Slashdot Mirror


KGB Wants Control of Email and VOIP

blair1q writes "The FSB (really just a rebadged KGB) is worried about the abilities that internet communications services such as Hotmail, Gmail, and Skype give to people they consider black-hats. In particular, they don't like the fact that these services allow encryption. They say they aren't going to seize or block them, yet, but are just 'studying' the situation, with an eye possibly toward implementing controls like those in China. Their increased interest in the tools may be related to a DDoS attack on Russian President Dmitri Medvedev's own LiveJournal account, which he termed 'revolting and illegal.'"

129 comments

  1. Join the club, comrade by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The U.S. government wants the exact same thing. I'm pretty sure that almost every government at this point wants *at least* a way to bypass encryption, a "kill switch" for the internet in their country, and some form of email monitoring (all these without any pesky warrants, of course). If your country is an exception, count yourself lucky.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Join the club, comrade by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If your country is an exception, count yourself lucky.

      Count yourself delusional, more like... But if they think they can actually pull this off, the KGB is delusional. Encryption is out of the bag. The software for VOIP and e-mail is wide open. (FOSS) All it will do is drive people from Skype to Jitsi. (Or similar)

    2. Re:Join the club, comrade by Riceballsan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ah but if it drives them to Jitsi or any alternatives, then that is a quick easy way to know who to flag as a terrorist. After all 90% of people won't be educated enough to know the difference if encryption is lost, so the 10% that switch, are the ones with something to hide.

    3. Re:Join the club, comrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The government does, but businesses don't; and in the USA, businesses always win

    4. Re:Join the club, comrade by Gaygirlie · · Score: 2

      All it will do is drive people from Skype to Jitsi. (Or similar)

      No one has ever heard of Jitsi or similar.

    5. Re:Join the club, comrade by timeOday · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I disagree. Convenience dictates the vast majority of people will migrate to one of a few centralized solutions, which can be pressured (or legislated) to honor wiretap orders. And the few who go out of their way for extra privacy are practically volunteering themselves for extra scrutiny by doing so.

    6. Re:Join the club, comrade by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      If your country is an exception, count yourself lucky.

      Count yourself delusional, more like... But if they think they can actually pull this off, the KGB is delusional. ...

      Um. Notice how all these anti government protests are not in the following countries ... USA, Russia, China.

      Moo.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:Join the club, comrade by hey! · · Score: 2

      I might entertain the government having this power to invade my privacy, provided they don't get to do it in privacy themselves.

      I think they should get a warrant specifying what they're looking for, and if they don't find what they're looking for they should be required to give you official notification that they've been reading your stuff.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:Join the club, comrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The notion that people with nothing to hide shouldn't seek to preserve their privacy is one of many completely absurd beliefs anywhere, right up there with scientology. We give up too many rights because of ignorant points of view like this. The fact is, with no privacy at all, it would be a trivial matter to find something to put everyone away for. Go ahead, say you've never broken the law and gotten away with it. Make yourself a liar.

    9. Re:Join the club, comrade by nadaou · · Score: 3, Informative

      > No one has ever heard of Jitsi or similar.

      Now they, have, thanks!
      http://jitsi.org/

      Skype doesn't work with my webcam, even though the OS supports it with other programs. My family (don't know about yours) won't mind installing Jitsi, ... win!

      GNOME's empathy is another: http://packages.debian.org/sid/empathy

      Pidgin too.

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    10. Re:Join the club, comrade by mlts · · Score: 1

      Similar, but not the same. It is highly doubtful that a Great Firewall of China will be coming up soon for the US, nor posts saying "$POLITICAL_OFFICIAL sux" would be rewritten in flight to praise $POLITICAL_OFFICIAL as they do in some other countries.

    11. Re:Join the club, comrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone is already considered such out of the box, this is why they want to bypass encryption, being flagged that way is seamingly become more and more irrelevant.

    12. Re:Join the club, comrade by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      http://jitsi.org/

      First of all, if you are using e.g. MSN protocol with Jitsi all the data goes through Microsoft servers and are again in the exact same situation as before and liable for listening. Thus you have gained nothing. Secondly, if you instead use one of the decentralized protocols you have to deal with all the hassles it entails, like for example setting up the server settings and such. Considering that I will want to be able to chat with my friends and family, and they will want to chat with their friends and families, and their friends will want to chat with their friends and so on everyone would have to deal with that hassle. It's a lot easier to just use one of the centralized ones. Ie. atleast none of my non-geek fellows will want to start using non-centralized stuff and there's no point in telling them to change client just to use the same stuff they are already using.

    13. Re:Join the club, comrade by ArcadeNut · · Score: 1

      No one has ever heard of Jitsi or similar.

      I have! But only one post ago...

      --
      Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
    14. Re:Join the club, comrade by Asmodae · · Score: 1

      I read FSB as FBI when I first saw this article and was not surprised.

    15. Re:Join the club, comrade by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The "funny" bit is that those who'd need the most surveillance will certainly be exempt.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:Join the club, comrade by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

      I downloaded and deleted from the servers all the mail I'm legally allowed to immediately after I first read about that. My new policy is to delete all mail from the servers, keeping only an encrypted copy on my local main box (and its associated backups). Everyone should do the same, if they are able. Use fetchmail, offlineimap, whatever but do it quick. Remember, if you had nothing to hide they wouldn't be trying to examine your email, citizen! **shudder**

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    17. Re:Join the club, comrade by hannson · · Score: 3, Funny

      absurd beliefs anywhere, right up there with scientology

      You are so sued!

    18. Re:Join the club, comrade by Threni · · Score: 1

      If Google etc allows ssl, and everyone uses it, and the emails themselves are encrypted, then the governments have a bit of a problem. They can outlaw it, require access etc. But then people can add proper encryption on top of that, but this won't stand out trivially because all the other emails will be encrypted anyway, so they'll have to get google to give them access to everyone's email, which will be hard to keep secret. This is probably what they're worrying about.

    19. Re:Join the club, comrade by mldi · · Score: 1

      Oh, the FBI won't have the time of day to look at your decrypted email. They'll be too busy tracking down identity thieves. I hope they like paperwork.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    20. Re:Join the club, comrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, wait, are you seriously suggesting that if the US government says to Google "hey, can I have Threni@gmail.com's e-mail history", Google doesn't just give it to them?

    21. Re:Join the club, comrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You only increase the number of parties trying to eavesdrop by one.

      Instead of: You-[Your ISP]-[Recievers ISP]-Reciever
      You now have: You-{CRYPTO}=[Your ISP]=[MSN]=[Recievers ISP]={DE-CRYPTO}-Reciever

      The latter is a clear improvement, because even though the number of potential eavesdroppers has increased by 50% the chance for any potential eavesdropper to gain information from an intercepted message is reduced drastically.

    22. Re:Join the club, comrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might suggest the possibility of the person needing to hide something. They could be using it because others use it (Less likely probably). They could be using it because of political preferences (think FSF, ACLU, human rights, etc likely). They could be using it because of highly confidential business information (less likely). They could be using it because of criminal enterprises or activities (drugs, drug distribution, etc). They could be using it because of sexual preferences. They could be using it for a thousand different reasons. Terrorism is almost certainly in the minority when it comes to why someone would use encryption when few people in the mainstream use it.

    23. Re:Join the club, comrade by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      "It's a lot easier to just" let the KGB or whatever alphabet soup guys listen to all my chat.

      FTFY

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    24. Re:Join the club, comrade by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      They could be using it because the IT guy is a paranoid privacy advocate, and chose it for the entire company. Like at my company. :)

    25. Re:Join the club, comrade by cavreader · · Score: 1

      But isn't Wikileaks and other similiar sites pushing for complete disclosure of all information no matter what? Seems like the "information yearns to be free" advocates would really hate the widespread use of encryption. The KGB is just joining their cause.

    26. Re:Join the club, comrade by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      "It's a lot easier to just" let the KGB or whatever alphabet soup guys listen to all my chat.

      FTFY

      That doesn't refute the point I made, though.

    27. Re:Join the club, comrade by WNight · · Score: 1

      What, that you can't help people too apathetic to help themselves?

    28. Re:Join the club, comrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and a pony.

    29. Re:Join the club, comrade by Issarlk · · Score: 1

      Ok, I flagged 10% of the people as terrorists. What do now ?

    30. Re:Join the club, comrade by Jurily · · Score: 2

      Go ahead, say you've never broken the law and gotten away with it. Make yourself a liar.

      That's more likely ignorance than an outright lie. Given enough laws, everyone is a criminal.

    31. Re:Join the club, comrade by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      Under the Law, ignorance is no excuse..

    32. Re:Join the club, comrade by russotto · · Score: 1

      "It's a lot easier to just" let the KGB or whatever alphabet soup guys listen to all my chat.

      Sure. They've got limited resources. While they're listening to me, maybe the real "subversives" are getting away. I take this one step further by eschewing email and chat entirely and just posting everything to slashdot... then the problem isn't keeping it secret, it's getting anyone to pay attention in the first place.

    33. Re:Join the club, comrade by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Under the Law, ignorance is no excuse..

      Oh yeah? Then explain politicians!

    34. Re:Join the club, comrade by houstonbofh · · Score: 1
      I think you missed something...

      If Google etc allows ssl, and everyone uses it, and the emails themselves are encrypted, then the governments have a bit of a problem.

      Does that help? If the endpoints do the encryption, the path does not matter.

    35. Re:Join the club, comrade by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Oh yes... The Tea Party loves Obama...
      I think the difference is that we have them all the time. They did not until now, because it would get you shot.

    36. Re:Join the club, comrade by Jurily · · Score: 1

      They're rich.

  2. Back in the USA by plawsy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And this is different from NSA, et al ... how?

    1. Re:Back in the USA by kvvbassboy · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's Russia, so it must be more sinister and evil.

    2. Re:Back in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it's not like they're sneaking into other countries and irradiating people to death or anything... oh wait.

    3. Re:Back in the USA by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      Sounds as if these guys are doing exactly what they should do; evaluating the Internet-related problems they face given their mission to protect their government's interests. I'd be shocked if every major national government doesn't have folks looking at the same problems.

    4. Re:Back in the USA by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      You should see what the CIA is doing.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Back in the USA by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

      By extension, you should see what every secret service is doing. Ask Georgij Markov, Fidel Castro, or Mahmoud al-Mabhouh. Oh wait, you can't: some people were doing their job properly (and with ruthless efficiency).

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    6. Re:Back in the USA by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

      Oh wait, you can ask Castro, provided you can reach him. Those ones fizzled...

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    7. Re:Back in the USA by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      What bothers me is that the interests of the government and the interests of the people those governments allegedly represent clash almost head-on.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Back in the USA by ozbird · · Score: 1

      "We're the good guys, Marty."

    9. Re:Back in the USA by O(+inf) · · Score: 1

      NSA probably does have access to GMail etc storage (even if Google doesn't know that), but they aren't proposing to ban, say, gmx.de, on the grounds that they have no means of accessing the storage there, nor intercept user communication over HTTPS. Nor will they complain if you host your own mail server and use secure protocols to communicate. Neither TFS nor TFA explain it, but what really made the whole thing so shocking is that FSB blokes have called for banning GMail, Skype etc in Russia unless some means of access are provided. In other words, they want government-mandated backends to all forms of communication, and to ban anything that can't be wiretapped. It should also be noted that the use of strong crypto by organizations (rather than private individuals) is heavily regulated in Russia, with most activity requiring special certification. Using foreign-hosted systems is seen as a workaround for the law.

    10. Re:Back in the USA by PPH · · Score: 1

      NSA, FSB, KGB. Entirely different combinations of three letters.

      PPH is the only one you should trust.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    11. Re:Back in the USA by Clsid · · Score: 1

      Well it's their country and they have every right to do so. What makes you think it's ok to wiretap a phone line but it is not ok to intercept emails or other forms of Internet communication? First off Medvedev said that they aren't going to do anything to block them, but my point is, that even if they do, I would hardly call them irresponsibly. I truly believe that authorities should monitor everyone they deem dangerous to the safety of their citizens, that's why they are the government even if such resources can be misused for political purposes, like it was done with some Colombian politicians during Uribe's regime. Those politicians will have to deal with the heat afterwards either from their voters or from the international community.

  3. As opposed to how the US is handling it? by bazmail · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Clean up your own back yard before you go knocking on your neighbors door.
    The NSA has hardware in Google HQ and most likely other US data centers too.

    1. Re:As opposed to how the US is handling it? by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      Clean up your own back yard before you go knocking on your neighbors door.

      The NSA has hardware in Google HQ and most likely other US data centers too.

      The speed which which they tracked down the Craigslist Killer shows it's really happening, it's really stored, it's all there for them to pull up when they need it. Including this post and you reading it.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:As opposed to how the US is handling it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation needed.

      Really. You are required to successfully infiltrate Google Headquarters and collect evidence. Shouldn't be too hard.

    3. Re:As opposed to how the US is handling it? by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      Hey guys! /waves at camera

      Oh, I see ... you've been furloughed too.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    4. Re:As opposed to how the US is handling it? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Citation needed.

      Really. You are required to successfully infiltrate Google Headquarters and collect evidence. Shouldn't be too hard.

      There's a geocache hidden there. Shhh!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  4. freenet by crowlogic · · Score: 2

    This is why everyone should be running freenet, stick your virtual fingers in the mans eyes. http://freenetproject.org/

    1. Re:freenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If everyone using Freenet was jailed tomorrow and accused of trafficking kiddie porn, the media wouldn't even notice.

    2. Re:freenet by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      This is why everyone should be running freenet, stick your virtual fingers in the mans eyes. http://freenetproject.org/

      Since all the good stuff is outside of Freenet network, what good would using it do?

    3. Re:freenet by crowlogic · · Score: 1

      just to piss off the man and devout resources to tracking useless shit

    4. Re:freenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put all the good stuff inside of it!
      Thatâ(TM)s what it would do.

    5. Re:freenet by crowlogic · · Score: 1

      ya think?

    6. Re:freenet by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      So basically, you're saying the point to using freenet is to feed your own delusions and conspiracy theories? No thanks, there's much better uses for it than just to create needless traffic.

    7. Re:freenet by crowlogic · · Score: 1

      No, that's not the point, I just felt like writing something snarky to demonstrate the useless of almost all forms of communication

  5. KGB is a station is San Diego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would KGB a classic rock radio station out in San Diego want to control email ? Ratings ain't good enuff.. eh?

  6. There is nothing a Government Spook hates more by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    than competition.

    So the argument is made that the interwebs need control, a la Great Firewall of China.

    In Post-Soviet Russia Freedom means more control over YOU.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  7. Don't ALL email services allow 3rd-pty encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you use a client like Thunderbird, it's automatic (e.g., Enigmail), but even with webmail you can simply cut and paste.

  8. Open PGP by bkmoore · · Score: 1

    If the FSB / KGB, NSA, etc. come down too hard on Gmail, etc. then people who need or desire security will probably start using Open PGP or some other, stronger form of encryption. The smart spook should work on cracking the lowest-common form of encryption and try to get people to use it and think it's secure.

    1. Re:Open PGP by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      If the FSB / KGB, NSA, etc. come down too hard on Gmail, etc. then people who need or desire security will probably start using Open PGP or some other, stronger form of encryption. The smart spook should work on cracking the lowest-common form of encryption and try to get people to use it and think it's secure.

      It's already at work ... and that is the stupidest password for a slashdot account I've seen this week.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Open PGP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The smart spook should work on cracking the lowest-common form of encryption and try to get people to use it and think it's secure.

      Right now that would be ROT-26.

  9. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VOIP control YOU!

  10. I wonder... by cobrausn · · Score: 1

    If this will just force people who care about privacy to start using encryption. Considering how few people care about privacy, that means they will likely have reduced the set of people they 'should' be looking at by quite a bit (i.e., now just terrorists, subversives, and geeks instead of everybody). If the occasional security-concious geek gets caught up in the net and looked at a bit too closely, so be it, might still be a win so far as they are concerned.

    Under these kinds of circumstances, hiding 'in plain sight' without using encrypted traffic (just use coded phrases and the like) would probably garner less attention. Maybe send your terrorist communications using unencrypted leet speak.

    --
    How does it feel to be a liar with pants constantly on fire?
  11. Not really KGB by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 0

    FBS and SVR split the duties of the old KGB, so its a fragment of KGB, but it's very inaccurate of a /. headline to label it KGB, KGB was disolved nearly 20 years ago (3 December 1991).

  12. Sounds like a job for... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    ...steganography.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Sounds like a job for... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      ...steganography.

      I am reminded of a puzzle, where an ape is placed in a cage, with two possible ways of escape, as identified by those who placed the ape there to observe.

      The ape found a third way.

      Perhaps the best way to defeat someone nosing in on your conversation is to devise a simple way to communicate in code, which appears normal or actually creates such a massive barrier to decrypting your meaning that no software alone could handle it.

      If I wanted to keep the Cage Bee out of my affairs I might actually resort to writing letters and dropping them in the mail in places where they can't easily intercept them.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      ...steganography.

      Now your porn collection can also double as personal data storage, what an awesome excuse for ever increasing collection!

    3. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      It also doubles as a good excuse. "No, I do NOT have two terabytes of porn, the pics are just so large because they hide my plans to become ruler of the world."

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Sounds like a job for... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > Now your porn collection can also double as personal data storage, what an awesome excuse for ever increasing collection!

      I wonder if my wife would buy that explanation.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gives new meaning to the catch phrase from Pinky & The Brain.

  13. Ahh ok by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    So you want Slashdot to report on nothing that is negative outside of the US, so long as they US does it as well?

    Why? Just general US-hate?

    Seems to me this is news no matter where it happens. I've seen Slashdot report on the US government doing plenty of stupid shit, including all the AT&T stuff, so why can't they also report on Russia?

  14. Re:Back in the USSR by cobrausn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I love how anytime someone points out how any other government than the US government might be doing evil things, it's immediately assumed to be some attempt by Americans to make themselves look better, and compared to some similar American program. It's as if it is somehow more important that an insult be hurled at the US than attention be diverted to some other country's less-than-honorable behavior for a few moments.

    Trust me, we are all well aware of the failings and bad behavior of the US government. I see about ten articles a day about it. But don't ignore the serial killer next door because a loud, obnoxious, schizophrenic drunk is making noise down the street.

    --
    How does it feel to be a liar with pants constantly on fire?
  15. LiveJournal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the fact that he has a LiveJournal account is both revolting and illegal in my mind

  16. KGB? by yeltski · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    >>The FSB (really just a rebadged KGB) What is this bigoted and nationalistic editorializing nonsense? What if I said "Federal Republic of Germany" is just a rebadged "Nazi Germany"?

    1. Re:KGB? by couchslug · · Score: 0

      It isn't bigoted to point out that the former Soviet Union dissolved and that Russia still has a similar set of masters with zero hope for meaningful change.

      Nazi Germany was defeated in battle. The Soviets merely "right-sized" after their economy shat the bed.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:KGB? by yeltski · · Score: 0

      No, it is bigoted to claim that a totally different government entity that is stuffed by totally different people, is the same thing after 20 years of vehement anti-soviet liberal reform. You are one of the people who will keep saying 'KGB' until there is no country left at all, because that is your true bigoted goal. That would be the meaningful change in your eyes. Also, Soviet Union was defeated in battle just as much as Nazi Germany, thats why US called it the Cold War. The Soviets were driven out of the party 30 years ago, by liberal capitalists, ie Gorbochev and Yeltsin. You can come out of the closet now.

    3. Re:KGB? by O(+inf) · · Score: 1

      It's even technically incorrect. For example, KGB was also responsible for foreign intelligence, which FSB does not do.

    4. Re:KGB? by O(+inf) · · Score: 1

      It isn't bigoted to point out that the former Soviet Union dissolved and that Russia still has a similar set of masters with zero hope for meaningful change.

      It's not particularly similar, aside from that both now and then ruling elites cling to power at all costs. However, the social and economical structure they impose on society is vastly different.

    5. Re:KGB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      totally different government entity that is stuffed[sic] by totally different people

      It is a reorganized (several times) version of the same government entity. The KGB's employees weren't all fired and replaced by new people in 1991. The head of the KGB was fired, the organization was legally abolished and immediately re-established with a new name and head. The new head reorganized the units under him. It was later moved to be a unit of the Russian department of Justice.

      When Putin became President he reorganized it again, and moved it to be directly under him. So a former KGB member was running the KGB's lineal descendant directly from his office. Despite the name changes, it serves the same function and is controlled from the same level of state power. It may have more democratic controls on it, but being a security organization nobody but its minders knows if it is really following those controls. The Russian Federation citizens it is tasked with assassinating probably don't see much distinction.

      You can still say it's "totally different," but I think if you say it now you won't believe it so much.

    6. Re:KGB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KBG did some foreign intelligence work, mostly the spy-vs-spy stuff. GRU was the primary intelligence arm of the military, and did the heavy lifting.

      Does, actually. GRU never disbanded, reorganized only marginally, and didn't even change its name.

    7. Re:KGB? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      The Soviet were NOT strategically defeated in battle.

      They left A-stan because it was not worth staying, and the government they began lasted a couple of years afterward. The A-stan casualty levels were quite tolerable, but as with the British and US, "trying to hustle the East" is a fool's errand.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    8. Re:KGB? by yeltski · · Score: 1

      Have you not read the news since WW1? Because last time I checked, battles stopped being fought with sticks and stones since then. Soviet Union was strategically defeated using propaganda and dissident counter-culture that birthed people like Gorbochev, who by his own admission did everything possible to destroy the Soviet Union.
      So yeah, of course Soviet Union didn't "lose" in Afghanistan, they pulled out, but what the hell does Afghanistan has to do with anything? Nothing, just like neither does conventional warfare for a very long time.

  17. KG was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calling the FSB a rebadged KGB is a bit disingenuous, isn't it? I mean, one doesn't have to live in Russia to discern that these are two different organisations with different structures and, most importantly, goals.

    1. Re:KG was by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Calling the FSB a rebadged KGB is a bit disingenuous, isn't it? I mean, one doesn't have to live in Russia to discern that these are two different organisations with different structures and, most importantly, goals.

      Anything which reports to Vladimir Putin is still a Cagey Bee in my book.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  18. in russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...livejournal account attacks you!

  19. Moooooooommmmmmyyyy! by HiggsBison · · Score: 1

    We're the officially appointed sneaky cheaters! They're cheating and ignoring us! Mother Russia, tell them to quit it! Unfair, unfair, unfair!

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
  20. Chips and Dips by hercubus · · Score: 1

    Nice story "Chips & Dips"
    Slashdot (really just a rebranded "Chips & Dips") can't resist pulling an acronym out of the mists of time
    Seriously, not that hard to say "Russia's Federal Security Service (aka FSB) wants..."
    The 1980's called and said they wanted their Cold War propaganda back

    --
    -- How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.
    1. Re:Chips and Dips by Opyros · · Score: 1

      For that matter, the KGB was really just a rebranded CHEKA.

  21. Re:In soviet russia... by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As if you'd need "soviet" for that anymore. Face it, the Soviet Union protected our liberty. As long as they existed, the "western democracies" had to play nice to be seen as the good guy.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. The trouble with astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Recently" observed but how many million years ago did it actually happen?

  23. Hehe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your country is an exception, count yourself lucky.

    Belgium HAS no government at the moment... Wooh! Safe.

    1. Re:Hehe... by jandoedel · · Score: 1

      Dude, you still have plenty of governments left. European, Flemish, Walloon, French community, Brussels Region, German speaking. You still have, like, 85% of your governments left + an-old-but-still-kinda-in-charge government. And a king. And 2 queens.

  24. We have to learn from China! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I mean, look at them! They have an economic growth in times of a recession, so their model of society has to be right.

    Let's face it, folks. Communism was the right idea.

    (may contain traces of nuts or sarcasm)

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. Re:ever heard by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    "That's right, don't use Jitsi. I repeat, don't use J I T S I. Or Debian Empathy. Emmmmmpathy."

    Why are all the governments of 2011 acting like it's 1994 and the internet is this hot new thing to control after they sorta let it slide for 17 years? Separating forest from trees, all these gov desires are pretty low IQ. "MMMMM. Email. Gimme!" They couldn't have thought of that back when AOL was still the rage? Why now?

    Theory: Fishbowl Effect. After we have finally had our fun with memes and made a fer .com dollars, the endless years of hyperconnectedness are going to drag on with not even a religious apocalypse to distract us, so those in power have nothing better to do than start salivating over hypertracking. Back in 1994 the web was still fun.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  26. FSB!=KGB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The FSB (really just a rebadged KGB) is worried about the abilities that internet communications services.."

    For completeness sake this should be written as:
    "The FSB (really just a rebadged KGB (really just a rebadged MGB (really just a rebadged NKVD (really just a rebadged OGPU (really just a rebadged Cheka (...) ) ) ) ) ) is worried about the abilities that internet communications services.."

  27. Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That read the title as "KGB Wants Control of Email and YOU"?

  28. Slashbloid, brought to you by FOX by xororand · · Score: 1

    Did you not notice that the "News for Nerds" slogan has been gone for a while?
    Slashbloid's main purpose is to generate advert impressions now. It doesn't matter how cheap and wrong the summaries are. FOX News would be proud.

  29. Re:ever heard by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why are they doing this now? One word: Egypt. The fact that with Internet organizing one of their old boys club could be run out on a rail? I'm sure that scares the shit out of them.

    As for TFA? I'm sure we'll be seeing more of this in the coming months. Anything that can threaten power the way it did in Egypt will have to be monitored (for the children/terrists/etc) and sadly most folks won't know nor care that everything is being monitored as long as it isn't THEIR door that gets kicked in. If you're doing nothing wrong, right?

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  30. In other news... by alendit · · Score: 0

    ...German Verfassungsschutz (really just rebaged SS) wants to be allowed to hack into your PC (http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Wirtschaft-stuetzt-Schaeubles-Plan-fuer-heimlichen-PC-Zugriff-Update-168367.html , German).

    You may not agree with FSB's methods (i do not either), but lets not point fingers and pretend that other secret services are ANY different. And the thing with "KGB" is either bashing or just ignorance.

  31. Re:ever heard by ozbird · · Score: 1

    Better get used to ... *sunglasses on* Democracy. YEEEEEEEEAHHHHHHHHH

  32. I agree... by pyrbrand · · Score: 3, Funny

    Russian President Dmitri Medvedev's own LiveJournal account, which he termed 'revolting and illegal.'

    I agree. LiveJournal accounts can often be revolting and illegal.

  33. The KGB no longer exists by Frangible · · Score: 1

    There is no KGB. Putting it in the title is pretty dumb and factually incorrect.

    Yeah, the FSB is the success to the KGB in the Russian Federation, but if you tell a Russian there's no difference between it and the Soviet Union, half of them will probably punch you in the face.

    This kind of stuff just makes Slashdot read like an amateur blog that can't be trusted for news or fact checking.

    1. Re:The KGB no longer exists by O(+inf) · · Score: 1

      There is no KGB.

      There is, actually, just not in Russia.

    2. Re:The KGB no longer exists by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      KGB Wants Control of Email and VOIP
      The FSB (really just a rebadged KGB) is worried about the abilities...

      FSB Wants Control of Email and VOIP
      The FSB (successor to the KGB) is worried about the abilities...

      See what I did there? All of the facts, none of the bias!

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    3. Re:The KGB no longer exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FSB conducts assassinations of the citizens in its jurisdiction.

      Granted, these citizens want to overthrow the government, and are actively making war against it, but they're citizens and the government is using secret police to kill the leading ones, instead of merely fighting the war against them and using the secret police to capture the leading ones for trial and execution.

      Is this how the new! improved! KGB would act?

      Yes. Yes it is.

      The name changes and organizational restructurings and reduction in political scope have not altered it completely. It still has powers that America will never grant its internal secret police, and it is asking for powers to interdict telecommunications just like its original namesake.

      FSB is more KGB than it is FBI. Russia is more Soviet Union than it is USA.

  34. KGB??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The KGB has not existed in about 20 years. Call an organization by some antiquated/hip-sounding name so that you can get a moron like Soulskill to post it on the front page. Is this really what Slashdot has stooped down to?
     
    --morgan greywolf

    1. Re:KGB??? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      The same murdering MOFOs still work for them, that have no concepts of freedom or 'hatred' for government controls. They think they are 'above' the elected government.

      Oh and im sure their mothers beat them silly when young and didnt give them their potatoes.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  35. Medvedev's part in the story by O(+inf) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Their increased interest in the tools may be related to a DDoS attack on Russian President Dmitri Medvedev's own LiveJournal account, which he termed 'revolting and illegal.'"

    This is very much oversimplifying the part of Medvedev in this story (as well as the story in general).

    This whole mess started when an FSB official (head of their department of information and telecommunication security), in the course of an official meeting, brought up GMail, Hotmail and Skype as an example of a "security problem" due to impossibility of wiretaps (as servers are outside the country, and HTTPS ensures secure connection to them from within), and suggested a ban (neither TFS nor TFA mention this!).

    Shortly after, an official from president Medvedev's administration stated that the ban - and, more broadly, the whole idea that foreign-hosted services are a "security issue" - is a personal opinion of that particular FSB person, and does not represent the official position of that organization nor government as a whole.

    Shortly after that, prime minister Putin's press secretary stated that this is incorrect, and the position is the official position of FSB, that it is well-argued and reasonable, and that Putin takes it with all due consideration.

    So basically it's more of the same thing that we've seen before. Whether it's a genuine power struggle between president and prime minister (the elections are less than a year away), or whether they're playing out a scripted "good cop / bad cop" in preparation for the same, is yet to be seen.

  36. girls, dont date spies or govt stooges by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    One simple solution, and if every girl ignores or doesnt date or marry any and all govt stooges / spies / LEOs. Then you will quickly see very few applicants to these agencies if it casts you as a 'virgin' outcast.

    Or if you are already with one, leave em.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:girls, dont date spies or govt stooges by sznupi · · Score: 1

      That would run counter to pretty much every evolutionary reinforced social & mating desires in human females...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  37. Horatio Moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are more things in heaven and /.
    *shades*
    than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
    YYYYEEEAAAAHHHHHH!

  38. Front Side Bus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What else could FSB possibly stand for?

  39. Over React Much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people just have to deal with pranks like a DDoS against their facebook page. It's just a prank because facebook is non-essential. Because it's the president, however, it becomes revolting and something they must rewrite law to stop. Sounds like Medvedev's just flexing his real-p33n (KGB agents, judicial authority) to squash 'dem hackers' e-p33n.

  40. Re:Back in the USSR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Trust me..."

    Yeah, right.

  41. KGB exists in Belarus by sznupi · · Score: 1

    Belorussian KGB of course makes the usage in the headline even more moronic - FSB would do fine, clarification at the beginning of TFS left as is.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  42. Re:ever heard by sznupi · · Score: 1

    Fishbowl Effect. After we have finally had our fun with memes and made a fer .com dollars, the endless years of hyperconnectedness are going to drag on with not even a religious apocalypse to distract us...

    Life / internet: pretty much the same crap, over and over, forever.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  43. Ssssstop it! by cyberfin · · Score: 1

    Really. Stop the sensationalistic headlines. KGB is long gone. It's the FSB. Period.

    --
    "I'm taking this loop off." - Jack O'Neill
  44. Re:Back in the USSR by Clsid · · Score: 1

    I don't know if it looks like an attempt to make Americans look better, but it is clearly an attempt to make Russia look bad. First off, it wasn't reported anywhere that Medvedev said that no such measures would come to pass, even if the FSB ends up suggesting it after the end of the "studies". Second, statements like "The FSB (really just a rebadged KGB)" really does not help with objectivity. It's like saying, the French Foreign Legion (the one that was causing havoc in Algeria), or the CIA (America's coup d'etats planners) which already tries to paint those institutions in a bad way.

    Also, a sentence like "with an eye possibly toward implementing controls like those in China" was clearly written by somebody who didn't even read the article. What they said is that Russian people were commenting on the Internet, and I quote from the Reuters article: "with many saying Russia could follow China's attempts to limit the Internet".

    I have been to Russia and I understand that it must not be easy to just let go of a country that was pointing nuclear weapons towards the US, and probably still does, but to be honest they are more worried about World War 2 history and how they won, than competing with the US. If anything, they want to be friendly with the US but they are very independent by nature, and this gets reflected in the fact that it's hard to spot foreigners in Russia unless at the usual touristic places, that they build a lot of the stuff they use, even stuff like Yandex replacing Google, vKontakte replacing Facebook, Rutube replacing YouTube and so on. So that independent culture only gets more reinforced. It was very curious to see that at the hotel I was staying, I didn't see any foreigner, and we are talking about a hotel complex that has like 4 huge towers.

    So really, just let go and report stuff in Russia as if you were talking about the French. Something along the lines "that's silly, but well, they are French, they like to be different".

  45. "Pwufessuh HaiwyPheet's GREATEST HITS" (NOT!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject-line above, & these "prime examples" below via links to the originals of WHY hairyfeet shouldn't have gone to "ITT Tech", in his TECHNICAL BLUNDERS, & more (regarding HOSTS files):

    ---

    Static vs. Dynamic Adbanner addressing (lol, "according to hairyfeet"):

    (Which even BestBuy Techs know!)

    http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2061048&cid=35681060

    ---

    DNS Client Cache turn off for HOSTS, a TECHNICAL Blunder by Hairyfeet:

    (Which even BestBuy Techs know also (just like the one above!))

    http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2061048&cid=35686054

    ---

    Hairyfeet's single solutions SECURITY FAILURES? See inside:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2064694&cid=35690260

    ---

    Your sources on "security" vs. mine (actual security people) (AND myself, a source on it):

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2064694&cid=35690328

    ---

    Lastly, as to your LIBEL of myself (w/ arstech):

    http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2061048&cid=35668740

    ---

    The defeat of hairyfeet by APK (video analogy - hilarious, BUT, apt):

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2064694&cid=35690536

    ---

    They say it all, & usually vs. hairyfeet's own words quoted! I wouldn't pay him too much heed, especially after you read the above b.s., lies, changing figures, & even LIBEL of others that hairyfeet likes to do. After all - he's from "ITT Tech" (student)...

    Worst part of ALL, here?

    Hairyfeet just clearly doesn't even understand how HOSTS files benefit you for:

    ---

    1.) ADDED Reliability (vs. DNS going down, or being 'poisoned', & even DNSBL (DNS Block Lists))

    2.) ADDED "layered" Security online (vs. known bad sites &/or servers (botnet C&C) + maliciously scripted adbannners by BLOCKING them out)

    3.) ADDED Speed (not loading adbanners, and hardcoding your fav. sites into it)

    4.) Even more ADDED 'anonymity' online (vs. DNS request logs)

    (Even server admins might NOT mind having the load on their DNS servers lightened up also, bonus!)

    ---

    APK

    P.S.=> Personally though - because hairyfeet is only a "techie"? I suspect he doesn't want people to know about HOSTS files' added LAYERED SECURITY benefits to the end-user: Why?? Because if users stop getting so much "malware-in-general" which layered security (and HOSTS) give you added layered protection against, he's out money...apk

  46. ALL of the west should be doing this by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    China and Russia are constantly attacking the west.
    It is time for us to install this as well.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.