly "rental" fee for internet is outrageously high.

    31. Re:Xenophobia... by boxwood · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, I've traveled a lot and in every country I go there are usually two languages: the local language and english.

      English is the lingua franca (yeah I know the origin of this term). If two people meet and they are from different countries, then 99% of the time the language that they will be able to best communicate in is english. Yes more people know chinese than english, but if you see a chinese person talking to a japanese person, more than likely they will be speaking english.

      And many of the people you meet are probably being polite and will talk with you in your language to make things easier for you. Remember that you may want to practice your french or german or italian, but unless you're paying someone for a lesson they may get impatient while you're struggling to understand when they know you'll understand each other better if they just talk in english. And besides, they probably want to practice their english just as much (if not more) than you want to practice your italian.

    32. Re:Xenophobia... by boxwood · · Score: 1

      they population of Japan is expected to shrink by something like 20 million in the next few decades. Thats a lot of empty living spaces.

      And Japan has adapted fairly well to dealing with the high population density. I don't think its a fear of more people thats the big factor here. Its a fear of having different people, ie xenophobia.

    33. Re:Xenophobia... by ewok85 · · Score: 1

      Well, sorta. The Kanto region has about 42million people at about 1300ppl/km2. Compare that to to the NY tri-state area which is about 19million people at about 1100ppl/km2. Its not exactly a big deal - you look at Hong Kong or Singapore and there is a much higher density.

      Much of it IS about xenophobia, some of it is just tough luck (carers who can't speak Japanese aren't much use).

      What hasn't been mentioned is what about the Japanese themselves? Nurses and carers are in high demand, there is high unemployment - why isn't the slack being taken up? Much of this is because being a nurse in Japan is a shitty job - you don't get paid or treated any better than someone working 9-5 in an office and you'd make more money working part-time at 7-11 than you would as a registered nurse or worse, a carer. Considering that many hospitals are running at a loss and the state of the Japanese social security system this is going to change anytime soon.

    34. Re:Xenophobia... by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      In the US we have immigrant laborers that are likely to do jobs that the general populace doesn't want to do. In Japan the desire for a homogeneous society is working against them because of their migration policies $100,000 robots aren't the solution. I'm quite sure that Chinese workers, making a buck fifty a day would welcome working in a Japanese home, for real wages as a caregiver

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    35. Re:Xenophobia... by cats · · Score: 1

      There is nothing evil about a country wishing to maintain its ethnic and cultural identity.

    36. Re:Xenophobia... by John+Saffran · · Score: 1

      I was responding to the parent's comment that xenophobia is ok as long as it doesn't affect us .. suffice to say that if that were acceptable then the holocause would be acceptable. Were you or your own directly affected by the holocaust? Most people would see that as unacceptable.

      In regards to your comment about maintaining ethnic and cultural identity, if that were the extent of the deal then the label xenophobia wouldn't be appropriate, but that's not the root cause of seeking to replace temporary migrant workers with robots. By and large the temporary workers aren't going to be settling in japan on a permanent basis (both due to their own desires and the restrictive laws against it) so the argument that they're seeking to protect ethnic and cultural identity doesn't ring true.

      One particularly interesting example of the attitude of japanese society is the treatment of japanese-brazilians .. they're effectively treated like 'gaijin', ie. a threat to japanese culture, even though for all intents and purposes they'd be seen as japanese in a society that wasn't xenophobic.

    37. Re:Xenophobia... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It isn't just language though, it is integration with the local culture. I think that is as big a barrier in Japan as language is.

      The problem with Japanese society in particular is that it is highly structured and observance of unwritten social codes is near universal. The government had to run a campaign try to get people to accept that tourists cannot be expected to know these things and their actions not thought of as offensive. It has worked pretty well but dealing with tourists and dealing with employees that come into contact with customers/patients so another matter entirely.

      We have the same sort of problem here in the UK with people not integrating, although our culture is less rigid and easier to understand. It does still create problems though. You could argue that the Japanese should try to be a bit more tolerant or forgiving, but that is a change that can't be made at an individual level because of the collective responsibility they feel. A couple of years ago there was a politician who had to resign over a funding scandal, and the leader of his party had to go with him because he initially supported the guy. Similarly an employer would feel responsible for social faux-pas made by their employees, even fairly minor ones, so it isn't enough for the employee alone to apologise. By employing that person their actions reflect directly on the employer.

      I'm not saying any of this is morally right or not xenophobic, just trying to shed some light on the subject. Personally I think that some groups could do more to integrate into British society but at the same time am aware at just how high the bar is in Japan.

      They have a minister in charge of population the situation is so bad. They need to raise the retirement age and have more children. Problem is that useful working life is not extending as fast a life expectancy and children are expensive (especially when many Japanese would not take state support even if offered). Women wanting a career is also a factor, both in terms of not wanting time off for children and the cost of childcare when both parents work.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  5. Insurance by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

    Maybe they don't have Old Glory Robot Insurance.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  6. Old People by Grapplebeam · · Score: 1

    Don't like new technology!? Wow, who would've thought. Except for everyone, ever. Duh.

    --
    There is no -1 Disagree.
    1. Re:Old People by sznupi · · Score: 2

      The obvious thing to do is put robots in nurseries, daycare centers, kindergartens, primary school, etc. (with their staff going to elderly care)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  7. Cut the price by c0d3g33k · · Score: 1

    At something like $1000/unit, I bet these people would be singing a different tune.

    1. Re:Cut the price by Chapter80 · · Score: 4, Funny

      At something like $1000/unit, I bet these people would be singing a different tune.

      I dunno. I couldn't get my 78 year old Dad to use a FREE Roomba Robot Vacuum Cleaner or a FREE Tom Tom GPS. But he has 5 AOL accounts.

      Old people and technology don't mix.

    2. Re:Cut the price by mysidia · · Score: 2

      I dunno. I couldn't get my 78 year old Dad to use a FREE Roomba Robot Vacuum Cleaner or a FREE Tom Tom GPS. But he has 5 AOL accounts.

      Someone bought the Roomba and GPS for him, so he doesn't appreciate their value.

      AOL accounts are worthless, so their value is easy to appreciate

    3. Re:Cut the price by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Old people and technology don't mix."

      Older GENERATIONS and technology don't mix, and that problem will solve itself.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  8. there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. many countries complain about the downside of immigration. but japan is one of the few countries that actually polices it obsessively, such that there is very little, and what little of it that there is, is strictly temporary and vigorously policed. as such, japan has a greying population and has to build robots, because they fear koreans or chinese or filipinos will somehow destroy their country. nonsense. there's nothing wrong with controlled immigration, but the japanese have a very weird hang up about it. still, considering their racial hang ups, you have to wonder what bothers the elderly more: a nonjapanese nurse or a robot?

    2. finally, there's this story:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/28/world/asia/28generation.html

    japan is a "grey democracy," a gerokelptocracy (made up word): the elderly hoarde the power in corporations and in society's rules such that the young can't get a foothold. young workers are underpaid and overworked in companies purposefully to support the perks for older dead wood in the company. such that many young japanese now just want to leave the country. this of course exacerbates japan's serious problem of a top heavy age distribution: who is going to pay for the care of all of the older japanese?

    so robots caring for the elderly might be a funny tech article, and us techies might think of the japanese trying to get robots in all these domestic situations as laudable. but its actually the sign of a social sickness. the whole subject matter really speaks of some very serious social problems japan has, that are only going to get worse, unless japan makes some difficult choices, and soon

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by royallthefourth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the elderly hoarde the power in corporations and in society's rules such that the young can't get a foothold. young workers are underpaid and overworked in companies purposefully to support the perks for older dead wood in the company.

      Sounds similar enough to the United States. Here, the unemployment rate for age group 20-24 is more than twice that of the 50-54 year old crowd.(http://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cpseea13.htm) Even after they find jobs, they'll make far less money (adjusted for inflation) than their older counterparts made at the same age. Almost nobody in the younger group will ever have a job that offers a pension.

      Things are chugging along well enough for most people here, but as the trend continues this will be a become a big problem and the legitimacy of the people who are pulling the levers will continue to decline.

    2. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

      The Japanese government started giving people generous benefits (like 12 months paid leave) to get pregnant and have kids. BUT producing more humans on an already-overpopulated planet is not the solution.

      In fact in the long-term Japan is probably better-off with fewer babies being born. In the short term it causes healthcare shortages but in the long term (20-30 years) the problem will pass-away

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      so robots caring for the elderly might be a funny tech article, and us techies might think of the japanese trying to get robots in all these domestic situations as laudable. but its actually the sign of a social sickness. the whole subject matter really speaks of some very serious social problems japan has, that are only going to get worse, unless japan makes some difficult choices, and soon

      Only subtly different issues between the Japanese and say, the US. We both have an aging demographic. Given the entitlements both countries (and a host of others, I'm not sure anyone really has the answer) give to the elderly - and given the costs involved in taking care of the aged, we're both looking for some hurt. You can see this at any nursing home in the US. Virtually all of the careworkers are immigrants working at unsustainably low wage levels. A care attendant is never going to make a terribly healthy wage. It's above minimum wage to be sure, but there is very little room for advancement and it's essentially a physical job. As you get older, say in your late 50's or 60's it gets harder to lift and move the sedentary whales in your care.

      Much has been made about how this 'service industry' is going to be the economic lifeline since we've trashed everything below Stock Market manipulator and politician, but it doesn't really work for most folks.

      To put it into a more historical (as opposed to an hysterical) context - in the past (pre Medicare / Medicaid in the US), the elderly often died in poverty and it's attendant misery. You got sick and bam, you dead. Now, we take care of hugely complex chronically ill patients for decades in Medicaid / Medicare funded nursing homes. Funding for Medicaid nursing home patients is typically 30 - 50% of a state's Medicaid budget (Medicaid for those of an un USasian persuasion is a jointly state and Federal funded healthcare system for indigent / poor people. It has turned into a middle class nursing home entitlement since nobody, but nobody can afford nursing home care otherwise). In the upcoming years as budgets get stretched further, expect to see this issue played out in the US. We have a couple of options - continue funding nursing homes like we have, to the short term detriment of everyone else or change the social contract some how so we don't aggressively treat the elderly or more likely, just muddle on and make up everything as we go.

      And robots aren't going to help a bunch.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by commodore64_love · · Score: 2

      >>>move the sedentary whales in your care.

      If I had to care for a heavy person, I'd put them on a mandatory diet until they dropped to a reasonable level (like 120-140 pounds) that I could lift. IN fact - at that point most people would probably be able to lift themselves and not need so much help (other than balance-assistance).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by vakuona · · Score: 2

      Um, no. The solution is to manage the population down gently. Japan is pretty much falling off a cliff population wise. That is not a good thing because the population becomes too imbalanced. You cannot have too many older, non productive needing care without creating serious problems. It would be all "good" if people were perfectly healthy and productive until they were aged 90, then just dropped dead. However, people become a net drain on society at some point, and it's usually OK if there are more than enough young workers to do their bit, and help the elderly, and have an overall positive outcome. But a population drop like the one Japan will face is pretty catastrophic, and has so many really bad implications.

    6. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Interesting

      absolutely true. but while this is a serious problem in the usa (and other industrialized countries), in japan, it is THE defining social problem of this era. the "gerokleptocracy" is exacerbated in japan by a lack of immigration. the usa complains about mexican immigration and europe complains about muslim immigration, but in japan, the problem is no nurses for a top heavy society age-wise. it puts some perspective on american and european complaints about immigration

      if as a society you have fewer children and you live longer, you are going to have serious financial problems caring for your older generations. immigration is one way to ameliorate the problem, as japan better learn, and soon

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    7. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by jdgeorge · · Score: 2

      the elderly hoarde the power in corporations and in society's rules such that the young can't get a foothold. young workers are underpaid and overworked in companies purposefully to support the perks for older dead wood in the company.

      Sounds similar enough to the United States. Here, the unemployment rate for age group 20-24 is more than twice that of the 50-54 year old crowd.(http://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cpseea13.htm) Even after they find jobs, they'll make far less money (adjusted for inflation) than their older counterparts made at the same age. Almost nobody in the younger group will ever have a job that offers a pension.

      Mmmm... Almost nobody in the US today who has a non-union job has a pension. It's all 401Ks and IRAs.

      Things are chugging along well enough for most people here, but as the trend continues this will be a become a big problem

      Yes.

      and the legitimacy of the people who are pulling the levers will continue to decline.

      Huh? In the US, the lever pullers are elected. Love them or hate them, they are just as legitimate as the citizens who vote for them.

    8. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      There's no racism like Asian racism

    9. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>The solution is to manage the population down gently.

      How?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    10. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by BZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > In the US, the lever pullers are elected.

      No, they're not. Figureheads are elected. The lever pullers are for the most part the career bureaucrats and the lobbyists.

      The last time we had an elected official seriously trying to change how the bureaucracy worked his name was Joe McCarthy. No one particularly enjoyed that, so no one has tried since.

    11. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by Applekid · · Score: 1

      Government sponsored skydiving? Free hookers and cocaine? Euthanasia bounties paid to your family?

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    12. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe its Singapore that offers incentives for young women to pursue careers when they want to slow population growth, and offers incentives for women to stay home when they want to speed up population growth. I understand that its been going back-n-forth as needed for a while now.

    13. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't bother "arguing" with him, he's just going to say some shit like "THEY SHOULD LET THE FREE MARKET HANDLE IT THE PROBLEM WILL SOLVE ITSELF!!!". Doing so is just wasting your time.

    14. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by sznupi · · Score: 1

      It's not something self-contained though; while not exactly elected, it gets perpetrated by society. "It's not corruption if I can do it"

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    15. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 2

      The elderly Japanese have the deepest pockets on earth. Japan has the highest savings of almost any country, and most Japanese, particularly elderly, are frugal. Did I mention they are very self-sufficient, grounded, and family oriented, too. Compared to nomadic Americans who retire as strangers to their communities, the elderly Japanese look secure. Of course, that is changing, and there is no telling what will happen when their young grow old and poor. Uh, I guess there is inheritance. Then maybe their youngs' young. Oh, the youth are not having kids? Then I guess Korea will inherit Japan.

    16. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by BZ · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about corruption?

      I'm not talking about corruption. I'm talking about the fact that the bureaucracy has its own goals (not even necessarily consciously) which have little to do with those of the elected officials nominally in charge of it, much less those of the electorate, and that there's not much that elected officials can do about it.

    17. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Of course - I just used this saying as a shortcut for, it turns out, partially disagreeing that the bureaucracy has little to do with the electorate (maybe not stated goals, sure ... but they are not so relevant in the first place IMHO)

      From where those people and their values come from? System of governance is also a reflection of society.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    18. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by BZ · · Score: 1

      > From where those people and their values come from?

      From certain demographics within the electorate. It's very much not a representative sample in terms of things like education, political leanings, income, personality (note that some of these things correlate with each other, though).

      It would be _very_ odd if it were, honestly.

      Also, US society is highly nonhomogeneous in terms of values. The bureaucracy is much less so. Again, it would be odd if that were not the case.

      I'll agree that a system of governance is a reflection of part of society. Whichever part happens to hold power. That's more or less a tautology, though. ;)

    19. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Isn't that how their presently dominating social group arrived on the islands, anyway?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    20. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by wiredlogic · · Score: 0

      You do realize that a significant portion of 20-24 year olds are unemployed because they go to school, right? Yours isn't exactly an apples to apples comparison.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    21. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by sznupi · · Score: 1

      It's really not so simple IMHO (that would be suspiciously close to "us" vs. "them"...); it's relatively hard to find somebody (out of random selection) who would refuse perks, if given the chance.

      Or, look at other areas: for example a family depending on the income of somebody in the military, and extended family of that one ... sure, many of them might even realize the BS of "9/11 & Iraq" ... but the military member of question is of course a distinguished, honorable man.
      Or family of some engineer or even blue collar worker - I'm sure many of them are quick to point out horrible pork and waste of gov spending in many areas... except if its a product related to said worker. Then the service is essential, and the price fair.
      How many things can be cherished, appreciated, if we are part of them ... how many start to be if we become part of them, without any specific background.

      And that's just one of the simplest aspects; present also in the bureaucracy. Symptomatic, overall (and I can say it even despite being in a place formerly behind Iron Curtain - it cracks me up when people forget how many millions of them were in the Party ... and how, even better, virtually all its members were closet Catholics / there isn't any phenomena of "unbaptized generation" (even if the baptism was in some small church in the country))

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    22. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by royallthefourth · · Score: 3, Informative

      You do realize that a significant portion of 20-24 year olds are unemployed because they go to school, right? Yours isn't exactly an apples to apples comparison.

      Students and others who aren't looking for full-time work aren't counted as part of the labor force, so they don't weigh in the unemployment rate. It's a valid comparison.

    23. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth is this an immigration problem? Just raise the salaries of nurses, and you will get more of them. If there isn't enough money, raise the taxes. I'd consider it a very fair tax, as you'd pretty much get it back when you get old. Every developed nation has to deal with the problems of a skewed age distribution, and importing young people from other countries seems like an extremely short-sighted solution.

    24. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      japan is a "grey democracy," a gerokelptocracy (made up word): the elderly hoarde the power in corporations and in society's rules such that the young can't get a foothold.

      Great word - although you had a typo - should be gerokleptocracy.

      Between social security, medicare, property tax abatements, and other goodies for seniors, the government is a machine that transfers wealth from the young, working, relatively poor to the old, retired, relatively wealthy. Oh yeah, let's not forget the tens of trillions of dollars in debt that supposedly the young will be paying in the future.

      Probably the most important political movement will be for the young to outright repudiate the debt. They didn't run it up, they aren't going to pay it.

    25. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the solution. Japanese government, are you listening?

      Offer free Viagra to the elderly. They will die of heart attacks or produce offspring. Tax the hell out of all contraceptives.

    26. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by sznupi · · Score: 1

      The second doesn't help with fertility, look at Russia (one of the main problems there is the cost of of contraceptives)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    27. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by sznupi · · Score: 1

      the government is a machine that transfers wealth from the young, working, relatively poor to the old, retired, relatively wealthy

      ...and to the really young, growing, dependable. Seriously, what does the word "government" even do there? That has always been the case - the community "benefits" most, at any given point, from those of productive age.

      There are some hiccups now, here and there, when the systems (much more vast, out of necessity) didn't have the time to react to quite recent rapid increase in life expectancy and decline in fertility. That is the problem. But the "deal" is not new, "evil gov" or not.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    28. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      It's not that "the community" benefits, it's that the idle relatively rich benefit at the expense of the working relatively poor.

      Since kings were overthrown, that has not been the explicit deal, no matter how much it is usually the case.

    29. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      no damnit!

      gerokelptocracy: rule of government by old seaweed

      don't twist my words! ;-)

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    30. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by matfud · · Score: 1

      I do not live in the US but due to the power they have it still affects me. Yes youre president does make me worried.Anyone who can send a nuke to my home is something to be scared of. :)

    31. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by matfud · · Score: 1

      I live in the UK so there are lots of launch sites. My government really likes the US. So it takes laws from the US. Good or bad we get them.

    32. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by ewok85 · · Score: 1

      Funny you mention that - mandatory Japanese health insurance premiums have been going up for years because the cost of providing care for the aging is increasing. I haven't seen a doctor for 3 years for anything, but I pay out $500 to the government for "health insurance" :(

    33. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by ewok85 · · Score: 1

      Not sure how this myth perpetuates, but its not true. Most elderly Japanese survive on government handouts (near-free healthcare, social security pensions).

    34. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by ewok85 · · Score: 1

      Good luck pushing a new tax through when the government changes every 12 months and can't get anything done ;)

    35. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      The Japanese government started giving people generous benefits (like 12 months paid leave) to get pregnant and have kids. BUT producing more humans on an already-overpopulated planet is not the solution.

      In fact in the long-term Japan is probably better-off with fewer babies being born. In the short term it causes healthcare shortages but in the long term (20-30 years) the problem will pass-away

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    36. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >1. many countries complain about the downside of >immigration. but japan is one of the few countries that >actually polices it obsessively, such that there is very >little, and what little of it that there is, is strictly temporary >and vigorously policed.

      Japan does police immigration, as they rightly should, but the rest of your statement simply is not true. How do I know this? Simple. I moved to Japan and had permanent residency 3 years after I arrived. Japan dodged the multicultural bullet so many other countries openly embraced and look at where it has gotten them.

      Japan wants skilled, educated immigrants willing to learn the language and the culture. If you think they'll simply open the flood gates and let everyone from East Asia come on in you're sadly mistaken. They'll deal with the problem in their own way and avoid having to deal with the myriad of issues the US and most of Europe is now facing thanks to unrestricted and largely uncontrolled mass immigrations of foreigners who won't assimilate.

    37. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Hey, I live in one of European US allies too... and let's face it, truth is - our populations are at large marveled by them, generally; don't try to realize all the dirt. And marveled by themselves of course, which is also unsubstantiated to a saddening degree. It's...human (and in the end irrelevant how much it's a case of our known cognitive hiccups...)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    38. Re:there's a deeper backstory here. 2 things: by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Rich-poor... that might be seen as another problem; of hiccups here and there in how the generation of parents or grandparents supports their children with their, also, accumulated goods (not by idling; they were also of "most productive" age); probably fairly isolated (come on, people know better than to piss off their future caregiver & consolation, I would think; plus the ages of "separation" move way upward for some time now). Overall - still, how society works, and for a long time. Of course, I've heard that useless folks were often pretty much abandoned, left to die, in the past... (well, we didn't really get rid of places of isolation, to push aside unsightly elders - but those places are a bit different now)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  9. Obvious (to me) solution by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    don't make robots, make exo-suits that allow them to care for themselves

    tell'm to strap on a articulated bodysuit that lets twingy muscles amplify goals?

    damn, wire me up when I can get outta bed, and I'll get myself out...

    I'd much rather have a prosthesis running down my arm and wipe my own ass, than a robot that carries me to the toilet and wipes for me.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Obvious (to me) solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And amplify all the shakes, and overreactions? Time to get into general contracting and home repair.

    2. Re:Obvious (to me) solution by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      That's actually really dangerous if you have a condition like osteoporosis, arthritis, muscular dystrophy, etc... Which of course, elderly commonly get.

    3. Re:Obvious (to me) solution by gorzek · · Score: 1

      That just means the exosuit should be wired directly to the brain, bypassing all those silly, fallible muscles!

      Just practice with a hot dog first or you'll rip your dick off.

  10. Pretty much an in-home 24-7 horror movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, come on who wouldn't want a Japanese robot helper

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glUnzzoFUxg
    or
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SE2VCwYDjx0
    or
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLXGS0J52co
    or
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJ6v3erZjGE

  11. Fair enough by starfishsystems · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "We want humans caring for us, not machines"

    Fair enough. Health care is not a place for elaborate gimmicks.

    Of course we've developed all sorts of devices which improve health care. Thermometers, for example, take away subjective guesswork. Monitoring instruments allow effective and economical observation of acute-care patients, at least insofar as various simple measurable symptoms are concerned.

    All that is great. Bedside light switches are great, for that matter. And $100,000 goes a long way when buying equipment of that kind.

    Now consider a medical device whose substantial function is to look somewhat like a living being. This device does not provide care. Except in cases of fairly advanced dementia, nobody is fooled. Its monitoring ability, if any, is no better than existing devices. Very considerable work is needed to provide a suitable environment for a mobile robot.

    In short, it's a solution looking for a problem. I get that. I managed a robotics research lab for 12 years. We're always on the lookout for possible applications of our research. Sometimes we overreach ourselves. This seems to be one of those times.

    --
    Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    1. Re:Fair enough by blair1q · · Score: 1

      What we want is for a human being to care about us when we're sick. The methodology of the medicine is beside the point. We'd be only too happy to be hooked up to a box that took the samplesand calculated the dosage and pumped the drugs. But when you're stuck in a hospital, knowing that your chance of dying today is much higher than yesterday, and the only "caregiver" you see from your bed is a meter-tall animatron who shambles in every few hours to pat your mattress, your emotional state suffers.

      My personal favorite is hot nurses with a little happy-hour on their breath. But that's anecdotal so it might not be true for everyone.

    2. Re:Fair enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In short, it's a solution looking for a problem. I get that. I managed a robotics research lab for 12 years. We're always on the lookout for possible applications of our research. Sometimes we overreach ourselves.

      Amen, brother.

    3. Re:Fair enough by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Some random felis catus to the rescue? (I'm not sure if such one is a bad or good thing...)

      Not much more than for comfort of course - though sometimes I do wonder how quick the result could be with a breeding program aimed for intelligence and gripping paws ;) (given less than a year for a generation...)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    4. Re:Fair enough by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      And $100,000 goes a long way when buying equipment of that kind.

      Heck, I'm pretty sure you could buy an actual human for less than $100k, especially from nearby southeast Asia.

  12. No worries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All they need is to get some good robot insurance and they'll be fine.

  13. more gov.speak; condemn in the strongest terms = by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we caused the problem/we're not DOing anything/damned internet.

  14. Said simply... by astern · · Score: 2

    DUH... OF COURSE?

    Japanese society can come up with great ideas, but a lot of times major ideas are not thought through all the way. This was one of those ideas, it was innovation for innovations sake and didn't really solve the problem of too many seniors and not enough facilities to take care of them. I mean, how much human care could $100,000 have provided to an entire senior center? Economically it didn't even make sense.

    A basic tenant of human care is the human interaction part of it. People (yes, we're talking about people here! Seniors are still people!) still need human interaction and care that no robotic platform will ever provide. Full stop. Never.

    --
    If the world isn't beating a path to your door you're doing something wrong.
    1. Re:Said simply... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      You put it to strongly - what if those people were to be raised by robots in the first place? ;p (remember experiments with bonding newborn monkeys to an appropriate puppet?)

      Too many people do want to put the elderly aside though, yes. They are too unsightly, I guess.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:Said simply... by hai_Priesty · · Score: 1

      DUH... OF COURSE?

      Japanese society can come up with great ideas, but a lot of times major ideas are not thought through all the way. This was one of those ideas, it was innovation for innovations sake and didn't really solve the problem of too many seniors and not enough facilities to take care of them. I mean, how much human care could $100,000 have provided to an entire senior center?

      But there is a significant minority (I read about 20%? last year from Nikkei- can't find the source now) that would have rather be taken care by a quality, affordable robot than a caretaker. May sound surprising to many, but a minority do think that being taken care of at home by a robot means they are still living like an independent individual instead of an invalid. Having a non-thinking, non-judging robot clean up when you pooped in your wheelchair can be more dignifying than having a nurse to do so. Human interaction can be provided less frequently, like caretakers checking every two or three days, and there should be lots of other stuff that a robot won't be advanced enough to do within this two or 3 decades. Too bad if this can't get through the initial steep prices. Just like viable green technology that may never be available on market if they were abandoned at Step 2 on pricing concerns.

  15. They're going about this backwards by Aqualung812 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Use the robots to free up staff, let the human staff take care of the elderly. Have more automation in test results, checking on patients that are unconscious, filling meds, etc.

    I'm sure their is a list of things the people in the hospitals hate to do that are boring, repeatable, and don't involve a patient directly. Put the robots there.

    --
    Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    1. Re:They're going about this backwards by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Use the robots to free up staff, let the human staff take care of the elderly. Have more automation in test results, checking on patients that are unconscious, filling meds, etc.

      I'm sure their is a list of things the people in the hospitals hate to do that are boring, repeatable, and don't involve a patient directly. Put the robots there.

      I'm sorry, but that's not probably the problem. Ever worked at or even been in a home for the elderly, especially dementia patients like they were talking about in TFA? They are not jobs people want. I know I'd rather be doing a boring repeatable job that didn't involve patients directly for less pay than working in such a place. Once, when I was desperate for a job in college I went to such a home to apply. I walked in, asked for an application, and then walked out to my car and threw the application in the back seat floor knowing that I'd never even fill it out simply due to the smell of the place while I was in the entry lobby for two minutes. Get rid of the hospital jobs with robots, and the people will move to other jobs but I bet not the ones taking care of the elderly.

  16. Allow immigration? by klapaucjusz · · Score: 1
    Perhaps it might be cheaper to allow care workers from neighbouring countries? Something like the American H1B1 programme, but for care workers?

    --jch

  17. Jeez, didn't they ever watch ROUJIN-Z? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH4K3OkRqL8

  18. The current technology is too poor by Animats · · Score: 2

    Mobile robots just aren't very good yet. But progress, after decades of frustration, is now rapid. Willow Garage is making real progress. Their mobile robot can already fold towels, starting from a pile of randomly placed towels. When it can change a bed, they'll have something useful.

    My guess is that the killer app for this will be a mobile robot for hotels that can clean a room and reset it for the next occupant. Give this ten years.

    1. Re:The current technology is too poor by sznupi · · Score: 1

      For capability - yeah,10 years sounds more than enough.

      For price per effect, in comparison with humans... ugh.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:The current technology is too poor by radtea · · Score: 1

      For price per effect, in comparison with humans... ugh.

      Assuming five times parts cost for the price it would be reasonble to have $10k worth of parts for a $50k unit. For something that just cleans hotel rooms I don't think that's unreasonable, assuming a modest level of supervision, say one human in charge of all the robots in the building. Assuming your hotel staff are costing you $10/hr all-in (not unreasonable for near-minimum-wage LEGAL workers) and working 1000 hours a year, if a robot could replace just one of them it would pay for itself within a decade, even including maintenace.

      This seems like an extremely do-able project, given a relatively modest development budget. Ideally you'd need a major hotel chain to sponsor it, as the field trials would be exciting, and the liability issues more than anything else will likely be the major impediment to adoption--you'd certainly have to have realtime video capture from these units to avoid spurious claims from guests that they had been run into and so on.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    3. Re:The current technology is too poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans are remarkably expensive; and you don't get significant economies of scale when you're producing lots of them.

    4. Re:The current technology is too poor by ewok85 · · Score: 1

      Is that a joke? We are at least a decade off being able to get robots even close to "room cleaning" levels of ability. We might have a 'bed making' robot in 5 years if we work at it ;)

    5. Re:The current technology is too poor by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Robots which can really replicate the abilities of human staff will be most likely quite a bit more expensive (unless you want to rebuild the hotels...oh, that's also expensive)

      Generally, you can probably buy human for much less than even your low estimate...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    6. Re:The current technology is too poor by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Hm, all economies of scale seem to revolve around humans.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  19. Scary idea by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Dude, that's Japan we're talking about. Making it hot there would involve tentacles or invisible penises. Well, with the recent news about invisibly cloaks at least the latter might soon be feasible ;)

    Nah, if they want to sell hot robots, they should cater to young horny nerds in the west. Some of us would have considered an Asimo with a fleshlight attached to be ultra-hot ;)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  20. Terminators by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    > In Japan, robots are friendly helpers, not Terminators.

    At least, for now.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Terminators by sznupi · · Score: 2

      That could be one of the solutions to "too much elderly"...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  21. The BBC got it right... by specialguy92 · · Score: 2

    The headline of the BBC article about this story: No, robot: Japan's elderly fail to welcome their robot overlords source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12347219

    --
    I can never spell "recursion" correctly on Google
    1. Re:The BBC got it right... by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's what I was getting at with the submission, but the awesome headline wound up not being mentioned.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  22. Robots are strong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, they know that robots steal old people's medicine and eat it for fuel.
    And when they grab you with their claws, you can't get break away because they're made out of metal and robots are strong.

    I don't know why the scientists make them!

  23. Not there yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Robot tech has not reached the point to where it can provide any real assistance to the elderly. Right now, it is just an expensive toy. We need a number of breakthroughs in AI for this to work as unsupervised aid to the elderly.

  24. Well by faust2097 · · Score: 1

    They could always lift the xenophobic near-total ban on foreigners working in their country but that would be preposterous!

    1. Re:Well by wsxyz · · Score: 1

      They could always lift the xenophobic near-total ban on foreigners working in their country but that would be preposterous!

      Why should they? The Japanese people have a right to maintain their culture free from outside corruption to whatever degree they desire. How utterly sad it would be (almost certainly will be) when the entire world is just one big lowest common denominator average of everything that came before. Just think how many unique customs, words, ways of thinking, talking, creating, and living will be lost forever.

    2. Re:Well by radtea · · Score: 2

      outside corruption

      There's your problem. You are reifying a homogenous, intollerant, ethno-racist culture and saying that it will be "corrupted" by external influences, as opposed to "diluted" or "enhanced". You've simply assumed without argument that the homogenous, xenophobic culture of Japan is superior to everything outside it, by some standard. I am left wondering what that standard is.

      I have no doubt that local cultures will persist despite homogenization. I come from a nation of mongrels, and we are still quite distinct, even from our neighbours to the south. Don't underestimate the robustness of local cultures, or the weakness of cultures that have to close themselves off from "corrupting" outside influences to maintain themselves.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    3. Re:Well by Shados · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree. Just which european and north american countries could do that too without being called racist and dropping discrimination laws all over the place.

    4. Re:Well by PPH · · Score: 1

      Then they should have had more kids to take care of them in their old age.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:Well by wsxyz · · Score: 1

      outside corruption

      ... You've simply assumed without argument that the homogenous, xenophobic culture of Japan is superior to everything outside it, by some standard. I am left wondering what that standard is.

      Not at all. I personally don't prefer Japanese culture, but most Japanese people do prefer Japanese culture and, to them, it is superior. Everyone has cultural preferences, and each culture has the right to maintain itself. There is nothing objectively wrong with the Japanese preference for cultural and racial homogeneity. Maybe it doesn't appeal to you. That's fine. Solution: Don't live in Japan.

    6. Re:Well by wsxyz · · Score: 1

      Personally I don't think North American countries, founded on the obliteration of native cultures have any such right. Europeans do, in my opinion, but if they choose to allow mass immigration, that is also their right.

    7. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japanese will become a dead language soon.
      I would link to this great article on young Japanese leaving Japan, but google is your friend
      I guess those who tax will tax taxes to stay afloat, just like the US

    8. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Japanese people have a right to maintain their culture free from outside corruption to whatever degree they desire.

      I could agree that a person has a right to eat sushi (or speak Japanese, or whatever) but does that person also have a right to force other people who live in the same general area to eat sushi? That would seem to go against the principle of individual freedom (having your neighbors dictate what you are allowed to eat).

      Just think how many unique customs, words, ways of thinking, talking, creating, and living will be lost forever.

      But on the other hand, if we're forcing everyone to eat sushi then we're missing on developing new foods. And, generally, if we force everyone to live the same way that people lived hundreds, or even thousands, of years ago then that's going to seriously stifle the development of new culture.

  25. Joe McCarthy?! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    the smearmongering communist witch hunter?

    please don't tell me you hold this man up as an example of anything except as a very dangerous demagogue

    of course the corporate corruption of our democracy needs to be changed. but it will be a cold day in hell before you convince anyone joe mccarthy is an example of anything except an asshole

    although, it is an interesting sign to me that his name should come up again. we are currently suffering a political movement in this country that doubts the president was born in hawaii and is a "secret muslim." classic joe mccarthy style smearmongering. and then there's that bill ayers guilt-by-association. heck if it works, bring back old joe as a hero, right?

    "have you sir ever associated with any member of the communist party." lol old joe! yes, it makes sense now. bringing back 1950s style fear and hysteria. learning from the best, i guess. thanks, right wing assholes

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by BZ · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > the smearmongering communist witch hunter?

      Yep. That guy.

      > a very dangerous demagogue

      Yes, indeed. Though at this point you rather have to be to get elected. I mean... Our current president sure did the whole "arousing the emotions and passions" thing that my dictionary uses as the definition of a demagogue, mostly about Change. Our previous president, same thing about an Axis of Evil.

      > joe mccarthy is an example of anything except an asshole

      Being an asshole is not mutually incompatible with being other things (for example, the guy was also a Senator; this is a common juxtaposition, actually). In this case, he was a crusading asshole, which is why he had the guts to try to do something as daft as taking on the bureaucracy to start with.

      In case it wasn't clear, I think McCarthy's methods were unaccetable (even if some of his suspicions were correct). But the point is, there are no acceptable methods that elected officials have today for controlling the bureaucracy. They're in the position of a manager who can't hire and fire employees and who has a small clique of employees who were there before he arrived and will be there after he leaves reporting to him... and controlling all of his access to information, as well as getting to interpret any directions he gives. If they don't do what he tells them to, he has no recourse. That's assuming he even finds out about it, which is doubtful.

      Now the problem is that before we had our current setup, the bureaucracy _was_ accountable to elected figures. We called it the spoils system. It was, unfortunately, even worse than what we have now.

    2. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes a special kind of stupid to read the grandparent post and think that it was praising McCarthy.

    3. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      yes, small government, cut the dead wood

      but you still insist on talking about joe mccarthy in a positive light. i don't understand this in the least. hitler built the autobahn but i'm not going to laud him for civil engineering accomplishments. by the same token, you're not being responsible if you continue to talk about senator joe mccarthy as anything but a dangerous vile figure. he destroyed careers and lives because they "associated" with communists, whatever that means. he used fear and hysteria. this is a demagogue. this is a figure you should have nothing but contempt for, because such "leaders" are our road to ruin

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    4. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      ""have you sir ever associated with any member of the communist party." lol old joe! yes, it makes sense now. bringing back 1950s style fear and hysteria. learning from the best, i guess. thanks, right wing assholes"

      I, as a citizen of a post-communits country, think that most of McCarthy's actions were actually needed to counter communism.

    5. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by BZ · · Score: 1

      > yes, small government, cut the dead wood

      Uh... Did I say anything like that?

      I'm so far pointing out a problem (or more precisely, a mismatch between how the US government actually works and what people are taught in civics class and like to believe). I'm completely at a loss as to plausible solutions, assuming it's even desirable to solve it. Again, we've had a spoils system before and it wasn't pretty. And if the goal is a government that's responsive to the electorate (is that the goal?) then it's not clear to me that "smaller government" accomplishes that in any way.

      > but you still insist on talking about joe mccarthy in a positive light.

      Only if you posit that elected officials having control over the bureaucracy (his goal, really, for a small part of the bureaucracy) is a good thing, _and_ that the ends justify the means in accomplishing this goal.

      Put another way, any value judgements happening here are in your head. I'm just saying that the man tried to give elected officials control over the makeup of the State Department bureaucracy. His reasons for doing this were mostly paranoid delusion (mostly, because a small number of those he fingered were in fact communist sympathizers; that was likely true of any big enough group of college-educated Americans at the time; others were Anglophiles, Francophiles, etc; that's all normal). Since there were no normal channels in place for elected officials to exercise such control, what ended up happening has more resemblance to a lynch mob, and for the same reasons (people acting on their passions, outside the bounds of the law).

      > hitler built the autobahn but i'm not going to laud him for civil engineering accomplishments

      Or his organizational ones? Just one aspect of a person's actions taints everything else about them in your mind? Or put another way, shouldn't Hitler get as much credit for the autobahn as Eisenhower does for the US interstate highway system?

      Is this conversation officially Godwin'ed yet? ;)

      > you're not being responsible if you continue to talk about senator joe mccarthy as anything but a dangerous vile figure

      Oh, c'mon. The guy was a slimeball, an alcoholic, and a demogogue as you said. But that doesn't change what he was trying to do. I can't help it if you think it was a good goal that he sullied with his bad means, or if you think anything he tried to do is tainted by its mere association with him. But that's a really black-and-white view of the world that I refuse to partake in.

      I mean... maybe I'm missing something. How is saying that McCarthy was vile and dangerous and so we shouldn't talk about him useful? How is describing his goals, not just his means, a problem? We shouldn't _forget_ about his means, because those aren't acceptable. But if his goal was a reasonable one (which I'm not convinced of) and if there were not better means available to achive it (which I _am_ convinced of), should we not be thinking about how better means could be provided?

    6. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by sznupi · · Score: 1

      a mismatch between how the US government actually works and what people are taught in civics class and like to believe

      This is basically what I was talking about nearby, BTW - only I tend to view it broader than "government", and "like to believe" as not confined to civics classes / etc.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    7. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Stalin was a monster. Unquestionably.

      But what is wrong with pointing out a historical fact that, during his reign, life expectancy in the area of Soviet Union increased dramatically? (that's despite all the victims!) Generally, bringing a very backwards country up to the status of a superpower.

      Or another irony of history: yes, strong censorship. But also the first largely literate generation.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    8. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I, as a citizen of a post-communist country, think they were useless witch hunt show (useless as far as their stated goal went at least; feeding Red Scare hysteria could be seen as a goal in itself)

      They didn't even really root much of any spies.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    9. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      "Just one aspect of a person's actions taints everything else about them in your mind? "

      uh... YES!

      you're fucking insane. really you are

      see this guy?:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Reiser

      he made a great file system. he's also a MURDERING SCUMBAG. guess what? HIS STATUS AS MURDERING SCUMBAG OBLITERATES EVERYTHING ELSE HE DID

      welcome to reality

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    10. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      so in other words, you endorse stasi style rule by fear... in order to get rid of the stasi?

      you're a moron, you know that?

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    11. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by BZ · · Score: 1

      Uh... I'm sorry, but it's you who're insane. Reiser's code did not disappear into the void. If you want to use it, you can. Apparently you don't want to; that's clearly your choice. Of course his filesystem is less desirable to use due to lack of an active maintainer and the unsavory associations, but "obliterated"?

      Do you apply this to everyone? Let me try some examples of this reasoning.

      Napoleon Bonaparte was a power-hungry mass-murderer (which he was, when you think about it, especially the campaign that ended at Waterloo), so any countries whose jurisprudence is based on the Napoleonic Code should immediately ditch that for some other legal system.

      Ulysses S. Grant allowed unbridled corruption amongst his cronies during his presidency, and mishandled the economy badly in 1873. So students of military history must not study his campaigns, since they are tainted.

      Thomas Edison was an unethical businessman who aimed to gain monopoly power by forcing all competitors out of business and lied to achieve this end. We should stop using incandescent light bulbs, as well as anything based on his work.

      Isaac Newton was a nasty person to deal with, who tried to suppress papers by contemporaries, spent most of his time dabbling in alchemy and the occult. We shouldn't teach his theory of mechanics to students, or if we do we certainly shouldn't mention his name in the process.

      Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner. We shouldn't be teaching children about anything he wrote, since it's tainted by association.

      My apologies for leaving out the all-caps and all.

    12. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by matfud · · Score: 1

      Some do not like the people who made our world. Even if they were absolute shits.

    13. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Well, the Red Scare had its basis. The Soviets actually believed they can create a fully communist world (that's what marxism says; world-revolution), they only settled for less only for practical reason. I can fully understand why American leaders wanted to make soviet propaganda/viewpoint unpopular.

    14. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by sznupi · · Score: 1

      But that becomes bordering on truisms, in best case, about human nature. In worst - is an expression of what McCarthyism represented; letting quite low impulses to dictate policies (what, McCarthy-like minded / any other crusaders didn't have their eyes set on whatever-their-scale domination?).

      Not even true in the strictest sense, not when it comes to Stalinism (when, at least openly, "socialism in one country" was promoted). It even would seem quite hypocritical... (considering US intervention, presence of US armed forces on Russian soil mere 2+ decades earlier, during their Civil War - BTW, probably that's what the Russian mentality of, mostly, being sensitive with maintaining buffer states around them is largely about: during the course of history they were quite regularly ravaged by foreign armies. But at least in my post-communist country it's hard to see any real effort at real understanding, at dispelling myths(*)) ...and how can we forget about few events during times in question, events which reflect "staunch anti-communism" - Bodo League massacre, Jeju Uprising or No Gun Ri Massacre? (and remember, your place at many points in time was possibly better than South Korea or Taiwan up to the 80s; the later were mostly just on the "proper" side) This is your "make soviet propaganda/viewpoint unpopular". Or, broader, some later examples

      If anything, McCarthyism didn't even particularly target communists, in practice - just political opponents. And certainly managed to alienate many "left" leaning people / made the rhetoric of the Soviets massively more believable (US political history is littered with blowbacks, it seems...)

      (*)real dynamics of (virtually all) social movements are rarely realized. Consider one possibility(!!) - take a look at world map and visualize all the places where "old" Christianity historically dominates, and which also tended to be quite feudal. Now visualize all the places which had serious problems (not only actual takeovers) with "communists" - notice anything curious? :)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    15. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      As I see you cite Korean examples. My post-communist country is Hungary.
      I'm not sure I would categorize the war crimes in Korea as McCarthysm.

      To be honest, when making the first comment I only had a superficial knowledge of what McCarthysm entailed (I thought it was just mostly anti-communist propaganda, and stricter security clearances). I agree that breaching due process, and baseless accusations and blacklists are unacceptable.

    16. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Shit itself doesn't seem to matter too much - mostly just what color of shit it is, to which PR it's attached.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    17. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by sznupi · · Score: 1
      (I'll so something useful while trying to pass heavy hangover, after going through notifications in mailbox... apologies for how late and how slightly incoherent this might be)

      To be honest, when making the first comment I only had a superficial knowledge of what McCarthysm entailed (I thought it was just mostly anti-communist propaganda, and stricter security clearances)

      You possibly hit the key issue here, without realizing. People, societies, have generally quite superficial knowledge about such issues. Not to be unexpected... they just want to carry on with their lives. Don't really want to be bothered (heck, our minds are even simply unable to really track more than few dozen individuals).

      breaching due process, and baseless accusations and blacklists

      I'm sure that does sound similar to you, from ex-communist Hungary, right?

      I'm not sure I would categorize the war crimes in Korea as McCarthysm.

      To me it's largely symptomatic, of what society ... of what humans can easily be (and don't get me wrong, US very possibly did quite near to best achievable way... that's not much of consolation), of what is bad in us / pack animal / we depend greatly on "we're the best, others are subpar" to feel good about ourselves... also to do horrible things ... but it's also, paradoxically, about what is good (our need to believe in Just World ... unfortunately easily derailed just by self-marvel and seeing others as evil; we must get pass this, to make the world really just)

      Because... it's working so-so at this point, for example (and how many people are even aware of this background for one of most just wars in recent history? If we can be upfront even with such one...). Have your pick (strangely, not a lot about Operation Condor - designed not only to get rid of left extremism, but to destroy left... check Sister Dianna Ortiz, that's 89)

      McCarthy was a symptom of that, of "we can do no wrong" / "you must be commie sympathizer if you;re against" / "you're either with us or against us" (remember who said the last one?)

      Yes, it's also playing Devil's advocate of course... oh well, there's enough of bad stuff on the Russians.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    18. Re:Joe McCarthy?! by sznupi · · Score: 1

      PS. And as I said, McCarthyism didn't even really work - didn't root out much of any spies. This "with us or against" very possible harmed the US / we can wonder about influence on sputnik moment.
      Korea was just an unfortunate expression of approach at least very related to McCarthyism. How it, unfortunately, happened in Korea (and not far off in time elsewhere, I linked to quite a few other examples) was probably more a case of opportunities than anything else - especially since only a few years earlier US demontsrated to not have too much qualms about similar approach in Europe (Morgenthau plan). Abandoning it also when possibility of one risk was realized... spread of communism on the merits of how people are better off

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  26. Too limited by Necron69 · · Score: 2

    The current state of the art in robotics is far too limited. If they could build a robot that could cook, clean, do laundry/dishes, and help you get dressed, I'm sure they would be more popular.

    Think of the Will Smith movie version of "I, Robot" where the robot cooks an apple pie from scratch. That's what you need.

    Necron69

    1. Re:Too limited by byner · · Score: 1

      Think of the Will Smith movie version of "I, Robot" where the robot cooks an apple pie from scratch.

      Did it first create the universe?

    2. Re:Too limited by 517714 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more of Galatea from "The Bicentennial Man."

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    3. Re:Too limited by citizenr · · Score: 1

      Think of the Will Smith movie version of "I, Robot" where the robot cooks an apple pie from scratch.

      Crumbly, but good!

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    4. Re:Too limited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a slightly more relevant pop culture reference. Such as GITS Solid state society. It was the first thing I thought of when I read the article. Ghost in the shell SSS did a good job of portraying a possible (albeit hyper technical ) reality. Not the networking of thousands of old people into an abduction system, but the concept of Kiefu aged (sp?) : literally translated "Noble Rot". The medical establishment uses cybernetic implants, robots and automated monitoring systems to keep an eye on, and tend to the needs of the elderly. I'm given to understand that this is more or less the direction japan is actually heading.

    5. Re:Too limited by Laser+Dan · · Score: 1

      Think of the Will Smith movie version of "I, Robot" where the robot cooks an apple pie from scratch. That's what you need.

      The robot first created the universe?
      I must have missed that bit.

    6. Re:Too limited by severn2j · · Score: 1

      If we're talking relevancy, then surely Roujin Z fits the bill here.. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102812/

  27. Put the patient in control by TomRC · · Score: 1

    Besides the obvious price and limited capabilities issues, I think where they fell down was in treating patients as objects to be "taken care of".

    They needed to put the patient in control.

    The robotic wheelchair/bed in the article will likely be much more popular, as it enables patients to do things for themselves. But reaching things with it might be difficult - perhaps it needs to be designed to bundle up the patient so it can hold them vertically, as if standing, so they can get closer to tables and counters and such. In effect, make a giant mobile hand and arm that can gently grab the person and move them around as they direct, instead of a mobile bed.

    1. Re:Put the patient in control by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      Then at least if the controlling computer gets bored it can play chess with them.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    2. Re:Put the patient in control by John+Whitley · · Score: 1

      "Putting the patient in control" doesn't apply to elderly people who are losing cognitive ability due to old age or outright dementia -- and there are going to be A LOT of them. For many people who succumb to Alzheimer's, the body is hale but the mind goes first. Today, this necessitates human assistance (family, eldercare staff, etc.) to get this person through their day.

      While mobility is certainly an issue for some patients, it's *far* easier to keep the elderly mobile and functional than the appalling state of U.S. nursing homes would suggest. Having dealt with this within my own family, this entails the nursing home working with physicians in a sleazy "you scratch our backs, we scratch yours" relationship. Specifically, the physician may do little to no actual work, gets paid by the nursing home, and produces evaluations/prescriptions on demand and fully to the desires of the facility. In one such example, the physician had no office and no phone number except the home's answering service and was essentially unreachable. Via such arrangements, patients who would otherwise very able to be mobile and manage well are labelled "aggressive", strapped into wheelchairs, and drugged insensate. It doesn't take much artificially reduced mobility to essentially kill an elderly person.

  28. Wrong market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The right market for human-like robots, right now, is in interactive sex dolls.

  29. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just imagine being helped by a robot in a hospital. It would be fucking awesome. Robot companies: please, please, please don't give up!

  30. The Western Model: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen Koji, just go and import a lot of third world cheap labor in the form of Jose, Juan, Ravinder, Jagdish, ... Problem solved!!! .....
    Hey Koji, I'm talking here...

  31. The Songs of Ibis by John+Whitley · · Score: 1

    Hiroshi Yamamoto covers this exact topic in one of the short stories in The Songs of Ibis. The angle there is the introduction of the first past-the-uncanny-valley android robot for nursing the elderly. Yamamoto takes on many of the particular challenges of working with the elderly (and with an aging population). The stories generally have a lovely classic sci-fi feel, using fiction to simultaneously explore new worlds and topical subject matter. It's also pretty darn near Clarke's definition of 'hard' sci-fi (and comp-sci-fi!) while remaining thoroughly enjoyable.

  32. If they don't like immigrants, why not reverse it? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Surely there must be some stable country with a young workforce that wouldn't mind caring for elderly Japanese?

    What local government official wouldn't lick their chops at the prospect of a bunch of people with pensions guaranteed by a government, creating service and construction jobs nearby?

    There are many Japanese already living in California, and a glut of real estate in certain areas--particulary the "Inland Empire". Even some parts of the Bay Area are in trouble, although some of them are virtually irredemable due to the presence of heavy industry over a seismic zone.

    This is just one small example. I bet other parts of the US, and other countries would have suitable accomodations.

    The last great Japanese export could be elderly people with streams of pension income.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  33. You have it backwards with Europe by sourcerror · · Score: 1

    Well, in Europe that are complaining about immigration are the ones which have decent fertility rates. (e.g. Britain, France, Germany; Italy is exception) While in Eastern-Europe the fertility is around 1.3 and people are pretty neutral towards immigration, but nobody wants to come anyway, because of lower wages.

    1. Re:You have it backwards with Europe by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Well actually, Russia (and I guess Ukraine, too) has not insignificant immigration - mostly from the rest of CIS.Still "follow the money" of course.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  34. The ATM Solution by PPH · · Score: 1

    You can stand in line for the next teller or use the ATM now.

    You can stand in line at the cafeteria or have the robot bring your food now.

    Your choice.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  35. Don't be afraid. by operagost · · Score: 1

    What these folks need is robot insurance. For robots are made of metal, and are strong. They eat old people's medicine for fuel.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  36. you're completely insane by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    see this guy?:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Reiser

    he made a great file system. he's also a MURDERING SCUMBAG. guess what? HIS STATUS AS MURDERING SCUMBAG OBLITERATES EVERYTHING ELSE HE DID

    welcome to reality, get used to it

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you're completely insane by sznupi · · Score: 1

      So you wish for falsification of history, got it.

      Hm, who else did that... Maybe a bit of book burning won't harm, too. Can't know that "insane" history!

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:you're completely insane by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      what are you babbling about?

      if you commit a heinous crime, this pretty much outshines any positive contributions you made. what is the problem you have with this basic concept of the reality of the world you live in?

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    3. Re:you're completely insane by sznupi · · Score: 1

      How you are unable to grasp me considering somebody an unquestionable monster without the need of all actions of said individual rewritten in history books as monstrous, how you are unable to approach it similarly - that's a problem with you, not the reality.

      It's uncannily similar to methods of people you supposedly condemn, BTW.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    4. Re:you're completely insane by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      what the fuck are you babbling about?

      rewritten? who is talking about rewriting anything? i said it 2x, now for a third time, maybe you will finally understand: if you commit a heinous crime, this pretty much outshines any positive contributions you made

      do you understand?

      that's what i am saying. stop putting words in my mouth

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    5. Re:you're completely insane by sznupi · · Score: 1

      You very clearly displayed your utter contempt for accurately remembering dry historical facts about those monsters of history, called (or yelled...) it an "insanity" (maybe it's so horrible and deplorable due to some your internal struggle, hm?); that's an approach bordering on fundamentalism, blind adherence to simplistic "truth" - which either way is certainly followed only when you deem it convenient...

      Here, just one absurdity to which your insanity leads: few lauded contemporaries of those who were mentioned earlier - Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower. Many heinous acts - city firestorms, JCS 1067 directive, wishing for half of Germans to starve to death (many thousands did, largely children), embargo of food relief, blocking economic reconstruction of the continent, stripping a million POWs of their status (to be used as forced labor). The last of the three - 1953 Iranian coup d'etat, destrying one of the most secular places in the region on its road to modernity.

      More examples, in case you missed.

      According to your approach, also those men are... monsters unworthy of mention, and their deeds would be best forgotten.

      Hey, if your approach deems them clearly subhuman, it must be true... but, again, uncannily similar to some people you supposedly condemn.

      (BTW, you might enjoy going out to some desolated place and screaming for some time; might even help...)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  37. Too short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    given less than a year for a generation...

    Hardly enough time for good selective pressures to take effect, though... and surely the socialization of the animals with their owners would be paramount, and that takes a lot of time to check. (We already have some cats who don't seem to care about their owners. I'd rather not give them intelligence and tool-using capacity.)

    1. Re:Too short by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but the offspring (and its offspring...) can be bred even before some potential great news about one of its parents, or both (sometimes), are revealed! Allowing us to select promising existing lineages (there's our selective pressure), even with a possibility of immediate inter-generational comparison! ;> (why would we want to rely on socialization?)

      And once we'll accomplish the readiness of first divisio............

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:Too short by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea... sorta like branch prediction but for evolution. :)

      Bring on Felis Sapiens! :P

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    3. Re:Too short by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Hm, yes; but maybe it's even broader example of speculative execution - sort of like Z3 can be theoretically Turing complete if (also) executing all instructions and afterwards discarding unneeded ones. Or...something in-between: after all, once we pinpoint exceptional specimens, we can not only take closer look at their already existing offspring - but also use them again in breeding. Which could perhaps speed things up a bit.

      Still rather slow, unfortunately. Almost certainly way beyond lifespans of everybody involved, quickly hitting our limits with execution of long term projects ;/

      But there might be some hope... if we ever seriously venture into space, what other cuddly pet could be possibly better? ;p (not only agility or hygiene, also how they are chosen already when the space is scarce and conditions hard... and an environment where planning is of paramount importance; where intelligence and gripping paws could be even more useful)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  38. The choice for elderly Japanese is simple by ghostunit · · Score: 1

    Non-Japanese care workers or die alone like dogs. That they're trying to solve this using robots is just sad... so pathetic.

    1. Re:The choice for elderly Japanese is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do allow non-Japanese care workers. The problem is finding non-Japanese care workers that speak an acceptable level of Japanese. Also, they are not trying to solve this problem with Robots, this is a story about one company that was trying to make money by selling robots to hospitals. This is not a story about a society trying to replace care workers with robots.

    2. Re:The choice for elderly Japanese is simple by ghostunit · · Score: 1

      As for the level of Japanese fluency, I see it more as an excuse than a legitimate reason to put yet another barrier between their country and the rest of the world. You don't see Mexican immigrants coming in with English degrees, yet they are oftenly praised for their hard-working attitude and good work output.

      As I said, the elderly Japanese better realize they don't really have a whole lotta options here. Robots? that's a pipe-dream and everyone knows it. The Japanese are just in denial, and the longer they keep it up, the longer it's gonna hurt them.

  39. That, or get busy in the bedroom by George_Ou · · Score: 1

    The people complaining about not enough young people are the same ones who didn't produce enough offspring. They're having a hard time finding mates due to their unrealistic expectations. They might want to relax the rules for more immigrant spouses from other countries. Yes that dilutes their Japanese gene pool, but it's better than going to zero at the rate they're headed.

  40. The idiotic "scared of robots" meme by homejapan · · Score: 1

    "In Japan robots are friendly helpers not Terminators."

    This idiotic meme just won't die, thanks to eternally lazy reporters. Tip to the BBC: Outside of Japan, robots are not Terminators. The Terminator was a movie character. It's fiction. Get it?

    Here in the real world, people and companies outside of Japan are falling all over themselves researching, building, and commercializing robots as home helpers, caretakers, special-needs assistants, workers, and more –the same as in Japan. Sorry, BBC, but if you want to claim there's some magical difference in Japan, you have to demonstrate it, not just assert it.

    From my home in Tokyo, where I can assure you the average person has zero daily contact with helper-type robots, I got so tired of this meme I ripped it apart at http://www.homejapan.com/japan-and-robots . The robot-loving "Westerners" I describe should feel mighty familiar to Slashdot readers (who, unlike the BBC, are probably smart enough to get that "OMG robots are evil Terminators!" is the stuff of jokes and movies, not the attitude of real people).

    1. Re:The idiotic "scared of robots" meme by boxwood · · Score: 1

      Dude relax, it was just a joke.

    2. Re:The idiotic "scared of robots" meme by homejapan · · Score: 1

      The BBC wrote its article as a joke?

    3. Re:The idiotic "scared of robots" meme by boxwood · · Score: 1

      Its a fluff piece. So yeah its meant to be somewhat amusing, but unlike a lot of fluff pieces it tries to inform the reader about something thats pretty significant, japan's demographic problem.

    4. Re:The idiotic "scared of robots" meme by homejapan · · Score: 1

      Sounds about right. But for the record, over here in Japan –and I'm assuming you're not here –there are plenty of people who have taken this bizarre idea from the media, and have expanded it into a mini-dogma with unequivocal claims that "the Japanese" have a "special relationship with robots" due to dolls and Shinto religion and Astro-Boy cartoons and whatever else seems to make muddled sense at the moment, and that "Westerners" are literally terrified of robots because of "Christian hang-ups" and yadda yadda. Jump ahead a few years to the present, and it's now being parroted, with no questions asked, by media overseas, print media in Japan (including non-Japanese publications), and even national news broadcasts any time a story related to robots comes up.

      That's what my reaction is aimed at: not a single BBC article, but this meme taking strong roots. (It may seem a really obscure topic from where you sit, but it might be one of those things you suddenly start seeing all over, now that it's come to your notice...)

      It's pretty harmless stuff. It's insulting to robot researchers and enthusiasts around the world, but trivial all the same. So why bother poking fun at it? *shrug* Because the meme is demonstrably false; that's reason enough. Never hurts to keep in practice with the question, "Wait a sec –is this thing we're hearing *true*?"

      That about wraps it up. Cheerio!

  41. Fix the aging problem with nano/biotech research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeeze, just spend 10% less on the military and plow this money into realy pushing the existing biotech/nanotech research......take a lesson from Aubrey de Grays Mprize and SENS foundations (he is now with the SENS foundation).....they have identified the 7 aging issues that 20th century medical science identified (mitochondrial damage, dna errors in cells, junk buildup inside and ouside of cells that the body cannot break down (but some bacteria have evloved to break down (read his book: Ending Aging: The Rejuvenation Breakthroughs that Could Reverse Human Aging in Our Lifetime)).

    With all the fantastic breakthroughs that are happening now (Craig Venters synthetic cells created from a cad file, early nanotech able to kill/control some cancers, interesting reversal of some aging in telleromerase defficent mice (not perfect, but a good proof of some concept). the list goes on and on.)

    Aubre estimates that 1 billion spent over 10 years could control and reverse aging in a mouse model (by developing tech to fix the aging damage as it occures). With the new super computers being developed all the time, we could use them to unravel all the information processes that the dna and the rna (etc) represent (remember Craig Venters synthetic cell, now he is developing cells to take the co2 out of the atmosphere to make fuels and plastics, clean up the enviroment, plus the ongoing efforts to develop advanced tabletop nanomanfacturing eventuality).

    How many people realize that most of the supercomputers in the US, for instance, spend most of their time exploring science that has a goal of new nuclear bombs, materials, any new science that can go "boom" eventualy!!

    Read jared Diamonds Collapse, or Gywnne Dyers "War", 2nd edition and you understand why we develop advanced civillizations that collapse after too many wars, we should be using high-tech tools to create life, not destroy it....we should develop advanced nantoech to fix our cells, use nanomanufacturing to make and recycle all our new toys instead of burying them or burning them.

  42. bring the elderly to the caregivers by vmaldia · · Score: 1

    If you can't import cheap labor to act as caregivers, then send the elderly to a country with cheap labor. The philippines has set up retirement villages for english, japanese and korean speaking old folks. The lower cost of living is a plus so even modest retirement benefits can easily pay for a nice house, a caregiver, a maid, a gardener and a driver. Relatives are just a call away with broadband internet and a webcam equipped PC. google japanese retirement philippines

  43. First world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A rapidly aging first world is also paying close attention to Japan"

    What the hell? You're implying that Japan is a third-world country?

  44. Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let the racist bastards die off I say.
    When Japan faced labor shortages two decades ago, their guest worker program required proof of Japanese heritage in order to apply for a visa. Later, they paid them to leave and agree to never return (http://finance.yahoo.com/career-work/article/106964/Japan-Pays-Foreign-Workers-to-Go-Home).
    Excuse me while I go look around in case someone yells Banzai! before trying to crack my skull with a shinai for having made them lose face. :-P