Slashdot Mirror


Why Thunderbolt Is Dead In the Water

adeelarshad82 writes "In the same way that Apple championed FireWire for the replacement of parallel SCSI, Thunderbolt is meant as the next big thing in video and audio peripheral interfaces. Plus, it's Apple's move to beat USB 3.0. However, Thunderbolt is off to a slow start, for a number of reasons — from cost to the technology's features in comparison to USB 3.0 — which is why it may be dead in the water."

5 of 568 comments (clear)

  1. Article reads like a big Apple bash by The+Dawn+Of+Time · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The article reads like a big Apple bash, even though Thunderbolt is Intel's tech. The points about cost are probably valid but the whole thing comes off as a big unsourced bitchfest.

  2. Re:Bullshit. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No it won't. USB will be the next USB. The connector is too common now to ever be replaced as the default digital interface for most things. It's on the front of my car radio, for damn sake.

    A good parallel is the 3.5mm headphone jack. Frankly, it's stupidly large and poorly designed for what it needs to do (USB isn't). But it will never be replaced by another (wired) connector in it's application space. There's just too many of them, and it's hard to make a compelling case for replacement for 98% of users.

    That is a bad analogy. The 3.5mm jack is easy to use because there is no wrong way to plug it in. Now the USB connector on the other hand is crap because a lot of people probably have to make two or three tries before then can plug something in. It is a really poor design which is only marginally better than those stupid PS/2 keyboard/mouse ports.

    Now the Thunderbolt connector, on the other hand, has just one right way that you can try to even plug it in. It is easy to see which side is up.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  3. Re:Really? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My understanding is that USB3 has a max theoretical transfer rate of 4 GB/s while Thunderbolt is at 10 GB/s per channel giving 20 GB/s total. Also overhead limits USB3 having a peak of 3.2 GB/s. Thunderbolt is designed more to replace eSATA and FireWire than USB.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  4. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    USB 3 offers no advantages over eSATA

    The power is in the connector.
    Everything has a USB port.

    Therefore it Just Works.

  5. Re:Really? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    USB 3 offers no advantages over eSATA

    Did they deprecate hubs in the USB3 spec?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)