Slashdot Mirror


The Dangers Of Amateur Astronomy In Afghanistan

Nancy_A writes "Most amateur astronomers take for granted that they can just go outside and enjoy viewing the night sky without encountering many problems. But in order for amateur astronomers in Afghanistan to simply set up a telescope in a dark region, they have to deal with more serious complications, such as making sure the area is clear of land mines, not arousing the suspicions the Taliban or the local police, and watching out for potential bombing raids by the US/UK/Afghan military alliance."

137 comments

  1. Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Most of us in the West complain when we don't have enough science grants or when some Bible-thumper questions our biology textbook.

    These poor bastards have to practice astronomy in a country where 70% of the population is illiterate, where the Koran-thumpers cut people's heads off, and where the occupying military force takes a blow-them-the-fuck-up-and-ask-questions-later approach to anyone who looks like they have a scope.

    Now *that's* rock-hard dedication to getting some astronomical observations.

    On the upside, the piss-poor electrical service probably really cuts down on the light pollution.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the upside, the piss-poor electrical service probably really cuts down on the light pollution.

      I expect the smell of napolam in the morning is to die for though.

    2. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      No, that's the smell of victory!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by DigiShaman · · Score: 1, Informative

      In case any of you didn't get the joke.

      "You smell that? Do you smell that? Napalm, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that. I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hill bombed, for twelve hours. When it was all over I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' dink body. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like... victory. Someday this war's gonna end..."
      (Lieutenant Colonel Bill Kilgore, Apocalypse Now)

      http://riot.typepad.com/the_lucretius_plan/2007/06/the_smell_of_vi.html

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's only fitting that they're doing it around the region where the stuff was first done. though, they probably don't have much of light pollution and can get up to thin air. it's not bad area geographically and even some of taliban must appreciate using stars for navigating. now go try and do archeology in syria..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you explain the joke immediately... it's not a joke anymore.

    6. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does biology have to do with the summary?

    7. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by rwven · · Score: 1

      Give me a break. I'm sure these horrid circumstances extend to FAR more than just astronomy. Every thing that TFA mentions could just as easily apply to going down to the grocery store for these people. In its present form, this is not news.

    8. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Now *that's* rock-hard dedication to getting some astronomical observations.

      actually its just far more likely that the media has convinced you that its a lot scarier than it is, the fact that people are bothering to do it shows its reasonably safe in some areas. If life was bad, they wouldn't be have time to dick around look at the stars. They'd be more concerened with eating and surviving.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    9. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what SHE said!

    10. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by OldSoldier · · Score: 1

      These poor bastards have to practice astronomy in a country where 70% of the population is illiterate,

      AND they have to practice it at night, in the dark too!

    11. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by x6060 · · Score: 1

      That isnt true at all. =\

      I watched a 20 year old kid stole out of his village every day across a minefield. The minefield had been there for 15 years and he knew it was there. I asked a local about it and most of the towns folk would just walk through the minefield to get to one of the neighboring villages. It was just an accepted danger. They could have walked a quarter mile out of their way to go around it, but they didnt. Well every week or 2 it would end poorly for some unlucky bastard, sometimes children.

      It is not that these areas are not extremely dangerous, they just dont care.

    12. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet you not only read it, you commented on it. Which means that whether or not it's news it got your attention and Slashdot got its ad revenue.

      I love you little bitches who come into a thread just to announce to everybody their banal opinion that it shouldn't be here in the first place, as if you have any part in the decision (hint: you don't). You have a problem with what gets posted here, go the fuck somewhere else. I guarantee you that NOBODY is going to miss you and the entire site will be short one fucking loser. Win-win if you ask me.

    13. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by rwven · · Score: 1

      Take your own advice. Moron.

    14. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by treeves · · Score: 1

      That's only funny when it follows a comment related to size or duration or the like, such as:

      Guy: I was in there waaay too long!
      Second guy: That's what SHE said!

      or

      Guy: I brought them a sample but they said it was too small.
      Second guy: That's what SHE said!

      Keep working on it , you'll get the hang of it.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    15. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep working on it , you'll get the hang of it.

      That's what SHE said!

    16. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by cavreader · · Score: 1

      If the occupying military took the blow-them-the-fuck-up-and-ask-questions-later approach there would be about 100 people left living in Afghanistan.

    17. Re:Now THAT is sacrifice for science, brother by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 1

      While expressed poorly, he does have a point. *You* are the one who decided to comment on this thread moaning about how "this is not news". I found the article fascinating and had never considered that amateur astronomy would even exist under these conditions. Yes, people buy goods, make love, school their children in war-zones... but how many of them love science enough to risk getting killed by the local police, warlords, an occupying force and local tribesmen? It's news, deal with it.

  2. Wow such insight! by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow such an insightful article. Who would have thought that it would be dangerous in a country that has been a war zone for over 2 decades?

    1. Re:Wow such insight! by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1

      Yea, this has nothing to do with armature astronomy. These woes are just a fact of life in Afghanistan no matter what you're trying to do.

    2. Re:Wow such insight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Decades? Give that another order of magnitude or two, for good measure.

    3. Re:Wow such insight! by rwven · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I just said as much in a reply to another comment. Going to the grocery store or market for these people is probably harrowing in many places... This isn't an article about astronomy.

    4. Re:Wow such insight! by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, there are automated drones flying around with sensors for detecting ruby coated optics. You could be targetted a lot easier doing astronomy than, say, picking carrots.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:Wow such insight! by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1

      Military optics are specially coated to protect from eye damage from the 633nm "ruby red" laser in military rangefinders. It wouldn't make sense to coat amateur astronomy gear with that. So probably no worries on being detected by a drone because of your astronomy equipment.

    6. Re:Wow such insight! by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      Its been four decades. And I've been harassed by police while using my telescope too.

    7. Re:Wow such insight! by jasomill · · Score: 1

      It's not news? It's not insightful? It's not about astronomy? It's a human interest story about the difficulties amateur astronomers face in a war zone, so it might be interesting to some humans — those who regularly visit an astronomy news site, say.

      It's clearly very hard to get a "fair and balanced" perspective on foreign conflicts from news stories alone, so I'd argue this sort of reporting is quite important even if one dismisses the "entertainment value" entirely.

      Incidentally, these astronomers deserve support from anyone truly interested in "fighting terrorism," for providing constructive alternative forms of "excitement." Terrorists are no different than anyone else in that their actions are quite often motivated by the desire to "find something interesting to do with their lives." And the fact that astronomy encourages science education, yet has deep roots in both Islamic and Western cultural traditions, is a nice bonus.

    8. Re:Wow such insight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One should also be concerned about those anxious, stimulant driven party people with funny hats saying comeonletmeshootthemnow while driving their cross hairs to something that is clearly a RPG. They just can't stand looking the gatherings of the local astronomy youth clubs without trigger finger spasms as they really just wanted to join the dance.

    9. Re:Wow such insight! by rwven · · Score: 1

      Did you really just invoke foxnews? Hasn't that been added to Godwin's law by now?

  3. Use the right 'scope' by DoomHamster · · Score: 1

    Also, be aware that these are not telescopes.

  4. If you're doing nothing wrong... by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

    FTFA:

    “We explained that we are astronomers, but the local police commander approached so to be sure that we are not terrorists and that our telescope had no military application and it is not a rocket launcher. We invited him to watch M4 Star Cluster, but he didn’t like it and said that his own binocular is more powerful. He told us were a group of half-witted and nothing else. One of the police registered our names and listed all our equipment.”

    Yeah this is Afghanistan, the commander was power-tripping, and western police as a whole are 100x better behaved, but the above is yet another example of the idiotic fallacy of "If you've done nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide" that authoritarians love trotting out to justify increased police powers and intrusions.

    1. Re:If you're doing nothing wrong... by TheCarp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Its funny, I almost said this to a cop yesterday.

      I saw that his car (parked in the "police parking only" spot had an expired inspection sticket, so I snapped a couple of quick photos as a "concerned citizen". He came running over to question me.... ROTFL he even asked "who is paying you" LOL!.

      Next day I walk by, he has a new inspection sticker (unlike about 10 other cars, including cruisers in the same lot).

      I was totally kicking myself for not tossing in a "if you have done nothing wrong...."

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:If you're doing nothing wrong... by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      FTFA:

      “We explained that we are astronomers, but the local police commander approached so to be sure that we are not terrorists and that our telescope had no military application and it is not a rocket launcher. We invited him to watch M4 Star Cluster, but he didn’t like it and said that his own binocular is more powerful.

      And he could have been right. Take any cheap beginner telescope that parents will get for their kids (likely what is available in Afghanistan) and 8 out of 10 times a simple pair of binoculars will be better suited as well as not as frustrating to use on the likely cheap mount with the scope.

      While looking at the M4 with my 13" dobsonian is nice, many times for general viewing, especially for others, guests, and novices, a good pair of binocs are better.

    3. Re:If you're doing nothing wrong... by vlm · · Score: 1

      Yeah this is Afghanistan, the commander was power-tripping, and western police as a whole are 100x better behaved,

      Sometimes.

      Try again in the us as a non-white, or not an obvious "dad trying to educate his kids", let us know how it goes, assuming they don't shoot you.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:If you're doing nothing wrong... by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Cops in Afghanistan have a good excuse to be paranoid. There legitimately are thousands of people trying to murder them and their loved ones, every day. A cop asking questions, and then registering the names and equipment of the people, really doesn't seem bad at all. If those people had been setting up a rocket launcher, and the cops saw it and did nothing, wouldn't that be far worse?

      Western police don't have that excuse.

    5. Re:If you're doing nothing wrong... by PickyH3D · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, because in the US it is frequent for asians, blacks and latinos to be questioned, beaten or shot for carrying a telescope. American police are regularly overzealous, and many times they are just downright stupid, but I have never once heard of someone struggling to explain telescopes. In fact, I used to live near a mountain peak that was frequented by all kinds of people for amateur astronomy without problems from the police. And the police were pretty stupid in that city.

      This type of fear and expectation of racism that many people present breeds racism itself. It absolutely causes tensions that otherwise would not exist.

    6. Re:If you're doing nothing wrong... by OldSoldier · · Score: 2

      Some minor harassment happens in the US too. We were doing a star viewing event at a local elementary school. There were perhaps 3 big dobsonians and 2 or so smaller scopes, 20-30 people in the ball field of this school at 10:00 in the fall (so it was very dark, well past sundown) and somehow a police helicopter started circling us. We figured some neighbor must have called about some activity in the school and maybe there was a helicopter already near by so the local authorities dispatched it instead of a squad car. Thing is, it wasn't a quick fly-by. It circled us about 10 times, but otherwise left us alone. No police lights, no spot light, no loud speaker announcement, just 10 very noisy circles of our location then it went away.

      I think unusual activity of any kind gets noticed and "inspected" these days.

    7. Re:If you're doing nothing wrong... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      They didn't have anything to hide and nothing happened to them, if you're trying to make a point make it, but getting someone checking out out because you have high end optics on a tripod on the top of a mountain ... IN A FUCKING WARZONE is not exactly an odd thing to ask.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    8. Re:If you're doing nothing wrong... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2

      Yeah this is Afghanistan, the commander was power-tripping, and western police as a whole are 100x better behaved,

      Sometimes.

      Try again in the us as a non-white, or not an obvious "dad trying to educate his kids", let us know how it goes, assuming they don't shoot you.

      Actually, even if you take a handful of suburbanite friends out into the country and set up a decent-sized tripod mounted telescope pointed skyward and wait, pretty soon the cops will be by demanding what the hell you think you're doing. Even though it should be pretty damn obvious from the equipment and star charts and red-lens fashlights what the hell you're doing. I can only imagine how much worse it would be if the astronomers were non-white.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    9. Re:If you're doing nothing wrong... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Why do you think it's a justification?

      It's not a justification. If you accept it as an attempt at justification, you are being distracted from finding the real justification and proving it right or wrong.

      The fact is, those who are most worried about legal advancements in intrusion are those who have done something wrong and do have something to hide. And they fight the technology and techniques. Instead of fighting to ensure that these things are only used legally, they try to fight them being used at all. Which does nothing to help the innocent and everything to help the criminal.

      Don't hate the drone. Make them have to get a warrant before they fly it over your house.

    10. Re:If you're doing nothing wrong... by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 1

      You were trespassing. Just because a school is state property doesn't make it open to the public. That was very nice of the police to leave you be after checking on you.

      I've been arrested for that before, but we weren't exactly star gazing.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    11. Re:If you're doing nothing wrong... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      I haven't had problems with cops while using telescopes, but when I was about ten or twelve, I had a lady freak out a bit because she though I was setting up some kind of mortar or rocket launcher. To be fair, she looked -- and sounded -- like she may well have been Vietnamese or Korean, so there's a good chance that she might have lived through some pretty horrific things, and I can understand how a reflector telescope at night might resemble a mortar to someone who doesn't use either one on a regular basis (but they aren't usually painted bright white...).

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    12. Re:If you're doing nothing wrong... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      You know what the difference between a telescope and a mortar is? The stuff inside the tube.

      If you're in a warzone, checking up on a group of people setting up a tube on a tripod is a perfectly reasonable thing to do.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    13. Re:If you're doing nothing wrong... by OldSoldier · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry... should have mentioned that this was done with the cooperation of school officials.

      So, we were NOT trespassing. Although I do wonder if someone called the school officials and double checked and that's what called off the 'copter.

    14. Re:If you're doing nothing wrong... by phme · · Score: 1

      Did you have a :look at the pictures they took that night? That's no cheap beginner scope. Looks like a decent polar-mounted 8" SC with at least a good DSLR camera. The guy is not the typical stargazer, and believe me (I'm there right now), you don't find easily these scopes in the shops in Kabul. This might very well be the best (civilian) scope in the country.

  5. The Dangers Of Amateur X In Afghanistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fill in X with anything.

    1. Re:The Dangers Of Amateur X In Afghanistan by obergfellja · · Score: 1

      Fill in eX with anything you say?

  6. Poor astronomers, poorer dogs by swanzilla · · Score: 1
    FTA:

    But their adventures weren’t over for the night. Next, a pack of dogs approached and began barking loudly. Aghaei said they dispersed the dogs by inventing a new application for green laser pointers.

    Bothersome dogs? Nothing a little permanent eye damage can't remedy.

    1. Re:Poor astronomers, poorer dogs by vlm · · Score: 1

      FTA:

      But their adventures weren’t over for the night. Next, a pack of dogs approached and began barking loudly. Aghaei said they dispersed the dogs by inventing a new application for green laser pointers.

      Bothersome dogs? Nothing a little permanent eye damage can't remedy.

      I suspect its more like the "cat trick" where the chase the dot of light. Never tried it on dogs, probably works pretty well.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Poor astronomers, poorer dogs by hellkyng · · Score: 4, Informative

      It works EXTREMELY well on most dogs. In fact my dog goes absolutely crazy for it, like crack fiend crazy. She gets so excited she shakes, and that is just when I reach near the box that the laser pointer is in. Then she will run until she passes out, literally, chasing the thing. And finally she goes into withdraw if she doesn't get it for a few days. Like crying, shaking, skittish angry withdraw. She has been clean about two months now, I'm tired of the damn thing.

    3. Re:Poor astronomers, poorer dogs by blair1q · · Score: 2

      Y'know, if, up on a table in the living room, you had a salt-water aquarium...and if, in that aquarium, you had a small, you know, shark... and if, on that shark, you put a harness...

      (do this in a Cristopher Walken voice and just try not to laugh.)

    4. Re:Poor astronomers, poorer dogs by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      My dogs are far more excited to chase the laser pointer than my cat.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    5. Re:Poor astronomers, poorer dogs by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      FTA:

      But their adventures weren’t over for the night. Next, a pack of dogs approached and began barking loudly. Aghaei said they dispersed the dogs by inventing a new application for green laser pointers.

      Bothersome dogs? Nothing a little permanent eye damage can't remedy.

      If there's one thing that makes standing around in a warzone full of special forces US troops safer, it's waving a laser pointer around erratically in the dark whilst setting up a device that looks a lot like a mortar.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
  7. Actually Islam is pro astronomy by perpenso · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... where the Koran-thumpers cut people's heads off ...

    In the middle ages muslims thought very highly of astronomy, so why would the guys wanting to base their society on that era be against astronomy?

    Some of the scientific work was done in central asia, if not Afghanistan then next door. Perhaps you've noticed that some stars and astronomical terms are arabic in origin.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomy_in_medieval_Islam

    1. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by royallthefourth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And don't forget that before the CIA created the Afghan Mujahideen 30 years ago, Afghanistan was a normal society with things like education, electricity, sanitation and equal rights for women (at least in the urban areas). Now those cities and the infrastructure that supported them have been bombed beyond recognition. But of course, none of that matters nearly as much as anticommunism and counterterrorism.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Afghan_Crowd_Circa_1980.png

    2. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, these days the Taliban and their radical ilk seem more interested in using science to blow shit up than in building up their culture. If you ever find yourself in a position of blowing up ancient statues because they might anger your sky god, that's a pretty good hint that your society has regressed significantly in its intellectual sophistication.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget that before the CIA created the Afghan Mujahideen 30 years ago, Afghanistan was a normal society with things like education, electricity, sanitation and equal rights for women (at least in the urban areas). Now those cities and the infrastructure that supported them have been bombed beyond recognition. But of course, none of that matters nearly as much as anticommunism and counterterrorism.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Afghan_Crowd_Circa_1980.png

      I think you mean to say it was the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan that created the Mujahideen, and destroyed all that "infrastructure". If you were intellectually honest that is.

    4. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      ...so why would the guys wanting to base their society on that era be against astronomy?

      They're not against the astronomy so much as they are against suspicious activity. The guy with the telescope could be (and most likely is) stargazing, or as far as they're concerned he could be scoping out the ideal vantage from which to snipe a government official. Nobody trusts anyone.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    5. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      In the middle ages muslims thought very highly of astronomy, so why would the guys wanting to base their society on that era be against astronomy?

      Because Tamerlane and his troops went in and killed everyone but the peasonts.

      What was left was a bunch of ignorant peasants who mostly fear the learning that was once prized in the Islamic world.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    6. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

      That's not the only reason they blew up the statues. They did the final deed after being insulted that they were offered money for the statues but not to fix their crumbling country.

      When the Afghani head council asked them to provide the money to feed the children instead of fixing the statues, they refused and said, 'No, the money is just for the statues, not for the children'. Herein, they made the decision to destroy the statues

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhas_of_Bamiyan#Dynamiting_and_destruction.2C_March_2001

    7. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, these days the Taliban and their radical ilk seem more interested in using science to blow shit up than in building up their culture. If you ever find yourself in a position of blowing up ancient statues because they might anger your sky god, that's a pretty good hint that your society has regressed significantly in its intellectual sophistication.

      Blowing up the Buddhist statues was a major crime in my book but Islam *never* approved of statues or paintings depicting humans, even at its scientific and mathematic peaks. Astronomy doesn't seem to cross any religious line as far as I know. I think the problems with astronomy are more practical, in a war zone people wonder if that telescope is a spotting scope (neither side wants to be observed), a rocket launcher, etc. Waving around green lasers can also be troublesome.

    8. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently it is pro-goatse too.

    9. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by squidguy · · Score: 0

      CIA didn't create the Muj, the Soviet invasion did.

    10. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by x6060 · · Score: 1

      We send quite a bit of aid to Afghanistan and all of that money seems to be filtered off by corruption before it ever reaches anyone actually in need. So Whos to say that money wouldnt have had a similar fate?

    11. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by royallthefourth · · Score: 2

      Because the Soviets didn't create those Mujahideen; it was the American response to the Soviet intervention to remove an incompetent and dangerous head-of-state next door (Amin). The backwards people in the hills wouldn't have amounted to anything the Red Army couldn't deal with if they hadn't trucked in foreign radicals to do the serious fighting, which wouldn't have happened without the CIA collaborators in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.

    12. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by x6060 · · Score: 1

      I would mod you up if I had the points. =\

    13. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, I guess he is quite right. The Islamic fundies are imported, they didn't "grow" there. The US (more specifically, the CIA) ported them over to Afghanistan in the 80s, mostly from the Arabian Peninsula. Which served two goals at once, you got rid of the Islamists in the "important" areas like the oil regions (imagine, another Iran... Saddam couldn't have waged a two front war for us, against Iran AND Saudi Arabia) and the poor sods went on to fight the godless Russkies for us too. Worked like a charm, really.

      I guess the US then somehow managed to double cross their former friends when the Russians didn't want to play the evil Commies anymore and became our ... well, not quite friends, but no longer "teh evilz" and that pissed Ozzy enough for that 9/11 stunt. I mean, it's not like the US don't simply dump their buddies when they're no longer convenient. For reference, see Saddam.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er...Jimmy Carter wanted to coax soviet union into attacking afghanistan because the afghan govt was friendly with russia.. so yes, in a way, it is America's own doing.

    15. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kinda...see 24m20s (great video by Neil deGrasse Tyson)
      The middle-east region had a great period for astronomy (and art, math, biology etc). Which was then followed by al-Ghazali - who brought the world Sufism.
      So it was in spite of Islam that the region did so well, not because of it.

    16. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation?

    17. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by magarity · · Score: 1

      They're not against the astronomy so much as they are against suspicious activity. The guy with the telescope could be (and most likely is) stargazing, or as far as they're concerned he could be scoping out the ideal vantage from which to snipe a government official. Nobody trusts anyone.

      No, when the local police commander who has come to check them out calls them a group of half wits for doing a little astronomy that's not just against suspicious activity, it's macho backwater anti-intellectualism.

      I bet there are some US service members at that nearby big base who are interested in astronomy. This group needs to find one to help out with coordinating viewings with patrols so they don't have to worry so much about getting shot.

    18. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Jimmy Carter? Or the CIA boss, George Bush? Does it even matter? The whole thing is just another opium war.. That brown Mexican stuff was shit.. China White is where it's at

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    19. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the Soviets didn't create those Mujahideen

      Talk about revisionist history. Total bullshit. They existed strictly BECAUSE of the Soviet invasion. The CIA went looking for people to back. Guess who they found. If you think the CIA has the power to create armies out of thin air, you are smoking crack. The CIA's standard policy, which has been in place at least as long as the 50s, is to support those who have already shown they are capable of supporting whatever endeavor the CIA finds of value. Next, you train them and supply them with weapons. That's it. Period.

    20. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by zill · · Score: 1

      I think you mean to say it was the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan that created the Mujahideen, and destroyed all that "infrastructure". If you were intellectually honest that is.

      The Mujahideen was mostly foreign fighters funded by foreign powers using foreign weapons. I failed to see why the Soviet would want to create such a situation.

    21. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the Soviets didn't create those Mujahideen

      Talk about revisionist history. Total bullshit. They existed strictly BECAUSE of the Soviet invasion.

      GP and P have it both wrong The rebels existed and were supported by CIA before the Soviets deployed troops in Afghanistan see here:

      Former CIA director and current Secretary of Defense Robert Gates wrote in his memoirs From the Shadows that the U.S. intelligence services began to provide financial aid to the rebel factions in Afghanistan six months before the Soviet deployment. [emphasises mine]

      Besides: The Soviets where not eager to get drawn into this civil war:

      The Afghan government, having secured a treaty in December 1978 that allowed them to call on Soviet forces, repeatedly requested the introduction of troops in Afghanistan in the spring and summer of 1979. [...] They repeated these requests and variants to these requests over the following months right up to December 1979. However, the Soviet government was in no hurry to grant them.

    22. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am the actual son of an actual ex-Mujahiddeen from Afghanistan, and I second that. Afghanistan was not sand and dirt. Not at all. It was beautiful and green, with the best irrigation system in the world... or so I'm told by my dad. Fact is, they even had plantations with huge water melons, enough to eat, schools, culture, and life wasn't bad at all. Maybe a bit more primitive, but far from a backwards shithole.

      But you got one thing wrong: Soviet Russia was invading Afghanistan at that time. And the US gave them weapons "to defend themselves".
      Of course, it actually was the US and Russia fighting it out with the lives of others, but oh well... It's not as if you'd complain if somebody gives to weapons to defend against an invasion. ^^

      In the end, they lost. Everybody who invades Afghanistan loses. Always. No exceptions. That's kinda an inside-joke in Afghanistan. But it's not because of the human defenses. It's because of the terrain itself.

      What fucked things up, is Karzai being so massively evil, that the Taliban looked good in comparison. That's why they came to power in the first place. And guess who the US set up as the leader again? That's right! Karzai! Including his drug-lord bastard of a brother.

      So now people plant poppy instead of food, as it brings 10 times the money. But no sustainability.

      If you want to do one good thing, give them Internet access wherever you can. One mobile phone tethered to a router with a bit of bandwidth optimization/compression/filtering and a few cheap terminals will do wonders to to a town. No, illiteracy wouldn't prevent those children from "getting" the net. If Afghani children want something, they don't think about if they can do it. They simply do it. :) Like learning to read and write a foreign language, and sharing stuff on YouTube.

    23. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      . Afghanistan was not sand and dirt. Not at all. It was beautiful and green, with the best irrigation system in the world... or so I'm told by my dad. Fact is, they even had plantations with huge water melons, enough to eat, schools, culture, and life wasn't bad at all. Maybe a bit more primitive, but far from a backwards shithole.

      But if you look at how this was largely achieved, especially the infrastructure development after 1950s onward - it was in large part paid by Soviet money and done by Soviet specialists. Ever since independence, Afghani governments have generally tried to stay on the good side of Soviets (Afghanistan was one the first countries in the world to establish official diplomatic relations with Soviet Russia in 1919, for example) - which made sense, considering the common border - and that paid off. Quote:

      "Soviet engineers were involved in constructing a total of 142 industrial and infrastructure facilities in Afghanistan in 1952-1988, with funds provided by the Soviet government, the paper said. The Pul-i-Kumri hydropower plant on the Kunduz River, the Naglu dam on the Kabul River and a nitrogen fertilizer plant in the city of Mazar-e-Sharif are among the facilities, as well highways, power lines, and gas and oil pipeline networks."

    24. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Actually, one could make the claim to preserve the statues, as Shaykh Qaradawi did when he flew to Afghanistan to try and intervene. Egypt still has the Sphinx, for example, and the Quran says to go travel the world and see the ruins of civilizations gone by. The Taliban wanted them destroyed because essentially Buddhists hadn't lived in Afghanistan for centuries and since they weren't being used, they saw it as ok and unoffensive to destroy the idols.

    25. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by perpenso · · Score: 1

      ... the Quran says to go travel the world and see the ruins of civilizations gone by ...

      Ruins are not necessarily preserved in tact. For example when christian constantinople was conquered by muslims the mosaics were plastered over in the cathedral.

    26. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What fucked things up, is Karzai being so massively evil, that the Taliban looked good in comparison. That's why they came to power in the first place. And guess who the US set up as the leader again? That's right!

      Hamid Karzai was just a Foreign Minister under Rabbani before the Taliban took power. Before that, he was a CIA lackey based in nearby Pakistan during the Soviet occupation. His father was a member of parliament until the Taliban assassinated him. Neither held the reins prior to the Taliban.

      Can't disagree with anything else in your post, though.

      - T

    27. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blowing up the Buddhist statues was a major crime in my book

      I wonder how Buddhist really reacted to the news around the world? I didn't even flinch as it is the responsibility of the Taliban soldiers to find their path and perhaps seeing the statues for a brief while before they where blown was indeed the first step. The crime was indeed that of destroying common cultural heritage of mankind, which was on the other hand just stone organized and carved into a particular configuration to portray ideas and focus the attention of those present at the time.

    28. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by Lobachevsky · · Score: 1

      The Taliban are based more circa-1700s, whereas the "golden age" for the Middle East was closer to 700-1200 AD (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Golden_Age) Whenever a group looks backward and tries to be old-fashioned, they never pick a particularly advanced, progressive period. None of the right-wing "return America to how it used to be" folks want the 1960s with hippies, civil rights, and space exploration, even though 1960 is definitely old-fashioned as it was a half-century ago. They rather have the 1980s wall street 'greed is good' or the 1940s 'white man in charge' eras. In essence, the folks who look back always pick a very rigid, uncreative era. The creative don't look back, they just create and build anew.

    29. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by CarbonShell · · Score: 1

      If everything is true (sorry this is the internet and ./) I would mod you up, if I could.
      I also agree whole heartedly with everything you say.

      Sadly, when defending from one bastard, simply because he is the enemy of your enemy, you often wind up supporting another bastard.
      And yet we are surprised that the people that get caught up in the center of it do not trust us ...

      I also 100% agree with the statement about the internet. Freely available information is the WORST enemy of any government.
      We should not boycott countries, we should actively promote getting the tech they need.
      This helped North Africa rebel (though the results might not turn out to be what we hope).

    30. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      I was specifically thinking of the Jai Singh observatories in Mughal India, but going to Wikipedia reveals a list of very old observatories, many of which are indeed in Central Asia.

      (I'd be somewhat dubious of some of those claims for stone circles etc as "observatories". While some astronomical or calenderic function is very likely, calling them "observatories" seems a bit strong, from what I've seen of dozens of them.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    31. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by perpenso · · Score: 1

      ... the 1960s with hippies, civil rights, and space exploration, even though 1960 is definitely old-fashioned as it was a half-century ago. They rather have the 1980s wall street 'greed is good' or the 1940s 'white man in charge' eras ...

      I don't think the "recent" decades are as simple as you suggest. What you see accomplished in a generation is not necessarily the accomplishment of that generation's children or new way of thinking or new perspective. The 1960s hippies did not put anyone on the moon, well besides themselves on an acid trip. :-)

      The space exploration of the 1960s was not accomplished by the children of the 60s, it was accomplished by the children of the 40s and 50s that you seem less fond of. The 80s that you are not so fond of was actually the product of the children of the 60s and 70s. As a product of the 80s I can assure you that we were not running wall street. My generation's thing would be better characterized as being the generation truly inspired by Apollo, we were the very young impressionable minds that soaked it up as inspiration, in 1st grade we all knew why we needed to study math and science. The older generations were set in their ways, we were blank slates during Apollo. One manifestation of this was being utterly amazed at computers moving from behind glass walls with attendants who you offered your program to and who would later return the printout of your codes's results (OK only one mainframe at my university worked this way, the minicomputers had terminals and local printers in the lab) to appliance sized things sitting on your desk that were entirely yours. Program it, give or sell that program to others, ... or for the less technical use the computer as part of your daily work and play. Apologies for the focus on the 80s but that's the only generation I can speak for.

    32. Re:Actually Islam is pro astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mujahideen was mostly foreign fighters funded by foreign powers using foreign weapons. I failed to see why the Soviet would want to create such a situation.

      Your ignorance of history is appalling. The tribes were in open revolt against the puppet communist government before the Soviet invasion. They were the backbone of the Mujahideen. Fleeing to Pakistan to escape annihilation does not making you Pakistani. They had their share of foreign fighters, but to say that such foreign fighers were the majority is simply laughable.

      The Soviets wanted to prop up a violent and despotic communist government. A government who had committed atrocities that are well documented. Had the Soviets not intervened, the communist government would have fallen. As a result, no need for the Mujahideen. Back to school for you.

  8. "I don't want to live on this planet anymore." by obergfellja · · Score: 1

    Yeah, well that is the cost of allowing war to dictate what goes in the ground. Koran-thumpers will hurt you and than ask questions later... that sounds like something we have here... Bible-thumpers who will blow up abortion clinics, or kill you if you don't fit into their way of thought (like that one guy who killed the abortionist that went to the same church because he felt the abortionist was in the wrong.

    Uneducated world, it is bigger than you think. I have ran into so many idiots in the states that I am thing "I don't want to live on this planet anymore." - http://s3.amazonaws.com/kym-assets/photos/images/original/000/126/314/3cd8a33a.png?1306264975 It is a shame.

    Upside, little to no light pollution. I would kill for that (no pun intended).

    1. Re:"I don't want to live on this planet anymore." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like one of those idiots your talking about, crazy huh? Not really, this is slash idiot so you fit right in. Nice you hate bible thumps and Muslims.

    2. Re:"I don't want to live on this planet anymore." by obergfellja · · Score: 1

      and there is the proof why I don't want to live on this planet anymore. Thank you for proving my point.

  9. The can see the moon! by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I spoke to a man that was a college graduate out of Kabul when I was in Golestan, Farah Province, Afghanistan.

    He asked, "Which country is better, the USA or Afghanistan?"
    I replied "I think the USA is a better country."
    "Why?"
    "We have paved roads everywhere, and every house has electricity and running clean water." Only SLIGHTLY off, but it gets the idea across.
    "I think Afghanistan is a better country because I know that those things are impossible. And we have beautiful gardens and can see the moon."
    "We have gardens in America, and we can see the moon, too"
    "I know you are lying, because I have been to college and you cannot see the moon from America."

    This is a true story. Obviously, the dangers of astronomy in Afghanistan are worth the risk, because we cannot see the moon.

    1. Re:The can see the moon! by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Which is why NASA gave up on going to the moon. We can't see it, and we got tired of risking astronauts and spacecraft on blind shots.

      And the moral of the story is..... "Hard science is hard."

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:The can see the moon! by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Assuming this Afghani wasn't yanking your chain for laughs, that's a serious issue. I'm speaking of the ignorance and hopelessness entrenched in this mans head. I don't blame him either. Conflict is part of their culture. It was there from the moment he was born, and perhaps long after he's dead. Hell, may last another thousand years. Maybe a million. No, what these people need are a bunch of terminals air-dropped into villages with SATCOM uplinks. Hell, it might even be cheaper that the money we've spend so far on this theater of war. Shower them with knowledge, and let God sort it out. It sure wont stop the immediate violence, but I'd bet the ROI would be better in helping them help themselves.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:The can see the moon! by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As far as I could tell he was dead serious. He didn't believe that we could have paved roads everywhere and electricity and clean running water everywhere. He thought that I was yanking HIS chain.

      And I agree, it's not his fault at all. It's simply what he's been taught, and it's unfortunate that he doesn't have access to learning materials outside of his instructors.

    4. Re:The can see the moon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea except when the most trusted man in each community says on behalf of the power brokers "the information that the infidels are air dropping and passing onto you are all lies and you will be punished for reading the devils work." or similar things like that.

      The concept is strong but it would take even longer and even more humanitarian disaster (scary i know), should such a strategy come into action to win the hearts and minds.

      This plan would take centuries most likely. Books and access to information wont help people forget the air strikes, constant occupation by foreign powers who are now dropping information that so conveniently doesn't have a bad word to say about them. They also wont forget "lets scalp some raghead" soldiers who we also never have a bad word to say since they're serving our countries even if they are douchebags any time soon. (im not talking propaganda im talking our actual history reference books, (history written by the winner and all that jazz))

      There are also plenty of extremists for all sorts of reasons in the west, and they have access to all the information and it hasn't helped so many of them.

    5. Re:The can see the moon! by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Are you sure this wasn't a translation error and he meant stars? Was he surrounded by skyscrapers or something?

  10. Well they kind of look like an RPG by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    The article even mentions that their telescope was examined to make sure it wasn't a rocket launcher. This jives with what I think would happen if a bunch of guys went out at night with large tube like objects in that country. It does however sound like they still have to deal with light pollution, but from US bases.

    --
    Time to offend someone
    1. Re:Well they kind of look like an RPG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This jives with what I think

      *sigh* ... Not jive ...

      Definition of JIVE
      1
      : swing music or the dancing performed to it
      2
      a : glib, deceptive, or foolish talk

      You want this:

      Definition of JIBE
      intransitive verb
      : to be in accord : agree

  11. Shining green lasers around in a war zone ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Wow such an insightful article. Who would have thought that it would be dangerous in a country that has been a war zone for over 2 decades?

    Shining green lasers around in a war zone, what could go wrong?

  12. ...just not this particular flavor of it. by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the middle ages muslims thought very highly of astronomy, so why would the guys wanting to base their society on that era be against astronomy?
     

    ...because Wahabbism (the sect of Islam from which the likes of AQ and Taliban are based) isn't exactly out to bring back the days of classical scientific inquiry. The Wahhabist concept of Islam is a lot like Pol Pot's concept of Communism... skewed all to hell and not exactly what you would think, yet will claim to be the mantle and keeper of it.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:...just not this particular flavor of it. by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      skewed all to hell and not exactly what you would think, yet will claim to be the mantle and keeper of it

      That could be used to describe zealots of any stripe, especially religious but IMHO equally applicable to political and cultural zealots as well.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    2. Re:...just not this particular flavor of it. by sunderland56 · · Score: 2

      That would be like the world's leading proponent of democracy not allowing their own people to vote for their leader.

      Oh, wait....

    3. Re:...just not this particular flavor of it. by foobsr · · Score: 1

      ..because Wahabbism (the sect of Islam from which the likes of AQ and Taliban are based)

      Wahhabism is the dominant form of Islam in Saudi Arabia. (wikipedia)

      Well, think about it.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    4. Re:...just not this particular flavor of it. by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      I take it by your u/n you're a Mackem (I don't mean that as an insult; call me a Tackem if you want), so if you want to decide who leads Labour in the next GE it will cost you £41 p.a. and - paradoxically - only £25 p.a. if you're the only tory in the village. The liberals come cheap at twelve quid a year.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    5. Re:...just not this particular flavor of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wahhabism is the dominant form of Islam in Saudi Arabia.

      Saudis were the majority of attackers on 9/11.

      Well, think about it.

    6. Re:...just not this particular flavor of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet you're still killing civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq based on well-established lies. Over 6000 American service personnel and hundreds of thousands of civilians dead in both countries, all for a lie about weapons that didn't exist. A lie that you bought into because after being attacked by the Saudi's you wanted blood, you wanted revenge.

      Well, think about it. Or don't, that seems to be the American Way (tm).

    7. Re:...just not this particular flavor of it. by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Actually, Wahhabism is based in Saudi Arabia. The Taliban got their ideas from a more extreme offshoot of the Deobandi school in India. You can't link Wahhabism to Afghanis.

    8. Re:...just not this particular flavor of it. by Q-Hack! · · Score: 1

      all for a lie about weapons that didn't exist.

      I think you are mixing wars here. "Weapons that didn't exist" was Iraq... not Afghanistan. Otherwise, you are correct... we wanted revenge.

      --
      Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    9. Re:...just not this particular flavor of it. by arisvega · · Score: 1

      Saudis have been, and still are, the US's "friends" for decades now.

      Of course they mutilate people for minor offences, most of them leave in poverty, and they treat women horribly, but the remaining handful have so much oil to sell that this can be overlooked (--almost all of the French people I have spoken with genuinely believe that France is in Afghanistan to end corruption and liberate its citizens from oppression).

      Well, think about it.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  13. SO FUCKING LEAVE !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you don't like it, LEAVE !! We don't want your kind round here anyway !! Go back to fucking US of A or to whatever part of the third world you hail !!

  14. Moon showing by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

    Yeah, you don't wanna get caught out in the open mooning a sniper who'll put a shot right up Uranus.

    --
    I8-D
  15. Dangers of X in Afghanistan by necro81 · · Score: 1

    This is an interesting example. However, I think it fair to say that the headline could be made more generic:

    Dangers of [X] in [Country Wired in Civil War, Corruption, Insurgency, and Foreign Occupation]

  16. Heard: by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Well, I've never seen that comet before. Hey, I can see it moving! It's almost as if it's heading straight towar ^ `{ &.......[NO CARRIER]

  17. It's obvious really. by mr_lizard13 · · Score: 3, Funny

    They are plotting a terrorist attack on the moon.

    Bastards.

    --
    "We live in a global world" - Harvey Pitt, former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
    1. Re:It's obvious really. by Pope · · Score: 1

      We're Earthlings, we should blow up Earth things!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    2. Re:It's obvious really. by cosm · · Score: 1

      Now we have a reason to go there! I have an idea. Lets train TSA agents as astronauts and send them to the moon. Hell Mars too while we're at it. They can continue to be be the monkeys that they are to ensure that DHS secures the space frontier from intergalactic terrorist. Benefits everybody. Helps manned space exploration, gives the TSA an actual useful mission (although they would not know it from there 'new' mission statement), and I can lololol all the way to the space industry! Even better, have the government put all these agents on privatized corporate space-craft, so we grow the private-sector space exploration arena!

      It's not more ridiculous than their current method of operation. We have to save the children from intergalactic IEDs and space-boot bombers!

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    3. Re:It's obvious really. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      That would explain all those damned craters

    4. Re:It's obvious really. by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      CHA

  18. Oh no! A snip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you do not step on a mine, you may have your head blown up for possible being a sniper, cool.

  19. Drunk dudes and skunks by ArmchairAstronomer · · Score: 1

    Here in Michigan we were once threatened by a bunch of drunk dudes who were out joyriding while we were out stragazing. Most of the time those type of guys were interested in getting a look through the scopes but these dudes were wacked. No harm came to anyone in this "incident". The only chemical weapons we ever encountered were wielded by the skunks. All in all much safer here.

    The Afghans get props for their dedication to the science. Lets hope it gets better not worse for them.

  20. dum fsck sand hog mussleems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who gives a fsck what happens in AssGhanistan.

  21. captain obvious by Canazza · · Score: 0

    Warzones are dangerous: More at 11.

    --
    It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
  22. zbignew brezinski by decora · · Score: 1

    was absolutely thrilled that the soviets invaded afghanistan. it would give them a 'vietnam' (never ending proxy war).

    although most of these posts on slashdot have left out Pakistan (especially the ISI) and India

    1. Re:zbignew brezinski by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brzezinski claimed the French press fabricated that quote. Carter approved arming Afghan resistance just before the Soviet invasion, but no arms were actually supplied until months later.

      - T

  23. thats a tall claim by decora · · Score: 1

    considering that a large number of those astronomers were avid muslims and used their calculations to help plan religious ceremonies.

    its like saying that indian astronomy survived 'despite hinduism'. alot of those guys were priests.

    1. Re:thats a tall claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch the video. Neil describes the issue a lot better than I can.
      But AFAIK, Hinduism isn't quite as destructive to the scientific process as Islam or Christianity.

  24. Arizona - not that much better by mike449 · · Score: 1

    In Arizona, I can not just go out to the middle of nowhere and set up my scope. There are land owners with shotguns. I have to arrange with them where I can set up. Otherwise they shoot first and ask questions later.
    And then there are scorpions and snakes. Granted, they are not as bad as landmines, but they are somewhat of a deterrent.

  25. And then, after the interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He went home, beat his wife and cut off her nose for looking at the reporter. Poor him.

  26. Just go further out ... by Kittenman · · Score: 1
    I just RTFA ... he went 20km from Kabul, and was close enough to a military base to get light pollution. Back when I was a lot more active astronomer than I am now, I used to head to a field some 10 km from my hometown (south of Auckland, NZ), which was way the hell away from everything anyhow. No light pollution, no passing strangers. I met a goat once, but that was it.

    Afghanistan is a lot more empty than NZ - he just needs to head out further. Maybe he was purposefully provoking some response to get the material for his article?

    --
    "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
  27. Stars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait... they can still see the stars? Sounds like we need to install some additional infrastructure to fix that! Streetlights for everyone!

  28. Re:Waaah, sucks to be an astronomer, doesn't it! by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    That's not "perspective", it's "fallacy"

    Just because "X" sucks more than "Y", that does not imply that "Y" doesn't suck, too.

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  29. Can we help? by notKevinJohn · · Score: 1

    I know the probability of them having internet access is pretty low, but if that were the case, and they wanted to do astronomy without having to go out into the danger zone, maybe the astronomy community with robotic telescopes around the world would be willing to donate time to help amateur astronomers in war torn regions? I know I could probably find a few hours of time here and there on the robotic scope I have access to.

  30. oh really by bhenson · · Score: 1

    so that was what they were doing before that rocket flew overhead. "Astronomy"

  31. AND NOTHING OF VALUE WAS STATED. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the fuck cares. Parking lots are waiting to be build on that land!

  32. How about flying a kite? by Kuranes · · Score: 1

    Same goes for kiting.

  33. An obvious problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A telescope can look a lot like a mortar - a hollow metal tube, mounted at a steep angle, open at the top. A typical astronomical telescope is mostly open space except for a large mirror at the base and an eyepiece arrangement - it even has an aiming scope on the side.

    It's understandable that people could get somewhat excitable if they think someone is setting up a mortar.