Slashdot Mirror


Girls Go Geek Again

nessus42 writes "Computer science has always been a male-dominated field, right? Wrong. In 1987, 42% of the software developers in America were women. And 34% of the systems analysts in America were women. Women had started to flock to computer science in the mid-1960s, during the early days of computing, when men were already dominating other technical professions but had yet to dominate the world of computing. For about two decades, the percentages of women who earned Computer Science degrees rose steadily, peaking at 37% in 1984.... And then the women left. In droves. ...it looks like women are now returning to computer science."

51 of 378 comments (clear)

  1. Oh I'm sorry by shoehornjob · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought the headline read "girls DO geek again" and I got all excited for a minute there. Domn Slashdot misrepresenting headlines.

    --
    "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    1. Re:Oh I'm sorry by robot256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not to be confused with "girls do geeks again", which has its own set of likelihoods.

    2. Re:Oh I'm sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fact that this is the first comment on this article is pretty ironic, given that it's these kind of attitudes that keep women away.

    3. Re:Oh I'm sorry by Abstrackt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... given that it's these kind of attitudes that keep women away.

      If that were true, wouldn't women keep out of pretty much every industry?

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    4. Re:Oh I'm sorry by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, because you know jocks aren't chauvinists. There is nothing endemic to geek culture which is necessarily negative toward gender equality or respect. Those negatives exhibited by males in geek culture or jock or metrosexual or what-have-you are endemic to the social values imprinted across the entire gender. It is wrapped up in what it means to be male and how men should value themselves vs. women, and the cultural context in which these are expressed, be it geek culture or some other, is really just a lens on that broader social deficiency.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    5. Re:Oh I'm sorry by smelch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, that's not it. Girls love to be talked to that way, they dont' like seeing other girls talked about that way when they aren't. The problem with geeks doing it is that they're overtly creepy and unable to bluff enough "casual" interest to cover the scent of their all-too-eager interest.

      Women stay away because guys intimidate them and don't respect their intelligence, it has nothing to do with sexual jokes.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    6. Re:Oh I'm sorry by impaledsunset · · Score: 2

      Girls do geeks again. However, they are all female geeks. Sorry.

    7. Re:Oh I'm sorry by Abstrackt · · Score: 2

      I think it's normal for any industry to have assholes and have even been on the receiving end of sexism for being male. Two thirds of my coworkers are female, one is my direct supervisor, but I work in a different industry. My point is that I don't believe it's misogyny keeping women out of this field, they're not all so delicate that they can't stand up to the aforementioned assholes, maybe they'd just rather do something else.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    8. Re:Oh I'm sorry by LandDolphin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Rules to workplace flirting:

      1) Be attractive
      2) Don''t be unattractive

      /Or something like that

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    9. Re:Oh I'm sorry by Requiem18th · · Score: 2

      Actually the fact that you find this offensive shows that you have no idea what real objectification is.

      This is a standard joke everybody could anticipate, it's the standard joke one would expect in *every* *single* tv show about IT, or any other thing.

      Besides nowhere in this joke is the idea that women are impersonal objects merely for sexual gratification, if any, this is self deprecating humour by geek men against geek men.

      That you choose to read it any other ways says more about your fucked up self than the slashdot community at all.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    10. Re:Oh I'm sorry by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      Women are no different than men, a group of women will have misandry, chauvinism, sexism, stereotypes, and desire superiority instead of equality. This fact renders 99% of feminist rants, and rants on their behalf, as a hypocritical pile of B.S.

    11. Re:Oh I'm sorry by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2

      I don't disagree. In fact elsewhere in these threads I recounted an anecdote about how female dominated industries discriminate against men in the exact same way they complain about being discriminated against in male dominated industries. There are bound to be hypocrisies and double standards when people feel some irrational loyalty to a shared property determined genetically before they were even born. I am staunchly opposed to any kind of gender loyalty. I don't care if it's 'bros before hos' or 'sisters need to stick together' or whatever. Each person needs to critically approach how they value themselves and others without blindly submitting to the tyranny of the opinions of their peers.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    12. Re:Oh I'm sorry by DeciDigi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I left the industry in the late 90's in part because of misogynistic assholes. When the guys in the dept have one dress code, and I as the only female in the dept have another (that applies to all the secretaries) it gets really difficult to do your job. After a while you begin to suspect that the only reason your boss wont let you wear jeans and a company polo like the guys is because he really gets off on looking up your skirt when you're up a ladder...

      I still like to geek, and am raising a pod full of little geeklings, but now I'm a midwife rather than a network engineer. I find I prefer working with wetware over hardware any day ;-p

    13. Re:Oh I'm sorry by DeciDigi · · Score: 2

      No, of course that's my absolute, and only experience in the industry, and I absolutely never worked anywhere else... ever...

      In case you couldn't tell, that was sarcasm.

      The job I illustrated was the job that broke the proverbial camel's back for me. Enough with the being treated poorly. Now I will agree with you the guys in the dept with me were mostly cool, it seems that management collects a disproportionate amount of douchebaggery.

      I'm happy with where I'm at now. I'm self-employed, and as long as women are having babies, I'm not at risk of being downsized, outsourced, or insourced. :)

    14. Re:Oh I'm sorry by One+Monkey · · Score: 2

      Unwittingly you may have just provided the answer to the age old query of why it is that men don't seem to be able to multitask.

      They are all multi-tasking, constantly. Most men that I've encountered take the assessment of a female person's surface attractiveness as something their brain will just do regardless of whether they want it to or not. It doesn't stop them listening to anything she might have to say or assessing her personal qualities any more than any other factor such as trying to hold a sensible conversation on a bad phone line or whatever.

      If it is true that a woman can have many conversations with a man and never once think about his surface attractiveness then that leaves a whole heap of spare brain capacity for multi-tasking. I have heard women say "I just never thought of x that way" and assumed it meant the survey had been carried out but disregarded as irrelevant; this is the way it works for me.

      If, in fact, the survey never takes place at all it explains a hell of a lot about a lot of things... to me, anyway.

      --
      www.nodicerpg.com - Some RP stuff for free, some not so for free, but still cheap.
  2. Re:/. cannot math today it has the dumb by mmmmbeer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There may be some disagreement about what it means to "dominate." Clearly the author feels it requires a higher disparity.

  3. Re:How many developers by luckymutt · · Score: 2

    Interestingly, there were only 100.
    That made the statistician's job really easy.

  4. Re:The difference is... by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    They defiantly approach problems differently, I find women developers tend to be less interested in the next big things but the daily process of keeping things working... Now I could be way off because most of the Women developers I have worked with are from the 1980's graduates, and are focused on retirement. But even with younger women developers they seem less interested in trying to make something and more to keep it running or do what it is told.

    This isn't a bad thing, I have seen some very good code produced, and very timely.

    However it does sometimes create a situation where it is harder to create a change in the process.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  5. Re:/. cannot math today it has the dumb by nschubach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I question the "leaving in droves" comment though. Did the females leave or did the number of males coming in just go up an a rate faster than women? According to their data, far more men have submitted resumes than women.

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  6. Thank god! by Jailbrekr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its been a total sausage fest in I/T for the last 20 years. We need more women so we can act uncomfortable and awkward in what we consider our native surroundings.

    --
    Feed the need: Digitaladdiction.net
    1. Re:Thank god! by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny

      We need more women so we can act uncomfortable and awkward in what we consider our native surroundings.

      Wait, we're geeks ... I thought uncomfortable and awkward was our native surroundings. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Thank god! by DeciDigi · · Score: 2

      I disagree, there weren't and aren't many girl geeks, and they are significantly outnumbered by guy geeks but they do exist. They are not mythological like unicorns..

      I was playing in vi when I was still in high school. Why? Because I've always enjoyed code. My mom *gasp* was a hacker in the early '80s, and taught me how to code on my apple ][e. There are others, but often we're treated to a "pics or it didn't happen" mentality. Sometimes it's easier to just leave gender out of it.

  7. Honey, can you compile that code? by chrisj_0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    and then get me a beer :)

  8. Numbers by brit74 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In 1987, 42% of the software developers in America were women... the percentages of women who earned Computer Science degrees rose steadily, peaking at 37% in 1984
    If women with computer science degrees peaked in 1984 at 37%, then it also means women working as software developers were less likely to have a degree.

    From the Article: "In the past year, the number of women majoring in Computer Science has nearly doubled at Harvard, rising from 13% to 25%"
    If there was that much change in a single year, I'm betting it has more to do with the admissions process or other factors than any society-wide phenomena.

    1. Re:Numbers by dcollins · · Score: 2

      "If women with computer science degrees peaked in 1984 at 37%, then it also means women working as software developers were less likely to have a degree." ... in computer science.

      For example, I worked as a software engineer with my M.A. in mathematics & statistics. I know others who had physics degrees, etc.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  9. Just my theory. by wcrowe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It has to do with the complexity of the systems. Those early computer systems were not very complicated. Then, throughout the late 80s and 90s systems and software became much more complex. However, in the last ten years or so, much of the complexity is hidden. Programming and systems management has become just a lot of pointing and clicking without any need (usually) to really understand what's going on underneath the covers.

    I want to add that this is just a theory, and that tt's not that I think women are incapable of understanding very complex systems, it's just that I think the majority of them have no interest in that kind of work.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Just my theory. by wizardforce · · Score: 2

      I think we just found the real problem: a perceived hostile work environment. Would you want to work in a field where you thought/found that most of your co-werkers thought you were inferior/didn't belong there? I wouldn't and I am guessing that neither would they.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  10. Itchy by kereira · · Score: 2

    Although it's great that more women are getting back into CS, these kinds of articles make me itch. Geek girls shouldn't be hired or coerced into taking CS because of or in spite of their gender. They should be hired because they're good at what they do, and they should be encouraged to study if they have a sincere enthusiasm for the subject. If it turns out that the best students, or the best employees are male... so be it. /female CS grad and web developer

    --
    I don't not believe there isn't a God.
    1. Re:Itchy by mattack2 · · Score: 2

      "How is this not discrimination?"

      It is, they just call it the euphemism "affirmative action" in this case.

  11. Women Were Driven Out by Grond · · Score: 4, Informative

    Women didn't leave the field voluntarily. Once it became apparent that programming was becoming a lucrative field women were systematically driven out by a system that favored men:

    Eager to indentify talented individuals to train as computer programmers, employers relied on aptitude tests to make hiring decisions. ... [T]he tests were widely compromised and their answers were available for study through all-male networks such as college fraternities and Elks lodges. ... [A] second type of test, the personality profile, was even more slanted to male applicants. Based on a series of preference questions, these tests sought to identify job applicants who were the ideal programming “type.” According to test developers, successful programmers had most of the same personality traits as other white-collar professionals. The important distinction, however, was that programmers displayed “disinterest in people” and that they disliked “activities involving close personal interaction.” It is these personality profiles, says Ensmenger, that originated our modern stereotype of the anti-social computer geek. ... Although the stereotype of the anti-social programmer was created in the 1960s, it is now self-perpetuating. Employers seek to hire new recruits who fit the existing mold. Young people self-select into careers where they believe they will fit in—for example, women currently comprise 18% of computer science undergraduate majors, down from 37% in 1985.

    The gender disparity in programming is not the result of slight differences between men and women or subtle unconscious biases. It is the result of overt discrimination going back decades to the origin of the profession. And it will take overt action to correct the disparity.

    1. Re:Women Were Driven Out by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Boo hoo. I'd feel a lot worse about this if it wasn't being overtly done in the opposite direction in other industries. Who is complaining about the over representation of women and the active discrimination against men and masculinity in the health services industry eh? I once applied for a job at a hospital, and even though it was an IT support position they still ran me through a personality test. Apparently I failed it because I valued truth over compassion and was more inclined toward introspection than socialization. Clearly that invalidated my adequacy as candidate. Most ironically, while the test said something to the effect that the questions should be answered as honestly as possible, when the interviewer saw that I had 'failed' their test for suitability in their monolith, she asked if I wanted to change things. I said straight up that the test said it wanted the most honest answers possible, so if I changed anything I would either have been lying before or lying now, and what purpose would either serve? They didn't even value their own nonsense. They just want people to fit in or get out.

      So yeah, I'll be more sympathetic when I see people trying to change unjust systems in both directions. Until then it's just sexist hypocrisy.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    2. Re:Women Were Driven Out by Rakishi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So they selected anti-social people who at the same time were highly social in joining fraternal organizations? Sounds perfectly and utterly non-contradictory.

    3. Re:Women Were Driven Out by Riceballsan · · Score: 2

      I have to agree, this seems to show the exact opposite of women being driven out. What does being biased towards a personality type have to do with genders? Unless there tends to be less females with that personality type as males, the same with leaked tests unless there's some huge reason why only men would cheat, why is it less likely that the test also went to some sororities, unless of course there weren't enough women interested in it to arrange such a thing. Personality discrimination I am seeing, Gender discrimination I am not. I know darn well that if there were enough women with the motivation to cheat or match personality stereotypes, they would. There are about the same number of socially awkward women as men, and your average moral standard and ethics is no higher in either gender either.

    4. Re:Women Were Driven Out by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      So yeah, I'll be more sympathetic when I see people trying to change unjust systems in both directions. Until then it's just sexist hypocrisy.

      Frankly your opinion is silly. You're basically saying that everyone has to do everything and everything has to be perfect or there's no point in trying.

      That's just a crock.

      I, like most people on this site exist in the wider computer industry. This is the area we care about and are active in. We are more familiar with the injustices present and some of us want do something about it.

      But according to you I should split my time equally between improving the computer industry, the healthcare industry and a whole bunch of industries that have problems that I don't even know about.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:Women Were Driven Out by binarybum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yep, you're on to us. We wanted to keep it a total secret etched in the tablets of our elk lodges, but we totally prefer the fat, anti-social, greasy fingered, soda sipping dweeb mold rather than simply trying to look for the most qualified individual for the job. It's completely overt - we are even willing to give up our capitalistic ideals and endure dents in our bottom line to maintain this fraternal tradition.

      It's probably okay that you know this now though - we are not frightened of loosing our stronghold. We know that you are incapable of taking overt action because we have evidence that is equally as strong as what you have presented, that you are all spending your time having topless pillow-fights in your sororities.

      This all makes total sense if you don't think about it and just assume that a significant majority of people in high places are just filled with hate to the point where they are willing to sacrifice financial and technological gains to consciously perpetuate an arbitrary standard.

      Signed CEOs everywhere

      --
      ôó
    6. Re:Women Were Driven Out by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      , is there anything else that government can do to make hiring people any more dangerous

      Look at the statistics for hiring academics. In the US with a government enforced discrimination in favour of women, when normalizing for the different biases across subjects, women need basically the same qualifications to get a job as men. In Europe where this is not the case, women need higher qualifications to get the same job. Basically, there is a massive bias and the government is doing its job by making society work.

      I recognise you from another thread: you seem to be very much of the opinion that the government gets in the way. The trouble is that you fall essentially in the same trap as communists by assuming that people won't be amazing a-holes who will destroy everything within their grasp.

      The trouble is that some people are amazing a-holes. The job of the government is to make society work even with major a-holes around. Like the kind of a-holes who think women are de-facto worse than men and won't hire them.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:Women Were Driven Out by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2

      In effect, yes. While there are "positive" discriminations like filling quotas with and lowering standards for women and minorities in everything from school admissions to awarding government contracts, it is rather hard to be sympathetic about injustices, because at that point the injustices are balancing out the special privileges.

      It amounts to a sort of social contact. Part of the reason that Western society evolved chivalrous behavior towards women was in compensation for their disenfranchisement. Men were expected to pay for everything because women were socially excluded from most of the workforce. Men were supposed to defer to women in most social situations because women were required to defer to men politically. I don't believe that this patriarchal society was right or good, but it was consistent and ethical (within its own standards, not objectively).

      The problem is that people want to have their cakes and eat them too. They want to be treated like equals and yet still have the special privileges that were afforded them in previous compensation for their inequality, in the end extending the very inequality.

      Frequently this common mindset is defended with the idea that "we" owe "them" for whatever previous injustices. This is flat out immoral. Each person can only be held accountable for what they do themselves. They are not their parents or grandparents or on back through eternity, and punishing them (even indirectly through unequal preferences) for the crimes of their ancestors is itself an injustice.

      In the end, you are either against the preferential treatment of any person based on membership in any superficial class, or you're not. I support equality, real equality, where performance is the only measure of value academically, professionally, socially, and politically.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  12. Re:/. cannot math today it has the dumb by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's always had majority men, but 58-42 is very different from the roughly 80-20 split that it has now. It's sort of like the difference between pediatric medicine (currently about 55-45 in favor of women) and nursing (95-5 in favor of women).

    In the cases where you have a gender in an extreme minority, you often get silly social reactions around them. For instance, male geeks who stay in all-male environments might not get used to treating women professionally rather than drooling over them or harassing them. Similarly, some female nurses (particularly older female nurses) have been known to mistreat male nurses because they think there is something wrong with the men.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  13. Cause and effect by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think it has anything to do with a rising interest in IT. its that women need jobs these days too, due to the economy, so i bet you will find ALL industries are increasing their woman count. Especially 'clean' jobs since most women ( or men really ) don't want to go out and dig ditches for a living.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  14. My mom was a computer operator in the 70s by Quila · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These days your average person pushes a button, types in a username/password, and starts clicking things to get to work.

    She powered up various large devices in order, typed a long hex boot string into the system, then proceded to load punch cards, open reel tapes and hard drive cake platters, and perform other various complicated tasks.

    It's a lot easier now.

    1. Re:My mom was a computer operator in the 70s by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      Okay, pick some task that needs solving. Now try implementing it on a modern computer in a high-level language. Then try implementing it on a machine from the early '80s, say a 1MHz 6502 with 16KB of RAM. Now tell me that programming back then was easy. Maybe I should repeat the quote from the STANTEC ZEBRA users' manual, which said that the 150 instruction (baroque instructions, with hundreds of side effects and behaviour that altered depending on the sequence - not uncommon at the time) limitation for programs was not a problem because no one could write a working program 150 instructions long.

      Simple computers do not mean that programming is simple. Quite the reverse. A complex computer is a lot more forgiving of programmers.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  15. Re:Something here not right by jtollefson · · Score: 2

    I'm sure I'm just responding to flamebait... but I'll bite.

    Every manager I've had in the past 10 years has been a woman. Matter of fact I just lost out a promotion to a woman. I'm not bitter either, she's just as good as I am and has been with the team longer.

    There may be a disparity of women to men in many IT workplaces... but it isn't always the case. Take your stereotypes somewhere else because they don't always apply.

  16. Re:42%? by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 2

    The 42% are women and the 58% are nerds. That's when.

  17. Why by Jorl17 · · Score: 2

    Why is it that America always represents the world? The World is so different from America.

    --
    Have you heard about SoylentNews?
  18. Lets run the fogcreek numbers per hiring category by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 5, Informative

    Even though this was a small sample, as Joel mentioned lets look at the numbers:

    Made it to resume review: Female - 75.68%, Male - 72.05%
    Made it to the coding stage: Female - 28.38%, Male - 26.49%
    Made it to phone interview: Female - 0.054%, Male - 0.099%
    In person interview: Female - 0.041%, Male - 0.0565%
    Received an offer: Female - 0.041%, Male - 0.0194%
    Official Hire: Female - 0.014%, Male - Male - 0.013%

    Even though this was a small sample, is there anything we can derive from this? The last stat to me doesn't matter as much, even though the numbers were for all intensive purposes the same percentage, even though there were 8 times more male applicants.

    If we were to break down the stages the women had better percentages up to the phone interview. Does this show or should this show that the males did better at the coding assignment? If we can agree that that is what happened then the whole "boys play with computers more, tinker, etc etc" might have 'some' truth to it. Before the phone interview the females led by nearly 2%. By the time the phone interview came around, the males had gained that 2% but additional ground on top of the that.

    However 100% of those females that made it to the in person interview made it to the offer stage while the men lost the ground that they gained during the coding stage. Does this mean perhaps that the males had poorer social skills to cause some doubt in their ability to do the work or perhaps be a good fit? Did the women wear low tops?(i am not suggesting the Joel and his interviewers are biased regarding to this, but i am just babbling there).

    Would be interesting to see what others think or perhaps what Joel thinks of the numbers after he printed them(assuming that he wasnt keeping track as things progressed through the entire process.

  19. Re:/. cannot math today it has the dumb by MoriT · · Score: 2
  20. Grace Hopper by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Informative

    Let's not forget Admiral Grace Hopper who programmed, developed a successful programming language, led successful standardization efforts, managed--did just about everything you could do with computers both as a direct individual-contributor and as a high-level manager.

    She was a nerd and she did "stuff that mattered."

    1. Re:Grace Hopper by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      But she had a PhD in mathematics from Yale; not your average person, male or female. She did more than develop successful programming language, she conceived of the compiler in an era of jump-wire programming, that's programming as we know it. And moreover the intention of the design of her language was to have something of which an intelligent non-programmer could follow the explanation as a simple quasi-english. And though we mock the successor, COBOL, of her language (which she also help design), remember that unlike most languages today it allows one to exactly specify representation in storage and disk, while now we struggle with portability issues largely revolving around lack of that.

  21. The figures do not add up by rhook · · Score: 2

    "In 1987, 42% of the software developers in America were women. And 34% of the systems analysts in America were women."

    So 58% of developers were men and 64% of systems analysts were men. Looks like men dominated the field then too.

  22. Re:The difference is... by treeves · · Score: 2

    Either way, he's probably not going to work tomorrow, right?

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  23. Re:This may be true... by OrangeMonkey11 · · Score: 2

    WOW look like someone panties is riding a bit too high and is getting uncomfortable, that was meant to be a joke.