Slashdot Mirror


$30 GPS Jammer Can Wreak Havok

An anonymous reader writes "A simple $30 GPS jammer made in China can ruin your day. It doesn't just affect your car's navigation — ATM machines, cell phone towers, plane, boat, train navigation systems all depend upon GPS signals that are easily blocked. These devices fail badly — with no redundancy. These jammers can be used to defeat vehicle tracking products — but end up causing a moving cloud of chaos. The next wave of anti-GPS devices include GPS spoofers to trick or confuse nearby devices."

27 of 386 comments (clear)

  1. Weak spot in FAA's "NextGen" system by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What's even more disturbing is that the FAA is currently looking to move away from traditional radar and even human air traffic controllers, as part of their "NextGen" system. GPS is just fine as long as there is a redundancy in the system. But the idea of abandoning radar as if GPS were a time-tested system is a little scary.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Weak spot in FAA's "NextGen" system by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But the idea of abandoning radar as if GPS were a time-tested system is a little scary.

      It is time tested. It works very well. It's just more vulnerable.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Weak spot in FAA's "NextGen" system by kaiser423 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Modern INS is good enough that even if you lose GPS lock, you'll be able to get where you're going very precisely. You can dead reckon very, very well with modern equipment.

      I was recently flying a fairly expensive INS, and broke GPS lock in the middle of a flight. 3 hours of jet flight later, that INS showed me on the runway with the same 6-DOF (position, yaw, pitch, roll) within a couple of meters of what a still locked system was doing.

    3. Re:Weak spot in FAA's "NextGen" system by colinnwn · · Score: 4, Informative

      It would affect nothing. Pilots have a "decision height" at which point they must go around if they can't see the runway. GPS, along with several other technologies, allows 2 things, a lower decision height, and automated landings. Rules that regulate pilots and avionics require that the pilot is always able to identify a failure, and to be reasonably able to safely recover from a failure using alternative instruments or procedures. If the plane's GPS were to loose a fix, it would set off an alarm, and the pilot would either immediately start a go-around, or s/he would choose to land manually.

      Planes also have an IRU (internal reference unit) or laser gyroscope that is able to dead reckon where the plane is based on the fact of knowing where an aircraft was at some previous point, and summing up all of the movements of the aircraft since that point. Before GPS, using IRUs were the primary automated navigation tool for commercial aircraft. So even in the event of a loss of GPS fix, the aircraft still knows exactly where it is for a long period of time. I don't know if the IRU can feed its location fix back into the NextGen aircraft transponder (which normally uses GPS) that reports to air traffic control computers where the aircraft is.

    4. Re:Weak spot in FAA's "NextGen" system by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny
  2. Old news by GPSguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The ability to white-noise (or pink-noise) jam GPS has been around and employed for, literally, years. And, most of the first of these I saw came from China, too. GPS is a relatively fragile system, at least n the L1-C/A world: GPS satellites have limited power budgets so signal levels are low on the ground. Receivers have high gain. Multipath in urban environments can confuse receivers. Emitting a random noise signal over the range of L1 frequencies isn't that hard, and doesn't take much power... or antenna height... to cause problems.

    The article makes all of these points. Read it and take note of the fragility of the system. That's its downfall, not a $30 device.

    --
    Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by tenure.
  3. Re:Redundant by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

    At Indy, all you need to know is "Turn Left"

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  4. messing with air-traffic controllers get some hard by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 5, Informative

    messing with air-traffic controllers can get you some hard time. I think it's federal pound you in the ass time.

  5. Re:Multiple possible comments by Joe+U · · Score: 3, Informative

    (Technical): ...which is why they are illegal in nearly every regulatory environment.

    Like drugs and guns, which we now have none of.

  6. Oh, bad form... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm not surprised by how many devices would use GPS(the ability to get a fairly accurate location fix and a damn accurate timebase for peanuts and an OK view of the sky is certainly attractive...); but I am surprised, a bit, at how many "serious" systems(even ones where hostile action is to be expected, like ATMs, or where failure Just Isn't Acceptable, like air traffic control) wouldn't have some degree of redundancy, if only because of the risk of a cheap GPS module burning some sensitive RF chip because the local arc-welder user fired up again...

    Your basic RTC, say, isn't as accurate as GPS time; especially in the long term, or if not temperature compensated and subject to variable conditions; but it should still deviate by less than a second over a day or two of lost GPS(never mind 10-60 minutes of jamming) and can, if needed, retain reasonably accurate time for as long as power holds out, and they don't need much power.

    Similarly, today's MEMS accelerometers and on-chip magnetometers/compasses, while you might not want to dead-reckon your way around the world with them, can easily enough compensate for losses in GPS fix over the short term, and can 'sanity-check' abrupt changes in GPS readings.

    For static objects(like radar towers) you can basically treat position as a constant(possibly with recalibration from time to time if there are structural shifts) and calculate dish position based on a simple rotary encoder or the like.

    Obviously, for space, power, and cost reasons, Joe Consumer's $50 cellphone or $80 dash-nav isn't necessarily going to incorporate multiple layers of GPS failsafe. If the GPS stops working, Joe can just use the meat-coprocessor he stores in his skull to suck it up and figure it out until GPS comes back online.

    For more important systems, though, I would honestly have hoped for better, especially in situations(like cell towers and most ATMs) where the equipment itself isn't exactly inexpensive, so $50 or $100 worth of accelerometer and RTC failsafe would be reasonable, and where they usually have a network hard-line. NTP isn't perfect; but it certainly is handy(if necessary, users of dedicated circuits, rather than those who rely on public internet, might be able to achieve even greater accuracy by comparing their GPS time with the GPS time reported by the hardware on the other end of the circuit, to determine the round-trip time fairly exactly...)

    Also, the "backup" gyrocompass mentioned in TFA, that failed to act as a backup to GPS because it crashed when it lost GPS signal is just sad. Perhaps it was purchased from the same company who provides emergency generators that can only be started by mains-powered control systems?

  7. $30 box from evil empire by codegen · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you bothered to read past the first page, you would have found out that the $30 box from the evil empire was shutting down Newark Airport twice a day because a truck driver was using it to defeat the toll transponder on the NJ Turnpike next door.

    --
    Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
  8. Re:ATM's??? by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 3, Informative

    ATMs (and many other things) use GPS as a highly accurate master clock.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  9. Re:WANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why would you want one other than to just be an asshole?

  10. Re:Vulnerable by Hydian · · Score: 5, Informative

    Military has its own encrypted channels for GPS signals. Same satellites but not the same signal as consumer devices.

    While this is true, it just means that you need to jam a different frequency. Encryption has nothing to do with it as you aren't trying to access it, but DoS it. The reasons that the military runs its own separate GPS are for better accuracy (civilian GPS has inaccuracy built in while military GPS is accurate to within a meter) and so they can shut it down without hurting themselves within a theater.

  11. Re:Vulnerable by kenj0418 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    or just run your jammer at 100 watts

    The FCC will appreciate that I'm sure.

    Considering this discussion was about jamming GPS on an incoming missile. I think I'll cope with whatever fine the FCC decides to charge.

  12. Re:WANT! by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You probably don't want one. A few years ago I bought a cell phone jammer from a company in Hong Kong. The build quality was terrible and I was only able to jam phones within a 2 or 3 foot radius at best. Most of the time the phone would drop signal and then find its way back onto the network in 30 or so seconds. I managed just once to drop a stranger's loud call on the train after dozes on attempts.

    Turns out cell phones are designed to find ways around interference. Afterall, my jammer was just like having to deal with 100 nearby cell phones trying to make calls. Some phones have no problem with this.

    The real issue is that when you're dealing with potentially illegal items with no brands, there's no incentive to make the product work correctly. I wouldn't be surprised if these jammers sucked also.

  13. Re:WANT! by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 5, Funny

    0) Teaching women to use maps. "Gee honey, looks like the GPS satellites are down again. Now look here at this Atlas".

    You must not be married.

    I gave my wife a GPS so she can yell at it instead of me when she's lost.

    --
    Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
  14. Re:WANT! by penix1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Shouldn't go to the theater while on call.

    --
    This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
  15. Re:Redundant by jbeaupre · · Score: 3, Funny

    Destination in 500 miles.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  16. Re:WANT! by DanTheStone · · Score: 3, Informative

    They continue to be extremely illegal. Tread softly.

  17. Re:Vulnerable by mcvos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With $30 jammers, who do you think will win that arms race?

  18. Re:WANT! by The+Rizz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just because this is powered by electricity doesn't make it news for nerds.

    No, but it being a high-tech subject with implications for a massive amount of existing and emerging technologies does.

  19. Re:WANT! by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    And the doctor with his phone discretely on vibrate, who gets called to an emergency in the middle of the movie?

    No use calling him, apparently he doesn't know the way to the hospital.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  20. Re:WANT! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't see how GPS jammer can be positively useful

    Rental Car companies often track your usage and bill you extra if you leave the state(s) you said you were going to use the rental car in. If you're being tracked by the <insert name of law enforcement agency here> you can render their tracking devices useless. I'm sure there are other opportunities to take advantage of the "stealth mode" offered by such a device.

  21. Re:Lousy engineering by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What competent engineer would design an important system that depends on GPS, with no backup? The satellite signals are very faint, and can be disrupted for seconds or hours by lots of different causes, including entirely natural causes like solar flares.

    The competent engineer with the incompetent boss.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  22. Re:Vulnerable by justthisdude · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A quick GPS history lesson: GPS signals are spread-spectrum in order to make them harder to jam from a distance. The military goal was not to make it un-jammable, merely to force a functioning jammer to be so large that it could be found and (ahem) stopped. So GPS was built upon the assumption of radiation-seeking missiles to protect it. To deter jamming, they spread the main signal SO widely that it was hard for them to even acquire themselves (back in the day). For acquisition they built a less spread "finder" signal. This is spread over only about a MHz and can be easily acquired. It gives some accuracy, but also gives a timing code to find the second code which is spread over more bandwidth around the same frequency. As an afterthought, they released the first stage (the narrow one) to the public. This first stage is what we all use and love.

    --
    "I love his boyish charm, but I hate his childishness" - Leela