Slashdot Mirror


The Science of Lightsabers

sethmad writes "As everyone who's ever passed the GRE knows, there are two major hypothetical operational problems with Star Wars lightsabers. More accurately I should say there were two problems, because I solved both of them."

159 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. What are your patent numbers? by perpenso · · Score: 3, Funny

    More accurately I should say there were two problems, because I solved both of them.

    What are your patent numbers? :-)

    1. Re:What are your patent numbers? by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      And how many parsecs until they expire?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:What are your patent numbers? by jmd_akbar · · Score: 3, Funny

      And how many parsecs until they expire?

      And here I thought Parsec was a unit of distance...

      --
      Nothing here... So... SHOOO!!!
    3. Re:What are your patent numbers? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, if you go far enough away they can't be enforced. Why do you think the movie industry is based on the west coast?

    4. Re:What are your patent numbers? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Come now, gentlemen. We know the most relevant measure of viability is the number of midichlorians in the bloodstream.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:What are your patent numbers? by cmdahler · · Score: 1

      And here I thought Parsec was a unit of distance...

      Hmmm. When you get right down to it, what really is the difference between distance and time when either is expressed as a function of the speed of light?

    6. Re:What are your patent numbers? by stubob · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, there's prior art from a long, long time ago in a galaxy far, far away.

      --
      Planning to be moderated ± 1: Bad Pun.
    7. Re:What are your patent numbers? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So if you get a blood transfusion, you can be a jedi for a day?

    8. Re:What are your patent numbers? by Roachie · · Score: 1

      Isn't space and time equivalent? Like a second is around 186,000 miles?

      Just sayin.

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    9. Re:What are your patent numbers? by Roachie · · Score: 1

      Update:

      Apparently the Kessel run takes over 3 months:

      http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=parsec+%2F+c

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    10. Re:What are your patent numbers? by qubezz · · Score: 1

      Grandparent's knowledge of geek lore is light-years ahead of yours...

    11. Re:What are your patent numbers? by CSMoran · · Score: 1

      Close, but no cigar. The time dimension has a minus in front of it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timelike#Spacetime_intervals

      --
      Every end has half a stick.
    12. Re:What are your patent numbers? by Roachie · · Score: 1

      Nice wiki, I will spend more time with that one.

      BUT! By definition there is no negative metric, I'll take my cigar now, thanks!

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  2. I want some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I want some of what he is smok'n
    Come on dude share some...

  3. The British.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    We would call them Torches you idiot!

    1. Re:The British.... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      touché

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    2. Re:The British.... by operagost · · Score: 1

      He was a bit touchy about it, wasn't he?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:The British.... by madprof · · Score: 1

      I can't think of any British accent that would say floushlight.

    4. Re:The British.... by 2names · · Score: 1

      You spelled "douche" wrong...

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    5. Re:The British.... by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      huge WHOOSH

  4. That still has the magnet problem... by Zakabog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you're using a magnetic field to control the plasma then any magnet can still interfere with the light saber. For some reason I was expecting a much more technical article than 'its got a metal rod in the center, tada!'

    1. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, this was stupid and pointless, even by idle standards. Maybe /. needs to add a retarded section.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by dmgxmichael · · Score: 2

      heh heh yup. I also thought that the largest problem with a lightsaber being plasma is that to cut as efficiently as portrayed it would roast anyone within a football field of it. Little problem called convection and the laws of thermodynamics.

    3. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I was younger (and nerdier) I once proposed a similar but more sensible version using in-universe technology that was well understood by Starwars fans: force fields. Obviously, starships have shields that keep asteroids, debris, weapons and projectiles from damaging them. Similarly, speeders and various devices apply forces at a distance to hover and float. Why can't this technology be used to harness a plasma field as a cutting device?

      It stood to reason that the interaction of these repelling, focussing fields would result in the spark and fizzle of lightsabres clashing, as tiny amounts of plasma escaped. Likewise, the interactions would prevent the blades from passing through each other and also account for occasional 'sabre lock' where two blades are periodically joined and must be separated.

      As I said, I was younger and nerdier back then.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    4. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I want to go with "a constant flux state between energy and matter" which is why it seems to have the properties of both matter and energy.

    5. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't know why, but I clicked on the link. That site is fucking retarded.

    6. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by XanC · · Score: 2

      Don't say "don't say retarded".

    7. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      Well, that's just it, I don't think it's a form of plasma on the sabers (or that it cannot be). It has to be something projected through a crystalline substance. The heat of plasma is enough to cut through steel, a crystal would melt because of the intense heat it would require to generate it. Not to mention the fact that the saber itself would be incredibly hot to handle.

    8. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by oldmac31310 · · Score: 2

      So, you're saying /. needs a 'gay' section? Fair enough.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    9. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by sshirley · · Score: 2

      and gay

    10. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by PitaBred · · Score: 2

      You were just younger. The fact that you're bragging about it now means you're still just as nerdy, if not more so ;)

    11. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Faggy.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    12. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by DavidTC · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The biggest problem with lightsabers isn't even the science of them.

      It's that they're insane weapons.

      Look, if you have something that can cut through anything, you shoot it at people. Imagine a dual-lightsaber that's 3 inches long, operates for five seconds, and is shot, spinning, at people. Hell, forget shot, you could put a release timer on them and throw them at people, having them spring into action a quarter second after release.

      Perhaps there could be spinning death frisbees. Can you curve a light blade around the edge? ;)

      Or perhaps you could just fire the 'blade' itself, leave the generator behind. But I think that's disallowed under the 'rules' of lightsabers, which says the light blade goes out and then comes back, which also has the benefit of saying that lightsabers don't use power unless they're actually cutting something, otherwise, they're 100% efficient. (Except that they're always cutting the air, hence the hum, so always use a tiny amount of power.)

      All I really know is waving it around near your body is a good way to lose parts of your body.

      But, even stupider, there appears to be no reason you can't slide your blade down the other guy's blade and cut off his fingers. Unlike traditional swords, there's no guard, nor can there be one.

      Likewise, as they're weightless, there's no reason to not have very long ones. Lightpikes, you just aim them at the enemy, push a button, and the blade extends twenty feet out, straight through their torso. You jerk it upward, slicing them in half. Then cut off the blade and go to the next guy, or just wave it back in forth in an arch if they're all coming at once. (Hell, you wouldn't even need to be a Jedi to safely use one of those!)

      Granted, you couldn't block blaster fire with one, but there's no reason you couldn't have short and long setting, or at least a duel-weapon with a short and long side.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    13. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny
    14. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by tibit · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure. Ever seen a plasma cutter go through steel blades that are many inches thick? You can stand fairly close to it.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    15. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by dmgxmichael · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it doesn't do so instantaneously now does it? A light saber by contrast can pass through inches of steel in the blink of an eye, which requires an amount of energy several orders of magnitude higher than a plasma cutter generates.

    16. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That assumes the material is cheap enough and readily available.
      The tine and expense needed to make one is insane; especially when you have convention weapons that work fine.

      Also, they don't cut through anything, hell most thing take time to cut through.

      Waving it around near you body is a good way to get injured with any weapon. That's why hey are highly trained.

      The basis for your ill thought out write up also ignored the fact that they are trained force users. So they can foresee simple moves, or even complex ones. Sliding your blade down a light saber, or an sword, would only work against the most stupidest and ill trained adversaries. And no, your buddies swing foam weapon do not count as trained.

      Making them long as several disadvantages, try using one in a corridor, or in a cantina. There hard to come by and create as it is.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    17. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "starships have shields that keep asteroids"

      I seem to remember a star cruiser having to blast asteroids to try and find some run away smuggler.

      Of course, in that series they where light sabers, not plasma torches.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    18. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by tibit · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    19. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      which requires an amount of energy several orders of magnitude higher

      No it doesn't - you just dont understand the relevant physics.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    20. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by dmgxmichael · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet I understand them better than Lucas. So back off, it's a damn slashdot post, not a physics dissertation.

    21. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by suutar · · Score: 1

      Dunno. The main time we've seen a saber used against a really thick metal object that I recall is Qui-gon going through a security door on the Trade Federation ship in Phantom Menace... it was far from instantaneous. The Trade Federation's warbots were generally pretty cuttable but also much thinner, and much of their metal must have been hollow tubing to run wires through (unless they have solid bars made of layered metal and ceramic for conductors and insulators). I'm sure I'm forgetting some stuff. Feel free to point it out; I enjoy discussing this kind of thing :)

    22. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by suutar · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he means 'an energy density', which I could agree with... a plasma torch cuts what, half an inch? Fine it down to a hundredth of an inch and I bet it'd go through pretty quickly. (might weld itself back together, though. Maybe 1/10th of an inch would be better.)

    23. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by Cryolithic · · Score: 1

      An internets...shit, two for you...

    24. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Likewise, the interactions would prevent the blades from passing through each other and also account for occasional 'sabre lock' where two blades are periodically joined and must be separated.

      Gimme your geek card. Right now. RIGHT now.

      You were talking about Star Wars at first.... then went straight to Space Balls. I'm pretty sure that two people fighting with light sabers are not going to casually cooperate with each other to get one foot on the other guys knee to pull the entwined light sabers apart.

      Not to mention in Space Balls, it was NOT a sabre. They were rings you got from some Yogurt merch. Which brings up whole other questions of why Yogurt would be putting insanely powerful weapons in Yogurt Cereal.

    25. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by geoskd · · Score: 1

      heh heh yup. I also thought that the largest problem with a lightsaber being plasma is that to cut as efficiently as portrayed it would roast anyone within a football field of it. Little problem called convection and the laws of thermodynamics.

      Not to mention that "metal rod" he's so proud of being obliterated the moment the plasma was turned on.

      -=Geoskd

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    26. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Well blasters don't make much sense either. They seem to fire some kind of plasma, but despite the projectile having much more mass and travelling at a much slower speed than a bullet they always go in a straight line and appear unaffected by gravity. They leave burn marks and don't need ammo, supporting the theory that they are energy weapons. At the speed and weight they appear to have it wouldn't be too hard to create body armour capable of resisting them.

      Come to think of it why do Storm Troopers wear all that gear? It clearly offers no protection against even the smallest side-arms.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      this article was a shitting cunt of a fucktard of a cunting shit cunt fuck shit cunt piss fuck cunt of a SHITTINGCUNTINGFUCKTARD of a retarded waste of universe. Fuck.

    28. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps you could just fire the 'blade' itself, leave the generator behind. But I think that's disallowed under the 'rules' of lightsabers, which says the light blade goes out and then comes back

      So what you're saying is that we need a light-boomerang?

      I'm not gonna catch that one on the return...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    29. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      Oh good. Someone got the reference. I'll be keeping my card, thank you very much.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    30. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      And in fact, while I'm at it, I'll raise the ante with Expanded Universe reference to saber lock in Jedi Knight: Jedi Outcast.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    31. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem with lightsabers isn't even the science of them.

      It's that they're insane weapons.

      Any more insane than a sword? It's only insane by the characteristics you have defined for it. A weapon has as much to do with tradition and training as it does with form, for example Gurkha knives look kinda kooky until you realise how effective they are.

      There could be lots of technology reasons in that realm that would make it practical, even before you bring the force into it. Or let me guess you think "there's no all powerful mystical force controlling my destiny!" :-P

      Look, if you have something that can cut through anything, you shoot it at people. Imagine a dual-lightsaber that's 3 inches long, operates for five seconds, and is shot, spinning, at people. Hell, forget shot, you could put a release timer on them and throw them at people, having them spring into action a quarter second after release.

      Perhaps there could be spinning death frisbees. Can you curve a light blade around the edge? ;)

      Or perhaps you could just fire the 'blade' itself, leave the generator behind. But I think that's disallowed under the 'rules' of lightsabers, which says the light blade goes out and then comes back, which also has the benefit of saying that lightsabers don't use power unless they're actually cutting something, otherwise, they're 100% efficient. (Except that they're always cutting the air, hence the hum, so always use a tiny amount of power.)

      Look I'm pretty sure all that stuff is covered in the games.

      All I really know is waving it around near your body is a good way to lose parts of your body.

      But, even stupider, there appears to be no reason you can't slide your blade down the other guy's blade and cut off his fingers. Unlike traditional swords, there's no guard, nor can there be one.

      You don't need a light sabre for that ask anyone who's done any hanbo training, stick, knife or machete fighting. You don't train with a actual weapon otherwise you end up permanently injured.

      Try the knuckle thing and you get your head attacked, besides how do you know there isn't some sort of guard. I've competed in knife fighting contest (and actually won!!) it's a cold passionless style of fighting where one mistake leads to death (the comps use a special type of knife). It's comparable to chess, with blood.

      Likewise, as they're weightless, there's no reason to not have very long ones. Lightpikes, you just aim them at the enemy, push a button, and the blade extends twenty feet out, straight through their torso. You jerk it upward, slicing them in half. Then cut off the blade and go to the next guy, or just wave it back in forth in an arch if they're all coming at once. (Hell, you wouldn't even need to be a Jedi to safely use one of those!)

      Granted, you couldn't block blaster fire with one, but there's no reason you couldn't have short and long setting, or at least a duel-weapon with a short and long side.

      Look your lack of faith disturbs me. Maybe the wave is captured at a particular resonant frequency so it can only be a certain length. Maybe its a gravitaional wave that contains the blade. You seem so focused on the things in your definition that make it insane instead of asking What is it about this that would make it a useful weapon? throwing it like a boomerang, hitting it on the floor, Does something about it attract the blaster bolts to the "blade", WIll it cut AND roast a leg of lamb at the same time, Do you need the "Force" to use one?

      Don't forget though, it's a science fiction and it's supposed to be fun, so don't get hung up on the detail cause it just makes you not very much fun.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    32. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Come on now :)

      Your ante is an obscure reference in a video game that could be a software bug? :P

      I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you were deliberately mixing the two movies for sarcasm and to see if anybody could get the reference.... but ante? Hardly..........

      I respect the attempt though.

    33. Re:That still has the magnet problem... by bejiitas_wrath · · Score: 1

      In one of the novels of Star Wars, the protagonist put 3 crystals in his lightsaber instead of one and he could switch it to 3 different lengths. So this is quite possible in the Star Wars universe. And lightsabers used standard laser diodes. So having 2 extra length settings for your light saber that the enemy does not know about would be very advantageous in battle.

      --
      liberare massarum ex ignorantia, clausa descendit molestie.
  5. excellent by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    good. Now solve the next important world's mysteries: who are the 2 chicks in the Internets tubes (except for 2g1c) and how is driving or flying a DeLorean at 88MPH help it to move through time back and forward.

    Oh, and if you can go ahead and do this by tomorrow, I have an important meeting I will need to provide this information at.

    1. Re:excellent by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Let me be franc here, that's exactly how it is. But don't call me Shirly.

  6. Your solution fails by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    You failed to solve #2. You retain the magnetic field, but don't offer a solution to the problem of interference.

    1. Re:Your solution fails by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 1

      Failed to solve #1 too, since it was a problem dealing with LIGHT and had nothing to do with plasma. If I tell you that it won't work with light and you tell me that it'll work with plasma as a retort, that's not proving me wrong.

    2. Re:Your solution fails by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Also, energy contained is a small package; which is the real issue. Give me all the energy I need, in a package the size of a roll of quarters, and there isn't much that can't be done.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  7. Already Been Done by STRICQ · · Score: 1

    This exact design was already described a few years ago by that Science/Discovery channel guy. Can't remember his name.

    1. Re:Already Been Done by swanzilla · · Score: 2

      If said guy used the extend-able metal tube to drink his own urine, chances are good it was Bear Grylls.

    2. Re:Already Been Done by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      Yeah, saw that show too - this idea is just a rip-off.

      --
      This is blinging
    3. Re:Already Been Done by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      The people who tagged the article "dumb" are gonna feel dumb now.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:Already Been Done by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      You mis-chose the post I was replying to (maybe your view settings hid the lower-rated parent post). People called the article "dumb" with extreme prejudice when the idea was originally Michio Kaku's.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    5. Re:Already Been Done by slackzilly · · Score: 1

      I feel dumb because I didn't tag the article "dumb"

      --
      - "If one man can create that much hate, you can only imagine how much love we as a togetherness can create."
  8. Why did this get posted? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Come on. Half the comments on this story are probably going to be better than this dork's.

    A light saber that used plasma would likely be hot. Hot enough that holding it would get very uncomfortable, magnetic field or no. And if the magnetic field is confining it, how does it get through the porous metal? Without destroying the metal? Where does the plasma come from if it's constantly leaking out? Why do lightsabers require focusing gems? How does a light saber deflect blaster and laser hits that would otherwise melt metal? How can lightsabers be an ancient weapon and the guy who designed them is still living on some planet somewhere?

    1. Re:Why did this get posted? by TemporalBeing · · Score: 2

      A light saber that used plasma would likely be hot. Hot enough that holding it would get very uncomfortable, magnetic field or no.

      Valid point. Though temperature is highly dependent on the substance used to make the plasma and the amount of plasma to start with. And since we're in this fictional world - the handle could have a built-in cooling method that abates the temperature as it gets closer to the holder - that could even be part of the power system used to heat the plasma.

      And if the magnetic field is confining it, how does it get through the porous metal? Without destroying the metal?

      The magnetic field would need to exist outside the porous metal by at least a few millimeters to as much as a couple inches. Whether or not the metal is destroyed depends on the metal and its melting point. Thereby the metal used would have to have a melting point considerably higher than the temperature of the plasma.

      Where does the plasma come from if it's constantly leaking out?

      The magnetic field contains the plasma so while it is leaking out of the porous metal, it gets recycled back in later on. Thereby, no loss of substance. Perhaps the hottest parts are extruded from the tip and fall back towards the handle as they cool, following the flow of the magnetic field.

      Why do lightsabers require focusing gems?

      Perhaps to keep the temperature of the plasma just right? Perhaps to run the power source?

      How does a light saber deflect blaster and laser hits that would otherwise melt metal?

      Magnetic fields are well known for changing the direction of light, even subtly. Of course, aside from the fact that the field/plasma would burn/melt a bullet - it wouldn't be much help in all cases.

      How can lightsabers be an ancient weapon and the guy who designed them is still living on some planet somewhere?

      Depends on your definition of ancient. The guy could be from a race that lives for a very, very long time. Yoda was nearly 1000 when he died in episode 5; and the Palpatine was at least as old as Yoda from the back story given - yet didn't look it until the end of Episode 3 when he had to draw from everything built up in him to fight off the Jedi as opposed to using it to maintain his age. So anything is possible - especially in such a fictional universe.

      Of course, this also means that the magnetic field would have to be finely tuned for the materials used (perhaps accounting for the differences in color between different light sabers), and it would also suffer from magnetic interference from numerous sources - some of which would be fatal to its use or longevity as a weapon.

      And, of course, there is the simpler solution which applies only in the fictional Star Wars Universe - the light saber itself is not actually a laser/light/plasma blade but made up of the force (in a physical, more concentrated form of the midoclorians) as manipulated by its wielder, thereby requiring the ability to manipulate the force to use it (consistent with Star Wars AFAIK). Stronger users of the force could therefore have longer blades if desired, and the focusing gem is just a focal point for the wielder. In other words, the light saber is just a smaller, more useful version of the lightning emitted by powerful Jedi/Sithe that can be used with less skill in the force by those that have been properly trained. Sadly, this does nothing for science in the real world.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    2. Re:Why did this get posted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "The magnetic field would need to exist outside the porous metal by at least a few millimeters to as much as a couple inches. Whether or not the metal is destroyed depends on the metal and its melting point. Thereby the metal used would have to have a melting point considerably higher than the temperature of the plasma."

      Why don't they make the whole plane out of the stuff they make the black boxes with?

      IE, if you could just get metal that had a higher melting point, wouldn't all of the empire be built with the stuff to stop Jedi from shredding it and costing a fortune to replace?

      J

    3. Re:Why did this get posted? by kimvette · · Score: 2

      And, of course, there is the simpler solution which applies only in the fictional Star Wars Universe - the light saber itself is not actually a laser/light/plasma blade but made up of the force (in a physical, more concentrated form of the midoclorians) as manipulated by its wielder, thereby requiring the ability to manipulate the force to use it (consistent with Star Wars AFAIK). Stronger users of the force could therefore have longer blades if desired, and the focusing gem is just a focal point for the wielder. In other words, the light saber is just a smaller, more useful version of the lightning emitted by powerful Jedi/Sithe that can be used with less skill in the force by those that have been properly trained. Sadly, this does nothing for science in the real world.

      And yet, Han Solo, an athiest analog in the Star Wars universe who refused to believe in the force, was able to use a light saber to cut open a tauntaun.

      What happened to just enjoying a fantasy story at face value and not geeking out over the petty little details?

      (I'm so ashamed I remember not only little details of the plot but creature names as well!)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    4. Re:Why did this get posted? by drcln · · Score: 1

      ceoyoyo said:

      Come on. Half the comments on this story are probably going to be better than this dork's.

      Not so far.

      --
      your gravity fails and negativity don't pull you through
    5. Re:Why did this get posted? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      "Depends on your definition of ancient. The guy could be from a race that lives for a very, very long time. Yoda was nearly 1000 when he died in episode 5; and the Palpatine was at least as old as Yoda from the back story given."

      Palpatine was 82 years old when the Battle of Yavin happened in A New Hope, not as old as Yoda.

    6. Re:Why did this get posted? by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Magnetic fields don't change the direction of light. And they certainly aren't "well known" for it. Name one example.

      Magnetic fields are well known because of magnets. Sheesh.

      And a CRT monitor - which utilizes magnetic fields to do just that - would disagree with you.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    7. Re:Why did this get posted? by SockPuppetOfTheWeek · · Score: 1

      Physics FAIL. The magnetic fields in a CRT monitor changes the direction of beams of electrons, not beams of photons. The inside of the CRT display is coated with materials which fluoresce (i.e. release photons) when the electron beam strikes it.

    8. Re:Why did this get posted? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      YODA DIES IN EPISODE 5?! where is the spoiler alert!?

      Forget the spoiler alert. Is this another "Han shot first" edit on the new DVDs? I thought he died in a different movie.

    9. Re:Why did this get posted? by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Don't feel too bad, I just found my old tautaun figure (complete with a tummy flap) in my parent's garage. So I took it and put in on one of my wife's bookshelves, staring at her computer seat. She wasn't pleased when she finally noticed it.

      And everyone knows that a lightsaber is just a manifestation of the Schwartz!

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    10. Re:Why did this get posted? by geoskd · · Score: 1

      The magnetic field would need to exist outside the porous metal by at least a few millimeters to as much as a couple inches. Whether or not the metal is destroyed depends on the metal and its melting point. Thereby the metal used would have to have a melting point considerably higher than the temperature of the plasma.

      In order to have any real cutting power, the plasma would have to be really hot. Plasma cutting torches spew between 5000 and 10,000 F, and those don't cut terribly fast. Tungsten and carbon both melt around 5000 to 6000 F. Even if the plasma was just cool enough not to melt the rod, it would loose all its strength at those temperatures, and your light saber would be a limp noodle.

      Nothing drives me nuts more than armchair engineers. They have this insane faith in engineering to produce impossible solutions, and feel that if engineers haven't created their device for them, then the engineers just aren't trying. The original poster for this falls under the category of wing nut / whack job. Go out and read a book or two on plasma dynamics before you post somewhere claiming to have "solved" a plasma engineering problem.

      -=Geoskd

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    11. Re:Why did this get posted? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      What happened to just enjoying a fantasy story at face value and not geeking out over the petty little details?

      Frasier: Think about it, Niles. What's the one thing better than an exquisite meal? An exquisite meal with one tiny flaw we can pick at all night.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Why did this get posted? by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Go out and read a book or two on plasma dynamics before you post somewhere claiming to have "solved" a plasma engineering problem.

      Didn't say I solved it. Just pointed out the OP how it would work supposing it is possible. At present our technological ability is not sufficient to make it possible.

      Nothing drives me nuts more than armchair engineers. They have this insane faith in engineering to produce impossible solutions, and feel that if engineers haven't created their device for them, then the engineers just aren't trying

      +1000

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  9. WTF? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    How much was samzenpus paid to put this piece of crap blogspam on the front page?

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  10. Off fuck by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Rearrange title to make a well known phrase or saying.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Off fuck by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Yoda, you is that?

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  11. Um... What's a... by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

    What's a GRE and why would passing one allow you to know hypothetical problems with Star Wars tech. I passed a truck full of pigs on the 401 and the only thing I learned is "stay upwind of the pig trucks"

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Um... What's a... by Eric+Sharkey · · Score: 2
    2. Re:Um... What's a... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      What's a GRE

      It's one of the third class of solutions to the general "P=NP?" range of problems, described by many (DNA in particular) to be an SEP. For the generic case of these, under fairly wide conditions, a problem P that is in the set SEP, is indeed, "NP" (No Problem).

      and why would passing one allow you to know hypothetical problems with Star Wars tech.

      I think it should be clear now.

      Just as a matter of interest, who is Slashdot UID #42?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  12. Copied solution or not? by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

    I'd like to say this was copied from the TV series in which Dr. Michio Kaku presented the exact same "solutions" to those two lightsaber problems (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSNubaa7n9o), but in the same series he also discusses a time travel machine, so who know; he may have copied the ideas from this kid.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:Copied solution or not? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Sci Fi Science: Physics of the Impossible, season 1, episode 8: "How to Build a Light Saber", Original air date January 12, 2010.

      I Have Solved All Your Lightsaber Problems, posted June 9, 2011.

  13. In before Jedi by SeakingFUKyea · · Score: 1

    LOL FICTION!

  14. Noise by michelcolman · · Score: 1

    He hasn't solved the most difficult problem, though: the noise. Normally, a light saber like that would be completely silent. How do you let it make those whooshing sounds?

    1. Re:Noise by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 2

      He hasn't solved the most difficult problem, though: the noise. Normally, a light saber like that would be completely silent. How do you let it make those whooshing sounds?

      The same way you did with a stick when you were a kid. Make "Vruu Vruu" noises while swinging it. ;-)

    2. Re:Noise by Alioth · · Score: 1

      A speaker and a small 8 bit microcontroller-based sound generator in the handle, and a couple of accelerometers to detect it being waved around.

    3. Re:Noise by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      I bet there's an app for that already :-)

    4. Re:Noise by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      Anything with a big 'ol vibrating transformer in it will make a similar noise. My dad has a power conditioner on his computer that makes a similar noise if you pick it up and swing it around.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    5. Re:Noise by savi · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if we have to account for lightsaber sounds, then we have to account for noise and fiery explosions in space.

    6. Re:Noise by bmorency · · Score: 1

      There is an app for that. Lucasfilm released it for the iphone. http://www.iphonebuzz.com/lightsaber-unleashed-application-review-045008.php

    7. Re:Noise by bughunter · · Score: 2

      Anything with a big 'ol vibrating transformer in it will make a similar noise.

      No. Those make the wokk wokk wokk sound when they transform from a 14-inch phallus that goes bzzzzzzzzrrrrrrzzzzzrrrrrrrrrrzzz into a Harley-Davidson V-Rod Muscle 1250, that goes chugchug chugchug chugchug... ROARRRRR!. My lesbian aunt keeps one in her purse.

      Oh. Sorry. I thought you said "transforming vibrator."

      My mistake.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    8. Re:Noise by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      In that galaxy they have a very thick vacuum.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    9. Re:Noise by tragedy · · Score: 1

      The thing about noise and fiery explosions in space is that, when a spaceship blows up, the area around it isn't empty space anymore. For one thing, when the oxygen tanks blow, you're probably going to get some fire. When a ship blows it's going to send out a shockwave of gas/plasma/particulates. When that hits another ship, the people in the other ship are going to hear it. Of course, in the real world, the sound would probably be much higher pitched. Without blowing up some things in space, in fact, it's going to be very difficult for a poor foley artist to know what an explosion in space will actually sound like, so they fall back on canned explosion sounds.

      Bear in mind that movies often skip sensible realism and not just in science fiction movies. When was the last time you saw a "realistic" war movie and complained that the sound of a large explosion occurred simultaneously with the flash even though the vantage point was several seconds away at the speed of sound? How about any movie when there's music coming from somewhere but the characters don't seem to be able to hear it? Or, how about when the character in the movie turns on their car radio and some music starts playing and you know that it's not the movies background music, but then the camera changes and you're looking at the car from a distance, or maybe you're in a different scene altogether, but the music keeps playing uninterrupted?

      There was an episode of Babylon 5 that focused on some of the station techs going about their duties while a big space battle is going on outside. There was a bit where they're looking out a window and one comments to the other that when there's an orange flash it's one of theirs blowing up and when there's a blue flash it's one of the raiders because, whatever they are, they don't keep an oxygen atmosphere in their ships.

  15. Impossible by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

    "The collapsible rod extends out of the handle of the lightsaber when activated, much like a high-tech version of a toy lightsaber with a flickable blade. The plasma and magnetic field are energized immediately when powered up"

    For the rod to be able to fit inside the handle it would firstly have to be of very, very thin material, otherwise it would simply not fit in there. Secondly, there's not that many ways of making something that could expand and retract in such a limit space without making it very fragile. Combine that with the aforementioned fragile material and these things wouldn't be able to even sustain their own weight; fighting with those would be completely out of the question.

    Now, about the magnetic fields: to be able to contain plasma without it leaking these things would have to sport very, very powerful magnetic fields. Even assuming they had the tech to generate powerful enough magnetic field in such a small space how would they limit its range? They would somehow have to be able to generate two magnetic fields in order to protect the rod from the plasma, and to prevent the plasma from espacing, and they'd have to be able to also limit how wide the fields are at the same time. That's again out of the question.

    But then again, none of it is real anyways so arguing about it is as pointless as two anonymous people yelling death threats to eachothers on the Internets.

    1. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It uses Galifreyan technology.

    2. Re:Impossible by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      "The collapsible rod extends out of the handle of the lightsaber when activated, much like a high-tech version of a toy lightsaber with a flickable blade. The plasma and magnetic field are energized immediately when powered up"

      For the rod to be able to fit inside the handle it would firstly have to be of very, very thin material, otherwise it would simply not fit in there. Secondly, there's not that many ways of making something that could expand and retract in such a limit space without making it very fragile. Combine that with the aforementioned fragile material and these things wouldn't be able to even sustain their own weight; fighting with those would be completely out of the question.

      I was thinking the same thing and imagining them collapsing and folding over in the same way wrapping paper tubes do when my daughter uses them as lightsabers.

      Of course who knows what magical materials there must be in that galaxy from a long time ago and far far away. Judging by the size of the windows in their ships and how they can get to orbit an maneuver around in space w/o refueling they've obviously invented some pretty impressive tech.

    3. Re:Impossible by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      For the rod to be able to fit inside the handle it would firstly have to be of very, very thin material, otherwise it would simply not fit in there. Secondly, there's not that many ways of making something that could expand and retract in such a limit space without making it very fragile. Combine that with the aforementioned fragile material and these things wouldn't be able to even sustain their own weight; fighting with those would be completely out of the question.

      I don't see this as an issue. Right now you could build a 5-foot telescoping titanium baton that could retract into something the size of a large flashlight and would be strong enough to swordfight with. Consider that people used to have real, no-shit life-or-death swordfights with rapiers. Those aren't beefy swords.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:Impossible by geekoid · · Score: 1

      well, they do have complete control over gravity, so power probably isn't an issue for them.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. Metal rod? by teslafreak · · Score: 1

    They are shown in several instances to cut metal, what metal is the core made from? Also, if it were bare metal striking bare metal, why does it spark so much on a simple non-sliding hit? If the core is telescoping metal with a sufficient rigidity to take hard strikes, you would figure the nesting pieces would make a saber with a "blade" much thicker near the base, and thinner near the top. Why is it not so?

    1. Re:Metal rod? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Titanium with an outer coating of fire steel. Next question? :-P

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  17. From Discovery channel, 2009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://science.discovery.com/videos/sci-fi-science-designing-a-light-sabre.html

  18. Already Suggested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Michio Kaku suggested this very same thing in his book "Physics of the Impossible". You fail.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michio_Kaku

  19. Not sure how this made the news by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

    but it was a funny read. And, if you had billions of dollars, maybe you could pull off a prototype that would have no real world functionality. Besides maybe a mexican jedi fiesta with jaba the hut pinata's.

  20. Old idea, doesn't work. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't remember where I've heard this before, but I've definitely heard it. But there are some very large problems you haven't solved.

    First, this is still going to require a large amount of energy. Where does that come from? And if you've got something superheated into a plasma, how do you keep the metal from melting?

    Second, as others have pointed out, you haven't actually solved the magnetic-field problem. Basically, any Jedi could have his lightsaber entirely disabled, or even turned back on him, by inducing a magnetic field on the room he's in.

    Third, it doesn't explain the part where lightsabers are incredibly difficult to wield, due to weird gyroscopic effects, such that only someone with force-sensitive reflexes should be able to wield them properly. Ok, Han Solo can cut open a tauntaun, but that's a pretty crude motion -- try to swing it around, and if you're not careful, you could end up cutting yourself as easily as your opponent.

    Fourth (!), what are blaster bolts, and how does a lightsaber deflect them? It makes very little sense to suppose that a blaster bolt is just some plasma wrapped around a tube in the same way -- that seems awfully complicated compared to alternatives like just firing the plasma as a projectile -- and then, why would they bounce off force fields the way they do, as if they were somehow slowly-moving laser light?

    Finally, how do you explain the phenomena in Episode 1... Alright, maybe you want to pretend that didn't exist, but this phenomena is fairly commonly observed and generally accepted as something that it'd be reasonable for a lightsaber to do. Anyway, what about the point where Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan are trying to break into a room by slowly melting the blast door with their lightsabers? I suppose the metal rod could be collapsing, but then I'd expect that when you pull it out, it'll have to slowly extend again -- and it also suggests that lightsabers would collapse entirely too easily. If they're made of light, this makes much more sense, but then we have all the same problems as light.

    So, cool idea, but let's just accept that Star Wars is science fantasy. It's enjoyable science fantasy, and there's no shame in wanting to be a jedi, but you'll never have a lightsaber. (Also, there's no Santa. Sorry.)

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Old idea, doesn't work. by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      fourth is obvious, a the magnetic rod in the middle would deflect plasma (and it would have to be magnetic to keep form getting eaten by the plasma). Even you solved your objection after that.

    2. Re:Old idea, doesn't work. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Third, it doesn't explain the part where lightsabers are incredibly difficult to wield, due to weird gyroscopic effects, such that only someone with force-sensitive reflexes should be able to wield them properly. Ok, Han Solo can cut open a tauntaun, but that's a pretty crude motion -- try to swing it around, and if you're not careful, you could end up cutting yourself as easily as your opponent.

      I've never heard of any 'gyroscopic effects'. Lightsabers would be hard to wield in the real world, simply because they have no momentum on the blade. Hence the 'blade' jerks around all over the place, it wouldn't look anything like the movies.(In fact, gyroscopes might help if they keep it from jerking everywhere.)

      Now that we've got computers fast enough to do it and sensors accurate enough, it might be informative to put someone in goggle-VR and hand them a lightsaber handle with sensors in it and see how well they actually do with it. I suspect most people would manage to cut off a limb,and that's without it being in a fight. Once it starts bouncing off someone else's blade, all bets are off.

      There sorta are 'real' lightsabers on the Wii, it's close enough to a 'real' lightsaber handle, and I believe I read somewhere that they were considering letting you hurt yourself if you mis-handled your lightsaber, but it was much too common and annoyed people. And they have to 'fake' the smoothness of the movies, because people would just twist their wrist and jerk the lightsaber 180 degrees in a quarter second, which according to 'lightsaber physics' is possible, but looks stupid and is a gamebreaker. (Not to mention would be damn dangerous with a real lightsaber.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    3. Re:Old idea, doesn't work. by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      fourth is obvious, a the magnetic rod in the middle would deflect plasma (and it would have to be magnetic to keep form getting eaten by the plasma). Even you solved your objection after that.

      It wouldn't deflect the projectile as if it were a solid object; it would instead partially get caught inside the same magnetic field that holds the saber's own plasma and the rest of the projectile would just disperse around the saber.

    4. Re:Old idea, doesn't work. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      It took only a few seconds on Google to find a source -- well, sort of. I definitely remember reading about it in a book somewhere, likely a legitimate expanded universe book.

      It still likely wouldn't look like in the movies, but it'd look closer than what you suggest:

      Due to the weightlessness of plasma and the strong gyroscopic effect generated by it, lightsabers required a great deal of strength and dexterity to wield, and it was extremely difficult -- and dangerous -- for the untrained to attempt using...

      Lightsaber combat was the preferred fighting method used by lightsaber wielders, many of the forms and styles being designed to compensate for the gyroscopic effect inherent in lightsabers, and take advantage of the Force-sensitivity common in most wielders.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. The first problem in making a Lightsabre by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Is getting enough energy in a handheld device.to power it for more than a microsecond.

    (Dr Kaku's explantion for that was "nano-batteries" )

    1. Re:The first problem in making a Lightsabre by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      Has a lightsaber ever been totally destroyed on screen? I remember at least one being cut in half or disabled and even that would be terrifying if the power source were anti-matter. Remember, any containment failure will result in all that energy, enough to melt through a meter thick blast door in Ep 1 without concern, being released instantly.

    2. Re:The first problem in making a Lightsabre by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      According to the books, lightsabers don't actually use much energy. It take a fairly large jolt to fire them up, but the way they work is that the light goes out, reaches the end of the blade, and then comes back into the handle, where it goes out again. It's a closed loop. When you turn them off, all the power goes back into the battery.

      So a lightsaber only uses power when it's cutting stuff. Cutting stuff means it doesn't get everything back. (Specifically, it loses some power as heat.)

      So if you were to operate them in a total vacuum, you could run them almost forever. (They've never said, but the light production presumably uses some power. But it isn't a very bright light.)

      In most circumstances, of course, it's constantly cutting the air, (hence the hum) so some power is used, but not very much.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  23. Re:hot by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    What if the telescoping core and handle are separated by a layer of ceramic insulation?

    What if the handle was also actively cooled?

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  24. Bah, everyone knows they are made of.. by shadowrat · · Score: 2

    midichlorian waste. when yoda says, "luminous beings are we" he's describing how someone is full of glowing damaging midichlorian poop. a lightsaber draws this toxic waste out of a jedi's body like tanuki foot pads, stores it, and focuses it as a weapon. midichlorian poop behaves EXACTLY like a light saber. Problem solved. It's how it works.

    btw: do you feel tired? do you not have as much energy as you want? As someone with innate jedi abilities, you really need to take special care of yourself. You are probably full of toxic midichlorian waste. I suggest buying my magnetic rare earth bracelets. may the force be with you.

    1. Re:Bah, everyone knows they are made of.. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Product idea: 5-Hour Force.

  25. Mistaken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For a while I though that Starwars was a work of fiction; as in, made up.

    My mistake

  26. As a Brit by rasherbuyer · · Score: 1

    Well I wasted 30 seconds of my life by RTFA and the first inaccuracy that struck me:

    We don't actually have anything we would call a flashlight.

    What Americans call a flashlight we call a torch...

    1. Re:As a Brit by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      WHOOSH

    2. Re:As a Brit by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      What do you call a piece of wood with a burning rag at the end of it? I honestly don't know.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  27. sigh, per Lucas (2.0): by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    The JEDI (SITH) use their MIDOCHLORANS to channel ENERGY from a PARALLEL universe. The light SABER device is a CONDUIT, not a ENERGY storage MEDIUM.

    UN-altered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of this IMPORTANT Information is ENCOURAGED, ESPECIALLY to COMPUTER BULLETIN BOARDS.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:sigh, per Lucas (2.0): by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      UN-altered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of this IMPORTANT Information is ENCOURAGED, ESPECIALLY to COMPUTER BULLETIN BOARDS.

      Okay!

      The JEDI (SITH) use their MIDOCHLORANS to channel ENERGY from a PARALLEL universe. The light SABER device is a CONDUIT, not a ENERGY storage MEDIUM.

      UN-altered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of this IMPORTANT Information is ENCOURAGED, ESPECIALLY to COMPUTER BULLETIN BOARDS.

  28. Well that's not how our work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    lightsaber

    The lightsaber works by extending a 'Quantum Probability Field' vertically up from a small metal disk. The 'Quantum Probability Field' appears to be a long pole, but in reality it is shaped like an extremely narrow, vertically elongated and oblate 'normal distribution curve'.

    At the quantum level matter is constantly blipping into and out of existence. Where and when matter 'chooses' to do this is subject to quantum probability. What the 'Quantum Probability Field' does is to create an area of space vertically above the base-disk in-which the probability of matter blipping into existence reaches almost 1.

    Bending probability in this way causes an imbalance that the laws of physics must rectify. This rectification happens at the very edge of the 'Quantum Probability Field'. What we find here is a 'probability trough' - a region of space in-which the probability of matter existing is very close to zero.

    So to summarise how the lightsaber produces a blade, it simply generates the 'Quantum Probability Field' which cause matter to exist in the area of space that extends in a long thin beam from the sabre stem. The matter is brought into existence by bending the laws of probability in that region of space. That matter that is brought into existence naturally expands as its introduction into reality causes pressure inside the field. The expanding matter then falls into the probability trough at the edge of the field and promptly winks out of existence.

    The lightsaber blade carries no momentum and is virtually weightless. The matter it causes to bring into existence does have weight, however as the blade is moved, the matter itself does not move. It simply winks out of existence in one place and new matter is winked into existence to replace it further along the blade's path.

    The matter that the 'Quantum Probability Field' brings into existence is not what cause the blade to cut normal matter. The actual cutting edge of the lightsaber is the 'probability trough' that winks matter out of existence.

    So when the blade edge (the probability trough) cuts normal matter it winks it out of existence. This 'missing' matter is then probabilistically available to be winked into existence inside the 'Quantum Probability Field' and thus form the blade itself.

    So one way of looking at it is that the lightsaber cuts by winking the matter that it is cutting out of existence at the very edge of its generated 'Quantum Probability Field' and using that matter to then form the blade itself.

    In truth, it is not really using the *same* matter. But when matter is taken out of the universe, the universe pumps more matter in to replace it. The 'Quantum Probability Field' simply bends probability space in order make sure that matter is created in the right place (in the shape of a blade).

    Why does the lightsaber glow?

    Well the matter that is brought into existence is highly energised plasma. Even though the probability trough winks that plasma out of existence as soon as it leaves the blade, some visible light does manage to escape. The probability trough simply reduced the likely hood of matter existing to virtually zero, but not absolutely zero.

    The frequency of the energy that 'bleeds through' the probability trough is adjustable by frequency. This is how we manage to get different coloured lightsaber blades.

    Although a magnetic field could disturb the generated (created) plasma, such a disturbance would have no effect on the blade itself. Remember the blade is actually just the field. So if a magnet were to push the plasma out of that field then that plasma would simply be winked out of existence by the quantum probability trough and thus instantly replaced by newly created plasma back inside the blade.

    Then there is the matter of why a lightsaber blade will stop another lightsaber blade. Well, at close proximity, the quantum probability fields strongly repel one another. The repulsion between two fields is barely measurable at a distance of about one centimetre but quickly rises to virtually infinite on contact.

  29. fencing by snookerhog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I once had a discussion about light sabers with a Olympic fencing gold medalist. His job was sword fighting and his main gripe with light sabers (which was not addressed in this article) was that since the blade is made of light, it has no weight and thus the speed of your strikes is not limited by the blade in any way, only by how fast you can manipulate the handle. In his opinion (and mine) this would make saber duels quite short indeed.

    1. Re:fencing by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, except that said duels are between people who can see the damn future. So yes you can slide them in half with a flick of the wrist, but they knew that flick was coming 5 minutes ago.

    2. Re:fencing by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Would be a good trick for pizza delivery- it shows up at your door the minute you decide to order one! I wonder if it would be messy cutting a pizza with a lightsaber?

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  30. Sigh, and you call yourself a geek by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    You are debating this tiny kids silly answer of there being a metal rod inside when there can't be one inside from the fiction that came up with the idea.

    This kid think he is so smart but forgets to actually read the material where the lightsaber originated. Whatever the lightsaber is, it is a "X" that is focussed through crystals, uses very little if any power if the blade is not used in combat, behaves as a solid with immense heat on contact but no radiation. That is what the fiction of the movies have created. Books and games have added on to it but regarless of what lore you use, if you want to explain fiction, you got to respect the lore.

    It don't matter how you could create something LIKE a lightsaber, unless you replicate that, it is not a lightsaber.

    This kid basically thinks Falco the Dragon is an open plane, sure you can sit on an open plane and fly but that is not what Falco is.

    When a kid fails comprehensive reading of a trashy "sci-fi" story, you know a career flipping burgers is just going to be a dream forever as he sweaps out astrays at restaurants... oh wait, you can't smoke in restaurants any more? Oh well, so much for this kids future.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Sigh, and you call yourself a geek by geekoid · · Score: 1

      they key problem is that then lkight saber changed in the mnyth.

      Artical written in the 70s clearly indicate it's a condensed beam of light.

      Plasma was added later. A mistake, in my opinion.

      In fact, they have been making excuse for them for decades.

      The number ONE reason to use hem is that if skilled you can block blaster shots.

      also, as a sign of an elegant weapon from a more civilized age.
      .

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  31. All wrong. A lightsaber is really.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... a fantasy created by a guy who went to film school, and who never had a single class in physics or engineering!

  32. Sigh, STOP encouraring them by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    You can't "explain" fiction by adding your own fiction. IF you want to play the game of debating a fictional universe, you got to accept that universe as it is.

    Lightsabers are for most of the lore of Star Wars ordinary weapons that anyone can use. However, since blasters do exist ONLY someone skilled enough to deflect incoming blaster shots (not laser shots) would survive long enough to make any use of it.

    Once you can make use of the lightsaber to deflect incoming shots it becomes a valuable weapon with some sense behind it. It is supposed to be far less energy consuming then blasters, can be used in more ways, and a blaster doesn't help you deal with incoming fire.

    Respect the lore or don't bother.

    Retconning the grand-parents gibberish is called and it lead to mideclorians or whatever they were called. I

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Sigh, STOP encouraring them by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      According to the Wookiepedia (which I've been reading lately, because I know far less about Star Wars than someone of my nerdiness should), the blade has a significant gyroscopic effect, and as such requires great dexterity to use. Somehow, being sensitive to the Force makes that easier, to within the reasonable limits of human capacity.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  33. lightsabers are real by ilec_geek · · Score: 1

    The legend of a "flaming sword" has been around for thousands of years. The Cherub posted at the entrance to the Garden of Eden as a guard to the Tree of Life had a "flaming sword that turned in every direction." And we all know Genesis is literal, true history, right? I think a lightsaber is entirely possible. Think about how super-heated plasma and non-magnetic force fields would behave if they actually existed in a 4th spatial dimension and how it would appear to us if it intersected our 3 dimensional realm. I don't "think outside the box." My box just happens to have 10 dimensions. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

    1. Re:lightsabers are real by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      You're missing a dimension
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  34. Actually... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Liam Neeson thought that it was all "will power or something" until they told him during the making of "The Phantom Menace" that "No, there is a switch right here. See?".

    Can't seem to find the video of that though.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Actually... by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Is that why they made the "on" buttons big, red and obvious in TPM?

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  35. Swapping imaginaries by erice · · Score: 1

    When I was younger (and nerdier) I once proposed a similar but more sensible version using in-universe technology that was well understood by Starwars fans: force fields. Obviously, starships have shields that keep asteroids, debris, weapons and projectiles from damaging them. Similarly, speeders and various devices apply forces at a distance to hover and float. Why can't this technology be used to harness a plasma field as a cutting device?

    Because force fields are just as improbable as light sabers and for a lot of the same reasons. Force fields are more widely employed in sci-fi but that doesn't make them any closer to the reality we actually live in.

    1. Re:Swapping imaginaries by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      the reality we actually live in

      You may live in reality, but this is /. - the rest os us have successfully avoided reality for most of our lives!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    2. Re:Swapping imaginaries by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      You may live in reality, but this is /. - the rest os us have successfully avoided reality for most of our lives!

      That reminds me.
      Mom! Replicate me a Sandwich, Earl of, hot.

  36. HOT! (no, really...) by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    All I really know is waving it around near your body is a good way to lose parts of your body.

    I always thought it was funny, that jedi and sith would do flips while holding one. If it is a plasma jet in a magnetic field, it is still going to produce a lot of heat, and that heat will rise. Doing a flip while holding one is probably a good way to get a third degree burn...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:HOT! (no, really...) by Rei · · Score: 1

      This all simply argues that they're not plasma, not something superheated but which simply creates incidental light or diffracts in the air (such as actual light). Everything else falls under the principle of "sufficiently advanced tech = magic". Remember that the canon already well established force fields of various kinds (shields, tractor beams, hovering craft, etc), so the concept of the two objects not passing through each other without a solid physical core should not seem absurd if you accept the premise of those other things. And given that they have superluminal travel, they must have gravity control, so if you accept that as a premise, should it really seem absurd that they can invert the direction of the light beam (or whatever) at the ends of the blade? Not that that's the only possibility, of course; after all, why shouldn't said "force field" techs should be able to do the same? Or what if their tech is to encourage and control diffraction? I mean, there's no limit to the possibilities.

      The key is that the canon leaves more than enough maneuvering room to explain the existence of such tech. The real question with Star Wars is why various tech elements never seem to be carried to their logical conclusions.

      --
      Do you think you're the only one who can transform into a car?
    2. Re:HOT! (no, really...) by suutar · · Score: 1

      I always figured it was just some blaster-bolt-related energy encased in an energy-only shield (like they had on the Death Star reactor vent).

    3. Re:HOT! (no, really...) by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      The real question with Star Wars is why various tech elements never seem to be carried to their logical conclusions.

      Because Star Wars is not, never was, never will be science fiction.

      Adding "in space" to a basic fantasy quest narrative with wizards does not make it science fiction.

    4. Re:HOT! (no, really...) by qubezz · · Score: 1

      This is a long time ago in a galaxy far away where Jedis can levitate spaceships with their thoughts (but are modest enough to not just fly around themselves), detect their children on ships in space (but not their sisters, even when they are sucking face with them), instantaneously feel people dying on distant planets, control people's thoughts, come back from the dead as ghosts and talk to people, and shoot frickin' lightning out of their hands. They even have the self-control not to murder giant rabbit retards. A world where explosions in space make an earth-shattering kaboom. Maybe it is enough to say light sabers are Jedi magic.

  37. Bent by jdkramar · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't a metal rod in the middle mean that it is possible to bend the lightsaber? Or are we assuming this is some super metal? Maybe the light in the Star Wars galaxy is made of stronger stuff than our light?

    --
    "One can not truly appreciate Shakespeare until you have heard it in it's original Klingon" -Star Trek
  38. The science of light sabers by blair1q · · Score: 1

    Number of working light sabers that exist: 0

    Damn. Wish I'd filled out a grant application to get funding to study that for 8 years first. Oh well.

    1. Re:The science of light sabers by geekoid · · Score: 1

      the light saber technology is kept down by BigSith.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:The science of light sabers by blair1q · · Score: 1

      They just don't want us to know when Peak Force is really going to happen.

  39. There was a Sci Fi Science episode on this. by RockHammer · · Score: 1

    Link to a Sci Fi Science episode where they evaluate the design of a lightsaber using components available today. Some other episodes have related topics discussed in the comments.

  40. Michio Kaku did it by bolrod · · Score: 1

    In the program Science : Physics of the impossible http://science.discovery.com/videos/sci-fi-science-designing-a-light-sabre.html

  41. Light Sabers are for Assholes by cobrausn · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T819usZLQtE&feature=channel_video_title

    I wonder why Star Wars didn't have any of these guys.

    --
    How does it feel to be a liar with pants constantly on fire?
    1. Re:Light Sabers are for Assholes by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      That was funny. Thanks.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  42. From Michio Kaku Book by Erasmas · · Score: 1

    This article is mostly lifted from the great book "Physics of the Impossible" by Michio Kaku. If you want a more in-depth look at the possible physics behind light-sabers, check it out. It is written for non-physicists, and covers possible future solutions for technology popular in science fiction, including tractor beams, force fields, teleportation, etc.

  43. Narnia by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    Next on his list--proving the plausibility of armoires that are wormholes to vast parallel universes where the law of physics is christian allegory.

  44. We are all forgetting the differences bewtween... by __aasehi2499 · · Score: 1

    Science Fiction, which Star Wars is not, and Science Fantasy, which Star Wars is. The first is written from the premise that these things are possible, we just can't do them with current tech. The second is written for the purpose of a 'good' story with something flashy and amazing. This effort of reverse engineering is pointless, because it was never engineered in the first place, not even in Lucas' head.

  45. why does a light saber have to be so special? by fikx · · Score: 1

    I always assumed (based on the original 3 movies...in MY world, those are the Star Wars universe :) that the light saber was just a different take on the common blaster. like a swordsman looks down on a gun (no skill needed, just point, runs out of ammo, mechanically wears out, etc.), The Jedis look down on blasters. Anyone with that level of skill wants a weapon that extends and compliments that skill instead of a machine that does your work for you. . I didn't need the saber to be a special unknown technology to be unique. The comment in the 3rd movie about his skills being complete worried me some, but I figure that just shows you've been motivated enough to figure out how to make a weapon that fits your skills, and since only Jedi's get irritated at blasters for being crude and limited, all the sabers are hand-made on a one by one basis. Technology was always background in the first 3 movies, it was assumed everyone COULD build those things, but only some people were interested in actually getting into the details of 'em (i.e. grunt work).
    The light saber wasn't special by itself until the later 3 movies, which by then Lucas was so in love with his genius of scifi, no one could tell him to leave it be. His ideas of what the story SHOULD have been was always naive in my opinion....been done before and done better.

    --
    AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
  46. Re:duh by tragedy · · Score: 1

    Hang on. "Hundreds of Millions of Kilowatts"? As in hundreds of gigawatts? As in more than the residential electrical power usage of the entire United States? As in enough to instantaneously vaporise the blast door they were slowly melting through in Episode One? I think maybe you're exaggerating just a little.