Slashdot Mirror


Legacy From the 1800s Leaves Tokyo In the Dark

itwbennett writes "East Japan entered its fifth day of power rationing on Friday, with no end to the planned blackouts in sight. The local electrical utility can't make up the shortfall by importing power from another region, though, because Japan lacks a national power grid, a consequence of a decision made in the late 1800s."

322 comments

  1. Time to get out those telescopes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dark (and hopefully) clear skies...

    1. Re:Time to get out those telescopes! by rtaylor · · Score: 1

      The ground is still a little wobbly at times.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    2. Re:Time to get out those telescopes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're fishing for a Cesium glow joke, now is not the time.

    3. Re:Time to get out those telescopes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You joke, but there are a lot of amateur astronomers in Japan*, and it's fair to say that more than a few are racing to make astronomical hay while the lights don't shine.

      (*Funnily enough, one of the main reasons for this is because of the lack of functioning infrastructure as a result of the bombing during and immediately after WW2.)

  2. Japan Does Have a National Power Grid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have several frequency converter stations.

    1. Re:Japan Does Have a National Power Grid by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      They should just be linked up with HVDC lines anyway, but eh. Same problem.

    2. Re:Japan Does Have a National Power Grid by Heian-794 · · Score: 4, Informative

      They do, but they don't have the capacity to convert the amounts of power that the Kanto side suddenly needs. It's unfortunate that they didn't invest in more conversion capacity before this disaster, but then again, it probably would have been viewed as a waste of money, as few people could have imagined a power shortage of this scale before.

      A few years ago the government began urging offices to keep their indoor temperatures at 28 degrees C (82 F) to save energy; there are doubts as to its efficacy as the increased sweat and lethargy bring greater water usage (more laundry) and lowered productivity.

      I despised this program but could certainly endure it this year when there are so many people suffering from a lot more than an overheated working environment, but the silver lining is that when power capacity does finally get back up -- the Fukushima reactors were nearing end-of-life and new ones were already scheduled for 2013 -- regular folks might be able to work in air-conditioned offices again. After what we've been through, it sure will feel like a luxury.

    3. Re:Japan Does Have a National Power Grid by Rei · · Score: 2

      This earthquake/tsunami/meltdown/etc could be a Catastrotunity in that regard -- finally providing the impetus to modernize their grid. Laying new power lines should be far faster than building new power plants, and since we're talking high power/long distance and they'll need to match frequencies, I would expect that they'll be HVDC.

      Another thing that they should be able to do faster than building new thermal power plants is to build power storage facilities to buffer day/night demand (battery storage, mini pumped-hydro, etc). China already uses these for demand buffering quite extensively. But they have a nice side effect of also helping support more intermittent power generation as well, because there is little difference between buffering supply and buffering demand. Which is great, because installing new photovoltaic capacity is also much faster than building new centralized thermal power plants (at least if global solar production can keep up).

      If speed of getting new power into the region is of the essence, they may well end up with a very modern, very green grid purely as a side effect.

      --
      Santa Ana Winds: Like the Dustbowl, but with awards shows.
  3. if we get to 88Hz can we go back in time to fix th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if we get to 88Hz can we go back in time to fix this?

  4. I'll save you from reading TFA by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Informative

    Half of Japan used 50Hz and the other side uses 60Hz. They have three conversion stations with a combined capacity of just 1GW, so power from one side can't power the other.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by swanzilla · · Score: 4, Funny

      Half of Japan used 50Hz and the other side uses 60Hz. They have three conversion stations with a combined capacity of just 1GW, so power from one side can't power the other.

      Side note: the only power source capable of generating 1.21 gigawatts of electricity is a bolt of lightning.

    2. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Funny

      Half of Japan used 50Hz and the other side uses 60Hz. They have three conversion stations with a combined capacity of just 1GW, so power from one side can't power the other.

      Side note: the only power source capable of generating 1.21 gigawatts of electricity is a bolt of lightning.

      In 1955, sure.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by GameboyRMH · · Score: 0

      Gigawatts? I think you mean jiggawatts...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Heian-794 · · Score: 1

      Or plutonium. You probably think that here in high-tech Japan, we can just walk into the corner drugstore and buy plutonium. Unfortunately, even here it's a little hard to come by.

      ^_^;

    5. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gigawatts? I think you mean jiggawatts...

      jigga what?

    6. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jigga who?

    7. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Ja'Achan · · Score: 2

      jigga, please

    8. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Nadaka · · Score: 0

      They have 40 tons of plutonium. Its not as rare as you might think in japan. but it is well guarded.

    9. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      plutonium isn't hard to come by.
      In japan, plutonium grows on trees and rains from thin air!

      I'm going to hell now aren't I.

    10. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's like incompatible warp-plasma".

    11. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Whoa, a reverse Star Trek :P

      They should have made a joke like that in one of the episodes/movies where they visited the past or a more primitive culture.

      Scotty when using a keyboard: "I get it now, it's just like the backup diagnostic console on the warp reactor control unit!"

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    12. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by firewrought · · Score: 1

      Side note: the only power source capable of generating 1.21 gigawatts of electricity is a bolt of lightning.

      Japan has two ABWR's at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa that output 1.3 GW's each. Of course, it's not individual power sources that matter but the fleet as a whole, and, if I interpret DOE 2009 figures correctly, Japan's fleet has a generation capacity of 280 GW and an average load of 112 GW. I have no idea what peak capacity is this time of year or how load/generation are distributed geographically, but it's easy to see how the 1.21 GW conversion capability is a mere straw through which to sip power (~equivalent to 1 large reactor).

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    13. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    14. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 0

      They have three conversion stations with a combined capacity of just 1GW, so power from one side can't power the other.

      Well, all they need is 21% more power and they could go back to 1885 to rectify this problem.

      --
      We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
    15. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by jgtg32a · · Score: 1, Informative

      It is still spelled Giga, just pronounced jigga

    16. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

      Woosh....

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    17. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could try going to Fukushima, I hear there's nuclear material everywhere!

    18. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by demonbug · · Score: 2

      Or plutonium. You probably think that here in high-tech Japan, we can just walk into the corner drugstore and buy plutonium. Unfortunately, even here it's a little hard to come by.

      ^_^;

      That's okay. I hear there is a plan in the works to spread it more equitably about the country, perhaps even share some with the rest of the world.

      (Too soon?)

    19. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no, lightening produces 1.21 Jigawatts. I have yet to find the exact metric conversion into Gigawatts...

    20. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Well the plutonium is easy enough to get. But it's damned near impossible to find a Delorean there anymore.

    21. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      but it is well guarded.

      Doesnt matter. The Libyans are otherwise occupied.

    22. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Also Japan didn't have any roads where you could get to 88 miles per hour before the quake.

    23. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard they actually would like less of the stuff at some power plant north of Tokyo. They have so much of it, they're having storage problems...

    24. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its was 1.21 jigawatts

    25. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      jigga watt?

    26. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the plants with issues don't use plutonium, they use uranium. It's the radioactive cesium and iodine by products thats the problem.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    27. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Confusador · · Score: 1

      At the moment, not having enough plutonium is exactly the opposite of Japan's problem.

    28. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      "A computer that responds to voice commands! How quaint."

    29. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      joke only in America where they cant spoke proper England :D

    30. Re:I'll save you from reading TFA by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2

      Reactor #3 is fueled with MOX, so yes, the plants with issues do use plutonium. Not that makes any difference.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  5. I'll bet ... by PPH · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... this situation changes. And Japan will leap to the forefront of HVDC transmission gear manufacturing.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:I'll bet ... by Algae_94 · · Score: 0

      Since they need the ability they might work on HVDC transmission gear, but what market is there for this technology elsewhere? Just standardize national grids and you don't need to worry about it.

    2. Re:I'll bet ... by adonoman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Anywhere you need to transmit power a long distance - you get less power loss over the distance. In Canada a decent portion of our power generation is from hydroelectric dams in the north - 1000 km from the main demands for that power. We have 450,000-volt DC lines running that distance. Any tech that makes that transmission more efficient, or reduces maintenance costs at either end would be snapped up quickly.

    3. Re:I'll bet ... by biggknifeparty · · Score: 1

      Except we're too cheap to buy the products. Plus the Harper administration would rather put up blue "Economic Stimulus" billboards while paying hookers tons of cash than actually do anything that would stimulate the economy.

    4. Re:I'll bet ... by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      (I am asking because I do not know).

      Why not just use AC if the frequency on both ends is the same?

    5. Re:I'll bet ... by 21mhz · · Score: 2

      You can't deny that paying hookers also stimulates the economy... if only a little bit.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    6. Re:I'll bet ... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I bet you guys will be first with superconducting transmission lines, given your close proximity to absolute zero...

    7. Re:I'll bet ... by PPH · · Score: 1
      DC links are more efficient and give the operator more control over system stability and power flow.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-voltage_direct_current#Advantages_of_HVDC_over_AC_transmission

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re:I'll bet ... by adonoman · · Score: 1

      Manitoba Hydro is looking at spending 2 to 4 billion on a new HVDC line to the north in the next couple years. The idea being that they'll turn around and sell all that extra capacity to the US as premium renewable power.

    9. Re:I'll bet ... by adonoman · · Score: 1

      Yup, the cooling's practically free.

    10. Re:I'll bet ... by unitron · · Score: 2

      "You can't deny that paying hookers also stimulates the economy..."

      Amongst other things.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    11. Re:I'll bet ... by paulej72 · · Score: 1

      Also you do not need to match the sine wave exactly either. The three main grids in the US are connected via some DC links so that frequency matching is not necessary.

    12. Re:I'll bet ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they could make HVDC (high power Direct current) popular around the world if they polarised effort in that direction at lower cost

        but the world does have a need and want for far more low power DC hybrid off grid/on grid house items Today, we are told this is by and large the greatest users of on grid power today, so there's a massive market already there, and this would save lots of grid power generation/consumption in the long term , if only it where made cheaper and in far greater supply.

    13. Re:I'll bet ... by Kyont · · Score: 1

      It's a good question, but there is a reason. If there is an AC link between two different systems, they essentially become one system and they have to stay synchronized with each other. This results in all kinds of complications for the grid operators. Generator outages or power surges in one area affect the other area. The frequency in both areas must remain the same or else you instantly damage all kinds of expensive rotating equipment. If two (unconnected) areas nominally operate at 60 Hz, they still vary slightly from that frequency all the time -- it would be quite common to see one at 59.98 Hz and the other at 60.02 Hz and then the reverse ten minutes later. If you join those up, the laws of physics dictate they become synchronized. If you keep them apart with DC lines, it is much easier to "schedule" how much power flows, and when, without worrying as much about what's going on in the other grid at that microsecond. This is probably why Canada uses them -- you pump through massive amounts of electricity when the dams are generating, and none at all when they aren't, and keeping those small northern grids synchronized to the Toronto grid (or wherever) is more trouble than it's worth when nothing is happening up there.

      On the other hand, there are advantages to linking up by AC, since a larger grid has more inertia and more generators that can pick up the slack when one generator goes out. The US has three major AC grids which are quite large and interconnected only with small amounts of DC - the East, the West, and dang ol' Texas. The East and West might never be joined up, due to the vast distances and expense involved. Texas might never be joined up because we still consider ourselves an independent occupied nation and don't want to over-commit to a long-term relationship with the USA. :-)

      --
      You shall see a cow on the roof of a cotton house.
  6. Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can't really change it now, can they?

    1. Re:Well.... by v1 · · Score: 1

      it's changeable, but costly. Transformers are designed around the frequency of the power they handle. To standardize would require a lot of big expensive multimillion dollar monster transformers to be replaced. And if you do some research on the big scare of a nasty magnetic storm damaging transformers, they lay out the gory details of just how few of these can get manufactured a year.

      Even if Japan had unlimited money and immediately ordered all the units they'd need, it would probably be at least 10 years before they got most of them manufactured. Cost was probably the big factor for them not standardizing 100 yrs ago, but now it's more a matter of calendar time required. And then you have to replace smaller units all over the place - at the substations, and the trashcans up on the poles too. It's a huge undertaking.
       

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:Well.... by Intron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They can't really change it now, can they?

      The wire doesn't care very much. In the areas that are destroyed, they have to buy all new equipment anyway. Seems like a good time to standardize.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    3. Re:Well.... by NEDHead · · Score: 1

      Can you actually cite some sources on this? Transformers are all about voltage changing. It is not immediately clear that the difference between 50hz and 60hz would affect them all that much.

      I would guess that the larger problem would be with motors and other devices that rely on the power frequency to determine their performance characteristics.

    4. Re:Well.... by SIGBUS · · Score: 2

      Actually, the 50 Hz transformers would work just fine on 60 Hz (but they would be heavier than necessary). It's when you run a transformer on a lower-than-rated frequency that you need to derate its power-handling capacity.

      Of course, there would be plenty of other problems with a frequency switch, especially changes in motor speeds. A whole lot of equipment would need to be replaced, or remotored and regeared. The logistics of switching half of Japan would dwarf that of Ontario's 1950s-era switch from 25 Hz to 60 Hz.

      --
      Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
    5. Re:Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I would guess that the larger problem would be with motors and other devices that rely on the power frequency to determine their performance characteristics."
      But not transformers. They're magic.

    6. Re:Well.... by Rei · · Score: 2

      Where do you get that? I just did a search for HVDC link construction times, and ran into this, which cites the time to build the whole Cross-Sound Cable (CSC) project, which involved two terminals and a 40km submarine cable to transmit 330MW HVDC, at nine months. Sure as heck beats building a new nuclear power plant or whatnot.

      I imagine the limiting factor will be global high-power thyristor production and stocks.

      --
      Santa Ana Winds: Like the Dustbowl, but with awards shows.
    7. Re:Well.... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Most of the power generation and distribution hardware on each side is just fine still. However, perhaps this will be the impetus for them to start a slow project of national standardization, migrating the dividing line a bit in one direction or the other every year.

      --
      Santa Ana Winds: Like the Dustbowl, but with awards shows.
    8. Re:Well.... by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      But not transformers. They're magic.

      Optimus Prime is, he rose from the dead.

    9. Re:Well.... by NEDHead · · Score: 2

      Magic to you perhaps. To those who actually know anything about the subject, transformers take an AC source at a certain voltage and current, and generate an output of a different voltage and current AT THE SAME FREQUENCY.

      There may be phase shifts, and there are always energy losses, but the frequency stays the same.

      Most AC motors are frequency locked to the power source, hence will operate at different RPM at 50 Hz than at 60 Hz. If that is an issue in the application, then a motor change would be required. Many TVs were also locked to the power signal - PAL vs NTSC.

    10. Re:Well.... by metalgamer84 · · Score: 1

      Jump starting him wasn't magic, its was automotive know-how ;)

    11. Re:Well.... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      Transformers are effectively radio transceivers. The transmitter and receiver are so close together that energy is transmitted from one to the other with high efficiency. Every transformer is wound to work at a particular frequency so when talking about big power transformers you can't just change the frequency. Having said that a lot of consumer equipment would cope fairly well. Computers, light fittings, etc are pretty tolerant. Big electric motors in factories, not so.

    12. Re:Well.... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Cripes, 25Hz? How big were their transformers?

    13. Re:Well.... by unitron · · Score: 1

      If you hook up AC sources in parallel, which is what a grid does, then a frequency difference would have the two fighting each other part of the time.

      Superimpose a graph of a 50 Hz sine wave and a graph of a 60 Hz sine wave. Take note of where one is going down while the other is going up. That's not good when you're trying to re-enforce one power source with another, and who knows what kind of sum or difference frequency (heterodyning) currents will wind up causing who knows what kind of problems.

      Transformers are designed for particular frequencies, and aren't very happy or efficient with anything outside of spec.

      The higher the frequency the less metal you have to use in them by the way. Aircraft have been set up to use 400Hz AC for years, to enable lighter transformers. Switch-mode power supplies in computers and now in home entertainment equipment are smaller than the old "big heavy transformer feeding a rectifier assembly followed by big capacitors and maybe a big choke coil as well" type. The switch mode supplies rectify the incoming AC first, then chop the resulting high voltage DC at a much higher frequency so as to be able to use a much smaller transformer.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    14. Re:Well.... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Any book on power transformer design can tell you why a transformer designed to work at 60 Hz and some voltage will be at risk of damage if run at 50 Hz and the same voltage. The problem is this: any winding of a transformer is essentially an inductor. The current through an inductor is the product of the voltage across it and the time that voltage is applied, and the magnetic field inside that inductor is proportional to the current. At the lower frequency (50 Hz) the time is longer. Magnetic circuits in power transformers can get only so strong before the magnetic material saturates, at which point the current increases VERY rapidly. The higher current means more power loss ( I^2*R ), which heats the transformer until something burns.

      A huge power transformer designed to work at 50 Hz and some voltage but run at 60 Hz and the same voltage may or may not have problems (this is beyond my area of knowledge). There may be a problem with reduced skin depth at the higher frequency causing higher losses (I doubt it). There are probably higher "iron losses" in a core optimized for 50 Hz run at 60 Hz.

      My educated guess is that if they have to unify the country, they should raise the frequency.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    15. Re:Well.... by |TheMAN · · Score: 1

      IIRC, 25hz power is still available to industrial customers in Ontario, but on a very limited basis. The Sir Adam Beck station has frequency converters to supply 25hz power to Stelco in Hamilton (45 mins to 1 hour north by car) where it is used to power their blast furnaces.

      The NYC subway used 25hz power for their trains supplied through power substations using rotary converters... not sure if they still do

    16. Re:Well.... by gullevek · · Score: 1

      As like as america would stop using inches and miles. All the neon lights are working only in the 50 or 60Hz.

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
  7. Ah, the beauty of standards... by wandazulu · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...so many to choose from.

    1. Re:Ah, the beauty of standards... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      The other beauty is standard entrenchment. Australia a land of 240V nominal power decided in the 80s to align with the European standard of 230V. In order to not break anything they simply redefined 240V +/- 5% to be 230V +10% -5%. End result is my wall currently measures 244V 20 years after our "switch" to 230V.

    2. Re:Ah, the beauty of standards... by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      Hehe ... electricity as a relatively early technological development (i.e. invented before international standards bodies were as well established as they are now) is a perfect example of what happens when each country (or in Japan's case, even separate regions within a country) is free to roll out whatever system they prefer. In a way, it's surprising that we didn't end up with more variation. Most countries are 50 or 60 Hz, ~110-120V or ~230-240V, but it could have ended up worse with places using all kinds of bizarre voltages and frequencies. The only thing that prevented that is that most countries bought their initial electrical equipment from one of just a few vendors, which basically made the choice of standard for them.

      I really wish it could be globally standardised though. I move between Australia and the US frequently (dual citizen) and it annoys the hell out of me that most electrical equipment bought in one place won't work in the other. I mean, I know it is an impossible dream (noone is going to spend the money replacing an entire electrical grid along with all the equipment that people plug into it), but it really would be nice. Still, it seems more stuff these days is multi-voltage capable at least (computers, games consoles, anything else with a transformer 'brick' on its power cable).

      But they ~could~ standardise the ~plugs~ in each country at least. The number of different plug shapes is just phenomenal ... far more than the number of differing frequency/voltage combos. Some are objectively better than others too. IMO the US ones aren't very 'secure' feeling, they fall out too easily and it's not clear, especially in the dark, which way 'up' they go. The UK ones are much more solid, but IMO also too bulky. The ones used in Australia are pretty good I think: cannot be inserted upside down, very secure, and although bigger than the US plugs, not as bulky as the UK ones. Also why doesn't the US have on/off switches on their power outlets like every other damn country? Much nicer than physically unplugging something if you want to guarantee zero power draw. But I digress: I wouldn't really care which plug was chosen, but it really would be nice if it were the same everywhere. :)

    3. Re:Ah, the beauty of standards... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      That's how it works in Europe too.

      The so called "230" volts is 220 in mainland Europe and 240 in the UK. (Which is, of course, why Australia is on 240).

      All post '80s (and the vast majority of pre '80s) equipment works anywhere from 200 too 255ish.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    4. Re:Ah, the beauty of standards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me it seems like the standards made up by Tesla and Westinghouse (which I'm presuming where much of the U.S. system comes from, and despite many plants/utilities having Edison in their name.) actually makes sense, but everybody else had to come up with something different. It seems like 60Hz (being easily divisible by both 2 and 3) would make doing the math for 3-phase and dual phase systems off of the same generator a lot simpler. So why others went with 50Hz doesn't make that much sense. (Voltage has less to do with it, because 240v is also used here as well for things like dryers and AC/heating.) Did the other numbers sound more "metric" or is there some other reason? (Like stuff put in place by Edison or perhaps even Phillips or Siemens at the time.)

      But then again, you also have a handful of countries that can't agree to drive on the same side of the road as everybody else. Tradition is funny that way.

    5. Re:Ah, the beauty of standards... by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      I'd agree with that ... 60 Hz does seem to make more sense. But I'm not particularly knowledgeable about electricity and I'm sure someone will reply with some perfectly good reasons why 50 Hz was chosen in some places. :) It is interesting that the US uses 240 for some things (I knew this but hadn't thought about it in a while). The 'keep it simple as possible' side of me prefers a single voltage used on everything (as in 230-240V nominal countries), rather than mixing and matching, though it makes little practical difference I admit. And I've heard good arguments (re transmission loss etc.) why certain voltages were used in certain countries.

      Re driving though: I wouldn't say it's a 'handful'. A full one-third of the world's population drives on the left hand side. Right-hand side is the majority yes, but not an overwhelming majority with just a couple of holdouts bucking the trend. It's a good example though of another thing that would be nice to standardise but very difficult to switch. Thankfully there are very few places where countries with opposite driving sides have a land border though: they are generally separated by oceans.

  8. Satellite photos by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    It's time to get some new nighttime satellite photos. The ones that show the lights from space. It would be intresting to compare the before/after images.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    1. Re:Satellite photos by asher09 · · Score: 0

      What you're envisioning would be cool looking, but from what I've heard, the blackouts happen during the day...

      --
      Some were yelling one thing, some another. Most of them had no idea what was going on or why they were there. Acts19:32
    2. Re:Satellite photos by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Rolling blackouts to keep peak power usage within their current capacity - just like California had, only this time not due to greed and incompetence.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    3. Re:Satellite photos by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Depends on the region, the rolling blackouts are in fact just that, rolling. The government divided up the entire Kantou region into 5 different sections and each section has different blackout hours.

    4. Re:Satellite photos by asher09 · · Score: 0

      According to the PDF on this site, the blackouts go from ~7AM to 9PM. http://teidenjapan.appspot.com/en.html#tepco

      --
      Some were yelling one thing, some another. Most of them had no idea what was going on or why they were there. Acts19:32
    5. Re:Satellite photos by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      They keep on changing that, I was in Ibaraki prefecture when the quake happened and they first announced(but ended up not implementing) the blackouts they were from I think 6 am to 10 pm(keep in mind Japan doesn't do daylight savings time at all, so it gets dark relatively early).

    6. Re:Satellite photos by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      I'd say incompetence is still a major factor in this.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    7. Re:Satellite photos by Kosi · · Score: 1

      According to Tepco's history, it is possible that you'll have to revise that statement in the future. I wouldn't want to rule out the possibility that greed and incompetence increased the consequences of what nature caused to these nuclear sites.

    8. Re:Satellite photos by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'd say it's a result of ancient decisions that never got reviewed and now bite them in the back. It's not like we don't have any of those looming over our heads.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Satellite photos by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It's one of those things that is simply too expensive to 'fix' these days (replacing half a countries entire power grid and people's equipment that gets plugged into it). Once things reach a certain level of entrenchment or investment, changing them becomes near-impossible (from both an economic and logistical viewpoint).

      Kinda reminds me of the US being the only (developed) country left not using the metric system. The biggest argument why this is the case is simply that it would cost too much to change: too much signage, equipment etc. There's so much investment and momentum behind the old system that it seems an insurmountable task to change, despite the obvious advantages of doing so. Similarly, Japan probably knew that having two different power frequencies in different halves of the country could pose a problem and probably ought to be fixed, but it's just too expensive to do it.

      The analogy's not perfect: changing to metric can be done in a phased approach where you use both systems for a period of time, whereas you can't really do that with an electric grid. But I think the mentality of 'yes this could be improved, but it's simply too hard/expensive to do it' is similar.

  9. So how does TV work? by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    Japan uses NTSC, which is based on 60 hertz. How does it work in East Japan's 50 hertz zone? Hmmm.

    I guess this also means electronic manufacturers have to design their products to work with either 50 or 60 hertz.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:So how does TV work? by localroger · · Score: 4, Informative

      TV's don't sync to the power line. They convert incoming power to DC then work from that.

      --
      Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    2. Re:So how does TV work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works very well, thanks to the ~59.97 Hz vertical sync pulses conveniently included in the NTSC video signal which allow the vertical deflection oscillator in the television receiver to acquire and maintain phase lock with the video being transmitted, regardless of the power main phase or frequency.

    3. Re:So how does TV work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep . All the electronics I have that I purchased while in Japan all say: "100VAC 50/60Hz"

      Though, now reading that, I've just realised that I'm giving them too much voltage with the US 110V _;

    4. Re:So how does TV work? by stox · · Score: 3, Interesting

      TV's used to sync to the power line until well into the 1960's. The tolerances needed for color put an end to that,

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    5. Re:So how does TV work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is true today, on the age of electronics, but until 3 or 4 dacades ago TVs did sync to the power lines. Why do you think nearly every country has its TV standard frequency as the same as the power lines?

      So I guess I have to repeat the question: Japan uses NTSC, which is based on 60 hertz. How did that worked in East Japan's 50 hertz zone a few decades ago (before modern electronics)?

    6. Re:So how does TV work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet that East Japan was PAL back then. Then when the television frequencies decoupled from the powerlines, they seized on that to standardize everybody on NTSC.

    7. Re:So how does TV work? by CityZen · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't TVs have to sync to the incoming TV signal?

    8. Re:So how does TV work? by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Informative

      >>>TV's don't sync to the power line. They convert incoming power to DC then work from that.

      That is so horribly wrong. "The NTSC field refresh frequency in the black-and-white system originally exactly matched the nominal 60 Hz frequency of alternating current power used in the United States. Matching the field refresh rate to the power source avoided intermodulation (also called beating), which produces rolling bars on the screen......

      "Synchronization of the refresh rate to the power incidentally helped kinescope cameras record early live television broadcasts, as it was very simple to synchronize a film camera to capture one frame of video on each film frame by using the alternating current frequency to set the speed of the synchronous AC motor-drive camera.....

      "The actual figure of 525 lines was chosen as a consequence of the limitations of the vacuum-tube-based technologies of the day. In early TV systems, a master voltage-controlled oscillator was run at twice the horizontal line frequency, and this frequency was divided down by the number of lines used (in this case 525) to give the field frequency (60 Hz in this case). This frequency was then compared with the 60 Hz power-line frequency and any discrepancy corrected by adjusting the frequency of the master oscillator." - wiki

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    9. Re:So how does TV work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which is why the frame rate for NTSC is actually 29.97. The other .03 is the blanking interval that contains the chroma information.

    10. Re:So how does TV work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep . All the electronics I have that I purchased while in Japan all say: "100VAC 50/60Hz"

      Though, now reading that, I've just realised that I'm giving them too much voltage with the US 110V _;

      That's still tolerable.

      Several years ago I've heard about someone who imported one of those weird early-1990s computers from Japan... to Brazil. The computer was rather expensive.

      That person did not realise that the brazilian 127V is too much for a 100V-only device and the machine's power supply went kaploof.

    11. Re:So how does TV work? by TheSync · · Score: 1

      The change from 60Hz BW to 59.94Hz color is a bit more complex than that. Wikipedia says:

      "When a transmitter broadcasts an NTSC signal, it amplitude-modulates a radio-frequency carrier with the NTSC signal just described, while it frequency-modulates a carrier 4.5 MHz higher with the audio signal. If non-linear distortion happens to the broadcast signal, the 3.579545 MHz color carrier may beat with the sound carrier to produce a dot pattern on the screen. To make the resulting pattern less noticeable, designers adjusted the original 60 Hz field rate down by a factor of 1.001 (0.1%), to approximately 59.94 fields per second. This adjustment ensures that the sums and differences of the sound carrier and the color subcarrier and their multiples (i.e., the intermodulation products of the two carriers) are not exact multiples of the frame rate, which is the necessary condition for the dots to remain stationary on the screen, making them most noticeable."

    12. Re:So how does TV work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and then crystal oscillators were popularized, and this stopped being used.

    13. Re:So how does TV work? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      All TVs used to sync to the power line. That is why we have 60/30 frames per second in the US 60HZ power (NTSC) and 50/25 frames in Europe (PAL) 50HZ power. Of course, the new TVs now all convert voltage and frequency from the plug to DC and work from that.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    14. Re:So how does TV work? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Yeah but I don't think it was as recent as some people think. TV signals contain synchronisation pulses, like RS232. Maybe in the 1930s there were experimental systems where a frame was one cycle of a city power supply. But not more recently than that.

    15. Re:So how does TV work? by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      That might have been true in the stone ages, but not today. You can take your NTSC TV to Europe where we have 50Hz power lines and the TV will still show you perfectly NTSC.

    16. Re:So how does TV work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure TV sync signal is not dependent on AC powerline, but they still have to be the same frequency.
      Otherwise you will see annoying stroboscopic effects.
      Ever wonder why PAL and NTSC field rate somehow mysterously match the AC frequency of the region using them?

    17. Re:So how does TV work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's right. Read the first line of your quote. Note the word 'originally'.

      TV's haven't synced to mains power since the transition to colour (too fuzzy). Hell, modern flatscreens don't even 'refresh' the way an old analogue set does.

    18. Re:So how does TV work? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      TV's used to sync to the power line until well into the 1960's

      Not really. Before color TV, transmitters might have synchronized to the AC line (although I doubt it.) TV receivers synchronized to the received signal. The reason for making the vertical scan exactly the same as the power frequency was to allow for cheap TVs and good TVs as they degraded with age: Power frequency ripple in the TV's power supply caused slight variations in brightness on the screen. If the frequencies matched, the areas of different brightness were stable and hard to notice. When color TV came in and the frequency changed, a moving band of different brightness would climb up the screen (every 16 seconds, I think). Also, the width of the image often varied, so a warp in the video would travel up the screen at the same rate.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    19. Re:So how does TV work? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      >I'll bet that East Japan was PAL back then.

      As far as I know, 50hz NTSC doesn't exist as a broadcast standard, but 60hz PAL most certainly DOES -- in Brazil. It's 704x480@60 fields/second, but uses PAL for color modulation instead of NTSC. There's nothing inherently 50/60-hz about PAL or NTSC.

      I'm not 100% sure, but I think that back in the VHS era, Americans who wanted to watch European tapes could buy a $30 box that changed the color encoding from PAL to NTSC, but left the resolution and field rate unchanged, so you could connect a European VCR's composite output to an American TV through the box as long as the TV had sufficient vertical-hold adjustment range to tweak the field rate down to 50hz.

    20. Re:So how does TV work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and that's exactly why you get a far better rounded 25,50,100, and 200 digital rate today on 50Hz rather than having to deal with that crappy 23.97,29.97,59.94 using 60 Hz in the digital video encoding age

    21. Re:So how does TV work? by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      You're speaking about the early days of TV -- history, really. The GP is speaking in the present tense, so while you're right about the origins, saying "That is so horribly wrong" is actually, um, wrong itself. I believe stox, the poster above you was correct when stating that the tolerances needed when color was introduced meant a better timing source was needed.

    22. Re:So how does TV work? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Absolutely nothing you said in any way conflicts with the RECEIVER not syncing to the power line.

      TVs sync to the sync pulses in the actual video signal. Otherwise, a phase difference between the studio and the receiver would scramble the picture. The cameras DID sync to the line frequency.

      A lot of plug-in clocks also used to sync to line frequency. Some might still, but there's less reason to do so now, and international sales give a good reason not to.

      Meanwhile, modern PC power supplies no longer care much about the voltage (within reason) or the frequency of the input power.

  10. Re:if we get to 88Hz can we go back in time to fix by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Funny

    if we get to 88Hz can we go back in time to fix this?

    Boy, imagine how we'd laugh if the punchline was funny!

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  11. What's it like in Japan? Will this cause changes? by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Very interesting article. I had no idea that Japan was effectively split in half thanks to 50Hz and 60Hz power grids. So does every home that is hooked up to 50Hz have a converter to switch it to 60Hz or vice versa since some electronic devices are rather dependent on the AC frequency? What happens when somebody decides to move across the country from one power source to the other? Do you just throw out all your old clocks that relied on the AC frequency for its timing source and buy new ones? I also wonder if the disaster unfolding there might encourage them to try to migrate the entire country to a single standard, whether 50 or 60. It has certainly demonstrated a major problem with their current infrastructure...

  12. Re:if we get to 88Hz can we go back in time to fix by pavon · · Score: 2

    Hey, just because they did things differently doesn't mean you should call people from Coventry England backwards.

  13. What can we say? by JeddyH · · Score: 0

    They are screwed, this decision has fucked both parties.

    1. Re:What can we say? by magarity · · Score: 1

      They are screwed, this decision has fucked both parties.

      At first I couldn't tell what you mean at all; then the staggering depths of this comment's cluelessness hit me. Japan was a feudal monarchy in the 1800's. There were no political parties then as known now. And now they have a bunch of political parties, not 'both', because it's a parliamentary system.

    2. Re:What can we say? by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Parties doesn't necessarily mean formal organizations.

      In this case, the parties are "eastern Japan" and "western Japan".

    3. Re:What can we say? by magarity · · Score: 1

      That interpretation doesn't work in the context of the GP's text because the side that still has power isn't screwed at all, they just can't help their countrymen.

    4. Re:What can we say? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      At first I couldn't tell what you mean at all; then the staggering depths of this comment's cluelessness hit me. Japan was a feudal monarchy in the 1800's. There were no political parties then as known now. And now they have a bunch of political parties, not 'both', because it's a parliamentary system.

      At first I couldn't tell what you mean at all; then the staggering depths of this comment's cluelessness hit me. Parties are just abstract groups. Some parties are political, but they aren't even close to a thousandth of a percent of the full amount of parties.

  14. Re:Free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFA first?

  15. Free Market by dcollins · · Score: 3, Insightful

    FTA: "Japan's electricity system got its start in 1883 with the founding of Tokyo Electric Light Co. Demand quickly grew and in 1895 the company bought electricity generation equipment from Germany's AEG. In west Japan the same evolution was taking place, and Osaka Electric Lamp imported equipment from General Electric."

    Wait: I thought the free market solved all problems and never needed government intervention.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  16. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    Other than poorly designed clocks, what other devices actually care about the power line frequency? My parents in Virginia have very bad 60Hz power, they have a few clocks that are often off by 10 minutes or more each way, so it's not a good idea to base your clock frequency source on the power line in the first place. Most devices not either don't care (light bulbs) or put their power through an AC/DC conversion step anyway. So what would really need to be thrown out if you switched from 50Hz to 60Hz standard? And wouldn't now be an excellent time to make the change?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  17. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Intron · · Score: 1

    US gear is very much 60Hz, 110V. But electronics in Europe and Asia tends to be more flexible.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  18. Why don't they go to Tachi Station? by bhcompy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tachi Station sells power converters.

    1. Re:Why don't they go to Tachi Station? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tachi Station sells power converters.

      Toshi station is on Tatooine, where is Tachi?

    2. Re:Why don't they go to Tachi Station? by bhcompy · · Score: 2

      Actually we're both wrong. It's Tosche

    3. Re:Why don't they go to Tachi Station? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they can waste time with their friends when their chores are done

    4. Re:Why don't they go to Tachi Station? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I was going to but my uncle said I had to clean the new droids to have them ready by morning. Something about wasting time with friends later???

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    5. Re:Why don't they go to Tachi Station? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tosche Station, thank you.

    6. Re:Why don't they go to Tachi Station? by Confusador · · Score: 1

      Tatooine is a bit of a trek at sublight speeds, and the earthquake took down their hyperdrive

  19. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do you just throw out all your old clocks that relied on the AC frequency for its timing source

    Clocks don't use the AC frequency as a timing source. The AC frequency is nowhere near accurate enough for that - I have lots of UPS logs showing how much it varies over time.

    Clocks running on AC (or battery) use a cheap & accurate quartz crystal oscillator to keep track of time.

    Now, AC motors on the other hand...

  20. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Government intervention exist just for this reason, to make sure that in case of a disaster the infrastructure doesn't crumble. How would you like if water wasn't regulated by the government? No, you're an American obviously and take such things for granted. Pray you never find out, it's an experience you likely won't survive.

  21. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by xleeko · · Score: 3, Informative

    Other than poorly designed clocks, what other devices actually care about the power line frequency?

    Motors. Big motors, like the kind you find in your furnace, A/C compressor, elevators, and other places. Nobody cares about the consumer electronics because all that stuff either auto-ranges or can be manually switched. But big industrial equipment is everywhere and lasts a long time.

  22. The Positron Rifle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The real serious question raised here is that in Evangelion they hook up the entire Japanese power grid to the positron rifle. How is that supposed to work if the power grids are incompatible?

    1. Re:The Positron Rifle by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      Does this make it fiction now?

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    2. Re:The Positron Rifle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As the first episode opens in the year 2015, Tokyo-3 is being attacked by the third Angel."

      Obviously they will now build Tokyo-2 and fix the power grid issue. Don't know when they will have time to build Tokyo-3.

    3. Re:The Positron Rifle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was after the Second Impact. Maybe they finally standardized?

    4. Re:The Positron Rifle by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Two power feeds. DUH!

  23. Re:Free Market by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Whoooooosh

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  24. Re:Free Market by magarity · · Score: 2

    Wait: I thought the free market solved all problems and never needed government intervention.

    You seem to have a stunning amount of faith in government, including 1800's feudal Japan, to accurately plan for catastrophes 130 years in advance.

  25. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AC electric motors. Especially Three-Phase industrial motors.

  26. When it Hertz, it hurts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is all.

  27. 100 VAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the parts of Japan that use 100VAC?

    1. Re:100 VAC? by tsalmark · · Score: 1

      All of Japan is 100 VAC.

  28. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    The motors I deal with in my job (manufacturing automation) are all DC motors and stepper motors driven by controllers which are performing an AC/DC conversion, so this is only a problem with constant speed AC motors. But granted, climate control is a HUGE installed base.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  29. The US electrical is far from the "gold standard" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Slashdot reported last summer that the US grid is not ready to accept "green power" sources (wind/solar) and redistribute to consumers. The Slashdot story stated that wind energy created surges (gusts?) on the grid, especially when the wind was blowing too hard. The grid was designed for point source generation, not distributed generation.

    Luckily, I see this story is still online. Check the interactive graphic of the US grid.

  30. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All electronics that I have seen in Japan are all standardised to "100VAC 50/60Hz"
    But since this was the case there since the advent of the electronic revolutions, the pretty well always sold frequency tolerant hardware to be used anywhere in the country.

    Bringing those Japanese electronics back to the US has the benefit of running them at 10% over their preferred voltage (at the US 110V). So, that's something to keep in mind when importing electronics from over there.

  31. Re:Free Market by Microlith · · Score: 1

    I think the point was about the needless division of the country into 50Hz and 60Hz zones, thus inhibiting the growth of an efficient nation-wide power grid.

  32. Off the grid and little solar lighting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes its more expensive, but wouldn't independent solar power installations even at the local residential level seem attractive at this time?

  33. Doesn't the US have the same problem? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

    The US has mostly unconnected power grids too.
    Two major and three minor grids, the grid I'm on, Alaska isn't connected to anything else.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Interconnection - has more information

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=110997398

    But theres a plan to connect the Eastern and Western Interconnections at Clovis NM in the next couple years.

    1. Re:Doesn't the US have the same problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US has mostly unconnected power grids too.
      Two major and three minor grids, the grid I'm on, Alaska isn't connected to anything else.

      Mostly unconnected? The three grids in the contiguous US + lower Canada (East,West,South) are all among the largest connected electrical grids in the world. As for Alaska and Hawaii having separate grids...yeah....can't think of any reason for that.

  34. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you look at electronics sold for Asian markets or manufactured by Japanese manufacturers for other world markets, it is usually labeled 50-60 Hz, and either 100-240V or 220-240V AC.

    You can design for the worst case: Higher currents of the lower frequency and lower voltage, and then just run AC motors a little faster for the higher frequency. A combination of auto-switching transformer networks or DC-DC switching supplies handle the other issues.

  35. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bigest problem for changing from 50->60 or 60->50 are electric motors. (fans, vaccums, elevators, FACTORIES, power tools, water pumps, and generaly changing factories is propably very expensive, you may not complain when vaccuming will give you 20%more or less power, but when conveyor belts, mixing machines, crains, and lot of other stuff gets faster or slower you get into trouble. And I am not even considering that in one or other way the efficiency got worse/better and things get stronger/weaker. In home you get some problems. ( like refiregerator(pump is Hz fixed, kitchen/toilet Fan, vaccuming, food processors and other spinning things.
    TV, clock, radio, PC, chrgers: (is generaly not huge problem)

  36. Re:Free Market by dwye · · Score: 2

    You seem to have a stunning amount of faith in government, including 1800's feudal Japan, to accurately plan for catastrophes 130 years in advance.

    1890's Japan was very well post-feudal. Remember, it was only ten years after they bought the incompatible GE equipment (I should make a nasty comment here, since my family worked for Westinghouse) to where they defeating the Russians in 1905.

    Also, this dual grid prevents countrywide cascade failures :-)

  37. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

    117, not 110, although it varies around from maybe 112-125 depending on where and when you are

  38. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by ericpi · · Score: 2

    Other than poorly designed clocks, what other devices actually care about the power line frequency?

    Actually, mains power should normally be a very good frequency source for a clock. Utilities periodically adjust the frequency such that the long term clock drift is near zero. From wikipedia:

    Network operators will regulate the daily average frequency so that clocks stay within a few seconds of correct time. In practice the nominal frequency is raised or lowered by a specific percentage to maintain synchronization. Over the course of a day, the average frequency is maintained at the nominal value within a few hundred parts per million.

  39. Re:Free market by Kjella · · Score: 2

    Pfft, we don't need no national power grids! That's socialism! The free market will sort it out!

    Actually the electric companies are typically for improved transfer capacity, as long as they're not paying too much for it. That allows them to sell the power some other place where prices are higher then turn around and demand higher prices locally too because reserves are low.

    What they don't build is emergency capacity, because to a corporation they typically don't have to care about the consequences except to their bottom line. You saw it a lot in the financial crisis, if it's not profitable to lend money we'll simply stop. That it's choking the rest of the economy doesn't matter. Nor would they ever get to charge the costs either, imagine if in this crisis they said "Finally we ended up using those expensive converters, now to pay them off on this crisis we'll increase prices 10x" and you'd see a lynch mob with torches and pitchforks even in overly polite Japan. It's something people want to have, but they're not willing to pay for it. "The government" has to step in and be the collective responsibility that the country has emergency systems, because the consumers failed to make those demands to the producers.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  40. Re:GOOD NIGHT TOKYO !! by Rei · · Score: 1

    Who is "Sighonara"?

    --
    Santa Ana Winds: Like the Dustbowl, but with awards shows.
  41. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by maxume · · Score: 1

    It varies. Most of my recent wall warts and my 4 year old laptop power supply all say something like 100-240V.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  42. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

    Most clocks don't use the AC frequency as a timing source. Plenty of older mains powered clocks do, you can often come across them in lecture theatres in older institutions. You can usually tell because the second hand will move continuously rather than ticking.

  43. XE by michaelmalak · · Score: 2

    In the 1800's, Japan was just practicing eXtreme Engineering (XE) and employing the principle of YAGNI. It was deemed more important to electrify the country and then iterate the solution later, than it was to design for future expansion, let alone consider the risks of human life dependence upon the early choices.

  44. humanity nondetachable, interconnected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when one cries, another one sheds a tear in some way. hurt one... it's even much bigger than that. the lights are coming up all over now.

  45. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by NevarMore · · Score: 1

    For kicks pick any 5 power bricks and look at the label. I bet most of them will say 100-240V, 50-60hz. Will work in most of the world if you have a simple plug adapter, no need for a voltage or frequency change.

  46. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by bmo · · Score: 1

    Nope.

    Electric wall clocks that you plug in use the AC line for accuracy.

    The 60Hz out of the wall socket is very accurate. Accurate to within a minute or so a month. They use something called a synchronous motor. It's only in the past 40 years that quartz crystal controlled clocks were even mass marketed.

    "Single phase synchronous motors are available in small sizes for applications requiring precise timing such as time keeping, (clocks) and tape players. Though battery powered quartz regulated clocks are widely available, the AC line operated variety has better long term accuracy-- over a period of months. This is due to power plant operators purposely maintaining the long term accuracy of the frequency of the AC distribution system. If it falls behind by a few cycles, they will make up the lost cycles of AC so that clocks lose no time."

    http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_2/chpt_13/2.html

    Even plug-in alarm clocks don't use a crystal oscillator - they simply count pulses from the AC line.

    When Southern California Edison went from 50 to 60Hz in 1948, people had to throw out their old electric wall clocks and get new ones.

    --
    BMO

  47. Time to build big extension cords by nido · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If the USS Ronald Reagan had a couple Mighty Pumps in its inventory, these could be attached to the catapult steam lines. An electrical generator could be attached to the pump's drive shaft, generating power. Then they'd just run a cable to the shore to power the cities affected by the disaster.

    The USS Enterprise has 310 megawatts of thermal power. I don't know how much of this could be sent to the catapult lines... Nimitz-class carriers have 2 reactors instead of 8, and generate ~190 MW of thermal power.

    There is some historical legacy for using an aircraft carrier to power a city:

    ... Each of Lexington’s four electrical generators could produce 35,200 kilowatts. All together, the generators were powerful enough to fulfill the electricity requirements of a decent sized city. And, for 30 days that is exactly what she did. ...

    -When USS Lexington Powered A City

    Lots of people have found my site this week (/. post on Sunday, google, etc), and the link about the MYT engine was one of the more-commonly followed links. This page has better information about the MYT pump/engine:

    The MYT [Massive Yet Tiny] Engine as a pump/compressor purportedly exceeds existing pumps/compressors in providing massive pressure, volume, and flow -- all in one unit. This attribute makes it ideal for geothermal energy, among many other such applications.

    -Angel Labs eyes geothermal for MYT Engine application

    When Disaster Strikes, Send the Enterprise. I just did my first newspaper interview this morning. :)

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
    1. Re:Time to build big extension cords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many ships does it take to supply the missing 9.7GW?

    2. Re:Time to build big extension cords by hawguy · · Score: 4, Informative

      The reactors at Fukushima generate over 3,000MW of power, and that's not the only plant that's offline. Maybe if you had 10 aircraft carriers, 3GW of generators and these magic MYT Engines (or at least conventional turbines) *and* some place to plug them in that would be a viable solution. Oh, and the vast majority of an aircraft carrier's steam output goes to the turbines that drive the props - how will you get that steam up above the water line to your generators? Maybe you can just jack up the back of the carrier out of the water and connect the generators to the prop shafts. Then you "only" need to find a generator that runs at prop shaft speed or a gearbox to convert the speed.

    3. Re:Time to build big extension cords by jaymzter · · Score: 0

      For real? How to get the steam above the waterline? You do realize this is high pressure steam (~1200 psi), and that traditional catapults use steam in the first place. Besides, steam rises!

      If the ship is anchored or in port there is no reason for the turbines to be engaged anyway. The only thing using the steam would be the on board generators and possibly evaporators.

      --
      If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
    4. Re:Time to build big extension cords by nido · · Score: 1

      If you don't have a tool you can't use it for anything.

      It took most of a week to get new backup generators to those power plants. Shouldn't the Navy have some portable power plants, to help with disaster response? I suppose these shouldn't all be attached to the large ships, as they wouldn't want to tie up the Ronald Reagan next to the leaking nuclear power plant...

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    5. Re:Time to build big extension cords by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Perhaps there's not enough juice to go around for all the coffee makers, discotheques, and big-screen televisions.

      OTOH, I'm pretty sure that 300 MWp is plenty to power a few hospitals, food distribution areas, and some command/coordination centers. Probably have enough power left over to maybe keep some radios, and perhaps a light bulb or two going so that folks in shelters can get some light and news.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re:Time to build big extension cords by dj245 · · Score: 2

      This article is from IndustrialInfo.com. Free registration is required for most articles, paid registration required for others. My company has a subscription. My company (a major turbine manufacturer) is also helping to bring the 20GW of lost generation back online. We are also frantically bringing mothballed hydro, coal, and other resources online since some of the coal plants were damaged in the earthquake. Even if you could hookup ships to the Japanese grid, it is a drop in the bucket.

      Tohoku Electric Power Company is Japan's Hardest-Hit Power Provider
      Released March 16, 2011 | TOKYO, JAPAN
      Researched by Industrial Info Resources (Sugar Land, Texas)--Among Japan's power providers affected by Friday's earthquake, Tohoku Electric Power Company Incorporated (TYO:9506 ) (Tokuden) (Sendai, Japan) was hit hardest. Immediately following the earthquake, nearly 5 million households were without power, and the region lost nearly 20 gigawatts (GW) of capacity. Tokuden's service area is comprised of the Tohoku region, the northern part of the main island. This region includes Aomori prefecture, Iwate prefecture, Akita prefecture, Miyagi prefecture, Yamagata prefecture, Fukushima prefecture and Niigata prefecture.

      At this time, approximately 550,000 households are still without power, including 325,000 that have been completely destroyed by the earthquake and subsequent tsunami. The Miyagi, Iwate and Fukushima prefectures were hit hardest.

      Because of what was expected to be a severe imbalance between power supply and demand, Tokuden announced its intention to implement rolling blackouts on Monday, March 14. However there has been a decrease in demand and an increase in supply, counteracting the imbalance in capacity. Recent precipitation in the region has also increased the electrical output of hydropower stations owned and operated by Tohoku that have been restarted for the spring season. The prospect of rolling blackouts is steadily becoming less likely due to a larger-than-expected supply, the widespread devastation and conservation measures. On Thursday, March 17, Tohoku expects to have 10 GW of electricity available for its service area.

      Onagawa nuclear power station, located in Ishinomaki, Miyagi prefecture, as well as Higashidori nuclear power station, located in eastern Aomori prefecture, remain offline. Onagawa has an operating capacity of 2,174 megawatts (MW), and units 1 and 3 safely powered down following the earthquake and achieved stability by 1:30 a.m. JST Saturday, March 12. Unit 2 was scheduled to resume operations on Friday, following a scheduled maintenance outage that began last November. Restart procedures were terminated immediately, and the unit was safely powered down.

      Higashidori, with a generating capacity of 1,100 MW via one boiling water reactor, was also down for scheduled maintenance and was not active at the time of the earthquake. Maintenance began in February and Tohoku may bring the station up to full capacity by the end of July.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    7. Re:Time to build big extension cords by mikael · · Score: 1

      How about some mobile nuclear reactors, or as Wired titled an article:

      In Soviet Union, nuclear reactors finds you!

        Russian mobile nuclear reactors

      There are Power station ships, but given the power requirements of Japan, they would need 30 of these.

      Though it looks like the future is going to be Modular nuclear reactors, which are smaller than the conventional 3 GigaWatt reactor, but can be strung together and transported by container.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    8. Re:Time to build big extension cords by hcdejong · · Score: 3, Informative

      The most compact nuclear power plants around (naval units used in submarines) weigh about 1000 tons. These use highly enriched uranium, so they would be seen as a security risk.
      Containerizing this unit would mean at least 50 40-ft containers (with each container at its maximum weight), you probably need more because most containers won't reach this density. That would give something like 80 MW. Considering that a 20-ft container can hold at least a 1-MW diesel generator with its fuel supply, having a containerized nuclear reactor would seem to hold little advantage over diesel gensets.

      There's also the problem that you really want the reactor vessel and the primary coolant loop as one unit, since you can't easily disconnect these once the reactor has been active and has irradiated the primary loop.
      Now the reactor vessel alone is larger than a standard container. You'd end up with a very large and heavy undivisible central unit.

      You'd be better off leaving the reactor on a ship and just running a cable ashore. For smaller power needs, existing containerized diesel gensets are a good solution.

    9. Re:Time to build big extension cords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So other plants didn't have significant damages and they will probably soon resume normal operation. Or in a few weeks. However Fukushima's reactors are probably done, at least 1-4. I'm not sure what are they pumping into the remainig two. Having two grids is idiotic in the first place, but I hope they don't depend on single powerplant.

    10. Re:Time to build big extension cords by hawguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For real? How to get the steam above the waterline? You do realize this is high pressure steam (~1200 psi), and that traditional catapults use steam in the first place. Besides, steam rises!

      Oh sorry, my bad, I guess they just need to open some hatches and let the steam waft out of the boilers to the surface.

      I was under the impression that 300MW worth of high pressure steam would take a sizeable pipe (or pipes), and running that pipe from the reactor boiler to someplace where you could put a generator would require cutting holes in many decks of the aircraft carrier or cutting a hole in the side of the boat.

    11. Re:Time to build big extension cords by hawguy · · Score: 1

      OTOH, I'm pretty sure that 300 MWp is plenty to power a few hospitals, food distribution areas, and some command/coordination centers. Probably have enough power left over to maybe keep some radios, and perhaps a light bulb or two going so that folks in shelters can get some light and news.

      And how to do you plan on getting power to these hospitals, food distribution areas and some command/coordination centers from your carrier mounted generators without plugging into the same grid that powers everything else? Some of these are located kilometers away from the shoreline.

      You don't just lay a 25KV transmission line on the ground.

    12. Re:Time to build big extension cords by hawguy · · Score: 1

      It took most of a week to get new backup generators to those power plants. Shouldn't the Navy have some portable power plants, to help with disaster response? I suppose these shouldn't all be attached to the large ships, as they wouldn't want to tie up the Ronald Reagan next to the leaking nuclear power plant...

      You can buy or rent 10 - 15MW containerized and trailerable portable gas turbine power plants. Several MW sized diesel gensets are quite common. All you gotta do is find a way to deliver them and a way to keep them fueled. Not a problem in a disaster zone where they are having trouble delivering basic necessities like food, right?

      I mean, what's the problem with just airdropping a generator next to a nuclear plant emitting dangerous levels of radiation and plugging it in to the "emergency power" socket? Surely it's not any harder than plugging my refrigerator into my 1000W Honda generator. 1 KW @ 120VAC, 1MW at 5000VAC, it's all the same, right?

    13. Re:Time to build big extension cords by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Which really begs the question* of why they haven't shipped in a new generator in the past 7 (8?) days. Hell, that's more than enough time to source one from abroad, let alone elsewhere in Japan (surely someone in Japan has a working generator they aren't using). The first thing they should have done when they discovered the generators were offline should have been to start sourcing temporary replacements.

      And why they didn't commission a ship to moor up alongside the plant to provide power in the interim is another mind boggling question. Almost any major ship is equipped to run on shore power when in-port, and that can just as easily be used to feed power instead of drawing it. Worst case, the ship is a write-off due to being irradiated, but that's a lot cheaper than a meltdown.

      They should have had power restored within 24 hours; 36 at worst. At least going forward, the solution seems rather obvious: keep a set of backup generators off-site (but nearby).

      * Yes, I know that's not the proper use of the phrase. No, I don't care.

    14. Re:Time to build big extension cords by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      When Disaster Strikes, Send the Enterprise.

      Ye gods is that site full of errors and ignorance, the author of which knows roughly nothing about supercarriers...
       
      I'm off to post it on sci.military.naval - where the experts will have a field day. After they stop laughing.

    15. Re:Time to build big extension cords by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      +1 for excellent use of irony :)

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    16. Re:Time to build big extension cords by nido · · Score: 1

      Ye gods is that site full of errors and ignorance, the author of which knows roughly nothing about supercarriers...

      Specific criticisms would be helpful. Your email address - 'fairwater' - leads me to believe that you know something about submarines. Veteran? Active duty?

         

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    17. Re:Time to build big extension cords by rhook · · Score: 1

      The most compact nuclear power plants around (naval units used in submarines) weigh about 1000 tons.

      Wrong, these are much smaller.

      http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_22/b4180020375312.htm

    18. Re:Time to build big extension cords by hawguy · · Score: 1

      The most compact nuclear power plants around (naval units used in submarines) weigh about 1000 tons.

      Wrong, these are much smaller.

      http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_22/b4180020375312.htm

      I think he was talking about real reactors, not imaginary ones....from the article you linked to:

      So far, no manufacturer has sought certification for any small reactor, according to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Formal approvals would likely take three to five years, the same as for bigger reactors, says Scott Burnell, a commission spokesman.

    19. Re:Time to build big extension cords by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      Ye gods is that site full of errors and ignorance, the author of which knows roughly nothing about supercarriers...

      Specific criticisms would be helpful.

      There's really no way to provide specific criticisms - the idea is ludicrous from top to bottom.
       
      For one thing, you fail to realize those ships are taken out of service because they're worn out and because it would be too expensive to overhaul them and make them safe and reliable to continue operations. Not to mention the ongoing (and considerable) expense of maintaining them 'ready to go' once you've invested in overhauling them.
       
      For another, your friend talks of sailors being 'parked'. Nothing could be further from the truth, sailors on shore duty aren't 'parked' - they're assigned to a job (teaching school, working at a shoreside maintenance facility, whatever). Even accepting the massive disruptions of pulling them from those jobs - they aren't qualified to go to sea. Their qualifications are expired and their skills rusty. Figure on weeks or months to spin up a crew to reasonable proficiency.
       
      Etc... etc...
       

      Your email address - 'fairwater' - leads me to believe that you know something about submarines. Veteran? Active duty?

      Good eye... Veteran. And student of matters naval for the better part of three decades.

    20. Re:Time to build big extension cords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certification is only needed if they wish to deploy these reactors, they have already been developed.

    21. Re:Time to build big extension cords by rhook · · Score: 1

      Some satellites have small nuclear reactors in them. These have been around since at least the 60s. Hardly what I would call imaginary.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_generator

    22. Re:Time to build big extension cords by mhotchin · · Score: 1

      RTGs have outputs measured in watts. Note the lack of any prefixes denoting 'lots of'.

    23. Re:Time to build big extension cords by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Certification is only needed if they wish to deploy these reactors, they have already been developed.

      So they've designed the ideal small, portable reactor that will solve the world's energy problems, the only stumbling block is that they are not allowed to sell it and they may not have even have created a prototype, but it looks great on paper.

      That's the part that makes them imaginary -- they haven't been certified yet and no one yet knows that the reactor they describe will be certified. Who knows what changes the NRC might require before certification. Maybe this $50M truck transportable reactor will turn into a $150M reactor that has to be built and fueled on-site.

    24. Re:Time to build big extension cords by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Some satellites have small nuclear reactors in them. These have been around since at least the 60s. Hardly what I would call imaginary.

      I was talking about the original poster's 25MW truck portable reactors as being imaginary, I'm not sure why you are talking about a 1KW RTG - do you think installing a million of these is a good replacement for a single nuclear reactor? Is there any reason to believe that they can be adequately scaled to provide Gigawatt scale power?

    25. Re:Time to build big extension cords by rhook · · Score: 1

      Which really begs the question* of why they haven't shipped in a new generator in the past 7 (8?) days.

      How do you think they've been pumping water in?

    26. Re:Time to build big extension cords by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Some of them were real decades ago.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    27. Re:Time to build big extension cords by hawguy · · Score: 1

      But a russian reactor designed in the 1960's (?) is not really a portable solution that could be used in the modern world - even the Russians stopped using them after Chernobyl. No one is doubting that you *can* design a small portable reactor (especially if you don't have many safety constraints), it's just that none have been commercially produced so at this point they are all vaporware.

    28. Re:Time to build big extension cords by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Hindsight is 20/20 and all but ...

      After this, I think it would be rather intelligent to be able to do JUST WHAT YOU DESCRIBED.

      Having a big honking 'Emergency backup power' socket they can EASILY plug into, as well as several (at least twice as many as required, three times would be better) generators stored relatively close, say within 12 hours but not so close that a natural disaster is likely to take out all 3 of the backup sets. Stick one up on a mountain, one in somewhere as far away from a fault line as possible, and another one in another country with an airplane/skycrane standing by to move it into position. These generators would be tested weekly to confirm operation, and would under no circumstances be used for anything other than being shipped to a SPECIFIC plant to provide power in this sort of cases. No sharing of this resource, its too damn important. None of this 'oh, we got a 50hz genset, but need a 60hz one! Doh!' Test the damn things before the reactor goes live. Inspect them regularly by outside parties (not the power company responsible for the plant, someone who actually gets paid more to find infractions so they actually LOOK for them)

      Yea, so it wouldn't be a big honking plug, but for fucks sake BAD BAD shit happens when power can't be had for keeping cooling online when the reactor has to stop providing its own power, its just fucking stupid to not have an EASY way to get something hooked up in before the batteries run out. In 12 hours, they should have been able to get something shipped in from the west coast of America, stored in the NAPA valley region or something. So what happens is 'Oh shit, tsunami hit Japan, scramble the transport with backup genset and worry about if its actually needed while in flight, it can turn around if need be'. Problem more or less solved. Short of a nuclear war, nothing thats going to take out the NAPA valley region of california is also going to take out Japan so in exchange, they do the same for west coast reactors in the US.

      As for hooking it up ... if they had planned for it, the only difference would be bigger connectors and the fact that you'd have to use heavy equipment to move the cables and secure the connections rather than your hand. Radiation levels really didn't go bad until several DAYS after the actual event.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    29. Re:Time to build big extension cords by nido · · Score: 1

      For one thing, you fail to realize those ships are taken out of service because they're worn out and because it would be too expensive to overhaul them and make them safe and reliable to continue operations.

      My friend who works at Puget Sound did tell me, after I wrote what you read, that the Kitty Hawk was in rather poor shape. The link about the Enterprise's recent maintenance period gave a number of reasons why it cost 50% more than planned - completely rusted pipes, only ship of it's class, etc. But all that stuff's been taken care of now... I do wonder when the reactors were last replaced. How many trips around the world could it take on the remaining fuel?

      Last night I discovered that the USS Nassau is being decommissioned in about 2 weeks. I think it'd be ideal for this kind of conversion. Depending on its condition, of course, but certainly better than the JFK, Kitty Hawk, Ranger, etc.

      For another, your friend talks of sailors being 'parked'. Nothing could be further from the truth, sailors on shore duty aren't 'parked' - they're assigned to a job (teaching school, working at a shoreside maintenance facility, whatever).

      I understand that there's a Navy Reserve - I'd staff my disaster relief ship with semi-retired sailors first.

      Even accepting the massive disruptions of pulling them from those jobs - they aren't qualified to go to sea. Their qualifications are expired and their skills rusty. Figure on weeks or months to spin up a crew to reasonable proficiency

      While you're quite correct that I don't have much practical experience with the Navy, I don't think most of the jobs on the repurposed Enterprise would compare to the USS Enterprise that needs to be ready to launch fighters and bomb shit 24/7. Catapulting and catching airplanes is a big deal. Loading and launching Helicopters, not so much.

      One of the things I said in my post from Sunday (linked above, somewhere) was that 'someone' should at least do a proper study to figure out what they'd need to do to dedicate a retired ship to disaster relief. I've heard from a couple of Enterprise veterans who like the idea. The pilot-veteran wasn't especially enthusiastic, but his concerns were mostly about 'cost' and manpower.

      Someone else had the same idea today: A Great White Fleet for the 21st Century. I'd like to think that he found my website sometime over the past 7 months, but... .Sometimes good ideas emerge in multiple locations spontaneously.

      The main thing is to do a proper study.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    30. Re:Time to build big extension cords by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call them reactors. They don't share anything in common, design wise, with the power plants. They are much simpler with fewer moving parts and a complete inability to melt down, but also with very low power generation for a very long time.

    31. Re:Time to build big extension cords by captain_sweatpants · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree with you about the need for redundancy in your backup/safety systems, but as far as the hindsight thing goes this is an epic failure of the engineers and management of this plant. Clearly they have never bothered to do a safety audit on this plant or they would have realised that having one set of backup generators placed within reach of a tsunami is extremely unsafe. It's a nuclear plant for crying out loud, you need multiple redundancies in your systems! This is obvious! Also the Japanese shouldn't need to rely on the US to come save them in an emergency (even though the US is generally very good at doing this.) They should have plenty of their own backup generators and water pumps available at a moments notice for their MANY nuclear plants.

      This wouldn't solve the problem mentioned in the article however. Again having a national power grid is an obvious solution. It's a tiny country FFS, this stuff is really basic. My opinion of Japanese engineers has lowered significantly after this debarcle.

    32. Re:Time to build big extension cords by Artemis3 · · Score: 1

      Not to be picky, but there is such thing as power generation on boat; as in, dedicated ships whose sole purpose is to generate power. Waller Marine (Houston) has 171mW power barges running on oil/gas. http://www.wallermarine.com/float.html

      Fukushima I still has reactor 5 and 6 which should (hopefully) be OK, and the other plants should be repaired and brought back online asap, including Fukushima II.

      At the time of the incident, Fukushima I only had reactors 1-3 online, their combined output was 2028 mW. Reactors 5-6 could output 1884 mW on their own.

      --
      Artix
      Your Linux, your init.
    33. Re:Time to build big extension cords by hawguy · · Score: 1

      This wouldn't solve the problem mentioned in the article however. Again having a national power grid is an obvious solution. It's a tiny country FFS, this stuff is really basic. My opinion of Japanese engineers has lowered significantly after this debarcle.

      But they do have a single national power grid. It just turns out that they have two major sections with limited capacity between them -- just like how the USA is broken into 3 major grids with limited capacity between them:

      http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=110997398

      It's not a huge engineering feat to add more capacity between grids - high capacity DC lines are quite common in the world, and with a DC line it doesn't matter what frequency is on the other end.

      Of course, having a well connected grid doesn't ensure that unusual conditions can't trigger power problems:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_Blackout_of_2003

      My opinion of Japanese engineers has lowered significantly after this debacle.

      You realize, of course, that engineers don't make funding decisions? Moving the country to one frequency standard would be hugely expensive, but not a big engineering feat. Nor would increasing transmission capacity between grids.

      If you want to be disappointed in engineering, then you need look no farther than the West Coast of the USA - at their two California coastal plants, one had seismic reinforcements installed backwards and one had an entire reactor vessel installed backwards. Those are mistakes that *can* be blamed on engineers - either in design, drawings, or the on-site engineers that oversaw the projects. The engineers of Fukushima designed a nuclear power plant 40 years ago that largely stayed intact after an earthquake 30 times larger than it was designed to withstand - if the generators hadn't failed, then it's likely that there would have been no problems.

      It remains to be seen why the generators failed - whether due to a tsunami greater than the reactor complex was designed for, a design failure, or some hardware or system failure.

    34. Re:Time to build big extension cords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont go blaming the Japanese engineers when it's clearly the middle/upper management of the executive boards of these on site supply companies making these choices for lowering costs, saving money on that wall , and putting those backup generators in that unused space over there instead of building a water tight building to house it all saves a few quid and looks good on the balance sheet right so it's fine.

    35. Re:Time to build big extension cords by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "I absolutely agree with you about the need for redundancy in your backup/safety systems, but as far as the hindsight thing goes this is an epic failure of the engineers and management of this plant. Clearly they have never bothered to do a safety audit on this plant or they would have realised that having one set of backup generators placed within reach of a tsunami is extremely unsafe."

      Yeah. It's only that the safety systems were not within reach of a tsunami, so the nuclear plant did pass the safety audits.

      Of course they are known to be within tsunami reach *now*, so safety checks will be changed.

    36. Re:Time to build big extension cords by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The link about the Enterprise's recent maintenance period gave a number of reasons why it cost 50% more than planned - completely rusted pipes, only ship of it's class, etc. But all that stuff's been taken care of now... I do wonder when the reactors were last replaced. How many trips around the world could it take on the remaining fuel?

      All of *that* stuff has been taken care of, but by now there'll be more. Her reactors have never been replaced - and never will be. It's cheaper to buy three new carriers than to replace her reactors. As far as refuelling goes, it looks like she was last refueled in 1990 - so those cores are going to be getting pretty near to end of life.

      For another, your friend talks of sailors being 'parked'. Nothing could be further from the truth, sailors on shore duty aren't 'parked' - they're assigned to a job (teaching school, working at a shoreside maintenance facility, whatever).

      I understand that there's a Navy Reserve - I'd staff my disaster relief ship with semi-retired sailors first.

      The Navy Reserve are civilians who can be called to active duty in an emergency - and even worse than sailors on shore duty, they're skills are rusty and the qualifications out of date. Damm few of them are retired or even semi-retired.

      Even accepting the massive disruptions of pulling them from those jobs - they aren't qualified to go to sea. Their qualifications are expired and their skills rusty. Figure on weeks or months to spin up a crew to reasonable proficiency

      While you're quite correct that I don't have much practical experience with the Navy, I don't think most of the jobs on the repurposed Enterprise would compare to the USS Enterprise that needs to be ready to launch fighters and bomb shit 24/7. Catapulting and catching airplanes is a big deal. Loading and launching Helicopters, not so much.

      You have got to be kidding me.

      First off, you have the massive job of loading and prepping those helicopters. (Which means all the load handlers and maintenance personnel and fuel handlers and all the rest of the hanger and deck crews. All you do is trade load handlers for ordinance techs.) Then you have the job of coordinating launches and landing. (Which means the Air Boss and his crew.) Then you have the job of controlling the airspace around the carrier. (Air Traffic Control.) Then you have the job of planning and coordinating all the ops, afloat and ashore. (The air operations department.) All of this damm near as complicated as doing so with jet fighters - and also happening 24/7 while in action assisting at a disaster.

      It's only easier in the sense that an 900 piece jigsaw puzzle is 'easier' than a 1000 piece one.

      And I haven't even mentioned the aviation maintenance shops yet.

      Then you have all the engineers - doing the same job whether fighting a war or providing humanitarian assistance. Ditto for the navigators, quartermasters, etc... operating and steering the ship. Ditto for the machinists and electricians keeping the ships equipment running. Ditto for the damage control techs. Ditto for the cooks and others supporting all the above.

      All of these require training and experience. Almost none of them can be done by a scratch crew hastily thrown together.

      No offense, but it's not lack of practical experience that's the problem here - it's a complete lack of understanding of the issues at all.

      I've heard from a couple of Enterprise veterans who like the idea. The pilot-veteran wasn't especially enthusiastic, but his concerns were mostly about 'cost' and manpower.

      Don't ever ask sailors what they think of ludicrous ideas that will keep their ship alive - almost to a man they'll sign on. Sailors

    37. Re:Time to build big extension cords by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Why would you use the cat for power generation when you've got a nuclear steam generator onboard? Harness it directly.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    38. Re:Time to build big extension cords by captain_sweatpants · · Score: 1

      You realize, of course, that engineers don't make funding decisions?

      Yes, but they do have the ability to influence them. Also being able to incite public outrage by disclosing nuclear safety risks gives them a lot of leverage. I would have thought the absolutely economic necessity of an uninterrupted power supply would also be a good inducement to spending money. Particularly when a stagnating economy would benefit greatly from a large public infrastructure program.

      It remains to be seen why the generators failed - whether due to a tsunami greater than the reactor complex was designed for, a design failure, or some hardware or system failure.

      Yes it will be interesting to see just how epicly they failed here. Pumping water is such a trivial task and in this case so vitally important that I'm absolutely astounded it is a problem in 2011. Designing some generators to withstand a tsunami is not an engineering challenge. For one thing you can simply place them 30m or so above sea level with a risk factor of 0. Not having readily available alternatives is an engineering failure. This situation is disgraceful and and frankly I've been quite disturbed on how the nuclear industry has responded to these problems, downplaying them at every oppurtunity. They should be pointing out how insanely incompetent this water pumping issue is and that nuclear power plants can easily be designed to eliminate this problem! The cost of a major nuclear meltdown is so massive that no reasonable expense should be spared in making sure it doesn't happen. That is the engineers responsibility.

    39. Re:Time to build big extension cords by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      "For one thing you can simply place them 30m or so above sea level with a risk factor of 0."

      Not zero, not ever zero. Never mind that a strong quake or aftershock ... ahem ... just like the one that happened, could topple them or simply damage an already-spinning generator assembly, what about, >30m funnelled waves, asteroids, and successively less likely but NOT ZERO probability adverse events, etc.

      If you are going to take the piss out of engineers for being sloppy, etc, then hold yourself to a similar standard please.

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    40. Re:Time to build big extension cords by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      How do you think they've been pumping water in?

      Fire trucks with diesel pumps.
      Not electrical generators/pumps.

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    41. Re:Time to build big extension cords by captain_sweatpants · · Score: 1

      Well obviously there is no such thing as 0. I take it as a compliment you didn't find fault with anything else I said. Assuming you are a competent engineer I'd be completely confident you could design a tsunami-proof backup system with a probability of 99.9999% or some other number arbitrarily close to 0. Of course you can't prevent every type of failure, but tsunamis are one you definately can and should (assuming the entire world isn't simultaneously being buried under the sea.) Also the engineers had time to refine their designs (30 years?) I had no oppurtunity to refine my post after I submitted it and noticed my error.

    42. Re:Time to build big extension cords by hawguy · · Score: 1

      You realize, of course, that engineers don't make funding decisions?

      Yes, but they do have the ability to influence them. Also being able to incite public outrage by disclosing nuclear safety risks gives them a lot of leverage.

      I think you overestimate the influence of engineers, I mean look at the GE employees back in the 70's that argued that this reactor design was dangerous and could suffer from a containment explosion and breach:

      http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20110318/wl_csm/370818_1

      They quit their jobs and their concerns were dismissed and the reactor went on to be sold. And so far, 40 years later, the failure mode they warned about hasn't happened (not even at Fukushima).

      And that's the problem with arguing against rare events or complicated failure modes - it's hard to say that they will definitely happen. When an engineer starts waving his arms and says "Hey! Wait, when the thingamagig rubs against the widget for 20 years and someone presses the big red button, bad things will happen", there's plenty of wiggle room for the powers-that-be to explain it away as an extremely rare set of conditions that won't happen. And most of the time they are right. Rare failure modes are just that... rare.

      LIkewise, when an engineer says "Hey, for only $25M you can install another set of generators up the hill to protect against a Tsunami that scientists say is unlikely", people nod their heads and say "Yeah, that's a good idea"...until it comes down to funding it.

      I would have thought the absolutely economic necessity of an uninterrupted power supply would also be a good inducement to spending money. Particularly when a stagnating economy would benefit greatly from a large public infrastructure program.

      But they had batteries, and redundant generators (6 of them?), as well as being tied to the grid. Apparently the design spec for the facility didn't count on such a large Tsunami washing over it. Or maybe it did - I haven't seen any definitive details on why the generators failed. Maybe they were in watertight containment structures and some automatic safety control opened the air intakes and tried to start them while the air intakes were still under water? If that did happen, then that *is* an engineering failure, though maybe outside of the engineer's control if someone said "To prevent a runaway reactor in the event that the plant is abandoned, the generators *must* be started after 15 minutes on battery power regardless of what the water sensors say". I really don't know what happened...do you?

      Yes it will be interesting to see just how epicly they failed here. Pumping water is such a trivial task and in this case so vitally important that I'm absolutely astounded it is a problem in 2011.

      Yes, but you still don't know the root cause of the problem. Is it really an engineering failure if back when the reactor was designed, scientists said that a Tsunami of the magnitude that occured was a 1,000 year event and could be discounted over the projected lifetime of the facility? Engineers don't often have the luxury of overdesigning - they design to spec (which includes a safety factor).

      Designing some generators to withstand a tsunami is not an engineering challenge. For one thing you can simply place them 30m or so above sea level with a risk factor of 0.

      But what do you do when you have a 31m Tsunami? After all, Sendai was hit by 30m waves...Alaska was once hit by a 500m Tsunami. And why would you even put 100 tons of generators on top of a tower when you can bury them in watertight enclosures?

      Not having readily available alternatives is an engineering failure. This situation is disgraceful and and frankly I've been quite disturbed on how the nuclear industry has responded to these problems, downplaying th

    43. Re:Time to build big extension cords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, thats what she said!!

  48. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by bmo · · Score: 1

    Dammit, I should have edited that. Ignore the "minute or so a month" because it's more accurate than that. I wrote that before finding the All About Circuits page.

    --
    BMO

  49. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Kalidor · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is how my school did it. In grade school we had rather simple looking analogue clocks that essentially mimicked the clock on the control panel for the PA system. If there was a power outage the clocks would stop, and when the power came back we would see them run quick to catch up.

    Same with DST, if we got in early enough we would see the clocks run fast to spring 1 hour ahead or run really fast to "fall" 11 hours ahead. (Never ran backwards)

    --

    Code softly but carry a big magnet.

  50. Smart Meters? by Ichijo · · Score: 0

    East Japan entered its fifth day of power rationing on Friday, with no end to the planned blackouts in sight.

    The problem described above (a shortage of electricity) is easily solved through the use of smart meters, where electricity prices adjust in real-time in response to demand in order to prevent demand from ever exceeding supply.

    Does Japan not have smart meters yet?

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    1. Re:Smart Meters? by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Uh. Smart meters don't fix shortages of electricity. All they do is cost the consumer more money when they're using it at peak. That's a retrograde punishment system. The solution is to build more power plants, or import more when you need it. If you live in Ontario and Quebec you already know this, since we sell most of our power to the US. Because Americans can't be bothered to build more power plants.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Smart Meters? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Uh. Smart meters don't fix shortages of electricity. All they do is cost the consumer more money when they're using it at peak.

      You've just described how supply and demand prevents shortages, while claiming that it doesn't prevent shortages.

      Think about it this way. Would you use less electricity if it cost more? If electricity cost enough, wouldn't it lower demand for electricity below the level of supply?

      A shortage exists only when demand exceeds supply, and when that happens, it means the price is too low. Smart meters bring real-time price information to consumers, which helps reduce demand for electricity during peak times, and that eliminates the shortage.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    3. Re:Smart Meters? by mikael · · Score: 2

      The UK has off-peak electricity (white meters), while the regular-rate electricity goes through the standard meter (black meter). It usually means that people run their dish washers, washing machines and dryers in the early hours of the morning, and cook their evening meal after 6.00pm.

      Smart meters in the UK let you know how many Kilowatts of electricity you are using at any moment, which encourages home-owners to switch off lights or to purchase dual motion-sensor/dimmer switches. One setting has the light off, another has the light on only if there is motion, and the third has the light permanently on.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:Smart Meters? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Sorry doesn't work that way. Because people are billed in blocks, or as prices fluctuate at peak. Meaning when everyone is at home from 1600-2300, you're going to be screwed out the ass. Unless you're one of those people who works nights, in which case you get a nice break on your hydro rates.

      People won't use less electricity if it costs more, because they're always billed at peak when they're at home. They have no real 'choice' in reducing consumption. Because they have no way to do laundry/cook/etc at 3am, when they're sleeping.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Smart Meters? by loshwomp · · Score: 1

      Uh. Smart meters don't fix shortages of electricity. All they do is cost the consumer more money when they're using it at peak. That's a retrograde punishment system.

      Your "retrograde punishment system" is also called the free market. Smart meters by themselves don't fix anything, but they do enable real-time energy pricing (or its simper cousin: time-of-use metering).

      Market forces then move energy consumed at peak demand times toward the demand valleys. Closing the gap between min and max daily demand makes more efficient use of the grid, and that is often a more cost-effective solution than building new infrastructure.

      If you live in Ontario and Quebec you already know this, since we sell most of our power to the US.

      We buy your energy (not power) because you have a surplus of cheap energy. It is far from a frictionless market, but these are basic market forces at work.

    6. Re:Smart Meters? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      If you lived in Ontario or Quebec you'd know that it's a retrograde punishment system. Everyone here pays a higher rate because Hydro-one screwed up so badly that they had to disband and reform it as OPG(yet keep hydro-one around for maintenance), to set the market price. The higher price, plus the "debt retirement charge" goes exactly to that.

      There's no driving market force behind prices here. And ah yes, you buy power. In raw kwh's, not engery. We don't measure in electrons here.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    7. Re:Smart Meters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've just described how supply and demand prevents shortages, while claiming that it doesn't prevent shortages.

      Following that logic, we could say that people starving in third world countries are supply and demands way of solving the food shortage problem. (Pardon me for the strawman argument, but surely you can see how having less power and charging more for it doesn't solve the problem really)

      Would you use less electricity if it cost more?

      Yes, but significantly less? I mean, I could turn on the lights when it becomes completely dark instead of dusk. I'd do the laundry at a later time when it's cheaper. But I would most likely not unplug my freezer, nor my fridge, nor change the time at which I cook, use my microwave, use my computer (because it's my primary form of income).

      Industry however wouldn't give a flying fuck, even in the days of Green Everything. They'd do a cost analysis, see what they can skimp on (especially after those large investments in all that power consuming equipment a couple of years ago), and they'd more than likely charge more for their product. In turn, the consumer pays more, requiring a higher income for the same standard of living. A bakery is still going to bake X breads a day, they'll just raise the price, in turn either lowering the quality of life or creating inflation as people demand higher wages.

      A shortage exists only when demand exceeds supply, and when that happens, it means the price is too low.

      From a pure economical perspective, yes. But have another look at food. You can't deny that there's a food shortage in the world, but what if it's more profitable to turn food into fuel than sell it as food? Hell, sometimes it's more profitable for farmers to get rid of their excess products by letting them rot in storage than it is to sell it to a country where people starve (something that happens quite often in the fruit industry here).

      If electricity was a pure luxury item, like a television, I would be inclined to agree with you. But everything uses electricity, either in manufacturing or during consumption. The solution to an energy shortage is to produce more energy (preferably sustainable, but let's all be realistic and realize that we don't quite live in that utopia just yet), or as you suggest decrease the quality of life by way of economy.

    8. Re:Smart Meters? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      People won't use less electricity if it costs more, because they're always billed at peak when they're at home. They have no real 'choice' in reducing consumption. Because they have no way to do laundry/cook/etc at 3am, when they're sleeping.

      I do my laundry when I'm sleeping, because my washer has a timer on it. I can cook when I'm sleeping, because I can run the crock pot overnight. And if the peak happens when the sun is up, it might encourage me to put up some solar panels.

      So not only does peak-hour pricing allow me to economize, it also saves us all the cost of building a new electrical plant just to provide enough additional electricity for the peak. So peak-hour pricing saves us money in two ways.

      The alternative to charging what people are willing to pay (i.e. freedom) is, as you can read in the article, rationing (not freedom).

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    9. Re:Smart Meters? by loshwomp · · Score: 1

      If you lived in Ontario or Quebec you'd know that it's a retrograde punishment system.

      I have no idea how broken your utility is, but it doesn't invalidate the concept of smart metering or TOU metering.

      And ah yes, you buy power. In raw kwh's, not engery.

      Nice try, but kWh is a unit of energy, not power.

      Power is instantaneous. Energy is power integrated over time, and is measured in units like watthours, or kilo-watthours. Go look it up sometime.

    10. Re:Smart Meters? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Following that logic, we could say that people starving in third world countries are supply and demands way of solving the food shortage problem.

      No, starvation in those countries is caused by political problems that prevent the free market from working.

      But I would most likely not unplug my freezer, nor my fridge, nor change the time at which I cook, use my microwave, use my computer (because it's my primary form of income).

      Would you put up some solar panels? Turn down the heater and wear a sweater? Turn the A/C up a couple of degrees?

      A bakery is still going to bake X breads a day, they'll just raise the price...

      But they won't pass 100% of the cost onto the consumer. Why? Because the cost increase will justify changing the way they do a few things, in order to save peak hour electricity. Maybe they'll shut down the oven during the peak period. Things like that.

      Meanwhile, every electricity user will save money by not having to pay to build a new power plant just to provide enough additional electricity for the peak period.

      So people will realize 100% of the benefit, while paying <100% of the cost, of peak hour pricing. This results in a net benefit.

      ...what if it's more profitable to turn food into fuel than sell it as food?

      Then we should stop subsidizing fuel.

      The solution to an energy shortage is to produce more energy...

      You're only thinking from the supply side. It's a supply and demand problem, not just a supply problem.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    11. Re:Smart Meters? by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 2

      You've just described how supply and demand prevents shortages, while claiming that it doesn't prevent shortages.

      Think about it this way. Would you use less electricity if it cost more? If electricity cost enough, wouldn't it lower demand for electricity below the level of supply?

      A shortage exists only when demand exceeds supply, and when that happens, it means the price is too low. Smart meters bring real-time price information to consumers, which helps reduce demand for electricity during peak times, and that eliminates the shortage.

      But you can only reduce your demand up to a point. After that, you will need to pay the electricity no matter the price. Is like trying to live without air conditioners in Phoenix's summer or heaters in nordic countries at winter. You don't have choice. Even so, for the Japanese market, the least significant component of demand will be household demand; industry, transport and commercial customers have a far higher demand of electricity. That's why with the current energy shortages are many train lines stopped. If you had ever been in Tokyo, you will be aware that the city without trains will collapse, just like is happening at the moment.

      --
      Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    12. Re:Smart Meters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The alternative to charging what people are willing to pay (i.e. freedom) is, as you can read in the article, rationing (not freedom).

      Freedom vs. not freedom?
      Don't make me laugh / cry.

      Freedom is when I get to set the price. Then I pay whatever I like.
      Limiting available power based on economic power is as free as limiting it based on any kind of distinguishing aspect (location, education, marital status).
      You think just because the price is high, people stop wanting electricity?
      Wrong: they can no longer afford it. Nevertheless, they still want it.

    13. Re:Smart Meters? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Freedom is when I get to set the price. Then I pay whatever I like.

      Like eBay, right? Where the final price is set based on how much you and the other bidders are willing to pay.

      Well, that's exactly how smart meters work. Everyone bids on the price of electricity simply by using it, so everyone gets to help decide how much electricity ultimately costs for each time period.

      Limiting available power based on economic power is as free as limiting it based on any kind of distinguishing aspect (location, education, marital status).

      But the alternative, communism, just doesn't work very well.

      You think just because the price is high, people stop wanting electricity?

      Not exactly. When the price is high, people will want less of it.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    14. Re:Smart Meters? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      But you can only reduce your demand up to a point. After that, you will need to pay the electricity no matter the price.

      You're thinking of things like food. Demand for electricity is much more elastic.

      Is like trying to live without air conditioners in Phoenix's summer or heaters in nordic countries at winter.

      Before air conditioners came to people's homes in Phoenix, people would hang wet sheets up in their windows, or they would go to the air conditioned movie theaters to cool off.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    15. Re:Smart Meters? by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Your plan would only screw over poor people. Think of heating, for example: Someone who enjoys the temperature at 80 degrees indoors in their poorly insulated home, but makes money above his means, will continue to do so even when the price gets bad.

      Meanwhile, you will have people living paycheck to paycheck burning newspapers in a trash barrel in their living room.

      Also many people rent; they do not have the luxury of installing any fancy things like solar panels for their high rise, or even controlling their own thermostat. Landlords would either turn the thermostats to a very uncomfortable level or pass on the increased costs to the renters at the first opportunity. They have no immediate pressure (until there is legislation) to improve things; since all landlords in a geographic area would be affected equally, it would take some time before "supply and demand" pressure applies.

      Raising the price is *not* the solution.

    16. Re:Smart Meters? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Your plan would only screw over poor people...you will have people living paycheck to paycheck burning newspapers in a trash barrel in their living room.

      There are better ways to provide welfare than through artificially low energy prices. When people are insulated from their costs, they have no incentive or ability to economize. THAT is what screws poor people.

      Also many people rent; they do not have the luxury of installing any fancy things like solar panels for their high rise, or even controlling their own thermostat. Landlords would either turn the thermostats to a very uncomfortable level or pass on the increased costs to the renters at the first opportunity.

      When peak hour electricity prices rise high enough, why wouldn't those landlords install solar panels and charge their tenants for the electricity?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    17. Re:Smart Meters? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Right. Keep telling yourself that when you're not paying for power lost over the line.

      And as for screwed up you can read this:
      http://www.moneyville.ca/article/956001--power-companies-paid-millions-not-to-generate-elecrtricity?bn=1

      So yes it does invalidate smart metering. If you can't figure out why, then you can ask the UK why they're not walking towards mandatory blackouts.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    18. Re:Smart Meters? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      When people are insulated from their costs, they have no incentive or ability to economize. THAT is what screws poor people.

      What? What screws poor people is what has always screwed poor people: corporate types who rip off those who have no disposable income, and have to choose between necessities.

      When peak hour electricity prices rise high enough, why wouldn't those landlords install solar panels and charge their tenants for the electricity?

      Show me a landlord willing to make a major capital investment for his tenants and I'll show you a saint. Not going to happen. The reality is that rental property owners operate on fairly narrow margins (getting narrower here in my State where property taxes just keep going up, and you can only charge so much for your units.) Besides which, providing enough power to offset grid costs in any meaningful way is going to require a. a LOT of space for a LOT of solar panels, which aren't exactly cheap, plus a heavy-duty synchronized inverter and switching gear. Unless banks make cheap credit available for such investments, and assuming a reasonable payback period, there's no reason for a landlord to bother. This is not his problem.

      And in the U.S., at least, most rental properties don't include electric power as part of the rent anyway: that's billed separately to the tenant by the power company. Consequently there's not motivation for a landlord to do squat in that regard. Many do include heating, but that's usually natural gas not electric.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    19. Re:Smart Meters? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      But you can only reduce your demand up to a point. After that, you will need to pay the electricity no matter the price.

      You're thinking of things like food. Demand for electricity is much more elastic.

      Is like trying to live without air conditioners in Phoenix's summer or heaters in nordic countries at winter.

      Before air conditioners came to people's homes in Phoenix, people would hang wet sheets up in their windows, or they would go to the air conditioned movie theaters to cool off.

      Tha's ridiculous. How far back do you want to go? Caves?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    20. Re:Smart Meters? by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      You have some school-level physics revision to do: *energy* is lost from the lines. Power is an instantaneous measure of the rate of energy loss, but energy is what really matters in terms for the "paying" above.

      And smart metering apart from anything else means so many things to different people that you can't possibly invalidate all of those concepts and their utilities, never mind what you think you're talking about.

      I am in the UK. I have spent a little time looking at demand control of various flavours (industrial and domestic), wholesale and retail pricing, suppression of peak demand to reduce infrastructure costs, allowing more intermittent generation on to the grid, etc, etc. You simply cannot airily wave your hand and say "it's all crap." In fact it's already happening and useful and we're only arguing about how much and what form.

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    21. Re:Smart Meters? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Show me a landlord willing to make a major capital investment for his tenants and I'll show you a saint. Not going to happen.

      You don't understand. He wouldn't put up solar panels for the benefit of his tenants, but for the extra income.

      And in the U.S., at least, most rental properties don't include electric power as part of the rent anyway: that's billed separately to the tenant by the power company.

      In the same way, the energy from the solar panels would also be billed separately, at market rates, by the landlord.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    22. Re:Smart Meters? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Tha's ridiculous. How far back do you want to go? Caves?

      With the kind of subsidies you seem to prefer, there would be no innovation, because there would be no incentive to find cheaper sources of power, or to build more energy-efficient appliances and buildings.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    23. Re:Smart Meters? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it worked well in spain too. Ask people there how much they're enjoying the 40c/kwh that they're paying 'on peak' in order to 'offset' the lack of proper generation.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    24. Re:Smart Meters? by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      They're offsetting a completely crass centrally-subsidised energy pricing scheme which is bankrupt. You can't blame the metering for the failure for the market to be operating sensibly at all at the retail level (as I understand things).

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
  51. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by MachDelta · · Score: 1

    When I worked in an oil warehouse, all of our portable pumps were AC. Granted, most of them had speed control modules because at full snort they would either a) make a gigantic splashing mess with light viscosity oil, or b) throw breakers like they were going out of style while pushing the high viscosity stuff. :)

  52. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    Most devices not either don't care (light bulbs) or put their power through an AC/DC conversion step anyway. So what would really need to be thrown out if you switched

    Umm that AC/DC coversion does not exactly handwave the difference in 50 or 60 hertz current so it might actually matter.

    hint after you run it down your bridge rectifier coming out of your cap filter your ripple will be
    (dc load current)/120|100*capacitance

    and some thing may not be able to handle that much ripple

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  53. Dagen H by Ecks · · Score: 1

    Japan needs a Dagen H for electricity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dagen_H

  54. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most devices not either don't care (light bulbs)

    Do people notice the lights? I recall dad mentioning the flicker was noticeable when you went from a 60 area into a 50.

    This was some time ago when Canada still had a few areas of 50Hz. Perhaps more modern incandescents have a more sustained 'glow' that alleviates the effect.

  55. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by effigiate · · Score: 1

    ANSI C84.1 is the standard that power companies are held against. I don't have the standard in front of me, but I believe that the standard is 104V to 127V, for an average of 115V.

  56. Re:Free Market by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Informative

    However east and west Japan were still relatively independent even in the 1890s. It wasn't really until after the Russo-Japanese war that the country really started to become just that, a unified country. Humans have this odd way of thinking about countries, namely that the government/political structures and geographical boundaries of countries today are the same as they were over 100 years ago, they are often much different. Japan was very much like Germany, essentially a very loosely affiliated set of states bound by geographical, linguistic, and cultural ties but often separated by bitter political and military rivalries. I doubt that even if someone had the foresight to force both sides to use the same standards they would have had the political capital to make it a reality. That sort of political capital didn't really exist until after the Russo-Japanese war towards the end of the Meiji era.

  57. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by jsrjsr · · Score: 1

    Some clocks DO use line frequency as the timing source.

    For example, "synchronous movement" clocks -- essentially synchronous motors driving gears to move the hands. Many buildings from before 1980 have a clock socket (a recessed outlet) mounted where most people would put a clock that was intended for this type of clock. Most later buildings don't have this feature as most wall clocks are now battery operated.

    I've also seen early electronic clocks that used the line for the timing source.

    (Remembering this stuff is starting to make me feel old...)

  58. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    110 is the guaranteed minimum. Any less than that and your power utility is not providing service, legally.

    120 is the spec.

    115 is an average of the two.

    120V, 60Hz is the standard.

  59. Re:Free Market by jsrjsr · · Score: 2

    To know that, we'd have to know if the Japanese government got involved and locked in the choices before the market had a chance to correct it. After all, until the two systems met it didn't matter what frequencies they used.

  60. Re:Free market by Terrasque · · Score: 1

    That allows them to sell the power some other place where prices are higher then turn around and demand higher prices locally too because reserves are low.

    That sounds awfully familiar.. Let me guess, you're from Norway, too? :D

    --
    It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
  61. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moreso for commercial and government buildings in Japan.

    Most residences don't have air conditioning. It's typically seen as frivolous.

  62. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consumer electricity in the US is required by law to be 120 volts plus or minus 5 percent. I believe that was standardized in the 1980's. Before that some places were 110 volts, some 115, and some 120.

  63. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Running clocks from the powerline frequency is not poorly designed, in fact, it's a very good design, except, it seems, in Virginia.

    Power companies are required to keep their line frequencies at a steady 50/60 Hz over the average of a day. If the company generates too high a frequency at some point, they will purposely generate a lower frequency to even it out so that during a day, the correct frequency average is attained.

    Your clock should be very accurate if powered off the power lines and you have a competent electric company.

    [citation needed?] -- Just call your electric company and get someone with a clue on the phone.

  64. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by whoever57 · · Score: 2

    Other than poorly designed clocks, what other devices actually care about the power line frequency?

    Poorly designed? In the UK, power line frequency is very tightly controlled and fluctuations are corrected for during the night, so clocks that were synchronous to the power were very accurate. The problem isn't the clocks, its the power generation. Also, sotting in my garage, I have an old turntable, with a synchronous motor. Again, any frequency error is far less than one's ability to distinguish from the correct frequency.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  65. Land of rising sun, may be light... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Land of setting sun, may be dark.

  66. Re:Free Market by ocdscouter · · Score: 1

    Wait: I thought the free market solved all problems and never needed government intervention.

    You seem to have a stunning amount of faith in government, including 1800's feudal Japan, to accurately plan for catastrophes 130 years in advance.

    In a perfect world, the moral would be that you can't put your complete trust in any one thing. But that concept has been having an on-again off-again relationship with Gray Areas, which makes many people distrustful of it.

  67. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by ejasons · · Score: 1

    The bigest problem for changing from 50->60 or 60->50 are electric motors. (fans, vaccums, elevators, FACTORIES, power tools, water pumps, and generaly changing factories is propably very expensive, you may not complain when vaccuming will give you 20%more or less power, but when conveyor belts, mixing machines, crains, and lot of other stuff gets faster or slower you get into trouble. And I am not even considering that in one or other way the efficiency got worse/better and things get stronger/weaker. In home you get some problems. ( like refiregerator(pump is Hz fixed, kitchen/toilet Fan, vaccuming, food processors and other spinning things.
    TV, clock, radio, PC, chrgers: (is generaly not huge problem)

    Your lack of right parentheses makes me uneasy. Like a badly-formed Lisp program...

  68. My experience by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Usually when a Japanese power plant is shut down, it has a serious pest control problem. The best solution is to send in the first cyberpunk-looking teenage kid you see with no help whatsoever. You don't need to pay them, they have to do it because the only way to get where they're headed is through the power plant.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:My experience by shibashaba · · Score: 1

      wtf is that supposed to mean

      i'm really curious

      --
      ---------- Open Source is capitalism applied to IP.
    2. Re:My experience by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Reference to Pokemon RPGs...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  69. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by ejasons · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is how my school did it. In grade school we had rather simple looking analogue clocks that essentially mimicked the clock on the control panel for the PA system. If there was a power outage the clocks would stop, and when the power came back we would see them run quick to catch up.

    So you're hypothesizing that, after a power outage, they increase the line frequency for a while to compensate for the time down?

  70. 60 Hz and time control by Relayman · · Score: 1

    The 60 Hz power in the U.S. is monitored on a cumulative basis. Over time, it is very accurate. My Dad worked at a power plant in the '40s and said he had two clocks: one running on Western Union and one running on the generated power. If the clocks deviated by more than a second, the generator speed would be adjusted slightly to get the clocks back in sync.

    I'm sure the method has been updated, but I'll bet the concept is the same.

    --
    If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    1. Re:60 Hz and time control by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      The 60 Hz power in the U.S. is monitored on a cumulative basis. Over time, it is very accurate. My Dad worked at a power plant in the '40s and said he had two clocks: one running on Western Union and one running on the generated power. If the clocks deviated by more than a second, the generator speed would be adjusted slightly to get the clocks back in sync. I'm sure the method has been updated, but I'll bet the concept is the same.

      Yes. During periods of heavy load, generator RPM (and hence line frequency) may drop slightly. That is compensated nightly by increasing the frequency so that the total number of A.C. cycles output each day is the same. That guarantees that any devices (such as synchronous clocks) that depend upon line frequency will, at the end of the day, still be keeping proper time.

      It's not just residential equipment, either. There's still a lot of stuff out there that depends upon stable power line frequency for one purpose or another. Too much drift will cause problems.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  71. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by RandomJoe · · Score: 1

    Climate control (at least for commercial HVAC) is a relative non-issue as well. Every motor I've seen installed lately is happy at either frequency - for that matter, we put lots of them on variable-speed drives which varies the frequency and voltage all over the place. Only extremely old motors might have issues.

    So all that really happens is the motor speeds up/down a bit (depending on who converts their system) which is handily fixed - if you even need to - as most large air handling equipment is belt-driven. Pull the sheaves off, put on a slightly-different size, fire it back up. Some equipment has adjustable sheaves already, so just screw the assembly in/out a bit to change the diameter.

    Water pumps aren't so readily adjusted, but most have balancing valves after the pumps anyway to set the desired flow - just tweak it open/closed a bit and again you're done.

    Some of the really old building automation systems I've seen used to use "line time clocks" - referencing the AC frequency for their clock. I expect some of those wouldn't keep proper time, and one particular panel simply quit functioning if the frequency fell outside 60 Hz +/- a few tenths (found that out when they stopped running every time the emergency generators were tested). Those panels were obsoleted by the manufacturer quite a few years ago, but there are still a LOT of them installed and operating (in the US anyway). They would have to be upgraded, but it's an easy retrofit to something newer - the new stuff is so much smaller than those old panels you can just gut the old cans and install new with room to spare.

  72. Re:Free Market by hey! · · Score: 1

    Well, how about the Reagan administration decision to leave the choice of cell transmission system up to the free market? I'm not saying there were *no* advantages to doing things that way, but net I don't think it produced such great results.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  73. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US only standardized it's power grid in the 1950s or so.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility_frequency#Standardization

    In the United States, the Southern California Edison company had standardized on 50 Hz. Much of Southern California operated on 50 Hz and did not completely change frequency of their generators and customer equipment to 60 Hz until around 1948. Some projects by the Au Sable Electric Company used 30 Hz at transmission voltages up to 110,000 volts in 1914.

    In Mexico, areas operating on 50 Hz grid were converted during the 1970s, uniting the country under 60 Hz.

    But,

    Some 25 Hz generators still exist at the Beck 1 and Rankine generating stations near Niagara Falls to provide power for large industrial customers who did not want to replace existing equipment; and some 25 Hz motors and a 25 Hz power station exist in New Orleans for floodwater pumps

    Eventually, world power grid will be created and new standardization will need to happen, probably DC, but that will take a century or two ;)

  74. The 50/60 Hz split once caused a major blackout by grandpa-geek · · Score: 2

    The 50/60 Hz split posed a problem for air conditioner manufacturers in Japan. Their solution was frequency-converting air conditioners that would work on either 50 Hz or 60 Hz. When they were first being installed it was not noticed that their characteristics over their range of operating voltages were not the same as conventional air conditioners.

    The problem became clear on a hot summer day in the late 1980's. TEPCO was importing power to the Tokyo area from nuclear plants a considerable distance away. Long distance transmission of electricity requires reactive power to maintain voltage at the receiving end. The frequency-converting air conditioners increased the need for reactive power in the Tokyo area.

    In early afternoon, TEPCO ran out of reactive power and the voltage collapsed, causing a major blackout. It was the first major blackout that happened without some kind of event such as a lightning strike or a piece of equipment failing.

    1. Re:The 50/60 Hz split once caused a major blackout by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      In other words, you could say they ran out of imaginary power.

    2. Re:The 50/60 Hz split once caused a major blackout by grandpa-geek · · Score: 1

      Reactive power isn't imaginary, except in its mathematical representation. It is really due to the charging and discharging of lines and other reactances.

    3. Re:The 50/60 Hz split once caused a major blackout by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Reactive power isn't imaginary, except in its mathematical representation. It is really due to the charging and discharging of lines and other reactances.

      Maybe one in a hundred Slashdot readers would have understood the parent poster's comment... you understood what he was saying yet still didn't realize that he was being facetious.

  75. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

    Although it's different there, I seem to recall more air conditioning in Okinawa.

    --
    SSC
  76. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most electronic devices accept AC between 50Hz and 60Hz. Most industrial applications use inverters to put out whatever frequency they want - when I used to work in automation we used them to change the speed of conveyors with AC motors on.

    We use 50Hz in the UK; I've never had a problem with a US device, which uses 60 Hz, other than needing a step-down transformer.

  77. Re:Free Market by jayveekay · · Score: 1

    In America it is the opposite, as today many citizens believe that the political boundaries of 100 years ago are still in effect.

    In particular with respect to Hawaii not being a state.

  78. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    This is one of those situations which could be the best to use as a reason to upgrade, with the help of many other countries who want to see japan get back on its feet, and just get something new going that the whole country can rely on, and make it just one type, but also better the overall situation as future disaster situations can profit from...

  79. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Your clock should be very accurate if powered off the power lines and you have a competent electric company.

    Aye, therein lies the rub. My parent's property is very rural. My mother also claims that light bulbs burn out a lot faster there, but I think that is just her imagination.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  80. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked in power generation for Duke Power, now Duke Energy, back in the 1980's and I can assure you that the 60Hz is very, very, very tightly controlled. That's the only way multiple power generation stations can connect to the grind without canceling each other. That's what the power companies call motoring and it's just about the worst thing that can happen on the grid.

  81. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    What, and "bigest", "vaccums", "propably", "vaccuming", "refiregerator", "chrgers", and "generaly" DON'T bother you? Not to mention the grammar? You, sir, are a ridiculous computer nerd!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  82. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by russotto · · Score: 1

    My parents in Virginia have very bad 60Hz power, they have a few clocks that are often off by 10 minutes or more each way, so it's not a good idea to base your clock frequency source on the power line in the first place.

    It's extremely unlikely your parents have power which is not 60Hz within very close tolerances, unless they're literally off the grid.

  83. The Invisible Hand of the Market strikes again! by fantomas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looks like the invisible hand of the free market really dropped the ball that time....

    1. Re:The Invisible Hand of the Market strikes again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it works just fine. All the people have to do is become electrical engineers, figure out the excess generation capacity and relative disaster-proofness of the electrical system in various parts of the country, and find a house or apartment located in the optimum area. Oh, and if they don't like the electric service they get they can just break their lease or sell their house or something and move to somewhere where the service will be better.

      I mean, how hard can that be? Everyone's already a medical expert, financial genius, and is overflowing with legal knowledge in addition to whatever they have to know to do their regular jobs, take care of families, etc. That's pretty much how the "free market" is supposed to work, right? On second thought, it doesn't seem so "free" when you consider it that way, huh?

    2. Re:The Invisible Hand of the Market strikes again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or they could just take it in their stride and polarise the mass production of and to 12v DC in all consumer rated house item's PC's,TV's,wireless electronic's and fridges, etc and then export them to all the world.

        if only they were able to gear up and supply all this electrical off grid/on grid in the future, shame their not the the worlds supplier's of such computerised kit today, or they might stand a chance of making things better for off grid generic kit at lower prices

  84. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well notebooks usually have power supplies capable of accepting 100-250VAC 50-60Hz. There is (or have been at least) some efficiency loss in those universal power adapters but there is no big problem in designing them even for higher power outputs.
    And is it not likely the clocks in Japan never have used the AC frequency as a timebase?

    -- Megol

  85. ummm..you mean jiggawatts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    great scott!

  86. Re:Free Market by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

    I will repost again this updated http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2035046&cid=35472440 post.

    Wikipedia has a inaccurate map of Japan's power grid:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Power_Grid_of_Japan.PNG

    A better map, more detailed that shows how really is actually the grid:
    http://www.geni.org/globalenergy/library/national_energy_grid/japan/graphics/japangridmap.gif

    Updates at the end since the following is necessary to put things in context.

    They have 2 FC facilities able to exchange 1200 MW at best, but the exchange between the two grids goes around 7-8% yearly, both ways, far, far less than what is needed at the moment and what they could provide, I doubt that Japan doesn't have at least 15% spare capacity in both grids. The FC are only able to replace units 1 and 2 from Fukushima Power Plant. 1200 MW are nothing versus the demand of eastern Japan. The reason that eastern Japan blackouts will be more bad than needed and Tepco's problems with their nuclear power plants comes in this report http://www.ieej.or.jp/aperc/pdf/GRID_COMBINED_DRAFT.pdf from APEC:

    But power interconnections are far less developed between Japan’s electric service areas than within them. Thus, an issue has arisen with respect to what might happen to the reliability of power supply in Japan when a particular class of generating capacity has to be taken out of service. In August 2002, the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) was required by the Japanese government to take all of its nuclear power plants out of service since the utility had failed to report technical safety violations at some of the plants as required by law. Although subsequent safety inspections revealed that none of the violations presented an actual threat to public safety, continuing public distrust meant that nearly all of Tokyo’s nuclear plants remained out of service through the summer of 2003 and beyond. (emphasis mine) Since summer is when Tokyo’s power demand peaks, and since TEPCO relied on nuclear power for 29 percent of its generating capacity and 47 percent of its electricity generation in 200117, there were real concerns that power demand might not be met.

    Normally, TEPCO would have had roughly 72 GW of generating capacity available to meet Tokyo’s needs during the summer of 2003, including 60 GW of its own capacity, 8 GW owned by Japan’s Electric Power Development Corporation (EPDC) and other generators in its area, and 4 GW from companies outside of its area. But with 13 GW of nuclear capacity remaining out of service (though about 4 GW of nuclear capacity had already been allowed to resume service), and with 4 GW of thermal power plants out of service for scheduled maintenance, the actual amount of generating capacity on which TEPCO could rely that summer was only around 55 GW. By comparison, the utility projected that peak demand would be around 61 GW if the weather were normal and 64 GW if the summer were hot. Hence, it had to plan for a possible 9 GW shortfall.

    TEPCO’s plans for filling the gap between available capacity and possible peak summer demand included a variety of supply-side and demand-side measures. On the supply side, the utility anticipated that it could obtain 2,190 MW by restarting thermal plants that had been shut down due to their relative inefficiency and high cost, 760 MW by accelerating the testing and start-up of new plants, 700 MW by rescheduling thermal plant repairs, and 1,660 MW through extra purchases from neighbours. Somewhat more alarmingly, the utility hoped to obtain 3,200 MW if necessary through emergency supply measures such as power drawn from the trial operation of thermal

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
  87. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny. I know my local power power companies count the 50 hz cycles and makes sure it evens out over a day.

  88. Electricity isn't ruled by Free Market by mangu · · Score: 2

    Wait: I thought the free market solved all problems and never needed government intervention.

    The Free Market *WOULD* solve all these problems, if it weren't for all that pesky government intervention.

    There are few activities so strongly regulated anywhere as the electric power industry. I should know it, for the first five years of my career as an electronics engineer I worked for a power company.

    The situation is so bad that when people say the power industry has been "deregulated" somewhere, like in California, for example, the industry is actually still more regulated than any other industry.

    Had Free Market forces prevailed in Japan there would exist many interconnection points between the 50hz and 60hz zones. After all, what good is a market if you are unable to buy and sell stuff?

    The problem in Japan is not the Free Market, but the fact that the industry was divided in two segments that weren't allowed to trade their product freely among themselves.

    1. Re:Electricity isn't ruled by Free Market by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      The Free Market *WOULD* solve all these problems, if it weren't for all that pesky government intervention.

      Absolutely false. The problem here was a lack of standards in the completely unregulated market that existed at the time.

      There are few activities so strongly regulated anywhere as the electric power industry.

      There's a reason for this. It's to avoid the kind of problems that an unregulated system would result in, such as happened in Japan in the late 1800s.

      Had Free Market forces prevailed in Japan there would exist many interconnection points between the 50hz and 60hz zones. After all, what good is a market if you are unable to buy and sell stuff?

      Nope. You can buy and sell stuff much more cheaply within your compatible zone.

      The problem in Japan is not the Free Market, but the fact that the industry was divided in two segments that weren't allowed to trade their product freely among themselves.

      They're are allowed to do so. The reason they rarely ever do is because it costs too much, not because of any government regulations preventing it. Market forces ensure continued segmentation in this case.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  89. Q: 50Hz or 60Hz by slew · · Score: 1

    Okay, so I read the article (so sue me)... Here's an interesting tidbit...

    All of eastern Japan, including Tokyo and the disaster-struck region to the north, is standardized on 50Hz supply while the rest of the country uses 60Hz.

    I wonder what the USS RR could output given the USA is on 60Hz... The history you cited was that the USA Lexington powered Tacoma, WA (a USA city that used 60Hz)...

    Given the limited number of frequency converting stations in Japan, I find it hard to believe that...
    1. an Aircraft carrier would carry a frequency converting unit with enough capacity OR
    2. Aircraft carrier systems could use either 50Hz or 60Hz so the whole ship could run at 50Hz and supply power to the 50Hz grid in that part of japan

    So I'm wondering if this is just a "would-be-nice-but" option instead of something they could actually do...

    Somehow this reminds me of the STTNG "sour the milk episode"...

  90. Re:Free Market by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    However east and west Japan were still relatively independent even in the 1890s. It wasn't really until after the Russo-Japanese war that the country really started to become just that, a unified country.

    Huh? Japan has been a more-or-less unified county since the Battle of Sekigahara paved the way for the Tokugawa Shogunate.
     

    Japan was very much like Germany, essentially a very loosely affiliated set of states bound by geographical, linguistic, and cultural ties but often separated by bitter political and military rivalries.

    It was - until the Tokogawa Shoguns. After that, while there were regional rivalries and factions (which were not really worse than the same found in the US today), but political and military power was firmly in the hands of the Shogunate and after that the Imperial Goverment.

  91. Take the what? by Dr+Egg · · Score: 1

    and passengers in some stations are being asked to take the stairs instead of the escalator.

    Escalators are stairs (even ones that are off)...

  92. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by joggle · · Score: 1

    I think the main cost would be the large power transformers between the power stations, substations and neighborhoods. You'd also need to replace half the power plants in Japan so that they generate power at a different frequency (or add a converter at each power plant which would also cost a significant amount of money). On top of that, you'd need to figure out some way to transition from one power network to the other, probably by building duplicate transformers and substations in an area, connecting it to the other grid then switching to it neighborhood by neighborhood. Doesn't seem feasible to me, especially when they need to spend at least $100 billion to recover from the disaster. Remember, the area that was destroyed uses the same grid as Tokyo and there is absolutely no way in the world you're going to get Tokyo to switch power systems at this point.

  93. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by JanneM · · Score: 2

    Many things, such as lights, don't care.

    Most modern built-in power converters and supplies can handle pretty much anything - if you look at the power brick for your computer, chances are it says "100-240V, 50-60Hz". It's expensive to run separate production lines, so companies have tried to make stuff as universal as possible.

    Older things here in Japan often have a small switch at the back, marked "50/60". You set it according to where you live.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  94. On the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is the perfect time for japan to think about long term power savings. by the sounds of how affected things are by the impact of losing electricity, they should take a really hard think about whether they really need to be consuming so much electricity. from the ashes of this disaster they have the potential to be the most affinitive with tech and most environmentally friendly.

    in crisis there is opportunity

  95. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by WeblionX · · Score: 1

    No reason they couldn't if all the clocks were on their own circuit.

    --
    (\(\
    (=_=) Bani!
    (")")
  96. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern clocks use quartz crystals instead. Older devices (and I have seen one such clock-radio myself) have an explicit switch for 60 Hz or 50 Hz operation.

  97. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Nexx · · Score: 1

    Have you been to Japan in the past 30 years? Most residences have air conditioning as it's frequently > 35C with tonnes of humidity during the summers.

  98. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Any type of simple motor assembly really. Open up any random drill in your local home improvement store if you want and the 110V/220V (depending where you are) is just connected straight through to the motor with a small triac controller to control speed. Same goes for your bigger appliances around your house (washer machine, dryer). The heating elements in appliances as well which would affect the rate at which they heat up, standard light bulbs will be either dimmer or brighter (depending on which way you go) which affects lifespan, powerline data transfer (home control units like X10 or plug-in networks) depend on a certain frequency etc. etc.

    There's a lot going on that we're still relying on AC for. Until a couple of years ago there was still gear in NYC that depended on DC being there and here in the states we still expect 110-130V with hopefully a double phase in your house to get 220V vs. 220-240V 3-or-more phases (to get 400V) elsewhere in the developed world. We're stuck with the choices some of our great-grandparents made (actually choices Tesla and Edison made) for a long time to come.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  99. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    >So does every home that is hooked up to 50Hz have a converter to switch it to 60Hz or vice versa since some electronic devices are rather dependent on the AC frequency?

    There is no converter available for home. The only electronic devices
    dependent on the AC frequency are extremely cheap microwave ovens.
    A good microwave oven works on either frequency.

    > What happens when somebody decides to move across the country from one power source to the other?

    Most devices automatically works on either frequency, and a small number have some manual switch for the frequency.
    Perhaps the cheap microwave oven would be much cheaper than a converter.

    > Do you just throw out all your old clocks that relied on the AC frequency for its timing source and buy new ones?

    As, stated above, most such clock should work just fine or have a switch.
    In addition, the manufacturer normally have services to adjust the product for frequency if it do not have a switch.

    > I also wonder if the disaster unfolding there might encourage them to try to migrate the entire country to a single standard, whether 50 or 60.
    > It has certainly demonstrated a major problem with their current infrastructure.

    In my observation, the migration to a single standard will not happen in this century.
    The converter capacity might be made higher and dual frequency power stations might be increased.
    Some of the power stations located close to the border can generate either frequency.

  100. Many power plants produce multiple gW by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    Many, many coal, oil and nuclear power plants have capacities from 0.9GW to 5GW. Even some hydroelectric systems - notably the Three Gorges Dam, which has a capacity of 22.5 GW. "Small" gas-fired plants designed to be powered up to meet intermittent peak power demand range up to 700 MW.

    This is just one reference.

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    1. Re:Many power plants produce multiple gW by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Thanks for making me feel old ... the reference was to the movie Back to the Future, from 1985.

      It sucks to realize that one of your frequently visited websites is now inhabited by people who weren't even alive long enough ago to get pop movie references ... I could be your father :(

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  101. Betamax! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Betamax is the way to go, I tell ya.

  102. Japan has no national AC frequency! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never mind grid! Stuff has to work on either 50 or 60 Hz, evidently.

  103. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Even before the days of electronic control, there were a vast variety of motor types. High power motors needed to be highly efficient and highly reliable, and that meant slip rings (no commutation), which implied a motor synchronous with the power source (or, I guess, a permanent magnet on the rotor and no electrical connection to the rotor, also synchronous). Commutating motors could run at almost any speed, but commutators wear and have some efficiency loss. Induction motors aren't as efficient and lag the synchronous frequency by a small (load-dependent) amount. (Note: when I say synchronous I mean the line frequency or an integer division of it.)

    I'm no expert on motors, perhaps someone can clarify the technology here?

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  104. You insensitive clod by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    How would you like if water wasn't regulated by the government?

    My water comes from a well. In the US.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  105. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by John+Meacham · · Score: 1

    That's because they use new switching regulators which bump up the frequency to a couple of kilohertz anyway and are pretty indifferent to input voltage as long as it isn't so high it physically fries the equipment. Transformers and AC motors need to be tuned to a specific frequency/voltage. cheap switching supplies are great, but rather limited. In general they can reduce the voltage and handle a few hundred watts. If you need a couple dozen kilovolts (like your old tv) or a few kilowatts of power (like your microwave) or have a strong AC motor (like your plug-in power drill) then transformers tuned to your specific frequency are needed.

    certainly inexpensive switching supplies have been great for reducing the dependence on specific voltages and frequencies, but there are hundreds of millions (billions?) of microwaves, refrigerators, washing machines, power tools, electric razors, high power amplifiers, magnetic ballasts and whatnot out there.

    And moving them to DC power isn't a good idea, there are big inefficiencies in power supplies, economical solid state high power ones especially so. a 1500 watt microwave with an unreasonably high 90% efficient power supply would still have to radiate 150watts(!!) from its power circuitry. A lot easier with a metal core transformer the weight of a brick than a silicon mosfet the size of a fingernail. (though, the CPU overclockers have some experience with that :))

    That said, eastern japan is in a particularly odd spot, being 100V 50Hz. Matching neither US nor european standards.

    --
    http://notanumber.net/
  106. TEPCO: a history of nuclear disaster cover-ups by Artemis3 · · Score: 1

    This is worth reading: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2011/mar2011/tepc-m17.shtml Insightful article, things are making sense now...

    I hope Japan seriously consider to go with a single standard, so they can share and balance their needs in situations like this.
    It intrigues me, how could they chose a common voltage but not a common alternating frequency? And i wonder about the advantages disadvantages form using, say, 100volts instead of 120 or 220?

    --
    Artix
    Your Linux, your init.
  107. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

    From what I remember, during time changes or other corrections, they'd shift the minute hand's gear to match the second hand until the clocks displayed the right time. The shift-in and shift-out happened right at the 12 o'clock position.

    As a result, the motor still ran at the same rate, and at no point did any hand move faster than 6 degrees/second. Nonetheless, the displayed time would advance at 60x normal rate.

    It's the kind of thing that could be handled with a simple shifting mechanism that changed which gear drove the minute hand. Even simpler than VTEC.

  108. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Perhaps the cheap microwave oven would be much cheaper than a converter."
    so start a new trend and mass produce the 12v DC microwave oven components and other hybrid off grid/on grid consumer devices in the next rebuild from the insurance monies and new investments coming your way etc to get the costs down, and sell all this dual power consumer kit to the world

  109. wrong unit of measure by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    it's 1.21 jigawatts

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  110. Re:Free Market by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Well, how about the Reagan administration decision to leave the choice of cell transmission system up to the free market? I'm not saying there were *no* advantages to doing things that way, but net I don't think it produced such great results.

    Yes and no. As a consequence, there was no choice of cell transmission system. Instead, we have multiple incompatible systems, but then again the tech is still fairly new, and it wasn't obvious then which way we should go. So they experimented ... different companies doing things differently. Eventually things will shake out.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  111. How about NOT dealing with it? by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the 60 Hz power could be imported as is and sent to circuits which would be specifically allocated to the task. Then people could use these circuits to power devices that just don't care (heat, light, computers, anything with a wallwart) and take an equivalent load off the 50 Hz side. The nice part is that this system could just STAY IN PLACE more or less indefinitely. While it would be impractical to do this with homes, many commercial buildings are wired with multiple circuits.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  112. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Most modern built-in power converters and supplies can handle pretty much anything - if you look at the power brick for your computer, chances are it says "100-240V, 50-60Hz". It's expensive to run separate production lines, so companies have tried to make stuff as universal as possible.

    And of course this is (partly) because Japan has both 50 and 60Hz. So all of us who can plug our portables anywhere in the world can say "thank you Japan"!

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  113. Re:Free Market by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Wooooosh.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  114. Re:Free Market by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Eventually things will shake out.

    Yeah, eventually they'll all adopt some descendant of GSM.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  115. Re:if we get to 88Hz can we go back in time to fix by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

    Yes, but only if there's 1.21GW of power available available.

  116. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I replace most of the incandescents in this house multiple times per year. The one over the stove is unsurprising, the others moreso. I live in the boonies. Lots of brownouts, almost no surges, or so the UPS claims. The electrical switches in the house are crap, I've replaced some of them over time, mostly as they've failed. The owners built the place and used the cheapest of everything.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  117. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    That's because they use new switching regulators which bump up the frequency to a couple of kilohertz anyway and are pretty indifferent to input voltage as long as it isn't so high it physically fries the equipment. Transformers and AC motors need to be tuned to a specific frequency/voltage. cheap switching supplies are great, but rather limited. In general they can reduce the voltage and handle a few hundred watts. If you need a couple dozen kilovolts (like your old tv) or a few kilowatts of power (like your microwave) or have a strong AC motor (like your plug-in power drill) then transformers tuned to your specific frequency are needed.

    For a given mass a switching supply can always be built which will handle more power than a linear supply. What the linear supply gets you is that it doesn't require any management. I tried to run a Singer embroidery machine from a switching supply because its linear supply died and it didn't work. I put a voltmeter on it and I found that the machine doesn't draw enough power at idle to keep the supply switching (it's a real simple, very low-power 2.5D CNC machine, it only has a 4x4" work area and it runs on teensy little steppers and an electric motor that looks like it came from an ordinary R/C kit car, as you might imagine) so the voltage wouldn't stay up at 12V to run the thing. I can probably put a load resistor alongside, but I haven't gotten around to it. I think it would be wiser to just find a linear supply, since you have to load a switcher to at least 5% (more for low-quality supplies) to get it to work properly. I need about 1.25A peak at 12V, so finding a linear wall wart that will do the job is a task.

    Obviously a linear supply is cheaper unless copper gets much more expensive...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  118. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    But it's mostly because they use switching power supplies and they will actually run on a broader range than 50-60 Hz (sometimes much broader) and on a broader range of voltages than 110-250 as well. So all of us who can plug our switching power supplies in anywhere in the world can say "thank you, transistors and capacitors!"

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  119. Re:Free market by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Yes. Yes, I am.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  120. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Cart? Horse? Cause? Effect?

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  121. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I highly doubt the FREQUENCY of the power is off. Voltage is another matter entirely. The US has a grid system, with multiple power plants interconnected. If the frequency goes off by even a small percentage, you risk damaging the actual power generators themselves.

  122. Re:What's it like in Japan? Will this cause change by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Most of the common red LED alarm clock/clock radios that use a 9 V battery as a back up power source also use the line frequency as the power source. It's kind of obvious as when operating on battery power, they don't have access to the line frequency and therefore rely on some kind of internal oscillator that is horribly inaccurate. At least they seem to run fast on battery power, so you don't end up late for work when the power goes out.

    As a side note, it's kind of amazing to me that those clocks with that design are still being made. The battery backup circuit was probably designed in the 1970's. In 2011 surely they could design a better battery backup system that is a lot more accurate, not to mention doesn't eat through a fresh 9V battery in about one and a half days.