Slashdot Mirror


Using Crowdsourcing To Identify Vancouver Rioters

Fudge Factor 3000 writes "The Canucks' loss in the last game of the Stanley Cup Finals resulted in complete mayhem in downtown Vancouver. Everything from upturned cars set alight to looting was commonplace. Unfortunately, most of the perpetrators were able to maintain their anonymity by disappearing into the crowds. Fortunately, bystanders took several pictures and videos of the carnage. Now, websites (including both Facebook and Tumblr) have set up pages to use crowdsourcing to identify the hooligans."

35 of 397 comments (clear)

  1. Wow by kamapuaa · · Score: 4, Funny

    People care about hockey? And enough to riot?

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re:Wow by webmistressrachel · · Score: 3, Funny

      I read "rioters" as "routers" expecting a map of the internets in Vancouver, then read the summary... I guess I'll just have to carry on doing my own wardriving for the time being...

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    2. Re:Wow by mangu · · Score: 5, Funny

      People care about hockey? And enough to riot?

      Different people, different worries

    3. Re:Wow by Korveck · · Score: 4, Informative

      Keep your ignorance away from here. Ice hockey is the biggest sport in Canada. In Vancouver, the Stanley Cup final game 7 is THE biggest sports event. The anticipation for Canucks to win their first Stanley Cup title is huge.

      However, the hockey game is unlikely the true reason behind the riot. The rioters were prepared to riot. They brought the tools with them to set fire before the game even started. Many of the arrested were known rioters, who caused problems before the Winter Olympics in 2010.

    4. Re:Wow by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      US: walmart has a $300 sale on widescreen TVs.

    5. Re:Wow by NFN_NLN · · Score: 3, Interesting

      People care about hockey? And enough to riot?

      Different people, different worries

      Vancouver is similar to the worst US cities before the housing bust. It costs 11 times the average income to buy the average house. This would put servicing housing debt at 72% of your gross income. There isn't much industry and therefore job prospects aren't the greatest. The average young person is likely to live in debt their entire lives if they stay. I don't see how people can live without drawing equity from their homes to pay daily expenses. Add on top of that foreigners driving up the price of everything.

      As someone mentioned about the hooligans trying to start a riot during the Olympics, it didn't work. A riot only happens when you have enough pissed off people in a large group. The end of a losing hockey playoff is just a catalyst that brought a lot of already morally defeated people together in one place.

      Saying the hockey game caused the riot is like saying the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand caused World War I.

    6. Re:Wow by jjohnson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Vancouver housing prices weren't the cause of the riot. Neither were disaffected youth angry about the cost of living.

      While the housing market is grossly overinflated, the rental market is sane. Young people simply rent instead of buying, and rent quite nice places too because the main driver of inflating housing costs are foreign investors buying up all the condo stock. Metro Vancouver's unemployment rate (7.6%) is lower than Canada's overall, and has been pretty constant for the last decade. There's no large, pent up reservoir of anger.

      The cause of the riots was 1) corralling 100,000 fans downtown to watch the game on outdoor screens, and 2) a large portion of those fans being drunk suburban kids looking to get their riot on. Blame lackluster police presence if you want. It was hooliganism pure and simple. Look at the photos. Look at their expensive shoes. Those Canucks jerseys they're all wearing aren't cheap. They're young, middle-class drunks having fun.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    7. Re:Wow by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny

      There are some editing errors in the OP, which make misunderstanding natural. For instance, it says "(in both Facebook and have been set up to use crowdsourcing to identify the hooligans."

      This is Canada. I take that to properly read: (in both Facebook and French) have been set up to use crowdsourcing to identify the hooligans."

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    8. Re:Wow by IonOtter · · Score: 5, Informative

      Disclosure: Dad was the arson inspector for my old home town.

      Not a poor arsonist, just unfamiliar.

      Put just one sheet of newspaper, crumpled into a ball and ignited, under the seat.

      One pound of foam rubber seat cushion is equal to one pound of gasoline. The car will burn completely down to the frame, the rims will melt, and there will be absolutely no evidence of how it was done. That's because the ashes of the paper will either be obliterated by the firefighting water, or the air turbulence of the fire itself.

      --
      [End Of Line]
    9. Re:Wow by NFN_NLN · · Score: 5, Informative

      Vancouver housing prices weren't the cause of the riot. Neither were disaffected youth angry about the cost of living.

      While the housing market is grossly overinflated, the rental market is sane. Young people simply rent instead of buying, and rent quite nice places too because the main driver of inflating housing costs are foreign investors buying up all the condo stock. Metro Vancouver's unemployment rate (7.6%) is lower than Canada's overall, and has been pretty constant for the last decade. There's no large, pent up reservoir of anger.

      Employment rate is not always the best indicator as people are often underemployed. The common term is the "working poor" and it is well documented:

      """" Seth Klein with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives says that's because a lot of British Columbians make very low wages. "They can't make ends meet. They're faced with terrible trade-offs between paying the rent, feeding the kids, or heating the house." """
      - http://www.news1130.com/news/local/article/241285--bc-has-highest-child-poverty-rate-of-all-canadian-provinces

      """ The poverty rate for people of all ages in BC also rose to 12 percent. It was the highest overall poverty rate of any province for the 11th consecutive year. """
      - http://mostlywater.org/bcs_poverty_rate_still_highest_canada

      """ Despite the manipulation of statistics by various government agencies, more people are hungry in this country and in this province than we have seen for a long time. Food banks are multiplying, each one reporting that there is not enough in contributions to meet the need. It is reported that 700,000 people in Canada rely on food banks to feed themselves and their families... The fact is that the majority of the poor in Canada and in British Columbia are working. """

      - http://www2.canada.com/oceansidestar/news/story.html?id=418878d9-429c-4361-acf5-c06f05079302

      Also, I'm not sure how renting from foreigners who are driving up and/or controlling condo prices contributes to peace of mind.

    10. Re:Wow by jjohnson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't dispute the problems with poverty in Vancouver. I see it every day. My wife teaches at a high school in Whalley, Surrey. I go through Chinatown a couple days a week.

      What I'm disputing is that the riot was caused by social unrest. The pictures tell an obvious tale: half the crowd is wearing expensive Canucks jerseys and have nice haircuts. The ones who've been identified from the photos are rich kids from the burbs. If you see sunglasses, they're expensive designer sunglasses. This was hooliganism, not the poor rising up.

      Foreign investment in real estate is a mixed blessing. It drives up prices, preventing the poor and the young from owning property, but it also gluts the rental market driving rental prices down. A common complaint among investors is that they're unable to finance the purchase solely by renting it out. The only unambiguously good thing is that the demand for more condos allows the city to require an apportionment of new construction to go for social housing.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    11. Re:Wow by germansausage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There were 2 groups that started the rioting. First there were the hard core rioters. These were the same bunch who riot at G8 meetings. The "Black Bloc". Actually they couldn't give a fuck about politics or hockey. For them, rioting and looting and mixing it up with the cops is a sort of urban "extreme sport". They came equipped with bandana's and geologist hammers.

      The second group were a new bunch. The facebook rioters. Riot 2.0 as it were. These were the dumbasses who came downtown so they could take pictures of themselves standing in front of burning cars so they could post them on their facebook. Status "At A Riot. Epic :) :) :) "

      Add to that a huge number of 18-25 year old kids, rat-arse drunk and happy to participate as long as the group is big enough to give them some sort of anonymity.

      Angry Canuck fans may have been there but were probably a minority. Groups 1 and 2 would have rioted win or lose.

    12. Re:Wow by Dahamma · · Score: 3, Informative

      Vancouver is similar to the worst US cities before the housing bust. It costs 11 times the average income to buy the average house. This would put servicing housing debt at 72% of your gross income.

      1) that's still not as bad as New York City, and I don't see massive sports-related riots there when the Yankees lose.

      2) look at the rioters - the average age was probably under 24 - I don't care where you are, 24 year olds are not buying homes these days

      3) the same thing happened when the Canucks lost in '94, and housing prices were not much of an issue back then

      Pissed off, impressionable, DRUNK hockey fans caused the riot. Occam's razor - why try to read social injustice and malaise into an act when booze and testosterone will do just fine...

  2. Yay for Facebook! by ZipK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Facebook's greatest value to humanity may be as a honeypot to stupid people who post their misdeeds for all the public (and law enforcement agencies) to see.

    1. Re:Yay for Facebook! by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is that it's not really the drunks you want to get (despite the fact that they did a lot of the damage), it's the instigators in bandanas who started trouble then melted away into the crowd once they had set things in motion. I'm not saying the stupid people shouldn't be dragged out and shamed, but don't pat yourself on the back if you're catching only the "useful idiots"

    2. Re:Yay for Facebook! by Caerdwyn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't matter whether there were "anarchists" looking to cause trouble by "starting things". It's zero excuse at all. Everyone who participated, regardless of whether they intended to riot as a premeditated act or not, is a willing participant. A criminal. "I saw someone else doing it first!" is not an excuse to break windows, stab people, torch cop cars, or loot. And it should not be cause to reduce the punishment.

      Stop making excuses and pointing fingers. The reason that people rioted is that every last one of them who participated wanted to riot, had a choice to make on whether to riot or not, and chose to break windows, to attack people, to trash whatever car they were closest to, and to steal from stores. There are no extenuating circumstances. If a thousand people did it, a thousand people need to be in jail, not ten or a hundred. This isn't "harmless childhood pranks" or "social justice" (I swear, I want to shoot people who claim that as an excuse for stealing big-screen TVs. Literally.); it's blood and thuggery.

      Extra punishment for agent provacateurs? Yes. Free pass for drunks and hockey-garbage? NO.

      --
      Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
    3. Re:Yay for Facebook! by ShakaUVM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>I suggest http://youarenotsosmart.com/2011/02/10/deindividuation/ for further reading.

      So your article says that in anonymous crowds, people can act like idiots? And get away with it? Astonishing research. Anyone who has ever participated in an online community knows that's how it works.

      It's still absolutely no excuse to riot.

  3. Re:I think you a whole something by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now websites (in both Facebook and have been set up to use crowdsourcing to identify the hooligans.

    )

    BOTH facebook?? These people mean business!

  4. Re:Just for rioting? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Your car wasn't totaled in Vancouver, was it?

  5. Re:Just for rioting? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really? Really?! Did you even see a single picture from the mayhem? There was so much property damage only because the police was too busy saving people from mob beat downs!
    Drop your stupid dogmatic devotion to your specific "ism", get your head out of your ass and actually look at the world around you as it is once in a while.

  6. Re:Just for rioting? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Those "isolated property crimes" you speak of will cost Vancouver residents and businesses millions of dollars, damages that aren't covered for riots. Not to mention the black eye Vancouver gets now on the world stage.

    You must be just willfully blind or just plain stupid not see the violence going on last night.

    In short, you are a fucking moron who has tried to inject your naive and childlike political views into a serious, actual issue.

  7. Re:Just for rioting? Seriously? by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hey guess what. Fuck you. No seriously fuck you. In Canada we generally have a well ordered, and well behaved society. Lets see we got one guy who got the shit beat of him by 15-20 people because he was trying to protect property. And we have idiots who have this idea that public mischief, rioting, and in general being a danger to everyone else is not worthy of your time?

    It wasn't a few cars, it wasn't a few businesses, and it sure the fuck wasn't a few people who got stomped in the face because they tried to stop the fuckers from ruining businesses and looting. And if you are a Canadian. Get the fuck out of the country and go somewhere else. Maybe europe, where they let you destroy someone elses property because your "sensibilities" can be offended, because a sports team lost.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  8. !CCTV, !privacy invasion, !crowdsourced policework by Annirak · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is not a case of CCTV. Rather, these images have been submitted from mobile devices and cameras.

    This is not a case of privacy invasion. People have committed criminal acts out in public, fully knowing that people are filming. They're begging to be identified.

    Furthermore, the police did not set up these facebook pages; these are set up by concerned citizens who are appalled by the behaviour seen last night. The police have set up a system for submitting evidence, but they have not started a "crowd-sourced" identification initiative as of yet. So maybe the police is doing crowd-sourced evidence gathering, but certainly not analysis.

    I want to point out how the police behaved in this riot. They stood their ground, but did not use an unnecessary force. They rarely engaged directly with the rioters; they just held a line, and occasionally fired tear gas, flashbangs, and pepperspray into the crowd. This is one recent case of police in the news NOT confiscating/breaking everyone's recording devices.

    I think the Vancouver police and the RCMP deserve some commendation for how they handled this riot. They did not prevent as much property damage as they could have, but on the otherhand, they took a far more measured approach to interaction with the rioters than has been taken in the past and they are seemingly embracing social media, rather than raging in fear of it.

  9. Re:Just for rioting? Seriously? by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Before you comment, perhaps you'd like to do some research and educate yourself. Here: http://tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=369127

    Coles Notes: 150 people injured, some quite seriously. Millions of dollars in damage, which tax payers and insurance payers (translation: the populace - you know, the people who are working together now to help find the criminals) will have to pay for. Perpetrated not by a crowd going insane over the angst of a lost hockey game but by anarchists and professional criminals taking advantage of a large crowd of people which could provide cover for their activities while blame was placed on the hockey fans rather than the criminals perpetrating the crimes.

    Forgive me if I disagree with you, strongly, and am very happy to see initiatives like this to catch the criminals and happier still to know that the hockey fans often stepped in to try to hold back the criminals from their desired goals.

  10. Re:Just for rioting? Seriously? by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

    But a sports team LOST! What is the suffering of a few people in the face of such injustice!

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  11. Re:Just for rioting? Seriously? by stoanhart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, how do you mange to sound more like a dick with each word you write?

    You realize this isn't some vigilante man hunt, right? It's just people looking at pics of crimes in progress and seeing if they recognize anyone. If they do, they report them to the police and let justice take its course.

    As to this:

    "At least rioters are just violent pricks and adrenaline-fueled idiots; you guys sound like the sort of vengeful, soulless libertarians who would shoot a man rather than let him walk away with your TV"

    I don't even know what to say. People smashing property for no reason are worse than people trying to defend their own property. Go fuck yourself.

  12. Re:Vigilante safety patrol by Mia'cova · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What are you even talking about? First, these are all videos citizens recorded of crimes happening in front of their eyes in public streets. None of this is coming from the police. If someone is identified, a police expert will evaluate that. If it looks like a match, they'll press charges. If there's enough evidence to convince a judge, they'll be prosecuted. Do you think we run our justice system with some facebook/hot-or-not hybrid? Wow.

  13. You mean muppets like Brock Anton? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Crowdsourcing? Sometimes you don't even need that, sometimes a muppet hands himself in because he LOVES FACEBOOK SO MUCH! Honestly. Read it and weep for humanity.

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  14. We don't want criminals here by dala1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People in Vancouver are standing up and saying this type of behaviour is unacceptable. Last night, they did this by taking pictures, creating forums to share evidence, and guarding businesses. Today they gathered downtown to help with the cleanup. For those of you searching for an Orwellian scenario in all of this, there's nothing to find.

    1. Re:We don't want criminals here by Maow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Next time, you should do it by going out on the streets and punching in the face every idiot who tries to set a car on fire or break a shop window. Then there won't be a need to clean the streets up next morning.

      (but yeah, taking a photo first is a good idea anyway)

      There was a video played on CBC TV this morning, submitted by a spectator, presented without commentary due to its shocking nature:

      A (rather large) man trying to prevent looting of The Bay on Georgia Street getting swarmed and getting the snot kicked out of him for his efforts. Final frame is him motionless on the street.

      I sympathize with your initial reaction, but it's definitely not a wise one. Much better to get pic's of criminal acts, then casually FOLLOW perpetrators, getting further pictures a block away when the face mask is down. Should be easy to remain unnoticed due to the crowds & number of cameras.

  15. Re:!CCTV, !privacy invasion, !crowdsourced policew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Vancouver Police and RCMP (Abbotsford, Surrey, Maple Ridge, and probably most of the cops in the metro area) knew that if they pushed too hard it would get bad.

    I watched the news on CBC and CTV live, and CBC itself has enough video to catch the people who set the cars on fire, because 4 of those cars (the prius?, the truck, and the two copcars) were right outside the CBC's offices. CTV has video of people looting the HBC and London Drugs because Rob Brown was caught right in the thick of it.

    As for the police breaking up the crowds, what they did was broke them up starting in front of the CBC and Canada Post area and whittled them down by barricading the streets using the riot gear and making the crowds smaller and smaller, eventually there was just one group of probably 100 people who continued to vandalize things, but the perps who started it were probably long gone by then.

    And contrary to media reports, some of the people in the buildings were employees keeping looters out, they were plainclothed and had fire extuingishers.

    The Coach store, was looted (you can tell from TV) and that's probably the only store that was actually carrying expensive items near the windows. London Drugs and HBC, the window/door areas tend to be where cosmetics and checkout tills are, so I imagine the dollar value in merchandise stolen was probably in the low thousands, and the actual glass and building damage might exceed the merchandise losses. The coach, LV, Hermes, Tiffany and Gucci stores are all located around the same Hotel, but the coach building is more visible. The LV store is actually located inside the Hotel, so if they smashed the windows they might have got away with the display items in the window, but not much else.

    The Futureshop, people were trying to get into, but I can tell you that would have failed since it's on the second floor and has the same kind of barricade the London Drugs has. The London Drugs people actually kicked-in the barricade. My observation here is that the barricade failed because it wasn't designed to have 10 people kicking it for 20 minutes with no law enforcement around.

    The Sears was broken into, as well. Again, the same as the London Drugs and the HBC, mostly cosmetics and checkout tills are near the entrances.

    Photos and Video, everyone not looting had their camera out, the VPD has appealed to the public to send them all the photos and video.

    Note that a lot of these were smartphones, did you know that the EXIF data will not only tell the cops where you were, but what time, so your photos can be triangulated with other peoples images to pinpoint the instigators.

    On the other hand, also note that people came up from Seattle and Victoria. So 100,000 people downtown, and those people who came up to start things may have not even be from the Vancouver area.

    Some fault of the riots happening can be pinned on how much checking they were not doing to prevent people from bringing bags and lighters/matches.

  16. Re:Just for rioting? Seriously? by Annirak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I should clarify; around slashdot, we're awfully big on civil liberties, personal privacy and libertarianism (Hey, government, stay out of my business!). That said, we don't spend nearly enough time on civic duty. Civic duty and civil liberties are inextricably linked: a society will remain well ordered if either, there are no civil liberties and no civic duty, or there are lots of civil liberties, but they come at a price: that of civic duty.

    Consequently, if you want the government to stay out of your life, you owe your society the duty of reporting it if your neighbor steals from the convenience store while you're watching. The police will follow up on the allegations, do their own investigation, and they may ask you to testify. But that's the price of civic liberties.

  17. Re:!CCTV, !privacy invasion, !crowdsourced policew by ChinggisK · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Two different police departments aren't necessarily going to handle things the same way.

  18. Re:I was in the midst of it and by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let me get this straight.

    You're glorifying and condoning destruction of property, violence and cheering for more violence and senseless destruction. You're also using "mob energy" and "excitement" as justification for said senseless destruction and violence.

    All because you think the city you're living in is a bit dull. What the fuck is wrong with you?

    --
    Eat the rich.
  19. It's Much Worse Here In The UK... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...you go to a riot and occasionally a soccer match breaks out!

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.