Slashdot Mirror


Vatican Bans IOS Confession App

An anonymous reader writes "Despite all the hype that a lowly priest had approved the new confessional app hitting the app store, the truth has now revealed itself. According to today's Daily Mail, a spokesman for the Vatican, Federico Lombardi said: 'It is essential to understand that the rites of penance require a personal dialogue between penitents and their confessor. It cannot be replaced by a computer application. I must stress to avoid all ambiguity, under no circumstance is it possible to confess by iPhone."

37 of 323 comments (clear)

  1. Probably a good move, regardless of Vat's logic.. by intellitech · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Confessions probably shouldn't be communicated over cellular data connections, anyway..

    --
    vos nescitis quicquam, nec cogitatis quia expedit nobis ut unus moriatur homo pro populo et non tota gens pereat.
  2. Not sure about that... by grub · · Score: 3, Funny


    FTA: The Vatican has warned that an app can never replace visiting a priest.

    Oh, I don't know. An app is much easier on the ass.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Not sure about that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, how can a priest find out if your kids are diddle-worthy over the phone.

    2. Re:Not sure about that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're holding the priest wrong.

  3. I guess the Vatican doesn't want by hsmith · · Score: 3, Funny

    To pay the 30% Apple tax on selling indulgences through IAP either - is it a consumable or a subscription?

    1. Re:I guess the Vatican doesn't want by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Haha, very funny. The truth is, contrary to popular perception (especially from protestants), that indulgences aren't sold; in fact, they are acts of penance done to reduce the required stay in purgatory, not a money-making scheme. In fact, if they were a money-making scheme, they're one of the least effective ones in existence. Indulgences were given for reading your bible, for reciting prayers regularly, and many other things.

      Newsflash: catholic.com provides literature supporting the catholic church. :P

      The truth is that in the past the Catholic church was a very corrupt and power hungry organization. Notice I'm giving the benefit of doubt to the present church.

      Indulgences were sold, AND the church purposely kept the bible away from the masses by keeping it in latin and in limited distribution. Johannes Gutenberg got in trouble with the church by publishing a readable translation of the Bible, and later Martin Luther inadvertently initiated the protestant reformation by publishing his "95 Theses on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences" protesting the actions of the Archbishop's selling of indulgences to finance the rebuilding of St. Peter's Basilica.

      Just because the church spent centuries trying to justify indulgences doesn't negate the suspicions that protestants still hold against catholicism.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    2. Re:I guess the Vatican doesn't want by wsxyz · · Score: 2

      The only dogma about Purgatory is that prayers for the dead are beneficial.

      Since it is also dogma that souls in Hell cannot be helped by prayer, and those in Heaven have no need of prayer, the dogma that prayers for the dead are beneficial demands that another state exist. This state is what the Church calls Purgatory. The exact nature of Purgatory is not defined by the Church.

      You may have been thinking of Limbo - the state of deceased unbaptized infants - which a few years ago was, with great fanfare, declared abolished by the press. In fact, the existence of Limbo was never a dogma of the Church, and the theological commission which studied the question of Limbo a few years ago did not conclude that there is no Limbo. It concluded that the Church does not know the fate of deceased unbaptized infants.

    3. Re:I guess the Vatican doesn't want by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 2

      It's only trollish because you disagree.

      If you can't bring yourself to take my word for it, then please do your own research. There are history books at your local library, and you could follow your own advise and use Google. Just don't limit yourself to the catholic church for the information.

      I'm not going to post citations, and quite frankly I'm pretty startled that your view on historical facts are so skewed and incomplete. Look up "Johannes Gutenburg" and "Martin Luther". Why should I limit your research to links that I can provide?

      What you are asking me to do is equivalent to provide sources for the fact that water is wet.

      Saying, in a nutshell, "this is a fact" with no logical or historical basis besides common misconception is illogical. What do they call this, again? Oh, right: "If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it".

      I'm shocked on how ignorant you have kept yourself. For your own good, please go to a library or even better take a history class.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  4. Not Banned by ThePCJedi · · Score: 5, Informative

    To be more specific the app is not banned, but it's purpose has been clarified.

    It is an app designed to help prepare people for confession, they only say no to the idea of this replacing the act of confessing to a priest.

    1. Re:Not Banned by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, thank goodness the proper magical bullshit has been protected. Imagine doing your weird cult-like activity incorrectly! Thank you Vatican overseers!

  5. Re:Probably a good move, regardless of Vat's logic by Anonymusing · · Score: 5, Informative

    The app wasn't to make confessions anyway, but to assist Catholics in the confession process. From the original article: "So, how does the app work? It leads you through an 'Examination of Conscience' to help you figure out what your real sins are -- and not just by retreading your run of the mill 10 Commandments. The sinful suggestions the app offers are inventive and even age appropriate."

    I've read elsewhere that one of the priests who designed it, had a parishioner show up in the confession box with it, and used the app during confession to help remind him of his transgressions.

    So this is just grandstanding by the Papacy. The app was never meant to replace "personal dialogue between penitents and their confessor." This is like saying Google Maps is bad because it somehow replaces the actual travel you're intending to take. Uh, no.

    --
    Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
  6. The Penance Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The iPhone app was never meant to replace the Sacrament. It is a tool to help people prepare, do it, and pray. I don't agree with using a digital device while in confession or saving information even temporarily on devices when it comes to my sins.

    There is a free application for Android devices that is similar called PenanceProject. It helps users do an examination of conscience before the Sacrament and to pray afterwards.

    You can get the application here: https://market.android.com/details?id=appinventor.ai_jamorrow.PenanceProject

    To find out more about The Penance Project and why Catholics confess please visit: http://www.thepenanceproject.

  7. Wrong, Not Banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The app in question was created to help people through the process of Confession. It's a little daunting if you haven't done it in a while. Trust me, as a chronic on-again-off-again Catholic, I know. I have he app. It just takes the place of old catechism books I would use to brush up on Confession before going.

    The article says that no app can ever replace going to a priest. That's not what this app attempts to do. The conclusion that the app is banned is drawn from faulty logic. There is no ban. Who ever wrote the article has absolutely no idea what either side of this is talking about.

  8. Even the Vatican doesn't RTFA by Tridus · · Score: 5, Informative

    This app doesn't do confession. It never did. That was some creation by an incredibly simplistic media headline which was always wrong.

    The app helps you figure out what your sins are, and can keep track of what you've previously confessed.

    So all they're saying now is that the app can't do something that it never did in the first place. Umm, goodie?

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    1. Re:Even the Vatican doesn't RTFA by Chapter80 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I wish I had mod points to mod you up.

      "Vatican bans IOS Confession App" headline is totally misleading (and actually incorrect).

      They didn't ban the app. They said that the app is to be used to as you said - to help you determine what to confess. Which is exactly what the app was designed for, and what their earlier announcement said.

      No change. No story here. Nothing to see here. Move along.

    2. Re:Even the Vatican doesn't RTFA by PatHMV · · Score: 2

      Except that the Vatican DIDN'T say that this app is bad or impermissible. That's TFA's conclusion from the Vatican's statement, not what the Vatican actually said. The Vatican did not, as best I can tell from TFA, condemn this app. It said only that it's not possible to confess by iPhone. Since this app does not allow for confession by iPhone, the Vatican has not condemned it. They didn't mention the app by name. They didn't say that [app name] can't be used.

    3. Re:Even the Vatican doesn't RTFA by OctaviusIII · · Score: 2

      At long last the Vatican actually says something with clarity and timeliness. Maybe they finally hired a communications director. So I'm quite glad they came out and made sure that this was clarified. The whole thing about contraceptives for medical purposes wasn't new but the Vatican had never been explicit about clarifying things, so we all went apeshit at the announcement. Good of them to get in front of the curve on something for once.

      --
      What's this? Another weblog? On transit?
  9. Misleading Title!!! by tkprit · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Vatican didn't BAN anything! A spokesperson for the Vatican said it wasn't supposed to be used for call-in confessions — which it was never DESIGNED to do in the first place; it's not even possible to do that!

    RTFA!

    a spokesman for the Vacitan, Federico Lombardi said: ‘It is essential to understand that the rites of penance require a personal dialogue between penitents and their confessor.’It cannot be replaced by a computer application’. ‘I must stress to avoid all ambiguity, under no circumstance is it possible to "confess by iPhone".’

    The guy is STATING THE OBVIOUS because the app has been sensationalized, hello! /. is better than this!

    1. Re:Misleading Title!!! by IANAAC · · Score: 2

      hello! /. is better than this!

      Um, actually, no it's not. Slashdot ROUTINELY puts up sensationalist and outright wrong headlines.

    2. Re:Misleading Title!!! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2

      ‘I must stress to avoid all ambiguity, under no circumstance is it possible to "confess by iPhone".’

      The guy is STATING THE OBVIOUS because the app has been sensationalized, hello! /. is better than this!

      I don't think it's that obvious, and I bet there's not a programmer on Slashdot who didn't immediately start thinking of counterexamples. "What if I'm an astronaut and my spaceship is about to burn up on re-entry and I want to confess? What if I'm that guy in 127 hours and I need to confess before the gangrene sits in. What if I was on my way to the confessional when I got trapped in a blizzard and need to call one in?"

      "Under no circumstances"? This guy doesn't write unit tests for a living.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  10. Agreed by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

    I actually agree with this, to an extent. Religion aside, my understanding (as an atheist) is that confession is supposed to be an admission of guilt, and reflects an internal acceptance of the church's morality. I'm not saying that morality is particularly right, but I digress. I think the actual visit with another person is a vital part of that admission and acceptance. With a quick look through any online forum, it's quite clear that people are inclined to be aggressive and dishonest if they think they are anonymous.

    Remove the personal contact, and sincerity vanishes as well.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  11. They gave it a shot but. by ddd0004 · · Score: 3, Funny

    They couldn't get past the l33tspeak and SMS language

    for9!ve m3 fath3r f0r I h@ve s!nn3d,OMG LOL
    !'ve l00k3d 4t pr0n and OMG th!s ch!ck w@s hawt!!
    l8r noob

  12. Article so wrong on so many counts by ildon · · Score: 2

    It's so wrong it's wrong about being wrong. The app was never intended to replace confession to begin with. It was to assist people in doing an examination of conscience so they could be better prepared for their real confession with the priest. At no point was this app ever intended to *replace* confession. It's like a study guide to help you prepare for an exam, not an exam itself. However, much of the news media saw "Confession App" and often did zero research on the subject and was just like "LOL ROBOTS REPLACING PRIESTS". I will say that NPR at least got the story correct, but I saw a lot of other news outlets that did not at all.

    In fact, the Vatican saying that an iPhone app cannot replace confession with a priest is exactly the same as the app's creator's belief. The Vatican is not banning the app at all, and their statement is likely more a reaction to the aforementioned news media and idiotic public who didn't even try to figure out what the app's purpose was rather than an indictment of the app itself.

  13. Dependent on the Church by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Bible actually clearly states you are to confess sin directly to God, not to man. But the Catholic Church wants you dependent on the Church, and this app removes part of that dependence.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Dependent on the Church by LastGunslinger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, we went over this between 400 and 500 years ago. It was called the Reformation.

    2. Re:Dependent on the Church by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 2

      Jesus advises us to seek help from another and provide help to another this way we both are healed.

      James 5:16 does not explicitly give the power to hear confessions to priests or the church.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    3. Re:Dependent on the Church by LordLucless · · Score: 2

      Meh, it was more along the lines of a compromise: "I'll endorse your religion and protect you from the nasty inquisitors, if you'll let me have a divorce". The founders of the Church of England were very much concerned about reformation issues - it was just its titular head that wasn't.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  14. Re:Probably a good move, regardless of Vat's logic by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 5, Informative

    I wouldn't say it's "grandstanding by the Papacy". There was a lot of misinformation going around about the app - a lot of news stories that were flat wrong - and setting the record straight officially and unambiguously makes sense. (I'm hardly a fan of the Catholic Church, but they're not guilty of quite everything they're accused of. :) )

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  15. Reminds Me of a Story by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Many years ago, I new woman, who was raise Catholic, sorta, but never went to Church as an adult -- except to go to confession. Instead of confessing, she made up stories to get the priest hot. She claimed that some of them would get off listening to her.

    1. Re:Reminds Me of a Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      An elderly man goes into confession and says to the priest, "Father, I'm 80 years old, married, have four kids and 11 grandchildren, and last night I had an affair. I made love to two 21 year old girls. Both of them. Twice."

      The priest said: "Well, my son, when was the last time you were in confession?"

      "Never Father, I'm Jewish."

      "So then, why are you telling me?"

      "Are you kidding? I'm telling everybody!"

  16. post reformation doesn't count by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 2

    yeah, they're different now, but that's one of the reasons the Protestants even exist.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    1. Re:post reformation doesn't count by funwithBSD · · Score: 2

      Interestingly enough, another other reason was the fact you needed a priest to intercede for you with the creator.
      The idea you could pray directly to God was blasphemy back then.

      And I think that is their major objection. Once more, the personal interaction with a priest is no longer needed in the process.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  17. Re:Probably a good move, regardless of Vat's logic by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just heard about this from friends and coworkers and they all were lead to think (from their own sources I suppose) that the app was actually used for confessing and getting absolved through it.

    That would require them to use in-app purchasing, and give Apple 30% of each indulgence.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  18. Re:Probably a good move, regardless of Vat's logic by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

    You do... but only on the Pentecostal version. you admit your sins to it and then slap your self in the forehead with the phone as it says "in the name of jeee....sus..." loudly...

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  19. Re:What do you mean? by SETIGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    What about a burning bush?????

    I think you're supposed to confess that to your gynecologist.

  20. Re:For that matter by RKThoadan · · Score: 2

    It doesn't mention priests but James 5:16 is quite explicit about confessing to another person:

    "Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous person is powerful and effective."

    I'd say that confession in general is a slowly rising trend among Protestants. The Lutheran church has always believed in it, although it's not as emphasized as it is in Catholic, Orthodox and Anglican/Episcopal churches. It's beginning to be supported among more typically Evangelical churches as well, although the most common suggestion there is to confess to your spouse or a church Elder. Most Evangelical ministers aren't too comfortable with it yet, but many are making a point of getting training (often from Catholics or Lutherans) in that, and agree that it really does require that training to be effective.

  21. Re:Probably a good move, regardless of Vat's logic by Miseph · · Score: 2

    When did it become the twenty firth century? Are there going to be 19 clones of Colin Firth also running about making mediocre films and inexplicably moistening ladies' undergarments or something?

    Aside from that, your blind prejudice is no better than any other. Sadly, I can't think of any good quips to the effect of "don't be a hypocrite" that aren't derived from some religious text from the top of my head, but I think you get the idea.

    --
    Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.