Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Music Industry Copyright Class Action Settled

limber writes "The largest Canadian copyright class action suit has been settled for $50 million. The offenders? The four labels comprising the Canadian Recording Industry Association — EMI, Sony Music, Universal Music, and Warner Music. Ahem." The terms of the settlement are a compromise — anyone with works on the pending list can receive compensation while the music industry is absolved of further liability. The two major Canadian licensing agencies (CMRRA and SODRAC) will be tasked with improving the licensing process to prevent future abuse.

99 comments

  1. Good luck with that. by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The CRIA has had years to pay these artists. Why would they start now?

    Also notice how this is less than 1% of what the CRIA actually owes its artists. Settlements like this only encourage them to keep stiffing their artists.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  2. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do I think this is going to trickle down and hurt the little guy no matter how it turned out?

  3. Not all good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Posting anonymously from work...
     
     

    The two major Canadian licensing agencies (CMRRA and SODRAC) will be tasked with improving the licensing process to prevent future abuse.

    Why do I get the feeling that means, instead of "the CMRRA and SODRAC will ensure the music industry doesn't make this mistake again", as I'm sure they'd like us to believe, that actually equates to "the CMRRA and SODRAC will ensure stricter copyright legislation so that the music industry has an easier time of controlling things and screwing over people"?... Why do I get the feeling the music industry actually won and the people of Canada got screwed?...

    1. Re:Not all good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Neither CMRRA nor SODRAC are governement bodies; they'll have to lobby MPs like all the other cabals to get their restrictions in place.

    2. Re:Not all good... by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      But I bet they have priority access...

    3. Re:Not all good... by isopropanol · · Score: 1

      We have a majority government. They only have to lobby the Heritage Minister.

  4. So... by Ecuador · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, for willfully and illegally selling 300,000 works, the recording companies paid just $50 million, or $166 per song. And careful, that is per song, NOT per copy! So they are most likely giving a fraction of their illegally gotten gains - forget about any punitive damages, they probably even get to keep a lot of the stolen money!
    Next time you are sharing a song online, make sure a) you make money of it b) you are a big corp.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:So... by Whalou · · Score: 1

      Especially b)...

      --
      English is not this .sig mother tongue...
    2. Re:So... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      This is news to you?
      If you commit a crime always go big. If your mom and pop shop dumps waste in the river you are going to jail, if you are union carbide all of Bhopal India can be your waste dump.

    3. Re:So... by dstyle5 · · Score: 2

      I wonder if they will "pay" them in iTunes credits and free CDs like every other company that settles in class actions and pays with products instead of money. Or being a Canadian settlement perhaps the terms were Tim Horton's gift cards and Canadian Tire money.

    4. Re:So... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not so much A as it is B. It would have been interesting had the damages been assessed similar to the Jamie Thomas verdict ($80,000 per song). $80,000 * 300,000 = $24 billion. I'd have loved to have seen them squirm over having to pay a $24 billion judgement against them and see them crying about how unfair it was and how it would bankrupt them. Granted, there wouldn't be any cognitive dissonance to burst. They really do think that infringement by the public should be punished by huge fines (and, I'm sure they'd love to add in, jail terms) while infringement by them should be punished by a vicious finger shaking and a fine not to exceed ten percent of the profits they made off of the infringement.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    5. Re:So... by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

      Comparison to:

      Limewire settlement: $10,808 per song, 65x more. 300,000 infringements -> $3.24 billion
      Joel Tenenbaum: $22,500 per song, 135x more. 300,000 infringements -> $6.75 billion
      Jammie Thomas-Rasset 2010: $62,500 per song, 375x more. 300,000 infringements -> $18.75 billion

      The scales of justice seem badly in need of calibration.

    6. Re:So... by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Could it be a Canadian settlement has something to do with this? After all, the Canadian dollar is now worth more than the US dollar, so some adjustment to your figures is required.

      It isn't like the US dollar is some kind of international standard any more.

      Besides, US music is probably worth less in Canada anyway.

    7. Re:So... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Just because the Canadian dollar has gone from 0.70 US$ to 1.03 US$ does not change the fact that we pay 30% more for American goods (before taxes).

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    8. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have been sued in a USA court. 300,000 x 100,000 x (estimated copies sold) would bring a nice punitive fine which could be used to help promote local Canadian talent...

  5. Re:I hope... by mini+me · · Score: 2

    What about Nickleback? Oh wait, that just reenforces your point.

  6. Re:I hope... by creat3d · · Score: 1

    Yes, that's all we have, the same way the US has only produced Britney Spears, Limp Bizkit and Barry Manilow.

    --
    Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
  7. Love this ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The record companies commit wholesale copyright infringement, and take the stance they should be allowed to do it and will settle the costs later.

    The rest of us download a fucking Brittany Spears song and they want to sue us for eleventy trillion dollars.

    I think it's time to start feeding recording executives to wild dogs -- they want draconian laws to make sure we can't do anything, but they just walk around them and pretend they didn't do anything wrong. Arrogant bastards.

    I've said it before, if they keep extending this "copyright levy" to everything under the sun, I'm going to start pirating on a large scale. I'm already paying for it, I might as well get my money's worth.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Love this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The rest of us download a fucking Brittany Spears song and they want to sue us for eleventy trillion dollars.

      To be fair, you need to be punished for downloading Britney Spears. And for spelling her name wrong.

      And I need to be punished for knowing you spelled it wrong...

    2. Re:Love this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What have you got against wild dogs? That would for sure be cruelty to animals as these scumbags are festering postules of blight and disease on the planet even when they are alive, and not much less so if they were dead.

    3. Re:Love this ... by jd2112 · · Score: 2

      The rest of us download a fucking Brittany Spears song and they want to sue us for eleventy trillion dollars.

      Isn't listening to Brittney Spears punishment enough?

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    4. Re:Love this ... by H0p313ss · · Score: 4, Funny

      Since this is a story about a Canadian lawsuit, by Canadian Content rules since this joke should be about Celene Dion or Avril Lavigne.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    5. Re:Love this ... by PIBM · · Score: 1

      The only way to be sure would be to nuke them to orbit ?

    6. Re:Love this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fair enough: you should be punished for even mentioning Celine Dion.

    7. Re:Love this ... by N0Man74 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, you need to be punished for downloading Britney Spears.

      Isn't hearing it punishment enough? Even if you don't listen to it, isn't the shame of possessing it punishment enough?

    8. Re:Love this ... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      That's my stance whenever they make noise about bringing the "mandatory copyright fees" to the US for everything (especially ISP bills). I don't pirate music, but if I'm going to be charged $5 a month in "just in case you are a copyright pirate" fees, I might as well become a copyright pirate. Those fees will create more pirates then they "cure" (for lack of a better word).

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    9. Re:Love this ... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      And for spelling her name wrong.

      It's a reasonable mistake. That's the correct spelling for that other dog.

      A perfectly understandable confusion.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    10. Re:Love this ... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2

      You forgot Canada's greatest recording artist.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    11. Re:Love this ... by metacell · · Score: 1

      The rest of us download a fucking Brittany Spears song and they want to sue us for eleventy trillion dollars.

      To be fair, you need to be punished for downloading Britney Spears. And for spelling her name wrong.

      And I need to be punished for knowing you spelled it wrong...

      By Brittany Spears. Covered in hot grits.

    12. Re:Love this ... by metacell · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't you be allowed to download legally if you pay a fee for it?

    13. Re:Love this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brittany Spears

      So you'r the one!

      It's Pryottaney Spears, dammit! ;)

    14. Re:Love this ... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      While it's interesting data, why does Google file it under 'jobs'? Are they hiring someone to manually fix typos in search queries?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    15. Re:Love this ... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      You would think so, but I'd be willing to bet that the RIAA/MPAA would want it both ways. They'd want to be able to go after those who share out music (keep it illegal) *AND* get money from people just in case they share/download music. As it is, they get money from the sales of "Music" CD-Rs (same as regular CD-Rs but with an added RIAA tax on them to guard against people using them for non-legal purposes) but still pursue lawsuits.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  8. The best counter-point by erroneus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Every time the **AAs get up in front of government or the public to claim "support for the artists" this situation and others need to be brought up plainly and clearly. I know that like many here, those arguments made me laugh, then made me sick and now make me angry. They are simply lying with impunity on this matter and need to be taken to account. I would love for them to be questioned before the US congress to see if we can get some truth and/or perjury from them. That won't and can't happen fairly, though, as long as they are major contributors to both big parties and to nearly every elected official in office today.

    1. Re:The best counter-point by alienzed · · Score: 0

      yeah but everything deserves to exist. The dinosaurs got huge and couldn't cope with change but they are still around right?

      --
      Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
    2. Re:The best counter-point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time the **AAs get up in front of government or the public to claim "support for the artists" this situation and others need to be brought up plainly and clearly.

      The **AA are USA based, this is a story about Canada. Can't you tell the difference?

    3. Re:The best counter-point by Gnavpot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Every time the **AAs get up in front of government or the public to claim "support for the artists" this situation and others need to be brought up plainly and clearly.

      The **AA are USA based, this is a story about Canada. Can't you tell the difference?

      From the summary:
      "The offenders? The four labels comprising the Canadian Recording Industry Association â" EMI, Sony Music, Universal Music, and Warner Music."

      Oh, yes. Those labels are certainly local Canadian companys with no connection to the US labels whatsoever.

  9. RIPPED OFF by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

    50 million is a ripoff compared to the billions owed in backpay. That's equivalent to your boss saying, "I'll pay your $50 an hour," waiting years for your paycheck, and then he hands you a measly $5 an hour and says "Oops sorry." I would not have accepted it.

    Worse - Since there are lawyers involved, the 50 million will probably shrink to 20 million that has to be distributed amongst the ~1 million singers owed money.

    And these nonpaying a-holes in RIAA screw the singers, but they have the nerve to demand WE the customers pay for every single song we make a copy of - $1 if we download it, $1 if we burn it to a CD-R, $1 if we duplicate it across a 2nd PC, and so on.

    GRRRR.

    (I am a little bitter. Can you tell?)

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:RIPPED OFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      troll detected... mod down on sight. :3

      Ok. Have a Nice Day.

    2. Re:RIPPED OFF by nursebebo · · Score: 1

      Cool info thanks. Regarding this new version 2.9 it’s normal to take some time to get used to the new tools.CNA Classes

      --
      [url=http://www.onlinecnaclass.com/]Online CNA Classes[/url]
  10. Re:I hope... by WhirlwindMonk · · Score: 1

    You forgot Hannah Montana.

  11. Re:I hope... by hipp5 · · Score: 1

    Come to think of it, I don't think there is a Canadian recording artist that doesn't suck.

    Arcade Fire?

  12. It's not about supporting the artists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not about supporting the artists it's about supporting the politicians. The AA's never miss those payments!!!

  13. Orphan works by tepples · · Score: 1

    The CRIA has had years to pay these artists.

    Which is difficult if the artist cannot be contacted.

    1. Re:Orphan works by Hatta · · Score: 2

      If the artist can't be contacted, they can't file a lawsuit either. I don't think we're talking about orphan works here.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Orphan works by codegen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which is difficult if the artist cannot be contacted.

      Some of the artists on the list included Beyonce and Bruce Springsteen. Not exactly artists that are hard to find, that is if they bothered to try...

      --
      Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
    3. Re:Orphan works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fuck that. In many cases involved in this case, the artist involved is a relatively big name. Many cases of the abuse are to put out Top 20 compilations, etc. The record labels knew fucking well how to get in touch with the artists. They didn't simply because it would mean they'd have to actually pay them when they found them.

    4. Re:Orphan works by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Which is difficult if the artist cannot be contacted.

      Some of the artists on the list included Beyonce and Bruce Springsteen. Not exactly artists
      that are hard to find, that is if they bothered to try...

      The latter, at least, lives in New Jersey. They sent a courier with a cheque, but he turned back as he was afraid of getting a Snooki on him.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  14. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nothing about this suit was specific to Canadian artists, only Canadian labels, which hold the Canadian distribution rights to artists from around the world. The lead plaintiff was Chet Baker, who was born in Oklahoma and never had any sort of Canadian residency.

    And yes, you are right, Canadian music is fucking terrible. And the guy who said Arcade Fire should go kill himself immediately.

  15. Re:I hope... by UncleTogie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, but they gave us Rush, too, so we can forgive 'em for Ms. Dion at least.

    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  16. To class or not to class by Cigarra · · Score: 1

    "The suit, which has not been given class action status..."

    Doesn't even the poster read TFA anymore?

    --
    I don't have a sig.
    1. Re:To class or not to class by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      It was a class action suit. This settlement immunizes them from further lawsuits. The first link is out of date. In 2009 it hadn't YET been granted class action status by a judge, but it was still a class action lawsuit even then, just not approved yet.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    2. Re:To class or not to class by Phasma+Felis · · Score: 1

      Did you read the *other* FA? There's two of them, and the one you're quoting is a year and a half old.

  17. All our base are belong to whom? by tepples · · Score: 1

    If the artist can't be contacted, they can't file a lawsuit either.

    A copyright owner can be reclusive up until the moment that the copyright owner is ready to sue. Or a copyright owner can die or go out of business, and it might not be feasible to trace to whom the copyright has passed. Quick question: Who owns the copyright in Zero Wing, a 1989 scrolling shooter video game developed by Toaplan?

    1. Re:All our base are belong to whom? by smelch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So I guess the thing to do would be to not sell works when it is unclear how to do so legally. Especially when you're constantly suing people for copyright infringement.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    2. Re:All our base are belong to whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Indeed. If you wish to claim that the current copyright law is morally just and should be supported then it's more than a little hypocritical to be the biggest abuser.

    3. Re:All our base are belong to whom? by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>A copyright owner can be reclusive up until the moment that the copyright owner is ready to sue.

      That certainly sounds like a valid excuse. NOW - What excuse do you have for Canadian RIAA not paying artists like Celine Dion, Alanis Morisette, Sarah McLachlan, and so on? The truth is that RIAA didn't pay because they didn't want to pay. They wanted to use these songs on "Greatest Hits" and other compilation albums for free, rather than pay the wages due.

      i.e. They are the very "thieves" they accuse us and piratebay of being. RIAA=record execs==Hypocritical bastards.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:All our base are belong to whom? by tepples · · Score: 1

      So I guess the thing to do would be to not sell works when it is unclear how to do so legally.

      In which case copyright is utterly failing "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts", as the constitution of Canada's neighbor to the south and west puts it.

    5. Re:All our base are belong to whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Square Enix?

    6. Re:All our base are belong to whom? by blind+monkey+3 · · Score: 1

      If the artist can't be contacted, they can't file a lawsuit either.

      A copyright owner can be reclusive up until the moment that the copyright owner is ready to sue. Or a copyright owner can die or go out of business, and it might not be feasible to trace to whom the copyright has passed. Quick question: Who owns the copyright in Zero Wing, a 1989 scrolling shooter video game developed by Toaplan?

      Since you are defending their actions, I'd like a little clarification (a genuine request to get both sides of the equation).
      I assume you are not saying that it is okay to distribute works if you don't know who the copyright owner is.
      I also expect the distributers in question had these "products" in their portfolio. My misgivings are:
      I am not aware of Canadian law but here in Australia before someone can sue they have to make an attempt at getting the payment (letter of demand with accompanying documantation), isn't that the case in Canada? If it is, why did they not pay when presented with a request for payment (I feel very cynical in saying that they knew their legal team could drag it out and end up paying a fraction of the amount so I hope you do have an explanation)?
      Now that they have been contacted by the copyright owners, where is all the money?
      Shouldn't the distributer have been keeping the money in an account and not spending it? Shouldn't their balance sheet have this money listed as debts to be paid - i.e. bring down their profits?
      Shouldn't it be reasonable to expect full payment?
      These are some of the companies that extrapolate very large figures when calculating losses "due to theft", should they not pay interest on the money they have been using? I know over here we can claim interest.
      Is it not reasonable to expect that there is a copyright owner?
      The more I think about it, the more I see wrong with what has occurred (except for the distributer, they seem to have come out of it quite cheaply) to argue that "they couldn't find them" and only pay 1% of what is owing is very disingenuous in my opinion - I would not be able to get away with that argument, but then I suppose I don't have their resources or lawyers... sigh, I guess the envy is showing.

      --
      BM3
    7. Re:All our base are belong to whom? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Who owns the copyright in Zero Wing, a 1989 scrolling shooter video game developed by Toaplan?

      I would assume that all your copyright are belong to us...

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    8. Re:All our base are belong to whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no "-1 Disagree" moderation option. That's what "reply" is for.

      It's cute how you continue to cling to the false idea that you're being downmodded because I disagree with you.

      Here's a hint, I agree with your positions. I agree with your positions, and I am downmodding you.

      Why?

      You. Are. A. Troll. And you're trollish behavior is doing more harm than good to the positions you claim to believe in.

    9. Re:All our base are belong to whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it just goes to prove that copyright lasts too long...If a good faith effort is made to locate the holder and no one says Hey over here...that is my work...the work should be dropped into the public domain.

      My flameproof pants are ready, but then I am an AC anyway.

    10. Re:All our base are belong to whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you mean Canada's copyright implementation fails to fulfill the mandate of the constitution of another country? Well, we had better let the CRIA have at everyone's catalogue, no holds barred.

  18. the parasites profit, artists and fans suffer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    modern music has become a corporate commodity, there's no creativity or art left, it's nothing but overpriced crap

  19. Re:I hope... by Script+Cat · · Score: 1

    Arcade fire isn't that good they just have a good memorable band name. There are other bands in the same style whos music is far superior to Arcade fire. But sadly those band names elude me right now for some reason. So that makes Arcade fire awsome.

  20. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "I don't think there is a Canadian recording artist that doesn't suck"

    just off the top of my head ...

    Neil Young
    Leonard Cohen
    Tragically Hip
    Loreena McKennitt
    KD Lang
    Ian Tyson
    Barenaked Ladies
    Tom Cochrane
    Minglewood Band
    Powder Blues
    Stampeders
    Chilliwack
    Anne Beverly Brown
    Tom Phillips
    Mae Moore
    Lynn Miles
    Buffy Sue St. Marie
    Stan Rogers
    Gordon Lightfoot
    etc.

  21. An open letter to Canada by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dear Canada,

          Please stop ending acronyms with an A. It's confusing. We don't know whether you're saying CMRReh, or whether its real name is CMRRA.

    And no, saying CMRRAeh doesn't help. There might, for all we know (not that we care - Ed) be a CMRRAA.

    Put it another way, how can you distinguish these guys from these guys?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:An open letter to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have the CAA, not the AAA, And the AA is British.

    2. Re:An open letter to Canada by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      We have the CAA, not the AAA, And the AA is British.

      I think they are non-denomenational.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:An open letter to Canada by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 1

      It definitely sounds like Robert Heinlein's martian names in Double star.

      --
      "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
    4. Re:An open letter to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody should call the Anonymous Americans Against Acronym Abuse (AAAAA).

  22. Re:I hope... by Japher · · Score: 1

    I thought obscure names increased hipster cred.

  23. So what are we missing? by Zelucifer · · Score: 2

    ~$6 billiion to ~$50 million, either there's a huge chunk of information missing, a large percentage of the represented class is going to opt out, or something is up. Obviously the vast majority of the class has no dire need for a short-changed payment, and can stand to sue individually, or as a group in order to get multiples of this settlement.

    --
    The corner of a round room
  24. Re:I hope... by kevinmenzel · · Score: 1

    Damn, of the stuff I know on that list, it's stuff I like... for an AC, that's a pretty informative post! (On the one day I don't have like 15 mod points...)

  25. Re:I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Hey don't slam on Manilow. I may not appreciate his music much, but he's got a lot of talent and has had quite a career:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Manilow_discography

    1977 Grammy – I Write The Songs – Song of the Year (award went to the song's writer Bruce Johnston)
    1977 Emmy for Outstanding Special – Comedy, Variety or Music – The Barry Manilow Special
    1977 Special Tony Award – Barry Manilow on Broadway
    1978 American Music Awards – Best Pop/Rock Male Artist
    1979 Grammy – Copacabana Best Pop Male Vocal Performance
    1979 American Music Awards – Best Pop/Rock Male Artist
    1980 American Music Awards – Best Pop/Rock Male Artist
    2002 Songwriter's Hall of Fame
    2006 Emmy for Outstanding Individual Performance in a Variety or Music Program – Barry Manilow: Music And Passion
    2007 RIAA – Plaque commemorating worldwide record sales of 75 million
    2009 Clio Awards Honorary award for prior work with commercial jingles
    2009 Inducted into the Hit Parade Hall of Fame

  26. Wow you left out the good ones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anyone who omits Rush (whether knowingly or ignorant) has questionable taste.

    to continue:

    Triumph
    Coney Hatch
    Bryan Adams
    April Wine
    Pat Travers
    BTO

    1. Re:Wow you left out the good ones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rush??? A guidepost of good taste?

      rotflmao

      yes there's freedom of expression and boy, are you using it

    2. Re:Wow you left out the good ones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Devin Townsend, and anything he's been in contact with.

  27. Re:I hope... by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 1

    All bow to The Weakerthans... who only bow to Triumph.

  28. Re:I hope... by creat3d · · Score: 2

    He's had a very successful carreer. He obviously won many awards. He's still Barry Manilow.

    --
    Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
  29. Re:I hope... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 2

    You forgot Hannah Montana.

    I know I had until you brought her up. Thanks a lot!!!

  30. IANAL Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it possible to bring up a settlement like this in US court cases as a type of precedent?

    1. Re:IANAL Question by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      Not a lawyer either but, yes. It wouldn't have the same standing as a US case, but US courts do consider foreign court rulings (in fact, our system is based on British rulings), especially if there aren't many US rulings on the topic.

      There's the problems that A) I doubt there's a paucity of rulings on companies not paying their employees, I've never had a job with a major corporation where I actually got payed what I was told I'd be payed (and have my own damned settlements for less than what I was owed in the first place). And B) this is a settlement, I'm relatively sure settlements don't count much for precedent, though other rulings (IE, whether or not to make it a class action suit) from within the case might apply.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
  31. Sound recording vs. composition copyright by tepples · · Score: 1

    They wanted to use these songs on "Greatest Hits" and other compilation albums for free, rather than pay the wages due.

    What wages due? Are there standard rates for licensing the right to make and sell phonorecords of a three- to five-minute nondramatic musical sound recording? I thought mechanical licenses were only for the composition, not the recording. If an artist switched labels part-way through his or her career, it's possible that the artist's former label said "not at any price". Or an artist's former label may have been caught up in , leaving the copyright ownership of the artist's early recordings unclear. In this case, it becomes no different from the Zero Wing example.

  32. Re:So what are we missing? .....this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The artists asked for the unpaid royalties AND maximum copyright statutory damages per song. The settlement was unpaid royalties and much less than the maximum statutory damages. Oh and the 4 big corps have to pay the artists legal fees.

  33. Vote Pirate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you see, as I do, that the RIAA, et al are out of freaking control, then join the Pirate Party, as I have. We don't want to steal as the overlords would have you believe. We just want the corporations to play fair. Look us up.

    1. Re:Vote Pirate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you see, as I do, that the RIAA, et al are out of freaking control, then join the Anarchists, as I have. We don't want to steal as the overlords would have you believe. We just want the corporations to play fair. Look us up.

  34. Re:I hope... by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Yeah, pretty much every country, every genre, every era, etc, has some good stuff and some junk.
    (Also, AC forgot to make fun of Bieber. :P)

    As for _good_ Canadian musicians, I'll mention Great Big Sea, good stuff on the lighter side of the Irish/rock fusion genre.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  35. Legal precedent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were being sued by the RIAA/MPAA for copyright infringement, this case would now be my reference point for what the damages per song should be.

    If the companies being the *AAs think that $160/song is all they should pay then why should Jamie Thomas pay more?

    I think that this case has put a big hole in a lot of damages cases.

    1. Re:Legal precedent by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, a legal precedent set in Canada does not usually apply in the USA. Otherwise this would have worked nicely the other way around, and $80,000 fine per work would have worked as a precedent.

      That said, even though there's no formal precedent in the legal sense, saying 'these people who are suing me claim that the song is worth less than $160/song, so this should be the maximum damages' may work.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  36. More than 3 Strikes. They should be Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like more than Three Strikes for these guys. They should no longer be allowed to use the Internet. And while we are at it, how about the Death Penalty for Corporations and jail terms for their CEOs.

  37. Re:I hope... by ppanon · · Score: 1

    Tom Cochran, Bruce Coburn, Royal Wood...

    --
    Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  38. Re:I hope... by ppanon · · Score: 1

    BTO, Leonard Cohen, Gordon Lightfoot, Murray McLauchlan, Joni Mitchell, Neil Young, The Guess Who, The Payola$, Sarah McLachlan are more than just overproduced manufactured successes. They've had major influences.

    Go listen to K.D. Lang sing Cohen's Hallelujah at the Olympic ceremony and tell me it doesn't give you chills.

    Heck, even like some Blue Rodeo. And while I think Rush is overrated, New Orleans is sinking is a decent (and somewhat prophetic) blues tune.

    --
    Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  39. Re:I hope... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    Yep, Loreena McKennitt FTW!

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  40. What mandate underlies Canadian copyright? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Wow, you mean Canada's copyright implementation fails to fulfill the mandate of the constitution of another country?

    First let me clarify: Nowhere did I intend to imply that a foreign country's constitution was the basis underlying Canadian copyright. But the framers of the 1982 constitution had to be aware of its neighbor's mandate. In fact, what mandate underlies Canadian copyright? #91 gives none. And the country that has such a mandate likewise has an orphan works problem.

  41. Re:I hope... by creat3d · · Score: 1

    Isn't New Orleans Is Sinking by Tragically Hip, not Rush?

    --
    Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.