Slashdot Mirror


Google To Discontinue Google Labs

kai_hiwatari writes "Today, Google has announced that they are closing down Google Labs. They say this will help them prioritize their product effort. Google says closing Google Labs means ending many of their experiments. However, not every experiment will be gone. Google will be incorporating the Labs experiments they have decided to continue in other product areas. Android apps such as Google Goggles, Google Listen etc. will continue to be available in the Android Market."

31 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. Lots of good work now going to waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this is the single most disappointing announcement Google has ever done.

    1. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by GodInHell · · Score: 4, Funny

      Worse then the death of Wave? /snark

    2. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      if google with nearly infinite pockets can't 'justify' r/d, we are all doomed.

      how can a small co innovate if one with deep pockets either can't or refuses to?

      or, maybe its just greed at this point? really hard to believe they could 'not afford' to keep it going.

      btw, is this going to be layoffs?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Necessity is the mother of all invention.
      Hard work is the unsung father.
      Accidents (that is odd) are the crazy uncle everyone loves, but nobody wants around.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:Lots of good work now going to waste. by dudpixel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was wondering if this means the employees "20% time" to work on any project of their choosing will also soon be scrapped.

      That would be the beginning of the end for Google if it were to happen...

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
  2. The day the labs died... by dlingman · · Score: 2

    I can almost hear Don McLean in the background - very, very faintly...

    1. Re:The day the labs died... by lennier · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can almost hear Don McLean in the background - very, very faintly...

      And they were singin',
      I, I'm feeling lucky today
      I boot my Chrometop to the desktop but the Wave's gone away
      And Google boys turn off their Goggles and say
      This'll be the day I get laid

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  3. Pity... by Ibiwan · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...I actually used Sets on a fairly regular basis. Check out it out before it's gone!

    --
    -- //no comment
  4. 20% Time? by Spigot+the+Bear · · Score: 2

    Isn't the whole point of the "20% time" over at Google that people can just work on whatever they want, useful or not? Labs seemed like a great place for this sort of work to live, whether it became a "real" product eventually or not. I'm not really sure I understand the logic behind closing it down to "focus" on their main products. If that's their goal, they should eliminate the 20% time completely.

    On another note, does this mean all the labs in Gmail, etc are going away as well?

    1. Re:20% Time? by zget · · Score: 5, Interesting
      As someone else here commented, Google has been changing rapidly recently: http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2339084&cid=36825878

      I also was able to meet with some (middle management) people at Google and their attitude reminded me very strongly of MS's behavior 15 years ago: They don't listen to what others say and what they say often implies: "We're the smartest people on the planet, the world revolves around us, if you don't want to work with us and use our stuff, you're just an idiot." So it think I can conclude that Google sees themselves as "winning" the way that MS saw themselves winning in the late 90's.

      You can see the same change with all the "privacy is not important" and the recent Google+ product. I think we are really seeing a turning point here. Google has finally passed the point where it has, after a long time, accepted it's not the small geeky company it once was and is now just driving for profits. The scary thing is, they have got in a great position to exploit that now.

    2. Re:20% Time? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, they are a pubically traded company that needs to grow every quarter in compressed 8 to 12 week time frames to boast its share price. Like most companies the need to cut costs and increase productivity.

      The employees need to work 20% harder the same price and you can do this by having them focus on products which generate income. It is a business and not a fun place to experiment with cool toys.

      The worst situation would be for the Wall Street investors to march in and hire efficiency experts who will then demand to force layoffs, hiring freezes, and benefit cuts, etc. This will foce the top talent to leave and kill morale and productivity. Look at what happened with HP and IBM? Need I say more? No one who is bright would ever consider working there now. Google is in trouble. Apple is suing them to death and its ad revenue is not generating that constant income increase every 8 to 12 weeks to boast their share price.

      They need R&D of course, but they need to keep expanding and the best thing to do is increase productivity to keep its stock price highest.

    3. Re:20% Time? by ustolemyname · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean the privacy oriented Google+ product? The one that has a user interfaces that forces users to manage their privacy, and enables them to do it well?

    4. Re:20% Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, just call them DoubleClick and be done with it. That's what they are.

  5. Google Sets by slshwtw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I use google sets from time to time when I can't remember something, like the name of a product or company, by generating a list from items I know are similar.

  6. Nooo! by Slartibartfast · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've always *loved* Google Labs! It's where I first bumped into "suggest," and a whole bunch of other really cool features that have eventually been rolled into the final product.

    I'm very, very sad. Used to be a Red Hat Labs that suffered the same fate; I guess that sort of paradigm just doesn't have enough energy for the long run.

    *sigh*

    1. Re:Nooo! by robathome · · Score: 2

      You mean the arm of Alcatel-Lucent that decided they will no longer do pure science, and concentrate on product-oriented R&D?

      --

      At 3 A.M. you can see people's auras; at five you can see their contrails...
  7. Only part of original not quoted by TFA . . . by wrencherd · · Score: 5, Informative
    . . . is this:

    We’ll continue to push speed and innovation—the driving forces behind Google Labs—across all our products, as the early launch of the Google+ field trial last month showed.

    It's a lot faster just to read the orig.

  8. Killing off the autonomous vehicle project? by Animats · · Score: 2

    Does this mean the end of Google's self-driving cars?

  9. Google Code Search by Etrigoth · · Score: 2

    Oh please don't let them take this offline!

    --
    When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained.
  10. End of cool ideas ? by nerdyalien · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I doubt this is the end of Google generating cool ideas/apps. As long as they keep on hiring new guys with brilliant imagination, they are safe. But this announcement sounds like they are moving towards more big corporate style work flow, where all cool ideas are channeled towards an existing product. I see some similarities with Microsoft here, where most research is geared towards an existing product.

    Potential downfall is, some ideas/apps/products are better off alone. For an example, whole Xbox Kinect was exceptional as a hardware device. But as it was bundled with the gaming console, we missed out all the other cool stuff it can do (hacks we saw on youtube). Quite lucky they released a SDK. Sometimes, I wish they released Kinect as an separate ubiquitous hardware.

  11. Killing Innovation? by Rotag_FU · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope this is not the case, but it sounds like they are killing off their central idea birthing grounds? When Google first started developing an OS for cell phones it would have seemed like a crazy stretch for a search engine company, but Android is successful today. How many new "crazy" ideas will never see the light of day that could create future critical technologies for the company by this decision to "prioritize their product effort"? It is important for a tech company to have focus, but it needs at least a small group of innovative people to have the opportunity to let their ideas run wild in order to create the next big thing or they will eventually just stall and hand over technological innovation to a smaller, hungrier company. To me this seems almost as stupid as when Xerox decided that the core ideas at Xerox PARC in the 70's weren't worth productizing and basically gave them away to Apple.

    1. Re:Killing Innovation? by Microlith · · Score: 4, Informative

      When Google first started developing an OS for cell phones it would have seemed like a crazy stretch for a search engine company, but Android is successful today.

      Android, from day one, was a product like any other. It was not born in the Labs, it was purchased.

  12. I don't know whether this scene from work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is funny or depressing...

    An email came through and a coworker died last night. Everybody read it and then went about their day.

    This announcement came on Slashdot and I just heard three people exclaim "Noooo!!!"

    I am still undecided whether that is a sad state of affairs or funny....

  13. Replacing lab extensions with apps by wdef · · Score: 2

    On the surface this is just plain dumb. But lab extensions like Tasks should just be a default part of gmail anyway and hopefully will be. My guess is this is about superseding the labs concept with apps which can come from anywhere and are easy to monetize.

  14. Of course by Exitar · · Score: 3, Funny

    No time for innovation. All resources must be used to better clone Facebook.

  15. Just a few more nails, and I can bury "The Cloud". by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

    I've always been wary of "cloud computing", esp. when it's powered by a hybrid "thick-client" connected to a remote data repository... Applications anyone? At least with a client side service (eg: mail reader app) I can continue to use the features I like (such as gestures, goggles, nibbles, etc.) beyond the external "support" lifetime -- Without wondering if a feature will disappear tomorrow.

    As an avid Google Labs user, I find their lack of support disturbing.

    Furthermore, my plotter does not work with Windows7. The MFG no-longer supports it, so they won't recompile the driver, or give out the source so that I may do so. XP's EOL is 993.0488278587964 from now. This tells me that not only will I be using G'Linux / FLOS Software in the near future, and insist on hardware driver source-code, but that "The Cloud" I use must be built from my own servers, or not at all.

    I think I'll call my globally accessible private personal network "The Closet"; I suspect many will identify with this terminology in terms of privacy for multiple reasons.

  16. Kugelmass apologia by epine · · Score: 2

    I'm reading the final book of the Baroque Cycle right now. Who let you out of the book? You sound just like a Tory scrivener.

    Of course, if you're so easily lead by the nose into the "fear and greed" school of business, of course your backers will be quick to exploit this. You've lashed yourself to the bilge pump. Happy treading.

    In every business, there's a right balance between short term necessity and vision for the long haul. Many small businesses have been scuttled by hard nosed investors who inhaled too much (or too little) coinage fume while the world was changing around them, to paraphrase 3000 pages.

  17. Re:So no more 20% personal time? by creativeHavoc · · Score: 3, Informative

    While many were left wondering, Google tells me that the company has no changes to announce with regards to the 20 Percent Time program; killing Labs doesn’t mean the discontinuation of the one day a week Googlers get to spend on “projects that aren’t necessarily in [their] job descriptions.” “We’ll continue to devote a subset of our time to newer and experiment projects,” Google representative Jason Friedenfelds tells me.

    http://techcrunch.com/2011/07/20/20-percent/

    --
    insight through the mind
  18. This is why I won't use Google+ by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2

    Google is far too willing to pull the plug on their ventures for me. I used to use the GOOG411 service, but they killed it. And I'm concerned that if I put a lot of time and energy into Google+, they'll kill it too.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  19. Google Labs going ... Google Directory gone ! by dbu · · Score: 2

    Google Labs is going and, in other news tonight... Google Directory is already gone!
    http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2011/07/google-directory-no-longer-available.html
    It really sad that Google feels it has to trim so many projects and services