Slashdot Mirror


Signs of Dark Matter From Minnesota Mine

thomst writes "Juan Collar, team leader of COGENT, an experimental effort to detect WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles), recently presented a paper detailing 15 months of data collected via a pure germanium detector located deep in a Minnesota mine which seems to confirm similar results reported by a European effort called DAMA/LIBRA. The results are particularly intriguing, because they appear to show a seasonal variation in the density of WIMPs that accords with models which predict Earth should encounter more WIMPs in Summer (when its path around the Sun moves in the same direction as the Milky Way revolves) than in Winter (when it goes the opposite direction). The most interesting thing about the COGENT experiment is that the mass of the WIMP candidates it records is significantly less than most particle physicists had predicted, according to popular models. (Ron Cowen wrote an earlier article about COGENT last year that goes into a lot more detail about how COGENT works, what its team expects it to find, and why.)"

158 comments

  1. winter? summer? by conspirator57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    some of us live in the southern hemisphere, you insensitive clods!

    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  2. Science is good by Tsingi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nice to see that we are still supporting science for the sake of science, not just science that turns into profits for some private corporation.

    1. Re:Science is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until they figure out how to charge you for dark matter.

    2. Re:Science is good by Coisiche · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the stuff, despite these results, is still hypothetical but there's probably already sufficiently vague patents on it's commercial use. They'll proably get a cease and desist letter from a lawyer now. It's the way the world works.

    3. Re:Science is good by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

      Patents aren't generally enforceable against basic research unless the research is actually making and selling something.

      --
      Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    4. Re:Science is good by khallow · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, information about the existence of dark matter is useful knowledge in improving our understanding of the universe and focusing the efforts of thousands of physicists and their support personnel. So it's not science for the sake of science.

    5. Re:Science is good by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Just wait until they figure out how to charge you for dark matter.

      Why? Nibbler will fling it at you for free.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    6. Re:Science is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why do you use the word "unfortunately" and what is your point in response to Tsingi? You make a valid statement, but your post comes off as argumentative to the one you are replying to. I don't see what point you are trying to argue.

      I think maybe you're just a dumbfuck. Or you're just disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing with his choice of words.

    7. Re:Science is good by khallow · · Score: 0

      Why do you use the word "unfortunately" and what is your point in response to Tsingi? You make a valid statement, but your post comes off as argumentative to the one you are replying to. I don't see what point you are trying to argue.

      Let's look at two phrases from Tsingi's post:

      science for the sake of science

      and

      profits for some private corporation

      Why should I consider the former as somehow being "nicer" than the latter? As I see it, "science for the sake of science" is merely being unaccountable with Other Peoples' Money (OPM). There's no interest in the usefulness of the science. It's a comfortable myth for OPM-fueled researchers to embrace.

      At least with science for the sake of profits for some private corporation, you are doing something useful (and usually doing it with your own money not OPM).

      We also need to note that he presents a false dichotomy. Science can be pursued for reasons other than private profit or science for its own sake.

      The "focusing the efforts of thousands of physicists and their support personnel" is a genuine economic value beyond any scientific consideration. Physicists, their staff, and their equipment aren't cheap. And it expands human knowledge in a useful and concrete way.

    8. Re:Science is good by thegreatemu · · Score: 1

      knowledge in improving our understanding of the universe ... So it's not science for the sake of science.

      Ummm, methinks you should look up the definition of science

    9. Re:Science is good by khallow · · Score: 1

      Ummm, methinks you should look up the definition of science

      And why would that help? I already know the common definitions of science. But to indulge your wishes, I went ahead and looked. Didn't see any insights there. Science isn't understanding of the universe, it's an activity which can improve understanding of the universe or it can generate "knowledge" for which there is no and never will be practical application.

    10. Re:Science is good by tendrousbeastie · · Score: 1

      I challenge you to give a definition of science that isn't immediately disputed by about 15 people. I'm pretty sure I can't.

      I'm not trying to be sarcastic or argumentative, I'm sincere. It is really hard to define but most people act as if it is obvious what it is.

    11. Re:Science is good by datsa · · Score: 1

      What about making and selling a dark matter detector? I'm assuming you can patent that, even if you can't patent dark matter itself...

  3. Re:Umm, Guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ummm -- Minnesota is not a COAL mining mecca; the Sudan mine is located in what is known as the Iron Range.

  4. Wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why are the nerds trying to detect the wimps?

    1. Re:Wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have found the wimps, and we are they.

    2. Re:Wait.... by Hartree · · Score: 1

      They hope the jocks will pick on the wimps rather than the nerds during PE class.

    3. Re:Wait.... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      The MACHOs were too mean to them.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:Wait.... by datsa · · Score: 1

      So the nerds are trying to recruit the wimps for protection from the machos?

  5. Re:winter? summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    toughen up or move north.

  6. Re:Umm, Guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hence the old WCCO running joke of "The Iron Ranger", with his trusty horse Taconite... I miss those days. :)

  7. Re:winter? summer? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    And the experiment should be duplicated there.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  8. Re:winter? summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My geraniums are just blooming too.

  9. Dark matter in a coal mine? by Delgul · · Score: 1

    Science keeps amazing me!

    1. Re:Dark matter in a coal mine? by unimacs · · Score: 1

      It's an old iron mine.

    2. Re:Dark matter in a coal mine? by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      It just keeps getting more amazing!

  10. Re:winter? summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is being duplicated there: DM-Ice

  11. Re:Umm, Guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mine is iron ore.

    Pretty good iron ore actually. 60%+ iron. Stuff that a magnet will stick to.

    But it was too deep to mine economically.

    You can tour the mine if you want, it's in Tower/Soudan, up by Ely and close to the Boundary Waters Canoe Area (a few hours drive from Duluth, MN). There's a mine tour and a physics lab tour.

  12. ah the antipodes by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i would be angry at the sleight as well, except for the fact that, as an antipodean, you would instead feel pleasure at being overlooked

    and my apologies for not writing this upside down and backwards and inside out in meaning, as is antipodean custom

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:ah the antipodes by Canazza · · Score: 1

      So. what? Australia is Bizzaro world?
      Would that make the Digiridoo the Bizzaro-Electric Guitar?

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
  13. that always bothered me by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way

    "The Sun orbits around the center of the galaxy in a galactic year—once every 225-250 million Earth years."

    has there ever been any research into odd or bad events in our geological record that occur with 237 million year frequency?

    because right now, at this moment, we are plowing through space we haven't plowed through in 237 million years. what the hell are we hitting? everything from asteroids to comets to various kinds of background radiation to fundamental particles could potentially vary periodically, according to this 237 million year loop

    yes, i take solace that most stuff around us is orbiting right along with us

    but not all of it

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:that always bothered me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just google "what happened 250 Million years ago" from Science Daily Nov 28, 2006 - http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/11/061126121112.htm The earth experienced its biggest mass extinction about 250 million years ago, an event that wiped out an estimated 95% of marine species and 70% of land species. New research shows that this mass extinction did more than eliminate species: it fundamentally changed the basic ecology of the world's oceans.

    2. Re:that always bothered me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The heliosphere should keep most stuff out.

      Even if there's some sort of rogue planet/mega asteroid belt out there the scales are so massive it's bafflingly unlikely that anything would come into the solar system let alone do anything.

      But there is always the chance.

      I'd be more worried about your every day comets/asteroids smashing into the Earth.

    3. Re:that always bothered me by Framboise · · Score: 4, Informative

      Note that the solar system co-rotates with the Milky Way matter around it, so the 225-250 Myr period with respect to an inertial frame is not relevant for dramatic effects. The sometimes discussed effect linked with massive extinction is the periodic crossing of the Milky Way plane, which occurs about every 35 Myr. The last great extinction ocurred 65 Myr ago, so one should have seen at least one or two of these plane crossing.

      Another possibility is the solar system crossing spiral arms, with period of order of 150 Myr, but this is debated.

       

    4. Re:that always bothered me by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      The Permian-Triassic Extinction, "the Earth's most severe extinction event", occurred ~250Mya.

      However, you have to ask what danger could be fixed in space, relative to the Milky Way's position relative to the position of background galaxies. Everything is moving relative to everything else, why would a line between the centre of our galaxy and an arbitrary deep space object be a permanent danger?

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    5. Re:that always bothered me by kasperd · · Score: 2

      right now, at this moment, we are plowing through space we haven't plowed through in 237 million years. what the hell are we hitting?

      There couldn't possibly be anything static lurking around in that part of space, the gravity would pull it towards the centre of the galaxy. so, whatever was there would have to be moving around the galaxy at the same pace. It is of course not entirely impossible that there are objects in a non-circular orbit, but if there was we wouldn't be meeting it at the same spot every time, and I could imagine that the trajectory of such an object would be quite irregular due to the gravity of other objects it would meet on its way.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    6. Re:that always bothered me by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way

      "The Sun orbits around the center of the galaxy in a galactic year—once every 225-250 million Earth years."

      has there ever been any research into odd or bad events in our geological record that occur with 237 million year frequency?

      because right now, at this moment, we are plowing through space we haven't plowed through in 237 million years. what the hell are we hitting? everything from asteroids to comets to various kinds of background radiation to fundamental particles could potentially vary periodically, according to this 237 million year loop

      yes, i take solace that most stuff around us is orbiting right along with us

      but not all of it

      It's not just the sun that orbits the center of the galaxy, but the entire solar system, including all of the rest of the solar systems. So assuming they are all rotating at the same rate in relationship to each other, then there isn't any new space to be plowing through.

      Put differently, whatever was in the space we currently occupy 237 million years ago has also moved away and is occupying different space. Now if your concern is some rogue comet or something that passes through this spot every 237 million years and is not affected by the gravity of the other bodies in the galaxy, well that risk would be extremely small. The likelihood of a single object (or even multiple ones) in an orbit around the center of the galaxy but in a different plane that would intersect with our solar system at the same time every 237 million years, while not impossible, it certainly improbably.

      Even a radiation burst from a distant star or pulsar aimed directly this way every 237 million years would require the distant object to be stationary compared to our solar system moving through it to be able to hit the same spot every 237 million years.

      In short, it's not that our solar system is revolving around the center of the milky way galaxy every 237 million years, it is that the entire milky way galaxy is revolving around its center every 237 million.

    7. Re:that always bothered me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that the solar system co-rotates with the Milky Way matter around it,

      But not, as this experiment shows, with respect to the dark matter.

    8. Re:that always bothered me by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      because right now, at this moment, we are plowing through space we haven't plowed through in 237 million years.

      More accurately, we're plowing through space we've never plowed through before, in the context of the universe. The Milky Way is *also* moving through space at about 2.1 million km/hr or 600 km/s. I suppose it all depends on your reference frame.

    9. Re:that always bothered me by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Being that the Earth is on the outer edge of the galaxy, I could see the Milky Way plowing into some intergalactic radiation and us getting pushed to the front of it could cause issues. Or anything else like that.

      But more than likely, something that happened 237mil years ago was just a one time thing and just so happens to align with another number.

    10. Re:that always bothered me by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, there could be an object counterrotating. Same rotation period, opposite direction. Two encounters per period.
      However, I somehow doubt that it could maintain that counterrotation for too long.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    11. Re:that always bothered me by Americium · · Score: 1

      If it's not orbiting it would just fall into the galactic center, so there would be no periodicity for hitting those particles.

    12. Re:that always bothered me by bhassel · · Score: 1

      But there could be a source of particles outside our galaxy that is only encountering the Milky Way in a specific spot / from a specific direction. We'd be out of the path (or shielded from them) until our solar system periodically ends up on that side of the galaxy.

    13. Re:that always bothered me by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      Note that the solar system co-rotates with the Milky Way matter around it, so the 225-250 Myr period with respect to an inertial frame is not relevant for dramatic effects.

      Not so. The movement of stars is not similar. The rotation of the Milky way is far from homogeneous. It is thought that some stars are passing much faster than others -- kind of like a traffic model -- which creates the spiral arms, although that isn't fully understood too. There are stars bouncing up far from the plane, through the plane down and up again. There are all kind of weird distortions, also caused by Supernovae pressure, new stars, etc. It is like a boiling soup in 3D, the model of a stationary disk is not correct.
      For instance, from the chemical composition of the sun we know it originated from a different region of space, and that it travelled faster than its current surroundings.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
  14. Signs of Dark Matter From Minnesota Mine by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Signs of Dark Matter From Minnesota Mine

    Coal?

    1. Re:Signs of Dark Matter From Minnesota Mine by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Signs of Dark Matter From Minnesota Mine

      Coal?

      Yeah, that's why the call it "Coal Dark Matter".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Signs of Dark Matter From Minnesota Mine by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

      Iron ore.

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    3. Re:Signs of Dark Matter From Minnesota Mine by holmstar · · Score: 1

      Nice try, but it's an iron mine.

  15. Re:winter? summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead, why not have the summary give the *month* when Earth's path around the Sun moves in the same/opposite direction as the Milky Way revolves?

  16. Re:winter? summer? by rossdee · · Score: 2

    For those of you that live in the southern hemisphere and don't have such seasons, winter is when it is cold. In Minnesota it can cool down to below 240K

    (Yes I am aware that Antarctica has winter, but nobody lives there apart from penguins)

  17. The Soudan Mine can be toured by swb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The lab is located in a lower (the lowest?) level of the Soudan Mine. This mine is also a state park and you can tour the mine.

    The tour (when I took it, about 9 years ago) took you down to the same level as the lab, which I think is the lowest level of the mine or within a level or two of the lowest level.

    You ride a mine cart to a room where extraction of iron ore took place, hear some details about early mining, including a lights-out experience where they show you what it was like with nothing more than old-fashioned arc lamps on the miner's helmets.

    Before you leave this level, you get to go into the lab area and get a look around. I don't think you go much past the entry way, but it's neat anyway.

    The mine had a fire recently and I don't know if the tours are back in operation, but I believe they have every intention of continuing with them once they fix whatever happened.

    1. Re:The Soudan Mine can be toured by unimacs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My family took the tour a couple of summers ago. Interesting history. They used to keep mules down there for months at a stretch. They were often in complete darkness. When brought back up to the surface they had to have their eyes covered until they were acclimated to light. The original miners used candles and the mining company made them pay for each one so they wouldn't be wasted (and to recoup some of the already paltry wages they were paying). If you are ever in that area it's definitely worth seeing, but frankly there's not too many reasons to visit that part of the state.

    2. Re:The Soudan Mine can be toured by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Charging for candles had nothing to do with wasting candles, it had to do with ensuring that the miners could never make enough to pay their debts. Same as it was for coal miners. Each pay check would dig them deeper in debt.

    3. Re:The Soudan Mine can be toured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not too many reasons, unless you enjoy the outdoors - then this area is your playground. Recently the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources purchased a large plot of land directly adjacent to the Soudan Mine - they now call this area Vermilion State Park. Some of the best fishing in the state, and in turn the world, is in this area. Most of this region is state or national forest land - an individual can hike for months on end and not be out of the wilderness. Personally, if I could find a sustainable income up there I would move in a heartbeat - unfortunately the trees don't need tech support :(

    4. Re:The Soudan Mine can be toured by Zenaku · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They charged the miners for candles, dynamite, and pretty much every other supply. See, (if I recall correctly from when I took the tour several years ago) the miners were not actually employees -- they were independent contractors. The company sold them supplies, let them into the mine, and then bought whatever ore they hauled out. This was mostly done to screw them. They could spend 18 hours a day hauling iron out of the mine for the company and yet not turn a profit.

      Also, incidentally, my group also took a full tour of the lab while we were down there -- I think they are happy to give tours, they just aren't regularly scheduled. We had called a few days before and one of the grad students working there met us and showed us around. Sadly, I was not struck by any super-power-granting science beams.

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    5. Re:The Soudan Mine can be toured by plsenjy · · Score: 1

      Not too many reasons, unless you enjoy the outdoors - then this area is your playground. Recently the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources purchased a large plot of land directly adjacent to the Soudan Mine - they now call this area Vermilion State Park. Some of the best fishing in the state, and in turn the world, is in this area. Most of this region is state or national forest land - an individual can hike for months on end and not be out of the wilderness. Personally, if I could find a sustainable income up there I would move in a heartbeat - unfortunately the trees don't need tech support :(

      Yaaaawn. Another spot not worth visiting because the hotel doesn't have a decent T1 connection. Why would I visit a place if I can't boot up my computer and see the exact same online content that is available to me at home?

      --
      Glad I could help.
    6. Re:The Soudan Mine can be toured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually took a tour there with my highschool physics class from Harbor City International School down in duluth back in 2008.

      The elevator ride down was perhaps the most intense moment of my entire life, it's pitch black and shakes the hell all over the place.

      On one of the doors they actually have a sign from the old mining days labeled "No woman through this door". I snapped a picture of it with the student teacher lady standing next to it, it was perfect.

    7. Re:The Soudan Mine can be toured by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      thus the song, though it did refer to coal rather than iron mining, i imagine the social dynamic was neigh identical:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteen_Tons

      http://www.ernieford.com/SixteenTons.htm

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    8. Re:The Soudan Mine can be toured by holmstar · · Score: 1

      unless you enjoy the outdoors

      Why would I visit a place if I can't boot up my computer and see the exact same online content that is available to me at home?

      The entire point of going there is to get away and hang out in nature. Clearly the park wasn't intended for you.

    9. Re:The Soudan Mine can be toured by Mr_Huber · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that happens. My present job is helping make lightning detectors. When I applied for the job, I was heartbroken to learn there was not a cage somewhere in the building with a giant tesla coil set up for testing.

      I've had a number of disappointments like that. The dye laser I worked with in college looked like a fuel injector hooked to a paint bucket. The pump laser was an anemic old argon ion device that maybe put out 0.75 W on a good day. My senior project carbon 60 experiments used tiny glass ampules that only changed color from orange to darker orange. Even the massive magnet we used to check for superconductivity was only impressive for the sheer amount of iron. All in all, physics labs were disappointing.

      Especially compared to those jerks over in Nuclear Engineering, shooting the control rods out of the student reactor and flooding the room with Chernikov radiation and firing up the beta gun to capture lightning bolts in lucite because it was Thursday and there was nothing better to do. And don't get me started on how once they hit grad school, they could climb the walls like spiders or shoot frikkin' laser beams from their eyes.

    10. Re:The Soudan Mine can be toured by habig · · Score: 2

      Work to fix the parts of the entry shaft which were damaged by the fire will stop public tours for the next few months, but we hope things will be back to normal at that point.

      Yes, "normal" includes regularly scheduled lab tours as well as historical mine tours. If you're up in this part of the world for touristy reasons (most of which involve fishing and canoeing) definitely look up the Soudan Underground Mine State Park.

    11. Re:The Soudan Mine can be toured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >They could spend 18 hours a day hauling iron out of the mine for the company and yet not turn a profit.
      so what's in it for them? After they did that for a week, and didn't turn a profit, why did they show up to do it for the next week?

  18. Get a life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the experiment is based in the Northern Hemisphere the reference can be assumed to be spring or Summer in the Northern Hemisphere.

  19. Sounds like another feeble open source acronym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Giant Interacting Massive P ..... er, nevermind.

  20. Scientific breakthrough! by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    Dark matter is more of a medium charcoal color.

  21. Re:winter? summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    some of us live in the southern hemisphere, you insensitive clods!

    Yes, but statistically speaking, not very many of us do, and since Slashdot is a USA-based site, and even the summary mentions that the researchers were in the Northern hemisphere (Minnesota and Europe) it's pretty easy to figure out what they mean, even for someone who lives in a topsy-turvy land where up is down and presumably left is right and you have to wear magnetic boots to avoid falling off the Earth.

  22. Re:Umm, Guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typo -- you forgot the O -- Soudan.

  23. Re:winter? summer? by pspahn · · Score: 1

    The month appears to be irrelevant. The season is what is relevant. If the guy means to do a summer-time study in Minnesota to show that summer is when something happens, nobody is going to care what season it is in NSW. Lose the ego.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  24. Population growth = more raw materials needed by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    Whodathunk ?? This is 2011 already !!

    How do you think we get stuff? Magic? Recycling yields less that 100%, so as the population grows, we need to get more stuff out of the ground.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:Population growth = more raw materials needed by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 1

      How do you think we get stuff? Magic?

      China. And Ben Bernanke

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
  25. Re:winter? summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Yes, but statistically speaking, not very many of us do, and since Slashdot is a USA-based site, and...

    Yes, but statistically speaking, WHOOOOSH!

  26. Did anyone else completely misinterpet the title? by jpstanle · · Score: 1

    When I first saw the title of the thread, my initial reaction was "How the hell is there dark matter in Minnesota? Did they find Nibbler's litter box or something?"

  27. The problem with seasonal variation... by Troggie87 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I did my physics undergrad at the University of Minnesota Duluth, and they graciously let me play around in the mine on occasion. I don't do much particle physics anymore so I'm not particularily equipped to judge their results, but I can say that all kinds of seasonal errors can be introduced in these experiments. Cosmic rays have a seasonal variation for example. Another that happens at Soudan for sure and possibly in Italy is seasonal variation in background radiation. The air circulation at Soudan is largely passive, and there is lots of radon gas seeping from the rocks. In the cold winter the exchange is excellent, but in the summer the circulation is terrible and you get anywhere from 5 to 10 times the radon background in the cave (air in the cave is warmer than outside in the winter and cooler in the summer, you can do the math).

    I'm not saying either of those are the cause of this, but there is good reason to squint hard at anything claiming "seasonal evidence" when the claim is extrordainary (in the sense that it is way off from any model). Scientists should be skeptical of this, especially since they are claiming a result before theory suggests a result should even be possible.

    1. Re:The problem with seasonal variation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be relatively straightforward to check for temperature-induced variations in the results: just dissasemble the equipment and reassemble it in a similar mine in the southern hemisphere. If what is being detected comes from outside of the earth you should still get the same effect independent of location, and it'll be higher during the cold season. Or reassemble somewhere near the equator, where there aren't any pronounced seasons.

      The cosmic-ray angle is interesting, but according to TFA they planned for this already.

      I wonder about the guided tours someone else mentioned already. Are these detectors so sensitive that a tourist with a wristwatch with (radioactive) glow in the dark needles would be detected? I bet the volume of tourists also has a seasonal variation.

    2. Re:The problem with seasonal variation... by Americium · · Score: 1

      Radon experts are on site to deal with it. Even background Radon on the Earth's surface, .25 pCi/L is far, far too high to do dark matter experiments, nevermind 100 pCi/L underground. Radon has to be completely eliminated in these labs in the mines, and a 5-10 fold increase would be picked up by monitors.

    3. Re:The problem with seasonal variation... by Americium · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the whole point of putting it deep in a mine to get rid of cosmic ray interference. The area the tourists see are separated from dark matter experiments, so any gamma rays coming from a wristwatch wouldn't do anything, and that glow in the watch is from alpha particles anyway. The antimatter-matter annihilations and K-40 peaks from Human bodies are much higher energy than anything from the watch, so just having humans around has to be dealt with.

    4. Re:The problem with seasonal variation... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying either of those are the cause of this, but there is good reason to squint hard at anything claiming "seasonal evidence" when the claim is extrordainary (in the sense that it is way off from any model).

      But the point you're criticizing here (seasonal variation) is not extraordinary in the sense you say -- it is, in fact, exactly what the model suggests we should see. It's doubly not-surprising in that it's confirm rather than contradicting another experiment which showed the exact same thing. The only thing surprising in the result is the lighter mass than predicted.

      It should also be noted that, and this should really come as no surprise to everyone, most of the Ph.D.'s and grad students doing the experiment although thought of the concerns obvious to an undergrad.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    5. Re:The problem with seasonal variation... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      s/although/already/

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    6. Re:The problem with seasonal variation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But an experienced physicist like Collar (who has spent nearly 3 decades hunting for dark matter and identifying these sorts of backgrounds) will have designed a quality experiment that eliminates something as simple as Radon. To be sure, there are always other backgrounds...If you want to hear him describe them all, check out this criticism of DAMA from a few years back... http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/04/21/guest-post-juan-collar-on-dark-matter-detection/

  28. no by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    australia is known for arnold schwarzenegger, amadeus mozart, sigmund freud, franz ferdinand, the house of hapsburg, and "the sound of music"

    please get a geography education

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:no by Canazza · · Score: 1
      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    2. Re:no by Chaymus · · Score: 0

      thread winner.

    3. Re:no by GuruBuckaroo · · Score: 1

      In accordance with Pope's Law, I can't tell if this should be laughed at or laughed with. My parody detector is completely fried in these crazy years.

      --
      Poor means hoping the toothache goes away.
    4. Re:no by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      two things:

      1. yes, i am joking

      2. as someone who has laughed at what others said in seriousness, and someone who has been mortified at what some meant as a joke, i share and feel your pain. the internet is a wondrous and frightening window on half-communicated things

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    5. Re:no by mbkennel · · Score: 1

      alright mate, so ya gonna put another (euphemism for non-aryan) on the barbie?

    6. Re:no by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      you forgot the closing sarcasm tag for those who are deaf to subtlety.

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    7. Re:no by ender06 · · Score: 0

      Arnold is from Austria, not Australia, get your own geography education.

    8. Re:no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      australia is known for arnold schwarzenegger, amadeus mozart, sigmund freud, franz ferdinand, the house of hapsburg, and "the sound of music"

      please get a geography education

      That's Austria not Australia.

      Please get a geography education.

  29. Re:winter? summer? by physburn · · Score: 1
    Good link, but its just a proposal and a test at the ice cube cosmic ray experiment so far. But yes it should be duplicated there. That will take some time though, DAMA took 13 years to get a decent signal (8 sigma I believe). So by 2020, we'll have a confirmation, maybe. And even then we'll still not really know what dark matter is.

    ---

    Dark Matter Feed @ Feed Distiller

  30. Re:Did anyone else completely misinterpet the titl by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 2

    Well, if it is a coal mine, wouldn't you expect it to be full of dark matter? ;)

  31. (OT) Fortune generator by arielCo · · Score: 0

    I'm also glad to see that /. is working on the fortune generator. Too bad it blurts all fortunes in ROT-13. Hint for the curious:

    < uglymess.txt tr '[A-Za-z]' '[N-ZA-Mn-za-m]' | sed 's/%/\n\n/g' > clean.txt

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    1. Re:(OT) Fortune generator by arielCo · · Score: 1, Troll

      Corrected:

      < uglymess.txt tr '[A-Za-z]' '[N-ZA-Mn-za-m]' | sed 's/ % /\n\n/g' > clean.txt

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    2. Re:(OT) Fortune generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wondered what that was. I just had a glance and it all just seemed to be in Cthulu-speak.

  32. yes, this is correct by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    my supposition is also absurd because the milky way itself is "moving" (orbitting?), in relation to other galaxies. there is no fixed point we are moving against

    however, it is a slightly intriguing possibility, no? that say, some fundamental constant we take for granted as constant actually might vary slightly across a 250 million year period... for some reason. wouldn't that be interesting? yes, this is wild conjecture, but you could certainly sit around and construct a few "what ifs" that would suggest such a possibility. even though we aren't remotely able to ask serious science questions about such a hypothetical periodicity to... something, right now in our scientific maturity

    at least the thought is the basis for some perhaps compelling speculative science fiction, if not real science

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:yes, this is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      however, it is a slightly intriguing possibility, no?

      Not really.

    2. Re:yes, this is correct by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Don't feel bad, it's occurred to me too.
      Improbable, yes, quite, but not absolutely totally impossible- after all, there is much to the universe still not understood.. like dark matter. (Personally I blame anti-dark matter ;-D )
      Seriously though, if there is something in the galaxy that caused the mass extinction, and it's location at any given time is randomized by the effects of gravity, it's not totally comforting to know we could still come across it at some point, and never even know when it's coming. Or if a totally separate but physically identical effect (gamma ray burst, for example) happens. OTOH, I think the odds are in our favor.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    3. Re:yes, this is correct by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      my supposition is also absurd because the milky way itself is "moving" (orbitting?), in relation to other galaxies. there is no fixed point we are moving against

      however, it is a slightly intriguing possibility, no? that say, some fundamental constant we take for granted as constant actually might vary slightly across a 250 million year period... for some reason. wouldn't that be interesting? yes, this is wild conjecture, but you could certainly sit around and construct a few "what ifs" that would suggest such a possibility. even though we aren't remotely able to ask serious science questions about such a hypothetical periodicity to... something, right now in our scientific maturity

      at least the thought is the basis for some perhaps compelling speculative science fiction, if not real science

      Definitely would work for science fiction, but the possibility is so remote as to be virtually 0. It is not just our solar system that is revolving in our galaxy which is revolving in our universe. All the other galaxies are also revolving, plus the distance between the galaxies is changing which would make the angles between the galaxies different today than they were 237 million years ago. Even the stars we see in the night sky are in different positions than they were 2000 years ago (and not just because of the earth's wobble).

      This is not to say that some gamma burst from some distant galaxy could not hit us (or even from something in our own galaxy). But the likelihood for it to occur on schedule every 237 milliion years is statistically zero. Much more likely is that something in another part of our galaxy or another galaxy which is constantly streaming radiation, like a giant pulsar or black hole or something yet to be discovered, will swing around and we will go through it's path. Much as the comet that hit Jupiter. The comet always followed that path, Jupiter just happened to be in the right place at the right time.

    4. Re:yes, this is correct by Coldmoon · · Score: 1

      ...(Personally I blame anti-dark matter ;-D )

      Errm - Dark Energy perhaps?

      --
      Coldmoon over Dark water...
  33. Re:winter? summer? by garcia · · Score: 1

    Actually 230K. But hey, what's another 10 degrees Kelvin when we're already at more than 40 below zero.

  34. Re:winter? summer? by arkenian · · Score: 1

    The month appears to be irrelevant. The season is what is relevant. If the guy means to do a summer-time study in Minnesota to show that summer is when something happens, nobody is going to care what season it is in NSW. Lose the ego.

    Actually quite the opposite. It is based on where the planet is in its orbit, which is based on the month, not the notional season. Unless I entirely misunderstand TFS, if the experiment had been in NSW, it would've had to be held in winter.

  35. Re:winter? summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows the southern hemisphere orbits the sun in the opposite direction of the northern hemisphere. So, people in the southern hemisphere will still experience more dark matter in their summer.

  36. Re:winter? summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and the troll wins!

  37. Re:winter? summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The experiment was not in NSW.

  38. Exciting to see it get sorted out by pavon · · Score: 2

    This is especially interesting to me because another experiment failed to detect any evidence of dark matter, which seemed to contradict the (not quite statistically significant) hints that CDMS may have detected dark matter last year.

    I'm also confused about which experiment this is. It says it is in the Soudan mine in Minnesota, but it isn't mentioned on either of the websites for the mine. Is it part of MINOS or CDMS, or is it something separate?

    Regardless, I have been really excited about these detectors for the last couple years (even more so than the LHC), and it is great to start seeing data.

    1. Re:Exciting to see it get sorted out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither, this is the COGENT experiment, you can learn more about it via the University of Chicago website

    2. Re:Exciting to see it get sorted out by habig · · Score: 2

      It is indeed at the Soudan Mine. Our website doesn't do a good job at explaining the smaller experiments which operate there, although we are working on fixing that.

  39. Re:Umm, Guys... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    Whoosh.

  40. Re:winter? summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like we've lost another one to magnetic boot failure.

  41. Re:winter? summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The month appears to be irrelevant. The season is what is relevant. If the guy means to do a summer-time study in Minnesota to show that summer is when something happens, nobody is going to care what season it is in NSW. Lose the ego.

    God, you're a fucking moron. I guess you probably represent most of the demographic on this site now. What arkenian wrote mirrors my sentiment, but he's much nicer about it and isn't 100% confident in his response (probably to be nice to you). Lose the ego.

  42. So now the Dark Matter is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    really just becoming Emo Matter?

    1. Re:So now the Dark Matter is... by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      and it's switched to only wearing dark matter until they find a darker color.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  43. Re:winter? summer? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

    Southern hemisphere still has us beat.
    It snowed CO2 at Scott Amundsen base once IIRC.
    -nB

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  44. Re:winter? summer? by Bengie · · Score: 1

    Coldest I've seen living in Wisconsin is -62c/-80f/211k including wind-chill. Local news said exposed skin could develop frostbite in 10-15 seconds. WI is right next to MN, so similar temps, although MN tends to take the brunt of the weather that the Rockys sends our way.

  45. Re:winter? summer? by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 2
    --
    -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
  46. sayeth the great medieval poet, donald rumsfeld: by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    "There are known knowns; there are things we know we know.
    We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know.
    But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know."

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  47. Not so clear cut by thegreatemu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's a huge controversy right now in the field. The DAMA/Libra experiment has been claiming an 8-sigma excess for years which they say is consistent with dark matter, but they keep getting excluded by other experiments, most notably CDMS and Xenon. Every time their favored region is excluded, they come up with a new way to reanalyze their data to make it consistent again. But they have not ever released any of their data to the community (and hold patents on the type of crystal they use for their detector) so it's impossible to directly verify.

    CoGeNT first released hints of a low-energy excess which could be consistent with DAMA-type dark matter about a year ago. I was at the APS conference earlier this week where Collar released the seasonal modulation results which make it seem even more likely that they see the same thing as DAMA. However, just the next day, CDMS presented an analysis of their low energy data which is below their normal dark matter threshold (because the rate of background events in that region is quite high and poorly understood). They showed that, even if they didn't account for the known sources of background, the rate in their detector is inconsistent with CoGeNT's. As many people rightly point out, CoGeNT is seeing an exponential signal near threshold, which is what you'd expect to see in just about any detector with or without dark matter present.

    The whole situation is muddled even further by politics and personalities. Collar is respected as a scientist, but is also generally agreed to be an asshole. When he announced the annular modulation result, he spent 25 minutes of his talk attacking xenon on mostly pointless grounds, then had only a single slide showing the important result of the modulation. He finds tiny holes in other's analyses, but doesn't often present a very convincing picture of his own.

    tl;dr: The community is far from agreeing that what he and DAMA have seen are in fact WIMPs. CDMS and Xenon tend to have better established analysis programs and pay more attention to their systematics, and they still rule out both DAMA and CoGeNT. However, I think everyone at this point agrees they are seeing something interesting, just likely not WIMPs.

    1. Re:Not so clear cut by Americium · · Score: 1

      If not WIMPs, then what? Are there any other candidates, or did you mean entirely new particle that hasn't been thought of?

    2. Re:Not so clear cut by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      But they have not ever released any of their data to the community (and hold patents on the type of crystal they use for their detector) so it's impossible to directly verify.

      And thus is not, in any way even remotely, scientific. Why are we discussing pseudo-science in an article about actual science (what always deals exclusively with the realm of what's verifiable/falsifiable)?

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    3. Re:Not so clear cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree with your assessment that Juan Collar is an asshole. His "show" at the American Physical Society meeting was an embarrassment for all physicists in the room.

      In my opinion (as an NSF-funded experimental particle physicist), he is shooting himself in the foot by insulting funding agency reviewers. I am holding my breath for China (Shangai) to do this experiment better while the US and European groups continue their in-fighting.

    4. Re:Not so clear cut by thegreatemu · · Score: 1

      The most often-cited hypothesis are cosmic rays, which do show a similar annular modulation due primarily (as far as we know) to changing temperature and density in the atmosphere. This modulation is measured extremely well by MACRO, a detector in LNGS (the same site as DAMA). But, the phase (time of year when the signal is at maximum) of the cosmic ray modulation seems to be inconsistent with the DAMA (and to a lesser extent, CoGeNT) oscillation.

      WIMPs are also not a particularly defined particle; only the "vanilla" WIMP is excluded by CDMS and Xenon. Every theorist has his or her favorite way to reconcile all the experimental evidence, usually by just changing one or two parameters. For instance, you can make the Xenon signal agree by proposing that the WIMP interacts differently with neutrons than with protons, which is actually well-supported by some models. The thing that NO theory can do is reconcile the CoGeNT and CDMS signals, since they are both germanium detectors; those two will be where the interesting showdown happens I think.

    5. Re:Not so clear cut by thegreatemu · · Score: 1

      Very few collaborations of this size release all of their data publicly. Partly it's a practicality issue: how do you share several TB of data with whoever wants it? Plus, it's very easy for someone not familiar with the setup to misinterpret the data (an argument often used by climate scientists for why raw data is not released).

      As I said, I don't think anyone disputes that DAMA sees _something_ with an annular modulation,just their interpretation of it. As far as the community is concerned, the WIMP explanation HAS been falsified already. But the DAMA people hold out that, since the other detectors use different target materials they are not directly comparable. Stalemate until someone else can get ahold of some of their crystals.

    6. Re:Not so clear cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watched Collar's talk online yesterday, it is at https://webcast.stsci.edu/webcast/
      I count 4 minutes out of 40 spent on criticizing other experiments, on what looks like solid grounds.
      A "respected scientist" you must not be yourself, based on the language you use here.

    7. Re:Not so clear cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like DAMA/Libra are doing climate 'science'.

    8. Re:Not so clear cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Pointless grounds"? Dude, too many disgruntled XENON tr0lls in this thread...

    9. Re:Not so clear cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much better established program of analysis...hmmm. The rumor mill has it that Elena (Xenon 100) shopped around for post-docs who would analyze the data that would give HER required null result. Even if that's not true, that detector is extraordinarily complicated, as are the CDMS detectors. They deserve exquisite attention. On the other hand, the CoGeNT detectors are single channel devices, and incredibly easy to analyze. So simple that Collar is giving the data out to anyone who asks for it so that they can do their own analysis. He must be pretty confident in his own analysis, if you ask me...

  48. Dark Matter by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Is excreted by three eyed alien monkeys and is used to power space ships.

  49. TV Show related to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can find out more about this in "Through the Wormhole with Morgan Freeman", this particular subject is in episode 8 (the last one)

  50. Get ready for the zinger by guspasho · · Score: 1

    Of course the matter is dark, it's at the bottom of a mine shaft!

  51. Re:winter? summer? by damnfuct · · Score: 1

    there should be no "degrees" before "kelvin"

  52. Way, WAY off topic, but ... by thomst · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    On April 27, I posted this comment on another story about an entirely different topic. Eventually, it got modded to +3 Insightful. Then, this morning, I discovered it had been modded all the way down to -1 Overrated.

    There's only one reason why a single moderator would spend that many mod points on down-modding a single post: to put it below the browsing threshold of virtually all /. readers. The question is, "Why?" And I suspect the only credible answer to that question is, "Because he is so consumed by dedication either to communism or to libertarianism (the two political philosophies whose fundamental assumptions I criticized in the post), that he feels compelled to suppress any criticism of it for which he is unable to muster an argument in response.

    Now, because communists are so thin on the ground around here, I have my strong suspicions which philosophy my censor espouses - but it doesn't matter either way, because, in either case, this is clearly a case of someone systematically attempting to suppress dissenting speech. The act of suppression itself is one of craven philosophical cowardice, and it does nothing whatsoever to enhance the credibility of the political philosophy it purports to defend. To the contrary, it merely establishes that the moderator, at least, can muster no useful counter-argument. Instead, he substitutes moderation abuse for intelligent discourse.

    In the interest of fairness, I urge you to read my comment. Whether or not the down-mod is undone, it deserves at least that much consideration.

    --
    Check out my novel.
    1. Re:Way, WAY off topic, but ... by osu-neko · · Score: 2

      There's only one reason why a single moderator would spend that many mod points on down-modding a single post

      No single moderator did, since no single moderator possibly could. It takes at minimum four moderators to move a post from +3 to -1.

      In the interest of fairness, I urge you to read my comment [slashdot.org]. Whether or not the down-mod is undone, it deserves at least that much consideration.

      I doubt it. Posting off-topic about it just makes you sound like a complete idiot. It's not worth the time to read. (And this coming from someone who thinks both communists and libertarians are obviously morons.)

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    2. Re:Way, WAY off topic, but ... by thomst · · Score: 1

      There's only one reason why a single moderator would spend that many mod points on down-modding a single post

      No single moderator did, since no single moderator possibly could. It takes at minimum four moderators to move a post from +3 to -1.

      Your naivete is charming.

      Single users with multiple accounts? On /.? Inconceivable!

      --
      Check out my novel.
    3. Re:Way, WAY off topic, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A single moderator can only spend one point on a given post, IIRC.

  53. Re:sayeth the great medieval poet, donald rumsfeld by conspirator57 · · Score: 1
    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  54. Re:winter? summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wind chill doesn't count when reporting temperatures. Stick to air temp and worry about the wind chill only if you're bothering to go outside.

  55. Re:THEY STILL MINE ?? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    They still mine, yes. But today most of it is data mining.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  56. Re:winter? summer? by holmstar · · Score: 1

    Actually no. The low concentration of C02 in the atmosphere means that dry ice sublimates faster than it freezes at the temperatures that were recorded in Antarctica. So flakes of dry ice would never get a chance to form.

  57. Re:Umm, Guys... by holmstar · · Score: 1

    Yeah... well the joke doesn't really fit the reality of it being an iron mine.

  58. COGENT by students · · Score: 2

    This experiment is outside my field of expertise, but I know several people who worked on this experiment and have met Juan Collar several times. It seems like an excellent experiment, but there is a funny side to their results:- Juan Collar has been talking for a long time about how he has been very close to showing the DAMA claim of dark matter detection is incorrect, and now he has confirmed it. I often got the feeling that the COGENT team didn't really believe dark matter existed.

    1. Re:COGENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am pretty sure Juan is tortured by the turn of events ;-)

  59. Re:winter? summer? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Still have summer and winter don'tcha?

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  60. Re:Did anyone else completely misinterpet the titl by holmstar · · Score: 1

    Nope. Iron.

  61. Why do you hate America? by Benfea · · Score: 1

    I'm on to you! Real Americans(TM) on the radio warned me about your plot to confiscate all our Bibles and guns! Yer obviously onna them people whut believes Obama was barn in Amurka! [/silly]

    1. Re:Why do you hate America? by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      Heh, you better keep your gun, you're going to need it.

  62. Re:Did anyone else completely misinterpet the titl by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    Nope. Iron.

    Well, it is still dark and it is still matter!

  63. backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These particles have mass, right? (hence the "M" in the acronym)
    So wouldn't they be rotating WITH the galaxy?
    Doesn't that imply a higher collision rate when moving AGAINST the rotation of the Milky Way?

  64. Re:winter? summer? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    And what seasons do you have there.

    Most of the populated area just has summer year around.
    Or if you are at the south pole you have a full year of winter.

    For the rest of us who live in the correct Hemisphere (North) we have areas with seasons. Where when we say winter we mean it. and not just a cool summer day.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  65. Re:winter? summer? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Dag Nabbit I had to wash the Boes-Eisenstein condensate off my car again.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  66. Re:Did anyone else completely misinterpet the titl by osu-neko · · Score: 1

    The reason dark matter has been the "missing mass" for so long is that Minnesotans have been hording it for ourselves. Sorry...

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  67. truth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this is as true as Juan Collar's talk's claiming to be the best, when there are others that have better limits. Such people will one day discover how pity they are. so sad

  68. Who's summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't say who's summer. There is a summer in the northern hemisphere, and a summer in the southern hemisphere, and we are all screwed if they both happen at once. The article doesn't say exactly where its published, although Europe is predominantly in the Northern Hemisphere, so that would mean that we Northerners (that includes you people in Georgia, Tennessee, Florida and Texas) are going with the celestial current, and those southern cross types (go ahead, call me an insensitive clod), are going against the intergalactic celestial current. You always though there was-- you know --something... and now you know.

    1. Re:Who's summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am Summer.

  69. but WIMPS cant exist inside Galaxies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was impossible for WIMPS to exist inside galaxies,because they would be streaming into stars due to gravitational attraction. Since WIMPS dont interact with the electromagnetic field effects of baryonic matter (thus weakly interacting) these WIMPS would exclusively be attracted by the gravity of stars, but not repulsed by the explosive effects of fusion reactions. This would lead to every star's equilibrium between inward acting gravity and outward acting fusion reaction being unbalanced, wiht the WMPS slowly increasing the mass of the star and hence the violence of fusion. Causing all stars to grow smaller and hotter until they nova'd. The only fix for this which has been suggested is to have all WIMPS safely quarantined in the outer galactic halo by their own angular momentum, thus they would never interact with anything on Earth.

  70. Re:winter? summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congrats on feeding the troll. Well done.

  71. and at night... by cdpage · · Score: 1

    if the summer increases the threshold of observation, by way of moving with the galaxy, so then should we see more at night too, (when our hemisphere is moving the same direction too)

    No?