Slashdot Mirror


HP To Put WebOS On PCs In 2012

Stenchwarrior writes "Hewlett-Packard's chief executive officer Leo Apotheker announced that WebOS will be on every PC that HP ships in 2012. The move is intended to attract more developers and push the operating system from mobile devices onto desktops. Apotheker made the announcement during a presentation to HP's staff in India, according to a report by Bloomberg. It's not likely that WebOS will supplant existing operating systems on PCs, but rather would run on top of Windows to be able to launch WebOS apps. HP had previously announced its plans to push WebOS onto PCs last month, but, at the time, the company didn't reveal the scope of its commitment to the operating system. We now know that HP means each and every PC it sells starting in 2012 will have WebOS installed."

200 comments

  1. Why? by fotbr · · Score: 1

    I guess I don't understand why one would want to launch WebOS applications when they're sitting at their desktop or laptop. Is there an actual desire for this that I'm just too dense to understand?

    1. Re:Why? by bloodhawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am with ya on that, this move is completely beyond comprehension, not only does it seem pointless but if you have dealt much with HP software over the years the last thing you would want from them is more of it.

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just one more thing to uninstall from HPs.

    3. Re:Why? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      And the fact it installs on top of windows, its just another piece of bloatware that will annoy users...

      A fast booting splashtop like environment would be useful, or what Dell did where there's a separate low power ARM cpu inside which runs an instant-on os for browsing and media playback with much better battery life etc...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they've bought into the "app for that" mentality, and want to order a pizza. I go to the pizza place's website, whether on my phone or my laptop. They open the pizza place's app, and they'll now be able to do that on their laptop.

      Also, PIM etc. apps, can take advantage of WebOS's synchronization capabilities (yeah, instead of supporting standards for interchanging data with your choice of PC apps).

      Not saying it's a good thing, but it's definitely got appeal to average users.

    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "The fact"? Don't you mean the assumption of the author of the article?

    6. Re:Why? by yoshi_mon · · Score: 2

      This likely is a boardroom decision that is devoid of engineering input. And given HPs cooperate culture lately it does not surprise me one bit.

      It is however very sad from a company that was founded by engineers.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    7. Re:Why? by jejones · · Score: 1

      As a happy Palm Pre user, I'm very interested in whether WebOS's UI can be well-mapped to a {desk, lap}top. IMHO it's far more intuitive than Android's, and I'd be very happy with a WebOS tablet. I refuse to buy hardware contaminated with Windows. If I can get a WebOS computer without having to buy Windows, I'm willing to give it a look.

    8. Re:Why? by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 1

      Just one more thing to not buy from HP.

      --
      Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
    9. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if WebOS is an App-bound cellphone platform, but there needs to be more awareness that we're quietly being FRAGMENTED with products coming out exclusively for expensive and always-on-the-internet smartphones platforms. Funny, because we spent 10 years caving into ditching modems, buying routers, paying for broadband and internal cabling and routers and already pay for cheaper internet service than what it costs to run a barely smart cellphone today.

      All that for what? As soon as companies went mainstream pushing apps a couple years ago, market forces are constantly pushing us to not only have web access, but buy a connected cellphone for apps (both connected and disconnected). Because ticket information, game times, schedules and so on are no longer cheaper to develop for a WWW audience. What happened?

      Apparently the PC as a legal ad service is no longer a goldmine, and I find it bittersweet that even Microsoft, who thrives on Windows sales, has given us NO choice when it comes to their proprietary, scannable tag system for their own desktop OS. If webOS delivers a friendly app market that is compatible with Android's or Apple's, then it would be trivial to see the benefits of not having to bother friends who have access to the aforementioned phones.

      I can suspect that an App provides many benefits
      apps have been abusing customer privacy by collecting names, location, address book and gps data
      apps want to advertise to your friends (especially the facebook games)
      apps can have their own ad-streaming code, ignoring all your browser's restrictions on popups, blocking, etc

    10. Re:Why? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Presumably there will be cool WebOS apps that are not available for Windows. And of course it allows the integration of the PC with WebOS tablets so that the tablet can be a thin client for all of your PCs. And it allows for the transparent integration of presentations like movies and other content across the devices.

      Hopefully cool stuff, if they don't screw it up. Put me down for "maybe".

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    11. Re:Why? by Idbar · · Score: 2

      I think I didn't get it before, but WebOS is a hit/miss in Spanish speaking countries as it's an homonym with "Huevos", which is slang for "balls".

      As in "Tienes WebOS?". Ah, yes... I don't see a good future launching WebOS either.

    12. Re:Why? by toastar · · Score: 1

      Presumably there will be cool WebOS apps that are not available for Windows.

      Cool, so now i can use the in car navigator while sitting at home!

    13. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause according to Andorid fanboys over at CNET, the more devices with your OS the better you are. This will give HP huge rollout numbers since they can count all computers and mobile-like devices. They will be number one platform in no time.

    14. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing you describe there requires the need to install a webOS ontop of windows. windows can play most media out of the box and has full open support for whatever codecs you want to add, this is really just an extra layer of crap for for little or no benefit. personally I give it 12 months post launch till it is declared officially dead.

    15. Re:Why? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm also a happy Pre user, and looking forward to the Pre3/Touchpad combination. I'll be happier if WebOS for the desktop will be available for installation on other vendor hardware, as a lot of people like or are locked into Dell, Lenovo, or Toshiba, or build their own.

      Those who question the installation of WebOS on HP systems in large part haven't seen what HP is trying to do with it. The concept is closer to consumer cloud computing than anything else that I've seen. While certain services will allow you wide access to one type of data (Box.net for files, webmail for e-mail, etc.), HP is going for total data availability from any device (at least if it's running WebOS). You can have local copies if you wish, but the data will be synchronized across a wide variety of devices. In the future, if it pans out, then I'm sure we'll see WebOS TVs, tables, walls, or refrigerators (or maybe even toasters) to make it so we never have to do much more than turn around to access our data.

      Personally, I'd love to have the option of synchronizing it with my choice of hosts, or with my systems at home if I choose to keep things out of someone else's hands. The options are important, and if it means paying a few bucks for it, I'm OK with that.

      I don't know if WebOS will be the platform to make this happen the way that it needs to. It may be that Apple will come up with something similar by utilizing their new data center. Google, of course, has been pushing to become the world's data repository. Some other party could come up with something that does it better. Everyone is pushing everyone else, and it makes it an interesting time to watch it all unfold.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    16. Re:Why? by altoz · · Score: 1

      It's not hard to understand their thinking. They saw the amount of money that Apple was making and realized that the key piece to what Apple has is their own OS. They want their own iTunes, app store, etc.

      Not saying it will work, but I can see where they're trying to go. The big advantage Apple has over all the other PC manufacturers is that they control everything from hardware to software. HP took a step in that direction so they can give the user a better experience.

      I mean, Dell's acquiring AMD and that's pretty much the same play in the hardware direction.

    17. Re:Why? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      There is virtually no desire for this. I'm guessing a buyer a senior buyer at HP found WebOS at rock-bottom liquidation prices so low he couldn't pass it up. This is despite the fact that HP have no use for it and their customers either haven't heard of it or don't give a crap about it, nor should they. Maybe they'll have to learn the hard way not to go into a dollar store with a full wallet - when you do, you're guaranteed to buy crap you don't need just because it appears to be cheap. Not such a great deal if it goes unused, is it?

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    18. Re:Why? by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Dell is not acquiring AMD. It was speculated, but most people don't take it seriously.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    19. Re:Why? by zaivala · · Score: 1

      I'd be happy to see this. I'm still using my old Handspring Visor, so I'm not fully aware of the benefits of WebOS over older PalmOS, but I love my Visor. The thing I love least about it is that the synch software is still only written for Windows 3 and 3.1... I'm about to try the Palm Synch in Ubuntu if I get brave enough...

    20. Re:Why? by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Presumably it would be an instant-on OS you can use instead of Windows. I actually like the idea. Furthermore, HP has touchscreens on some of their laptops now so I suspect they may take advantage of this feature. WebOS is supposed to sync up and partially control all your mobile devices (SMS texting, emails, facebook, twitter, etc) even if you don't have your phone right next to you, so I don't see why this is a bad thing. You can have a tablet, phone, and laptop all in sync without thinking about it.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    21. Re:Why? by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Nope. WebOS is on HP phones and their tablet. Its a good OS for this purpose. I suspect they want their line of laptops and desktops to sync up with the mobile devices and this is why they are doing this.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    22. Re:Why? by Desler · · Score: 1

      They could have your laptop and desktop sync with your phone or tablet without having to layer WebOS on top of Windows. I guess it's magic that I don't need ot install iOS or Android on my laptop or desktop to sync the phone up, eh?

    23. Re:Why? by Desler · · Score: 1

      I mean, Dell's acquiring AMD and that's pretty much the same play in the hardware direction.

      Since when? There was a rumor that this was going to happen that someone apparently pulled out of their ass, but that doesn't count as a forgone fact.

    24. Re:Why? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      I think I didn't get it before, but WebOS is a hit/miss in Spanish speaking countries as it's an homonym with "Huevos", which is slang for "balls".

      As in "Tienes WebOS?". Ah, yes... I don't see a good future launching WebOS either.

      Fortunately English and not Spanish is the lingua franca of our modern times.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    25. Re:Why? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      I guess I don't understand why one would want to launch WebOS applications when they're sitting at their desktop or laptop

      I would like to be able to run iPad apps on my windows laptop. If I could run iOS on my laptop I could do that.

      Same deal here.

    26. Re:Why? by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      It was author speculation that it would be layered on top. I think it will be more like an instant-on OS like Asus has right now in some of their laptops.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    27. Re:Why? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Yah, look. If they wanted they could probably shim up some native Windows app in a few years that provided the same things. But since their whole OS can run as a Windows app, there's no need to do it the hard way and delay the product.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    28. Re:Why? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2

      It's not going to be installed on top of windows.

      It's going to be instant-on.

      http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/hp-picks-up-phoenixs-hyperspace-hypercore-and-flip-instant-on/

    29. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the apps will be created to run both as web-app and standalone on the PC. with html5, javascript engines performance improvements... consider V8, node.js, jquery, jquery-yui, and couchdb possibilities... but with WebOS stack. There are tons and tons of users that will be happy with this type of system, not to mention businesses.

    30. Re:Why? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      You do know that WebOS is the successor of PalmOS, and was acquired by HP when they bought Palm and replaced all the HP and Compaq handheld devices, right? What they're doing is saying "Guess what... all those apps you have for your mobile device will now run on your HP desktop as well -- and have full access to the same data pool."

      WebOS is no discount OS -- it's version 2 of the first successful handheld OS out there (NewtonOS doesn't count), updated to take advantage of the latest and greatest technologies (if you consider cloud computing great, that is). Its pedigree is older than Symbian, and it has retained a strong developer following from the PalmOS crowd. This means that it isn't as open as Android, and isn't as closed as iOS -- it's the happy medium. HP is banking that this will help them gain a large marketshare in the ubiquitous computing market.

    31. Re:Why? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Chapura writes sync software for WebOS, and just released an update for WebOS 2.0. The Palm Classic ROM was dropped by HP from the 2.x line, but the homebrew community has managed to figure out how to wedge it back in, so your old apps still have a chance of working (it's not perfectly backward-compatible).

      The main reason that there's no longer sync software is that so many people are not using local mail clients for their primary mail. Whether it's Yahoo, Gmail, or Exchange, contacts are routinely kept on the server. There's less of a perceived need for it. With Palm, your profile includes contacts from a variety of sources, and they're backed up to your Palm Profile by default so that if you have to replace your existing device, all of that comes down automatically.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    32. Re:Why? by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Im glad someone knows what they are talking about. All I see in here are Apple fanboi's taking every opportunity to bash something they clearly know nothing about.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    33. Re:Why? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I think they are gonna try to pull that "Quickboot Linux" crap like some did with the "instant on" ROM chips in motherboards. My dad has one of those, know how many times he's used it? Never. not a single time. Because while having an instant browser is nice it won't run his messenger or his QB or any of the little Windows apps he likes, so he never bothers.

      I think that is kinda the problem most people don't get about the desktop, the simple fact It is NEVER Windows and Office that bites you in the ass and keeps people from trying new stuff, it is those bazillion little apps that they know, that they like, that "just works" for them.

      The reason you can get away with this on cell phones is nobody has anything invested in the apps. it is a phone, they have gone through half a dozen, and they have NO expectations so as long as it works and say, there is an app to get to FB or check their mail or whatever, well as long as it has that they frankly don't care.

      Now compare that to the desktop where I have had to invest in some CRAZY hoop jumping all because someone has an app that they have spent waaay too much time in, know it by heart, and consider it a "must have". For some it is the funky software that came with some camera, for others it is an app by a certain company like QuickBooks, hell I had one I had to build an NOS (new, old stock) PC and rig him up a KVM switch because much of his work depends on Macromedia Xres, and that thing is picky as hell. No VMs, no dual core CPUs, hell it didn't even like SATA drives. So just for that single program I had to build a 1.8GHz PC with 1.25Gb of RAM and an IDE HDD. But he is happy.

      And it is THIS, this right here, that is the double edge sword that gives MSFT the desktop but at the same time makes them work so hard for backwards compatibility . Because they people have invested interest in "their programs" that they need to do stuff "their way" and it damned well better run. WebOS could be the greatest thing since the Amiga but the people won't give up their apps and Windows for it, sorry they just won't.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    34. Re:Why? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Thanks you! Man that dude had me scared for a minute! No more AMD would mean the end of little mom & Pop shops, as it is the AMD machines that let us build a nice quad for under $500 and still make a profit.

      As for TFA another "instant on" will be just another bullet point nobody actually uses just like the one in ASUS boards. I have sold plenty of those, nobody uses them. Why? Because there is ALWAYS one app they need which the "instant on" don't have. Be it messenger, or iTunes, or something, but they soon learn it isn't worth messing with if "my app" doesn't work. I liked the way my dad put it when I showed him how to use the instant on in his new board..."Will it run MSN messenger?" "no, then what the hell good is that?" because to dad if he couldn't talk to his friends with messenger while he checked his mail there just wasn't any point.

      So nice try HP, kinda pointless, but if it makes you happy! Personally I hope WinPhone 7 and WebOS BOTH carve out a niche, because the more competition the better, but personally I'm betting it'll be a two horse ace between iOS and Droid with MSFT getting a corporate niche, probably the one now held by RIM.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    35. Re:Why? by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      While true, for native speakers, there are about as many native Spanish speakers (358 million) as English speakers.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_language
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_language

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    36. Re:Why? by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      WebOS is by all accounts great software, which was hobbled by poor hardware and half-hearted support from Palm. In concept and execution it is superb, so much so that Apple have started poaching former developers (for notifications for example).

      If HP had the guts and wherewithal to fully back WebOS, drop Windows for consumers, and convert all their offerings to WebOS, they could really create an ecosystem to rival Apple or Google's, and win over a lot of consumers to a simpler method of computing (most people hate their personal computers which come to dominate spare time they'd like to spend *doing stuff*). This is exactly the right move (putting it on desktop PCs) from HP.

      Apple are moving to replace their desktop OS with iOS (the two already share a lot, and a lot of the difference (UI) is now coming back to Mac OS, I'd expect them to merge them again in a few years). HP could beat them at this game with a truly web-friendly OS on their consumer computers which does everything most consumers want from a computer.

      As to whether this sort of corporation has the focus, drive and determination to stick with this product for the first few difficult years, promoting it everywhere, and attract enough critical mass with developers in the face of concerted attacks on all fronts from the likes of Microsoft and Apple, I have my doubts, but good luck to them.

    37. Re:Why? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I would be interested to see if they can create "Minority Report" style integration on phones, tablets, laptops and desktops by using the same OS at all levels and writing the shell so that running applications can be moved between individual devices.

    38. Re:Why? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      You mean like the name of Nintendo's most recent console caused it to fail in the marketplace?
      If anything, a name like that just means "free word-of-mouth advertising".

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    39. Re:Why? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I hope you showed him Meebo.

    40. Re:Why? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I think that's a pretty decent thing to do in PCs, especially those with a touchscreen like a tablet. Sometimes you might only want to turn a device on to browse the web, so why not provide something that does just that.

      I think ultimately I'd like to see a Windows tablet where when you pick it up and walk around it has a tablet UI, but drop it into a dock and suddenly you have a full desktop. I'm pretty certain Microsoft will do it in Windows 8.

      I think HP could have beaten Microsoft to the punch here. If they could refactor webOS into a runtime such that it runs over Windows or Linux and the apps don't care. Maybe apps would be compiled to some kind of bitcode (e.g. LLVM bitcode) so they're natively compiled or executed at runtime. Then you'll see hybrid webOS / Windows devices and dedicated devices. The apps would run on all of them. It could be incredibly cool.

    41. Re:Why? by rxan · · Score: 1

      I only 'used' Dell's low-power media software once, and that was just out of curiosity to see what it was. Once I knew, I never booted it again.

    42. Re:Why? by Idbar · · Score: 1

      Well, and don't even get me started with the Chinese

      Still, more than 417,000,000 people (as of 1999) will find it a little funny to hear about their smartfphone having WebOs.

    43. Re:Why? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Your statement that they "could" do it your way ignores that they could do it more easily another way.

      WebOS works as a Windows app. Yeah, really. I know that's going to take you a bit to get your head around. HP could make WebOS a free download for all Windows PCs, not just the HP ones, as a Windows app that does all of the WebOS things in a window. If they provide a sync server, you could log in to your Windows PC WebOS app world, and operate your WebOS device as if it were in front of you even if it were half the world away. You could play the movies on it. It could play the movies you had. It could sync its data to you, and you to it. It could have a cloud component to put the third leg on this stool.

      The benefits are hard to explain now, as all true innovations are. Trust me: you'll like it.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  2. Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...Yet they will not take even consumer friendly Ubuntu seriously. IS the idea of Linux as a consumer friendly OS a dead end?

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, um, webOS is Linux. Does that help?

      Also, there's this thing, which you may have heard of.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    2. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      It's still a crippled OS even compared to Windows.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      ...Yet they will not take even consumer friendly Ubuntu seriously. IS the idea of Linux as a consumer friendly OS a dead end?

      Consumer friendly would mean at least as easy as Windows (you'd think it's not a high bar), and to have all apps users would want/need.

      On this basis, I'd say the closest to consumer friendly Linux has ever gotten is Android, and their app market is doing worse than iOS / Windows Phone 7 right now (amazing for WP7, didn't expect that in mere 4 months).

      And that's mobile, nothing on the desktop. So if you see such an animal as a consumer friendly Linux on the desktop, let me know.

      Maybe Chrome OS. Maybe. Looks pretty bad right now.

    4. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's completely clear what the parent is saying: that consumer Linux is dead.

      The parent was, of course, completely wrong. Consumer Linux is bigger than it's ever been, and growing rapidly.

      And seriously, get help for your rage issues. If you don't, I'm afraid you'll hurt yourself, or someone else.

    5. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2

      GNU/Linux? Sure. You just need to get away from the "I am a unix" mentality. It forces the system into the users face. No user wants to know how or why things happen. They just want it all to work. Ubuntu is close as you will get if you keep hanging onto that paradigm.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    6. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On this basis, I'd say the closest to consumer friendly Linux has ever gotten is Android, and their app market is doing worse than iOS / Windows Phone 7 right now [...]

      [[citation needed]]

    7. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know, once you get past the SlashBias, most people actually do like the Windows experience. If the only people you talk to about this kind of thing are Slashdotters then you're going to have a skewed view of thing.
       
      And Microsoft set some pretty modest expectations from WP7 and met them quickly. Could it just be that Android and iPhone don't have as much a lock on the market as they first thought? When I first got my Android I thought it was the best thing since sliced bread but the experience keeps getting worse and worse. I've found several issues with the phone and all the forums pretty much read like every Linux forum I've ever went to on problems... Tons of users with the same issues and no real answers.

    8. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by zaivala · · Score: 0

      I take it you don't find Ubuntu as easy as Windows? I find it much easier, not to mention finding support is much easier and faster. It doesn't have all the apps you want/need? WINE runs most Windows programs, and Crossover runs virtually all of them, plus GNU/Linux has replacement apps that, for the most part, run every bit as well or better than Windows apps, and for a lot less money (Crossover itself is $39.95, WINE is free, and most Linux apps are free).

    9. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Reapman · · Score: 1

      Worse then Windows Phone 7's market? Seriously?

      I've read a few places that the Windows Marketplace just hit 9000 apps.

      http://money.cnn.com/2011/03/09/technology/wac_wholesale_applications/

      According to that they have 9500, which is a far cry from Android's 200k+ and iPhone's 300k+

    10. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      Consumer friendly would mean at least as easy as Windows (you'd think it's not a high bar), and to have all apps users would want/need.

      I have an Ubuntu PC that runs all of the apps I need...and they were all free. The only place that it does not match up is in gaming and my understanding is that if I were to buy Crossover, that would be solved.
      As far as ease of use goes, I found it no harder to learn to use than it was to learn to use a Macintosh and everybody keeps telling me that a Mac is easier to use than Windows.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    11. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by rssrss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Only on /. would a bunch of computer nerds be complaining about a big OEM installing a Linux variant on their PCs. Goes to show you. Some people can't be made happy, no matter what you do.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
    12. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Lennie · · Score: 1

      No, the desktop is dead, long live webapps on a Linux kernel and webkit ! ;-)

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    13. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by DeadboltX · · Score: 1

      Obviously having plenty of choices and options is a good thing, but there is such a thing as too many. iPhone may have 300k apps in their store, but that just means you have to sift through 80k poorly named fart noise apps, 30k calculators, etc, etc..

    14. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Both of which are beset by either proprietary or NIH elements that break them away from Linux as a whole.

      What value is there in a kernel when the user space and environment are wholly dependent on elements you cannot access, and have no ability to influence?

    15. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Only on /. would a bunch of computer nerds be complaining about a big OEM installing a Linux variant on their PCs.

      Because it's all "oh it's our custom Linux that has all sorts of proprietary elements that you can't replace, but that makes it User Friendly, unlike all those terrible open source bits."

    16. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Microlith · · Score: 1

      No user wants to know how or why things happen. They just want it all to work. Ubuntu is close as you will get if you keep hanging onto that paradigm.

      Then tell all those vendors to stop using crippled OSes like Android and iOS, and to stop using proprietary components (like webOS, which uses a proprietary framebuffer and a proprietary IPC system) and *nix users might adopt them. Until then, all they're doing is saying "please abandon everything that's been done to date and adopt this system that we alone control! Because Linux!"

    17. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      Why do you feel that Python is so bad? What do you find wrong with it?

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    18. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it s marketed as Linux, and as anything but an addition to your main OS, yes it's dead.

    19. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      have an Ubuntu PC that runs all of the apps I need...and they were all free. The only place that it does not match up is in gaming and my understanding is that if I were to buy Crossover, that would be solved.
      As far as ease of use goes, I found it no harder to learn to use than it was to learn to use a Macintosh and everybody keeps telling me that a Mac is easier to use than Windows.

      I mean no offense here. But the reality is, you're on Slashdot, you're saying Ubuntu is as easy OSX, has all apps you need, and objectively speaking, from this I can tell you don't even have a clue how far from an average user you are.

      You wouldn't also acknowledge that in 2008-2009 we saw the likes of HP and Dell try to sell Ubuntu computers, soon cancelled due to vastly higher return rates and tech support calls.

      That said, when reality doesn't match your ideals, just ignore reality. That always works.

    20. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      It is not crippled. NT operating system is not better than Linux, actually vice versa. But the real answer is that for normal people the operating system used (NT, Linux, HURD, FreeBSD, Minix, SunOS....) in software system does not matter anyway other than your used hardware is supported and needed software (not specific software brand but just if you need email client, you get a email client for it) is ported to the OS. Today most application programs use so many different system libraries and software platforms that those are the real game changers. Like Qt, Java, HTML5, .NET and so on.

      People have not never used OS's directly, always used them as only to run other software (were it a shell, GUI, office suite or ssh...
      OS is like a engine in the car. No one use it directly but they use pedals and wheel, sit on seat and listen music trough radio. The engine is just most important machinery/part of the car, even that today at some cars you are not permitted to open the hood to change oil.

      Linux is everywhere, even that most Anti-Linux persons does not know that they use it daily on their favorite devices or devices what they need to get their favorite devices working. Without Linux the Internet as we know it, would not exist.

    21. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Woy · · Score: 1

      These are not our nerds. Those are paid to say the things they say, by the companies that will lose out if Linux succeeds. Consider for example this turd, polished to +4 moderation score:

      ...Yet they will not take even consumer friendly Ubuntu seriously. IS the idea of Linux as a consumer friendly OS a dead end?

      I mean IS it? IS it?

      Lol.

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
    22. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Rennt · · Score: 1

      Both of which are beset by either proprietary or NIH elements that break them away from the GNU userland as a whole.

      For what its worth.

    23. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      are we witnessing the birth of meme?

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    24. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      No, what you don't realize is that the fact of the matter is if those same people had ordered a PC with OSX from Dell or HP, they would have had the same problem. It didn't work the way they were used to and they couldn't install MS Office (Ok, they would not have had that last problem). The thing is that most people do not realize that most of the software they buy for a Windows PC or an OSX PC has a functional equivalent that is free for Linux. The reason why some people who think Linux is hard can use an OSX PC is because they have been marketed that "Macs are easy". My wife uses Ubuntu. She is a typical office drone. She had no more trouble figuring it out than she has with the Mac a friend of ours brings by every now and again. The problem in both cases is that certain things do not work the same as in Windows.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    25. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I really hope so. It seems pretty forced thus far, but it would be such an awesome meme.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    26. Re:Consumer Linux Is Dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I bet lots of people would complain about Linux on their PCs, if they didn't also have Windows as a choice.

  3. anonops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Web site of Broadcast Music Inc. (BMI) is down.

    1. Re:anonops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one's stopping you from submitting an article about it.

  4. Great success by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this will be a raging success, a truly innovative and high quality product, just like everything else HP has produced in the past decade.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Great success by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you're sarcastic, but we still have beter experience with HP than other brands. Maybe using Windows as a step to get more people to use WebOS applications isn't such a bad idea. I mean, most users just use the computer to mail, watch videos on Youtube and stalk eachother on Facebook, how much of a stretch is it to jump from Windows to an OS that only needs to connect you to the internet and run your choice of browser?

      --
      home
    2. Re:Great success by zaivala · · Score: 2

      Give this guy irony points. My HP desktop has nannyware built into it that forces me to reinstall the operating system if I install anything that modifies the MBR (e..g, most distros of Linux, as dual boot). Nobody has yet shown me how to disable that, and several attempts have only caused me to, yup, reinstall the software. The only way around this is to install Linux outright, and throw my Windoze disks out.

    3. Re:Great success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no watson, but a quick search on google based on your words (HP reinstall operating system modifies MBR) led me to a program called HP ProtectTools that needs to be removed. Hope that helps!

    4. Re:Great success by Rennt · · Score: 2

      Sounds like you keep re-installing the same crappy nag-enabled OEM software. Get a real copy of Windows and you'll be happy (assuming Windows is your thing that is).

    5. Re:Great success by zaivala · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your kind and generous comment. A "Real" copy of Windows, which is not even a real operating system but a revenue stream, would not include the "Real" drivers for my "Real" hardware. Getting rid of bloatware is easy. I was suggesting that nobody yet has told me how to disable the nagware, which your comment does not address. Your comment is as helpful as [insert negative metaphor].

    6. Re:Great success by Rennt · · Score: 1

      Jesus Christ zaivala, you do what everyone else does and get the drivers from HP's website.

      The discs HP give you are NOT the same thing as a Windows install disc. They are designed for a factory restore, and can't effectively be used if you are modifying the factory loadout. You KNOW this, and complaining is not going to change anything.

      Don't go projecting your frustration on people that are trying to help cause you don't like the answer. Suck it up and get your own Windows license, or get out of the Microsoft ecosystem if their practices irk you so much.

    7. Re:Great success by zaivala · · Score: 1

      Hey, I know I have the long hair and beard thing, but you gotta stop confusing me for Jesus. HP does not carry the drivers on their website for machines the age of this one. I had to get them to dig through their hidden files to get the install disks. Thanks for assuming I'm stupid. I'll do the same for you some day.

  5. Good News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great Idea.

  6. YeahThanksButNoThanks by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Aaaaand... One more reason why my first task on any new OEM PC boils down to "wipe and reinstall the OS".

    I honestly don't know if I "like" WebOS or not yet, but if I want a Windows PC, I damned well want a Windows PC, not a frankenbox designed to push some crack-addled CEO's latest cross-marketing wet dreams on an otherwise unwilling audience.

    1. Re:YeahThanksButNoThanks by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      I guess Decrapifier http://www.pcdecrapifier.com/ will include that too.

    2. Re:YeahThanksButNoThanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The old way of thinking is "one PC, one OS." This is going by the wayside and if you don't adopt to the reality of it all and you're in IT you'll be going by the wayside soon as well.

    3. Re:YeahThanksButNoThanks by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't know if I "like" WebOS or not yet, but if I want a Windows PC, I damned well want a Windows PC, not a frankenbox designed to push some crack-addled CEO's latest cross-marketing wet dreams on an otherwise unwilling audience.

      It's quite possible that the summary (and original article) is completely wrong. It's not at all clear from what Apotheker said, that WebOS will run in a VM under Windows. You could also read it as 'we will support WebOS as an option on all our systems'.

    4. Re:YeahThanksButNoThanks by pla · · Score: 1

      The old way of thinking is "one PC, one OS." This is going by the wayside and if you don't adopt to the reality of it all and you're in IT you'll be going by the wayside soon as well.

      Come again? Did you respond to the wrong post?

      I use VMs (and relatives) literally on a daily basis - From "real" virtualization, to emulation, to lowly runtime-sandboxes.

      Key detail, though - I choose what to run on my PC, and when to run something non-native to my primary hardware and OS combo. You do not choose that for me. HP does not. Even Microsoft does not. I do.

      Perhaps I can't do a whole lot about bundling in the long run, but I can sure as hell cost HP sales today for trying to tell me what I will or will not run on machines I control.

  7. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  8. No balls. HP is doomed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Part of the reason why these OEM's will keep seeing their Desktop PC margins disappear is because they can't commit to a single vision and execute it properly.

    What kind of a message does it send when you're spreading your bets across two half-baked platforms? Dual booting is seen as bipolar behavior by consumers. Make your choice and push forward. Dont' force the consumer or the developer to make the hard choices. You're the device supplier, you should make the decision.

    Choice isn't always a good thing. Markets, Consumers, Developers â" they all like a clear, decisive path. Not a shit sandwich that forces your to burn calories and look for trade-offs.

    HP's message with this: "We don't know what the fuck we're doing."

    1. Re:No balls. HP is doomed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP has Apple-envy and wants to own their own mobile OS. But not even crApple is stupid enough to shove iOS down Mac/books' throats. Who wants to run cramped mobile apps on a desktop machine?

      Most importantly, who wants to develop for yet another [pseudo-proprietary] mobile platform? Android and iOS own the lion's share of the market, Blackberry & Micro$oft are trying to stay relevant, Maemo has the backing of the largest cellphone maker, and now a market-failed webOS picked up by HP who thinks they can turn it around. This will not end well for HP. Shades of AOL-TimeWarner come to mind.

  9. I don't care by shellster_dude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No matter what a PC comes with, the first thing I do is slash and burn and install whatever I want. There's no way I'm going to put up with all the bloatware and possible malicious software the vendor installed.

    1. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep one more POS junk to uninstall...

    2. Re:I don't care by zdepthcharge · · Score: 1

      Especially on an HP machine.

    3. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At least you have a higher chance of it running linux flawlessly though. I remember when the EeePC came out, I bought one and replaced the OS with Ubuntu. One of the key selling points for me was that it was shipped with a working version of one linux distribution.

  10. Hang on by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Do people still actually buy HP computers?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Hang on by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Surely you jest? They sell more than anyone else.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Hang on by camperdave · · Score: 1

      People? No. Corporations? In droves.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:Hang on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ISPs hand HP boxes out in a bungle with their service here.

    4. Re:Hang on by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      Opened my corporate HP. Turns out is is made in the same factory as iPhones (Foxconn)

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    5. Re:Hang on by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Surely you jest? They sell more than anyone else.

      Unfortunately this is true.

      John and Jane Clueless will go down to Harvey Norman/Wallmart/Tesco's and purchase a HP laptop that was sold to them by an equally clueless salesman.

      But to my even greater annoyance,

      John Q CIO will standardise on HP laptops because he golfs with the regional director of HP sales.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:Hang on by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      I didn't quite understand if you meant that as a good thing or bad thing. Even from a single supplier, there are different levels of quality of production.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    7. Re:Hang on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP is both the biggest consumer OEM, and server vendor.

  11. Following Apple by lotho+brandybuck · · Score: 1

    Only 10 years after Apple put Unix on consumer desktops!

    1. Re:Following Apple by grub · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is running on top of Windows, though.

      It'd be like driving a Lamborghini on a canoe.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Following Apple by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      Apparently dual-booting not running on top of Win.. Was a bad summary. Read this article for example: http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/hp-picks-up-phoenixs-hyperspace-hypercore-and-flip-instant-on/

  12. Glad to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    That /. Is as close-minded and resistant to change as ever. None of you know any details of how this will work, and I'm betting most of you have never even used WebOS, yet you immediately shit on HP and proclaim you'll never buy their products again.

    Posted from my Palm Pre, running WebOS 2.1.

    1. Re:Glad to see by jejones · · Score: 1

      Link to, or instructions on how to, upgrade a Pre to 2.1, please?

    2. Re:Glad to see by Qubit · · Score: 1

      That /. Is as close-minded and resistant to change as ever. None of you know any details of how this will work, and I'm betting most of you have never even used WebOS

      Okay, I'll bite: Why should I run WebOS?

      I usually run Ubuntu or Debian, and I have an Android phone because it's the closest thing out there to a generic FOSS system on my phone (MeeGo ain't there yet, and OpenMoko doesn't cut it).

      I run Windows for a few very specific applications that various employers want me to run (although I'm weaning them off), and I test websites and various pieces of software on OSX, when necessary.

      What can WebOS offer me?

      --

      coding is life /* the rest is */
    3. Re:Glad to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.webos-internals.org/wiki/WebOS_2_Upgrade

      Have fun.

    4. Re:Glad to see by sglewis100 · · Score: 1

      http://www.webos-internals.org/wiki/WebOS_2_Upgrade

      Have fun.

      Wow. So if I have an AT&T Pre Plus, I can run 2.X but not use apps that require 2.X. On Sprint you'll lose navigation and network updates. On Verizon I guess it works okay. Other than that, the instructions weren't TOO complicated (but still way above Joe Consumer), until I got to the part about enabling flash.

      I'm not sure this is really "just as good" as a HP supported upgrade.

    5. Re:Glad to see by Funk_dat69 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the quantity of apps is lacking, but as a fan of FOSS, you may be interested in how much WebOS has in common with other Linux distributions.
      Kernel 2.6.14
      glib, udev, lvm, WebKit, gStreamer, etc

      Take a look here:
      http://opensource.palm.com/1.4.5/index.html

      If you install a terminal app and take a look around, it looks much like a standard Linux system. Often times Linux apps compiled for arm just work.

      To answer you question: Freedom! Palm (now HP) have been encouraging people to hack/extend/play around with the system. It's a great little Linux system with a top notch interface(Luma). It's a shame that it's so ignored.

      That being said, I have no idea what this "webOS on a PC" means. it may just be the Luma interface running on windows, which just sounds 'ick'.

      --
      FUNK!
    6. Re:Glad to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just as good as an HP supported upgrade, in fact it's a giant hackjob. But on Sprint, at least, you don't lose navigation if you know where to look for a 2.0 version.

      And not many App Catalog apps require 2.0 yet, so it's not a big loss.

  13. Hepic Phail by Pope+Raymond+Lama · · Score: 1

    "Launch on top of Windows" - A.K.A. an emulator app (even if through a virtual machine, nonetheless it will be an emulator for something that allows web OS apps launch seamlessly on windows ... none of whcih I can see as anything close of newsworthy)

    --
    -><- no .sig is good sig.
  14. more crapware by swschrad · · Score: 1

    and I bet there is not a restore disk for either system in the box. here's a nickel, Leo, go buy a clue.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:more crapware by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      ADVENTURES IN GRAMMAR NAZISM: Technically it should be a semicolon after "Leo"; tell all your friends. Save the semicolon!

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    2. Re:more crapware by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Technically, it should be something other than a comma, but the semicolon is only one of a number of options. It could be a period, an exclamation point, an em-dash, or even (though it would give a slightly archaic feel) a colon. Simply inserting the word "to" before "go" would also fix the problem.

      I'm also a fan of the semicolon, but—unfortunately—the only time it's mandatory in English is in a list of lists.

    3. Re:more crapware by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      For the new kids, we like to make things simple—after all, the kids would get alarmed: and we shouldn't want to find ourselves with that mess. I, too, am a patron of such alternatives—mostly the colon and em-dash. But syntactically, the semicolon is the most natural, since we're talking about a straight sentence fusion, and an em-dash is merely sugar for emphasis—sexy, wonderful emphasis.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  15. what what WHAT?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would be great news! I (as much as anyone who has used PCs for the past fifteen years) am sick and tired of Windows. If HP can pre-load this Web OS along with Windows, maybe they can eventually get developers' attention focused on the alternatives whilst still satisfying Windows consumers.

      As a die-hard PC user, I don't care what system it is, as long as I don't have to put up with Windows anymore. Thus pre-loading another system is a step in the right direction.

  16. less is more. really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet more bloatware for me to remove from new machines that my company buys, oh joy. :)

  17. UI and processor by mr100percent · · Score: 2

    This brings up several questions. WebOS is a dedicated touchscreen app. Using one of those OSes with a mouse is much less appealing and doesn't feel as productive. Ever tried running the iOS emulator (comes with the SDK) or somesuch? It's just not meant for it.

    Also, wouldn't you have to recompile all the apps? ARM is a different processor

    1. Re:UI and processor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fancy thing about WebOS (indeed, the reason it's called WebOS) is that apps are mostly written in HTML and CSS. Only things that really require hardware access (mostly 3D games) are native code. So, really, most WebOS apps could run on any architecture unmodified.

    2. Re:UI and processor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This brings up several questions. WebOS is a dedicated touchscreen app.

      It would make sense to use it on a detachable touch-friendly LCD screen, connected to a PC via WiFi.

    3. Re:UI and processor by Antisyzygy · · Score: 2

      HP has touchscreen desktop computers as well as touchscreens on some of their laptops. I suspect this means they will probably make this a standard feature on WebOS devices.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    4. Re:UI and processor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to recompile the apps, WebOS apps are written in JavaScript.

    5. Re:UI and processor by smbarbour · · Score: 1

      All of the apps (except those built with the PDK) are HTML and Javascript.

      While I'm not happy with my current WebOS phone (the Pixi Plus that I had to beg for from Verizon's third-party insurance provider to replace the Palm Plus that had a cracked screen), I love the OS. Even the built-in apps can be modified.

  18. Why? Visit our App store! by AdamThor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Everyone seems to be coming up with something like this. And I think it's all to encourage you to stay within the owner's ecosystem where they make the rules and skim the profits of everything that comes through.

    Apple iStore started it.
    Then Steam. GamesForWindowsLive is an obvious ripoff. Apple is offering more and more stuff, Facebook wants to start offering credits or something like that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_Credits App Stores, Paypal, etc. it's the wave of the future.

    Everyone wants to be the broker through which you do all your stuff. I kinda hope that they all screw off and drop dead. I don't need any more middle men between me and my destination.

    Maybe the marketplaces will proliferate to the extent that none of them can become truly mandatory. Or maybe one day you'll choose between the 300 different app markets that do all sorts of shit and you'll have to be careful to shop out the one with the best terms. Or maybe you'll have to join a bunch of them (that product you just bought requires you to join another one, please generate ANOTHER unique username and password!) and you'll have to manage all 300 digital identities.

    Perhaps you can see how excited I am.

    --
    -- "Oh. This guy again."
    1. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me about it. That's why I visit farms directly rather than use the grocery store. I mean, if I want corn, I'm going to go get it from the guy with the field rather than some middle man who thinks he can tell me what's best.

    2. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by Aqualung812 · · Score: 2

      I kinda hope that they all screw off and drop dead. I don't need any more middle men between me and my destination.

      Maybe the marketplaces will proliferate to the extent that none of them can become truly mandatory. Or maybe one day you'll choose between the 300 different app markets that do all sorts of shit and you'll have to be careful to shop out the one with the best terms. Or maybe you'll have to join a bunch of them (that product you just bought requires you to join another one, please generate ANOTHER unique username and password!) and you'll have to manage all 300 digital identities.

      Perhaps you can see how excited I am.

      I'm with you on the "store" overload with all of the DRM that comes with it, but I must point out that in terms of middle men, you're usually ahead with one of these stores. There are far more indie musicians/authors/software-devs now, since the chain is usually creator->store->customer, rather than creator->(agent)->smaller label/softwareco/publisher-> multinational parent corp -> distribution chain -> retail store -> customer.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    3. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by AdamThor · · Score: 1

      Ah, you are correct, I think. Still, these stores drive me crazy. What is it, then? Perhaps it's the marketing that comes along with it. Maybe it's having to run an extra application. Or maybe it's the liberties that they seem to take with my computer.

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    4. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by AReilly · · Score: 1

      Why not? Works for Ubuntu. You want Amazon or WalMart or the guy down the road managing your software updates?

      --
      -- Andrew
    5. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      My guess is that it is all back to the DRM: Software to prevent you from copying (that is buggy), logins and passwords to forget, etc...

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    6. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by colesw · · Score: 1

      I'm confused, is Ubuntu like WalMart, Amazon or the guy down the road?

    7. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I think they meant that it's not like Walmart, Amazon... (The post can be read in many ways, but if you read it as if it were spoken and rhetorical it makes sense.)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    8. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by Medevilae · · Score: 1

      Steam is non-intrusive though, and lets you do what you want with what you buy. They're not trying to lock you into anything. I've always appreciated VALVe for their look on Steam- entertainment as a service, not a product.

    9. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      dunno, when the store becomes mainstream and full of offers you may be better off setting up a website and a shopping cart instead.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    10. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Unless "what you want" is to pay the same price as someone in the country next to you pays for a game, or "what you want" is to continue playing your games after you've done something that falls under Valve's "we can terminate your access at any time" policy.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    11. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by Medevilae · · Score: 1

      They will never terminate access to games you've paid for- even if Steam for some reason went bankrupt, they'll release your games DRM free. Unless you commit financial fraud through something like a charge back, they will not "terminate your access at any time," and even then they'll give your stuff back once you actually pay them. You might be confusing Steam account access in general with the VAC system, but it will only prevent you from joining VAC secure multiplayer servers, and if you cheated then you deserve it anyway.

    12. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by Lennie · · Score: 1

      I run my apps on a 'private-cloud', a small Soekris box in the corner with an encrypted backup in the 'real cloud'.

      And life is good again.

      I'm just waiting for the 'freedombox' to be ready and easy to install to replace it.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    13. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    14. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, at the parent of the parent of the parent.

    15. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to argue against your general point, but your timeline is a little off. Steam predates the apple app store by years.

    16. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by Linegod · · Score: 1

      Steam came before Apple iStore. So did Games for Windows Live.

      You're right, screw the Apple iStore.

      --
      -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
    17. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      Unless you commit financial fraud through something like a charge back

      WTF? Does Valve pay you to post this? A chargeback is not necessarily financial fraud. Regardless, there is no justification for them to block access to anything other than the software involved with the chargeback. There is no reason to block every game on the account.

    18. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 2

      even if Steam for some reason went bankrupt, they'll release your games DRM free.

      The steam fanbois love saying this. And I always ask them: where has anyone official from Steam ever said that? Quote please. They always seem to dodge the question or put their head back in the sand.

    19. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by k8to · · Score: 1

      They stated that they implemented the code to let the clients go free, and tested it. I believe that, but don't know how to be certain.

      This leaves dangling the question of: in the event that they are going bankrupt or whatever, what will be the motivation to actually use this technology? What about acquisition situations (nearly necessary in bankruptcy)? It's questionable whether they will be legally able to take this action in such a situation.

      Thus I view it as a well intentioned but fundamentally empty promise.

      --
      -josh
    20. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by mayberry42 · · Score: 1

      Everyone seems to be coming up with something like this. And I think it's all to encourage you to stay within the owner's ecosystem where they make the rules and skim the profits of everything that comes through.

      Naturally. It's much easier and cheaper to add worthless (and costless) crap to your product than it is to actually lower the price.

    21. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      They will never terminate access to games you've paid for- even if Steam for some reason went bankrupt, they'll release your games DRM free.

      Who will release the games DRM free?
      Is there an escrow out there that has all the DRM free versions of the games, full access to Steam and all the user accounts?
      Or did they just promise to do something after they no longer exist?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    22. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by awshidahak · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I always found the actual "app store" concept interesting (as in the "wow, that's kinda neat" type of interesting) ever since I discovered Linspire's CNR (Click N Run) application (which was just a front end for Debian's apt, but I did not know of apt at the time). I think for me that the whole idea of a place where one can find almost every application they need accessible under a series of categories rather useful. It's a lot faster than the old way of hunting all over the internet to find the one thing that I need. I only wish there was a decent one for windows.

    23. Re:Why? Visit our App store! by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      I think the actual owners of those games (EA, Activision, Ubisoft, and so forth) might not be too happy with that idea - to be frank, in the event Valve goes under I can reasonably say that I guarantee that they will not release any games, except potentially Valve games, without DRM- since they legally cannot do so, not being the copyright owner and all.

      Also, "financial fraud"? There are documented cases in which Valve has charged for a purchase, refused to provide access to it, and then outright blocked the account of the customer when they charged back the purchase which Valve refused to fulfil. Case in point, the people who somehow managed to get a copy of the Korean (I think - don't quote me on which country) copy of Left 4 Dead because it was 10 times cheaper, and Valve refused to allow them to activate or play it.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  19. Dual boot it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of running within windows, run it instead of windows. This has been done before with laptops prompting to load a "quick browser" instead of loading a full windows OS.

    1. Re:Dual boot it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of running within windows, run it instead of windows. This has been done before with laptops prompting to load a "quick browser" instead of loading a full windows OS.

      I wouldn't be at all surprised if that's what they're considering doing in the long term, with this dual-OS setup that they're touting for 2012 as a way to get consumers used to the idea.

  20. Could this be an Instant On operating system? by Marrow · · Score: 1

    My laptop for instance has two power buttons. One brings up the normal OS loader, and the other brings up an instant-on OS to play media files and a browser. I never use it, but its an idea.
    Put WebOS in its own partition. Let them choose it at boot time...or with its own power button. Heck, if its in ROM it could be pretty nifty.

    1. Re:Could this be an Instant On operating system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you've never rebooted a Pre. There is no chance in hell it will ever be an instant-on anything. It is linux. Linux with a JVM running. Linux with a JVM running Luna. If you want instant-on stuff you have to look at, you know, optimized code. WebOS is about as far from optimized as you can get.

  21. Intel Giveth, Microsoft / HP Taketh Away by extraordinaire · · Score: 1

    I suppose from TFA that this is going to be run as a virtual machine layer. The last thing we need is yet another layer on our computers to slow them down even further. I suppose it will be ironic, however, if User-Friendly, Widely-Accepted Desktop Linux finally comes in the form of a product you run inside of Windows.

  22. Dude by swanzilla · · Score: 1

    I'm gettin' a Dell.

  23. Re:Note To Self: by Bardez · · Score: 1

    "Continue" being the point of interest in there. My only HP laptop had its display panel die just after 2 years. My friend's HP laptop has component failure every 4-6 months, it seems.

    --
    Perception is the thin dividing line between reality and fiction.
  24. Is there a poster on Slashdot who has a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone posting so far ever used WebOS. In case you don't know, webOS was written by Palm, used on the Palm Pre, and even my 1.4.5 version of WebOS kicks the crap out of iOS for usability. The new versions and the new development model since HP bought Palm, can run entirely within the browser. Think in terms of super web toolkit. So any app you buy for your phone/pad can run on your desktop as well in your web browser. Not sure if they are planing on tightening the browser into core Windows a bit more, the way IE4 and 98 were tied together. If done right, will prove to be a boon to those who have a Palm/HP phone or Pad

    1. Re:Is there a poster on Slashdot who has a clue by Okonomiyaki · · Score: 1

      But can it run Flash? Because that is the most important thing in the whole world!

    2. Re:Is there a poster on Slashdot who has a clue by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      Almost. In february 2010 it was supposed to be released "in the first half of 2010". Then "sorry, in October 2010". Then I don't know but it's not released yet AFAIK.

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    3. Re:Is there a poster on Slashdot who has a clue by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      Correcting myself. It seems that WebOS 2 supports Flash out of the box. The infinite delay is for a WebOS 1 version.

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
  25. What's WebOS? by ubergeek65536 · · Score: 1

    Is that the one with cobwebs on it?

  26. I will not accept free software! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is incredible! Who do these people think they are giving away potentially useful software for free! I'm happy to accept the free trials and bloated services they give me for free. But I'll be damned if I'm going to accept an alternative to the Windows environment for free. I'll stick with Apple where they charge me for everything, including updates. That really is the only civilized way to handle things. Free software is obviously a clear path to anarchy and must be opposed.

  27. We finally have a date! by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    2012 WILL be the year of the Linux (HP) Desktop.

    1. Re:We finally have a date! by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      2012 WILL be the year of the Linux (HP) Desktop.

      Linux has been running my home desktops since 1999, and my work desktops since 2003. My wife loves it, and now despises Windows. On those rare occasions at work when I have to run Windows (for short amounts of time, fortunately), it feels primitive and unintuitive.

    2. Re:We finally have a date! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it will be the year of the Windows desktop containing an Oracle/Sun VirtualBox, containing a Linux (HP) WebOS lame desktop.

      W

  28. Dual Boot by Dopeskills · · Score: 1

    It's just speculation that HP will ship WebOS on top of Windows. Maybe, what will really happen is that HP will provide a dual boot solution (think bootcamp) for customers so that they can boot WebOS as the primary operating system.

    1. Re:Dual Boot by ProppaT · · Score: 2

      This is what should and probably will happen.

      I would be ecstatic if my next laptop gave me the option to press one button to launch windows or one button to launch an "instant boot" version of webOS. webOS would be much easier on the battery and, under most normal situations, webOS would offer all I need. A web browser and a few distractions.

      It will never supplant a full blown OS and that's not the goal. But it would be great for those moments when you just want to reply to some e-mails real quick or browse the web.

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    2. Re:Dual Boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't expect much improvement in battery life. In the end it's still x86 hardware which isn't a power efficient architecture. If you're not convinced, look at the power comparisons of an Intel-based laptop running Windows vs Ubuntu. Windows actually wins out due to better ACPI support. WebOS isn't magic, it runs Linux underneath. Maybe it can squeeze out a little more runtime but it'll be peanuts.

  29. !FOSS mobile users potentially gained 100k apps ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about good news and a hell of a potential application boost.

    A forum member/webOS developer ArthurThornton on preCentral began a discussion about getting Classic running on webOS 2, and then 2.1. Early this morning, he posted a detailed set of steps, including the files needed (and webOS Doctor versions from which they come), to get Classic working again; Arthur verified it on his newly-OTA-updated Pre 2, and other users are beginning to test as well (as will we).

    We know that many of you have always seen Classic as a sort of disincentive for webOS innovation, but for others, Classic was and remains a mission-critical app. For those users, help has arrived.

    - Now they are working on getting the emulator working on android and Blackberry OS.

  30. Xizibit sez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yo dawg, i heard you liked OSes so we put and OS on top of your OS so you can...... What exactly is the point of this again?

    1. Re:Xizibit sez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it opens up the option for the users to use other applications not built for THAT platform and run them natively.

      With the option of classic on WebOS 2.1 , and now them looking to port classic to android and rim in talks with google to run android roms on blackberry OS, it makes your openSource mobile device and blackberries 100x more powerful, 100x more valuable and now 100,000 times more lusted over by iPhone users :)

  31. Re:Note To Self: by danlip · · Score: 1

    My last HP laptop was 10 years ago, the hard drive died in less than 1 year and I had to take it in twice before I could convince the idiots at the authorized service center that my hard drive was going bad - it was making the click of death and running extremely slowly because of drive errors, so it should not have been hard to diagnose. Bad drives can happen to anyone but should not been a hassle to get them fixed. Apple on the other hand just replaces my parts when I complain, no questions. Dell seems pretty good too but my experience with them has just been corporate machines with gold-plated service contracts. I won't be buying HP anyway so I don't care what bloatware they load on it.

  32. Re:Following Apple (Following HP) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which was only 16 years after HP put Unix on a portable computer!

    (The first version of HP-UX was released for the HP Integral PC.)

  33. Not really an 'OS' then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am tired of web browsers and skins thinking they are operating systems. If you require any existing software to be present on a device in order to run, then it's not an OS.

  34. Confusion at its worst by HeavyAl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Recently some of my in-laws brought me their new HP notebook complaining that it was (of course) slow, and that intermittently they could or could not load their pictures onto it. Turned out that it was one of these notebooks HP had shipped with the webos as some kind of pre-boot setup and my less than technically savvy family members weren't able to tell when they were in windows (yes, a nightmare unto itself) or were in the webos. The solution was to backup their data, wipe the machine and install stock Windows 7 from scratch. They haven't had any complaints since.

    HP, this does not bode well!

    1. Re:Confusion at its worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHAT??? HP is not yet shipping computers with "webOS preboot" or some such yet. If what you say is true, then you had quite a techie news scoop on your hands and blew it. If not, then your not only a troll but a liar.

    2. Re:Confusion at its worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no HP notebooks shipping with WebOS today, so you're spouting crap.

    3. Re:Confusion at its worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WebOS has definitely not made it to any PCs yet. It might be some other piece of software, but it definitely wasn't WebOS.

    4. Re:Confusion at its worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure what it is called but they most definitely have been shipping some preboot webOS thingie, I purchased a new laptop for my sister late last year and first thing I had to do was wipe that shit from the machine as it confused and annoyed her, I didn't actually bother to have a close look at what it was, after all it was from HP, leaving it on there would be about the equivalent to leaving Symantec or Mcafee software installed.

    5. Re:Confusion at its worst by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      he isn't spouting crap, I don't think it is webOS but HP's have been shipping with a fast boot OS for media playing and web browsing for sometime now. I purchased 2 pavillions early this year, I booted them a few times before I gave them the disk wipe treatment that anything from HP deserves and twice I saw it boot into whatever fast boot OS they were using, I didn't bother to investigate further though as I planned on imaging them the next day anyway.

  35. Yawn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who gives a rat's?

    HP sucks.

    They made some nice calculators a long time ago.

    Other than that: shitty Unix workstations with a crap port of Unix on a crap architecture, shitty printers (with chips in cartridges), shitty PC's and other consumer hardware.

    HP: no thanks. One of the world's most irrelevant multinationals.

    Wozniak had the good sense to quit HP in the 1970's to start something cooler.

    1. Re:Yawn. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you left out the x86-64 servers and blades that rule your online world

    2. Re:Yawn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP: no thanks. One of the world's most irrelevant multinationals.

      HP produces exceptional quality office printers as well as providing Linux software to rule them. That alone makes them relevant for me.

  36. WebOS will be on every PC that HP ships in 2012? by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

    What, all 5,000 of them? Wow ...

    That's gonna attract throngs of developers!

  37. Re:Note To Self: Don't buy computers by jelizondo · · Score: 1

    Caveat emptor!

    I just cleaned up my son-in-law's Acer computer of all sort of shit, purportedly put in by the manufacturer to "help" the consumer get a great experience with their product.

    Mostly useless stuff taking up RAM and processor cycles and delivering usage information to Acer "parteners" (God Bless you Peter Sellers!)

    Nowadays, you have to either live with the bloatware or be knowledgeable enough to know what you can remove safely. Starting with the horrible Norton / Symantec shit...

    A couple of weeks ago a cleaned a Sony (my daughter's) and it wasn't as bad; I haven't seen a recent HP but my guess is that everyone is jumping on the easy "partners" money, so this shit is here to stay.

    --
    Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. - Cardinal Wolsey
  38. Product insinuation by Troll-Under-D'Bridge · · Score: 1

    It looks to me more like a way for HP to phase in a product without taking too much of a risk (burning their bridge to Microsoft before they've erected their skyway to the cloud).

    Remember how for the longest time Microsoft continued to developed DOS while they were trying to perfect their Mac System clone called "Windows"? Until Win 95 came out, Windows was one mess of a barely good enough graphical interface.

    Ditto for Google and their seemingly perpetual "Beta" offerings.

    I suspect HP's first goal is to develop product awareness. When enough people are aware, they have the option of using WebOS as their one and only desktop operating system. Of course, this all depends on the positive reaction that WebOS would get from the tech media or social networks. If they market it correctly, then they just might beat Google to the first widely deployed Internet-centric (aka cloud, App-based, network) computer.

    Microsoft might have to shoot itself in the foot to compete, as it chooses between maintaining lock-in support for its cash cow Office suite or developing an App-based OS.

  39. Well Dell fans by JumpDrive · · Score: 1

    .. glad you showed up.
    At my company you cannot buy Dells. After 5 orders which had 2 to 5 PC's, every order was screwed up in some way. DOA, wrong operating system, no operating system (yes that last is true).
    On our second order from HP we got a computer in and looked at the form factor and called them up and said we would happy with the fan placement. They took it back. Put the RMA tag on it and UPS came by and picked it up.

  40. Great White Hope? by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    Where there is a http://opensource.palm.com/, I don't know to what extent they're opening up the entire OS.

    Could WebOS be the Great White Hope for geeks now that Nokia has gone to the dark $ide?

    And how open (rooted) are HP current or future WebOS handhelds to be?

    Is there any HP analogue to the N900?

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    1. Re:Great White Hope? by Hydian · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, no rooting required on current devices. You just enter the old Konami code and it is in developer mode which allows you to load in whatever you like.

    2. Re:Great White Hope? by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Looks like I might have found my next phone. Thanks.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  41. Re:WebOS will be on every PC that HP ships in 2012 by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with HP computers?

    Granted I haven't been in the market for a long time, but the last time I was, HP computers were quite solidly built, with toolless removal of disk drives, heavy (i.e, high-quality) power supplies, etc.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  42. It will not be WebOS but a webos layer... by snaggen · · Score: 1

    Since WebOS applications is just web apps run in a V8 javascript environment with some nice javascript api:s for notifications, window management aso. my guess is that the PC WebOS will be a layer on top of Windows (and Linux mybe?) that just runs WebOS apps. They have said it will be an integrated experience, so they will probably have ported their notification, window management and other apis to be a gateway to the underlying os.
    I will be surprised if they will be able to run the "native" binaries, like the 3D games... since they require Linux underneath.

  43. Re:WebOS will be on every PC that HP ships in 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP computers are fine as long as you wipe out any of the HP software on them. Software from HP is a special kind of hell I would only wish on my worst enemy.

  44. actually quite useful! by doubtless · · Score: 1

    I frequently find myself switching between my PC & Blackberry, replying messages on one hand and doing some other work on the PC with the other. I for one would be happy to have the BB OS on the PC just so that I can use only one keyboard instead.

    So yah, I can definitely see the appeal of this approach.

    --
    geek page at KY speaks
  45. WebOS to run on top of Windows ? by doperative · · Score: 1

    "It's not likely that WebOS will supplant existing operating systems on PCs, but rather would run on top of Windows to be able to launch WebOS apps" link

    `HP chief technical officer Phil McKinney told the Seattle Times that the company's PCs will have an "integrated WebOS experience." It won't be a virtualization, he said, but rather an "enhancement" to Windows' link

  46. Web OS runs on the Linux kernel by doperative · · Score: 1

    "Since WebOS applications is just web apps run in a V8 javascript environment with some nice javascript api:s for notifications, window management aso"..

    "webOS is a proprietary mobile operating system running on the Linux kernel, initially developed by Palm, which was later acquired by HP" link

  47. Re:WebOS will be on every PC that HP ships in 2012 by Hydian · · Score: 1

    I have a niggling feeling that the top PC maker worldwide (based on PC shipments) sells a few more than 5,000 PCs a year. Must be at least 5,003.

  48. Mini Quick Boot OS by matthew_t_west · · Score: 1

    WebOS could work as one of those minimal "instant on" OSs like iOS, Android, Chrome and some other proprietary menu driven mini-OSs. Here's an example: Instant boot laptop for "everyday" computer use, and a real OS for real computing. I could see my 2.5 and 5 year old daughters dealing with WebOS much more easily than, say, Windows or OS X. So, when they want to use the tablet/laptop/computer they get WebOS or iOS. When they need to start doing word processing, layout, image manipulation, they can use the grown-up OS.

    That being said, this market is already taken by iOS and Android. It's probably too late.

    M

    --
    Browse at 1. You'll thank me later.