Slashdot Mirror


Swede Arrested For Building Nuclear Reactor

An anonymous reader writes "A 31 year old Swedish male was arrested for trying to build a nuclear reactor in his apartment. He got hold of radioactive material thru mail-order purchases and from smoke detectors. Police raided his apartment after he had contacted the Swedish Radiation Authority (Strålsäkerhetsmyndigheten) to inquire if it was legal to construct a nuclear reactor at home."

72 of 410 comments (clear)

  1. Now, Come On ... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Funny

    Geez, everyone's a critic. He's just trying to send electricity back onto the grid and he probably couldn't get approval from his landlord to put solar panels on his roof.

    1. Re:Now, Come On ... by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      Well, a nuclear reactor potentially adds a whole new meaning to "there goes the neighborhood".

      P.S.Namely, there it goes in a cloud of radioactivity.I know nuclear reactors generally can't explode.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    2. Re:Now, Come On ... by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

      I know...Right!? I mean it's not like when this guy did the same thing in his dad's shed.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    3. Re:Now, Come On ... by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      Sadly, knowing most landlords, I'm thinking the guy probably would, if only because it wouldn't require bolting the thing onto the structure.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    4. Re:Now, Come On ... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Only if you're a superhero and only if it happened to you in the 60s.

      *sigh* Even radiation was better in the past.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Now, Come On ... by pjfontillas · · Score: 2

      As long as he doesn't have to bolt it down or changes something with the appearance of the house, most landlords wouldn't really complain too much. If they get their cut of the power, it's a sure thing they'll not only green light it but shoot down any complaints of neighbors concerning radiation or other minor complaints.

      Radiation from a nuclear reactor is a minor complaint?

      --
      Life. Is. Good.
  2. Lesson learned by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Never ask for permission, but just do!

    1. Re:Lesson learned by impaledsunset · · Score: 2

      If you're going to ignore the answer to a question, sometimes is best to not ask it at all.

  3. Better to ask forgiveness than permission by barlevg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love that the only reason he got busted is because he asked if it was okay...

    Seems like he should have either:

    (a) Asked BEFORE acquiring the material or

    (b) Not asked at all

    1. Re:Better to ask forgiveness than permission by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      I really want to agree here but, this is one of those areas that tests my resolve a bit.

      Look at the pictures on this guys blog. He blew up a container that he was working in and contaminated his whole stove area. Who knows what other messes this guy was making. Did you see the pictures of the original Radioactive Boyscout recently? (when he was caught stealing smoke detectors).

      Admittedly, they are doing some cool stuff, and I have no qualms about them putting their own lives at risk for the love of their hobbies but... Even the original guy said that by the end of it, he could detect the elevated levels of radiation several houses away. Given the inverse square law, thats, a bit scary.

      Never mind the contaminated mess he could be leaving behind. An apartment where someone else may have to live, and you share walls with others, just really is a bad spot for this.

      Thats not to say he couldn't savely have the reactor there once built but...preparing the materials, and other operations that can contaminate the apartment?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  4. What are you in for? by TehNoobTrumpet · · Score: 5, Funny

    Prisoner 1: "I raped a bitch and killed her. What're you in for?"
    Prisoner 2: "I built a nuclear power plant in my kitchen."

    1. Re:What are you in for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Prisoner 3: "I downloaded and shared 10,000 movies."

    2. Re:What are you in for? by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Prisoner 5: "I published the encryption algorithm used by an American company, which is legal where I live"

    3. Re:What are you in for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "And they all moved away from me on the Group "W" bench there."

    4. Re:What are you in for? by ginbot462 · · Score: 2

      OMG? What happened to Prisoner 4? You bastards, wait until Number 6 hears about this. (He'll probably look smugly at you .. in knowing sort of way)

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    5. Re:What are you in for? by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      She was caring for a hedgehog. From the same source... http://www.thelocal.se/35230/20110729/ Those Sweeds are a bunch of criminals!

    6. Re:What are you in for? by Amouth · · Score: 5, Funny

      Arlo: "Littering." And they all moved away from me on the bench
      there, and the hairy eyeball and all kinds of mean nasty things, till I
      said, "And creating a nuisance." And they all came back, shook my hand,
      and we had a great time...

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    7. Re:What are you in for? by haruchai · · Score: 2

      Arlo Guthrie: Littering

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    8. Re:What are you in for? by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Prisoner 3: "I had consensual sex with two women, who then met up and withdrew consent after the fact. They only busted me after I leaked crimes committed by the US Army."

      Don't forget, this is Sweden.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    9. Re:What are you in for? by Mikkeles · · Score: 5, Funny

      Prisoner No. 6: "I am not a number!"

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    10. Re:What are you in for? by N0Man74 · · Score: 2

      Prisoner 6: "I published a link on my blog to Prisoner 5's algorithm."

  5. The hard parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Choice quote: "To get it to generate electricity you would need a turbine and a generator and that is very difficult to build yourself".

    Yeah, it's not like thhey're nineteenth century steam technology like the redundant safety systems.

    1. Re:The hard parts by plover · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Choice quote: "To get it to generate electricity you would need a turbine and a generator and that is very difficult to build yourself".

      On its face, the quote is correct. A turbine and generator would be hard to build yourself. From scratch.

      However, you can go to an automotive junkyard and pick up a used turbo unit for a few bucks, and while you're there, you can pick up an alternator, too. Now the problem is no harder than piping the steam from a pressure cooker through the turbo, and hooking the turbo to the alternator. Just add fission and you're on the grid!

      A lot of people are playing with homemade turbine engines made from junked car parts. Perhaps they are deliberately trying to make it sound hard to discourage other Swedes with too many smoke detectors from trying a similar experiment.

      --
      John
    2. Re:The hard parts by jfengel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That would get you out some electricity. Building it as a continuously-operating system is somewhat trickier.

      Even trickier than that is getting it into your house power grid, which means syncing up the AC and other EE-grade power issues. You can buy the device you need, but it would end up costing more than just buying power from the power company, and be less convenient. (Plus, he was doing it in an apartment, probably without direct access to the mains.)

      He didn't want to generate power, just do a little tinkering. He might well have hooked it up to a junk generator at some point, just to prove he could, but it wasn't the point. And the authorities were right to get nervous about it: the materials are toxic as well as radioactive, and putting more lives at risk than his. Get yourself a shed in the middle of nowhere next time.

    3. Re:The hard parts by Talderas · · Score: 2

      Mr Rogers is a terrorist!

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    4. Re:The hard parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why assume he wanted electricity? A subcritical pile makes heat. Heat is energy, heat is expensive. It gets cold in europe in the winter. Stack the pile in your furnace in the winter, unstack it in the summer so it doesn't make heat. Easy peasy. Only real problem is the toxic result of fission. Also libyans might try to steal your pile, so send a HS kid back in time to tell you when you need to wear a bullet proof vest. Easy.

    5. Re:The hard parts by plover · · Score: 4, Funny

      We're talking about building a kitchen table nuclear reactor, and your safety concern is that the junk-car turbo might not have been properly operated?

      I like your style!

      --
      John
  6. Being arrested is no big deal... being CHARGED is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    What's the big deal about being "arrested"? Police (and others) use their power of arrest all the time. The big story will be if he is charged with something.

  7. I'l bet... by vk2sky · · Score: 2

    ...it's that bloody boy scout, up to his old tricks again.

    1. Re:I'l bet... by Talderas · · Score: 2

      He wasn't even an Eagle Scout at the time. He earned that later. Can you imagine if he was an Eagle Scout? I bet you he either would have figured out some awesome new method for nuclear power generation or would have died in the process as so many Eagle Scouts seem to do in the name of progress (Roger Chaffee, Ellison Onizuka, William McCool).

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  8. headline != article content by rbrausse · · Score: 5, Informative

    he was questioned by the police because he apparently violated some Swedish nuclear material laws.

    the story in short:
    - he invested $950
    - he bought radioactive material and dismantled one domestic fire alarm
    - he blogged about his expirements
    - he asked the Swedish authorities if it is allowed to build a nuclear reactor
    - some official accompanied by police offices visited his flat and found no radiation problem
    - he was questioned at a police stations and was afterwards released
    - all the nuclear stuff was confiscated

    1. Re:headline != article content by vlm · · Score: 2

      Everything about the story makes sense except for

      - all the nuclear stuff was confiscated

      What he was doing, and what he owned, was perfectly legal, right?

      That's the whole point of exempt sources... Ultra super low power, yet detectable with good gear... Assuming he wasn't stupid enough to beg borrow steal non-exempt sources...

      Now if he had unlicensed non-exempt sources, I can see why they'd throw the book at him and confiscate it all. I'd even more or less support it. I have friends who are in charge of non-exempt sources and the legal requirements are mostly sane and sensible so its not only legally correct but also scientifically / morally / ethically correct to follow non-exempt source licensing laws. So many laws in the US are corrupt that its weird that I can actually whole heartedly support one...

      I'm sure that screwing around with a domestic fire alarm is 1) Perfectly safe 2) thru a peculiarity of a loophole of the law is technically illegal. But thats right up there with ripping off mattress labels, or currency defacement laws.

      Anyway does anyone know if he was busted with the Swedish-chef equivalent of exempt or non-exempt sources? Maybe Sweden must have the concept of exempt sources, modern industrial society more or less depends upon it?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:headline != article content by vlm · · Score: 2

      I'm sure that screwing around with a domestic fire alarm

      He also ordered radioactive material from overseas.

      so?

      If its a non-stolen legally exempt source under the overseas country laws (probably USA) and also is a legally exempt source under local laws (most likely) and if he followed the export/import/shipping laws (hmm, getting complicated here, but for exempt sources its generally not a big deal) then it doesn't matter.

      People/companies ship radioactive material overseas, perfectly legally, all the time. Even the non-exempt stuff is really no big deal even when you follow all the laws, most of which are common sense anyway.

      No one wants to discuss which laws he broke, if he broke any, just a lot of "radiation = girl cooties" and "get in your couch and watch Oprah like you're supposed to, prole" babble. What he did can easily be done completely legally and above board, or if you almost intentionally try very hard can be multiple felonies.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:headline != article content by beanpoppa · · Score: 2

      - all the nuclear stuff was confiscated

      Then the fire inspector came and cited him for not having any functioning smoke detectors.

  9. Nope by symes · · Score: 2

    He was not trying to generate electricity - "To get it to generate electricity you would need a turbine and a generator and that is very difficult to build yourself," he told HD. He was just tinkering! Obviously a DIY purist. This guy should get a geek medal or something. Utterly brilliant. And I am very pleased I'm not his neighbour.

  10. another attempt by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 5, Informative

    This kid tried (badly, apparently) to do the same in the US a while back. I lived only a couple of streets over, but had left the area a dozen years before his attempt. I think I delivered newspapers to his house.

  11. Overkill much? by Xacid · · Score: 2

    Is it really necessary to raid a guy who was asking for permission in the first place? Seems like he would have welcomed an "inspection" and handled things accordingly from there. Since he was asking for permission it sounds like he wasn't trying to break the law - give the guy some credit. All this is going to do is discourage others from inquiring and just doing whatever they're after.

  12. How was this going to work? by volsung · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm puzzled how this guy was going to build a "nuclear reactor" out of mail-order isotopes and smoke detectors. Smoke detectors usually contain Am-241, which is an alpha emitter. The mail order stuff I assume was uranium ore. Was he planning to create neutrons from (alpha, n) reactions and use those to trigger a few fissions from the uranium?

    This sounds like his experiment bears as much similarity to a reactor as a balloon full of hairspray resembles a car engine.

    1. Re:How was this going to work? by hAckz0r · · Score: 2
      Don't worry, just hide behind your newspaper. That will be all you need to stop alpha particle radiation.

      Now after the Americium-241 degrades into Cm or plutonium, that is another matter. For the neutron radiation a good thick wall of lead should do it. Just keep that tucked inside your closet for easy access.

    2. Re:How was this going to work? by Dencrypt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's his blog. Might explain some of his work.
      richardsreactor.blogspot.com/

    3. Re:How was this going to work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's pretty much exactly the way David Hahn (the "atomic boy scout") did it. An alpha emitter - Am-241, but also radium from old clock dial paint - wrapping in IIRC beryllium foil to make a neutron source. The fissionable wasn't so much uranium as thorium (extracted from gas lantern mantles -- back then they still had thorium in them). Hahn had quite the little breeder reactor going in his garden shed.

      Not all nuclear reactors are multi-megawatt power reactors. Indeed, most aren't. Quite a few colleges have research reactors on campus. (Or had; who knows in these paranoid days.)

  13. Re:The worying bit is by biodata · · Score: 2

    Replace the words 'radioactive material' with the word 'fertiliser', given recent events, and see whether you are more/same/less worried.

    --
    Korma: Good
  14. Belt buckles, shoelaces and a piece of gum by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who needs radioactive material to build a nuclear reactor? This is clearly no Macgyver.

    1. Re:Belt buckles, shoelaces and a piece of gum by geoffaus · · Score: 2

      I prefer my Mr Fusion

      --
      As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
  15. Next on Discovery... by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

    Arrested? He should get his own TV show!

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    1. Re:Next on Discovery... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      What should the format be like? A mix of Mythbusters and Jackass?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Next on Discovery... by Adriax · · Score: 2
      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
  16. Re:Is this even possible? by hAckz0r · · Score: 2
    Its possible is you are building an RTG reactor. Its not much more than using the Seebeck effect (temperature differential) to generate electricity.

    Radioisotope thermoelectric generator
    https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_generator

  17. Re:Being arrested is no big deal... being CHARGED by del_diablo · · Score: 2

    But the problem was that it is not even illegal to do that in Sweden. It is only a legal "greyzone", and there is no laws for it either.
    What should have happened is that the police deliver a letter stating "we need to approve if its legal or not", ask him to please halt the building process(in case it turns out is would not be legal after a law has been made), and then it goes trough the electeds, and if there are indeed large enough reasons agains it should be illegal.
    Arresting him for it is outright rude.

  18. Re:The worying bit is by EdZ · · Score: 2

    lasting for decades

    Or until someone busts out a hose. Whichever is sooner.

  19. Re:Prisoner 6 by openfrog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Prisoner 6: "I recorded a video of police beating the crap out of a teenager for no good reason at a bus stop."

    http://neil.fraser.name/news/2010/12/23/
    http://neil.fraser.name/news/2011/04/28/

    P.S. There is a good ending to this story: follow the links to the blog of Neil Fraser, a Google engineer who bailed the guy out after he spent seven months in jail, accused of, since video recording police is not illegal... "attempted lynching"....

  20. Re:Government destroys economy by canajin56 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Keep in mind that you are replying to Reacher Gilt. If his neighbors get irradiated or killed, they can organize a boycott and let the invisible hand of the market take care of it. After being brutally boycotted, nobody else would ever dare try it again. That's why the police are unnecessary. If you get robbed, simply spread the word. People will not do business with the robber, and then he will starve to death. Much cleaner. You can't have the police stop him. See, he has unlimited and inalienable freedom. If you stop a murderer from murdering a child, you have stolen his freedom to murder, his natural and inalienable right. Without government in the way, he would be totally free to do so.

    --
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  21. Want details by Stellian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How exactly one goes about building a nuclear reactor from mail order uranium (presumably depleted) and smoke detectors (about 1 microgram of Americium 241 each) ? The critical mass of Am 241 is over 50 Kg, so he would need 50 million smoke detectors to build a bomb. For a controlled, moderated reaction, much more, maybe hundreds of Kg. The technology to enrich natural uranium up to reactor-grade level is barely in the hands of states.

    The fact that someone took him seriously and actually sent a guy with a detector AND a police squad to his house shows just how ridiculously incompetent the regulators are, and how paranoid people get when the word "radiation" is uttered.

    1. Re:Want details by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As an explosion risk, this guy ranks well below a kid with a pack of sparklers. However, I can see taking some precautions around anyone who has been playing with Am241-containing items in any atypical quantity...

      That stuff is a reasonably zesty alpha emitter, and modestly well absorbed if taken internally, which isn't a good mix. If some noob has been fucking around, it is hardly unreasonable to take the precautionary step of assuming that he's manage to produce a bunch of toxic and radioactive dust.

    2. Re:Want details by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sure they were more worried about the radioactive material itself than the possibility he would actually succeed at building a reactor. He was never going to build a working reactor, but it's quite possible he might have acquired enough radioactive material to make himself and his neighbors very sick.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Want details by interkin3tic · · Score: 2
      TFA points out that he himself didn't expect much of it

      He told the newspaper that had he succeeded in building a nuclear reactor, generating any power would probably have proved beyond him. "To get it to generate electricity you would need a turbine and a generator and that is very difficult to build yourself," he told HD.

      He also claims he had been using a geiger counter and had not detected "a problem" with the radiation.

  22. Re:Mail-order? by vlm · · Score: 2

    If by "nuclear material" you mean legally exempt sources, there's a couple places. United nuclear is a marketer/reseller of the actual suppliers. Kind of like digikey and mouser do not manufacture resistors, they resell them. By legal definition exempt sources are harmless; don't sweat it.

    If by "nuclear material" you mean legally non-exempt sources, there's a couple perfectly legal places. Just submit your valid non-expired NRC licensing information, which they'll verify, and then ship the goods. If I recall correctly UPS had a special shipping process that was horrifically expensive. I was very tangentially involved with the NBC gear at my army reserve unit and you could get detection gear non-exempt sources thru "the mail", used for testing equipment and also for training. Think of a licensed animal veterinarian getting licensed non-exempt radio-iodine shots to treat a cat with hyperthyroidism, this stuff is all just off the shelf and business as usual. Follow the law like everyone else in the business. I suppose you could forge a Swedish license to order stuff overseas, but get caught doing that and its well deserved hard time, both for the forger and the shipper who didn't bother to verify the license "just this one time".

    If by "nuclear material" you mean normal household products that are radioactive, like low-sodium salt, or old camping lantern mantles, or smoke detectors, or pretty much anything made of granite, any one of numerous "rock collection minerals", well I guess start with amazon.com. If by some miracle, you have a radiation-free house, it can be just as radioactive as any normal house with just a couple mail order purchases.

    If by "nuclear material" you mean something a meth head stole and is fencing on ebay to raise some money to buy sudafed, well I guess the answer is ebay.com.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  23. Re:Being arrested is no big deal... being CHARGED by adsl · · Score: 2

    I am presuming that you are British? In the UK being "arrested" merely means being questioned. It has little to no long term consequences. In other countries being "arrested" means actually being formally charged with an offence. An ""arrest" record stays on your record forever and many job interviewers specifically ask if one has ever been "arrested". As this is a public record it means answering it in the affirmative and hoping that the interviewer listens to your side of the experience. But many would just move on to another candidate. Thus an arrest record can be devastating.

  24. Re:Information published by the experimenter himse by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 2

    With little gems on his blog page like "But I tried to cook Americium, Radium and Beryllium in 96% sulphuric-acid, to easier get them blended.", accompanied by photos of goop spilled all over his kitchen stove, I kinda agree with the authorities here....

    --
    Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  25. Re:Being arrested is no big deal... being CHARGED by SEWilco · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's the big deal about being "arrested"? Police (and others) use their power of arrest all the time. The big story will be if he is charged with something.

    He won't get a charge. Neutrons don't carry a charge.

  26. Re:Prisoner 6 by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

    kind of a sad story. the kid did time for no reason and the cops and DA got off scot-free! ;(

    and the kid only got off because he had a friend. a lot of us would not have had this kind of help and would rot in prison for a long time.

    the system is broken if this can happen. HOW many months was he locked up - and for no good reason at all!

    how much suffering did the cops and DA get?

    NONE.

    there is no justice. this thing happens a lot and the judges do nothing about it. they all know the system is an out of control machine and its best to just stay out of its lunatic way if you want to stay alive.

    how very sad to hear this about our so-called justice system.

    the DA should be serving LIFE for this. with no parole. then maybe the rich white fucks will think again before ruining a guy's life!

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  27. In his apartment? Ridiculous! by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 2

    I build mine in a rented garage, like all right-thinking people. It's right by the death ray and the free energy machines.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  28. Re:Being arrested is no big deal... being CHARGED by captainpanic · · Score: 2

    I also don't like a police state where you can get arrested for no apparent reason. But it's not like there was "no apparent reason". He was playing with goddamn nuclear material!

    What should the police have done according to all you complaining people? Kindly request that he refrains from building a nuclear reactor, and that he delivers the nuclear material before noon the next day, because although it's a grey area in the law, it's best not to play with it in a residential area?

    Of course they raided the apartment and confiscated the whole thing. And when you raid an apartment, and confiscate stuff, you also arrest people.

    Good job, Sweden.

  29. Re:Is this even possible? by Alioth · · Score: 2

    "Tiny" nuclear reactors can be as small as 9 inches by 16 inches, as in the SNAP-10 used to power a spacecraft in the 1960s (this was a full-fledged nuclear reactor, not an RTG). Much much smaller than a hot tub.

  30. Just goes to show by paiute · · Score: 2

    It's better to ask for forgiveness than permission.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  31. I just put a skylight in my place. by drainbramage · · Score: 2

    The people upstairs are furious.

    --
    No brain, no pain.
    1. Re:I just put a skylight in my place. by mikael · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... and glow in the dark.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  32. Re:Being arrested is no big deal... being CHARGED by Xtifr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But the problem was that it is not even illegal to do that in Sweden. It is only a legal "greyzone", and there is no laws for it either.

    I'm sure Sweden has laws against things like reckless endangerment. That Americium is some nasty crap. It's not as toxic as Plutonium, but it's no fun.

    Forget radioactivity for a minute. How would you feel if it turned out that your neighbor had been growing ebola cultures in his living room because he was convinced he could find a cure? I doubt if there are any specific laws against growing your own ebola cultures, but I'll damn sure betcha it's against plenty of laws that are on the books.

  33. Why arrested? by shaitand · · Score: 2

    He was obviously making a good faith effort to find out the relevant laws and comply. He bought freely available materials over-the-counter so to speak. This isn't a bad guy but rather a curious one and justice is not served by punishing him. As some point people have forgotten that the law is guideline to justice and that actual justice should be served by the system, not strict compliance with the letter of the law.

  34. i don't worry about regulators overreacting by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    i worry more about the insane things some crackpot might be doing with radioactive elements next door

    you have strange priorities, because the regulators were RIGHT to overreact

    if regulators got the impression some loony toon was playing with radioactivity in an apartment building, they aren't doing their job if they don't overreact

    is this hysteria on my part? false alarmism on my part?

    no, it is false complacency on your part to take the concept of some wackjob playing with radioactivity in tight living spaces lightly

    and if you resent my use of the words "crackpot", "loony toon" and "wackjob", then you have no sense of responsibility, and judging by radioactive boyscout: swedish edition's sense of responsibility, there are far stronger words ic ould have chosen to use

    you don't play with radioactivity in an apartment building. you don't do that. it is highly irresponsible. understand that, or understand nothing. this isn't about freedoms being trounced or overintrusive bureaucracy or the rights of the science minded to explore and build: it is about IRRESPONSIBILITY

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i don't worry about regulators overreacting by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 2

      If the police had come with a search warrant, and arrested him if they found evidence that he was doing something illegal, that would be reasonable. But arresting him merely because he asked permission to make a reactor is silly.

  35. Re:Prisoner 6 by c6gunner · · Score: 2

    the DA should be serving LIFE for this. with no parole. then maybe the rich white fucks will think again before ruining a guy's life!

    Thaks for that calm, reasonable assesment of the situation, and for not resorting to race-baiting or a lynch-mob mentality. Individuals such as yourself are an invaluable part of the slashdot community. Keep up the good work!