Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Plans iPad Competitor (and 2 New Kindles)

destinyland writes "Some time in the next 10 weeks, Amazon will release a new Android tablet device, which will compete directly with Apple's iPad, according to the Wall Street Journal. Amazon hopes to leverage the digital content they've already made available online — digital video, music, and ebooks, as well as their new app store for Android devices. The device will ship without a built-in camera, prompting one tablet watcher to report that 'it feels like Amazon is trying to strip it down and bring it in at the lowest cost possible.' Amazon will also release two new versions of the Kindle — one with a touch screen, and one at a lower price." Now if only they'd make it a proper e-reader by including a Pixel Qi (or similar) daylight-readable screen, I'd be sold.

102 of 145 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Going to be bombarded with users asking how to do things or to trouble shoot it, so have to learn ANOTHER set.

    WTF? Do you learn all the controls for their other devices too? "Oh yeah, you need to set spin cycle three to get jeans dry in your washing machine, now I just need to help Bob with his SatNav before I'll have a chance to look at your motorboat".

  2. Re:Ugh by Threni · · Score: 1

    It's an Android tablet, so it'll probably be as easy to use as other Android tablets, phones etc. Do you find Android devices complicated to use?

  3. Re:Price War? by Necroman · · Score: 1

    Doubt it. Samsung had to push out the release of their Galaxy Tab 10.1 because Apple's iPad 2 had better specs and they were able to sell it at a lower price.

    I wouldn't expect these devices to drop too much in price. The most this competition will do is cause tablet makers to produce lower end tablets.

    --
    Its not what it is, its something else.
  4. huh? by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Now if only they'd make it a proper e-reader by including a Pixel Qi (or similar) daylight-readable screen, I'd be sold.

    Huh? Make what a proper ereader? The Kindle? The kindle eInk is easily readable in broad daylight. It's useless in the dark.Or are you talking about the tablet? Your syntax is unclear. Please rephrase.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:huh? by awyeah · · Score: 1

      Yes, please elaborate. My kindle is the current generation and it's perfectly readable in broad daylight.

      --
      Why, no, I haven't meta-moderated lately. Thanks for asking!
    2. Re:huh? by gubers33 · · Score: 1

      Completely agree. I have read my Kindle on a the beach with zero clouds in the sky and bright as could be and it read like a book.

      --
      Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
    3. Re:huh? by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1

      I think what the parent wants is a full strength Android-based tablet/eReader with an eInk touchscreen. I would love to see that come to market!

    4. Re:huh? by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Presumably, destinyland is seeking a tablet which also has the the ability to be read in sunlight like a Kindle. This is set up as a competitor to the iPad, which doesn't behave particularly well in sunlight.

      It's a tablet rather than a dedicated e-reader, and since tablets can run programs that require fast response times (which the Kindle's screen can't do), they're hoping for the best of both worlds.

    5. Re:huh? by destinyland · · Score: 2

      Hey! Destinyland didn't say that. Timothy did.

      Sincerely,

      Destinyland

    6. Re:huh? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      He means the tablet. And it's a bad idea - it was already tried with Notion Ink Adam, and PQi was found very lacking compared to current generation of eInk in terms of contrast.

    7. Re:huh? by jfengel · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. Sorry about that; having the inane ramblings of a Slashdot editor attributed to me would be very upsetting.

    8. Re:huh? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It is very subjective. I find the refresh time and method on last-generation Kindles to be fast enough to not annoy me, but then I've been using eInk readers for over 3 years now.

      Anyway, no-one is proposing to use eInk for general-purpose tablets. My point was that adding PixelQi to a tablet will not magically make it a good e-reader - it's too low-contrast to read indoors, and in direct sunlight you'll get glare on the glass that'll also drown out the screen. At best, you're going to get something of roughly the same contrast as 3-year-old eInk readers, which is to say, not all that good. And, on the other hand, the quality of normal (non-reflective) mode will suffer.

      Best just stick to IPS as iPad does, and make a solid reader app. It's good enough for most, and us bookworms will buy a separate eInk device anyway, and consider the tablet on its merits as a tablet.

    9. Re:huh? by subreality · · Score: 1

      What the link doesn't explain is that the Pixel Qi doesn't have as good of contrast as eInk, and it's black and white when it's in reflective mode. For an ebook, I'd say that's a poor tradeoff. IMO the Kindle already has the best ebook display with current technology.

    10. Re:huh? by NotPeteMcCabe · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean it's a bad idea. It's a terrific idea—the current technology may not quite be there yet.

    11. Re:huh? by HJED · · Score: 1

      Maybe because all the screen aren't dodge, only some of them? When my first one broke, they sent me a new one international express post from the US (I live in Australia) and I didn't even have to send my old one back they just told me to throw it in the bin.

      --
      null
    12. Re:huh? by Tei · · Score: 1

      I have used a iPod and a iPad under horrible conditions of dust and dirty hands (don't ask), and the screen is readable.. mostly because is a glass (probably of a special type) and the screen is good, very, very, good.

      And I have used these machines to read long books, games, and browse, for very long hours, too.

      What you comment, is not a problem at all, ... at least for Apple devices, or devices with the quality of Apple hardware.

      --

      -Woof woof woof!

    13. Re:huh? by leenks · · Score: 1

      My iPad2 and iPhone4, like pretty much every colour LCD screen, are practically unusable outdoors in sunlight.

  5. Re:Ugh by Niris · · Score: 1

    They're generally easy to use, until someone has a problem and you have to find where different settings are that may be causing the issue, or if it's a problem with a specific app that doesn't want to play nice.

  6. Re:Ugh by Niris · · Score: 1

    Real job will be next year when I'm done with my degree, hence the last part in the signature.

  7. UI replacements on Android by tepples · · Score: 2

    Do you find Android devices complicated to use?

    Yes, when customizations by the manufacturer or carrier overcomplicate the UI. It's also complicated to find apps for entry-level Android-powered devices whose manufacturers don't pay Google for Android Market access.

  8. Re:Ugh by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    If they are not company owned why are you doing this?
    If they are company owned this sounds like something helpdesk grunts can handle.

  9. New Kindle.. we'll see by willoughby · · Score: 1

    No EPUB, no sd card slot... no sale.

    1. Re:New Kindle.. we'll see by p0p0 · · Score: 1

      EPUB is understandable, but software like Calibre can easily convert it to MOBI. SD Card is moot. The Kindle now comes with 4GB of memory. Few books are bigger then a few hundred kb, and you should use something else for music.

    2. Re:New Kindle.. we'll see by MimeticLie · · Score: 1

      and you should use something else for music.

      Why? Why is it preferable to carry around yet another device than to expect the same level of functionality provided by the Kindle's competitors?

    3. Re:New Kindle.. we'll see by chispito · · Score: 1
      Well, there is this:

      http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304569504576403291417417796.html#ixzz1S7TijLao

      "A spokeswoman for Amazon said, "We're working closely with Pottermore to make sure Kindle customers will be able to buy and read J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter books."

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    4. Re:New Kindle.. we'll see by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You already carry a device that can play music in your pocket - it's called a "cell phone".

    5. Re:New Kindle.. we'll see by LtGordon · · Score: 1

      I'm actually in the same boat where 4 GB and no expandability is less than ideal. I am a huge fan of being able to load and read PDF documents onto an e-reader, which can easily hit 20+ MB each.

    6. Re:New Kindle.. we'll see by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

      If this is true, paper books are pretty much dead to me.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    7. Re:New Kindle.. we'll see by dakameleon · · Score: 2

      Because a specialist device doesn't need to and shouldn't compete with more generalist devices?

      You can stick to the philosophy of "Do one thing, do it well" and still endure. Attempting to be a jack of all trades chasing competitors for ancillary features shouldn't be important if you know what you're selling should sell on its own merits.

      I use my Kindle for reading, and my iPhone for music - I charge my Kindle once a month, my iPhone daily. Two separate but complimentary devices.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    8. Re:New Kindle.. we'll see by willoughby · · Score: 1

      That SD card slot isn't just for capacity, it's also a separate partition. I can slide an SD card loaded with pirate copies of George Orwells "1984" into my Nook and Barnes & Noble can't even see them, much less delete them. With the Kindle... well, we know what happens. Amazon has the Kindle set up so they can see everything on it and take "appropriate action" ("but we'll never do it again")

    9. Re:New Kindle.. we'll see by Eskarel · · Score: 2

      Amazon also can't, and won't, do anything to the documents you manually put on your kindle, 1984 was yanked because it was sold by Amazon improperly, Amazon doesn't back up private documents, nor have they ever yanked them.

    10. Re:New Kindle.. we'll see by cachorro · · Score: 1

      Not a bad idea. I was considering buying my wife a reader for her birthday, and was comparing kindle to nook. Came across lots of postings on various websites about jailbreaking the nook and turning it into a not-so-bad android-based tablet for less money than any of the (then) current offerings. Almost bought a nook to play with, but I simply cannot justify owning a tablet as well as a laptop _and_ smartphone (N8). Can't imagine anything what would fall through the cracks that a tablet would catch. It might be perfect for someone else tho

    11. Re:New Kindle.. we'll see by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      I don't carry a cellphone. I have a PAYG that's been sitting in a drawer for 8 or 9 months now. I'll pull it out in a few weeks, as my wife's due date is approaching, but after the delivery, back in the drawer it goes.

      To be fair, I also don't own a Kindle.

  10. Kindle is black and white by tepples · · Score: 1

    The Kindle?

    Black and white. Is there a Kindle model with a daylight-readable screen useful for, say, children's picture books or other material that relies on color?

    1. Re:Kindle is black and white by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      What I'd like to see is a large color e-ink panel that can be cut to size and targeted at hobbyists. Doesn't need to be fast, even a refresh of a second or two would be alright.

    2. Re:Kindle is black and white by davester666 · · Score: 1

      They'll consider working on this once you've placed your deposit for the first shipment of 1 million of these panels.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  11. Re:kindle started it all by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No ti didn't. I mean is was out, but no one wanted a tablet' until the iPad. well, the VAST majority of people.

    They are not really comparable. one is a device designed for a specific task, the other is a multipurpose portable computer.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  12. Re:kindle started it all by Moridineas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What about the Newton? What about those brick thick tablets in the 90s/early 2000s that you could draw on?

    I have a Kindle and an iPad. I read books on both. The Kindle experience is, imho, far better. The Kindle is great, but the Kindle is not a general purpose tablet. The iPad is. It's absolutely fair to say that the iPad started the current tablet craze.

  13. Touchscreen....No Thanks! by Fool106 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Am I the only one who doesn't want a touchscreen kindle? I do not want to see my finger prints all over the screen while I try to read a book.

    1. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Am I the only one who doesn't want a touchscreen kindle? I do not want to see my finger prints all over the screen while I try to read a book.

      Ditto. I suspect most people demanding touchscreens have never actually used one for long.

    2. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It would still have physical keys to flip pages, I'd imagine (like all those Sony readers), which is what you use 99% of the time, so there wouldn't be many fingerprints. Touch would be for picking a book from the bookshelf, and also for browsing the book store - and it does make sense there.

      What worries me is whether they'll be able to maintain the high contrast ratio. When Sony went for touchscreens, their screens did become somewhat darker.

    3. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by steveg · · Score: 1

      You're not the only one. I was interested in the new Nook until I found it was a touchscreen.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
    4. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by mlts · · Score: 2

      You are not the only one. I much rather have buttons on a bookreader, especially for page turning, and not have to worry about fingerprints. The Kindle is a decent form factor for holding like a novel.

      The Kindle is a bookreader. Having Web browser functionality is nice, because sometimes clicking on a link in text to do something may prove fruitful.

      However, if the Kindle turns into a touch screen tablet, it will just be a face in a herd, and lose the usefulness that made it a sellout item in the first place. We have a ton of touch screen tablets.

      What Amazon should do instead is get the Kindle to work with the epub format, add a SD card slot, so if someone wants 32 GB, they can have it. Since Amazon also has a decent cloud store, why not offer to stream/download from that as well? This doesn't need anything fancy on the screen, although AT&T may not like Whispernet being used for this.

      Amazon should not lose what makes the Kindle great, and that is the ease of reading books with it, regardless of light. If they make the Kindle into another tablet, they will lose their market because they will be just another generic iPad competitor.

    5. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by steveg · · Score: 3, Informative

      When Barnes and Noble announced the new touchscreen Nook, one of my objections on various forums was about the reduction in clarity that came with touchscreens. A number of people told me that, while that was a problem with the 1st gen Sony touchscreens, the newer Pearl touchscreens used a different process and there was no optical penalty for the touchscreen part.

      You'd still have to deal with the fact that it's a touchscreen, and I'm not too enthusiastic about that, but it seems that clarity is no longer the problem it was.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
    6. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by Fool106 · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with trying to make Kindle another tablet! It's a book reader for god's sake. The one thing I want it to do it does well. I have the 2nd gen Kindle and did not want to buy the current generation since mine works great still. I wanted to skip a generation until I upgraded my Kindle. Now I'm not so sure I want to upgrade if they release a touchscreen version.

    7. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      That's good to hear!

      You'd still have to deal with the fact that it's a touchscreen, and I'm not too enthusiastic about that

      Why not, so long as they do the same think Nook did and keep the page flip buttons?

    8. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Used my iPhone for 2 years now. Bought parents an iPad2 a while back. I have no problems with fingerprints. The light from the screen usually diminishes the impact

      He was talking about a potential touchscreen Kindle. An e-ink device. There wouldn't be any light from the screen except reflected ambient light so what you're saying wouldn't apply.

    9. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      What Amazon should do instead is get the Kindle to work with the epub format, add a SD card slot, so if someone wants 32 GB, they can have it. Since Amazon also has a decent cloud store, why not offer to stream/download from that as well? This doesn't need anything fancy on the screen, although AT&T may not like Whispernet being used for this.

      Money, money, money: Amazon has no reason to put things in ePub because it owns the Mobipocket format and its DRM. (However, since Mobipocket is a clearly-described standard, I really can't figure out what it is that people want to do with ePub that they can't with Mobi - except check out library books.) Adding an SD slot costs money, and Amazon has been absolutely dedicated to getting the price down ASAP (it's almost certain that the device will experience a huge jump in purchases once it can be sold below $100). And streaming over Whispernet will never happen because Amazon has to pay AT&T for all that data usage - they'd have to charge a per-byte fee if it ever were used for anything more than book delivery and the very occasional Wikipedia lookup.

    10. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Oh, I didn't think Amazon would release an E-ink touch screen tablet to compete with ipad, even disregarding this fingerprint issue, the refresh rate would be unsatisfactory for anything else but reading books, and would be doubly bad for responding quickly to direct touch commands.

    11. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I read my kindle books on my nexus S, and I never notice a smudge.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And social media.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I like my old ipod touch, even with its smudges and fingerprints. I'd definitely be open-minded about buying another touch-screen device (but probably not from Apple).

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    14. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      You think library books explain the nigh-religious fervor with which people have sworn on here that they'll never buy a book reader that doesn't support ePub? Not to mention that those library books are going to have DRM...

    15. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by Fool106 · · Score: 2

      Because your fingers dont have any natural oils on it right? The kindle is also not backlit. It's e-ink.

    16. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by de_smudger · · Score: 1

      That's because in your case most of the the light is coming straight through, from the underneath the smudges - the kindle doesn't use a backlight, so light more often comes in at an acute angle and gets scattered by smudges making them more visible. I have an iPhone and a Kindle, and find I clean the Kindle screen for reading whereas I tend to notice iPhone smudges only when it's off.

    17. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by steveg · · Score: 1

      Because touchscreens have the habit of *doing* things when you touch them. I like to be able to handle my book reader without unintended things happening.
      I use a PocketBook 360 ebook reader. Some people complain that the page turn buttons are hard to push (they are!) I *like* that about it.
      I don't like touchpads on laptops that click when you touch them either.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
    18. Re:Touchscreen....No Thanks! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Hm, that is good point, actually. Come to think of it, whenever I try to read from a tablet, I often accidentally turn pages by tapping it somewhere.

      I think the best of both worlds would be to have a hardware switch that would completely disable the touch screen (much like the one iPad has that can be used to lock orientation). That way, you still have the convenience of touchscreen for navigating through the menus, shopping etc, but once you start reading, you disable it and use the hardware buttons.

  14. No sale until I have control by Anomalyst · · Score: 2

    Bozo will not have the ability to push his whims down my throat. I paid for it. It is MINE.

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    1. Re:No sale until I have control by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      As far as he's concerned it's just an Amazon Point-of-Sale -- to the extent that it'll probably be free or heavily subsidized to Prime members.

      I bet he's going to do a much better job delivering a quality Android tablet than Samsung or Verizon, however. Amazon is just much better at retailing good consumer experiences, like Apple.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    2. Re:No sale until I have control by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      If you turn the wireless off, he'll never know it exists. You don't even have to register it to an account in order to use it. Sideloads work just fine. It's yours to do with as you please.

    3. Re:No sale until I have control by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Then don't use whisper net.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  15. Re:Ugh by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's a lot of BS in Computer Science already we don't need any more.

  16. Re:Ugh by rwool · · Score: 1

    Another new tablet? Probably with a completely different UI than all the others. Going to be bombarded with users asking how to do things or to trouble shoot it, so have to learn ANOTHER set. Already sick of tablets and their non-standardization.

    no doubt there are more to come it will be at least a year (if we are lucky) if not longer before some type of standardization is used among all tablets

  17. Re:kindle started it all by jojoba_oil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No ti didn't. I mean is was out, but no one wanted a tablet' until the iPad. well, the VAST majority of people.

    They are not really comparable. one is a device designed for a specific task, the other is a multipurpose portable computer.

    I have trouble calling the iPad a computer. Can you save files on its harddrive? Not directly. Can you word process on it? Not really. Can you edit pictures on it? Not very effectively. Can you program/create things on it? Not that I've ever seen.

    Can you explain to me how it's a portable computer instead of an oversized phone? When would I need an iPad that I wouldn't be able to use a netbook?

  18. Re:Ugh by arisvega · · Score: 1

    Already sick of tablets and their non-standardization.

    Standardization is for insects.

    --
    The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  19. Re:Ugh by jojoba_oil · · Score: 1

    cheaper then the iPad to get all those people who want tables but the iPad is out of their price range.

    I may be dense, but why would anyone want an iPad for a table?

    Okay. It was a cheap shot. I'm sorry.

  20. Re:kindle started it all by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    The hell you can't save a file to the iPad.

    If you took 5-10 minutes and installed some apps, even free ones, you can do all the things you say you can't do on an iPad.

    Just because you don't have the patience or knowledge to do something doesn't mean it can't be done.

  21. Re:kindle started it all by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    You have to install an app to save things to your iPad? Wow I must get me one of those [/sarcasm]

  22. Re:Another tablet and a confusing product lineup by city · · Score: 1

    God forbid we have choices when buying a tablet.

    --
    I am a v1ral sig. Plse c0py me and h3lp me spread. Thank y0u?
  23. Interesting but by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    I will only buy one if they stop paying criminal blackmailers, Perhaps others do not want any of their cash being redirected towards protection rackets...

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    1. Re:Interesting but by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      They are paying Microsoft money following the blackmail claims that they were using (undisclosed) IP. This money is then used to blackmail other companies. That is why in many places paying protection money etc is against the law. It funds further such activity.

      Of course, if MS actually revealed what this IP is, people would then have the option to stop using it, or fighting the claim in the courts. Without that revelation, anyone who pays up are committing a criminal act. Except that that particular sort of blackmail seems to be more legal than when some smaller firm like the local criminals do it.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  24. Re:Ugh by rainmouse · · Score: 1

    Another new tablet? Probably with a completely different UI than all the others. Going to be bombarded with users asking how to do things or to trouble shoot it, so have to learn ANOTHER set. Already sick of tablets and their non-standardization.

    Apple are trying their hardest to get rid of standards, whether its trying to patent parts of HTML 5 or suing anyone with a vaguely similar UI. It's going to be hardly their own fault to not want to give half their profits to Apple via lawyers.

  25. Re:Another tablet and a confusing product lineup by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    "God forbid we have choices when buying a tablet."


    Choices? We have a deluge of devices trying to be based on a single platform while going to far trying to be there own propriety system. The Android market is a confusing mess.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  26. Re:kindle started it all by Telvin_3d · · Score: 2

    If you don't have any apps, what are you saving? The pictures you are not editing? The text files you are not writing?

  27. Re:Ugh by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I'm a little concerned about a company that sells electronic media, then on the whim of someone, reaches out and deletes said media from all of its client base. I think I'd wait on any purchase from Amazon...

  28. Hurray for Foxconn of Shenzhen! by retroworks · · Score: 1

    Along with "Polaroid", they have another "Manufacturer", called "Amazon", to contract assembly with. I can't wait to get the "Aunt Jemima", "Uncle Ben's" or "Cap'n Crunch" kindle.

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:Hurray for Foxconn of Shenzhen! by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Amazon doesn't claim to be a manufacturer. Additionally, your post makes little sense in English.

  29. Re:Ugh by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

    I'm a little concerned about a company that sells electronic media, then on the whim of someone, reaches out and deletes said media from all of its client base. I think I'd wait on any purchase from Amazon...

    It wasn't on a whim. Someone uploaded a copyright file to the Kindle Store that they did not have the right to do so with, thinking it was out of copyright. Technically it is out of copyright were the uploader resides (Canada), and should be out of copyright in the US, but that's another discussion entirely, and I think we'd all be preaching to the choir with that one. At the point they got a legal nastygram about the book, they were required to remove it. Not only that, to protect themselves from being a provider of stolen merchandise -- the closest analogue to what they unwittingly did -- they had to make a good faith effort to resolve the situation. The best way to do this was to send a remote file delete command. Was it an ideal solution? No. Ideally they would have sent an alert to those who bought the item giving them a few days notice, then deleted the item. I get them occasionally when my debit card craps out after I buy something off the Kindle store on the Kindle itself, it looks like a book with the title "There has been a problem with a recent purchase", letting you know you need to look at Amazon's account page for more information. They could have sent a similar one, "Urgent Notice Regarding your recent purchase of 1982" with a warning that the file was in fact, illegal, and they had to get rid of it. I know it's technologically possible -- now, anyway. It might not have been so at that time. I am under the impression that they made a good faith effort to appease the people who purchased the book, I seem to remember them offering free deadtree versions of the book for anyone who complained, but I might be wrong. But you do have to understand that Amazon's current business model is completely dependent on making good faith gestures towards the content resellers. If they pissed off a publisher and they said "welp, no more Kindle sales for us, we're going to do our own thing," then Amazon would be in trouble. This is the same reason Netflix is trying to pass off a huge price hike to it's users. Basically, Hollywood, being the oh so greedy and humble jackasses they are, are trying to push a 1200% license increase onto Netflix for streaming their content -- ultimately, the studios want to make as much as a theater ticket for each and every single person who streams a movie. Netflix can't really fight back, outside of trying to talk some sense into them (good luck with that), so they're just having to adjust and try to not go under before Hollywood gets a clue.

  30. Re:Ugh by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

    As a quick aside, there was a LOT more whitespace in that before Slashdot got ahold of it. Turning off the new slow-as-molasses ajax nightmare posting system royally breaks things.

  31. Re:Ugh by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    every hick and their family members are going to come over to ask questions on everything.

    You're a classist buffoon.

    The next time you look down your nose at a "hick," bear in mind he's probably thinking, "Thank God I've got a real job that let's me work normal hours and pays enough to raise a family -- not like that rude hipster stuck in retail."

  32. Misleading title by arisvega · · Score: 1

    If you (*clears throat*) RTFA, you will perhaps agree with me that instead of stating

    "Amazon Plans iPad Competitor (and 2 New Kindles)"

    it would be more appropriate to say

    "Amazon Plans 2 New Kindles (and iPad Competitor)"

    Anyway, given a fair price and connectivity, I am game if it;

    a) can be read under direct sunlight,

    b) has a refresh rate slightly above pathetic, and

    c) has a rudimentary operating system that I can mess around with (and am officially allowed to do so).

    A sensible set of demands I got there, would you not agree?

    --
    The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  33. Will they make a clean break from Google? by golemite · · Score: 1

    They have their own app store, music, movies and more. All they have to do is license a mapping app and this could be a major non Google Android device..

    --
    http://www.s4biturbo.com/
  34. Re:Ugh by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

    1982? The little known prequel? ;-)

  35. Re:kindle started it all by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

    Kindle isn't a tablet - it's a dedicated e-Reader. It has close to zero similarity to the tablet form factor - it's not a general computing device, it's not touch screen, etc, etc.

  36. Re:Ugh by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    Here's a suggestion (from a sysadmin with hiring power): spend less time getting worthless certifications and get a real job where you don't have to support consumer devices.

    Good change of subject. True management material. Deflect the issue and attack!

  37. Re:kindle started it all by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    Can you explain to me how it's a portable computer instead of an oversized phone? When would I need an iPad that I wouldn't be able to use a netbook?

    Simple. You're a techie, perhaps and old techie set in you ways, and you just don't see where computers are going. You're the IBM greybeard that could never imagine a computer in every home because they took up too much space, too much power, and ran specialized programs that no average person could want. Your phone probably is a already a computer with a phone function that does way more than your first computer ever did and better. What it does may not be what you want to do, but you are the minority. I'm sure you didn't listen to Steve Jobs last speech where he said he was trying to get rid of the file system. That there is no file system that can be viewed and manipulated isn't preventing the iPhone or iPad from being a computer, it's a feature that they are working hard to achieve. When it comes down to it, most people don't want to manipulate all 30k of their mp3s into their own folders organized how they want. They just want to load them into a program that does all that for them and play them. If the program in question doesn't work they way they want, they'll get a different program to handle all that for them. The iPad could run some sort of CLI and do all the things that computers used to do, but the consumers don't want that. Face it, the UI is changing. The filesystem and guts of a computer are being hidden from people, but that doesn't mean it's not a computer.

    For what you want, there will be special models, developer machines, pet projects for which, 99% of the world could care less about. Not saying I agree with it or like it, but that's how I see it. I was wondering when the iOS would crack and the demand for some sort of file system would force it to appear. However, after listening to Jobs speak, I know it won't. They will just put more effort into making sure all of that is handled in the background till it is not longer an issue.

    In car allegory, computers are moving from type that anybody with knowledge could work on and change the oil to the type that do what they are meant to do and when something goes wrong you take it into the shop where they have the tools to read the errors in the chips log and do everything for you. For those hobbiests that really want to work on their own engines and change their own oil, it will be possible with the right tools, special brands, or old models, but those won't matter to the majority of the market.

  38. A proper e-reader? by prowler1 · · Score: 1

    Personally I would prefer it is Amazon didn't package a number of their books with their DRM'ed proprietary format. I own a Kindle and think it is great for reading regular novels but not so great for technical resources (page refresh a bit to slow, jumping around not the easiest) and recently I purchased a technical book. I went to import it into Calibre and found I couldn't.

    I had to boot a Windows machine, install an old copy of the Kindle Reader, unplug the computer from the network to stop it auto updating and run a special script to convert the book to .mobi before I could read the book which I had purchased in my reader of choice :|

    As I mentioned, the e-reader side is fine for novels and almost everyone who has seen it comments on how much it looks like real paper. Would be nice if the refresh was quicker and had a better interface for jumping around in a book but as other comments I have seen commented on, touch screen could suck due to the finger prints everywhere on the screen.

  39. Re:kindle started it all by Eskarel · · Score: 2

    The thing is none of that is actually true.

    Yes mobile devices are selling like hotcakes, but I don't know a single person who had a computer of some sort(laptop, netbook, desktop, etc) before they bought an iPad and doesn't have one now. I don't even know anyone who put off an upgrade or replacement to one of those devices because they bought an iPad.

    People like Jobs keep touting the end of the PC, but as far as I've seen and read there's absolutely no evidence of it happening. Sure PC sales are slowing, but that's because everyone who can currently use one and wants one has one. The few people who don't are too poor to buy an iPad either.

    Maybe you're seeing stuff I'm not, but I just don't see any evidence of a decline in PC ownership, a decline in the rate of increase in PC ownership sure, but that was coming with or without the new sort of tablets.

    The same prediction has been made for years but it's never happened. No one is throwing out their laptop to buy an iPad.

  40. Doubt will brand as "'droid" by __aazsst3756 · · Score: 1

    This will come closer to being branded like the Nook than any Android tablet, but with better app support. Amazon has content, and is one of the few companies in position to seriously compete with Apple in that area. They can fork android, build their own ecosystem, put it on their front page and sell millions. I think the writing has been on the wall for several months now.

  41. Re:Ugh by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

    1982? The little known prequel? ;-)

    Yes, but this is the Hollywood version. They're getting Michael Bay to direct. It turns out Big Brother is an alien conspiracy, which they solve via pyrotechnics. In 3D and IMAX, Summer 2012.

  42. Re:kindle started it all by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

    Can you word process on it? Not really.

    Why not? There are plenty of word processing apps available.

    Unless you're one of those people for whom 'word processing' == 'Microsoft Word', in which case you can't word process on Linux either.

  43. Re:kindle started it all by leenks · · Score: 1

    I'm running iOS 5 betas, and yes, it is true. Wire free activation and cloud backups.

  44. Re:kindle started it all by leenks · · Score: 1

    WINE

  45. Re:kindle started it all by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    Yes, directly. Yes, really. Yes, if there's an app for it. Yes, even though you haven't seen it.

    Explain to me how a (modern) smartphone isn't a portable computer with cellular voice hardware.

    There is no time you'd need an iPad where a netbook wouldn't get the job done. What is your point? You could also lug around your desktop. It gets even more done than a netbook.

  46. Re:Ugh by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    You clearly dislike your job, so instead of complaining about it on the internet, why don't you man up and go apply to McDonald's?

    Because his vastly inflated sense of entitlement prevents him from doing a lowly job that doesn't utilise his awesome technical knowledge, sharply honed intellect and massive cock to best effect.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  47. Re:kindle started it all by hey! · · Score: 2

    The Kindle experience is great for novels. It is not so good for technical books or non-fiction books with illustrations and figures. As for math books -- forget it. A page with equations is either rendered as if it were put into an open blender and splattered across the wall, or as an unreadable image. Ironically, I *can* read those book on my iPod touch using the Amazon Reader. The rendering infrastructure must be better. Also on the touch I can zoom in and out of illustrations and photos, a capability for some reason not implemented in the Android reader software for Amazon of Barnes and Noble.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  48. Re:Ugh by Golddess · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, the ol' "you have no right to complain because there are people worse off than you" argument.

    --
    "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
  49. Re:kindle started it all by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    What point I was trying to make is not that desktop computer will disappear, but that you can't dismiss items like the iPad or iPhone as a computer just because it doesn't act the way you think it should as a computer. It's the sci-fi future and most people are now walking around with a PC in their pocket (instead of strapped to their thigh or forearm as old sci-fi movies and tv series predicted).

  50. Re:kindle started it all by Moridineas · · Score: 1

    Releasing ebooks for the Kindle is somewhat frustrating... The mobipocket format that Amazon has used up until this point is several limited compared to epub (and especially the forthcoming epub3). It has all sorts of bizarre limitations like, on one visible page, you can't have specify multiple left margins (that is margin-left in the css) -- only one will be visible. No right margins. No nested lists. Little typographic control. Beyond weird limitations like that, mobipocket itself is like a bastardized HTML 3.2. One almost expects to see tags at any second. Really, if you have to do any complicated formatting at all, an image is your best option.

    Things that matter not at all for novels, but make a big difference technical, academic, etc books.

    Beyond that, as you said, there are pretty big differences between an eink kindle, an iPhone kindle reader, and Kindle for the PC.

    But, the Kindle is far and away the most popular platform. The publishing company I work for primarily focuses on Kindle because iPad, nook, etc books just don't sell at nearly the same rate.

  51. Re:kindle started it all by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    A picture, an MP3 or a video from the net perhaps. Like I do all the time on my £300 cheaper netbook. I'm sure there's lots of uses for tablets but not one where someone else tells me what I can put on it.

  52. Re:Ugh by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I was thinking about what you said. I'm trying to think of a situation where faceless-corporation A, sells stolen items to client's B's; and both parties had reasonable expectations that the product was sellable. Then faceless-corporation A has to go and retrieve sold items from all clients B's. Nothing comes to mind as a similar example. But what does come to mind is that faceless-corporation A gets fined by the D.O.D., and pays damages to Plaintiff. And when I consider if the book was a bound book, this is like faceless-corporation A breaks into my house, and steals the book. I think this is a slippery slope Amazon stepped on, and it's a problem I don't have the time to spend trying to solve.

  53. Re:Ugh by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

    Ditch the sig. Listing certs looks unprofessional. Let your posts stand or fall on their content.