Slashdot Mirror


Start-Up Claims Immortality For Data With 'Stone-Like' Disc

CWmike writes "Start-up Millenniata and LG plan to soon release a new optical disc and read/write player that will store movies, photos or any other data forever. The data can be accessed using any current DVD or Blu-ray player. The M-Disc can be dipped in liquid nitrogen and then boiling water without harming it. It also has a Defense Department study (PDF) backing up the resiliency of its product compared with other leading optical disc competitors. The company would not disclose what material is used to produce the optical discs, referring to it only as a 'natural' substance that is 'stone-like.' Like DVDs and Blu-ray discs, the M-Disc platters are made up of multiple layers of material. But there is no reflective, or die, layer. Instead, during the recording process a laser 'etches' pits onto the substrate material."

188 of 261 comments (clear)

  1. This story certainly has immortality by toby · · Score: 1

    Like the fabled non-volatile memory, stone-like disks have appeared on Slashdot at least once before.

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:This story certainly has immortality by Conditioner · · Score: 3, Funny
    2. Re:This story certainly has immortality by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      A Mr. F. Flintstone of Bedrock writes in to say: "But ... we had these when I was a kid and stored movies on them. Only they were flat, and on cave walls."

    3. Re:This story certainly has immortality by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      Close.

      The M-Disc can be dipped in liquid nitrogen and then boiling water without harming it

      I used to be a blacksmith back in an earlier life, and I still have all of my tools, which include a 500-pound power hammer. I bet that would make short work of that pissy little drive... :-)

  2. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The M-Disc can be dipped in liquid nitrogen and then boiling water without harming it.

    Yeah ... /me rushes out and buys one tonight at Best Buy because, you know, the last fourteen computers, MP3 players and PDAs i've owned all died in the vats of liquid nitrogen around my house - for some stupid reason I keep dropping stuff in those.

    1. Re:What? by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 2

      In fairness, I think all of us have accidentally dropped a consumer device in water or let it sit on a dashboard on a hot day. While this technology may not initially be useful for regular devices, eventually we may come to benefit from it.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    2. Re:What? by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 2

      Yeah, the right questions would be...
      1) Will a 3 ft drop to a concrete floor break it? How many such falls can it withstand?
      2) If I rub the readable side with sand paper, will it get damaged? How long will it hold? Can the data still be recovered?
      3) How variable is the temperature range it is supposed to stored in? What happens if there is power outage and I cannot maintain the range for 1-2 weeks?
      4) Ditto for moisture, and general exposure to air & water.

    3. Re:What? by Sene · · Score: 4, Informative

      I didn't see them calling the disc idiot-proof :)

    4. Re:What? by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Be careful when you hold the baby.

    5. Re:What? by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 2

      Yeah ... /me rushes out and buys one tonight at Best Buy because, you know, the last fourteen computers, MP3 players and PDAs i've owned all died in the vats of liquid nitrogen around my house - for some stupid reason I keep dropping stuff in those.

      That was obviously a reference to climate change. Global warming does not mean that it will get uniformly hotter, but that the temperatures become more extreme at both ends of the range. Hence it will get as cold as liquid nitrogen in Winter and as hot as boiling water in Summer.

      So it will be nice to know that our data will survive, even if we won't stand a chance.

    6. Re:What? by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... /me rushes out and buys one tonight at Best Buy because, you know, the last fourteen computers, MP3 players and PDAs i've owned all died in the vats of liquid nitrogen around my house - for some stupid reason I keep dropping stuff in those.

      That was obviously a reference to climate change. Global warming does not mean that it will get uniformly hotter, but that the temperatures become more extreme at both ends of the range. Hence it will get as cold as liquid nitrogen in Winter and as hot as boiling water in Summer.

      So it will be nice to know that our data will survive, even if we won't stand a chance.

      I didn't see any reference at all to climate change in his post. To me it was a sarcastic point that being able to survive being dipped in liquid nitrogen is a bit excessive, because no one keeps liquid nitrogen around the house. See, it's called sarcasm.

      Nor did I see anything in the summary that would point to climate change. I think they were simply showing that if it can survive going from liquid nitrogen to boiling water, it will survive 10 years in your non-climate controlled storage shed.

      Or were you just desperately looking for any way possible to preach to us about how global warming is going to kill us all sometime next week?

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    7. Re:What? by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      I am concerned about the time frame too. A dip is usually 5 seconds. I would be concerned about much moderate temperatures for much prolonged time period.

    8. Re:What? by countertrolling · · Score: 2

      See, it's called sarcasm.

      Well, speaking of which... I mean, I'm sure you're responding to something perfectly serious

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    9. Re:What? by chill · · Score: 1

      Assume it is multiple layers of synthetic diamond or sapphire. Sapphire crystal is used to make some damn impervious stuff.

      How do you think something like that would hold up to your scenarios?

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    10. Re:What? by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      See, it's called sarcasm.

      Well, speaking of which.. I mean, I'm sure you're responding to something perfectly serious

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    11. Re:What? by countertrolling · · Score: 2

      How'd that happen?

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    12. Re:What? by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      How'd that happen?

      Well, you can say that again!

      As to the GP... Man, I really hope he wasn't serious, but my sarc meter read nothing as I was reading his post. If he was sarcastic, I need to have my sarc meter re-WHOOSHED.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    13. Re:What? by mlts · · Score: 1

      I know this is a revert to older technology, but for price of disks like this, maybe going to a caddy-based mechanism for the DVD writer might be a good idea, and have the disks shipped in caddies? This way, the media would not have to leave the caddy, greatly decreasing the chance of getting scratched. Of course, the media can be removed from the caddy to be read on a normal CD/DVD drive.

      For long term archiving, this would be a good idea, as the biggest enemy in most environments to optical media are scratches.

    14. Re:What? by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      you too?

      what gets me is every time I have liquid nitrogen and boiling water in close proximity I never think its a bad idea.

    15. Re:What? by That+Guy+From+Mrktng · · Score: 1

      Duh, It's made of diamond[1] you only have to show it to a women and you will lose it. /sexist

      [1]Thats my wild guess, the disk is made of several layers of diamond nano particles, ala CPU diffusion technologies, I have tough about it before but will be nice to get more details, this and the "moving heatsink" are probably the coolest hardware news I remember from /. pretty scarce nowadays. Do we have to get an almost-meltdown in global economy to get good stories?

    16. Re:What? by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      If he was sarcastic, I need to have my sarc meter re-WHOOSHED

      The giveaway was the idea that global warming would bring Winters down to -200C and Summer up to 100C. Those figures may be a tad exaggerated.

    17. Re:What? by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      I'd just be interested in it as a way to store old data at work in a way that doesn't rot/break over a few years.

    18. Re:What? by ArundelCastle · · Score: 2

      In fairness, I think all of us have accidentally dropped a consumer device in water or let it sit on a dashboard on a hot day. While this technology may not initially be useful for regular devices, eventually we may come to benefit from it.

      In fairness, liquid nitrogen and water share very few properties. Nor is the convection of boiling water and radiation of solar energy affecting a solid the same way.
      Extreme conditions make for good press releases and irritating slashdot summaries. Simulating 200+ years of real decay is neither provable or disprovable. A "forever" product only needs to last as long as it's remembered. I can remember reading about three "archival" optical/magnetic/whatever media products on /. in the past. I can't tell you what they are called, and you probably haven't heard of them either.

      Of course I might be working for the crystalline holographic storage lobby.

    19. Re:What? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      I am concerned about the time frame too. A dip is usually 5 seconds. I would be concerned about much moderate temperatures for much prolonged time period.

      Ditto. Liquid nitrogen is great as a publicity stunt, but then you can also pour it onto bare skin without taking any damage (you have to do it right, the evaporating nitrogen forms a protective layer so the liquid never touches your skin and then you angle the limb so it runs off across the gas layer). OTOH how long can you store one of these at 110F and 100% humidity (common in many parts of the world) before the media dies?

    20. Re:What? by badran · · Score: 2

      This is more like Child-proofing. You will be surprised what a 5 year old can do.

    21. Re:What? by greentshirt · · Score: 2
      Actually, I find the parent's list of questions highly relevant. The most common ways I've destroyed data-mediums are (1) dropping and shattering them (2) scratching them (3) leaving them in car/office/attic without realizing and (4) accidentally getting them wet. Wanting a potential backup medium to be withstand the most commons forms of accidental damage is not idiot-proofing.

      I really don't care if this product can withstand the heat of a thousand angry suns; however, if it proves more resilient in my real world usage, then there's a story here.

    22. Re:What? by mlk · · Score: 1

      Wide spread adoption of this sort of thing would kill the Disney and Barbie business models.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    23. Re:What? by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

      Will it survive being in a building on fire and collapsing?

    24. Re:What? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      This is more like Child-proofing. You will be surprised what a 5 year old can do.

      I expect they see their market being companies who want to store records for very long periods of time, possibly centuries, not people with kids. I do agree though that kids can be horrifically destructive with discs though.

    25. Re:What? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Most things shatter from internal stresses when they are exposed to "extreme" (relatively) heat compared to what they were just in. Something to do with the exterior expanding far faster than the interior.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    26. Re:What? by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      If he was sarcastic, I need to have my sarc meter re-WHOOSHED

      The giveaway was the idea that global warming would bring Winters down to -200C and Summer up to 100C. Those figures may be a tad exaggerated.

      I took it as:
      We will need data storage this resilient because we are all going to die. Only stuff that can handle these extremes will survive.

      However, I think you are correct. Off to get my re-WHOOSHing done.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    27. Re:What? by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      And what about being dropped on a rooftop while skydiving from13,500 ft (~4114 meters)

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  3. Bedrock: by Hartree · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think this is how Fred Flintstone's instant camera worked.

    1. Re:Bedrock: by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Funny

      M-Disc
      Meet the M-Disc
      It's modern stone-age data storage, you need

      M-Disc
      Meet the M-Disc
      It will store your data till the human race is history

      Let's write the data on a piece of stone-like strata
      Thanks to the guys at Millenniata

      When you use the M-Disk
      Your data will last a life time
      Even more than a life time
      Your data will last a long ass time!

      Is my boredom showing?

    2. Re:Bedrock: by couchslug · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm still waiting for beaver shots of Betty.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:Bedrock: by Genda · · Score: 3, Funny

      Would that be better than a Betty shot of Beaver? "Ward... don't you think you were a little hard on the Beav last night?"

    4. Re:Bedrock: by Hartree · · Score: 1

      *shrug* "It's a living."

  4. Immortal Reader As Well by Normal+Dan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd like to see this along with a disc reader that will withstand the test of time. What good is a disc if it can't be read with future technology? Imagine an archaeologist finding this disc 2000 years from now, with no way to read it. Now imagine if there was a device that withstood the test of time and could play back the information on the disc in some form. The people of the future would just need to wipe the screen down and press play.

    --
    A unique way to learn a language: http://languageloom.com
    1. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It wouldn't be cheap; but so long as the standard survived, or was infer-able, an optical disk reader in working condition would be merely a convenience:

      Using the microscopy capabilities of the present, much less the future(assuming we aren't fighting wars for canned goods and desperately holding off the murderous rat-men, in which case it probably doesn't matter), getting a complete image of the pits and lands on the disc surface would merely be a matter of considerable tedium. From there, with knowledge of the standard, it would be an image processing task to recover the data(and, of course, those would have to be stored in a known format, not some encrypted nonsense that depends on a keyserver that went offline during the transgene crusades of 2031)...

      The same is largely true of magnetic media. Having a device that costs $20, hangs off a contemporary bus, and is designed to handle the medium sure is handy; but a microscope and some patience is a functional substitute.

    2. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by PRMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Any DVD reader can read it. Compatibility with those should last beyond our lifetime.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by Ziekheid · · Score: 1

      You honestly think that future generations wouldn't be able to access information on how devices from the past worked and rebuild them after that?
      There must be one major disaster if we ever reach a stage where this happens.

    4. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      I would hope in 2,000 years your average archaeologist would have the tools to scan the disk at a molecular level and have an AI extract any important information based on historical archives of data formats.

    5. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Honestly, how hard would it be to create some stone tablets laser etched with the wiring schematics, signalling information, and physical/mechanical dimensions for a reader? It seems to me like we should be preparing some 'technology bootstrap' packets like this anyway given the precarious nature of modern technology. Combined with the current IP laws and trade secrets, I have to wonder how much information is lost each day regarding technology dating back 20 never mind 50+ years in the current social and commercial climate.

    6. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by JonahsDad · · Score: 1

      Not a major disaster, just a global war between three groups of athiests.

    7. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by bpsbr_ernie · · Score: 2

      But... will there be DRM... and will it annoy them... and lead them to believe... "oh, its just a stupid Hollywood movie... not worth decoding..." ;-)

    8. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given modern CnC/laser engraving tech, I'm assuming that 'rosetta stoning' some technical standards onto suitably chosen rocks would be as cheap, or cheaper, then ever. A competent hacker could probably knock out a 'pseudo-printer' driver that takes arbitrary print jobs and churns out control signals for an engraving system fairly quickly, at which point you'd just need a bunch of stone tablets chosen for geologic durability.

      Whether anybody would bother is much less clear.

    9. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by camperdave · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would hope in 2,000 years your average archaeologist would have the tools to scan the disk at a molecular level and have an AI extract any important information based on historical archives of data formats.

      "Esteemed Instructor. I have found a stone disk from 2000 years ago, in the diggings."
      "Have you indeed? Is it intact?"
      "Yes, Esteemed Instructor. I have taken the liberty of scanning the disk at the molecular level, and I have had my AI extract the information based on the historical archives of known data formats."
      "And what have you found?"
      "This!"

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    10. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Archaeologist: It appears the ancients worshipped a god known only as "RFC", whose commandments were numbereed consecutively. There is some confusion as to whether these were taken as literal commandments or spiritual allegories; while some seem to dictate simple enough standards for a (primitive) digital society, a few seem distinctly implausible, involving e.g. using pigeons for data transfer; some researchers contend these were wholy allegorical, while others suggest these were actual ceremonies carried out at religious festivals known as "cons".

    11. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by Trogre · · Score: 1

      With the seemingly downward trend in optical drive quality over the past twelve years, I doubt that a drive made today could read such a disc in 3 years time, much less 2000.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    12. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by Lanteran · · Score: 3, Funny

      But if we're talking movie DVDs, you've got CSS to deal with. That would probably ensure that none of our pop-culture survives millennia. Thank god...

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    13. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      Modern archaeologists have been able to read etched stone records from 5000 years ago. And most of the deciphering was done in the 19th century - ie. without the help of computers.

      I think 2000 years from now they can handle whatever system we can dream up.

    14. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Not a major disaster, just a global war between three groups of athiests.

      ...or between three groups of theists, for that matter.

      That said -- information and devices for the retrieval thereof are small and ubiquitous enough that I'd be surprised to see a global war with human survivors reset the clock entirely. Nuclear warheads are expensive, and there are certainly large populated areas lacking target value to nuclear-armed nations -- even if the popularity of devices is low, it just takes one village full of OLPCs with Wikipedia preloaded to be preserving a whole lot of content... never mind all the converted Cold War bunkers now housing datacenters.

    15. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Well played, my friend. Well played.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    16. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by dwreid · · Score: 1

      It's actually more complex than you know. The problem has many layers. First is the problem of decoding the data and figuring out how that is encoded. It's not just "a pit is a one and no pit is a zero". There's more to it than that. Is it a limited run length code? Is it a Non-Return to Zero code? What parts of the data are information and what parts are house keeping for the file structure? Then add the error correction algorithm. Now you have raw data but what is that data? Is it text? Is it photos? Is it software? Let's say it was video. Now you have to figure out how which of the many video formats and encoding and compression CODECs and algorithms was used. Since none of them would still be in use that won't be easy. Now you have some decoded data but how do you display it? What is the color representation? Is it RGB? Is is CYMK? Is it something else? It is NTSC? Is it raster or some form of vector? Is it interlaced or progressive? What is the frame size? What is the frame rate? In the end, it could take years and many units of currency to figure out what's on the disc and display it. When NASA found the lost lunar tapes they had no way to read them any more and that wasn't that long ago. They had to find some old tape drives in some guys garage and rebuild them before the data could be recovered. At one time data was stored on 7-track magnetic tape. It was the most widely used standard of the time. Now, unless you can find one of those really rare old drives the information on those tapes is just lost. Then there is that once widely used standard called the 8 inch floppy disk. and on and on... Marks on paper last for hundreds or thousands of years. Information on electronic media lasts until Apple decides to discontinue it with no notice. This century will, in the long term, be the most undocumented century since the stone age when it's all said and done.

    17. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by That+Guy+From+Mrktng · · Score: 1

      "Came for the news, stayed for the anons"

      He'll be here all night, In fact he never leaves.

    18. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      You save the instructions on how to build and operate a reader... onto a stone disc. That way archaeologists in the future will be able to know how to build new readers. =)

    19. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

      We've been using 10 based counting system for few thousands of years. At worst we will be using a even power of 2 based compuer: 4, 8 or 16 values to a bit. Otherwise programming it would be much much harder with no good sides.

    20. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by kvezach · · Score: 1

      Etch them, then coat them with glass, then add another coating of diamond using CVD. That should last! I'm only keeping the glass because, theoretically, diamond is metastable. Perhaps you could replace the diamond with some sort of boron-containing compound (cubic boron nitride, B4C, rhenium boride), which would be fully stable and very hard, but I don't know if they are transparent.

    21. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by pablo_max · · Score: 1

      It is even easier than that I think. If you are really concerned about storing a disk and reader simply for posterity, then just invent a really, really good sealed container. Put said items into container. Replace oxygen with nitrogen and you are golden. Replacing corrosive oxygen with an inert gas should stave off the breakdown of the device for 2000 years easily.

    22. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      In the end, it could take years and many units of currency to figure out what's on the disc and display it.

      People tried to determine the function of the Antikythera mechanism for decades before they figured it out, thanks to advanced medical imaging. If the disk proves to be historically significant or even just a rare curiosity from a time you think will be "the most undocumented century since the stone age", someone will make the effort to decode it.

    23. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      You don't have to keep up with the state of the art(which would be impossible on any reasonably long timescale), you just have to ensure that whatever you do record is a subset, or a rediscoverable backwater, of the state of the art.

      In this case, for instance, the fact that the computing of the future uses metastate quantum-entagled unobtanium photonic lattices or whatever doesn't make binary logic false, just outdated. Anybody from the future who is sufficiently enthused may find our level of development rather pathetic; but working out the basic elements of binary logic would depend on the same mathematical principles that it did when Boole worked it out in the 1840s.

    24. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by Kjella · · Score: 1

      But that is tablets encoded by humans being decoded by humans with relatively obvious patterns. It's far from certain tablets encoded by computers can be as easily decoded, even with computers as there's a huge asymmetry in developer time. There's an incredibly large set of fairly efficient compression/encoding routines that'll all produce near-random data. Trying to figure out exactly which of these routines applies in which order with which parameters and settings is one helluva job.

      Try locking a bunch of developers who've never worked on the H.264 standard, give them some basic books on compression/encoding but nothing describing the exact implementation in H.264 and hand them some decrypted BluRays. Let them try working from the encoded bitstream to a decoded movie, with absolutely no hints if they're on the right track or not. My prediction is that they'd give up pretty quickly.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    25. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by lurcher · · Score: 1

      And after I posted that, I was worried it was too little information for the South Park reference.

      No, just enough.

    26. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Then you have the raw binary data but still no information. I guess ASCII would be fairly easy to decode even with simple forensics but once you go in the other medias like audio and video (compression) it would become a lot harder to decode. You have to assume that the people finding your discs have no recollection at all about your present and most likely it will become a religious icon before being decoded by an inquiring soul. Maybe on the front you can draw instructions similar to the Pioneer probes.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    27. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, we have clearly visible writings from the past which we still cannot decode. And there was no fancy stuff like compression going on, just normal writing from that time.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    28. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      I wonder how often does that happen.

      I figure that some day, some archaeologist will dig up some ancient copies of the Silmarillion and take it for the bible of a minoritary religion.

    29. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      The entire modern computer industry is not much more than 50 years old. If human civilization has somehow figured out a way to survive 2000 years, I'm pretty sure none of us can even begin to imagine what computers will be capable of doing. Actually, I'm pretty sure we can't accurately imagine what they will be capable of in even 100 years.

    30. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by suutar · · Score: 1

      I dunno. It would take a lot to keep Disney from repackaging and reselling their movies over and over... and over... I don't think there'd be archaeologists left afterwards.

    31. Re:Immortal Reader As Well by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that they will be wrong?

  5. I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Stonehenge is a data center! I wonder if they're hiring?

    1. Re:I knew it! by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 2

      It all sounds great; that is until they take you downstairs and you have to watch the 2000 year long "Diversity, winning with combinations!" video from HR whilst strapped into the Pandorica...

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
  6. It's durable... by jspayne · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...but the write times are a bitch.

    *chinkchink. pause. chink. pause. chinkchink. *

    1. Re:It's durable... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just whip the scribes harder. They were advertised as "52x" on the box, and by god they'll put out 52x or die trying!

    2. Re:It's durable... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      ust whip the scribes harder. They were advertised as "52x" on the box, and by god they'll put out 52x or die trying!

      You are confusing read and write speeds - they are not the same! I would be surprised if current scribes can muster even 4x write speeds. Time to upgrade them dinosaurs bone chisels already!

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  7. Just be careful... by Kargan · · Score: 1

    ...not to drop it.

    --
    Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
    1. Re:Just be careful... by MaxBooger · · Score: 4, Funny

      Moses, "The Lord, the Lord Jehovah has given unto you these fifteen... ", *CRASH*, "Oy! Ten! Ten commandments for all to obey!"

  8. Won't work, not toddler-proof by greg65535 · · Score: 1

    Wasn't tested on toddlers, just ask my 2yr old about the state of my DVD library.

    1. Re:Won't work, not toddler-proof by suutar · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. Can this format handle going through the dishwasher?

  9. Re:Prior art! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    No problem, we can just burn some bitcoin hashes to these new "stone-like" disks and pay the royalties that way...

  10. **IA by Immostlyharmless · · Score: 1

    I wonder what their comment on backing your stuff up to a media that will last forever will be?

  11. formats by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    just think about encoding nightmares! reading the data problem is not too hard to solve even if we claw back from the stone age; the real problem is how to decode the data and then how to process it.

    I can imagine them getting stumped on the DOC files they are trying open; the jpegs have to be even more difficult.

  12. Stone discs? by Thraxy · · Score: 1

    Oh great, they hired Moses...

  13. Re:Mica Discs by kanto · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it's possible they could be made of some variant of Mica. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mica

    Interesting, live in one of those countries that export it the most and had no idea of the stuff :) Personally I was thinking of a thin layer of artificial diamonds/graphite, just don't know how you'd imprint anything on them without upgrading the laser to a handcannon.

  14. Lab Test by djl4570 · · Score: 1

    Give a few of these to Labrador Retrievers and check back the next day to see if they are as durable as claimed.

  15. Re:Mica Discs by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Mica is a very soft mineral and not very suitable for this sort of application.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  16. Re:What about Africans? by rpresser · · Score: 1

    Apparently you're also part troll.

  17. The "die" layer must be why by rpresser · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the CD/DVD/BD discs don't last. If only they'd used a dye layer instead.

  18. Or you could just post your data on the web by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    and wait for it to be archived.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Or you could just post your data on the web by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      "Only wimps use tape backup: real men just upload their important stuff on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  19. Re:Mica Discs by Ira+Sponsible · · Score: 1

    I was thinking something along the lines of carborundum or artificial corundum, either of which would make very durable disks.

    --
    1.Netcraft confirms:In Soviet Russia all your base welcomes a beowolf cluster of CowboyNeal overlords. 2.? 3.Profit!!1!
  20. Re:Mica Discs by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    Mica is a very soft mineral and not very suitable for this sort of application.

    They didn't say the whole disc is made out of (whatever it is). They say it's made up of "multiple layers of material."

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  21. Liquid Nitrogen by pcjunky · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can put a normal CD-R disk in Liquid Nitrogen without any damage. I have tested it myself. Although it warps into a dome shape until it warms.

    1. Re:Liquid Nitrogen by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Although it warps into a dome shape until it warms.

      Two bits enter! One bit leaves!

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  22. So kind of like factory-made CDs/DVDs? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    This doesn't sound a whole lot different than CDs or DVDs burned in factories. Those don't use a dye layer either, but pits etched into an (aluminum?) substrate. It sounds like this company has found a way to produce similar results at home -- but that doesn't mean the resulting discs will be any more durable or have longer life than your store-bought CDs/DVDs.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:So kind of like factory-made CDs/DVDs? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      This doesn't sound a whole lot different than CDs or DVDs burned in factories. Those don't use a dye layer either, but pits etched into an (aluminum?) substrate. It sounds like this company has found a way to produce similar results at home -- but that doesn't mean the resulting discs will be any more durable or have longer life than your store-bought CDs/DVDs.

      1. MAFIAA has little incentive to sell you discs that will last forever - I'd say, on the contrary. The fact they sell you pressed CD/DVD-es is rather related to the cost of producing them than it is with their concern on how long they'll last for you.
      2. However, as a Write-Once-a-single-copy (backup, archiving purposes), I think this one will make a killing. The current life-span of recordable CD/DVD (not the pressed ones) vary between 10-300 years (subject to the quality and storage/use patterns).

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    2. Re:So kind of like factory-made CDs/DVDs? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      They've tested the new media for exposure to light, temperature, and humidity, and they claim it suffered no degradation (while all others did). That's significant, but if you scratch it, it's still destroyed. In that sense, it still seems more fragile than high-quality magnetic tape -- but I suppose if the goal is long-term storage, they could put an actual anti-scratch coating on the media and charge you more for it.

      I think your estimates of the life of burned CDs and DVDs are way overblown, BTW. Ten years is reasonable, but I've had media fail sooner than that, and I view any media much older than that with suspicion. Unless of course it was stored in perfect, atmosphere-controlled conditions -- but if that's the case, I think DVD-R is the wrong medium. Too small and still too fragile.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    3. Re:So kind of like factory-made CDs/DVDs? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      I think your estimates of the life of burned CDs and DVDs are way overblown, BTW.

      Not mine, so I can't comment. What I can do is to provide some sources for the estimates:

      300 years citation - "MAM-A (Mitsui) claims a life of 300 years on their archival gold CD-R and 100 years for gold DVDs."
      10 year estimate - "According to research conducted by J. Perdereau, CD-Rs are expected to have an average life expectancy of 10 years."

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    4. Re:So kind of like factory-made CDs/DVDs? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      OK, well those MAM-A figures are a special case. When they talk about "archival gold CD-Rs," they really mean gold... they use a 24 karat gold substrate and patented dyes to achieve higher durability than other media on the market. But of course, it's never been proven, because no single piece of this media has been around for 300 years. Most of their claims seem to be based on the improved lightfastness of their patented dye, but there are various factors that affect media durability (temperature, humidity, etc.)

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    5. Re:So kind of like factory-made CDs/DVDs? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      But of course, it's never been proven, because no single piece of this media has been around for 300 years.

      :) Well, with the current crisis, what can we do better than to wait and see :)

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    6. Re:So kind of like factory-made CDs/DVDs? by hitmark · · Score: 1

      I wonder who it was that decided that optical media should be shipped with exposed data surface. A diskette like system would be plenty durable against scratches.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    7. Re:So kind of like factory-made CDs/DVDs? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I can count on one hand the number of optical disks ruined by scratches since 1998. Then again, I didn't have a little brother...

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    8. Re:So kind of like factory-made CDs/DVDs? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      But of course, it's never been proven, because no single piece of this media has been around for 300 years.

      It doesn't matter - I have some of these that have bad data sectors after 14 years. They were sold as archival medical-grade, and cost something like $15 a piece.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:So kind of like factory-made CDs/DVDs? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      This doesn't sound a whole lot different than CDs or DVDs burned in factories. Those don't use a dye layer either, but pits etched into an (aluminum?) substrate

      Not burned or etched, but stamped. Much faster.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    10. Re:So kind of like factory-made CDs/DVDs? by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Or kids, as i think Doctorow has a funny anecdote about his daughter putting DVDs on the floor and skating around on top of them.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    11. Re:So kind of like factory-made CDs/DVDs? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >MAFIAA has little incentive to sell you discs that will last forever

      Is consumer entertainment media really the subject matter of concern here?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    12. Re:So kind of like factory-made CDs/DVDs? by c0lo · · Score: 1
      Quoting from the GP post

      This doesn't sound a whole lot different than CDs or DVDs burned in factories.

      What, in your opinion, is written on the vast majority of the CD/DVD-es produced in factories? (with the minor correction: by etching, not burning, it's cheaper)

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  23. Sure. by wbav · · Score: 1

    It can take boiling water and liquid nitrogen, but what about that Kleenex in my pocket? That's killed more DVDs than I'd like to admit.

    --

    =================
    Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
  24. Re:Mica Discs by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Go over your Moh's hardness scale again - Mica is TOO SOFT to be usable as ANY layer. It's very brittle as well and not quite transparent.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  25. Archiving data long term by pcjunky · · Score: 2

    My wife's Thesis was on this subject. Readers won't last long enough to make this useful.

    http://explorer.cyberstreet.com/CET4970H-Peterson-Thesis.pdf

    1. Re:Archiving data long term by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      You don't need a reader, as long as the format is discoverable. They didn't send a reader up with the Voyager disc, did they?

    2. Re:Archiving data long term by rossdee · · Score: 2

      Has any alien decrypted the message yet?

    3. Re:Archiving data long term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While I'd agree that it's probably easier to just convert the data to the then-current archive format every 5-10 years, and that "media that lasts a long time" is not any real solution to the problem they describe, dedicated readers are not strictly necessary. Purpose-build readers are certainly handy, but a system based on optically-observable binary marks can be read by anyone with a system of lenses and some free time. In fact, I'd wager you could could build a system to read the disc automatically using 1940s-era electro-mechanical computers without too much trouble -- after all, the ABC and other early machines used optically-observable binary marks on their paper tape storage systems.

      As for the required software, that's just a matter of using a format that can be reverse-engineered, or a including documentation on the storage format with the medium. ASCII text files, for example, would still be readable even if we lost all the ASCII map tables -- just by noting the leading 0 that occurs every 8 bits you could deduce the fundamental data element size, and if you had any idea what language the data was in you could run an n-gram frequency analysis to build a pretty reliable character map. And that process is quite a bit less guess-work than is required to read other ancient writings. If you're going to store compressed video you'd better be prepared to write a lot of pseudo-code to go along with your data files, but there are many useful data formats with straightforward definitions that could easily be re-created by any interested future user.

      Also, if you can avoid a lot of OS dependencies, and you aren't shooting for something that would be usable by someone with no knowledge of today's computers, it's likely that in the future people will still be able to run/translate i386 code on whatever computing platform is available at the time. So it's plausible that you could just include the relevant i386 instructions from libtiff and some notation that describes how to prepare the input memory structure and how to read the output memory to find the bitmap available at the end of processing. Given that, the ability to interpret i386 code, and a couple dozen lines of wrapper to interface with the then-current OS, future users could simply run the existing software.

      Of course all of this assumes you're willing to spend a decent bit of time/money getting at the data -- it certainly isn't something the average person or even company would do just to get at their 25-year-old tax records. But it seems eminently plausible to me that digital data can in general be preserved and successfully read decades or centuries later even without ongoing maintenance to update the storage medium and data format.

    4. Re:Archiving data long term by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Microscopes are pretty easy to make.

    5. Re:Archiving data long term by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      None of the original readers for Hieroglyphics are around either. As long as the message and medium are intact then the data can be recovered, a working reader simply makes the task easier.

    6. Re:Archiving data long term by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Has any alien decrypted the message yet?

      Obviously. Or how else would they know to stay away from earth?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:Archiving data long term by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Call me crazy, but wouldn't C/C++ code be far more useful. You could treat it like pseudo code if you have to, but it's far more readable.

    8. Re:Archiving data long term by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Has any alien decrypted the message yet?

      "Be sure to drink your Ovaltine."

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    9. Re:Archiving data long term by joggle · · Score: 1

      I didn't read the entire thesis, rather just skipping to the section that seemed relevant (2.3.2). I didn't see anything ruling out optical storage there, rather readers should be stored along with the archived data or at least the specifications needed to build a reader.

      Was I reading the wrong section?

      Personally, I think if consumers generally agree upon an archival format then that format will stick around for a very long time. The CD standard is already 30 years old and doesn't show any signs of going away.

  26. Patents for the "rock-like" material by Spikeles · · Score: 1

    The longest DVD archival life achievable today is provided with the new MDISC—a revolutionary optical disc technology developed by Dr. Barry Lunt and Dr. Matt Linford of Brigham Young University and manufactured by Utah-based Millenniata, Inc. –

    The material is probably mentioned in one of these Patents

    --
    I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
    1. Re:Patents for the "rock-like" material by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      The patent says silicon and/or aluminum. Doesn't sound very stone like to me. His patent also sounds much like an LP. I think this is yet another version of making a unique invention by adding "with a computer" to the description of something that already exists.

    2. Re:Patents for the "rock-like" material by solanum · · Score: 1

      The patent says silicon and/or aluminum. Doesn't sound very stone like to me.

      What? Stone is mostly silicon dioxide, how does something made out of silicon not sound stone like?

      --
      Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
  27. Re:Mica Discs by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing sapphire, what the little stones in sand paper, and high end watch crystals are made of. There is already patents for data storage on it, and it is incredibly heat resistant. I don't know about die free writing.

  28. Stone-like? I know, I know! by macraig · · Score: 1

    It's Play-Doh.

  29. Re:Stone-like? I know, I know! by macraig · · Score: 1

    (Oven-fired, that is.)

  30. First movie to be burned onto one of these? by Reality+Master+301 · · Score: 1

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0049833/ I'll be here all week, try the veal!

  31. The material is so good because.. by Sneekyknees · · Score: 1

    they make it asbestos they can!

  32. Useful by StandardAI · · Score: 1

    This actually fills a nitch, considering that most memory can be wiped easily with a magnet, and that personally burned DVD's only last a few years before they start to degrade. It's perfect for time capsules.

  33. Re:Mica Discs by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    Go over your Moh's hardness scale again - Mica is TOO SOFT to be usable as ANY layer. It's very brittle as well and not quite transparent.

    Really? So it's too soft to be sandwiched between two pieces of hard, transparent plastic?

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  34. Weren't etched substratae used before? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

    Weren't the original large-format Laser Video Discs created via this principle? I thought they etched dots into an aluminium substrate using a higher power setting.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    1. Re:Weren't etched substratae used before? by Danga · · Score: 2

      CDs, DVDs, and Laser Discs are created the same way. They are aluminum discs sandwiched between two layers of plastic, with the pits etched in with a laser (the lands are the unmodified parts of the disc).

      Manufactured optical discs do NOT have the aluminum layer etched using a laser, instead they are "pressed" and a die is used to press pits into a mostly aluminum layer which is done all at once (like how a stamp works). Write-able optical discs instead have a reflective layer with a layer of dye in front of it and the laser punches holes in the dye which is really just a phase change allowing the areas hit by the laser to let the reading laser through so it can be reflected back to the reading sensor. Re-writable discs have further functionality allowing to phase change between "pit" and "land".

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
  35. Will It Blend? by Pascarello · · Score: 1

    I can not wait to see that video. :)

  36. Like all relics it will be deemed by assemblerex · · Score: 1

    religious or ceremonial, the catch all of confused scientists.
    "What were all the microscopic pits for?"
    "To catch their souls of course!!!"

  37. Re:The "die" layer must be why by hierophanta · · Score: 1
    the author of the article actually switches from die to dye 3 times in one line of text (on my screen)- 'dye. During recording, a laser hits the die layer and burns it, changing the dye ' (page 2).

    but the face palm happened when i read this:

    "However, the discs write at only 4x or 5.28MB/sec, half the speed of today's DVD players. "We feel if we can move to the 8X, that'd be great, but we can live with the four for now," Shumway said, adding that his engineers are working on upping the speed of recording."

    they record half the speed of todays players at 4x?

    thats unpossible !

  38. Re:slashpot by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "I have a 'stone-like' 'natural' substance in my pants."

    Sand?

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  39. Stoneware by pegasustonans · · Score: 2

    Also can be tied to a stick and used to smack down post-apocalyptic miscreants after its original purpose is long forgotten.

    --
    And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    1. Re:Stoneware by catmistake · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing, and looking forward to reading good thread on what the natural substance they were using was... :/

  40. Just like Creative by Dareth · · Score: 1

    I miss my old Creative CD Burner! Fast as hell, but sounded like a defective jet engine. And most everyone that I knew about died shortly after its warranty expired.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Just like Creative by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Your CD burner went on a killing spree after its warranty expired?

  41. now where's my; by ushere · · Score: 1

    51/4" floppy drive? oh, and my 31/2" one as well. cd? what's that? ad infinitum

  42. sure... by cowtamer · · Score: 1

    This is how they touted CDs in the earl 1990s. Tapes from the early 1980s are still playable (despite physical abuse), and can be repaired easily if they are not. It's a rare CD which lasts 10 years under non-archive conditions.

    By the time this technology is proved useless, they will have made their money and retired!

    (or perhaps this is a good thing and I'm being too cynical -- but they'd better have a self-powered player unit that will live as long as the media -- or human-readable plans to build one)

    1. Re:sure... by Danga · · Score: 1

      I have worked with these discs and one of their drives and was very skeptical at first but after learning more about it I realized it is really pretty ground breaking and useful for archiving data. I of course joked around with the same joke you said regarding the actual life of the discs but compared to current writable optical media M-Discs are definitely a huge step up.

      You see a regular writable discs main long term storage problem is the dye used to store the data degrades MUCH quicker than any other part of the disc and it WILL degrade most likely in a few years although some dyes are better made and last longer. But once the dye is gone all that remains is the reflector layer and all the previously available data is gone.

      M-Discs don't use dye and instead use a rock-like layer that the drive laser punches holes through and the rock-like layer degrades MUCH slower than anything else making up the discs which probably could last hundreds of years if taken care of and if there are not other failures such as adhesive or polycarbonite degradation problems. Of course at some point the data will need to be transferred to another medium but since the discs are readable by standard DVD drives there will be readers available for them for a LONG time since optical drive manufacturers always maintain backwards compatibility with older optical media standards.

      Another benefit of optical drives is the "reader" is not tied to the storage medium like most other modern data storage technologies. If the reading mechanics go out in a hard drive or flash media drive then in order to read the data again the device will need to be taken apart and repaired or have the platters/flash media chip transfered to a working setup which is both difficult to do and usually expensive unless you know the right people. With optical media if the optical drive has problems reading a disc that is in good condition and not damaged/corrupted then you just hook a different drive up to the computer, take the optical disc out of the non-functioning drive and put it in the new drive and you can start reading right away and get back to work.

      IMO right now optical media archiving using discs that really do not degrade (okay degrade in 10s/100s or years instead of just years) is the best way to go for long term data storage especially because there is a great track record of making sure new optical drives support reading old optical media formats. Think about this, I could take one of the first CD albums ever manufactured, Billy Joel's 52nd street sold in Japan in 1982, and walk into a store that sells computers and easily find a computer that can read the CD. What other media that is ~30 years old could you do the same with?

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    2. Re:sure... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Glad i am not the only one that see a benefit in seperating media from the read/write hardware.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  43. I swear I've seen this before—Cranberry Diam by scrod · · Score: 1

    These "diamond-hard stone" discs can withstand "temperatures extending up to 176 degrees Fahrenheit as well as UV rays that would destroy conventional DVD discs."

    http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/cranberry-diamondisc-the-35-dvd-thatll-last-longer-than-your/

  44. single sided? by swell · · Score: 1

    "no reflective or die layer"

    Does this mean that I can't record on both sides any more?

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  45. Re:slashpot by teaserX · · Score: 1

    I have a 'stone-like' 'natural' substance in my pants.

    Coprolites?

    --
    We really need your help
    http://www.gofundme.com/help-sherry
  46. Radiant Silvergun? by Yosho · · Score: 1

    Am I the only person who saw 'Stone-Like' in the title and immediately thought of Radiant Silvergun? Let's hope it doesn't destroy humanity...

    --
    Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  47. put it to the mythbusters test by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    put it to the mythbusters test

  48. Re:The "die" layer must be why by hierophanta · · Score: 1

    you can press with a die and you can stain with a dye. and you can dye a die, but you cant dye a dye because then you would just have more dye. but oddly you can press a die of a die. also if you like, you can press a die of a 20 sided die and then stain it with some dye. does that clear things up?

  49. They requested modified testing to get the numbers by tlambert · · Score: 2

    They requested modified testing to get the numbers

    Basically, modified ECMA-379 testing, starting with known good discs (where the write was initially verified to be good) with testing limited to 85C temperature and 85% relative humidity profile testing, with the addition of full-spectrum light in order to make the dye substrate more vulnerable to phase-change from humidity lensing of the light.

    The two key elements of the Millenniata test which differ from ECMA-379 are
    consideration of the initial write quality of the discs selected for testing, and the
    introduction of full spectrum light to the test environment.

    ...or to put it into slash-terms: any sufficiently advanced technology is equivalent to a rigged demo. I'm not saying it's not useful; it probably will be a big hit with the LDS Church, the military, and the IRS, but they had to start with good writes and then work at extreme boundary conditions on the testing to successfully destroy the other discs.

    -- Terry

  50. Sounds like it came from the future by paiute · · Score: 1

    This must be how the message of the Weaseljumper was able to survive being embedded in coal for a million years or so: http://www.scribd.com/doc/13855395/Weaseljumper-Read-Me-First

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  51. Re:What about Africans? by Genda · · Score: 1

    Actually in your case I'd take a wild shot and go with Homo Erectus... ;-)

  52. Re:What about Africans? by Genda · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing though, from the shallow end of the gene pool. Chlorine anybody???

  53. Perfect! by asdbffg · · Score: 1

    Best of all, the DRM is built right into the stone.

  54. New name: Titan discs by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    We need to store them in huge vaults, protected by robots (golems). Perhaps some day some little guy will investigate with a band of adventurers (murderous looters, really) and they'll trip over every security measure put in place.

  55. Re:What about Africans? by Genda · · Score: 1

    WOW! This is a mixed salad of mental illness

    Let's see, we start it all off with a really witless attempt at a racial slur. Honestly, this is a living example of why we so need Head-Start. Then he goes for the ham-fisted attempt at sarcasm, and finally brings the whole trailer trash Trifecta home with an awkward insinuation regarding a political system that only exists any more on a backward Caribbean Island. My hats off sir, in two sentences you've regurgitated enough stupidity to lower the average IQ of the western hemisphere by 0.3%. What a monument to ignorance. What a shining beacon for morons everywhere! You must be very proud! Congratulations. ;-)

  56. Because boiling water and liquid nitrogen is what I regularly expose my discs to. Not.

    How 'bout testing it against my kids, that drop them on the wood floor, and then swirl them around doing their own etching.

    --
    One man's pink plane is another man's blue plane.
  57. optical or analogue? by justhatched · · Score: 1

    Sounds alot like vinyl to me, and I only just chucked out the old turntables!

  58. And we all know what it's made of. by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    It's made of diamondium! - Professor Farnsworth

  59. Price down to $8 per blank disk by Animats · · Score: 1

    The problem with archival-quality DVD blanks is that they cost too much. These cost about $8 each from Amazon.

    It's not clear what the writing rate is. Etching pits is usually slower than turning a dye a different color. Despite this, it's a useful technology to have around.

    1. Re:Price down to $8 per blank disk by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I remember paying $10 apiece for CD blanks, and not archival ones.

  60. Re:I swear I've seen this before—Cranberry D by Danga · · Score: 1

    The discs you mentioned are from the same source, Cranberry was just a company (that does not seem to exist any longer) that handled the marketing of the MDiscs. The technology has been around a while, I used one of the drives and played around with the media a few years ago at my former employers office and at that time I think the discs went by the names Cranberry DiamondDisc as well as the manufacturers name M-ARC disc.

    --
    Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
  61. "there is no reflective, or die, layer." by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Would that be "dye"?

    Or have we renamed it the "die layer" with hindsight?

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:"there is no reflective, or die, layer." by somersault · · Score: 1

      die
      noun
      dies, plural

      1) The cubical part of a pedestal between the base and the cornice; a dado or plinth

      2) A device for cutting or molding metal into a particular shape

      3) An engraved device for stamping a design on coins or medals

      Definitions 2 and 3 suggest that "die layer" would make more sense than "dye layer" for recording etchings on a disk IMO.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:"there is no reflective, or die, layer." by Captain+Hook · · Score: 1

      All other optical discs have a dye which is what the laser is burning to record the data, no dye makes more sense when comparing to other optical technologies..

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    3. Re:"there is no reflective, or die, layer." by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Not true. All other consumer-writeable optical discs have a crystal dye layer that the laser records to. All factory-produced optical discs use a die press to produce the ridges/valleys that the laser reads.

  62. Re:It doesn't really last forever by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

    probability of survival of the media. If it is designed to withstand two millenia you really ought not to have any problems reading it after 30 or 50 years. And you still can get hardware 50 years old in working condition

  63. Re:The "die" layer must be why by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

    So the marketdroids didn't lie about my 4 year old dvd 16x player being the "technology of tommorow"?!

  64. Been done... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    ... years ago:

    http://lalists.stanford.edu/lad/2008/01/0446.html

    For some reason I got accused of being silly about the issue of selling media containing GPLed software...

  65. Re:This technology will never make it big.... by slydder · · Score: 1

    grrr. forgot to log in.

  66. Re:Even stone disks degrade. by pmontra · · Score: 1

    Open air, exposed to weather is not a good environment for long term storage of anything. Just think about the difference in the conservation status of the exposed and the buried parts of Pompeii. The buried ones will be well conserved even when those M-disc will be unreadable, that is when nobody has a reader for them anymore and nobody cares about building a new one from the specs, if they ever find them.

  67. Yes, that's great, but what I am wondering is by bursch-X · · Score: 1

    Will it blend?

    --
    There are two rules for success:
    1. Never tell everything you know.
  68. Thoughts by Anon8---) · · Score: 1

    It's a "CD-R" so still clunky, cumbersome for transport of big amounts of data and write-once read-only. Personally I'm sick of CDs and DVDs mainly because the CD and DVD drives still have problems with them (not all DVDs are recognized/can be read) and they represent an era I'd like to leave behind. This may be great for archivists but for normal users it'll be like a step back.

  69. Re:The "die" layer must be why by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    Next thing, you'll, be saying, there are, too many,,,, commas.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  70. All well and good BUT ... by Going_Digital · · Score: 1

    While I like the idea of long term storage only half the problem is solved as when the hardware goes obsolete there will be nothing to read them on. The BBC 1986 Domesday project stored data on laserdisc, while the laserdiscs survived very few players capable of reading them survived. Now this was a high profile project that people made the effort to recover, but what about all the stuff that is not considered valuable until it is to late. Who is going to find something that can read a DVD in 100 years time ? And even if you did, will the file formats be readable by anything or will the 1000 year copyright laws that we will have by then prevent someone writing software to read a long since defunct file format ?

  71. Re:On my Christmas list by gtvr · · Score: 1

    You'll need a good reader though, to reconstitute yourself after the next Big Bang.

  72. Redundent. Make it redundent. Redundency is your by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

    Why oh why is there not a data archive format at the file system level for optical media?

    Why isn't there enough redundency and enough scatter to the information.

    I should be able to:

    1. Break a disk in half, glue back together with crazy glue, and read the disk.

    2. Cover up to 45% of the disk with paint. ANY 45% and still recover my data.

    Sure, reconstructing would be difficult. Capacity would be down. But I'd like to have an archive format that I can write to, and put in a box along with a reader and be reasonably confident that my grandkids can read it.

    --
    Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
  73. Yeah Right... by JadedIdealist · · Score: 1

    Hand the disk to a 3 year old kid to play with for an hour. Bet it won't work then. - Marketing BS IMO.

  74. Wax Cylinders and Punch Cards by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    This is a great article, I'll just program my current computer to copy the article using these punch cards, and record it on this handy wax cylinder.

    I'll just plug my wax cylinder and punch card readers into my serial port, its so easy!

  75. Re:Mica Discs by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Any stress on the plastic layers would cause a split in the mica layer, it's that brittle. You can flake it off with finger-pressure, the same amount of pressure woud cause fractures and data corruption.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  76. Re:Mica Discs by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia has no real-life experience.

    I have stuff from block mica to yellowcake uranium ore. I know mica is nowhere near suitable in uses such as plastic discs.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  77. Re:Redundent. Make it redundent. Redundency is you by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Well, you can easily do it. The technology needed is: A CD pen. Write your data on the CD with the pen. You don't even need glue, or a drive to read it.
    Of course the data capacity is not very high. But then, think of the advantages!

    For more durable data storage, you also may consider scratching the data onto the disk.

    SCNR

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  78. "I Love Lucy" in 70,000 AD by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Perish the thought. But possible. Homage to commedienne who was born 100 years ago this week.

  79. Re:Redundent. Make it redundent. Redundency is you by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

    In the cases you've cited, it's not so much about data redundancy as it is about the laws of physics. If the surface of the disc isn't smooth enough, that sucker isn't going to spin and you're boned. If we want backups that last, we should really use some sort of non-optical media, if you think about it. At least, that's my opinion.

    --
    Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  80. Flinstones by Chuby007 · · Score: 1

    The Flinstones had this technology a long time ago, however it was not played with a regular DVD or CD player but with a Pterodactyl

  81. laser etched ?? by blackair · · Score: 1

    So its laser etched on this special disk, but will a good scratch kill the data readability. One careless nimrod can really make for a bad day. and where are these "data crystals" babylon 5 promised us .....and my light-weight Jet pack lol

  82. Re:Report analysis by joggle · · Score: 1

    Two very informative posts. Wish I had some mod points to send your way.

  83. I'll tell you if it's unbreakable by vandamme · · Score: 1

    I'll give it to my granddaughters for 2 minutes. Or less.

  84. Gartner's Credibility by GrantRobertson · · Score: 1

    Gene Ruth, a research director at Gartner, said generally he's not heard of a problem with DVD longevity. And, while he admits that a DVD on a car dashboard could be in trouble, the medium has generally had a good track record.

    There goes Gartner's credibility, right out the window.