Slashdot Mirror


South Korean Scientists Create Glowing Dog

cultiv8 writes "A research team from Seoul National University (SNU) said the genetically modified female beagle has been found to glow fluorescent green under ultraviolet light if given a doxycycline antibiotic. The researchers, who completed a two-year test, said the ability to glow can be turned on or off by adding a drug to the dog's food. 'The creation of Tegon opens new horizons since the gene injected to make the dog glow can be substituted with genes that trigger fatal human diseases,' the news agency quoted lead researcher Lee Byeong-chun as saying. He said the dog was created using the somatic cell nuclear transfer technology that the university team used to make the world's first cloned dog, Snuppy, in 2005."

139 comments

  1. All I can think of is the joke... by mike.rimov · · Score: 1

    Who's (modified for the article) punchline is.

    "Hey, I'm a programmer, I don't have time for a princess, but hey, a glowing dog, now that's cool"

    1. Re:All I can think of is the joke... by derGoldstein · · Score: 2

      [dog barks]
      damn dogs never let me sleep at night (closes window)
      [dog glows]
      damn dogs never let me sleep at night (closes curtains)

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    2. Re:All I can think of is the joke... by rainmouse · · Score: 1

      "Hey, I'm a programmer, I don't have time for a princess, but hey, a glowing dog, now that's cool"

      Glowing dog? Pics or it didn't happen.

    3. Re:All I can think of is the joke... by derGoldstein · · Score: 0

      I thought that at first, but then realized that you're not going to see some glowing poodle wagging its tail -- you're going to see some poor, sick, probably unconscious little creature that's barely alive.
      (I'm not dissing research on animals as a whole, just pointing out that you probably don't want to see a picture of the results)

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    4. Re:All I can think of is the joke... by derGoldstein · · Score: 1

      Erm... forget I said that. Go here. I'm really glad I was wrong.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    5. Re:All I can think of is the joke... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      When you are a $3.5 million proof-of-concept, and also an adorable microbeagle, you are probably OK.

      The concept-proven successors working on the "because there are 268 illnesses that humans and dogs have in common, creating dogs that artificially show such symptoms could aid treatment methods for diseases that afflict humans" part of the project are likely to be a bit more pitiable.

    6. Re:All I can think of is the joke... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      an tasty microbeagle

      FTFY given it's Korea.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    7. Re:All I can think of is the joke... by beadfulthings · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I happen to have a journalist acquaintance who wrote a pretty good book about dog cloning in Korea. I can tell you you're both right and wrong. You will see the adorable beagle mentioned in the post just below. What you won't see, and (just as you say) won't want to see are the many dogs sacrificed for the project. Although Seoul and other cities are home to pampered pets, dogs are also a livestock commodity in Korea, and if you want to do a bit of research, you won't have any trouble getting all the dogs you want, and nobody will particularly care where they go.

      We could've easily produced the first cloned dog right here in the United States, and researchers in Texas knew that. They also knew, full well, that Americans wouldn't stand for what had to be done in order to accomplish the feat.

      In any event, if you like dogs, "Dog, Inc." is a pretty good read.

      --
      "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
    8. Re:All I can think of is the joke... by jamiesan · · Score: 1

      It's a dog's light in this man's modern research lab.

    9. Re:All I can think of is the joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      North Korean Scientists invent Glowing South Koreans,
      Method?
        Atomic Weapons, works on Dogs too

    10. Re:All I can think of is the joke... by antdude · · Score: 1

      How about a glowing princess? :D

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    11. Re:All I can think of is the joke... by torsmo · · Score: 1

      Man, I came just came here to see any "Koreans eat dogs in the dark" comments.

    12. Re:All I can think of is the joke... by Divebus · · Score: 1

      Kegogi tastes like a wet dog smells, apparently.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    13. Re:All I can think of is the joke... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The amount they glow is up to how attentive you are to their needs.

    14. Re:All I can think of is the joke... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Of course, the real question is "what does it taste like?"

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. Great useful feature! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you lose the dog in the dark, you can quickly find it with your portable ultraviolet torch. Err.. maybe not that useful I guess.

  3. Perfect theme song by devleopard · · Score: 1

    George Clinton's Atomic Dog

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuyS9M8T03A

    --
    The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.
    1. Re:Perfect theme song by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

      Has anybody seen
      A dog dyed bright green?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBpYDNMb_wY

      .

  4. link to the picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/5354635/Scientists-create-glowing-dog

    1. Re:link to the picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, but there's something a tad odd about that article:

      Tegon...has been found to glow fluorescent green under ultraviolet

      The pictures have her glowing orangey-red. What gives?

    2. Re:link to the picture by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Obviously dogs are color blind.

      Given this is a Korean dog, the important question would be "yeah, but what does it taste like?"

    3. Re:link to the picture by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      There's something else to add: They weren't the ones to do this first. I was just watching a show the other day about them doing the exact same thing in fruit flies giving them glowing spots on their wings by incorporating a DNA switch and jelly fish DNA.

  5. What fun! by Cornwallis · · Score: 1

    'The creation of Tegon opens new horizons since the gene injected to make the dog glow can be substituted with genes that trigger fatal human diseases,'

    Now, just substitute "can be" with "will be"...

    1. Re:What fun! by underqualified · · Score: 1

      What a waste of science.

    2. Re:What fun! by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

      What is the fascination with making animals glow?

      Make lawn grass that produces THC, or better yet LSD already.

    3. Re:What fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grass already contains DMT, isn't that good enough?

    4. Re:What fun! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Why grass? Wouldn't DEA agents who involuntarily produce illicit compounds metabolically be much more amusing?

    5. Re:What fun! by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

      What is the fascination with making animals glow?

      It's a quick and dirty way to test whether the inserted gene is being expressed in all tissues.

      Step two is to attach your desired test gene to the bioluminescent gene. Now you can see where the test gene is being expressed. That removes the doubt from a failure to get the expected result; is it because the experimental treatment doesn't work properly, or because the gene isn't active in the desired tissue? Failure+glow means the treatment failed. Failure+no-glow means a problem with the insertion.

      (IANAB, IANYB.)

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    6. Re:What fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is like having an LED for debugging genetic code in a system where you have no other ways before.

      INB4 spoiled kids asking for source code debugger.

    7. Re:What fun! by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

      +5 Insightful

      --
      I8-D
    8. Re:What fun! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      That quote seemed suspicious to me. So if they can add something to food to trigger the "glow" gene, that quote means they can also add something to food to trigger the "fatal disease" gene... That's a TERRIBLE idea!!! (Yes, I know the individual would need to have the gene encoded before birth, and it's not just the food additive...)

    9. Re:What fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's like a debug statement then?

      That actually makes a lot of sense.

    10. Re:What fun! by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Informative

      IAAB. It's equivalent to using a print statement as a report mechanism during debugging. In fact, this use of GFP is even called a "reporter" gene. There are other reporters commonly used; prior to the discovery of fluorescent proteins, the most popular bacterial reporter was a step in the lactose metabolism pathway that caused the colony to turn blue when it was interrupted by another gene (thus demonstrating not functionality, but that the gene had been inserted correctly into the carrier molecule.)

      Another control mechanism that's often used is antibiotic resistance: if it doesn't die, then the resistance gene is where it should be. This has the added benefit of getting rid of the samples you don't want at the same time. Of course, neither of these are very useful for seeing tissue-specific expression, which is why fluorescent proteins revolutionized molecular biology when they were discovered.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    11. Re:What fun! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Well yes. If you can create lab animals with the same fatal condition you can then test treatments for the condition on them. You then get into that whole animal testing issue. It is one of those areas where people will have different opinions for sure.
      I am in the cost vs benefit camp.
      Animal testing for cosmetics == bad.
      Animal testing to save lives == acceptable.
      Others have different opinions on that.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    12. Re:What fun! by kiatoa · · Score: 1

      Seems like a great solution for feral dogs and helping breeders get rich. To all your pure-bred (assuming genetically modified is still "pure-bred") dogs, cats whatever add a gene that causes them to die if not fed a special additive to their food.

      No more strays ...

      I'm just kidding of course but whats the bet that the Monsanto equivalent in the pet world does just exactly this?

      --
      90% of the wealth is in 2% of the pockets. Bummer to be in the majority.
    13. Re:What fun! by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      >> It's equivalent to using a print statement

      Imagine what will happen when we have a remote kernel debugger?

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    14. Re:What fun! by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      Well, right now we have the ability to take memory dumps and compare them, creating a kind of rudimentary trace log. This shoddy JPEG of a microarray displays one column per gene of interest. Brightness reflects gene expression level (red is low, green is high, grey is in between.) Each row is a separate set of conditions, such as progress through a stress response.

      In plant biology, time of day has been used as the y-axis, by taking many different samples at different times. This was done in order to find the genes responsible for changing between photosynthesis and respiration, and created a very cool and nifty image (in one of my textbooks that I don't have readily available) of all sorts of repeated and dynamic patterns, only a tiny fraction of which we understand—but at least we can see them!

      Getting a kernel debugger, though, would require the ability to stop time instantly in order to equivalate interrupts and traps. I don't think that's going to happen any time soon. :)

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    15. Re:What fun! by underqualified · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I change my mind. It's not a waste of science after all.

    16. Re:What fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the fascination with making animals glow?

      It's Korea, this is to help them find their food when it's dark.

    17. Re:What fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Tyrell Corporation will certainly be interested in this new technology.

    18. Re:What fun! by Mr.+Jaggers · · Score: 1

      Build in a lysine-deficiency into all the breeding females?

      Better hope your animals aren't as smart as velociraptors... and be damn careful with that frog DNA!!

      --

      When I grow up, I want to have Christopher Walken hair.
    19. Re:What fun! by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      What is the fascination with making animals glow?

      I figure it's a long term plan to make night time less stressful when the zombie apocalypse comes

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
  6. Perfect plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 - create glowing dog
    2- ???
    3- Profit !

    1. Re:Perfect plan by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      Brought to you by Ryan Industries.

  7. Flu Shot anyone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let the paranoia begin.
    Gives the term "crowd controll" a whole new meaning ...

  8. meh... GFP by staalmannen · · Score: 2

    Ok this was a proof-of-concept experiment to make a transgenic dog using Dox-inducible expression. It might be useful for some stuff since dogs are a genetic model for some human diseases but still not THAT cool... What I am REALLY looking forward to is someone doing a homologous replacement of Tbx5 with Tbx4 in chickens (pehaps by using zinc finger nucleases). This would most likely change the development of the wings to front-legs. A four-legged chichken - THAT would be cool. When that proof-of concept experiment would be done we could do the same for a number of other birds - ostriches for example (would be neat riding beasts)... and with some proper breeding we might even be able to generate something similar to dinosaurs :P

    1. Re:meh... GFP by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      How about 6 winded chickens or 12 legged turkeys for eating?

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    2. Re:meh... GFP by staalmannen · · Score: 1

      That does not sound very realistic since it would mean that you would have to initiate new limb buds at the appropriate places, and I doubt that those extra limbs would be functional (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymelia). Replacing Tbx5 with Tbx4 under the native Tbx5 promoter would however mean that you would have expression at the appropriate place (front limb buds), time and level. A proof-of-concept experiment by overexpression was already done back in 1999 (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v398/n6730/abs/398810a0.html) but that one utilized overexpression and suffered from remaining endogenous Tbx5 expression.

  9. Fluorescent green dogburgers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yum yum!

  10. Not glowing by Zouden · · Score: 5, Informative

    While I don't mean to belittle the work done by these scientists, I want to point out a common mistake used in science journalism - referring to GFP as "glowing". It does not glow, in any sense of the word. It fluoresces, which means you need to shine blue or UV light on it and examine it through a filter that removes the incident light, and then it will appear green. It can appear quite amazing under those conditions, but you can't take this dog out for a walk at night and see it emitting green light. You won't even see it reflecting green light, unless you take him near a UV source.

    There is a biological technique that does cause things to glow, but it's more complicated than a single protein so is not as commonly used as GFP.

    --
    "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    1. Re:Not glowing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      glow |gl| verb
      give out steady light without flame:

      You know, you could always carry a portable blacklight with you....

    2. Re:Not glowing by kieran · · Score: 1

      The restaurant will sort out the lighting and provide filtering glasses. Done!

    3. Re:Not glowing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better yet, you could mount them on the dog. Fast and furious style...

    4. Re:Not glowing by Metabolife · · Score: 1

      This dog would be awesome at a rave!

    5. Re:Not glowing by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      unless you take him near a UV source

      Like, the Sun?

      (Don't mind me, I'm just being snarky)

    6. Re:Not glowing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you talking about the Korean restaurant

  11. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the gene injected to make the dog glow can be substituted with genes that trigger fatal human diseases"

    Now why the hell would anyone want to do that?

    1. Re:WTF? by umghhh · · Score: 1

      as somebody pointed out already a dog is a nice approximation of what human body would do in case of certain diseases. Now it is all yours to determine whether this is done to make better drugs of terms of efficiency in curing stuff, making better drugs in terms of curing stuff only as good as is enough for profit or makingstuff that kills people effectively or some other purpose. I for one would tip it is either 2 or 3 but it may be that some naive scientists lied to a politician and actually did 1 - I mean it is possible even if not likely.

    2. Re:WTF? by rjzak · · Score: 2

      Curing stuff by triggering the disease? No thanks. Sounds more like genetically engineering people to have a built-in kill switch.

      --
      Professional Genius
    3. Re:WTF? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I was beginning to wonder if I was the only one who read that sentence correctly, as-written.

    4. Re:WTF? by Disfnord · · Score: 1

      Assassinations?

    5. Re:WTF? by aiht · · Score: 1

      Curing stuff by triggering the disease? No thanks. Sounds more like genetically engineering people to have a built-in kill switch.

      Seriously?
      How do you expect anyone to test potential cures without having a sufferer of the disease to try to cure?
      You have to be able to repro the bug, before you can test the fix.

    6. Re:WTF? by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      No, that would involve fatally gene-tweaked donkeys.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  12. Pics by sirkumi · · Score: 2
  13. Re:Insanity by Darth+Hamsy · · Score: 0

    +1 Troll. Nearly had me.

  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. Korean BBQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would Koreans want to eat glowing food?

    1. Re:Korean BBQ by DamienNightbane · · Score: 0

      So they can save electricity by taking the light bulbs out of their fridges.

  16. Re:Insanity by Enleth · · Score: 1

    According to Nietsche, God is dead since at least 1882, which means that the source code is in public domain even by the standards of Disney. Sorry, no bonus.

    [Feeding a troll? Sure, the bigger a piece, the better, more chance of choking!]

    --
    This is Slashdot. Common sense is futile. You will be modded down.
  17. unappetizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just make sure there are UV filters on the lights in the restaurant. That would really put me off my dinner. :o)

  18. Imagine a burglar ... by fuzzytv · · Score: 1

    Imagine a burglar who comes to your house. A pitbull growling in the dark - that's already pretty scary. A glowing growling pitbull, that's super-scary.

  19. Afterwards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And then ate him...

  20. Dog Fur Dye Industry by retroworks · · Score: 1

    I like how they always say "could lead to a cure for Alzheimer's" every time they use genetic engineering to do a nerdy prank. There is need or market demand for glowing dogs, no problem being solved or cost reduced. Sooner or later someone's going to let the DNA loose and nature is going to get hurt.

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:Dog Fur Dye Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is need or market demand for glowing dogs, no problem being solved or cost reduced.

      I'm assuming you meant NO need or market demand, and I doubt that.

      I'm sure quite a few people would like a glow in the dark designer dog, especially those folks who have them tiny dogs they carry around.

      Sooner or later someone's going to let the DNA loose and nature is going to get hurt.

      I...y'know, I wanted to go off on a vitriol filled rant about how fearmongering results in us huddling in caves sitting on our hands, but I couldn't phrase it in a way that I liked. So let me just say, I don't agree with you.

    2. Re:Dog Fur Dye Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop anthropomorphicizing Nature, she hates that.

    3. Re:Dog Fur Dye Industry by PPH · · Score: 1

      I like how they always say "could lead to a cure for Alzheimer's"

      I don't know about a cure. But it sure would be handy for finding grandpa when he wanders off in the dark.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  21. Many miss the point here by Cable · · Score: 1

    The gene that causes the dog to glow under ultraviolet light when a certain food is given to it, can have the gene replaced with one dogs and humans share. This can help test gene therapy to help cure these genetic disorders.

  22. meh. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    The mutation is just reflecting an external UV light. It would be much cooler if it could actually *generate* light. Imagine a dog that could glow like a glow worm.

  23. Why not Pigs? by fygment · · Score: 1

    Are they not closer to human physiology ... or is that just BS so nobody feels bad about the god-awful things they do to pigs in the name of science/medecine? But then Korea has a bit of a hate-on for dogs so it makes sense.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  24. I Absolutely hate by shoehornjob · · Score: 0

    people who do research on household pets. I consider my dog to be part of my family and when I hear of asshole scientists doing research on what would otherwise be someone's pet it really pisses me off. There is no reason for that or any dog to glow or have any other "modification". This just backs up my observation that most of these people are a$$holes.

    --
    "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    1. Re:I Absolutely hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      people who do research on household pets. I consider my dog to be part of my family and when I hear of asshole scientists doing research on what would otherwise be someone's pet it really pisses me off. There is no reason for that or any dog to glow or have any other "modification". This just backs up my observation that most of these people are a$$holes.

      I understand your sentiment, but bear in mind that every society draws an arbitrary line between the animals we befriend and those we eat. You protect your dog and eat bacon. In korea some dog breeds are befriended while other breeds are food.

    2. Re:I Absolutely hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you like to volunteer for medical experimentation yourself instead?
      Volunteers are always welcome. But we try to cut down on human experimentation, unlike Monsanto & co.

    3. Re:I Absolutely hate by SlashV · · Score: 1

      Thanks for putting my feeling to words. However, I must admit that this feeling is somewhat hypocritical. I mean, just taking pity on an animal because you happen to like it. Pigs for example are equally smart and adorable (although less handsome) as dogs, yet we put them in small cages and butcher them by the millions. This one dog being cloned and maybe not even having a particularly bad life is bliss by comparison.

    4. Re:I Absolutely hate by bareman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Meanwhile people whose child or spouse is spared from death by this same research feel quite differently about it.

    5. Re:I Absolutely hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So...are you saying you'd prefer they should stop all animal experimentation, or only those animals that are pets to someone out there? Which is quite a broad range of animals.

      Or perhaps you prefer animals to be natural and not be messed about with humans? Which means that a significant number of dog breeds would be considered monstrous by you.

      Or maybe you just mean genetic experiments? Or drug based? Or do you also consider experiments in changing their diet? Psychological experimentation? Environmental manipulation? Etc, etc.

      They are trying to use non-human animals in place of humans since we have major gripes about human experimentation. As you consider all dogs to be at the "level" of humans, this would, of course, cause you discomfort. However, not everyone sees it like that. For some people, they seem to think that animals, dogs, cats, mice, naked mole rats, alpacas, baboons, slugs, roaches, cockatoos, parrots, etc are all more preferable to experiment on than human beings. Usually with an insane amount of oversight now (at least in the US of A), but they still trudge on to get this shit done.

      Are they assholes? Who knows. If you talk to PETA, they're probably Satan himself, assfucking Hitler with Osama in the back (TOOT TOOT MAN TRAIN). If you talk to people that benefit from treatments pioneered and verified through animal testing, polio/heart surgery/leprosy/etc, would probably say they're decent people. If you talk to the people themselves, you'll probably find some of them just want to help people and damn the animals while others are bleeding hearts who'll drop out of animal experimentation after one too many puppies dying on them.

      Do I think animal experimentation is good? Yes. Do I wish there were alternatives so we wouldn't have to do it? Hell yes. Would I prefer if we could use people who step forward and sell their bodies to science to get experimented on? Oh fuck yes. None of that ethical shit about "animals don't want to do it" or "it's cruel to them" if people stood up and said "YES, EXPERIMENT ON ME FOR A MILLION DOLLARS." Like that cow in Hitchhikers that wanted to be eaten.

      Anyway, scientists aren't douchebags unless they're douchebags and experimenting on animals means very little as an indicator of their douchebaggery. It just means that you probably love animals a shitton more than these scientists, the people supporting these scientists, the people running oversight on these scientists, and the people raking money on the successes of these scientists.

    6. Re:I Absolutely hate by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      Your point is valid. I just wish that research can get to a point where most of the modelling is done on super computers (cray, big blue etc. I know some of it has already being done but progress can't come too soon. On the other hand I do like the pig for dinner. At one time I considered having one of those pot bellied pigs for a family pet but my wife pretty much vetoed that before I could make a good arguement.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    7. Re:I Absolutely hate by Stem_Cell_Brad · · Score: 1

      shucks, i have no mod points left +1

    8. Re:I Absolutely hate by kiatoa · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I've eaten dog before (tends to taste a bit like what it was eating, coconut and scraps, yech). I also had a dog that got hit by a car and the neighbors got to it before we did. Apparently they ate well that night. Shit happens. Things are born, die, sometimes get eaten by other things. That said I could never eat my own dog (extreme starvation situation excepted). Your emotional attachment is just that, an emotional attachment and personally I'm fine with offending your sensibilities if it yields a cure for some nasty disease.

      All that said however, I'm a firm believer that *all* animals should be treated with compassion and respect. I consider brutal treatment of cows destined for a grease burger just as despicable as torturing lab monkeys with toxic cosmetics. Why single out dogs for special treatment?

      --
      90% of the wealth is in 2% of the pockets. Bummer to be in the majority.
    9. Re:I Absolutely hate by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      I agree that ALL animals should be treated with compassion and respect. I believe that we humans are the alpha species on this planet and thus bear the responsibility for animals and the environment (theirs and ours). I was just singling out dogs because that was the subject of the article.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
  25. leave life alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the impression playing with nature is stupid. Those researches should go find themselves first. The submit themselves to the cause of science. They can be the subject of their experiments.
    I think we would see better progress being made.

  26. Of course glowing! All dog glowing! by erroneus · · Score: 2

    Why this news? Dog is born puppy, then you feed it and it glowing. Keep feed it and it keep glowing until all glow up.

  27. Yes, It glows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but will it blend?

  28. Quote from researcher upon experimental success. by hey! · · Score: 1

    It's ALIVE! [insane cackle]

    While this is serious science, there's a whiff of mad science about it. If this were my project, I'd dine out at science fiction conventions for the rest of my life on this.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  29. Fatal human diseases? by darniil · · Score: 2
    Ok, I'm sure this is nothing to worry about, but the way part of the article was worded threw me off.

    the gene injected to make the dog glow can be substituted with genes that trigger fatal human diseases

    The way that's written, my first thought was using dogs as bioweapons. I doubt that's really the case, so what do they really mean by this?

    1. Re:Fatal human diseases? by DekkerAvesque · · Score: 1

      Right? I was thinking they were implying they could genetically alter a human so that when given this antibiotic said person would contract a fatal disease.

    2. Re:Fatal human diseases? by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      They are trying to creates those dogs from Call of Duty's kino der toten level. Grab your shotgun.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    3. Re:Fatal human diseases? by Qzukk · · Score: 2

      what do they really mean by this?

      What's different here is that the glow requires a trigger (the antibiotic). Their plan is to implant genes that cause, say, cystic fibrosis (picked totally at random, not sure what human diseases they could give a dog) in a dog embryo. The dog is born and grows up healthy, then when it's time to test a cystic fibrosis drug, they give the dog cystic fibrosis by giving them the antibiotic. Essentially, a way to test treatments for genetic defects when those defects would probably kill the subject before you could try treating them.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    4. Re:Fatal human diseases? by darniil · · Score: 1

      Thank you. That clears things up. Makes a lot of sense, too.

  30. Re:Insanity by magusxxx · · Score: 1

    They're not destroying the Earth. They're just Genetically Engineering with Extreme Prejudice.

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
  31. Taking my Rottweiler to a Rave by magusxxx · · Score: 1

    Great! Now I don't have to pick my dog up, break it in half, and shake.

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
  32. restaurants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I imagine this is so all you need is a portable uv light with you to test whether or not your food is authentic dog or rip off cat meat.

  33. Re:Of course glowing! All dog glowing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I chuckled. Good show.

  34. Re:Of course glowing! All dog glowing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My kingdom for modpoints!

  35. My Cat Does That by cheezitmike · · Score: 1

    So what? My cat can produce spots on the carpet that glow under a fluorescent UV light. I suppose if we had a dog, the cat could pee on the dog and make it glow too. But you don't see cats running of to publish stuff in journals; they have too much important napping and paw-licking to do instead.

  36. Re:Of course glowing! All dog glowing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 mildly racist.

  37. We must not allow a glowing dog gap! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Mr. President, we *must* develop our own glowing dog before the North Koreans develop this technology too.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:We must not allow a glowing dog gap! by Stem_Cell_Brad · · Score: 1

      I suppose we should develop a doomsday dog that explodes upon detecting fluorescence of a glow dog.

  38. Carotenosis by plsenjy · · Score: 0

    I understand that if humans ingest enough carrots a similar effect can be produced.

    --
    Glad I could help.
  39. Missing the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys are all missing the point! This isn't about cute dogs; this technology can one day be used to help humans.

    Because who doesn't want a girl that glows up green in the dark when you shine a blacklight on her.

  40. You all ARE missing the point by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Corporate sponsorships. Yep, ads on animals, e.g. flashing on green sea turtles. And a talking chimp.

    The late Michael Crichton already wrote about it in Next.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  41. Dinner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Takes the fun out of hunting for your food.

  42. bonsai! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's next? Kittens that grown into the shape of glass jars?

  43. Life imitates Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't there an episode of The Big Bang Theory where Sheldon creates bio-luminescent goldfish to use as living nightlights?

    1. Re:Life imitates Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, why don't you ask the other person who watches it?

    2. Re:Life imitates Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say art imitates life in this case. People have be splicing fluorescing genes into fish and plants for longer than The Big Bang Theory has been on. The novel concept here seems to be that it's a dog.

  44. Damn that interpreter!!! by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    I said glow in the dark mosquitos not beagles.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:Damn that interpreter!!! by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Glow in the dark mosquitos. Now that's a useful thought.

      But how to get the gene into the general population?

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  45. Re:Of course glowing! All dog glowing! by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

    You resisted the urge to make a "try the special of the day" remark. +1

    --
    Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  46. As Zhasu said to Scar ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    The opening dialog of Zhasu's intro in The Lion King, addressed to Scar was, "Didn't your mother teach you not to play with your food?". Looks like we could ask the Korean scientists the same thing.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  47. Y'all are completely missing the point. by dotfile · · Score: 1

    This could turn out to be an energy saving breakthrough. Just imagine the annual energy savings from being able to dramatically reduce lighting levels in restaurants.

  48. The Urban Coyotes Thank You... by littlewink · · Score: 1

    Now we can see dinner delivery coming at night.

  49. Didn't someone do this with cats at some point? by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    I swear this story sounds familiar...

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  50. Trigger fatal diseases? by Zinho · · Score: 1

    the gene injected to make the dog glow can be substituted with genes that trigger fatal human diseases

    Perhaps I'm in too much of a mad scientist mindset, but the summary sounded to me like they were making practice runs for an injectable kill switch for humans. "Mr. Bond, I've altered your DNA, making the serum I hold in my hand a deadly poison only to you." Better yet, if the villain has read his evil overlord list, he'd just tell Bond that the serum is a poison, and modify his minions' DNA so the same serum activates their soldier boosts. Watch and laugh as Bond tries to kill his guards with it, only to make them stronger.

    You have to really trust your geneticist if you're going in for recombinant DNA therapy...

    --
    "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
  51. The Hound of the Baskervilles? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    (first thing I thought of after seeing this)

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  52. The Hound of the Baskervilles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All we need is a marsh, an escaped convict, some crazy englishmen, and a drug-using detective.

  53. This will make my parties much safer by formfeed · · Score: 1

    Add some UV night lights and strap a small barrel of rum to the collar: You won't trip over the dog anymore and you can easily find you liquor.

    Scorpions are already UV fluorescent but are a real pain to train. Dogs are much safer to hold and pet.

  54. As Sheldon Cooper would say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dog nightlights - a billion dollar idea! Shhhhh...

  55. Glowing? Never mind! by jafac · · Score: 1

    The real question is - how does it taste?

    Ha ha. I know. Bad Korean Joke. :D But given that I know of Korean-Americans whose Korean-national relatives DO still eat dogs, and consider it to be a delicacy, - - it IS teh FUNNY!

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  56. Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at least they won't have to worry about eating in the dark if the power goes out.

  57. the technique is a big deal by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    It's an amazingly useful protein for scientific research... Because of its research utility it's become a ubiquitous tool for molecular and cell biology. Indeed, in October of 2008 Osamu Shimomura, Martin Chalfie, and Roger Y. Tsien were awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their brilliant contributions to our modern scientific use of GFP, with The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences calling GFP a "guiding star" and likening its research development to the invention of the microscope.

  58. Interesting, however... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article didn't answer the most important question:

    How does it taste?

  59. a more obvious question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how did they keep the scientists from eating the dog?

  60. This is how the zombies start by Nyder · · Score: 1

    What could go wrong with this?

    surely not starting the zombie invasion.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  61. 30,000 Americans are sick and Glowing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Information at the Morgellons Research Foundation website will change your life. This is already pandemic. The CDC and the U.S. Military will NOT release the results of their study. Morgellons has been reported in every country except Iceland. It affects humans of all ages and domestic animals. If I wanted to flouresce I would wear make-up. GMO foods , vaccines and other GMO meds are killing teh population with Rh positive blood types.