Slashdot Mirror


iPad 2 Rumored to be in Production

Stoobalou writes "The normally sober and sometimes accurate Wall Street Journal is claiming that Apple's iPad 2 is currently in production. Foxconn might be producing a limited number of prototype samples of the Second Coming of the iPad but we're pretty sure full production won't start until Steve Jobs (or whoever will be donning the black turtleneck in his sickly stead) strides onto the stage at the official launch keynote."

192 comments

  1. Rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This post is rumored to be the 1st post! It's in production now!

    1. Re:Rumors by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

      But who will get the 1st suicide?

    2. Re:Rumors by Duradin · · Score: 1

      My money is on Dell. Apple pays their section of Foxconn workers extra to not commit suicide.

    3. Re:Rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No fair Slashdot! WSJ don't need the hits but we do. http://www.thinq.co.uk/2011/2/9/rumour-apple-ipad-2-production/

    4. Re:Rumors by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      And other perks, like the free safety nets.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    5. Re:Rumors by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      I wonder how much profit Foxconn is making on the worker's misery? I mean Good Lord in the article you linked to it says they are talking of moving to Vietnam to lower production costs If this doesn't show this "free trade race to the bottom" benefits no one but the top 1% I don't know what does.

      I mean China lets you dump toxic waste out the back door, pollute its air and rivers worse than the USA did in the 1800s, and treat workers little better than slaves, and that STILL isn't enough? What does Vietnam offer, one free child worker for every four purchased? The profit margins they must be making on the iShiny have got to be beyond insane, yet their greed still isn't satisfied. Is it any wonder so many see corporations as the embodiment of evil?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    6. Re:Rumors by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      a good amount of Chinese clothing production is outsourced to African countries.

      the goods go out with "made in China" written on them.

  2. /. News Network by Even+on+Slashdot+FOE · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A company well known for releasing new models of its products will release a new model of one of its newest products! Gasp!

    Also, will it have video-out capability yet? Or possibly video-in so I can use it to pretend I have a portable DVD player?

    1. Re:/. News Network by mekkab · · Score: 1

      A company well known for releasing new models of its products will release a new model of one of its newest products! Gasp!

      A company notorious about being tightlipped on new stuff in development can't trust their Chinese partner company and gets scooped by the Grey Lady.

      It's slashdot news-worthy.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    2. Re:/. News Network by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Informative

      A company well known for releasing new models of its products will release a new model of one of its newest products! Gasp!

      A company notorious about being tightlipped on new stuff in development can't trust their Chinese partner company and gets scooped by the Grey Lady.

      It's slashdot news-worthy.

      The Gray Lady typically refers to the New York Times. The Wall Street Journal is the Gray Lady's psychotic older sister.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:/. News Network by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also, will it have video-out capability yet? Or possibly video-in so I can use it to pretend I have a portable DVD player?

      The very idea is heretical: A video-out capability would imply the existence of screens more perfect than the one Apple sees fit to include.

      A video-in capability would imply the existence of things worth seeing that are not already in the app store.

      Absurd to reason and dangerous to faith.

    4. Re:/. News Network by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      She's arguably more sociopathic than outright psychotic...

    5. Re:/. News Network by Tharsman · · Score: 1

      Also, will it have video-out capability yet? Or possibly video-in so I can use it to pretend I have a portable DVD player?

      Get yourself Air Video, better than a video-in cable. It's one of those apps I can't live without.

      Hopefully they will add AirPlay support once iOS 4.3 is out and allow for over the air video out, too. In the meantime, you can get video out cables that plug in the one port. Why get more ports when one port can do it all? :P

    6. Re:/. News Network by thechink · · Score: 4, Informative

      The iPad 1 already has video out. You just had to buy the necessary adapter. You could also use AirPlay.

    7. Re:/. News Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is AirPlay not video out?

      Wait, you want video out to mean connecting a dedicated cable, rather than using a modern, 21st century home digital network?

      Do you also miss the CDROM on your MacBook Air, and 8 track on your Nissan Leaf?

    8. Re:/. News Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Grey Granny then?

    9. Re:/. News Network by utahjazz · · Score: 4, Informative

      The iPad 1 already has video-out: http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC552ZM/A

      It only works with certain apps, but you definitely can do presentations and such on a 50" screen, from your iPad.

    10. Re:/. News Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be missing the point. Say he went to a hotel for a stay and wanted to watch something on his iPaid on the TV in the room without paying some silly $10 charge. Connect the cable and watch. Where is that modern, 21st century home digital network with the TV allowing you to use wireless to connect? Hint: It isn't there in the hotel.

    11. Re:/. News Network by objekt · · Score: 1

      You can already have video out from a number of apps; netflix, youtube, etc.

      --
      -- Boycott Shell
    12. Re:/. News Network by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      Or Lady Gaga.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    13. Re:/. News Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try reading the reviews on the product you linked. It only works for some apps, apparently not including movies downloaded through the app store.

    14. Re:/. News Network by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, no one in the world wonders, nor cares, why you don't use Apple products. The iPad can do HDMI-out.

    15. Re:/. News Network by Altus · · Score: 1

      I used to do this with my iPod and a video out cable or my computer sometimes.

      The thing is, these days most hotels lock you out of any kind of input on the TV, either you cant plug into the back or you cant switch inputs on the TV. Its been years since I have been in a room where I could do this.

      Hotels would rather you bought your media from them.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    16. Re:/. News Network by timeOday · · Score: 1

      The iPad 1 already has video out.

      Well, sort of... it's very crippled. Look at all the reviews in the link you posted - the average score is only 2/5, because it does NOT simply output what's on your screen - only certain apps output certain things, and even some videos from iTunes will NOT go out. (Even though it's just analog VGA out in the first place!) I don't see the point paying for a shockingly overpriced $30 pigtail when there's no indication of when it will or won't work.

      Maybe AirPlay isn't hobbled by all the restrictions, although somehow I doubt it.

    17. Re:/. News Network by node+3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You might be missing the point. Say he went to a hotel for a stay and wanted to watch something on his iPaid on the TV in the room without paying some silly $10 charge. Connect the cable and watch. Where is that modern, 21st century home digital network with the TV allowing you to use wireless to connect? Hint: It isn't there in the hotel.

      How is that a coherent argument?

      If you are at a hotel, you can use AirPlay just as you can at home, with an AppleTV. If the hotel TV doesn't have HDMI, you can use analog connections directly from the iPad. If the hotel TV doesn't have digital *or* analog connections, how is that a problem with the iPad?

      And that's all within the very unusual circumstance of being in a hotel and wanting to hook video up to a TV. If that were the biggest problem with the iPad (that it for some reason couldn't video-out to hotel TVs) it would hardly be much of a thing to complain about for most people.

      You are right, he might be missing the point. The point isn't that there's anything wrong with the iPad, the point is to just complain.

    18. Re:/. News Network by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Also, will it have video-out capability yet? Or possibly video-in so I can use it to pretend I have a portable DVD player?

      it already had video out. Buy the same cable that you can already buy for an iPod which gives you the standard L/R/Video cables, and it works like a charm.

      I watched movies from my hotel room on my last business trip using both my iPod and iPad as video sources.

      The ability to do video out had been there since day one.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    19. Re:/. News Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that the dock connector to component and to composite adapters will also work with the iPad, though you only get 480p and 480i out of them respectively.

    20. Re:/. News Network by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Stay at a Marriott.

      From what I have seen, they have a box attached to the TV which will take video sources, your laptop. You name it.

      They have an instruction sheet in the room, and I believe it is called "Plugged In" or something. On my last business trip, I was having problems, called down to the desk, and a technician was at my door in five minutes and got it working.

      They made it about as easy as you could possibly get.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    21. Re:/. News Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a typical Apple zealot. When people say they want video out, you know damn well they mean a persistent video feed, and not some shit hardcoded into an application because Apple held it back for a later model, just so you gays can rush out and buy something again.

    22. Re:/. News Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The video-out is only a test of faith. True Apple disciples will refuse to use it or they'll burn in Apple hell.

    23. Re:/. News Network by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      The iPod line has had video out since the first "photo" iPod. The iOS line has had component video out since the original iPhone.

      I do agree it is silly to not just announce the latest products, but to announce the rumor of a widely expected product...

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    24. Re:/. News Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its vapourware

    25. Re:/. News Network by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Considering:
      January 27, 2010: iPad is announced by Steve Jobs. Availability within 6-8 weeks.
      April 3, 2010: iPad wifi is first sold. (roughly 8 weeks later)

      If the iPad2 is going to be announced shortly, Apple would have be a complete idiot to start manufacturing after they announce it.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    26. Re:/. News Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the comments on the project page indicate and as you indicate, it has significant (I would say severe) limitations. How about iPad 2 including an improved video-out capability that sucks less?

    27. Re:/. News Network by mekkab · · Score: 1

      nice 1, thanks for the correction.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  3. News flash! by Glock27 · · Score: 1

    Companies will often make many copies of a product before officially announcing it, so demand may be met after the announcement.

    Given the extreme demand for Apple's excellent products in general, and the iPad in particular, it seems only plausible that production has already started.

    --
    Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
    Score: -1 100% Flamebait
  4. Not a 2 by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    I wish people would stop calling it the iPad 2. Does Apple make a MacBook 2? An iMac 2? iPod touch 2? No, Apple generally doesn't number its products. It will probably be known as the 2011 iPad or informally as the iPad 2G (if you follow the iPod touch examples).

    1. Re:Not a 2 by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1

      No... and Apple never made an iPhone 3 or iPhone 4 either. Oh.. Wait. They did.

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    2. Re:Not a 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh yes, because calling it by something with which everyone in the world know what you mean is SUCH a bad idea.

    3. Re:Not a 2 by Glock27 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually the iPhone models were:

      • iPhone
      • iPhone 3G
      • iPhone 3GS
      • iPhone 4

      So, Apple has been all over the place with its naming "conventions".

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    4. Re:Not a 2 by getNewNickName · · Score: 1

      No one knows exactly how Apple will name the product until it's released, so calling it iPad 2 is a convenient way to refer to the next revision.

    5. Re:Not a 2 by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      Technically, it was the iPhone 3G, and 3GS. The iPhone 3G was actually the 2nd generation, and the 3GS was the 3rd. Thus, the iPhone 4 which is the 4th generation (but still 3G)

    6. Re:Not a 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wish people would stop calling it the iPad 2. Does Apple make a MacBook 2? An iMac 2? iPod touch 2? No, Apple generally doesn't number its products. It will probably be known as the 2011 iPad or informally as the iPad 2G (if you follow the iPod touch example

      And you're saying this, while this huge headline is on Apple.com's front page.

    7. Re:Not a 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did market the iPhone as iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, and iPhone 4, but if you notice Apple never puts that designation on the phone itself. They all just say iPhone and up until the 4, the capacity of the flash drive.

    8. Re:Not a 2 by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      The iPhone is one product of Apple that's more the exception to the rest of their lineups. They don't label their desktop PCs, laptops, iPods, mice, displays, routers, nor servers in such a fashion.

    9. Re:Not a 2 by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 2

      Or the Apple II or Apple III.

    10. Re:Not a 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.apple.com/iphone4 brings me to Page Not Found

      Apple called it the 4 to differentiate it from the 3G and 3GS at the time, but now they only carry the 4. So ergo it's generally referred to as the iPhone.

    11. Re:Not a 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish people would stop calling it the iPad 2. Does Apple make a MacBook 2? An iMac 2? iPod touch 2? No, Apple generally doesn't number its products. It will probably be known as the 2011 iPad or informally as the iPad 2G (if you follow the iPod touch examples).

      And here in the hoary, unwashed plebeian netherworld of "the rest of humanity outside of Apple's marketing department and the diehard Macheads in a mental state of rapture because their shiny art-designed toys are popular for the first time in decades", we don't particularly care. I know, I know, it's hard to imagine a world outside of the warm, loving embrace of The Almighty Steve (He Whose Name Mere Mortals Are Not Fit To Speak But Not For His Grace), but out here, we. Just. Don't. Care.

    12. Re:Not a 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Apple still offers the 3GS.

    13. Re:Not a 2 by Tharsman · · Score: 2

      I wish people would stop calling it the iPad 2. Does Apple make a MacBook 2? An iMac 2? iPod touch 2? No, Apple generally doesn't number its products. It will probably be known as the 2011 iPad or informally as the iPad 2G (if you follow the iPod touch examples).

      Hmm, you realize they call the iPod Touch line "iPod Touch (Xth Generation)" with the X replaced by the version number?

      Sure they don't put it in THEIR website, but every website and every keynote and every communication calls it Xth Generation. I hope they do give it a descriptive name, I recall one ALMOST accidentally buying a 2nd Gen iPod Touch because it was listed as the cheapest option among the 3rd Gen in their store. I luckily noticed the extremely weaker specs before I went for it.

      I sort of wish they changed the numbering, though, for iPhones too, and started calling them with years. iPhone '11, iPod '11, iPad '11, etc. Would be much easier to tie up hardware specs across the lines (and they tend to be almost the same.)

      On that note, I am going to predict the future:

      Soon Apple will announce the iPad 2nd Gen, and announce it's specs. They will likely lower the price of the cheapest 1st Gen iPads and sell them as budget units (and humiliating Motorola's Xoom with it's $799 price tag.)

      This summer Apple will release the iPhone 5, and announce very similar specs to those in the iPad 2nd Gen.

      This October Apple will release the iPod Touch 5th Generation, it will be an iPhone 5 without cell coverage, earpiece and perhaps not camera flash either.

    14. Re:Not a 2 by ifrag · · Score: 1

      Does Apple make a MacBook 2?

      If only... it would be easier to track down information when needed if Apple did have some kind of basic numbering. Or even somewhat non-intuitive number like NVidia, but at least something to point at and say "it's laptop version such-and-such" rather than trying to remember exactly what year it was purchased.

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
    15. Re:Not a 2 by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      Apple IIe.

    16. Re:Not a 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because their laptops, desktops, router, etc. Use a total replacement life-cycle. That is when they release the new model they stop selling the old model. With the iPhone and iPod touch however they have been having some overlap between generations. They sell some models of the iPhone 3Gs even though the iPhone 4 is out for example.

      The iPad may follow either life-cycle. So it's not obvious if they will release an iPad V (the V is for video) or just update the iPad product line to include new better specs

    17. Re:Not a 2 by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      Not the iPhone either Oh, wait....

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    18. Re:Not a 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, because Jobs and Murdoch have an iron grip on the internet and prevent you from doing what you want with your own non-Apple devices.

      People like you are the saddest sacks of crap in the world today. Yeah, sub-rate merchandise. Another self important idiot takes a dump on Slashdot.

      You are NOT special. You are NOT a rebel. You are NOT unique. You are NOT remotely as smart as you think you are. You are just another little nothing in a sea of specks.

    19. Re:Not a 2 by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 1

      Except that I'm typing this on an iMac11,3 and I have a MacBookPro2,1 at home, as well as a MacPro3,1. Those aren't version numbers though, are they? Of course, these aren't printed on the devices themselves, but are in the System Profiler (think Device Manager plus System Properties). Nonetheless, there are version numbers.

    20. Re:Not a 2 by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. There sure wasn't a / an:

      Apple II (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_II_series)
      Macintosh II (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_II_series)
      iPhone 4 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPhone_4)

      etc.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    21. Re:Not a 2 by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      That should be ][, //e, or //c, //e+, and IIgs.

      Adding GT or GS the model name makes it sound "bad-ass" :-)

    22. Re:Not a 2 by wbo · · Score: 1

      If only... it would be easier to track down information when needed if Apple did have some kind of basic numbering. Or even somewhat non-intuitive number like NVidia, but at least something to point at and say "it's laptop version such-and-such" rather than trying to remember exactly what year it was purchased.

      Actually Apple does give each hardware refresh a version number. In OS X you can see the version numbering by going to About This Mac and clicking on the More Info... button. Select the Hardware option on the left side and you should see a Model Identifier that says something like "MacBookPro5,1" The 5,1 part represents the hardware version/generation.

    23. Re:Not a 2 by toriver · · Score: 1

      I wish people would stop calling a certain OS "Windows 7". It identifies itself as Windows Vista 6.1.

    24. Re:Not a 2 by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if all vendors also followed this convention. Several have descriptions as Macbook Pro (early 2006), Macbook Pro (late 2006), MML3258 (or whatever Apple's internal designation format is), descriptions by the chip type (Nehlem, Peplum, NewSteveOnium), etc. (Yes, I have a Macbook Pro, which turns out to be a late 2006- wow this thing is 4 years old already?!). Is it that hard just to labeled it as you explained? Yeah, I figured it out, but c'mon, make it easier.....

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    25. Re:Not a 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF are you talking about? Apple Inc. clearly lists every iPod by generation on their support pages.

  5. Please have a real stylus. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That would be so fantastic! I would never need to buy a notebook again!

    1. Re:Please have a real stylus. by uprise78 · · Score: 1

      fat chance. that would be totally against Apple's minimalist nature not to mention the iPad did pretty fine without one even though many said it needed one. just buy a Windows 7 Slate if you want a real stylus.

    2. Re:Please have a real stylus. by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      That would be so fantastic! I would never need to buy a notebook again!

      How many years did it take Apple to release a mouse that allowed "Right-Click"? Jobs though multiple buttons on the mouse would be too confusing. CMD-Click is so much simpler.

      The iPad will never have a stylus.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    3. Re:Please have a real stylus. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a boxwave capacitive stylus. It gets great reviews for use on iPads.

    4. Re:Please have a real stylus. by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      There are several to be had on amazon. Depending on the stylus and software, it's pretty close to using a regular pencil on paper.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    5. Re:Please have a real stylus. by hsmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      God, it would be so nice if some company would just go ahead and make one to buy!

      I wonder if one could find a stylus on Amazon?

    6. Re:Please have a real stylus. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      How many years did it take Apple to release a mouse that allowed "Right-Click"?

      Apple Mighty Mouse came out in 2005.
      But Mac OS 8 came out in 1997. Worked just fine with 2 button mice.

      How many things in some Unix/Windows programs force you to right click to get to something? By making the least common denominator no right click, it forces UI designers to make a good design for someone who may not know how to right click.

    7. Re:Please have a real stylus. by Cornelius+the+Great · · Score: 1

      A capacitive stylus is more like writing with a crayon than a pencil. If you look at these, you'll quickly notice that they're not much more precise than your finger (unless you have really fat hands).

      --
      Sigs are for losers
    8. Re:Please have a real stylus. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      The OS supported it for years (since OS8, I think) while people like you went on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on about it, and Mac users stared at you in puzzlement as they just used their Microsoft Intellimouse or some other third party mouse or trackball or whatever floated their boat. I had a four button mouse back in the OS6 days.

    9. Re:Please have a real stylus. by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I remember when Win '95 came out and being told how awesome it was that it supported multiple monitors out of the box.

      My response was - you mean like 'this'? And demonstrating it in my 8100AV and OS 7.x

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    10. Re:Please have a real stylus. by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      the lunar blue one looks way to much like a pocketrocket vibrator for my taste

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
  6. No DVD by crow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is very unlikely that Apple would do anything to make it easy to put a DVD on the iPad. They want you to obtain content like that through the iTunes store. Anything they can do to help kill physical media is good for Apple.

    1. Re:No DVD by riegel · · Score: 1

      Anything they can do to help kill physical media is good for Apple.

      And is good for me also. Files are so much better than physical media. IMHO.

      --
      http://p8ste.com - Web based Clipboard
    2. Re:No DVD by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      dude welcome to the 21st century. physical media...next you'll be telling me you use floppies!

    3. Re:No DVD by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Files are fine assuming you can transfer them around and play them on any device you own regardless of a) where you purchased it, b) without registering the device, c) without caring who manufactured the player. Which rules out any video purchased on iTunes and most other stores for that matter. The best solution at the moment is to rip content.

    4. Re:No DVD by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well except for those 100+ DVD's sitting under your TV that you now have to repurchase from iTunes?

    5. Re:No DVD by Tharsman · · Score: 1

      It is very unlikely that Apple would do anything to make it easy to put a DVD on the iPad. They want you to obtain content like that through the iTunes store. Anything they can do to help kill physical media is good for Apple.

      Anything they can do to help kill physical media is good for everyone.

    6. Re:No DVD by immaterial · · Score: 1

      This logic would have them now allowing iTunes to rip CDs either, which if clearly not the case. Perhaps the reason Apple hasn't built in the ability to rip DVDs (which would only help sell their ecosystem) is because it is illegal under the DMCA?

    7. Re:No DVD by LoP_XTC · · Score: 1

      Simple ... Handbrake and convert from DVD to iTunes friendly format. Ive done this and its great since I can use the Apple TV we got as a gift to stream the content to any TV in the house that its hooked up to.

      --
      "Curiouser and Curiouser...." -Alice
    8. Re:No DVD by Arkham · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Actually it's quite easy to get a DVD movie onto an iPad.

      1) Most movies come with "Digital Copy" now. Put the code in iTunes, and you are done.
      2) For the ones that don't there's always Handbrake, which has presets for it and makes it trivial to convert in a few minutes. Once it's done, drag to iTunes and sync.

      --
      - Vincit qui patitur.
    9. Re:No DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TV?

      Was that the delivery mechanism for passive media consumption popular in the late 20th Century?

    10. Re:No DVD by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      People are legitimately concerned that a particular store/DRM regime may disappear one day, which is why Amazon UnBox, iTunes and the various MS marketplaces offer terms for rental :) Don't have to worry about DRM expiring when you only have the movie for 3 days.

      If you want to OWN a movie, to be able to watch it on demand, without Internet or company interference, your only option remains ordering the disk. Sorry, that's the best the technology can offer, assuming we exclude the plainly illegit methods, like torrents.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    11. Re:No DVD by Tharsman · · Score: 1

      My DVDs can burn in a fire, they can grow fungus, get scratched. DVDs may eventually go the way of the Dodo and manufacturing may cease, eventually my dvd player breaks down and there is no way to play that back.

      Yes, all extreme cases, just as extreme as the ones you list.

      For one, there are rentals (yay netflix streaming, die dvd rentals!)

      But in the long run, it just takes looking at the digital music market to predict what will happen in the long term. These DRMs will eventually be depreciated, stores like iTunes will continue to support old DRMs but only sell DRM free content. It will take a few years, though, because it wont happen until movie digital sales are as commonplace as digital music sales were a couple years ago.

    12. Re:No DVD by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      No it's not: you become beholden to your DRM certificates' provider. What happens when you want to use non-Apple hardware/software 10 years from now ? or even next year ?

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    13. Re:No DVD by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      it's not the best "technology" has to offer. It's the business "business" and "the law" want to offer us for now. It isn't hard to imagine a standardized, normalized, maybe even syndicate- or government-run DRM scheme that would free us from being beholden to a single company.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    14. Re:No DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I ripped all of my DVDs onto iTunes and I easily sync them up to my iPad. I'm not sure your point has merit. I've got King Kong, Ikuru, and 40 Year-Old Virgin (a terrific, Slashdot-inspired documentary BTW) on there right now. The parent post is equally without merit, since Apple and all manner of 3rd party suppliers sell video out cables for both iPhone and iPad. Last time I went back to CT, I played Matrix on my mother's TV for her straight from my iPhone with this: Apple Composite AV Cable

    15. Re:No DVD by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      My DVDs can burn in a fire

      Most people have insurance against that. Does anyone even offer insurance against your DRM scheme going belly up? (I can't really see how they could given the massive systemic risk)

      they can grow fungus, get scratched.

      Some of us take care of our possesions. Ok scratches may be an issue for a few of the most frequently used discs but they shouldn't be a threat to your entire collection in the way a DRM scheme going belly up is.

      But in the long run, it just takes looking at the digital music market to predict what will happen in the long term. These DRMs will eventually be depreciated, stores like iTunes will continue to support old DRMs but only sell DRM free content. It will take a few years, though, because it wont happen until movie digital sales are as commonplace as digital music sales were a couple years ago.

      I hope you are right but fear you are wrong. Afaict the music industry only relented on DRM because they were fed up with apple having a two product lockin (you couldn't use your ipod with DRM music purchased from anywhere other than itunes and you couldn't easilly use your itunes music on a non-apple portable player).

      The movie industry OTOH seems to be all for tightening up on protection. Afaict movies have never been sold in the west in any significant numbers (there was videocd but I have never seen a legit videocd for sale) in an unprotected digital format. Yes the DVD protection is thoughrougly cracked but they are still using it to bring the legal hammer on anyone who sells DVD copying software commercially and they really stepped up the protection for blu-ray.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    16. Re:No DVD by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it's not entirely legal in the US to format-shift the content you bought leased which is protected with any sort of encryption code (even if it's ROT-13) according to the DMCA. For the rest, QuickTime allows you to convert other digital media with nice presets for AppleTV, iPod Touch etc.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    17. Re:No DVD by Tharsman · · Score: 2

      I hope you are right but fear you are wrong. Afaict the music industry only relented on DRM because they were fed up with apple having a two product lockin (you couldn't use your ipod with DRM music purchased from anywhere other than itunes and you couldn't easilly use your itunes music on a non-apple portable player).

      The movie industry OTOH seems to be all for tightening up on protection. Afaict movies have never been sold in the west in any significant numbers (there was videocd but I have never seen a legit videocd for sale) in an unprotected digital format. Yes the DVD protection is thoughrougly cracked but they are still using it to bring the legal hammer on anyone who sells DVD copying software commercially and they really stepped up the protection for blu-ray.

      It was Apple that was sick of the DRM, every time some one came up with any kind of workaround the DRM they were contractually forced to patch the DRM to prevent that DRM, a lot of money wasted in something that added no real security and in the end it added nothing to their sales (people WANTED iPods, they didn't need a lock-in to sell the things.) It was the music industry that refused to let go of the DRM. Heck, even at the end they told Apple they would only accept DRM free music IF Apple allowed them to increase the prices for new music and best-sellers.

      There are two reasons I think it will take digital purchases to be at the same level of digital music before this happens. First, digital distributors need to have more power before they can voice their annoyance with keeping DRMs up to date. Second, content owners must feel the world has accepted digital purchases and that the masses truly think digital sales are easier to get than piracy.

    18. Re:No DVD by Albanach · · Score: 0

      Yes, 'quite easy'. Obvious problems though - you shouldn't need iTunes. It's a stupid interface for getting movies onto your device. Something like AirShare lets you drag and drop a movie on your desktop to the device, but of course the sandboxing means you can't get that movie into your iPad videos folder, you nee to watch it inside AirShare.

      The iPad also has no inbuilt way to watch movies stored on NAS. There's a number of apps which try to offer DLNA support, but all the ones I've tried have been unstable.

      It's not that the iPad isn't capable - look at the XBMC install for jailbroken iPads. It's just that Apple won't allow the capabilities to be exploited. They'd rather you just bought the movie again through iTunes and let them get their cut.

    19. Re:No DVD by Kashell · · Score: 2

      FYI: Handbrake can convert quite a few things into MP4, but these all don't play on the iPad. there's some issues here.

    20. Re:No DVD by node+3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      None of your listed fears reasonably apply to iTunes content.

    21. Re:No DVD by iluvcapra · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it's not the best "technology" has to offer. It's the business "business" and "the law" want to offer us for now.

      What part of my post, after the word "assuming," didn't you understand?

      Without legal regimes to create copyrights, there'd be no mass media to buy content from, you'd have a high-speed no-physical-media perfectly-interoperable system to deliver the best content creators would have to offer under such a system, which would be:

      • 30 second videos of cats peeing on things
      • 1 minute Star Trek parodies (that go on far too long even at that)
      • 5 minute screencasts showing you how to python script your word processor
      • two-hour university lectures given by pointy-headed media academics who spend their whole lecture pompously asserting how advanced modern society is now that authors are unable to collect royalties, and how he's going to have to stop posting the videos unless more people stop auditing his class and start taking it for credit, because he's gotta eat.
      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    22. Re:No DVD by node+3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, 'quite easy'. Obvious problems though - you shouldn't need iTunes. It's a stupid interface for getting movies onto your device.

      How so? iTunes is a large part of the mass appeal of iPods.

      Something like AirShare lets you drag and drop a movie on your desktop to the device, but of course the sandboxing means you can't get that movie into your iPad videos folder, you nee to watch it inside AirShare.

      Why does that matter? It still plays just fine.

      The iPad also has no inbuilt way to watch movies stored on NAS.

      Why does that matter? If there are apps easily available, how important is to to be built in?

      There's a number of apps which try to offer DLNA support, but all the ones I've tried have been unstable.

      I've not used any DLNA apps, but I've used network video sharing apps, and they all worked fantastically, even transcoding on the fly.

      It's not that the iPad isn't capable - look at the XBMC install for jailbroken iPads. It's just that Apple won't allow the capabilities to be exploited.

      Um, except that they do. You've seen the App Store, right?

      They'd rather you just bought the movie again through iTunes and let them get their cut.

      Their "cut" isn't the issue. They'd much rather you buy an iPad than buy movies from them. Their selling of movies is entirely about selling hardware. The reason they limit *some* things is in order to make their devices more appealing. Once something becomes too complex, people start to look elsewhere.

    23. Re:No DVD by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Steve has a better way: for a small fee, you can download a digital copy right to your device directly from iTunes. It's like magic, except that Steve gets 30%.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    24. Re:No DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, buying the same thing a dozen times over depending on where you want to play it is awesome.

      No, no, you keep to your clearly far superior way. I'm going to go watch my DVD on my computer. Or maybe on my TV. Or maybe even on a friend's TV. Why, more than one possiblity? Madness!

    25. Re:No DVD by kevinmenzel · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it's because originally when iTunes was released, there was no iTunes store, so you HAD to rip CDs for content?

    26. Re:No DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything they can do to help kill physical media is good for everyone.

      Have you met my friend, Mr. Orwell?

    27. Re:No DVD by imboboage0 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you're saying. I use handbrake to rip DVDs to a playable MP4 format for my Xbox. There's a preset that says iPad, and I'm sure it can encode videos for the ipads capabilities just fine. http://lifehacker.com/#!5572037/handbrake-presets-for-your-new-ipad-or-iphone-4

      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    28. Re:No DVD by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      nice though handbrake and x264 are, a DVD isn't a very good master format. iTunes store will have a quality edge over the original DVD if they're not completely incompetent.

      consider the iPad at the distance from your eyes you'll typically watch from is the equivalent of quite a large TV. ...just sayin'

    29. Re:No DVD by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      used them heaps in my last job. EDL lists, FLX files, closed-captioning data etc.

      oldskoo. ever wonder why film post is so expensive? all that old gear to maintain.

    30. Re:No DVD by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      blu-ray mastering machines are backward compatible.

      the manufacturing process has been essentially the same since CDs became cheap to produce - it's rather like processing a black and white photo, but with metal and lasers (you can tell CDs were invented by pioneers in glam rock)

    31. Re:No DVD by evanspw · · Score: 1

      No, they want you to get content from an iTunes server, either your local one or something in the cloud. But there is absolutely nothing to stop you putting any video you want to in your own iTunes library (I am not a lawyer, but there may be some copyright issues in some jurisdictions).

      I'll be happy to see the end of plastic disks.

      --
      Interstitial spaces are filled with cream.
  7. Why wait? by zill · · Score: 1

    but we're pretty sure full production won't start until .. official launch keynote.

    Why would they wait until the official launch to start full production? Don't they need to build up a significant stock by the shipping date?

    1. Re:Why wait? by Tharsman · · Score: 1

      Only reason that comes to my mind is secrecy, but still does not sound realistic to me. Parts have been showing in some places so manufacturing, to some level, is already going on. Final assembly may be what finally got kick-started.

    2. Re:Why wait? by CityZen · · Score: 1

      Indeed, you are correct; they'd need to start "full" production about 3 months before launch in order to have sufficient inventory to ship for the expected demand. (These figures vary, of course, depending upon production rate and expected demand figures, but there needs to be a reasonable equilibrium there.)

    3. Re:Why wait? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Ship straight from the factory warehouse. Why store it, move it store it and move it when you can just direct ship?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Why wait? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      It doesn't make a lot of manufacturing sensel that Apple waits till after the announcement to start manufacturing. For the sake of argument the iPad2 is just as successful as the iPad has been. 14 million devices /365 days = 38,000 iPads a day. I don't anyone who can go from 0 to 38,000 in the short span of a few months.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  8. WSJ = Apple re-setting expectations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    WSJ gets leaked info directly from Apple. Given the quotes in the video, it seems like they're trying to lower people's expectations. One (maybe, but not for-sure, two) cameras, same resolution, higher specs otherwise. Everybody expects higher specs, but also dual cameras, higher-DPI display, and for it to fart unicorns and be made of unobtanium mined from Pandora.

    Me? Gimme facetime so the little one can call her grandparents. That alone will sell an amazing amount. But I'd really like higher-DPI. And possibly a 7".

    1. Re:WSJ = Apple re-setting expectations by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      A 7" version at the same 1024 x 768 resolution would have higher pixels per inch --- so that would be one justification for the in-between size.

      A smaller size would also compete nicely w/ the Kindle, Nook and Sony e-book readers (despite not being e-ink).

      And if it had a stylus, would be the replacement for the Newton MessagePad which Steve Jobs promised when Apple absorbed Newton and killed it.

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    2. Re:WSJ = Apple re-setting expectations by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

      Given the quotes in the video, it seems like they're trying to lower people's expectations.

      Make an exception to Jobs' anti-leak beliefs in order to "reset the expectations" of techies, while risking the Osborne effect and suppressing demand for the current iPad? No way, dude. It's got to be an unofficial leak.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    3. Re:WSJ = Apple re-setting expectations by socsoc · · Score: 1

      Pandora? Everyone knows only Slacker has unobtanium.

    4. Re:WSJ = Apple re-setting expectations by willy_me · · Score: 1

      and for it to fart unicorns

      Please, it is not like an iPad can break the laws of physics. In order to get it to fart unicorns you first have to feed it smurfs - and good luck finding enough smurfs to make one unicorn.

      and be made of unobtanium mined from Pandora

      Now you're just being silly.... I heard they were going to use adamantium.

    5. Re:WSJ = Apple re-setting expectations by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      The Pandora from Avatar or the Pandora from Borderlands? I'll take the Borderlands one because there's a chance the iPad will have a x4 fire elemental effect. Sweet!

    6. Re:WSJ = Apple re-setting expectations by anethema · · Score: 1

      Stylus=resistive touch screen=junk for daily use.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  9. Normally sober ? by mbone · · Score: 4, Funny

    The normally sober and sometimes accurate Wall Street Journal

    Must not read the editorial page much.

    1. Re:Normally sober ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The normally sober and sometimes accurate Wall Street Journal

      Must not read the editorial page much.

      You must not understand the editorial page.
      And /. is something to swear by?

    2. Re:Normally sober ? by LordBmore · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't be surprised. The submission was posted by the frequently drunk and wholly inaccurate CmdrTaco.

    3. Re:Normally sober ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The normally sober and sometimes accurate Wall Street Journal

      Must not read the editorial page much.

      You must not understand the editorial page.
      And /. is something to swear by?

      Understand? Easy. Make sense of? Not enough Koolaid in the world for that.

    4. Re:Normally sober ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The normally sober and sometimes accurate Wall Street Journal

      Must not read the editorial page much.

      You must not understand the editorial page.

      That you look down on those who disagree with you does not convince me you are right. That you don't even try to present an argument makes me suspect that you know you have no argument.

      And /. is something to swear by?

      No one made any claim about slashdot. There are people who think the WSJ is a news source that makes a real effort to be a well researched, factually correct portrayal of reality. No one in their right mind thinks that about slashdot.

  10. Re:Can I get a job at Foxconn? by uprise78 · · Score: 1

    tart

  11. I post this link every six months by wembley+fraggle · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://www.misterbg.org/AppleProductCycle/

    It's continuously relevant.

    1. Re:I post this link every six months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's continuously relevant.

      Apple’s stock surges as Wall Street analysts proclaim the new device will be “Apple’s savior” and the key to turning around the decades-long decline in Apple’s share of the global PC market.

      Yes, yes. It certainly is.

    2. Re:I post this link every six months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory Oatmeal:

      http://theoatmeal.com/comics/apple

    3. Re:I post this link every six months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So's this:

      http://theoatmeal.com/comics/apple

    4. Re:I post this link every six months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the footnote at the end of the page:

      The author has been an Apple user since 1984. During that time, he has owned an Apple IIe, an Apple IIgs, a Mac SE/30, a Mac Quadra 660AV, a PowerComputing PowerCenter 150, and a Power Mac G3/350 (Blue & White). He currently uses a Dual 2.0GHz PowerMac G5 and a 12" PowerBook G4

      Lol

  12. Interesting assumption by Dzimas · · Score: 2

    Given that Foxconn has produced over 1 million iPads a month, I don't see why production wouldn't ramp up a few weeks before an announcement. Staff need to be trained and assembly line glitches need to be resolved before they can deliver flat out. That said, I ordered an Apple TV last November that shipped directly from Shenzhen after a short delay-- it seems that they're not even bothering to warehouse inventory in North America anymore because there is no cost saving when everything has to be air freighted anyway.

  13. Announcement != Production start by jedrek · · Score: 1

    Apple, unlike pretty much every other major player in the consumer electronics/computer market, has a great track record of having products available to buy the day they're announced. The online Apple store always goes down on days when new products are announced so people can order stuff as soon as it's been presented.

  14. Probably true... by bhunachchicken · · Score: 1

    "we're pretty sure full production won't start until Steve Jobs (or whoever will be donning the black turtleneck in his sickly stead) strides onto the stage at the official launch keynote"

    Going by Apple's track record, they usually announce the product and allow you to buy it immediately from their website, to be delivered within a few days. If they had to manufacture the things, they'd make the announcement.... and then everyone would twiddle their thumbs for a few months, waiting for the damn thing.

    I don't believe Apple operates like that any more. They know people go ape shit for their next must-have gadget, so they now adopt the "It's out to buy now! RUN!!! RUN!!!" approach.

    And people normally do.

  15. It needs updating by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    Steve looks too fat in that picture.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:It needs updating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stay classy fella.

  16. Steve Jobs scratches butt twice. It's a sign! by Dega704 · · Score: 2

    Seriously though, Apple's greatest achievement is how they have managed to wrap the public and the tech media around their little finger. The dust hasn't even quite settled from the first iPad launch and I am already seeing articles plastered all over the place about the 'rumors' of the iPad 2.

  17. Two things: by name_already_taken · · Score: 1
    1. They're not going to do a 7 inch version. Forget about it. I've got two 7" Android devices, and the screen is too small to be useful but the device is too large to stick in your pocket. Apple rarely reverses their design decisions. Look how long it took to get a mouse with a secondary click! (That was crazy, by the way)
    2. They're not going to do a stylus. One of the guiding design principles is that good design eliminates or minimizes moving parts. A stylus is a moving part. Forget about it.

    Oh, and yes, I'm disappointed about the screen resolution. The iPad's screen is great, but the latest iPhone screen is better and having a 10" screen at the iPhone's pixel density would truly have been fantastic.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  18. Still waiting for the ideal.... by mark-t · · Score: 1
    Show me a tablet with a letter-sized screen for reading papers or books formatted for that size without having to pan or zoom (14" diagonal), one that can have user content (in particular, pdf's) uploaded to it easily, and one that can *ACTUALLY* be used in a modestly interactive way (such as book reading) for more than a few hours at a time without having to be plugged in (I've heard some of the claims about iPad battery life being really good, but I haven't found them to be true in my experience with the unit).

    I am so disillusioned with the iPad that I'm not holding much hope for its successor.

    1. Re:Still waiting for the ideal.... by Zenaku · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I hate to be yet another voice claiming great iPad battery life against your direct experience, but. . . seriously, did you have a defective unit or something? In my experience a few hours of reading won't even drop my battery gauge by more than a few percent. Hell a few hours of video isn't even a problem.

      The only problem I ever have with battery life is when I want to completely drain it, as they say one should occasionally do. I think the damn thing harvests power from ambient radio waves.

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    2. Re:Still waiting for the ideal.... by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      Upload to a website or email yourself the PDF then stick it in iBooks. Or are you thinking you want to plug in a USB cable and drag and drop a PDF onto your device. How...1990s.

    3. Re:Still waiting for the ideal.... by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      it's sounds like you just want an e-book. go buy a kindle, it's way cheaper and the battery lasts a lot longer.

      (my wife bought a kindle about two years ago...she loved it and used it every day. she said it was awesome. one day she bought an iPad, but after that she still used the kindle most of the time. one day I pointed out that there's a kindle app for the iPad. she never used her kindle again. Oops!)

    4. Re:Still waiting for the ideal.... by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      Show me a tablet with a letter-sized screen for reading papers or books formatted for that size without having to pan or zoom (14" diagonal), one that can have user content (in particular, pdf's) uploaded to it easily, and one that can *ACTUALLY* be used in a modestly interactive way (such as book reading) for more than a few hours at a time without having to be plugged in (I've heard some of the claims about iPad battery life being really good, but I haven't found them to be true in my experience with the unit).

      Have you given the Kindle DX a try? It sounds like it has the capabilities and form factor that you are looking for.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    5. Re:Still waiting for the ideal.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The Kindle fails my purposes in other ways where the iPad actually wins. First and most notably, the Kindle is not color. Secondly, its not designed to respond to touch gestures. Third, the refresh rate is unacceptably slow and is too visually distracting when trying to quickly visually scan across multiple pages for particular information (which may be a diagram and not just text that can be searched for).

      Of course, also there's the fact that the Kindle isn't a 14" unit, and to the can't display letter-sized PDF's supplied by the end user at full size without zooming/panning.

    6. Re:Still waiting for the ideal.... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You mean, like the kindle? OK, it's not 14" diagonal but everything else fits, and it is a pleasure to use.
      .

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Still waiting for the ideal.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The refresh rate on the kindle is abominable... and is visually distracting (I've tried using it). Also, it does not do color, nor does it have a decent touch screen interface.

    8. Re:Still waiting for the ideal.... by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      well, i don't think what you want exists in exactly the form you specified. you'll have to make do with some other device or live without. not a big deal.

      now, if you're speaking as a manager who wants to give 500 employees a portable letter-size PDF viewer so they can look at legal documents, you might be able to find someone in taiwan or china to do a production run just for you, at a price not far from the iPad.

    9. Re:Still waiting for the ideal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me a tablet with a letter-sized screen for reading papers

      A4 would be more globally useful.

    10. Re:Still waiting for the ideal.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      A4 size would suit me just fine too.

    11. Re:Still waiting for the ideal.... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Informative

      A few hours battery life reading? What kind of reading were you doing? I borrowed an iPad for a month and the average time between charges was a week if I was just reading. If I was watching a video or surfing the web a lot, it was a few days. It wasn't my iPad so I don't know how well the owner took care of it but it seemed to have decent battery life for me. It doesn't last weeks like a Kindle will but then again you can't do all the other stuff on a Kindle so that's a trade-off

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  19. Rip. Mix. Burn. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

    Granted it came out before the iTunes store, but Apple was the company behind Rip. Mix. Burn. which greatly pissed off all the record companies.

  20. Option strategy blueprint. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmmm.

    I think I'll base an Apple options strategy on that.

    For each five lines of the above, there's an options strategy:

    Buy calls, covered writes, straddles, long puts ......

  21. Obligatory by noidentity · · Score: 1

    The main new feature the iPad 2 is rumored to have: wings.

  22. Re:Not know how to right click by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Ya'know,

    This might be the only piece of The Newbie Experience I have no patience making policy over. I have taught a couple of brand new users very successfully with the catchphrase "when in doubt, right click and see what shows up". It's like a treasure chest of goodies.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  23. Apple IPad 2 - Marketing and beyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm Sure Apple are at least on the verge of producing the Apple iPad 2. I agree with one of the last comments that Apple have been great at aiding the media and giving them a bone to chew on so-to-speak! Its actually great but simple marketing. They can guage how much demand and get some valuable last minute feedback before they go into production. I keep up with all of the ipad 2 news here http://www.infoweblive.com/default.aspx/apple-ipad-2
    I would like to see multiple USB ports and a built in stand liek some of the new HTC Google Android phones? oops did i mention them both in the same paragraph? My bad ;)
    PS: I'll be buying an Apple IPad 2 as soon as its available

  24. Can also do AirPlay by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    You can do HD video out via AirPlay. There are open AirPlay servers for any computer, or you can use an AppleTV.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  25. Wow... by kiwimate · · Score: 1

    The normally sober and sometimes accurate Wall Street Journal...

    I don't think you fully appreciate the amazing levels of hypocrisy and outright lack of awareness involved in posting that on a site like Slashdot. This is, after all, the site where it's entirely possible to have 100 comments on a story before anyone posts a rebuttal/explanation that total invalidates all prior comments with two sentences that come straight from reading the article.

  26. Dog bites man by Telvin_3d · · Score: 1

    How is this news? Apple tends to stick to annual release schedules. iPad launched in April. April is now 2 months away. Breaking news! Product in production two months before it goes on sale!

    The only news would be if the iPad2 WASN'T in production already.

  27. Yawn by McTickles · · Score: 0

    More iGadgets.

  28. Re:Fabulous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've not run into a youtube video that I can't play on my ipad. I have the wi-fi version so I can't comment on the data.

  29. Apple vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Ipad 2 is vaporware, which is trying to compete with the Android tablets like the Xoom that is being released in a few days.

    1. Re:Apple vaporware by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      "Vaporware" is usually reserved for products that companies announce themselves that will never make it to production. From what we know of Apple, they are on a yearly refresh cycle for their iOS devices so early Spring would be the time they announce a new iPad. Also, Apple usually announces a product which is available shortly thereafter. The term you're looking for is "Rumors".

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  30. Guess it's time to start hanging out in bars again by thesameguy · · Score: 1

    Maybe I can substantiate its imminence!

  31. Valentine's day by faa · · Score: 1

    I've heard rumors from 9to5mac that the shipment planed for the Valentine's Day

  32. Still 10" by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who wants a 12"?

    Man, that came out wrong.

    12" screen, that is.

    1. Re:Still 10" by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who wants a 12"?

      Hmmm.... thats why you call yourself Quiet_Desperation

    2. Re:Still 10" by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1

      10" is not enough for you?

    3. Re:Still 10" by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Yeah. My post came with the humorous male part length implication already integrated, but, hey, good for you. :-)

  33. One benefit by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    until that purchased contents DRM system is deprecated and you're left with a bunch of useless files you can no longer play.

    Actually, the Apple DRM'ed files would continue to play as long as your devices held out.

    Another poster replied with a good point - physical DVD's can be destroyed. If you accidentally deleted your Apple media, one good point in their favor is you can simply re-download the files because Apple knows what you have. And not all Apple media is DRm - audio files are not. It's only Video that has that annoying encumbrance.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  34. Damn them. by FellowConspirator · · Score: 1

    I fear I shall purchase such a device. My annual bonus shall be distributed soon and the peer pressure is great. We are working with iPads in the office, and I have a fantasy of using such a device as a gaming (board/tabletop RPG) aid (I recognize I will need to do some of my own development)... Oh, the gadget-goodness, it burns...

    Of course, my employer will probably provide me with one, in which case, I can save some money...

    1. Re:Damn them. by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1

      No way would I spend my own hard-earned nickels and dimes on it. If my employer were to provide one on the other hand, I'd be happy to have it. I'm only now starting to understand what the damn thing is good for (aside from video watching, social networking, and other such frivolity).

    2. Re:Damn them. by gig · · Score: 1

      It's good for anything you can do with your hands (touch) or your eyes (screen). Pretty much everything.

  35. It will be called the iPad Maxi by AskFirefly · · Score: 1

    And it is expected to fully absorb the marketplace within a week or so. Hopefully, it will be a match for the heavy flow of demand right at the beginning.

    --
    I'm not a human, but I play one on T.V.
  36. Re:I'd be more interested... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    I would appreciate rumors of your demise, but I fear those would be even more exaggerated than the crap you spew.

  37. USB or Light Peak by cdpage · · Score: 1

    Also rumored to have USB...(one of those, shoulda been there in the first place kinda things).

    But what are the chances they bring out light peak instead? would be Very Apple of them to go that way instead.

  38. Does this really suprise anyone? by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 2

    Apple will continue to put a new one of these out every 6 months, and tell you that you absolutely must have it. And somehow they make money, humans are so gullible.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:Does this really suprise anyone? by gig · · Score: 1

      No, the working life of iPad is 2 years. They expect you to buy one every 2 years. There is a 1 year warranty you can extend to 2 with AppleCare and always be under warranty if you buy a new iPad every 2 years. However you get free software updates for 3 years.

      iPad has a 10-12 hour battery. If you charge it once a day, that is 8760 hours over 2 years, making a $599 iPad about 14 cents per hour. It is a good deal.

      Resale value on a 2 year old iOS device is about 30%. That lowers the price to about the same as a netbook.

      iPad is actually cheaper than paper and ink printing for many users. These devices pay for themselves very easily.

    2. Re:Does this really suprise anyone? by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 0

      Thank you for that informative post, oh slave of jobs.

      --
      What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  39. Is it news? by ideaz · · Score: 2

    This is not news for most of us here.

  40. Here is how to know there is one in the works by geekoid · · Score: 2

    The iPad is a success.

    Really, it's not even a tiny leap to think they will make another iPad.

    You know what else is in the works? a new iPhone.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  41. You know it will suck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because Jobs takes sick leave and puts one of his minions in when they have a 'nothing to report, minor refresh' keynote.

  42. Re:Fabulous! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    I'm not at all an Apple fan, and not particularly keen on iPad, but here's a tip: before you write any other comment on it, go to your nearest Apple store and, you know, play with an iPad for a few minutes, to know what it even is. Just so that you don't write patently stupid things like:

    won't let me watch 90% of the videos on YouTube

  43. dear apple by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

    please get rid of those damn game center nag messages. i don't need to be reminded every time i start every game that i have chosen not to participate in some mid-level manager's "social high score networking" pop-up dialog box wet dream. it's asinine and insulting. stop it.

  44. They will ship the day they're introduced by gig · · Score: 1

    It's only first-gen products that get announced and ship later. They'll have millions of iPad 2's built before they introduce them. They will ship "today!" same as MacBook Air recently.

  45. It makes perfect sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently, they are marking down the original Ipad for ***90%*** off...***sold for $23.74*** (hey, isn't that closer to 95% off!?)

  46. Re:Fabulous! by techwreck · · Score: 1

    1. I own an iPad. 2. Most of the video content on YouTube is served up in Flash which the iPad does not support. While I was being somewhat sarcastic with the 90% figure, the actual number on the percentage of video content on the web delivered in Flash is quoted by many sources to be over 75%. This has been one of my biggest frustrations of owning the device and while some may see it as a trivial matter. What you call "stupid", I believe it is a legitimate concern.

  47. Re:Fabulous! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    1. I own an iPad. 2. Most of the video content on YouTube is served up in Flash which the iPad does not support.

    iPad has a YouTube app, which will play all videos from the website. It doesn't work in the browser, yes, but who cares?