Slashdot Mirror


The Features That Make Each Web Browser Unique

snydeq writes "InfoWorld's Peter Wayner offers a look at 13 promising features unique to one browser. From Chrome's support for SPDY, to IE9's emphasis on energy efficiency, to Firefox Sync, browser vendors are working hard to establish any edge that might attract more users to their stack of code. And while speed and HTML5 compatibility remain key in the battle of the Web browsers, unique features often point the way forward. 'Given the pace of browser updates these days, don't be surprised to find the best of the bunch being copied by competitors soon,' Wayner writes. 'After all, yesterday's browser bells and whistles are today's must-have features.'"

20 of 132 comments (clear)

  1. Thank you for linking to print page by jgtg32a · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It made me find the actual article and that is apparently 4 pages.

    Again thank you

  2. IE9's Energy Efficiency by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 2

    Is IE9's touted energy efficiency really a feature that sets it apart from the other browsers? It really feels like Microsoft was reaching pretty hard when they released that data, much of which only showed that IE9 was only marginally more energy efficient on many of the tests than Firefox.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    1. Re:IE9's Energy Efficiency by hedwards · · Score: 2

      To add the the ACs point, I use Firefox on my Nexus One, it's not like perfect, but it runs pretty well at this point, and certainly better than whatever crap it is that they bundled with Android. I get my tabs and everything is works fine. There are still some issues, but the progress has been just astonishing since I first installed it.

    2. Re:IE9's Energy Efficiency by LordLimecat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The entire article is garbage. It lists Songbird as a browser (when its really a media player using firefox's Gecko), it implies that other browsers dont have Jumplists on Win7 (hint, Chrome and--i think-- firefox both do), lists "email" as a unique feature of Opera, when Firefox came out of a project that had email et al, Firefox 4s sync is HARDLY unique in an arena with Chrome (and I assume safari and Opera have it as well), and Im pretty sure IE9 has a separate process per tab-- not just chrome.

      Seriously, none of these are unique, except perhaps Opera's turbo caching and Chrome's SPDY-- and its a bit too early to tell if SPDY is going to take off.

  3. Firefox Sync copied Opera Link by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Informative

    per usual. Opera Software innovates (tabs, spell-checking, syncing of bookmarks, turbo compression) and others copy.

    >>>There was a time when Mozilla combined the email program with the browser, but it stopped this integration long ago.

    No. Not really. Look at Mozilla SeaMonkey (direct descendent of Netscape Navigator/Communicator). It includes not just email, but also Usenet newsgroups, relay chat, and a composer.

    >>>Safari 5: Easy user agent alterations

    Opera has had this for years, allowing users to display sites as Internet Explorer or Firefox-compliant.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:Firefox Sync copied Opera Link by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Informative

      This again? Opera didn't invent tabs. Please stop spreading this myth

      He said 'innovate', not invent. One of the things Opera had on FF for years was that the windows were tabbed... and the UI supported them properly. While FF's tabs were very basic, Opera's tabs had a lot well-implemented features for managing them.

      That doesn't matter, though. The reason Opera people get uppity about who got what first is numerous people on Slashdot, while riding on a high of FireFox/Mozilla fandom and IE hate, made claims about how FireFox was 'inventing' these features. It gets a little old when you try out FireFox, coming from Opera, and find the UI can't do have the things the Opera UI can do.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:Firefox Sync copied Opera Link by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2

      pera Software innovates (tabs, spell-checking, syncing of bookmarks, turbo compression) and others copy.

      Everyone copies from everyone. Tabs were in Omniweb (albeit with a slightly different implementation) in 1999. Spell checking should be implemented at the OS level and rolled out as a service to apps (as OS X does). Re-implementing it for every app is idiotic architectural design. Numerous browsers on OS X had spellchecking before Opera (since 2000) and they have grammar checking as well. Admittedly, Opera can't do a lot about the fact that OS's have failed to step up and implement spellchecking as a service, but they could at least plug into the native functionality when it is offered. There was Firefox plug-in to synch bookmarks in 2005. That's not to say Opera isn't a fine browser and even the first to bring some features into popularity, but don't go getting blinded by your like of one product. It's too easy to not look hard at the history an just buy into what you want to be true.

    3. Re:Firefox Sync copied Opera Link by keefus_a · · Score: 2

      The OP had it wrong when he/she mentioned that Firefox copied Opera, as that is not the point. The actual issue is that the article is supposed to point out "unique" features in each browser and "Sync" is most certainly NOT unique to Firefox. It doesn't really matter who did it first in this case. The shame is that Opera's "Unite" feature does so much more than just keeping bookmarks in sync across devices, yet it didn't get a mention.

  4. Re:User Agent by ledow · · Score: 4, Informative

    Opera's had that for ages. Literally 4, 5 or maybe even 6 "major" versions.

  5. Does anyone really care about unique features? by Viol8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So long as its reliable, easy to use and isn't full of security holes I doubt many people give a damn about their web browser. Can you imagine an entire article about the relative merits of ftp or telnet clients? All most people want is for their browser to render pages properly. End of. If a new standard comes out and web sites use it then yes, browser should support it. Otherwise, apart from the browser developers themselves and a few fanbois, does anyone really care?

  6. firefox PLUGINS by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    The rest of the browsers lack decent plugins that can remake the whole browser experience. You can turn it into a ten foot browser for your living room or make it easy to use for a sysadmin with vimperator.

  7. Re:Bloat by Antarius · · Score: 2

    Oh my god!

    Did you warn them about 9/11?!

    http://xkcd.com/875/

  8. Re:User Agent by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Informative

    >>>so block non-IE browsers from accessing content.

    These sites don't actually "block" the content - they are just poorly programmed. For example I cannot access Youtube Mail from Mozilla's SeaMonkey or Opera's opera, because the idiot web programmer didn't recognize the browser as "IE" or "FF" and simply didn't send the HTML (or javascript). He made the stupid assumption that the browser was incapable of displaying youtube. Either that or he was lazy.

    >>>Safari was pretty much the only one that had it build in

    Opera has had user agent strings since the early 2000s. You can set it as Opera, or Internet Explorer, or Mozilla Firefox, or IE/opera, or FF/opera.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  9. IE8 the first? Don't make me laugh. by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Multiprocess was standard on early unix browsers - you opened a link in a new window it spawned a new process. It was only later that netscape switched to multithreaded presumably so the codebase was easier to port to Windows which as everyone knows has a piss poor process model and still can't even do fork() never mind sophisticated parent-child process interaction.

  10. Re:No, but by bunratty · · Score: 2

    Firefox doesn't have it built in because the vast majority of users never need it. Nearly all sites work with Firefox's default user agent string.

    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  11. Revisionist history by Ambitwistor · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Before the Internet, there was a collection of nets, like Compuserve, Minitel, MSN, and AOL. Then the 'Inter' prefix was added by linking these nets altogether, and everyone was given the freedom to request information from any computer out there."

    The Internet predates CompuServe, AOL, etc., and wasn't created by linking those walled-garden services together.

    1. Re:Revisionist history by vlm · · Score: 2

      Typical kids book report of 2030, assuming our native language remains The Queens English instead of switching to textspeak:

      Before the Intertubes, there was a collection of nets, like PSN, Qriocity, and PS3 netflix streaming. Then the 'Inter' prefix was added by linking these nets altogether, and everyone was given the freedom to request all credit card numbers stored in the playstation network, from any computer out there.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  12. print page links not needed by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thank you for linking to print page It made me find the actual article and that is apparently 4 pages.

    This is interesting in an article about unique browser features. Maybe a better article would go through features rarely known about. Like in Safari you can click the "reader" button in the URL bar and it consolidates multi-page articles in to a single page including the images. There is a Firefox extension called "repagination" to do the same thing. Given how much I see people complaining about multi-page articles, it would have been nice for this article to have covered this.

    Similarly, Safari and some Firefox plug-ins allow the user to grab the corner of text input boxes and resize them, which is an indispensable feature once you've used it, but was also overlooked in this article.

    1. Re:print page links not needed by _0xd0ad · · Score: 2

      Same here (Windows). As of Firefox 4.0 it's a standard feature.

  13. Re:No, but by _0xd0ad · · Score: 3, Informative

    Firefox does have it built-in. You go to about:config and add a "general.useragent.override" string. Plugins just make changing it an easier and friendlier process.