Slashdot Mirror


FCC Giving Away Wi-fi Routers For Broadband Tests

An anonymous reader writes "The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will be giving away 10,000 Wireless-N routers as part of their program to perform a number of broadband tests, for the benefit of a better connection in the future. They are striving to work on improving a number of issues including latency, packet loss, connection speeds and much more."

196 comments

  1. First post! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do I win a free router?

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:First post! by derspankster · · Score: 0

      I've been running one of their free routers for months now. Is this some kind of time warp?

    2. Re:First post! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Just what I want, my gateway to the internet given to me by a government agency..because they have SUCH a good track record for not snooping around right??

      /tin foilhat

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    3. Re:First post! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well if the news is only reaching us now, that should tell them that the latency is pretty bad...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:First post! by Rasperin · · Score: 1

      Yes you did! Now, just give me your full name (as seen on your credit card), address to ship it to, and 3 forms of government issued identification to prove you are who you say you are, a passport or social security card will work great! This is for verification, I promise!

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    5. Re:First post! by TrentTheThief · · Score: 1

      I've been running one of their free routers for months now. Is this some kind of time warp?

      Must be. I've had one for quite awhile. It has better wireless than the telco router. Easier to configure, too.

    6. Re:First post! by hoffmanbike · · Score: 1

      this is wicked old news, i've had one of these for almost 2 months, the "testing" messes up my connection nightly, i'm thinking about dropping out of the program and going back to my old router.

    7. Re:First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am supprised the Chinese and the OPEC States lent them the money to buy them!

    8. Re:First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is old news. I've had one of these "free" routers for about two months now, after signing up for the program last fall. It's not really a free router; it's a router with custom version of DD-WRT so that it can monitor your actual bandwidth and compare it to what your ISP promises you. You can use it as a "free wireless router", but they really intend for you to use it as a complementary device to your current setup. And you're not allowed to flash new firmware or do extensive configuration on it. And it's not even yours - they want it back when the project is over.

  2. Be Afraid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google, errrr the FCC will be giving away Wireless N routers.

    Nothing to collect here sir - please move along

  3. stupid by Osgeld · · Score: 0

    eventhough its one of the cheapest crap routers out there I am just going to take a wild guess and say there is more important things we could be pissing our money away on. Besides the FCC is so stupid they couldn't even compile a fkin map do we want their spyware loaded routers broadcasting god knows what to who knows where eating at out caps

    1. Re:stupid by 0racle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Money has been pissed away to bring broadband to the US because at one time people saw the utility of it. Someone is now looking into why it never materialized but the checks were cached.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    2. Re:stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Old news. This is already ongoing. It's a pretty darn decent Netgear (almost $100 on Newegg).

    3. Re:stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm glad they were cached, I'd be pissed if they were actually cashed.

    4. Re:stupid by mtmra70 · · Score: 2

      Money has been pissed away to bring broadband to the US because at one time people saw the utility of it. Someone is now looking into why it never materialized but the checks were cached.

      Well there is the problem. Had they cashed the checks, instead of caching them, we might actually have some good broadband throughout this country.

    5. Re:stupid by 0racle · · Score: 2

      God damnit. Thats what I get for actually working today.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    6. Re:stupid by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I do the same thing all the time, but I usually correct myself. It's a natural result of working in IT. So much cache and so little cash.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    7. Re:stupid by mcelrath · · Score: 3, Informative

      eventhough its one of the cheapest crap routers out there

      Ahem. The WNR3500L they're giving away is a linux-based (openwrt) high-end wireless router. It was $150 when new, now can be had for $80. Its successor the WNDR3700 retails for $185 and it's freaking awesome. A customizable linux-based router is precisely what I'd choose if I wanted to do an experiment like this.

      --
      1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
    8. Re:stupid by synthparadox · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I'm participating in this and I've had my router since around November.
      Also they're not "giving them away" per se. The routers have custom firmware on them and they come with a letter saying when we're done we want the routers back otherwise we're sending you a bill (as agreed on when you signed up for the program).

    9. Re:stupid by MikePikeFL · · Score: 1

      they come with a letter saying when we're done we want the routers back otherwise we're sending you a bill (as agreed on when you signed up for the program).

      Hmm, according to the FAQ, that's not how it works:

      http://www.testmyisp.com/faq.html#faq-19

      --
      "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway" -Andrew Tanenbaum
    10. Re:stupid by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      and was not concerned with a bit of security to the people that will be using one, + what I was getting at is netgear has a bad rep of only lasting a few months at best, I know I keep buying them refurb for 19$ usually twice a year for work who are too cheap to get anything decent

    11. Re:stupid by synthparadox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sorry. I misread the letter. It says I must send it back if I decide not to continue participating in this program.

    12. Re:stupid by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      You mean the hardware is decent. Out of a dozen or so Netgear products I've used, one (a white 5 port switch) was decent. The rest were shit, likely due to incredibly awful firmware. Crashhappy routers and switches that will blast your network with piss if you plug another brand into the network, I shit you not.

    13. Re:stupid by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      Australian pronunciation is "cay-sh" for cache. Frustrates the hell out of the Americans and English here, but it doesn't leave anything ambiguous.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    14. Re:stupid by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Someone is now looking into why it never materialized but the checks were cached.

      Were the checks cached in the cloud somewhere ?

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    15. Re:stupid by slackbheep · · Score: 1

      The lady selling me my last processor insisted on using " Ka-Shay" Which I've heard elsewhere, but still makes my hair stand on end ;(

    16. Re:stupid by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      That's cachet.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
  4. caps! by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    Making sure everyone has fast, reliable access available is great; but the FCC also has to worry about internet caps! Now that AT&T is cutting people off after a certain amount of bandwidth use, someone with the power to stop this monopolistic abuse needs to flex some muscle. What is the FCC doing about internet caps?

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:caps! by yelvington · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Making sure everyone has fast, reliable access available is great; but the FCC also has to worry about internet caps! Now that AT&T is cutting people off after a certain amount of bandwidth use, someone with the power to stop this monopolistic abuse needs to flex some muscle. What is the FCC doing about internet caps?

      I'm just guessing, but perhaps it would be wise to first measure and document what the carriers do, as opposed to what they say?

    2. Re:caps! by Macrat · · Score: 1

      What is the FCC doing about internet caps?

      Nothing while the bribes keep coming in.

    3. Re:caps! by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      ...and what better way to do this than by seeding all the carriers with routers that call home to the FCC with live metrics?

  5. $50 for your privacy by jimbolauski · · Score: 5, Funny

    My privacy is worth much more then a crappy router that will accidentally send all my browsing information.

    --
    Knowledge = Power
    P= W/t
    t=Money
    Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    1. Re:$50 for your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My privacy is worth much more then a crappy router that will accidentally send all my browsing information.

      They're the Feds. If you won't turn your browsing activity over for a free gadget, they'll just go to ATT and get it from them.

    2. Re:$50 for your privacy by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Informative

      My privacy is worth much more then a crappy router that will accidentally send all my browsing information.

      So... What type of sites do you browse that you don't care for the feds to know about? Anime Tentacle Porn usually isn't illegal, you know...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:$50 for your privacy by Askjeffro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find it cute that you believe you have privacy as it is.

    4. Re:$50 for your privacy by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      So... What type of sites do you browse that you don't care for the feds to know about? Anime Tentacle Porn usually isn't illegal, you know...

      It's not the legality that worries me (all my illegal fun happens behind an encrypted VPN) it's that my neighbors will know I'm into Anime Tentacle Porn, for that kind of shame $50 is too low.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    5. Re:$50 for your privacy by spun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, the FCC is sending out routers to ten thousand random people because the FCC wants to spy on, uh, ten thousand random people. The government is out to gitcha! RUN! Fucking moron. The government does tons of terrible shit, like giving all the wealth generated by the middle class to about 400 well connected guys, but guess what? This is not one of those terrible things. When you act like a paranoid schizophrenic, and tell everyone the government is ALWAYS out to screw EVERYONE over, ALL THE TIME, you are doing the work those 400 well connected guys want you to do. They want everyone to mistrust the one thing, the only thing that can possibly stop them: the power of people working together, i.e. government. So thanks for that. You do know that even if you were to fellate them 24/7 for the next fifty years, they won't let you into their little club, right?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    6. Re:$50 for your privacy by macraig · · Score: 1

      Hey, I know somebody who knows someone whose ex-wife was once married to one of The 400, so that must make me pretty special!

    7. Re:$50 for your privacy by by+(1706743) · · Score: 1

      Nah, that's too mainstream -- looks like he's into topless, baby-oil covered bombshells playing Wii.

    8. Re:$50 for your privacy by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Why do you link to this during work hours!? T_T

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    9. Re:$50 for your privacy by misxn · · Score: 2

      My privacy is worth much more then a crappy router that will accidentally send all my browsing information.

      Your local grocery knows more about you than the government.

    10. Re:$50 for your privacy by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So... What type of sites do you browse that you don't care for the feds to know about?

      All of them.

      --
      Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    11. Re:$50 for your privacy by yeshuawatso · · Score: 2

      I received my router from SamKnows back in January. I connected the thing through a spare Linux box, and set it up as a free and open wifi access point for the apartment next to me. I then sniffed all the packets going into and out of this connection to see if they were truly using the router to collect information on the volunteers. No dice. This router accesses the SAME urls, protocols, and IP addresses every day, most of the data being openly available to view; RTP streams are garbage from what I can tell. Not once did I see information being uploaded that was content from the apartment complexes browsing habits. The only strange behavior the router exhibited was when five or more clients were connected, the router would perform some speed test; even that's not too strange as it's testing the internet performance when the connection is stressed.

      Furthermore, the information the router provides is exceptional. It really does a thorough test of the connection and the website to view the data is designed very well, utilizing a slew of my favorite FLOSS JavaScript and flash tools (jQuery, jQueryUI, Open Flash Charts,etc).

    12. Re:$50 for your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The video is no longer available.

    13. Re:$50 for your privacy by geekoid · · Score: 1

      actually, it does some terrible shit, and a lot of shit people don't understand so they assume it's bad. Most of what they do is good.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:$50 for your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not so worry about the spying in this one particular instance. However, this is wrong.

      Who do you think is paying for the ten thousand random people? the FCC? Goverment? Santa Clause?. No, the government does not have any money of its own, it just takes it from its people one way or another. This 10000 routers are being paid by you and me in 1 of 3 ways:

      1) forcibly taking money from you typically before you get to see the money, they call this "tax".
      2) borrowing it, mostly from China, Japan and Rusia, and making you and me cosigners making us responsible for paying it back plus interests.
      3) Creating money out of thin air, devaluing the value of your savings and your salary.

      Literally all of government spending does this. It is immoral in the same way that theft is immoral. Taking our purchasing power, and just handing it over to a few lucky random 10000 is simply wrong.

      This may not be a whole lot of money in the grand scheme of things, but just like theft, it is wrong regardless of amount.

    15. Re:$50 for your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The privacy isn't there, but the legal protection of it is, so... if somebody breaches the privacy, they have broken a law.

      In the case of the free router, when they break privacy there, they will just blush and apologize for a mistake in the normal course of their stated business.

    16. Re:$50 for your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree with most of what you say, but I'm pretty sure the government is taking my money and giving it to the democrat voters in the form of social benefits and free healthcare. Those 400 people are actually paying people like me to work in their corporations.

    17. Re:$50 for your privacy by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      The "power of the people" stopped giving a shit many moons ago. What makes you think "the people" care now? Where were they when they had a chance to elect, other than straight party line? Where were they when our media doles out a symphony of BS soundbites? Where were they when our Government decays right before their collective eyes?

      Where were they when they had a chance to hold our elective officials accountable?!!! Can you really trust them now? Where's the damn accountability among individuals? If we don't have that, we've got nothing.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    18. Re:$50 for your privacy by Zerth · · Score: 1

      They're the Feds. If you won't turn your browsing activity over for a free gadget, they'll just go to ATT and get it from them.

      That statement is especially funny, because in the terms it says anyone using ATT doesn't need to put all their devices behind the testing router, merely connect the router to the ATT gateway.

      Clearly, they don't need to spy on you because ATT is already giving them your traffic so they just need to measure latency.

    19. Re:$50 for your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm related by marriage to one of the 400. Having no money myself, it's a bit odd having close in-laws who own a national sports team, a personal jet and several mansions.

    20. Re:$50 for your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like this post. I especially liked the part where YOU FUCKING WON THIS THREAD.

      Thanks for being a voice of reason for once in Slashdot's history!

    21. Re:$50 for your privacy by dwhitaker · · Score: 1

      Actually, you need to return the router when you're done with it.

    22. Re:$50 for your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the FCC is sending out routers to ten thousand random people because the FCC wants to spy on, uh, ten thousand random people. The government is out to gitcha! RUN! Fucking moron. The government does tons of terrible shit, like giving all the wealth generated by the middle class to about 400 well connected guys, but guess what? This is not one of those terrible things. When you act like a paranoid schizophrenic, and tell everyone the government is ALWAYS out to screw EVERYONE over, ALL THE TIME, you are doing the work those 400 well connected guys want you to do. They want everyone to mistrust the one thing, the only thing that can possibly stop them: the power of people working together, i.e. government. So thanks for that. You do know that even if you were to fellate them 24/7 for the next fifty years, they won't let you into their little club, right?

      Nice theory, but most of those 400 people are IN the government, and make law. The "power of people" is not government. Not any more.

    23. Re:$50 for your privacy by ashidosan · · Score: 1

      The video is available if you live in the UK. Search for "topless wii" and eventually get directed to nuts.co.uk. Unfortunately, it's IP-locked to the UK.

    24. Re:$50 for your privacy by spun · · Score: 1

      No, they are not in government. What a waste of their time that would be. They HIRE people to do that menial shit for them. If the power of the people is not in government, that is the people's fault. We can get it back. Government works when we take the time to make it work for us, and it is a tool of oppression only when we let our guard down.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    25. Re:$50 for your privacy by spun · · Score: 1

      More blame the victim mentality from the master of the craft.

      "Your Honor, if it please the court, the supposed victim known as "the people" was not only dressed in a "screw me over" outfit, they practically BEGGED the accused Fat Cat to give it to them good and hard. The people let themselves be screwed over because they must have WANTED it like that! My client, Mr. Fat Cat, was only giving the people the proper screwing they so obviously desired. Did 'the people' struggle? Did they resist? Not that I noticed! Obviously, the real criminal here is not Mr. Fat Cat, but... THE GOVERNMENT! I suggest we give it the death penalty."

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    26. Re:$50 for your privacy by spun · · Score: 2

      Hahahaha, what a good little Eichmann you are. Look at tax policy changes over the last 40 years. There is a class war going on, and the rich not only started it, they are winning. Despite enormous increases in GDP, the average family makes the same amount now that they made 40 years ago. All the increase went to the top .001 percent. Those 400 people now own as much as the bottom 150 MILLION. And you think it was because they earned it, how naive. Class traitor.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    27. Re:$50 for your privacy by spun · · Score: 2

      The government does not "take" money from the people. The people PAY the government for the privilege of living in a society they like. Nothing is free. You want to live here in America? You gotta pay for the privilege. Otherwise, shop around for a better deal, there are hundreds of countries in the world, and if you have skills, most would be glad to have you. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way to Somalia, a place that has just the amount of government you seem to want.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    28. Re:$50 for your privacy by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "You do know that even if you were to fellate them 24/7 for the next fifty years, they won't let you into their little club, right?"

      The economy is tough enough it's worth doing for the hot meal.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    29. Re:$50 for your privacy by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      In a round about way, sometimes the victim sets the stage for his/her own environment by which to be abused. Of course, those doing the abusing still must face justice and be punished accordingly.

      Essentially, it's more like people want easy and simple results in both security and justice. However, many people don't put forth the effort in ensuring a positive future by working in the present. I'm sorry, but if you want something in life, you have to work hard it. This mantra holds true in almost all facets of life. You don't work, you don't get shit in return. Worse yet, some people work excessively hard, but at the wrong things in life. For those people, they get screwed twice. Ignorance is the most costly attribute any society can burden. Which BTW, is the point I'm trying to make.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    30. Re:$50 for your privacy by Evi1M4chine · · Score: 1

      I find it sad that you, in the face of a slight breeze, completely fold, like a blob without a spine. ;)

      But I also find is very useful. Now give me all your money, or I'll come and give you the evil eye.
      It will be evil! So evil!

      --
      I must be some kind of leader... Since Slashdot is following me to the grave. ;)
    31. Re:$50 for your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you, spun.

    32. Re:$50 for your privacy by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Yes, the FCC is sending out routers to ten thousand random people because the FCC wants to spy on, uh, ten thousand random people. The government is out to gitcha! RUN! Fucking moron. The government does tons of terrible shit, like giving all the wealth generated by the middle class to about 400 well connected guys, but guess what? This is not one of those terrible things. When you act like a paranoid schizophrenic, and tell everyone the government is ALWAYS out to screw EVERYONE over, ALL THE TIME, you are doing the work those 400 well connected guys want you to do. They want everyone to mistrust the one thing, the only thing that can possibly stop them: the power of people working together, i.e. government. So thanks for that. You do know that even if you were to fellate them 24/7 for the next fifty years, they won't let you into their little club, right?

      you have such a low number, yet you haven't learned to quote whatever message your replying to so we can tell, easily, which post you are referring to?

      Sad, and your rant was so well thought out and made so much sense.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    33. Re:$50 for your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "[...]the power of people working together, i.e. government."

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly_on_violence

      Whereas other people working together without initiating violence:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_organization

      So 'the power of people working together, i.e. government' is wrong. You could say 'the power of people working together, e.g. government' I suppose, but then it would lose the intended meaning that it is the only thing able to counter this. So the only option left is to recognize that it isn't the only solution, and in fact is the reason for the problem in the first place as you yourself pointed out.

    34. Re:$50 for your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the government does terrible things like transferring wealth from working people to rich politically connected individuals, and yet at the same time it represents the power of people working together? I think what you meant to say is that it represents a minority using force against the majority, not a kumbayah type of community organization...

    35. Re:$50 for your privacy by spun · · Score: 1

      Our government does terrible things in the present because we, the people, let it. We don't have to, and in the past, we haven't let it do that. In many other countries, they don't let their government do that. The answer is never to get rid of government, it is always to limit the power of the wealthy over everyone else. Government can be a tool of the wealthy, or it can be a tool to control the dominance of the wealthy elite over the rest of us. We do need to band together to protect ourselves from powerful people who would oppress us and take the fruits of our labor through unfair practices and pressures. When we band together to do that, we call it "government." We need cops in the market place, keeping it free, or the wealthy will dominate the marketplace like they dominate everything else.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    36. Re:$50 for your privacy by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, the FCC is sending out routers to ten thousand random people because the FCC wants to spy on, uh, ten thousand random people. The government is out to gitcha! RUN!

      Now look, you have a point, but it's not at all unbelievable that some of those 10,000 people will be selected to be spied upon.

      Since they only want 10,000 people, they should have no problem finding a sample set large enough which is totally uninterested in privacy. Since the set is 10,000 people, I would also be surprised if none of them installed it in a way that would let them snoop the traffic.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. Duplicate from June 1, 2010 by rminsk · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Duplicate from June 1, 2010 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No that was the beta test... this is new. (You'd know that if you RTFA.)

    2. Re:Duplicate from June 1, 2010 by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      No, no it's not.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  7. Proper Heading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    FCC buys wifi routers using taxpayer money for people that can afford broadband connections.

    Why not instead just do a voluntary program with existing routers people own? (Think far-simplified SETI@Home.)

    1. Re:Proper Heading by macraig · · Score: 3, Informative

      Simple: the router must use custom firmware that performs bandwidth tests during idle periods and reports the results. Can't do that with any old random router off the shelf.

    2. Re:Proper Heading by skids · · Score: 1

      Well, technically one could, but as to getting 10,000 "average user" volunteers to load a custom firmware and reconfig -- that's another matter.

    3. Re:Proper Heading by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      Which leads to wondering: what happens when a few of those geeks "jailbreak" those routers? does the swat team come in and kick down the door because you flashed it with DD-WRT firmware?

      Or did the fed team pick a model that is not [yet] supported by the DD-WRT firmwares?

    4. Re:Proper Heading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple, they need a control in their experiment. Having 10,000 different bandwidth connections with 500 different routers, running Bandwidth@Work or some some such, would not render consistent results due to the variances in data handling between routers.

    5. Re:Proper Heading by macraig · · Score: 1

      It comes pre-loaded with the necessary firmware, silly.

    6. Re:Proper Heading by macraig · · Score: 2

      Since the actual agreement leaves open the door that participants might not get to keep the router, I'll bet that jailbreaking it with other firmware before the project is complete is one of the exceptions that would have SamKnows knocking on your door wanting it back....

      They won't give a crap if you jailbreak it AFTER the program is over.

    7. Re:Proper Heading by M8e · · Score: 1

      That's his point.
      They are giving the routers away to "average users" instead of asking "average users" to install a custom firmware on any old random router.
      If an user installs a custom firmware on their router they are not an "average user".

      -"Can't do that with any old random router off the shelf."
      -"Well, technically one could, but..."

    8. Re:Proper Heading by macraig · · Score: 1

      I don't think that was precisely his point. :-|

      My former DGL-4300 doesn't even support 3rd-party firmware. The DD-WRT database describes it as "not possible". The WNR3500L is a different story. I'll find out first-hand in a few years....

    9. Re:Proper Heading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *woosh* much? He's agreeing with you, because instead of giving away the routers trying to get average user volunteers to make sure they have a compatible router and install the software would be an exercise in frustration for all parties involved.

    10. Re:Proper Heading by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

      I guess more to the point, why not just make software available that would perform the same tests? This would seem to accomplish the same goal minus the cost and logistics of purchasing, deploying and supporting 10,000 routers. I agree that a router would be a more ideal testing platform since results from software on a PC would be affected if that PC is connected to a POS router, and the PC isn't as likely to be on 24x7, but surely those two things are worth some tradeoffs. Consider that you could get a much larger sample size by going the software route. Instead of 10,000 routers, you may get 50,000 people that install the software. Maybe you could offer some sort of incentive such as a $10 prepaid visa card or something for installing the software and leaving it running for 90 days.

    11. Re:Proper Heading by macraig · · Score: 1

      There was probably debate about it before the choice was made, though we can't know exactly why they chose the solution they did. I'd guess that predictability (like the difference between game design for a console versus a PC) won out over a larger sample size.

  8. Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They already gave me one last year, a nice Netgear. Can I get another one?

  9. Packet loss? by Gary+Perkins · · Score: 1

    Ok, once in a while I see latency that actually impacts quality (mostly on DSL), but when's the last time anyone had packet loss that wasn't on their own network?

    1. Re:Packet loss? by Audguy · · Score: 1

      me, right now (well the last 2 days) grumble grumble.

    2. Re:Packet loss? by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      when's the last time anyone had packet loss that wasn't on their own network?

      Today. Seriously, I see packet loss on intercontinental links all the time. Not my ISP's network, and not my network, but it still affects me.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    3. Re:Packet loss? by Gary+Perkins · · Score: 1

      Ok, I stand corrected. LOL Guess I've just been lucky!

    4. Re:Packet loss? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if it's packet loss or what it is, but these last few weeks I've had periods of time (on AT&T DSL) where I simply can't load images from Akamai-based servers. I can browse the NewEgg store, but I can't see any pictures, because images10.newegg.com is actually images10.newegg.com.edgesuite.net
       
      Myabe they're trying and failing miserably to throttle Netflix (who also uses Akamai).

    5. Re:Packet loss? by Gary+Perkins · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if it's packet loss or what it is, but these last few weeks I've had periods of time (on AT&T DSL) where I simply can't load images from Akamai-based servers. I can browse the NewEgg store, but I can't see any pictures, because images10.newegg.com is actually images10.newegg.com.edgesuite.net Myabe they're trying and failing miserably to throttle Netflix (who also uses Akamai).

      I dunno, but I had horrible experience with AT&T DSL. Periods of high latency, and similar experience with Akamai and other content hosts. At first I was using Google DNS, but when I got tired of the slow pageloads I used the DNS provided by DHCP...if it helped at all I didn't notice.

    6. Re:Packet loss? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      According to my FCC router...

      Between 0.25% and 0% for the last week with an average of about .08%.

      Since being installed on December 30th:

      Median 0.03%
      Average: 0.17%
      Max: 2.94%
      Min: 0%

      Source:
      https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?hl=en&hl=en&key=0AlfaVbc6wTazdFBWd0VoaXg1Smt4YUxqOHlVazJFMEE&single=true&gid=0&output=html

      Now we know!

    7. Re:Packet loss? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few months ago Canadians and Americans living in some of the northern parts of the country were having issues with a connection between New York and init7/swisscom. It was bad enough that Shaw cut their stream to Swisscom for a while.

    8. Re:Packet loss? by Gary+Perkins · · Score: 1

      Wow, someone mod him up Informative! :)

  10. "It's a trap!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...was my first reaction. However, it seems that there is a relatively decent privacy policy.

    I admit that I remain suspicious, however: a "free" device and all sorts of tantalizing data available for analysis. This is a significant temptation for any corporation or government. Furthermore, since the testers have received material "consideration" and have opted-in, I suspect that there is little legal recourse in terms of privacy violation .(and perhaps some implicitly waived rights?)

    Anon in case, well, you know... it's a trap. Haha.

    1. Re:"It's a trap!" by skids · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Once it is yours (after the test) just nuke the custom firmware and load your favorite WRT flavor. I mean, unless you are paranoid enough to think they have custom hardware in there just to spy, and if you are that paranoid, you probably already think they have it in commercially sold routers.

    2. Re:"It's a trap!" by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Same thought here, but there are some things to be aware of:

      "What effect will this have on my monthly download cap?

      Our units involved in the FCC project transfer a large amount of data, which varies according to the speed of your connection. The usage on a 10Mbps connection will be around 20GB/month, and will likely be around 60GB on a 50Mbps connection. The amount that's downloaded is speed dependant (so a slower connection will use less traffic than a faster connection).

      If you're on a product with a low cap then we'd advise against signing up, or at least informing us beforehand so that we can apply a different testing profile (we can run smaller speed tests on a per-device if necessary)."

      "How long will the testing period last?

      The initial testing period is scheduled to last three years."

      http://www.testmyisp.com/faq.html

      "Information collected
      We may collect personal information about you which you give to us when you use our website, for example, to receive our exchange updates and regular website updates. For the purpose of the FCC and Ofcom studies we will collect your personal information and information about the performance of your internet connection."

      "Your data
      Users of SamKnows.com have certain rights under the your country’s Data Protection Legislation. You can, for instance, ask to be told what information we hold about you in our databases. SamKnows.com will provide you with all of the details that we hold about you, both online and offline, upon request. In order to request this information, please contact us by sending an email to team@samknows.com."

      http://www.samknows.com/broadband/privacy

  11. "Heavy Downloaders" by crow_t_robot · · Score: 2
    Every slashdot user is disqualified:

    They have extended their research efforts to the public, but there are some minor requirements which need to be met. For example, your connection must be consistent (suffer very few disconnections), users must be considered average Internet browsers and not heavy downloaders [...]

    1. Re:"Heavy Downloaders" by macraig · · Score: 1

      The reason for that qualification isn't pejorative, it's practical: the device needs useful idle periods during which it can perform tests and report the results. If the router is constantly active 24/7 with, say, BitTorrent traffic, then the router never gets to "get a word in edgewise" and there'd be no data to report.

    2. Re:"Heavy Downloaders" by ThinkWeak · · Score: 1

      I'm not exactly versed on what is considered to be a "heavy downloader". I can see if you have a ton of BitTorrent traffic constantly traveling on your connection, but what about video game playing, streaming movies, etc. That's not 24/7, but it is generally during peak traffic. Isn't that when you would want to run your tests?

    3. Re:"Heavy Downloaders" by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      Heavy is such a vague term. I'm not doing any torrenting, and plan not to download Ubuntu 11 ISO's this quarter.

      Even then, I just installed DD-WRT last friday night and was the bandwidth counters show 0.5 to 1GB incoming out of daily flash video, mostly youtubing from the non-geek living with me. I seem to recall /. comments that our USA smartphones are normally capped at 2GB / MONTH. So do they really want only old-lady type users who only write e-mails and never even 'listen to music'? (which unbeknownst to older folks means NOT low-bandwidth mp3s, but youtube's live-stage videoclips with the performance of the song, or boring slideshows with the soundtrack in the background.)

      Now excuse me while I go break down and download that Ubuntu 11.4 ISO was holding back on trying. And I'm not as twitchy as teens torrenting DAILY dvd rips and TV shows and keeping open upload slots for anyone who cares.

    4. Re:"Heavy Downloaders" by macraig · · Score: 1

      Nope. It just needs idle periods. It doesn't matter what time of day those periods are. The router performs its own tests; it doesn't monitor or use the actual user traffic in any way, AFAIK (and I'm a participant).

    5. Re:"Heavy Downloaders" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't generally download more than 1 or 2 GB per day (except when a new version of Ubuntu is released)

    6. Re:"Heavy Downloaders" by ThinkWeak · · Score: 1

      I guess I don't understand the purpose of this study. Granted it will probably identify if there is NEVER a point in time in the day when your internet connection reaches the advertised speed, but ideally I would like to see them do something about traffic speeds during normal hours. I don't care if my internet connection reaches above (or beyond) the advertised rates between the hours of 2:00am EST and 6:00am EST or 1:00pm EST to 4:00pm EST. I want it to perform at its advertised level when I'm home or awake.

      Maybe it does and only reports during those idle periods or am I missing something?

    7. Re:"Heavy Downloaders" by macraig · · Score: 1

      Well, you might be right that it only phones home during idle periods. It may be gathering some stats all the time. Come to think of it, my online "dashboard" suggests that might be true.

  12. warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    its a trap

  13. Old news.... by macraig · · Score: 1

    Geez, somebody is late to the party... I've had one for months now. I still haven't figgered out what to do with my old DGL-4300 router, though.

    BTW, if you read the actual agreement you will notice that it doesn't guarantee that participants will be allowed to keep the router. The text of the agreement clearly leaves open the possibility that SamKnows might repossess the routers, though it is probably impractical for them to do so (thus the extra-contractual assurances about keeping them).

    1. Re:Old news.... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I still haven't figgered out what to do with my old DGL-4300 router, though.

      Use it as a repeater or a second roamable AP to extend the range of your wireless network. Or install HSMM-MESH on one and join your WLAN into a mesh if there's one nearby.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Old news.... by macraig · · Score: 1

      I don't think the DGL-4300 can use any custom firmware, and it's only 802.11*g*, in any case (the WNR3500L is 802.11n, and I upgraded my laptop because of it).

  14. Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think so. I will my buy my own; thank you very much. They want to improve my speeds? They want to give you these routers so that they can control internet connections. If it was their choice they would require that everyone have these routers. Paranoid?

    1. Re:Yeah right by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      Paranoid?

      Apparently you are, if you think the purpose is to "control internet connections."

    2. Re:Yeah right by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Paranoid?

      Not at all. You're just being a diligent, alert American.

      - Glenn Beck

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  15. I'm involved with this by dave562 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is a simple program. I plugged in the Netgear router in between my firewall and my cable modem and configured it as a bridge. It analyzes the traffic and sends the information to the FCC.

    I love how some people here are whining about privacy. I think those people will whine about anything. What is the alternative? The data needs to be collected. Either you want the government to step in and regulate the telcos, or you don't. If you don't, then STFU and stop whining about the crappy service they are giving you. If you do, then realize you have to be part of the solution. Whining about it never fixed anything. At some point, someone has to collect some data.

    If you don't want to participate in the program, don't. On the other hand, I'm happy to know that the FCC is getting some real data to show that when I fire up my VPN client from home to do some work, everything else on the network (NetFlix, et al) gets throttled back to next to nothing. I'm happy to be a guinea pig so that the FCC an see that the supposedly "faster" connection that I'm paying for is not really any faster than the basic package.

    If you're doing something with your internet connection that the government cares about, they already know about you. Participating in some research is not going to suddenly put you on their radar. Your browsing history is a lot less interesting to most people than you think it is. The country is involved in two wars and the economy is crumbling around us. Do you really think the government cares if you want to wank off to www.fatmomfetish.com, or whatever other "super secret private" stuff you are doing with your internet connection? Running a Tor exit node? Seeding the latest movie rip? Ooooo, you crazy rebels you!

    1. Re:I'm involved with this by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      For anyone interested, Their privacy policy is here. They have done a good job of explaining what they are doing.

    2. Re:I'm involved with this by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      I had to quickly replace my router last year when it died and I'm not terribly happy with the one I ended up with. What model did they give you?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    3. Re:I'm involved with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Either you want the government to step in and regulate the telcos, or you don't. If you don't, then STFU and stop whining about the crappy service they are giving you.

      The crappy service is because the FCC is regulating the telcos. If they weren't, I could have multiple ISPs to choose from, and they could be forced to compete on service.

      They don't have to compete, thanks to regulations from the FCC ensuring that no one will compete, so I get crappy service at inflated prices instead.

      But, sure, the solution to overregulation is even more regulation. Why not.

    4. Re:I'm involved with this by dave562 · · Score: 1

      I can check the model when I get home. It's their high-end home / small office router. GigE, Wireless-N. It's stable. I've never had to reboot it.

    5. Re:I'm involved with this by sdguero · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the heads up! I signed up this morning and my friends are giving me flak for it now. Your post is reassuring...

    6. Re:I'm involved with this by dave562 · · Score: 1

      The program seems to be a good one. If you want to, you can completely replace your router with the one they send you. I decided to put mine outside of the firewall because I don't like the idea of having some random device inside the perimeter.

    7. Re:I'm involved with this by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Mine was a Netgear WNR3500L

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    8. Re:I'm involved with this by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Three wars. Plus whatever it is we call fighting off the massive misinformation campaign that is the GOP.

    9. Re:I'm involved with this by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Bonus: After the test is over you can install a DD-WRT Linux firmware on the Netgear WNR3500L in order to flush any tracking software and have fully customizable router...

      My Linksys WRT54GL with DD-WRT is pretty sweet -- I even added a multi-player Tetris game (ssh or telnet + ncurses), and usage graphs for individual services, like TOR, my private GIT repository, my g/f's WOW, etc. I can only drool over the possibilities enabled by having a USB port available.

      Sign me up.

      P.S. It would be interesting to connect their router downstream of my current router and see just exactly what they are recording / sending.

    10. Re:I'm involved with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a simple program. I plugged in the Netgear router in between my firewall and my cable modem and configured it as a bridge. It analyzes the traffic and sends the information to the FCC.

      It's not even that intrusive. The router only analyzes traffic to determine when to run the test.

      What tests are performed?

      At present we are performing the following tests:

              Multi-threaded HTTP download speed test
              Multi-threaded HTTP based upload speed test
              Availability of the connection
              Jitter
              Latency (both ICMP and UDP)
              Packet loss (both ICMP and UDP)
              DNS query resolution time
              DNS query failure rate
              Web page loading time
              Web page loading failure rate
              Video streaming performance

      The above tests are performed against a cluster of test servers, hosted all around the US. The web browsing test is performed against 10 real US-based websites.

      We are always developing new tests and can remotely upgrade the existing units with new testing profiles once they are ready for production use. Pretty comprehensive I think you'll agree!

    11. Re:I'm involved with this by adolf · · Score: 1

      The instructions:

      • If you do not have an existing router, then we will ask you to install the Netgear WNR3500L as you would with any other router.
      • If you have a cable/DSL modem and an existing separate router we will ask you to replace it with the Netgear WNR3500L.
      • If you cannot replace your existing router (due to it being an integrated DSL/cable modem and router, for example), then we will ask you to install the Netgear WNR3500L behind your existing router and reconnect all of your devices to the Netgear WNR3500L (both wired and wireless).
      • AT&T U-Verse customers will be asked to connect the Netgear WNR3500L to their U-Verse gateway and do nothing further.

      For U-Verse, the instructions don't let their magic router do any meaningfully-invasive data tracking*, as long as the user already has their own router.

      The reason the instructions are different for U-Verse is likely because is easy/trivial to glean some statistic information from a U-Verse gateway without a password, so perhaps that's good enough for them to determine when to run their tests. Plus, every U-Verse customer has the same software interface on their gateway -- it's completely homogenous and predictable.

      Meanwhile, I don't use the gateway as a firewall, and consider the network at that point to be completely untrusted anyway. (I use it when troubleshooting crapfested Windows boxes, and for the Wii, and for anything else that I want to have Internet access but which has no business on my private network.)

      Based on this, I signed up. It can sit beside my Tomato-running WRT54GL and do its thing -- no problem. I've got plenty of bandwidth to spare, and I doubt this program uses very much at all.

      When it's done, I'll recycle the box into something more useful. The WRT54GL has been seeming a bit RAM and CPU starved, lately, and this should fix that up neatly....plus the USB port does sound like it has a few uses.

      (*: Without ugly hacks like ARP poisoning/table overflows and such that are exceedingly unlikely to be used in this sort of application.)

    12. Re:I'm involved with this by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      What is the alternative?

      Call up the guys at pingtest.net and ask them to send them the data set for amount < what this program is costing.

      Still, this program is far better than the $300M database that doesn't do anything. <----- I'm not even sure if that's hyperbole or not at this point.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  16. This seems ridiculous by GigaHurtsMyRobot · · Score: 1

    Why wouldn't it be the ISP collecting these statistics (as part of end-to-end monitoring and customer support reduction), and the FCC perhaps requiring that they be given a copy to stay aware of and create these regulations from?

    1. Re:This seems ridiculous by greywire · · Score: 1

      Do you really trust your ISP to give you the full bandwidth they are overselling, er, I mean, selling you? And then you think they would collect statistics voluntarily and hand that over to someone else who might then tell them they are not providing the service they advertise?

      Yeah, I believe in fairies too. I do believe in fairies, I do believe..

      PS yeah its a cheap Netgear router. But it can run dd-wrt. Haven't decided yet if I'm going to flash it, since I do I want them to get the information they are after first. And I'm on Time warner cable. I'm pretty sure they use fairy dust..

      --
      -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
    2. Re:This seems ridiculous by GigaHurtsMyRobot · · Score: 1
      Just depends how many levels you want to take it. The FCC could require them, via legislation, right?

      Do you trust the ISP to identify these routers very quickly, either by traffic analysis or MAC address, and provide a special Quality of Service just for them?

    3. Re:This seems ridiculous by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because that really wouldn't be a trusted source now, would it?

      Why don't we just ask the fox how many chickens we have?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:This seems ridiculous by greywire · · Score: 1

      well, of course, its nicer I think to see it done voluntarily (between the users and the fcc in this case with the help of a router manufacturer) rather than having legislation (never mind the time it would take to do, the money involved, etc).

      And thats an interesting point.. I wonder if its possible (or rather, feasible or practical) to detect whatever the SamKnows firmware is doing (I assume its communicating information directly to some server) and then compensate for that by giving those users better access. And then I wonder if they would do that. If so, then, GREAT! I'll get better access now! I haven't noticed a difference though.,,

      --
      -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
    5. Re:This seems ridiculous by omnichad · · Score: 1

      ISP's lie.

    6. Re:This seems ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be super sweet, then I just MAC hop my existing router / shape my traffic the same way and everybody wins.

    7. Re:This seems ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just depends how many levels you want to take it. The FCC could require them, via legislation, right?

      The FCC isn't a legislative body, they are a federal regulatory agency. They can create regulations that companies have to follow, but those regulations have really long time periods to take effect (usually), and then they have to have the regulators in order to audit said companies and make sure they are complying with the regulations. If they aren't, then they have to get others involved to help them mount a case and gather evidence about the infraction and then compel the company to hand over evidence that they need to go through, blah blah blah.

      By the time any of this happens, the companies will already have been able to throttle everyone and make so much money without providing the real service, that it won't matter any more.

      If it were true legislation, then the executive branch could get involved via the justice department and actually file charges and all that jazz. Regulatory bodies have much less to work with, take the FDA as a prime example with all of the recalls on food and drugs in the past few years.

  17. Still ignoring the duoploy by metrometro · · Score: 2

    The FCC is making much fuss and noise about "digital inclusion" and whatnot, but no one at any level is willing to talk about the fact that most of the country has two or less options in broadband. During the summer of love (2002, IIRC), the big telecoms took advantage of deregulation to divide up the broadband market by city, and it's been higher prices, lower caps and no new pipe in ten yearsever since. Verizon FiOS is dead. Wireless is consolidating. It's permanent monopoly time, and the FCC just keeps talking about broadband maps and Internet literacy training (?!) as the solution.

    Here's a better answer: bring back common carrier rules for backbone service rates, and let the local ISPs (remember those?) come back to life. Pass network neutrality. Ban the ownership of both content services and pipes. Lay some city-owned dark fiber and let the private sector bid to operate it. It ain't rocket science, but it will require standing up to Comcast and AT&T.

    1. Re:Still ignoring the duoploy by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      Verizon FiOS is dead.

      It's still working for me. Best service I've ever had.

    2. Re:Still ignoring the duoploy by Arcady13 · · Score: 1

      Verizon is not going to add any new cities. You're lucky. All I can get is Time Warner or AT&T.

    3. Re:Still ignoring the duoploy by Lunatrik · · Score: 1

      Verizon is not going to add any new cities. You're lucky. All I can get is Time Warner or AT&T.

      Verizon disagrees. http://www.fiercetelecom.com/story/verizon-brings-fios-upstate-new-york-challenge-time-warner-cable/2011-03-28

    4. Re:Still ignoring the duoploy by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Verizon is still actively building out the service in New Jersey. They do, after all, have a statewide cable TV franchise to do so. Verizon clearly stated that they wouldn't starting building out in cities they didn't have a franchise agreement in. Sounds like they were sick of fighting with individual municipalities to get FAs for service.

  18. OMG... FCC to be slashdotted by erroneus · · Score: 1

    I am sure it is already happening, but 10,000 applications have probably already been filled out.

  19. I have one of these by name_already_taken · · Score: 2

    I have one of these devices. It's plugged into a port on a managed switch and doesn't see any of my traffic; basically it has access to the Internet connection and that's it.

    There's a site at http://reporting.samknows.com/ that I can log into and see graphs of the test results, which are:

    • Website load times in seconds
    • Latency in milliseconds
    • Packet loss in %
    • Web Downloads Multi-Threaded in Mbps
    • Video streaming in seconds to buffer and seconds of delay
    • Downstream throughput in Mbps
    • Upstream throughput in Mbps
    • DNS response time in milliseconds
    • Failed web requests in %
    • Failed DNS requests in %
    • RTP Packet Loss in %
    • RTP Jitter in milliseconds

    All these stats are graphed daily.

    I have U-Verse, and the instructions state that with U-Verse you just plug the device into a switch port and plug nothing else into it. They probably don't want the U-Verse video traffic running through it. I also disabled its wifi, since it wasn't necessary.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:I have one of these by Mirrim · · Score: 0

      I've had a Sam Knows router for about two months now. No problems with either set-up or use. In fact, I appreciate the online stats aggregation of my service. It is great having a decent N router for my new laptop. As far as privacy concerns, I'm pretty darned boring for any government official to be interested in what I do from day to day online. Er, OMG! It could be that subversive MMO playing, online news surfing and mushy love letter emails to my lover!!!

    2. Re:I have one of these by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I am not worried about the FCC spying on us, I am worried that they are using off the shelf hardware with well known "hacker" firmware, to me it sounds like they are sending out 10,000 government approved bot clients with the hopes of gathering quality data after they epically failed with a freaking map over services they are regulating to the point of strangling any competition.

      Shouldnt these ass hats KNOW already? cant they get data from what, all 5 ISP's in the sates? and if they don't trust that data why cant they just choke hold them some more to get correct data? why are they so clueless to the thing they are supposedly in control of?

  20. How much data does it use? by demonbug · · Score: 1

    How much data is sent/received for the tests? I wouldn't want to hit my monthly cap...

    Also, how long before the ISPs are able to uniquely identify traffic from/to these particular routers, and will "traffic shape" accordingly? I'm guessing more than one ISP employee has one to experiment on...

    1. Re:How much data does it use? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Could try reading the linked page.

      From the FAQ:

      Our units involved in the FCC project transfer a large amount of data, which varies according to the speed of your connection. The usage on a 10Mbps connection will be around 20GB/month, and will likely be around 60GB on a 50Mbps connection. The amount that's downloaded is speed dependant (so a slower connection will use less traffic than a faster connection).

      If you're on a product with a low cap then we'd advise against signing up, or at least informing us beforehand so that we can apply a different testing profile (we can run smaller speed tests on a per-device if necessary).

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:How much data does it use? by socz · · Score: 1

      apparently, its quite a bit but they say they'll reduce it for slower speeds. I saw something like 20GB per month.

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    3. Re:How much data does it use? by rjhall · · Score: 1

      if only there were some answers to frequently asked questions
      http://www.testmyisp.com/faq.html#faq-14

  21. Google Fiber by demonbug · · Score: 1

    Not really related (well, sort of), but it looks like Kansas City, Kansas are the lucky winnars! of the Google Community Fiber project.

  22. Forgot... by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    Forget that it also graphs VoIP Call Jitter, up and down in milliseconds.

    Presumably these stats are the results of its own testing, as I'm not using VoIP.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  23. It's.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a trap!

  24. FCC is not giving them alway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're giving them away and footing the bill.

    1. Re:FCC is not giving them alway by Nimey · · Score: 1

      TEABAGGER SPOTTED.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  25. How does it work? by dogsbreath · · Score: 1

    Lots of comments about waste of money, etc., but it depends on what and how it works.

    First off: without some independent metrics, how is the FCC to gain an understanding of the status of broadband quality? Sure they can infer somethings from stats provided by ISPs but I am sure there are all kinds of issues with using secondhand data from parties with vested interests.

    Given that the FCC should have an independent understanding of broadband deployment and quality in the US, then sticking 10,000 data collectors out there is not a bad idea. I would guess that the routers have custom firmware and call home to a server on a regular basis. Putting the metric collector on the router instead of a program on a local PC is obviously the way to go: always on, known behaviour, and relatively free from user fiddling.

    It seems like a damn good idea to me.

    1. Re:How does it work? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If only someone had an article and a link to where this information can be found~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:How does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's basically exactly how it works. The router ends up sending a gig or so of traffic a day on my connection. When the connection is idle, the router does a batch of tests (multithreaded download / upload, ping, dns lookups, etc). The technology is run by a UK company called SamKnows (samknows.com). Also, it's nice to be able to see my daily results on their very usable website.

      I actually had an issue with one point with the version of netgear firmware their custom build was based on. The bandwidth meter would double count any bytes downloaded close to my peak connection speed. I reported the problem to SamKnows and they very helpfully provided me with a later build that fixed it. And, the router itself is very nice (free) hardware.

    3. Re:How does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jackass.

    4. Re:How does it work? by dogsbreath · · Score: 1

      I wish Industry Canada would take a similar interest in broadband deployment in Canada.

  26. Firmware upgrade by bhengh · · Score: 1

    Are the routers DD-WRT compatible?

    1. Re:Firmware upgrade by Nimey · · Score: 1

      RTFA. You can't alter the router or you'll have to give it back.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Firmware upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GIYF

      http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Netgear_WNR3500L

    3. Re:Firmware upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes they are. Have to get a special initial install file though, it's not compatible with the stock DD-WRT for the same model due to its special firmware.

  27. hmmm.... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    while I dont like the idea of a government router, I do like the idea that the government is trying to measure the speed consumers are actually receiving. So I'm going to say this is a good thing. If you're concerned about your privacy, don't sign up. If not, do us all a favor and help them do this measurement.

  28. Slashvertisement by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    This has been going on for quite a while now, they've already shipped a bunch of routers, mines been hooked up for a few months already.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  29. I have one of these by Galaga88 · · Score: 2

    I have one of these already. It's a NETGEAR WNR3500L. I've not seen any impact on my connection quality. Quite the contrary, I've used its reporting functions twice already in trying to get my ISP to track down connection quality issues at their end.

    It keeps a running log of your ping, throughput, packet loss, etc. which you can access freely through their website. I was able to use this to document periods of latency spikes and massive packet loss.

    I guess if you think the FCC is taking a particularly convoluted route to spy on me, rather than just, tapping in at the ISP itself, you're free to do that. I'll just think you're probably more than a bit daft.

  30. Depends on how you define it by slapout · · Score: 1

    If by "given away" you mean spending tax dollars on...

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  31. Not Free... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Read the TOS you agree to. they want them back when done of if you dont set it up for them. and you agree to not hack it or reverse engineer it.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  32. Old news, but the router and tracking is awesome by Frozen-Solid · · Score: 3, Informative

    Old news, and it was even posted on Slashdot when the program started last summer. I've been running an FCC White Box for several months now and love it. The router is a high quality Netgear with QoS filtering and all the bells and whistles you expect out of a $100+ router. It beats the ever living crap out of my old Belkin Wireless N. The tracking software doesn't monitor actual sites or any actual private information. Just packet loss, ping times, download and upload speeds, streaming stability, voip stability, etc. The graphs and charts it spits out are extremely useful and I've been using them for the past 2 months when complaining to Mediacom about my slow speeds, packet loss, and horrible ping times. It keeps 2 weeks of hourly data, and after that just tracks it as an average/min/max for the day. http://i53.tinypic.com/35bt5ro.jpg

    --
    Frozen Insanity
    http://frozen-solid.net
  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. Great! Just in time for by blair1q · · Score: 1

    Great! Just in time for my ISP to throttle its competitors when the FCC fails to impose Net Neutrality, which it can do without having to buy 10,000 pieces of equipment.

  35. My FCC router is unit # 7000 range by glittermage · · Score: 1

    This is old news. I got my tax payer funded router (thanks) about 3 months ago. The online reports are very neat and shows me that I'm glad my life doesn't depend on my ISP.

    Date / Failure Rate in % (the online graphs are much better).
    2011-03-30 0.02
    2011-03-29 0.00
    2011-03-28 0.24
    2011-03-27 0.00
    2011-03-26 0.04
    2011-03-25 0.11
    2011-03-24 0.04
    2011-03-23 1.23
    I'd like to run the reports monthly versus weekly and daily though, I'll write SamKnows and ask about that.

  36. Use of federal funds? by Overunderrated · · Score: 0

    I don't want to come off like a tea partier here, but come on. Research into wi-fi technologies? Private industry hasn't exactly ignored this technology. I don't think the governments needs to throw money at it.

    1. Re:Use of federal funds? by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the real world. Politicians will never invest tax money in risky ventures when they can just spend ten times as much and take credit for something that already works.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  37. Government Dichotomy by glodime · · Score: 1

    Government is either totally good for everyone (other than the 400 you mentioned) or totally bad for everyone. Thanks for clearing that up for us.

    1. Re:Government Dichotomy by spun · · Score: 1

      Yeah... are you 'special?' Do you suffer from dyslexia or some other reading disability? I only ask because I did not say that government is either totally good or totally bad, in fact, I said just the opposite. "The government does tons of terrible shit... This is not one of those things" implies the government is both good and bad. Hope that helped clear things up for you.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:Government Dichotomy by glodime · · Score: 1

      Actions taken by the government are completely good or bad. This is a good one that could never result in any abuse. Anything that benefits the 400 well connected guys in any way is bad. This could never help the 400 well connected guys in any way so it is good. It would be stupid to be cautious when dealing with the government because it is obvious when the government is doing something bad.

    3. Re:Government Dichotomy by spun · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that you ARE an idiot, gotcha. I'll be sure to ignore any future posts you might peck out. Have fun licking those windows!

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    4. Re:Government Dichotomy by glodime · · Score: 1

      You are quick to draw conclusions.

    5. Re:Government Dichotomy by spun · · Score: 1

      Yes, because the Internet is a big place, and there are a LOT of idiots out there, all too ready to waste my time. I don't know whether you really believe what you write, or you are attempting to be facetious, but either way: buh-bye. I'm just not wasting any more time with you.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    6. Re:Government Dichotomy by glodime · · Score: 1

      That is the most logical and well articulated argument you've written in this thread. Unfortunately, you have (apparently) written me off without introspection on what you've written here. I actually agree with your point about wealth and income inequality being detrimental to society. But it is no reason to call someone a paranoid schizophrenic because they value their privacy more or define privacy differently than others or maybe have concerns about bad actors within or with influence over governments.

      BTW, I looked at some of your previous posts. I'd be interested in hearing any thoughts you have on how to transition from our current economic system to one you would deem "improved".

  38. Re:Old news, but the router and tracking is awesom by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

    Now I don't feel so bad about my ISP. I've been running it for a while now too. http://tinypic.com/r/2j5z120/7

  39. A stepping stone to IPv6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As many of us know by now, Comcast has actually taken a leadership role in getting their user population ready for IPv6. They have developed an open source plug-in to OpenWRT which enables flashed routers to both reach into the IPv6 Internet from IPv4 prior to the transition and **seamlessly** transition to a configuration that reaches out from IPv6 to IPv4 after the transition. I'm sorry, but after a long history of disrespect in the technorati community (anyone remember the Usenet Death Penalty?), that is one pretty admirable step.

    Anyway, once the FCC test is complete from "Samknows", they say on the signup page you can keep the router. Well, apparently you can run OpenWRT on the router. Add the Comcast code and you should be well-positioned for the transition to IPv6, all courtesy of Uncle Sam. Its too bad they didn't work with Comcast to develop a custom load with the IPv6 helper and the Samknows code prior to shipping the units out (or make it easily installable). I have my 360 and Mac Mini HTPC on an N bridge, so it only makes sense to upgrade to an N router. Too bad the rest of my crap is all G. :(

    Hmm, I wonder if there is some loophole out there about all code developed or sponsored by the federal government being in the public domain. Perhaps their custom code may be legally reverse engineered after all!

  40. Free WiFi Router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had one for over a month. On 25 Gbit FIOS.

  41. This is a joke, right? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    The gov't invented and manages large parts of the Internet.... Please, please tell me this is not just a half jest, but full on irony at work ;)

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:This is a joke, right? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'll take one if it supports IPv6. The computers on my network will just have to defend themselves from any attacks from the router.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  42. could they actually be useful? by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    Area I'm at does not have DSL and I ain't gonna signup for Comcast! So..... could one of these be used to access some highspeed wireless broadband? (OK so I admit I'm not a wifi guru like everybody else). How would it compare to using a Ubiquiti Networks Bullet mounted on a tall pole with a high gain 2.4GHz antenna to reach free wifi in certain neighborhoods that have it? Though I also have to ask do these have reasonable throughput as I found Google wifi in Mountain View reeeeaaaallllyyy ssssllllooowwww.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  43. What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you are telling me they can't find more ways to cut the budget? Here is another great one right here. And there are thousands upon thousands more like it.

    Save your GD routers and give us our money back

  44. PaRaNoId FrEaKs by WhipItGood · · Score: 1

    This white box has already produced great results. My crappy Internet connection improved 2 days after I was informed via email from Sam Knows that my ISP (Cox Communications) had been informed that I was participating in the trial. AWESOME! It's been running great for two months hence. That's been worth the price of admission already.

    So I have questions for you paranoid freaks. What makes you think your off-the-shelf POS router doesn't already include government spyware? Oh, right, because you immediately flashed the firmware and installed dd-wrt. And you don't think that government scriptgrammers with unmentionable agencies haven't already checked in code to the latest development build? And while you're reading through the source code trying to find unmentionable hard-coded IP addresses pointing to servers running in data centers that don't exist, don't you think the warm silicon slamming bits through your router has the very logic you are searching for burned within?

    Boo! Don't look behind you.

  45. legal hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FCC wants to track your porn habits.

  46. Just fyi... by bogie · · Score: 1

    On any decent cable connection or with something like fios this will eat up like 20GB+ a month. That's actually not a lot but still if you are running near some sort of cap with your isp I'd avoid it.

    The router btw seems to get pretty good reviews and its 300Mb N, does open source firmware, and has some really nice features. Much better than what I would have thought they would be using. Then again maybe they are using it specifically because of an open source firmware that can be cutomized.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  47. Mine's better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't need this.

  48. You had me till you said by hokeyru · · Score: 1

    Netgear.

  49. Got my freebie from government and flashed it by Cito · · Score: 1

    2 weeks ago I received my free fcc router for the test it's a Netgear WNR3500L, after unboxing I immediately flashed it and installed DD-WRT on it :) set it up as a repeater and turned off dhcp and all routing just to use it as a wifi repeater and extended the wifi range around my house for the low low cost of 0 thanks fcc! hehe

    1. Re:Got my freebie from government and flashed it by willzzz · · Score: 1

      Yup I plan on doing the same! ;-) Nothing like FREE gear from the FCC! LMAO.

  50. This is a good program by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    I am participating in this program. I think America is way behind in the broadband area, and if the FCC doesn't know what the big players are really doing, they cannot make good decisions on our behalf. I believe there are people in the government that want us to stay competitive, if only to pay taxes. I have my doubts about what Comcast is doing to me for my money, and this program gives me access to great statistics. I for one like this program. There is nothing I am doing that I am concerned about them knowing anyway. Any business I do over the Internet is https anyway, and I assume if they want to look iside my encrypted packets badly enough, they can. My opinion anyway :-)

  51. Old dogs can't change their spots by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    the routers are actually infected with Syphilis.

  52. so whaddaya expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > the government is ALWAYS out to screw EVERYONE over, ALL THE TIME

    from a population raised on e.t., rootin 4 the cute lil' thang 2 excape from the evil gummint goons? explains the tea party, 2;-}