Slashdot Mirror


Celebrating Yuri Gagarin's 1961 Flight Into Space

DeviceGuru writes "The 50th anniversary of the first-ever manned space flight, by Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Alekseyevich Gagarin, is being celebrated on April 12 with a two-day early activation of the ARISSat-1 ham radio satellite aboard the International Space Station. If you can get your hands on a scanner or ham handy-talkie you can join in the celebration by listening to prerecorded messages from the satellite as it orbits the globe tonight and tomorrow."

124 comments

  1. Happy Cosmonautics Day by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 0

    Good to see other people other countries joining what I though to be a purely Soviet holiday up till now. A person well worth celebrating, mind you!

    But I suppose the internet helps...

    Enjoy, and don't get too drunk today ;)

    Ura! Yuri Alekseevich!

    1. Re:Happy Cosmonautics Day by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 0

      In America, Cosmonautics Day celebrates YOU!

      Cheers!

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Happy Cosmonautics Day by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      If i actually had wodka in the house, i'd drink one tonight on Yuri, sadly though, he will have to settle for a glass of ice-thea (it will have a slice of lemon though)

      50 years of manned spaceflight! Here's to another 50, even if we achieve only half of the last 50 years, it will be worth watching

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
  2. Re:But he wasn't the first guy in space. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was this guy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Ilyushin

    Have you actually read the article you are citing?

  3. Re:But he wasn't the first guy in space. by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 2, Informative

    FTFWPA: "The entire early history of the Soviet manned space program has been declassified and we have piles of memoirs of cosmonauts, engineers, etc., who participated. We know who was in the original cosmonaut team, who never flew, was dismissed, or was killed in ground tests. Ilyushin is not one of them."

  4. Re:But he wasn't the first guy in space. by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

    Too bad I don't have mod points....

  5. Re:But he wasn't the first guy in space. by vivek7006 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Have you actually read the article you are citing?

    Nope, because this is SLASHDOT (in 300 style!)

  6. great by Globalintimate · · Score: 1

    I think the inventory of satellite changed our life a lot, it is worthy of celebrating.

    1. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Assuming you meant "invention", not "inventory"; otherwise your post is even MORE worthless - if that's possible)

      You do realize we're talking about manned spaceflight here, don't you?

    2. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard to see the point in being an asshole. The poster sounds like s/he isn't a native Anglophone.

    3. Re:great by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Hard to see the point in being an asshole. The poster sounds like s/he isn't a native Anglophone.

      YMBNH

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:great by MaDeR · · Score: 1

      "we're talking about manned spaceflight"
      You seem to claim that either manned spaceflight is not worth celebrating or that manned spaceflight is not performed by satellites.

      --
      What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".
    5. Re:great by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Plus, Sputnik and Yuri were lifted by essentially the same rocket... with quite a bit of other accomplishments Even better - Vostok (which doesn't have to mean only "East"; also "dawn" or "sunrise", a bit) was essentially a variant of Zenit satellite... quite possibly the largest series of unmanned satellites in history.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  7. Re:But he wasn't the first guy in space. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but Joseph Kittinger was there almost a year before Gagarin, and he didn't need a spaceship to do it. On August 16, 1960, Colonel Kittinger jumped out of a hot air balloon at over 100,000 ft with nothing but his gargantuan balls of steel attracting the earth towards their center of mass at half the speed of sound. You will never meet anyone as badass as Colonel Kittinger.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcT8lKKpeXs

  8. Re:But he wasn't the first guy in space. by mikael_j · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, he jumped from a balloon at 31,200 m up, this is nowhere near the Kármán line at 100,000 m which is commonly defined as the edge of space.

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  9. Free comic book by Amiralul · · Score: 1

    Here's a free comic book related to this event: CBZ or PDF

    1. Re:Free comic book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you twitting now? No. So why the hell do you shorten your links? Is it cooler? No, it pisses people off!

    2. Re:Free comic book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called being a TwitterTwat.

  10. I hope he's enjoying the afterlife by ikarys · · Score: 0

    Bending spoons in heaven.

    1. Re:I hope he's enjoying the afterlife by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 1

      How many pilots fell victim to SU-15
      Rest in peace young Yuri, there's a heaven for a G
      Be a lie if I told you that your profession was safe,
      My comrade, you deserve respect!

      (adapted from Life Goes On, by 2Pac)

    2. Re:I hope he's enjoying the afterlife by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I'm not the only one thinking this. :P

    3. Re:I hope he's enjoying the afterlife by Issarlk · · Score: 1

      AFAIK he was a communist. They don't believe in heaven.

    4. Re:I hope he's enjoying the afterlife by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, everyone is an "atheist" when they know that saying otherwise will get them thrown in a gulag.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:I hope he's enjoying the afterlife by Ironchew · · Score: 1

      AFAIK he was a communist. They don't believe in heaven.

      You deserve a prize for the most logical fallacies packed into ten words.

    6. Re:I hope he's enjoying the afterlife by MaDeR · · Score: 1

      I am atheist. Nothing (at least theoretically) will happen to me for this reason. Now what?

      --
      What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".
    7. Re:I hope he's enjoying the afterlife by sznupi · · Score: 1

      So, he was the first to actually be in heavens while... not believing in them?

      And in regards to various mythologies you probably also allude to - don't believe so readily in... myths. Vast majority of people behind the Iron Curtain... heck, vast majority of Party members were closet Christians, at "worst". "Strangely" in most communist places you can't really see any phenomenon of "unbaptized generation" (at worst - baptism in the countryside)

      Also, there's a curious overlap between "old Christian sects" places and those which had any notable problems with "communism"; it's probably largely a continuation of the same dynamics, really.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  11. Re:But he wasn't the first guy in space. by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

    The problem is that he died in 2010 ... a man in space that survived would the a hero of the Soviet Union ...

    Yuri got there first

    --
    Puteulanus fenestra mortis
  12. To many more manned spaceflights. by kvvbassboy · · Score: 2

    I think this is the primary scientific/engineering landmark of the 20th century, followed distantly by the Internet.

    1. Re:To many more manned spaceflights. by martin-boundary · · Score: 0

      I would say the Wright Brothers' first powered flight outranks this from an engineering landmark point of view. Aeroplanes have had a much bigger impact on the world throughout the 20th century, while space flight's importance is great but more specialized.

    2. Re:To many more manned spaceflights. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Wright brothers just copied something birds had been doing for millions of years, but manned spaceflight was something entirely new.

    3. Re:To many more manned spaceflights. by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      Powered flight was the next step in flight. People have been flying for decades with unpowered aircraft. This is 2 years after the first man made device was put into orbit.
      In the first years of the 20th century everyone and their grandmother were making powered aircraft. This was proper science.

    4. Re:To many more manned spaceflights. by GWRedDragon · · Score: 1

      As opposed to the development of the computer?

    5. Re:To many more manned spaceflights. by Sique · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I beg to differ. I am using space flight services far more often than airplane services. I am using weather forecasts, satellite TV and GPS on a daily basis, while I don't fly that often or get airmail or are buying stuff transported by airplanes.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    6. Re:To many more manned spaceflights. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm, none of these are MANNED, you jackass, and none of these would be possible without electronics and computers, and ALL of these could be possible without space.

    7. Re:To many more manned spaceflights. by igny · · Score: 1

      But do you get sick with viruses transported by airplanes from all over the world?

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    8. Re:To many more manned spaceflights. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      From an engineering standpoint, once the internal combustion engine came along, powered flight wasn't that great of a technical challenge. Powered space flight was a much more challenging technical achievement (as evidenced by how many engineers it took working from the V-2 to Sputnik).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    9. Re:To many more manned spaceflights. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Hm, none of these are MANNED, you jackass, .

      Because those satellites just 'appear' in space, right?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    10. Re:To many more manned spaceflights. by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Landmarks of the 20th century, please. Try again.

    11. Re:To many more manned spaceflights. by MaDeR · · Score: 1

      Did you ever seen how birds fly? Good grief, only lately we have any tech to fly small drones (with flapping wings). Even oh Slashdot was something about it.

      --
      What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".
    12. Re:To many more manned spaceflights. by tmarsh86 · · Score: 1

      Powered space flight WAS a 20th century landmark.

    13. Re:To many more manned spaceflights. by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      So was powered flight, which is why I proposed the Wright brothers flight (1905 -> a full century of developments in transport, communications (post), mapping, warfare, etc, vs 1961 -> half a century of space based technologies such as communications and mapping).

  13. at least that flight has truly occurred by biancmb · · Score: 0

    not as the much celebrated moon missions by the US

    1. Re:at least that flight has truly occurred by MaDeR · · Score: 1

      Nice trolling try, but not banana.

      --
      What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".
  14. I hope he's enjoying the afterlife... by ikarys · · Score: 1

    ... bending spoons in zero G heaven.

    1. Re:I hope he's enjoying the afterlife... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confusing Yuri Gagarin with Uri Geller.

  15. Actually it was Wan Hu... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wan Hu was the first man in space: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wan_Hu :)

    1. Re:Actually it was Wan Hu... by dokc · · Score: 1

      Wan Hu was the first man in space: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wan_Hu :)

      Actually, it was Icarus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icarus

      --
      In love, war and slashdot discussions, everything is allowed.
    2. Re:Actually it was Wan Hu... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wan Hu was the first man in space: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wan_Hu :)

      So... Hu was on first?

  16. UTC times by commlinx · · Score: 2

    The page http://www.arissat1.org/v3/ includes the transmission time in UTC and information on some of the other telemtry channels. They begin Monday 11 April 2011 at 14:30 UTC and continue until 10:30 UTC on 13 April 2011. I just tried the 145.950 MHz FM downlink as it passed over Australia without luck, but was using a fairly crappy wideband scanner antenna indoors. I might give it a try tomorrow with a 150MHz antenna which is closest narrowband antenna I've got.

  17. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by supertrinko · · Score: 2

    They're no longer your enemy. And Yuri did an amazing thing, the soviets performed an amazing feat. Yes, that should be celebrated, and the thousands who died in the cold war wouldn't think otherwise (I am equally able to spout unfounded statements about what soldiers would or would not do).

    --
    If it rhymes it must be true.
  18. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yuri did an amazing thing

    Not to be pedantic, but Yuri didn't actually do anything. Vostok 1 was fully automatic from lift-off to bail out.

  19. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some people don't have their head so far up their ass that they can't celebrate a great achievement of mankind unless they did it. The Soviets one-upped you. You one-upped them with Apollo. The world moved forward. Not everything has to be about you.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  20. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

    That's why - http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/4513/strebkov1976.2/0_5c0f3_6f23fd15_XL

  21. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by antifoidulus · · Score: 0

    Not to be pedantic, but Yuri didn't actually do anything. Vostok 1 was fully automatic from lift-off to bail out.

    Well, he didn't shit his space suit(probably, I don't know if the Soviets released any records on that one). So that's gotta be worth SOMETHING.

  22. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by Nimatek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'Our civilization'? I was under the impression that everyone on this planet belongs to 'our civilization' and thus all our great accomplishments are worthy of celebration. Space race? Enemies? What time are you living in exactly? Would you prefer for scientific and engineering achievements not to happen, unless they belong to your country, serving your 'nation'? I better stop, this is getting too close to Godwin territory.

  23. Still counting in earth-years? by captainpanic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Happy 50th space anniversary... (although I think that it's a little hypocritical to celebrate 50 revolutions of the earth around the sun, when the whole point of it is to be less earth-bound).

    -- In Soviet Russia...Rockets launch you!

    1. Re:Still counting in earth-years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hypocritical?

    2. Re:Still counting in earth-years? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      when the whole point of it is to be less earth-bound)

      Who said that was the point? Frankly, satellites have provided me with WAY more benefit than any moon landing ever did. AFAIC, *that* was the point.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Still counting in earth-years? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      You're an animal. A human to be specific. You've evolved and internalized via biological functions all manner of earth-bound cycles. You are not an interstellar space spore. The idea that we can just get rid of the year as a metric because of a guy orbiting the earth is a bit silly and certainly is not "the point."

      Maybe in some transhuman future where everyone lives off-planet and we control our genes and biology. But right now? Naww. Monkeyman needs a calendar.

    4. Re:Still counting in earth-years? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      His fight doesn't count by FIA rules. For a flight to be official the pilot must land with his craft.
      Yes shameless nitpicking that no including myself should give any weight too but someone was going to say it so I might as well get it out of the way.

      The only downside is that Gargarin is not with us today. He is exploring beyond the rim.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Still counting in earth-years? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      FIA officially recognizes his flight.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    6. Re:Still counting in earth-years? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Though such fairly precise Earth-bound timekeeping seems fairly strange for monkeyman... they went strangely overboard with watching the cycles. They even know exactly the day of their birthdays now. And intoxicate themselves on anniversary. Strange.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  24. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What time are you living in exactly?

    Well, for the purposes of this discussion, 1961 seems like a reasonable context. At the time, no one in the US was celebrating.

    Would you prefer for scientific and engineering achievements not to happen, unless they belong to your country, serving your 'nation'?

    The Manhattan Project was an incredible scientific and engineering achievement by any measure, but whether it's something to to celebrated depends a lot on which side of the war you happened to be on.

  25. Re:But he wasn't the first guy in space. by tehcyder · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    It was this guy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Ilyushin

    Have you actually read the article you are citing?

    There are times when I think slashdot should have a football (ok, soccer) yellow/red card system for particularly stupid and/or misleading posts. But then that wouldn't exactly encourage the advertisers as on any one day about half the readership would be banned.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  26. First orbit recreation by atisss · · Score: 1

    This video recreation is amazing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKs6ikmrLgg

  27. conversation record... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some translation of conversation just before flight between Korolev an Gagarin:

    Korolev: Yuri, then I want you just to recall that after a moment's willingness to take place six minutes and will start before the flight so that you do not worry. Reception.
    Gagarin: I understand, I am perfectly calm!
    Queens: There's a packing tube - lunch, dinner and breakfast.
    Gagarin: Clear
    Korolev: Sausage, Bean there, and jam for tea. 63 pieces, you will be thick.
    Gagarin: heh heh
    Korolev: After arrival, eat everything at once - instructs Korolev.
    ->>Gagarin retains a sense of humor:
    Gagarin: Main thing there is sausages to vodka drink with.
    Everyone laughs
    Korolev: Damn, and he writes all, the bastard! - Jokingly resents Korolev, knowing that the tape of Gagarin captures every word.
    Everyone laughs

    Original you can find in http://www.x-libri.ru/elib/innet170/00000001.htm
    sorry for bad translation ;))

  28. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by tehcyder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Doesn't it seem strange to celebrate what was, after all, a major loss for our civilization? The fact that we lost both opening chapters of the space race (Sputnik 1 and Vostok 1) is a national shame, which should be burned into our memory to be sure, but celebrated? Hardly.

    Celebrating the victories of our enemies is like spitting on the graves of the hundreds of thousands who died in the cold war.

    I suppose you're still pissed off that the Chinese invented gunpowder three thousand years ago?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  29. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by tehcyder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yuri did an amazing thing

    Not to be pedantic, but Yuri didn't actually do anything. Vostok 1 was fully automatic from lift-off to bail out.

    Yeah, and Neil Armstrong was just a glorified pilot. I've been on holidays several times on planes, what's so special about the Moon?
    Talk about sour grapes.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  30. Re:But he wasn't the first guy in space. by bkmoore · · Score: 3, Interesting

    His balloon was not a hot air balloon. It was filled with a lifting gas, either helium or hydrogen. Operating a hot air balloon at that altitude would require bringing along oxygen for the burner, which would increase overall weight and decrease altitude. Also, Gagarin orbited the planet in space. Kitinger explored the upper atmosphere in a high-altitude balloon. Both achievements were equally dangerous and impressive, but they are not the same.

  31. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 2

    The fact that we lost both opening chapters of the space race

    The fact that you had a space race is a national shame on both sides.

    Imagine if engineers and scientists on each side had been allowed to say to the other, "Dude, let's work together on this one."

    And before you respond with the obvious, how many of these engineers and scientists were doing it for the love and glory of mother Russia / America, rather than because they wanted to explore space?

    Celebrating the victories of our enemies is like spitting on the graves of the hundreds of thousands who died in the cold war.

    Deliberately misinterpreting the notions of both "enemy" and "cold war" is like spitting on the graves of the hundreds of thousands who died in the cold war.

    Trololo, molotov 303.

  32. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by Deus.1.01 · · Score: 0

    Indeed, everything we have today have been touched by achivements from all corners of the earth, be it ancient greek, medival muslim/christian societies, indian and chineese.

    We wouldnt have any renaissance or even better the enlightment age if the munks didn't have anything to work on.

    And today, the notion of several civilizations is completely irrelevant, we are tied as one on a global scale in more ways then just political and economical factors...good and bad.

    --
    My -1 Troll is actually a +1 funny. And my -1 flame is actually a +1 insightfull.
  33. Re:But he wasn't the first guy in space. by Kjella · · Score: 3, Funny

    On August 16, 1960, Colonel Kittinger jumped out of a hot air balloon at over 100,000 ft

    Yes, he jumped from a balloon at 31,200 m up, this is nowhere near the KÃrmÃn line at 100,000 m which is commonly defined as the edge of space.

    You must excuse him, he works for NASA...

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  34. Re:But he wasn't the first guy in space. by Jello+B. · · Score: 1

    hello, 2006.

  35. Food For the Moon Landing Skeptics by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... listening to prerecorded messages from the satellite as it orbits ...

    It was all a fake! Well, at least we have Buzz Aldrin, ready to turn any impertinent folk's face into a Picasso, if the journalist claims that the Moon Landing was a fake. If I had traveled to the Moon and back, I would also be so onery, in case someone asked me if it was a fake. Oh, you could check it yourselves . . . one of the Moon missions left a mirror on the surface of the Moon. All you need to do, is to shine a laser on it.

    Oh, and one more thing. The US Space Program was really tits up . . . even Werner von Braun had to turn to Walt Disney for support. When Sputnik and Gagarin went up, JFK got his ass in gear.

    Something to the state of the times in the world way back when, from Ice Station Zebra:

    David Jones: The Russians put our camera made by *our* German scientists and your film made by *your* German scientists into their satellite made by *their* German scientists.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Food For the Moon Landing Skeptics by GWRedDragon · · Score: 2

      Oh, you could check it yourselves . . . one of the Moon missions left a mirror on the surface of the Moon. All you need to do, is to shine a laser on it.

      Hardly evidence, given that even the biggest conspiracy theorists probably believe that there were successful unmanned moon landings. Not that I don't think men landed on the moon, but it's difficult to conclusively prove if you have zero trust in official sources and somehow discount all the photographs and video.

    2. Re:Food For the Moon Landing Skeptics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 1969 the Americans first landed men on the moon. Now some people have made names for themselves by saying that this and subsequent landings never happened. Their position is that NASA faked them in order to save face and fool the public. To prove their point they rely on explanations of the reported events using dubious science and lay explanations that any first year science major would and does, laugh at.

      However, they always miss or purposely avoid the the one piece of irrefutable proof that it did in fact happen. That is that the Soviet government never refuted the American claims and they were in a unique position to do so. For even after the Americans landed on the moon the Soviets still continued to send orbiters, landers and rovers to the moon.

      http://www.russianspaceweb.com/spacecraft_planetary_lunar.html

      Now if they wanted to get the goods on the Americans all they had to do was to land, photograph or explore with a rover the American landing sights. Just imagine the embarrassment not to mention the the damage to American credibility, at the height of the cold war no less, that such information would generate. Records even show that they never landed or even explored that areas that that American landings happened. So they did not even go and look to make sure because they knew it really happened.

      They did not use it to pressure the Americans to stop bombing North Vietnam and Cambodia where Soviet military advisers were being killed as a result. They did not use it to pressure the United States to stop sending military advisers and Stinger missiles to the Afghan fighters during the Soviet occupation. They did not use it to stop the Star Wars program of the Regan administration.

      In fact they did not even use it to turn the West's attention away from the Soviet Union during the Soviet Coup of 1991 when members of the Soviet government briefly deposed Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev and attempted to take control of the country.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_coup_attempt_of_1991

      Which every body knew was the last death throws of the Soviet empire. If they did not use the information then to turn the attention of the American, and world public, inward to their own governments lies and thus corruption and force it to ignore the events in the Soviet Union in order to deal with a damaging domestic and international issue. Then the proof of faked moon landings did not and never existed.

      One final thought. After the fall of the Soviet Union the Russian economy tanked. People were selling all kinds of stuff owed by the crumbling state, ships, weapons, artworks and knowledge but nobody ever approached any Western news agency or tabloid to sell them this information. And to say that one would buy it but not publish is foolish. The seller could just keep peddling it until some on did and then it would be old news and worthless until then it would still be worth something.

    3. Re:Food For the Moon Landing Skeptics by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      The US space program wasn't in bad shape at all by then. Sputnik had kicked it into gear back in 1957. You have to look at the military side to understand. By 1961 the US was actually far ahead im ICBMs, SLBM and Bombers. The R-7 was a massive impractical ICBM that took a week to prep for a launch but it was the only thing the USSR had that had a chance of threatening the US with. In 1957 the US was working on making practical ICBMs and smaller warheads. It had no military need for anything like the R-7. By 1964 the US had jumped into the lead with Gemini and by 1969 the US landed on the moon.

      Oh and just for historical perspective the US didn't any German help with cameras or film for spysats. We had Dr. Land. The same man that developed the Polaroid helped develop the first cameras for the U2, SR-71, and the first US spy sats. But it was a good movie.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Food For the Moon Landing Skeptics by sznupi · · Score: 1

      R-7 was the first operational ICBM... (not like it was practical in that role of course, not like the "missile gap" wasn't a myth; at least it turned out to be a fabulous launcher)

      And they had practical ones quite soon afterwards. Probably deciding to jump on the next obvious stage, not having huge bomber force ("bomber gap" also being a myth...)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    5. Re:Food For the Moon Landing Skeptics by sznupi · · Score: 1

      "German scientists" was much less true for the Soviets, actually; they got mostly just technicians, and send them back to Germany long before sputnik.

      Their record afterwards suggests they have a few tricks of their own in this field, for some reason (check also the engine of Atlas V, and whole first stage (tankage & engine) of Taurus 2)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  36. A Song Tribute by rishistar · · Score: 1

    There is a song about commemorating the event here http://geekpop.bandcamp.com/track/radio-gagarin

    --
    Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
  37. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just a thought: does anyone outside of your civilization regard the entire planet as "our civilization"? Western ideas aren't as universal as you might have been mislead into thinking.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  38. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by Seumas · · Score: 1

    Scientific and free-thinking communities generally don't adhere to the same bullshit "THERE IS OUR ENEMY!" rhetoric as politicians and the ignorant masses they lead.

  39. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by Nimatek · · Score: 1

    Science is quite separate from cultural values and ideologies. Breakthroughs can be of benefit to all factions of our human civilization. Also, 'western ideas' is a very broad term. I don't find it particularly meaningful, seeing as even among the 'western countries' there are numerous disagreements on basic issues, such as the structuring of society and economy. It is difficult to take such nationalistic squabbling in the name of ideology seriously, as the ideological makeup and the entire culture of a country can shift and transform over the course of only two generations, while such achievements persist as foundation for everyone to build on, when the original enmities are long dead.

  40. Yuri's Night by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    Or, if you don't want to sit at home listening to the radio, you can see if there is a Yuri's Night party near you. Most were over the weekend, but there are still a few the night of.

    Also, it's the anniversary of the first US space shuttle launch.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Yuri's Night by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I would see the anniversary of STS launch as something... sad. Set us back probably at least a decade. With automatic rendezvous & docking done in the 60s, it was obsolete before it seriously got on drawing boards (vs. just attaching some small tug to your cargo and not wasting most of launch mass for airframe)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  41. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

    Science is quite separate from cultural values and ideologies.
    Another Western idea. Seriously, you don't even think to question the foundations of your thinking...such as if members of other cultures think the same way as you and share your Western values.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  42. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by dave420 · · Score: 1

    "You"? I don't think the guy you're replying to had anything to do with the space programs.

  43. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Manhattan Project was an incredible scientific and engineering achievement by any measure, but whether it's something to to celebrated depends a lot on which side of the war you happened to be on.

    Or nuclear energy.

  44. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    Celebrating the victories of our enemies is like spitting on the graves of the hundreds of thousands who died in the cold war.

    Says the guy who picked Stalin's forgien minister for a nickname.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  45. Also Today... by necro81 · · Score: 1

    Today is the day NASA is expected to announce who will receive the retired space shuttles.

  46. And a shout-out to Sergei Korolev too by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    I would also like to recognize Sergei Korolev, a name that's sadly unknown in the United States, Without him, there might never have been a space race, or satellites, or a man on the moon, etc. He's the guy who achieved the miracle of talking Kruschev into a space program. He also taught himself rocketry, worked his way through school as a common laborer, served time in Stalin's gulags, and headed the team that recreated the V-2 rocket in the Soviet Union after the War.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:And a shout-out to Sergei Korolev too by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      Sergei was offered the Nobel prize for Sputnik and Gagarin's flight. Nobel committee only knew of him as "Chief Designer" but USSR says these accomplishments are of "all people." They don't give the Nobel prize posthumously. What is amazing is he managed to stay alive from the gulags! An excellent book, "Korolev: How One Man Masterminded the Soviet Drive to Beat America to the Moon" by James Harford, http://www.amazon.com/Korolev-Masterminded-Soviet-Drive-America/dp/0471327212/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top

      Book has many interviews with several of Sergei's colleagues. One of them mentioned when Kennedy said America is going to race USSR to the moon. Russians could either compete in the race or not. They did neither (kind of like what America is doing now).

      What if Korolev had died in the gulags? What if there were other "greats" who perished under Stalin's rule, and which certain things that could have been did not happen?

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
  47. ooops, bad link by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  48. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and Neil Armstrong was just a glorified pilot. I've been on holidays several times on planes, what's so special about the Moon?

    Looks like an explanation is in order. Among certain groups, there is a tradition of grumbling about the attention given to the "meat in the seat", when the *real* accomplishment is designing, building, launching, and guiding the spacecraft housing said passenger.

    In other words, you rise to the top of the engineering game, launch a rocket to the frickin' moon, and some jock still comes along and grabs the spotlight.

  49. And 50 years later... by tekrat · · Score: 2

    It's pretty much only the Russians still launching men/women into space. The US Space program is essentially, over.

    NASA's plans are up in the air, muddled and without focus, liable to change on political whim, and even when they go forward, it will be hopelessly underfunded and probably a disaster.

    Meanwhile, the Russians are using pretty much the exact same technology they were 50 years ago, and continuing to launch. NASA has to buy seats on the next few years of flights if we want to get anybody into or out of the ISS.

    Maybe SpaceX will change things for the better, but what I find so sad is that the USA went to the moon, and now our country is just a shadow of it's former self, bloated, dull, and stupid. We're the Roman Empire waiting to fall. Nero is fiddling.

    Here's to Yuri and Valentina though. I remember pointing out on Slashdot years ago, when Star Trek Enterprise premeired, how the title sequence avoided the Russians, even though it was trying to show the advancement of human space flight.

    I suggest someone change that title sequence, because all the advancement in that area is coming from someplace else, Russia, China, India -- but likely NOT the USA.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:And 50 years later... by quenda · · Score: 1

      The US Space program is essentially, over.

      Manned program. Which is a bit sad, but the science goes on. And more so the military & intelligence side. Just without the PR program.

    2. Re:And 50 years later... by MaDeR · · Score: 1

      Ares (not Aries, retard) is DEAD. Way to go.

      --
      What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".
  50. first to orbit, but first up? by corbettw · · Score: 1

    Not to take away from Gagarin and the rest of the Soviet space program's accomplishment of putting a man in space, orbiting the earth, and returning safely, but it's important to remember he may not have been the first man in space.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Cosmonauts

    Considering the memory hole that the Soviet Union was, it's impossible to say if any of those are real or not (some are obviously hoaxes); but it's equally impossible to disprove at least some of them.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    1. Re:first to orbit, but first up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh. If that were true we would have found out about it after '91, when Yeltsin was showing us the "answers in the back of the book" from a bunch of other Cold War coverups.

    2. Re:first to orbit, but first up? by braindrainbahrain · · Score: 1

      Kewl story on the Lost Cosmonauts, thanks for posting.. See also this recent news blurb (and book) about the cosmonaut Vladimir Kamarov, allegedly the cosmonaut that Robert Heinlein heard about during his visit to the USSRin 1960.

    3. Re:first to orbit, but first up? by Figec · · Score: 1

      I believe the Lost Cosmonaut folklore to have some truth to it as someone I know and trust who grow up in the Soviet Union has related to me how he vividly recalls an episode where a classmate lost his Cosmonaut dad to a failed space shot, and that this event was covered up and kept quiet.

    4. Re:first to orbit, but first up? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The reason why it's very unlikely is because the Soviet space program was already extremely fast-paced. It's hard to believe that there would be time for numerous additional flights before Vostok-1.

  51. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by GooberToo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Imagine if engineers and scientists on each side had been allowed to say to the other, "Dude, let's work together on this one."

    They wouldn't have received any funding. Let's recap. Goddard basically created modern rocketry. No one would fund him. He created the then definitive works on the subject. WWII started and his work was basically ignored by the allies despite his efforts. Germany took his efforts and created the stepping stones for modern missiles, rockets, and manned flight. It was funded by war. Post WWII, Germans taken in by both the US and Russia created the manned flight programs, which in turn were funded by war or the fear of war. Remember, manned flight was an excuse to justify massive spending to create ICMBs.

    So basically, "working together" almost never receives funding unless there is yet another underlying cause allowing the first to be used as a public excuse.

    Hell, the US-German program was so successful and the US program was so unsuccessful, the US-German program was literally mothballed and prevented from launching so as to allow the pure-US effort a chance as well as to allow the Russian's time to actually launch Sputnik to as to create an internal overflight precedence. Once Sputnik was launched, which created much ire and fear of the US public, much to the surprise of the US Cabinet, and after repeated US failures, the German program was removed from mothballs. The US-German program was taken directly from mothballs to the launch pad, and successfully launched. The US-German program was mothballed roughly a year before Sputnik was launched into space.

  52. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by Hatta · · Score: 1

    He got in. That's amazing enough.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  53. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    Doesn't it seem strange to celebrate what was, after all, a major loss for our civilization? The fact that we lost both opening chapters of the space race (Sputnik 1 and Vostok 1) is a national shame, which should be burned into our memory to be sure, but celebrated? Hardly.

    Celebrating the victories of our enemies is like spitting on the graves of the hundreds of thousands who died in the cold war.

    I suppose you're still pissed off that the Chinese invented gunpowder three thousand years ago?

    The funniest thing is the guy's handle is "molotov303", so he named his online persona after a protege of Stalin. Nice going, comrade!

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  54. Re:But he wasn't the first guy in space. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2006? Is that you? I must warn you about an earthquake in haiti and another one in Japan!!!! Google for it!

  55. What about the first African in space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When is that going to happen?

    (Obviously without the aid of NON-AFRICANS)...

  56. Yuri's Night is giving away a free eBook by DrewMartin · · Score: 1

    Yuri's Night folks are giving up copies of Martian Summer for a limited time. They're trying to create a space review mob to get space topics trending. Here is the link if you are interested: http://yurisnight.net/2011/04/yuri%E2%80%99s-night-and-martian-summer-the-millions-and-millions-give-away/

  57. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Yuri did an amazing thing

    Not to be pedantic, but Yuri didn't actually do anything. Vostok 1 was fully automatic from lift-off to bail out.

    He risked his life to prove it would work. That scores a fair bit higher than a computer-desk-critic.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  58. Programmed in to my Yaesu FT-530 by wwphx · · Score: 1

    Eagerly hoping to hear something!

    73, KB7UJR

    --
    When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  59. Celebrating Russian space accomplishment at NASA by k6mfw · · Score: 2

    If there is one thing that is amazing is there are (were) celebrations of a Russian (or precisely Soviet) space accomplishment at a NASA facility. This was last year at NASA Ames Research Center, this year budget issues prevented this year's Yuri's Night but they had Yuri's Education Day (http://ynba.org/2011/).

    Last year's event had all kinds of people you typically don't see at a NASA facility. Plus the music was really loud with all the flashing lights, etc. in same building that housed research aircraft (XV15, ER-2, QSRA which are all now long gone). And sometimes the smoke you smell coming from certain groups that is not cigarette or stage smoke. I asked some 20-somethings of what they think of it all, generally they see Gagarin's flight not as a competition between two countries but his flight was the evolutionary step of all mankind.

    So here we are 50 years since Yuri's flight, and the big announcement is what museums will contain the Space Shuttles! It seems we all succumbed to being flatlanders. Only looking straight ahead (for profits) or looking down (for oil) instead of looking up, out, and beyond.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  60. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by arose · · Score: 1

    To be fair, the handle could come from the Finnish drink named after same protege.

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  61. Re:Celebrating Russian space accomplishment at NAS by slooglasnik · · Score: 1

    True

    --
    "Can Aliens destroy earth before we even realize it.? Noot. But humans can!!!"
  62. Not true by Cyberax · · Score: 2

    Not true. Orthodox Church existed just fine during the USSR. It even had official state support, even during Stalin's reign.

  63. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by Nimatek · · Score: 1

    That's not a Western idea, as it is not an idea at all. It's a fact that is independent of 'Western values'. While some cultures don't see anything as separate from their ideology or religion, that does nothing to bind the purely scientific results, once they become available. They might be glorified and used by a particular ideology in a certain way, but as I explained in my previous post, ideologies and cultural values are temporary cruft, easily brushed from the scientific achievements they birthed, once they die off.

  64. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Soviet Union, most assuredly, was a child of and a part of Western (European) civilization, rooted in the same history stemming from Greeks and Romans and Judeo-Christian religious tradition. It was an implementation of some of the more extreme ideas, sure, but those ideas were of European philosophers, and people implementing them had education largely in European tradition (you know - Latin, Greek, natural philosophy...).

    French and Germans have fought numerous times as well. That doesn't mean that they do not belong to the same civilization.

  65. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Yuri knew full well that he could end up like this, and still went ahead.

  66. Re:Strange thing to celebrate... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Well, for the purposes of this discussion, 1961 seems like a reasonable context. At the time, no one in the US was celebrating.

    If so, that doesn't speak too well for US, but I find it hard to believe. The Apollo landing was definitely celebrated in USSR (by common folk who were interested in such matters, anyway).

    As well, I don't know about 1961, but this dates to 1971.

  67. "I didn't see God" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No I didn't see God.I looked and looked, but I didn't see God." - Yuri Gagarin, answering a question of a foreign journalist about the flight.

    1. Re:"I didn't see God" by MaDeR · · Score: 1

      Religious people moved God away from sky long ago before manned spaceflight. Somewhere, where no one can see him by merely flying close.

      --
      What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".
  68. No luck here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried to pick it up as it went over Portland, OR tonight (23:34 local time) with a 2 Meter radio and a 4 element 144 MHz yagi sitting indoors on a tripod. ISS got up to 40 degrees elevation but no sign of a signal. Checking a few forums, nobody seems to have heard anything from the satellite so you're not alone. There seems to be an unconfirmed report on the funcube group that the batteries went flat, but I have yet to see any official statement from AMSAT or the arissat home page.