Slashdot Mirror


Iran's New Space Program

eldavojohn writes "Coinciding with the 32nd anniversary of the Iranian revolution, Iran opened a center to receive satellite images built 'entirely by Iranian engineers.' Iran promised that by the end of their year (March of 2011) they would launch two observational satellites: Fajr (Dawn) and Rasad-1 (Observation-1). You might recall two years ago when they launched Omid, which completed about 700 orbits in two weeks. There are reports that new launch rockets will be revealed in February to launch the new satellites — all equipment is claimed to be entirely Iranian made. Iranian media is reporting that one of the satellites 'carries remote measuring equipment that would be used in meteorology and identifying sea borders.' The Iranian Student News Agency says Explorer 4 (Kavoshgar 4) is meant to transport humans and other living organisms into space, and that the sensory on the satellites 'is able to find gas and oil resources, identify coal mines, jungles and agricultural products as well as salty-marsh and contaminated environments.' These rapid fire achievements are not the only bragging Iran has done as of late; they also claim 'new gamma radiation units for medical treatments and a supercomputer billed as among the top 500 most powerful in the world. But, fact or fiction aside, the satellites have old enemies speculating."

243 comments

  1. Orbital nukes in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... by olsmeister · · Score: 2

    But I guess what Stuxnet is for.

    1. Re:Orbital nukes in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... by turing_m · · Score: 2

      Having a working ICBM would be a great way to prevent your country from being "liberated", or at least your oil from being liberated. Provided the ICBMs don't do a boomerang.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    2. Re:Orbital nukes in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ICBM's aren't sufficient for that. There's a reason the USA and USSR both had the nuclear triad of ICBMs, subs and bombers: the latter had much better survivability in case of a first strike. A country like Iran, with a huge technological disadvantage, would have its ICBMs destroyed or disabled by a first strike (even a conventional one). That means its ICBMs are only useful for a first strike, and that in turn makes them hugely threatening.

      Ergo, expect Iran to be bombed as soon as the deploy an ICBM.

    3. Re:Orbital nukes in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      Call me naive, crazy or whatever you wish, but IF these statements are true, I say Kudos to Iran. If they can build ICBMs, more Kudos to them. ICBMs in the hands of warmongering islamist fundamentalists can't be much worse than in the hands of warmongering christian/capitalist fundamentalists. Or any other type of warmongering asshole.

      So if we survived Russia and the US having the capability to blow up this dirtball a thousand times over, one more player won't make me quake in fear no matter who that player is... well... unless they're suicidal... THAT would be dangerous. Interestingly enough, though, the leaders of most cults somehow very often do not join their brothers in faith in suicide induced death. Makes one wonder, doesn't it?

    4. Re:Orbital nukes in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      Sure, let's give every crackpot dictator the means to destroy the Earth on a whim. I mean, it's only fair right? If the US and Russia were able to make it through their Cold War intact, I'm totally sure that means that every country is mature and stable enough to handle it.

      What's the worst that could happen?

    5. Re:Orbital nukes in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      These guys will never get enough nukes to cause WW3 or wipe out the whole world. Don't forget that both Russia and the US have anti-ICBM systems in place, as presumably does China. Japan has some stuff in place too. ICBMs are not the be-all and end-all of nuclear war.

      Where nukes will be useful to Iran is in deterring an invasion by the US and in elevating Iran to a bigger player on the world stage. Think about how the US and Russia behaved during the cold war, aiding countries with somewhat similar ideals in an attempt to limit the spread of communism/capitalism. With nukes Iran can help other Islamic states maintain their independence and defend Islam itself as they see it.

      The goal is not to win a nuclear war, it is to ensure Iran's continued sovereignty and increase its (and Islam's) influence in the world.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Orbital nukes in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I take confidence in your "some stuff in place" statement. As I do the high success rate of anti-ICBM systems.

  2. I'm a rock-it-man! by NitzJaaron · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm shocked that they aren't just photoshoping pictures of a guy in an American or Russian space suit strapped to the side of a photoshoped rocket.

    1. Re:I'm a rock-it-man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of this picture:
      http://i.neoseeker.com/mgv/152409-Kilik%2064/409/21/g_gundam.jpg
      as featured here:
      http://www.quartertothree.com/game-talk/showthread.php?t=15132&page=64

    2. Re:I'm a rock-it-man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being ignorant and go to Iran. The people are well educated and the intelligent. Yes the government there are a pain in the arse. But the people of Iran are not evil like America makes them out to be.

    3. Re:I'm a rock-it-man! by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Why Photoshop it? This could be the next method to deter dissidents.

    4. Re:I'm a rock-it-man! by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      I do not think it is the people of Iran that the world thinks is evil. The current leadership of Iran is the issue.

    5. Re:I'm a rock-it-man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah. Iran should stop being evil and invading countries half way across the world using trumped up justification for their deeds.

  3. Built by Engineers? by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somehow, I had a mental image of a bunch of engineers trying to erect a building. None survived.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    1. Re:Built by Engineers? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You've got the joke wrong.

      "A building built by an architect might fall down, but a building built by an engineer should be torn down."

      Just who do you think designs and supervises the construction of buildings?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Built by Engineers? by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 1

      Who actually constructs the buildings?

      --
      My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    3. Re:Built by Engineers? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Just who do you think designs and supervises the construction of buildings?

      Usually, a Structural Engineer of Record who stamps, signs, and vouches for the building. The SER is then liable for problems with the building for up to six years after their death. Special insurance is available for those claims.

      SER certification requires formal training (e.g. B.Eng.) specialized post-graduate training, experience, and registration explicitly as a SER with multiple peer reviews. They often specialize in areas such as a building envelopes.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    4. Re:Built by Engineers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 answering rhetorical questions

    5. Re:Built by Engineers? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of adding:

      - Buzz Killington

      at the end but figured that was a little belt / suspenders.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    6. Re:Built by Engineers? by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

      Mexicans.

    7. Re:Built by Engineers? by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Oh, come now, why can't engineers have great erections too?

  4. Yes, Russia better worry the most by rednip · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've never understood why the Russian leadership seems willing to arm it's most crazy neighbor to the south. It's not like they don't already have an islamist problem.

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    1. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Aaron+England · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Because instability in the Middle East raises oil prices and as of 2009 Russia surpassed Saudi Arabia as the world's largest oil exporter.

    2. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How rational of a worry is that? Which of those two groups is really the more genuinely dangerous nowadays?

    3. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking into consideration the "crazyness" of the rest of the worlds governments (US: Torture, invasions, abuse of power, runaway government spending - Mexico: Rampant Corruption - Egypt:Mass censorship, dictatorship - Pretty much every government: Civil Rights Issues, police state tendencies, etc) is Iran really so out of control?

    4. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would depend on whether or not you are a young boy.

    5. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by smelch · · Score: 1

      Yes. Next question?

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    6. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radicals are radicals and radicals of any kind are dangerous. In the last 20 years there have been significantly more successful attacks on US soil by Christian extremists (primarily in the form of attacks on abortion clinics) then their have been by Islamic extremists. Granted, the Islamic attacks have taken significantly more lives. To be honest, I'm most scared of people who use the term "christianist" as I believe that the gradual but steady decrease in intelligence of the average human being poses a much greater risk to our collective security than terrorism.

    7. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by bsquizzato · · Score: 1

      Syriana, anyone?

    8. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The christianistas most definitely.

      There are members of apocalyptic christian death cults at the highest levels of government and military power in the US. People who pray every night that the world and all humanity be annihilated in a cleansing fire, so that they may finally dominate the world with a global christian theocracy lead directly by their god made manifest. Some of these people have access to nuclear weapons.

      Even if you discount the worst case scenario, they are working very hard to repeal freedom, social and scientific progress in the US and occasionally they win.

    9. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidence please of Iranian Government out of control.

    10. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Smauler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Iran is not crazy. I'm not sure where you got that idea from. The government is pretty hard line in some instances, but the populace isn't generally. In my opinion crazy is starting wars.

    11. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go walk around town in wearing a speedo, a crucifix, and a "Mo sucks" poster on your butt. Bonus points if you're a woman. Echoes of Die Hard 3 notwithstanding, let us know if you survive. Cultural relativist moron.

    12. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Iran is not crazy."

      A piece of Geography rarely is.

    13. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by gstoddart · · Score: 0

      Iran is not crazy. I'm not sure where you got that idea from. The government is pretty hard line in some instances

      And, when you're talking about countries and how they interact, you're talking about the Government of that country. In this case, crazy. Batshit crazy one might say -- listening to any speech of Ahmadinejad, and you're forced to wonder if the man is even lucid.

      but the populace isn't generally

      No, but if they try to dissent with the government, out comes the guns, batons, and tanks.

      The citizens of Iran may not be crazy, but in a real sense of the word, they don't get a vote. At least, not a real one.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    14. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      People who pray every night that the world and all humanity be annihilated in a cleansing fire, so that they may finally dominate the world with a global christian theocracy lead directly by their god made manifest.

      Cite for the cleansing fire claim? I don't deny that evangelical Protestantism drives a great deal of American politics, but your assertion doesn't at all square with the beliefs of the denominations widely represented in government.

    15. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used the term christianist mainly because those who point the finger forget to look in their own backyard. I grew up around people like this. It's more than just rattlesnake worship and the occasional nutjob. The other reason for the term is that I find it offensive and those that use it have no clue about the religion or the people and could care less. Take a look at any other term that has been used to demonize a people. It doesn't matter just as long as we have a sub-human group to hate.

    16. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by JordanL · · Score: 1

      Why? When was the last time radical christians organized a global attempt to indiscriminately kill people on a massive scale? The Crusades? There are simply more dangerous things in the world at the moment.

    17. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by khallow · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the last 20 years there have been significantly more successful attacks on US soil by Christian extremists (primarily in the form of attacks on abortion clinics) then their have been by Islamic extremists.

      What's the body count? Last I checked, the Islamist extremists killed over two orders of magnitude more people than the anti-abortion people. The second biggest known terrorist attack (the Oklahoma City bombing) was anti-government not Christian. EgyptAir 990 might qualify as a terrorist attack. After that, you're into nuts with guns territory.

      If we look overseas we see a number of high casualty bombings in Europe and a ridiculous amount of bloodletting throughout the Middle East. You can talk about how scary the Christians are, but where's the countries with high death rates from Christian extremists? The Islamists have killed lots of people in Algeria, Somalia, Sudan, Afghanistan, and Iraq. Nothing in the Christian world compares to that.

    18. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      >it the USA that is out of control and evil and crazy

      Put your sister in a bikini and have her walk down the sidewalk in Times Square. Then have her do the same in Tehran's Grand Bazaar. Report back and let us know which scenario goes best.

    19. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Israel is not a theocracy, or if it is, it's not a Jewish theocracy.

      Israel also does not engage in genocide. There are well over 100 million Arabs in the ME. Their squabbles with a small handful who call themselves Palestinians hardly qualifies as genocide.

      All states murder innocents. At least Israel doesn't attack shopping centers and public buses.

    20. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Nadaka · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC couple months ago, an american christian preacher went to Uganda and preached about the righteousness of killing homosexuals, dozens have been hanged and stoned and laws have been drafted with the death penalty for homosexuality in response.

    21. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by JordanL · · Score: 1

      An american christian preacher got the ugandan govt to change laws by preaching? Citation needed. And even if true, that is a far cry from any group that goes about training in the use of munitions intended for civilian targets.

    22. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Why? When was the last time radical christians organized a global attempt to indiscriminately kill people on a massive scale? The Crusades?

      There are simply more dangerous things in the world at the moment.

      The Crusades were a response to over four hundred years of Muslim crusades and unchecked violence. Four centuries is a lot of turning the other cheek wouldn't you say? The purpose of the Crusades were to restore access to the holy land for pilgrims visiting from Europe and to halt the advance of the Moors into Europe.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    23. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Laws were drafted, no idea if they passed.

      Basic scenario is that the American christian preacher came to Uganda, preached hate and death.
      Then a tabloid published a list of names and addresses of gays.
      Many of them were killed.
      Laws were drafted with the death penalty for gays.
      ?
      That should be enough info for you to google it yourself.

    24. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      True Iran has womens rights/"cover your shame" cultural/morality issues, but lets modify you situation a little. Take ten people with "end the (US) war in Afghanistan" signs/t-shirts. March the group through Tehran's Grand Bazaar, they'll probably be cheered. Take that same group and try to have them march around the White House in Washington DC, they'll be arrested (I believe several recent attempts to protest near "national icons" have resulted in almost immediate arrests, protests have been limited to very narrow timeframes and often to specific areas such as "freedom cages").

    25. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      A piece of Geography rarely is.

      Rosie O'Donnell begs to differ.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    26. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Be an Iranian woman who is raped. Then you'll find out about the out of control Iranian Government.

    27. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by jmn2519 · · Score: 0

      Nicely done. Please mod parent up.

    28. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      >they'll be arrested

      Are you joking? Have you ever walked around the outside of the White House? There are protesters camped out all over the place, all the time, none of whom are arrested, and many of whom have been there for months.

    29. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by swb · · Score: 1

      Hubris, perhaps?

      The Russians believe their strategy "worked" in Chechnya -- bomb the cities to the stone age, kill anyone who doesn't cooperate, and arm a local force whose existence depends on you and their willingness to do whatever it takes to suppress dissent.

      My sense is they think they could probably crush any kind of Iranian aggression just as easily.

    30. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Be a single woman in western business attire who is alone. Walk past the White House. Now do the same in Tehran's Grand Bazaar and let us know how that works out for you.

      Or, organize a women's rights march in Washington DC, then try the same in Tehran.

      The summary for this story says it all.

      http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/iran/

      "FRONTLINE/World reporter Jane Kokan talks about clandestinely filming the story that got her colleague beaten to death." Beaten to death for filming a story about opposition movements in Iran.

      How many people in the United States were beaten to death or shot for protesting the election of George Bush in 2004 or the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? None.

      How many people in Iran were beaten to death or shot for protesting the election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009? 30 officially, 80 claimed.

    31. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are some of the tamer beliefs.

      http://www.thercg.org/questions/p145.a.html#c
      http://www.ourchurch.com/member/c/cleansingfire/index.php?p=1_12
      http://forum.anointedyouth.org/discussion-archives/5307-altar-heart-full-fire.html
      http://seventhdaycult.com/what-is-adventism.html

    32. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by rubycodez · · Score: 0

      liar, you can't even get married in Israel unless you are Jewish. It most certainly is a theocracy. Israel most certainly bombs shopping centers and public buses and hospitals and schools of those it considers an inferior race. sorry you only watch the biased news agencies owned by zionist cartels.

    33. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Here is another test. Walk around Tehran's Grand Bazaar in a green shirt while carrying a sign that says "vote fraud" and see what happens.

    34. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How rational of a worry is that? Which of those two groups is really the more genuinely dangerous nowadays?

      Well, seeing as America is a "Christian Nation", headed by Christian Presidents who have waged recent wars that have killed way more people in the middle-east than Muslims have killed in America, I think the answer depends on your particular prejudice.

      I'm not picking a side here, just pointing out that it is all a matter of perspective.

    35. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      None of those posts represent the denominations most represented in the US government.

    36. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      this hypothetical "sister in a bikini", if she went topless, would probably be arrested here. but other places in the world are not so horrified of the human body. also, "sister in a bikini" probably wouldn't fair so well in certain areas of south side of chicago 35 miles from me, she'd be gang-raped and left for dead.

    37. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Russia has a problem with radical Sunni (Salafi / Wahhabi) insurgency. Iran is not a threat there, because those folks hate Iran (which is Shiite) just as much if not more. Aside from that, there isn't anything for two countries to fight over, and they can back each other (and China) in UN versus US and its Western allies.

    38. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC this also included some congressmen with ties to The Family.

    39. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C|N>K

    40. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The laws didn't pass, no one on the list was killed (although some were forced to flee their homes), and I am assuming the preacher you are referring to is Jenkins, if so he did not support killing them and thinks the anti-homosexual intolerance has gone to far. But hey your version is much more exciting. http://www.aolnews.com/2010/11/21/georgia-preacher-leads-anti-gay-crusade-in-uganda/

    41. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And, when you're talking about countries and how they interact, you're talking about the Government of that country.

      If that's the case, the USA has been crazy for over 50 years.

      I mean, I know /. is an american site and has an unashamedly american bias, but this shit is just ridiculous. Iran is less of a threat to the world than the USA is. The USA has shown time and time again that they are prepared to start wars, meddle in other countries internal affairs, kidnap civilians, ignore international law or force countries to sign treaties saying US citizens will not be subject to international law, etc, etc, etc.

      What has Iran actually done? Sure the government says a bunch of stuff, but what do they actually do? And before you spout off some crap about the threat of war with the US stopping them doing anything, I put it to you that the only reason they say all of those stupid things is the threat of war with the US and that abominable criminal organisation that people call Israel.

      listening to any speech of Ahmadinejad, and you're forced to wonder if the man is even lucid.

      I wonder about that. Do you speak Persian? Who does the translation? And by the way, the same could be said for any number of your political figures. Your current president sounds reasonably lucid, but the one before? Why was he not put down? I'm a native english speaker and even I had trouble understanding how so many could allow such a buffoon into a position of power.

      Tell you what, you shoot/hang/bury alive all of the idiots in your country that think a foreign citizen has committed treason (WTF!?!?!) by publishing information leaked by one of your own citizens and then we can talk. Until then, you may as well suck up that propaganda and I'll just keep spitting it back out all over idiots who think it's digestible.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    42. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      Mission accomplished much?

      Central America, Korea, Afghanistan (I mean the previous conflict where the US armed the taliban), Iraq (I mean the previous Iraq where the US armed Saddam)

      Pot vs. kettle much?

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    43. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iran neighbours Russia to the south? I thought it was locked between Iraq and Afghanistan - you know, those places you've bombed civilians for a decade?

    44. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Amen to that, brother.

      Of all the insanity on Slashdot, the thing that probably drives me the most crazy is the number of people who reply with "The USA is just as bad" when someone complains about human rights in a totalitarian nation. (And no, I'm not American.) Could the USA do a lot better in the human rights department? Absolutely. Are they orders-of-magnitude better than many, many, many places on this planet? Also absolutely.

    45. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      I'll bite since I know Israel has misbehaved, the difference is that I don't think its anywhere near the level that has been levied against them. What public bus have they bombed? When has Israel publicly proclaimed any group of people as an inferior race? This is not the rhetoric I've heard both from the Israeli government and from Israeli citizens so I'm curious about these incidents as I'm sure they would be news to many. Also, what central authority poses as a theocracy for the country? The Prime Minister seems to have real powers and is not superseded by some higher authority. If I'm wrong anywhere, please correct me.

    46. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by russotto · · Score: 1

      this hypothetical "sister in a bikini", if she went topless, would probably be arrested here.

      Fun fact: it's legal for women to go topless in NYC.
      Less fun fact: It's damn near freezing in NYC right now, so toplessness and bikinis are right out for most people.

    47. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Whatever. I'm not an American, and I'm not about to defend any of what you're bitching about. In fact, I agree with a lot of what you say.

      I have seen speeches with Ahmadinejad and the simultaneous translation (I believe it was actually Al Jazeera) -- I'm still of the opinion he's bat-shit crazy. I can only hear someone talking about wiping the Great Satan off the planet so much before I'm forced to come to that conclusion.

      I also saw the footage of what was happening to their protesters not so long ago. Something to do with shooting a student who was peacefully protesting -- you might have seen it, it made the news.

      I know people of Persian origin, and *they* think he's bat-shit crazy. So, without resorting to being a complete wanker who goes off on an anti-US diatribe at the drop of a hat, care to provide any evidence that Ahmadinejad isn't an insane bastard?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    48. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Central America, Korea, Afghanistan (I mean the previous conflict where the US armed the taliban),

      BZZZZTTTTTT!!!!!!

      Wrong!

      The US armed the Mujahideen to fight the Russians. See, we sometimes arm whoever is fighting our enemies. You know. It's the whole "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" kinda thing. Besides, the Mujahideen became the Northern Alliance, which resisted the Taliban up until and beyond 9-11. The Northern Alliance is who we assisted when we "invaded".

      In other words, you don't know what the fuck you are talking about. There is not point in reading the rest as you have already proven that what you have convinced yourself are facts are merely what you WANT to be true and are not based on any type of evidence or reality.

    49. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Cigarra · · Score: 1

      Iran (nor they crazy governments) hasn't started any single war in the last decades.

      USA, on the other hand, has. Many.

      Now, I must ask: who's crazier?

      --
      I don't have a sig.
    50. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Any country in which NOT believing in the prevailing religion is a crime, is fucking crazy.

      Any country which still has public stonings, is fucking crazy.

      Simple enough for 'ya?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    51. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by markass530 · · Score: 0

      "Wars legitimate goal is a more perfect peace" a great man said that. For Vietnam read "Vietnam the Necessary War: A Reinterpretation of America's Most Disastrous Military Conflict" and do you really think after the towers fell, we should have let the Taliban continue?? Iraq, eh, thats debatable, but I offered my services in support of it, and believe in what was done. If you drive a car to work, you can't really argue on its net effect, and how you benefited from it.

    52. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BZZZZTTTTTT!!!!!!

      Wrong!

      The CIA funded Osama Bin Laden.

      In other words, you don't know what the fuck you are talking about. There is not point in reading the rest as you have already proven that what you have convinced yourself are facts are merely what you WANT to be true and are not based on any type of evidence or reality.

    53. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Eivind · · Score: 1

      So, you're the opinion that USA is crazy, then ?

      Just asking.

    54. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I've never understood why the Russian leadership seems willing to arm it's most crazy neighbor to the south. It's not like they don't already have an islamist problem.

      Because Iran is broadly speaking anti-American, they are a sort of an "enemy of my enemy is my friend" to Russia. Russia does not trust the US.

      Besides, it is a good trading opportunity.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    55. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      How rational of a worry is that? Which of those two groups is really the more genuinely dangerous nowadays?

      The extremist Christians who could potentially gain control of the US government and its planet-destroying nuclear capability are far more of a worry than a few Al Qaeda terrorists with AK47s.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    56. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      And even if true, that is a far cry from any group that goes about training in the use of munitions intended for civilian targets.

      Try explaining the difference to a gay Ugandan who's about to be hanged, you slavering bigot.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    57. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      >it the USA that is out of control and evil and crazy

      Put your sister in a bikini and have her walk down the sidewalk in Times Square. Then have her do the same in Tehran's Grand Bazaar. Report back and let us know which scenario goes best.

      Try doing the same in Dubai , Islamabad or Riyadh as well and then report back to us on how different Iran is from them.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    58. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Amen to that, brother.

      Of all the insanity on Slashdot, the thing that probably drives me the most crazy is the number of people who reply with "The USA is just as bad" when someone complains about human rights in a totalitarian nation. (And no, I'm not American.) Could the USA do a lot better in the human rights department? Absolutely. Are they orders-of-magnitude better than many, many, many places on this planet? Also absolutely.

      Don't forget that for a lot of people invading another country and killing tens of thousands of civilians counts as a fairly egregious human rights violation. Even most countries with horrible human rights records haven't killed anywhere near that many people.

      Human rights apply just as much to foreigners as your own citizens.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    59. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      do you really think after the towers fell, we should have let the Taliban continue??

      The Taliban did not fly any planes into the World Trade Center. The US government tried to link them with Al Qaeda in people's minds because Osama bin Laden was hiding out in Afghanistan or Pakistan and the Taliban wouldn't have handed him over to the US even if they knew where he was.

      The Taliban were an unpleasant government who oppressed their own people, as were/are Algeria, Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Yemen, Syria, Burma, Belarus and many others. If the world/US wanted to get rid of them for this reason, that is what they should have done, not made up spurious reasons in order to justify lashing out in a fit of anger against the handiest easy target.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    60. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US seems much more willing to arm crazy people than Russia. The only real islamist problem comes because the whole arab world is sick and tired of Israels oppression, ethnic cleansing and aggression. Slap Israel around a bit until they start behaving like humans (and act as if non-jews also are humans) and the problem would be solved.

      The US would have the whole arab peninsula as friends instead of just Israel.

    61. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by swb · · Score: 1

      The point isn't that the Russian strategy accomplished anything besides killing a lot of Chechens, destroying a couple of trillion rubles worth of infrastructure and fueling an internal terrorist/separatist movement for the next century.

      But to the Russians, it was a measure of success -- Chechnya was firmly under their control, the organized armed resistance was crushed and they had a local strongman running the show. Sporadic troubles from the Caucuses are nothing new, and I don't think they take them all that seriously until it becomes a "you look weak" PR issue -- ie, bombs blowing up trains, Opera Houses held hostage, airport terminals bombed -- basically terrorism in Moscow.

      Basically it reflects the Russian brutalist approach to everything.

    62. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it does apply to the public persona of both Bush and Shrub.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    63. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      George W. Bush is a Methodist. That's a mainline Protestant denomination, not one of the Fundamentalist denominations that the OP alludes to.

    64. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Both bushes made statements on national or sometimes international television about immanentizing the eschaton.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    65. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by JordanL · · Score: 1

      So I'm bigoted because I see a difference in someone designing a bomb then detonating it upon innocents and someone who's teachings lead someone to draw their own (unacceptable) conclusions that lead to murder? You sir, are in desperate need of perspective.

    66. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by markass530 · · Score: 1

      uhhh... wow so you don't believe that al queda was the Taliban's best buddy in afghanistan, enjoying land to train, stage, live, ETC, cuz if you don't believe that then I am wasting my time

    67. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      Nukes are defence! Nobody want to nuke a country, which can nuke back - why do you think US and Soviet never clashed during the cold war?

      --
      This is blinging
    68. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      The point isn't that the Russian strategy accomplished anything besides killing a lot of Chechens, destroying a couple of trillion rubles worth of infrastructure and fueling an internal terrorist/separatist movement for the next century.

      Like I said, mission accomplished. Sure Americans are now realising how stupid the entire Iraq thing was, and maybe Russians are starting to as well. Yeah, Iraq may be on the other side of the world from the USA, but the whole Iraq thing is going to bite the US on the bum...

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    69. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      And to me, invading a country to overthrow the dictator oppressing and killing his people because they don't practice the same religion as him is a good thing. Then taking every effort to rebuild that country and to stop the violence from the overthrown group against the oppressed group. Sounds much the same as what we did in WW2.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    70. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by tabrnaker · · Score: 1
      Just be aware that the 'corruption' in Mexico is mainly due to stupidity and not maliciousness. One thing the mexicans have perfected is how to always stand in the middle of a path. Our highways are a testament to this where to exit or enter you need to criss-cross the stream of cars attempting to do the opposite of you.

      Corruption is mainly because there are so many obstacles in place to actually get anything done that people will try and help those they know just because they can't bear to see anyone they know go through all the stupidity.

      Of course, some of the corruption is akin to something you would call intelligence. Everybody knows that a piece of paper with a degree on it doesn't really signify anything about what the person knows and so you can either attend the school/university, etc... or just pay them a smaller fee than the tuition and save both of you the trouble of going through the act that the paper actually signifies anything.

    71. Re:Yes, Russia better worry the most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any country in which NOT believing in the prevailing propaganda is a crime, is fucking crazy.

      Any country which still has non-public torturing, is fucking crazy.

      Simple enough for 'ya?

      Fixed that for you.

  5. Cold War deja vu all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sounds like an echo from a few decades back. Just swap "iranian" for "russian", and you have authentic old news story. The cold war was acually quite deadly for a lot of peple however.

    1. Re:Cold War deja vu all over again by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      Do you think that is just coincidence? With NASA facing cutbacks, this is good news for the space agency.

  6. What did one Iranian astornaut say to the other? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get ready for 72 virgins in Uranus.

  7. Clone the space shuttle by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

    Iran can always do what the Soviets did and make a clone of the US space shuttle.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buran_(spacecraft)

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Clone the space shuttle by gblackwo · · Score: 2

      That is like arguing that every Airbus is a ripoff of a Boeing. Despite the resemblance, the technology is fundamentally different in function and design.

    2. Re:Clone the space shuttle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many ways to build a space plane do you think there are? Take a look at X-prize entrants, they either resemble a capsule or a shuttle. The Buran and Shuttle have a resemblance due to optimized design, but are very different under the hood.

    3. Re:Clone the space shuttle by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, those Soviets never did anything first in the space race.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Clone the space shuttle by blair1q · · Score: 1

      What they did first is what the Iranians are finally doing, and it's causing the same reactions in the same reactionaries that the Russian version did.

      I think it's the reactionaries who aren't progressing.

    5. Re:Clone the space shuttle by gfreeman · · Score: 2

      No mod points to give you, sorry, but to acknowledge your well place sarcasm: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_space_exploration_milestones,_1957-1969#Notable_firsts

      1957: First intercontinental ballistic missile, the R-7 Semyorka
      1957: First satellite, Sputnik 1
      1957: First animal to enter Earth orbit, the dog Laika on Sputnik 2
      1959: First firing of a rocket in Earth orbit, first man-made object to escape Earth's orbit, Luna 1
      1959: First data communications, or telemetry, to and from outer space, Luna 1.
      1959: First man-made object to pass near the Moon, first man-made object in Solar orbit, Luna 1
      1959: First probe to impact the Moon, Luna 2
      1959: First images of the moon's far side, Luna 3
      1960: First animals to safely return from Earth orbit, the dogs Belka and Strelka on Sputnik 5.
      1960: First probe launched to Mars, Marsnik 1
      1961: First probe launched to Venus, Venera 1
      1961: First person in space (International definition) and in Earth orbit, Yuri Gagarin on Vostok 1, Vostok programme
      1961: First person to spend over a day in space Gherman Titov, Vostok 2 (also first person to sleep in space).
      1962: First dual manned spaceflight, Vostok 3 and Vostok 4
      1963: First woman in space, Valentina Tereshkova, Vostok 6
      1964: First multi-man crew (3), Voskhod 1
      1965: First EVA, by Aleksei Leonov, Voskhod 2
      1965: First probe to hit another planet (Venus), Venera 3
      1966: First probe to make a soft landing on and transmit from the surface of the moon, Luna 9
      1966: First probe in lunar orbit, Luna 10
      1967: First unmanned rendezvous and docking, Cosmos 186/Cosmos 188. (Until 2006, this had remained the only major space achievement that the US had not duplicated.)
      1969: First docking between two manned craft in Earth orbit and exchange of crews, Soyuz 4 and Soyuz 5

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    6. Re:Clone the space shuttle by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      The soviet version also flew, completely autonomously and landed perfectly without incident. Then it was retired.

    7. Re:Clone the space shuttle by mrsquid0 · · Score: 1

      So did Buran. It made one test flight, in 1988, then the Soviet Union abandoned the programme as not being worth the cost.

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
    8. Re:Clone the space shuttle by Animats · · Score: 2

      Buran is not a clone of the US space shuttle. It looks similar, but it's not. Buran is launched on a huge booster; it has no main engines of its own, unlike the US Shuttle. It's more rugged than the Shuttle, which can't handle rain or cold weather. In many ways, it's a better design. T

    9. Re:Clone the space shuttle by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Great blog article here about Buran. What might have been. Just goes to show that it's good to see the Russians still active in space exploration and how their different approach gets results. They've been kicking ass since Day 1.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  8. Re:You're a hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I honestly can't tell if this response was a joke or not.

  9. congratulations are by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    in order to iran, the islamic nation with an apparently insatiable appetite for science! I hope the pictures and data from the satellites are released publicly as well as perhaps their beacon frequencies? (to listen in on them as they traverse the skies, i know, im an amateur radio geek.)

    the medical equipment is fascinating too...are they based on any current designs? do they take advantage of any FLOSS?

    and being a tech nerd I cant wait to get specs on the new supercomputer too...are they soliciting any CPU time for college projects? what is its ultimate goal/architecture/performance metrics?

    and if you're wondering when politics plays into all of this, it doesnt. I dont care what the russians are doing, what the mullas are barking, or what the israelis are doing because this is nerd news.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:congratulations are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      in order for your high level of naivety.

    2. Re:congratulations are by blair1q · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      the pictures will be available on a site much like Google Maps but with a name you can't pronounce

      the medical equipment is operated on the principle that god willing you will get well

      their supercomputer is built using AMD microprocessors illegally smuggled into Iran in contravention of the ITAR

      and if you're wondering if politics plays no role in this, it does, because everything iran does is directed by a central oligarchy of religious fascists who don't care if their people live or die as long as they get closer to the day they can vaporize Israel

    3. Re:congratulations are by bsquizzato · · Score: 1

      in order for your lack of understanding of sarcasm.

    4. Re:congratulations are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go post that crap on israeli sites please. nobody gives a shit.

    5. Re:congratulations are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in order to iran, the islamic nation with an apparently insatiable appetite for science! (Yeah, real hard for a bunch of islamic fundamentalists to copy western designs...) I hope the pictures and data from the satellites are released publicly as well as perhaps their beacon frequencies? (Iran share data? fat chance. Think of all the shitty companies that steal GNU source code and never attribute or share with the rest of the world. Now multiply that to the size of a nation, and you have Iran.)

      the medical equipment is fascinating too...are they based on any current designs? do they take advantage of any FLOSS? (If it's based on open source, they won't tell you, they'll take all the credit for it, and they won't share any minor improvements.)

      and being a tech nerd I cant wait to get specs on the new supercomputer too...are they soliciting any CPU time for college projects? what is its ultimate goal/architecture/performance metrics? (Ultimate goal? Projecting military power with nukes.)

      and if you're wondering when politics plays into all of this, it doesnt. I dont care what the russians are doing, what the mullas are barking, or what the israelis are doing because this is nerd news. (I'd love to share knowledge as well, but these guys aren't friendly at all. They just take and never give.)

    6. Re:congratulations are by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      Oh, I thought politics played into this because the US is home to a bunch of barking fascists who want to vaporise anyone who is not christian or jewish... or who challenges the notion that the US is the best and can do whatever it fucking wants whenever it fucking wants. Obviously I was mistaken.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    7. Re:congratulations are by Subliminalbits · · Score: 1

      While I would like to believe Iran just wants to advance science it bothers me that the same technology required to put a satellite in orbit is also what is used to build an ICBM.

    8. Re:congratulations are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mohammed? Is that you?

    9. Re:congratulations are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh puleeezz. The moral equivalency bullshit is getting old.

      Does the US sanction stoning a woman because she was unfortunate enough to get raped? Which US president has advocated wiping another country off the map?

      The US has it's problems, but at least the majority of citizens don't think that strapping a bomb to themselves and taking out a large group of innocent men, women and children is somehow a way to wind up in heaven with seven virgins. And while were on this, I'm just wondering, once you've gone through all seven and they're not virgins anymore, what then?.

      When are you fruitcakes going to realize we're not in the 5th century BCE anymore. If you are so in love with death than go ahead and take yourselves out and leave those that want peace alone.

    10. Re:congratulations are by jmccay · · Score: 0

      Are we talking about the same Iran???? Truth and public data are not a part of there vocabulary. In truth, these are probably spy satellites. They'll probably use them to target Israel and the US with their new nuclear missiles. You are highly delusional. Muslims have only one insatiable appetite...the spread of Islam!

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    11. Re:congratulations are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. doesn't sanction the stoning of women because they get raped, but it does sanction sexual assault as a means of torture... until the media finds out... then it stops for a while until no one is looking. It wasn't a U.S. president, but a former air force chief of staff said something about bombing North Vietnam into the stone age. People strap bombs to themselves because they are otherwise powerless, due to a large extent by the global imbalance created largely by American over consumption, bullying and rhetoric about a Christian god. When are you fruitcakes going to realize that you reap what you sow?

    12. Re:congratulations are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're pretty ignorant saying the US military sanctions a lot of those actions. The people directly responsible are serving hefty court-martialled jail terms.

      Obviously you are anti-American. Maybe you should stop watching your sensationalist news and reading your tabloid journalism and pick up a real book that's college level material. A lot of shoddy propaganda is written these days by shock-jocks who do poor research and their controversial views are based on bad science and inaccurate reporting. But hey, it makes them a quick buck so they don't care!

      People strap bombs to themselves because they are otherwise powerless, due to a large extent by the global imbalance created largely by American over consumption, bullying and rhetoric about a Christian god. When are you fruitcakes going to realize that you reap what you sow?

      Well it's obvious you never studied economics 101 at a college level. The US economy is huge because it produces a tremendous amount of goods and service and trades with many global partners. Key terms you should look up are: "Comparative Advantage", "Absolute Advantage", "Trade".

      The part where you mention people wearing bombs and then you call Americans "fruitcakes"... Do you honestly think that bombing innocent civilians is rational? Please answer this question because I think this is a key malfunction in your worldview. I fail to see any rational logic behind it. What I do see is racism, tribalism, nationalism, and a bloodthirst for revenge at any cost. I don't think that is consistent with the "Religion of Peace(tm)", nor is it consistent with any mainstream religion including the other Abrahamic ones (Christianity & Judaism).

      I'll give you one point on over-consumption. We need to improve on that.

      I disagree with your statement about "bullying and rhetoric about a Christian god". Isn't a core tenet of Islam about _submission_ to Allah? Mujahideen shout "Allhu Akbar," while waving weapons around or blowing up buses and trains. Isn't that "bullying and rhetoric about (a deity)"? Oh but Allah is "your god" so war crimes in his name is 100% cool with you, and as long as white people are the ones murdered, you're alright with that...

      Nice double-standard, sir.

    13. Re:congratulations are by wmac · · Score: 1

      And you are a moron because Iran has neither ICBM nor Nuclear war heads. Besides what you said has already been done (along with 50 wars and millions of people killed) by US of A.

      Could you tell me what USA is looking for? if they think about spreading Islam)?

  10. Why all the hate? by AtomicDevice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every time I read a story about technological advancement in some [non friendly to the US] nation it's always portrayed in the light of "Oh crap, dirty brown people are getting their hands on technology OMFG THEY'RE GONNA NUKE US"

    What's up with that? What possible use could a stable, financially self-sufficient nation have for nuking a much larger nation (who has a lot more nukes)? I know people like to portray them as crazies and always extract the most radical-when-translated-and-taken-out-of-context quotes about how these countries/groups of people want nothing more than to wipe Israel and the US off the map, but I find it hard to believe that the leaders of such countries have any serious plans to this effect. I'm sure it drums up some good publicity in certain mainly arab nations, but every politician likes to talk big, few like to ask a country to pay for a dangerous and expensive war with a nearby nation.

    Maybe if we worked with countries like Iran instead of just antagonizing them to the max and declaring their religious government illegitimate (even though the only reason they don't have the secular government they used to have is because we installed the shah because they weren't doing what we wanted, oops!).

    If you're feeling threatened by someone, perhaps you should examine why they don't like you - is it because you are always a dick to them? Maybe don't be such a dick? (and apologize for forcibly removing their democratic government just so you could get a bigger piece of the money cake)

    --
    Ze Atomic Device! It iz Ztolen!
    1. Re:Why all the hate? by cptdondo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Stable? At the last election, government forces killed some 36 people demonstrating against vote fraud.

      That's not the mark of a stable government; that's a mark of a totalitarian regime that will kill to stay in power.

      That's why it's bad when they get nukes.

      I for one believe that trade is the best binder; sooner or later we won't be able to go to war against China because we simply won't have the industrial base to support ourselves (and I'm not talking weapons but shoes. How long would a US president last if the voters couldn't buy shoes? )

      Let's bind Iran in a web of trade so they can't go to war with us. The problem is that we really don't have anything they want....

    2. Re:Why all the hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stable? Just as stable as Tunisia and Egypt right? The only difference is that because Iranians never had that much freedom. So when there are protests out there, we don't see all that much about them.

    3. Re:Why all the hate? by CRCulver · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know people like to portray them as crazies and always extract the most radical-when-translated-and-taken-out-of-context quotes about how these countries/groups of people want nothing more than to wipe Israel and the US off the map, but I find it hard to believe that the leaders of such countries have any serious plans to this effect. I'm sure it drums up some good publicity in certain mainly arab nations, but every politician likes to talk big, few like to ask a country to pay for a dangerous and expensive war with a nearby nation.

      Iran has been bankrolling Hezbollah for years and years now. I agree that starting a nuclear war isn't very likely, but the Iranian regime has gone beyond mere rhetoric into driving violence.

    4. Re:Why all the hate? by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      I don't think there's any worry that Iran will nuke the United States. That would just be completely stupid on their part.

      The worry is that some of their nuclear technology might fall into the hands of some extremist group that would have no qualms about setting off a nuke in the middle of a city just to send a message. When someone blows themselves up using a regular bomb there's enough debris left over to have a good idea of who might have done it. Even a small nuclear device would cause enough destruction that there's going to be nothing left of the person, vehicle used for delivery, and ground zero to have any real clue. We'd have to base everything around the intelligence that's been gathered and that's not always very accurate. It can help corroborate an explanation, but you've seen what happens when we take action based solely on intelligence reports. It might not happen, but it's semi-plausible. It's probably even more likely to happen to Israel.

      Otherwise your post is spot on. Of course we really don't want to admit that for the last several decades we've been dicks to the rest of the world to serve our own interests. It clashes heavily with the vision of ourselves that we like to portray: leading by example, bringing democracy to the rest of the world, etc. We'll probably stop messing around with their governments, politics, and country just as soon as they run out of oil. Unless they become the next China and have a lot of western companies conducting business in their country, there wouldn't be much reason for us to stick around after that.

    5. Re:Why all the hate? by tgd · · Score: 1

      Well, we developed all of those technologies for the purposes of nuking someone ... so, its not unreasonable, if somewhat irrational, to expect we'd believe the same of someone else doing it.

      Not sure we've got the moral high ground to point fingers, though.

    6. Re:Why all the hate? by Smauler · · Score: 1

      The US installed regimes (ousting democracies) that killed thousands when in power. Just because a regime is corrupt and brutal doesn't mean that the west does not consider it stable. It's up to you to decide the morality of that, but your point that the Iranian government killed 36 people pales into insignificance compared to the brutality the west's allies have meted out in the past (and most of the west itself for that matter).

    7. Re:Why all the hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think part of it is the same reason why white folks get upset with the brown people driving while unlicensed with uninsured vehicles. And no, it's not the driveby-shooting-like aspect of having nukes in space. (While keeping up the car analogy.) Not so much upset that they're driving or have vehicles, but rather who will be left holding the bill when their shit hits our shit. And the fact that sooner or later, given enough time that such a collision is more than likely.

      Also there's this problem of having them avoid a collision while not telling too much about our low reflectivity, low-IR, and radar absorbing spy satellites that may cross trajectories with anything they decide to put up. Particularly when it comes to a heavily watched area like the Mideast and Persian Gulf. To some various DOD related agencies, it's probably bad enough that we have to share some things with the ESA, Russians, and Chinese just to avoid accidentally making a mess of space.

    8. Re:Why all the hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You act as if things here in the US (I assume you are speaking as a US Citizen) are a whole lot different. Do "freedom cages", "mass arrests", "baseless arrests", and "use of sonic/chemical devices on peaceful protesters" ring a bell. One or more of those occurrences seem to happen every time there is a sizable protest here in the US, especially when it involves federal matters (presidential elections/parades, "economic" meets, etc) We've had more than a few protester deaths in this country, especially when the protests are about police officers getting away with murder.

    9. Re:Why all the hate? by Belial6 · · Score: 0

      Every time I read a story about technological advancement in some [non friendly to the US] nation it's always portrayed in the light of "Oh crap, dirty brown people are getting their hands on technology OMFG THEY'RE GONNA NUKE US"

      If you didn't start your post declaring that you are a total racist, you could be taken a lot more seriously. I know it is hip to claim that the only reason we have a problem with anyone in the middle east is because "they are brown", but that doesn't cut it. The only way you could possibly think that it has anything to do with race is if you forget that the USSR was the big bad boogie man throughout the cold war. You would also have to forget that China is quickly growing to be considered a serious threat as well.

      Open your eyes, and see that not everyone is as much of a racist as you are. Sometimes people hate other people for reasons other than the color of their skin.

    10. Re:Why all the hate? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's any worry that Iran will nuke the United States. That would just be completely stupid on their part.

      I fear Iran more than I ever did the Russians because I never believed the Russians were crazy or suicidal. I have no such assurance in the case of Iran or N Korea. We've had lots and lots of evidence pointing to the fact that Islamist extremists can be quite suicidal for the right cause. The Mutually Assured Destruction model of deterrence (which has actually worked quite well so far) doesn't really work when one of the parties is willing to entertain the notion of certain death in exchange for the assurance of a glorious, virgin-laden afterlife.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    11. Re:Why all the hate? by tboulay · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase Hitchens.

      'we're approaching the day when a messianic regime gets their hands on apocalyptic weaponry"

      That people who do all they can to impose their barbaric ass-backward, anti science 'religious' ideology's all the time, are none the less able to cynically usurp the products of rational thought and the scientific method - is the saddest part of all.

    12. Re:Why all the hate? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      "Hate" is good politics. No politician, in a democracy, or a dictatorship, or anything in between, ever kept his job by calling his population a bunch of lazy dumb-asses, who are responsible for their own dire status. Pin the blame on some folks out of the country, or a minority group in the country too small to defend themselves.

      Embezzle, and stash the cash away in the Cayman Islands, Switzerland and Lichtenstein. Make sure to flee the country to your Villa on the Cote D'Azur before the shit hits the fan.

      Profit? Fuck that shit. Just relax by the pool.

      Um, does anyone know of a country looking for a dictator? I think I understand the work and could do the job.

      Before I get my hairy ass out of the country.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    13. Re:Why all the hate? by men0s · · Score: 1

      Stable? Just as stable as Tunisia and Egypt right? The only difference is that because Iranians never had that much freedom.

      They probably did have enough freedom before the Iranian Revolution. However, what they didn't have was a medium to quickly disperse information that Tunisia and Egypt did.

    14. Re:Why all the hate? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Oh crap, dirty brown people are getting their hands on technology

      Nice race-baiting straw man, there. People worrying about the Iranians and high-end weapons-related tech don't give a crap what color anybody is. It's the cultural world-view of the mysoginistic, retrograde theocratic thugocracy running the country, their vocal and overt support for terrorism, and their stated objective of wiping a country off the map. Who cares about skin pigment? It's what people do that matters. Like jailing and killing political opponents who don't want to be subject the Iranian leadership's beard and haircut police, language restrictions, and all of the other cultural toxicity that makes them so objectionable.

      the only reason they don't have the secular government they used to have is because we installed the shah because they weren't doing what we wanted, oops!

      Ah. So, our support for the Shah's regime is why the Mullahs rigged the most recent election and continue to beat down the nation's secularists?

      If you're feeling threatened by someone, perhaps you should examine why they don't like you

      All you have to examine are the actual words that the Mullahs and their proxies speak, out loud, on the record. They do hate western sensibilities (quick! ban the word pizza! make it a crime to be female without cloth on your head! have people killed for being insufficiently Islamic!). The west supports freedom of speech, of association, and of religious practice (including no religious practice). That perspective is intolerable to the crazies in charge of that country, and they are willing to murder civilians in neighboring countries in order to sustain an atmosphere of instability in which their medieval rule-by-ignorance-and-sword can continue to be the biggest influence on their region. Why you think it's a good idea is a mystery.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    15. Re:Why all the hate? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Every time I read a story about technological advancement in some [non friendly to the US] nation it's always portrayed in the light of "Oh crap, dirty brown people are getting their hands on technology OMFG THEY'RE GONNA NUKE US"

      It's nearly as bad when it's a friendly nation. Hence the billion redundant unfunny jokes about curry/unintelligible tech support/Kwik E Mart/funny accents if it's a story about a technical development in India. Then there's always the standard "they shouldn't be doing that, they should be spending that money on social programs to get running water to their poor first" idiotic comments. Funny how nobody ever insists on NASA being wound up until poverty in the US is eliminated and the last homeless American is housed.

      The racist undercurrent in /. has toned down a little over the years, but it's still there and I keep a close eye on it.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    16. Re:Why all the hate? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      The crazy thing here is it reads like you're about the good old US of A.

      ....messianic regime gets their hands on apocalyptic weaponry

      Messianic regime... don't you idiots always go on about "god bless" and "in god we trust" and shit. Your constitution might say your church and state are separate, but how likely is it that an open atheist could get into the presidency? How many in your government believe Israel was given by god to the jews? Who had the first nukes? Who is the only country to have used nukes directly on foreign people, and not just in war against Japan, but also in peace against the Bikini islands? Hmmm, sounds like a messianic regime with apocalyptic weaponry

      barbaric ass-backward, anti science 'religious' ideology's all the time, are none the less able to cynically usurp the products of rational thought and the scientific method

      Well barbaric is easy. Bikini Islands again, Vietnam with the agent orange polution and napalm on villages, Iraq with cluster munitions and the overt and deliberate massacre of civillians, and on and on and on. The US is the most barbaric nation in the history of the known universe.

      Anti-science 'religious' ideology is pretty obvious, the most recent example of its growth in the US being a recent /. story regarding New Mexico.

      You rapidly violent fuckwits usurp the products of rational thought and scientific method to the detriment of the rest of the planet. And you think your shit doesn't stink

      That's the saddest part of all...

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    17. Re:Why all the hate? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      How many terrorist or destabilising forces has the US bankrolled? Just asking. Hypocrisy ain't pretty you know....

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    18. Re:Why all the hate? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      Islamist(sic) extremists can be quite suicidal for the right cause

      The Iranian government are not Islamic extremists any more than the US government are Christian extremists. You have more to fear from former soviet states because they have nuclear material dotted around the place with little security. If I wanted to make a dirty bomb I'd be looking around there. Iran is most certainly not crazy and has some very advanced science and technology.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    19. Re:Why all the hate? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 0

      That's right! It's got nothing to do with race, Americans just like hating people for no reason whatsoever. Americans are just hateful. That's what they do. It keeps the economy going.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    20. Re:Why all the hate? by Alimony+Pakhdan · · Score: 1

      Guess it is hard for you to understand that those of us who have friends and family in a country that the leaders of Iran have stated intent and taken action towards "wiping off the map" might be concerned. OR maybe you are just a troll?

    21. Re:Why all the hate? by mswhippingboy · · Score: 1

      I've seen some hateful posts on this thread, but none as hateful, misinformed or bigoted as yours.

      --
      Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    22. Re:Why all the hate? by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      The US has been bankrolling Israel for years and years now.

      How is this different?

    23. Re:Why all the hate? by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      Did I say it was? The OP claimed that Iran has never gone from musing about violence to directly supporting violence. I corrected him. The shady foreign police acts of the US have nothing to do with it.

    24. Re:Why all the hate? by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      The US is the most barbaric nation in the history of the known universe.

      Even if one totals deaths from US interventions, the amount of people the US has killed still trails behind the Soviet Union and far behind China under Mao. I am in no way defending American foreign policy, but the figures do not show the US to be the most barbaric regime in history.

    25. Re:Why all the hate? by russotto · · Score: 1

      Messianic regime... don't you idiots always go on about "god bless" and "in god we trust" and shit.

      "God bless" is like "geseundheit", it's just something you say when someone sneezes. "In god we trust" is on our money, but I've never heard it come up in any other context.

      Your constitution might say your church and state are separate, but how likely is it that an open atheist could get into the presidency?

      About as likely as a Catholic, a divorcee, or a black man.

      How many in your government believe Israel was given by god to the jews?

      Probably none of them, but I haven't polled them.

      Who had the first nukes?

      Oh, got us there. Yep, that was the US.

      Who is the only country to have used nukes directly on foreign people,

      Hey, that would be the US again.

      and not just in war against Japan, but also in peace against the Bikini islands?

      We moved the people off the atoll first.

      Hmmm, sounds like a messianic regime with apocalyptic weaponry

      No one's denying the US has apocalyptic weaponry.

      Well barbaric is easy. Bikini Islands again,

      Nuking a few islands with nobody on them doesn't even come close to the bar for barbaric.

      Vietnam with the agent orange polution and napalm on villages,

      Yeah, war gets pretty barbaric. You don't need defoliants and napalm to make it so; the whole idea is barbaric.

      Iraq with cluster munitions and the overt and deliberate massacre of civillians,

      Would those be the civilians with the army uniforms and firearms, or the civilians attempting to drive explosive-laden vehicles through the checkpoints?

      and on and on and on. The US is the most barbaric nation in the history of the known universe.

      ROTFL. All the stuff you said about the US could be 100% true, and that still wouldn't be the case, not by a long shot. Read some history. Uganda under Idi Amin, the USSR under Stalin. The Mongols under Genghis Khan. Do a little reading on what the Roman Empire was like -- and remember they're the ones who made a point of not being barbarians.

    26. Re:Why all the hate? by Belial6 · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if that is sarcasm or irony.

    27. Re:Why all the hate? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      and not just in war against Japan, but also in peace against the Bikini islands?

      We moved the people off the atoll first.

      BZZZZT. Kids went out and played in the falling ash thinking it was snow the Americans had brought them.

      Iraq with cluster munitions and the overt and deliberate massacre of civillians,

      Would those be the civilians with the army uniforms and firearms, or the civilians attempting to drive explosive-laden vehicles through the checkpoints?

      No, I referring more to the women, children and journalists.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    28. Re:Why all the hate? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      There are far more hateful, misinformed and bigoted comments than mine all over this thread. The ones you don't notice have an anti Iranian/pro American paranoia flavour. I just like playing devils advocate and balancing things up a bit..

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    29. Re:Why all the hate? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      Fairly heavy irony with just a hint of unpleasant truth.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    30. Re:Why all the hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I read a story about technological advancement in some [non friendly to the US] nation it's always portrayed in the light of "Oh crap, dirty brown people are getting their hands on technology OMFG THEY'RE GONNA NUKE US"

      It is only portrayed that way by the far left, who also hate America. What the Iranians look like is irrelevant, their "God will love us more if we instigate Armageddon!" theology is the reason to worry about their nuclear capabilities.

    31. Re:Why all the hate? by bit01 · · Score: 1

      hasbara. Make sure to read links further down the list.

      Israel has been paying for large scale propaganda for decades. They're doing a lot of behind the scenes stuff too including successfully directing US foreign policy.

      ---

      Marketing talk is not just cheap, it has negative value. Free speech can be compromised just as much by too much noise as too little signal.

    32. Re:Why all the hate? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      their barbaric ass-backward, anti science 'religious' ideology

      Whatever Islam's faults, I don't think being anti-science is among them.

      In case you hadn't noticed TFA is about a scientific/technological success story.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    33. Re:Why all the hate? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      They probably did have enough freedom before the Iranian Revolution

      Try reading some history, Iran under the Shah was a pretty repressive place, the revolution had mass appeal precisely because Iranians hated him (and his Western puppet masters) so much.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    34. Re:Why all the hate? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      the notion of certain death in exchange for the assurance of a glorious, virgin-laden afterlife.

      The people in charge of Iran aren't suicide bombers. Otherwise they'd be dead by now.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    35. Re:Why all the hate? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Even if they wanted to, Iran aren't going to wipe Israel off the map while the US still has nuclear weapons and the best equipped military in the world.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    36. Re:Why all the hate? by Alimony+Pakhdan · · Score: 1

      You missed my point completely it seems.

    37. Re:Why all the hate? by Xest · · Score: 1

      I generally sympathise with Iran to an extent, because I do think there is a fair bit of gross hypocrisy involved. America wants sympathy and expects the world to support it when when terorrists blow up it's airliners, yet to date the US has held no one to account for shooting down a civilian Iranian airliner some years back with the deaths of a couple of hundred civilians. I can understand why Iran hates the West in the face of such blatant hypocrisy.

      But this doesn't mean we can pretend everything with Iran is rosy and they're just misunderstood, that's absolutely not the case, and they ARE a destabilising force in the middle east at least as much as the US and Israel has been and frankly, arguably much more so.

      There is a mountain of evidence demonstrating that the Iranians have been fighting proxy wars with their neighbours through covert funding of Hezbollah, Iraqi Shia insurgencies, and seemingly even sections of the Taliban now too. Iran is effectively attacking Israel, Iraq, Afghanistan and US/coalition forces in those countries by funding terrorist groups, and so I can also understand why there is sentiment that it's about time we sent some explosives back Iran's way.

      You're right that we shouldn't totally rubbish the Iranian's, it has a large population of well educated moderates who want more freedom, but needless to say their government is most definitely a problem, not just for their own people, but for peace in the Middle East and for the world as a whole as the effects of that ripple outwards.

      You're also wrong that Iran is either stable, or arguably even financially self-sufficient. Iran is very much at war not with just it's neighbours, but with itself, from the moderate peaceful anti-government protestors, through to terrorist groups from Southern Iran who hate their own government.

      So whilst I have sympathy for Iran's greivances and think many of them are justified, I do not feel they justify oppresion against their own citizens, and I do not think they're a valid excuse for carrying out multiple wars via proxy against it's neighbours. I think really a two pronged approach is needed- on one hand it's time to punish those responsible for shooting down Iran Air 655 and paying compensation to Iranian families whose relatives were victims, whilst simultaneously making it clear that from this point on any act of war committed by proxy, will be treated as a direct act of war.

  11. May I be the first to say that this is great... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    ...target practice!

    (I kid, I kid. Just don't tell Sarah Palin.)

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  12. Re:What did one Iranian astornaut say to the other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ouch.

  13. Russian Parts, Chinese Parts... by jameskojiro · · Score: 2

    All Made in Iran.....

    (Clang).....

    To Paraphrase the first Iranian Astronaut after his retro rockets failed to fire trapping him in orbit for a few extra hours....

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    1. Re:Russian Parts, Chinese Parts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The first Iranian astronaut was Anousheh Ansari, a female

    2. Re:Russian Parts, Chinese Parts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, she was a cosmonaut, she flew on a russian ship.

    3. Re:Russian Parts, Chinese Parts... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      She wasn't an astronaut, she was a passenger.

    4. Re:Russian Parts, Chinese Parts... by Chicken_Kickers · · Score: 1

      So this is what the mighty have come down to. When faced with competitors who are rapidly catching up, Americans choose to pooh-pooh them as copycats and inferior derivatives, all the while dumbing down your own science education and breeding your own ultra nationalists and religious nut jobs. You, see, it doesn't matter how Iran, or China or India got their technology. The fact that they have them, and more importantly, continuing to develop them, is enough. So, go ahead and sit on your laurel. Better yet, get into more unnecessary wars (with all this talk of nuking Iran) so that your economy will bleed dry and your people descend into barbarism. And to those who says Iran is unstable, I ask you to forecast what people like Sarah Palin and the Tea Party whackos will do if they get into power.

    5. Re:Russian Parts, Chinese Parts... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      She wasn't an astronaut, she was a passenger.

      At this stage in history, if you've been in space you're an astronaut. Or do you not count all the scientists who have been to the ISS just because they didn't actually fly the space craft?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Russian Parts, Chinese Parts... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Even if I do count the scientists, she still stand separate because she did no significant work while on the station. (She was a test subject for other peoples experiments, and a low level tech that collected samples for other peoples experiments, but no work of her own. Scientifically she was nothing more than a lab rat)

      She, and the rest of the tourists were passengers, period. Deal with it.

      (Protip: Even in the early days of aviation they made the distinction between passengers and crew.)

  14. Re:You're a hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any other kind?
    Not counting Canadians, Mexicans and South Americans of course.

  15. Re:You're a hypocrite by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    Poe.

  16. Translated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..opened a center to receive satellite images

    Read as: "..opened a center to receive SPY satellite images"

    Explorer 4 (Kavoshgar 4) is meant to transport humans and other living organisms into space

    BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PAYLOADS

    1. Re:Translated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PAYLOADS"

      In your pants!

      (Don't use so many caps, it's like yelling error forced me to add this.)

  17. I would really like to see another space race by Palpatine_li · · Score: 0

    so we can soon see a real Orion spaceship up in the orbit, if only just to spite of all the hipsters. but seriously, how is an Orion continental destroyer more dangerous than the thousands of missile silos on the ground? while the development of the former will finally grant us large scale human existence outside earth and the technologies to fly to and colonize moon and even Mars.

  18. Swarm by reitton · · Score: 1

    It's only a matter of time until they start using swarm techniques to overwhelm our star cruisers.

  19. A Tiny Bit of Compassion for the Iranian People by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I believe that recent military and defense transactions with "their most crazy neighbor to the south" has little to do with logic and more to do with lucrative arms deals that have recently been put on hold (I daresay in the interest of regional stability).

    To answer your question in a historical context I might point you to the horrible things that Russia and the United States did during the Cold War that essentially provided puppet theaters for their ideologies to be fought out. Why risk your citizens when you can show the world who's right with war and poverty in weaker nations? Wikipedia does a decent job of summing this up but you might look up the 1953 Iranian coup d'état followed by the 1979 Iranian revolution and surmise why it would be in Russia's best interest to keep this thorn festering in the United States' side right up until today. The Soviet War in Afghanistan, the Eastern Bloc and many other actions were basically a cowardly way of Russia and the United States putting external countries in chaos to prove who was the better country in our petty capitalism versus socialism spat (and after all that everybody's implementing a little bit of both).

    Similar to the redrawing of national/political boundaries by the Allies following World War II, we (and I mean the world, US/Russian citizens, the citizens of those countries, everybody) will for a very long time feel the pain and suffering of putting such pressures on weaker nations during the Cold War.

    When you say "it's most crazy neighbor to the south," it might benefit you to consider the pressures that added to that craziness. While the blame lies entirely on no one, everybody participated. For a somewhat more even handed introduction to Iran's problems, check out the intro to Persepolis (the movie or the manga).

    You know who's really lost a lot in all of this? The Iranian citizens.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:A Tiny Bit of Compassion for the Iranian People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS. this "petty" capitalism vs socialism issue is in fact THE existential issue that all human societies are having to grapple with in the modern world.

      If you don't accept that free markets also lead to freer societies, then I suggest you put up just one example of where socialism has been a success and lead to a greeter freedom of its citizens. To suggest that the Iran problem is completely as a result of aggressive Imperialist powers playing proxy wars is a little bit narrow.

      Your historical perspective also omits completely the role of fundamentalist religion has played in making Iran "crazy". Kind of central to their story, and the current oppression of Iranian citizens.

    2. Re:A Tiny Bit of Compassion for the Iranian People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "it might benefit you to consider the pressures that added to that craziness"
      breeding? genetics?

    3. Re:A Tiny Bit of Compassion for the Iranian People by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If you don't accept that free markets also lead to freer societies, then I suggest you put up just one example of where socialism has been a success and lead to a greeter freedom of its citizens. /quote. As GP said, we've ended up with a compromise between capitalism and socialism anyway. Most Western European countries, Scandinavia and the UK brought in a form of partial socialism after the Second World War. Pure free markets only really exist in places like Somalia, i.e. gangster states.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  20. Re:What did one Iranian astornaut say to the other by hedwards · · Score: 1

    That's what she said.

  21. Iran needs a place to put all their viruses by swschrad · · Score: 1

    so they're looking towards space. if you think their reactor is going to be a big hit when the rooted controls stop working, just wait until their space bombs get called by the botnet.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:Iran needs a place to put all their viruses by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "so they're looking towards space."

      That's good.
      There's nothing able to fund NASA quicker than the US Religious nuts thinking the Iranians would make Mars a Muslim planet and build a mosque there.

  22. Because they're religious nuts? by headkase · · Score: 1

    Maybe I think we should nuke them first because Ahmadinejad (you know, the Iranian "President" - well if you don't count those pesky votes..) believes that it is his duty to trigger a period of chaos, war and bloodshed, which will lead to the coming of the 12th Imam who will eventually rule the world.

    Citation.

    Seriously, Iran is fucked in the head when it comes to thinking. I don't want their kind of thinking having access to nuclear warheads and ballistic missiles.

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:Because they're religious nuts? by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      If you were truly informed on the Iranian situation you'd know that Ahmadinejad, though holding the title of president, is not the supreme ruler of Iran. He must answer to other people, and he does not have control over the military. While he's probably a nutjob, he can't singlehandedly plunge Iran into a war against the wishes of others.

    2. Re:Because they're religious nuts? by headkase · · Score: 1

      He's a nutjob and I think the world would be a safer place if Iran did not pursue "peaceful" nuclear energy and ballistic missiles at the same time. Call me rational when I think that is wise.

      --
      Shh.
    3. Re:Because they're religious nuts? by losfromla · · Score: 1

      your citation is far from unbiased. Try again.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    4. Re:Because they're religious nuts? by headkase · · Score: 1

      It is perfectly biased from my perspective. Of course, I'm not a nut.. ;)

      --
      Shh.
    5. Re:Because they're religious nuts? by MindSlap · · Score: 0

      If you were truly informed on the Iranian situation you'd know that Ahmadinejad, though holding the title of president, is not the supreme ruler of Iran. He must answer to other people, and he does not have control over the military. While he's probably a nutjob, he can't singlehandedly plunge Iran into a war against the wishes of others.

      Huh?
      Amaneedadinnerjacket answers to the mullahs..not 'the people'..
      "Supreme leader" Khamenei has the final say...
      It was the mullahs in 05 that handpicked em ya know...

      What was that about being informed?

      Oops..there I go with that silly reality thing again..
      MOD ME DOWN!!!

    6. Re:Because they're religious nuts? by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      None of what you say contradicts my point, that Ahmadinejad isn't really in charge. And as much as he likes to play the violent demagogue, many analysts find that Khamenei and his advisors keep cool and don't intend to bring the country into a nuclear holocaust.

    7. Re:Because they're religious nuts? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 0

      Hahaha. Your user name says it all.

      I think the world would be a lot safer if we took all of the USA's nukes and distributed them around the world to every country except the US. The US is full of Christian extremists, religious nuts if you will.

      Oh yeah, and we should round up all the European Jews in the middle east and ship them off to South America where they should have gone in the 40's. Y'know, instead of invading an otherwise peaceful territory over some misguided Zionist concept that the descendants of penis worshippers from central Asia have some claim over Palestine. Isreal is full of Jewish extremists.

      There you go, world peace. Simple as that.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    8. Re:Because they're religious nuts? by headkase · · Score: 0

      Good sir, fuck off.

      --
      Shh.
    9. Re:Because they're religious nuts? by mswhippingboy · · Score: 1

      Right. Thank God (or would that be Allah?) we have the level head of Ayatollah Khamenei in charge.

      --
      Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    10. Re:Because they're religious nuts? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      Citing an Israeli propaganda site detracts from your argument.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    11. Re:Because they're religious nuts? by MindSlap · · Score: 0

      None of what you say contradicts my point, that Ahmadinejad isn't really in charge. And as much as he likes to play the violent demagogue, many analysts find that Khamenei and his advisors keep cool and don't intend to bring the country into a nuclear holocaust.

      ==========

      Wait..let me get this straight...
      "As much as he likes play violent demagogue"..."kamenei and his advisors keep cool" ...and how does letting him play 'violent demagogue' equate to 'keeping cool'?....

      Think about that for a moment...
      Thats like saying..."Obama..while over regulating and burdening the economy"..."is saving the economy and creating jobs"....

      But hey..this is the kind of group think/ illogically muddled thinking I've come to expect when confronting others with reality...
      Go figure huh?

      Nice try tho..thanks for playing.

      (Dont worry tho..I expect my response to be modded down into oblivion)

    12. Re:Because they're religious nuts? by headkase · · Score: 1

      Facts are facts regardless of the source. I originally read and took note of the fact ages ago on CNN, now the search I performed through expediency gave that link. It is still a factual statement. Rather than beat around the bush, what do you think of the beliefs of the Iranian president?

      --
      Shh.
    13. Re:Because they're religious nuts? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      Hmmm beliefs of the Iranian president...

      In terms of some religious duty to create instability, I think he is bat shit crazy... but then so are a lot of Christians who are also pushing the whole holy war/crusade thing. You know, all those whackos that believe all that crap about the Jews having some god given right to some dirt in the middle east? I'd lump a lot of extremist Jews in with them too. I would like to see forced re-education camps set up in Antarctica for whacko members of all the Abrahamic religions.

      In terms of wiping Israel off the map, I agree wholeheartedly. I don't agree with hurting a single Jew, but the political entity that is Israel was founded by Zionists who were the first to use terrorist tactics such as mass transport hijacking to get their way. It was also founded by a bunch of Jews descended from people with little to no genetic link to the Israelites. I don't see why a political entity that frequently flouts the rule of law and is essentially a concession to terrorism should be allowed to exist, let alone be protected by a major super power. If Israel didn't keep behaving like a bunch of shits I might have a different opinion, but as it stands, I say wipe it off the map and replace it with Palestine.

      .

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    14. Re:Because they're religious nuts? by headkase · · Score: 1

      The issue at hand is less of "does Israel have justification to exist" and more "should Iran have both nuclear capability and delivery means." Focusing on the second issue I, as a Westerner, do not think that Iran has peaceful intentions. Rather I think they are positioning themselves as a regional military power through developing weapons programs under the guise of "peaceful nuclear energy" and "space exploration." What to do about this? Well, there is not much the West can do in today's conflicted world short of either glassing the country as an example or wholesale invasion which the USA already used their free card with Iraq.

      So what will we actually do? Simple, make it as difficult as possible for Iran knowing we can only slow them and not stop them and at the same time perfect our Missile Defense Shields. They're gonna get nuclear warheads and missiles for them but by the time Iran can actually point them at us we'll just shoot them down. For the region however, Iran will remain a problem.

      --
      Shh.
    15. Re:Because they're religious nuts? by tabrnaker · · Score: 1
      You do know that the US government has had lots of nutcases who can only see things as black and white (if you're not with us you're against us) who think it's their duty to bring about WW3 as foretold by the Nostradamus prophecies, and have huge 'secret socieities' dedicated to accomplishing that, hence their meddling in the middle east and the world to try and bring about the prophecies in their favour?

      Doesn't matter what country you're in when you drink the kool-aid, it's still kool-aid.

  23. NK is the best Korea! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    This story sounds strangely deja vu like.

    What other militant country with a nutjob leader which has openly swore to wipe another off a map was trying to advance "satellite putting up in orbity" technology and at the same time trying to start a nuclear program (but only to generate power) which is their god given right to do so...

    Nothing to see here, move along.

    I would say they are playing with fire, but that would be too obvious not to mention literal.

    1. Re:NK is the best Korea! by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      "a nutjob leader which has openly swore to wipe another off a map"

      You do realise that was simply false dont you, A mistranslation of what was said.

      Never let the facts get in the way of a biased rant eh?

    2. Re:NK is the best Korea! by wmac · · Score: 1

      "militant country with a nutjob leader" You mean number 1 militant country i.e. USA and it's leader, George bush ?

    3. Re:NK is the best Korea! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Sooo, which one are you talking about. Are you saying that Iran hasn't said they want to wipe Israel of the map or are you saying that NK doesn't want to do the same to SK?

      If it was such a mistranslation, why did you choose not to cite it, or quote it, or something rather than just have a snide quip of a response?

      Facts? Present some, considering what I was joking about is probably considered the common view in these issues.

    4. Re:NK is the best Korea! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Touche.

      Though they already got the bomb, and are in fact the only nation to actually use it, twice.

  24. Re:You're a hypocrite by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    Ah Bomb bomb bomb...bomb bomb Iran...

    Ah Bomb bomb bomb...bomb bome Iran...

    [Falsetto] A bomb Iraaaaaaan....

    (sung to the tune of Barbara Ann)

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  25. in orbit, to face Mecca's direction, face Earth by Thud457 · · Score: 1, Informative

    That's Iranian-American.
    There's been no Iranian Islamonauts, female or otherwise.
    In my book, that's score 1 for the Americans, err Russians. Damn this outsourcing is confusing.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:in orbit, to face Mecca's direction, face Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, thats Iranian.

      She was born in Iran to Iranian parents...

      USAmericans and their idea that ethnicities are geography-dependent...

  26. Burn, strawman! by mangu · · Score: 1

    (US: Torture, invasions, abuse of power, runaway government spending - Mexico: Rampant Corruption - Egypt:Mass censorship, dictatorship - Pretty much every government: Civil Rights Issues, police state tendencies, etc)

    And my brother is the most evil of all, he kicked my dog!

    If you are trying to equate any of those other governments' wrongdoings with one that tries to stone a woman to death for "adultery" because she befriended another man two years after her husband died you are as wacko as the Iranian theocrats.

  27. Iranium the Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, there is even a movie to go along with it...

    http://www.iraniumthemovie.com

  28. orbital nukes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you people are worried about nukes? Jesus they have new gamma radiation units people! Who's to say Dr. Banner has gone rouge? he hasn't been seen in months!

    1. Re:orbital nukes? by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      What? Hulk is now a drag queen?

  29. Re:What did one Iranian astornaut say to the other by mangu · · Score: 1

    Ouch

    That's what she said.

    No, that was what he, the Iranian suicide terrorist, said when he found out that the virgins in Paradise were not females...

  30. For sale, bridge in Brooklyn by mangu · · Score: 0

    Hello, I have this wonderful bridge and I want to sell it really cheap. I think you would love it. I also happen to have a tower in Paris that I'm willing to sell at a bargain price.

    BTW, are you interested in getting a commission for taking a few million dollars out of Nigeria?

    1. Re:For sale, bridge in Brooklyn by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      I can understand why having bought the bridge and tower you would want to offload them, but trying to get him on the Nigerian thing is just plain rude. You see, you're swallowing the propaganda has two major ill effects.

      Firstly, it's bad for you personally because it narrows your mind and constrains it to predictable repeated pathways and as we all know, a brain that follows the same pathways again and again without exploring new possibilities starts to die and develops dementia.

      Secondly, people from Iran actually read this shit. So they see a few comments like the most excellent GP, and then they see the majority of dumb Americans posting crap like yours or other worse hate speech (which of course you are most free to post). If your brain is still capable of trying on other ideas, I invite you to put yourself in the shoes of an Iranian. Read the GP and then read all the propaganda spewing, shitty comments you support on this story. As an Iranian, how would you feel about the US? Would you be supporting the government doing whatever it takes to develop a deterrent against US aggression?

      If you answer "no" to the rhetorical question above, I fear you may have already lost too much of your brain to be an effective part of society and I request you top yourself to eliminate your unnecessary resource consumption.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
  31. Miscalculation in article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > You might recall two years ago when they launched Omid, which completed about 700 orbits in two weeks.
    Something is wrong about these numbers.
    It is impossible for any satellite to surround earth in less than about 86 minutes. At that orbital period, 700 orbits would take more than 40 days.

    The nearer to earth the satellite gets, the lower the orbital period will be and the cheaper the rocket.

    If the satellite would be orbiting just at the limit of space (100km, where it would lose height and burn in the atmosphere very quickly), it's orbital period would be about 86 minutes.
    For the orbital perioud to be just 2 weeks / 700, required orbit height would be about 3300 kilometers beneath sea level somewhere in earth's outer core (ignoring the fact that gravity would be significantly lower there).

    1. Re:Miscalculation in article? by IceFoot · · Score: 1

      Yes. According to Wikipedia, "It completed more than 700 orbits over seven weeks."

      Note to OP: 2 != 7

  32. Skipped a few steps there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about them making cars and gasoline before nuclear power and spacecraft?

  33. did it really do 700 revs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The source was Iranian state television. They have been known to embellish Iranian accomplishments... Did Omid really even make it into space?

  34. Why did the Iranian rocket crash? by Agent__Smith · · Score: 1

    Ran out of coal.

    --
    "It seems that we are at the age where life stops giving us things, and starts taking them away..." Indiana Jones
  35. This is not about satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iran needs a launch platform to be able to strike the US with nukes, anyone who thinks it's so called "space program" has any other purpose is an idiot.

  36. Announcement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I announce that I will begin a project to have sexual relations with Mila Kunis.

  37. Ahhh, the sweet irony by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    While the religious fanatical state in the middle east is working hard to advance science, "heart land" of america is working hard to denounce science.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  38. We're too late.... by Lucas123 · · Score: 1

    These satellite launch photos just in from Iran's space agency: http://realitypod.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/14.jpg

  39. I remember the supercomputer stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember Iran bragging about the supercomputer stuff.... I sure looked a lot like a beowulf cluster. The login screens sure looked like a beowulf cluster. Some of the management screens looked like OSCAR (Open Source Cluster Application Resources) screens. You don't need 'top scientific minds in the world(tm)', you can just download the software and build an off-the-shelf cluster (many junior-high and high-school kids have done this). All you need are a group of about 20-30 computers (less will still work, but more is usually always better), install the software, presto, instant supercomputer. Of course, to those who don't know from computers, especially supercomputers, (and since these things always work better on that exotic, unknown linux system), only a rare group could possibly have blah, blah. And yet somehow Stuxnet got in. Beware of bold assertions and those playing fast and loose with universal truths.

  40. ICBMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "transport humans and other living organisms into space", my ass.
    Weapons more like, nukes in particular.

    Iran is NOT currently a nation with peaceful intents.

  41. Nothing in the Christian world compares?WTF by Falconhell · · Score: 1

    Ever hear of Timothy McVeigh? He killed quite a few. Now lets look at the numbers killed in South America by US sponsored terroist groups. Or Afghanistan during the russian invasion. Or in Ireland when US Irish were funding the IRA for amy years only stopping after 9/11. Or thieving Terrosit nation of Israel, using bombs paid for and supplied by the US.

    1. Re:Nothing in the Christian world compares?WTF by khallow · · Score: 1

      Ever hear of Timothy McVeigh?

      From my prior post:

      The second biggest known terrorist attack (the Oklahoma City bombing) was anti-government not Christian.

      That was the attack that McVeigh was responsible for.

      Now lets look at the numbers killed in South America by US sponsored terroist groups.

      Not associated with Christianity.

      Or Afghanistan during the russian invasion.

      Most certainly not associated with Christianity.

      Or in Ireland when US Irish were funding the IRA for amy years only stopping after 9/11.

      Again not associated with Christianity although the two conflicting cultures had slightly different versions of Christianity which was part of what kept them distinct.

      Or thieving Terrosit nation of Israel

      Oh look, another case where Christianity wasn't involved.

      Now try this. Take all the deaths that you claimed, falsely, were due to Christianity and compare them to say, the deaths in Algiers from the Islamist terrorism there. Note that despite not having fancy American backing or that radical religion, Christianity, these Islamists still managed to kill more people. You'll find separately that the same holds for Sudan and Somalia.

      The only thing comforting is that the Islamists don't have the capabilities or organization that the Communists or various Fascists of the last century had.

    2. Re:Nothing in the Christian world compares?WTF by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Given the US govt is dominated by christians, I dont see how you can say nothing to do etc.

      The main reason for the IRA struggle was quite certainly two christian religions,
      or are youj trying to say there are Protestants in the IRA?

      Your claim that islamists kill more is simply laughable.

    3. Re:Nothing in the Christian world compares?WTF by khallow · · Score: 1

      Given the US govt is dominated by christians, I dont see how you can say nothing to do etc.

      That's right, you don't see. I don't think there's anything more that needs to be said here.

    4. Re:Nothing in the Christian world compares?WTF by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You are missing the point that as soon as a killing is by a Muslim, it's all part of the Islamic World Terrorist Force, whereas if it's by a non-Muslim, it's due to local politics, a nut with a grudge, drugs, crime or anything else.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  42. Didnt you see the results of Cast lead. by Falconhell · · Score: 1

    NO but they have killed many thousands of Palestinian and Lebanese civlians and used phosphorus against a school.

    Israel is a contry founded by a terrorist campaign you know. Look up Irgun or the stern gang, and the King David hotel

    1. Re:Didnt you see the results of Cast lead. by russotto · · Score: 1

      Israel is a contry founded by a terrorist campaign you know. Look up Irgun or the stern gang, and the King David hotel

      So is the US, though the term hadn't been invented yet. Look up the Sons of Liberty, who the British called the "Sons of Violence".

    2. Re:Didnt you see the results of Cast lead. by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Yep, they were terrorists too. Funny how when it is terrorists you agree with they are freedom fighters, and when you dont agree they are terrorists.

    3. Re:Didnt you see the results of Cast lead. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Israel is a contry founded by a terrorist campaign you know.

      Unlike America, France, China, Russia, South Africa...oh, wait.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  43. 700 oribts in two weeks? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

    You might recall two years ago when they launched Omid, which completed about 700 orbits in two weeks.

    Hmm, seems to me that 700 orbits in two weeks is about one orbit every thirty minutes.

    It's been a long time since I was in school, but last I checked a 30 minute orbit around Earth is impossible.

    Well, without a continuous 7G burn to keep the satellite from flying off out of the solar system - speed required to do a 30 minute orbit is about 60% more than solar escape speed.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  44. 32nd anniversary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would have thought old Mahmoud would have picked an anniversary that was a power of 2 for this? (Or does that tell us about how many fingers he can count before he loses track?)
     

  45. What it really means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coinciding with the 32nd anniversary of the Iranian revolution, Iran opened a center to receive satellite images

    Translation: Iran loaded up Google Earth today for the first time.

  46. Re:You're a hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >(sung to the tune of Barbara Ann)

    Well, there's the problem. I was singing it to the tune of "99 Bottles of Beer."

  47. Windows in Iran by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    What's funny is some of the pictures in Iran-related coverage seemed to show an LCD with the Windows XP Funskool theme.

    The lesson for me from that is even if you emphatically hate a country's (the "Great Satan's") foreign policy, Windows is such a drug that nobody can desist from it.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  48. Re:You're a hypocrite by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    It's good to be reminded of the sheer moral, philosophical and political weight of Obama's opponents. It honestly makes you wonder how anyone could have voted for him when given the option of an intellectual colossus instead.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it