Slashdot Mirror


Book Review: Social Engineering: The Art of Human Hacking

brothke writes "One can sum up all of Social Engineering: The Art of Human Hacking in two sentences from page 297, where author Christopher Hadnagy writes 'tools are an important aspect of social engineering, but they do not make the social engineer. A tool alone is useless; but the knowledge of how to leverage and utilize that tool is invaluable.' Far too many people think that information security and data protection is simply about running tools, without understanding how to use them. In this tremendous book, Hadnagy shows how crucial the human element is within information security." Keep reading for the rest of Ben's review. Social Engineering: The Art of Human Hacking author Christopher Hadnagy pages 408 publisher Wiley rating 10/10 reviewer Ben Rothke ISBN 0470639539 summary Definitive text on social engineering With that, Social Engineering: The Art of Human Hacking is a fascinating and engrossing book on an important topic. The author takes the reader on a vast journey of the many aspects of social engineering. Since social engineering is such a people oriented topic, a large part of the book is dedicated to sociological and psychological topics. This is an important area, as far too many technology books focus on the hardware and software elements, completely ignoring the people element. The social engineer can then use that gap to their advantage.

By the time that you start chapter 2 on page 23, it is abundantly clear that the author knows what he is talking about. This is in stark contrast with How To Become The Worlds No. 1 Hacker, where that author uses plagiarism to try to weave a tale of being the world’s greatest security expert. Here, Hadnagy uses his real knowledge and experience to take the reader on a long and engaging ride on the subject. Coming in at 9 chapters and 360 pages, the author brings an encyclopedic knowledge and dishes it out in every chapter.

Two of the most popular books to date on social engineering to date have been Kevin Mitnick’s The Art of Deception: Controlling the Human Element of Security and The Art of Intrusion: The Real Stories Behind the Exploits of Hackers, Intruders and Deceivers. The difference between those books and Hadnagy, is that Mitnick for the most part details the events and stories around the attacks; while Hadnagy details the myriad specifics on how to carry out the social engineering attack.

The book digs deep and details how the social engineer needs to use a formal context for the attack, and breaks down the specific details and line-items on how to execute on that. That approach is much more suited to performing social engineering, than simply reading about social engineering.

Chapter 1 goes though the necessary introduction to the topic, with chapter 2 detailing the various aspects of information gathering. Once I started reading, it was hard to put the book down.

Social engineering is often misportrayed as the art of asking a question or two and then gaining root access. In chapter 3 on elicitation, the author details the reality of the requirements on how to carefully and cautiously elicit information from the target. Elicitation is not something for the social engineer alone, even the US Department of Homeland Security has a pamphlet(Pdf) that is uses to assist agents with elicitation.

After elicitation, chapter 4 details the art of pretexting, which is when an attacker creates an invented scenario to use to extract information from the victim.

Chapter 5 on mind tricks starts getting into the psychological element of social engineering. The author details topics such as micro expressions, modes of thinking, interrogation, neuro-linguistic programming and more.

Chapter 6 is on influence and the power of persuasion. The author notes that people are trained from a young age in nearly every culture to listen to and respect authority. When the social engineer takes on that role, it becomes a most powerful tool; far more powerful than any script or piece of software.

The author wisely waits until chapter 7 to discuss software tools used during a social engineering engagement. One of the author’s favorite and most powerful tools is Maltego, which is an open source intelligence and forensics application. While the author concludes that it is the human element that is the most powerful, and that a great tool in the hand of a novice is worthless; the other side is that good tools (of which the author lists many), in the hands of an experienced social engineer, is an extremely powerful and often overwhelming combination.

Every chapter in the book is superb, but chapter 9 – Prevention and Mitigation stands out. After spending 338 pages about how to use social engineering; chapter 9 details the steps a firm must put in place to ensure they do not become a victim of a social engineering attack. The chapter lists the following six steps that must be executed upon:

Learning to identify social engineering attacks

Creating a personal security awareness program

Creating awareness of the value of the information that is being sought by social engineers

Keeping software updated

Developing scripts

Learning from social engineering audits

The author astutely notes that security awareness is not about 45- or 90-minute programs that only occur annually; rather it is about creating a culture and set of information security standards that each person in the organization is committed to using their entire life. This is definitely not a small undertaking. Firms must create awareness and security engineering programs to deal with the above six items. If they do not, they are them placing themselves at significant risk of being unable to effectively deal with social network attacks.

As to awareness, if nothing else, Social Engineering: The Art of Human Hacking demonstrates the importance of ensuring that social engineering is an integral part of an information security awareness program. This can’t be underemphasized as even the definitive book on security awareness Managing an Information Security and Privacy Awareness and Training Program only has about 10 pages on social engineering attacks.

There are plenty of security books on hardware, software, certification and more. Those were perhaps the easy ones to write. Until now, very few have dealt with the human element, and the costs associated with ignoring that have been devastating. Social Engineering: The Art of Human Hacking is a book that is a long time in coming, but worth every page.

While seemingly geared to the information security staff, this is a book should be read by everyone, whether they are in technology or not. Social engineering is not something that just occurs behind a keyboard. Social attackers know that. It is about time everyone else did also.

Reviewer Ben Rothke is the author of Computer Security: 20 Things Every Employee Should Know

You can purchase Social Engineering: The Art of Human Hacking from amazon.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

114 comments

  1. I see that you're a social engineer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty social engineer myself.

    1. Re:I see that you're a social engineer. by Geotopia · · Score: 1

      I once got an opposing party in litigation to reveal the address of a family member simply by chatting about a "shared" interest in horticulture (whatever that is)!

  2. Social Engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Buy my book.

    1. Re:Social Engineering by kalirion · · Score: 1

      I don't think that actually works...

  3. The Human Factor by prakslash · · Score: 5, Funny

    Agree with the author completely. In order to eliminate the vulnerabilities arising out of the human factor, we have instituted the following password guidelines:

    Password Security Guidelines V2.2b

    Due to new security policies, the following guidelines have been issued to assist in choosing new passwords. Please follow them closely.

    Passwords must conform to at least 12 of the following attributes.
    1. Minimum length 12 characters.
    2. Must contain both upper and lower case characters as well as at least 2 numbers.
    3. Not in any dictionary.
    4. No word or phrase bearing any connection to the holder.
    5. Containing no characters in the ASCII character set.
    6. Must be quantum theoretically secure, i.e. must automatically change if observed (to protect against net sniffing).
    7. Binary representation must not contain any of the sequences 00 01 10 11, commonly known about in hacker circles.
    8. Changed prior to every use.
    9. Contain tissue samples of at least 3 vital organs.
    10. Undecodable by virtue of application of 0-way hash function.
    11. Contain non-linear random S-boxes (without a backdoor).

    It works! We haven't had any login attempts into our systems - legitimate or otherwise.

    1. Re:The Human Factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good point but passwords are just one small aspect of it all.

    2. Re:The Human Factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All our passwords are "encrypted" as our policy states. Therefore, we are fine.

    3. Re:The Human Factor by bastion_xx · · Score: 2

      I'm surprised you got an "interesting" score instead of "funny". Love the conformation to 12 of 11 attributes too . :)

    4. Re:The Human Factor by bknabe · · Score: 1

      All you're missing is, "divisible by the square root of the number of hydrogen atoms extant immediately after the Big Bang," (and requiring at least 13 of the attributes) and everythings covered.

    5. Re:The Human Factor by re_organeyes · · Score: 0

      Good job!

        I would add, "And your password will not be visible when you create it, so make sure you type it correctly."

    6. Re:The Human Factor by WilCompute · · Score: 1

      Ever hear tell of that newfangled thing called utf 8?

      --
      NDxTreme Content on the Edge.
    7. Re:The Human Factor by Exclamation+mark! · · Score: 1

      This is not funny! Our password policy at work is not far from this!

      --
      I'm a wanker.... and loving it!
    8. Re:The Human Factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *WOOOOOOSH*

    9. Re:The Human Factor by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      And no wussy typing a second time to check that it's correct either.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:The Human Factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No login attempts? Did you connect your systems to the Internet?

  4. The word you are looking for is... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ..."swindling". It is not new.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:The word you are looking for is... by lessthan · · Score: 2

      Exactly! I love this marketing hype about the new boogie man "social engineering." It is called a swindle or a con and has been around as long as humans have been able to lie.

      --
      Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
    2. Re:The word you are looking for is... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      yeah.. social engineering is actually quite easy, if you know the end result that you'd like to happen.

      anyways the books title is so generated that I'll skip it. simpsons can cover that.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:The word you are looking for is... by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

      no boogie man....social enginnering is a big deal. why are u knocking a book that tries to increase its awareness?

    4. Re:The word you are looking for is... by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

      once again..i am stunned, why u judging a book by the title? focus on the content!!! focus on the book review!! cmon already....

  5. Second! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Second!

  6. halfway through this book by nopainogain · · Score: 0

    It seems like a rehash of every security book to come before it. I feel like i'm practically lip-syncing Kevin Mitnick's book "the art of deception".

  7. Mitnick by ItsPaPPy · · Score: 0

    If Kevin Mitnick didn't write this book, then I am not reading it.

    1. Re:Mitnick by nopainogain · · Score: 0

      he didnt officially write it but his words were plagurized all over it.

    2. Re:Mitnick by DeniseResoux · · Score: 2

      them be fighten words!!! u really think this guy plagiarzed mitnick? how do you know?

    3. Re:Mitnick by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

      and you read this book? so how much is copied? the review here makes it seem like this has the details mitnicks book did not have.

    4. Re:Mitnick by nopainogain · · Score: 0

      The operative term in your statement being "seem like". I could paraphrase any book in the library. When you read sequential chapters with subjects that follow sequence right down to the sentence, it becomes more visible Not everyone reads with comprehension. His references (if we stretched to call them that) are as obvious as an NBA star in a room full of dwarves. It's clear he's paraphrasing Mitnick from start to at least the middle where I stopped.

    5. Re:Mitnick by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      I have this book at home and have read about 3/4 of it. It's a great book and I too agree that this is a great read for anyone. When I am done I'll be passing this book on to my friends and my dad.

      Mitnick didn't write the book, no, but I think that he did the foreword. The tone and writing style of the book is interesting and will make you think. I think I paid ~30.00 for this book, Including the Canadian Tax, and I feel I got great value from it.

      I approve of this book

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    6. Re:Mitnick by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

      the new book mentions maltego, which was not even around when mitnick was hacking....

    7. Re:Mitnick by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

      i double checked....there is no plagioarism there may be fair use...but i think you commetnt and acucsation really crossed the line. what u got against the author of this book?

    8. Re:Mitnick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, learn to spell plagiarize.
      Next, show some façade of veracity by showing the most infinitesimal aspect of proof, before you make such a silly comment.

    9. Re:Mitnick by nopainogain · · Score: 0

      I dont have anything against the book per se. it contains valid accurate useful info---------that i have only seen 100x before.

    10. Re:Mitnick by treeves · · Score: 1

      Oooo-oh! Mr. Fancy AC, all high and mighty with his fancy little cedilla in his 'facade'!
      Aren't we something special!

      And a "facade of veracity" strikes me as oxymoronic, given that veracity means truth, and facade (in this context, not referring to buildings) means false or superficial.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    11. Re:Mitnick by nopainogain · · Score: 0

      you could view my misspelling as an avoidance of plagiarizing the previous uses of the word. Brought to you by the department of non-entertaining-irony.

    12. Re:Mitnick by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

      100X.....come on.... who ya kiddin!?

    13. Re:Mitnick by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

      ok, u made yer point....now show him some proof of the copying from Mitnick.....

    14. Re:Mitnick by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

      no way!!! it is not avoidance of plagiarizing, rather of avoidance of the issue. run away from the facts..see what i care.

    15. Re:Mitnick by nopainogain · · Score: 0

      ok, it sounds like you are defending this book harder than I was criticizing it. Do we have a fiscal stake in it's success? I could care less or more (no i don't mean couldn't care less). I just posted that it smelled like a meal I'd already eaten. I'll be reading a different book next month and won't care. It strikes me that you will be in another open forum defending this one.

    16. Re:Mitnick by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Oooo-oh! Mr. Fancy AC, all high and mighty with his fancy little cedilla in his 'facade'! Aren't we something special!

      And a "facade of veracity" strikes me as oxymoronic, given that veracity means truth, and facade (in this context, not referring to buildings) means false or superficial.

      He deliberately used "facade of veracity" to emphasise that there is not even the slightest attempt at veracity by the OP (i.e. even a sham truth would be more than OP presented, which was nothing).

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    17. Re:Mitnick by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I could care less or more (no i don't mean couldn't care less)

      That is not an accepted English phrase, not least because it is meaningless.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    18. Re:Mitnick by nopainogain · · Score: 0

      let's not get lost in semantics.

    19. Re:Mitnick by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      When I am done I'll be passing this book on to my friends and my dad.

      I'm pretty sure that's now illegal everywhere except Russia.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re:Mitnick by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

      no fiancial stake...just trying to get people to take infosec seriously...

    21. Re:Mitnick by nopainogain · · Score: 0

      lol, good luck with that. infosec to people on the outside is like earthquakes and tsunamis, they only worry about it after it happens and then only for enough time for their short-term memory to allow them to move on.

    22. Re:Mitnick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Denise, sounds like you are dating the author... who are you and why do you like him so much? Are you part of his team? I agree the book is great, but just seems like you are really defending

  8. Kevin Mitnick ripoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Didn't Mitnick do this 8 years ago with Art of Deception. Even the title is sort of stolen. Is there anything new in here that hasn't already been written about by one of the world's greatest social engineers?

    1. Re:Kevin Mitnick ripoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kevin, is that you?

    2. Re:Kevin Mitnick ripoff? by nitsew · · Score: 5, Informative

      Didn't Mitnick do this 8 years ago with Art of Deception. Even the title is sort of stolen. Is there anything new in here that hasn't already been written about by one of the world's greatest social engineers?

      If you look closely at the front of the book, you will see a recommendation by Mitnick. Also, if you read the review, it explains how this is different from Mitnick's book.

      "Two of the most popular books to date on social engineering to date have been Kevin Mitnick’s The Art of Deception: Controlling the Human Element of Security and The Art of Intrusion: The Real Stories Behind the Exploits of Hackers, Intruders and Deceivers. The difference between those books and Hadnagy, is that Mitnick for the most part details the events and stories around the attacks; while Hadnagy details the myriad specifics on how to carry out the social engineering attack. "

      But, thanks for playing!

    3. Re:Kevin Mitnick ripoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    4. Re:Kevin Mitnick ripoff? by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

      What's next...Chris, I am your father :)

    5. Re:Kevin Mitnick ripoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the exact same thing after reading the first line or two of the summary. Really this appears to be the same thing. Mitnick's book is good and the followup was pretty good but very similar.

    6. Re:Kevin Mitnick ripoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Art of Intrusion was a book of stories, Art of Deception was pretty much an instruction book for social engineering. Good counter though, I'll have to check this one out.

      And I love playing!

  9. Social firewall by vawwyakr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good thing I always have my social firewall up....of course this mostly means not looking at anyone and mumbling and running away whenever someone talks to me.

    1. Re:Social firewall by BigJClark · · Score: 1


      Hello Mr V. Awwyakr,

      My name is Paul and I'm posting on behalf of Slashdot security team. We are performing a random security audit on your account. If you could provide me with your
      username and password, then we can conclude this test and move on.

      Thanks,
      Paul
      SlashdotSecurity Team

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
  10. tools = people? by skids · · Score: 3, Funny

    A tool alone is useless; but the knowledge of how to leverage and utilize that tool is invaluable

    Was this just a polite way ti say "most people are total tools?"

    1. Re:tools = people? by f1vlad · · Score: 1

      Essentially that is so.

      --
      o_O
    2. Re:tools = people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:tools = people? by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Negative. The reviewer is actually the master of Social Engineering, and has intentionally aroused the suspicions of /.'rs to prevent anyone from reading the contents therein.

  11. Is this review... by MrEricSir · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...a social engineering scheme to make people buy the book?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Is this review... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Send me $5 and I'll tell you.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    2. Re:Is this review... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but I have patented this method of disclosure. Please send $1 to Patent Dude, KL5-3226.

    3. Re:Is this review... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      social enginnering by book? no way... there has to be easier ways.

  12. Mix of Dale Carnegie and Software by DeAngeloLampkin · · Score: 0
    Maybe with a dash of amoral, depending on what's being done.
    I am curious as to what the reviewer means by "social network" attacks though. (New term for me)

    -DeAngelo
    CheerThis -hassle free sharing with NO login and infinite voting
    SheenNation - hassle free sharing Sheen! (no login and infinite voting)
    Braincano

    --
    If you get a moment, check out my blog Braincano
    1. Re:Mix of Dale Carnegie and Software by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      A social network attack would be googling your user name, finidng that the first result is for your facebook profile and second is for your linkdin profile. Scraping that information (possibly by becoming your "friend") and then using it to answer "Super Secret" password recovery questions so I can reset your password to whatever I want.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    2. Re:Mix of Dale Carnegie and Software by DeAngeloLampkin · · Score: 0

      Aaah, I see. Thanks for the clarification!

      -DeAngelo
      CheerThis -hassle free sharing with NO login and infinite voting
      SheenNation - hassle free sharing Sheen! (no login and infinite voting)
      Braincano

      --
      If you get a moment, check out my blog Braincano
  13. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yo Mr Engineer, I'm really happy for you, and imma let you finish, but Surgeons are the best human hackers evar.

    1. Re:Obligatory by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Yo Mr Engineer, I'm really happy for you, and imma let you finish, but Surgeons are the best human hackers evar.

      This. I'm fine with "hacking" meaning "to bypass computer security" instead of replacing hardware or coding, but "hacking" when referring to humans has a long history. Not quite surgeon level, but there are always sharp tools involved. "Social Engineering" is good enough.

    2. Re:Obligatory by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      'Hacking' refers to modifying something to function in ways not facilitated by the designer. Surgeons don't hack, they fix. P.S. Except for plastic surgeons, specifically the sex change ones. Those are really hacky indeed.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    3. Re:Obligatory by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      I think "sex change" qualifies as "modifying something to function in ways not facilitated by the designer."

      Unless, of course, there is an Intelligent Designer who facilitates sex changes. It could happen.

    4. Re:Obligatory by mcvos · · Score: 1

      'Hacking' refers to modifying something to function in ways not facilitated by the designer. Surgeons don't hack, they fix.

      There's overlap between hacking and fixing. Removing an appendix is clearly a modification of the original design. A tiny one, but still. The stomach reduction thing to help people lose weight also definitely sounds a bit like a hack. And what about artificial hearts and other implants that fix/replace/improve functionality?

      Of course that's still mostly trying to restore/fix functionality that the body once had or should have had (I'm suddenly thinking about the hacks to restore OtherOS on the PS3), whereas stuff like the body modification scene or people implanting chips and sensors in their body are quite a bit more dramatic. Or maybe prosthetics that are superior in some ways to natural ability (like the cheetah prosthetic legs).

  14. Leverage and utilize? by Tony · · Score: 0

    A tool alone is useless; but the knowledge of how to leverage and utilize that tool is invaluable.

    Wow! Two content-less marketing terms in one sentence. But they look so sad and lonely without "synergy" there beside them.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    1. Re:Leverage and utilize? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? This statement makes perfect sense and is meaningful. For example: you can give a student a calculator and then compute sines and cosines; but do they know what there doing? Do they know if the numbers make any sense? OR, if you're given a paint brush and the finest paints; if you have no skills or knowledge, will your work be any good?

    2. Re:Leverage and utilize? by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

      what is the problem w/ that comment?

    3. Re:Leverage and utilize? by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      A tool alone is useless; without synergy with the knowledge of how to leverage and utilize that tool. Cloud computing.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    4. Re:Leverage and utilize? by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      A tool alone is useless; but the knowledge of how to use that tool is invaluable.

      Happy?

      "A tool alone is useless; but the knowledge of how to use that tool is ... um, also useless without the tool itself. So what I'm saying is that together the tool and the knowledge of how to use the tool are ... great. Doesn't really make a pithy quote, though."

      Okay, how about:

      A tool alone is useless; you must know how to wield it.

    5. Re:Leverage and utilize? by LemurOfDoom · · Score: 1

      This is the very first thing I thought upon reading the summary. OP couldn't have chosen a better sentence to make me avoid this book.

    6. Re:Leverage and utilize? by DeniseResoux · · Score: 0

      Why don't u focus on the review, the concept, the issue, et al, and not get caught up in the most minor parts of the review.

    7. Re:Leverage and utilize? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowledge alone is useless; but the tool to leverage and utilize that knowledge is invaluable.

  15. This book caused me to get a Nook! by turbogizzmo · · Score: 1

    So i was picking out some books to read (pleasure and reference) and this one caught my eye....tech books are so expensive that the stack I had picked out cost more than a Nook. Made a deal with the Nook dude to sell me one with a gift card and got the Nook and most of the books i picked out digitally for almost same price. Random comment i know but this is the book that caused it, I havent finished it yet but i give a +1 to this review, very well written so far.

  16. Another source by cjonslashdot · · Score: 0

    Those interested in social engineering might also want to read chapter 5 of my book High-Assurance Design (website at http://www.assuredbydesign.com/haa/). It contains a complete taxonomy of social engineering techniques and compares them to commonly known "con schemes" (e.g., "pigeon drop", "Spanish prisoner", "pump-and-dump"....) Chapter 5 happens to be available as a complementary download here: http://www.assuredbydesign.com/haa/chs/Berg_ch05.pdf

    1. Re:Another source by DeniseResoux · · Score: 2

      cool. wild that it is $60 new from amazon and 1 cent used from others....

    2. Re:Another source by cjonslashdot · · Score: 1

      The book was not promoted very well by Addison-Wesley, so not many people know about it. If you're smart you'll be your own judge.

    3. Re:Another source by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

      Wiley did this book, not addison wesley

    4. Re:Another source by cjonslashdot · · Score: 1

      I thought you meant my book, Value-Driven IT.

    5. Re:Another source by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      No wonder Addison Wesley did such a lousy promotional job.

    6. Re:Another source by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

      not getting your point...how did they do a lousy job?

  17. Bad Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Art of Human Hacking"

    Jack the Ripper and Jeffrey Dahmer would definitely be interested!

  18. Neuro-linguistic programming? by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

    Oh, please. Save that bullshit for frat boys who think that saying "penetrating" often enough will get them laid.

    1. Re:Neuro-linguistic programming? by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

      who is this comment supposed to be directed to?

    2. Re:Neuro-linguistic programming? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The book's author, I'd assume. NLP is referenced in the review, in the description of chapter 5.

      And yes, NLP is complete and utter bunk.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Neuro-linguistic programming? by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

      >>>, NLP is complete and utter bunk that is your view. others may differ.

    4. Re:Neuro-linguistic programming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and who r u 2 make such a comment?

    5. Re:Neuro-linguistic programming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, please. Save that bullshit for frat boys who think that saying "penetrating" often enough will get them laid.

      It's OK not to like NPL, we'll still accept you here. Why do you feel that NLP is so bad? What do you find wrong with it?
      Would you agree that some people think NPL is quite useful in social engineering?

    6. Re:Neuro-linguistic programming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to brush your teeth.

  19. Great read by samsonites101 · · Score: 1

    Great book and great reference. It covers a wide range of topics and is very clear about each of them. Provides great example situations, real case studies, and ways to defend against SE attacks. Would recommend it to anyone!

  20. Whole book in two sentences? And it's any good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude if you can sum up the whole book by two sentences on p. 297, it kind of doesn't sound like it's worth buying.

  21. Re:Whole book in two sentences? And it's any good? by DeniseResoux · · Score: 1

    that's why its called a spoiler :)

  22. question by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    Will this help me get root privileges on my sexy neighbor?

    1. Re:question by DeniseResoux · · Score: 0

      u sick dog.

    2. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes. instantly.

  23. There's always a shortcut by nsaspook · · Score: 1
    --
    In GOD we trust, all others we monitor.
  24. Human Hacking!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the title I thought this discussion was going to be about Jeffery Dahmer.

    1. Re:Human Hacking!?!? by DeniseResoux · · Score: 0

      What gave you that (sick) idea?

  25. Nice Review by pinkushun · · Score: 1

    Well I enjoyed it. Curious about the book now.

    1. Re:Nice Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go buy it dude~!

  26. Typo by mekkab · · Score: 1

    "that is uses "

    It looks like you were typing in the passive voice (initial sentence fragment was probably "that is used"), made a passive verb active to get rid of the passive voice in your writing (a noble goal!) but forgot to remove the 'is.'

    Can someone fix that?

    otherwise, it sounds quite interesting, though I wonder how far Hadnagy goes into NLP and if the book provides any examples in the context of social engineering. Most of those techniques need to be executed in person, and exposing your face can be a risk.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Typo by DeniseResoux · · Score: 0

      yes, it does.. read da book!

  27. Culture of Paranoia by Fuseboy · · Score: 1

    It will be interesting to see what effect this has on customer service generally. Is it possible to have sensible, non-theatrical security procedures that are preliminary and don't interfere with an essentially friendly relationship? Or will the attitude of security consciousness turn into a strange form of paranoid bureaucracy that colors everything?

  28. DeniseResoux (2,012,610) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you had perhaps a smaller # you might realize that what you
    are doing here will actually have a net negative effect.

    In this community, the merits of the book will be all that is
    necessary. All the bloating and bellowing by /.rs here will not
    affect the sales. Shilling, will.

    -@|