Slashdot Mirror


New Houses Killing Wi-Fi

Barence writes "Poor Wi-Fi or mobile reception is one of the banes of modern living — and modern building techniques could be making things worse. PC Pro has photos of a new-build being covered from floorboards to rafters in a tin-foil like material. The "highly reflective" material could have unpredictable results for radio signals, potentially bouncing mobile signals away from the house or preventing Wi-Fi signals from reaching the garden. And the new householder is likely to be none the wiser."

47 of 358 comments (clear)

  1. I personally love it by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since moving into my new home, I've noticed a significant reduction in secret CIA messages being injected into my brainwaves. Goodbye ugly tinfoil hat!

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:I personally love it by NiteMair · · Score: 2

      This is SPECTACULAR!

      I want this stuff installed on my house.

      1) My wifi signals don't need to leave my house.
      2) My neighbors' wifi signals don't need to enter my house.
      3) I *hate* cell phones, and now when people come over, their calls will drop, their bars will drop, and they'll turn the damn things off finally.
      4) I have satellite TV.
      5) I need better insulation.

    2. Re:I personally love it by chill · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I can see them pitching that one.

      "See, we want to microwave somebody's brain. Maybe someone from legal..."

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:I personally love it by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      Since moving into my new home, I've noticed a significant reduction in secret CIA messages being injected into my brainwaves. Goodbye ugly tinfoil hat!

      I wouldn't get too cocky about this...nor would I throw away a perfectly good tin foil hat either.

      You just have to wait for them to process the "Change of Address" forms before they can know where to start re-transmission of the CIA brainwave secret messages.

      Not to make you paranoid or anything, but you might wanna give it a couple weeks more before breathing a sigh of relief.

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. Non-issue really by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Insulation isn't usually put on interrior walls and I have no need to broadcast my wifi outside of my house. Those that do can position their WAP near a window.

    I'm also certain this is not an a recent issue. Almost all the insulation I've seen, apart from spray insulation, has some kind of foil-like backing.

    Maybe complainers should spend 2 minutes trying a different wifi channel instead of blaming their home.

    1. Re:Non-issue really by capnkr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A networking company I've done contract work for has a small hotel client constructed with steel framing instead of wood. Only 2 floors, 8 rooms per side/floor, front and back, but WiFi is a nightmare. There are *5* AP's in the building; one central, 2 each in the attic space either side of the central router, & one AP even has to have a yagi on it to reach into the bottom, corner room with signal strength sufficient to keep hotel guests from complaining. After working there 3 times in the past 2 years resolving issues, I think that steel construction is more of a concern than a radiant barrier layer on the insulation of an exterior wall...

      --
      "...there are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can." ~ Mark Twain
    2. Re:Non-issue really by gatkinso · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most interior walls are insulated just not with the wrap.

      If this stuff is RF reflective you can get all kinds of weird multipath issues, signal bouncing round.

      However one good thing is that it would help keep your signal IN your house, which is great for security.

      Double edged sword.

      Who browses the web in their garden? I go out there to unplug!

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    3. Re:Non-issue really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was just about to write the same thing. We moved from a 1920's colonial to a 1980's modern colonial which has foil backed foam on the exterior walls in addition to the typical insulation. Adding outlets is a bit of a pain, so is finding studs, though no where near as bad as slat and mortar. Anyway I'll take the $200/mo utility savings over having to install a couple of extra access points.

    4. Re:Non-issue really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yea, you might. The article has no evidence, conducted no tests, and received no information from the manufacturer or really anyone else. They saw something that looked like tinfoil on an unfinished house, and then wrote a completely speculative article claiming that it will affect wireless waves. My parents house is covered in a material that looks exactly the same (no idea if it actually is the same). I can sit by the pool 20 yards from the house and easily get a strong signal to the wireless router in the kitchen. Maybe this new stuff is different and maybe it causes a problem, but it's flat out irresponsible to write an article claiming that it's a problem without a shred of evidence.

    5. Re:Non-issue really by BKX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wouldn't say it's a non-issue, but it's certainly not a new issue. A lot of houses use insulation or soundboard (which is metal coated, like in the picture in TFA) in bedrooms, to deaden sounds (who wants their kids to hear sex noises?); even older houses have it. In fact, my brother and I both put insulating soundboard in our master bedrooms for noise reasons, and because the stuff was on sale for $2/sheet at our local Habitat for Humanity Re-Store. As these materials become more common, we'll be seeing them and their problems in more and more new houses and in more and more retrofits and remodels.

      And another annoyance, in many older homes, such as my father's and my old college dorm building, is the use of "Stucco of Death". That stuff is aw[esome|full]. It will cause severe roadrash when you're drunk and fall into it, much to your detriment and friends' laughter. And the chicken wire that is used as a backing for the stucco is a very good Faraday cage. It's nearly impossible to get signal for any cell phone in my dad's house even though you get full bars outside and at open windows/doors, and no one can get his wifi signal outside, even though he has four APs throughout his house.

    6. Re:Non-issue really by isopropanol · · Score: 2

      We have people complaining about emissions from powerline ethernet (been a bit of fuss about that here in the UK recently)

      Must be nice to have the complaints based on real concerns... Here (Vancouver Island) we had a cellphone tower project cancelled because the PTA didn't want "radiation" within a half kilometer of an elementary school... but the open tank sewage plant is OK.

    7. Re:Non-issue really by tripleevenfall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More over, this article contains no fact or anything close to it about whether this material affects transmission at all. It was simply a blogger walking past a house being built and saying "hmm", then googling. The material is said to have "reflectivity", but of what? It never says it's constructed of metal or a problem material, the blogger just describes it as "foil-like". What if it means heat reflectivity? What effect exactly has been studied in materials that appear to the eye to be "foil like"? This is just poppycock on the level of "Well I don't see how the towers could have fell down... gubment musta put nukes in the basement!"

    8. Re:Non-issue really by IronicToo · · Score: 2

      Mod parent up, worthless article by a clueless author. Has anyone ever tried blocking WiFi with aluminum foil? It doesn't work, one of my electrical engineering professors tried it to use it to isolate two antennas from each other, aluminum foil had no effect. Leaves on the other hand (due to high water content) stop it dead. A better article would have talked about the hidden dangers of planting trees around the house. Not sure how cell would behave (very different frequency).

    9. Re:Non-issue really by RingDev · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From my time working in the cell phone industry, I'd say "fooie!" to this being a problem at all. Atleast with cell towers, metal objects created almost no interfierance. Water was the devil. A huge chunk of metal in from of an antena had only a tiny impact, but fill that chunk of metal with water, say like a water tower, and it's like a giant black hole for radio signals. We also had issues with small lakes bouncing signals like crazy. You could be driving around a lake, have a tower 100 feet away from you, and another 12 miles away across the lake, and we'd have to put them on no-handoff lists, because a little bit of waves in the water can give the CC the impression that you are getting a better signal from across the lake.

      A think layer of tin on the back of your insulation, that has been being used for decades, isn't going to cause any issue that hasn't already been dealt with.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    10. Re:Non-issue really by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      So do they plan on going after that unlicensed fusion reactor that bathes their children in radiation all day?

    11. Re:Non-issue really by agentgonzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just heard this lunchtime that when they installed the new radar equipment on the top of Portsdown hill (Just outside Portsmouth - if you live close, the big blue buildings with the radar on Portsdown hill) they attached the motors only and had it turning for 2-3 weeks before any radar emitters were turned on. They got umpteen complaints from local residents during that period that the 'new radars' were interfering with their TV and causing 'bad reception'. All these phone numbers got logged as time-wasters for subsequent public complaints!

    12. Re:Non-issue really by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      Where said blogger is an editor at a magazine that just did a cover feature on the same style of meterial being used on some internal rooms and potentially causing wifi problems. Which one would hope would actually mean they have a little bit of short term knowledge in order to base their still flimsy guesses on. Of course that article might have been all guesswork as well, it's not a magazine I read to know.

      And he doesn't just describe it as "foil-like" he also provides the product spec sheet that states that is has an aluminium layer which, while you might disagree, the rest of will continue to believe is a metal.

    13. Re:Non-issue really by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2

      I suspect these materials might not present much of a challenge. I have spent the last 10 years working in cheese factories constructed with steel/foam sandwich panels. Getting any kind of radio signal working in these buildings can be a real problem, usually best solved by good ol' ethernet. I managed to get wifi and mobile signals working at my last workplace with a combination of various repeaters, occasionally with pringles-can antennas, but my new workplace has defeated me, at least for now.

      In practice, I can just about live without wifi at work, but it would be nice to get a robust mobile phone signal in there.

    14. Re:Non-issue really by That's+What+She+Said · · Score: 2

      Sorry for my attitude, but are you really telling us that you used a Yagi antenna in an indoor environment? That would be kind of insane...

      Wi-Fi *is* a nightmare, period. My business provides mobility solutions for the SMB market and we often design wireless networks in industrial environments. The choice of antennas and the power and channel settings on the APs shall be carefully tuned, as to avoid interference from other RF sources, neighboring networks and the reflectivity of the walls and ceilings. It's not easy at all...

      That's one of my gripes with Wi-Fi popularization. For example, lots of people use Wi-Fi in small apartments, when Ethernet cabling would do just fine, just because they want to choose to access the web on their couches, kitchen or desk. Caveat: the distance between the kitchen and the couch is often much less than 10 feet.

      So, their network is accessible from two stories up or down in the building, because the transmitter power can't be reduced and the AP is transmitting at 20dBm (100mW). At this power level, the attenuation from the walls won't block the signal. In fact, you can get signal through two or three brick walls at this level.

      So, if you live in a building in a big city, there's no channel you can use without problems, as the only non-overlapping channels in the 2.4GHz band are 1, 6 and 11. If you can use 802.11a (or 802.11n in the 5.2GHz band), there are more channels to choose from, but most (cheap) equipment and wireless NICs only use the 2.4GHz band!

      So, the problem with Wi-Fi is much bigger than "tinfoil-like insulation that may block signals" or other construction materials. It's a technology that isn't simple enough to troubleshoot for the average user. Even most IT personnel don't know enough about RF to set up and troubleshoot a wireless network!

    15. Re:Non-issue really by operagost · · Score: 2

      My house is over 200 years old with an addition that was erected during its renovation in 1988. The walls of the original section are nearly two feet of high-iron-content field stone. The inside of that section is insulated with the typical high-end foil-faced foam board from the late 80s. The addition is sheathed with foil-faced foam board, and I've installed a radiant barrier (aluminum coated kevlar) in the attic. I get four or five bars on my cell phone. That being said, the cell tower is only about a mile away so that might help!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    16. Re:Non-issue really by T-Bone-T · · Score: 2

      There's more to it. Not everybody can run ethernet in their apartment.

  3. ...advantages outweigh the problems by SpiralSpirit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it reflects huge amounts of radiant energy transfer from your envelope materials away from the interior of your home, making it that much more efficient to cool, and during winter it helps keep the heat inside the house. The wifi 'issue' just doesn't seem to be that much of an issue when you're talking about one of the core efficiencies in your house, and one of the biggest loads on the nation's energy usage.

  4. Grounded? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    From a look at the exterior shot provided, no special effort appears to have been taken to ground the foil. It appears to just be there to keep moisture and/or rabid sheetrock mites from getting into the interior material. I'm a bit surprised that some plastic wasn't cheaper; but it seems otherwise sensible enough.

    For those who know more than I about the dark arts of RF propagation, what would the effect be of ungrounded conductive sheets? Substantial signal attenuation? Not much effect? Completely unpredictable absorption and re-emmision that could vary wildly according to the exact geometry of the piece?

    In a similar vein, if one had an AP/router that one didn't love to much(not so hard when they start at $20...), what would the effect be of attempting to use the metal foil as an antenna, by coupling it directly to the antenna output? Horribly non-optimized for the frequency, I'd imagine; but would it be expected to Not Work, to Not Work and kill the RF amp, to work somewhat, to work better than one might expect?

    1. Re:Grounded? by macraig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The material is being used for its additive insulation value, PERIOD. It is not a moisture barrier, nor is it there to block "sheetrock mites". WTF? THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS SHEETROCK MITES.

      Good grief. The original unsubstantiated hysteria in TFA was bad enough; don't heap more FUD on the pile.

    2. Re:Grounded? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      I was attempting a deadpan joke with the 'rabid sheetrock mites'. I'll try to be more overt.

  5. "Alarm Bells"? by Tintivilus · · Score: 2

    Author of TFA says he doesn't know if the material he observed has an impact on radio, just quoting the fact that it's "reflective" from a vendor brochure, but according to the same pdf the material is in fact metallic

    Protect TF200 Thermo includes a tough non-woven PP core with a durable bright high purity permeable aluminium layer, bonded to the substrate.

    Yep, sounds like a radio-eater all right. Interesting stuff, too.

  6. Really? by yoshi_mon · · Score: 2

    And the new householder is likely to be none the wiser.

    You are telling me that Joe and Jane Enduser don't know about how RF works? Or that their computer is not the monitor? Or that their smartphones are also working off of RF?

    And further that there are new homes that are being built without setting up even some basic runs for modern say CAT6 wires? You say that all you need is co-ax? Or some 1900 tech pair of twisted strands?

    Oh and the right wing tells me to chant USA USA USA no matter what idiotic news I see? Golly Lassy! Tech Timmy is down a well! Better go run to Fox News with why ignorance is good!

    --

    Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    1. Re:Really? by Mage+Powers · · Score: 2

      cabling is the hard part, reterminating the ends should be relatively easy

  7. Really reaching here by PingSpike · · Score: 2

    I love to complain about stupid things more than your average person, but is this really a problem? Put a repeater in the window. My heating bill, on a 1980s house is by far once of the most cash sucking and depressing aspects of my budget.

    And as an added bonus, maybe it'll keep neighbors from stealing everyone's wifi.

    1. Re:Really reaching here by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only because you chose to not fix that problem.

      $1500 to have the house insulation upgraded.
      $6800 to have the AC and furnace changed over to a SEER 18 and a 98% efficient setup.
      $6500 to have new double pane windows installed
      $1100 to have the house checked for air leaks and those fixed with caulking.

      My winter heating bill IN January when it was 6-10 degrees F outside most of the time in michigan up where we get real snow was $80.00, December was less and Febuary was less.

      and you can do all of that in stages. the furnace and AC I got $1500.00 off my taxes because I bought them, that paid for the insulation. The windows we did over the course of a year one window at a time. I had a carpenter show me the first two times, I did the rest except for the big 8'X12' picture windows in the front room.

      Stopping restaurants for 2 years paid for the windows, insulation and air leak check and repair. The furnace and AC were paid for by not buying a new car this year, suffering with a 42" 720p plasma, and torturing my family by not going to Florida for a 1 week vacation but staying home. I know I should be turned in for torturing my family.

      Most people live in old houses with crap insulation and crap windows that have a 600 year old furnace in the basement that are never maintained properly. Your home is in disrepair, fix it and your heat and AC bills drop like a rock.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Really reaching here by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Greatest effect was the furnace. When we bought the home 3 years ago the furnace looked new, (the previous home owner though that cleaning things is the same as maintaining things, it looks great and was even waxed with car wax yearly!) so I investigated and discovered that that model was last made in 1989 and that serial number was made in 1986 and it was a 62% efficient furnace, 25 years later the furnace guy determined that it was running at about 55% (they do a thermal comparison of exhaust temp and air heating temp.) replacing that alone dropped a Significant amount. From $380 a month to $180 a month.

      Air leaks and insulation fixed comfort problems in rooms. the main living area had enough air leaks that on a winter windy day it was 10 degrees colder than the rest of the house. The last 3 together took off another $100 a month. and honestly all of this should have been done anyways as normal house maintenance. A house with the original 1950's windows still in place is the same as buying a car with bald tires that are showing the belts.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Really reaching here by stephathome · · Score: 2

      I don't know if this is true for all manufactured homes, but when my husband and I looked at them about 10 years ago, interest rates to buy a manufactured home were higher than for regular homes because lenders treated them as though they would devalue over time.

  8. Phones? by identity0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Uh, Wifi? I'd think the cell phones (I assume that's what OP means by 'mobiles') are the important one...

    Plenty of people including myself only have a cell phone these days.

    My apartment's fine, but I have school in a very concrete-and-steel building that has very poor phone reception, which ends up draining my battery in no time. They do have good wifi because of a lot of APs, though. Remember, you can add more APs for wifi, but not for phones.

    1. Re:Phones? by Tintivilus · · Score: 2

      Remember, you can add more APs for wifi, but not for phones.

      Not true. Residential users can use broadband backhaul for relatively cheap (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Femtocell)

      Bigger users can get bigger equipment. Last year, my office installed entire cell stations for major providers in our main equipment rooms and wired them with low-loss coax to little dome antennas scattered around the buildings. Helps coverage immensely :)

    2. Re:Phones? by adolf · · Score: 2

      Everyone and their brother replied to you to remind you about the existence of femptocells and small/cheap repeaters and such, but those don't work all that hot in a large building that actively eats RF or have lots of users.

      Fortunately, there's other solutions that actually work and actually scale. (Fiber backhaul for in-building wireless? You betcha.)

      There's other examples, too.

      (It's always amusing to me that Slashdot will, on one hand, recommend the fanciest and best networking kit imaginable, and then with the other hand suggest the shittiest and worst-performing RF stuff available.)

  9. Content free article by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow, talk about content free.

    That article had even less content than the guy who was pushing his blog posts awhile back.

    Your insulation 'might' be blocking wifi &/or 3g. But we don't know, we didn't bother to do any actual research.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  10. i'd rather buy 2-3 more wifi bases by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    than spend $500 more in heating costs every year

    i for one welcome our new tin foil energy saving house overlords

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  11. Great! by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Far less leakage, and less chance of home builders skipping putting in ethernet. All new homes should be wired and not counting on wifi to do the trick.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  12. Old hat. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Call someone that has aluminum siding and aluminum screens on their home as them how their home from 1950 that was resided in the 70's or 80's works for wifi to the garden or the grotto.. This is not new. Nor is it news to anyone that actually has a clue about Wifi or home building in general.

    Insulation boards have had foil backing for decades. a lot of other building products as well.

    It's just whiny rich people that notice after moving into their new McMansion. Because they are too damn cheap to buy a second AP for the back yard.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  13. Re:can have your cake and eat it too by SpiralSpirit · · Score: 2

    possible, surely. financially prohibitive? no demand? perhaps.

  14. Old stucco by c · · Score: 2

    My last house was built in 1925, and covered in stucco. Newer stucco is usually some kind of latex goop and doesn't need much of a backing, but this old stucco was basically mortar and needed metal mesh to support it. In this case, it was a heavy diamond mesh like you find on outside stairs and whatnot. The guys who blew insulation into the walls from the outside just loved it...

    That being said, I never saw a significant problem with either cellular phone or wifi signals.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
  15. Re:Building codes by Combatso · · Score: 2

    you will find very few low, or non voltage wiring requirments in any code... the reason hydro lines are required by code, how to run cable, where to put outlets, number of outlets per wall (min) and cable size.. its becuase its dangerous stuff... houses rarely burn, and people rarely die becuase fiber was installed wrong.. However, over-amp'ing copper or alluminum can start fires and kill people... so all the stuff the home owner wont see, needs to meet code before its covered.. building codes are for safety,... that isnt to say, that in new home construction one shouldnt wire the house for all forseen future projects.. When I reno'd my house I ran 2 runs of cat5e, 2 runs of rg6, and since i had a few boxes in the garage, 1 run of cat6 to each room back to a wiring closet (i use the term closet losely). I think i'm using 2 of the wires total, just for my media centre PC... but im set for my forseeable future... it would be pointless for me to install fiber, since I wont be using it and its not going to net me any return when I sell.... If i was mistaken by your comment, and you meant, fiber to the prem during construction, thats up to you municipality to decide... I know the last mile provdiders here are doing that in my municipality for all the new developments.

  16. Its insulation, and not new by BitZtream · · Score: 4, Informative

    Its just insulation. It goes on exterior walls to help form a heat boundary. Its not even a little bit new, the observer is just a really shitty observer and never noticed it being put into every building thats been built in the last 40 or so years at least. Example, my cheap little home built in 1977 has it.

    It doesn't go on interior walls, you don't generally insulate interior walls, as the air flow through open doors in your home and the fact that your duct system intentionally moves air into those rooms would defeat the point entirely.

    Some people do choose to insulate their interior walls for sound dampening, but not with foil backed insulation, they use cheaper insulation without it or specific insulation for sound, which is what we did when remodeling our living room to prevent sound from the TV/stereo from bothering people sleeping in other rooms.

    It won't effect your Wifi signal as its on the external walls only and no one would use it on interior walls (even if they wanted to insulate) because its more expensive and just a waste of money in those locations.

    If you can't get a signal between the first floor and second floor of your home it has almost nothing to do with insulation and the fact that the antennas used on wifi routers are designed to radiate horizontally from the antenna (perpendicular to its orientation). It would be, in almost every case, a complete waste of RF energy to broadcast a signal upwards from a WAP when for most cases there will be no one above it or below it that its supposed to get too.

    Finally ... it has VERY LITTLE EFFECT on the signal. My home is completely wrapped in it, walls and attic, and we sit on a slab, yet I still have no problem picking up and connecting to any wifi access point within 2 houses of me (and we aren't talking about town homes 10 feet from each other, at least 100-150 feet between homes), though its not like I'm getting full speed out of 802.11g with it, though my workshop, which is about 75 feet from my home will consistently get 10mb out of it, and it is insulated with brand new (built 3 years ago) foil backed insulation as well.

    Does it effect the signal, sure, everything does. Does it effect it enough to care about it over the massive energy savings for heating and cooling? No, not even a little.

    The home owner is likely to be none the wiser about the size of the wiring in his home either, and wether its really designed to be used like many of us where we have several machines in one room functioning as servers/routers/firewalls for our home networks drawing way more power than the home was designed to deliver to a single outlet. As a general rule, if you don't know what that shiny material is, there are far more important things in your home that you should learn about first if your worried about how your technology is going to be effected. Wiring of the home would be top on my list. Clean power is far more of a concern than insulation. Nothing worse than wiring thats too small for the job causing your power supplies or UPSes to continually be fighting surges and spikes due to turning off and on other equipment. Older homes with shared runs using 14 gauge wire to power multiple outlets are far more damaging and problematic than the insulation, they are also considerably more dangerous in a modern world where 10 amps simply isn't enough power for some home appliances at startup (vacuum cleaner, microwave, big plasma TVs). You really want 12 gauge as a minimum, with individual runs from the breaker box to EACH outlet, 10 gauge if you can afford it is a much better choice and far safer. Considering how little it effects the cost of a new build, you'd be an idiot if you were given the option and didn't take it.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:Its insulation, and not new by Starvingboy · · Score: 2

      . You really want 12 gauge as a minimum, with individual runs from the breaker box to EACH outlet, 10 gauge if you can afford

      I'm as big a fan of Overkill as the next guy, but just think for a second how big your breaker panel would have to be if you had ONE breaker per outlet.

  17. Re:Issue really. by godefroi · · Score: 2

    you get metal studs with a metal mesh lathe laid over the top before you even get to think about putting sheetrock on

    Huh?

    I'm currently working in a commercial building, and I have been working here continuously since before the gutting and remodeling. Continuously. I saw every wall of this building torn down and rebuilt around me, and while LOTS of metal studs (and the metal "tracks" that go underneath and on top of them) went up, I never once saw any "metal mesh lathe". They just screwed the sheetrock to the studs, just like I'd do to wood studs in my home. Wikipedia seems to indicate that this is normal.

    --
    Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
  18. My place was built in '82 by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 2

    I'm not worried about the wi-fi because I have a wireless router. But the cell phone reception is horrendous. I take a few steps outside and it's fine. While I was fixing the place up I had poked some holes in the walls and found metal beams inside. The place is like a giant Faraday cage. The fact that it's the bottom floor of a three-story condo doesn't help either.

    I just spent $250 (it was on sale, too. Normally it's $400) on a cell phone signal booster. I hope it helps.

  19. Re:Issue really. by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 2

    A Linksys WRT54G with DD-WRT installed will do it quite nicely.