Slashdot Mirror


GameStop Opening Deus Ex Boxes, Removing Free Game Coupon

DisKurzion writes "A leaked GameStop memo indicates that employees are to open the regular PC release of Deus Ex: Human Revolution and discard the included OnLive coupon. From the article: 'GameStop spokesperson Beth Sharum confirmed the practice, telling Ars that "Square Enix packed the competitor's coupon with our DXHR product without our prior knowledge and we did pull these coupons.'"

41 of 343 comments (clear)

  1. Tampering by CSFFlame · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't this tampering with a new product?

    1. Re:Tampering by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh you can bet this will be quite actionable unless there is a contract agreement to the contrary.

    2. Re:Tampering by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      By reasonable standards, yes, but Gamestop used to sell used games as new. This is basically a monopoly that abuses their customers. And their customers are largely under 18 year olds with more disposable income than experience or common sense, so they keep shopping there.

    3. Re:Tampering by Tharsman · · Score: 2

      Indeed. There are two potential outcomes of this.

      A: class action lawsuit.
      B: If the game includes a game key to install, OnLive will work with SquareEnix to recognize that number as a valid cupon number.

      Hopefully they approach option B. I rather users actually get what they paid for than lawyers dip in a huge percentage of a class action suit's settlement.

      I have to say, I have test-played OnLive, and the system is amazing. Only reason I have not bought a single game from them is I like to own a copy I can play offline. If they started offering a steam-like distribution, where I can download a copy on top of the one I stream, or include coupons like these in game boxes, I'd jump all over their service in a heartbeat.

      The saddest thing is GameStop's actions have resulted in increased promotion to the coupon. I had no clue about this and likely would had never found out without this coverage. Now I do plan to go buy the game (that i was not going to buy due to my PC not being able to run it smoothly) at BestBuy and activate that coupon to play from my underpowered PC :D

    4. Re:Tampering by morari · · Score: 2

      Used to? They still do. The last time I went in there was to buy the last Wolfenstein (2009). The very day it came out, yet they someone only had the display copy for PC. The box was on display, the game was shoved in a paper envelope and filed away in a drawer. They expected me to pay full price for an opened product. I walked across the parking lot and got it from Wal-Mart instead, where they had dozens sitting on the shelf. I didn't have to put up with any sales pitches over frequent shopper cards or subscriptions to lame-ass magazines either.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    5. Re:Tampering by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Isn't this tampering with a new product?

      It's false advertising if they state it's a new product / sealed in box, without informing that it is an "open box" product.

      Fortunately for GS; the product is not a food item or medication, so there is no risk that their tampering causes bodily injury or death.. if it were, and they broke the seal on the package before purchase, it would be a federal crime called Tampering with a consumer product.

    6. Re:Tampering by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Informative

      You do realise that the reason why these rules exist is because products you mention are PERISHABLES? As in they can become fatal when opened in wrong environment, and are sealed to increase their due date.
      Medicines are also often controlled substances.

      You can be absolutely certain that any product that doesn't fall in that category (or similar category where opening product may cause significant harm to the product itself) can, and often will be opened by retailer if there is a suspicion of something being wrong with package. They absolutely have this right, both legally and contractually with their supplier. You have to be utterly ignorant of how retail works (and why it works the way it does) to claim otherwise.

      And no, removing coupons that were put against retailers' desire, and possibly agreements does not fall into this category. And even if they remove the coupons, the game itself is completely unused, and therefore new.

      The only thing they may be doing wrong is false advertisement if package includes mention of the coupon, and retailer doesn't specifically mention the lack of this coupon before sale is made.

    7. Re:Tampering by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      I didn't have to put up with any sales pitches over frequent shopper cards or subscriptions to lame-ass magazines either.

      I wish there was a code word or short phrase for "I don't mean to be rude, and I know you are required by your employer to ask, but stop trying to upsell me or get me to sign up for stuff." When I was working there, I'd prefer it when people would just ignore my greeting, which was supposed to be followed up with an annoying sales pitch. I'm not sure others would agree though.

    8. Re:Tampering by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just start answering in Latvian. If they appear to understand then use medieval French. If they still understand you, they are clearly overqualified for the job.

  2. You've got to be kidding... by RogueyWon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So... let me get this right.

    If you're competing against a fast-growing distribution method that has the potential to completely under-cut your own business model, the best way to do that is to... engage in behaviour that will really piss a good portion of your customers off?

    It's not actually the removal of the coupons that bugs me - it's the opening of the game boxes. I know that some retailers do this a lot - fortunately, it's rarer here in the UK than it is in the US. But I really don't like it - I've certainly bought "new" DS games in the past in the US that had saves already on the cartridge (presumably a staff member's).

    It's not as if they're just competing against download distribution. I've never bought a game from Amazon or play.com that had been opened before it arrived (well, aside from the time our local post-office staff decided that stealing was fun, but that's another story) - and those are almost always cheaper. Seriously, do these bricks and mortar retailers even want to stay in business?

    Actually, IANAL, but is there a legal issue here? If there's a reasonable expectation that every copy of the game includes this coupon and Gamestop are removing it, are they committing fraud or theft or something? Either from the consumer or from Square-Enix? I mean, surely Square-Enix must have a civil case here - and it's almost at the kind of level where it starts to sound criminal (if it happened in the UK at least).

    1. Re:You've got to be kidding... by prgrmr · · Score: 2

      IANAL either, but I would expect that GameStop owns the games until they sell them, and can do with them as they wish, given that the games are their property. What they are obligated to do or not to do contractually with the game maker may be a different story.

    2. Re:You've got to be kidding... by RogueyWon · · Score: 5, Informative

      I suppose it depends on whether the coupon is advertised anywhere. If it's advertised as being included with the game - and especially if there's a marking on the game box itself saying "coupon inside" - then there are all kinds of trading standards laws that would be getting broken in the UK. I've no idea whether there are US equivalents.

      If the coupon isn't advertised anywhere, then it may be murkier.

    3. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are selling used games as if they were new. If they consider a game to be used after the customer has opened it, then the customer should do the same.

    4. Re:You've got to be kidding... by RogueyWon · · Score: 2

      And it's not marked anywhere on the box? That's what I was getting at - it doesn't really matter what Gamestop is advertising it as on their website and their posters in store. If there's a little marking on the box saying "OnLive voucher included", then they may be in a world of legal hurt. If Square-Enix have something saying "OnLive voucher included in every PC boxed copy" on their website, then they may have issues as well, though that's probably less certain.

    5. Re:You've got to be kidding... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They need a sales tax license, and they need to have the product for "resale" to avoid paying sales tax themselves upon purchase. This sort of tampering may place them under requirement to pay sales tax on the product, rather than reselling it as a new product--they're not authorized to alter it and resell it....

    6. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Desler · · Score: 2

      Maybe GameStop doesn't, but if anyone does I think they're courting legal trouble.

      Why?

      GameStop doesn't make any specific claims about what's in the sold package, but if what they're advertising is "a boxed copy of DXHR" and it's common knowledge that such a box includes a coupon from the publisher, there's some bad faith going on.

      Yes, they do. Their website clearly states what you get in the package. The box itself also makes no mention of the coupon, either.

    7. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Desler · · Score: 2

      I'm willing to bet it's most likely in violation of US anti-competition laws, if not product tampering.

      In what way is it a violation of anti-competition laws? GameStop does not hold some significant market share over game sales as they are easily dwarfed by companies like Best Buy. Secondly, GameStop has already been investigated by the FTC for this practice since it's been their company policy FOR YEARS. And since those stories mentioning that are from 2009 and nothing seems to have happened to them, it's doubtful you are correct on either count.

    8. Re:You've got to be kidding... by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 2

      No, why would there be?

      If it's coupon it has cash value. They are selling a retail package to the customer, minus the coupon, which was intended to be part of that package. This is theft.

    9. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Sir+Realist · · Score: 2

      I think there's a legal issue even if it isn't advertised... from Square's pov. Now that word has gotten out that they're doing this, Square could claim that GS's practices are hurting the sales of their game. Not a law broken, as such, but certainly grounds for a civil suit.

    10. Re:You've got to be kidding... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 3

      They'll boycott gamestop if and only if the employees mug them at gunpoint when they come in.

      You're giving them more credit than they deserve...

    11. Re:You've got to be kidding... by mysidia · · Score: 2

      If the coupon isn't advertised anywhere, then it may be murkier.

      If the coupon were not advertised anywhere, we on Slashdot would probably not know or care about it.

    12. Re:You've got to be kidding... by mysidia · · Score: 2

      I would suspect that unless *Gamestop* advertises there is a coupon inside, they are not falsely advertising

      The 'false advertising' would be the advertisement that we sell this product, this new game; instead of "We sell an open box copy of this product that has some components removed which were contained in the original product"

    13. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      No offence, but no retailer in the world will have any problems breaking "sealed boxes". In most cases their supplier will help them get new seals, or they can ship product back as "defective, contents do not match agreement" and get it back sealed. Retailers essentially ALWAYS have a right to break the seal, unless it's an obvious "warranty void if broken" kind of a seal on the product itself (think unscrewing the game cartridge open). Shrink wrap is not that kind of seal, and essentially every retailer has a shrink wrapping machine in the back specifically for purpose of re-wrapping boxes.

    14. Re:You've got to be kidding... by mysidia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The coupon is not a necessary part of the game though. It's an extraneous addition. As I said, one would have a claim, but it's up to a jury/judge to decide if the coupon constitutes a substantial part of purchase interest.

      Who gets to decide if the coupon is a "necessary" part of the game? If I was on the fence, and the manufacturer including coupons was what tipped the scales to me buying a new copy of the game, I would call that fairly necessary.

      I suppose based on this "not a necessary part" logic; a bookseller could sell you a "new" book and "cut out" the last page.... it's not a "necessary part" of the book, just an extraneous addition; you can still read the book, you just don't get to read the epilogue, or maybe the ending, is all.

  3. So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by tekrat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cool. I can violate every provision of the EULA, and it's GameStop that has to agree to the terms.

    I wonder if that'll hold up in a court of law?

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by ge7 · · Score: 2

      Just because GameStop agreed to the EULA by opening the box (not that this has ever been agreed to in court, or that I know of Deus Ex even having this), doesn't mean you can violate their terms.

    2. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Khyber · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, you can. You didn't agree to shit, Gamestop did. You are under no obligation at all to abide by the EULA, especially since I'll bet that EULA has a clause about non-transferrable property that kicks in upon opening of the software packaging.

      Gamestop is then violating the EULA, their problem, not yours.

      As it is, this is product tampering, and bait and switch, not to mention anti-competitive practice.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Khyber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, EA argued that one against me in court, stating that opening the box did indeed constitute agreement to what was contained therein. Very miserably shot down, and the main reason they settled against my class-action suit.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Khyber · · Score: 2

      You are implying corporations ever really learn from their mistakes.

      They'll try to claim the same thing again. This is how we play the legal game.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  4. Cereal box by Palshife · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This would be like my grocery store opening my cereal box to get the toy out so that I'm more likely to buy toys from the store.

    Fucked. Up.

    --
    Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
    1. Re:Cereal box by MobileC · · Score: 2

      It'd be more like the store opening up the cereal to remove a toy advertising a competitor they told the distributor not to include in the first place.

      --

      Fran
      :):):)
      1st 1st Poster of the new Millennium!

  5. DIsgusting by atari2600a · · Score: 2

    To think I wanted to work there as a child...

  6. Gamestop has always opened games by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't know what the reasoning is, but they do it. They reseal them when they sell them. So it is nothing different for this one. If you demand factory sealed games, Gamestop was never a place you shopped.

    Also to note Onlive isn't a distribution method. Onlive is a service where they run the games on their servers and stream you the video. The idea being you don't need to have a good computer to run the game. In reality it sucks badly since you only get a low bitrate 720p steam, meaning it does not look like you get with a high end system, more like with a low end one, and there's interface lag because of the network round trip.

    In terms of digital distribution, Gamestop actually is in that business, they purchased Impulse some time ago so they now sell games online as well as in stores.

  7. Wow by daemonc · · Score: 5, Funny

    What a bunch of deusbags.

    --
    All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.
  8. Can it even still be considered new? by Rinnon · · Score: 2

    When I purchase something that is advertised as "New" I expect it to BE new. I want it to be sold to me as it was shipped from the distributor. By opening these boxes and removing whatever the fuck they want, are these games even allowed to be called "new" anymore? I avoid shopping at Game Stop to begin with (There is fortunately a local store that has better prices and more selection), but when I DO need to buy a "new" game from them... I'm going to start insisting that they only give me sealed boxes. If a game is not still factory sealed, I'm going to demand it be sold at the used price point, as this is essentially now an "open box" item.

  9. This is why I won't shop GameStop by BaronHethorSamedi · · Score: 4, Informative

    True story. I went to Gamestop once to pick up Dragon Age: Origins. I'd seen the DLC advertised with a new copy, and that sounded like a good deal. The clerk offered me a used copy for slightly below the $60 asking price. I specified I wanted a new copy for the DLC, so he took the box out from behind the counter, I paid for it and left.

    I got the game home, opened it, and there was no code for DLC included. Then I noticed the game had been unsealed and re-wrapped. I took it back to the store, presented the receipt and said, "Hey, you sold me a used game at full retail." The guy tried to backpedal, saying it was a new copy that had been opened for display purposes, and maybe someone had stolen the DLC code. It was late, so at that point I offered to take the used copy he'd previously offered if he gave me the right price for it. He then said that was the only copy they had (though he'd previously tried to sell me on a used copy before presenting me with the "new" one). He hastily provided me with a full refund.

    Then I went to a competitor's store nearby, where I found a new (i.e. sealed) copy for $40, DLC included. I have not set foot inside a GameStop since. My definition of a "new game" is one that's gone from the factory to my hands without the contents of the box seeing daylight. GameStop, it seems, has other ideas.

  10. Re:Does anyone else smell that? That smell... by The+Dawn+Of+Time · · Score: 2

    I've got a better crystal ball - this is a tempest in a teapot, gamers will bitch and moan and do nothing about it, and life will go on. No lawsuit. No reckoning. Nothing.

  11. The legal ramifications, in a different article by Hahnsoo · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Wired article on this does a more balanced job at handling the legal ramifications:
    http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2011/08/gamestop-onlive/

    Basically, Gamestop may be in the right, legally, if Square-Enix has a pre-existing contract with them with a non-compete clause. As the article states: “Existing contracts between GameStop and Square may have barred this kind of promotion, and so GameStop may actually be justified in their action if Square is in breach of some promotion/marketing agreement”

    But they can also be in legal trouble over this, as the article also points out, for a number of different reasons.

    Nowhere on the packaging does it say "Free OnLive coupon", apparently. I haven't looked at the packaging myself.

  12. Gamestop been doing it for a long time by Xian97 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I quit shopping at Gamestop because they opened many of their boxes. Since they are selling new games along with used for consoles, how do you know which you will end up with? Case in point, I purchased a Nintendo DS game for my daughter. Christmas Day when she opened it up and put it in her DS there were saved games on it already - it had obviously been used. When I bought it, I mentioned that the box was not sealed, and they claimed that they had to do that else they would get shoplifted. I replied that other stores have less employees in the store but don't have their games opened and behind the counter.

    Another time in a different Gamestop my son bought the PS2 game Devil May Cry, again the package was open and the had the discs behind the counter. A few days later while playing it asks him to insert Disc 2, which was not in the box. We went back to the store and they still had the 2nd disc.

    In both cases they made good, but after those experiences they lost me as a customer, and I had been shopping there nearly every week since they were Babbages. It sounds like they have still haven't learned not to open packages.

    In this case it's even worse - don't they have to break the security seal to get the coupon? In the old days they could just re-shrink wrap it, these days most games come with a security seal as well.

  13. Re:First! by JustSomeProgrammer · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is PC copies of the game.

  14. Re:First! by Dunbal · · Score: 2

    Then I go back to my opening statement - people still buy things at Gamestop? I don't own a console and honestly after giving up 3 years ago because all the Gamestops in my neighborhood only stocked console games (or a very limited selection of used PC titles), I vowed never to buy a game again from a brick and mortar store. Guess what - I don't have any problems using Gamersgate or better yet buying directly from the publisher and downloading. It saves me a drive and it helps keep a useless store clerk job out of the economy.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.