Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Censors Crack Down on Time Travel

H_Fisher writes "Disrespect the Chinese government at your peril ... and this includes anything you do with the past. Time magazine's Techland blog reports that China is banning references to time travel which are disrespectful to the nation's culture and history. No word on whether this includes a travel ban on time lords."

154 comments

  1. First Post by digitac · · Score: 4, Funny

    From Friday, April 15, 2011. PS, gas prices went up again.

    1. Re:First Post by electron+sponge · · Score: 1

      Or to be more locally relevant to the story at hand:

      • Pollution still sucks and Beijing still censors the shit out of us
    2. Re:First Post by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

      So the chinese have invented the Frux Capacitor then?

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    3. Re:First Post by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Funny

      They actually stole the plans and modified them, along with the ones for their riced-up DeRorean.

    4. Re:First Post by cosm · · Score: 5, Funny

      RMAO

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    5. Re:First Post by treeves · · Score: 4, Funny

      Since DeLoreans don't have hair what effect does lice have on them?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    6. Re:First Post by Bahamut_Omega · · Score: 1

      Great, where's your local time lord when you need him? On the other hand; Imajin will be taking over China any day now.

    7. Re:First Post by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2

      No, they got the plans for a bunch of pinball machine parts by mistake.

    8. Re:First Post by VanGarrett · · Score: 1

      L-R is a Japanese thing. In Chinese, it's R-W. Or so I've been told.

    9. Re:First Post by readin · · Score: 2

      "Chinese" is more complicated than that. First, there are many languages of China. Second, the official language (Mandarin) has far more sounds than Japanese. It is comparable to English in the number of sounds available - including a sound like an L and a couple sounds that resemble and R.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    10. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mandarin has an initial L sound, but no final L sound. So a Mandarin speaker generally has no trouble distinguishing between "rice" and "lice", but finds it impossible to say the word "squirrel". For endless amusement, tell a Mandarin speaker to say "ell", then "luh".

    11. Re:First Post by readin · · Score: 1

      Or ask a Japanese speaker to say "world".

      When I was teaching in Taiwan I tried to teach a couple of older ladies (in their 60s now) their ABCs. They natively spoke Taiwanese of course (and at least one of them spoke Hakka natively too), but when Chiang Kai-shek showed up he made everyone learn Mandarin Chinese. I found interesting (and frustrating) that these ladies had no problem with the initial S sound for words like "Song"(not the music but the dynasty) and "san" (3) or even the mid-word S in "Cheesuu" (Cheese by someone who can't do a final S), but they could not say the letter "C". It always came out "she". All these years later and I still don't understand it.

      The Japanese language is similar in that their S sounds are sa, shi, su, se, so. I don't know how much trouble Japanese people have saying "si" (C).

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    12. Re:First Post by irving47 · · Score: 1

      Chances are they stole the formula for the electrolyte. So when they travel in time, the capacitor starts leaking all over the time vehicle and they have little chance of returning.

      (This might be just a little obscure even for slashdot. Google "Capacitor plague")

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    13. Re:First Post by Appolonius+of+Perge · · Score: 1

      (Mandarin) Chinese actually has a pretty restricted set of sounds, IMO (I speak it), but the raw consonants cover a lot of what English has, although it lacks a "th" or a "v" sound. Most of the awkwardness comes from the fact that it has a very restricted set of valid syllables, with no final consonants other than "ng," which makes it really hard for native Chinese speakers to pronounce western words with final consonants, and particularly consonant clusters. "Stockholm" is rendered as si-de-ge-er-mo in an attempt to cover all the consonants (and mapping er to ol because there's no final l).

    14. Re:First Post by Meski · · Score: 1

      Assume you had a working time machine, how would you deal with spares? Move from present to past, dropping a parts depot every 5 years or so? You'd need to make them rather secure, to prevent the natives from getting the technology prematurely...

    15. Re:First Post by bornagainpenguin · · Score: 1

      No, they got the plans for a bunch of pinball machine parts by mistake.

      Amazingly they were still able to manufacture a Derorean anyhow. Too bad it can't seem to hit above 60 mph without starting to lose bits and pieces...

      --
      Have a Virgin Mobile USA smartphone? Give VMRoms.com a try!
    16. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Re: your sig:

      Reality: The realization that feminism and misogyny are now virtually indistinguishable by misogynists.

      Fixed that for you.

    17. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chances are they stole the formula for the electrolyte. So when they travel in time, the capacitor starts leaking all over the time vehicle and they have little chance of returning.

      (This might be just a little obscure even for slashdot. Google "Capacitor plague")

      Woo! An obscure reference I recongnise! I feel special!

    18. Re:First Post by dominious · · Score: 1

      "si" and "so" are not the same sounds. Try "si" and think how your mouth moves, and then try "so" and see how your mouth moves.

      Or they just play a practical joke :)

    19. Re:First Post by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Too bad it can't seem to hit above 60 mph without starting to lose bits and pieces...

      I hear the number plates fall off all the time.

      And 60 mph is an achievement for a Northern Ireland built DeLorean, a sports car that can be chased down by two Libyans in a VW Van.

    20. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, y'see Marty one of them alone doesn't do much, but together, thousands of them are the mechanism that can bring this baby all the way to 88mph.
      I call it the BugRunner.

    21. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Marx capacitor

    22. Re:First Post by FRiC · · Score: 1

      It's your ears, or your pronunciation of C that makes them think you're saying she. Chinese people have no trouble pronouncing "C", since the (Mandarin) Chinese word for "west" is pronounced "C". If you have trouble teaching the C sound, just ask them to say west. On the other hand, there's no Mandarin sound that directly corresponds to "she".

      Since I speak both Mandarin and English, and I work with a lot of language learners and speakers, I discovered most Westerners have trouble differentiating Chinese people pronouncing C vs. She, while Chinese people themselves have no trouble. There are other examples of this in other languages too, it's as if the listeners' ears aren't trained to distinguish those sounds. It's just one of those strange things.

    23. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, a joke is always better if you have to google for it...

    24. Re:First Post by Even+on+Slashdot+FOE · · Score: 1

      Try listening to feminists on the internet. A lot of them clearly either don't understand the concept of "equal rights" or would vastly prefer force men to be Stepford Spouses.

    25. Re:First Post by nobodie · · Score: 1

      Putonghua, the mainland common language has three consonant finals: /r/, /n/ and /ng/ (apologies for not knowing how to write the proper symbol). The same is true for some other languages and varieties of Chinese, though some, like Guangdong Hua (Cantonese), have a few more. Beijing Hua (the language used in the capital "Peking") also has a final "r" that appears in many words that end in a vowel (so "hua" becomes "huar") where it is not used in Putonghua. To say that the only final consonant in "Mandarin" is /ng/ just plain wrong.

      There are many things you could say about finals: in putonghua there are no plosive finals, for example, but why bother? It is just another language and to try to render Swedish into another language is not easy. Frankly, not speaking Swedish, I am betting that I mispronounce the name of their capital city. I am sure that I amero-anglicize it in a way that might make some of them wince. I know my Dutch wife always laughs at my Dutch pronunciation, reminding me that I am butchering the vowels and the consonants. I struggle to get a correct pronunciation of Amsterdam. the American version is.... well not right.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    26. Re:First Post by readin · · Score: 1

      You mention the example of the word "West". but that sure sounds like "she" to me. As for not being able to distinguish, there are two "sh" sounds that are very similar. Sometimes I can tell them apart and sometimes I can't, but neither sounds like "C". Pinyin uses "xi" and "sh" for the sounds. Yale uses "shi" and "sh". Zhuyin uses a "T" like character and a character that looks a bit like a "?" but with straight lines.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    27. Re:First Post by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      The Marx capacitor

      I tried using that one as a replacement, but it kept plunking me down outside movie theaters showing Duck Soup...

      ...which I watched 167 times, and it kept getting funnier every time I saw it.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    28. Re:First Post by chaodyn · · Score: 1

      You don't need to worry about spares - when you break down you just write a letter with what parts you need and when and send it to yourself in care of Western Union with instructions to deliver it before you leave. Like that episode of Quantum Leap where Sam and Al switched during the leap and the door was shut - the second they dropped the letter into the mailbox the door opened. Makes logistics that much easier :)

    29. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are the loud ones. The vocal minority.

    30. Re:First Post by Meski · · Score: 1

      You'd rely on the post? :))

    31. Re:First Post by RancidPeanutOil · · Score: 1

      Dominious had the right idea - the vowels change the sound; additionally, consonants have weight in many tonal languages, so they actually perceive the sound differently. You think of them as the same phoneme, because in English, they are - even if they are allophonic. Taiwanese speakers have an additional distinction, so their phonological space is tighter in that area, and thus they are able to make finer phonetic distinctions - which is confusing, because you're (parent of parent) telling them they're all the same sound. So they're thinking, "this guy doesn't even know these sounds are different in his own language! Why listen to him? Ha ha ha." Also, all this Wade-Giles/Yale gibberish, even pinyin, is useless. Try the IPA.

    32. Re:First Post by readin · · Score: 1

      Thank you RandcidPeanutOil and Dominoes. You've given me something to think about and research. As for not realizing the sounds are different in my own language, I guess that's a possibility. I never realized there were two different "th" sounds until someone pointed it out to me.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  2. It's not paradoxical at all but... by xMrFishx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if the Chinese traveled back in time to tell themselves to ban talking about time travel because it was possible. Will this prevent the discovery of time travel so that they can not warn themselves? The plot thickens...

    1. Re:It's not paradoxical at all but... by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny

      Take it easy on the State Administration for Radio, Film & Television, xMrFishx; everybody kills Hong Xiuquan on their first trip. I did. It always gets fixed within a few minutes, what's the harm?

    2. Re:It's not paradoxical at all but... by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the Chinese traveled back in time to tell themselves to ban talking about time travel because it was possible. Will this prevent the discovery of time travel so that they can not warn themselves? The plot thickens...

      Yes, that was my first thought also! The Chinese in the year 2096 discovered time travel. Upon discovering this and inventing a workable time machine, Emperor Chian `xon Choue's first reaction was to send emissaries back in time to have a chat and ban talking about time travel. This way the future Chinese could have the secret all to themselves; except that they forgot what the secret was in the alternate reality and now the details of the meeting are lost because although it happened it never happened. So simple it's brilliant!

    3. Re:It's not paradoxical at all but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good stuff. Thank you.

    4. Re:It's not paradoxical at all but... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Speaking to you from 2075 to let you know their ban was an utter failure. Also. Chinese take-out is still popular in regions where the Tsunami of 2040 didn't wipe out coastal populations. And the Internet has been replaced by the much better GkKLdfv^(0--18X... transmission interrupted by tachyon flux...

    5. Re:It's not paradoxical at all but... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2

      Well darn - I didn't want to alarm anyone! Pssst - buy beachfront property in Nevada now before the price rises.

    6. Re:It's not paradoxical at all but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sure, tell that to AsianAvenger (detailed later on the page).

    7. Re:It's not paradoxical at all but... by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

      Genius!

      --
      I8-D
    8. Re:It's not paradoxical at all but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the plot thicks: http://www.exocomics.com/175

  3. scifi by Weezul · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you outlaw scifi then only criminals will have scifi,
    meaning only criminals will go on to study physics.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:scifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because only lonely, virgin nerds go on to study physics.

    2. Re:scifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      is this a trick question?

    3. Re:scifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kid Ben: "Where do baby Alien X's come from?"
      Kevin: "When two constellations love each other very much..."
      Gwen: "KEVIN!"
      Kevin: "I'm just trying to help the kid out. I had to learn Astrophysics on the streets."

    4. Re:scifi by OpenGLFan · · Score: 1

      If you outlaw scifi then only criminals will have scifi,
      meaning only criminals will go on to study physics.

      Thereby sucking them out of the university's Finance schools. Brilliant!

    5. Re:scifi by Weezul · · Score: 1

      Umm, last I herd, the requirements for like half the Wall St. jobs were :
      - PhD in mathematics or physics
      - lots of programming experience
      I'm sure you might also get the job with another hard science or engineering degree, so long as you could pass their interviews, which apparently get targets pretty heavily towards mathematical games.

      A business degree usually just means your suitable for managing people who couldn't get admitted to your school, wherever that happened to be. I'd imagine finance degree means roughly the same thing.

      Economics isn't necessarily the same however, more like studying Theology, i.e. you might've really learned something, but..

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    6. Re:scifi by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Economics isn't necessarily the same however, more like studying Theology, i.e. you might've really learned something, but..

      An interesting way to describe Economics, I'll remember that one.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  4. I actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually read Chinese Sensors Crack Down on Time Travel ............my hopes were dashed.soon

  5. NOooooooooo by ae1294 · · Score: 2

    I was just getting ready to jump into my time machine and go back to kill Sun Yat-sen. How could they have known?

    O... wait...

  6. Really Slashdot?!? Really? by cosm · · Score: 5, Informative
    Another Samzenpus FacePalm. The /. title is seriously misleading. FTA:

    With the way things are run, the state controls and monitors everything shown on your television or your computer. So yeah, China can randomly go back in time and say Marty McFly never existed. Scary, huh? The Doc would be furious. Fortunately, that's not what they're saying. But somehow the government has taken a sudden disliking to the idea of distorting certain historical events, things and people. (Cough.) ....The decision was made earlier this month, with the country's State Administration for Radio, Film & Television stating that "The producers and writers are treating the serious history in a frivolous way, which should by no means be encouraged anymore." What's wrong with these shows? They “casually make up myths, have monstrous and weird plots, use absurd tactics, and even promote feudalism, superstition, fatalism and reincarnation.”

    So time travel comes in because the article decided to link the concept of time-travel to television and movies that convey alternative histories (Which, to the pedants, can include time-travel). But it the main theme discussed is regarding misrepresenting history. Nowhere does it say sitting in your back-yard and working on that warp-drive is verboten. It seems to me they want to cut down on media that strays from the government dictated and allowed 'historical context'. Far from a ban on time-travel. Censorship...Yes...Sensationalist...Unfortunately.

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:Really Slashdot?!? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like stories where some one goes back in time and swaps Henry Ford for Mao and now China is 15 trillion in debt to the US?

    2. Re:Really Slashdot?!? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fatalism and reincarnation

      Children stories by Chan Buddhists are clearly the main target of this opinion of the administration. The culture revolution takes another step forward in destruction of Chinese culture before the retirement of the children of that revolution..

    3. Re:Really Slashdot?!? Really? by quenda · · Score: 2

      Seems more like they have had a run of bad "historical" dramas using a cliched and awkward plot device.
      The TV bosses have published guidelines to discourage more.

      If the BBC director sent out a memo saying, "Please, for the love of God, no more airport documentaries, serial-killer dramas, or home make-overs.", would we get the same response on /.?

    4. Re:Really Slashdot?!? Really? by D+H+NG · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, this is not just the article singling out time travel. According to The New York Times, the original government report does single out TV dramas that involve characters traveling back in time.

    5. Re:Really Slashdot?!? Really? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Seems more like they have had a run of bad "historical" dramas using a cliched and awkward plot device.

      Hmm? TVB's Step Into the Past series was pretty good, and even though it was a Hong Kong production, received a lot of support from the Beijing government in producing it in mainland China.

      The plot of it is about a police officer that discovers a terra-cotta warrior that looks like him (hey, foreshadowing), and then time travels to the past to make sure the Qin win like they're supposed to. It's not a bad series, though I've only watched about the first half of it.

      But anyway, my point is that Beijing obviously doesn't hate time travel dramas in general. Though there is a huge gaping hole of sci-fi in Chinese pop culture.

    6. Re:Really Slashdot?!? Really? by cosm · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Thanks for that...MOD UP!

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    7. Re:Really Slashdot?!? Really? by braindrainbahrain · · Score: 2

      It's a good thing we (or some of us) live in the enlightened USA. In the US, we would never allow a law that forbade the interpretation of history and our collective past. Except for Florida, that is.

    8. Re:Really Slashdot?!? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course, it doesn't help if TFA is also totally wrong.
      Chinese text from the original announcement:

      If you understand Chinese, it doesn't mention time travel or history at all. The confusion comes from the term , when used in certain context, can mean time travel. But in general it just means travel to a different world. In the context here, it means to travel to a mythological world.

      The are no mentioning of bans neither, it's just the dudes at State Administration for Radio, Film & Television doesn't like this particular show because it doesn't match their values and tell people to make better ones.

    9. Re:Really Slashdot?!? Really? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 0

      Exactly. And this dickishness just served to encourage the 'ha ha the Chinese are so stupid they can't even pronounce letters properly' idiots. Seriously, /. can be so lame sometimes.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    10. Re:Really Slashdot?!? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also before getting all up in arms in outrage about this people should consider Europe. In much of it any real debate on one of the defining moments in the last century's history is banned. I guess that's unimportant as it's been going on for so long, and it's largely America's ally (for now).

    11. Re:Really Slashdot?!? Really? by khallow · · Score: 1

      Thanks. When I saw this story, the first thought that popped into my head was "How is the US doing this worse?" I mean, that's what we're all thinking, right? Thanks for answering that question.

    12. Re:Really Slashdot?!? Really? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      So the Chinese government wants to ban time travel stories to stop historical revisionism when they engage in massive historical revisionism themselves? (Tiananmen Square? Nothing ever happened there!)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    13. Re:Really Slashdot?!? Really? by poity · · Score: 1

      If the BBC director sent out a memo saying, "Please, for the love of God, no more airport documentaries, serial-killer dramas, or home make-overs.", would we get the same response on /.?

      Probably, but it won't be too bad. However if it happens in America, /. would get bent out of shape about it's even more evidence that maniacal corporations are trying to enslave us by stifling creative thought and how USA is a police state that will not tolerate free thinking and how it's much much worse than China.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    14. Re:Really Slashdot?!? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what pivotal point in history would this be? If you are talking about WWII, many countries have laws that stop people from walking around in SS-uniforms while shouting racist remarks, but nothing about the debate. (Although Germany does have a law against the portrayal of Swastika's, this still does not pertain to any debate.

    15. Re:Really Slashdot?!? Really? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is not just the article singling out time travel. According to The New York Times, the original government report does single out TV dramas that involve characters traveling back in time.

      Maybe they just want to keep the lazy Trek writers out of the country.

      Seriously, though, coincidentally, I introduced my daughter to Back to the Future last night. She liked thinking about the time paradoxes as much as the film itself. To limit avenues of fictional exploration is to dumb down your society.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  7. Alternative history by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems to me that their real fear is people latching on to the idea that things could ever have worked out differently. If people explore alternative histories and conjecture what would have happened if the ruling regime didn't come to power, how things might have been changed... perhaps for the better.

    Better to nip those flights of fancy in the bud and keep everyone's horizons nicely blinkered and focused on the factory assembly line.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    1. Re:Alternative history by vivian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No I think the real problem is they want to maintain their monopoly on making up history. If someone else starts doing it too, people might start getting the idea that perhaps all history they read isn't quite as true as they currently think it is.

    2. Re:Alternative history by readin · · Score: 1

      Excelly point. Also they don't want people looking at the past and discoving that what they've been told is full of lies. And they don't want people looking at what the CPC did to destroy so much of China and kill so many Chinese people. Nor would they want people looking at the history of China's relationship with Taiwan and discovering that maybe Taiwan isn't part of Taiwan after all. Nor would they want people realizing that China has a history (both past and current) of imperialism just like the British whom they so love to hate.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    3. Re:Alternative history by readin · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. Also they don't want people looking at the past and discovering that what they've been told is full of lies. And they don't want people looking at what the CPC did to destroy so much of China and kill so many Chinese people. Nor would they want people looking at the history of China's relationship with Taiwan and discovering that maybe Taiwan isn't part of China after all. Nor would they want people realizing that China has a history (both past and current) of imperialism just like the British whom they so love to hate.

      (yes, I know this is nearly an exact copy of my previous post, but I didn't have the good sense to preview that one :P)

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    4. Re:Alternative history by Tom · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that their real fear is people latching on to the idea that things could ever have worked out differently. If people explore alternative histories and conjecture what would have happened if the ruling regime didn't come to power, how things might have been changed... perhaps for the better.

      Because that is how history changes always work out - in Hollywood.

      So, if you want to play a serious round of "what if", you have to think about the other, less attractive, alternatives as well.

      China could have missed the trip into the future and entered the modern world with an agricultural economy and exploding population numbers. Because population control requires strict government control as much as the Big Firewall. So in your "alternate history", don't forget to account for a few hundred million starvation victims. Or maybe a major war with Russia, there were several points in the past 50 years where that could very well have happened. Or imagine a war between China and India, they are not exactly best friends, either. Can you even imagine that? 2.5 billion people at war with each other? That is roughly the entire world population at the time of WW2, except that despite the name, WW2 only affected less than half of the world population. So, accounting for modern weapons and higher population densities, 100 million dead is optimistic.

      Oh yeah. How things might have changed... perhaps much, much worse. Or perhaps better. I certainly don't support not being able to explore the possibilities, but let's not forget that Hollywood does not depict reality and you shouldn't take your convictions from movies.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    5. Re:Alternative history by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      Well, those aren't my convictions. These are the postulated convictions of writers in China - and arguably, Hollywood plots are rather what we're talking about. Now, I very much doubt that the Chinese powers-that-be would take offense at a writer whose works boil down to "Everything is as good as it could possibly be! If it weren't for the glorious communist party, we would be living in a capitalist hellhole!". The fact that they -are- taking offense to people's writings, suggests to me that they don't like the alternatives proposed and the implicit questions about how things could have been different (ie. preferable) to how they are now.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    6. Re:Alternative history by Tom · · Score: 1

      Maybe, maybe not. Sometimes, the stated reason really is the real reason.

      Ok, we're talking about politicians, forget everything I said. If I look at the slimeballs we have, and imagine that plus near absolute power... brrr...

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  8. In Capitalist China, Time Travel is Banned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think I smell the birth of a new meme.

    1. Re:In Capitalist China, Time Travel is Banned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure you don't. You probably just need to wash your clothes more than once every couple of months.

    2. Re:In Capitalist China, Time Travel is Banned. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that in Soviet Russia, Time Travel bans you?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  9. We are all time travelers by AbrasiveCat · · Score: 1

    Just "most" of us only travel forward in time.

  10. Choice examples by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 2

    A favorite SF story of mine is Walter Jon Williams's "Foreign Devils," which was part of an anthology of stories taking place in the setting of HG Wells's War of the Worlds, but taking place in other parts of the world. WJW's contribution depicted the reaction of China's royalty to the tripods etc. Not time travel per se but definitely cast the Chinese court in a less than favorable light.

    That's as close as I can get to a story which might draw ire from the PRC; any others? According to TFA they're down on stories which “casually make up myths, have monstrous and weird plots, use absurd tactics, and even promote feudalism, superstition, fatalism and reincarnation.” All of those at once sounds quite entertaining, actually.

    1. Re:Choice examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A favorite SF story of mine is Walter Jon Williams's "Foreign Devils," which was part of an anthology of stories taking place in the setting of HG Wells's War of the Worlds, but taking place in other parts of the world. WJW's contribution depicted the reaction of China's royalty to the tripods etc. Not time travel per se but definitely cast the Chinese court in a less than favorable light.

      That's as close as I can get to a story which might draw ire from the PRC; any others? According to TFA they're down on stories which “casually make up myths, have monstrous and weird plots, use absurd tactics, and even promote feudalism, superstition, fatalism and reincarnation.” All of those at once sounds quite entertaining, actually.

      I don't like the bible either.

    2. Re:Choice examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jade Empire (the video game) pretty much manages all of those from what I remember.

  11. 1984 by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

    This is just a historical revisionism / always at war with Oceania / business as usual thing.
    They even bothered to get a picture of the Delorean to go with the extremely tenuous headline.

  12. don't forget June 4, 1989 by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2

    June 4, 1989

    1. Re:don't forget June 4, 1989 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      June 4, 1989

      You mean, the date on which nothing happened?

      (Why yes, the "Simpsons Did It...)

  13. Obligatory Chinese Time Travel Commercial by Rollgunner · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Obligatory Chinese Time Travel Commercial by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Thank you sir, I enjoyed this commercial more than any I have seen for several years.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    2. Re:Obligatory Chinese Time Travel Commercial by MasterGwaha · · Score: 1

      LOL! thanks i have never seen that! sooo good!!

  14. must be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to have someone like the US dumping billions into your pocket, then you can come up with crazy shit all day long cause you do not have a real concern anymore

  15. How about disrespectful to its present government by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    A government that does not tolerate free speech, including art that for example ridicules certain aspects of culture or history, is simply telegraphing the weakness of its power over its people, and the tenuousness of its legitimacy.

    True power comes from the willing consent of the people.

    Power that comes from applying the heels of jackboots is oh so shallow and fragile.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  16. Oh quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sucking the Chinese dicks. Please, they are not worth it.

    1. Re:Oh quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong? Wasn't as fulfilling as you thought it would be?

  17. in soviet Russia We remove people from time! by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Funny

    in soviet Russia We remove people from time!

    1. Re:in soviet Russia We remove people from time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If your going to do this, you need to have the title "In Soviet Russia .."

      then in the body you have "we remove people from time!"

      Now please go back and correct this.
      thx

    2. Re:in soviet Russia We remove people from time! by quacking+duck · · Score: 2

      You just had to spoil last season's Doctor Who for everyone, didn't you...

    3. Re:in soviet Russia We remove people from time! by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      And they did it pretty well considering they didn't even have photoshop!

  18. This story would be banned by Grapplebeam · · Score: 1

    Since it's an old story, it must have time travelled to now.

    --
    There is no -1 Disagree.
  19. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Their top researchers are too busy trying to figure out why ridiculous foreigners don't seem to comprehend that their language does, in fact, contain an 'L' sound.

    1. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their top researchers are too busy trying to figure out why ridiculous foreigners don't seem to comprehend that their language does, in fact, contain an 'L' sound.

      and it is used anytime the english character "r" is spoken.

    2. Re:No. by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      It's just what you get used to with your language sounds growing up, I guess.

      The phonemes of your native language are what your brain's speech recognition center is trained to recognize, and if an unrelated language has some subtly different phonemes, they can be really hard to distinguish, or reproduce.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    3. Re:No. by readin · · Score: 1

      Checking for Japanese using a simple test like that has some sense, but testing for "Chinese" at that time with a simple test makes little sense because the Chinese spoke so many different languages at the time ("Chinese" is like "European" except that Europe was rarely united under a single tyrant the way China often was).

      Also, Taiwan was still part of Japan during WWII and many Taiwanese had Chinese ancestry and spoke the same language as people from Fujian province so a Japanese spy from Taiwan could easily pass for Chinese.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    4. Re:No. by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      I find the Japanese R sound to be half-way between and English R and D.

    5. Re:No. by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      tr;dl

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  20. It's because China was founded by Biff from BTTF by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Yep, he stole Marty McFlys time machine and conquered China long long ago. (or at least he will SOON?!!)

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  21. *Cough* by anomaly256 · · Score: 1

    Bullshit. Just because someone tweets something doesn't make it news.

    1. Re:*Cough* by cosm · · Score: 1

      Hah! In this day and age I have completely given up on expecting any sort of journalistic integrity. We have been overridden by Twitterphilia, Facebookitis, and the social internet. The signal to noise ratio shinks every day, with good content on the internet slowly being diluted by every socialite's pingbacksand retweet. Oh Web 2.0, how I long for the Geocities days of yore. At least then you had to manually choose to visit crap like MySpace and the ilk; now it is forced upon us at every corner of the interwebs. I can't even comment on most news sites now because it's all Facebook Connect. End Rant.

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    2. Re:*Cough* by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness slashdot is different.
      We have diligent human editors, working hard to make sure none of the twitter/facebook garbage, and digg-style democratically elected non-news, makes it to the hallowed front page.

  22. Sing it! by pookemon · · Score: 2

    Dr woooooo-oo hey! Dr woo.
    Dr woooooo-oo hey! Dr woo.

    --
    dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    1. Re:Sing it! by oldmac31310 · · Score: 3, Funny

      My brother had a dentist whose name was Doctor Hu. So there. True story.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    2. Re:Sing it! by ettlz · · Score: 1

      You wot?

    3. Re:Sing it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My family doctor is Dr. Moriarity. It makes for amusing sick day notes.

  23. I agree with the Chinese. by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    What would have happened in China if Bill S. Preston Esq. and 'Ted' Theodore Logan never returned Genghis Khan to the past?

    Anarchy, that's what.

  24. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They crack-down on travel ALL the time.

  25. real history, future stopping here to right things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so we needn't be travelling far. even the much anticipated rebirth of antidisestablishmentarianism won't help the royals & eugenatics now, as we move on now to fatal friday. much less useful than even atharism, these chosen ones genocidal creeps still think they're god. sheesh it's all in the genuine native elders teepeeleaks etchings. the royals remain unrepentant, which is now the title of a feature film featuring their less than human features.

    the usual tome;

    disarm

    leave

    now

  26. April 1 agian?! by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

    or did Ground Hog Day and April Fools get combined now and I'm experiencing April 1 again and again.
    Since they have essentially removed most reference of Mao Zedong from their history books now they are going after people attempt to change history. Even though I'm Chinese, but the communist Chinese always make me laugh with with their strange and bewildering policies with their people but their enforcement of certain laws against their are not funny.

    1. Re:April 1 agian?! by Stargoat · · Score: 1

      If only it was more like Silvio Berlusconi. Now there is a political entity you can laugh at AND feel good about yourself.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
  27. Obligatory Star Trek by ijakings · · Score: 1

    "The Chinese Science Directorate has concluded that time travel is impossible"

  28. Eschaton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "do not defy causality"

  29. Mental Masturbation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good for the China! Fictional plots involving time travel are nothing more than mental masturbation.

    1. Re:Mental Masturbation by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      Good for the China! Fictional plots involving time travel are nothing more than mental masturbation.

      I'll bet that you don't watch a lot of American TV. I'll take bad time-travel stories over 'roided-up guidos any day.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  30. Totalitarian nitwits by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

    One of the great things about totalitarians is that the logic of control pushes them to absurdities like this.

  31. Wrong Target by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    I was just getting ready to jump into my time machine and go back to kill Sun Yat-sen. How could they have known?

    You know, other than some rather sordid and scandalous private affairs, Dr. Sun was alright. Now if we're talking about Glorious Chairman Mou or Messianic Generalissimo Chiang, I am all for it.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:Wrong Target by ae1294 · · Score: 2

      I was just getting ready to jump into my time machine and go back to kill Sun Yat-sen. How could they have known?

      You know, other than some rather sordid and scandalous private affairs, Dr. Sun was alright. Now if we're talking about Glorious Chairman Mou or Messianic Generalissimo Chiang, I am all for it.

      He rapes my wife three years from now...

  32. Correction by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 1

    Chinese Sensors Down on Crack Time Travel.

    There, redacted it.

    1. Re:Correction by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Chinese Sensors Down on Crack Time Travel.

      There, redacted it.

      Crack Chinese Sensors Down. Slashdot cracking up.

  33. Coincidence? by drb226 · · Score: 2

    Time magazine...I see what's going on here.

  34. It's like this by Enahs · · Score: 1

    I saw it explained on another website like this, and as I have no access to Chinese television I can't confirm this. Apparently there had been this trend of making programs in which a character would, for one reason or another, travel back in time to Imperial China. There, they would discover that pre-Revolutionary China was...well...pretty nice. This obviously presents a problem for the government since, although they're fairly Western in the business world, their government is still officially "Communist".

    --
    Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
  35. Everyone kills Hitler on their first trip. by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    Except for that one guy who killed Hong Xiuquan.

  36. Cunning Chinese Plan by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    The plot thickens...

    Ever noticed that we seem to be getting more and more lawyers and fewer and fewer physicists? This is a very cunning plan by the Chinese to fix this. You pass the laws of physics as actual legislative laws and, by the time all those lawyers graduate law school they are actually trained as physicists. By this time next week 3x10^8 m/s won't be just a good idea it really will be the law!

  37. Re:how will they by plover · · Score: 2

    How will they prevent their people from traveling to the future naturally?

    They have a time-tested bullet related procedure that's highly effective.

    --
    John
  38. Did they also ban... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    Chronowolves?

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  39. Does that include by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    books that paint such a brilliant, detailed, and lifelike picture of history, that while you're reading it, you're taken back in time?

  40. Oh grow up by MoeDumb · · Score: 1

    The more repressive the government the more sensitive it is to cultural 'insults.' The more inbred the people too.

    --
    Mod Me Up. You'll make a grown man cry.
  41. Getting past the censors by bkmoore · · Score: 1

    Maybe China is concerned about filmmakers using time travel to sneak non-state-approved ideas about China's history past the censors. It has nothing to do with cultural 'insults.' It has to do with China wanting to control their peoples' perception of their own history. I watched an East German Propaganda movie once about a condemned village in Bavaria being saved by the workers and farmers standing up to the evil gangster Yankees and the puppet-West German government and Catholic Church. The Americans wanted to bulldoze the village to build a nuclear bomber base. But when one thinks about the film at a deeper level, it could be a critique of the East German Government and their relations with the Soviet Union. The film maker knew he couldn't openly criticize his own government, so he set his movie in the west. I wonder how many East Germans saw the movie and thought that exactly the same thing is happening here, but in the West, the people had the freedom to protest and be heard.

  42. Re:How about disrespectful to its present governme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >True power comes from the willing consent of the people.

    "(True) Power grows out of the barrel of a gun". --Mao Zedong (paraphrase)

  43. Can't help myself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great Scott...! That's heavy.

  44. Most Excellent! by maroberts · · Score: 1

    Party on, dudes!

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  45. Time Lords by dugeen · · Score: 1

    No doubt the Chinese government will be employing the Restoration Team to replace John Bennett with a Chinese actor on future versions of the Talons of Weng-Chiang DVD. Come to think of it, they've probably done it already on the grounds that it was the original production team's intention. And turned everyone bright orange with their Gumby restoration techniques.

  46. George Washington was a beaver by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    He didn't chop down the tree, he chewed it down. And he was a Chinese beaver.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  47. Nothing about censors by FRiC · · Score: 1

    Since no one ever bothers to read the source, the original statement actually says TV dramas should not have plots that are pure fantasy, such as time traveling drama; made-up mythologies; or encourage superstitions, such as believing in fate or reincarnations. There's nothing in the statement about censorship or banning.

    Chinese TV have always been quite dry for me, since a lot of it are historical drama that talk about revolutionary heroes, but my Chinese friends love them, maybe growing up in China helps.

  48. Time will tell by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    What's really interesting for me, is the Communists' ever tightening grip over their own people and their growing paranoia. They have massive problems and massive internal contradictions, and rather than doing what the rest of the (non-dysfunctional) world does, and let people air their grievances and have their say, they're bottling up the rage and discontent.

    I would liken it to a broken pressure cooker left on a stove. Democracy, and freedom of speech and assembly are like the pressure-release valve. I DON'T want to be anywhere near it when the thing finally explodes. And despite my own personal disgust of the immorality that pervades mainland Chinese society, I really do feel sorry for the average Chinese guy in the street, who has been shit-on by their government for millenia, and will suffer as this mess eventually unravels.

  49. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least now we have a plot for the third Bill & Ted movie....

  50. Time Cops? by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

    So, will they have Time Cops?

    --
    I8-D
  51. The Third Doctor by haapi · · Score: 1

    The Pertwee Doctor was proudly spoke Chinese in a couple of episodes.

    --
    Well, apparently, you only have to fool the majority of people for a little while.
  52. What if? by SoTerrified · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Right now, officially, there was no Tiananmen Square massacre. But what if some TV drama, under the cover of 'alternate history' creates a TV drama that explores what would've happened if there was a Tiananmen Square massacre in '89? The Chinese government has worked so hard covering that up, they don't want some TV drama, under the guise of fiction, coming in and giving people the facts. So they need a law to nip that in the bud quickly.

    Nothing to see here folks. This is just what happens when you want to firmly control the 'official' history. Obviously you can't have any kind of non-official history, even if it is fiction.

  53. Cheap knockoffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the CNN article on this it sounds like they are not only banning time-travel shows but pretty much all sci-fi and fantasy shows, ouch.

    Seems like the government there pretty is much stifling anything that promotes imagination or original thinking. Do they want their 99% working class to just be unimaginative working drones?

    Is this why the majority of Chinese brand products are just cheap knockoffs of products invented elsewhere, despite their massive industrial manufacturing complex they've developed?

  54. They've also banned Death Notes by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  55. no storing logs? by MooseTick · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this includes storing logs. With logs you can go back in time and figure out when events happened.

  56. wait a second...OMFG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't the US and USSR crack down on sci-fi references to nuclear power when they were developing the real thing? O_o

  57. Incorrect Report? by pokyo · · Score: 1

    My finance (chinese) read the original report and this is what she has to say about it

    Yes, I just read it, it was a short report of current china TV drama. In one
    section it mentioned that some ghost TV shows with or without time travel is
    absurd and low quality , and warns investor to think carefully before
    investing in these tvs. That is all.

  58. Re:How about disrespectful to its present governme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True power comes from the willing consent of the people.

    The Chinese (seem to) consent with their government. Usually, as long as the economy is doing fine, most people won't care much about what their government does. Besides, their culture is not the same as yours, they do not value freedom as much as the West pretends to.

  59. Won't Someone Please Think of the Picards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That removes about 35% of the episodes from all the Star Treks after the Original. And I have to say ... I'm ok with it!