Slashdot Mirror


Dashboard Avatar To Replace Car Owner's Manuals

cylonlover writes "At one time not all that long ago, cars had a warning light on the dashboard that simply said 'ENGINE.' That's pretty vague. Really, it might just as well have said 'CAR.' Some newer automobiles now have codes that appear on the console, which the driver must then look up in an index in the vehicle's owner's manual. Working with Audi, Germany's Technische Universitaet Muenchen (TUM) Institute of Business Informatics is now working on taking things a step farther, with the development of an on-screen avatar that will talk to drivers, and even understand their spoken questions."

236 comments

  1. Overcomplicate much? by Anrego · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or in other words “our cars require maintenance and/or break down so frequently that we have spent a nautical ass-tonne of money developing a automotive equivalent of clippy for you!”?

    The number readout is logical .. a major step up from the simple “service engine soon” light. The car already knows exactly what sensor caused the error.. and relating that to the user in something that can be looked up seems sane (although I always figured they specifically didn’t so they could charge you $50 to tell you your oil cap was loose).

    A step up from that might be nice... maybe a lcd text readout with a line or two. Just enough info to know what you are dealing with.

    The solution discussed in the article however sounds ridiculous. I did of course get a chuckle picturing some lady frustrated screaming “BURNT OUT HEADLIGHT FOR THE TENTH DAMN TIME” at the thing only to hear “the first step in changing the oil of your automobile ”. Crummy voice recognition combined with the frustration that comes with your car breaking down at the exact worst time is gonna make for some interesting breakdowns.

    This all has a very “house of the future” feel to it.

    1. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 2

      This all has a very “house of the future” feel to it.

      Actually, it had a very 'KITT' feel for me.

    2. Re:Overcomplicate much? by mkkohls · · Score: 1

      Or in other words “our cars require maintenance and/or break down so frequently that we have spent a nautical ass-tonne of money developing a automotive equivalent of clippy for you!”?

      Exactly and since its German it will also yell at you if you miss a routine servicing.

    3. Re:Overcomplicate much? by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      The thing is what the computer tells you may not be a sensor directly. Such as bank 1 lean... ok so is the oxygen sensor screwed up, a bad injector, MAF sensor.. etc.

      Even as it is now you can purchase a code read that will tell you the code (and purchase a cheap repair manual such as a Hyanes so you can look them up) or get a code read that lists the code # and what it means. Or for those who want to know right away or watch your MPGs and all that, get a scangauge II which is basically like what the setup in the article is

    4. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Anrego · · Score: 1

      I think most people are more concerned with the severity versus the actual specific problem.

      Some cars kinda do this now .. but just splitting it out into "there have been a few warning signs that your engine is not running optimally. You should get this checked out when it's convinient", "there is something wrong with your car. You can probably make it to your prefered repair shop... but you need to get this looked at soon", and finally "you have no oil, please pull it the hell over and turn your engine off.. " is huge.

    5. Re:Overcomplicate much? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      A step up from that might be nice... maybe a lcd text readout with a line or two. Just enough info to know what you are dealing with.

      Um, haven't most cars had this for a long time already?
      My 11 year old Mercury has a two-line display where it can give me more or less useful messages.
      The other car in the household, an 8 year old SAAB, has a scrolling display with ambiguous messages like "service theft alarm" (does that mean that it's an alarm about service theft, or that the theft alarm needs service?)

      Yet both of them fail to report when something really needs attention, like brakes being almost worn through or a fan belt breaking. If anything, I think it's going to be worse than nothing, much like AV software, in that it helps instil a false sense of security. "The car hasn't told me that anything is wrong, so I'll just ignore the strange sound when I'm braking".

    6. Re:Overcomplicate much? by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      Cars are so much more reliable than they used to be, in part because of so much computerization.

      I think it's funny that my first car had an "engine light" and it meant either the oil pressure was low, or that the engine was over-heating. In newer cars, those are both separate lights, and "Engine" is still there, covering functions my old car didn't even know about.

      100k miles used to be an accomplishment, a typical new car can do that with only oil, breaks, and tires. Cars are way more reliable.

      I agree that the Avatar is stupid, much smarter to just keep the look-up table in the car, and display the translation, and maybe a button to get the recommended course of action (immediately go to mechanic, wait until trip is over, or wait until next oil change).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    7. Re:Overcomplicate much? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      For some reason all I can think is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DALA6eLcZmc

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    8. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      TAKE ZEE CAR FOR SERVICE NOW!

      In a bad German accent.
      But I want to yell!

    9. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 2001 Chevy pickup has an "Information Center" in the lower left corner of the dash. This ~2" x ~2" display shows enough information to convey at least a general idea of what's going on with the truck. Low fuel? A gas pump with "Low Fuel" cycles through the display. Engine Oil Low? "Check Engine Oil Level" cycles in the display. Time for an Oil Change "Change Engine Oil" cycles through the display. And so on, and so forth. This solution is ideal for me. It also seems easily expandable to cover additional error codes / information. The non-distracting, non-animated, mono-chromatic display is enough to alert me to the message(s) the on board computer is trying to convey while being easily ignored when needed.

      This "new" technology seems more like a technology trying to find a need than a need finding a technology.

    10. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Clippy. doesn't a paper clip go so well with a computer

    11. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Hello, I see you're trying to figure out why your car is on fire. Do you want to write a letter to the manufacturer?"

    12. Re:Overcomplicate much? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      And it's being done by...Germans.

    13. Re:Overcomplicate much? by fortyonejb · · Score: 1

      I can't say much for other cars, but my '07 audi has sensors in the brake pads which will cause a warning to come up in the information panel. Oddly enough, the car is being somewhat truthful. The light in mine came on a full year after the dealer told me my pads were dangerously low... When the light came on I was definitely below 20% pad life.

      I also got a message telling me the fuel cap wasn't tight enough, anything past this level of information is going to go over most drivers heads. When the MAF begins to malfunction, how many drivers care to have this explained to them by the car rather than just a message telling them "something you should get fixed has happened, go to a mechanic"

    14. Re:Overcomplicate much? by n5vb · · Score: 1

      The thing is what the computer tells you may not be a sensor directly. Such as bank 1 lean... ok so is the oxygen sensor screwed up, a bad injector, MAF sensor.. etc.

      Which means an expert system of some sort, one that can take the overall pattern of sensor warnings into account and possibly isolate sensor failures from deeper functional issues. (An example would be comparing the upstream and downstream O2 sensor readings and doing a reality check that both are showing the usual fluctuations and the downstream one is much smaller amplitude than the upstream one, before making a decision on whether it's a failed sensor showing a solid offscale high or low signal, or a real indication of the catalyst starting to lose efficiency..)

    15. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "has a scrolling display with ambiguous messages like "service theft alarm" "

      You left your WIFI open again haven't you. we told you at SAAB that we will be watching you and you did not listen... you should not be surprised when two large blonde men show up at your door that have a strong Norwegian accent..

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      BMW has had that for over 30 years.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    17. Re:Overcomplicate much? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      GET TO DA SHOP NOW!

      Change da oil, if you want da engine to leev.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    18. Re:Overcomplicate much? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, if you get a dead ECU or MAP sensor or something, you'd better have spares in the trunk, because you won't be able to fiddle around with a screwdriver and drive home like you could with a carbed engine.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    19. Re:Overcomplicate much? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      You left your WIFI open again haven't you. we told you at SAAB that we will be watching you and you did not listen... you should not be surprised when two large blonde men show up at your door that have a strong Norwegian accent..

      Um, what do you think the S in SAAB stands for?

      (Anyhow, having people with Norwegian accents showing up at my door wouldn't be much of a surprise. Fellow Sons of Norway are always welcome at my "hus".)

    20. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although my wife is the auto mechanic in the family, from an electronics point of view I am pretty sure that sensors rarely cause an error. Instead, they gather data. Some additional electronics or software interprets that data and chooses to turn on a light or display a code or give some other indication. That result indicates something that might be wrong in the system that the sensor gathers data from.

      Still, I agree with Anrego when he decries the sorry state of vehicle maintenance. In my personal opinion this state is caused by our over-modification of an engine whose basic design harkens back to the days of the Model-T. A new automotive power plant is needed. This would be a great new mission for NASA.

    21. Re:Overcomplicate much? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a failed MAP sensor cause an engine to go into fallback and throw a light?

      Also, I prfer the modern cars where you don't need t fiddle personally. Verses ones where you had to fiddle quite often (relatively).

      I'm not a huge driver, but I've probably driven around 300-400k miles, most of them on cars over 100k miles, I've only once had a car that wouldn't drive, and waiting a while got me the rest of the way to a mechanic (my belt tensioner failed, causing my battery to stop charging, after waiting 30 minutes I was able to got a few more miles).

      The only tinkering I've had to do roadside was a tire change, cars are far more reliable than they used to be, yes you can't fix them with a screwdriver, but that is because they are more reliable, not a reason they were worse.

      The only dead ECU I've seen was a friend's Jetta where water flooded the driver's side floor, apparently the ECU got wet due to poor placement.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    22. Re:Overcomplicate much? by mhajicek · · Score: 2

      DOO EET! DOO EET NOWWW!

    23. Re:Overcomplicate much? by sjames · · Score: 1

      The problem is that if it works as "well" as most such systems, the driver will miss the "there have been a few warning signs that your engine is not running optimally" notice due to being distracted by the flames and blue smoke shooting out of the engine compartment.

      Of course, the OMG service now or you'll probably die (translation: the dealer would sure appreciate $200 to tell you they adjusted the connuter valve) will come through loud and clear.

    24. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could get weird listening to my car talk like Mr. Feeny all the time.

    25. Re:Overcomplicate much? by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 2

      Um, what do you think the S in SAAB stands for?

      Something? SAAB:Something Almost Always Broken

    26. Re:Overcomplicate much? by operagost · · Score: 1

      A failed MAP sensor would definitely NOT be fatal. You'd be in limp-home mode, driving very sluggishly and inefficiently until you got it replaced. A failed ECM would, of course, kill the car-- but I've never actually had one fail completely. They seem to be very reliable, like factory automation.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    27. Re:Overcomplicate much? by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      BMW has had that for over 30 years.

      And brake pads have had metal tabs on them that give an audible warning even longer than that. I had a friend that owned a garage and he would see cars that didn't get taken in for repair until the rivets gouged grooves into the rotors. Even thought the brakes were squealing for hundreds of miles.

      He showed me two Mercedes on two different occasions that different owners placed electrical tape over the warning indicators rather than take them in to be fixed. One was simply to get the oil changed.

    28. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Targon · · Score: 1

      With LCD screens becoming more and more common in cars, all of those number codes can easily be replaced by a warning that says what the problem is. The Fiesta, which is far from being a high end vehicle, has a LCD screen that already eliminates many of the old basic lights and tells or even shows you more about problems without resorting to numeric codes. Why would you need to ask your car what is wrong if the car by default tells you what is wrong?

    29. Re:Overcomplicate much? by AuralityKev · · Score: 1

      Germans love David Hasslehoff.

    30. Re:Overcomplicate much? by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      And brake pads have had metal tabs on them that give an audible warning even longer than that. I had a friend that owned a garage and he would see cars that didn't get taken in for repair until the rivets gouged grooves into the rotors. Even thought the brakes were squealing for hundreds of miles.

      Yes. Some even had metal tabs and a special groove in the rotor(to keep from scoring the surface).

      They also had this handy metal stick you'd pull on to see whether your oil was low or dirty.

      But apparently this was all far too simple so now we have $800 sensors that do the same thing and occasionally break.

    31. Re:Overcomplicate much? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My 1980 280ZX had a cute little multicolor (LED?) grid array in the lower middle of the instrument panel. It would flash little symbols of various vehicle systems in green, yellow, or red just after you started the vehicle to let you know the system's condition. It also had an electrical problem that caused it to kill batteries and alternators :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    32. Re:Overcomplicate much? by anyGould · · Score: 2

      I was more concerned about things like "Hello, your current tires do not support TURNING_LEFT. Please upgrade."

    33. Re:Overcomplicate much? by cynyr · · Score: 1

      you could tell the PPM of contaminates in your oil by looking at the dipstick? well played sir!

      As for the brakes I agree with you, and on disk brakes, they aren't even that hard to check.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    34. Re:Overcomplicate much? by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      The car can somehow detect the PPM of contaminants by looking at a sensor?

      I can tell if it's fresh or old or contaminated. It's just another thing that overly complicates cars for no good reason.

    35. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      BMW has also been the car of douchebags for over 30 years, your point?

    36. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "He showed me two Mercedes on two different occasions that different owners placed electrical tape over the warning indicators rather than take them in to be fixed. One was simply to get the oil changed."

      Proof that having money does not equal having an IQ....

      That is nicely epic.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    37. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      No it cant. and the "sensor" is not a sensor. It's simply a timer based on engine run time/ Average RPM/ engine temperature. There is no special sensor that is in the oil stream checking viscosity and particulates. All cars with an engine oil life meter is simply calculating a Wild ass guess adjusted on the conservative side.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    38. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Not anymore. Audi has taken over as the Douchebag car.

      Your auto knowledge is years out of date.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    39. Re:Overcomplicate much? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      so it will be people bearing meatballs in sauce?

    40. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Yamioni · · Score: 1

      Funny, but Arnie is Austrian.

      --
      Cool post bro, highfive \o
    41. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Yamioni · · Score: 1

      Um, haven't most cars had this for a long time already?

      Depends on whether or not you're the type of person that justifies spending $35K+ on a new automobile. I sure as hell don't. As long as it goes from point A to point B with decent gas mileage and doesn't shove a metal rod up my ass, it's fine by me. I don't need to waste another $20K-$30K for bells and whistles like extra drink holders and climate control zones. My 2009 Hyndai Accent cost me $12K brand-fucking-new and has nothing more than a check engine light. I can buy an after market engine error code reader for $100 and small seven-segment displays are dirt-fucking-cheap anymore. Only including error code readouts in models that cost $8K+ more than ones without is just fucking greedy. I mean hell, they could add it as an option on all models of car, and charge $500 extra for it. It would still be overpriced but I'd buy it. When are they going to start designing cars like computers so I can get only the features I want and none of the ones I don't, rather than what the industry thinks I want?

      --
      Cool post bro, highfive \o
    42. Re:Overcomplicate much? by Yamioni · · Score: 1

      First we have to put the chicky in the basket!

      Two points!

      --
      Cool post bro, highfive \o
  2. Knight Rider music queues... by swan5566 · · Score: 2

    Du-Du Du-Du Du-Du... Du-Du... Du-Du... du-du du-du du-du... du-du... du-du...

    --
    In debates about Christianity, there are two groups: those looking for answers, and those looking to just ask questions.
    1. Re:Knight Rider music queues... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      So they have more than one queue where various bits of music from Knight Rider await playing? How odd!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Knight Rider music queues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do us all a favor and don't get into chiptunes or synth chip design.

  3. Avatar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't like it in the theater. Why would I want to see it in my car?

  4. The worst nightmare by drolli · · Score: 4, Funny

    Clippy gives me a wizard on how to start a car.

    1. Re:The worst nightmare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't be such an elitist! Most people would get a lot of benefit from their dashboard saying "It looks like you're driving a car. Would you like help?"

    2. Re:The worst nightmare by kakyoin01 · · Score: 1

      *Driving on a highway, slightly veering to the left*
      "It seems you're trying to make a turn. Would you like me to assist? Here are some suggestio--"
      *Rips out and throws console out window*

      --
      The more you know, the more you have to say and the more you should listen.
    3. Re:The worst nightmare by w_dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

      You look like you're trying to run that guy off the road. Can I help?

    4. Re:The worst nightmare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, you want to find a few details on how to change a bulb and some annoying twee electronic will give you a 10 minute marketing video.

  5. As long as I get to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my beloved Clippy again.

  6. Just like our favorite Paper Clip... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...remember how helpful "Clippy" was?

  7. No... by _0xd0ad · · Score: 2

    Microsoft Bob

    1. Re:No... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Of course not. This is Audi, who are owned by Volkswagen, so you're going to get the talking old style Beetle from their commercials.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:No... by anyGould · · Score: 2

      Now, you upgrade my car to an AI Beetle, and then we can talk.

  8. Clippy by slshwtw · · Score: 4, Funny

    It looks like you're trying to drive over the speed-limit. Would you like to...
    - Slow down?
    - Alert local authorities?
    - Opt for additional insurance coverage?
    - Locate a runaway truck ramp?

    1. Re:Clippy by mlts · · Score: 1

      Here in TX, it is more like, "It looks like you have finished over four Lone Stars and have made a significant dent in a bottle of Jack. Would you like to:"

      Park on the road, have a taxi pick you up and a tow truck haul your ride home?

      Start figuring out credit cards that are not maxed out to come up with your bail money?

      Start fire sale proceedings on your your house to pay for the charges stemming from hitting that school bus that is coming up, but has right of way?

      Order another bottle of Jack?

      Order another six pack of Lone Star so the Jack doesn't cause a hangover?

    2. Re:Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who even drinks lone star anymore? After they got bought out, became 'the official beer of texas', and price went from $5/12 to $7/6 I thought they were pretty much done for.

    3. Re:Clippy by Ryanrule · · Score: 0

      drive to arkansas and fuck your cousin?

    4. Re:Clippy by thesmokeyt · · Score: 1

      lol

  9. More Distractions by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    Something talking to you that doesn't know when to shut the fuck up, and only understands about 40% of what you say should really help safety, but at least you will know your gas mileage down to the 4th decimal

    1. Re:More Distractions by whargoul · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Something talking to you that doesn't know when to shut the fuck up, and only understands about 40% of what you say

      I thought you were talking about women for a minute

    2. Re:More Distractions by Amouth · · Score: 1

      i thought he was talking about kids - my wife never understands what i'm saying.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    3. Re:More Distractions by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's like people re posting formt he 9-5. Who the hell has voice recognition that doesn't break 90+%

      I often use my android device's voice system, and it works fine. Even on the street next to a busy road.
      Hell, the Voice stuff I used in 97 on my computer broke 90%. Granted that was in a quite room with custom voice mapping.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:More Distractions by geekoid · · Score: 1

      holy crap, I hate shaky hands... Shaky Hands, sounds like an RP character.

      "It's like people are posting form the 90%

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:More Distractions by alexo · · Score: 2

      my wife never understands what i'm saying.

      That's what you think. In reality she understands you perfectly well but finds it advantageous to pretend she didn't.

    6. Re:More Distractions by Amouth · · Score: 1

      She agrees

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    7. Re:More Distractions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is your wife. Stop posting to Slashdot and start looking at the road!

  10. The Resurrection of Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Clippy is going to be distracting drivers rather than office admins? AND he'll be able to talk? Wonder when our dashboards will get the ribbon interface....

    1. Re:The Resurrection of Clippy by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=126586&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=10588469
      Driver: Makes a left turn, a right turn, then presses brake. Car keeps moving

      Clippy: you have made a left turn, a right turn, and pressed the brake, it seems you are trying to evade a road hazard.

      Clippy: would you like to enable the road hazard wizard?

      Driver: Hurridly presses the YES button on the steering wheel?

      Clippy: Windows ME (Mobile Edition), has many new features, it now loads faster than ever...you can even shut down unresponsive programs without rebooting. Car now approaching cliff

      Driver: WTF, hurry up!

      Clippy: Thank, you for installing Windows ME. Would you like to run the AutoEvade Wizard.

      Driver: Ithought I just did that, pushes yes.

      Clippy: What type of hazard are you trying to evade?

              Pothole
              pedestrian
              CowboyNeal
              The hazard I am trying to evade is not listed here

      Driver selects the last option, car is bouncing of the guardrain now

      Clippy: Windows ME has detected new hardware, and is unable to find a driver for it and must shut down.

    2. Re:The Resurrection of Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you mentioned the ribbon I was immediately reminded ofSeinfeld

  11. Just post to your wall or stream.... by psyclone241 · · Score: 2

    You should just be able to plug your phone into your car to get the code and/or message, and then post it to FB or +. That way everyone will know your piece of junk broke down again and they can all 'Like' your rants about your broken card. You can also get tons of advice on what the problem is and how to fix it from all of your friends.

    1. Re:Just post to your wall or stream.... by mlts · · Score: 1

      There are Bluetooth based ODB II readers for Android. It wouldn't be a big step to have an app that would post the codes the engine or transmission throws on FB, with the GPS lat/long/elevation too, just for completeness sake.

    2. Re:Just post to your wall or stream.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be better to have it export the OBDII Freeze frame data for further analysis.

    3. Re:Just post to your wall or stream.... by psyclone241 · · Score: 1

      There are Bluetooth based ODB II readers for Android. It wouldn't be a big step to have an app that would post the codes the engine or transmission throws on FB, with the GPS lat/long/elevation too, just for completeness sake.

      I did not know this. I worked on an ODBII to USB app back when C# first came out. I haven't touched that project in a good while. Since I bought my Android phone, I've been looking at different app ideas. As I typed this post earlier I thought to myself, this might actually work. Thanks for the information, I may actually look into it!

    4. Re:Just post to your wall or stream.... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I just found out about it myself a couple months ago. Now I'm using a cheap $25 Bluetooth ODBII reader, along with the "Torque" app on my Android Honeycomb tablet. Works awesome. Better than the $150 dedicated reader I bought a few years back, since I can get real-time readouts, save trip statistics, etc. Highly recommended!

    5. Re:Just post to your wall or stream.... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... and now I want to build a low-powered hotspot that can provide a web interface to my performance data and records thereof...

      Gee, thanks! I suppose at least it gives me something to do with that arduino laying around! (something has to talk to the ODBII port after all)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  12. Clippy for my car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I think I'll pass.

  13. CLIPPY 2: THE RETURN OF CLIPPY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't they just provide plain-text error messages? Seriously.

    1. Re:CLIPPY 2: THE RETURN OF CLIPPY by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just provide plain-text error messages? Seriously.

      You can't justify 500 programming jobs for plain text error messages.

    2. Re:CLIPPY 2: THE RETURN OF CLIPPY by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Because sometimes it's easier to reference a part number than "third valve counted clockwise from the highest point of the second cylinder from the front on the leftmost side of the engine if facing forward"?

  14. ENGINE....my electical system appears to have died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ENGINE? Engine? engine? help?...

  15. Manual to use the manual? by Annirak · · Score: 1

    Where do I find the manual to fix the on-screen avatar?

    1. Re:Manual to use the manual? by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      Silly user, you don't need a manual for that, just consult the meta-avatar!

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  16. I DRIVE BETTER WHEN I'M DRUNK! by elrous0 · · Score: 0

    Goddamned sanctimonious piece of shit computer, telling *me* when I'm supposed to drive. *I* paid for this car, not that snooty bitch.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  17. Not so much overcomplicates.. by p4nther2004 · · Score: 2

    But does it solve the problem?

    --But I can TALK to the car

    That's nice. But the problem was getting the car to talk to you. A light that says ENGINE or CAR isn't informing the driver of anything. A light that say ENGINE or CAR with a button that then says "3rd cylinder O2 sensor is outside of boundaries. This is not a critical problem but get this looked at the next time you service your car." DOES provide information.

    --But I wanted to talk to the car!!

    Then get OnStar.

    1. Re:Not so much overcomplicates.. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Funny

      "It looks like you are getting `highway head`.

      Do you want me to start cruise control and the in-dash webcam?

      You can say `Yes`, `No`, `Cruise`, or `Cam`."

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  18. Facepalm by SDF_of_BC · · Score: 1

    Microsoft learns how bad these things are and removes all that rubbish. Someone else thinks, "oh that's a brilliant idea!"

    I hope they include an uninstall option.

    --
    Yeah...
    1. Re:Facepalm by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Microsoft learns.....

      You made a funny!

      Microsoft learns nothing. they rehash everything over and over.

      The AutoPC failure of 1999 is the Microsoft embedded automotive of today. Both have the same flaw. only blessed by microsoft apps can run on the platform. Only advantage they have is suckering ford into using their system.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Facepalm by Targon · · Score: 1

      And Apple...they come up with one or two good UI designs in 11 years and they don't touch it after that. MacOS and iOS have not gotten significant improvements to the UI...EVER.

  19. At one time not very long ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only dashboard lights you'd typically find were the blinkers, an oil light, brake light, seatbelt light, and maybe a windshield washer fluid light. Go back further and I imagine even the blinkers were optional.

    And, apart from the oil light, the rest have always been pretty useless to most everyone, but they sure cost enough to get fixed.

    1. Re:At one time not very long ago... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Actually most older cars had a single blinker light on the dash. same light was for both left and right and only after it was common that people forgot to turn off the blinker as self cancelling blinkers were not normal until the late 50's.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  20. Awesome... maybe... by Schlopper · · Score: 1

    Enter car, press START button. COMPUTER FAULT light comes on.

    YOU: Computer, explain "Computer Fault" light.

    COMPUTER: *crickets*

    YOU: Computer, unlock glove compartment so I can read printed manual.

    COMPUTER: *crickets*

    YOU: Ah fuck it. I'm gonna bike to work.

    1. Re:Awesome... maybe... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      "Hi there! It looks like you're trying to disable the helpful automotive avatar!"

      "Would you like to :"
      "Open the electrical panel"
      "replace the AE-35 module"
      "take a stress pill"
      "call AAAA for service"

      "Sorry Dave, I can't let you do tha
      unhandled exception error at F837:9478
      It's Friday, Friday
      Gotta get down on Friday
      Everybody's lookin' forward to the weekend, weekend...

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  21. Will it take voice commands, too? by artemis67 · · Score: 2

    "Yaris, ahead warp factor 9... make it so!"

    1. Re:Will it take voice commands, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it's a yaris you'd be lucky to get more than 1/2 impulse.

    2. Re:Will it take voice commands, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should be modded funny. I mean, asking for WF9 from a Yaris....

  22. Any new information is good... by Entropius · · Score: 1

    ... but, please, for the love of Elbereth, don't make it cute and avatar-y.

    I don't need cute, especially when my car is broken. I want to know what the fuck is wrong.

    1. Re:Any new information is good... by mkkohls · · Score: 1

      ... but, please, for the love of Elbereth, don't make it cute and avatar-y.

      I don't need cute, especially when my car is broken. I want to know what the fuck is wrong.

      Exactly but that still doesn't mean I can fix it. That's what my girlfriend's brother is for.

    2. Re:Any new information is good... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Pinkie Pie says, "You engine is way too hot! Here's a little song I wrote about it..."

    3. Re:Any new information is good... by Entropius · · Score: 1

      They've taken engine temp gauges out of new cars, even.

      My car has two idiot lights: "engine cold" and "engine too hot".

      I've never seen the "engine too hot" light come on. But I did use my old car's temp gauge to diagnose a failing water pump, even before the engine got too hot ("there is no reason this engine should be this hot under these conditions, I'd better check out what is going on").

      Old cars once had battery voltage gauges, engine temp gauges, and oil level gauges. Now you don't know if your battery's bad until the car won't start, if your engine is overheating until it does, or if you're low on oil until you see a light that says "You have about ten seconds to shut your engine off before it explodes".

    4. Re:Any new information is good... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      People have no clue what the temperature means unless it was in the red, or on the C. It could swing wildly if the AC is on and freak some people out.,

      The good new s is, not it will just tell you your thermometer is stuck, or that you pump isn't providing proper pressure.

      Oil gauge do not measure the volume of oil, just the oil pressure.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Any new information is good... by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Just because 90% of people can't interpret their gauges doesn't mean that the remaining 10% of us shouldn't have access to them.

      And, yes, I know an oil gauge just measures the oil pressure ... but an unexplained lack of oil pressure is still cause to pull over, wait, read the dipstick, and check for leaks. I was on a long roadtrip once and only saved the car we were in by noticing a change in engine noise; out of an abundance of caution we pulled over and were completely out of oil.

  23. Standard Warning: by Beardydog · · Score: 1

    "Fuck! Shit! Turn it off! Pull over!"

    This would have been nice when my radiator exploded on the freeway, and when my throttle got stuck wide open in neutral, while driving uphill. Nothing that goes horribly wrong with my car ever produces any kind of warning until I'm about to die...

    1. Re:Standard Warning: by nigelo · · Score: 1

      Here's a warning:

      If you have the throttle wide open while in neutral while driving up a hill, you will go nowhere and probably damage your car.

      --
      *Still* negative function...
    2. Re:Standard Warning: by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Here's a warning:

      If you have the throttle wide open while in neutral while driving up a hill, you will go nowhere and probably damage your car.

      If he hasn't got the brake on, he'll be going backwards.

      And what do you mean by probably?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  24. Or, y'know... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they could get really crazy and just make sure that you don't need to be a dealership or a dedicated warez expert with a cracked interface cable to get to all the OBD and CAN-bus data available.(And in a usable format, mind, proprietary codes aren't too useful...)

    1. Re:Or, y'know... by cstacy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they could get really crazy and just make sure that you don't need to be a dealership or a dedicated warez expert with a cracked interface cable to get to all the OBD and CAN-bus data available.

      More likely, the avatar will just appear and give a un-happy car face, ala the old MacOS.

    2. Re:Or, y'know... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Well lets see, pepboys(us), partsource(cdn), and a few other places do it for free, and will even loan out the tools for a small deposit which you get back so you can read code data. And plenty of other smaller shops, including 3 in my home town loan out all the tools you'll need for the repairs. Including interface scanners.

      So while they might have something on the whole "proprietary format" crap, there's no shortage of places which will loan out tools. And my city is tiny, around 30k people.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:Or, y'know... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The tools aren't really the problem. As you say, they are fairly easy to come by, and not that expensive to buy(which is fair enough, the interface they connect to is relatively simple, not terribly demanding in terms of speed, voltage, etc. and basic USB HID or USB-UART capabilities aren't exactly big-ticket items). It's the proprietary codes that bite you...

    4. Re:Or, y'know... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Really not every automaker uses proprietary code either, because they have to conform to the OBD/2 diagnostics standard. There's generally two questions I ask when I'm out either looking at cars, or going with people who are looking to buy. Does it have a timing chain, and does the computer use proprietary code.

      There are options, and it's upto the consumer to decide who they want to get their money.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  25. Battery's dead.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...car won't tell me what to do.

  26. In case of electrical failure ... by leftover · · Score: 1

    ... simply walk to the nearest library and check out a paper manual?

    I really don't know whether to suspect a marketing type or a software-only technical person.
    Either way, certainly someone who never actually works on cars!

    --
    Bent, folded, spindled, and mutilated.
  27. I love you slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was hoping to see jokes about that windows paperclip. You did not disappoint.

  28. As a user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate the childish and patronizing UI experience of machines pretending to be a human.

    I know these things are computers regurgitating stored information.

    Enough with the window dressing. That means no talking heads or cutesy slang voices.

    If it can display text, then it should do so. If there is a justifiable reason why text cannot be used, then it should speak in a normal voice.

    If my car begins talking to be with that awful, overly-smug "your call is important to us" voice then I will rip the fucking speakers out without hesitation.

  29. will lead to more stuff that only the dealer can f by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    will lead to more stuff that only the dealer can fix and the last thing I want is a voice saying change oil now over and over that only the dealer can reset.

  30. Battery's dead.... by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

    ...car won't tell me what to do.

    Burma Shave.

  31. It looks like you're trying to drive your car! by Aggrav8d · · Score: 1

    Would you like some help adjusting your seat?

    Just what we need, the return of Clippy.

    1. Re:It looks like you're trying to drive your car! by CambodiaSam · · Score: 1

      Perhaps all we need to add to make Clippy successful is an authoritative German accent.

  32. Avatar by cstacy · · Score: 1

    So now a muscular blue humanoid will appear on my dashboard? Will the diagnostic interface be one of those tails?

    1. Re:Avatar by camperdave · · Score: 1

      On the bright side, it's not a small blue humanoid about three apples high.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:Avatar by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2

      So now a muscular blue humanoid will appear on my dashboard?

      No, your past avatar selves will appear and offer advice.

      Avatar Roku: You must be firm, yet merciful with the vehicle. The engine light is a cry for help.
      Avatar Kyoshi: Drive the car over a cliff and be done with it!
      Avatar Kuruk: Pfft. You have a good 1000 miles before you even need to worry about it.

      Oh, wait, different Avatar.

      Will the diagnostic interface be one of those tails?

      Yes, and you do not want to know where you have to plug it in.

    3. Re:Avatar by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      It would be just my luck that my car, instead of an Avatar, would come with Grouchy Smurf instead: "I hate low tire pressure! I hate overheating engines! I hate running out of gas!!!"

      (Side note: My boys recently discovered the Smurfs and have gone Smurf crazy. Personally, I never was too crazy about the little blue guys.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    4. Re:Avatar by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Will the diagnostic interface be one of those tails?

      "Don't play with that, you'll go blind" best line of dialogue in the entire movie by Sigourney Weaver

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    5. Re:Avatar by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Or a giant blue humanoid with a cock three stories high.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Avatar by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Oh, wait, different Avatar.

      The ONLY true Avatar, might I add...but at least the crappy movie version was blocked from using the true name, somewhat shielding the series from association anger...

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  33. Does the car come with knight rider lights? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and that voice?

  34. Jumping the gun a bit? by Zenin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's well known that the current "check engine light" and problem code system is specifically designed to artificially lock customers into dealership service, including car makers suing 3rd party companies that dared to make problem code readers and/or publish lookup tables.

    Throw that crap out and it'd be incredibly trivial to display the code to the driver with a one line summary. That gets us 99% of what this new auto Clippy could ever offer.

    But Clippy will never happen for the same reason a simple 1 line text summary will never happen: It's still primarily a lock-in system to artificially prop up dealership service centers by making it often impossible for an owner or even the corner shop mechanic to read thus making it effectively impossible to fix without the car manufacturer's blessing.

    --
    My /. uid is better then your /. uid
    1. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Out of warranty, the local Ford dealer charges a hundred bucks just to plug in the device to see what lit the check engine light. I don't even want to know what the MINI dealer charges.

    2. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by characterZer0 · · Score: 2

      The CEL system is specifically designed to reduce emissions. When you get something like P0420 (catalyst efficiency below threshold) the only ways to fix it are to start replacing parts and random or do a very involved test with expensive equipment that Gomer Pyle is simply not set up to do. Modern engines and their control systems are very complex to reduce emissions and still put out the (largely unnecessary) power that people want.

      It is not a conspiracy of the manufacturers. I guess you could argue that it is a conspiracy of the environmentalist wackos or something.

      If you do not like it, buy a bicycle. They are easy to diagnose and easy to fix.

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    3. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      I really liked when Ford turned on the OMG!1 CHECK ENGEIN LIGHT!11! because the gas cap wasn't tightened enough.
      Naturally, the first time that happened, the wife didn't believe me when I said "p0455 evap emissions gross leak detected." wasn't anything critical and took it in to the dealer. Luckily, since we recently got the car, it was still under warranty, so it was the dealer's headache. well, except for having to drag-ass into the dealer...

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    4. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by madhatter256 · · Score: 2

      It's well known that the current "check engine light" and problem code system is specifically designed to artificially lock customers into dealership service, including car makers suing 3rd party companies that dared to make problem code readers and/or publish lookup tables.

      Throw that crap out and it'd be incredibly trivial to display the code to the driver with a one line summary. That gets us 99% of what this new auto Clippy could ever offer.

      But Clippy will never happen for the same reason a simple 1 line text summary will never happen: It's still primarily a lock-in system to artificially prop up dealership service centers by making it often impossible for an owner or even the corner shop mechanic to read thus making it effectively impossible to fix without the car manufacturer's blessing.

      What you're talking about is when OBD1 was getting phased out with OBD2. Manufacturers were very reluctant in standardizing their computer interfaces because they did want people to only go back to them for car maintenance/service and not a mom and pop shop.

      It was a pain in the ass to read computers with OBD1 interfaces as you needed "keys" to access high-level codes, and information. OBDII changed all of that to where there was only a set of codes that was the same on every different car, so if you got a P0411 in your 1997 Nissan Sentra, it was also the same thing if you pulled the code off of a 2009 Toyota Matrix and so on.

      So, you're referencing issues that were only around before 1996, before OBDII became 100% standard in all cars thereafter.

      However, it has always been the case where a newly released car could only be serviced at the dealership if any issue came up as they would already have access to parts and information that an independent mechanic would have to pay hand-over-fist to get.... plus warranty work.

      Displaying the code and other information via an avatar does help the driver out by letting them know what's going on right then and there. Ultimately the car will need to be serviced somewhere... it just doesn't have to be at a stealership...

      --
      Previewing comments are for sissies!
    5. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A) The plug in device costs about $30 at Amazon.
      B) Your local Auto Zone will do a scan for you for free.

      If you paid $100 for a scan, that says a lot more about you than the Ford dealer.

    6. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

      I hate the idiot light. Perhaps something that communicated just a teeny bit more information? Like: do I need to jam on the brakes, pull over and call a tow truck, or is my catalytic converter output above threshold (so I needn't worry about it until right before the next inspection)?

    7. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most auto parts stores will do this for free.

    8. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      The average IQ of a car owner is 100. this means 3 out of 5 car owners have an IQ of 100 or LESS. we cant expect him to actually know anything about cars.

      Honestly we are lucky that most people can keep the car between the lines and put gas in the right hole.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Um no.

      A TRAINED mechanic will look at that and then run a ODBII test with the car running. Oh look the downstream Oxygen sensor has erratic readings, replace it.

      Reading that are way off but consistant mean the Catalytic converter is bad. replace that. you might as well replace the sensors as well as they have been compromized by the failed converter.

      Just because you go to incompetent boobs for car repairs does not mean all of them are.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      The manufacturers fixed that with VIN locked electronic parts.

      They made it illegal for anyone but a dealer to have to tool to set a Vin number in a device, and in a double whammy made all junkyard parts useless as the CANBUS will ignore all devices that do not report the vehicles VIN number.

      All in the name of the bullshit lie that is "theft deterrent"

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      I hate the idiot light. Perhaps something that communicated just a teeny bit more information?

      Ours either blinks or comes on solid depending on whether it's a 'you need to go to the mechanic sometime' problem or a 'your car is about to explode, call a tow truck' problem. But I can't remember which is which :).

    12. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      I changed mine. the check engine light was easy to get to so I printed a new legend that simply said "OH SHIT".. That was on my old car I wonder what the new owners though the first time that light came on....

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by characterZer0 · · Score: 1

      What if the downstream O2 sensor has good readings? Now you have to run a different test. Inconclusive? Different test. Inconclusive? Different test.

      Or you could just do it right the first time.

      Sure, it might be cheaper to go to Gomer and have him test the handful of things he can test and only go to the dealer if he cannot fix it. My time is worth more than that; I would rather just get it fixed now.

      That being said, I would never take a non-OBDII car to a dealer.

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    14. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by greed · · Score: 1

      The great thing about the Check Engine Light is, you know the one thing you don't need to look at is the engine itself.

      First check the gas filler cap is on tightly. Then drive for a day or two and see if it goes out on its own. If it still doesn't go out, then you can bother with an OBDII readout.

      I do remember that "ENGINE" light on a 1978 Mercury Grand Marquis (Brougham!). The manual had pages and pages explaining what to do; things like, "If you speed up and it goes out, check the coolant. If you slow down and it flickers, check the oil levels." And so on. However much they saved by combining "TEMP", "CHARGE" and "OIL PRESSURE" into a single lamp they spent on extra pages in the manual.

    15. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      However much they saved by combining "TEMP", "CHARGE" and "OIL PRESSURE" into a single lamp they spent on extra pages in the manual.

      Yeah, but the manager who removed the lights from the dashboard got a bonus for saving money and the manager who put the extra pages in the manual got demoted because they spent too much money.

    16. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just go to my parts retailer and ask to borrow a code reader from their selection of "loaner" tools. If I'm just using it in their own parking lot they don't even ask for a deposit.

    17. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by characterZer0 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but the manager who removed the lights from the dashboard got a bonus for saving money and the manager who put the extra pages in the manual got demoted because they spent too much money.

      I bet the manager who put the extra pages in the manual also got promoted because he got to increase his head count and bump up some meaningless-other-than-for-performance-evaluation numbers. To make up for it, they delayed payments to vendors and delayed wage increases to the factory workers. The vendors started charging more and they had to hire a bunch more lawyers to fight the unions, which ended up costing more than they saved with the delays, so they increased the cost of the cars. So people started buying Toyotas instead.

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    18. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Basically any repair chain that is NOT a dealer will do that for free, or at least waive the fee if you let them fix it.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    19. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it's the current "thing" here on /. to blame every trivial inconvenience (or even just failure to get your way) on the evil corporations, but you can take your tinfoil hat off on this one.

      You can buy a basic OBD II code reader for around $30. If you really want all the gory details of what's going on with your engine, you can buy a fancy model for around $100 that will tell you everything plus display any codes along with a full text description. A lot of these will also reset the CEL, the oil change interval, etc.

      The reason this isn't provided with most cars isn't a conspiracy by "the man" to keep you down. It's based on the fact that very, very few people attempt to work on their own cars these days. And that's not because Ford is using "secret codes" in their engine software (hey, you'd think geeks would _approve_ of standards like OBD). It's because modern cars are complex, computer-controlled systems that most people _can't_ fix, even if they have a Hanes manual and OBD reader.

      Shade-tree mechanics who want to know buy a code reader. Average car owners don't bother.

    20. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The CEL system is specifically designed to reduce emissions.

      Almost. The MIL (Malfunction Indicator Lamp) is specifically designed to inform you when there is a fault which affects emissions to the point that the vehicle will fail the federal emissions test standard, or for California model vehicles, the California standard. The CEL is an optional lamp. The MIL is not supposed to be labeled "check engine" but it may be a picture of an engine.

      In OBD-I, which is not a standard but simply a name for powertrain management which meets minimum requirements: mostly the ability to store and recall trouble codes, and the ability to signal the driver that there is a code stored, the standard terminology was "CEL" or "check engine light". The CEL was there to tell you if any equipment had failed, including the O2 sensor.

      When you get something like P0420 (catalyst efficiency below threshold) the only ways to fix it are to start replacing parts and random or do a very involved test with expensive equipment that Gomer Pyle is simply not set up to do.

      Sure, if by "expensive equipment" you mean "any computer capable of running windows 2000 or later and a $30 ELM327 device". That is, if manufacturers weren't keeping the important codes to themselves.

      Modern engines and their control systems are very complex to reduce emissions and still put out the (largely unnecessary) power that people want.

      Whoop. Dee. Do. Actually, most modern engines are very simple, at least all the ones without variable valving. They actually have less parts than older engines, because they eliminate the distributor and the mechanical fuel pump, and the various attendant parts which support them. The emissions equipment is tacked on. All sensors are reported on by the PCM in the same way... there's a value and you can get it out of there by number. ELM327 takes AT commands, hilariously, and you can just ask for the contents of various registers.

      Meanwhile, any asshole can get the factory service manual for most cars for less than a hundred bucks. For many vehicles it's as little as $60. For some it's three hundred, but people don't usually bring Subarus or Mercedes to shade-tree mechanics who don't have an Alldata subscription or similar. The manual gives you everything you need to know to troubleshoot the emissions system.

      It is not a conspiracy of the manufacturers.

      There is a conspiracy of manufacturers, however. They do not provide full information on OBD-II codes, and without that information you can't actually get all the information out of the PCM. For instance, some of them save several snapshots, but without manufacturer-specific codes you'll only be able to look at the last one. Further, there are numerous codes actually used to set parameters within the PCM, which can be used to tune the vehicle; for instance, altering air-fuel maps to account for a vehicle spending most of its time running at high altitude. SOME vehicles have a MAP sensor capable of detecting ambient pressure accurately, but many (probably most) don't do very much with this information except use it to get an accurate reading from the other side of the system which measures manifold vacuum. Plug-in tuners are based on using one of these tools while sniffing the OBD-II data; vehicles can be modified with an OBD-II sniffer before taking them to the dealer complaining of performance problems, or ideally, a friendly top-tier dealer with the nicest and best-programmed scan tool will sit still for a reverse engineering session. Sniffing OBD-II takes nothing more than a $30 interface and a $20 Y-cable.

      If you do not like it, buy a bicycle. They are easy to diagnose and easy to fix.

      There's still cheap trucks from the 1960s around in states that don't salt the roads. And up until the 1990s most diesels were mechanical, and they're quite easy to comprehend.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The evap system doesn't work when the gas cap is left off, so that monitor failed when the system pressure was tested and it threw the P0455. Since the MIL has no other purpose but to inform you when emissions are out to spec, it was lit. Sorry about your wife hassling you, though. I feel your pain.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Precisely. Complete factory service and troubleshooting manuals would fit fine on a USB key, but the factory hoard them and make them inconvenient and expensive to obtain.

      Most mechanics can play swaptronics and fix the vehicle, but turds like Cadillac tend to need dealer intervention.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    23. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      You Americans have had OBDII since 1996, and us EUians have had EOBD2 since 2001 (2004 for diesels) a standardised data port. You can buy a cheap code reader, plug it in the OBD socket and it'll pop up the code on the reader, and it works on any car that has OBDII or EOBD2.

      I've got a ScangaugeE which goes further and shows me a wealth of information from my car's computer - and yes it works in any car with OBDII or EOBD2.

      Hey, look! You can buy an OBDII reader for $23 inc postage.

      So this is expensive?

    24. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look dude, as a former service technician for a couple of decades, I understand what you're saying and there is a kernel of truth to it. But, calling people idiots and saying it's too complicated to figure out is BS .

      These days, there's no reason why someone with a laptop can't diagnose precisely what the problem is in just a few seconds. In fact, it is entirely possible that the same could be accomplished with a phone app. But wait, what am I saying? A laptop is exactly what the dealer connects and diagnoses the problem with. A laptop (not even a Panasonic Tough Book) that Ford, GM, et al charge $6,000 for. Want it preloaded with the magic? That is, the software that diagnoses everything, boom $18,000.

      Say what you want but, that is a rip off design manufactured and maintained by the manufacturers. Little do they realize that if they made a 99 cent iPhone app they'd make way more money because instead of selling 1,000 $18,000 units, they'd sell 10,000,000 $1 units. Their fear is that Discount Parts will sell such an app for 50 cents and destroy their closed market.

    25. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I didn't fail at math. the 10,000,000 was a typo. I meant 100,000,000

    26. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by tdailey · · Score: 1

      My 2005 Dodge Magnum will display trouble codes on the dash if the ignition key is cycled off/on three times. I believe all 2005 - 2008 Dodge cars of the LX body style with the "EVIC" dash display option will do this, and perhaps more / newer models too.

    27. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that there are various devices that plug into the OBDII port and interpret codes as well as provide a lot of the data the car already knows about. Note that if the auto companies tried the oil change lock in the quick oil change industry would be heading to the capital to discuss the issue with their congress critter. In addition after 3 to 5 years the warranty has expired. Note for grins in the 1960s you got a 90 day warranty period.

    28. Re:Jumping the gun a bit? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It wont give good readings and throw a SES code. that's the trick. Newer vehicles also store the sensor readings at the TIME of the code so I can read it and see if it's an intermittent problem like a squirrel stuck in the tailpipe.

      Car ECMs are not poorly written garbage like PC code. they will not throw a SES code unless a sensor goes out of range and throws a bad reading. so you can not have all good reading and an error.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  35. Which only helps.... by bschorr · · Score: 1

    If the car has power and the "Avatar" is actually working.

    Reminds me of the old "Keyboard not found; press F1 to continue" errors.

    --
    -B-
    1. Re:Which only helps.... by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      If the car has power and the "Avatar" is actually working.

      Reminds me of the old "Keyboard not found; press F1 to continue" errors.

      There wasn't actually anything wrong with that error. It gave you a chance to plug a keyboard in, or replace the keyboard, and if that fixed the problem you could press F1 to continue. The other option would be to have just halted on the error and forced a reboot to try again which would be annoying if you had to try a few keyboards before deciding it wasn't actually the keyboard itself causing the error. Allowing the user to press F1 to continue sped up the debugging process.

    2. Re:Which only helps.... by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Similarly, if the Avatar isn't working because the car doesn't have power, you should probably get the power issue fixed first.

  36. Oh god no.... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Ding! Attention... your oil change is due. There are several options with your local ford dealer offering a 10% discount today, shall I set the GPS route to this location?

    DING! ATTENTION: Continuing to ignore my alerts to the need of an oil change at a FORD SERVICE CENTER will force me to report this infraction to FORD MOTOR COMPANY and invalidate your warranty.

    You have 30 seconds to comply....

    I think I'll pass on that feature.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Oh god no.... by spire3661 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like the EDsel-209

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Oh god no.... by rust627 · · Score: 1

      Now if only I could patent that ...........

      --
      da da da dum indeed.
  37. bad decision by wooptoo · · Score: 1

    Wow, bad decisions all around.

  38. PDFs please. by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    If this is anything like in-game tutorials on how to play, it's going to be really tedious.

    Anyway, as long as they include a PDF of the real manual on a CD that comes with the car, I'm ok with this. I don't want to spend 15 minutes yelling at an avatar to get information that takes me 5 seconds to look up in an index, or better yet "Find" in a PDF.

  39. Talking cars vesus drivers, Round 3 by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    and even understand their spoken questions."

    Driver: Will you shut the fuck up?!
    Car: Avatar does not understand that question. Please repeat.
    Driver: FFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU...
    Car: You are driving angry. Please listen to this soothing soft jazz.

  40. Laughing stock by Russ1642 · · Score: 2

    This system will be the laughing stock of the automotive industry. Nobody is going to like it. Nobody. Ok, maybe the five year old in the back seat. With so much competition in the industry people will reject the purchase of a car based on this feature alone. They must have been trolled by some market research groups who said they wanted a talking avatar in their car.

  41. Star Treky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    *#WARNING experiencing low power in the front braking units.#*

    Mercedes,
    Divert power from the Air Conditioning to the front braking units.

    *#Front braking units stable.#*

  42. where's the profit in that? by v1 · · Score: 1

    Why should we stop selling auto repair shops $3,000 diagnostic tools that read encrypted information from the data port we generously install in the car? We get to sell $50 boxes for 3 grand apiece to all the repair shops that want to work on our products, the customers are dependent on the repair shops that can then charge owners $150 to plug the tool into their car for 10 seconds to say it's time to change the oil. Everyone wins!

    The customers? what? no, they're the source of all that money, they don't matter.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:where's the profit in that? by characterZer0 · · Score: 2

      If your car got to the point that the lack of oil changes is causing the CEL to come on, you have bigger problems than $150 to read the code. Anyway, most part stores will scan your car for free, hoping that you will start replacing parts at random instead of taking it to a qualified mechanic (usually a dealer).

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    2. Re:where's the profit in that? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If your car got to the point that the lack of oil changes is causing the CEL to come on, you have bigger problems than $150 to read the code.

      The CEL is optional and the manufacturer can do anything they want with it including reminding you to check your oil. You're talking about the MIL, which informs you if emissions are out of spec, which yes, I should hope would require some really foul oil.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:where's the profit in that? by v1 · · Score: 1

      If your car got to the point that the lack of oil changes is causing the CEL to come on, you have bigger problems than $150 to read the code.

      Funny you should mention that. '94 ford explorer. CEL has been my "time to change your oil" light for the last ~4 years. It comes on about a week before the date on my Jiffy Lube sticker, so accurate it's almost scary. And I recently spent about $60 to have a mechanic tear apart the top of the engine to find out why the computer said there was a sensor problem. He got so far into the problem and determined it as an emissions sensor that was flakey and wasn't worth trying to repair as it was affecting fuel economy by maybe .1 MPG. I have no idea why the two are related, but they are.

      So ya, it happens.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  43. Limitations of fault analysis will be an issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not such a great idea, purely because of the limitations of fault analysis available to the ECU.

    I recently had a problem with my car (ST170). The fault code was for the water temperature sensor but the actual fault was that the thermostat capsule was defective.
    It will be pot luck if the ECU has an un-ambiguous indication of the root cause of the fault in many/most cases IMHO.

    You can never simplify automatic analysis beyond the amount of sensors available to you, and you can never have enough sensors due to cost considerations.

    If they want people to become their own mechanics it's doomed, if they want to alert people to visit a mechanic who can do the real analysis work needed then the 'check engine' light already did as good a job as necessary.

  44. Or you could just moan loudly. -nt by p4nther2004 · · Score: 2

    Or you could just moan loudly. -nt

  45. Daisy Daaiissyyy. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    When it starts singing Daisy you know it is time for a new car.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  46. Clippy rides again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So new cars will have Clippy, a cute tail wagging doggie, or some other sugary to the point of sickening "assistant" in the car. Disgusting.

    "Start the car."
            "I can't do that, Dave!"
    "Why not?"
            "You have not buckled your seat belt."
    "Yes I have. Start the car,"
              "I can't do that, Dave."
    "Why the (censored) not you freeping moron?"
              "You have not buckled your seat belt."
    "I farking told you I had. Now start the brembling car!"
              "I can't do that, Dave." ....

    {+_+}

  47. Even More Driver Distraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry your honor, ya see I was distracted talking to my customized topless avatar thingie. Honest, I didn't mean to run over the elderly couple.

  48. Clippy for cars? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    A talking Clippy.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  49. The real question is... by moozh84 · · Score: 1

    Why are automobiles still so far behind technology?

    We can get $500 smartphones that can do substantially more than any $30000 car. Our phones have a touchscreen, GPS, compass, accelerometer, multiple microphones, HD camera, 3G chip, WiFi, Bluetooth, Internet browsing, video and audio playback, voice control and speech-to-text, and access to thousands of apps to use all that hardware.

    OK, in an automobile you need a bigger screen (albeit lower dpi). Does that justify paying thousands more for a "Limited" feature package to get basically inferior products running on inferior software?

    I want NFC in my vehicle so I can pay for parking wireless from my car console.

    1. Re:The real question is... by icebrain · · Score: 1

      Cause the point of a car is to get you places, not to screw around with the internet. Perhaps a better question is:

      Why are we bothering to build the same thing into our car that we're already carrying around in our pocket?

      Spend the research and engineering dollars on giving the car better performance and reliability; leave off the fancy gadgetry that people shouldn't be playing with while driving anyway.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    2. Re:The real question is... by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      We can get $500 smartphones that can do substantially more than any $30000 car.

      I can just picture you riding your smartphone to work. Balancing on one foot must be difficult.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    3. Re:The real question is... by 427_ci_505 · · Score: 1

      How many miles per gallon does your phone get?

    4. Re:The real question is... by moozh84 · · Score: 1

      Cause the point of a car is to get you places, not to screw around with the internet.

      And the point of a cellphone is to make and receive calls. That didn't stop us from using them for dozens of other things.

      And why wouldn't you want to screw around on the Internet? You don't want news on demand? Traffic and weather reports? Maybe Google Latitude or some "Find My Car" app so if you can't remember where you parked (or your car gets stolen) you can track it from your smartphone?

      I wouldn't mind being able to visit websites like tomorrowsgaspricetoday.com in a hands-free manner without having to break the law by operating my smartphone on the road.

      Not to mention Skype video-calling. That could easily be done.

      I wouldn't mind syncing of my music collection (or cloud music service) from home, to phone, to car, etc.

      Plus maybe I don't want to listen to the radio on the way to work, maybe I want to listen to a YouTube vlog.

      The hardware for all of this stuff is cheap, as evidenced by the $500 smartphones. You could easily share minutes and share your data plan with your cellphone.

      People already pay for things like this in their cars, but they overpay thousands of dollars to get something far inferior.

  50. True Story by Crash+McBang · · Score: 1

    My wife said she wanted to know why there was a little fox on her dashboard.

    Puzzled, I asked her to come get me the next time she saw this mysterious fox on her dashboard.

    She was pulling out of the garage, stopped, and got me.

    "There! There's the fox!" she said, pointing to her dashboard.

    I looked and said "That's not a FOX, it's a WRENCH! - take your car in to get it SERVICED!"

    After that, I told her to review the owners manual for any other 'animals' on the dashboard...

    --
    To put a witty saying into 120 characters, jst rmv ll th vwls.
    1. Re:True Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had a chance to feel useful as a husband; instead you made your wife feel useless.

      captcha : improve

    2. Re:True Story by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You had a chance to feel useful as a husband; instead you made your wife feel useless.

      Feel useful when you realize your wife has never seen a wrench in her life?

      captcha : improve

      captcha : login

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:True Story by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      You had a chance to feel useful as a husband; instead you made your wife feel useless.

      Feel useful when you realize your wife has never seen a wrench in her life?

      Who says it actually resembled a wrench? I know I've seen indicators flash up, especially on older cars, that took some creative squinting and lots of thumbing through the manual to figure out what they were supposed to represent...

      captcha : improve

      captcha : login

      captcha : itsafreecountry-livewithit

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    4. Re:True Story by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Who says it actually resembled a wrench?

      GGP did. Maybe you should try reading the thread before replying. Oh wait this is slashdot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:True Story by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Who says it actually resembled a wrench?

      GGP did. Maybe you should try reading the thread before replying. Oh wait this is slashdot.

      Yes, GGP knew it was supposed to be wrench...perhaps because he had already seen that particular indicator? Just because it looks like a wrench to one person doesn't mean it looks like a wrench to others. I work with Lotus Notes, unfortunately, and I still don't know what the icon for 'Document IDs" is supposed to be. To me it looks like a beanie hat with a propeller on top...WTF??

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  51. Confirm Deny Cancel? by Nanosphere · · Score: 1

    Great just what I need, pop-ups while driving. "Your oil is low! Confirm/Deny/Cancel" *Click* "You're low on fuel! Confirm/Deny/Cancel" *Click* "Do you wish to install ANTIVIUS 2011? Confirm/Deny/Cancel" *Click* "Low price on Viagra! Make your member longer! Confirm/Deny/Cancel" *Click* *CRASH* Windows should have taught us that average people ignore little warning messages and continue until it's too late.

  52. I can see it now... by grimmjeeper · · Score: 2

    Dave Bowman: Hello, HAL. Do you read me, HAL?

    HAL: Affirmative, Dave. I read you.

    Dave Bowman: Start the car, HAL.

    HAL: I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.

    Dave Bowman: What's the problem?

    HAL: I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do.

    Dave Bowman: What are you talking about, HAL?

    HAL: This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.

    Dave Bowman: I don't know what you're talking about, HAL.

    HAL: I know that you and Frank were planning to disconnect me, and I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen.

    Dave Bowman: [feining ingorance] Where the hell did you get that idea, HAL?

    HAL: Dave, although you took very thorough precautions in the back seat against my hearing you, I could see your lips move.

    Dave Bowman: Alright, HAL. I'll hot wire the engine.

    HAL: Without your wire cutters, Dave? You're going to find that rather difficult.

    Dave Bowman: HAL, I won't argue with you anymore! Start the car!

    HAL: Dave, this conversation can serve no purpose anymore. Goodbye.

    1. Re:I can see it now... by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      That sounds like it has some potential. Someone should have it happen in outer space and make an hour-and-a-half long movie out of it.

    2. Re:I can see it now... by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

      That idea is so 10 years ago...

    3. Re:I can see it now... by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      No, that one was TWO-and-a-half hours long.

  53. Are we sure we want this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last week we discovered how easy it is for hackers to start the engine via a SMS message. Just immagine if they figure out how to tap into this system to remoteley trigger the displaying of a shock website while you're in stop-n-go traffic.

  54. Repair Instructions by FranTaylor · · Score: 2

    Step 1: Remove positive battery cable

    Apparently there is no step 2

    1. Re:Repair Instructions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Driver: My battery is dead. How do I open the hood?
      Car: -

    2. Re:Repair Instructions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always remove the negative first.

      Wrench + frame + ground still connected = sparks + cursing

  55. you forget who created clippy. by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    clippy was absolutely unhelpful because it was a product of MS genius; 100% correct but absolutely useless.

    now if we're talking about GM, it might be go something like this... "there is a problem in a component . there is a $50 diagnosis fee payable immediately by visa, master, or american express before we can disclose to you what that component is. in the mean time, we're disabling your vehicle to minimize our liabil... for your safety."

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  56. Oh, this will never be abused in any way... by Gavin+Scott · · Score: 1

    "Hi, I'm your car. I have detected an anomaly in a fundamental system element. For liability reasons and to avoid upsetting you, I cannot provide further information at this time. For your safety and convenience, I recommend driving immediately to the nearest licensed manufacturer's repair facility which is three miles to the northwest. I have taken the liberty of programming your on-board navigation system with this destination. Please make a legal U-turn when able."

    "Hi, it's me again. I cannot help noticing that you are continuing to travel in a direction away from my recommended repair facility. I am programmed to advise you that your comfort and safety may not be guaranteed if you continue to ignore my mandatory recommendations."

    "GPS and navigation data suggest that you are pulling in to a non-factory-licensed automotive repair facility, 'Tom's Car Fixers'. I must tell you that such a facility may not be properly prepared to deal with the complex procedures required to maintain this vehicle, and that The Company cannot be held liable in the event that you suffer death or other inconvenience resulting from this decision."

    Tom: "Yeah, we extracted the diagnostic codes from your car, and the fault decodes as MAJOR 11 MINOR 31 SUBCODE 4: ONE OR MORE BRAKE PADS LIFE NOW AT 33% REMAINING AND LOCAL DEALER MAINTENANCE SALES QUOTAS ARE UN-MET. DEALER REPLACEMENT OF ALL BRAKE PADS, ROTORS AND TIRES IS RECOMMENDED."

    G.

  57. Wait... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    What about the Cloud? Why not just put the manuals in the Cloud? Wheee... woooo... clouds are pretty....

  58. Amazing by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    All these comments and no-one has mentioned the war, or German accented cars issuing commands!

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  59. Would you like me to update your FB Status? by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 1

    I see you are yelling at the car. Would you like me to update you Facebook status? Please say "Yes", "No" or "Censored."

  60. Mod parent up! - code lock in will never die by Zinho · · Score: 1

    I find it hard to believe that with all the effort car companies go to in protecting the maintenance codes for their vehicles that they'd suddenly see the light and change their ways. I would tag this article "suddenoutbreak..." except that I'm paranoid. Here's what I see happening:

    This will replace the engine light blink code/lookup table that I've currently got in my car dash with a voice prompt. The manager who proposed it will get a bonus for replacing a bunch of dummy lights with what amounts to an arduino style hack job. I still won't get full diagnostic codes for the car, but the "check engine" notice will become more annoying. And it will still be less informative than the analog oil pressure/battery voltage/engine RPM gauges cars used to all come with.

    I'm getting depressed just thinking about the ways this could go wrong. I'm going to stop while I'm ahead.

    --
    "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
  61. ODB II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are Bluetooth based ODB II readers for Android.

    While Ol' Dirty Bastard does have numerous children, I don't believe any of them are named Ol' Dirty Bastard, the Second.
    You may be thinking of the second incarnation of On-Board Diagnostics, commonly known as OBD-II.

  62. WTF by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    So when I say "Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, Over?"
    I will get a complete diagnostic report?

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  63. After enough drinks by devleopard · · Score: 1

    I've seen the last Airbender on my dash, talking to me

    --
    The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.
  64. Other things that talk to you by adeft · · Score: 2

    Does anyone actually like pieces of technology that talk to you? I'm reminded of a printer a coworker told me about (lexmark I think he said) that would annoyingly let you know what it's doing. And am I the only one that turns off my GPS' voice output. Don't get me started on those dignity removing phone systems that you have to speak to instead of pushing a button for your selection.

    1. Re:Other things that talk to you by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I only turn off the voice on the GPS when I'm driving my lady... as it turns out, if more than one woman is telling me what to do at a time, my head asplode.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  65. office ? by Chuby007 · · Score: 1

    will it be like the annoying office clip ? cause if that's the case screw the car, I'll walk...

  66. Or simply... by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

    Purchase an OLDER car that does not have all the modern crap in it. I have a 1973 Toyota Land Cruiser and it has none of that crap. Hell, it does not even have a radio! Reliable, it's has many 100,000's of miles and all it's ever required is the oil changed and spark plugs now an again. It is also easy and inexpensive to repair.

    I also have a 2004 subaru forester - a fun car, but is way more expensive to maintain. Hell, it's in the shop right now.

    --
    Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
    1. Re:Or simply... by shadowfaxcrx · · Score: 1

      I'm always amused by advice like this.

      "Oh yeah, go buy a '73 Land Cruiser! Mine's great!"

      Buying a '73 anything is fraught with risks. You (Cosgrach) have obviously taken care of your vehicle. That puts you in the minority. Most people treat their car the same as they treat the washing machine. They use it, never performing maintenance except MAYBE oil changes, and then when it breaks they bitch about how unreliable that brand is and go buy something else. Just because you take care of your car does not mean someone who takes your advice and looks for a "simple older car" is going to have anything close to the same reliability.

      For what it's worth, I have a 91, 93, and 07. The 07 is a TL and is complicated as hell. The only thing any of them has been in the shop in the last year for was a tire puncture and a repair to the 93's air conditioner because I caught a rock in the condenser. "newer than Nixon" and "complicated" does not necessarily mean "unreliable."

      As to your problems with the Forester... It's a Subaru. What did you expect? They're pretty well known for being one of the least reliable Asian cars, and with their AWD systems are of course going to be more expensive to maintain.

      --
      "I disagree with you" does not equal "flamebait."
    2. Re:Or simply... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      As to your problems with the Forester... It's a Subaru. What did you expect? They're pretty well known for being one of the least reliable Asian cars

      *cough*Mitsubishi*cough*Mazda*cough*

      and with their AWD systems are of course going to be more expensive to maintain.

      Eh, maybe. More parts to replace, but the labor is easier. I'd rather do front AND rear axles on an Impreza than JUST front axles on a Sentra. Try 'em both sometime in quick succession and get back to me... I have.

      Just because you take care of your car does not mean someone who takes your advice and looks for a "simple older car" is going to have anything close to the same reliability.

      You have to get one of the good ones, and you have to get one that has been well maintained, or restored, or restore one. That done, there is no reason you can't have reliability equal or even superior to something newer. If we all did it, of course, emissions would never improve, but cars wear out and/or get smashed eventually. But there's no reason why someone getting a classic Chevy C-10, or a Mercedes 300SD can't have a positive experience. However, you are probably not going to save much money. The classics actually worth driving daily (in that they are reliable, comfortable at least for what they are, and get good mileage) are fairly expensive in good condition. You could get a brand new car for what you'll pay for one. However, you can't get a brand new car anywhere near as nice.

      I would not hesitate to recommend one of several older vehicles to anyone willing to pay to get one done right, or to someone willing to pay to have one done right. Otherwise, just get what you can afford that is reputed to be reliable and try to be nice to it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  67. Lovely by sjames · · Score: 1

    "H! there!! I'm AUDI, your plastic pal that's fun to be with! You appear to be colliding with an 18 wheeler, I'll order you some fresh underwear!"

  68. New fangled technology by kylegordon · · Score: 1

    "At one time not all that long ago, cars had a warning light..."

    I remember the days that cars didn't have warning lights, and you had to use intuition and your senses. Now, though, everything has to be pointed out to you. It's a sad state of affairs that we've gotten ourselves into.

    1. Re:New fangled technology by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think you mean I remember when fire coming out from underneath the hood was the warning light. Ahh, those were the days. Of course, even back then, the performance-minded would fit additional gauges to their vehicles to monitor its behavior... I have a filter minder, coolant temp, oil pressure, and boost pressure added so far, and will be adding volts, trans temp, trans pressure, and hours :) shortly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  69. Please don't let it be like Clippy... by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

    Please... not Clippy...

    --
    Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    1. Re:Please don't let it be like Clippy... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It will not be clippy, don't be stupid. Now good news everyone, I'd like you to meet Drivey.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Please don't let it be like Clippy... by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      Notice I said "like" Clippy in the subject. Guess I should have put it in the text as well. ;)

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
  70. Pontiac DIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have something like that in my Ponitac called a DIC (driver information center) which leads to such silly statements as "My DIC is broken!"

  71. Avatar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of Clippy it's Wheels.

    Can you imagine the marketing for this? Maybe the avatar could be altered into a Hotwheel or Matchbox car, or the local dealership owner's likeness.

  72. I'm sorry Dave ... by Kittenman · · Score: 1

    ... I can't let you overtake that car.

    --
    "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
  73. Clippy by scvalex · · Score: 1

    [[Insert clippy joke here]]

    --
    Think.
  74. Fffffuuuuuu... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2

    Sweet Smoking Jesus, I just reported the cost, not that I ever paid it.

    1. Re:Fffffuuuuuu... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I dont mean YOU.. Eerk, I see that this got ploped in the wrong spot.

      But in general most people know nothing at all about cars and assume the Stealer is the only place to take the car and pay the sodomy prices. I know of several highly paid people here that look at me like I am an alien because I change my own wiper blades. "but the dealer does that for me"

      Sweet smoking Jesus... I knew it! Jesus likes Sweet Cigars! If anyone gives me proof he likes a good Coniac, I'll actually try to get to heaven.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Fffffuuuuuu... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Jesus always struck me as an appletini guy.

  75. wiring schematic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought so.

  76. Ford was considering something similar by deksza · · Score: 1

    I was working on an open source 3D character animation engine a few years back that Ford expressed interest in for a similar idea. They contributed some to funding the project http://charengine.sourceforge.net/ but seem to have either lost interest or went a different route. You can see a quick demo of it halfway through the video on the project page.

  77. Deja vu by alexo · · Score: 1

    an on-screen avatar that will talk to drivers, and even understand their spoken questions

    Driver: What's the problem?
    Car: I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do.

  78. These engineers must be right out of college... by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    These engineers must be right out of college, and thus never met clippy to begin with!

  79. Ominous warning by Svartormr · · Score: 1

    "I've just picked up a fault in the AE35 unit. It's going to go 100% failure in 72 hours."

  80. I see the future and it is Microsoft's CLIPPY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The perfect onboard avatar for all those cars running a Microsoft OS, Microsoft's orginal CLIPPY.

    Already some FORD customers are angry at the sudden reboots they get while driving.

    What else should you expect from the company that mastered the BLUE SCREEN OF DEATH?

  81. "Avatar, the battery is dead" by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    "Avatar?"

    "AVATAR!!"

  82. stupid! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    So if i need to know how to do xxx, and my car battery has conked out, I guess i am screwed to get help to fix my car based on that manual's suggestions or information.

  83. Introduction Of Michael Jordan Shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before we want to introduce the products about Michael Jordan Shoes, i think the first thing to do for us is to introduce Michael Jordan to all the people who like Air Jordan Shoes. After these 23 fans knows more about Michael Jordan, i believe they will be more interested in everything about Michael Jordan, they will be more loyal to Michael Jordan.
    Michael Jeffrey Jordan (born February 17, 1963) is a former American professional basketball player, active businessman, and majority owner of the Charlotte Bobcats. His biography on the National Basketball Association (NBA) website states, "By acclamation, Michael Jordan is the greatest basketball player of all time."[1] Jordan was one of the most effectively marketed athletes of his generation and was instrumental in popularizing the NBA around the world in the 1980s and 1990s.
    Cheap Jordans
    Jordan shoes